Bluefire Renewables 10Q 2013 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2013

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File No. 000-52361

BLUEFIRE RENEWABLES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		20-4590982
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

31 Musick

Irvine, CA 92618

(Address of principal executive offices)

(949) 588-3767

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer	[ ]	Accelerated filer	[ ]

Non-accelerated filer	[ ]	Smaller reporting company	[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

As of August 19, 2013, there were 46,300,012 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.		F-1

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		3

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		11

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.		11

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.		12

Item 1A. Risk Factors.		12

Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		12

Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities.		13

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.		13

Item 5. Other Information.		13

Item 6. Exhibits.		13

Signatures		14

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

BLUEFIRE RENEWABLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A DEVELOPMENT-STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,165		$	59,603
Accounts receivable		96,832			3,538
Costs of financing		1,031			25,644
Prepaid expenses		13,560			8,952
Total current assets		126,588			97,737

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $105,148 and $103,159, respectively		1,212,433			1,218,314
Total assets	$	1,339,021		$	1,316,051

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,208,049		$	1,080,056
Accrued liabilities		466,860			595,760
Convertible notes payable, net of discount of $19,400 and $41,502, respectively		398,600			359,498
Line of credit, related party		15,230			15,230
Note payable to a related party		200,000			200,000
Derivative liability		42,488			59,949
Total current liabilities		2,331,227			2,310,493

Outstanding warrant liability		745			22,600
Total liabilities		2,331,972			2,333,093

Redeemable non-controlling interest		847,203			849,945

Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 37,571,975 and 33,591,538 shares issued; and 37,539,804 and 33,559,366 outstanding, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		37,572			33,591
Additional paid-in capital		15,043,722			14,847,401
Committed shares to be issued; 5,740,741 shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		803,704			803,704
Treasury stock at cost, 32,172 shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		(101,581	)		(101,581	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(17,623,571	)		(17,450,102	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,840,154	)		(1,866,987	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	1,339,021		$	1,316,051

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-1

BLUEFIRE RENEWABLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A DEVELOPMENT-STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

		For the Three Months ended June 30, 2013		For the Three Months ended June 30, 2012			For the Six Months ended June 30, 2013			For the Six Months ended June 30, 2012			From March 28, 2006 (Inception) Through June 30, 2013

Revenues:
Consulting fees	$	-		$	30,000		$	2,020		$	91,900		$	285,980
Department of Energy grant revenue		551,828			206,944			617,939			211,811			7,236,269
Department of Energy - unbilled grant revenue		-			-			-			-			197,041
Total revenues		551,828			236,944			619,959			303,711			7,719,290

Cost of revenue
Consulting revenue		-			-			-			-			61,391
Gross margin		551,828			236,944			619,959			303,711			7,657,899
Operating expenses:
Project development, including stock based compensation of $0, $0, $0, $0, and $4,468,490, respectively		128,301			152,686			246,688			291,273			19,653,637
General and administrative, including stock based compensation of $0, $33,000, $9,075, $44,000, and $6,481,619		176,263			303,668			398,602			678,408			18,464,502
Related party license fee		-			-			-			-			1,000,000
Total operating expenses		304,564			456,354			645,290			969,681			39,118,139

Operating income (loss)		247,264			(219,410	)		(25,331	)		(665,970	)		(31,460,240	)

Other income and (expense):
Other income		-			-			-			-			256,295
Financing related charge		-			-			-			-			(211,660	)
Amortization of debt discount		(44,513	)		(89,093	)		(125,616	)		(90,253	)		(935,402	)
Interest expense		(19,386	)		-			(76,447	)		-			(428,192	)
Related party interest expense		(462	)		(219	)		(919	)		(1,090	)		(175,132	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		-			-			-			-			(2,818,370	)
Loss on warrant modification		-			-			-			-			(803,704	)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities		-			-			-			-			45,811
Deobligation of Department of Energy billings in excess of estimated earnings		-			-			-			-			354,000
Gain / (loss) from change in fair value of warrant liability		7,736			99,150			21,855			(5,445	)		2,966,671
Gain from change in fair value of derivative liability		90,236			25,002			59,505			24,616			161,126
Loss on excess of derivative over face value		(28,507	)		-			(28,507	)		-			(28,507	)
Loss on the retirements of warrants		-			-			-			-			(146,718	)
Total other income and (expense)		5,104			34,840			(150,129	)		(72,172	)		(1,763,782	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		252,368			(184,570	)		(175,460	)		(738,142			(33,224,022	)
Provision for income taxes		355			-			(751	)		(825	)		(86,298	)
Net income (loss)	$	252,723		$	(184,570	)	$	(176,211	)	$	(738,967	)	$	(33,310,320	)

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		(685	)		409			(2,742	)		(2,542	)		(15,297	)
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest	$	253,408		$	(184,979	)	$	(173,469	)	$	(736,425	)	$	(33,295,023	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	0.01		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		35,699,485			32,739,430			34,807,751			32,521,594

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-2

BLUEFIRE RENEWABLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A DEVELOPMENT-STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended			For the Six Months Ended			From March 28, 2006 (Inception) Through
	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012			June 30, 2013

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(176,211	)	$	(738,967	)	$	(33,310,320	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Change in the fair value of warrant liability		(21,855	)		5,445			(2,966,671	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(59,505	)		16,937			(161,126	)
Loss on excess fair value of derivative liability		28,507			-			28,507
Founders’ shares		-			-			17,000
Costs associated with purchase of Sucre Agricultural Corp		-			-			(3,550	)
Interest expense on beneficial conversion feature of convertible notes		-			-			676,983
Loss on extinguishment of convertible debt		-			-			2,718,370
Loss on retirement of warrants		-			-	��		146,718
Common stock issued for interest on convertible notes		-			-			55,585
Discount on sale of stock associated with private placement		-			-			211,660
Accretion of discount on note payable to related party		-			-			83,736
Debt issuance costs for rejected loan guarantees		-			-			583,634
Gain on settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities		-			-			(45,811	)
Loss on warrant modification		-						803,704
Share-based compensation		9,075			43,912			11,722,416
Unrealized Department of Energy unbilled receivables		-			-			20,116
Amortization		154,439			-			459,164
Depreciation		1,989			56,230			105,505
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(93,294	)		(30,000	)		(96,832	)
Department of Energy unbilled grant receivable		-			187,454			42,183
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(4,608	)		(6,164	)		(13,561	)
Accounts payable		127,993			294,245			1,249,363
Accrued liabilities		(124,860	)		(45,319	)		450,272
Net cash used in operating activities		(158,330	)		(216,227	)		(17,223,955	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment		-			-			(217,636	)
Construction in progress		3,892			41,001			(1,054,459	)
Net cash used in investing activities		3,892			41,001			(1,272,095	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash paid for treasury stock		-			-			(101,581	)
Cash received in acquisition of Sucre Agricultural Corp.		-			-			690,000
Proceeds from sale of stock through private placement		-			-			544,500
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		-			-			40,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			35,000			14,745,000
Proceeds from convertible notes payable		110,000			300,000			3,005,500
Repayment of notes payable		-			-			(500,000	)
Proceeds from related party line of credit/notes payable		-			-			335,230
Repayment of related party line of credit/notes payable		-			(4,000	)		(120,000	)
Debt issuance costs		-			(84,800	)		(658,434	)
Retirement of warrants		-			-			(220,000	)
Proceeds from sale of LLC Unit		-			-			750,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		110,000			246,200			18,510,215

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(44,438	)		70,974			15,165

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period		59,603			15,028			-

Cash and cash equivalents end of period	$	15,165		$	86,002		$	15,165

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	61,445
Income taxes	$	751		$	-		$	27,851

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of convertible notes payable into common stock	$	101,000		$	-		$	2,101,000
Interest converted to common stock	$	4,040		$	-		$	59,609
Fair value of warrants issued to placement agents	$	-		$	-		$	725,591
Accounts payable, net of reimbursement, included in construction-in-progress	$	-		$	-		$	45,842
Discount on related party note payable	$	-		$	-		$	83,736
Accretion of redeemable non-controlling interest	$	-		$	-		$	112,500
Derivative liability reclassed to additional paid-in capital	$	86,187		$	-		$	86,187

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3

BLUEFIRE RENEWABLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A DEVELOPMENT-STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

BlueFire Renewables, Inc. (“BlueFire” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 28, 2006 (“Inception”). BlueFire was established to deploy the commercially ready and patented process for the conversion of cellulosic waste materials to ethanol (“Arkenol Technology”) under a technology license agreement with Arkenol, Inc. (“Arkenol”). BlueFire’s use of the Arkenol Technology positions it as a cellulose-to-ethanol company with demonstrated production of ethanol from urban trash (post-sorted “MSW”), rice and wheat straws, wood waste and other agricultural residues. The Company’s goal is to develop and operate high-value carbohydrate-based transportation fuel production facilities in North America, and to provide professional services to such facilities worldwide. These “biorefineries” will convert widely available, inexpensive, organic materials such as agricultural residues, high-content biomass crops, wood residues, and cellulose from MSW into ethanol.

On July 15, 2010, the board of directors of BlueFire, by unanimous written consent, approved the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada, changing the Company’s name from BlueFire Ethanol Fuels, Inc. to BlueFire Renewables, Inc. On July 20, 2010, the Certificate of Amendment was accepted by the Secretary of State of Nevada.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Management’s Plans

Going Concern

The Company is a development-stage company which has incurred losses since Inception. Management has funded operations primarily through proceeds received in connection with a reverse merger, loans from its majority shareholder, the private placement of the Company’s common stock in December 2007 for net proceeds of approximately $14,500,000, the issuance of convertible notes with warrants in July and in August 2007, and Department of Energy reimbursements from 2009 through the present. The Company may encounter difficulties in establishing operations due to the time frame of developing, constructing and ultimately operating the planned bio-refinery projects.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company has negative working capital of approximately $2,205,000. Management has estimated that operating expenses for the next 12 months will be approximately $1,700,000, excluding engineering costs related to the development of bio-refinery projects. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Throughout the remainder of 2013, the Company intends to fund its operations with reimbursements under the Department of Energy contract, as well as seek additional funding in the form of equity or debt. However, the Company’s ability to get reimbursed under the DOE contract is dependent on the availability of cash to pay for the related costs. As of August 19, 2013, the Company expects the current resources available to them will only be sufficient for a period of approximately one month unless significant additional financing is received. Management has determined that the general expenditures must be reduced and additional capital will be required in the form of equity or debt securities. In addition, if we cannot raise additional short term capital we may consume all of our cash reserved for operations. There are no assurances that management will be able to raise capital on terms acceptable to the Company. If we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned development, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from these uncertainties.

Additionally, the Company’s Lancaster plant is currently shovel ready, except for the air permit which the Company will need to renew as stated below, and only requires minimal capital to maintain until funding is obtained for the construction. The preparation for the construction of this plant was the primary capital use in prior years. In December 2011, BlueFire requested an extension to pay the project’s permits for an additional year while we awaited potential financing. The Company has let the air permits expire as there were no more extensions available and management deemed the project not likely to start construction in the short-term. BlueFire will need to resubmit for air permits once it is able to raise the necessary financing. The Company sees this project on hold until we receive the funding to construct the facility.

F-4

As of December 31, 2010, the Company completed the detailed engineering on our proposed Fulton Project, procured all necessary permits for construction of the plant, and began site clearing and preparation work, signaling the beginning of construction. As of December 31, 2012, all site preparation activities have been completed, including clearing and grating of the site, building access roads, completing railroad tie-ins to connect the site to the rail system, and finalizing the layout plan to prepare for the site foundation. However, as additional capital and/or cost share funds become available, additional work may be completed, such as retaining wall construction, utility infrastructure placement, and the preparation of construction staging areas.

We estimate the total construction cost of the bio-refineries to be in the range of approximately $300 million for the Fulton Project and approximately $100 million to $125 million for the Lancaster Biorefinery. These cost approximations do not reflect any increase/decrease in raw materials or any fluctuation in construction cost that would be realized by the dynamic world metals markets. The Company is currently in discussions with potential sources of financing for these facilities but no definitive agreements are in place. The Company cannot continue significant development or furtherance of the Fulton project until financing for the construction of the Fulton plant is obtained, however the Company has continued to improve and modify plans to for construction in contemplation of different configurations that would be advantageous for potential investors.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of these financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consist of normal recurring adjustments. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012. The results of operations for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company included $41,425 related to the amortization of debt discount in interest expense rather than amortization of debt discount in the statement of operations. The classification has been corrected for the presentation of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 in the accompanying statement of operations. There was no effect on net income or earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to the reclassification.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BlueFire Renewables, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, BlueFire Ethanol, Inc., and Sucre Source LLC. BlueFire Ethanol Lancaster, LLC, and BlueFire Fulton Renewable Energy LLC (excluding 1% interest sold) are wholly-owned subsidiaries of BlueFire Ethanol, Inc. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Project Development

Project development costs are either expensed or capitalized. The costs of materials and equipment that will be acquired or constructed for project development activities, and that have alternative future uses, both in project development, marketing or sales, will be classified as property and equipment and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. To date, project development costs include the research and development expenses related to the Company’s future cellulose-to-ethanol production facilities. During three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 28, 2006 (Inception) to June 30, 2013, research and development costs included in Project Development were approximately $128,000, $153,000, $247,000, $291,000, and $15,185,000, respectively.

F-5

Convertible Debt

Convertible debt is accounted for under the guidelines established by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options”. The Company records a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) related to the issuance of convertible debt that have conversion features at fixed or adjustable rates that are in-the-money when issued and records the fair value of warrants issued with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion features, both of which are credited to paid-in-capital.

The Company calculates the fair value of warrants issued with the convertible instruments using the Black-Scholes valuation method, using the same assumptions used for valuing employee options for purposes of ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, except that the contractual life of the warrant is used. Under these guidelines, the Company allocates the value of the proceeds received from a convertible debt transaction between the conversion feature and any other detachable instruments (such as warrants) on a relative fair value basis. The allocated fair value is recorded as a debt discount or premium and is amortized over the expected term of the convertible debt to interest expense. For a conversion price change of a convertible debt issue, the additional intrinsic value of the debt conversion feature, calculated as the number of additional shares issuable due to a conversion price change multiplied by the previous conversion price, is recorded as additional debt discount and amortized over the remaining life of the debt.

The Company accounts for modifications of its BCF’s in accordance with ASC 470-50 “Modifications and Extinguishments”. ASC 470 requires the modification of a convertible debt instrument that changes the fair value of an embedded conversion feature and the subsequent recognition of interest expense or the associated debt instrument when the modification does not result in a debt extinguishment.

Equity Instruments Issued with Registration Rights Agreement

The Company accounts for these penalties as contingent liabilities, applying the accounting guidance of ASC 450 “Contingencies”. This accounting is consistent with views established in ASC 825 “Financial Instruments”. Accordingly, the Company recognizes damages when it becomes probable that they will be incurred and amounts are reasonably estimable.

In connection with the Company signing the $10,000,000 Purchase Agreement with LPC, the Company was required to file a registration statement related to the transaction with the SEC covering the shares that may be issued to LPC under the Purchase Agreement within ten days of the agreement, and the registration statement was to be declared effective by March 31, 2011. The registration statement was declared effective on May 10, 2011, without any penalty, and LPC did not terminate the Purchase Agreement.

In connection with the Company signing the $2,000,000 Equity Facility with TCA on March 28, 2012, the Company agreed to file a registration statement related to the transaction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC“) covering the shares that may be issued to TCA under the Equity Facility within 45 days of closing. Although under the Registration Rights Agreement the registration statement was to be declared effective within 90 days following closing, it has yet to be declared effective. The Company is working with TCA to resolve this issue. There has been no accrual for any penalties as it relates to the Equity Facility Registration Rights Agreement. The penalty for filing to get the registration statement effective is capped at $20,000, and the Company believes that any penalty is remote as the terms of the TCA Agreement, when combined with the debt portion of financing from TCA, both of which were provided by TCA, prevent us from having it declared effective.

F-6

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows the guidance of ASC 820 – “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure”. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. The guidance establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company did not have any level 1 financial instruments at June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s warrant liability and derivative liability are considered level 2 items, see Notes 4 and 5.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company’s redeemable non-controlling interest is considered a level 3 item and changed during the six months ended June 30, 2013 as follows.

Balance at December 31, 2012	$	849,945
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		(2,742	)
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	847,203

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company’s operations are subject to new innovations in product design and function. Significant technical changes can have an adverse effect on product lives. Design and development of new products are important elements to achieve and maintain profitability in the Company’s industry segment. The Company may be subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The Company does not anticipate expenditures to comply with such laws and does not believe that regulations will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. The Company believes that its operations comply, in all material respects, with applicable federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.

Income (loss) per Common Share

The Company presents basic loss per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. Basic income (loss) per share is computed as net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants, and other convertible securities. As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had 0 and 1,229,659 options and 928,571 and 7,115,265 warrants, respectively, for which all of the exercise prices were in excess of the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the corresponding quarter and thus no shares are considered dilutive under the treasury stock method of accounting and their effects would have been antidilutive due to the loss in certain of the periods presented.

F-7

Derivative Financial Instruments

We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow risks or market-risks that may affect the fair values of our financial instruments. However, under the provisions ASC 815 – “Derivatives and Hedging” certain financial instruments that have characteristics of a derivative, as defined by ASC 815, such as embedded conversion features on our Convertible Notes, that are potentially settled in the Company’s own common stock, are classified as liabilities when either (a) the holder possesses rights to net-cash settlement or (b) physical or net-share settlement is not within our control. In such instances, net-cash settlement is assumed for financial accounting and reporting purposes, even when the terms of the underlying contracts do not provide for net-cash settlement. Derivative financial instruments are initially recorded, and continuously carried, at fair value each reporting period.

The value of the embedded conversion feature is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. All future changes in the fair value of the embedded conversion feature will be recognized currently in earnings until the note is converted or redeemed. Determining the fair value of derivative financial instruments involves judgment and the use of certain relevant assumptions including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, credit risk, volatility and other factors. The use of different assumptions could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Redeemable - Non-controlling Interest

Redeemable interest held by third parties in subsidiaries owned or controlled by the Company is reported on the consolidated balance sheets outside permanent equity. As these redeemable non-controlling interests provide for redemption features not solely within the control of the issuer, we classify such interests outside of permanent equity in accordance with ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”. All redeemable non-controlling interest reported in the consolidated statements of operations reflects the respective interests in the income or loss after income taxes of the subsidiaries attributable to the other parties, the effect of which is removed from the net loss available to the Company. The Company accreted the redemption value of the redeemable non-controlling interest over the redemption period using the straight-line method.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 – DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTS

Department of Energy Awards 1 and 2

In February 2007, the Company was awarded a grant for up to $40 million from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (“DOE”) cellulosic ethanol grant program to develop a solid waste biorefinery project at a landfill in Southern California. During October 2007, the Company finalized Award 1 for a total approved budget of just under $10,000,000 with the DOE. This award is a 60%/40% cost share, whereby 40% of approved costs may be reimbursed by the DOE pursuant to the total $40 million award announced in February 2007.

In December 2009, as a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the DOE increased the Award 2 to a total of $81 million for Phase II of its Fulton Project. This is in addition to a renegotiated Phase I funding for development of the biorefinery of approximately $7 million out of the previously announced $10 million total. This brings the DOE’s total award to the Fulton project to approximately $88 million. The Company is currently drawing down on funds for Phase II of its Fulton Project.

As of August 19, 2013, the Company has received reimbursements of approximately $11,220,000 under these awards.

F-8

Since 2009, our operations had been financed to a large degree through funding provided by the DOE. We rely on access to this funding as a source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by the cash flow from our operations. If we are unable to access government funding our ability to finance our projects and/or operations and implement our strategy and business plan will be severely hampered. Awards 1 and 2 consist of a total reimbursable amount of approximately $87,560,000, and through August 19, 2013, we have an unreimbursed amount of approximately $76,069,000 available to us under the awards. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to receive grants, loan guarantees, or other funding for our projects from the DOE.

In June 2011, it was determined that the Company had received an over payment of approximately $354,000 from the cumulative reimbursements of the DOE grants under Award 1 for the period from inception of the award through December 31, 2010. The over payment was a result of estimates made on the indirect rate during the reimbursement process over the course of the award. As of September 12, 2012 Award 1 was officially closed and the over payment was deobligated. The Company was notified of the deobligation in the fourth quarter of 2012.

NOTE 4 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

On March 28, 2012 the Company entered into a $300,000 promissory note with a third party. See Note 9 for additional information.

On July 31, 2012, the Company issued a convertible note of $63,500 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. Under the terms of the notes, the Company was to repay any principal balance and interest, at 8% per annum at maturity date of May 2, 2013. The Company had the option to prepay the convertible promissory note prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement. The convertible promissory note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock after six months. The conversion price was calculated by multiplying 58% (42% discount to market) by the average of the lowest three closing bid prices during the 10 days prior to the conversion date. The Company determined that since the conversion price was variable and did not contain a floor, the conversion feature represented a derivative liability upon the ability to convert the loan, which commenced on approximately January 27, 2013.

The Company calculated the derivative liability using the Black-Scholes pricing model for the note upon the initial date the note became convertible and recorded the fair market value of the derivative liability of approximately $47,000, resulting in a discount to the note. The discount was amortized over the term of the note and accelerated as the note was converted. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, all of the discount was amortized to interest expense, with no remaining unamortized discount. See below for assumptions used in valuing the derivative liability. As of June 30, 2013, all amounts outstanding in relation to this note have been converted to equity.

On October 11, 2012, the Company issued a convertible note of $37,500 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. Under the terms of the notes, the Company was to repay any principal balance and interest, at 8% per annum at maturity date of July 15, 2013. The Company had the option to prepay the convertible promissory note prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement. The convertible promissory note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock after six months. The conversion price was calculated by multiplying 58% (42% discount to market) by the average of the lowest three closing bid prices during the 10 days prior to the conversion date. The Company determined that since the conversion price was variable and does not contain a floor, the conversion feature represented a derivative liability upon the ability to convert the loan, which commenced on approximately April 9, 2013.

The Company calculated the derivative liability using the Black-Scholes pricing model for the note upon the initial date the note became convertible and recorded the fair market value of the derivative liability of approximately $66,000, resulting in a discount to the note and an additional day one charge of $28,507 for the excess value of the derivative liability over the face value of the note. The excess value was recognized as an expense in the accompanying statement of operations. The discount was being amortized over the term of the note. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, all $37,500 of the discount was amortized to interest expense as the note was fully converted, with no remaining unamortized discount. See below for assumptions used in valuing the derivative liability.

On December 21, 2012, the Company agreed to a convertible note of $32,500 to Asher Enterprises, Inc, which was funded and effective in January 2013. Under the terms of the notes, the Company is to repay any principal balance and interest, at 8% per annum at maturity date of September 26, 2013. The Company may prepay the convertible promissory note prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement. The convertible promissory note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock after six months. The conversion price is calculated by multiplying 58% (42% discount to market) by the average of the lowest three closing bid prices during the 10 days prior to the conversion date. The Company determined that since the conversion price was variable and does not contain a floor, the conversion feature represented a derivative liability upon the ability to convert the loan, which commenced on approximately June 19, 2013. See below for assumptions used in valuing the derivative liability. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, $27,000 in principal has been converted, and $5,500 plus accrued interest remain outstanding.

F-9

On February 11, 2013, the Company agreed to a convertible note of $53,000 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. Under the terms of the notes, the Company is to repay any principal balance and interest, at 8% per annum at maturity date of November 13, 2013. The Company may prepay the convertible promissory note prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement. The convertible promissory note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock after six months. The conversion price is calculated by multiplying 58% (42% discount to market) by the average of the lowest three closing bid prices during the 10 days prior to the conversion date. Since the conversion feature is only convertible after six months, there is no derivative liability. However, the Company will account for the derivative liability upon the passage of time and the note becoming convertible if not extinguished, as defined above. Derivative accounting applies upon the conversion feature being available to the holder, as it is variable and does not have a floor as to the number of common shares in which could be converted.

On June 13, 2013, the Company agreed to a convertible note of $32,500 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. Under the terms of the notes, the Company is to repay any principal balance and interest, at 8% per annum at maturity date of March 17, 2014. The Company may prepay the convertible promissory note prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement. The convertible promissory note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock after six months. The conversion price is calculated by multiplying 58% (42% discount to market) by the average of the lowest three closing bid prices during the 10 days prior to the conversion date. Since the conversion feature is only convertible after six months, there is no derivative liability. However, the Company will account for the derivative liability upon the passage of time and the note becoming convertible if not extinguished, as defined above. Derivative accounting applies upon the conversion feature being available to the holder, as it is variable and does not have a floor as to the number of common shares in which could be converted.

Upon conversion of all or a portion of the convertible notes, the derivative liability associated with the principal converted is valued immediately before conversion using the Black-Scholes model. The change in fair value of the derivative liability associated with the principal converted is recorded as a gain/loss on fair value of derivative liability in the accompanying statement of operation, with the derivative liability associated with the principal converted credited to additional paid-in capital. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the holder of the convertible notes converted $101,000 of principal plus accrued interest thereon, into 3,186,119 shares of common stock. Derivative liability of approximately $86,000 associated with the converted principal was credited to additional paid-in capital at the time of conversion. As of June 30, 2013, the derivative liability associated with the remaining associated notes was valued at approximately $42,000. The Company used the following inputs to the Black-Scholes pricing model for each valuation.

Using the Black-Scholes pricing model, with the range of inputs listed below, we calculated the fair market value of the conversion feature at inception of the conversion feature and at each conversion event. The Company revalued the conversion feature at June 30, 2013 in the same manor with the inputs listed below and recognized a gain on the change in fair value of the derivative liability on the accompanying statement of operations of $90,236.

During the six months ending June 30, 2013, the range of inputs used to calculate derivative liabilities noted above were as follows:

	Six months ending
	June 30, 2013
Annual dividend yield		-
Expected life (years)		0.01 - 0.27
Risk-free interest rate		0.04 - 0.12	%
Expected volatility		61.34 - 134.92	%

In addition, fees paid to secure the convertible debt were accounted for as deferred financing costs and capitalized in the accompanying balance sheet or considered and on-issuance discount to the notes. The deferred financing costs and discounts, as applicable, are being amortized over the term of the notes. As of June 30, 2013, the Company amortized approximately $25,000 with $1,000 in deferred financing costs remaining. As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s remaining convertible notes outstanding include on-issuance discounts totaling $8,000 of which approximately $3,376 has been charged to amortization of debt discount. Unamortized debt discount of $19,400 remains as of June 30, 2013.

F-10

NOTE 5 – OUTSTANDING WARRANT LIABILITY

As a result of adopting ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” effective January 1, 2009, 6,962,963 of our issued and outstanding common stock purchase warrants previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment. These warrants had an exercise price of $2.90; 5,962,563 warrants were set to expire in December 2012 and 1,000,000 expired August 2010 (See Note 6). As such, effective January 1, 2009 we reclassified the fair value of these common stock purchase warrants, which have exercise price reset features, from equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their date of issue in August 2007 and December 2007. On January 1, 2009, we reclassified from additional paid-in capital, as a cumulative effect adjustment, $15.7 million to beginning retained earnings and $2.9 million to a long-term warrant liability to recognize the fair value of such warrants on such date.

In connection with the 5,962,563 warrants that expired in December 2012, the Company recognized gains of approximately $0, $19,000, $0, $1,000, and $2,516,000 from the change in fair value of these warrants during the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and the period from Inception to June 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2012 none of these warrants remained outstanding.

On October 19, 2009, the Company cancelled 673,200 warrants for $220,000 in cash. These warrants were part of the 1,000,000 warrants issued in August 2007, and were set to expire August 2010.

These common stock purchase warrants were initially issued in connection with two private offerings, our August 2007 issuance of 689,655 shares of common stock and our December 2007 issuance of 5,740,741 shares of common stock. The common stock purchase warrants were not issued with the intent of effectively hedging any future cash flow, fair value of any asset, liability or any net investment in a foreign operation. The warrants do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as such, changes in the fair value of these warrants are recognized in earnings until such time as the warrants are exercised or expire. These warrants either expired or were exercised in 2012 and accordingly no revaluation was necessary as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012. See Note 9.

The Company issued 428,571 warrants to purchase common stock in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on January 19, 2011 with Lincoln Park Capital, LLC (See Note 9). These warrants are accounted for as a liability under ASC 815. The Company assesses the fair value of the warrants quarterly based on the Black-Scholes pricing model. See below for variables used in assessing the fair value.

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Annual dividend yield		-		-
Expected life (years) of		2.55		3.05
Risk-free interest rate		0.51	%	0.72	%
Expected volatility		111.85	%	116.79	%

In connection with these warrants, the Company recognized a gain/(loss) on the change in fair value of warrant liability of approximately $7,800, $80,000, $22,000, ($6,000), and $125,000 from the change in fair value of these warrants during three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from Inception to June 30, 2013.

F-11

Expected volatility is based primarily on historical volatility. Historical volatility was computed using weekly pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the expected life of the warrants. The Company believes this method produces an estimate that is representative of our expectations of future volatility over the expected term of these warrants. The Company currently has no reason to believe future volatility over the expected remaining life of these warrants is likely to differ materially from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining term of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities rates.

NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Fulton Project Lease

On July 20, 2010, the Company entered into a thirty year lease agreement with Itawamba County, Mississippi for the purpose of the development, construction, and operation of the Fulton Project. At the end of the primary 30 year lease term, the Company shall have the right for two additional thirty year terms. The current lease rate is computed based on a per acre rate per month that is approximately $10,300 per month. The lease stipulates the lease rate is to be reduced at the time of the construction start by a Property Cost Reduction Formula which can substantially reduce the monthly lease costs. The lease rate shall be adjusted every five years to the Consumer Price Index.

Rent expense under non-cancellable leases was approximately $30,900, $30,900, $61,800, $61,800, and $369,800 during the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and the period from March 28, 2006 (Inception) to June 30, 2013, respectively.

The Company is not current on lease payments due to Itawamba County, and as of June 30, 2013, we were in technical default of the lease due to non-payment. Accordingly, approximately $267,600 has been accrued in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company is in constant communication with Itawamba County officials, and we are working on alternative mechanisms for payment of the outstanding amounts due. The Company does not believe there is a significant risk that Itawamba County will void the lease for non-payment. As of August 19, 2013, we have not received a notice of default.

Legal Proceedings

Pursuant to the Order, the Court ruled in favor of the shareholders on the two claims, finding that the Warrants contain certain anti-dilution protective provisions which provide for the re-adjustment of the exercise price of such Warrants upon certain events and that such exercise price per share of the Warrants must be decreased to $0.00.

On March 7, 2013, the shareholders making claims provided their request for judgment based on the Order received, which has been initially refused by the Court via a second minute order received by the Company on April 8, 2013. On April 15, 2013, the Company’s counsel submitted a proposed judgment to the Court as per the Courts request, which followed the Order and provided for no monetary damages against the Company. On May 14, 2013, this proposed judgment was approved by the Court (“Judgment”).

F-12

On June 20, 2013, the Company filed motions to vacate the Judgment, a motion for a new trial, and a motion to stay enforcement of the Judgment, all of which were denied on June 27, 2013.

On August 2, 2013, pursuant to the exercise notice of the Warrants, and the Order, the Company issued 5,740,741 shares to certain shareholders. See Note 9 in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Other than the above, we are currently not involved in litigation that we believe will have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, other than as disclosed below. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our company’s or our company’s subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision is expected to have a material adverse effect, other than as disclosed below.

NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On December 15, 2010, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) by and between Arnold Klann, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the board of directors and majority shareholder of the Company, as lender (the “Lender”), and the Company, as borrower. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Lender agreed to advance to the Company a principal amount of Two Hundred Thousand United States Dollars ($200,000) (the “Loan”). The Loan Agreement requires the Company to (i) pay to the Lender a one-time amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the Loan (the “Fee Amount”) in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock at a value of $0.50 per share, at the Lender’s option; and (ii) issue the Lender warrants allowing the Lender to buy 500,000 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per common share, such warrants to expire on December 15, 2013. The Company has promised to pay in full the outstanding principal balance of any and all amounts due under the Loan Agreement within thirty (30) days of the Company’s receipt of investment financing or a commitment from a third party to provide One Million United States Dollars ($1,000,000) to the Company or one of its subsidiaries (the “Due Date”), to be paid in cash.

The fair value of the warrants was $83,736 as determined by the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions: volatility of 112.6%, risk-free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, and a term of three (3) years.

The proceeds were allocated to the warrants issued to the note holder based on their relative fair values which resulted in $83,736 allocated to the warrants. The amount allocated to the warrants resulted in a discount to the note. The Company amortized the discount over the estimated term of the Loan using the straight line method due to the short term nature of the Loan. The Company estimated the Loan would be paid back during the quarter ended September 30, 2011. During the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 28, 2006 (Inception) to June 30, 2013, the Company amortized the discount to interest expense of approximately $0, $0, $0, $0, and $83,736, respectively.

For the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 28, 2006 (Inception) to June 30, 2013, the Company recognized interest expense of approximately $0, $0, $0, $0, and $30,000, respectively.

NOTE 8 – REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

On December 23, 2010, the Company sold a one percent (1%) membership interest in its operating subsidiary, BlueFire Fulton Renewable Energy, LLC (“BlueFire Fulton” or the “Fulton Project”), to an accredited investor for a purchase price of $750,000 (“Purchase Price”). The Company maintains a 99% ownership interest in the Fulton Project. In addition, the investor received a right to require the Company to redeem the 1% interest for $862,500, or any pro-rata amount thereon. The redemption is based upon future contingent events based upon obtaining financing for the construction of the Fulton Project. The third party equity interests in the consolidated joint ventures are reflected as redeemable non-controlling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements outside of equity. The Company accreted the redeemable non-controlling interest for the total redemption price of $862,500 through the estimated forecasted financial close, originally estimated to be the end of the third quarter of 2011.

F-13

Net income (loss) attributable to the redeemable non-controlling interest during for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from Inception to June 30, 2013 was $(685), $409, $(2,742), $(2,542), and $(15,297), respectively which netted against the value of the redeemable non-controlling interest in temporary equity. The allocation of income (loss) was presented on the statement of operations.

NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Stock-Based Compensation

During the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 28, 2006 (Inception) to June 30, 2013, the Company recognized stock-based compensation, including consultants, of approximately $0, $33,000, $9,100, $44,000, and $6,481,600, to general and administrative expenses and $0, $0, $0, $0, and $4,468,000 to project development expenses, respectively. There is no additional future compensation expense to record as of June 30, 2013 based on the previous awards.

Shares Issued for Services

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock for legal services provided. In connection with this issuance the Company recorded approximately $9,100 in legal expense which is included in general and administrative expense. The Company valued the shares using the closing market price on the date of issuance.

Stock Purchase Agreement

On January 19, 2011, the Company signed a $10 million purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“LPC”), an Illinois limited liability company. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with LPC whereby we agreed to file a registration statement related to the transaction with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) covering the shares that may be issued to LPC under the Purchase Agreement within ten days of the agreement. Although under the Purchase Agreement the registration statement was to be declared effective by March 31, 2011, LPC did not terminate the Purchase Agreement. The registration statement was declared effective on May 10, 2011, without any penalty.

After the SEC had declared effective the registration statement related to the transaction, the Company has the right, in their sole discretion, over a 30-month period to sell the shares of common stock to LPC in amounts from $35,000 and up to $500,000 per sale, depending on the Company’s stock price as set forth in the Purchase Agreement, up to the aggregate commitment of $10 million.

There are no upper limits to the price LPC may pay to purchase our common stock and the purchase price of the shares related to the $10 million funding will be based on the prevailing market prices of the Company’s shares immediately preceding the time of sales without any fixed discount, and the Company controls the timing and amount of any future sales, if any, of shares to LPC. LPC shall not have the right or the obligation to purchase any shares of our common stock on any business day that the price of our common stock is below $0.15. The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, closing conditions and indemnification and termination provisions by, among and for the benefit of the parties. LPC has covenanted not to cause or engage in any manner whatsoever, any direct or indirect short selling or hedging of the Company’s shares of common stock. The Purchase Agreement may be terminated by us at any time at our discretion without any cost to us. Except for a limitation on variable priced financings, there are no financial or business covenants, restrictions on future fundings, rights of first refusal, participation rights, penalties or liquidated damages in the agreement.

Upon signing the Purchase Agreement, BlueFire received $150,000 from LPC as an initial purchase under the $10 million commitment in exchange for 428,571 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 428,571 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.55 per share. The warrants contain a ratchet provision in which the exercise price will be adjusted based on future issuances of common stock, excluding certain issuances; if issuances are at prices lower than the current exercise price (see Note 6). The warrants have an expiration date of January 2016.

Concurrently, in consideration for entering into the $10 million agreement, we issued to LPC 600,000 shares of our common stock as a commitment fee and shall issue up to 600,000 shares pro rata as LPC purchases up to the remaining $9.85 million.

F-14

During the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and the period from Inception to March 31, 2012 the Company drew $0, $0, $0, $35,000, and $385,000 on the Purchase Agreement.

Equity Facility Agreement

On March 28, 2012, BlueFire finalized a committed equity facility (the “Equity Facility”) with TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership (“TCA”), whereby the parties entered into (i) a committed equity facility agreement (the “Equity Agreement”) and (ii) a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Equity Agreement, for a period of twenty-four (24) months commencing on the date of effectiveness of the Registration Statement (as defined below), TCA committed to purchase up to $2,000,000 of BlueFire’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), pursuant to Advances (as defined below), covering the Registrable Securities (as defined below). The purchase price of the Shares under the Equity Agreement is equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of BlueFire’s common stock during the five (5) consecutive trading days after BlueFire delivers to TCA an Advance notice in writing requiring TCA to advance funds (an “Advance”) to BlueFire, subject to the terms of the Equity Agreement. The “Registrable Securities” include (i) the Shares; and (ii) any securities issued or issuable with respect to the Shares by way of exchange, stock dividend or stock split or in connection with a combination of shares, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or other reorganization or otherwise. As further consideration for TCA entering into and structuring the Equity Facility, BlueFire paid to TCA a fee by issuing to TCA shares of BlueFire’s common stock that equal a dollar amount of $110,000 (the “Facility Fee Shares”). It is the intention of BlueFire and TCA that the value of the Facility Fee Shares shall equal $110,000. In the event the value of the Facility Fee Shares issued to TCA does not equal $110,000 after a nine month evaluation date, the Equity Agreement provides for an adjustment provision allowing for necessary action (either the issuance of additional shares to TCA or the return of shares previously issued to TCA to BlueFire’s treasury) to adjust the number of Facility Fee Shares issued. BlueFire also entered into the Registration Rights Agreement with TCA. Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, BlueFire is obligated to file a registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC’) to cover the Registrable Securities within 45 days of closing. BlueFire must use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Registration Statement to be declared effective by the SEC by a date that is no later than 90 days following closing.

In connection with the issuance of approximately 280,000 shares for the $110,000 facility fee as described above, the Company capitalized said amount within deferred financings costs, along with other costs incurred as part Equity Facility and the Convertible Note described below. Additional costs related to the Equity Facility and paid from the funds of the Convertible Note described below, were approximately $60,000. Aggregate costs of the Equity Facility were $170,000. Because these costs were to access the Equity Facility, earned by TCA regardless of the Company drawing on the Equity Facility, and not part of a funding, they are treated akin to debt costs. The deferred financings costs related to the Equity Facility were amortized over one (1) year on a straight-line basis. The Company believed this accelerated amortization, which is less than the two year Equity Facility term, was appropriate based on substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As of December 31, 2012, the Company determined that it was not probable the Registration Statement would become effective under the original structure of the agreement and accordingly, wrote off all remaining deferred financing costs related to the Equity Agreement. Amortization of the deferred financing costs during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.

On March 28, 2012, BlueFire entered into a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”) with TCA, related to a $300,000 convertible promissory note issued by BlueFire in favor of TCA (the “Convertible Note”). The Security Agreement grants to TCA a continuing, first priority security interest in all of BlueFire’s assets, wheresoever located and whether now existing or hereafter arising or acquired. On March 28, 2012, BlueFire issued the Convertible Note in favor of TCA. The maturity date of the Convertible Note is March 28, 2013, and the Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum with a default rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of BlueFire’s common stock at a price equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of BlueFire’s common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately prior to the date of conversion. The Convertible Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at BlueFire’s option without penalty. The proceeds received by the Company under the purchase agreement are expected to be used for general working capital purposes which include costs expected to be reimbursed under the DOE cost share program.

F-15

In connection with the Convertible Note, approximately $93,000 was withheld and immediately disbursed to cover costs of the Convertible Note and Equity Facility described above. The costs related to the Convertible Note were $24,800 which were capitalized as deferred financing costs; were amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the Convertible Note. In addition, $7,500 was dispersed to cover legal fees. After all costs, the Company received approximately $207,000 in cash from the Convertible Note. Amortization of the deferred financing costs during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $38,617, $21,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2013, there were no remaining deferred financing costs.

This note contains an embedded conversion feature whereby the holder can convert the note at a discount to the fair value of the Company’s common stock price. Based on applicable guidance the embedded conversion feature is considered a derivative instrument and bifurcated. This liability is recorded on the face of the financial statements as “derivative liability”, and must be revalued each reporting period.

The Company discounted the note by the fair market value of the derivative liability upon inception of the note. This discount was accreted back to the face value of the note over the note term.

Using the Black-Scholes pricing model, with the inputs listed below, we calculated the fair market value of the conversion feature to be $162,500 at the notes inception. The Company revalued the conversion feature at June 30, 2013 in the same manor with the inputs listed below and recognized a gain on the change in fair value of the derivative liability on the accompanying statement of operations of $137,000.

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			March 28, 2012
Annual dividend yield		-			-			-
Expected life (years)		0.01			0.24			1.00
Risk-free interest rate		0.02	%		0.16	%		0.19	%
Expected volatility		134.92	%		76.50	%		119.00	%

Warrants Exercised

Some of our previously outstanding warrants contained a provision in which the exercise price is to be adjusted for future issuances of common stock at prices lower than their current exercise price.

In 2012, certain shareholders’ owning an aggregate of 5,740,741 warrants made claims of the Company that the exercise price of their warrants should have been adjusted due to a certain issuance of common shares by the Company (see Note 6). The Company initially believed that said issuance would not trigger adjustment based on the terms of the respective agreements.

On December 4, 2012, these shareholders presented exercise forms to the Company to exercise all 5,740,741 warrants for a like amount of common shares. The warrants were exercised at $0.00, which is the amount the shareholders’ believed the new exercise price should be based the ratchet provision and their claims.

On February 26, 2013, the Company received notice that the Court issued an Order in connection with these certain shareholders’ claims of breach of contract and declaratory relief related to 5,740,741 warrants issued by the Company (see Note 6).

F-16

The Company has considered these warrants exercised based on the notice of exercise received from the respective shareholders in December 2012. The Company determined, that based on the Order by the Court a ratchet event had taken place based on the Order and claims made. The Company used December 4, 2012 as the date in which the new terms were considered to be in force based on the Shareholders’ notice to exercise on that date and the Courts subsequent Order that allowed the Shareholders to do so.

As such, the modification of the exercise price is treated as an extinguishment of the warrants under the previous terms, with a revaluation of the warrants with new terms. As such, the warrant liability was valued immediately before extinguishment with the gain/loss recognized through earnings and remaining value reclassified to equity. Because there was only approximately one week of remaining life under the unmodified terms and because the previous exercise price was out of the money ($2.90) compared to the price of our common stock on the day of extinguishment ($0.14), the warrant value upon extinguishment was considered to be near zero based on a Black-Scholes calculation, which also used volatility of 104.2% and risk-free rate of 0.07%. Because the warrant liability was also valued near zero as of September 30, 2012, there was no value transferred to equity.

In addition, the new warrant liability was valued immediately after the modification but prior to the exercise by the Shareholders with the new value being recognized through earnings. The “new” warrants have a fixed price, fixed number of shares, and effectively no ratchet provision based on the Order. There are no circumstances at this time that would require or allow for net cash settlement. As such, the warrants qualify for equity accounting under ASC 815. The Company valued the warrants with new terms at approximately $804,000 based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock on December 4, 2012 ($0.14) as it was considered an immediate exercise and therefore, the value of the shares was known on the date of exercise. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had not issued these shares, but was required to do so based on the information from the Court, the shareholders raising the claim, and the shareholders’ exercise notice which is deemed correct based on the subsequent Order. On August 2, 2013, the Company issued these 5,740,741 shares. Accordingly, the warrants are considered committed shares to be issued in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to June 30, 2013, the holder of various convertible notes, converted $27,000 in principal of a separate note into 2,987,296 shares of common stock. See Note 4 for more information on the conversion features of the notes.

On August 2, 2013, pursuant to the exercise notice of the Warrants, and the Order, the Company issued 5,740,741 shares to certain shareholders.

F-17

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC contain or may contain forward-looking statements and information that are (collectively, the “Filings”) based upon beliefs of, and information currently available to, the Company’s management as well as estimates and assumptions made by Company’s management. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are only predictions and speak only as of the date hereof. When used in the Filings, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current view of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors, including the risks contained in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC, relating to the Company’s industry, the Company’s operations and results of operations, and any businesses that the Company may acquire. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, or planned.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, the Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Our financial statements would be affected to the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

PLAN OF OPERATION

Our primary business encompasses development activities culminating in the design, construction, ownership and long-term operation of cellulosic ethanol production biorefineries utilizing the licensed Arkenol Technology in North America. Our secondary business is providing support and operational services to Arkenol Technology based biorefineries worldwide. As such, we are currently in the development-stage of finding suitable locations and deploying project opportunities for converting cellulose fractions of municipal solid waste and other opportunistic feedstock into ethanol fuels.

Our initial planned biorefineries in North America are projected as follows:

●

A bio-refinery that will process approximately 190 tons of green waste material annually to produce roughly 3.9 million gallons of ethanol annually. On November 9, 2007, we purchased the facility site which is located in Lancaster, California for the BlueFire Ethanol Lancaster project (“Lancaster Bio-refinery”). Permit applications were filed on June 24, 2007, to allow for construction of the Lancaster Bio-refinery. On or around July 23, 2008, the Los Angeles Planning Commission approved the use permit for construction of the plant. However, a subsequent appeal of the county decision, which BlueFire overcame, combined with the waiting period under the California Environmental Quality Act, pushed the effective date of the now non-appealable permit approval to December 12, 2008. On February 12, 2009, we were issued our “Authority to Construct” permit by the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. In 2009 the Company submitted an application for a $58 million dollar loan guarantee for the Lancaster Bio-refinery with the DOE Program DE-FOA-0000140 (“DOE LGPO”), which provides federal loan guarantees for projects that employ innovative energy efficiency, renewable energy, and advanced transmission and distribution technologies. In 2010, the Company was informed that the loan guarantee for the planned bio-refinery in Lancaster, California, was rejected by the DOE due to a lack of definitive contracts for feedstock and off-take at the time of submittal of the loan guarantee for the Lancaster Bio-refinery, as well as the fact that the Company was also pursuing a much larger project in Fulton, Mississippi. We have completed the detailed engineering and design on the project and are seeking funding in order to build the facility. We estimate the total cost including contingencies to be in the range of approximately $100 million to $125 million for the Lancaster Bio-refinery. The cost approximations above do not reflect any fluctuations in raw materials or construction costs since the original pricing estimates. In December 2011, BlueFire requested an extension to pay the project’s permits for an additional year while we awaited potential financing. The Company has let the air permits expire as there were no more extensions available and management deemed the project not likely to start construction in the short-term. BlueFire will need to resubmit for air permits once it is able to raise the necessary financing. The Company sees this project on hold until we receive the funding to construct the facility. Although the Company originally intended to use this proposed facility for their first cellulosic ethanol refinery plant, the Company is now considering using it as a bio-refinery to produce products other than cellulosic ethanol, such as higher value chemicals that would yield fuel additives that that could improve the project economics for a smaller facility. The preparation for the construction of this plant was the primary capital uses in prior years. We are currently in discussions with potential sources of financing for this facility but no definitive agreements are in place.

●

A bio-refinery proposed for development and construction in conjunction with the DOE, previously located in Southern California, and now located in Fulton, Mississippi, which will process approximately 700 metric dry tons of woody biomass, mill residue, and other cellulosic waste to produce approximately 19 million gallons of ethanol annually (“Fulton Project”). We estimate the total construction cost of the Fulton Project to be in the range of approximately $300 million. In 2007, we received an Award from the DOE of up to $40 million for the Fulton Project. On or around October 4, 2007, we finalized Award 1 for a total approved budget of just under $10,000,000 with the DOE. This award is a 60%/40% cost share, whereby 40% of approved costs may be reimbursed by the DOE pursuant to the total $40 million award announced in February 2007. In 2008, the Company began to draw down on the Award 1 monies that were finalized with the DOE. As our Fulton Project developed further, the Company was able to begin drawing down on Award 2, the second phase of DOE monies. On December 4, 2009, the DOE announced that the total award for this project has been increased to a maximum of $88 million under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) and the Energy Policy Act of 2005. As of September 12, 2012 Award 1 was officially closed, although the Company was not notified until after our September 30, 2012 quarterly report was filed. As of June 30, 2013, BlueFire has been reimbursed approximately $11,125,400 from the DOE under this award. In 2010, BlueFire signed definitive agreements for the following three crucial contracts related to the Fulton Project: (a) feedstock supply with Cooper Marine, (b) off-take for the ethanol of the facility with Tenaska, and (c) the construction of the facility with MasTec. Also in 2010, BlueFire continued to develop the engineering package for the Fulton Project, and completed both the FEL-2 and FEL-3 stages of engineering readying the facility for construction. As of November 2010, the Fulton Project has all necessary permits for construction, and in that same month we began site clearing and preparation work, signaling the beginning of construction. In June 2011, BlueFire completed initial site preparation and the site is now ready for facility construction. In February 2010, we announced that we submitted an application for a $250 million dollar loan guarantee for the Fulton Project, under the DOE LGPO, mentioned above. In February 2011, BlueFire received notice from the DOE LGPO staff that the Fulton Project’s application will not move forward until such time as the project has raised the remaining equity necessary for the completion of funding. In August 2010, BlueFire submitted an application for a $250 million loan guarantee with the USDA, which would represent substantially all of the funding shortfall on the project. In October 2011, BlueFire was notified by its lender (“Lender”) for the Company’s USDA loan guarantee application that the USDA sent the Lender notice that they are currently ineligible to participate in the USDA Bio-refinery Assistance Program. The USDA offered to meet with the Lender and the Company in order to provide further explanation as to its decision and to allow the Lender and the Company the opportunity to provide any new information and potential alternatives for the USDA’s consideration. By the end of 2012, no significant progress had been made with the USDA or the Lender and thus the Company abandoned the pursuit of the USDA Loan Guarantee program. In October 2011, BlueFire signed a Memorandum of Understanding with China Huadian Engineering Co., a unit of China Huadian Corp., which is China’s fourth-largest utility, to buy a stake in the Fulton Project and may later also provide debt financing. BlueFire is currently in negotiations with China Huadian Corp, but no definitive agreements have yet been executed. BlueFire continues to work with other potential strategic partners to close financing for the Fulton facility.

Several other opportunities are being evaluated by us in North America, although no definitive agreements have been reached.

●

In November 2011, BlueFire created SucreSource LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary specifically tasked to partner with synergistic back end companies that need cellulosic sugars as a feedstock for their fermentation or chemical processes. SucreSource will utilize the Arkenol process to provide the front end technology to partner with these companies. SucreSource is cultivating relationships and will continue to develop them throughout 2013.

●

In February of 2012, SucreSource announced its first client GS Caltex, a South Korean petroleum company. In the same month, it received the first payment under the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for work on a facility in South Korea. As of the end of 2012, SucreSource had completed and fulfilled all initial work and obligations under the fixed portion of the agreement. This year’s anticipated work product and additional services will be billed on an hourly basis when services are performed.

BlueFire’s capital requirement strategy for its planned bio-refineries are as follows:

●

Obtain additional operating capital from joint venture partnerships, Federal or State grants or loan guarantees, debt financing or equity financing to fund our ongoing operations and the development of initial bio-refineries in North America. Although the Company is in discussions with potential financial and strategic sources of financing for their planned bio-refineries, no definitive agreements are in place.

●

The 2008 Farm Bill, Title IX (Energy Title) provides grants for demonstration scale Bio-refineries, and loan guarantees for commercial scale Bio-refineries that produce advanced Biofuels (i.e., any fuel that is not corn-based). Section 9003 includes a Loan Guarantee Program under which the USDA could provide loan guarantees up to $250 million to fund development, construction, and retrofitting of commercial-scale refineries. Section 9003 also includes a grant program to assist in paying the costs of the development and construction of demonstration-scale bio-refineries to demonstrate the commercial viability which can potentially fund up to 50% of project costs. Recently draft proposals of an updated Farm Bill for 2013 were presented in Congress that will include additional grants and loan guarantee opportunities than previously announced or remaining from the previous Farm Bill’s. BlueFire plans to pursue all available opportunities within the Farm Bill, although initial attempts have been unsuccessful.

●

Utilize proceeds from reimbursements under the DOE contract.

●

As available and as applicable to our business plans, applications for public funding will be submitted to leverage private capital raised by us.

DEVELOPMENTS IN BLUEFIRE’S BIOREFINERY ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT

In 2010, BlueFire continued to develop the engineering package for the Fulton Project, and completed the Front-End Loading (FEL) stages 2 and FEL-3 of engineering for the Fulton Project readying the facility for construction. FEL is the process for conceptual development of processing industry projects. This process is used in the petrochemical, refining, and pharmaceutical industries. Front-End Loading is also referred to as Front-End Engineering Design (FEED).

There are three stages in the FEL process:

FEL-1	FEL-2	FEL-3

* Material Balance	* Preliminary Equipment Design	* Purchase Ready Major Equipment Specifications

* Energy Balance	* Preliminary Layout	* Definitive Estimate

* Project Charter	* Preliminary Schedule	* Project Execution Plan

	* Preliminary Estimate	* Preliminary 3D Model

		* Electrical Equipment List

		* Line List

		* Instrument Index

As of November 2010, the Fulton Project had all necessary permits for construction, and in that same month we began site clearing and preparation work, signaling the beginning of construction. In June 2011, BlueFire completed initial site preparation and the site is now ready for facility construction. In February 2010, we announced that we submitted an application for a $250 million dollar loan guarantee for the Fulton Project, under the DOE LGPO, mentioned above. In February 2011, BlueFire received notice from the DOE LGPO staff that the Fulton Project’s application will not move forward until such time as the project has raised the remaining equity necessary for the completion of funding. In August 2010, BlueFire submitted an application for a $250 million loan guarantee with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) under Section 9003 of the 2008 Farm Bill, as defined below (“USDA LG”). In October 2011, BlueFire was notified by its lender (“Lender”) for the Company’s USDA loan guarantee application that the USDA sent the Lender notice that they are currently ineligible to participate in the USDA Bio-refinery Assistance Program. The USDA offered to meet with the Lender and the Company in order to provide further explanation as to its decision and to allow the Lender and the Company the opportunity to provide any new information and potential alternatives for the USDA’s consideration. By the end of 2012, no significant progress had been made with the USDA or the Lender and thus the Company abandoned the pursuit of the USDA Loan Guarantee program. In October 2011, BlueFire signed a Memorandum of Understanding with China Huadian Engineering Co., a unit of China Huadian Corp., which is China’s fourth-largest utility, to buy a stake in the Fulton Project and may later also provide debt financing. BlueFire is currently in negotiations with China Huadian Corp, but no definitive agreements have yet been executed. BlueFire continues to work with other potential strategic partners to close financing for the Fulton facility.

On September 27, 2010, the Company announced a contract with Cooper Marine & Timberlands to provide feedstock for the Company’s planned Fulton Project for a period of up to 15 years. Under the agreement, Cooper Marine & Timberlands (“CMT”) will supply the project with all of the feedstock required to produce approximately 19-million gallons of ethanol per year from locally sourced cellulosic materials such as wood chips, forest residual chips, pre-commercial thinnings and urban wood waste such as construction waste, storm debris, land clearing; or manufactured wood waste from furniture manufacturing. Under the Agreement, CMT will pursue a least-cost strategy for feedstock supply made possible by the project site’s proximity to feedstock sources and the flexibility of BlueFire’s process to use a wide spectrum of cellulosic waste materials in pure or mixed forms. CMT, with several chip mills in operation in Mississippi and Alabama, is a member company of Cooper/T. Smith one of America’s oldest and largest stevedoring and maritime related firms with operations on all three U.S. coasts and foreign operations in Central and South America.

On September 20, 2010, the Company announced an off-take agreement with Tenaska BioFuels, LLC (“TBF”) for the purchase and sale of all ethanol produced at the Company’s planned Fulton Project. Pricing of the 15-year contract follows a market-based formula structured to capture the premium allowed for cellulosic ethanol compared to corn-based ethanol giving the Company a credit worthy contract to support financing of the project. Despite the long-term nature of the contract, the Company is not precluded from the upside in the coming years as fuel prices rise. TBF, a marketing affiliate of Tenaska, provides procurement and marketing, supply chain management, physical delivery, and financial services to customers in the agriculture and energy markets, including the ethanol and biodiesel industries. In business since 1987, Tenaska is one of the largest independent power producers.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

Revenue

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were approximately $552,000 and $237,000, respectively. Revenue in both 2013 and 2012 was primarily related to federal grant revenue from the DOE. The federal grant generally provides for reimbursement in connection with related development and construction costs involving commercialization of our technologies. The increase in revenue was dueprimarily to the Company’s ability to be reimbursed by the DOE for costs incurred in prior periods.

Project Development

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, our project development costs were approximately $128,000, compared to project development costs of $153,000 for the same period during 2012. The decrease in project development costs is mainly due to the decrease in operating activities due to limited capital resources available to us in the second quarter of 2013 versus the same period in 2012.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were approximately $176,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $304,000 for the same period in 2012. The decrease in general and administrative costs is mainly due to further reduced non-critical operations at the end of fiscal 2012 to conserve working capital.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

Revenue

Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were approximately $620,000 and $304,000, respectively. Revenue in both 2013 and 2012 was primarily related to federal grant revenue from the DOE. The federal grant generally provides for reimbursement in connection with related development and construction costs involving commercialization of our technologies. The increase in revenue was mainly due to the Company’s ability to be reimbursed by the DOE for costs incurred in prior periods.

Project Development

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, our project development costs were approximately $247,000 compared to project development costs of $291,000 for the same period during 2012. The decrease in project development costs is mainly due to the decrease in operating activities due to limited capital resources available to us in the second quarter of 2013 versus the same period in 2012.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were approximately $399,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $678,000 for the same period in 2012. The decrease in general and administrative costs is mainly due to further reduced non-critical operations at the end of fiscal 2012 to conserve working capital.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Historically, we have funded our operations through financing activities consisting primarily of private placements of debt and equity securities with existing shareholders and outside investors. In addition, we receive funds under the grant received from the DOE. Our principal use of funds has been for the further development of our Biorefinery Projects, for capital expenditures and general corporate expenses. As our Projects are developed to the point of construction, we anticipate significant purchases of long lead time item equipment for construction which will require a significant amount of capital. As of June 30, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $15,000. As of August 19, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $15,000.

Historically, we have funded our operations though the following transactions:

In February 2009, the Company obtained a line of credit in the amount of $570,000 from Arkenol Inc., its technology licensor, to provide additional liquidity to the Company as needed, the credit line was ultimately paid back during 2009 and cancelled.

In October 2009, the Company received additional funds of approximately $3,800,000 from the DOE, due to the success in amending its DOE award to include costs previously incurred in connection with the development of the Lancaster Bio-refinery which have a direct attributable benefit to the Fulton Project. The funds were used to fund operations for the remainder of 2009 and most of 2010.

On December 15, 2010, the Company entered into a $200,000 loan agreement (“Loan”) with Arnold Klann, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO/Lender”). The Loan requires the Company to (i) pay to the CEO/Lender a one-time amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the Loan in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock at a value of $0.50 per share, at the CEO/Lender’s option; and (ii) issue the CEO/Lender warrants allowing the CEO/Lender to buy 500,000 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per common share, such warrants to expire on December 15, 2013. The Company has promised to pay in full the outstanding principal balance of any and all amounts due under the Loan Agreement within thirty (30) days of the Company’s receipt of investment financing or a commitment from a third party to provide $1,000,000 to the Company or one of its subsidiaries. The proceeds from this loan were used to fund operations.

On November 10, 2011, the Company obtained a line of credit in the amount of $40,000 from its Chairman/Chief Executive Officer and majority shareholder to provide additional liquidity to the Company as needed, at his sole discretion. Under the terms of the note, the Company is to repay any principal balance and interest, at 12% per annum, within 30 days of receiving qualified investment financing of $100,000 or more. As of August 19, 2013, the outstanding balance on the line of credit is approximately $15,230.

After the SEC declared effective the registration statement related to the transaction, the Company had the right, in its sole discretion, over a 30-month period to sell shares of common stock to LPC in amounts from $35,000 and up to $500,000 per sale, depending on the Company’s stock price, and under certain conditions, as set forth in the Purchase Agreement, up to the aggregate commitment of $10 million. As of August 19, 2013 the Purchase Agreement with LPC has terminated.

On March 28, 2012, the Company finalized a $2,000,000 Equity Facility with TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership (“TCA”). The Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with TCA whereby we agreed to file a registration statement related to the transaction with the SEC covering the shares that may be issued to TCA under the Equity Facility within 45 days of closing. Although under the Registration Rights Agreement the registration statement was to be declared effective within 90 days following closing, it has yet to be declared effective. The Company is working with TCA to resolve this issue.

On March 28, 2012, the Company finalized a $300,000 secured convertible promissory note in favor of TCA (the “Convertible Note”). The maturity date of the Convertible Note is March 28, 2013, and the Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of twelve percent per annum with a default rate of eighteen percent per annum. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock and may be prepaid in whole or in part at the Company’s option without penalty. The Company was unable to repay the Convertible Note by the maturity date, and is currently working with TCA and other potential lenders to resolve the issue.

On July 31, 2012, the Company borrowed $63,500 under a short-term convertible note payable with a third party. Under the terms of the agreement, the note incurred interest at eight percent per annum and was due on May 2, 2013. The note was convertible into common shares at any time after six months at a discount to the then market price of our common stock. As of June 30, 2013, this note and all accrued interest has been converted into common stock.

On October 11, 2012, the Company borrowed $37,500 under a short-term convertible note payable with a third party. Under the terms of the agreement, the note incurred interest at eight percent per annum and was due on July 15, 2013. The note was convertible into common shares at any time after six months at a discount to the then market price of our common stock. As of June 30, 2013, this note and all accrued interest has been converted into common stock.

On December 21, 2012, the Company borrowed $32,500 under a short-term convertible note payable with a third party, which was funded and effective in January 2013. Under the terms of the agreement, the note incurs interest at eight percent per annum and is due on September 26, 2013. The note is convertible into common shares at any time after six months at a discount to the then market price of our common stock. The Company may prepay the convertible debt, prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, a portion of this note has been converted into common stock.

On February 11, 2013, the Company borrowed $53,000 under a short-term convertible note payable with a third party. Under the terms of the agreement, the note incurs interest at eight percent per annum and is due on November 13, 2013. The note is convertible into common shares at any time after six months at a discount to the then market price of our common stock. The Company may prepay the convertible debt, prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement.

On June 13, 2013, the Company borrowed $32,500 under a short-term convertible note payable with a third party. Under the terms of the agreement, the note incurred interest at eight percent per annum and was due on March 17, 2014. The note was convertible into common shares at any time after six months at a discount to the then market price of our common stock. The Company may prepay the convertible debt, prior to maturity at varying prepayment penalty rates specified under the agreement.

Management has estimated that operating expenses for the next twelve months will be approximately $1,700,000, excluding engineering costs related to the development of bio-refinery projects. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. For the remainder of 2013, the Company intends to fund its operations with reimbursements under the Department of Energy contract, from the sale of Fulton Project equity ownership, potential strategic partner alliances, and from the sale of debt and equity instruments. The Company’s ability to get reimbursed on the DOE contract is dependent on the availability of cash to pay for the related costs. As of August 19, 2013, the Company expects the current resources, as well as the resources available in the short term under various financing mechanisms, will only be sufficient for a period of approximately one month, depending upon certain funding conditions contained herein, unless significant additional financing is received. Management has determined that the general expenditures have been reduced as much as can be expected and additional capital will be required in the form of equity or debt securities. In addition, if we cannot raise additional short term capital we will be forced to continue to further accrue liabilities due to our limited cash reserves. There are no assurances that management will be able to raise capital on terms acceptable to the Company. If we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned development, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Changes in Cash Flows

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we used cash of approximately $159,000 and $216,000 in operating activates. During the 2013 period we had a net loss of approximately $176,000, which was offset by non-cash charges of approximately $100,000 and net cash usage stemming from operating assets and liabilities of approximately $95,000. During the 2012 period, we had a net loss of approximately $739,000, which included add back non-cash charges of approximately $123,000 and approximately $400,000 of add backs for operating assets and liabilities. The reduction in cash used in operating activities was primarily a result of smaller net losses and reduced operations.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we received cash of approximately $4,000 from DOE reimbursements in construction activities at our Fulton Project, compared with $41,000. The net receipts are due to receiving cash back from capitalizable costs once the associated cost has been paid in the similar period in 2012.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we had positive cash flow from financing activities of approximately $110,000 compared to approximately $246,000 for the same period in 2012. We received gross proceeds from various convertible note transactions of approximately $118,000, of which we received proceeds of $110,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $246,000 in convertible note proceeds and $85,000 in debt issuance costs in the same period in 2012.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.

The methods, estimates, and judgment we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. The SEC has defined “critical accounting policies” as those accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and require us to make our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based upon this definition, our most critical estimates relate to the fair value of warrant liabilities. We also have other key accounting estimates and policies, but we believe that these other policies either do not generally require us to make estimates and judgments that are as difficult or as subjective, or it is less likely that they would have a material impact on our reported results of operations for a given period. For additional information see Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the notes to our reviewed financial statements appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report and our annual audited financial statements appearing on Form 10-K. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available, and actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our PEO and PFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

On February 26, 2013, the Company received notice that the Orange County Superior Court (the “Court”) issued a Minute Order (the “Order”) in connection with certain shareholders’ claims of breach of contract and declaratory relief related to 5,740,741 warrants (the “Warrants”) issued by the Company. Pursuant to the Order, the Court ruled in favor of the shareholders on the two claims, finding that the Warrants contain certain anti-dilution protective provisions which provide for the re-adjustment of the exercise price of such Warrants upon certain events and that such exercise price per share of the Warrants must be decreased to $0.00.

The Company has considered these warrants exercised based on the notice of exercise received from the respective shareholders in December 2012. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had not issued these shares, but was required to do so based on the information from the Court, the shareholders raising the claim, and the shareholders’ exercise notice which is deemed correct based on the subsequent Order, but subsequently issued them on August 2, 2013. The Company had valued the shares based on their market price on the date the warrants were exercised. As such, the consolidated statement of operations reflects the required issuance of $803,704 as a warrant modification expense which is reflected as shares committed to be issued on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

On March 7, 2013, the shareholders making claims provided their request for judgment based on the Order received, which had been initially refused by the Court via a second minute order received by the Company on April 8, 2013. On April 15, 2013, the Company’s counsel submitted a proposed judgment to the Court as per the Courts request, which followed the Order and provided for no monetary damages against the Company. On May 14, 2013, this proposed judgment was approved by the Court (“Judgment”).

On June 20, 2013, the Company filed motions to vacate the Judgment, a motion for a new trial, and a motion to stay enforcement of the Judgment, all of which were denied on June 27, 2013.

On July 7, 2013, the Company filed a Notice of Appeal for a temporary stay of Judgment, and a motion to strike or tax costs. The motion to strike costs was denied on July 9, 2013, and the notice of appeal will be heard on July 31, 2013, although the judge’s initial belief is the Judgment is a non-appealable interlocutory judgment.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

We believe there are no changes that constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

See Note 4 for information related to Convertible Notes Payable. Other than the information presented in Note 4 there were no unregistered sales of the Company’s equity securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2013, other than those previously reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q, the Company was in default with regard to its payment obligations, on a convertible note issued in favor of TCA on March 28, 2012, in the aggregate principal amount of $300.000.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of 2002*

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of 2002*

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

Filed herewith

In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information on Exhibit No. 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” herewith not “filed”.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BLUEFIRE RENEWABLES, INC.

Date: August 19, 2013	By:	/s/ Arnold Klann
	Name:	Arnold Klann
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
		(Principal Financial Officer)
		(Principal Accounting Officer)

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. junior Avg

Bluefire Renewables Inactive 10-Q2013 Q2 Quarterly report

Content analysis