UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| R | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Yukon Territory (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 000-52073 (Commission File Number) | 75-2578509 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
2441 Warrenville Road, Suite 610, Lisle, Illinois 60532-3642
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
Registrant’s phone number, including area code (800) 282-3232
| Title of each class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| Common Stock | NASDAQ Global Market Toronto Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, no par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes R No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No R
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller repor ting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer R | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No R
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2010 was $2,227,308,395 based on the closing price of $36.63 as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market. Solely for the purposes of this calculation, directors and officers of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates.
As of January 31, 2011, there were 61,795,318 shares outstanding of the Registrant’s no par value common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
As permitted by General Instruction G of Form 10-K, the information required by Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference, and will be included either in a definitive proxy statement or an amendment to this Form 10-K, which must be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | ||
| EX-10.28 | ||
| EX-10.29 | ||
| EX-10.30 | ||
| EX-10.31 | ||
| EX-12.1 | ||
| EX-21.1 | ||
| EX-23.1 | ||
| EX-31.1 | ||
| EX-31.2 | ||
| EX-32.1 | ||
2
Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements concerning SXC Health Solutions Corp.’s operations, economic performance and financial condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are developed by combining currently available information with SXC Health Solutions Corp.’s beliefs and assumptions and are generally identified by the words “believe,” “expect,&rdq uo; “anticipate” and other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements do not guarantee future performance, which may be materially different from that expressed in, or implied by, any such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.
These forward-looking statements are based largely on SXC Health Solutions Corp.’s current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those identified under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Actual results could differ materially from results referred to in the forward-looking statements. In addition, important factors to consider in evaluating such forward-looking statements include changes in external market factors, changes in SXC Health Solutions Corp.’s business or growth strategy or an inability to execute its strategy due to changes in its industry or the economy in general. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurances that the results referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will in fact occur. SXC Health Solutions Corp. undertakes no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any such obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, changes to future results over time or otherwise.
3
PART I
THE COMPANY
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The following description of the business should be read in conjunction with the information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. This description contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements due to the factors set forth in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Refe rences in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we,” “our,” “us,” "SXC" or the “Company,” refer to SXC Health Solutions Corp. and its directly and indirectly owned subsidiaries as a combined entity.
OVERVIEW
The Company is a leading provider of pharmacy benefit management (“PBM”) services and healthcare information technology (“HCIT”) solutions to the healthcare benefit management industry. The Company’s product offerings and solutions combine a wide range of applications and PBM services designed to assist its customers in reducing the cost and managing the complexity of their prescription drug programs. The Company’s customers include many of the largest organizations in the pharmaceutical supply chain, such as pharmacy benefit managers, managed care organizations, self-insured employer groups, unions, third party health care plan administrators, and state and federal government entities.
The Company’s PBM services, which are marketed under the informedRx brand, include electronic point-of-sale pharmacy claims management, retail pharmacy network management, mail service pharmacy claims management, specialty pharmacy claims management, Medicare Part D services, benefit design consultation, preferred drug management programs, drug review and analysis, consulting services, data access, and reporting and information analysis. The Company owns a mail service pharmacy and a specialty service pharmacy. In a ddition, the Company is a national provider of drug benefits to its customers under the federal government’s Medicare Part D program.
The Company’s HCIT solutions include RxCLAIM®, an on-line transaction processing system that provides instant adjudication of prescription drug claims, RxMAX®, the Company’s rebate management sys tem, RxTRACK®, the Company’s data warehouse and analysis system, Zynchros, the Company’s suite of on-demand formulary management tools, the Company’s pharmacy management system for retail, chain, institutional and mail-order pharmacies, as well as a number of other software products for customers in the pharmaceutical supply chain. The Company’s HCIT solutions are available on a license basis with on-going maintenance and support or on a transaction fee basis using an application service provider (“ASP”) model.
The Company conducts business in both the U nited States and Canada. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized revenue of $1.94 billion, $1.44 billion, and $859.0 million, respectively, from the United States, and $4.1 million, $2.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively, from Canada.
Effective April 30, 2008, the Company completed its acquisition of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. (“NMHC”). The acquisition was funded with a combination of cash and Company common shares, resulting in a purchase price of approximately $143.8 million. Effective with the acquisition of NMHC, the Company operates in two reportable operating segments, PBM and HCIT, which provide both recurring and non-recurring revenues from the PBM industry.
On September 23, 2009, the Company issued 10,350, 000 shares of its common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $20.75 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering were $203.1 million.
On September 17, 2010, the Company executed a two-for-one stock split effected by a stock dividend on the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. All share and per share data presented in this Annual Report have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
The Company completed its acquisition of MedfusionRx, LLC (“MedfusionRx"), a leading independent specialty pharmacy provider, on December 28, 2010. The purchase price for MedfusionRx was $101.7 million in cash, subject to a customary working capital adjustment, with an additional $5.5 million potential earn-out payment subject to the achievement of certain performance targets in the 2012 fiscal year. The acquisition will help expand the Company's specialty pharmacy business and enhance its capabilities in this rapidly growing segment of the PBM industry.
The Company exists under the Yukon Business Corporations Act. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 2441 Warrenville Road, Suite 610, Lisle, Illinois 60532, and the telephone number for the Company’s princi pal executive office is 800-282-3232. The Company maintains a website at www.sxc.com. The information contained in, or that can be accessed through, the Company’s website is not part of, and is not incorporated into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or other filings the Company makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company will make available free of charge on its website the annual report on Form 10-K, future quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The Company will also make available all financial reports filed in accordance with Canadian GAAP with SEDAR through its website.
Products, Solutions and Services
The Company’s solutions address the challenges faced by the two primary participants in the pharmaceutical supply chain: payors and providers. The Company provides comprehensive PBM systems and services, pharmacy practice management systems and related prescription fulfillment services. The Company believes it is unique in that it can deploy its solutions as:
4
| • | informedRx® — PBM services such as pharmacy network management can be provided to the Company’s customers using the Company’s own system software and services; |
| • | Web-enabled technology — the Company provides on-line transaction processing solutions through web-enabled, real-time transaction processing technology; and |
| • | Software solutions — licensed software products can be sold in addition to systems implementation and consulting services and maintenance. |
Payor Products and Services Offered by the Company
PBM Services — informedRx
The Company’s informedRx offering is a b road suite of customizable PBM services that provide a flexible and cost-effective alternative to traditional PBM offerings typically employed by health plans, government agencies and employers. The Company provides a broad range of pharmacy spend management solutions and information technology capabilities. Its product offerings and solutions combine a wide range of PBM services designed for managed care organizations, self-insured employer groups, unions, third party health care plan administrators, and state and federal government entities. The Company’s customers have gained increased control of their pharmacy benefit dollars and maximized cost control and quality of care through a full range of pharmacy spend management services, including:
Formulary Administration — Provide support for customers’ existing formularies and preferred drug lists or collaborate to create best-in-class models supported by formulary predictive modeling and impact analysis. Pharmacist, physician and member-focused intervention protocols provide quality controls to drive generics, preferred drug products and appropriate use. Formularies are administered based on specific plan designs, or by enabling customers with the tools to maintain their own custom formularies online.
Benefit Plan Design and Management — Accommodate any plan design option requi red and support an unlimited number of benefit design variations. The Company specializes in applying data-driven insights to help customers understand the medical risk drivers within their population and take a strategic approach to plan design. The Company provides benefit design configuration and support to customers, in accordance with mutually developed processes. Benefit designs can be modified online, in real time, by the Company or by the customer’s staff.
Pharmacy Network Management — A wide range of retail network options, including supporting existing networks or assisting customers in developing proprietary networks that mee t specific geographic access requirements, desired price discounts, or other service requirements. A proprietary national retail network, which consists of pharmacies in all 50 states and in Puerto Rico, Guam and the Virgin Islands, provides excellent access to the Company’s customers.
Drug Utilization Review (“DUR”) — Pre-dispensing DUR edit checks are performed on an online, real-time basis between mail and retail pharmacies to encourage appropriate drug utilization, enhance member outcomes, and reduce drug costs. All prescriptions are checked for member eligibility and plan design features and are then compared again st previous histories of prescriptions filled by the same pharmacy, by other participating retail network pharmacies and by the mail service pharmacy.
Clinical Services and Consulting — Consultative and technical expertise to augment, develop, deploy, and support any additional clinical programs. Customers also have the option of using the Company’s clinical programs, which incorporate complete prescription drug information to reduce the growth rate of prescription drug costs and increase the quality of care and member safety. The Company offers comprehensive clinical management strategies which help reduce undesirable events, increase medication compliance, decrease medication waste, and promote plan member well-being.
Reporting and Information Analysis Solutions — Providing two main levels of reporting: A comprehensive reporting package (which includes a large menu of unique reports), and an online analytical decision support tool, RxTRACK®, designed to meet and exceed the Company’s customers’ expectations and provide fl exibility for customized reporting. The Company uses customer plan data and industry benchmark data to drive proactive discussions regarding opportunities to increase savings.
Mail Service — informedMAIL gives members flexibility, privacy, and easy access to their maintenance medications while offering significant plan savings to the customer. To provide a higher standard of service and to assert greater control over outcomes for clients, informedMAIL offers a full-service, state of the art mail service pharmacy that provides high quality service, member support and convenient, easy-to-use mail service delivery throughout the U.S. P rojected savings for mail service are dependent on plan design features, including co-payments and incentives, and utilization patterns.
Specialty Service— The Company offers customers the ability to control spending on specialty medications and ensure patients receive support for complex medications, in one of the fastest growing segments of pharmaceutical spending, with Ascend SpecialtyRx and MedfusionRx.
The Company’s specialty therapy medication management program uses a highly-trained and specialized clinical staff organized in disease pods, a patient-centric approach and evidence based clinical treatment protocols. The patient care team communicates with the patient, patient’s physician, and other caregivers as needed to obtain a complete medical and pharmacy history and then craft an individualized treatment plan including patient education, counseling and expected therapy outcomes. Plan savings are achieved as the cost for specialty medication using this program is generally lower than retail pricing.
Web Services - A suite of Web Services that enables cust omers to interact with the claims processing system using a standardized protocol in a secure environment. This method of access provides the Company's clients with the freedom to build products, tools, and reports that utilize data throughout their enterprises. Once the raw data is in house, it can be used by the customer
5
as appropriate, thus providing far greater flexibility and return on investment.
A member website, RxPORTALTM, invites members to learn more about their prescription benefit programs, medication histories, drug information and related industry news. This site also features a real-time trial adjudication program that gives members the information they need to make informed, cost-effective choices regarding their prescription therapy. This site can be customized with a customer's logo and name, links to the organization's Internet home site, and up-to-date news bulletins about the organization.
RxPROVIDER PORTALTM is a web based interface that allows pharmacists and physicians to obtain information from RxCLAIM® on a member's plan to assist in providing more cost effective prescription medications. The portal gives providers the ability to view claim details, remittance advice and eligibility, and perform prior authorizations online.
Healthcare IT
The Company's HCIT offerings deliver applications on a license, ASP , or fee-for-service basis to customers who administer and manage pharmacy benefits. SXC has achieved a broad industry footprint by deploying technology to help healthcare companies manage the rising prescription drug costs and enhance the level of care they provide.
HCIT products and services serve a diversified group of payor customers that include health plans, federal, state and provincial government programs, pharmacy benefit managers, workers' compensation programs, and long-term and/or chronic care facility operators. In addition, SXC's robust and flexible technology serves as the engine for informedRx, the Company's full service PBM.
Technology Pr oducts and Services
RxCLAIM® is an on-line transaction processing system designed to provide instant on-line adjudication of third-party prescription drug claims at the point of service, including trouble-free claims management and cost-effective review, as well as payment and billing support and real-time functionality for updating benefit, price, member, provider and drug details. RxCLAIM® is desig ned to provide the Company’s customers with automation efficiencies, flexibility and control by facilitating the real-time processing of pharmacy claims and payments against eligibility, plan benefits, formularies, price, drug utilization review, prior authorization, and rebates in addition to many other features.
Other products
| • | Integrail Pathfinde rTM PRO is a comprehensive software application that enables a wide array of users to understand the impact of healthcare resource allocation and medical decision-making through the incorporation of risk prediction and episode profiling technologies. The application offers users an intuitive system for integrating disparate data sources to pinpoint variations in resource utilization and quality of care. The tool offers both a standardized library of reports and robust ad hoc query capabilities that are designed to provide flexible, easy access to complex information. |
| • | IntegrailRx features the ability to measure and predict both pharmacy and total risk using pharmacy claims. This gives customers the insights they need to improve member outcomes, better manage trend and structure benefits based on a forward-looking view of their medical risk. |
| • | RxBUILDER is a web-based interface for formular y creation and maintenance utilizing a Medi-Span® based product file. This rules-based approach minimizes the work of list building and maintenance operations and captures efficiencies in sharing formulary information between lines of business. |
| • | RxPORTALTM allows customers to interact with the patient's formulary and drug history in a secure environment allowing patients and health plans to access industry leading tools and up to date information. |
| • | RxAUTHTM is a prior authorization (“PA”) management solution which offers flexibility and efficiency in automating the PA process from end-to-end. Built upon the powerful prior authorization capabilities housed in RxCLAIM® , RxAUTHTM supports the entire PA lifecycle, from receipt of the request, through rules adjudication, to execution of the resulting decision. RxAUTHTM is also available in a web based application. |
| • ; | RxMAX® is a rebate management system that is designed to assist health plans in managing their relationships with pharmaceutical manufacturers through contract management, record keeping, calculating market share, and creating billing details and summaries. |
| • | Zynchros provides a suite of on-demand formulary management tools to help payors effectively manage their formulary programs, and to maintain Medicare Part D compliance in their programs. |
Medicare Part D
Since the inception of the Medicare Part D program, the Company has offered a comprehensive array of services to the Medicare marketplace, all compliant with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) regulations and configured to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing pharmaceutical landscape.
As a full-service PBM and a National Prescription Drug Plan, the Company supports a wide variety of Medicare Part D Plan Sponsors. The Company provides prescription benefit management support for Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans ("MAPDs") and prescription drug plans ("PDPs"), including implementation of specific Medicare Part D plan designs, creation and maintenance of Medicare Part D formularies (including CMS submission), CMS reporting requirements and consultative, proactive account management.
The Industry
The Company believes the key market factors that influence spending on information technology solutions and services by participants
6
in the pharmaceutical supply chain are the amount spent on prescription drugs and the associated volume of prescription drugs dispensed and insurance claims processed each year. According to IMS Health (“IMS”), approximately 3.9 billion pharmacy prescriptions were written and filled in the United States during 2009 — representing a retail value in excess of $300 billion. Based on the factors described below, the Company expects drug utilization rates to continue to rise in the future. The Company estimates that the current market opportunity for its information technology and services in its industry is significant, and is growing at a rate in excess of the drug utilization rate alone due to the following factors:
Aging population. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. population is expected to age rapidly through 2030, when 19.5% of the population will be over the age of 65, compared to 12.0% in 2000. Older Americans require more medications than their younger counterparts — often 20 to 40 prescriptions annually, according to CMS. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation ("Kaiser"), the number of prescriptions purchased in the U.S. increased 39% from 1999 to 2009, while the population only grew 9%. The increase in prescriptions due to an aging population is expected to drive demand for senior-focused clinical programs and benefit plans, as well as information technology decision support tools to facilitate on-line analytical assessment of specific population trends, which will address the PBM needs of an aging population.
Rising drug prices. According to IMS, the U.S. pharmaceutical market in 2011 is expected to grow 3% to 5%, and continue to grow at a 3% to 6% annual compound rate. Retail prescription prices have increased on average 3.6% annually between 2000 and 2009, according to Kaiser, a rate which is higher than the average inflation rate during that same period of 2.5%. Industry solutions to counter rising drug prices include tools to identify clinically appropriate cost-savings opportunities, supporting clinical programs that help promote generic and clinically equivalent, lower-cost preferred drug products, utilization management programs, such as prior authorization ("PA") and step-therapy, to help ensure that patients who can benefit from therapies are identified and that c ost-effective treatment is encouraged, and tools to identify clinically appropriate, cost-saving opportunities.
Health information technology stimulus. During 2009, the U.S. government introduced an approximately $20 billion stimulus package to spur the usage of electronic health records in the U.S. The package provides incentive payments to providers or hospitals to become meaningful users of electronic health records. The goal is to create a national infrastructure of health information technology to help improve health care quality, reduce health care costs, and add security to patient health records. The Company believes this program will fundamentally change the methods and manner in which health information records are shared, stored, and utilized.
Health care reform. The health care reform statute enacted in 2010 could provide drug coverage for an estimated 30 million people in the form of expanded Medicaid coverage. The Company is active in this market and believes that expansion will create growth opportunities. In addition, the reform bill provides a pathway for follow-on biologic development, giving more cost effective generic options to clients and opportunity for margin expansion for the Company.
Medicare Part D. Medicare Part D is a program that subsidizes the costs of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries. This program is heavily regulated with rules that can and do change on a regular basis. Ongoing regulatory changes by CMS will continue to fuel the future demands of this program. Medicare Part D has impacted the demand for pharmacy benefit management as well as information technology, as the Company's customers are required to update their systems, and the Company believes they will continue to require support to maintain these systems.
Growth in Specialty Drug Class. During 2009, specialty drug spend continued to grow at a double digit pace, increasing 14.7% from 2008 according to Medco Health Solutions, Inc. There is a move to shift coverage of these drugs from the medical benefit to the pharmacy benefit. The Company believes this movement presents opportunities for its specialty pharmacy program.
Generic Pipeline. According to IMS, products representing approximately $17 billion in annual sales in the U.S. are expected to come off patent and face the prospect of generic competition in 2011. Also according to IMS, over the next five years, more than $140 billion in brand drugs globally will come off patent, fueling growth in the availability of generic equivalents. The Company believes that this presents an opportunity for client cost savings and Company margin expansion.
Competition
The Company competes with numerous companies that provide the same or similar services. Its competitors range from large publicly traded companies to several small and privately owned companies which compete for a significant part of the market. The principal competitive factors are qualit y of service, scope of available services, and price. The ability to be competitive is influenced by the Company's ability to negotiate prices with pharmacies, drug manufacturers, and third party rebate administrators. Market share for PBM services in the United States is highly concentrated, with a few national firms, such as Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation, controlling a significant share of prescription volume. Some of the Company's competitors have been in existence for longer periods of time and are better established. Some of them also have broader public recognition, substantially greater financial and marketing resources, and more experienced management. In addition, some of the Company's customers and potential customers may find it desirable to perform for themselves those services now being rendered by the Company.
The Company's ability to attract and retain customers is substantially dependent on its capability to provide competitive pricing, efficient and accurate claims management, utilization review services and related reporting, and consulting services.
The payor and pharmaceutical supply chain markets require solutions which address the unique needs of each constituent. The Company's customers require robust and scalable technology solutions, as well as the ability to ensure cost efficiency for themselves and their customers. The Company's product offerings include a wide range of PBM services and software products for managing prescription drug progra ms and for drug prescribing and dispensing. The Company's payor suite of products includes a wide range of pharmacy benefits management and claims adjudication systems, as well as informedRx, the Company's suite of PBM services. The Company's provider suite of products
7
includes pharmacy practice management systems, point-of-sale applications, and related prescription fulfillment services, which can be integrated with other pharmacy and patient management systems for full enterprise-wide control.
Competitive Strengths
The Company believes that the following competitive strengths are the keys to its success:
Flexible, customized and independent services: The Company believes a key differentiator between itself and its competitors is not only the Company's ability to provide innovative PBM services, but also to deliver these services on an à la carte basis. The inform edRx suite offers the flexibility of broad product choice along the entire PBM continuum, enabling enhanced customer control, solutions tailored to the Company's customers’ specific requirements, and flexible pricing. The market for the Company's products is divided between large customers that have the sophisticated technology infrastructure and staff required to operate a 24-hour data center and other customers that are not able or willing to operate these sophisticated systems.
The Company’s business model allows its large customers to license the Company’s products and operate the Company’s systems themselves (with or without taking advantage of the Company’s significant customization, consulting and systems implementation services) and allows its other customers to utilize the Company’s systems’ capabilities on a fee-per-transaction or subscription basis through ASP processing from the Company’s data center.
Leading technology and platform: The Company’s technology is robust, scalable, and web-enabled. The Company’s payor offerings efficiently supported over 460 million transactions in 2010. The platform is able to instantly cross-check multiple processes, such as reviewing claim eligibility, adverse drug reaction and properly calculating member, pharmacy and payor payments. The Company’s technology is built on flexible, database-driven rule sets and broad functionality applicable for most any type of business. The Company believes it has one of the most comprehensive claims processing platforms in the market.
The Company’s technology platform allows it to provide more comprehensive PBM services through its informedRx brand by offering customers a selection of services to choose from to meet their unique needs versus requiring them to accept a one-size-fits-all solution. The Company believes this à la carte offering is a key differentiator from its competitors.
Measurable cost savings for customers: The Company provides it s customers with increased control over prescription drug costs and drug benefit programs. The Company’s pricing model and flexible product offerings are designed to deliver measurable cost savings to the Company’s customers. The Company believes its pricing model is a key differentiator from its competitors for the Company’s customers who want to gain control of their prescription drug costs. For example, the Company’s pharmacy network contracts and manufacturer rebate agreements are made available by the Company to each customer. For customers who select the Company’s pharmacy network and manufacturer rebate services on a fixed fee per transaction basis, there is clarity to the rebates and other fees payable by the pharmaceutical manufacturer or third party rebate administrator to the customer. The Company believes that its pricing model together with the flexibility to select from a broad range of customizable services helps the customers realize measurable results and cost s avings.
Business Strategy
The Company seeks to enhance its position as a leading provider of technology-enabled PBM services to the pharmaceutical supply chain in North America. The Company’s primary strategies are:
| • | Expand the breadth of the Company’s informedRx services for health plans, self-insured employers and government agencies that sponsor pharmacy benefit plans: Within the Company’s informedRx suite of products, it has several key initiatives underway which the Company believes will help it to expand its revenue per claim and make the Company more competitive in the broader market. The Company combines its claims processing capabilities with a full suite of PBM services to offer competitively priced pharmacy networks, specialty drug and mail order programs, manufacturer rebate contracts and clinical programs, to enable the Company’s customers to have more control over their drug spending. With the Company’s diversified product portfolio and the market demand for greater transparency in pricing of prescription drugs, the Company believes it is in an attractive market environme nt for informedRx to prosper. |
| • | Provide additional informedRx services to the Company’s existing payor customer base: Based on the success the Company has had to date with informedRx, the Company intends to sell additional services to the Company’s existing customers through its informedRx suite of products which include the Company’s Mail Service and Specialty Service, as well as the Company’s competitive pharmacy network and clinical offerings. The Company may also make capital investments in technology to further improve the quality of its products. By providing a broader range of services, the Company believes that it can increase its customer base and the breadth of products utilized by each customer, thereby increasing the Company’s revenue base. |
| • | Target large public sector fee-for-service opportunities: Based on the success the Company has had to date with public sector opportunities, it intends to sell additional services to state, federal, and provincial Medicaid plans. The Company sells PBM technology solutions to support pharmacy claims processing, Medicaid rebate management, and sophisticated pharmacy claims prior authorization workflow and processing, among other services. |
| • | Aggressively pursue large health plan technology upgrades: Th e Company’s goal is to be the industry’s leading provider of tools, technology and services to help its customers better manage pharmacy programs, and in turn, to reduce the cost of drug delivery and enhance the healthcare experience for their plan members. |
| • | Sell HCIT solutions throughout the LTC/institutional pharmacy market: The long-term care (“LTC”) market often faces the challenge of balancing the co nflicting goals of containing healthcare costs, while maintaining and even improving the health |
8
of nursing home residents. The dynamics of the nursing home facility/pharmacy/resident relationship, in addition to regulatory restrictions governing the health, safety, and well-being of residents, drive this market’s need for efficient PBM. LTC facilities — including assisted living and skilled nursing facilities — are looking for integrated systems that offer efficient claims processing and adjudication services, cost-saving clinical opportunities, census management and business analysis capabilities.
| • | Pursue strategic acquisition opportunities: The Company actively evaluates opportunities to expand its product offerings and customer base through strategic acquisitions. The Company’s acquisition strategy focuses on identifying acquisitions that expand its core footprint in the PBM market, add new products and services in potential high growth areas and provide additional scale in areas such as specialty pharmacy management, oncology or public sector pharmacy (including state Medicaid). The Company believes that its management team’s proven ability to successfully identify acquisition opportunities that are complementary and synergistic to its business and to integrate them into its existing operations with minimal disruption has played, and will continue to play, an important role in the expansion of its business. |
| • | Broaden the Company’s services, technology and markets through next generation growth opportunities: The Company continues to pursue next generation growth opportunities through proprietary development of new technology applications and new PBM services. The Company currently has a number of tools that are available to its HCIT customers to facilitate e-prescribing and other electronic health record keeping. The Company believes that this market will continue to grow and offers an excellent opportunity to complement the Company’s PBM services and further enhance its product offerings. In addition, the Company believes that the recently enacted healthcare reform statute, which contemplates an expansion of coverage and emphasis on technology improvements in healthcare services (such as e-prescribing), offers a number of potential growth opportunities. |
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
Various aspects of the Company’s business are governed by federal and state laws and regulations. Because sanctions may be imposed for violations of these laws, compliance is a significant operational requirement. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all existing legal requirements material to the operation of its business. There are, however, significant uncertainties involving the application of many of these legal requirements to its business. In addition, at any given time, there are numerous proposed health care laws and regulations at the federal and state levels, many of which could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condi tion. The Company is unable to predict what additional federal or state legislation or regulatory initiatives may be enacted in the future relating to its business or the health care industry in general, or what effect any such legislation or regulations might have on the Company. The Company also cannot provide any assurance that federal or state governments will not impose additional restrictions or adopt interpretations of existing laws or regulations that could have a material adverse effect on its business or financial performance.
Some of the state laws described below may be preempted in whole or in part by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), which provides for comprehensive federal regulation of employee benefit plans. However, the scope of ERISA preemption is uncertain and is subje ct to conflicting court rulings. The Company also provides services to certain clients, such as governmental entities, that are not subject to the preemption provisions of ERISA.
Federal Laws and Regulations Affecting the PBM Industry
The following descriptions identify various federal laws and regulations that affect or may affect aspects of the Company’s PBM business:
Legislation and Litigation Affecting Drug Prices.
Average wholesale price (“AWP”) is a standard pricing unit published by third party data sources and currently used throughout the pharmacy benefits industry as the basis for determining drug pricing under contracts with clients, pharmacies, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. The calculation and reporting of AWP have been the subject of investigations by federal and state governments and litigation brought against pharmaceutical manufacturers and data services that report AWP. The Company is not responsible for calculations, reports or payments of AWP; however, such investigations or lawsuits could impact its business because many of its customer contracts, pharmaceutical purchase agreements, retail network contracts and other agreements use AWP as a pricing benchmark. In March 2009, a federal district court gave final approval to settlement of class action lawsuits brought against First DataBank (“FDB”) and Medi-Span, two primary sources of AWP reporting. Under the terms of the settlement, FDB and Medi-Span agreed, among other things, to reduce the reported AWP of certain prescription drugs by four percent effective September 26, 2009. FDB and Medi-Span also announced that they would discontinue publishing AWP within two years of the settlement.
In response to this action, the Company, as authorized in most of the Company’s standard customer contracts, adopted a revised pricing benchmark to assure cost neutrality for the Company, its customers, and pharmacies as to what they paid or received, as applicable, for prescription drug products using the AWP pricing benchmark before September 26, 2009 and what they would pay or receive on or after September&n bsp;26, 2009. While that transition has been accomplished to date with no material adverse effect on the Company, there can be no assurances that customers and pharmacies in reviewing the results of the transition may not challenge the way in which the transition occurred and/or whether it preserved cost neutrality as intended, or that the results of such challenges will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance, results of operations and financial condition in future periods. These changes, as well as any changes proposed by the federal government and the states regarding the reimbursement for drugs by Medicaid and Medicare, could impact the Company’s pricing to customers and other payors and could impact its ability to negotiate discounts with manufacturers, wholesalers, or retail pharmacies.
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003.
The Medicare voluntary outpatient prescription drug benefit (“Part D”) established under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (“MMA”) became effective on January 1, 2006. The MMA also created new guidelines for
9
Medicare HMOs, termed Medicare Advantage Plans, which offer both an outpatient prescription drug benefit and health care coverage.
Medicare beneficiaries who elect Part D coverage pay a monthly premium for the covered outpatient drug benefit. Assistance with premiums and cost sharing are provided to eligible low-income beneficiaries. The voluntary outpatient prescription drug benefit requires coverage of essentially the same pharmaceuticals that are approved for the Medicaid program, although selection may be restricted through a formulary. The new outpatient prescription drug benefit is offered on an insured basis by PDPs in 34 regions across the United States and by Medicare Advantage Plans, along with health care coverage, in 26 regions across the United States.
As a PDP plan sponsor and in its capacity as a subcontractor with certain Part D Plan clients, the Company is subject to certain federal rules, regulations, and sub-regulatory guidance pertaining to the operation of Medicare Part D. If CMS determines that the Company has not performed satisfactorily as a subcontractor, CMS may request the Company’s PDP or Medicare Advantage Plan client to revoke its Part D activities or responsibilities. While the Company believes that it provides an appropriate level of service under its respective contract and subcontracts, it can give no assurances that CMS or a Part D Plan will not terminate its business relationships insofar as they pertain to Medicare Part D.
PDPs and Medicare Advantage Plans are subject to provisions of the MMA intended to deter “fraud, waste and abuse” and are strictly monitored by CMS and its contracted Medicare Drug Integrity Contractors (“MEDICs”) to ensure that Part D program funds are not spent inappropriately. In April 2006, CMS issued a chapter 9 to the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual interpreting the fraud, waste and abuse provisions of Part D, referred to as the “FWA Guidance.” Among other things, the FWA Guidance cites the following examples of potential PBM fraud, waste and abuse risks in connection with Part D: prescription drug switching, unlawful remuneration, inappropriate formulary decisions, prescription drug splitting or shorting, and failure to offer negotiated prices. CMS has offered additional sub-regulatory guidance regarding some of these risk areas, particularly with respect to the Part D formulary d ecision making process which is highly regulated by CMS. No assurance can be given that the Company will not be subject to scrutiny or challenge under one or more of the underlying laws by the government enforcers or private litigants.
Also in 2006, CMS issued guidance to PDPs and Medicare Advantage Plans requiring that such plans report 100% of all price concessions received for PBM services. This CMS guidance suggests that best practices would require PDPs and Medicare Advantage Plans to contractually require the right to audit their PBMs, as well as require 100% transparency as to manufacturer rebates paid for drugs provided under the sponsor’s plan, including the portion of such rebates retained by the PBM as part of the price concession for the PBM’s services. In 2009, CMS codified this guidance in regulations, effective January 1, 2010, that require Part D drug plan sponsors to use the amount paid to a pharmacy as the basis for determining cost sharing for beneficiaries and for reporting a plan’s drug costs to CMS. The Company does not anticipate that such disclosures will have a materially adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as “PPACA”) made changes to Medicare Advantage Plans that are likely to result in significant reductions in government payments to the plans and reduced enrollment numbers. Those individuals leaving a Medicare Advantage Plan are e xpected to transition into the traditional Medicare program, making the net financial effect on the Company's activities uncertain. The PPACA also made changes to the Medicare Part D program that could have an impact on our business. These new provisions include changes in the way drugs are paid for under the coverage gap, creation of protected classes of drugs that have an impact on formularies and allow the government more control over formularies, reductions in the subsidies provided to higher income individuals, and changes in dispensing requirements in long-term care facilities. Some of these changes may have a positive impact and others may have a negative impact on our revenues and business model.
Federal Anti-Remuneration/Fraud and Abuse Laws.
The federal healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, an entity from paying or receiving, subject to certain exceptions and safe harbors, any remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce the referral of individuals covered by federally funded health care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (“CHAMPUS”) or the purchase, or the arranging for or recommending of the purchase, of items or services for which payment may be made in whole or in part under Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS or other federally funded health care programs. Sanctions for violating the Anti-Kickback Statute may include imprisonment, criminal and civil fines, and exclusion from participation in the federally funded health care programs.
The federal healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted broadly by courts, the Office of Inspector General, referred to as the “OIG” within the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“DHHS”) and other administrative bodies. Because of the statute’s broad scope and the limited statutory exceptions, federal regulations establish certain safe harbors from liability. For example, safe harbors exist for certain properly disclosed and reported discounts received from vendors, certain investment interests, certain properly disclosed payments made by vendors to group purchasing organizations, certain personal services arrangements, and certain discount and payment arrangements between PBMs and HMO risk contractors serving Medicaid and Medicare members. A practice that does not fall within an exception or a safe harbor is not necessarily unlawful, but may be subject to scrutiny and c hallenge. In the absence of an applicable exception or safe harbor, a violation of the statute may occur even if only one purpose of a payment arrangement is to induce patient referrals or purchases of products or services that are reimbursed by federal health care programs. Among the practices that have been identified by the OIG as potentially improper under the statute are certain product conversion programs in which benefits are given by drug manufacturers to pharmacists or physicians for changing a prescription, or recommending or requesting such a change, from one drug to another. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been cited as a partial basis, along with state consumer protection laws discussed below, for investigations and multi-state settlements relating to financial incentives provided by drug manufacturers to retail pharmacies as well as to PBMs in connection with such programs.
Additionally, it is a crime under the Public Contractor Anti-Kickback Statute, for any person to knowingly and willfully offer or provide any remuneration to a prime contractor to the United States, including a contractor servicing federally funded health programs, in order to obtain favorable treatment in a subcontract. Violators of this law also may be subject to civil monetary penalties.
In April 2003, the OIG published “Final OIG Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers” referred to as
10
“Compliance Guidance.” The Compliance Guidance is voluntary and is directly aimed at the compliance efforts of pharmaceutical manufacturers. This Compliance Guidance highlights several transactions as potential risks, including the provision of grants, “prebates” and “upfront payments” to PBMs to support disease management programs and therapeutic interchanges. The Compliance Guidance also indicates that the provision of rebates or other payments to PBMs by pharmaceutical manufacturers may potentially trigger liability under the Anti-Kickback Statute, if not properly structured and disclosed.
The PPACA made two important clarifications that significantly strengthen enforcement of the Anti-Kickback Statute. PPACA clarified that a person may violate the Anti-Kickback Statute regardless of whether that person has the specific intent to violate or even knows about the statute. PPACA also made clear that a claim resulting from an Anti-Kickback Statute violation is a false claim under the Federal False Claims Act. The provision codifies what some federal district courts had already held and significantly heightens the civil penalties that the Company could face for an Anti-Kickback Statute violation.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with the legal requirements imposed by such anti-remunera tion laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject to scrutiny or challenge under such laws or regulations. Any such challenge could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Federal Statutes Prohibiting False Claims.
The Federal False Claims Act imposes liability for knowingly making or causing to be made false claims with respect to governmental programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, for services not rendered, or for misrepresenting actual services rendered, in order to obtain higher reimbursement. Private individuals may bring qui tam or whistleblower suits against providers under the Federal False Claims Act, which authorizes the payment of a portion of any recovery to the individual bringing suit. Such actions are initially required to be filed under seal pending their review by the Department of Justice. Federal district courts have interpreted the Federal False Claims Act as applying to claims for reimbursement that violate the anti-kickback statute or federal physician self-referral law under certain circumstances. The Federal False Claims Act generally provides for the imposition of civil penalties and for treble damages, resulting in the possibility of substantial financial penalties for small billing errors that are replicated in a large number of claims, as each individual claim could be deemed to be a separate violation of the Federal False Claims Act. Crim inal provisions that are similar to the Federal False Claims Act provide that a corporation may be fined if it is convicted of presenting to any federal agency a claim or making a statement that it knows to be false, fictitious or fraudulent to any federal agency.
In 2010, the Company directly contracted with the federal government to provide services to beneficiaries of federally funded health programs. Therefore, the Company directly submitted claims to the federal government. In addition, the Company does contract with and provide services to entities or organizations that are federal government contractors, such as Medicare Part D PDPs. There can be no assurance that the government would not potentially view one or more of the Company’s actions in providing services to federal government contractors as causing or assisting in the presentment of a false claim particularly in light of the April 2009 amendment of the law to expand the scope of liability. The PPACA also expanded liability by making clear that a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute can be a predicate for a false claim under the False Claims Act and by adding a provision that requires the return of overpayments received from Medicare or Medicaid, with the failure to do so constituting a basis for a false claim.
The Company does not believe it is in violation of the Federal False Claims Act and it has a corporate compliance and ethics program, policies and procedures and internal controls in place to help maintain an organizational culture of honesty and integrity.
ERISA Regulation.
ERISA regulates certain aspects of employee pension and health benefit plans, including self-funded corporate health plans. The Company has agreements with self-funded corporate health plans to provide PBM services, and therefore, it is a service provider to ERISA plans. ERISA imposes duties on any person or entity that is a fiduciary with respect to the ERISA plan. The Company administers pharmacy benefits for ERISA plans in accordance with plan design choices made by the ERISA plan sponsors. The Company does not believe that the general conduct of its business subjects it to the fiduciary obligations set forth by ERISA, except when it has specifically contracted with an ERISA plan sponsor t o accept fiduciary responsibility and be named as a fiduciary for certain functions. In those cases where the Company has not accepted fiduciary status, there can be no assurance that the U.S. Department of Labor, which is the agency that enforces ERISA, or a private litigant would not assert that the fiduciary obligations imposed by the statute apply to certain aspects of the Company’s operations.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against various PBMs by private litigants, including Plan participants on behalf of an ERISA plan and by ERISA Plan sponsors, alleging that the PBMs are ERISA fiduciaries and that, in such capacity, they allegedly violated ERISA fiduciary duties in connection with certain business practices related to their respective contracts with retail pharmacy networks and/or pharmaceutical manufacture rs.
ERISA also imposes civil and criminal liability on service providers to health plans and certain other persons if certain forms of illegal remuneration are made or received. These provisions of ERISA are similar, but not identical, to the federal healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute discussed above. In particular, ERISA does not provide the statutory and regulatory safe harbor exceptions incorporated into the federal healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute. Like the health care anti-kickback laws, the corresponding provisions of ERISA are written broadly and their application to particular cases is often uncertain. The Company has implemented policies regarding, among other things, disclosure to health plan sponsors with respect to any commissions paid by or to it that might fall within the scope of such provisions and accordingly beli eve it is in substantial compliance with any applicable provisions of ERISA. However, the Company can provide no assurance that its policies in this regard would be found by the appropriate enforcement authorities and potential private litigants to meet the requirements of ERISA.
FDA Regulation.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) generally has authority to regulate drug promotional materials that are disseminated by or on behalf of a drug manufacturer. In January 1998, the FDA issued a Notice and Draft Guidance regarding its intent to regulate certain
11
drug promotion and switching activities of PBMs that are controlled, directly or indirectly, by drug manufacturers. After extending the comment period due to numerous industry objections to the proposed draft, the FDA has taken no further action on the Notice and Draft Guidance. However, there can be no assurance that the FDA will not attempt again to assert jurisdiction over aspects of the Company’s PBM business in the future and, although it is not controlled directly or indirectly by any drug manufacturer, the future impact of the FDA regulation could materially adversely a ffect the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Antitrust Regulation.
The federal antitrust laws regulate trade and commerce and prohibit unfair competition as defined by those laws. Section One of the Sherman Antitrust Act prohibits contracts, combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce. Despite its sweeping language, however, Section One of the Sherman Act has been interpreted to prohibit only unreasonable restraints on competition. Section Two of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization and attempts at monopolization. Similarly, Section Seven of the Clayton Act prohibi ts unlawful mergers and acquisitions. In addition, the Robinson Patman Act, which is part of the Clayton Act, prohibits a variety of conduct relating to the sale of goods, including prohibiting practices the statute defines as price discrimination. One section of the Robinson Patman Act prohibits a seller from selling goods of like grade or quality to different customers at different prices if the favorable prices are not available to all customers competing in the same class of trade. Successful plaintiffs in antitrust actions are allowed to recover treble damages for the damage sustained as a result of the violation.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against PBMs and pharmaceutical manufacturers under various state and federal antitrust laws by retail pharmacies throughout the United States challenging certain branded drug pri cing practices. The complaints allege, in part, that the defendant PBMs accepted rebates and discounts from pharmaceutical manufacturers on purchases of brand-name prescription drugs and conspired with other PBMs to fix prices in violation of the Robinson Patman Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act. The suits seek unspecified monetary damages, including treble damages, and injunctive relief.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with the legal requirements imposed by such antitrust laws. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject to scrutiny or challenge under such legislation. To the extent that it appears to have actual or potential market power in a relevant market, the Company’s business arrangements and practices may be subject to heightened scrutiny under the antitrust la ws. Any such challenge could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
State Laws and Regulations Affecting the PBM Industry
The following descriptions identify various state laws and regulations that affect or may affect aspects of the Company’s PBM business:
State Anti-Remuneration/False Claims Laws.
Several states have laws and/or regulations similar to the federal healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute and Federal False Claims Act described above, while several others are currently considering passing or strengthening false claims laws. Such state laws are not necessarily limited to services or items for which government-funded health care program payments may be made. Such state laws may be broad enough to include improper payments made in connection with services or items that are paid by commercial payors. Sanctions for violating these state anti-remuneration and false claims laws may include injunction, imprisonment, criminal and civil fines and exclusion from participation in the state Medicaid programs. Additionally, under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, discussed in greater detail below, states are incentivized to pass broad false claims legislation similar to the Federal False Claims Act and there has been activ ity in several states during the past several years to do so.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with the legal requirements imposed by such laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject to scrutiny or challenge under such laws or regulations. Any such challenge could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
State Consumer Protection Laws.
Most states have enacted consumer protection and deceptive trade laws that generally prohibit payments and other broad categories of conduct deemed harmful to consumers. These statutes may be enforced by states and/or private litigants. Such laws have been and continue to be the basis for investigations, prosecutions, and settlements of PBMs, initiated by state prosecutors as well as by private litigants.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with the legal requirements imposed by such laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject to scrutiny or challenge under one or more of these laws, or under similar consumer protection theories.
State Comprehensive PBM Regulation.
Legislation directly regulating PBM activities in a comprehensive manner has been introduced in a number of states. In addition, legislation has been proposed in some states seeking to impose fiduciary obligations or disclosure requirements on PBMs. If enacted in a state in a form that is applicable to the operations it conducts there, this type of legislation could materially adversely impact the Company. Maine and the District of Columbia have each enacted a statute imposing fiduciary and disclosure obligations on PBMs. Similarly, both North Dakota and South Dakota have relatively comprehensive PBM laws that, among other things, increase financial transparency and regula te therapeutic interchange programs.
Many states have licensure or registration laws governing certain types of ancillary health care organizations, including preferred provider organizations, TPAs, companies that provide utilization review services and companies that engage in the practices of a pharmacy. The scope of these laws differs significantly from state to state, and the application of such laws to the activities of PBMs often is unclear.
In addition, certain quasi-regulatory organizations, including the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy and the National
12
Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) have issued model regulations or may propose future regulations concerning PBMs and/or PBM activities, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (“NCQA”), the Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (“URAC”), or other credentialing organizations may provide voluntary standards regarding PBM activities. In 2007, for example, URAC finalized PBM accreditation standards for PBMs serving the commercially insured market. While the actions of these quasi-regulatory organizations do not have the fo rce of law, they may influence states to adopt their requirements or recommendations and influence customer requirements for PBM services. Moreover, any standards established by these organizations could also impact the Company’s health plan customers and/or the services it provides to them.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with all such laws and requirements where required, and continue to monitor legislative and regulatory developments. In 2009, the Company was awarded full PBM accreditation from URAC. There can be no assurance, however, regarding the future interpretation of these laws and their applicability to the activities of the Company’s PBM business. Future legislation or regulation, or interpretations by regulatory and quasi-regulatory authorities of existing laws and regulations, could materially affect the cost and nature of the Company’s business as currently conducted.
Network Access Legislation.
A majority of states now have some form of legislation affecting the Company’s ability to limit access to a pharmacy provider network, referred to as any willing provider legislation, or removal of a network provider, referred to as due process legislation. Such legislation may require the Company or its clients to admit any retail pharmacy willing to meet the plan’s price and other terms for network participation, or may provide that a provider may not be removed from a network except in compliance with certain proce dures. Similarly, there are any willing pharmacy provisions applicable to Medicare Part D plans. These statutes have not materially affected the Company’s business.
State Legislation Affecting Plan or Benefit Design.
Some states have enacted legislation that prohibits certain types of managed care plan sponsors from implementing certain restrictive design features, and many states have legislation regulating various aspects of managed care plans, including provisions relating to the pharmacy benefits. For example, some states, under so-called freedom of choice legislation, provide that members of the plan may not be required to use network prov iders, but must instead be provided with benefits even if they choose to use non-network providers. Other states have enacted legislation purporting to prohibit health plans from offering members financial incentives for use of mail service pharmacies. Legislation has been introduced in some states to prohibit or restrict therapeutic intervention, to require coverage of all FDA-approved drugs or to require coverage for off-label uses of drugs where those uses are recognized in peer-reviewed medical journals or reference compendia. Other states mandate coverage of certain benefits or conditions and require health plan coverage of specific drugs, if deemed medically necessary by the prescribing physician. Such legislation does not generally apply to the Company directly, but may apply to certain of its clients, such as HMOs and health insurers. If legislation were to become widely adopted, it could have the effect of limiting the economic benefits achievable through PBMs. This development could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
State Regulation of Financial Risk Plans.
Fee-for-service prescription drug plans are generally not subject to financial regulation by the states. However, if a PBM offers to provide prescription drug coverage on a capitated basis or otherwise accepts material financial risk in providing the benefit, laws in various states may regulate the plan. Such laws may require that the party at risk establish reserves or otherwise demonstrate financial responsibility. Laws that may apply in such cases include insurance laws, HMO laws or limited prepaid health service plan laws. Currently, the Company does not believe that its PBM business incurs financial risk of the type subject to such regulation. However, if it chooses to become a regional PDP for the Medicare outpatient prescription drug benefit at some time in the future, the Company would need to comply with state laws governing risk-bearing entities in the states where it operates a PDP.
State Discount Drug Card Regulation.
Numerous states have laws and/or regulations regulating the selling, marketing, promoting, advertising or distributing of commercial discount drug cards for cash purchases. Such laws and regulations provide, generally , that any person may bring an action for damages or seek an injunction for violations. The Company administers a limited commercial discount drug card program that it does not consider material to its business. The Company believes its administration of the commercial discount drug card program is in compliance with various state laws. However, there can be no assurance that the existence of such laws will not materially impact the Company’s ability to offer certain new commercial products and/or services in the future.
Combined Federal and State Laws, Regulations and Other Standards Affecting the PBM Industry
Certain aspects of th e Company’s PBM business are or may be affected by bodies of law that exist at both the federal and state levels and by other standard setting entities. Among these are the following:
Pharmacy Licensure and Regulation.
The Company is subject to state and federal statutes and regulations governing the operation of mail service and specialty pharmacies and the dispensing of controlled substances. The Company’s pharmacies deliver prescription drugs and supplies to individuals in all 50 states. The practice of pharmacy is generally regulated at the state level by state boards of pharmacy. Each of the Company’s pharmacies must be license d in the state in which it is located. Also, many of the states where the Company delivers pharmaceuticals, including controlled substances, have laws and regulations that require out-of-state mail service pharmacies to register with that state’s board of pharmacy or similar regulatory body. Federal statutes and regulations govern the labeling, packaging, advertising and adulteration of prescription drugs and the dispensing of controlled substances. Federal controlled substance laws require the Company to register its pharmacies with the United States Drug Enforcement Administration and to comply with security, record keeping, inventory control and labeling standards in order to dispense controlled substances.
13
The Company is also subject to certain federal and state laws affecting on-line pharmacies because it dispenses prescription drugs pursuant to refill orders received through its Internet websites, among other methods. Several states have proposed new laws to regulate on-line pharmacies, and federal regulation of on-line pharmacies by the FDA or another federal agency has also been proposed. Other statutes and regulations may affect our mail service operations. For example, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) requires mail service sellers of goods generally to engage in truthful advertising, to stock a reasonable supply of the products to be sold, to fill mail service orders within thirty days and to provide clients with refunds when appropriate. In addition, the United States Postal Se rvice has statutory authority to restrict the transmission of drugs and medicines through the mail. The Company’s pharmacists are subject to state regulation of the profession of pharmacy and employees engaged in a professional practice must satisfy applicable state licensing requirements.
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.
The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”) came into law on February 8, 2006 enacting significant changes to the Medicaid system, a state and federally funded program, with respect to prescription drugs. Among other things, the DRA revises the methodology used to determine federal upper payment limits, the maximum amo unt a state can reimburse for generic drugs under Medicaid, permits stronger cost-sharing requirements applicable to Medicaid prescription drugs, and contains provisions intended to reduce fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicaid program. The DRA’s fraud, waste and abuse provisions, among other things, incentivize states to enact their own false claims acts, mirrored on the Federal False Claims Act, described above, and appropriate federal funding to increase scrutiny of the Medicaid program. The fraud, waste and abuse provisions also include a provision intended to strengthen Medicaid’s status as payor of last resort relative to private health insurance by specifying that PBMs and self-insured plans may be liable third parties. The provisions in the DRA have the potential to impact the PBM industry by means of increased prosecutorial and private litigant scrutiny of the pharmaceutical industry in general, which may include PBMs. Additionally, the DRA mandates the public availability of pharmaceuti cal manufacturer average manufacturer prices (“AMPs”) and creates incentives to states to use AMPs for Medicaid reimbursement, potentially paving the way for a more general market shift in reimbursement mechanisms from AWP-based methodologies to AMP-based methodologies, discussed in more detail above, under “Legislation and Litigation Affecting Drug Prices.” Additionally, the third party recovery provisions in the DRA may lead to greater financial recoveries from third party PBMs in cases where Medicaid was not properly a primary payor on a drug claim, even where a PBM is not financially at risk.
Privacy and Confidentiality Legislation.
747,453 Gross profit 186,600 115,486 Product development costs 11,951 10,105 SG&A 85,797 68,792 Depreciation of property and equipment 5,811 4,810 Amortization of intangible assets 9,724 9,365 Operating income 73,317 22,414 Interest income (756 ) (2,749 ) Interest expense and other expense, net 5,988 4,859 Income before income taxes 68,085 20,304 Income tax expense 22,024 5,191 Net income $ 46,061 $ 15,113 Diluted earnings per share $ 0.86 $ 0.32
The Company’s activities involve the receipt, use and disclosure of confidential health information, including disclosure of the confidential information to a participant’s health benefit plan, as permitted in accordance with applicable federal and state privacy laws. In addition, the Company uses and discloses de-identified data for analytical and other purposes. Many state laws restrict the use and disclosure of confidential medical information, and similar new legislative and regulatory initiatives are underway in several states. To date, no such laws adversely impact the Company’s ability to provide its services, but there can be no assurance that federal or state governments will not enact such legislation, impose restrictions or adopt interpretations of existing laws that could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the regulations issued thereunder (collectively “HIPAA”) impose extensive requirements on the way in which health plans, healthcare providers, healthcare clearinghouses (known as “covered entities”) and their business associates use, disclose and safeguard protected health information (“PHI”), including requirements to protect the integrity, availability and confidentiality of electronic PHI. Many of these obligations were expanded under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinic Health Act (the “HITECH Act”), passed as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
The final privacy regulations (“Privacy Rule”) issued by the DHHS pursuant to HIPAA, gives individuals the right to know how their PHI is used and disclosed, as well as the right to access, amend and obtain information concerning certain disclosures of PHI. Covered entities, such as pharmacies and health plans, are required to provide a written Notice of Privacy Practices to individuals that describes how the entity uses and discloses PHI, and how individuals may exercise their rights with respect to their PHI. For most uses and disclosures of PHI other than for treatment, payment, healthcare operations or certain public policy purposes, HIPAA generally requires that covered entities obtain a valid written individual authorization. In most cases, use or disclosure of PHI must be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose of the use or disclosure.
We receive fees from our clients for administering a rebate program with pharmaceutical manufacturers based on the use of selected drugs by members of health plans sponsored by our clients, as well as fees for other programs and services. We believe our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could suffer if:
$ — $ — Total stockholders’ equity $ 553,256 $ 458,494 $ 194,163 $ 132,457 $ 111,490
The Company is itself a covered entity under HIPAA in connection with its operation of a mail service pharmacy and a specialty service pharmacy. In connection with its other PBM activities, the Company is not considered a covered entity. However, the Company’s health plan clients and pharmacy customers are covered entities, and are required to enter into business associate agreements with vendors, such as PBMs, that perform a function or activity for the covered entity that involves the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information. The business associate agreements mandated by the Privacy Rule create a contractual obligation for the PBM to perform its duties for the covered entity in compliance with the Privacy Rule, and as of February 17, 2010, also create a statutory obligation for the PBM to satisfy cer tain aspects of the Privacy Rule and the final HIPAA security regulations. Criminal penalties and civil sanctions may be imposed for failing to comply with HIPAA standards, and these penalties and sanctions have significantly increased under the HITECH Act.
The final transactions and code sets regulation (the “Transaction Rule”) promulgated under HIPAA requires that all covered entities that engage in electronic transactions use standardized formats and code sets. It is incumbent upon PBMs to conduct all such transactions in accordance with the Transaction Rule to satisfy the obligations of their covered entity clients. DHHS promulgated a National Provider Identifiers (“NPI”) Final Rule which requires health plans to utilize NPIs in all Standard Transactions. NPIs replaced National Association of Boards o f Pharmacy numbers for pharmacies, Drug Enforcement Agency numbers for physicians and similar identifiers for other health care providers. The Company has undertaken the necessary arrangements to ensure that its standard transactions remain compliant with the Transaction Rule subsequent to the implementation of NPI Final Rule.
The final security regulations (the “Security Rule”) issued pursuant to HIPAA mandate the use of administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect the confidentiality of electronic health care information. Similarly to the other two rules issued pursuant to HIPAA, the
14
Security Rule applies to covered entities. As of February 17, 2010, aspects of the Security Rule will also apply to business associates. The Company has made the necessary arrangements to ensure compliance with the Security Rule for all aspects of its business.
The Company must also comply with the recently promulgated “breach notification” regulations, which implement provisions of the HITECH Act. Under these regulations, covered entities must promptly notify affected individuals in the case of a breach of “unsecured PHI,” as well as the HHS Secretary and the media in cases where a breach affects more than 500 individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals must be reported to the HHS Secretary on an annual basis. The regulations also require business associates of covered entities to notify the covered entity of breaches at or by the business associate. The Company is taking reasonable steps to reduce the amount of unsecured PHI it handles.
The PPACA created new health information technology standards that could require changes to the Company's existing software products. For example, the statute requires the establishment of standards and protocols to allow for the interoperability of federal and state health program enrollment systems and provides the government with authority to require those changes as a condition of receiving federal health i nformation technology funds.
While new and future regulatory interpretations could alter the Company’s assessment of its efforts to comply with HIPAA, the HITECH Act, PPACA and implementing regulations and guidance, the Company currently believes that compliance with these legal authorities should not have a material adverse effect on its business operations.
Pursuant to HIPAA, state laws that are more protective of medical information are not pre-empted by HIPAA. Therefore, to the extent states continue to enact more protective legislation, the Company could be required to make significant changes to its business operations.
Independent of any regulatory restrictions, individual health plan sponsor clients could increase limitations on the Company’s use of medical information, which could prevent it from offering certain services.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
On March 23, 2010, the President of the United States signed into law the most comprehensive change to America's healthcare system in decades. The PPACA contains a variety of provisions that could have a sig nificant impact on the Company and its customers. The PPACA provides the opportunity for significant expansion of the Company's PBM and health information technology activities. These potential benefits are the result of an expected increase in the number of individuals with health insurance and the potential increase in demand for pharmaceutical products and health information technology services.
However, the PPACA also presents great uncertainty for the Company and potential risks to its operations and financial success. The PPACA contains many provisions intended to reduce the government's healthcare costs through reimbursement reductions, alternative payment methods, and ongoing studies of healthcare reimbursement systems. For example, the PPACA establishes the Independent Payment Advisory Board (“IPAB”), which is designed to make prop osals as early as 2014 to reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending in years when that growth exceeds established targets. Another potential source of reimbursement uncertainty is the newly established Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (“CMMI”), which is designed to test the cost-cutting efficacy of innovative payment service delivery systems through demonstration projects. These types of provisions could have a significant impact on the profitability of the Company and its customers, particularly because of the unpredictability of the proposals that could be generated by the IPAB and the CMMI.
The PPACA also requires PBMs to disclose certain information, including discounts and rebates obtained from pharmaceutical manufacturers, to Part D or MA-PD plan sponsors or qualified health benefits plans available via an e xchange. In addition, the PPACA changes the calculation of Medicaid rebates in a way that could increase or decrease pharmaceutical manufacturers' incentive to provide discounts and rebates to PBMs. These changes could have a negative impact on the Company's revenues or business model. Additionally, the PPACA expands existing fraud and abuse provisions and significantly increases the resources available to the federal government to pursue fraud and abuse issues, which could expose the Company to greater scrutiny and possibly significant financial liability. For example, the PPACA extends the treble damages available for violations of the federal False Claims Act to violations relating to the state-based health insurance exchanges created by PPACA. Moreover, new civil monetary penalties ($15,000 daily for failure to grant timely access and $50,000 for knowing violations) are established for false statements or obstructing inspections or audits by the Department of Health and Human Service's Office of Inspecto r General. The result is that the Company could be forced to expend greater resources on monitoring and compliance programs and legal fees. Similarly, the Company's customers could face greater scrutiny and financial liability, which could indirectly put pressure on the Company's financial relationships with those customers.
Aside from particular provisions of the PPACA, there is significant uncertainty about the implementation of PPACA, likely through hundreds of new regulations, guidance documents, and other policy statements that could result in significant changes to the Company's business model and the healthcare economy as a whole.
Political developments also continue to contribute to the u ncertainty surrounding implementation of the PPACA. The November 2010 congressional elections resulted in a US Congress divided between Republican control of the House of Representatives and Democratic control of the Senate. This split may affect the timing, manner, and predictability of the PPACA's regulatory implementation, because the Republican majority in the House has largely supported repealing or defunding the PPACA. Democrats have largely resisted repeal of PPACA and changes to its implementation. The resulting unpredictability of the timing and manner of PPACA's implementation creates significant uncertainty for the Company and its customers about the structure and regulatory environment of the healthcare market and future revenue sources. Additionally, these uncertainties have been enhanced by a series of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the PPACA and calling into question key aspects of the statute such as the individual mandate to carry health insurance. Questions about the constitu tionality of the statute are unlikely to be resolved in the near term, and many legal scholars believe the question will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The outcome of this legal question presents potentially significant consequences for the Company and its customers, particularly in terms of future financial projections and the healthcare regulatory environment.
15
Future Regulation.
The Company is unable to predict accurately what additional federal or state legislation or regulatory initiatives may be enacted in the future relating to its businesses or the health care industry in general, or what effect any such legislation or regulations might have on it. For example, the federal government and several state governments have considered the Patients’ Bill of Rights and other similar legislation aimed primarily at improving quality of care provided to individuals in managed care plans. Some of the initiatives would provide greater access to drugs not included on health plan formularies, giving participants the right to sue their health plan for malpractice, and mandating an appeals or grievance process. There can be no assurance that federal or state governments will not impose additional restrictions, via a Patients’ Bill of Rights or otherwise, or adopt interpretations of exi sting laws that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 1,216 employees, primarily located in Lisle, Illinois, and Scottsdale, Arizona, who se services are devoted full time to SXC and its subsidiaries. The Company has never had a work stoppage. The Company’s personnel are not represented by any collective bargaining unit and are not unionized. The Company considers its relations with its personnel to be good. The Company’s future success will depend, in part, on its ability to continue to attract, retain, and motivate highly qualified technical and managerial personnel, for whom competition is intense.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS
The Company operates in two reportable operating segments, PBM and HCIT, which provide both recurring and non-recurring revenues from the PBM industry. Financial information about the Company’s two segments is described in Note 14 to Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CUSTOMERS
The Company generates a significant portion of its revenue from a small number of customers and for the year ended December 31, 2010, MedMetrics Health Partners, Inc. accounted for 10.5% of total revenue. The loss of, or substantial changes in the services provided to, these significant customers, or the loss of other customers that could be significant in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
INDUSTRY RISKS
Our future growth is dependent on further market acceptance and increased market penetration of our products.
Our business model depends on our ability to sell our products and services. Achieving increased market acceptance of our products and services will require substantial sales and marketing efforts and the expenditure of significant financial and other resources to create awareness and demand by participants in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Additionally, payors, which may have invested substantial resources in other methods of conducting business and exchanging information, may be reluctant to purchase our products and services.
We cannot be assured that payors will purchase our products and services. If we fail to achieve broad acceptance of our products and services by payors, and other healthcare industry participants, or if we fail to position our services as a preferred method for information management and pharmaceutical healthcare delivery, our business, financial condition, and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.
The electronic healthcare information market is rapidly evolving. A number of market entrants have introduced or developed products and services that are competitive with one or more components of our offerings. We expect that additional companies will continue to enter this market. In new and rapidly evolvin g industries, there is significant uncertainty and risk as to the demand for, and market acceptance of, products and services. Because the markets for our products and services are evolving, we are not able to predict the size and growth rate of the markets with any certainty. We cannot be assured that the markets for our products and services will continue to grow or, if they do, that they will be strong and continue to grow at a sufficient pace. If markets fail to grow, grow more slowly than expected or become saturated with competitors, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Competition in our industry is intense and could reduce or eliminate our profitability.
The PBM industry is very competitive. If we do not compete effectively, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could suffer. The industry is highly consolidated and dominated by a few large companies with significant resources, purchasing power, and other competitive advantages, which we do not have. A limited number of firms, including national PBM companies such as Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc., and CVS Caremark Corporation have significant market share of the prescription volume. Our competitors also include drug retailers, physician practice management companies, and insurance companies/health maintenance organizations. We may also experience competition from other sources in the future. PBM companies compete primarily on the basis of price, service, reporting capabilities and clinical services. In most cases, our competitors are large, profitable, and well-establ ished companies with substantially greater financial and marketing resources than our resources.
Consolidation in the healthcare industry could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Many healthcare industry participants are consolidating to create integrated healthcare delivery systems with greater market power. As provider networks and managed care organizations consolidate, thereby decreasing the number of market participants, competition to provide products, and services like ours will become more intense, and the importance of establishing relationships with key industry participants will
16
become greater. In the past we have lost customers as a result of industry consolidation. In addition, industry participants may try to use their market power to negotiate price reductions for our products and services. Further, consolidation of management and billing services through integrated delivery systems may decrease demand for our products. If we are forced to reduce prices as a result of either an imbalance of market power or decreased demand for our products, revenue would be reduced and we could become significantly less profitable.
Future changes in laws or regulations in the healthcare industry could adversely affect our business.
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to changing political, economic, and regulatory influences. For example, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law 105-32) contained significant changes to Medicare and Medicaid and had an impact for several years on healthcare providers’ ability to invest in capital intensive systems. In addition, HIPAA and Canadian privacy statutes directly impact the healthcare industry by requiring various security and privacy measures in ord er to ensure the protection of patient health information. More recently, increased government involvement in healthcare, such as the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (which introduced the Medicare Part D benefit effective January 1, 2006), the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (“MIPPA”), the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the PPACA and other U.S. initiatives at both the federal and state level could lower reimbursement rates and otherwise change the business environment of our customers and the other entities with which we have a business relationship. Further, existing laws and regulations are subject to changing interpretation by courts, regulatory agencies, and agency officials. PBMs have also increasingly become the target of f ederal and state litigation over practices relating to drug switching, handling of rebates, and fiduciary duties.
These factors affect PBMs directly, as well as impacting the purchasing practices and operation of healthcare organizations. The PPACA contains programs to reform or amend the U.S. healthcare system and to change healthcare financing and reimbursement systems. These reforms are expected to increase the number of individuals who have health insurance coverage and expand the market for pharmaceutical products. However, healthcare industry participants may also respond by reducing their investments or postponing investment decisions, including investments in our product offerings. Moreover, the manner and timing of implementation and portions of the law's constitutionality remain uncertain.The healthcare industry is expected to continue to undergo significant changes for the foreseeable future, and we cannot predict the effect of possible future legislation and regulation on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
BUSINESS RISKS
Demands by our customers for enhanced service levels or possible loss or unfavorable modification of contracts with our customers could negatively affect our profitability.
As our customers face the continued rapid growth in prescription drug costs, they may demand additional services and enhanced service levels to help mitigate the increase in spending. Additionally, increasing downward pressure of federal and state reimbursements for pharmaceuticals and other medical services may cause our customers to demand lower fees. We operate in a very competitive environment, and as a result, may not be able to increase our fees to compensate for these increased services which could negatively affect our profitability.
Due to the term of our contracts with customers, if we are unable to renew those contracts at the same s ervice levels previously provided, or at all, or replace any lost customers, our future business and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our contracts with customers generally do not have terms longer than three years and, in some cases, are terminable by the customer on relatively short notice. Our larger customers generally seek bids from other PBM providers in advance of the expiration of their contracts. In addition, we believe the managed care industry is undergoing substantial consolidation, and another party that is not our customer could acquire some of our managed care customers. In such a case, the likelihood such customer would renew its PBM contract with us could be reduced, and the likelihood of a reduction in services would increase.
We are dependent on key customers.
We generate a significant portion of our revenue from a small number of customers. One of our customers accounted for 10.5% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010. If our existing customers elect not to renew their contracts with us at the expiry of the current terms of those contracts, or reduce the level of service offerings the Company provides, our recurring revenue base will be reduced, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, we sell most of our computer software and services to PBM organizations, Blue Cross/Blue Shield organizations, managed care organizations and retail/mail-order pharmacy chains. If the healthcare benefits industry or our customers in the healthcare benefits industry experience problems, they may curtail spending on our products and services and our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected. For example, we may suffer a loss of customers if there is any significant consolidation among firms in the healthcare benefits industry or other participants in the pharmaceutical supply chain or if demand for pharmaceutical claims processing services should decline.
Many of our clients put their contracts out for competitive bidding prior to expiration. Competitive bidding requires costly and time-consuming efforts on our behalf and, even after we have won such bidding processes, we can incur significant expense in proceedings or litigation contesting the adequacy or fairness of these bidding processes. We could lose clients if they cancel their agreements with us, if we fail to win a competitive bid at the time of contract renewal, if the financial condition of any of our clients deteriorates or if our clients are acquired by, or acquire, companies with which we do not have contracts. Over the past several years, self-funded employers, third party administrators and other managed care companies have experienced significant consolidation. Consolidations by their very nature reduce the number of clients who may need our services. A client involved in a merger or acquisition by a company that is not a client of ours may not renew, and in some instances may terminate, its contract with us. Our clients have been and may continue to be, subject to consolidation pressure.
Our business strategy of expansion through acquisitions may result in unexpected integration costs and challenges, loss of acquired business and/or dilution to existing shareholders.
We look to the acquisition of other businesses, such as the acquisitions of NMHC and MedfusionRx, as a way to achieve our strategy
17
of expanding our product offerings and customer base. The successful implementation of this acquisition strategy depends on our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, acquire companies on acceptable terms, integrate the acquired company’s operations and technology successfully with our own, and maintain the goodwill of the acquired business. We are unable to predict whether or when we will be able to identify any suitable additional acquisition candidates or, the likelihood that any potential acquisition will be completed. It is also possible that a potential acquisition will be dilutive to existing shareholders. In addition, while we belie ve we have the experience and know-how to integrate acquisitions, such efforts entail significant risks including, but not limited to:
| • | a diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; |
| &bull ; | failure to successfully integrate the operations, services, products and personnel of an acquired company; |
| • | failure to realize expected synergies from an acquired company; |
| • | possible inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies among the companies being combined or assimilated, which would make it more difficult to implement and harmonize company-wide financial, accounting, billing, information technology and other systems; |
| • | possible difficulties maintaining the quality of products and services that acquired companies have historically provided; |
| • | required amortization of the identifiable intangible assets of an acquired business, which will reduce our net income in the years following its acquisition, and we also would be required to reduce our net income in future years if we were to experience an impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets attributable to an acquisition; |
| • | the potential loss of key employees or customers from either our current business or the business of the acquired company; |
| • | coordinating businesses located in different geographic regions; and |
| • | the assumption of significant and/or unknown liabilities of the acquired company. |
Our future success depends upon the ability to grow, and if we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may incur unexpected expenses and be u nable to meet our customers’ requirements.
An important part of our business strategy is to expand the scope of our operations, both organically and through acquisitions. We cannot be certain that our systems, procedures, controls, and space will be adequate to support expansion of our operations, and we may be unable to expand and upgrade our systems and infrastructure to accommodate any future growth. Growth in operations will place significant demands on our management, financial and other resources. Our future operating results will depend on the ability of our management and key employees to successfully manage changing business conditions and to implement and improve our technical, administrative, financial control and reporting systems. Our inability to finance future growth, manage future expansion or hire and reta in the personnel needed to manage our business successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in the industry pricing benchmarks could adversely affect our financial performance.
Contracts in the prescription drug industry, including our contracts with our retail network pharmacies and with our PBM customers, have traditionally used certain published benchmarks to establish pricing for prescription drugs. These benchmarks include Average Wholesale Price (“AWP”), Average Sales Price (“ASP”), Average Manufacturer Price, Wholesale Acquisition C ost, and Direct Price. Most of our contracts with pharmacies and customers historically utilized the AWP standard. In March 2009, class action litigation settlements with the two primary entities that publish AWP, First DataBank (“FDB”) and Medi-Span, have raised uncertainties as to whether payors, pharmacy providers, PBMs and others in the prescription drug industry will continue to utilize AWP as it has previously been calculated or whether other pricing benchmarks will be adopted for establishing prices within the industry.
In March 2009, a federal district court gave final approval to settlements of class action lawsuits brought against FDB and Medi-Span, two primary sources of AWP price reporting. Under the terms of the settlements, FDB and Medi-Span have agreed, among other things to reduce the reported AWP of certain drugs by four percent, and FDB and Medi-Span also announced that they would discontinue publishing AWP within two years of the settlements. On September 3, 2009, a federal appeals court rejected challenges to the settlements, clearing the way for the AWP reductions to take effect on September 26, 2009. In response to this action, the Company, as authorized in most of the Company’s standard customer contracts, adopted a revised pricing benchmark to ensure cost neutrality for the Company, its customers and pharmacies as to what they paid or received, as applicable, for prescription drug products using the AWP pricing benchmark before September 26, 2009 and what they would pay or receive on or after September 26, 2009. While that transition has been accomplished to date with no material adverse effect on the Company, there can be no assurances that customers and pharmacies in reviewing the results of the transition may not challenge the way in which the transition occurred and/ or whether it preserved cost neutrality as intended, or that the results of such challenges will not have a material adverse effect on our financial performance, results of operations and financial condition in future periods.
Further, changes in the reporting of any applicable pricing benchmarks, including the expected introduction of a new pricing benchmark in place of AWP by FDB and Medi-Span, or in the basis for calculating reimbursements proposed by the federal government and certain states, and other legislative or regulatory adjustments that may be made regarding the reimbursement of payments for drugs by Medicaid and Medicare, could impact our pricing to customers and other payors and could impact our ability to negotiate discounts with manufacturers, wholesalers, or retail pharmacies. In some circumstances, such changes could also impact the reimbursement that we receive in our mail order and specialty pharmacies or that we receive from Medicare or Medicaid programs for drugs covered by such programs and from managed care organizations that contract with government health programs to provide prescription drug benefits. In addition, it is possible that payors and pharmacy providers will disagree with the use or application of the changes we have put in place or begin to evaluate other pricing benchmarks as the basis for contracting for prescription drugs and PBM services in the future, and the effect of this development on our business cannot be predicted at this time. Due to these and other uncertainties, we can give no assurance that the short or long-term impact of changes to industry pricing benchmarks
18
will not have a material adverse effect on our financial performance, results of operations and financial condition in future periods.
If we lose relationships with one or more key pharmaceutical manufacturers or if rebate payments we receive from pharmaceutical manufacturers and rebate processing service providers decline, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be negatively impacted.
| • | we lose relationships with one or more key pharmaceutical manufacturers; |
| • | we are unable to finalize rebate contracts with one or more key pharmaceutical manufacturers in the future, or are unable to negotiate interim arrangements; |
| • | rebates decline due to the failure of our health plan sponsors to meet market share or other thresholds; |
| • | legal restrictions are imposed on the ability of pharmaceutical manufacturers to offer rebates or purchase our programs or services; |
| • | pharmaceutical manufactures choose not to offer rebates or purchase our programs or services; or |
| • | rebates decline due to contract branded products losing their patents. |
Over the next few years, as patents expire covering many brand name drugs that currently have substantial market share, generic products will be introduced that may substantially reduce the market share of these brand name drugs. Historically, manufacturers of generic drugs have not offered formulary rebates on their drugs. Our profitability could be adversely affected if the use of newly approved, brand name drugs added to formularies, does not offset any decline in use of brand name drugs whose patents expire.
Government efforts to reduce health care costs and alter health care financing practices could lead to a decreased demand for our services or to reduced rebates from manufacturers.
The PPACA and other proposals considered by Congress related to health care, could impact PBMs directly (e.g. requiring disclosure of information about pricing and product switches), or indirectly (e.g. modifying reimbursement rates for pharmaceutical manufacturers participating in government programs). The PPACA and other health care related proposals may increase government involvement in healthcare and regulation of PBM, pharmacy services and managed care plans, or otherwise change the way we do business. Some of these initiatives would, among other things, require that health plan members have greater access to drugs not included on a plan's formulary and give health plan members the right to sue their health plans for malpractice when they have been denied care. Health plan sponsors may react to the PPACA or other health care related proposals and the uncertainty surrounding them by cutting back or d elaying the purchase of our PBM services, and manufacturers may react by reducing rebates or reducing supplies of certain products. These proposals could lead to a decreased demand for our services or to reduced rebates from manufacturers. We cannot predict what effect, if any, these proposals may have on our businesses. Other legislative or market-driven changes in the healthcare system that we cannot anticipate could also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Prescription volumes may decline, and our net revenues and profitability may be negatively impacted, if the safety risk profiles of drugs increase or if drugs are withdrawn from the market, including as a result of manufacturing issues, or if prescription drugs transition to over-the-counter products.
We dispense significant volumes of brand-name and generic drugs from our mail-order pharmacies and through networks of retail pharmacies. When increased safety risk profiles or manufacturing issues of specific drugs or classes of drugs result in utilization decreases, physicians may cease writing or otherwise reduce the numbers of prescriptions for these drugs. Additionally, negative press regarding drugs with higher safety risk profiles may result in reduced global consumer demand for such drugs. On occasion, products are withdrawn by their manufacturers or transition to over-the-counter products. In cases where there are no acceptable prescription drug equivalents or alternatives for these prescription drugs, our volumes, net revenues, profitability and cash flows may decline.
If we are unable to compete successfully, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.
The market for our products and services is fragmented, intensely competitive and is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and user needs and the frequent introduction of new products and services. We compete on the basis of several factors, including: breadth and depth of services; reputation; reliability, accuracy and security of our software programs; ability to enhance existing products and services; ability to introduce and gain market acceptance of new products and services quickly and in a cost-effective manner; customer service; price and cost-saving measures; and industry expertise and experience.
Some of our competitors are more established, benefit from greater name recognition and have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us. Furthermore, we expect that competition will continue to increase as a result of consolidation in both the information technology and healthcare industries. If our competitors or potential competitors were to merge or partner with one another, the change in the competitive landscape could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively.
In addition, the HCIT market is c haracterized by rapid technological change and increasingly sophisticated and varied customer needs. To successfully compete in this market, we must continue to enhance our existing products and services, anticipate and develop new technology that addresses the needs of our existing and prospective customers and keep pace with changing industry standards on a timely and cost-effective basis. The development of our proprietary technology entails significant technical and business risks, and we may not be successful in using new technologies effectively or in adapting our proprietary technology to evolving customer requirements or industry practice. Moreover,
19
competitors may develop products that are more efficient, less costly, or otherwise better received by the market than us. We cannot be assured that we will be able to introduce new products in a timely manner, or at all, or that such products will achieve market acceptance.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that the competitive pressures that we face will not materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our software products are susceptible to undetected errors or similar problems, which may cause our systems to fail to perform properly.
Complex software such as ours often contains defects or errors that are difficult to detect, even through testing, and despite testing by us, our existing and future software products may contain errors. We strive to regularly introduce new solutions and enhancements to our products and services. If we detect any errors before introducing a product, we may have to delay commercial release for an extended period of time while the problem is addressed and in some cases may lose sales as a result of the delay. If we do not discover software errors that affect our products until after they are sold and become operational, we would need to provide enhancements to correct such errors, which would result in unexpected additional expense and diversion of resources to remedy such errors.
Any errors in our software or enhancements, regardless of whether or when they are detected or remedied, may result in harm to our reputation, product liability claims, license terminations or renegotiations, or delays in, or loss of, market acceptance of our product offerings.
Furthermore, our customers might use our software together with products from other companies. As a result, when problems occur, it might be difficult to identify the source of the problem. Even when our software does not directly cause these problems , the existence of these errors might cause us to incur significant costs, divert the attention of our technical personnel from development efforts, impact our reputation or cause significant customer relations problems.
We may be liable for the consequences of the use of incorrect or incomplete data that we provide.
We provide data, including patient clinical information, to pharmaceutical providers for their use in dispensing prescription drugs to patients. Third-party contractors provide us with most of this data. If this data is incorrect or incomplete, adverse consequences, including severe injury or death, may occur and give rise to product liability and other claims against us. In addition, a court or government agency may take the position that our delivery of health information directly, including through pharmaceutical providers, or delivery of information by a third-party site that a consumer accesses through our websites, exposes us to personal injury liability, or other liability for wrongful delivery or handling of healthcare services or erroneous health information. While we maintain product liability insurance coverage in an amount that we believe is sufficient for our business, we cannot be assured that this coverage will prove to be adequate or will continue to be available on acceptable terms, if at all. A claim brought against us that is uninsured or under-insured could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even unsuccessful claims could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources.
It is difficult to predict the length of the sales cycle for our healthcare software solutions.
The length of the sales cycle for our healthcare software solutions is difficult to predict, as it depends on a number of factors, including the nature and size of the potential customer and the extent of the commitment being made by the potential customer. Our sales and marketing efforts with respect to pharmaceutical providers and payors generally involve a lengthy sales cycle due to these organizations’ complex decision-making processes. Additionally, in light of increased government involvement in healthcare and related changes in the operating environment for healthcare organizations, our current and potential cu stomers may react by curtailing or deferring investments, including those for our services. In many cases, our acquisition of new business is dependent on us successfully bidding pursuant to a competitive bidding process. If potential customers take longer than we expect to decide whether to purchase our solutions, our selling expenses could increase and our revenues could decrease or be delayed, which could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Due to complex calculations within our customer contracts, we may be required to issue significant credit memos to our customers that could adversely affect our business, profitability and growth prospects.
Contracts with our customers have complex calculations. We are consistently in the process of implementing procedures to improve our monitoring of material contractual obligations. We continue to issue credit memos to customers related to meeting, among other things, pricing performance guarantees. The continued issuance of credit memos could adversely affect our business, profitability and growth prospects.
Failure of our health plan customers to pay for prescription claims or a delay in payment of those claims could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.
Our contracts with retail pharmacies that participate in our network generally obligate us to make payments for prescription claims even if we are not reimbursed by our customers. If our customers delay their reimbursement payments or fail to make payments for prescription claims, it could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.
If we become subject to liability claims that are not covered by our insurance policies, we may be liable for damages and other expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Various aspects of our business may subject us to litigation and li ability for damages, for example, the performance of PBM services and the operation of our call centers and website. A successful product or professional liability claim in excess of our insurance coverage where we are required to pay damages, incur legal costs or face negative publicity could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, our business reputation and our ability to attract and retain clients, network pharmacies, and employees. While we intend to maintain professional and general liability insurance coverage at all times, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to maintain insurance in the future, that insurance will be available on acceptable terms or that insurance will be adequate to cover any or all potential product or professional liability claims.
Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by damage from a variety of sources, many of which are not within our control.
20
The success of our business depends in part on our ability to operate our systems without interruption. Our products and services are susceptible to all the threats inherent in computer software and other technology-based systems. Our systems are vulnerable to, among other things, power loss and telecommunications failures, software and hardware err ors, failures or crashes, computer viruses and similar disruptive problems, and fire, flood, and other natural disasters. Although we take precautions to guard against and minimize damage from these and other potential risks, including implementing disaster recovery systems and procedures, they are often unpredictable and beyond our control. Any significant interruptions in our services could damage our reputation in the marketplace and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business depends on our intellectual property rights, and if we are unable to protect them, our competitive position may suffer.
We do not have any patents on our technology. Nonetheless, our business plan is predicated on our proprietary systems and technology. Accordingly, protecting our intellectual property rights is critical to our continued success and our ability to maintain our competitive position. We protect our proprietary rights through a combination of trademark, trade secret and copyright law, confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with our employees, consultants, customers and suppliers, and limiting access to our trade secrets and technology. We cannot be assured that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology, which could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position. Also, despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our intellectual property by reverse-engineering the functionality of our systems or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthori zed use of our intellectual property is difficult and expensive, and we are unable to determine the extent, if any, to which piracy of our intellectual property exists.
In addition, we may have to engage in litigation in the future to enforce or protect our intellectual property rights, and we may incur substantial costs and the diversion of management’s time and attention as a result.
We may become subject to claims that we infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which, even if not successful, could have a material adverse impact on our business.
We could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims from third parties as the number of our competitors grows and our applications’ functionality overlaps with their products. There has been a substantial amount of intellectual property litigation in the information technology industries. While we do not believe that we have infringed or are infringing on any proprietary rights of third parties, we cannot assure that infringement claims will not be asserted against us or that those claims will be unsuccessful. Even if a claim brought against us is ultimately unsuccessful, we could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources in defending any infringement claims. Furthermore, a party making a claim against us could secure a judgment awarding substantial damages as well as injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and ma rket our products and services. We may be required to license intellectual property from third parties in order to continue using our products, and we cannot assure that we will be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
We may be unable to obtain, retain the right to use or successfully integrate third-party licenses for the use in our solutions, which could prevent us from offering the products and services which use those technologies.
We use third-party licenses for some of the technology used in our solutions, and intend to continue licensing technologies from third parties. These licenses are the ty pe that ordinarily accompany the business that we conduct. However, these licenses might not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all in the future. Most of these licenses can be renewed only by mutual consent and may be terminated if we breach the terms of the license and fail to cure the breach within a specified period of time. Although we are not dependent upon any individual license and believe that substitutes are generally available, our inability to obtain or renew any of these licenses could delay development of our new product offerings or prevent us from selling our existing solutions until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed and integrated, or developed by us, and there is no assurance as to when we would be able to do so, if at all. Lack of access to required licenses from third parties could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Most of our third-party licenses are non-exclusive. Our competitors may obtain the right to use any of the technology covered by these licenses and use the technology to attempt to compete more effectively with us. Our use of third-party technologies exposes us to risks associated with the integration of components from various sources into our solutions, such as unknown software errors or defects or unanticipated incompatibility with our systems and technologies. In addition, if our vendors choose to discontinue support of the licensed technology in the future or are unsuccessful in their continued research and development efforts, are unable to continue their business, decide to discontinue dealings with us or are acquired by a competitor or other party that does not wish to deal with us, we may not be able to modify or adapt our own solutions to use other available technologies in a timely manner, if at all.
We are subject to a number of existing laws, regulations, and industry initiatives, non-compliance with which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We could suffer civil and/or criminal penalties, lose customers, and be required to pay substantial damages or make significant changes to our operations if we fail to comply with complex and rapidly evolving laws and regulations.
During the past several years, the U.S. health care industry has been subject to an increase in governmental regulation at both the federal and state levels. Numerous state and federal laws and regulations affect our business and operations. The categories include, but are not necessarily limited to:
| • | health care fraud and abuse laws and regulations, which prohibit certain types of payments and referrals as well as false claims made in connection with health benefit programs; |
| • | privacy and confidentiality laws and regulations, including those under HIPAA; |
| • | ERISA and related regulations, which regulate many health care plans; |
21
| • | potential regulation of the PBM industry by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; |
| • | the Medicare prescription drug coverage law and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) regulations; |
| • | consumer protection and unfair trade practice laws and regulations; |
| • | various licensure laws, such as state insurance, managed care and third party administrator licensure laws; |
| • | pharmacy laws and regulations; |
| • | antitrust lawsuits challenging PBM pricing practices; |
| • ; | state legislation regulating PBMs or imposing fiduciary status on PBMs; |
| • | drug pricing legislation, including “most favored nation” pricing and “unitary pricing” legislation; |
| • | other Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement regulations; |
| • | pending legislation regarding importation of drug products into the United States; |
| • | legislation imposing benefit plan design restrictions, which limit how our customers can design their drug benefit plans; |
| • | network pharmacy access law s, including “any willing provider” and “due process” legislation, that affect aspects of our pharmacy network contracts; and |
| • | formulary development and disclosure laws |
If we fail to comply with existing or future applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer civil or criminal penalties. We devote sig nificant operational and managerial resources to comply with these laws and regulations. Although we have not been notified, and are not otherwise aware of any material claim or non-compliance, there can be no assurance that we are in compliance with all existing legal requirements material to our business. Different interpretations and enforcement policies of these laws and regulations could subject our current practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality, or could require us to make significant changes to our operations. In addition, we cannot predict the impact of future legislation and regulatory changes on our business or assure you that we will be able to obtain or maintain the regulatory approvals required to operate our business.
We cannot predict whether or when future healthcare reform initiatives by U.S. ;federal or state, Canadian or other foreign regulatory authorities will be proposed, enacted or implemented or what impact those initiatives may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, government regulation could alter the clinical workflow of physicians, hospitals, and other healthcare participants, thereby limiting the utility of our products and services to existing and potential customers and resulting in a negative impact on market acceptance of our products and services.
Due to the complex laws and regulations governing the Medicare program in which we participate, our recorded estimates may materially change in the future, and our failure to fully comply with such laws and regulations may adversely impact our business and financial results.
The Medicare Part D program in which we participate is based upon extremely complex laws and regulations that are subject to interpretation. As a result, there is at least a reasonable possibility that our recorded estimates of receivables from CMS may change by a material amount in the near term. Additionally, our noncompliance with such laws and regulations could result in fines, penalties and exclusion from the Medicare program.
Although we are not aware of any allegations of noncompliance that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements, we cannot assure you that any instances of noncompliance will not have a material adverse effect o n our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
Uncertainty regarding the impact of Medicare Part D may adversely impact our business and financial results.
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 created a new, voluntary prescription drug benefit for Medicare beneficiaries entitled to Medicare benefits under Part A or enrolled in Medicare Part B effective January 1, 2006. We currently participate in the administration of the Medicare drug benefit: (i) through the provision of PBM services to our health plan customers and other customers that have qualified as a prescription drug plan (“PDP”) or a “Medicare Advantage” plan, (ii) by assisting employers, unions and other health plan customers that qualify for the retiree drug subsidy available under Medicare Part D by collecting and submitting eligibility and/or drug cost data to CMS for them in order to obtain the subsidy, and (iii) by operating as a CMS approved Employer/Union Group Waiver PDP contract with CMS (S8841). Our existing PBM business could be adversely affected if our customers decide to discontinue providing prescription drug benefits altogether to their Medicare-eligible members. We are not yet able to assess the impact that Medicare Part D will have on our customers’ decisions to continue to offer a prescription drug benefit to their Medicare-eligible members.
In addition, as an approved PDP sponsor, we are a direct contractor to the federal government and subject to the rules, regulations, and enforcement authority of the federal government over its contractors. In addition, under regulations established by CMS governing participation in the Medicare Part D program, our subsidiary, NMHC Group Solutions Insurance, Inc. (“GSI”), a former risk-bearing entity regulated under state insurance laws, must obtain licensure as a domestic insurance company. GSI has been approved to operate as a risk-bearing entity in its domicile state, Delaware, as required by CMS, and has obtained approval from all but two state insurance departments that it is not required to maintain a risk bearing license in such states. We did not continue to provide our PDP to individual Medicare Part D enrollees in 2009 and CMS has acknowledged our intent to provide the PDP Medicare benefits solely to employer groups. In addition, as of January 1, 2008, we only provide non-risk bearin g Medicare benefits to employer groups that will reimburse us directly for any prescription drug costs. We do
22
not intend at this time to offer our PDP to employer groups in instances where we could be subject to risk.
We face additional regulatory risks associated with our Specialty Service business which could subje ct us to additional regulatory scrutiny and liability and which could adversely affect the profitability of the Specialty Service business.
With our acquisition of MedfusionRx and its pharmacies in December 2010, additional state regulations became applicable to us. Various aspects of the Specialty Service business are governed by state laws and regulations not previously applicable to us or which may now be applicable in different ways. Significant sanctions may be imposed for violations of these laws and compliance programs are a significant operational requirement of our business. There are significant uncertainties involving the application of many of these legal requirements to us. Accordingly, we may be required to incur additional administrative and compliance expenses in determining the applicable requirements and in adapting our compliance pra ctices, or modifying our business practices, in order to satisfy changing interpretations and regulatory policies.
Our Mail Service and Specialty Service businesses are dependent on our relationships with a limited number of suppliers and the loss of any of these relationships could significantly impact our ability to sustain and/or improve our financial performance.
We derive a substantial percentage of our Mail Service and Specialty Service revenue and profitability within the PBM segment from our relationships with a limited number of suppliers. Our agreements with these suppliers may be short-term and cancelable by either party without cau se with a relatively short time-frame of prior notice. These agreements may limit our ability to provide services for competing drugs during the term of the agreement and allow the supplier to distribute through channels other than us. Further, certain of these agreements allow pricing and other terms of these relationships to be periodically adjusted for changing market conditions or required service levels. A termination or modification to any of these relationships could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. An additional risk related to supply is that many products distributed by our Specialty Service business are manufactured with ingredients that are susceptible to supply shortages. If any products we distribute are in short supply for long periods of time, this could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to grow our Specialty Service business could be limited if we do not expand our existing base of drugs or if we lose patients.
Our Specialty Service business focuses on complex and high cost medications that serve a relatively small patient population. Due to the limited patient populations utilizing the medications our Specialty Service business handles, our future growth relies in part on expanding our base of drugs or penetration in certain treatment categories. Further, a loss of patient base or reduction in demand for any reason for the medications we currently dispense could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The operations of our Specialty Service business may be adversely affected by industry trends in managed care contracting and consolidation.
A growing number of health plans are contracting with a single provider of specialty pharmacy services. Likewise, manufacturers may not be eager to contract with regional providers of specialty pharmacy services. If we are unable to obtain managed care contracts in the areas in which we provide specialty pharmacy services or are unable to obtain specialty pharmacy products at reasonable costs or at all, our business could be adversely affected.
If our security is breached, outsiders could gain access to information we are required to keep confidential, and we could be subject to liability and customers could be deterred from using our services.
Our business relies on using the Internet to transmit confidential information. However, the difficulty of securely transmitting confidential information over the Internet has been a significant barrier to engaging in sensitive communications over the Internet, and is an important concern of our existing and prospective customers. Publicized compromise of Internet security, including third-party misappropriation of patient information or other data, or a perception of any such security breach, may deter people from using the Internet for these purposes, whi ch would result in an unwillingness to use our systems to conduct transactions that involve transmitting confidential healthcare information. Further, if we are unable to protect the physical and electronic security and privacy of our databases and transactions, we could be subject to potential liability and regulatory action, our reputation and customer relationships would be harmed, and our business, operations, and financial results may be materially adversely affected.
We are highly dependent on senior management and key employees. Competition for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees that we need to support our business.
Our success largely depends on the skills, experience, and continued efforts of our management and other key personnel, and on our ability to continue to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified individuals. Competition for senior management and other key personnel is intense, and the pool of suitable candidates is limited. If we lose the services of one or more of our key employees, we may not be able to find a suitable replacement and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Our ability to provide high-quality services to our customers also depends in large part upon the experience and expertise of our employees generally. We must attract and retain highly qualified personnel with a deep understanding of the healt hcare, PBM and HCIT industries. We compete with a number of companies for experienced personnel and many of these companies, including customers and competitors, have greater resources than we have and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training our employees, which increases their value to customers and competitors who may seek to recruit them and increases the cost of replacing them. If we are unable to attract or retain qualified employees, the quality of our services could diminish and we may be unable to meet our business and financial goals.
Actual financial results may vary from our publicly disclosed forecasts.
Our actual financial results may vary from our publicly disclosed forecasts and these variations could be material and adverse. We periodically provide guidance on future financial results. These forecasts reflect numerous assumptions concerning our expected performance,
23
as well as other factors, which are beyond our control and which may not turn out to be correct. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our guidance and other forward-l ooking statements are reasonable when we make such statements, actual results could be materially different. Our financial results are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those identified throughout these risk factors. If our actual results vary from our announced guidance, the price of our common shares may decline, and such a decline could be substantial. We do not undertake to update any guidance or other forward-looking information we may provide.
We may experience fluctuations in our financial results because of timing issues associated with our revenue recognition policy.
A portion of our revenue is derived from system sales, where we recognize revenue upon execution of a license agreement and shipment of the software, as long as all vendor obligations have been satisfied and collection of license fees is probable. As the costs associated with system sales are minimal, revenue and income may vary significantly based on the timing of recognition of revenue. Given that revenue from certain projects is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method, our revenue from these projects can vary substantially on a monthly and quarterly basis. In addition, certain contracts may contain undelivered elements or multiple deliverables, which may cause the applicable revenue to be deferred over multiple periods. Accordingly, the timing and delivery requirements of customers’ orders may have a material effect on our operations and financial results during any reporting period. In addition, to the extent that the costs required to complete a fixed price contract exceed the price quoted by us, our results may be materiall y adversely affected.
If we are required to write off goodwill or other intangible assets, our financial position and results of operations would be adversely affected.
We have goodwill and other intangible assets of approximately $277 million as of December 31, 2010. We are required to periodically evaluate goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment. In the future we may take charges against earnings resulting from impairment. Any determination requiring the write off of a significant portion of our goodwill or other intangible assets could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
Our tax filings are subject to possible review, audit and/or reassessment and we may be liable for additional taxes, interest or penalties if the final tax outcome is different from those provided for in our filings.
Although our primary operations are in the Unit ed States, we also have operations in Canada. Our income tax liability is therefore a consolidation of the tax liabilities we expect to have in various locations. Our tax rate is affected by the profitability of our operations in all locations, tax rates and systems of the countries in which we operate, our tax policies and the impact of certain tax planning strategies which we have implemented or may implement. To determine our worldwide tax liability, we make estimates of possible tax liabilities. Our tax filings, positions and strategies are subject to review under local or international tax audit and the outcomes of such reviews are uncertain. In addition, these audits generally take place years after the period in which the tax provision in question was provided and it may take a substantial amount of time before the final outcome of any audit is known. Future final tax outcomes could also differ materially from the amounts recorded in our financial statements. These differences could have a material ef fect on our financial position and our net income in the period such determination is made.
Changes in our accounting estimates and assumptions could negatively affect our financial position and results of operations.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. We are also required to make certain judgments that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expen ses during each reporting period. We periodically evaluate our estimates and assumptions including those relating to revenue recognition, rebates, asset impairments, valuation of allowance for doubtful accounts, contingencies, and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable based on specific circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and changes in accounting standards could have an adverse impact on our future financial position and results of operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company’s principal business operations are conducted from a 102,134 squar e foot leased office facility located at 2441 Warrenville Road, Suite 610 in Lisle, Illinois (outside of Chicago). This lease expires in January 2018.
The Company’s Specialty Service operation, which supports the delivery of certain medications to individuals with chronic or genetic diseases and disorders, has its main locations in Maine and Alabama, with seven additional facilities mostly located in the southeastern states of the U.S. The Company's Mail Service operation is located in Florida.
Besides the Lisle, Specialty Service and Mail Service facilities, the Company maintains operations in several other leased locations in the U. S. and Canada, including operations in Ontario (Milton), Arizona, Hawaii, Georgia, Arkansas, and Pennsylvania.
The Company believes these properties are adequate for its current operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information on legal proceedings, see Note 13(b) “Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 3.
24
ITEM 4. RESERVED
25
PART II
ITEM 5. & nbsp;MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The Company’s common stock is traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and NASDAQ Global Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “SXC” and “SXCI,” respectively. Amounts related to trading on the TSX are provided in Canadian dollars. The following table sets forth for each period indicated the high and low sales prices for the Company’s common stock on the TSX:
| High | Low | ||||||||
| 2010 | |||||||||
| First quarter | C | $ | 35.14 | C | $ | 23.22 | |||
| Second quarter | C | $ | 39.53 | C | $ | 31.50 | |||
| Third quarter | C | $ | 42.73 | C | $ | 31.88 | |||
| Fourth quarter | C | $ | 46.06 | C | $ | 36.76 | |||
| 2009 | |||||||||
| First quarter | C | $ | 13.93 | C | $ | 9.24 | |||
| Second quarter | C | $ | 15.50 | C | $ | 10.65 | |||
| Third quarter | C | $ | 26.25 | C | $ | 14.25 | |||
Fourth quarter | C | $ | 29.69 | C | $ | 22.81 | |||
The Company’s co mmon stock began trading on the NASDAQ on June 13, 2006. The following table sets forth for each period indicated the high and low prices for the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ:
| High | Low | ||||||
| 2010 | |||||||
| First quarter | $ | 34.47 | $ | 22.61 | |||
| Second quarter | $ | 38.49 | $ | 29.17 | |||
| Third quarter | $ | 41.58 | $ | 30.70 | |||
| Fourth quarter | $ | 45.78 | $ | 35.81 | |||
| 2009 | |||||||
| First quarter | $ | 11.00 | $ | 7.81 | |||
| Second quarter | $ | 13.45 | $ | 8.85 | |||
| Third quarter | $ | 24.43 | $ | 12.26 | |||
| Fourth quarter | $ | 28.08 | $ | 21.27 | |||
On February 1, 2011, the closing sale price of the common stock, as reported by the TSX and NASDAQ was Cdn.$48.23 and $48.62 per share, respectively. As of February 1, 2011, there were approximately 23,925 holders of the Company’s common stock either of record or in street name.
Dividend Policy
The Company has never paid a cash dividend on its common stock and has no present intention to commence the payment of cash dividends. It is possible that the Board of Directors could determine in the future, based on the Company’s financial and other relevant circumstances at that time, to pay cash dividends.
26
Stock Performance
TSX
The following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative returns for the Company’s stock, as compared to the TSX Composite Index and the S&P/TSX Capped Health Care index, as of December 31 of each year indicated. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 was made on January 1, 2006 and assumes the reinvestment of any dividends.
The following table presents the five-year comparison of cumulative returns for the Company’s stock, as compared to the TSX Composite Index and the S&P/TSX Capped Health Care index, as of December 31 of each year indicated. The values assume an initial investment of $100 was made on January 1, 2006 and assume the reinvestment of any dividends.
| Cumulative Total Return | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1/3/2006 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| SXC | $ | 100.00 | $ | 215.44 | $ | 133.82 | $ | 209.01 | $ | 526.65 | $ | 783.09 | ||||||
| TSX Composite | $ | 100.00 | $ | 139.60 | $ | 149.60 | $ | 97.20 | $ | 127.03 | $ | 145.38 | ||||||
| S&P/TSX Capped Health Care Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 96.97 | $ | 72.48 | $ | 51.20 | $ | 65.61 | $ | 91.74 | ||||||
Nasdaq
The following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative returns for the Company’s stock, as compared to the Nasdaq Composite Index and the S&P Healthcare index, as of December 31 of each year indicated. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 was made on June 13, 2006 (the date of the U.S. initial public offering) and assumes the reinvestment of any dividends.
The following table presents a five-year comparison of cumulative returns for the Company’s stock, as compared to the Nasdaq Composite Index and the S&P Healthcar e index, as of December 31 of each year indicated. The values assume an initial investment of $100 was made on June 13, 2006 (the date of the U.S. initial public offering) and assume the reinvestment of any dividends.
27
| Cumulative Total Return | ||||||||||||||||||
| 6/13/2006 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| SXC | $ | 100.00 | $ | 143.53 | 103.13 | $ | 132.86 | $ | 383.78 | $ | 609.67 | |||||||
| Nasdaq Composite | $ | 100.00 | $ | 116.54 | $ | 127.98 | $ | 76.09 | $ | 109.49 | $ | 128.01 | ||||||
| S&P Healthcare index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 111.91 | $ | 117.94 | $ | 89.07 | $ | 104.27 | $ | 105.01 | ||||||
The info rmation in this “Stock Performance Graphs” section shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31 , 2009. The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Selected consolidated financial data for fiscal 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006 are all in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto.
| For The Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 (5) (6) | 2009(4) | 2008(3) | 2007(2) | 2006(1) | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands except share and per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Statement of Operations Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,948,389 | $ | 1,438,634 | $ | 862,939 | $ | 93,171 | $ | 80,923 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 64,735 | $ | 46,061 | $ | 15,113 | $ | 13,146 | $ | 13,647 | |||||||||
| Earnings per share, basic | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.89 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.37 | |||||||||
| Earnings per share, diluted | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.35 | |||||||||
| Weighed average common shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 60,736,831 | 52,008,408 | 45,956,932 | 41,510,744 | 37,420,740 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 63,136,600 | 53,594,746 | 46,826,022 | 43,125,508 | 39,400,278 | ||||||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(7) | 30.94 | 9.98 | 4.43 | 21.31 | 7.41 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 816,309 | $ | 662,080 | $ | 428,343 | $ | 159,479 | $ | 131,415 | |||||||||
| Long-term debt | $ | — | — | $ | |||||||||||||||
Notes:
| 1) | On June 22, 2006, the Company completed a public offering in Canada and the U.S. of 6,400,000 common shares at a price of Cdn $6.75 per common share. The gross proceeds of the offering were $38.7 million (Cdn $43.2 million), excluding underwriting fees and issuance costs of $2.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively . |
| 2) | Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the FASB’s guidance for uncertainty in income taxes and, as a result, the Company recognized an adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits of $0.2 million and a corresponding reduction in the beginning balance of retained earnings. |
| 3) | Effective April 30, 2008, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired all of the outstanding shares of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. (“NMHC”), based in Port Washington, New York, which provides PBM. The results of operations of the acquired business are included from the date of acquisition. The Company issued 5,571,920 shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition. |
| 4) | On September 23, 2009, the Company completed a public offering in Canada and the U.S of 10,350,000 of its common shares at a price |
28
of $20.75 per share. The gross proceeds to the Company from the offering were $214.8 million. Share issuance costs were approximately $11.7 million for underwriting discounts and commissions, and related professional services.
| 5) | On September 17, 2010, the Company executed a two-for-one stock split effected by a stock dividend on the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. All share and per share data presented in this Annual Report have been adjust ed to reflect this stock split. |
| 6) | The Company completed its acquisition of MedfusionRx on December 28, 2010. The purchase price for MedfusionRx was $101.7 million in cash, subject to a customary working capital adjustments, with an additional $5.5 million potential earn-out payment subject to the achievement of certain performance targets in the 2012 fiscal year. |
| 7) | See Exhibit 12.1 to this Annual Report for the computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges. |
29
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of SXC Health Solutions Corp. (the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements. This MD&A also contains forward looking statements and should be read in conjuncti on with the risk factors described in Item 1A “Risk Factors.”
Certain information in this MD&A, in various filings with regulators, in reports to shareholders and in other communications is forward-looking within the meaning of certain securities laws and is subject to important risks, uncertainties and assumptions. This forward-looking information includes, amongst others, information with respect to the Company’s objectives and the strategies to achieve those objectives, as well as information with respect to the Company’s beliefs, plans, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but may not b e limited to, the ability of the Company to adequately address: the risks associated with further market acceptance of the Company’s products and services; its ability to manage its growth effectively; its reliance on and ability to retain key customers and key personnel; industry conditions such as consolidation of customers, competitors and acquisition targets; the Company’s ability to acquire a company, manage integration and potential dilution associated therewith; the impact of technology changes on its products/service offerings, including the impact on the intellectual property rights of others; the effects of regulatory and legislative changes in the healthcare industry; and the sufficiency and fluctuations of its liquidity and capital needs.
When relying on forward-looking information to m ake decisions, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. In making the forward-looking statements contained in this MD&A, the Company does not assume any significant acquisitions, dispositions or one-time items. It does assume, however, the renewal of certain customer contracts. Every year, the Company has major customer contracts that come up for renewal. In addition, the Company also assumes new customer contracts. In this regard, the Company is pursuing large opportunities that present a very long and complex sales cycle which substantially affects its forecasting abilities. The Company has assumed certain timing for the realization of these opportunities which it thinks is reasonable but which may not be achieved. Furthermore, the pursuit of these larger opportunities does not ensure a linear progression of revenue and earnings since they may involve significant up-front costs followed by renewals and cancellations of existing c ontracts. The Company has assumed certain revenues which may not be realized. The Company has also assumed that the material factors referred to in the previous paragraph will not cause such forward-looking information to differ materially from actual results or events. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and is subject to change and there can be no assurance that such assumptions will reflect the actual outcome of such items or factors. For additional information with respect to certain of these and other factors, refer to the risks and uncertainties section of Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
THE FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MD&A REPRESENTS THE COMPANY’S CURRENT EXPECTATIONS AND, ACCORDINGLY, IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. HOWEVER, THE COMPANY EXPRESSLY DISC LAIMS ANY INTENTION OR OBLIGATION TO UPDATE OR REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION, WHETHER AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW.
All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated.
Overview
PBM Business
The Company provides comprehensive PBM servic es to customers, which include managed care organizations, local governments, unions, corporations, HMOs, employers, workers’ compensation plans, third party health care plan administrators, and federal and state government programs through its network of licensed pharmacies throughout the United States. The PBM services include electronic point-of-sale pharmacy claims management, retail pharmacy network management, mail service pharmacy, specialty service pharmacy, Medicare Part D services, benefit design consultation, preferred drug management programs, drug review and analysis, consulting services, data access and reporting and information analysis. The Company owns a Mail Service pharmacy (“Mail Service”) and a Specialty Service pharmacy (“Specialty Service”). In addition, the Company is a national provider of drug benefits to its customers under the federal government’s Medicare Part D program.
Revenue primarily consists of sales of prescription drugs, together with any associated administrative fees, to customers and participants, either through the Company’s nationwide network of pharmacies, Mail Service pharmacy or Specialty Service pharmacy. Revenue related to the sales of prescription drugs is recognized when the claims are adjudicated and the prescription drugs are shipped. Claims are adjudicated at the point-of-sale using an on-line processing system.
Under the Company’s customer contracts, the retail pharmacy is solely obligated to collect the co-payments from the participants. As such, the Company does not include part icipant co-payments to retail pharmacies in revenue or cost of revenue. If these amounts were included in revenue and cost of revenue, operating income and net income would not have been affected.
The Company evaluates customer contracts to determine whether it acts as a principal or as an agent in the fulfillment of prescriptions through its retail pharmacy network. The Company acts as a principal in most of its transactions with customers and revenue is recognized at the prescription price (ingredient cost plus dispensing fee) negotiated with customers, plus an administrative fee, if applicable (“gross reporting”). Gross reporting is appropriate when the Company (i) has separate contractual relationships with customers and with pharmacies, (ii) is responsible to validate and manage a claim through the cl aims adjudication process, (iii) commits to set prescription prices for the pharmacy, including instructing the pharmacy as to how that price is to be settled (co-payment requirements), (iv) manages the overall prescription drug relationship with the patients, who are participants of customers’ plans, and (v) has credit risk for the price due from the customer. In instances where the
30
Company merely administers a customer’s network pharmacy contract to which the Company is not a p arty and under which the Company does not assume pricing risk and credit risk, among other factors, the Company only records an administrative fee as revenue. For these customers, the Company earns an administrative fee for collecting payments from the customer and remitting the corresponding amount to the pharmacies in the customer’s network. In these transactions, the Company acts as an agent for the customer. As the Company is not the principal in these transactions, the drug ingredient cost is not included in revenue or in cost of revenue (“net reporting”). As such, there is no impact to gross profit based upon whether gross or net reporting is used.
HCIT Business
The Company is also a leading provider of HCIT solutions and services to providers, payors, and other participants in the pharmaceutical supply chain in North America. The Company’s product offerings include a wide range of software products for managing prescription drug programs and for drug prescribing and dispensing. The Company’s solutions are available on a license basis with on-going maintenance and support or on a transaction fee basis using an Application Service Provider (“ASP”) model. The Company’s payor customers include managed care organizations, Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations, government agencies, employers and intermediaries such as pharmacy benefit managers. The solutions offered by the Company’s services assist both payors and providers in managing the complexity and reducing the cost of their prescription drug programs and dispensing activities.
Profitability of the HCIT business depends primarily on revenue derived from transaction processing services, software license sales, hardware sales, maintenance, and professional services. Recurring revenue remains a cornerstone of the Company’s business model and consists of transaction processing services and maintenance. Growth in revenue from recurring sources has been driven primarily by growth in the Company’s transaction processing business in the form of claims processing for its payor customers and switching services for its provider customers. Through the Company’s transaction processing business, where the Company is generally paid based on the volume of transactions processed, the Company continues to benefit from the growth in pharmaceutical drug use in the United States. The Company believes that aging demographics and incre ased use of prescription drugs will continue to benefit the transaction processing business. In addition to benefiting from this industry growth, the Company continues to focus on increasing recurring revenue in the transaction processing area by adding new transaction processing customers to its existing customer base. The recognition of revenue depends on various factors including the type of service provided, contract parameters, and any undelivered elements.
Operating Expenses
The Company’s operating expenses primarily consist of cost of revenue, product development costs, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs, depreciation, and amorti zation. Cost of revenue includes the costs of drugs dispensed as well as costs related to the products and services provided to customers and costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the transaction processing centers. These costs include salaries and related expenses for professional services personnel, transaction processing centers’ personnel, customer support personnel, any hardware or equipment sold to customers and depreciation expense related to data center operations. Product development costs consist of staffing expenses to produce enhancements and new initiatives. SG&A costs relate to selling expenses, commissions, marketing, network administration and administrative costs, including legal, accounting, investor relations and corporate development costs. Depreciation expense relates to the depreciation of property and equipment used by the Company. Amortization expense relates to definite-lived intangible assets from business acquisitions.
Industry Overview
The PBM industry is intensely competitive, generally resulting in continuous pressure on gross profit as a percentage of total revenue. In recent years, industry consolidation and dramatic growth in managed healthcare have led to increasingly aggressive pricing of PBM services. Given the pressure on all parties to reduce healthcare costs, the Company expects this competitive environment to continue for the foreseeable future. In order to remain competitive, the Company looks to continue to drive purchasing efficiencies of pharmaceuticals to improve operating margins, and target the acquisition of other businesses to achieve its strategy of expanding its product offerings and customer base. T he Company also looks to retain and expand its customer base by improving the quality of service provided by enhancing its solutions and lowering the total drug spend for customers.
The HCIT industry is increasingly competitive as technologies continue to advance and new products continue to emerge. This rapidly developing industry requires the Company to perpetually improve its offerings to meet customer’s rising product standards. Recent governmental stimulus initiatives to improve the country’s electronic health records should assist the growth of the industry, but it may also increase competition as more players enter the expanding market.
The complicated environment in which the Company operates presents it with opportunities, challenges, and risks. The Company’s clients are paramount to its success; the retention of existing and winning of new clients and members poses the greatest opportunity, and the loss thereof represents an ongoing risk. The preservation of the Company’s relationships with pharmaceutical manufacturers and retail pharmacies is very important to the execution of its business strategies. The Company’s future success will hinge on its ability to drive Mail Service volume and increase generic dispensing rates in light of the significant brand-name drug patent expirations expected to occur over the next several years. The Company’s ability to continue to provide innovative and competitive clinical and other services to clients and patients, including the Company’s active participation in the Medicare Part D benefit and the rapidly growing specialty pharmacy industry, also plays an imp ortant part in the Company’s future success.
The frequency with which the Company’s customer contracts come up for renewal, and the potential for one of the Company’s larger customers to terminate, or elect not to renew, its existing contract with the Company, create the risk that the Company’s results of operations may be volatile. The Company’s customer contracts generally do not have terms longer than three years and, in some cases, are terminable by the customer on relatively short notice. The Company’s larger customers generally seek bids from other PBM providers in advance of the expiration of their contracts. If existing customers elect not to renew their contracts with the Company at the expiration of the current terms of those contracts, and in particular if one of the Company’s largest customers elects not to renew, the Company’s recurring revenue base will be
31
reduced and results of operations will be adversely affected.
The Company operates in a competitive environment where clients and other payors seek to control the growth in the cost of providing prescription drug benefits. The Company&rsq uo;s business model is designed to reduce the level of drug cost. The Company helps manage drug cost primarily by its programs designed to maximize the substitution of expensive brand drugs with equivalent but much lower cost generic drugs, obtaining competitive discounts from suppliers, securing rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party rebate administrators, securing discounts from retail pharmacies, applying the Company’s sophisticated clinical programs, and efficiently administering prescriptions dispensed through the Company’s Mail Service and Specialty Service pharmacies.
Various aspects of the Company’s business are governed by federal and state laws and regulations. Because sanctions may be imposed for violations of these laws, compliance is a significant operational requirement. The Com pany believes it is in substantial compliance with all existing legal requirements material to the operation of its business. There are, however, significant uncertainties involving the application of many of these legal requirements to its business. In addition, there are numerous proposed health care laws and regulations at the federal and state levels, many of which could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. The Company is unable to predict what additional federal or state legislation or regulatory initiatives may be enacted in the future relating to its business or the health care industry in general, or what effect any such legislation or regulations might have on it. The Company also cannot provide any assurance that federal or state governments will not impose additional restrictions or adopt interpretations of existing laws or regulations that could have a material adverse effect on its business or financial performance.
Competitive Strengths
The Company has demonstrated its ability to serve a broad range of clients from large managed care organizations and state governments to employer groups with fewer than a thousand members. The Company believes its principal competitive strengths are:
Flexible, customized and independent services: The Company believes a key differentiator between itself and its competit ors is not only the Company’s ability to provide innovative PBM services, but also to deliver these services on an à la carte basis. The informedRx suite offers the flexibility of broad product choice along the entire PBM continuum, enabling enhanced customer control, solutions tailored to the Company’s customers’ specific requirements, and flexible pricing. The market for the Company’s products is divided between large customers that have the sophisticated technology infrastructure and staff required to operate a 24-hour data center and other customers that are not able or willing to operate these sophisticated systems.
The Company’s business model allows its large customers to license the Company’s product s and operate the Company’s systems themselves (with or without taking advantage of the Company’s significant customization, consulting and systems implementation services) and allows its other customers to utilize the Company’s systems’ capabilities on a fee-per-transaction or subscription basis through ASP processing from the Company’s data center.
Leading technology and platform: The Company’s technology is robust, scalable, and web-enabled. The Company’s payor offerings efficiently supported over 460 million transactions in 2010. The platform is able to instantly cross-check multiple processes, su ch as reviewing claim eligibility, adverse drug reaction and properly calculating member, pharmacy and payor payments. The Company’s technology is built on flexible, database-driven rule sets and broad functionality applicable for most any type of business. The Company believes it has one of the most comprehensive claims processing platforms in the market.
The Company’s technology platform allows it to provide more comprehensive PBM services through informedRx by offering customers a selection of services to choose from to meet their unique needs versus requiring them to accept a one-size-fits-all solution. The Company believes this à la carte offering is a key differentiator from its competitors.
Measurable cost savings for customers: The Company provides its customers with increased control over prescription drug costs and drug benefit programs. The Company’s pricing model and flexible product offerings are designed to deliver measurable cost savings to the Company’s customers. The Company believes its pricing model is a key differentiator from its competitors for the Company’s customers who want to gain control of their prescription drug costs. For example, the Company’s pharmacy network contracts and manufacturer rebate agreements are made available by the Company to each customer. For customers who select the Company’s pharmacy networ k and manufacturer rebate services on a fixed fee per transaction basis, there is clarity to the rebates and other fees payable to the client. The Company believes that its pricing model together with the flexibility to select from a broad range of customizable services helps the customers realize measurable results and cost savings.
Selected financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009
Selected financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are noted below:
| • | Total revenue in 2010 was $1.95 billion as compared to $1.44 billion in 2009. The increase is largely attributable to an increase in PBM revenue of $505.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compar ed to the same period in 2009. PBM revenues increased primarily due to growth in the customer base throughout 2010 and the end of 2009. The increased customer base was complemented by additional services sold to existing customers. |
| • | The Company reported net income of $64.7 million, or $1.03 per share (fully-diluted), for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $46.1 million, or $0.86 per share (fully-diluted), for the same period in 2009. Net income is higher for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compa red to the same period in 2009, due to higher gross profit attributable to an increase in HCIT and PBM revenues, plus lower interest expense due to the extinguishment of the Company's long-term debt in December 2009. These increases are partially offset by an increase in income taxes. |
| • | Operating income increased $25.2 million, or 34.4%, in 2010 to $98.5 million as compared to $73.3 million in 2009. This |
32
increase was driven by increased gross profits in both the PBM and HCIT segments.
| • | Strong operational results drove an increase in operating cash flow of $9.9 million, or 11.4% |
| • | On September 17, 2010, the Company executed a two-for-one stock split effected by a stock dividend on the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. All share and per share data presented in this Annual Report have been adjusted to reflect this stock split. |
| • | On March 4, 2010, the Company announced a new agreement with HealthSpring Inc. (“HealthSpring”), pursuant to which the Company's informedRx subsidiary will provide HealthSpring with its full suite of PBM services, and therefore manage significant drug spend. The initial term of the agreement is three years with provisions for two additional one-year extensions. & nbsp;HealthSpring began to deploy specialty pharmacy services in mid-2010, with implementation of the full PBM services starting on January 1, 2011. The Company expects that gross profit percentage related to this agreement will be significantly lower than historical gross profit percentages due to the related transaction volume. |
| • | On December 28, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of MedfusionRx, L.L.C. and certain affiliated entities and certain assets of Medtown South, L.L.C, (together "MedfusionRx") a specialty pharmacy provider with expertise in providing clinical services to patients with complex chronic conditions. The purchase price for MedfusionRx was $101.7 million in cash, subject to a customary post-closing working capital adjustment, and an opportunity for the former owners of MedfusionRx to earn an additional $5.5 million in cash, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance targets in the 2012 fiscal year, in each case based on the terms and subject to the conditions contained in the MedfusionRx purchase agreement. The Company expects the acquisition to transform the Company's Specialty Service pharmacy business by expanding its presence and enhancing its capabilities in this rapidly growing segment of the PBM industry. |
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to year ended December 31, 2009
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
| & nbsp; | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
| In thousands, except per share data | |||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,948,389 | $ | 1,438,634 | |||
| Cost of revenue | 1,734,334 | 1,252,034 | |||||
| Gross profit | 214,055 | 186,600 | |||||
| Product development costs | 12,428 | 11,951 | |||||
| SG&A | 89,254 | 85,797 | |||||
| Depreciation of property and equipment | 5,995 | 5,811 | |||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 7,856 | 9,724 | |||||
| Operating income | 98,522 | 73,317 | |||||
| Interest income | (727 | ) | (756 | ) | |||
| Interest expense and other expense, net | 1,693 | 5,988 | |||||
| Income before income taxes | 97,556 | 68,085 | |||||
| Income tax expense | 32,821 | 22,024 | |||||
| Net income | $ | 64,735 | $ | ||||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.86 | |||
Revenue
Revenue increased $509.8 million, or 35.4%, to $1.95 billion during 2010 primarily due to new customer starts as of January 1, 2010. Revenues have also increased as compared to the same period in 2009 due to an increase in new PBM services sold to several existing HCIT customers during 2010 and the end of 2009. Overall, these changes are a result of synergies between the HCIT and PBM segments which have allowed the Company to focus on offering a broader array of products and services to the Company's customers.
33
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased $482.3 million, or 38.5%, to $1.73 billion during 2010, primarily due to the increased revenues from the PBM segment driven by the factors noted above. Cost of revenue in the PBM segment relates to the actual cost of the prescription drugs sold. Cost of revenue for the HCIT segment relates primarily to the cost of labor to deliver the services provided.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $27.5 million, or 14.7%, to $214.1 million during 2010, mostly due to increased margins of $21.5 million, or 15.5%, earned from incremental PBM revenues as compared to the same period in 2009. Gross profit percentage has decreased from 13.0% for the year ended December 31, 2009, to 11.0% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010, as a result of the PBM business producing a greater percentage of the Company's total gross profit. PBM revenues carry a lower gross profit percentage as compared to HCIT revenues due to the highly competitive nature of the PBM industry. As PBM revenues grow as a percentage of the Company's total revenues and gross profit, gross profit as a percentage of revenue will decrease.
Product Development Costs
Product development costs for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $12.4 million compared to $12.0 million for the year ende d December 31, 2009. Product development costs represent the cost of labor related to development activities and includes stock-based compensation cost of $0.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Product development continues to be a key focus of the Company as it continues to pursue enhancements of existing products, as well as the development of new offerings, to support market expansion and to take advantage of cross-selling opportunities within its existing customer base.
SG&A Costs
SG&A costs for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $89.3 million compared to $85.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. SG&A costs consist primarily of employee costs in addition to professional services costs, facilities, and costs not related to cost of revenue. SG&A costs also include stock-based compensation cost of $4.9 million and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in SG&A costs is largely attributable to $2.4 million in expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition of MedfusionRx, and increased sto ck-based compensation cost. Stock-based compensation costs increased in 2010 driven by grants in 2010 and an increased value of the grants made in 2010 versus prior years. Although the Company has experienced an increase in the overall customer base during 2010, it has been able to hold its SG&A expenses steady, exclusive of the increases due to acquisition expenses and stock-based compensation charges, due to a focus on controlling its operating costs throughout 2010.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense relates to property and equipment used in all areas of the Company except for those depreciable assets directly related to the gen eration of revenue, which is included in the cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation expense increased $0.2 million to $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $5.8 million fo r the same period in 2009, primarily due to purchases related to the Company’s expansion of its data centers and information technology equipment to expand network capacity.
Amortization
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $7.9 million compared to $9.7 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease is due to many of the intangibles being amortized at a declining rate using a future economic benefit model instead of a straight- line methodology. Due to the acquisition of MedfusionRx, amortization of the Company’s intangible assets is expected to increase to approximately $14.2 million in 2011.
Interest Income and Expense and Other Expense, net
Interest income remained flat for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, due primarily to interest rates remaining at similar levels in 2010 as compared to 2009. Interest expense and other expense, net, decreased $4.3 million to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, due to the extinguishment of the Company’s long-term debt in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Income Taxes
The Company recognized income tax expense of $32.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing an effective tax rate of 33.6%, compared to $22.0 million, representing an effective tax rate of 32.3%, for the same period in 2009. The effective tax rate increased during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to the diminishing impact of the income tax benefit produced from acquisitions, as well as an increase in taxable income and the difference in the proportion of overall income among jurisdictions.
34
Segment Analysis
The Company manages its business in two segments, PBM and HCIT, and evaluates segment performance based on revenue and gross profit. Information about the Company’s business segments for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| PBM | HCIT | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,841,600 | $ | 1,335,961 | $ | 106,789 | $ | 102,673 | $ | 1,948,389 | $ | 1,438,634 | |||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | 1,681,944 | 1,197,757 | 52,390 | 54,277 | 1,734,334 | 1,252,034 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 159,656 | $ | 138,204 | $ | 54,399 | ; | $ | 48,396 | $ | 214,055 | $ | 186,600 | ||||||||||
| Gross profit % | 8.7 | % | 10.3 | % | 50.9 | % | 47.1 | % | 11.0 | % | 13.0 | % | |||||||||||
PBM
Revenue was $1.84 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to$1.34 billion for the same period in 2009. The $505.6 million, or 37.8%, increase in revenue is primarily due to new customer starts as of January 1, 2010, as well as other customers added later in 2009. Revenues have also increased as compared to the same period in 2009 due to an increase in PBM services sold to several HCIT customers during 2010 and the end of 2009. As contracts with these existing customers are re newed or renegotiated to provide for additional PBM services, revenue derived from these customers' contracts is moved from the HCIT segment to the PBM segment.
For transactions at retail pharmacies, driven by the terms of the customer contracts, the pharmacy is solely obligated to collect the co-payments from the participants. The Company does not assume liability for participant co-payments in retail pharmacy transactions, and therefore does not include participant co-payments in revenue or cost of revenue.
Cost of revenue was $1.68 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $1.20 billion for the same period in 2009. Cost of revenue increased $484.2 million, or 40.4%, in line with the increase in PBM revenues, and is predominantly comprised of the cost of prescription drugs. As a percentage of revenue, cost of revenue was 91.3% and 89.7% for the years ended December 31, 2010 and2009, respectively. The increase in the cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was due to lower margins earned on new customer additions in 2010. Generally, new customer additions start at lower margins due to costs incurred to bring in the new business. This was partially offset by the increased use of lower cost generic drugs. Generic drug usage continues to be a focus of the industry, and the Company, to help drive down health care costs to our customers. The Company will continue to seek opportunities for increased generic prescription drug usage to help reduce overall prescription drug costs to its customers and the Company.
Gross profit was $159.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $138.2 million for the same period in 2009. Gross profit increased $21.5 million, or 15.5%, due to growth in the customer base in 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Gross profit percentage was 8.7% and 10.3% for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gross profit percentage has decreased during 2010 as compared to 2009 due to newer business being added at lower margins. As noted above, new customer additions start at lower margins due to costs incurred to bring on new business.
HCIT
Total HCIT revenue increased $4.1 million, or 4.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Revenues increased mainly due to the rise in transaction processing revenues, driven by increased transaction volumes, and additional revenues earned for meeting certain contractual performance conditions during the year. This increase was partially offset by decreases in professional services and system sales revenues.
T ransaction processing revenue consists of claims processing and generally increases as a result of the launch of new contracts as well as increased volumes of services provided to existing customers. Professional services revenue is derived from providing support projects for both system sales and transaction processing clients, on an as-needed basis. This revenue is dependent on customers initiating new projects and system enhancements which require the Company to assist them on either a fixed bid or time and materials basis. System sales are derived from license upgrades and additional applications for existing and new clients, as well as software and hardware sales to pharmacies that purchase the Company's pharmacy system. Maintenance revenue is generated from maintenance services provided on related system or license sales.
Cost of revenue decreased 3.5% to $52.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $54.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Cost of revenue includes the direct support costs for the HCIT business as well as depreciation expense of $2.4 million and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, cost of revenue includes stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Cost of revenue decreased during 2010 as compared to 2009 mainly due to the continued focus by the Company to contain costs, as well as the conversion of some HCIT customers' contracts to the PBM segment, which moved the associated revenue and costs to support these customers into the PBM segment.
Gross profit increased $6.0 million, or 12.4%, to $54.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to $48.4 million for the same period in 2009. Gross profit percentage was 50.9% for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to 47.1% for the same period in 2009. Gross profit and gross profit percentage increased for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, due to the increase in transaction processing revenues that are able to leverage a fixed cost base, as well as due to additional revenues earned for meeting certain contractual performance conditions discussed earlier. These increases were offset by decreases in revenue earned from professional services and system sales.
35
Year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to year ended December 31, 2008
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
| In thousands, except per share data | |||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,438,634 | 862,939 | ||||
| Cost of revenue | 1,252,034 | ||||||
Revenue
Revenue increased $575.7 million to $1.44 billion during 2009, primarily due to three main factors: 1) the inclusion of a full year of operating results of NMHC in 2009 as compared to eight months in the prior year, 2) the conversion of existing HCIT customers to PBM customers through new contracts and contract amendments as a result of the Company taking advantage of cross-selling opportunities between the Company's two segments and 3) new customer additions during 2009.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased $504.6 million to $1.25 billion during 2009, primarily due to the increased revenues from the PBM segment driven by the factors noted above. Cost of revenue in the PBM segment relates to the actual cost of the prescription drugs sold. Cost of revenue for the HCIT segment relates primarily t o the cost of labor to deliver the services provided.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $71.1 million to $186.6 million during 2009, primarily due to having a full year of PBM segment gross profits versus eight months in the prior year, as well as the launch of new contracts during the year.
Product Development Costs
Product development costs for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $12.0 million compared to $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Product development costs represent the cost of labor related to development activities and include stock-based compensation cost of $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Product development continues to be a key focus of the Company as it continues to pursue enhancements of existing products, as well as the development of new offerings, to support market expansion and to take advantage of cross-selling opportunities within its existing customer base.
SG&A Costs
SG&A costs for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $85.8 million compared to $68.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. SG&A costs consist primarily of employee costs in addition to professional services costs, facilities, and costs not related to cost of revenue. SG&A costs also include stock-based compensation cost of $2.8 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in SG&A costs is largely attributable to increased operating expenses due to the acquisition of NMHC. The growth in the overall customer base also caused SG&A to increase due to increased payroll, professional services, and facility costs in order for the Company to properly service its customers. The decrease in stock-based compensation is primarily attributable to stock options that fully vested in 2008, partially offset by new grants in 2008 as well as in 2009. The Company also incurred additional stock-based compensation expense in 2008 related to the a ssumption and grant of restricted stock units in connection with the acquisition of NMHC.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense relates to property and equipment used in all areas of the Company except for those depreciable assets directly related to the generation of revenue, which is included in the cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation expense increased $1.0 million to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $4.8 million for the same period in 2008, due primarily to the expense related to assets associated with the acquisition of NMHC, as well as purchases related to the Company's expansion of its data centers an d information technology equipment to expand network capacity.
36
Amortization
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $9.7 million compared to $9.4 million for the same period in 2008. The increase is due to a full year of amortization of intangible assets associated with the acquisition of NMHC versus a pa rtial year in 2008, offset by a reduction in amortization due to the intangibles that are amortized at a declining rate using a future economic benefit model instead of a straight-line methodology.
Interest Income and Expense and Other Expense, net
Interest income decreased $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, due primarily to lower interest rates in 2009. Interest expense and other expense, net, increased $1.1 million to $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, due to a $1.1 million charge recorded to fully amortize deferred financing costs. The amortization of the deferred financing costs was accelerated due to the extinguishment of the Company's long-term debt in the fourth quarter of 2009. These increases were offset by lower interest rates, and a lower outstanding principal balance of the debt in 2009 versus 2008.
Interest expense and other expense, net, for 2008 also includes a $0.4 million expense for fair value adjustments related to the Company's derivative instruments. The derivative instruments were designated as cash flow hedges late in 2008. Hedge accounting was in place for most of 2009; however, a charge of $0.6 million was recorded to other expense when hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2009. Hedge accounting was discontinued due to the extinguishment of the Company's long-term debt obligation. The derivative instruments were hedging against changes in future interest paym ents on the long-term debt, and as the future interest payments were no longer probable of occurring, hedge accounting could no longer be applied. As such, changes in the fair value of the instruments will be recorded as additional charges or income in the statement of operations through the remainder of the contract term, which ends in June 2011.
Interest paid on the Company's term loan totaled $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $2.2 million in the same period in 2008.
Income Taxes
The Company recognized income tax expense of $22.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an effective tax rate of 32.3%, compared to $5.2 million, representing an effective tax rate of 25.6%, for the same period in 2008. The effective tax rate increased during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to the diminishing impact of the income tax benefit produced from the NMHC acquisition, as well as an increase in taxable income and the difference in the proportion of overall income among jurisdictions.
Segment Analysis
The Company manages its business in two segments, PBM and HCIT, and evaluates se gment performance based on revenue and gross profit. Information about the Company's business segments for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| PBM | HCIT | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,335,961 | $ | 771,840 | $ | 102,673 | $ | 91,099 | $ | 1,438,634 | $ | 862,939 | |||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | 1,197,757 | 702,333 | 54,277 | 45,120 | 1,252,034 | 747,453 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 13 8,204 | $ | 69,507 | $ | 48,396 | $ | 45,979 | $ | 186,600 | $ | 115,486 | |||||||||||
| Gross profit % | 10.3 | % | 9.0 | % | 47.1 | % | 50.5 | % | 13.0 | % | 13.4 | % | |||||||||||
PBM
Revenue was $1.34 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $771.8 million for the same period in 2008. Revenues increased during 2009 due to the inclusion of a full year of revenue related to the NMHC business as compared to only eight months in 2008. In addition, the terms of services for several HCIT customers were changed to include, or add more, PBM services. Revenues also increased due to the launch of new customer contracts throughout 2009.
Cost of revenue was $1.20 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $702.3 million for the same period in 2008. Cost of revenue has increased in line with the increase in PBM revenues, and is predominantly comprised of the cost of prescription drugs. As a percentage of r evenue, cost of revenue was 89.7% and 91.0% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in the cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue is due to the improved purchasing efficiencies for prescription drugs realized as a result of the increased size of the organization and the increased use of lower cost generic drugs. The Company will continue to seek opportunities for increased generic prescription drug usage to help reduce overall prescription drug costs to the Company and its customers.
Gross profit was $138.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $69.5 million for the same period in 2008. Gross profit increased primarily due to new customers added during 2009, along with a full year of PBM operations as compared to 8 months in 2008, both of which increased the volumes in the PBM segment. Gross pr ofit percentage was 10.3% and 9.0% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, with the improvement driven by the purchasing efficiencies realized from the NMHC acquisition.
37
HCIT
HCIT revenue in creased $11.6 million, or 12.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. Revenues increased mainly due to the rise in transaction processing revenues that are dependent on transaction volumes, driven by the launch of new customer contracts during 2009, as well as increased volumes from existing customers.
Transaction processing revenue consists of claims processing and generally increases as a result of the launch of new contracts as well as increased volumes of services provided to existing customers. Professional services revenue is derived from providing support projects for both system sales and transaction processing clients, on an as-needed basis. This revenue is dependent on customers initiating new projects and system enhancements which require the Company to assist them on both a fixed bid and time and mat erials basis. System sales are derived from license upgrades and additional applications for existing and new clients, as well as software and hardware sales to pharmacies that purchase the Company's pharmacy system. Maintenance revenue is generated from maintenance services provided on related system or license sales.
Cost of revenue increased 20.3% to $54.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $45.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Cost of revenue includes the direct support costs for the HCIT business as well as depreciation expense of $2.2 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, cost of revenue includes stoc k-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in HCIT cost of revenue is due primarily to personnel and support costs related to the growing transaction processing business and the implementation costs of new customer contracts.
Gross profit increased $2.4 million to $48.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $46.0 million for the same period in 2008. The increase is primarily due to increases in higher margin recurring revenue services. The increased gross profit was partially offset by additional HCIT personnel needed to support the growing HCIT business.
The Company’s sources of liquidity have primarily been cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from its public offerings, and proceeds from credit facilities. The Company’s principal uses of cash have been to fund working capital, finance strategic acquisitions and capital expenditures, satisfy contractual obligations, and to meet acquisition and investment needs. The Company anticipates that these uses will continue to be the principal demands on cash in the future.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents totaling $321.3 million and $304.4 million, respectively. The Company believes that its cash on hand, together with cash generated from operating activities, will be sufficient to support planned operations for the foreseeable future. At December 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash on hand, deposits in banks and bank term deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less. As of December 31, 2010, all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were exposed to market risks, primarily changes in U.S. and Canadian interest rates. Declines in interest rates over time will reduce interest income from these investments. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company repositioned its funds previously placed in money market funds and moved the funds i nto cash on deposit accounts. The Company assessed that it would earn a greater return from cash on deposit accounts due to the historically low rates currently paid on the U.S. money market funds. Further, the Company reduced expenses by moving the funds to cash on deposit accounts as the fees charged for those accounts are lower than the U.S. money market fund accounts.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Selected balance sheet highlights at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
| • | At December 31, 2010, cash and cash-equivalents increased $16.9 million to $321.3 million from $304.4 million at December 31, 2009. The increase is primarily related to strong operating cash flows of $96.3 million, offset by cash used to acquire MedfusionRx. |
| • &n bsp; | Restricted cash totaling $13.8 million relates to cash balances required to be maintained in accordance with various state statutes, contractual terms with customers and other customer restrictions related to the PBM business. The Company continues to monitor changes in balance requirements that may release restrictions and allow the funds to be used for general corporate purposes. |
| • &nbs p; | Accounts receivable are made up of trade accounts receivable from both the PBM and HCIT segment customers. Accounts receivable increased $24.8 million to $122.2 million at December 31, 2010 from $97.3 million at December 31, 2009, driven by increases in revenue of $505.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as additional trade accounts receivable related to the MedfusionRx acquisition. The accounts receivable balance is impacted by changes in revenues, as well as timing of collections, and is continually monitored by the Company to ensure timely collections and to assess the need for any changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts. |
| • | Rebates receivable of $34.2 million relate to billed and unbilled PBM receivables from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators in connection with the administration of the rebate program where the Company is the principal contracting party. The receivable and related payables are based on estimates, which are subject to final settlement. Rebates receivable increased $16.6 million to $34.2 million from $17.6 million at December 31, 2009, due primarily to increased rebate volumes driven by increased prescription drug sales transactions, as well as the timing of payments from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators. |
| • | The Company’s inventory balance of $8.7 million consists predominantly of prescription drugs and medical supplies at its Mail Service and Specialty Service pharmacies. As of December 31, 2010, the inventory balance has increased $1.6 million from the balance at December 31, 2009, mainly due to inventory related to the MedfusionRx acquisition. Changes in the |
38
inventory balance from period to period are caused by some seasonality in certain products, taking advantage of buying opportunities, and changing inventory levels due to customer demands.
| • | The accounts payable balance of $30.9 million represents amounts owed to the Company's suppliers for prescription drugs at the Mail Service and Specialty Service locations, as well as amounts due to vendors for general operating expenses. As of December 31, 2010, the accounts payable balance has increased $21.0 million from the balance at December 31, 2009, mainly due to payables assumed related to the acquisition of MedfusionRx. |
| • | Customer deposits payable of $15.4 million relate to deposits required by the Company for certain customers in order to satisfy liabilities incurred on the customer’s behalf for the adjudication of pharmacy claims, and are related to the restricted cash balances discussed above. |
| • | Pharmacy benefit management rebates payable represents amounts owed to customers for rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators where the Company administers the rebate program on the customer’s behalf, and the Company is the principal contracting party. The payables are based on estimates, which are subject to final settlement. Pharmacy benefit management rebates payable increased $14.8 million to $61.4 million at December 31, 2010. The increase is due to increased rebate volumes driven by increased prescription drug sales transactions. |
| • | Pharmacy benefit claims payable of $84.6 million predominantly relates to amounts owed to retail pharmacies for prescription drug costs and dispensing fees in connection with prescriptions dispensed by the retail network pharmacies for the Company’s customers when the Company is the principal contracting party with the pharmacy. Pharmacy benefit claims payable increased $22.9 million from the balance at December 31, 2009 due to increased transaction volumes during 2010. |
| • | Accrued liabilities decreased $9.1 million to $21.7 million at December 31, 2010 from $30.8 million at December 31, 2009, primarily due to the timing of payments made to customers in relation to contract performance guarantees and payments made related to assumed liabilities from the NMHC acquisition. |
| • | Other liabilities increased $4.0 million to $10.5 million at December 31, 2010 from $6.5 million at December 31, 2009, mainly due to the contingent purchase price liability recorded related to the MedfusionRx acquisition. The MedfusionRx purchase agreement includes a potential earn-out payment of $5.5 million to the former owners if certain performance criteria are met by MedfusionRx in 2012. The liability recorded is the estimated fair value of the liability as of December 31, 2010. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the contingent purchase price related to the acquisition. |
Cash flows from operating a ctivities
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company generated $96.3 million of cash through its operations. Cash provided by operating activities has increased $9.9 million compared to the same period in 2009 mainly due to the increased profitability of the Company. The Company’s continued focus on timely collection of its receivables, and effectively managing its working capital has also increased operating cash flows. Cash from operations consisted of net income of $64.7 million, adjusted for $16.3 million in depreciation and amortization expense, $5.9 million in stock-based compensation expense, an increase in rebates payable of $14.8 million, and an increase in pharmacy benefit claims payable of $22.9 million. These were partially offset by an increase of rebates receivable of $16.6 million, a decrease of accrued liabilities of $9.5 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $9.5 million, and $13.1 million in tax benefits from option exercises. The increases in accounts receivable, rebates receivable, rebates payable, and pharmacy benefit claims payable are all driven by the increased revenues and transactions of the PBM segment as discussed earlier.
Changes in the Company’s cash from operations results primarily from profitability of the Company, as well as the timing of collections on its receivables and payment or processing of its various payables and accrued liabilities. The Company continually monitors its balance of trade and rebate accounts receivable and devotes ample resources to collection efforts on those balances. Rebates receivable and the related payables are primarily estimates based on claims submitted. Rebates are typically paid to customers on a quarterly basis upon receipt of the billed funds from the pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators. The timing of the payments to customers and collections from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators on rebates causes fluctuations in the balances of these accounts on the balance sheet, as well as in the Company’s cash from operating activities.
Changes in non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization are caused by the purchase and acquisition of capital and intangible assets. As these assets become fully depreciated or amortized, the related expenses will decrease.
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, as well as non-cash items related to income taxes, will fluctuate based on working capital requirements and the required tax provision, which is determined by examining taxes actually paid or owed, as well as amounts expected to be paid or owed.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company generated $86.4 million of cash through its operations. Cash provided by operating activities has increased $44.8 million compared to the same period in 2008 mainly due to the increased profitability of the Company. The Company's continued focus on timely collection of its receivables, and effectively managing its working capital also increased operating cash flows. Cash from operations consisted of net income of $46.1 million adjusted for $17.7 million in depreciation and amortization expense, $3.7 million in stock-based compensation expense, a reduction of rebates receivable of $12.0 million, an increase in rebates payable of $10.3 million, an increase in pharmacy benefit claims payable of $10.3 million, and an increase in customer deposits of $3.0 million. These were partially offset by a reduction of accrued liabilities of $1.1 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $16.7 million, and $4.5 million in tax benefits from option exercises.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company generated $41.6 million of cash through its operations. Cash from operating activities consisted of net income of $15.1 million adjusted for $16.0 million in depreciation and amortization expense, $4.1 million in stock-
39
based compensation expense, and a $6.4 million increase in all other operating activities, primarily changes in working capital items. Included in the change in other operating activities (net of the effects of the acquisitions of NMHC and the assets of Zynchros, Inc.) is an $8.4 million decrease in claims payable, an $8.0 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $4.8 million increase in accrued liabilities and a $2.4 million increase in rebates receivable.
Cash flows from investing activities
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company used $103.7 million of cash for investing activities, which consisted primarily of cash used to acquire MedfusionRx. Additionally, the Company used $9.1 million for purchases of property and equipment to support increased tra nsaction volume, and $2.2 million to purchase short-term investments. These uses of cash were offset by $6.8 million in proceeds received from the sale of short-term investments.
As the Company grows, it continues to purchase capital assets to support increases in its information technology network capacity and personnel. The Company monitors and budgets these costs to ensure the expenditures aid in the strategic growth of the Company.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company used $15.8 million of cash for investing activities, which consisted primarily of $9.0 million for purchases of property and equipment to support increased transaction volume, and $5.1 million to purchase short-term investments.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Co mpany used $112.8 million of cash for investing activities, which consisted primarily of cash used for the acquisitions of NMHC and the assets of Zynchros Inc., along with the purchases of property and equipment to support increased transaction volume.
Cash flows from financing activities
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company generated $24.1 million of cash from financing activities, which mainly consisted of proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $11.0 million and a $13.1 million tax benefit on the exercise of stock options.
Cash flows from financing activities generally fluctuate based on the timing of option exercises by the Company’s employees, w hich are affected by market prices, vesting dates and expiration dates. The associated tax benefit on the exercise of stock options will also fluctuate based on the timing of option exercises, the market price of the Company's shares at the time of exercise, and the exercise price of the option.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company generated $166.2 million of cash from financing activities, which mainly consisted of $203.1 million in net proceeds from the public offering of 10,350,000 shares in September 2009. In addition to the cash generated from the public offering, cash inflows from financing activities included proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $6.3 million and a $4.5 million tax benefit on the exercise of stock options. These were partially offset by the repayment of all of the Company's long term debt of $47.6 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company generated $48.2 million of cash from financing activities, which consisted of the net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $45.8 million, the exercise of stock options of $1.5 million and a $0.8 million tax benefit on the exercise of stock option s.
Future Capital Requirements
The Company’s future capital requirements depend on many factors, including its product development programs. The Company expects to fund its operating and working capital needs, and business growth requirements through cash flow from operations and its cash and cash equivalents on hand. The Company expects that purchases of property and equipment will remain consistent with prior years. The Company cannot provide assurance that its actual cash requirements will not be greater than expected as of the date of this Annual Report. In order to meet business growth goals, the Company will, from time to time, consider the acquisition of, or in vestment in, complementary businesses, products, services and technologies, which might impact liquidity requirements or cause the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. Any issuance of additional equity or debt securities may result in dilution to shareholders, and the Company cannot be certain that additional public or private financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all.
If sources of liquidity are not available or if it cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations during the next twelve months, the Company might be required to obtain additional funds through operating improvements, capital markets transactions, asset sales or financing from third parties or a combination thereof. The Company cannot provide assurance that these additional sources of funds will be a vailable or, if available, will have reasonable terms.
If adequate funds are not available, the Company may have to substantially reduce or eliminate expenditures for marketing, research and development, and testing of proposed products, or obtain funds through arrangements with partners that require the Company to relinquish rights to certain of its technologies or products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital if its capital resources are exhausted. A lack of liquidity and an inability to raise capital when needed may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s ability to continue its operations or expand its business.
40
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Company’s significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and cash in future periods assuming all obligations reach maturity:
| Total | Less than 1 year | Years 1 - 3 | Years 4 - 5 | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | $ | 17,498 | $ | 3,885 | $ | 5,001 | $ | 4,122 | $ | 4,490 | |||||||||
| Capital leases | 161 | 130 | 32 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Purchase obligations(1) | 422 | 422 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 18,081 | $ | 4,437 | $ | 5,033 | $ | 4,122 | $ | 4,490 | |||||||||
| (1) | As of December&n bsp;31, 2010, certain contracts with the Company’s utilities providers require minimum annual purchases. |
The above table excludes $0.6 million related to the Company’s accrued liability for uncertain tax positions; the Company is unable to reliably estimate the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective taxing authorities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Outstanding Securities
As of January 31, 2011, the Company had 61,795,318 common shares outstanding, 1,556,828 options outstanding and 519,092 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) outstanding. The options are exercisable on a one-for-one basis into common shares. The outstanding RSUs are subject to time-based and performance-based vesting restrictions. The number of outstanding RSUs as of January 31, 2011 assumes the associated performance targets will be met at the maximum level for the performance-based RSUs. Once vested, RSUs convert on a one-for-one basis into common shares.
Summary of Quarterly Results
The following table provides summary quarterly results (unaudited) for the eight quarters prior to and including the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (in thousands except share and per share data):
| 2010 (1) (2) | 2009(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | Third Quarter | Second Quarter | First Quarter | Fourth Quarter | Third Quarter | Second Quarter | First Qu arter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PBM revenue | $ | 499,761 | $ | 463,042 | $ | 451,295 | $ | 427,502 | $ | 416,802 | $ | 357,473 | $ | 293,906 | $ | 267,780 | ||||||||||||||||
| HCIT revenue: | 27,112 | 26,880 | 28,151 | 24,646 | 26,514 | 26,056 | 26,923 | 23,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 526,873 | $ | 489,922 | $ | 479,446 | $ | 452,148 | $ | 443,316 | &nb sp; | $ | 383,529 | $ | 320,829 | $ | 290,960 | |||||||||||||||
| PBM gross profit % | 8.7 | % | 8.5 | % | 8.6 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.3 | % | 10.1 | % | 11.7 | % | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| HCIT gross profit % | 50.9 | % | 50.6 | % | 53.7 | % | 48.3 | % | 52.3 | % | 43.9 | % | 47.1 | % | 44.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 16,622 | $ | 16,176 | $ | 17,145 | $ | 14,792 | $ | 15,193 | $ | 11,209 | $ | 11,9 77 | $ | 7,682 | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic EPS | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted EPS | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||||||||||
| 1) | The Company acquired MedfusionRx on December 28, 2010 in exchange for $101.7 million in cash (subject to a customary working capital adjustment) and a contingent earn-out payment of up to $5.5 million based upon the achievement of certain performance targets in the 2012 fiscal year. |
| 2) | On September 17, 2010, the Company executed a two-for-one stock split effected by a stock dividend on the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. All share and per share data presented in this Annual Report have been adjusted to reflect this stock split. |
| 3) | On September 23, 2009, the Company completed a public offering of 10,350,000 of its common shares. The shares were offered to the public at a price of $20.75 per share. The gross proceeds from the offering totaled $214.8 million, excluding $11.7 million for underwriting discounts and commissions, and other offering costs. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the report ed amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, purchase price allocation in connection with acquisitions, the carrying amount of property and equipment, the value of intangible assets acquired and related amortization periods, impairment of goodwill, rebates, contingencies, the valuation allowances for receivables and future income taxes and accruals for income tax uncertainties. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Note 2 to the Company’s 2010 consolidated financial statements include a Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The understanding of the accounting policies used to prepare the consolidated financial statements
41
is important to understanding the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Revenue recognition
The Company’s revenue is derived from prescription drug sales along with transaction processing services, maintenance, professional ser vices, and systems sales (including software license and hardware sales).
The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (ii) the service or product has been provided to the customer and no uncertainties exist surrounding product acceptance; (iii) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) the collection of fees is reasonably assured. Areas of judgment and subjectivity in the Company’s revenue recognition include principal versus agent considerations for PBM contracts, arrangements with multiple elements, and professional service revenues under long-term contracts for HCIT contracts.
Principal versus agent considerations: The Company evaluates customer contracts using the indicators of the principal versus agent revenue accounting guidance to determine whether the Company acts as a principal or as an agent in the fulfillment of prescriptions through the retail pharmacy network. Assessing each contract requires judgment, and the conclusions reached on each contract will greatly impact the amount of revenue recorded. While gross profit is not impacted by the conclusion reached, revenues and cost of revenues will vary significantly. The Company assesses each contract to determine if the Company is acting as a principal or an agent. Key factors that the Company considers when determining whether it acts as a principal or an agent includes: (i) whether the Company has separate contractual relati onships with customers and with pharmacies, (ii) is the Company responsible to validate and manage a claim through its claims adjudication process, (iii) does the Company commit to set prescription prices for the pharmacy, including instructing the pharmacy as to how that price is to be settled (co-payment requirements), (iv) does the Company manage the overall prescription drug plan relationship with the patients, who are participants of customers’ plans, (v) who has credit risk for the amount due from the customer, and (vi) does the Company have direct obligations to the retail pharmacies to pay for the prescription drug spend. The Company weighs the criteria that are present in order to conclude whether the contract should be recorded gross as a principal, or net as an agent.
A rrangements with multiple elements: When the Company enters into arrangements with multiple deliverables it must consider: (i) whether the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) if the contract includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, whether delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company. In most cases, the Company is able to conclude that the separate deliverables have stand alone value since most of the deliverables are sold as stand alone products or services. A key area of judgment is for the Company to determine the relative selling prices of the undelivered items. The relative selling prices of undelivered elements, such as professional services, or ASP services, are determined based on stated pricing within the contract with each customer, or pricing for the same pr oduct sold to other customers. Professional services relative selling prices are determined based on billing rates per hour based on the type of professional services provided, whereas ASP services are generally based on transaction fee rates, or standard monthly access and processing fees. When the Company is unable to determine the relative selling prices based on contractual terms with the customer or from pricing of the same product sold to other customers, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for that deliverable. Once the relative selling prices are determined, revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting or element based on relative fair values.
Professional service revenues under long-term contracts: As part of the Company’s professional services offerings, the Company enters into contracts to provide professional services over a specified time frame, or for a specific contract deliverable. In cases where the contracts require professional services to be delivered for an extended time frame, the Company records revenue based on a percentage of completion model. The percentage of completion model is impacted by management’s estimate of hours required to complete a deliverable and the mix of staffing required for the project. When projects have a fixed fee, the Company must estimate the total cost to complete the deliverable in order to assess a projected margin from the project. Revenues are then recorded based o n the hours completed for the project and the calculated margin to be earned from the project. Revenues are impacted based on management’s estimate of margin to be earned on the project, and may fluctuate throughout the project as estimates are revised. Whenever management expects a loss on a project, the Company records the expected loss immediately in its consolidated statement of operations.
Rebates
The Company administers rebate programs through which it receives rebates and administrative fees from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators that are shared with customers. The Company recognizes rebates when the Company is entitled to them, and when the amounts of the rebates are determinable. The amount recorded for rebates earned by the Company from the pharmaceutical manufacturers, third party administrators, and from administrative fees are recorded as a reduction of cost of sales. Rebates owed to the Company’s customers are recorded as a reduction of revenue. The Company determines the amount of rebates to record based on the number and types of claims submitted, the rebate program terms with its customers, the Company’s rebate contracts, and any additional information that becomes available. The amount of rebates ultimately earned by the Company, or paid to its customers, is contingent upon several factors, including validation of claims data submitted by the Company, and may require adjustments in future periods to the amounts originally estimated. Historically, adjustments to the Company’s original rebate estimates have not been significant.
Goodwill and intangible assets
Goodwill is the residual amount that results when the purchase price of an acquired business exceeds the sum of the amounts allocated to the identifiable assets acquired, less liabilities assumed, based on their fair values. Goodwill is allocated to the Company’s reporting units that are expected to benefit from the business combination as of the date of the business combination. Intangible assets acquired individually or as part of a group of other assets are initially recognized and measured at cost. The cost of a group of intangible assets acquired in a transaction, including those acquired in a business combination that meet the specified criter ia for recognition apart from goodwill, is allocated to the individual assets acquired based on their fair values.
Goodwill and intangible assets are impacted by the Company’s fair value measurements at initial recording. Beginning in 2009, the
42
Company applied the revised business combination guidance as issued by the Fin ancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Measurements of goodwill and purchased intangible assets are based on models derived from a market participant point of view. Along with the methodology of how assets and liabilities acquired are measured, the new guidance also impacts the types of assets and liabilities required to be measured and recorded. Management’s conclusion on who would make up the market participants, the types of assets and liabilities required to be measured, and the methodology used to measure the assets and liabilities will all have a significant impact on the purchase price allocation for business combinations.
Asset impairments
The Company’s goodwill and long-lived assets (including property and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization) are subject to periodic impairment testing. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of October 31 of each year, while long-lived assets are only required to be tested for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Both asset impairment tests and considerations are impacted by various estimates and judgments made by management.
The annual impairment test for goodwill is impacted by management’s assessment of reporting units, allocation of the consolidated Company’s assets and liabilities to each reporting unit, management’s estimate of future operating results, and a selection of peers to establish a comparable market group. The annual impairment test completed for 2010 did not indicate any impairment of either of the Company’s two reporting units, and did not reveal that an impairment would be reasonably likely in the near future.
As noted above, long-lived assets are only required to be tested for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Assessing whether an impairment test is necessary requires management to monitor results of the business that utilize the long-lived assets, as well as outside market forces that may impact the future recoverability of the long-lived assets. No events or other circumstances occurred in 2010 that caused management to conclude any of its long-lived or intangible assets may not be recoverable.
Valuation of allowance for doubtful accounts
In assessing the valuation of the allowance for doubtful accounts, management reviews the collectability of accounts receivable in aggregate and on an individual account-basis. Delinquency is a ssessed based primarily on contractual terms, and management’s judgment is used as the basis for allowances required. Management reviews the accounts receivable on an individual customer-basis to determine if events such as subsequent collections, discussions with management of the debtor companies, or other activities lead to the conclusion to either increase or decrease the calculated allowance. The conclusions and estimates made are further impacted by changes in economic and market conditions as well as changes to the customers’ financial condition.
Contingencies
From time to time in connection with its operations, the Com pany is named as a defendant in actions for damages and costs allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs. Management also considers other areas of the Company’s business that may be subject to litigation and liability for damages arising from errors in processing the pricing of prescription drug claims, failure to meet performance measures within certain contracts relating to its services performed or its ability to obtain certain levels of discounts or rebates on prescription purchases from retail pharmacies, drug manufacturers and third party administrators or other actions or omissions. Reserves for contingencies are based upon the Company’s consideration of these proceedings and disputes. Management assesses the probability that these contingencies will be realized, and whether the outcome is reasonably estimable. The Company’s estimates for reserves recorded may be impacted by the history of similar claims, the limitations of any insurance coverage, advice from outside counsel, and manageme nt’s strategy with regard to the settlement or defense against such claims and obligations.
Income taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the deferred tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Benefits from tax positions are recognized in the consolidated financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. Management’s estimates of future operating results and tax planning strategies, assessment of the probability of future tax benefits realization, and the determination of the likelihood of tax positions being sustained upon exam, are key judgments which management makes which impact the accounting for income taxes and necessary valuation allowances.
Recent Accounting Standards
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for information on recent accounting pronouncements. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial condition and future operating resu lts for recently issued accounting guidance, and does not expect the recently issued guidance to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition or future results of operations.
43
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE PRICE SENSITIVITY
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents totaling $321.3 million, most of which is held in cash on deposit accounts. The Company previously paid interest based on the current LIBOR interest rate, however, the associated debt was fully repaid in December 2009, alleviating the Company’s exposure to interest rate risks for interest due on outstanding debt.
Throughout 2010, the Company’s effective interest income rate was less than 1%. Accordingly, the Company did not perform a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2010, assuming a hypothetical one percentage point decrease. As the interest rates at which the Company is earning interest are at historic lows, the Company would not expect a material change in its interest income if rates fell further than those applicable in 2010. Actual increases or decreases in earnings in the future could differ materially from this assumption based on the timing and amount of both interest rate changes and the levels of cash held by the Company. An analysis on the hypothetical impact to the Company’s interest expense was not performed since the long-term debt was extinguished during the fourth quarter of 2009, and the Company no longer has a risk due to interest rate fluctuations related to debt.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK
The Company is subject to foreign exchange risk related to its operations in Canada. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments to mitigate this risk. Exposure to fluctuations in Canadian-dollar denominated transactions is partially offset by Canadian-dollar denominated assets and liabilities. The realized foreign exchange gains and losses for each of the periods presented were insignificant to the Company's consolidated operations. The Company performed a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2010, assuming a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in the U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar exchange rate. Holding other variables constant, a 10% fluctuation in either direction in the exchange rate would affect the Company’s pre-tax income by less than $0.1 million.
There are inherent limitations in the sensitivity analysis presented, primarily due to the assumption that foreign exchange rate movements are linear and instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market changes that could arise, which may positively or negatively affect income.
44
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
RE PORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
SXC Health Solutions Corp.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SXC Health Solutions Corp. (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit include s examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SXC Health Solutions Corp. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2008, the Company changed the date of its annual goodwill impairment test from December 31 to October 31.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal con trol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 25, 2011
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
SXC Health Solutions Corp.:
We have audited SXC Health Solutions Corp.’s (the Company’s) in ternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the com pany; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material r espects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
The Company acquired MedfusionRx, L.L.C. and certain affiliated entities and certain assets of Medtown South, L.L.C. (collectively, MedfusionRx) on December 28, 2010, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, MedfusionRx's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $125.9 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2010. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of MedfusionRx.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flow and shareholders’ equity for the year then ended, and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 25, 2011
46
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| December 31, | |||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| (In thousands, except share data) | |||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||
| Current assets | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 321,284 | $ | 304,370 | |||
| Restricted cash | 13,790 | 14,169 | |||||
| Short term investments | — | 4,639 | |||||
| A ccounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,553 (2009 - $2,871) | 122,175 | 97,330 | |||||
| Rebates receivable | 34,249 | 17,630 | |||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 4,888 | 4,483 | |||||
| Inventory | 8,736 | 7,106 | |||||
Income tax recoverable | 5,285 | 345 | |||||
Pharmacy benefit management rebates payable
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
47
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||
| Revenue: | |||||||||||
| PBM | $ | 1,841,600 | $ | 1,335,961 | $ | 771,840 | |||||
| HCIT | 106,789 | 102,673 | 91,099 | ||||||||
| Total revenue | 1,948,389 | 1,438,634 | 862,939 | ||||||||
| Cost of revenue: | |||||||||||
| PBM | 1,681,944 | 1,197,757 | 702,333 | ||||||||
| HCIT | 52,390 | 54,277 | 45,1 20 | ||||||||
| Total cost of revenue | 1,734,334 | 1,252,034 | 747,453 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | 214,055 | 186,600 | 115,486 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | |||||||||||
| Product development costs | 12,428 | 11 ,951 | 10,105 | ||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 89,254 | 85,797 | 68,792 | ||||||||
| Depreciation of property and equipment | 5,995 | 5,811 | 4,810 | ||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 7,856 | 9,724 | 9,365 | ||||||||
| 115 ,533 | 113,283 | 93,072 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 98,522 | 73,317 | & nbsp; | 22,414 | |||||||
| Interest income | (727 | ) | (756 | ) | (2,749 | ) | |||||
| Interest expense and other expense, net | 1,693 | 5,988 | 4,859 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 97,556 | 68,085 | 20,304 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit): | |||||||||||
| Current | 29,531 | 22,285 | 4,866 | ||||||||
| Deferred | 3,290 | (261 | ) | 325 | |||||||
| 32,821 | 22,024 | 5,191 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 64,735 | $ | 46,061 | $ | 15,113 | |||||
| Basic | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.89 | $ | 0.33 | |||||
| Diluted | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.32 | |||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
48
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 64,735 | $ | 46,061 | $ | 15,113 | |||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | |||||||||||
| Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges and other (net of income tax expense of $1 and $255 in 2010 and 2009, respectively, and net of income tax benefit of $254 in 2008) | 1 | 429 | (430 | ) | |||||||
| Comprehensive income | $ | 64,736 | $ | 46,490 | $ | 14,683 | |||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
49
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 64,735 | $ | 46,061 | $ | 15,113 | |||||
| Items not involving cash: | |||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 5,895 | 3,657 | 4,080 | ||||||||
Depreciation of property and equipment | 8,439 | 8,014 | 6,615 | ||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 7,856 | 9,724 | 9,365 | ||||||||
| Deferred lease inducements and rent | (462 | ) | (593 | ) | (304 | ) | |||||
| Deferred income taxes | 3,290 | (261 | ) | 325 | |||||||
| Tax benefit on option exercises | (13,1 07 | ) | (4,464 | ) | (798 | ) | |||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: | |||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | (9,456 | ) | (16,705 | ) | 8,005 | ||||||
| Rebates receivable | (16,619 | ) | 11,956 | (2,383 | ) | ||||||
| Restricted cash | 379 | (1,671 | ) | 632 | |||||||
| Unbilled revenue | — | 73 | 1,122 | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | (824 | ) | (72 | ) | 107 | ||||||
| Inventory | 501 | (401 | ) | (83 | |||||||
| Income tax recoverable | 10,523 | 6,098 | 677 | &nbs p; | |||||||
| Accounts payable | 2,169 | 1,635 | 1,678 | ||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | (9,517 | ) | (1,139 | ) | 4,845 | ||||||
| Pharmacy benefit claim payments payable | 22,930 | 10,263 | (205 | ) | |||||||
| Pharmacy benefit management rebates payable | 14,758 | 10,280 | (8,357 | ) | |||||||
| Deferred revenue | 3,265 | (630 | ) | 1,305 | |||||||
| Customer deposits | 544 | 2,957 | (490 | ) | |||||||
| Other | 965 | 1,602 | 335 | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 96,264 | 86,384 | 41,584 | ||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (99,200 | ) | (2,176 | ) | (104,769 | ) | |||||
| Purchases of property and equipment | (9,070 | ) | (8,994 | ) | (8,410 | ) | |||||
| Lease inducements received | — | — | 373 | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of short term investments | 6,828 | 449 | — | ||||||||
| Purchases of short term investments | (2,208 | ) | (5,098 | ) | — | ||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (103,650 | ) | (15,819 | ) | (112,806 | ) | |||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of options | 11,024 | 6,264 | 1,549 | &nbs p; | |||||||
| Tax benefit on option exercises | 13,107 | 4,464 | 798 | ||||||||
| Proceeds from public offering, net of issuance costs | — | 203,121 | — | ||||||||
| Repayment of l ong-term debt | — | (47,640 | ) | (360 | ) | ||||||
| Payment of financing costs | — | — | (1,792 | ) | |||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of long term debt | — | — | 48,000 | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 24,131 | 166,209 | 48,195 | ||||||||
| Effect of foreign exchange on cash balances | 169 | (119 | ) | (187 | ) | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 16,914 | 236,655 | (23,214 | ) | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 304,370 | 67,715 | 90,929 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 321,284 | $ | 304,370 | $ | 67,715 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
50
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
(in thousands, except share data)
| &nbs p; | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Shares | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2007 | 41,971,868 | $ | 103,520 | $ | 8,299 | $ | 20,638 | $ | — | $ | 132,457 | |||||||||||
| Net income | — | &md ash; | — | 15,113 | — | 15,113 | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares under ESPP | 4,772 | 32 | — | — | — | 32 | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares for acquisition | 5,571,920 | 40,926 | — | — | — | 40,926 | ||||||||||||||||
| Costs to issue shares for acquisition | — | (362 | ) | — | — | — | (362 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options | 582,916 | 2,262 | (713 | ) | — | — | 1,549 | |||||||||||||||
| Vesting of restricted stock units | 74,588 | 610 | (610 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Tax benefit on options exercised | — | — | 798 | — | — | 798 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 4,080 | — | — | 4,080 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | — | — | — | (430 | ) | (430 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2008 | 48,206,064 | 146,988 | ||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
51
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDA TED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 1. | Description of Business |
SXC Health Solutions Corp. (the “Company”) is a leading provider of pharmacy benefits management (“PBM”) services and hea lthcare information technology (“HCIT”) solutions to the healthcare benefits management industry. The Company’s product offerings and solutions combine a wide range of PBM services, software applications, application service provider (“ASP”) processing services and professional services designed for many of the largest organizations in the pharmaceutical supply chain, such as federal, provincial, and state and local governments, pharmacy benefit managers, managed care organizations, retail pharmacy chains and other healthcare intermediaries. The Company is headquartered in Lisle, Illinois with several locations in the U.S. and Canada. The Company trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under ticker symbol “SXC” and on the Nasdaq Global Market under ticker symbol “SXCI.” For more information please visit www.sxc.com.
On December 28, 2010, the Company completed its acquisition of MedfusionRx, L.L.C. and certain affiliated entities and certain assets of Medtown South, L.L.C. (collectively, "MedfusionRx"). Effective April 30, 2008, the Company completed its acquisition of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. (“NMHC”). Please see Note 4 for more information on these acquisitions.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Significant accounting policies are summarized below:
Basis of presentation:
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and include its w holly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Amounts in the consolidated financial statements are expressed in U.S. dollars, except where otherwise indicated. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the prior years’ consolidated financial statements to the current year’s presentation.
Subsequent events:
As of the issuance date of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, no subsequent events have occurred that would require adjustment to, or disclosure in, the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) guidance.
Accounting Standards Codification:
Effective with the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“the Codification”), which is now the exclusive authoritative reference for nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. Where applicable, titles and references to accounting standards have been updated to reflect the Codification.
Use of estimates:
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, purchase price allocation in connection with acquisitions, valuation of property and equipment, valuation of intangible assets acquired and related amortization periods, impairment of goodwill, contingencies, valuation allowances for receivables and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue recognition:
The Company's revenue is derived from prescription drug sales along with transaction processing services, maintenance, professional services, and systems sales (including software license and hardware sales).
The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (ii) the service or product has been provided to the customer and no uncertainties exist surround ing product acceptance; (iii) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) the collection of fees is reasonably assured.
When the Company enters into arrangements with multiple deliverables, exclusive of arrangements with software deliverables, it applies the FASB's guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables and evaluates each deliverable to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting based on the following criteria: (i) whether the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) if the contract includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting or elem ent based on relative selling prices. The Company determines relative selling prices by using either (i) vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if it exists; or (ii) third-party evidence of selling price ("TPE"). When neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists for a deliverable, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for that deliverable.
After determining which deliverables represent a separate unit of accounting, each unit is then accounted for under the applicable revenue recognition guidance. In cases where elements cannot be treated as separate units of accounting, the elements are combined into a single unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes.
52
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
When the Company enters into arrangements with multiple deliverables involving software, the Company applies the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant’s ("AICPA") accounting guidance for software. The entire arrangement fee is allocated to each element in the arrangement based on the respective VSOE of fair value of each element.
When an arrangement includes software and non-software deliverables, the Company allocates the arrangement consideration to the non-software deliverables, and to the software deliverables as a group, based on the relative selling prices of all deliverables in the arrangement. When a tangible product contains software that is not essential to the product’s functionality, that nonessential software and any other deliverables within the arrangement that relate to that nonessential software, are accounted f or under accounting guidance for software. The non-software deliverables sold by the Company typically do not include software deliverables that are considered essential to the functionality of a tangible product.
Revenue is recognized for specific types of transactions as follows:
PBM revenue: The Company’s PBM revenue is primarily derived from sales of prescription drugs, together with any associated administrative fees, to customers and participants, either through the Company’s nationwide network of pharmacies, Mail Service or Specialty Service. Revenue related to the sales of prescription drugs by the Company’s nationwide network of pharmacies, Mail Service pharmacy or Specialty Service pharmacy is recognized when the claims are adjudicated and the prescription drugs are shipped. Claims are adjudicated at the point-of-sale using the Company’s on-line processing system. The Company’s Mail Service primarily fills prescriptions for the Company’s customers. Revenue from Specialty Service primarily represents sales of biopharmaceutical drugs and is reported at the net amount billed to third party payors, patients and others. The Company records an offsetting reduction to revenue for any rebates earned from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators which are payable to the Company’s customers.
For transa ctions at retail pharmacies, under the terms of the customer contracts, the pharmacy is solely obligated to collect the co-payments from the participants. The Company does not assume liability for participant co-payments in retail pharmacy transactions, and therefore does not include participant co-payments in revenue or cost of revenue. If these amounts were included in the Company’s operating results, its operating income and net income would not have been affected.
The Company evaluates customer contracts to determine whether the Company acts as a principal or as an agent in the fulfillment of prescriptions through its retail pharmacy network. The Company acts as a principal in certain of its transactions with customers and, in these cases, revenues are recognized at the prescription price (ingredient cost plus dispens ing fee) negotiated with customers, plus the Company’s administrative fees (“gross reporting”). Gross reporting is appropriate when the Company (i) has separate contractual relationships with customers and with pharmacies, (ii) is responsible to validate and manage a claim through its claims adjudication process, (iii) commits to set prescription prices for the pharmacy, including instructing the pharmacy as to how that price is to be settled (co-payment requirements), (iv) manages the overall prescription drug plan relationship with the patients, who are members of customers’ plans, and (v) has credit risk for the amount due from the customer.
HCIT revenue: HCIT revenues are genera ted from transaction processing, system sales, maintenance, and professional services. Revenue is recognized for the specific types of HCIT transactions as follows:
Transaction processing revenue: Revenue from transaction processing includes ASP and switching services. ASP services consist primarily of hosting, claims adjudication, customer support, financial reporting, data storage, and rebate administration services. The Company earns a transaction fee for each transaction processed. The Company recognizes revenue at the time the transaction is processed, with the exception of any undelivered elements.
System sales revenue: Revenue from software licenses is recognized in accordance with the AICPA's accounting guidance for software. Revenue is recognized when all the conditions described above are satisfied. In the event the fee is not fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized as the payments become due from the customer. In cases where collection is not deemed probable, revenue is recognized upon receipt of cash, assuming all other criteria have been met.
Typically, software license agreements are multiple element arrangements as they may also include professional services, related maintenance, hardware, and implementation services fees. Ar rangements that include non-software elements are evaluated to determine whether those services are considered essential to the functionality of the software. In general, the software sold by the Company is not essential to the functionality of the non-software elements, including tangible products, sold by the Company; accordingly, all software elements in multiple element arrangements are recognized under accounting guidance for software.
When non-software elements are not considered essential to the functionality of the software and significant customization of the software is not required, the entire arrangement fee is allocated to each element in the arrangement based on the respective VSOE of fair value of each element. VSOE of fair value used in determining the fair value of license revenues is based on the price charged by the Company when th e same element is sold in similar volumes to a customer of similar size and nature on a stand-alone basis. As the Company has not sold many licenses over the past several years, VSOE of fair value for licenses is not always established. VSOE used in determining revenue for consulting is based on the standard daily rates for the type of services being provided multiplied by the estimated time to complete the task. VSOE used in determining the fair value of maintenance and technical support is based on the annual renewal rates. The revenue allocable to the consulting services is recognized as the services are performed. In instances where VSOE exists for undelivered elements but does not exist for delivered elements of a software arrangement, the Company uses the residual method of allocation of the arrangement fees for revenue recognition purposes. The Company has used the residual method of revenue recognition to determine the amount of revenue to be applied to any software licenses that contain multiple ele ments for the periods covered in this Annual Report as VSOE of fair value of the software licenses was not available. If VSOE of fair value cannot be established for the undelivered elements of a license agreement, the entire amount of revenue under the arrangement is deferred until these elements have been delivered or VSOE can be established.
53
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Maintenance revenue: Maintenance revenues consist of revenue derived from contracts to provide post-contract customer support (“PCS”) to license holders. These revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Advance billings of PCS are not recorded to the extent that the term of the PCS has not commenced or payment has not been received.
Professional services revenue: Professional services revenues are recognized as the services are performed, generally on a time and material basis. Professional services revenues attributed to fixed price arrangements are recognized over the service period based on a proportionate performance method whereby the performance is estimated utilizing direct labor hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated direct labor hours to complete the project.
Cost of revenue:
The Company’s cost of revenue includes the cost of pharmaceuticals dispensed, either directly through Mail Service or Specialty Service, or indirectly through its nationwide ne twork of retail pharmacies. Cost of revenue is reduced for rebates earned from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators. Cost of revenue also includes the cost of personnel to support the Company’s transaction processing services, system sales, maintenance, and professional services. In addition, the Company includes in cost of revenue an amount of depreciation expense that is related to property and equipment used to provide services to customers.
Cash and cash equivalents:
The Company considers cash on hand, deposits in banks, money market funds, and bank term deposits with original maturities of ninety days or less as cash and cash equivalents. The amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value of cash and cash equivalents. These assets are deemed level one securities in the fair value hierarchy.
Restricted cash:
Restricted cash balances at December 31, 2010 are restricted as to use and relate primarily to minimum cash balances required in accordance with various state statutes, contractual terms with customers and ot her customer restrictions related to the Company’s PBM business.
Short-term investments:
As of December 31, 2009, the Company held debt securities, U.S. government treasuries, and other short-term investments that were classified as available-for-sale securities. These securities were classified as available-for-sale since they did not qualify as trading securities or as held-to-maturity securities. Management assessed the classification of each investment at the purchase date, and reviewed the classification at each reporting period. The available-for-sale securities were carried at fair value based on current market prices ob tained from industry pricing sources (e.g. Bloomberg). Unrealized gains and losses on the securities were recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax. The securities had maturities of less than one year, and were accordingly classified as current assets. As of December 31, 2010, the Company did not hold any debt securities, U.S. government treasuries, and other short-term investments.
The Company considered the need to review its investments for an other-than-temporary impairment at each reporting period. The Company reviewed each investment that had a fair value below its amortized cost basis and considered whether the decline in the asset’s value is temporary. For those impairments deemed other-than-temporary, a charge would be recorded to current period earnings. The Company did not record any other-than-t emporary impairment charges during 2010 or 2009.
Fair value measurements:
The Company applies the fair value accounting guidance for measuring its financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Currently, none of the Company’s non-financial assets are required to be carried at fair value. The Company would apply the fair value accounting guidance to non-financial assets and liabilities in the event that a non-financial asset or liabil ity was impaired, or, if non-financial assets and liabilities were purchased in a business acquisition.
The fair value of the contingent purchase price liability associated with the acquisition of MedfusionRx is based upon a probability weighted discounted cash flow model, based on the Company's expectation of the amount to be paid in the future to settle the contingent purchase price. The inputs utilized in calculating the fair value of the contingent purchase price liability are not observable in the market place. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate contracts is based upon observable market-based inputs that reflect the current value of the difference between the fixed rate payments the Company will make to the counter party, and the future variable rate receipts from the counterparty. The Company’s short-term investments held at December 31, 2009 were valued based upon market prices for those specific securities obtained from industry pricing sources.
Other assets and liabilities held by the Company deemed as financial instruments and required to be carried at fair value include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, rebates receivable, accounts payable, salaries and wages payable, accrued liabilities (current portion), pharmacy benefit management rebates payable and pharmacy benefit claim payments payable. The estimated fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of their maturities.
Deferred charges:
Deferred charges consisted of deferred financing costs relating to the issuance of long-term debt. Amortization was provided using the effective-interest method over the term of the related debt. As of December 31, 2009, the Company expensed all of the remaining deferred financing costs due to the extinguishment of the Company’s long-term debt associated with these costs.
Inventory:
Inventory consists primarily of prescription drugs and medical supplies, computer hardware and sub-licensed software held for resale and is carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventory costs are calculated using the first-in, first-out method and the weighted-
54
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
average method.
Property and equipment:
Property and equipment (“P&E”) are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is generally calculated over the e xpected estimated useful lives of the assets. Assets are depreciated in the following manner: 1) Furniture and equipment is depreciated using the straight- line method based on a useful life of five years, 2) Computer equipment and software assets are depreciated using a straight-line method and a useful life of three to five years, and 3) Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the asset’s life or the lease term.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts:
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Amounts collected on trade accounts receivable are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. In assessing the valuation of the allowance for doubtful accounts, management reviews the collectability of accounts receivable in aggregate and on an individual account-basis. Individual customer events such as subsequent collections, discussions with management of the debtor companies, or other activities are used by management as factors in concluding whether to increase or decrease the calculated allowance. Any increase or decrease to the allowance is recognized in the statements of operations as bad debt expense within selling, general and administrative expense.
Impairment of long-lived assets:
Long-lived assets or asset groups held and used, including P&E and purchased intangibles subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; the accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and a current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. Recoverability is ass essed based on the carrying amount of the asset and the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset or asset group. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the asset or asset group. The impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds fair value. During each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, no events or circumstances occurred that indicated that the carrying amounts of the long-lived assets may not be recoverable.
Goodwill:
Goodwill is the residual amount that results when the purchase price of an acquired business exceeds the sum of the amounts allocated to the identifiable assets acquired, less liabilities assumed, based on their fair values. Goodwill is allocated to the Company’s reporting unit that is expected to benefit from the business combination as of the date of the business combination.
Goodwill is not amortized, but rather, is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Prior to 2008, the Company completed its goodwill impairment test at December 31. In 2008, the Company changed the date of its annual impairment test to October 31 driven by the increase in reporting segments due to the NMHC acquisition completed in 2008. Changing the date to October 31 is preferable to allow the Company more time to accurately complete its impairment testing process.
Circumstances that could trigger an interim impairment test include: a significant adverse change in the business climate or legal factors; an adverse action or assessm ent by a regulator; unanticipated competition; the loss of key personnel; a change in reportable segments; the likelihood that a reporting unit or significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of; the results of testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit; and the recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit.
The impairment test is carried out in two steps. In the first step, the carrying amount of the reporting unit is compared with its fair value. When the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. The second step is carried out when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, in which case the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is compared with its carrying amount to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the value of goodwill is determined in a business combination using the fair value of the reporting unit as if it was the purchase price. When the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess and is presented as a separate line item in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company completed its goodwill impairment test for 2010 and determined no impairment existed. Based on the testing results, an impairment in the near future is not considered reasonably likely. The Company previously completed the impairment test in 2009 and 2008 and concluded no impairment existed.
Intangible assets:
Intangible assets acquired individually or as part of a group of other as sets are initially recognized and measured at cost. The cost of a group of intangible assets acquired in a transaction, including those acquired in a business combination that meet the specified criteria for recognition apart from goodwill, is allocated to the individual assets acquired based on their fair values.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives on either a straight-line basis or in proportion to the economic benefits expected to be consumed. Customer relationships acquired with the acquisition of NMHC and MedfusionRx are amortized over 8 years and 5 years, respectively, based on projected cash flows associated with existing customers at the acquisition date. The
55
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
remaining customer relationships are currently amortized over either five years or ten years on a straight-line basis. The remaining intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over 1 to 15 years.
The Company requires deposits from certain customers in order to satisfy liabilities incurred by the Company on the customer’s behalf for the adjudication of pharmacy claims. Customer deposits totalled $15.4 million and $14.8 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Rebates:
The Company administers a rebate program through which it receives rebates and administrative fees from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators that are shared with a majority of the Company’s customers. The rebates earned for the administration of the program are recorded as a reduction of cost of revenue and the portion of the rebate payable to customers is treated as a reduction of revenue. Rebates receivable include billed and unbilled PBM receivables from pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators. The Company records the gross rebate receivable and the related payable to the customers based on estimates, which are subject to final settlement due to the required validation of claims data submitted to the pharmaceutical manufacturers and third party administrators, as well as contingent items contained in the total calculation for rebates earned. The estimates are based upon claims submitted and the Company’s rebate contracts, and are adjusted as additional information becomes available. Upon billing the pharmaceutical manufacturer or third party administrator, any difference between the Company’s estimate and the actual amount of the rebate re ceivable is recorded to cost of revenue, net of the estimated impact to the Company’s customers. The Company generally pays rebates to its customers on a quarterly basis, or as agreed upon with its customers. There are certain instances where the Company pays rebates to its customers on a more accelerated basis.
In late 2008, the Company entered into new contracts for manufacturer rebates and currently only acts as the principal contracting party. Prior to entering into the new contracts, the Company had two rebate programs. In one of the programs the Company acted as an agent for its customers, and in the other as a principal, as it acts in the current rebate program.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, total unbilled pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates receivable amounted to $9.3 million and $7.0 million, respectively.
Research and p roduct development:
Research costs are expensed as incurred. Costs related to development of software are expensed as incurred unless such costs meet the criteria for capitalization and amortization. The Company has not capitalized any software development costs incurred during 2010, 2009, or 2008.
Stock-based compensation:
For stock-based awards issued to employees and directors, compensation cost related to those awards is measured based on the fair value of the options on the date of the grant. For stock options, the fair value is determined by using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The compensation cost of the awards expected to vest is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period as compensation expense and additional paid-in capital. In addition, the Company estimates forfeitures as part of the initial measure of the grant date fair value of the a ward.
The cumulative compensation cost is treated as a temporary difference for stock-based awards that are deductible for tax purposes. If a deduction reported on a tax return exceeds the cumulative compensation cost for those awards, any resulting realized tax benefit that exceeds the previously recognized deferred tax asset for those awards (the excess tax benefit) is recognized as additional paid-in capital. If the amount deductible is less than the cumulative compensation cost recognized for financial reporting purposes, the write-off of a deferred tax asset related to that deficiency, net of the related valuation allowance, if any, is first offset to the extent of any remaining additional paid-in capital from excess tax benefits from previous awards with the remainder recognized in the statement of operations.
Derivatives:
The Company accounts for derivative instruments pursuant to the FASB’s derivative and hedge accounting guidance. The guidance requires that all derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. Changes in the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments not deemed cash flow hedges are recorded in the statements of operations each reporting period. The Company records the change in the fair value of its derivative instruments deemed as cash flow hedges through other comprehensive income in each reporting period.
Foreign currency:
The Company’s functional currency and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Monetary items denominated in foreign currency are translated to U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and non-monetary items are translated at rates in effect when the assets were acquired or obligations incurred. Revenue and expenses are translated at rates in effect at the time of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of operations as "Other (income) expense."
Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding stock-based awards. The dilutive effect is calculated by assuming that the proceeds from the exercise of in-the-money stock options were used to acquire shares of common stock at the average market price for the period.
Income taxes:
56
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabili ties are recognized for the deferred tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date of enactment.
Future tax benefits resulting from historical net operating losses (“NOLs”) and deductible temporary differences are recognized in accordance with tax accounting guidance. In assessing the realizability of the related deferred inc ome tax assets (“DTAs”), management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the DTAs will be realized. The ultimate realization of DTAs is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the period in which those temporary differences become deductible, in addition to management’s tax planning strategies. Management considers projected future taxable income, uncertainties related to the industry in which the Company operates, tax planning strategies, historical taxable income, and a comparison of actual levels of taxable income with pre-tax book income in making this assessment. Valuation allowances are established for DTAs that are not considered more likely than not to be realized. The amount of this valuation allowance is subject to adjustment by the Company in future periods based upon its assessment of evidence supporting the degree of probability that DTAs will be realized.
The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions, although the Company believes its tax position is supportable, when the Company believes that the tax positions may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. Benefits from uncertain tax positions are recognized in the consolidated financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement. The Compa ny recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
Investment tax credits:
Non-refundable investment tax credits for Scientific Research and Experimental Development (“SRED”) activities are recorded when the Company has reasonable assurance that the credit will be realized. Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions in determining the expenditures eligible for the investment tax credit claim. It is possible that the allowable amount of the investment tax credit claim could be materially different from the recorded amount upon assessment by the Canada Revenue Agency. No n-refundable investment tax credits are recorded as a reduction of income tax expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
Deferred lease inducements:
Deferred lease inducements represent cash inducements and tenant improvement allowances received from the Company’s landlords that are amortized against rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective lease.
Deferred rent:
When the terms of an operating lease provide for periods of free rent, rent concessions and/or rent escalations, the Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective lease. The difference between the rent expense recognized and the actual payments made in accordance with the lease agreement is recognized as deferred rent liability.
(b) Recent accounting standards implemented are summarized below:
Rev enue arrangements with multiple deliverables:
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the amendment to revenue recognition guidance for transactions with multiple deliverables. The updated accounting guidance changes the criteria necessary for a delivered item to be considered a separate element by removing the requirement of using objective and reliable evidence of fair value in determining the amount of revenue to recognize. In place of having objective and reliable evidence of fair value for delivered and undelivered elements, a company may use its best estimate of selling price to determine the amount of revenue to recognize. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial results.
& nbsp;
Revenue arrangements that include software elements:
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the amended revenue recognition guidance for transactions involving tangible products that have software components. The new accounting guidance removes the non-software components and software elements of the tangible product from the scope of software revenue recognition accounting guidance. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial results.
3. Stock split
On September 2, 2010, the Company announced that its board of directors had declared a two-for-one stock split effected by a stock dividend on the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. On September 17, 2010, shareholders of record at the close of business on September 14, 2010 were issued one additional common share for each share owned as of that date. All share and per share data presented in this Annual Report have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
57
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
4. Business Combinations
MedfusionRx Acquisition
On December 28, 2010, the Company, through its direct wholly owned subsidiary SXC Health Solutions, Inc. (“SXC Inc.”), completed the acquisition of MedfusionRx, L.L.C. and certain affiliated entities and certain assets of Medtown South, L.L.C (collectively, "MedfusionRx"), a specialty pharmacy provider with significant expertise in providing clinical services to patients with complex chronic conditions. The purchase price for MedfusionRx was $101.7 million in cash, subject to a customary post-closing working capital adjustment, and an opportunity for the former owners of MedfusionRx to earn an additional $5.5 million in cash, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance targets in the 2012 fiscal year, in each case based upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained in the Purchase Agreement. MedfusionRx's results of operations from the date of acquisition through December 31, 2010 were not material to the Company’s results of operations for 2010.
The acquisition of MedfusionRx will help transform the Company's Specialty Service pharmacy business by expanding its presence and enhancing its capabilities in this rapidly growing segment of the PBM industry. The acquisition will also provide an opportunity to create new revenues and generate cost savings through purchasing synergies.
The purchase price of the acquired MedfusionRx operations was comprised of the following (in thousands):
| Cash payment to MedfusionRx shareholders | $ | 101,716 | |
| Fair value of contingent purchase price | 4,865 | ||
| Total purchase price | $ | 106,581 | |
The MedfusionRx purchase agreement includes contingent purchase price consideration in the form of an earn-out payment o f up to $5.5 million contingent upon the MedfusionRx book of business meeting or exceeding certain gross profit targets for the 2012 fiscal year. The $4.9 million fair-value of the contingent purchase price was accrued at the date of acquisition as part of the total consideration transferred. The Company utilized a probability weighted discounted cash flow method to arrive at the fair value of the contingent consideration. The Company will continue to reassess the fair value of the contingent purchase price until the applicable earn-out period has lapsed. Any future changes to the fair value of the contingent purchase price will be recognized in earnings of the Company. As the fair value measurement for the contingent consideration is based on inputs not observed in the market, the measurement is classified as a Level 3 measurement as defined by fair v alue measurements guidance.
Costs related to the MedfusionRx acquisition of $2.4 million are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010. The costs incurred are comprised of legal, accounting, valuation, and professional services fees associated with the MedfusionRx acquisition.
Purchase Price Allocation
The MedfusionRx acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting with the Company treated as the acquiring entity. Accordingly, the consideration paid by the Company to complete the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. All of the assets and liabilities recorded for the MedfusionRx acquisition are included within the Company's PBM segment. Goodwill is non-amortizing for financial statement purposes and the entire goodwill balance generated from the MedfusionRx acquisition is tax deductible.
The following summarizes the preliminary fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and are subject to change. The purchase price allocation and related valuation process are not complete. Final determination of the fair value may result in further adjustments to the amounts presented below (in thousands):
| Current assets | $ | 20,736 | |
| Property and equipment | 360 | ||
| Goodwill | 78,539 | ||
| Intangible assets | 26,262 | ||
| Total assets acquired | 125,897 | ||
| Current liabilities | 19,316 | ||
| Total liabilities assumed | $ | 19,316 | |
| Net assets acquired | $ | 106,581 | |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company did not recognize any amortization expense from intangible assets acquired due to the timing of when the acquisition of MedfusionRx closed. Amortization related to the intangible assets acquired from the MedfusionRx acquisition is expected to be $7.0 million in 2011.
58
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDA TED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The estimated fair values and useful lives of intangible assets acquired are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Fair Value | Useful Life | ||||
| Trademarks/Trade names | $ | 10,000 | 10 years | ||
| Customer relationships | 14,562 | 5 years | |||
| Non-compete agreements | 1,400 | 5 years | |||
| License | 300 | 3 years | |||
| Total | $ | 26,262 | |||
None of the acquired intangible assets will have any residual value at the end of the amortization periods. There were no in-process research and development assets acquired.
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined historical results of operations of the Company and MedfusionRx as if the acquisition had occurred on the first day of the comparable period presented. The unaudited pro forma financial information includes certain adjustment s related to the acquisition, such as increased amortization from the fair value of intangible assets acquired recorded as part of the purchase accounting, and consequential income tax effects from the acquisition. Unaudited pro forma results of operations are as follows (dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Revenue | $ | 2,202,386 | $ | 1,636,903 | |||
| Gross profit | $ | 238,551 | $ | 209,180 | |||
| Net income | $ | 67,956 | $ | 44,841 | |||
| Earnings per share: | |||||||
| Basic | $ | 1.12 | $ | 0.86 | |||
| Diluted | $ | 1.08 | $ | 0.84 | |||
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||
| Basic | 60,736,831 | 52,008,408 | |||||
| Diluted | 63,136,600 | 53,594,746 | |||||
This unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of what would have occurred if the transaction had taken place on the dates presented and is not indicative of what the Company’s actual results of operations would have been had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the periods indicated above. Further, the pro forma combined results do not reflect one-time costs to fully merge and operate the combined organization more efficiently, or anticipated synergies expected to result from the combination and should not be relied upon as being indicative of the future results that the Company will experience.
NMHC Acquisition
Effective April 30, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of NMHC, a PBM company, in an exchange offer of (i) 0.434 of a Company common share and (ii) $7.70 in cash for each outstanding NMHC common share. Total deal consideration approximated $143.8 million, which included the issuance of 5,571,920 Company common shares. The value of the common shares issued was based on the average market price of the Company’s common shares from a few days before to a few days after the agreement was finalized and announced. To fund the transaction, the Company entered into a six-year $48.0 million term loan agreement. The Company also signed a $10.0 million senior secured revolving credit agreement. NMHC results of operations are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
Prior to the NMHC acquisition, the Company and one of NMHC’s subsidiaries, NMHCRX, Inc., were parties to a consulting agreement and software license and maintenance agreements pursuant to which the Company licensed, and provided consulting and support services in connection with, certain computer software for one of NMHCRX, Inc.’s claims adjudication systems.
The Company and NMHC have similar missions and core values, and the Company believes the synergies gained from this business combination will create long-term value for customers, vendors and sharehol ders, as well as opportunities for new and existing employees by making the Company better positioned to compete in the changing PBM environment.
59
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
&n bsp;
The purchase price of the acquired NMHC operations was comprised of the following (in thousands):
| Cash payment to NMHC shareholders | $ | 98,711 | |
| Value assigned to shares issued | 40,930 | ||
| Direct costs of the acquisition | 4,114 | ||
| Total purchase price | $ | 143,755 | |
Direc t Costs of the Acquisition
Direct costs of the acquisition include investment banking fees, legal and accounting fees and other external costs directly related to the acquisition.
Purchase Price Allocation
The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting with the Company treated as the acquiring entity. Accordingly, the consideration paid by the Company to complete the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabil ities assumed based upon their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill and allocated to the Company's PBM segment. Goodwill is non-amortizing for financial statement purposes and is not tax deductible. The changes in goodwill from December 31, 2008 are primarily due to deferred tax adjustments, changes in the estimated fair value of acquired fixed assets, and revisions to the estimated fair values of assumed liabilities related to the NMHC acquisition. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded an adjustment to goodwill and deferred tax liabilities. The adjustment decreased goodwill and decreased deferred tax liabilities (non-current) by approximately $2.1 million.
The following summarizes the final fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):
| Current assets | $ | 115,864 | |
| Property and equipment | 3,495 | ||
| Goodwill | 122,122 | ||
| Intangible assets | 44,420 | ||
| Other assets | 1,258 | ||
| Total assets acquired | 287,159 | ||
| Current liabilities | 132,618 | ||
| Deferred income taxes | 10,490 | ||
| Other liabilities | 296 | ||
| Total liabilities assumed | 143,404 | ||
| Net assets acquired | $ | 143,755 | |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized $6.0 million of amortization expense from intangible assets acquired. Amortization for 2011 is expected to be $5.3 million.
The estimated fair values and useful lives of intangible assets acquired are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Fair Value | Useful Life | ||||
| Trademarks/Trade names | $ | 1,120 | 6 months | ||
| Customer relationships | 39,700 | 8 years | |||
| Non-compete agreements | 1,480 | 1 year | |||
| Software | 1,120 | 1 year | |||
| Licenses | 1,000 | 15 years | |||
| Total | $ | 44,420 | &n bsp; | ||
None of the acquired intangible assets will have any residual value at the end of the amortization periods. There were no in-process research and development assets acquired.
Zynchros acquisition
On December 22, 2008, the Company announced that it had acquired the assets of Zynchros, a privately-owned leader in formulary management solutions, in a cash transaction effective December 19, 2008. Founded in 2000, Zynchros provides a suite of on-demand formulary
60
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLI DATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
management tools to approximately 45 health plan and PBM customers. The zynchros.com platform helps payors to effectively manage their formulary programs, and to maintain Medicare Part D compliance of their programs. The Company recorded identifiable intangible assets of $1.7 million with estimated useful lives of 4 to 5 years and goodwill of $2.4 million associated with the acquisition. The goodwill acquired was allocated to the Company’s HCIT segment. Zynchros results of operations are included in the 2008 consolidated statement of operations for the period from December 19, 2008 through December 31, 2008 and were not material to the Company&rs quo;s results of operations for the twelve months then ended.
5. Property and equipment
Net property and equipment was made up of the following at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
| December 31, 2010 | Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Book Value | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||
| Furniture and equipment | $ | 5,800 | $ | (3,295 | ) | $ | 2,505 | ||||
| Computer equipment and software | 44,045 | (29,142 | ) | 14,903 | |||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 6,912 | & nbsp; | (3,424 | ) | 3,488 | ||||||
| $ | 56,757 | $ | (35,861 | ) | $ | 20,896 | |||||
| December 31, 2009 | Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Book Value | ||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||
| Furniture and equipment | $ | 5,161 | $ | (2,638 | ) | $ | 2,523 | ||||
| Computer equipment and software | 35,928 | (22,062 | ) | 13,866 | |||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 6,212 | (2,721 | ) | 3,491 | |||||||
| $ | 47,301 | $ | (27,421 | ) | $ | 19,880 | |||||
Depreciation expense, including property and equipment acquired under capital leases, totaled $8.4 million, $8.0 million, and $6.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Of the total depreciation expense, $2.4 million, $2.2 million, and $1.8 million was related to the data center operations and allocated to cost of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010,2009 and 2008, respectively.
6. Other intangible assets
Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the useful lives of the related assets. The components of intangible a ssets were as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net | ||||||||||||||||||
| Customer relationships | $ | 68,624 | $ | 25,493 | $ | 43,131 | $ | 53,760 | $ | 18,116 | $ | 35,644 | |||||||||||
| Acquired software | 3,765 | 3,272 | 493 | 3,765 | 2,932 | 833 | |||||||||||||||||
| Trademarks/Trade names | 11,370 | 1,252 | 10,118 | 1,370 | 1,188 | 182 | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-compete agreements | 2,910 | 1,492 | 1,418 | 1,510 | 1,484 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||
| 1,300 | 178 | 1,122 | 1,000 | 111 | 889 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 87,969 | $ | 31,687 | $ | 56,282 | $ | 61,405 | $ | 23,831 | $ | 37,574 | |||||||||||
Future amortization associated with intangible assets at December 31, 2010 is estimated to be $14.2 million in 2011, $11.5 million in 2012, $9.6 million in 2013, $8.2 million in 2014, $6.0 ;million in 2015 and $6.7 million for years after 2015.
7. Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt:
On April 25, 2008, the Company’s U.S. subsidiary, SXC Inc., entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) providing for up to $58 million of borrowings, consisting of (i) a $10 million senior secured revolving credit facility (including borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on same-day notice) referred to as a swing loan (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and (ii) a $48 million senior secured term loan (the “Term Loan Facility” and, together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). On April 29, 2008, US Corp. borrowed $48 million under the Term Loan Facility to pay a portion of the consideration in connection with the acquisition of NMHC and certain transaction fees and expenses related to the acquisition.
61
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company repaid the entire outstanding principal under the Term Loan Facility on December 31, 2009. In exchange for a payment of $45.6 million, the Company was relieved of its future obligations to the lender. The Company also cancelled the Revolving Credit Facility on the same date. There was no gain or loss on extinguishment of the principal balance of the debt when it was repaid to the lender; however, the Company recorded a charge of $1.1 million to interest expense upon the extinguishment to expense the unamortized financing costs related to the Credit Facilities. The financing costs initially were $1.8 million and had been presented on the consolidated balance sheet as deferred financing charges. These costs were previously amortized into interest expense over the life of the loan using the effective interest method.
8. Shareholder's Equity
| (a) | Common shares: |
(i) Authorized: Unlimited no par voting common shares
(ii) Issued and outstanding:
| Number of Shares | Amount | |||||
| (In thousands except per share data) | ||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2007 | 41,971,868 | $ | 103,520 | |||
| Issuance of common shares (iii) | 5,571,920 | 40,926 | ||||
| Issuance of common shares under ESPP | 4,772 | 32 | ||||
| Vesting of restricted stock units | 74,588 | 610 | ||||
| Stock issuance costs | — | (362 | ) | |||
| Exercise of options | 582,916 | 2,262 | ||||
| Balance, December 31, 2008 | 48,206,064 | 146,988 | ||||
| Issuance of common shares (iii) | 10,350,494 | 203,125 | ||||
| Tax benefit of share issuance costs | — | 331 | ||||
| Vesting of restricted stock units | 92,330 | 2,023 | ||||
| Exercise of options | 1,465,674 | 9,063 | ||||
| Balance, December 31, 2009 | 60,114,562 | 361,530 | ||||
| Vesting of restricted stock units | 122,242 | 4,563 | ||||
| Exercise of options | 1,366,193 | 15,643 | ||||
| Balance, December 31, 2010 | 61,602,997 | $ | 381,736 | |||
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaled $11.0 million, $6.3 million, and $1.5 million, respectively. The additional amounts recorded for option exercises relate to the reclassification of the fair v alue of those options from additional paid-in capital to common shares.
(iii) Issuance of common shares:
Effective April 30, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of NMHC in an exchange offer of (i) 0.434 of a common share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) $7.70 in cash for each outstanding NMHC common share. The Company issued 5,571,920 shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition during 2008, and an additional 494 shares were issued during 2009.
On September 23, 2009, the Company completed a public offering of 10,350,000 shares of its common stock. The shares were offered to the public at a price of $20.75 per share. The gross proceeds to the Company from the offering totalled $214.8 million, excludin g $11.7 million for underwriting discounts and commissions, and other offering costs.
| (b) | Stock Option Plan: |
Effective on March 11, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), which was ap proved by the shareholders of the Company at the Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders on May 13, 2009. The LTIP provides for the grant of stock option awards, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance awards and other stock-based awards to eligible persons, including executive officers and directors of the Company. The purpose of the LTIP is to advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining high caliber employees and other key individuals who perform services for the Company, a subsidiary or an affiliate; align the interests of the Company’s shareholders and recipients of awards under the LTIP by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Company’s growth and success; and motivate award recipients to act in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. The LTIP provides for a maximum of 2,140,000 common shares of the Company to be issued in addition to the common shares that rema ined available for issuance under the previous option plan (the “Plan”).
A committee of the Board of Directors determines award amounts, option prices and vesting periods, subject to the provisions of the LTIP. All officers, directors, employees and service providers of the Company are eligible to receive equity awards at the discretion of the
62
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
committee. Options issued under the LTIP entitle holders to purchase one common share as defined by the LTIP.
The LTIP replaced the Plan, and no further grants or awards will be issued under the Plan. At December 31, 2010, 3,524,177 common shares had been reserved for issuance under the LTIP and the Plan.
Prior to May 2007, all stock options awarded by the Company were denominated in Canadian dollars as required by the Plan in effect at the grant date. Amendments to the Plan in May 2007 permitted the Company to denominate stock option awards in either Canadian or U.S. dollars. All grants made subsequent to May 2007 are denominated in U.S. dollars.
The following table summarizes activity related to stock options denominated in Canadian dollars for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number of Options | ||||||||||||||||
$
5.49
The Company ceased granting Canadian dollar stock options in 2007. All Canadian dollar options outstanding expire five years from the date of vesting.
The following table summarizes the information about the Canadian dollar stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010 in Canadian dollars:
| Range of Exercise Price | Options Outstanding and Exercisable | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||
| $ 1.54 - $ 3.30 | 86,566 | 1.52 | $ | 3.30 | |||||
| $ 3.66 - $ 6.80 | 48,786 | 1.26 | $ | 4.36 | |||||
| $ 7.18 - $12.19 | 117,126 | 1.94 | $ | 7.59 | |||||
| $ 1.54 - $12.19 | 252,478 | 1.66 | $ | 5.49 | |||||
The aggregate intrinsic value and remaining contractual term of exercisable stock options at December 31, 2010 was approximately $9.4 million (Cdn.$9.4 million) and 1.66 years, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of Canadian stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 was as follows (in thousands):
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| U.S. dollars | $ | 20,340 | $ | 12,399 | $ | 2,790 | |||||
| Canadian dollars | $ | 20,656 | $ | 13,791 | $ | 2,972 | |||||
The total fair value of Canadian stock options which vested during the years ended December 31, 2010,2009, and 2008 was as follows (in thousands):
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| U.S. dollars | $ | 329 | $ | 275 | $ | 1,228 | |||||
| Canadian dollars | $ | 348 | $ | 317 | $ | 1,494 | |||||
As of December 31, 2010, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to Canadian dollar stock options as all options were fully vested.
The following table summarizes activity related to stock options denominated in U.S. dollars for the years ended December 31,
63
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2010, 2009, and 2008. The Company began issuing these stock options subsequent to May 2007:
| 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
7.93
U.S. dollar options granted during 2010, 2009, and 2008 were primarily subject to a graded vesting schedule of four years. U.S. dollar options granted expire five to seven years from the grant date.
The following table summarizes the information about the U.S. dollar stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010:
| Range of Exercise Price | Options Outstanding | Weighted Average Rem aining Contractual Life (Years) | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Options Exercisable | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||
| (In U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||||||
| $5.23 - $6.41 | 354,020 | 2.05 | $ | 5.75 | 118,180 | $ | 5.84 | |||||||||
| $7.18 - $8.00 | 334,896 | 2.56 | $ | 7.35 | 112,396 | $ | 7.41 | |||||||||
| $8.32 - $11. 79 | 315,250 | 1.22 | $ | 11.32 | 150,750 | $ | 11.08 | |||||||||
| $12.77 - $45.36 | 492,815 | 5.71 | $ | 20.27 | 72,308 | $ | 13.43 | |||||||||
| $5.23 - $45.36 | 1,496,981 | 3.19 | $ | 12.06 | 453,634 | $ | 9.18 | |||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value and remaining contractual term of exercisable stock options at December 31, 2010 was $15.2 million and 2.16 years, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value and remaining contractual term of all vested options and options that are expected to vest are $46.1 million and 3.19 years, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2010 and 2009 was $17.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively. There were no options exercised during 2008. The total fair value of stock options which vested during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 was approximately $2.3 million, $1.6 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, there was $4.8 million of unr ecognized compensation cost related to U.S. dollar stock options which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years.
| (c) | Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
On May 16, 2007, shareholders of the Company approved the creation of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) which allows eligible employees to withhold annually up to a maximum of 15% of their base salary, or $25,000, subject to U.S. Internal Revenue Service limitations, for the purchase of the Company’s common shares. Common shares will be purchased on the last day of each offering period at a discount of 5% of the fair market value of the common shares on such date. The aggregate number of common shares that may be awarded under the ESPP may not exceed 200,000 common shares.
During the first quarter of 2009, the ESPP was amended so that the common shares available for purchase under the ESPP are drawn from reacquired common shares purchased on be half of the Company in the open market. Prior to the amendment in 2009, the common shares available for purchase under the ESPP were drawn from either authorized but previously un-issued common shares or from reacquired common shares, including those purchased by the Company in the open market. During 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company delivered 7,072, 12,396, and 4,772 common shares, respectively, under the ESPP.
The ESPP is not considered compensatory as the plan terms are no more favorable than to all other share holders, and the purchase discount does not exceed the per-share costs that would be incurred through a public offering. Since the plan is not considered compensatory, no portion of the costs related to ESPP purchases is included in the Company’s stock-based compensation expense.
| (d) | Restricted Stock Units: |
The Company assumed 341,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of NMHC after the acquisition, which converted into 253,498 RSUs
64
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
of the Company. The RSUs vested 33% each in November 2008, N ovember 2009 and November 2010.
In September 2008, the Company granted an additional 102,000 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $7.95 per share to certain new employees who were previous employees of NMHC. These restricted stock units vest in one-fourth increments on each grant date anniversary.
During 2010, the Company granted 131,520 time-based RSUs and 116,480 performance based RSUs to its employees and non-employee directors with an average grant date fair value of $32.20. During 2009, the Company granted 203,870 time-based RSUs and 140,540 performance based RSUs to its employees and non-employee directors with an average grant date fair value of $13.11. Time-based RSUs vest on a straight-line basis over a range of three to four years and performance-based RSUs cliff vest based upon reaching agreed upon three-year performance conditions. The number of outstanding performance-based RSUs as of December 31, 2010, assumes the associated performance targets will be met at the maximum level for the performance-based RSUs.
At December 31, 2010, there were 282,232 time-based RSUs and 237,260 performance based RSUs outstanding. The total intrinsic value of RSUs that vested during the year was $4.6 million. At December 31, 2010, there was $8.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.33 years. The following table summarizes the information about RSUs at December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Restricted Stock Units | &nb sp; | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Number of Restricted Stock Units | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Number of Restricted Stock Units | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||||||
| Nonvested balance as of the beginning of the per | 454,840 | $ | 11.67 | 207,760 | $ | 7.35 | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
| Assumed | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | 253,498 | $ | 7.06 | |||||||||||
| Granted | 248,000 | $ | 32.20 | 344,410 | $ | 13.11 | 102,000 | $ | 7.95 | |||||||||||
| Vested | (122,242 | ) | $ | 9.51 | (92,330 | ) | $ | 7.22 | (84,996 | ) | $ | 7.07 | ||||||||
| Forfeited | (61,106 | ) | $ | 17.61 | (5,000 | ) | $ | 12.77 | (62,742 | ) | $ | 7.54 | ||||||||
| Nonvested balance as of the end of the period | 519,492 | $ | 21.28 | 454,840 | $ | 11.67 | 207,760 | $ | 7.35 | |||||||||||
| (e) | Stock-based compensation: |
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $5.9 million, $3.7 million, and $4.1 million, respectively.
The Company allocated stock-based compensation costs to the same statement of operations line item as the cash compensation to those employees. Accordingly, the allocation of the compensation costs is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 (in thousands):
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 736 | $ | 664 | $ | 590 | |||||
| Product development costs | 236 | 182 | |||||||||
The total income tax benefit, using the Company’s statutory tax rates, recognized in the statements of operations for stock-based compensation arrangements for years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $2.2 million, $1.4 million, and $1.5 million, respectively.
65
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the options at grant date for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, based on the following assumptions:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| Volatility | 47.9 - 48.5% | 47.1 - 48.0% | 46.9 - 52.4% | |||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.41 - 2.39% | 1.96 - 2.75% | 1.60 - 3.27% | |||||||||
| Expected life | 4.5 years | 4.5 years | 2 - 5 years | |||||||||
| Dividend yield | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Weighted average grant date fair value: | ||||||||||||
| U.S. dollar stock options | $ | 13.90 | $ | 5.55 | $ | 2.87 | ||||||
The volatility assumption is based on historical volatility at the date of grant for the period equal to the expected life of the option.
The expected life assumption is based on historical exercise patterns. The options issued to employees typically have a longer expected life of 4.5 to 5 years due to the vesting schedules, whereas options issued to dire ctors have a shorter expected life of 1 to 2.5 years due to the immediate vesting of some of their options.
The Company does not expect to pay dividends and, therefore, no dividend yield assumption is used in calculating the fair value of stock options.
9. Income taxes
The income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows.
| December 31, | |||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||
| Deferred income tax assets: | |||||||
| Non-capital loss carryforwards (“NOL”) | $ | 356 | $ | 407 | |||
| Deductible research and development expenses | — | 777 | |||||
| Property and equipment and intangible assets | 49 | 169 | |||||
| Capital loss carried forward | 3,473 | 3,408 | |||||
| Lease inducements and deferred financing | 1,805 | 2,237 | |||||
| Investment tax credits | 659 | 926 | |||||
| Reserves and accruals | 5,591 | 8,661 | |||||
| Stock-based compensation | 2,424 | 2,619 | |||||
| Other | 1,282 | 1,047 | |||||
| Total | 15,639 | 20,251 | |||||
| Less valuation allowance | 3,714 | 3,649 | |||||
| Total deferred tax assets | $ | 11,925 | $ | 16,602 | |||
| Deferred tax assets — current | $ | 6,647 | $ | 9,875 | |||
| Deferred tax assets — long term | 5,278 | 6,727 | |||||
| Total | 11,925 | 16,602 | |||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities: | |||||||
| Property and equipment and intangible assets | $ | 19,309 | $ | 18,382 | |||
| Other | 415 | 301 | |||||
| Total | $ | 19,724 | $ | 18,683 | |||
At December 31, 2010, the Company had gross deferred tax assets (“DTAs”) totaling $15.6 million compared to $20.3 million at December 31, 2009. Of the $15.6 million, $4.4 million of DTAs related to its Canadian operations compared to $5.7 million at December 31, 2009. The Company also had deferred tax liabilities which increased to $19.7 million at December 31, 2010 from $18.7 million at December 31, 2009.
The balance of the valuation allowance was $3.7 million at December 31, 2010 compared to $ 3.6 million at December 31, 2009. The
66
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
valuation allowance arising from the Canadian operations was $3.5 million at December 31, 2010 and $3.4 million at December 31, 2009. The Canadian valuation allowance increased during the year as a result of changes in exchange rates. The amount of this valuation allowance is subject to adjustment by the Company in future periods based upon its assessment of evidence supporting the degree of probability that DTAs will be realized.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had a DTA of $0.4 million related to state NOLs that are available to reduce future years’ taxable income and expire beginning in 2014. A valuation allowance of $0.2 million has been established against a portion of the NOLs related to one of the Company’s prior acquisitions.
The Company has unused investment tax credits of approximately $0.7 million, which can be offset against Canadian federal income taxes payable in future taxation years. These investment tax credits expire in varying amounts from 2020 up to 2029. Successful closure of various taxation authorities’ examinations of these investment tax credits, along with an expectation of future profitability, resulted in a reversal of valuation allowance related to these investment tax credits, which impacted the Company’s effective tax rate in 2009.
The differences between the effective tax rate reflected in the provision for income taxes and the U.S. statutory income tax rate are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Corporate statutory rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | |||||
| Income t ax expense on income before income taxes | $ | 34,145 | $ | 23,830 | $ | 7,107 | |||||
| Tax effect of: | |||||||||||
| Impact of federal graduated tax rate | — | — | (129 | ) | |||||||
| State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit | 2,219 | 1,622 | 385 | ||||||||
| Impact of foreign tax rates | (245 | ) | 387 | 122 | |||||||
| Change in valuation allowance | — | (182 | ) | (993 | ) | ||||||
| Cross-jurisdictional financing | (3,984 | ) | (3,991 | ) | (1,458 | ) | |||||
| Adjustment to tax reserves | 255 | 273 | (85 | ) | |||||||
| Other | 431 | 85 | 242 | ||||||||
| $ | 32,821 | $ | 22,024 | $ | 5,191 | ||||||
Income from U.S. operations before income taxes was $92.6 million, $66.8 million, and $12.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Income from Canadian operations before income taxes, including taxable income attributab le to intercompany debt, was $5.0 million, $1.3 million, and $7.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Current tax expense | |||||||||||
| United States | $ | 29,256 | $ | 22,100 | $ | 3,994 | |||||
| Canada | 275 | 185 | 872 | ||||||||
| Total current tax expense | 29,531 | 22,285 | 4,866 | ||||||||
| Deferred tax expense (benefit) | |||||||||||
| United States | 1,945 | (245 | ) | (411 | ) | ||||||
| Canada | 1,345 | (16 | ) | 736 | |||||||
| Total deferred tax expense | 3,290 | (261 | ) | 325 | |||||||
| Total tax expense | $ | 32,821 | $ | 22,024 | $ | 5,191 | |||||
Uncertain Tax Positions
U.S. GAAP accounting guidance for uncertain tax positions prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company has an accrued liability in the consolidated balance sheets of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, related to various uncertain federal and state income tax matters, the resolution of all of which would not have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.
The changes in this accrued liability from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, and from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, were a result of recognizing accrued interest and penalties related to the liability for tax uncertainties, as well as the effect of various additions
67
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
to the Company's liability for tax uncertainties.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Accrued interest at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respect ively. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease within twelve months of December 31, 2010. The Company currently estimates that such increases or decreases will not be material.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Canadian and U.S. federal jurisdictions, and various provincial, state and local jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006.
10. Earnings per share
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 (in thousands, except share and per share data):
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Numerator: | |||||||||||
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 64,735 | $ | 46,061 | $ | 15,113 | |||||
| Denominator for basic EPS — weighted average common shares outstanding | 60,736,831 | 52,008,408 | 45,956,932 | ||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||
| Restricted stock units | 552,617 | 104,290 | 3,710 | ||||||||
| Stock options | 1,847,152 | 1,482,048 | 865,380 | ||||||||
| Denominator for diluted EPS | 63,136,600 | 53,594,746 | 46,826,022 | ||||||||
| Earnings per share: | |||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.89 | $ | 0.33 | |||||
| Diluted | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.32 | |||||
There were no options excluded from computation of the diluted EPS during 2010. Stock options totaling 22,000 and 1,456,332 were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for 2009 and 2008, respectively, as the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the periods.
11. Supplemental cash flow information
(a) The components of cash and cash equivalents are as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Cash on deposit | $ | 387,687 | $ | 86,384 | |||
| Payments in transit | (66,423 | ) | (87,500 | ) | |||
| U.S. money market funds | — | 305,453 | |||||
| Canadian dollar deposit (December 31, 2010 — Cdn. $20 at 1.0002; December 31, 2009 — Cdn. $35 at 1.0517) | 20 | 33 | |||||
| $ | 321,284 | $ | 304,370 | ||||
(b) Other non-cash activities (in thousands):
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 201 0 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Contingent purchase price recorded from the MedfusionRx acquisition | 4,865 | — | — | ||||||||
| Equity shares issued as a result of the NMHC acquisition | $ | — | $ | 4 | $ | 40,926 | |||||
(c) Cash paid (received) for income taxes and interest was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 (in thousands):
68
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Income taxes paid | $ | 19,334 | $ | 15,698 | $ | 4,168 | |||||
| Interest paid | $ | 1,351 | $ | 3,870 | $ | 3,345 | |||||
| Interest received | $ | (746 | ) | $ | (787 | ) | $ | (2,294 | ) | ||
12. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has a 401(k) savings plan that allows eligible employees to defer a percentage of their salary, not to exceed $16,500 in 2010 and 2009 and $15,500 in 2008. The Company matches an amount equal to 100% of the first 1% of eligible earnings and 50% of the next 5% of eligible earnings. All participant contributio ns are 100% vested. Employer contributions become 100% vested after completion of three years of service. For 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s contributions to this plan were $1.7 million, $1.3 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.
13. Commitments and contingencies
(a) ; Lease Commitments:
The Company maintains operating lease agreements for office space in its main operating locations. The Company also leases certain office equipment. Aggregate future minimum payments in respect of non-cancellable operating lease agreements as of December 31, 2010, which extend until 2018, are as follows (in thousands):
| Operating Leases | |||
| 2011 | $ | 3,885 | |
| 2012 | 2,895 | ||
| 2013 | 2,106 | ||
| 2014 | 2,055 | ||
| 2015 | 2,067 | ||
| After 2015 | 4,490 | ||
| $ | 17,498 | ||
The total rental expense under operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $5.7 million, $6.5 million, and $5.3 million, respectively. The lease renewal terms have not been factored into the commitments noted above as not renewing these leases would not have a detrimental impact on the Company. The Company terminated its Port Washington, New York lease effective May 2009, and paid an early termination fee of approximately $1.9 million. This cost was included in the purchase price of the NMHC acquisition in accordance with purchase accounting guidance in place at the time of the acquisition.
(b) Contingencies:
On December 28, 201 0, the Company completed its acquisition of MedfusionRx, a leading independent specialty pharmacy provider. In October 2009, federal agents executed a search warrant at MedfusionRx’s Birmingham, Alabama facility and received information relating to the dispensing, ordering, billing, claim submission and payment of a type of hemophilia medication and MedfusionRx’s relationship with a former marketer and deliverer of such medication. Subsequent to the completion of the acquisition, MedfusionRx’s former accountants received a grand jury subpoena for certain tax records of MedfusionRx and its former owners. MedfusionRx intends to cooperate fully with any requests received from governmental officials. While the Company believes that it is entitled to indemnification with respect to any costs or expenses arising from or relating to this matter pursuant to the terms of the MedfusionRx purchase agreement, we can give no assurances that such indemnification will be sufficient to cover all potential civil/criminal penalties and claims arising therefrom or relating thereto. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded any contingent liability in the consolidated financial statements relating to this matter.
In addition, from time to time in connection with its operations, the Company is named as a defendant in actions for damages and costs allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs. The Company has considered these proceedings and disputes in determining the necessity of any reserves for losses that are probable and reasonably estimable. In addition, various aspects of the Company’s business may subject it to litigation and liability for damages arising from errors in processing the pricing of prescription drug claims, failure to meet performance measures within certain contracts relating to its services performe d, its ability to obtain certain levels of discounts or rebates on prescription purchases from retail pharmacies and drug manufacturers or other actions or omissions. The Company’s recorded reserves are based on estimates developed with consideration given to the potential merits of claims or quantification of any performance obligations. The Company takes into account its history of claims, the limitations of any insurance coverage, advice from outside counsel, and management’s strategy with regard to the settlement or defense of such claims and obligations. While the ultimate outcome of those claims, lawsuits or performance obligations cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes, based on its understanding of the facts of these claims and performance obligations, that adequate provisions have been recorded in the accounts where required.
69
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(c) Guarantees:
The Company provides routine indemnification to its customers against liability if the Company’s products infringe on a third party’s intellectual property rights. The maximum amount of these indemnifications cannot be reasonably estimated due to their uncertain nature. Historically, the Company has not made payments related to these indemnifications.
14. Segment Information
(a) Reportable Segments
The Company manages its business in two segments, PBM and HCIT, and evaluates segment performance based on revenue and gross profit.
PBM Segment
The Company provides comprehensive PBM services to customers, which include managed care organizations, local governments, unions, corporations, HMOs, employers, workers’ compensation plans, third party heal th care plan administrators, and federal and state government programs through its network of licensed pharmacies throughout the United States. The PBM services include electronic point-of-sale pharmacy claims management, retail pharmacy network management, mail service pharmacy claims management, specialty pharmacy claims management, Medicare Part D services, benefit design consultation, preferred drug management programs, drug review and analysis, consulting services, data access and reporting and information analysis. The Company owns a Mail Service pharmacy and a Specialty Service pharmacy. In addition, the Company is a national provider of drug benefits to its customers under the federal government’s Medicare Part D program.
Revenue primarily consists of sales of prescription drugs, together with any associa ted administrative fees, to customers and participants, either through the Company’s nationwide network of pharmacies, Mail Service pharmacy or Specialty Service pharmacy. Revenue related to the sales of prescription drugs is recognized when the claims are adjudicated and the prescription drugs are shipped. Claims are adjudicated at the point-of-sale using an on-line processing system.
HCIT Segment
The Company is also a leading provider of HCIT solutions and services to providers, payors and other participants in the pharmaceutical supply chain in North America. The Company’s product offerings include a wide range of software products for mana ging prescription drug programs and for drug prescribing and dispensing. The Company’s solutions are available on a license basis with on-going maintenance and support or on a transaction fee basis using an ASP model. The Company’s payor customers include managed care organizations, Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations, government agencies, employers and intermediaries such as pharmacy benefit managers. The Company’s provider customers include over 1,900 independent, regional chain, institutional, and mail-order pharmacies. The solutions offered by the Company’s services assist both payors and providers in managing the complexity and reducing the cost of their prescription drug programs and dispensing activities. The Company’s profitability from HCIT depends primarily on revenue derived from transaction processing services, software license sales, hardware sales, maintenance, and professional services.
The Company evaluates segment performance based upon revenue and gross profit. Results for periods reported prior to the three months ended June 30, 2008 (the period in which the Company acquired NMHC) were reported in one operating segment, HCIT. Selling, general and administrative expenses, product development, depreciation and amortization are reported as corporate expenses. In addition, interest and other income and interest expense are reported within the corporate category. Prior period results have not been restated because to do so would be impracticable.
Financial information by segment is presented below (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 | PBM | HCIT | Corpora te | Total | |||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 1,841,600 | $ | 106,789 | $ | — | $ | 1,948,389 | |||||||
| Cost of revenue | 1,681,944 | 52,390 | — | 1,734,334 | |||||||||||
| Gross profit | 159,656 | 54,399 | — | 214,055 | |||||||||||
| Other corporate expenses | — | — | 116,499 | &n bsp; | 116,499 | ||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | — | — | — | 97,556 | |||||||||||
| Income tax expense | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
571,487
70
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| Year Ended December 31, 2009 | PBM | HCIT | Corporate | Total | |||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 1,335,961 | $ | 102,673 | $ | — | $ | 1,438,634 | |||||||
| Cost of revenue | 1,197,757 | 54,277 | — | 1,252,034 | |||||||||||
| Gross profit | 138,204 | 48,396 | — | 186,600 | |||||||||||
| Other corporate expenses | — | — | 118,515 | 118,515 | |||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | — | — | — | 68,085 | |||||||||||
| Income tax expense | — | — | — | 22,024 | |||||||||||
| Net income | — | — | — | $ | 46,061 | ||||||||||
| C apital expenditures | $ | 1,423 | $ | 7,571 | $ | — | $ | 8,994 | |||||||
| Property and equipment, n et | $ | 1,945 | $ | 17,935 | $ | — | $ | 19,880 | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2008 | PBM | HCIT | Corporate | Total | |||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 771,840 | $ | 91,099 | $ | — | $ | 862,939 | |||||||
| Cost of revenue | 702,333 | 45,120 | — | 747,453 | |||||||||||
| Gross profit | 69,507 | 45,979 | — | 115,486 | |||||||||||
| Other corporate expenses | — | — | 95,182 | 95,182 | |||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | — | — | — | 20,304 | |||||||||||
| Income tax expense | — | — | — | 5,191 | |||||||||||
| Net income | — | — | — | $ | 15,113 | ||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | $ | 360 | $ | 8,050 | $ | — | $ | 8,410 | |||||||
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 4,110 | $ | 16,646 | $ | — | $ | 20,756 | |||||||
| Goodwill | $ | 125,388 | $ | 18,363 | $ | — | $ | 143,751 | |||||||
(b) Geographic Information
All revenues of the Company are primarily earned in the United States. The Company’s Canadian operations represented less than 1% of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
(c) Major Customers
During the year ended December 31, 2010, one customer accounted for 10.5% of revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2009, one customer accoun ted for 12.6% of total revenue and another for 11.7% of total revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2008, one customer accounted for 12.3% of total revenue and another for 11.2% of total revenue. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, thes e major customers were included in the PBM segment.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, no one customer accounted for more than 10% of the total accounts receivable balance.
;
15. Financial instruments
(a) Credit risk:
The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk through cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company monitors the credit risk and credit standing of counterparties on a regular basis.
(b) Interest rate risk:
Prior to the extinguishment of its long-term debt on December 31, 2009, as discussed in Note 7, the Company was subject to interest rate risk related to variable rate debt. The Company used variable rate debt to finance its acquisition of NMHC in 2008. When interest rates increased, interest expense could increase. Conversely, when interest rates decreased, interest expense could also decrease.
To protect itself against the interest rate exposures, and pursuant to the terms of the Company’s $48 ;million credit agreement, the Company entered into interest rate contracts with notional amounts equal to 50% of the borrowed amount, or $24 million, for a three-year period from the date of issue. The Company entered into a 3-year interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $14 million to fix the LIBOR rate on $14 million of the term loan at 4.31%, resulting in an effective rate of 7.56% after adding the 3.25% margin per the credit agreement. Under the interest rate swap, the Company received LIBOR-based variable interest rate payments and made fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating the equivalent to fixed-rate debt. Additionally, the Company entered into a 3-year interest rate cap with a notional amount of $10 million to effectively cap the LIBOR rate on $10 million of the term loan at 4.50%, resulting in a maximum effective rate of 7.75% after adding the 3.25% margin per the credit agreement, excluding the associated fees. These instruments were designated as c ash flow hedges during 2008.
71
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
After the Company repaid all of its long-term debt in the fourth quarter of 2009, the cash flow h edge treatment was discontinued as the future transactions that the interest contracts were hedging were no longer probable of occurring.
As of December 31, 2010, both derivative instruments are “out of the money” and the Company is not currently exposed to any credit risk for amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheet should the counterparty in the agreement fail to meet its obligations under the agreement. The Company does not anticipate the instruments coming “out of the money” prior to their expiration in 2011. To manage credit risks, the Company selects counterparties based on credit assessme nts, limits overall exposure to any single counterparty, and monitors the market position with each counterparty. The Company assesses interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose other than hedging identified exposures. That is, the Company does not speculate using derivative instruments and has not designated any instruments as fair value hedges or hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in foreign operations.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes $0.4 million of net losses related to the aforementioned derivative instruments. This amount represents the change in the fair value of the interest rate swap from the date the transaction was entered into through the date that the Company implemented cash flow hedge accounting and the change in the fair value of the interest rate cap from the date the transaction was entered into through the end of the year.
(c) Fair values:
The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments has been determined based on the Company’s assessment of available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, these estimates may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. See Note 16 for the Company’s disclosure on the fair value of derivative instruments. The Company has determined that it is not meaningful to calculate the fair value of the non-current accrued liabilities as a portion of this amount is an accrual for tax uncertainties.
(d) Foreign exchange risk:
The Company is subject to foreign exchange risk related to its operations in Canada. The Company doe s not enter into derivative instruments to mitigate this risk. Exposure to fluctuations in Canadian-dollar denominated transactions is partially offset by Canadian dollar-denominated assets and liabilities.
16. Fair Value
Fair value measurement guidance defines a hierarchy to prioritize the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, with level 1 considered the most reliable. For assets and li abilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheet, the table below categorizes fair value measurements across the three levels as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||
| Derivatives | $ | — | 274 | — | $ | 274 | |||||||
| Contingent purchase price consideration | $ | — | — | 4,865 | &n bsp; | $ | 4,865 | ||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||
| Assets: | |||||||||||||
| Corporate debt securities | $ | — | 2,490 | — | $ | 2,490 | |||||||
| Other short term investment | $ | — | |||||||||||
When available and appropriate, the Company uses quoted market prices in active markets to determine fair value, and classifies such items within Level 1. Level 1 values include instruments traded on a public exchange. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. If the Company were to use one or more significant unobservable inputs for a model-derived valuation, the resulting valuation would be classified in Level 3.
The Company acquired MedfusionRx, a specialty pharmacy provider on December 28, 2010. The selling members of Medfusion have
72
SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP .
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the opportunity to earn an additional $5.5 million in cash, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance targets in the 2012 fiscal year. The $4.9 million fair-value of the contingent purchase price was accrued at the date of acquisition as part of the total consideration transferred. The Company utilized a probability weighted discounted cash flow method to arrive at the fair value of the con tingent consideration based on the expected results of Medfusion in 2012. As the fair value measurement for the contingent consideration is based on inputs not observed in the market, the measurement is classified as a Level 3 measurement as defined by fair value measurements guidance. There were no adjustments to the fair value of the contingent purchase price between the date of acquisition and the year end of the Company.
The Company has classified derivative liabilities as accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and as other noncurrent liabilities at December 31, 2009 in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair values represent quoted prices from a financial institution which are derived from movements in the underlying interest rate markets. The total fair value was $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was mostly recognized as other (income) expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
The corporate debt securities are recorded in short-term investments in the 2009 consolidated balance sheet. The fair values of these securities are based on quoted market prices for the specific securities held based on a matrix of valuations received from several pricing sources. Other short-term investments represent certificates of deposits and treasury bills that mature in over 90 days. These are recorded in short-term investments in the 2009 balance sheet. The fair values of these securities are based on quoted market prices for the specific securities held based on a matrix of valuations received from several pricing sources. The changes in fair value of the debt securities and other short-term investments have been insignificant since their initial purchase in the fourth quarter of 2009. The amortized cost for the debt securities and other short-term investments was $4.6 million as of December 31, 2009.
During 2010 and 2009 there were no movements of fair value measurements between levels 1, 2 and 3.
17. Supplemental Information
| Beginning Balance | Charged to Expense | Adjustments | Ending Balance | |||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | ||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 | $ | 2,871 | 1,219 | (537 | ) | $ | 3,553 | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2009 | $ | 3,570 | 1,085 | (1,784 | ) | $ | 2,871 | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2008 | $ | 605 | 1,284 | 1,681 | (1 | ) | $ | 3,570 | ||||||
(1) Includes $2,645 as a result of the acquisition of NMHC
| Beginning Balance | Charged to Expense | Adjustments | Ending Balance | ||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||
| Valuat ion allowance for deferred tax assets | |||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 | $ | 3,649 | 65 | — | $ | 3,714 | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2009 | $ | 5,712 | (1,881 | ) | (182 | ) | $ | 3,649 | |||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2008 | $ | 5,263 | |||||||||||
73
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation (under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer), pursuant to Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exch ange Act”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2010 (the “Evaluation Date”), which is the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the Evaluation Date such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted by the Company under the Exchange Act was accumulated and communicated to manag ement, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedu res that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Our independent registered p ublic accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an audit report that the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. KPMG LLP’s audit report is included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We acquired MedfusionRx on December 28, 2010. The acquired assets represented $125.9 million of our total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2010. We did not conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting associated with MedfusionRx as permitted by the implementation guidance set forth by the SEC relating to the SEC's rules on internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On February 23, 2011 the Board of Directors of the Company approved the form of an indemnification agreement between the Company and its directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. In February 2011, each of these individuals executed an indemnification agreement consistent with such form. The purpose of the indemnification agreement is to provide specific contractual assurance with respect to the indemnification rights extended to such directors and officers under Section 5 of the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws and under the laws of the Yukon Territory, Canada. A copy of the form of indemnification agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.28, and is incorporated herein by reference.
74
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information relating to directors is contained in the “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting — Election of Directors” section in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information relating to executive officers is contained in the “Executive Officers” section in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is contained in the “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” section in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information relating to the audit committee and the audit committee financial expert is contained in the “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Statement of C orporate Governance Practices” sections in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all directors, officers and employees. You can find the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on the Company’s internet website, www.sxc.com. The Company will post any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and any waivers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or NASDAQ, on its internet site.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information relating to executive and director compensation is contained in the “Executive Compensation” section in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The material incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the subheading “Compensation Committee Report” contained in the “Executive Compensation” section in the Proxy Statement shall be deemed furnished, and not filed, in this Form 10-K and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a result of this furnishing, except to the extent that is specifically incorporated by reference by the Company.
Information relating to compensation committee interlocks and insider participation is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the heading “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is contained in the “Voting Securities and Principal Shareholders Thereof” section in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
| Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Equity Awards | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans | |||||
| Equity compensation plan approved by security holders — Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") (4) | 2,238,451 | (1 | ) | 899,303 | ||||
| Equity compensation plan approved by security holders — Employee Stock Purchase Plan | — | — | (2 | ) | ||||
| Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders — restricted stock units(3) | 30,500 | — | — | |||||
| 1. | At December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding 252,478 options denominated in Canadian dollars with a weighted average exercise price of C$5.49. There are 1,496,981 options outstanding that are denominated in U.S. dollars with a weighted average exercise price of $12.06. The remaining 488,992 securities outstanding are RSUs with a weighted average grant date fair value of $22.11. |
| 2. | On March 11, 2009, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was amended to provide that all shares available thereunder would be acquired solely on the open market and there would be no further new issuances of shares. |
| 3. | Represents 30,500 RSUs granted to ten former NMHC employees on September 16, 2008, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $7.95, issued under a plan assumed by the Company in connection with the NMHC acquisition, in accordance with the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Exchange and Toronto Stock Exchange. No additional RSUs will be granted under this plan. |
| 4. | The LTIP provides for the grant of stock option awards, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performa nce awards and other stock-based awards to eligible persons, including executive officers and directors of the Company. |
75
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTO R INDEPENDENCE
Information about certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is contained in the “Related Party Transactions” and “Statement of Corporate Governance Practices — Board of Directors — Independence” sections in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information on principal accountant fees and services is contained in the “Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting — Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountants” section in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
76
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
a)
1) Financial Statements:
See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, filed herewith, for a list of financial statements.
2) Financial Statement Schedules:
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because the information either is not required or is otherwise included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
3) Exhibits Filed:
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | Reference | |
| 2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 25, 2008, by and among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc., Comet Merger Corporation and National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)February 27, 2008 | |
| 2.2 | Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, date d as of April 29, 2008, by and among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc., Comet Merger Corporation, and National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(6) to Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule TO filed by SXC with the SEC on April 30, 2008 | |
| 2.3 | Purchase Agreement, dated December 1, 2010, by and among MedfusionRx, L.L.C., Medtown South, L.L.C, the members of Medfusion identified therein, Ron Cunningham, in his capacity as Selling Party Representative pursuant to Section 9.08 thereof, and SXC Health Solutions, Inc. | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the SEC on December 29, 2010 | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Amalgamation of SYSTEMS XCELLENCE INC. | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Continuance of SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP. (formerly named SYSTEMS XCELLENCE INC.) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of SXC Health Solutions Corp. | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the SEC on June 27, 2008 | |
| 4.1 | Specimen of Common Stock Certificate | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 10.1† | SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to SXC Health Solutions Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2009. | |
| 10.2† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Stock Option Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.3† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.4† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.5† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.6† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.7† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Stock Option Agreement for certain Employees, Non-Employee Directors and Service Providers | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
77
| Exhibit Number | Descriptio n of Document | Reference | |
| 10.8† | Amended and Restated 2000 Restricted Stock Grant Plan of SXC Health Solutions, Corp., effective September 16, 2008 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.9† | Employment Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mark Thierer | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 11, 2008 | |
| 10.10† | Employment Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Jeffrey G. Park | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 11, 2008 | |
| 10.11† | Employment Agreement, effective as of November 6, 2008, between SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and John Romza | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.12† | Employment Agreement, effective as of November 6, 2008, between SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mike Bennof | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.13† | Employment Agreement, effective as of November 6, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc., informedRx and B. Greg Buscetto | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.14† | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC H ealth Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mark Thierer | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.15† | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, ef fective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Jeffrey G. Park | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.16† | SXC Health Solutions, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective January 1, 2009) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.17† | 2007 Employee Stock Purcha se Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-8 (SEC file No. 333-145449) filed by SXC on August 14, 2007 | |
| 10.18† | Amendment No. 1 to the SXC Health Solutions Corp. 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated March 11, 2 009 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.19† | Amendment No. 2 to the SXC Health Solutions Corp. 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated March 2, 2010 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.20 | Lease Agreement between HINES VAF WESTWOOD OF LISLE II, L.P. and SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., dated March 24, 2006 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 10.21† | Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2009, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc., infor medRx and B. Greg Buscetto | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.22† | Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2010, among SXC Healt h Solutions, Inc., informedRx and B. Greg Buscetto | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.23† | Separation Agreement and Gen eral Release dated December 13, 2010 and effective as of November 1, 2010 between SXC Health Solutions Inc., and Mike Bennof | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the SEC on December 17, 2010 | |
| 10.24† | Employment Agreement, effective as of June 22, 2010, among SXC Health Solutions Inc., and Joel Saban | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 5, 2010 | |
| 10.25† | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2010, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mark Thierer | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 4, 2010 | |
| 10.26† | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2010, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Jeffrey G. Park | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 4, 2010 | |
| 10.27† | SXC Health Solutions Corp. Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 17, 2010. | |
| 10.28 | Form of indemnification agreement for directors and certain officers of SXC Health Solutions Corp. | Filed herewith | |
78
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | Reference | |
| 10.29† | Employment Agreement, effective as of February 16, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Inc., and Clifford E. Berman. | Filed herewith | |
| 10.30† | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of December, 22, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Clifford E. Berman | Filed herewith | |
| 10.31† | SecondAmendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of June 17, 2009, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Clifford E. Berman | Filed herewith | |
| 12.1 | Statement of computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges | Filed herewith | |
| 18.1 | KPMG LLP Preferability Letter (United States) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | Filed herewith | |
| 23.1 | Consent of KPMG LLP (United States) | Filed herewith | |
| 31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| 31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| 32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of CEO as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| 32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of CFO as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| † | Indicates ma nagement contract or compensatory plan. | ||
79
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 24, 2011.
| SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP. | ||
| By: | /s/ Mark A. Thierer | |
| Mark A. Thierer | ||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacity and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/ Mark A. Thierer | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Director) | February 24, 2011 |
| Mark A. Thierer | |||
| By: | /s/ Jeffrey Park | Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | February 24, 2011 |
| Jeffrey Park | |||
| By: | /s/ Terrence C. Burke | Director | February 24, 2011 |
| Terrence C. Burke | |||
| By: | /s/ Steven Cosler | Director | February 24, 2011 |
| Steven Cosler | |||
| By: | /s/ William J. Davis | Director | February 24, 2011 |
| William J. Davis | |||
| By: | /s/ Anthony R. Masso | Director | February 24, 2011 |
| Anthony R. Masso | |||
| By: | /s/ Philip R. Reddon | Director | February 24, 2011 |
| Philip R. Reddon | |||
| By: | /s/ Curtis J. Thorne | Director | February 24, 2011 |
| Curtis J. Thorne |
80
Exhibit Index
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | Reference | |
| 2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 25, 2008, by and among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc., Comet Merger Corporation and National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)February 27, 2008 | |
| 2.2 | Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 29, 2008, by and among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc., Comet Merger Corporation, and National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(6) to Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule TO filed b y SXC with the SEC on April 30, 2008 | |
| 2.3 | Purchase Agreement, dated December 1, 2010, by and among MedfusionRx, L.L.C., Medtown South, L.L.C, the members of Medfusion identified therein, Ron Cunningham, in his capacity as Selling Party Representative pursuant to Section 9.08 thereof, and SXC Health Solutions, Inc. | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the SEC on December 29, 2010 | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Amalgamation of SYSTEMS XCELLENCE INC. | Incorporat ed herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Continuance of SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORP. (formerly named SYSTEMS XCELLENCE INC.) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exh ibit 3.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of SXC Health Solutions Corp. | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the SEC on June 27, 2008 | |
| 4.1 | Specimen of Common Stock Certificate | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 10.1† | SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to SXC Health Solutions Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2009. | |
| 10.2† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Stock Option Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.3† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.4† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC o n August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.5† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 t o the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 7, 2009. | |
| 10.6† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for certain Employees under the SXC Health Solutions Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.7† | Form of SXC Health Solutions Corp. Stock Option Agreement for certain Employees, Non-Employee Directors and Service Providers | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 10.8† | Amended and Restated 2000 Restricted Stock Grant Plan of SXC Health Solutions, Corp., effective September 16, 2008 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.9† | Employment Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mark Thierer | ||
81
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | Reference | |
| 10.10† | Employment Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Jeffrey G. Park | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 11, 2008 | |
| 10.11† | Employment Agreement, effective as of November 6, 2008, between SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and John Romza | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.12† | Employment Agreement, effective as of November 6, 2008, between SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mike Bennof | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.13† | Employment Agreement, effective as of November 6, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc., informedRx and B. Greg Buscetto | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 6, 2008 | |
| 10.14† | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mark Thierer | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.15† | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Jeffrey G. Park | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.16† | SXC Health Solutions, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective January 1, 2009) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.17† | 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-8 (SEC file No. 333-145449) filed by SXC on August 14, 2007 | |
| 10.18† | Amendment No. 1 to the SXC Health Solutions Corp. 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated March 11, 2009 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 10.19† | Amendment No. 2 to the SXC Health Solutions Corp. 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated March 2, 2010 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.20 | Lease Agreement between HINES VAF WESTWOOD OF LISLE II, L.P. and SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., dated March 24, 2006 | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 17, 2008 | |
| 10.21† | Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2009, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc., informedRx and B. Greg Buscetto | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.22† | Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2010, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc., informedRx and B. Greg Buscetto | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | |
| 10.23 † | Separation Agreement and General Release dated December 13, 2010 and effective as of November 1, 2010 between SXC Health Solutions Inc., and Mike Bennof | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by SXC with the SEC on December 17, 2010 | |
10.24† | Employment Agreement, effective as of June 22, 2010, among SXC Health Solutions Inc., and Joel Saban | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on August 5, 2010 | |
| 10.25† | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2010, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Mark Thierer | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 4, 2010 | |
| 10.26† | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2010, among SXC Health Solutions Corp., SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Jeffrey G. Park | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by SXC with the SEC on November 4, 2010 | |
| 10.27† | SXC Health Solutions Corp. Incentive Plan | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 17, 2010. | |
82
| Exhibit Number | Description of Document | Reference | |
| 10.28 | Form of indemnification agreement for directors and certain o fficers of SXC Health Solutions Corp. | Filed herewith | |
| 10.29† | Employment Agreement, effective as of February 16, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions Inc., and Clifford E. Berman. | Filed herewith | |
| 10.30† | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of December, 22, 2008, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Clifford E. Berman | ||
| 10.31† | SecondAmendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of June 17, 2009, among SXC Health Solutions, Inc. and Clifford E. Berman | Filed herewith | |
| 12.1 | Statement of computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges | Filed herewith | |
| 1 8.1 | KPMG LLP Preferability Letter (United States) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by SXC with the SEC on March 13, 2009 | |
| 21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | Filed herewith | |
| 23.1 | Consent of KPMG LLP (United States) | Filed herewith | |
| 31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| 31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| 32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of CEO as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| 32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of CFO as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Filed herewith | |
| † | Indicates management contract or compensatory pla n. | ||
83