Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of Estimates —The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents —Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of ninety days or less. The Company reclassifies cash overdrafts to accounts payable. Accounts Receivable —Through Nutri-Force, the Company sells product to third-party wholesale customers. The Company monitors the financial condition of its third-party wholesale customers and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances estimated to be uncollectible. In addition, customer allowances including promotional discounts and allowances are provided to wholesale customers based on various contract terms and are recorded as a reduction to revenue. The following table details the activity and balances for the Company’s customer allowances for the years ended December 31, 2016 , December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 (in thousands): Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year Additions Deductions Balance at End of Fiscal Year Period Ended December 31, 2016 $ 897 $ 3,097 $ (2,933 ) $ 1,061 Period Ended December 26, 2015 $ 1,883 $ 2,752 $ (3,738 ) $ 897 Period Ended December 27, 2014 $ — $ 3,194 $ (1,311 ) $ 1,883 Inventories —Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method. Finished goods inventory includes costs of freight on internally transferred merchandise, and costs associated with our buying department and distribution facilities, as well as manufacturing overhead which are capitalized into inventory and then expensed as merchandise is sold. In addition, the cost of inventory is reduced by purchase discounts and other allowances received from certain of our vendors. The Company estimates losses for expiring inventory and the net realizable value of inventory based on when a product is close to expiration and not expected to be sold, when a product has reached its expiration date, or when a product is not expected to be saleable. In determining the reserves for these products, consideration is given to such factors as the amount of inventory on hand, the remaining shelf life, current and expected market conditions, historical trends and the likelihood of recovering the inventory costs based on anticipated demand. The following table details the activity and balances for the Company’s reserve for inventory for the years ended December 31, 2016 , December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 (in thousands): Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year Amounts Charged to Cost of Goods Sold Write-Offs Against Reserves Balance at End of Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 $ 7,253 $ 11,067 $ (9,707 ) $ 8,613 Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015 (1) $ 5,797 $ 11,088 $ (9,632 ) $ 7,253 Fiscal Year Ended December 27, 2014 (1) $ 2,640 $ 8,764 $ (5,607 ) $ 5,797 (1) Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 figures have been restated to include the reserve for inventory of Nutri-Force. Property and Equipment, Net —Property and equipment, net is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are provided for on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally depreciated over seven years . Leasehold improvements are amortized generally over the shorter of their useful lives or related lease terms. The direct internal and external costs associated with the development of the features and functionality of the Company’s website, transaction processing systems, telecommunications infrastructure and network operations, are capitalized and are amortized on a straight line basis over the estimated useful lives of generally five years . Capitalization of costs begins when the preliminary project stage is completed and management authorizes and commits to funding the computer software project and that it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Depreciation of the assets commences when they are put into use. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred and expenditures for major renovations and improvements are capitalized. Upon retirement or disposition of property and equipment, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gains or losses are included in the results of operations. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets —The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances, including store closures, indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted pre-tax future net cash flows expected to be generated by that asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are not adequate to recover the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Goodwill and Other Intangibles —Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles are not amortized. Evaluations for impairment are performed at least annually, in the fourth quarter of each year, or whenever impairment indicators exist. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level (the Company’s operating segments). The evaluation of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles may first consider qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value. A quantitative evaluation is performed if the qualitative evaluation results in a more likely than not determination or if a qualitative evaluation is not performed. The Company’s quantitative impairment tests involve calculating the fair value of each reporting unit using the discounted cash flow analysis method along with the market multiples method which is used for additional validation of the fair value calculated. These valuation methods require certain assumptions and estimates be made by the Company regarding certain industry trends and future profitability. It is the Company’s policy to conduct goodwill impairment testing from information based on current business projections, which include projected future revenues and cash flows. The cash flows utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis are based on five-year financial forecasts developed internally by management. Cash flows for each reporting unit are discounted using an internally derived weighted average cost of capital which reflects the costs of borrowing for the funding of each unit as well as the risk associated with the units themselves. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company would compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with its carrying value. To compute the implied fair value of goodwill, the Company would assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. Also as part of the quantitative test, the Company conducts the test using a 10% decrease in its revenue projections as an additional sensitivity test to ensure the reporting unit’s fair value is greater than its carrying value should events in the future be less favorable than anticipated. For indefinite-lived tradenames, we utilize the royalty relief method in our quantitative evaluations. Under the royalty relief method, a royalty rate is determined based on comparable licensing arrangements which is applied to the revenue projections for the applicable indefinite-lived tradename and the fair value is calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis. To the extent that the implied fair value associated with the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is less than the recorded value, this would result in a write down of the carrying value of the asset. Impairment tests between annual tests may be undertaken if an event occurs or circumstances change that could reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. The valuation of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is affected by, among other things, the Company’s projections for the future and estimated results of future operations. Changes in the business plan or operating results that are different than the estimates used to develop the valuation of the assets may impact these valuations. For those intangible assets which have definite lives, the Company amortizes their cost on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, the periods of which vary based on their particular contractual terms. In Fiscal 2016, the Company performed a quantitative analysis of its retail and direct reporting units and determined that the fair value of these reporting units was greater that their respective carrying values. As a result, the Company believes the fair values of each of these reporting units and indefinite-lived tradenames substantially exceeds their respective carrying values. During Fiscal 2016, the Company also performed quantitative analyses of its manufacturing reporting unit and determined the carrying value of the manufacturing reporting unit exceeded its fair value, which resulted in the write-off of the corresponding goodwill of $32.6 million and the customer relationship intangible asset of $6.6 million . Refer to Note 5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional information. There have been no impairment charges related to goodwill or other intangibles during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 . Rent Expenses, Deferred Rent and Landlord Construction Allowances —Rent expense and rent incentives, including landlord construction allowances, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company records rent expense for stores, distribution centers and manufacturing facilities as a component of cost of goods sold. The Company accounts for landlord construction allowances as lease incentives and records them as a component of deferred rent, which is recognized in cost of goods sold over the lease term. Revenue Recognition —The Company recognizes revenue when merchandise is sold “at point of sale” in retail stores or upon delivery to a direct customer. In addition, shipping fees billed to customers are classified as sales. Amount recognized as shipping revenue during Fiscal 2016 , Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 , were $2.2 million , $2.0 million and $3.0 million respectively. Nutri-Force sells product primarily to third-party customers and to our retail and direct segments. Wholesale revenue is recognized when risk of loss, title and insurable risks have transferred to the customer, net of estimated returns and allowances. To arrive at net sales, gross sales are reduced by deferred sales, customer discounts, actual customer returns and a provision for estimated future customer returns, which is based on management’s review of historical and current customer returns. Sales taxes collected from customers are presented on a net basis and as such are excluded from revenue. Cost of Goods Sold —The Company includes the cost of inventory sold, costs of warehousing, distribution, manufacturing and store occupancy costs in cost of goods sold and excludes depreciation and amortization related to the retail and direct segments, which is included within selling, general and administrative expenses. Warehousing, distribution and manufacturing costs, which are capitalized into inventory and then expensed as merchandise is sold, include freight on internally transferred merchandise as well as for shipments to direct and wholesale customers and costs associated with our buying department and distribution facilities, as well as manufacturing overhead. Store occupancy costs include rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes and utilities. Vendor Allowances —Vendor allowances include discounts, allowances and rebates received from vendors and are based on various contract terms. Vendor allowances are recognized as either purchase discounts which represent a reduction of product cost, funding which is capitalized into inventory and recognized in the statement of income as the merchandise is sold, or direct offset which represents funding subject to immediate recognition in the statement of income, depending on the nature of the allowance. Frequent Buyer Program —The Company has a frequent buyer program (“Healthy Awards Program”), whereby customers earn points toward free merchandise based on the dollar volume of purchases. Beginning in Fiscal 2016, points are earned each calendar quarter and must be redeemed within the subsequent calendar quarter or they expire. In previous years, points were earned each calendar year and must be redeemed within the first three months of the following year or they expire. Sales are deferred at the time points are earned based on the value of points that are projected to be redeemed, which are based on historical redemption data. The Company records a liability in the period points are earned with a corresponding reduction of sales. Store Pre-opening Costs —Costs associated with the opening of new retail stores and start up activities are expensed as incurred. Advertising Costs —The costs of advertising for online marketing arrangements, magazines, direct mail and radio are expensed as incurred, or the first time the advertising takes place. Advertising expense was $21.9 million , $21.6 million and $19.3 million for Fiscal 2016 , Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 , respectively. Online Marketing Arrangements —The Company has entered into online marketing arrangements with various online companies. These agreements are established for periods of 24 months , 12 months or, in some cases, a lesser period and generally provide for compensation based on revenue sharing upon the attainment of stipulated revenue amounts, a percentage of the media expenditure managed by the online partner, or based on the number of visitors that the online company refers to the Company. The Company had no fixed payment commitments during Fiscal 2016 , Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 . Income Taxes —Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded in accordance with the liability method. Deferred income taxes have been provided for temporary differences between the tax bases and financial reporting bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect for the periods in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company accounts for tax positions based on the provisions of the accounting literature related to accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions. Such literature provides guidance for the recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For tax positions that are not more likely than not sustainable upon audit, the Company recognizes the largest amount of the benefit that is more likely than not to be sustained. The Company makes estimates of the potential liability based on our assessment of all potential tax exposures. In addition, the Company uses factors such as applicable tax laws and regulations, current information and past experience with similar issues to make these assessments. The tax positions are analyzed regularly and adjustments are made as events occur that warrant adjustments for those positions. The Company records interest expense and penalties payable to relevant tax authorities as income tax expense. Concentrations of Credit Risk —Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, include accounts receivable from wholesale customers as well as debit and credit card processors of retail transactions. As of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 , five customers represented approximately 58% and 53% , respectively, of the accounts receivable from wholesale customers. Accounts receivable from debit and credit card processors, included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets, totaled $10.6 million at December 31, 2016 and $10.2 million at December 26, 2015 . The Company had one supplier from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2016 , two suppliers from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2015 and one supplier from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2014 . We purchased approximately 11% of our total merchandise from these suppliers during Fiscal 2016 and approximately 17% during Fiscal 2015 and 12% during Fiscal 2014 . The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents, and at times holds cash balances in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. Stock-Based Compensation —Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of awards and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award, net of anticipated forfeitures. With the exception of restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units, determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating expected volatility, expected term and risk-free rate. Compensation expense resulting from the granting of restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units is based on the grant date fair value of those common shares and is recognized generally over the two to three year vesting period for restricted shares, the approximately three year vesting period for performance share units and over the quarterly or one year vesting periods for restricted share units. For accounting purposes, the expense for performance based stock options, performance based restricted shares and performance share units is calculated and recorded, based on the determination that the achievement of the pre-established performance targets are probable, over the relevant service period. The vesting requirements for performance based stock options and performance based restricted shares permit a catch-up of vesting at the end of the vesting period. Expense related to shares purchased under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) is accounted for based on fair value recognition requirements similar to stock options. ESPP participation occurs each calendar quarter (the “Participation Period”) and the expense of which is subject to employee participation in the plan. Under the ESPP, participating employees are allowed to purchase shares at 85% of the lower of the market price of the Company’s common stock at either the first or last trading day of the Participation Period. Compensation expense related to the ESPP is based on the estimated fair value of the discount and purchase price offered on the estimated shares to be purchased under the ESPP. Expense is calculated quarterly, based on the employee contributions made over the applicable three-month Participation Period, using volatility and risk free rates applicable to that three -month period. Net Income Per Share —The Company’s basic net income per share excludes the dilutive effect of stock options, unvested restricted shares, unvested performance share units and unvested restricted share units. It is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period divided into net income. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Stock options, unvested restricted shares, unvested performance share units, warrants and unvested restricted share units are included as potential dilutive securities for the periods applicable, using the treasury stock method to the extent dilutive. The components of the calculation of basic net income per common share and diluted net income per common share are as follows (in thousands except share and per share data): Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014 Numerator: Net income $ 24,964 $ 53,171 $ 61,241 Denominator: Basic weighted average common shares outstanding 23,875,540 28,954,804 30,239,183 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options 68,272 97,114 235,057 Restricted shares 115,287 150,353 184,995 Performance share units 7,173 — — Restricted share units 1,414 1,158 4,870 Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 24,067,686 29,203,429 30,664,105 Basic net income per common share $ 1.05 $ 1.84 $ 2.03 Diluted net income per common share $ 1.04 $ 1.82 $ 2.00 Stock options, restricted shares and performance share units for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 , December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 for 24,140 , 48,538 and 18,089 shares, respectively, have been excluded from the above calculation as they were anti-dilutive. The Company has the intent and ability to settle the principal portion of its Convertible Notes in cash, and as such, has applied the treasury stock method, which has resulted in the underlying convertible shares being anti-dilutive in Fiscal 2016 and 2015 as the Company’s average stock price from the issuance of the Convertible Notes through December 31, 2016 was less than the conversion price. Refer to Note 8. Credit Arrangements for additional information on the Convertible Notes. Recent Accounting Pronouncements — Except as noted below, the Company has considered all new accounting pronouncements and has concluded that there are no new pronouncements that may have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, based on current information. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Under ASU 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public companies and early adoption of ASU 2014-09 is permitted for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company currently expects this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. However, the Company is still evaluating ASU 2014-09 including the determination of the transition approach it will utilize. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 was issued by the FASB to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The main difference between previous GAAP and Topic 842 is the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. ASU 2016-02 will require modified retrospective application at the beginning of our first quarter of Fiscal 2019, but permits adoption in an earlier period. The Company currently expects this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations. However, the Company is still evaluating ASU 2016-02 in order to determine the impact of this guidance on the Company’s balance sheet and anticipates this guidance will result in a significant increase to long-term assets and liabilities given we have a significant number of leases. In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 addresses simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU 2016-09 is permitted. The Company has evaluated ASU 2016-09 and does not expect the impact of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. However, under certain circumstances, this guidance could have an impact on the Company’s effective tax rate as changes between tax and book treatment of equity compensation will be recognized in the provision for income taxes beginning in Fiscal 2017. The Company currently estimates the adoption of this guidance will increase the effective tax rate by 1.1 percentage points in Fiscal 2017. |