On June 22, 2018, the Partnership, New Legacy, the General Partner and the plaintiff in the Consolidated Action reached an agreement in principle to settle the Consolidated Action. The parties submitted a stipulation and agreement of settlement to the Court on July 6, 2018 (the “Settlement Agreement”) and, on July 11, 2018, the Court entered a scheduling order for consideration of the Settlement Agreement (the “Scheduling Order”). The Scheduling Order sets September 12, 2018 as the date for the hearing at which the Court will consider (i) the fairness of the Settlement Agreement; (ii) whether a judgment should be entered dismissing the Consolidated Action with prejudice; (iii) the plaintiff’s counsel’s application for fees and expenses; and (iv) any objections to the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement, if approved by the Court, will grant holders of Series A Preferred Units and Series B Preferred Units approximately 10,730,000 shares of common stock in New Legacy in addition to the approximately 16,913,592 shares those holders would collectively receive pursuant to the exchange ratios that were included in the Initial Merger Agreement. In exchange, the class of holders of Preferred Units (dating back to January 21, 2016 through the consummation of the Merger) have agreed to release the Partnership, the General Partner and New Legacy, and any of their parent entities, controlling persons, associates, affiliates, including any person or entity owning, directly or indirectly, any portion of the Partnership GP, or subsidiaries and each and all of their respective officers, directors, stockholders, employees, representatives, advisors, consultants and other released parties, from liability for any claims related to or arising out of the rights inhering to the Preferred Units (subject to limited exceptions related to tax liabilities), including all claims brought in the Consolidated Action. As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Doppelt Tax Action will be dismissed. Each of the administrative agent for the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, among the Partnership, as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto, dated as of April 1, 2014 (as amended, the “Revolving Credit Agreement”), and the majority lenders under the Term Loan Credit Agreement, among the Partnership, as borrower, Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as administrative agent and the lenders party thereto, dated as of October 25, 2016 (as amended, the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”), have consented to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, as required pursuant to the terms of the Revolving Credit Agreement and the Term Loan Credit Agreement, respectively.
A third putative class action lawsuit challenging the Merger was filed against the Partnership, the General Partner, New Legacy and Merger Sub on April 27, 2018 by Patrick Irish in the District Court in Midland County, Texas (the “Irish Action”). The Irish Action contains the same general causes of action as the initial complaint filed in the Doppelt Action and the Chammah Ventures Action and seeks the same relief. The Partnership, the General Partner, New Legacy and the plaintiff’s counsel in the Consolidated Action have agreed to coordinate efforts to obtain a dismissal of the Irish Action following the consummation of the Merger.
In connection with the Settlement Agreement, the Partnership has agreed to pay up to $5.7 million for fees and expenses to counsel for the plaintiff, and the plaintiff’s counsel has agreed not to request more than such amount in its fee application to the Court. This payment will be paid for with proceeds from the Partnership’s insurance policy. The Settlement Agreement, including the plaintiff’s counsel���s request for fees and expenses, is subject to approval by the Court. The Settlement Agreement provides for a period of time during which class members will be notified of the settlement and given an opportunity to object to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the class would be certified as anon-opt out class, meaning that all holders of Preferred Units would be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement if approved by the Court.
3