U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to ________
Commission File No: 333-137210
DIET COFFEE, INC.
(Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 05-0630427 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
16 East 40th Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10016 ________________________________________________________________________ (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) |
(212) 867-1370
(Issuer’s telephone number)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: As of November 16, 2007, the issuer had 85,587,677 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes o No x
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
DIET COFFEE, INC. | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited) | |
| | September 30, 2007 | |
ASSETS | | | |
Current Assets: | | | |
Cash | | $ | 1,222 | |
Other receivables (Note B) | | | 3,158 | |
Total current assets | | $ | 4,380 | |
| | | | |
LIABILITIES AND (DEFICIENCY IN) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | |
| | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (Note C) | | $ | 655,330 | |
Customer deposits | | | 15,544 | |
| | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 670,874 | |
| | | | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note G) | | | | |
| | | | |
(DEFICIENCY IN) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Note D): | | | | |
Series A Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 50,000 shares designated, 50,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 | | | 50 | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 authorized; 72,619,818 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2007 | | | 72,620 | |
Common stock to be issued | | | - | |
Additional paid in capital | | | 833,575 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (1,572,739 | ) |
| | | | |
Total (deficiency in) stockholders' equity | | | (666,494 | ) |
| | | | |
Total liabilities and (deficiency in) stockholders' equity | | $ | 4,380 | |
See the accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
DIET COFFEE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
REVENUES | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 1,812 | | $ | 268,854 | |
Cost of sales | | | 600 | | | 66,593 | |
Gross profit | | | 1,212 | | | 202,261 | |
| | | | | | | |
OPERATING EXPENSES | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 275,535 | | | 515,875 | |
| | | | | | | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | | | (274,323 | ) | | (313,614 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | - | | | 1,011 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss before provision for income taxes | | | (274,323 | ) | | (312,603 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Income taxes | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
NET LOSS | | $ | (274,323 | ) | $ | (312,603 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss per common share (basic and fully diluted) | | $ | (0.0038 | ) | $ | (0.0044 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average of common shares outstanding (basic and fully diluted) | | | 71,737,037 | | | 70,531,348 | |
See the accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
DIET COFFEE, INC | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF (DEFICIENCY IN) STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY | |
From December 19, 2005 (date of inception) to September 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
| | Series A-Preferred stock | | Common stock | | Stock To be | | Subscription | | | | Accumulated | | | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | issued | | Receivable | | Capital | | Deficit | | Total | |
Balance-December 19, 2005 | | | - | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | |
Common stock issued to founders | | | - | | | - | | | 67,750,000 | | | 67,750 | | | - | | | (67,750 | ) | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Series A preferred stock issued to founders | | | 50,000 | | | 50 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (50,000 | ) | | 49,950 | | | - | | | - | |
Subscription received | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 117,750 | | | - | | | - | | | 117,750 | |
Sale of common stock (to be issued) | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 640,599 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 640,599 | |
Net Loss (Restated) | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (447,186 | ) | | (447,186 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance-June 30, 2006 (Restated) | | | 50,000 | | $ | 50 | | | 67,750,000 | | $ | 67,750 | | $ | 640,599 | | $ | - | | $ | 49,950 | | $ | (447,186 | ) | $ | 311,163 | |
Sale and issuance of common stock | | | - | | | - | | | 3,763,000 | | | 3,763 | | | (640,599 | ) | | - | | | 693,336 | | | - | | | 56,500 | |
Net Loss | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (851,230 | ) | | (851,230 | ) |
Balance-June 30, 2007 | | | 50,000 | | $ | 50 | | | 71,513,000 | | $ | 71,513 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 743,286 | | $ | (1,298,416 | | $ | (483,567 | ) |
Issuance of shares in exchange for services rendered | | | - | | | - | | | 1,106,818 | | | 1,107 | | | - | | | - | | | 90,289 | | | - | �� | | 91,396 | |
Net Loss | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (274,323 | ) | | (274,323 | ) |
Balance-September 30, 2007 | | | 50,000 | | $ | 50 | | | 72,619,818 | | $ | 72,620 | | | - | | | - | | $ | 833,575 | | $ | (1,572,739 | ) | $ | (666,494 | ) |
See the accompanying footnotes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements |
DIET COFFEE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | $ | 1,133 | | $ | (352,342 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | - | | | 56,500 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 1,133 | | | (295,842 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 89 | | | 328,401 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 1,222 | | $ | 32,559 | |
| | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | | $ | - | | $ | - | |
Cash paid during the period for taxes | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
See the accompanying footnotes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements |
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements follows.
General
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-QSB. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Accordingly, the results from operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended June 30, 2008.. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the June 30, 2007 financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Form 10KSB filed on October 18, 2007.
Business and Basis of Presentation
Diet Coffee, Inc. (“Company”) was organized on December 19, 2005 under the state laws of Delaware with an original name of “The Diet Coffee Company”. On March 1, 2006, the Company changed its name to the current existing name.
Diet Coffee is engaged in the retailing and marketing of an all natural, high energy fat burning specialty coffee that helps individuals lose weight.
The Company has adopted a fiscal year end of June 30.
Revenue Recognition
For revenue from product sales, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition ("SAB104"), which superseded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements ("SAB101"). SAB 101 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectibility of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue for which the product was not delivered or is subject to refund until such time that the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been delivered or no refund will be required.
SAB 104 incorporates Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 ("EITF 00-21"), Multiple-deliverable Revenue Arrangements. EITF 00-21 addresses accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The effect of implementing EITF 00-21 on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations was not significant.
Consideration Paid to Customers
We offer our customers certain incentives in the form of cooperative advertising arrangements, product markdown allowances, trade discounts, cash discounts, and slotting fees. We account for these incentives in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer, ("EITF 01-9"). Markdown allowances, trade discounts, cooperative advertising program participation and cash discounts are all recorded as reductions of net sales. No customer incentives included in sales for the quarters ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statement in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company translates the foreign currency financial statements in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation." Assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates, and related revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the period. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component in stockholders' equity. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are included in the statement of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For the purpose of the accompanying financial statements, all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
Inventories / Cost of Goods Sold
The Company has adopted a policy to record inventory at the lower of cost or market determined by the first-in-first-out method. The elements of cost that comprise inventory and cost good sold are FOB shipping point costs, freight and destination charges, customs and importation fees and taxes, customer broker fees (if any) and other related costs. Warehousing costs are changed to cost of goods in the period the costs are incurred. The Company provides inventory allowances based on estimates of obsolete inventories. Inventories consist of finished products available for sale to distributors and customers. At September 30, 2007, Finished Goods inventory was $0.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
The Company maintains an allowance for doubt accounts to reduce amounts to their estimated realizable value, including reserves for customer allowances and incentives. In estimating the provision for doubtful accounts, the company considers a number of factors including age of the accounts receivable, trends and ratios involving the age of the accounts receivable and the customer mix of each aging categories. As of September 30, 2007, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $27,761 and -0-, respectively.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. When retired or otherwise disposed, the related carrying value and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the net difference less any amount realized from disposition, is reflected in earnings. For financial statement purposes, property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS 144). The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted discounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. SFAS No. 144 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less disposal costs.
Income Taxes
The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 ("SFAS 109") which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes are insignificant.
Research and Development
The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 ("SFAS 2"), "Accounting for Research and Development Costs". Under SFAS 2, all research and development costs must be charged to expense as incurred. Accordingly, internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Third-party research and developments costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed or as milestone results have been achieved. Company-sponsored research and development costs related to both present and future products are expensed in the period incurred. The Company had no expenditures on research and product development for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and, 2006, respectively.
Advertising
The Company follows SOP 93-7 whereby charging the costs of advertising to expenses as incurred. The Company charged to operations $1,738 and $199,987, as advertising costs for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and, 2006, respectively.
Comprehensive Income
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 ("SFAS 130"), "Reporting Comprehensive Income," establishes standards for reporting and displaying of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, SFAS 130 requires that all items that are required to be recognized under current accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. The Company does not have any items of comprehensive income in the period presented.
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Segment Information
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information ("SFAS 131") in the years ended December 31, 2001 and subsequent years. SFAS 131 establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information for those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS 131 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance.
Stock Based Compensation
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of SFAS 123.” This statement amended SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary charge to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amended the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Effective for the period ended June 30, 2006 the Company has adopted SFAS 123 (R) which supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and eliminates the intrinsic value method that was provided in SFAS 123 for accounting of stock-based compensation to employees. The Company made no employee stock-based compensation grants before June 30, 2007 and during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and therefore has no unrecognized stock compensation related liabilities or expense unvested or vested.
Loss per Share
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (“SFAS No. 128”) “Earnings per Share”. Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share amounts are computed based on net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The assumed exercise of warrants into 3,763,000 common shares was not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because the assumed exercise would be anti-dilutive for the period presented.
Liquidity
As shown in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred a quarterly net loss of $124,234 on revenues of $1,812 and generated $1,133 in cash flows for operations during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with high credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.
New Accounting Pronouncements
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155. “Accounting for certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140,” or SFAS No. 155. SFAS No. 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives, and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 155 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment to FASB Statement No. 140. Statement 156 requires that an entity recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a service contract under certain situations. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No.156 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48). “Accounting for uncertainty in Income Taxes”. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for Income Taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition and clearly scopes income taxes out of SFAS 5, “ Accounting for Contingencies”. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We have not yet evaluated the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires us to record the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in its financial statements. We are required to record an asset in its financial statements if a plan is overfunded or record a liability in its financial statements if a plan is underfunded with a corresponding offset to shareholders’ equity. Previously unrecognized assets and liabilities are recorded as a component of shareholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. SFAS 158 also requires us to measure the value of our assets and liabilities as of the end of our fiscal year ending after December 15, 2008. We have implemented SFAS 158 using the required prospective method. The recognition provisions of SFAS 158 are effective for the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. We do not expect that adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments, and certain other items, at fair value. SFAS 159 applies to reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
In December 2006, the FASB issued FSP EITF 00-19-2, Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements ("FSP 00-19-2") which addresses accounting for registration payment arrangements. FSP 00-19-2 specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. FSP 00-19-2 further clarifies that a financial instrument subject to a registration payment arrangement.
NOTE B - OTHER RECEIVABLES
Other receivables at September 30, 2007 consisted of a $3,158 credit card holdback by a merchant bank that processes payment due for product sales. The merchant bank holdback account is based on the dollar amount of sales and is designed to allow the Company to receive the credit card holdback cash, including interest for the Company, after customer refunds and chargebacks are cleared.
NOTE C - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at September 30, 2007 are as follows:
Accounts payable | | $ | 151,988 | |
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes | | | 170,590 | |
Accrued professional fees | | | 143,000 | |
Accrued general and administrative expense | | | 150,000 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 39,752 | |
Total | | $ | 655,330 | |
NOTE D - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Series A - Preferred stock
The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of Preferred stock, par value $0.001, within the limitations and restrictions stated in the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
The Company designated and issued of 50,000 shares of Series A - Preferred stock; non convertible. Each share of the Series A- Preferred stock is entitled to 10,000 votes on all matters submitted to the stockholders of the Company. The holders of the Series A-Preferred stock are not granted any preference upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the business of the Company.
Common stock
The Company has authorized 200,000,000 shares of Common stock, par value $0.001, of which 72,619,818 shares are issued and outstanding.
On July 20, 2007, the Company issued 181,819 shares of common stock to a consultant in exchange for satisfaction of royalty obligations pursuant to a Licensing and Supply Agreement dated May 18, 2007. The shares were valued at $54,546 (based on a closing price of $0.30). On September 26, 2007, the Company issued an additional 500,000 shares of common stock to the consultant in satisfaction of additional royalty obligations under the Agreement. The shares were valued at $19,000 (based on a closing price of $0.038).
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE D - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)
On September 17, 2007, the Company issued 425,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in exchange for legal services. The shares were valued at $17,850 (based on closing prices of $0.042).
Warrants
The Company issued 3,478,000 warrants to purchase Common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share expiring two years from the date of their issuance in 2006.
NOTE E - INCOME TAXES
The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax returns.
Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes are insignificant. A management estimate that at September 30, 2007, the Company has available for federal income tax purposes a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $988,000, expiring in the year 2023, that may be used to offset future taxable income. Due to significant changes in the Company's ownership, the future use of its existing net operating losses may be limited.
The Company has provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net operating loss benefit, since in the opinion of management based upon the earnings history of the Company; it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized. Components of deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2007 are as follows:
Non current:
Net operating loss carry forward | | $ | 988,000 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (988,000 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset | | | - | |
NOTE F - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The following table summarizes the changes in warrants outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company's common stock issued to shareholders at September 30, 2007.
| | | | | | Warrants Outstanding | | | | | | Warrants Exercisable | |
Exercise Prices | | | Number Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Number Exercisable | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
$ 0.50 | | | 3,763,000 | | | 1.31 | | $ | 0.50 | | | 3,763,000 | | $ | 0.50 | |
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE F - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)
Transactions involving the Company's warrant issuance are summarized as follows:
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Price Per Share | |
Outstanding at December 15, 2005 (date of inception) | | | - | | $ | - | |
Granted | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | - | | | - | |
Canceled or expired | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 | | | 3,763,000 | | $ | | |
Granted | | | - | | | - | |
Exercised | | | - | | | - | |
Canceled or expired | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2007 | | | 3,763,000 | | $ | 0.50 | |
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the Company completed a private placement in which we subsequently issued 3,478,000 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 3,478,000 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable until two years after the date of issuance at a purchase price of $0.50 per share on 3,478,000 warrants and include registration rights. The warrants were issued subsequent to June 30, 2006.
In July 2006, the Company sold 285,000 shares of its Common stock at a net average of $0.185 per share. As part of the sale of Common stock the Company issued 285,000 warrants to purchase its Common stock at a price of $0.50 per share expiring 2 years from the date of issuance.
There are no outstanding options as of September 30, 2007.
NOTE G - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Employment agreements
The Company had employment agreements with the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer as well as the Company’s Secretary. In addition to salary and benefit provisions, the agreements contain defined benefit commitments should the employee terminate their employment with or without cause. As of September 30, 2007, the Company owes $170,590 in deferred salaries that were incurred in accordance with the employment agreements with management.
On October 5, 2007, the Company increased the number of authorized directors to three and appointed Mr. Adam Engel as a director. Mr. Engel was also appointed to the officer positions of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary upon the resignation of the two officers discussed further below.
On October 5, 2007, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and its Secretary resigned from all of their respective employment positions with the Company, which resignations were to be effective October 12, 2007. In connection with their resignations, the Company entered into separation and consulting agreements with both of them.
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE G - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Separation agreements
In connection, with Messrs. Stocknoff and Attarian’s resignation from their officer and director positions with us, we entered into a letter agreement dated October 5, 2007 with each of Messrs Stocknoff and Attarian setting forth the terms of our mutual separation. Under the terms of these Agreements (which contained the same terms), Each of Mr. Stocknoff and Mr. Attarian and the Company agreed to waive any and all continuing rights and obligations under Mr. Stocknoff’s and Mr. Attarian’s respective employment agreements dated June 14, 2006. In consideration thereof and to enter into the Letter Agreements, we agreed to pay Messrs. Stocknoff and Attarian each $90,000 as follows: $20,000 on the Effective Date (as defined) and thereafter in equal semi-monthly installments of $2,500 until January 2008 at which time the installment payments shall increase to $5,000. Beginning January 2008, we may pay all or part of the installments in share of our common stock. In addition, we agreed to issue 5,000,000 shares of our common stock on the Effective Date to each of Messrs. Stocknoff and Attarian. Messrs. Stocknoff and Attarian also agreed to a 1 year non-compete/non solicitation provisions as well as confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses. Each party to this agreement granted mutual releases.
U.S. Federal Trade Commission Investigation
On March 26, 2007, Diet Coffee, Inc. (the “Company”) received a letter from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) whereby the Company was informed that the FTC is conducting an investigation into advertising claims made for the Company’s weight loss product known as “Slim Coffee”. The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether the Company, in connection with its sales of Slim Coffee, engaged in unfair or deceptive acts or practices and false advertising. The FTC threatened to file a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, alleging False Advertising, unless the Company and the FTC could reach a satisfactory resolution to the matter. A negotiated settlement has been reached with the FTC under which the Company, its officers and directors did not admit any wrongdoing. On October 5, 2007, the Company executed a stipulation to a final order and judgment in the amount of $923,910. The full amount of the judgment, and payment of any portion of it is suspended and cannot be reinstated so long as the Company abides by the reporting and monitoring requirements of the judgment; does not make false advertising claims in connection with any of its products in the future; and its past financial disclosures to the FTC were materially accurate. The Company expects stipulation will be executed by the FTC and filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. The Company expects to comply with terms of the stipulation and does not anticipate incurring a liability for the judgment.
Royalty commitment
On May 18, 2007, Diet Coffee, Inc. (the "Company") entered into a License and Supply Agreement with Jason Ryu, pursuant to which the Company licensed the right to market and sell a fluorescent light bulb that contains an air purifying microchip ion emitter from Mr. Ryu. In exchange for this license the Company agrees to pay Mr. Ryu a royalty of $0.20 per unit for the first 1.5 million units sold by the Company and the lesser of $0.15 per unit or 5% of manufacturing costs for all additional units. The initial term of this agreement shall be two years and shall automatically be renewed for subsequent two year periods if at lease 5 million units are sold by the Company during each period. Within ninety days from the date of this Agreement, the Company was required to place an order not less than 100,000 units and at least 600,000 units each quarter thereafter. As of the date of this filing, the Company has not ordered any units, however the Company has issued 681,819 shares of its common stock as prepayment of $30,000 in royalties under the agreement. Mr. Ryu has sent notice to the Company that license agreement shall continue on a non-exclusive basis.
DIET COFFEE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE H - CASH FLOWS
The following are non-cash transactions for the three months ended September 30, 2007:
On September 17, 2007, the Company issued 425,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in exchange for legal services. The shares were valued at $17,850 (based on a closing price of $0.042).
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company issued a total of 681,819 shares of common stock to Mr. Jason Ryu as prepayment of royalty obligations under a License and Supply Agreement. The shares were valued at $73,546 (based on closing prices of $0.30 for 181,819 shares and $0.038 for 500,000 shares).
NOTE I - GOING CONCERN MATTERS
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, as of September 30, 2007 and for the quarter then ended, the Company had sales of $1,812, incurred losses of $274,323 and generated $1,133 in cash to fund the current loss. These factors among others may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
The Company is actively pursuing additional equity financing through discussions with investment bankers and private investors. There can be no assurance the Company will be successful in its effort to secure additional equity financing.
If operations and cash flows continue to improve through these efforts, management believes that the Company can continue to operate. However, no assurance can be given that management's actions will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems.
The Company's existence is dependent upon management's ability to develop profitable operations and resolve its liquidity problems. Management anticipates the Company will attain profitable status and improve its liquidity through the continued developing, marketing and selling of its services and additional equity investment in the Company. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report. This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements contained in this report that are not historic in nature, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” or “plans” or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements based on current expectations and assumptions.
Various risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, but are not limited to, those set forth under the section “Risk Factors” set forth in this report.
The forward-looking events discussed in this annual report, the documents to which we refer you and other statements made from time to time by us or our representatives, may not occur, and actual events and results may differ materially and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us. For these statements, we claim the protection of the “bespeaks caution” doctrine. All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information currently available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
General
The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Report. Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating results for any future period. This report contains “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements, which are not historical facts contained in this Report, including this Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation, and notes to our unaudited financial statements, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” or “plans” or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Future events and our actual results may differ materially from the results reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, dependence on existing and future key strategic and strategic end-user customers, limited ability to establish new strategic relationships, ability to sustain and manage growth, variability of operating results, our expansion and development of new service lines, marketing and other business development initiatives, the commencement of new engagements, competition in the industry, general economic conditions, dependence on key personnel, the ability to attract, hire and retain personnel who possess the technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of our clients, the potential liability with respect to actions taken by our existing and past employees, risks associated with international sales, and other risks described herein and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 excludes issuers of “penny stock” (as defined under Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our common stock currently falls within that definition
All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information currently available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements.
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report.
Company History
We were incorporated in the State of Delaware on December 19, 2005 and amended our Certificate of Incorporation on March 1, 2006. On March 1, 2006, we changed our name from The Diet Coffee Company, Inc. to Diet Coffee, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 16 East 40th Street, 12th Floor, New York, New York. Our telephone number is (212) 867-1370.
We are engaged in the direct marketing and distribution of consumer products. Our first offering was the Slim Coffee product line, which featured coffee beverages. We no longer sell or market Slim Coffee products and do not anticipate selling Slim Coffee products in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. In May 2007, we entered into a license agreement to sell an energy saving compact fluorescent light bulb named the Ionic Bulb. We plan to market the Ionic Bulb through TV infomercials, catalogs, magazines and major U.S. retail and specialty stores and our website www.ionicbulb.com.
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 To September 30, 2006
Results of Operations
Revenues
Our sales were $1,812 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, consisting of Ionic Bulb product sales which we began marketing in this three month period. Our sales were $268,854 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from sales of products under the Slim Coffee product line, which we generated primarily from customer responses to our advertisements and their placing orders with us through our www.slimcoffee.com website or calling one of our toll-free telephone numbers. We no longer sell or market Slim Coffee products and do not anticipate actively selling Slim Coffee products in the future.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit was $1,212 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 versus our gross profit of $202,261 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $201,049. The decrease is attributable to our discontinuance of sales under the Slim Coffee product line and out recent entry into the Ionic Bulb market
Our gross profit percentage for quarter ended September 30, 2007 was 66.9%, as compared to 75.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Our gross profit percentage is generally higher for sales we make through direct response marketing as compared to sales we make to mass market and specialty retailers. We did not generate any sales from direct marketing in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 in contrast to the quarter ended September 30, 2006, when the majority of our net sales were generated from direct marketing of our Slim Coffee products.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses for the three ended September 30, 2007 were $275,535 and consisted primarily of rent and other office overhead expenses, personnel costs, stock based compensation costs and licensing royalties in accordance with the Ionic Bulb Licensing and Consulting Agreement. Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2006 were $515,875 and consisted primarily of $199,987 in product advertising, $114,703 in sales and marketing consulting fees, $94,897 in personnel costs and $72,766 in customer order fulfillment costs. Operating expenses decreased by $240,340 in the three months ended September 30, 2007, or approximately 47%, from $515,875 for the comparable period in 2006. This decrease in operating costs is attributable to the decrease in sales.
We decreased our media advertising spending in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 by $198,249 or 99.1%, as compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. We no longer sell or market Slim Coffee products as we did in the previous fiscal year and we do not anticipate actively selling Slim Coffee products in the future. We are seeking further improvements with our planned sales and marketing programs for the Ionic Bulb product.
Net Income and Loss
Our net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $274,323 in contrast to a net loss of $312,603 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. We recently began operating our business, including efforts to market and sell our products, and revenues generated were not sufficient to cover our operating costs in both three-month periods then ended. We reduced our net loss but terminating our Slim Coffee sales and marketing activities and reducing overhead costs. We are continuing our efforts to market and sell our Ionic Bulb products in order to generate a higher sales volume and unless and until such time as we generate substantially higher sales volume, we will continue realize net losses.
Our net loss per common share was ($0.0038) (basic and diluted) for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to our ($0.0044) (basic and diluted) net loss per common share for the three months ended September 30, 2006.
The weighted average number of outstanding shares was 71,737,037 (basic and diluted) for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 70,531,348 (basic and diluted) for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, common stock equivalents derived from shares issuable in conversion of 3,763,000 warrants are not considered in the calculation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding because they would be anti-dilutive, thereby decreasing the net loss per share.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
As of September 30, 2007, we had a working capital deficit and negative net worth of $666,494. As of June 30, 2007, we had a working capital deficit and negative net worth of $483,567. Our cash position at September 30, 2007 was $1,222 as compared to $89 as of June 30, 2007.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we generated a net cash flow from operating activities of $1,133 consisting primarily of a net loss of $274,323, adjusted primarily for $91,396 in non-cash expenses for legal services and licensing royalties that were satisfied by issuance of our common stock and a $171,374 increase in account payable and accrued expenses.
We expect capital expenditures to be nominal for the year ending June 30, 2008. These anticipated expenditures are for continued investments in property and equipment used in our business and software for our accounting and information systems.
Financing
As of September 30, 2007, we raised an aggregate of $814,849 in initial financing through the issuance 50,000 Series A preferred stock and 67,750,000 shares of common stock to founders and 3,763,000 shares issued in a private offering of common stock and warrants totaling $50,000, $67,750 and $697,099, respectively.
Plan of Operation and Financing Needs
Since our inception, we have generated insufficient revenues and gross profits and have incurred net losses. We have acquired the rights to sell the Ionic Bulb™, an energy saving compact fluorescent light bulb that we plan to market through TV infomercials, catalogs, magazines and major U.S. retail and specialty stores and our website www.ionicbulb.com. It is hoped that we will begin to achieve sustainable revenues within the next 12 months, of which there can be no guarantee. Our ability to achieve profitability is dependent on several factors, including but not limited to, our ability to: generate liquidity from operations and satisfy our ongoing operating costs on a timely basis. We still need additional investments in order to continue operations to cash flow break even. Additional investments are being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and conditions in the U.S. stock and debt markets make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations again, attempt to further restructure financial obligations and/or seek a strategic merger, acquisition or a sale of assets.
The independent auditor's report on our June 30, 2007 financial statements states that our recurring losses raise substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The effect of inflation on our revenue and operating results was not significant. Our operations are located in North America and there are no seasonal aspects that would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND USE OF ESTIMATES
Financial Reporting Release No. 60, recently released by the Securities and Exchange Commission, requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. The notes to the consolidated financial statements include a summary of significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, Financial Reporting Release No. 61 was recently released by the SEC requires all companies to include a discussion which addresses, among other things, liquidity, off-balance sheet arrangements, contractual obligations and commercial commitments. The following is a brief discussion of the more significant accounting policies and methods used by us.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, including the recoverability of tangible and intangible assets, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.
On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates. The most significant estimates relate to our recognition of revenue, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and inventory valuation reserves.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when we ship our product to customers. Customers at times request credits for returned product or in connection with incentives such as cooperative advertising agreements. We reduce sales or increase selling, general, and administrative expenses, depending on the nature of the credits, for estimated future credits to customers. Management bases such estimates either on historical information about credits issued, relative to total sales, or on specific knowledge of incentives offered to retailers.
Valuation of Accounts Receivable
Our allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate of probable losses, determined principally on the basis of historical experience and specific allowances for known troubled accounts.
Inventories
Inventories consist almost entirely of finished goods. We account for inventory using a first-in-first-out system in which we record inventory on our balance sheets at the lower of our cost or net realizable value. A product’s cost is comprised of the amount that we pay our manufacturer for product, tariffs and duties associated with transporting product across national borders and freight costs associated with transporting the product from our manufacturers to our warehouse locations. When circumstances dictate that we use net realizable value in lieu of cost, we base our estimates on expected future selling prices less expected disposal costs. The Cost of goods sold line item on the Statements of Operations is comprised of the book value (lower of cost or net realizable value) of inventory sold to customers during the reporting period.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2007, our President, Chief Financial Officer and Director carried out an evaluation, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our system of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our President, Chief Financial Officer and Director concluded that our controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified for each report and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the course of the preparation of our September 30, 2007 financial statements, we identified certain material weaknesses relating to our internal controls and procedures within the areas of revenue recognition and inventory accounting. Some of these internal control deficiencies may also constitute deficiencies in our disclosure controls.
In addition, we have a limited number of employees and is not able to have proper segregation of duties based on the cost benefit of hiring additional employees solely to address the segregation of duties issue. We determined the risks associated with the lack of segregation of duties are insignificant based on the close involvement of management in day-to-day operations (i.e. tone at the top, corporate governance, officer oversight and involvement with daily activities, and other company level controls). We limited resources available and the limited amount of transactions and activities allow for compensating controls.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.
In addition, our President, Chief Financial Officer and Director has determined that no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is (as that term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our President, Chief Financial Officer and Director is in the process of implementing a more effective system of controls, procedures and other changes in the areas of revenue recognition and inventory accounting to insure that information required to be disclosed in this quartely report on Form 10-QSB has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately. Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem, and intends to developed procedures to address them to the extent possible given limitations in financial and manpower resources.
The Company is required to be in compliance with the certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to internal control for the year ending June 30, 2008. Since inception, the Company has experienced severe cash flow problems and as a result has not had the resources to address fully the certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented . Failure to develop adequate internal control and hiring of qualified accounting personnel may result in a “material weakness” in the Company’s internal control relating to the above activities.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On March 26, 2007, Diet Coffee, Inc. (the “Company”) received a letter from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) whereby the Company was informed that the FTC is conducting an investigation into advertising claims made for the Company’s weight loss product known as “Slim Coffee”. The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether the Company, in connection with its sales of Slim Coffee, engaged in unfair or deceptive acts or practices and false advertising. The FTC threatened to file a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, alleging False Advertising, unless the Company and the FTC could reach a satisfactory resolution to the matter. A negotiated settlement has been reached with the FTC under which the Company, its officers and directors did not admit any wrongdoing. On October 5, 2007, the Company executed a stipulation to a final order and judgment in the amount of $923,910. The full amount of the judgment, and payment of any portion of it is suspended and cannot be reinstated so long as the Company abides by the reporting and monitoring requirements of the judgment; does not make false advertising claims in connection with any of its products in the future; and its past financial disclosures to the FTC were materially accurate. The Company expects stipulation will be executed by the FTC and filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. The Company expects to comply with terms of the stipulation and does not anticipate incurring a liability for the judgment.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On July 20, 2007, we issued 181,819 shares of our common stock as a compensatory stock grant relating to certain royalty obligations under our License and Supply Agreement. Our board valued the shares at $0.30 for a value of $54,546. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
3.1 | Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation.(1) |
| |
3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation.(1) |
| |
3.3 | Certificate of Designation, Powers, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock.(1) |
| |
3.4 | Registrant’s By-Laws.(1) |
| |
4.1 | Form of Warrant.(1) |
| |
4.2 | 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (2) |
| |
10.1 | Employment Agreement by and between David Stocknoff and Diet Coffee, Inc., dated as of July 16, 2006.(1) |
| |
10.2 | Employment Agreement by and between David Attarian and Diet Coffee, Inc., dated as of July 16, 2006.(1) |
| |
10.3 | Form of Subscription Agreement.(1) |
| |
10.4 | License and Supply Agreement dated as of May 18, 2007 by and among Diet Coffee, Inc. and Jason Ryu. (3) |
| |
10.5 | Letter Agreement dated October 5, 2007 between Diet Cofee, Inc. and David Stocknoff (4) |
| |
10.6 | Letter Agreement dated October 5, 2007 between Diet Coffee, Inc. and David Attarian (4) |
| |
10.7 | Consulting Agreement dated October 12, 2007 between Diet Coffee, Inc. and David Stocknoff (4) |
| |
10.8 | Consulting Agreement dated October 12, 2007 between Diet Coffee, Inc. and David Attarian (4) |
| |
14 | Code of Ethics (4) |
| |
21 | Subsidiaries (4) |
| |
31.1 | Certification of Adam J. Engel, President and Chief Financial Officer of Diet Coffee, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (5) |
| |
32.1 | Certification of Adam J. Engel, President and Chief Financial Officer of Diet Coffee, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (5) |
________
(1) | Filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-137210), as amended, originally filed with the SEC on September 8, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(2) | Filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-145985) filed with the SEC on September 11, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(3) | Filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2007and incorporated herein by reference. |
(4) | Filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference. |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Small business issuer caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| DIET COFFEE, INC. |
| | |
Date: November 19, 2007 | By: | /s/ Adam Engel |
|
Adam Engel President and Chief Executive Officer |