Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| PAGE |
| |
Corporate Data | 2 |
Investor Information | 3 |
| |
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS | |
| |
Balance Sheets | 5 |
Quarterly Operating Results | 6 |
Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations | 7 |
Same Property Statistical and Financial Data | 8 |
Reconciliation of Same Property NOI to GAAP Net Income (Loss) | 9 |
Same Property Definitions | 10 |
Debt Balances | 11 |
| |
PORTFOLIO DATA | |
| |
Office Portfolio Summary | 13 |
Office Portfolio Occupancy and In-Place Rents | 14 |
Multifamily Portfolio Summary | 15 |
Tenant Diversification | 16 |
Industry Diversification | 17 |
Lease Distribution | 18 |
Lease Expirations | 19 |
Quarterly Lease Expirations – Next Four Quarters | 20 |
Office Portfolio Leasing Activity | 21 |
This Supplemental Operating and Financial Data contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. You should not rely on forward looking statements as predictions of future events. Forward looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated results in the future and, accordingly, such results may differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statement made by us. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: adverse economic and real estate developments in Southern California and Honolulu; decreased rental rates or increased tenant incentives and vacancy rates; defaults on, early terminations of, or non-renewal of leases by tenants; increased interest rates and operating costs; failure to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness; difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and completing acquisitions; failure to successfully operate acquired properties and operations; failure to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; possible adverse changes in rent control laws and regulations; environmental uncertainties; risks related to natural disasters; lack or insufficient amount of insurance; inability to successfully expand into new markets or submarkets; risks associated with property development; conflicts of interest with our officers; changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates; the consequences of any future terrorist attacks; and other risks and uncertainties detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
CORPORATE DATA
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | CORPORATE DATA as of June 30, 2008 |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. (NYSE: DEI) is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT), and one of the largest owners and operators of high-quality office and multifamily properties located in submarkets in California and Hawaii. The Company’s properties are concentrated in ten submarkets – Brentwood, Olympic Corridor, Century City, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Sherman Oaks/Encino, Warner Center/Woodland Hills, Burbank, and Honolulu. The Company focuses on owning and acquiring a substantial share of top-tier office properties and premier multifamily communities in neighborhoods that possess significant supply constraints, high-end executive housing and key lifestyle amenities.
This Supplemental Operating and Financial Data supplements the information provided in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional information about us and our properties is also available at our website www.douglasemmett.com.
Number of office properties owned (1) | | | 55 | |
Square feet owned (in thousands) (1) | | | 13,327 | |
Office leased rate as of June 30, 2008 (excluding 6 properties acquired at the end of March 2008) | | | 95.5 | % |
Office occupied rate as of June 30, 2008 (excluding 6 properties acquired at the end of March 2008) (2) | | | 94.5 | % |
Office leased rate as of June 30, 2008 (including 6 properties acquired at the end of March 2008) | | | 94.8 | % |
Office occupied rate as of June 30, 2008 (including 6 properties acquired at the end of March 2008) (2) | | | 93.8 | % |
Number of multifamily properties owned | | | 9 | |
Number of multifamily units owned | | | 2,868 | |
Multifamily leased rate as of June 30, 2008 | | | 99.2 | % |
Market capitalization (in thousands): | | | | |
Total debt(3) (4) | | | 3,706,050 | |
Common equity capitalization(5) | | | 3,426,820 | |
Total market capitalization | | | 7,132,870 | |
Debt/total market capitalization | | | 52.0 | % |
Common stock data (NYSE:DEI): | | | | |
Range of closing prices(6) | | | $21.64 - $24.81 | |
Closing price at quarter end | | | $21.97 | |
Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding (in thousands) (6) (7) | | | 156,724 | |
Shares of common stock outstanding on June 30, 2008 (in thousands) (8) | | | 121,386 | |
(1) | Includes 6 properties totaling 1.4 million square feet acquired at the end of March 2008. All properties are 100% owned except Honolulu Club where we own a two-thirds interest. |
(2) | Represents percent leased less signed leases not yet commenced. |
(3) | Excludes non-cash loan premium. |
(4) | Excludes one-third of the $18 million debt balance carried by a consolidated joint venture formed in 2008, of which our Operating Partnership (OP) owns a two-thirds interest. |
(5) | Common equity capitalization represents the total number of shares of common stock and OP units outstanding multiplied by the closing price of our stock at the end of the period. |
(6) | For the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
(7) | Fully diluted shares shown here represent ownership in our company through shares of common stock and OP units. |
(8) | This amount represents undiluted shares, and does not include OP units. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | INVESTOR INFORMATION |
| 808 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 200, Santa Monica, California 90401 |
Dan A. Emmett Chairman of the Board, Douglas Emmett, Inc | Leslie E. Bider Chief Executive Officer, PinnacleCare and Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Warner Chapel Music, Inc. | Thomas E. O’Hern Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Macerich Company |
Jordan L. Kaplan President and Chief Executive Officer, Douglas Emmett, Inc. | Victor J. Coleman Former President and Chief Operating Officer, Arden Realty, Inc. and Managing Director, Hudson Capital, LLC | Dr. Andrea L. Rich Former President and Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles Museum of Art, and Former Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Operating Officer, University of California Los Angeles |
Kenneth M. Panzer Chief Operating Officer, Douglas Emmett, Inc. | Ghebre Selassie Mehreteab Chief Executive Officer, NHP Foundation | William Wilson III Former Chairman, Cornerstone Properties, Inc., Managing Partner, Wilson Meany Sullivan, LLC |
| EXECUTIVE AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT |
Jordan L. Kaplan President and Chief Executive Officer | Kenneth M. Panzer Chief Operating Officer | William Kamer Chief Financial Officer |
Allan B. Golad SVP, Property Management | Gregory R. Hambly Chief Accounting Officer | Michael J. Means SVP, Commercial Leasing |
INVESTOR RELATIONS
Mary C. Jensen
Vice President - Investor Relations
(310) 255-7751
Email Contact: mjensen@douglasemmett.com
Please visit our corporate website at: www.douglasemmett.com
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands) |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
Investment in real estate: | | | | | | |
Land | | $ | 890,148 | | | $ | 825,560 | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 5,515,561 | | | | 4,978,124 | |
Tenant improvements and lease intangibles | | | 530,368 | | | | 460,486 | |
| | | 6,936,077 | | | | 6,264,170 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (362,721 | ) | | | (242,114 | ) |
Net investment in real estate | | | 6,573,356 | | | | 6,022,056 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 2,764 | | | | 5,843 | |
Tenant receivables, net | | | 553 | | | | 955 | |
Deferred rent receivables, net | | | 28,447 | | | | 20,805 | |
Interest rate contracts | | | 94,932 | | | | 84,600 | |
Acquired lease intangible assets, net | | | 21,701 | | | | 24,313 | |
Other assets | | | 25,636 | | | | 31,396 | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,747,389 | | | $ | 6,189,968 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Secured notes payable | | $ | 3,712,050 | | | $ | 3,080,450 | |
Unamortized non-cash debt premium | | | 22,891 | | | | 25,227 | |
Interest rate contracts | | | 133,769 | | | | 129,083 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 20,723 | | | | 13,963 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 37,539 | | | | 48,741 | |
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net | | | 219,730 | | | | 218,371 | |
Security deposits | | | 35,298 | | | | 31,309 | |
Dividends payable | | | 22,760 | | | | 19,221 | |
Total liabilities | | | 4,204,760 | | | | 3,566,365 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Minority interests | | | 568,844 | | | | 793,764 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | | 1,214 | | | | 1,098 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 2,275,364 | | | | 2,019,716 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | (88,178 | ) | | | (101,163 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (214,615 | ) | | | (89,812 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 1,973,785 | | | | 1,829,839 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 6,747,389 | | | $ | 6,189,968 | |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS (unaudited and in thousands, except per share data) |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Office rental: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental revenues | | $ | 111,213 | | | $ | 92,884 | | | $ | 210,229 | | | $ | 184,496 | |
Tenant recoveries | | | 7,269 | | | | 5,575 | | | | 12,637 | | | | 13,761 | |
Parking and other income | | | 13,911 | | | | 11,098 | | | | 26,571 | | | | 22,198 | |
Total office revenues | | | 132,393 | | | | 109,557 | | | | 249,437 | | | | 220,455 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Multifamily rental: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental revenues | | | 16,423 | | | | 16,879 | | | | 33,647 | | | | 33,393 | |
Parking and other income | | | 559 | | | | 526 | | | | 1,119 | | | | 1,017 | |
Total multifamily revenues | | | 16,982 | | | | 17,405 | | | | 34,766 | | | | 34,410 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 149,375 | | | | 126,962 | | | | 284,203 | | | | 254,865 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Office expenses | | | 36,574 | | | | 31,337 | | | | 67,938 | | | | 64,631 | |
Multifamily expenses | | | 3,759 | | | | 3,872 | | | | 7,636 | | | | 8,795 | |
General and administrative | | | 5,729 | | | | 5,120 | | | | 11,014 | | | | 10,162 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 63,858 | | | | 50,494 | | | | 120,607 | | | | 101,615 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 109,920 | | | | 90,823 | | | | 207,195 | | | | 185,203 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 39,455 | | | | 36,139 | | | | 77,008 | | | | 69,662 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and other income | | | 123 | | | | 372 | | | | 532 | | | | 454 | |
Interest expense | | | (51,791 | ) | | | (38,313 | ) | | | (92,994 | ) | | | (76,615 | ) |
Loss before minority interests | | | (12,213 | ) | | | (1,802 | ) | | | (15,454 | ) | | | (6,499 | ) |
Minority interests | | | 2,785 | | | | 542 | | | | 3,526 | | | | 1,966 | |
Net loss | | $ | (9,428 | ) | | $ | (1,260 | ) | | $ | (11,928 | ) | | $ | (4,533 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per common share – basic and diluted(1) | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.10 | ) | | $ | (0.04 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding – basic and diluted(1) | | | 121,314 | | | | 114,862 | | | | 119,799 | | | | 114,933 | |
| (1) | Diluted shares are calculated in accordance with GAAP accounting literature, and include common stock plus dilutive equity instruments, as appropriate. This amount excludes OP units, which are included in the non-GAAP calculation of fully diluted shares on page 2. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AND ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (unaudited and in thousands, except per share data) |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Funds From Operations (FFO) (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loss | | $ | (9,428 | ) | | $ | (1,260 | ) | | $ | (11,928 | ) | | $ | (4,533 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets | | | 63,858 | | | | 50,494 | | | | 120,607 | | | | 101,612 | |
Minority interests | | | (2,785 | ) | | | (542 | ) | | | (3,526 | ) | | | (1,966 | ) |
Loss on asset disposition | | | 32 | | | | - | | | | 32 | | | | - | |
Less: adjustments attributable to minority interest in consolidated joint venture | | | (99 | ) | | | - | | | | (162 | ) | | | - | |
FFO | | $ | 51,578 | | | $ | 48,692 | | | $ | 105,023 | | | $ | 95,113 | |
Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) (2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO | | $ | 51,578 | | | $ | 48,692 | | | $ | 105,023 | | | $ | 95,113 | |
Straight-line rent adjustment | | | (3,371 | ) | | | (4,502 | ) | | | (7,642 | ) | | | (9,007 | ) |
Amortization of acquired above and below market leases | | | (11,493 | ) | | | (10,074 | ) | | | (21,691 | ) | | | (19,937 | ) |
Amortization of interest rate contracts and loan premium | | | 4,362 | | | | 1,850 | | | | 5,002 | | | | 4,324 | |
Amortization of prepaid financing | | | 478 | | | | 251 | | | | 840 | | | | 500 | |
Recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions | | | (6,341 | ) | | | (6,576 | ) | | | (11,899 | ) | | | (12,505 | ) |
Non-cash compensation expense | | | 1,049 | | | | 736 | | | | 4,340 | | | | 1,362 | |
Less: adjustments attributable to minority interest in consolidated joint venture | | | 48 | | | | - | | | | 48 | | | | - | |
AFFO | | $ | 36,310 | | | $ | 30,377 | | | $ | 74,021 | | | $ | 59,850 | |
Weighted average share equivalents outstanding (in thousands) - diluted | | | 156,724 | | | | 165,709 | | | | 156,573 | | | | 166,048 | |
FFO per share- diluted | | $ | 0.33 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.57 | |
Dividends per share declared | | $ | 0.1875 | | | $ | 0.1750 | | | $ | 0.3750 | | | $ | 0.3500 | |
AFFO payout ratio | | | 80.54 | % | | | 93.90 | % | | | 78.91 | % | | | 95.92 | % |
(1) | We calculate funds from operations before minority interest (FFO) in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). FFO represents net income (loss), computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating property, real estate depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because, in excluding real estate depreciation and amortization and gains and losses from property dispositions, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs, FFO will be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs. However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that results from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effect and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. Other equity REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ FFO. Accordingly, FFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends. FFO should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP. |
(2) | Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) is a non-GAAP financial measure we believe is a useful supplemental measure of our performance. We compute AFFO by adding to FFO the non-cash compensation expense, amortization of prepaid financing costs and straight-line rents, and then subtracting recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. AFFO is not intended to represent cash flow for the period, and it only provides an additional perspective on our ability to fund cash needs and make distributions to shareholders by adjusting the effect of the non-cash items included in FFO, as well as recurring capital expenditures and leasing costs. We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to AFFO. We also believe that AFFO provides useful information to the investment community about the Company’s financial position as compared to other REITs since AFFO is a widely reported measure used by other REITs. However, other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating AFFO and, accordingly, our AFFO may not be comparable to other REITs. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | SAME PROPERTY STATISTICAL AND FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited and in thousands, except statistics) |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | % Change | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Number of properties | | | 46 | | | | 46 | | | | |
Rentable square feet | | | 11,586,150 | | | | 11,585,250 | | | | |
Average % leased | | | 95.4 | % | | | 95.4 | % | | | |
Average % occupied | | | 94.4 | % | | | 93.4 | % | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Property Net Operating Income - GAAP Basis(1)(3) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total office revenues | | $ | 114,790 | | | $ | 109,102 | | | | 5.2 | % |
Total multifamily revenues | | | 16,982 | | | | 17,405 | | | | (2.4 | ) |
Total revenues | | | 131,772 | | | | 126,507 | | | | 4.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total office expense | | | 31,072 | | | | 31,238 | | | | (0.5 | ) |
Total multifamily expense | | | 3,759 | | | | 3,872 | | | | (2.9 | ) |
Total property expense | | | 34,831 | | | | 35,110 | | | | (0.8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Property NOI - GAAP basis | | $ | 96,941 | | | $ | 91,397 | | | | 6.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Property Net Operating Income - Cash Basis(1)(2)(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total office revenues | | $ | 104,659 | | | $ | 96,867 | | | | 8.0 | % |
Total multifamily revenues | | | 16,058 | | | | 15,501 | | | | 3.6 | |
Total revenues | | | 120,717 | | | | 112,368 | | | | 7.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total office expense | | | 31,237 | | | | 31,639 | | | | (1.3 | ) |
Total multifamily expense | | | 3,759 | | | | 3,872 | | | | (2.9 | ) |
Total property expense | | | 34,996 | | | | 35,511 | | | | (1.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Property NOI - cash basis | | $ | 85,721 | | | $ | 76,857 | | | | 11.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE: See page 10 for our description of same property, cash basis and NOI. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | RECONCILIATION OF SAME PROPERTY NOI TO GAAP NET INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited and in thousands) |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Same property office revenues - cash basis (1)(2) | | $ | 104,659 | | | $ | 96,867 | |
GAAP adjustments | | | 10,131 | | | | 12,235 | |
Same property office revenues - GAAP basis | | | 114,790 | | | | 109,102 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Same property multifamily revenues - cash basis | | | 16,058 | | | | 15,501 | |
GAAP adjustments | | | 924 | | | | 1,904 | |
Same property multifamily revenues - GAAP basis | | | 16,982 | | | | 17,405 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Same property revenues - GAAP basis | | | 131,772 | | | | 126,507 | |
Same property office expenses - GAAP basis | | | (31,072 | ) | | | (31,238 | ) |
Same property multifamily expenses - GAAP basis | | | (3,759 | ) | | | (3,872 | ) |
Same property Net Operating Income (NOI)(3) - GAAP basis | | | 96,941 | | | | 91,397 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-same property NOI - GAAP Basis | | | 12,101 | | | | 356 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total property NOI - GAAP basis | | | 109,042 | | | | 91,753 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | (5,729 | ) | | | (5,120 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (63,858 | ) | | | (50,494 | ) |
Operating income | | | 39,455 | | | | 36,139 | |
Interest and other income | | | 123 | | | | 372 | |
Interest expense | | | (51,791 | ) | | | (38,313 | ) |
Loss before minority interests | | | (12,213 | ) | | | (1,802 | ) |
Minority interests | | | 2,785 | | | | 542 | |
Net loss | | $ | (9,428 | ) | | $ | (1,260 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
NOTE: See page 10 for our description of same property, cash basis and NOI. | | | | | | | | |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | SAME PROPERTY DEFINITIONS |
(1) | To facilitate a more meaningful comparison of net operating income (NOI), as defined below, between periods, we calculate the amounts attributable to comparable properties, which we call same properties, that have been owned and operated by us during the entire span of both periods compared. Therefore, any properties either acquired after the first day of the earlier comparison period or sold before the last day of the later comparison period are excluded from same properties. We may also exclude from the same property set any property that is undergoing a major repositioning project that would impact the comparability of its results between two periods. |
(2) | NOI as defined below includes the revenue and expense directly attributable to our real estate properties calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and is specifically labeled as GAAP basis. We also believe that NOI calculated on a cash basis is useful for investors to understand our operations. Cash basis NOI is also a non-GAAP measure, which we calculate by excluding from GAAP basis NOI our straight-line rent adjustments and the amortization of above/below market lease intangible assets and liabilities. Accordingly, cash basis NOI should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. Cash basis NOI should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends. Cash basis NOI should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP. |
(3) | Reported net income (or loss) is computed in accordance with GAAP. In contrast, NOI is a non-GAAP measure consisting of the revenue and expense attributable to the real estate properties that we own and operate. The most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI is net income (or loss), adjusted to exclude general and administrative expense, depreciation and amortization expense, interest income, interest expense, income from unconsolidated partnerships, minority interests in consolidated partnerships, gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating properties, net income from discontinued operations and extraordinary items. Management uses NOI as a supplemental performance measure because, in excluding real estate depreciation and amortization expense and gains (or losses) from property dispositions, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that NOI will be useful to investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs. However, because NOI excludes depreciation and amortization expense and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions, nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties (all of which have real economic effect and could materially impact our results from operations), the utility of NOI as a measure of our performance is limited. Other equity REITs may not calculate NOI in a similar manner and, accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to such other REITs’ NOI. Accordingly, NOI should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. NOI should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends. NOI should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | DEBT BALANCES as of June 30, 2008 (unaudited and in thousands) |
| | | Principal Balance | | Variable Rate | | Effective Annual Fixed Rate(1) | | Maturity Date | | Swap Maturity Date |
Variable Rate Swapped to Fixed Rate: | | | | | | | | | | |
Modified Term Loan I(2)(3) | $ | 2,300,000 | | LIBOR + 0.85% | | 5.20% | | 08/31/12 | | 08/01/10 - 08/01/12 |
Term Loan II(4) | | 340,000 | | LIBOR + 1.50% | | 4.84 | | 04/01/15 | | 01/02/13 |
Fannie Mae Loan I(5) | | 293,000 | | DMBS + 0.60% | | 4.76 | | 06/01/12 | | 08/01/11 |
Fannie Mae Loan II(5) | | 95,080 | | DMBS + 0.60% | | 5.86 | | 06/01/12 | | 08/01/11 |
Fannie Mae Loan III(5) | | 36,920 | | DMBS + 0.60% | | 5.86 | | 02/01/15 | | 08/01/11 |
Fannie Mae Loan IV(5) | | 75,000 | | DMBS + 0.76% | | 4.93 | | 02/01/15 | | 08/01/11 |
Fannie Mae Loan V(5) | | 82,000 | | LIBOR + 0.62% | | 5.70 | | 02/01/16 | | 03/01/12 |
Fannie Mae Loan VI(5) | | 18,000 | | LIBOR + 0.62% | | 5.90 | | 06/01/17 | | 06/01/12 |
Subtotal | | 3,240,000 | (6) | | | 5.17% | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable Rate: | | | | | | | | | | |
General Electric Bridge Loan | | 380,000 | | LIBOR + 2.00% | | -- | | 01/02/09 | | -- |
Wells Fargo Loan(7) | | 18,000 | | LIBOR + 1.25% | | -- | | 03/01/10 | | -- |
$370 Million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility(8) | | 74,050 | | LIBOR / Fed Funds +(9) | | -- | | 10/30/09 | | -- |
Subtotal | | 3,712,050 | | | | | | | | |
Add: Unamortized Non-Cash Loan Premium(10) | | 22,891 | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 3,734,941 | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Includes the effect of interest rate contracts. Based on actual/365-day basis and excludes amortization of loan fees and unused fees on credit line. |
(2) | Secured by seven separate cross-collateralized pools. Requires monthly payments of interest only, with outstanding principal due upon maturity. |
(3) | Includes $1.11 billion swapped to 4.89% until August 1, 2010; $545.0 million swapped to 5.75% until December 1, 2010; $322.5 million swapped to 4.98% until August 1, 2011; and $322.5 million swapped to 5.02% until August 1, 2012. |
(4) | Secured by four properties in a cross-collateralized pool. Requires monthly payments of interest only, with outstanding principal due upon maturity. |
(5) | Secured by four separate collateralized pools. Fannie Mae Discount Mortgage-Backed Security (DMBS) generally tracks 90-day LIBOR. |
(6) | As of June 30, 2008, the weighted average remaining life of our total outstanding debt is 4.2 years, and the weighted average remaining life of the interest rate swaps is 2.9 years. |
(7) | This loan is carried by a consolidated joint venture formed in 2008, of which our Operating Partnership owns a two-thirds interest. |
(8) | This credit facility is secured by nine properties and has two-one year extension options available. |
(9) | This revolver bears interest at either LIBOR +0.70% or Fed Funds +0.95% at our election. If the amount outstanding exceeds $262.5 million, the credit facility bears interest at either LIBOR +0.80% or Fed Funds +1.05% at our election. |
(10) | Represents non-cash mark-to-market adjustment on variable rate debt associated with office properties. |
PORTFOLIO DATA
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | OFFICE PORTFOLIO SUMMARY as of June 30, 2008 |
Submarket | | Number of Properties | | | Rentable Square Feet (1) | | | Percent of Total | |
| | | | | | | | | |
West Los Angeles | | | | | | | | | |
Brentwood | | | 13 | | | | 1,390,630 | | | | 10.4 | % |
Olympic Corridor | | | 05 | | | | 1,096,016 | | | | 8.2 | |
Century City | | | 03 | | | | 915,979 | | | | 6.9 | |
Santa Monica | | | 08 | | | | 969,942 | | | | 7.3 | |
Beverly Hills | | | 06 | | | | 1,342,980 | | | | 10.1 | |
Westwood | | | 02 | | | | 396,807 | | | | 3.0 | |
San Fernando Valley | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sherman Oaks/Encino | | | 11 | | | | 3,180,949 | | | | 23.9 | |
Warner Center/Woodland Hills | | | 03 | | | | 2,855,097 | | | | 21.4 | |
Tri-Cities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Burbank | | | 01 | | | | 420,949 | | | | 3.1 | |
Honolulu | | | 03 | | | | 757,636 | | | | 5.7 | |
Total | | | 55 | | | | 13,326,985 | | | | 100.0 | % |
(1) | Based on BOMA 1996 remeasurement. Total consists of 12,456,116 leased square feet, 695,153 available square feet, 75,800 building management use square feet, and 99,916 square feet of BOMA 1996 adjustment on leased space. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | OFFICE PORTFOLIO OCCUPANCY AND IN-PLACE RENTS as of June 30, 2008 |
| | | | | | | | Annualized | | | Monthly | |
| | | | | | | | Rent Per | | | Rent Per | |
| | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Leased | | | Leased | |
Submarket | | Leased(1) | | | Rent(2) | | | Square Foot (3) | | | Square Foot | |
West Los Angeles | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Brentwood | | | 97.5 | % | | $ | 49,030,057 | | | $ | 36.62 | | | $ | 3.05 | |
Olympic Corridor | | | 94.1 | | | | 31,132,431 | | | | 30.71 | | | | 2.56 | |
Century City | | | 98.8 | | | | 31,383,728 | | | | 35.17 | | | | 2.93 | |
Santa Monica (4) | | | 98.3 | | | | 43,315,820 | | | | 46.76 | | | | 3.90 | |
Beverly Hills | | | 95.3 | | | | 44,218,876 | | | | 36.11 | | | | 3.01 | |
Westwood | | | 96.5 | | | | 13,304,248 | | | | 35.29 | | | | 2.94 | |
San Fernando Valley | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sherman Oaks/Encino | | | 94.3 | | | | 88,140,549 | | | | 30.05 | | | | 2.50 | |
Warner Center/Woodland Hills | | | 91.2 | | | | 71,345,278 | | | | 28.14 | | | | 2.34 | |
Tri-Cities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Burbank | | | 100.0 | | | | 13,383,871 | | | | 31.79 | | | | 2.65 | |
Honolulu | | | 92.3 | | | | 22,026,943 | | | | 33.51 | | | | 2.79 | |
Total /Weighted Average(5) | | | 94.8 | | | $ | 407,281,801 | | | | 33.06 | | | | 2.76 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring Capital Expenditures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Office (per rentable square foot) for the three months ended June 30, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.13 | | | | | |
- Office (per rentable square foot) for the six months ended June 30, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.20 | | | | | |
(1) | Includes 136,995 square feet with respect to signed leases not yet commenced. |
(2) | Represents annualized monthly cash rent under leases commenced as of June 30, 2008 (excluding 136,995 square feet with respect to signed leases not yet commenced). The amount reflects total cash rent before abatements. For our Burbank and Honolulu office properties, annualized rent is converted from triple net to gross by adding expense reimbursements to base rent. |
(3) | Represents annualized rent divided by leased square feet (excluding 136,995 square feet with respect to signed leases not commenced) as set forth in note (1) above for the total. |
(4) | Includes $1,287,232 of annualized rent attributable to our corporate headquarters at our Lincoln/Wilshire property. |
(5) | Office portfolio occupancy and in-place rents include the 6 properties acquired at the end of March 2008. Office portfolio occupancy and in-place rents excluding the 6 properties at the end of June 2008 were 95.5% and $370,061,847, respectively. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | MULTIFAMILY PORTFOLIO SUMMARY as of June 30, 2008 |
Submarket | | Number of Properties | | | Number of Units | | | Percent of Total | |
| | | | | | | | | |
West Los Angeles | | | | | | | | | |
Brentwood | | | 5 | | | | 950 | | | | 33 | % |
Santa Monica | | | 2 | | | | 820 | | | | 29 | |
Honolulu | | | 2 | | | | 1,098 | | | | 38 | |
Total | | | 9 | | | | 2,868 | | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Monthly Rent | |
Submarket | | Leased | | | Rent (1) | | | Per Leased Unit | |
| | | | | | | | | |
West Los Angeles | | | | | | | | | |
Brentwood | | | 99.5 | % | | $ | 23,921,722 | | | $ | 2,109 | |
Santa Monica (2) | | | 99.8 | | | | 20,265,552 | | | | 2,065 | |
Honolulu | | | 98.6 | | | | 18,681,333 | | | | 1,437 | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 99.2 | % | | $ | 62,868,607 | | | | 1,841 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring Capital Expenditures | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Multifamily (per unit) for the three months ended June 30, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 100 | |
- Multifamily (per unit) for the six months ended June 30, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 192 | |
(1) | Represents June 30, 2008 multifamily rental income annualized. |
(2) | Excludes 10,013 square feet of ancillary retail space, which generates $287,566 of annualized rent as of June 30, 2008. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | TENANT DIVERSIFICATION (1.0% or Greater of Annualized Rent) as of June 30, 2008 |
| Number of Leases | Number of Properties | Lease Expiration(1) | Total Leased Square Feet | Percent Rentable Square Feet | Annualized Rent(2) | Percent of Annualized Rent |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Time Warner(3) | 4 | 4 | 2010-2019 | 642,845 | 4.8 | % | | $ | 21,096,069 | 5.2% |
AIG SunAmerica | 1 | 1 | 2013 | 182,010 | 1.4 | | | | 5,211,950 | 1.3 |
Health Net Inc.(4) | 2 | 1 | 2008-2014 | 176,530 | 1.3 | | | | 4,671,172 | 1.1 |
The Endeavor Agency, LLC | 2 | 1 | 2019 | 103,421 | 0.8 | | | | 4,202,029 | 1.0 |
Metrocities Mortgage, LLC(5) | 2 | 2 | 2010-2015 | 138,040 | 1.0 | | | | 3,942,564 | 1.0 |
Blue Shield of California | 1 | 1 | 2009 | 135,106 | 1.0 | | | | 3,939,691 | 1.0 |
Total | 12 | 10 | | 1,377,952 | 10.3 | % | | $ | 43,063,475 | 10.6% |
(1) | Expiration dates are per leases and do not assume exercise of renewal, extension or termination options. For tenants with multiple leases, expirations are shown as a range. |
(2) | Represents annualized monthly cash rent under leases commenced as of June 30, 2008. The amount reflects total cash rent before abatements. For our Burbank and Honolulu office properties, annualized rent is converted from triple net to gross by adding expense reimbursements to base rent. |
(3) | Includes a 62,000 square foot lease expiring in June 2010, a 10,000 square foot lease expiring in October 2013, a 150,000 square foot lease expiring in April 2016, and a 421,000 square foot lease expiring in September 2019. |
(4) | Includes a 51,000 square foot lease expiring in December 2008 and a 125,000 square foot lease expiring in December 2014. |
(5) | Includes a 8,000 square foot lease expiring in September 2010 and a 130,000 square foot lease expiring in February 2015. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | INDUSTRY DIVERSIFICATION as of June 30, 2008 |
Industry | | Number of Leases | | | Annualized Rent as a Percent of Total | |
| | | | | | |
Legal | | | 356 | | | | 15.9 | % |
Financial Services | | | 286 | | | | 15.3 | |
Entertainment | | | 135 | | | | 11.4 | |
Health Services | | | 296 | | | | 8.9 | |
Real Estate | | | 172 | | | | 8.9 | |
Accounting & Consulting | | | 213 | | | | 8.8 | |
Insurance | | | 89 | | | | 7.6 | |
Retail | | | 173 | | | | 7.2 | |
Technology | | | 75 | | | | 4.1 | |
Advertising | | | 61 | | | | 3.2 | |
Public Administration | | | 28 | | | | 1.8 | |
Educational Services | | | 10 | | | | 0.7 | |
Other | | | 245 | | | | 6.2 | |
Total | | | 2,139 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | LEASE DISTRIBUTION as of June 30, 2008 |
| | Number of Leases | Leases as a Percent of Total | Rentable Square Feet (1) | Square Feet as a Percent of Total | Annualized Rent(2) | Annualized Rent as a Percent of Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,500 or less | | 1,049 | | 49.0% | | 1,437,730 | | 10.8% | | $ | 50,126,361 | | 12.3% |
2,501-10,000 | | 810 | | 37.9 | | 3,921,817 | | 29.4 | | | 128,908,417 | | 31.7 |
10,001-20,000 | | 183 | | 8.6 | | 2,586,223 | | 19.4 | | | 83,651,271 | | 20.5 |
20,001-40,000 | | 67 | | 3.1 | | 1,840,441 | | 13.8 | | | 60,673,191 | | 14.9 |
40,001-100,000 | | 23 | | 1.1 | | 1,285,952 | | 9.6 | | | 45,905,570 | | 11.3 |
Greater than 100,000 | | 7 | | 0.3 | | 1,246,958 | | 9.4 | | | 38,016,991 | | 9.3 |
Subtotal | | 2,139 | | 100.0% | | 12,319,121 | | 92.4% | | | 407,281,801 | | 100.0% |
Available | | - | | - | | 695,153 | | 5.2 | | | - | | - |
BOMA Adjustment(3) | | - | | - | | 99,916 | | 0.8 | | | - | | - |
Building Management Use | | - | | - | | 75,800 | | 0.6 | | | - | | - |
Signed leases not commenced | | - | | - | | 136,995 | | 1.0 | | | - | | - |
Total | | 2,139 | | 100.0% | | 13,326,985 | | 100.0% | | $ | 407,281,801 | | 100.0% |
(1) | Based on BOMA 1996 remeasurement. Total consists of 12,456,116 leased square feet (includes 136,995 square feet with respect to signed leases not commenced), 695,153 available square feet, 75,800 building management use square feet, and 99,916 square feet of BOMA 1996 adjustment on leased space. |
(2) | Represents annualized monthly cash base rent (i.e., excludes tenant reimbursements, parking and other revenue) under leases commenced as of June 30, 2008 (excluding 136,995 square feet with respect to signed leases not yet commenced). The amount reflects total cash rent before abatements. For our Burbank and Honolulu office properties, annualized rent is converted from triple net to gross by adding expense reimbursements to base rent. |
(3) | Represents square footage adjustments for leases that do not reflect BOMA 1996 remeasurement. |
(4) | Average tenant size is approximately 5,800 square feet. Median is approximately 2,600 square feet. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | LEASE EXPIRATIONS as of June 30, 2008 |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Number of Leases Expiring | | Rentable Square Feet(1) | | Expiring Square Feet as a Percent of Total | | | Annualized Rent(2) | | Annualized Rent as a Percent of Total | | | Annualized Rent Per Leased Square Foot(3) | | | Annualized Rent Per leased Square Foot at Expiration(4) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available | | - | | 695,153 | | 5.2% | | $ | - | | - % | | $ | - | | $ | - |
2008 | | 203 | | 796,045 | | 6.0 | | | 24,491,385 | | 6.0 | | | 30.77 | | | 30.87 |
2009 | | 469 | | 1,847,897 | | 13.9 | | | 58,584,813 | | 14.4 | | | 31.70 | | | 32.41 |
2010 | | 420 | | 1,800,442 | | 13.5 | | | 60,689,803 | | 14.9 | | | 33.71 | | | 35.68 |
2011 | | 352 | | 1,722,736 | | 12.9 | | | 57,423,067 | | 14.1 | | | 33.33 | | | 36.90 |
2012 | | 277 | | 1,509,537 | | 11.3 | | | 49,965,475 | | 12.3 | | | 33.10 | | | 37.69 |
2013 | | 197 | | 1,407,048 | | 10.6 | | | 48,197,279 | | 11.8 | | | 34.25 | | | 41.43 |
2014 | | 86 | | 793,284 | | 5.9 | | | 25,579,454 | | 6.3 | | | 32.25 | | | 39.12 |
2015 | | 47 | | 571,058 | | 4.3 | | | 17,934,623 | | 4.4 | | | 31.41 | | | 39.64 |
2016 | | 30 | | 615,805 | | 4.6 | | | 20,044,683 | | 4.9 | | | 32.55 | | | 39.45 |
2017 | | 27 | | 275,460 | | 2.1 | | | 9,003,663 | | 2.2 | | | 32.69 | | | 43.36 |
2018 | | 21 | | 223,744 | | 1.7 | | | 9,414,194 | | 2.3 | | | 42.08 | | | 63.63 |
Thereafter | | 10 | | 756,065 | | 5.7 | | | 25,953,362 | | 6.4 | | | 34.33 | | | 44.91 |
BOMA Adjustment(5) | | - | | 99,916 | | 0.7 | | | - | | - | | | - | | | - |
Building Management Use | | - | | 75,800 | | 0.6 | | | - | | - | | | - | | | - |
Signed leases not commenced | | - | | 136,995 | | 1.0 | | | - | | - | | | - | | | - |
Total/Weighted Average | | 2,139 | | 13,326,985 | | 100.0% | | $ | 407,281,801 | | 100.0% | | $ | 33.06 | | $ | 37.79 |
(1) | Based on BOMA 1996 remeasurement. Total consists of 12,456,116 leased square feet (includes 136,995 square feet with respect to signed leases not commenced), 695,153 available square feet, 75,800 building management use square feet, and 99,916 square feet of BOMA 1996 adjustment on leased space. |
(2) | Represents annualized monthly base rent under leases commenced as of June 30, 2008. The amount reflects total base rent before abatements. |
(3) | Represents annualized rent divided by leased square feet. |
(4) | Represents annualized rent at expiration divided by leased square feet. |
(5) | Represents the square footage adjustments for leases that do not reflect BOMA 1996 remeasurement. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | QUARTERLY LEASE EXPIRATIONS – NEXT FOUR QUARTERS as of June 30, 2008 |
Submarket | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q4 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | Q2 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Los Angeles | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Brentwood | Expiring SF | | 46,116 | | | 34,555 | | | 44,644 | | | 35,784 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 33.12 | | $ | 35.16 | | $ | 35.07 | | $ | 37.18 | |
| Olympic Corridor | Expiring SF | | 40,640 | | | 18,356 | | | 40,002 | | | 59,194 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 28.04 | | $ | 28.32 | | $ | 27.98 | | $ | 29.48 | |
| Century City | Expiring SF | | 5,473 | | | 7,193 | | | 24,995 | | | 61,403 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 33.31 | | $ | 33.06 | | $ | 34.37 | | $ | 32.42 | |
| Santa Monica | Expiring SF | | 80,873 | | | 14,371 | | | 979 | | | 28,576 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 37.56 | | $ | 42.89 | | $ | 43.89 | | $ | 47.92 | |
| Beverly Hills | Expiring SF | | 43,899 | | | 40,108 | | | 29,693 | | | 41,681 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 32.33 | | $ | 32.22 | | $ | 32.26 | | $ | 33.10 | |
| Westwood | Expiring SF | | 10,542 | | | 9,011 | | | 14,460 | | | 10,930 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 36.13 | | $ | 36.22 | | $ | 33.26 | | $ | 33.95 | |
San Fernando Valley | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Sherman Oaks/Encino | Expiring SF | | 94,819 | | | 109,449 | | | 75,667 | | | 83,948 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 29.14 | | $ | 28.41 | | $ | 30.18 | | $ | 29.12 | |
| Warner Center/Woodland Hills | Expiring SF | | 69,688 | | | 153,657 | | | 96,770 | | | 221,841 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 24.93 | | $ | 29.79 | | $ | 28.41 | | $ | 27.23 | |
Tri-Cities | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Burbank | Expiring SF | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | |
Honolulu | Expiring SF | | 7,392 | | | 9,903 | | | 4,484 | | | 10,772 | |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 26.01 | | $ | 29.94 | | $ | 30.87 | | $ | 36.17 | |
Total | Expiring SF | | 399,442 | (2) | | 396,603 | (3) | | 331,694 | (4) | | 554,129 | (5) |
| | Rent per SF(1) | $ | 30.99 | | $ | 30.74 | | $ | 30.74 | | $ | 30.79 | |
(1) | Represents annualized base rent (i.e., excludes tenant reimbursements, parking and other revenue) per leased square foot at expiration. The amount reflects total cash rent before abatements. For our Burbank and Honolulu office properties, annualized rent is converted from triple net to gross by adding expense reimbursements to base rent. |
(2) | As of June 30, 2008, 313,156 rentable square feet had been renewed for leases that were previously scheduled to expire in the quarter ending September 30, 2008. |
(3) | As of June 30, 2008, 126,655 rentable square feet had been renewed for leases that were previously scheduled to expire in the quarter ending December 31, 2008. |
(4) | As of June 30, 2008, 65,962 rentable square feet had been renewed for leases that were previously scheduled to expire in the quarter ending March 31, 2009. |
(5) | As of June 30, 2008, 13,466 rentable square feet had been renewed for leases that were previously scheduled to expire in the quarter ending June 30, 2009. |
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | OFFICE PORTFOLIO LEASING ACTIVITY For the three months ended June 30, 2008 |
Gross New Leasing Activity | | | |
Rentable square feet | | | 186,184 | |
Number of leases | | | 47 | |
Gross Renewal Leasing Activity | | | | |
Rentable square feet | | | 209,971 | |
Number of leases | | | 67 | |
Net Absorption | | | | |
Leased rentable square feet | | | 37,312 | |
Cash Rent Growth(1)(2) | | | | |
Expiring Rate | | $ | 31.82 | |
New/Renewal Rate | | $ | 40.35 | |
Increase | | | 26.8 | % |
Straight-Line Rent Growth(1)(3) | | | | |
Expiring Rate | | $ | 30.02 | |
New/Renewal Rate | | $ | 43.05 | |
Increase | | | 43.4 | % |
Weighted Average Lease Terms | | | | |
New (in months)(1) | | | 59 | |
Renewal (in months) | | | 52 | |
Tenant Improvement and Leasing Commissions (per rentable square foot) (1)(4) | | | | | | |
New leases | | $ | 18.14 | | | $ | 3.66 | |
Renewal leases | | $ | 10.67 | | | $ | 2.45 | |
Blended | | $ | 13.66 | | | $ | 2.97 | |
(1) | Excludes a 46,000 square foot fitness center lease at Honolulu Club. The 240-month new lease was executed in April 2008 as part of the sale of the fitness center by Douglas Emmett, Inc. to a third-party fitness center operator. This lease replaced a lease entered into between two subsidiaries of Douglas Emmett, Inc. in February 2008. |
(2) | Represents the difference between initial stabilized cash rents on new and renewal leases as compared to the expiring cash rents on the same space. |
(3) | Represents a comparison between straight-line rent on expiring leases and the straight-line rent for new leases on the same space. |
(4) | Represents weighted average lease transaction costs based on the leases executed in the current quarter in our properties, including repositioned properties. |