We expense environmental costs if they relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and do not contribute to current or future revenue generation. Liabilities are recorded when site restoration and environmental remediation and cleanup obligations are either known or considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries of environmental costs through insurance, indemnification arrangements or other sources are included in other assets to the extent such recoveries are considered probable. Neither we nor the Predecessors incurred material environmental expenses during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. In addition, we had no accrual for environmental liabilities as of September 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006.
On January 26, 2007, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.40 per unit distribution for the fourth quarter of 2006 on all common and subordinated units. The distribution was paid on February 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on February 5, 2007. The aggregate amount of the distribution was $3.1 million.
In February 2007, we entered into a Common Unit Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement for the issuance of 3.9 million common units to institutional investors in a private placement. We received net proceeds of $99.9 million, including a $2.0 million contribution by our general partner to maintain its 2% interest in us. Proceeds from this issuance were primarily used to repay indebtedness outstanding under our credit facility. These agreements, as amended, require us to cause a registration statement to become effective by December 30, 2007 or we will incur liquidated damages of 0.25% of the proceeds of the offering per thirty day period of non-compliance for the first thirty days, increasing thereafter. We do not expect to incur these liquidated damages.
On April 30, 2007, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.46 per unit distribution for the first quarter of 2007 on all common and subordinated units. The distribution was paid on May 15, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on May 7, 2007. The aggregate amount of the distribution was $5.4 million.
In June 2007, we entered into a Common Unit Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement for the issuance of an additional 3.4 million common units to institutional investors in a private placement. We received net proceeds of $120.0 million, including a $2.4 million contribution by our general partner to maintain its 2% interest in us. Proceeds from this issuance were primarily used to repay indebtedness outstanding under our credit facility. These agreements, as amended, require us to cause a registration statement to become effective by December 30, 2007 or we will incur liquidated damages of 0.25% of the proceeds of the offering per thirty day period of non-compliance for the first thirty days, increasing thereafter. We do not expect to incur these liquidated damages.
On July 25, 2007, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.50 per unit distribution for the second quarter of 2007 on all common and subordinated units. The distribution was paid on August 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 6, 2007. The aggregate amount of the distribution was $7.7 million.
On October 25, 2007, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.56 per unit distribution for the third quarter of 2007 on all common and subordinated units. The distribution was paid on November 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on November 5, 2007. The aggregate amount of the distribution was $8.9 million.
We are a partnership that is not taxable for federal income tax purposes. As such, we do not directly pay federal income tax. As appropriate, our taxable income or loss is includable in the federal income tax returns of our partners.
Effective January 1, 2007, the state of Texas changed its Texas franchise tax, which was based on taxable capital, to a gross margin tax. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded a $0.1 million provision for income taxes relating to our obligations under this tax.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated/combined financial statements and the related notes thereto, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
OVERVIEW
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in April 2006 by EnerVest to acquire, produce and develop oil and natural gas properties. We consummated the acquisition of our predecessors and an initial public offering of our common units effective October 1, 2006. Our general partner is EV Energy GP and the general partner of our general partner is EV Management.
Our predecessors were:
| · | EV Properties, a limited partnership that owned oil and natural gas properties and related assets in the Monroe Field in Northern Louisiana and in the Appalachian Basin in West Virginia, and |
| · | CGAS Exploration, a corporation that owned oil and natural gas properties and related assets in the Appalachian Basin primarily in Ohio. |
EV Properties was formed in the second quarter of 2006 by EnerVest, EV Investors and investment funds formed by EnCap to acquire the business of the following partnerships which were controlled by EnerVest:
| · | EnerVest Production Partners, a limited partnership that owned oil and natural gas properties and related assets in the Monroe Field in Northern Louisiana, and |
| · | EnerVest WV, a limited partnership that owned oil and natural gas properties and related assets in West Virginia. |
Effective October 1, 2006, we completed our initial public offering of 3.9 million common units at a price of $20.00 per unit, and on October 26, 2006, we closed the sale of an additional 0.4 million common units at a price per unit of $20.00 pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. Net proceeds from the sale of the common units were approximately $76.6 million.
In connection with our initial public offering, we acquired substantially all of the assets and operations of EV Properties and approximately one-half of the assets and operations of CGAS Exploration. The financial statements of our predecessors, therefore, include substantial operations that we did not acquire. In addition,
| · | CGAS Exploration incurred substantial expenses related to exploration activities, which we do not plan to do; |
| · | the contracts under which our predecessors reimbursed EnerVest for general and administrative costs were different than the contracts under which we reimburse EnerVest; and |
| · | our predecessors did not incur the additional costs of being a public company. |
Recent Acquisitions
On December 15, 2006, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in Louisiana, Texas and Oklahoma from Five States Energy Company, LLC for $27.6 million. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under our credit facility.
On January 31, 2007, we acquired natural gas properties in Michigan from certain institutional partnerships managed by EnerVest for $71.4 million. The acquisition was primarily funded with borrowings under our credit facility.
On March 30, 2007, we acquired additional natural gas properties in the Monroe Field in Louisiana from an institutional partnership managed by EnerVest for $95.3 million. The acquisition was primarily funded with borrowings under our credit facility.
On June 27, 2007, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in Central and East Texas from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation for $94.3 million. The acquisition was financed with borrowings under our credit facility and proceeds from the June 2007 private placement.
On October 1, 2007, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in the Permian Basin in New Mexico and Texas from Plantation Operating, LLC, an EnCap sponsored company, for $155.8 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under our amended and restated credit facility.
Issuance of Common Units in 2007
In February 2007, we entered into a Common Unit Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement for the issuance of 3.9 million common units to institutional investors in a private placement. We received net proceeds of $99.9 million, including a $2.0 million contribution by our general partner to maintain its 2% interest in us. Proceeds from this issuance were primarily used to repay indebtedness outstanding under our credit facility. These agreements, as amended, require us to cause a registration statement to become effective by December 30, 2007 or we will incur liquidated damages of 0.25% of the proceeds of the offering per thirty day period of non-compliance for the first thirty days, increasing thereafter. We do not expect to incur these liquidated damages.
In June 2007, we entered into a Common Unit Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement for the issuance of an additional 3.4 million common units to institutional investors in a private placement. We received net proceeds of $120.0 million, including a $2.4 million contribution by our general partner to maintain its 2% interest in us. Proceeds from this issuance were primarily used to repay indebtedness outstanding under our credit facility. These agreements, as amended, require us to cause a registration statement to become effective by December 30, 2007 or we will incur liquidated damages of 0.25% of the proceeds of the offering per thirty day period of non-compliance for the first thirty days, increasing thereafter. We do not expect to incur these liquidated damages.
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
Our primary business objective is to provide stability and growth in cash distributions per unit over time. The amount of cash we can distribute on our units principally depends upon the amount of cash generated from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:
| · | the prices at which we will sell our oil and natural gas production; |
| · | our ability to hedge commodity prices; |
| · | the amount of oil and natural gas we produce; and |
| · | the level of our operating and administrative costs. |
Oil and natural gas prices have been, and are expected to be, volatile. Prices for oil and natural gas fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty and a variety of factors beyond our control. Factors affecting the price of oil include the lack of excess productive capacity, geopolitical activities, worldwide supply disruptions, worldwide economic conditions, weather conditions, actions taken by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and fluctuating currency exchange rates. Factors affecting the price of natural gas include North American weather conditions, industrial and consumer demand for natural gas, storage levels of natural gas and the availability and accessibility of natural gas deposits in North America.
As of September 30, 2007, we are a party to derivative agreements, and we intend to enter into derivative agreements in the future to reduce the impact of oil and natural gas price volatility on our cash flows. By removing a significant portion of our price volatility on our future oil and natural gas production, we have mitigated, but not eliminated, the potential effects of changing oil and natural gas prices on our cash flows from operations for those periods.
The primary factors affecting our production levels are capital availability, our ability to make accretive acquisitions, the success of our drilling program and our inventory of drilling prospects. In addition, we face the challenge of natural production declines. As initial reservoir pressures are depleted, production from a given well decreases. We attempt to overcome this natural decline by drilling to find additional reserves and acquiring more reserves than we produce. Our future growth will depend on our ability to continue to add reserves in excess of production. We will maintain our focus on costs to add reserves through drilling and acquisitions as well as the costs necessary to produce such reserves. Our ability to add reserves through drilling is dependent on our capital resources and can be limited by many factors, including our ability to timely obtain drilling permits and regulatory approvals. Any delays in drilling, completion or connection to gathering lines of our new wells will negatively impact our production, which may have an adverse effect on our revenues and, as a result, cash available for distribution.
Higher oil and natural gas prices have led to higher demand for drilling rigs, operating personnel and field supplies and services, and have caused increases in the costs of these goods and services. We focus our efforts on increasing oil and natural gas reserves and production while controlling costs at a level that is appropriate for long-term operations. Our future cash flows from operations are dependent on our ability to manage our overall cost structure.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| | Successor (1) | | Predecessor | | Successor (1) | | Predecessor | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Production data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oil (MBbls) | | | 86 | | | 47 | | | 150 | | | 147 | |
Natural gas liquids (MBbls) | | | 68 | | | - | | | 71 | | | - | |
Natural gas (MMcf) | | | 2,828 | | | 1,190 | | | 6,129 | | | 3,275 | |
Net production (MMcfe) | | | 3,753 | | | 1,471 | | | 7,451 | | | 4,159 | |
Average sales price per unit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oil (Bbl) | | $ | 72.04 | | $ | 68.43 | | $ | 65.99 | | $ | 64.38 | |
Natural gas liquids (Bbl) | | | 45.02 | | | - | | | 44.86 | | | - | |
Natural gas (Mcf) | | | 6.04 | | | 6.72 | | | 6.71 | | | 7.60 | |
Average unit cost per Mcfe: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Production costs: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lease operating expenses | | $ | 1.97 | | $ | 1.50 | | $ | 1.87 | | $ | 1.46 | |
Production taxes | | | 0.22 | | | 0.04 | | | 0.22 | | | 0.04 | |
Total | | | 2.19 | | | 1.54 | | | 2.09 | | | 1.50 | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 1.66 | | | 1.38 | | | 1.58 | | | 1.06 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 0.70 | | | 0.41 | | | 0.85 | | | 0.36 | |
___________
(1) | | In connection with our initial public offering, we acquired substantially all of the assets and operations of EV Properties and approximately one-half of the assets and operations of CGAS Exploration. The financial statements of our predecessors, therefore, include substantial operations that we did not acquire. In addition, |
| · | CGAS Exploration incurred substantial expenses related to exploration activities, which we do not plan to do; |
| · | the contracts under which our predecessors reimbursed EnerVest for general and administrative costs were different than the contracts under which we reimburse EnerVest; and |
| · | our predecessors did not incur the additional costs of being a public company. |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared with the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $26.4 million, an increase of 135% compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006. This increase was primarily the result of a $15.8 million increase in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues as a result of increased oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids production and a $0.2 million increase in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues as a result of increased oil prices partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues as a result of lower prices for natural gas. Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids production for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased 84%, 100% and 138%, respectively, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to increased production from the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition. Oil prices for the three months ended September 30, 2007 averaged $72.04 per Bbl compared with $68.43 per Bbl for the three months ended September 30, 2006, and natural gas prices for the three months ended September 30, 2007 averaged $6.04 per Mcf compared with an average of $6.72 per Mcf for the three months ended September 30, 2006.
Due to fluctuations in the commodity market, gain on derivatives, net was $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Our predecessors accounted for their derivatives as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133 and, as a result, the changes in fair value of the derivatives were reported in AOCI and reclassified to net income in the periods in which the contracts were settled. Effective October 1, 2006, we elected not to designate our derivatives as hedges for accounting purposes in accordance with SFAS No. 133. The amount in AOCI at October 1, 2006 related to derivatives that previously were designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges continues to be deferred until the underlying production is produced and sold, at which time the amounts are reclassified from AOCI and reflected as a component of revenues. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that existed at October 1, 2006 and any derivatives entered into thereafter are no longer deferred in AOCI, but rather are recorded immediately to net income as “Gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net”.
Transportation and marketing-related revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased $0.8 million, or 55%, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to $1.1 million in transportation and marketing-related revenues from the Monroe acquisition partially offset by lower prices for natural gas transported through our gathering systems.
Lease operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased $5.2 million, or 234%, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006 as a result of $6.1 million in lease operating expenses for the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition, which includes $1.3 million of payments made to third parties for natural gas liquids processing and natural gas gathering services related to production from the assets acquired in the Anadarko acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in lease operating expenses related to the oil and natural gas properties that we did not acquire from CGAS Exploration. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe produced were $1.97 in the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $1.50 in the three months ended September 30, 2006.
The cost of purchased natural gas for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased by $0.7 million, or 60%, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to $1.0 million in transportation and marketing-related revenues from the Monroe acquisition partially offset by lower prices for natural gas.
Production taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $0.8 million, or $0.22 per Mcfe, compared with $0.1 million, or $0.04 per Mcfe, for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily the result of higher production taxes associated with the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the three months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $6.2 million, or $1.66 per Mcfe, compared with $2.0 million, or $1.38 per Mcfe, for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily due to an increase in depreciable property from the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition and an increase in the basis of the depreciable property that we acquired from CGAS Exploration.
General and administrative expenses include the costs of administrative employees and related benefits, management fees paid to EnerVest, professional fees and other costs not directly associated with field operations. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $2.6 million, an increase of $2.0 million, or 332%, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006. General and administrative expenses were $0.70 per Mcfe in the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $0.41 per Mcfe in the three months ended September 30, 2006. These increases are primarily the result of (i) $0.9 million of fees paid to EnerVest under an omnibus agreement, (ii) $0.8 million of payroll expenses for EV Management employees and (iii) an overall increase in costs related to being a public partnership.
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $1.6 million, an increase of $1.4 million, or 752%, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006 primarily as a result of an increase in our long-term debt.
As a result of the change in how we account for derivatives, gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net for the three months ended September 30, 2007 included $4.2 million of realized gains and $0.8 million of unrealized gains on the mark-to-market of derivatives.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared with the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $54.2 million, an increase of 58% compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This increase was primarily the result of a $22.5 million increase in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues as a result of increased natural gas and natural gas liquids production and a $0.2 million increase in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues as a result of increased oil prices partially offset by a $2.9 million decrease in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues as a result of lower prices for natural gas. Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids production for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased 2%, 100% and 87%, respectively, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to increased production from the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition. Oil prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 averaged $65.99 per Bbl compared with $64.38 per Bbl for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, and natural gas prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 averaged $6.71 per Mcf compared with an average of $7.60 per Mcf for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Due to fluctuations in the commodity market, gain on derivatives, net was $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Transportation and marketing-related revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $3.4 million, or 76%, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to $4.7 million in transportation and marketing-related revenues from the Monroe acquisition partially offset by lower prices for natural gas transported through our gathering systems.
Lease operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $7.8 million, or 128%, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as a result of $9.9 million in lease operating expenses for the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition, which includes $1.3 million of payments made to third parties for natural gas liquids processing and natural gas gathering services related to production from the assets acquired in the Anadarko acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in lease operating expenses related to the oil and natural gas properties that we did not acquire from CGAS Exploration. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe produced were $1.87 in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $1.46 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The cost of purchased natural gas for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased by $2.9 million, or 75%, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to $3.5 million in transportation and marketing-related revenues from the Monroe acquisition partially offset by lower prices for natural gas.
Production taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $1.7 million, or $0.22 per Mcfe, compared with $0.2 million, or $0.04 per Mcfe, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily the result of higher production taxes associated with the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $11.8 million, or $1.58 per Mcfe, compared with $4.4 million, or $1.06 per Mcfe, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily due to an increase in depreciable property from the Five States acquisition, the Michigan acquisition, the Monroe acquisition and the Anadarko acquisition and an increase in the basis of the depreciable property that we acquired from CGAS Exploration.
General and administrative expenses include the costs of administrative employees and related benefits, management fees paid to EnerVest, professional fees and other costs not directly associated with field operations. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $6.4 million, an increase of $4.9 million, or 327%, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006. General and administrative expenses were $0.85 per Mcfe in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with $0.36 per Mcfe in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. These increases are primarily the result of (i) $1.9 million of fees paid to EnerVest under an omnibus agreement, (ii) $2.1 million of payroll expenses for EV Management employees and (iii) an overall increase in costs related to being a public partnership.
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $3.9 million, an increase of $3.4 million, or 587%, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006 primarily as a result of an increase in our long-term debt.
As a result of the change in how we account for derivatives, gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included $8.2 million of realized gains and $5.2 million of unrealized losses on the mark-to-market of derivatives.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital have been issuances of equity securities, borrowings under our credit facility and cash flows from operations. Our primary uses of cash have been acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties and related assets, development of our oil and natural gas properties, distributions to our partners and working capital needs. At September 30, 2007, we had working capital of $34.0 million. For 2007, we believe that cash on hand, the sale of common units in February 2007 and June 2007, net cash flows generated from operations and borrowings under our credit facility will be adequate to fund our capital budget and satisfy our short-term liquidity needs. We may also utilize various financing sources available to us, including the issuance of additional common units through public offerings or private placements, to fund our long-term liquidity needs. Our ability to complete future offerings of our common units and the timing of these offerings will depend upon various factors including prevailing market conditions and our financial condition.
Available Credit Facility
As of September 30, 2007, we had a $150.0 million senior secured credit facility that expires in September 2011. The facility contained certain covenants which, among other things, required the maintenance of a current ratio (as defined in the facility) of greater than 1.0 and a ratio of total debt to earnings plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and exploration expense of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0. As of September 30, 2007, we were in compliance with all of the facility covenants.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we borrowed $259.4 million to finance our acquisitions and repaid $196.4 million of our outstanding debt using proceeds from our private equity offerings in February and June 2007. At September 30, 2007, we had $91.0 million outstanding under the facility.
On October 1, 2007, we amended and restated our credit facility to reflect a maximum borrowing availability of $500.0 million, subject to a borrowing base that will initially be $275.0 million. Borrowings under the amended and restated facility may not exceed this borrowing base as determined by the lenders under the amended and restated facility based on our oil and natural gas reserves. The borrowing base is subject to redetermination semi-annually and in connection with material acquisitions or divestitures of properties.
The amended and restated facility expires in October 2012. Borrowings under the amended and restated facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of EV Properties. We may use borrowings under the amended and restated facility for acquiring and developing oil and natural gas properties, for working capital purposes, for general corporate purposes and for funding distributions to partners. We also may use up to $50.0 million of available borrowing capacity for letters of credit. The amended and restated facility contains certain covenants which, among other things, require the maintenance of a current ratio (as defined in the amended and restated facility) of greater than 1.0 and a ratio of total debt to earnings plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and exploration expense of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0.
Borrowings under the amended and restated facility bear interest at a floating rate based on, at our election, a base rate or the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate plus applicable premiums based on the percent of the borrowing base that we have outstanding.
Cash Flows
Cash flows provided (used) by type of activity were as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
| | Successor | | Predecessor | |
Operating activities | | $ | 39,509 | | $ | 20,114 | |
Investing activities | | | (278,544 | ) | | (7,041 | ) |
Financing activities | | | 260,621 | | | (17,330 | ) |
Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities provided $39.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $20.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily the result of increased net income adjusted for non-cash items.
Investing Activities
Our principal recurring investing activity is the acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we spent $255.2 million for the acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties in Michigan, Northern Louisiana and Central and East Texas, $7.3 million for the development of oil and natural gas properties and $16.0 million for a deposit related to the Plantation acquisition. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our predecessors spent $6.9 million for the development of oil and natural gas properties, primarily related to development drilling on Ohio properties.
Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we received net proceeds of $219.8 million from our private equity offerings in February and June 2007. From these net proceeds, we repaid $196.4 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility. We borrowed $259.4 million under our credit facility to finance our acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties in Michigan, Northern Louisiana and Central and East Texas. We paid $16.2 million of distributions to holders of our common and subordinated units. In addition, we recorded deemed distributions of $5.8 million related to the difference between the purchase price allocations and the amounts paid for the Michigan acquisition and the Monroe acquisition. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our predecessors paid $33.3 million in distributions and dividends to partners and received $16.0 million in contributions from partners.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, to provide guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy and clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. SFAS No. 157 also requires expanded disclosure of the effect on earnings for items measured using unobservable data. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We will adopt SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any, on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been selected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We will adopt SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any, on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (each a “forward-looking statement”). The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “ensure,” “expect,” “if,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecasts,” “predict,” “outlook,” “aim,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “likely” and similar expressions, and the negative thereof, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projection of results of operations or of financial condition or state other “forward-looking” information.
All of our forward-looking information is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expected. Although it is not possible to identify all factors, these risks and uncertainties include the risk factors and the timing of any of those risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section included in Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. This document is available through our web site at http://www.evenergypartners.com or through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Analysis Retrieval System at http://www.sec.gov.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain market risks that are inherent in our financial statements that arise in the normal course of business. We may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market risk, but do not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes.
Commodity Price Risk
Our major market risk exposure is to oil and natural gas prices, which have historically been volatile. As such, future earnings are subject to change due to changes in these prices. Realized prices are primarily driven by the prevailing worldwide price for oil and regional spot prices for natural gas production. We have used, and expect to continue to use, energy financial instruments to reduce our risk of changes in the prices of oil and natural gas. Pursuant to our risk management policy, we engage in these activities as a hedging mechanism against price volatility associated with pre-existing or anticipated physical oil and natural gas to protect their profit margins.
As of September 30, 2007, we had entered into derivative instruments with the following terms:
Period Covered | | Index | | Hedged Volume per Day | | Weighted Average Fixed Price | | Weighted Average Floor Price | | Weighted Average Ceiling Price | |
Oil (Bbls): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swaps - remainder of 2007 | | | WTI | | | 1,491 | | $ | 72.80 | | | | | $ | $ | |
Swaps - 2008 | | | WTI | | | 1,215 | | | 72.45 | | | | | | | |
Collar - 2008 | | | WTI | | | 125 | | | | | | 62.00 | | | 73.95 | |
Swaps - 2009 | | | WTI | | | 981 | | | 71.85 | | | | | | | |
Collar - 2009 | | | WTI | | | 125 | | | | | | 62.00 | | | 73.90 | |
Swap - 2010 | | | WTI | | | 1,000 | | | 71.16 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Natural Gas (MMBtu): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swaps - remainder of 2007 | | | Dominion Appalachia | | | 3,100 | | | 10.27 | | | | | | | |
Swaps - 2008 | | | Dominion Appalachia | | | 2,700 | | | 9.75 | | | | | | | |
Swaps - remainder of 2007 | | | NYMEX | | | 5,500 | | | 8.52 | | | | | | | |
Collar - remainder of 2007 | | | NYMEX | | | 2,500 | | | | | | 7.25 | | | 9.05 | |
Swaps - 2008 | | | NYMEX | | | 4,000 | | | 8.85 | | | | | | | |
Collars - 2008 | | | NYMEX | | | 6,000 | | | | | | 7.67 | | | 10.25 | |
Swaps - 2009 | | | NYMEX | | | 4,500 | | | 8.00 | | | | | | | |
Collars - 2009 | | | NYMEX | | | 7,000 | | | | | | 7.79 | | | 9.50 | |
Swaps - 2010 | | | NYMEX | | | 7,500 | | | 8.44 | | | | | | | |
Swap - remainder of 2007 | | | MICHCON_NB | | | 2,000 | | | 10.26 | | | | | | | |
Collar - remainder of 2007 | | | MICHCON_NB | | | 3,000 | | | | | | 8.00 | | | 9.27 | |
Swap - 2008 | | | MICHCON_NB | | | 2,000 | | | 8.10 | | | | | | | |
Collar -2008 | | | MICHCON_NB | | | 2,000 | | | | | | 8.00 | | | 9.55 | |
Swap - 2009 | | | MICHCON_NB | | | 5,000 | | | 8.27 | | | | | | | |
Swaps - remainder of 2007 | | | HOUSTON SC | | | 3,840 | | | 7.88 | | | | | | | |
Swap - 2008 | | | HOUSTON SC | | | 3,393 | | | 8.35 | | | | | | | |
Swap - 2009 | | | HOUSTON SC | | | 4,320 | | | 8.29 | | | | | | | |
Swap - 2009 | | | EL PASO PERMIAN | | | 2,500 | | | 7.93 | | | | | | | |
We do not designate these or future derivative agreements as hedges for accounting purposes pursuant to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of these agreements are recognized currently in earnings. At September 30, 2007, the fair value associated with these derivative agreements is a net asset of $5.1 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
In accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2007 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Change in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
We are involved in disputes or legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe the outcome of such disputes or legal actions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
As of the date of this filing, there have been no changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
An investment in our common units involves various risks. When considering an investment in us, you should consider carefully all of the risk factors described in Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing us and there may be additional matters that we are unaware of or that we currently consider immaterial. All of these could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and, thus, the value of an investment in us.
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
2.1 | Purchase and Sale Agreement between EV Properties, L.P. and EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund IX, L.P. and EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund IX-WI, L.P. dated January 9, 2007 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to EV Energy Partners, L.P.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 16, 2007). |
| |
2.2 | Agreement of Sale and Purchase by and among EnerVest Monroe Limited Partnership, EnerVest Monroe Pipeline GP, L.C. and EnerVest Monroe Gathering, Ltd., as Seller, and EnerVest Production Partners, Ltd, as Buyer, dated March 7, 2007 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to EV Energy Partners L.P.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2007). |
| |
2.3 | First Amendment to Agreement of Sale and Purchase by and among EnerVest Monroe Limited Partnership, EnerVest Monroe Pipeline GP, L.C., EnerVest Production Partners, Ltd and EVPP GP, LLC dated March 29, 2007 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to EV Energy Partners, L.P.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2007). |
| |
2.4 | Purchase and Sale Agreement between Anadarko E&P Company LP and Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas Onshore LP, as Seller, and EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund X-A, L.P., EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund X-WI, L.P., EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-A, L.P., EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-WI, L.P., EnerVest Management Partners, Ltd., Wachovia Investment Holdings, LLC and EV Properties, L.P. dated April 13, 2007 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.3 to EV Energy Partners, L.P.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 2007). |
+2.5 | Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement between Plantation Operating, LLC, as Seller, and EV Properties, L.P., as Buyer, dated July 17, 2007. |
| |
+2.6 | First Amendment to Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement between Plantation Operating, LLC, as Seller, and EV Properties, L.P., as Buyer, dated October 1, 2007. |
| |
10.1 | Purchase Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, by and among EV Energy Partners, L.P. and the Purchasers named therein (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to EV Energy Partners, L.P.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007). |
| |
10.2 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, by and among EV Energy Partners, L.P. and the Purchasers named therein (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to EV Energy Partners, L.P.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007). |
| |
10.3 | Purchase Agreement, dated June 1, 2007, by and among EV Energy Partners, L.P. and the Purchasers named therein (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to EV Energy Partners, L.P.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 4, 2007). |
| |
10.4 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 1, 2007, by and among EV Energy Partners, L.P. and the Purchasers named therein (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to EV Energy Partners, L.P.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 4, 2007). |
| |
+31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
| |
+31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
| |
+32 .1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
| |
+32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
________________+ Filed herewith