Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Leases We lease our facilities under various non-cancelable operating leases, which expire on various dates through the year ending December 31, 2024. Rent expense is recognized using the straight-line method over the term of the lease. Rent expense, net of sublease income, was $3.7 million and $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. Rent expense, net of sublease income, was $10.5 million and $8.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. The aggregate future non-cancelable minimum rental payments on our operating leases, as of September 30, 2015 , are as follows (in thousands): Years Ending December 31, Amount 2015 (remaining three months) $ 2,935 2016 13,318 2017 9,843 2018 5,987 2019 5,454 2020 and thereafter 13,870 Total $ 51,407 Total future non-cancelable minimum rental payments have not been reduced by future minimum sublease rentals totaling $0.9 million . We are party to letters of credit totaling $1.1 million and $1.9 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively, issued primarily in support of operating leases at several of our facilities. These letters of credit are collateralized by a line with our bank. No amounts have been drawn against these letters of credit. Contract Manufacturer Commitments Our independent contract manufacturers procure components and assemble our products based on our forecasts. These forecasts are based on estimates of future demand for our products, which are in turn based on historical trends and an analysis from our sales and product marketing organizations, adjusted for overall market conditions. In order to reduce manufacturing lead times and plan for adequate supply, we may issue forecasts and orders for components and products that are non-cancelable. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , we had non-cancelable open orders of $18.9 million and $23.2 million , respectively. We are required to record a liability for firm, non-cancelable and unconditional purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers for quantities in excess of our future demand forecasts. As of September 30, 2015 we have not accrued any significant costs for such non-cancelable commitments. Purchase Obligations As of September 30, 2015 , we had approximately $28.5 million of non-cancelable firm purchase commitments primarily for purchases of software and services. Amounts which we have received delivery of the goods or services under purchase orders outstanding at September 30, 2015 , are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as accounts payable or accrued liabilities, and are excluded from the $28.5 million . Litigation We accrue for contingencies when we believe that a loss is probable and that we can reasonably estimate the amount of any such loss. We have made an assessment of the probability of incurring any such losses and whether or not those losses are estimable. On June 20, 2014, a purported stockholder class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against the Company, current and former members of our Board of Directors, current and former officers, and the underwriters of our March 2014 follow-on public offering. On July 17, 2014, a substantially similar lawsuit was filed in the same court against the same defendants. The actions were consolidated and, on March 4, 2015, an amended complaint was filed, alleging violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of a purported class consisting of purchasers of the Company's common stock pursuant or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus for the follow-on public offering, and seeking unspecified compensatory damages and other relief. On April 20, 2015, defendants filed demurrers seeking that the amended complaint be dismissed. On August 11, 2015, the court overruled defendants' demurrers. The Company intends to defend the litigation vigorously. Based on information currently available, the Company has determined that the amount of any possible loss or range of possible loss is not reasonably estimable. On November 24, 2014, a purported stockholder class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of its officers. On June 29, 2015, plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of a putative class of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s securities between January 2, 2014, and November 4, 2014. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, compensatory damages and attorneys’ fees and costs on behalf of the putative class. On August 21, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently scheduled for hearing on November 12, 2015. The Company intends to defend the litigation vigorously. Based on information currently available, the Company has determined that the amount of any possible loss or range of possible loss is not reasonably estimable. On January 28, 2015, certain of the Company’s officers and directors were named as defendants in a putative derivative action filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. On April 21, 2015, a substantially similar lawsuit was filed in the same court against the same defendants. The Company is named as a nominal defendant in both actions. The actions were consolidated and a consolidated complaint was filed on June 15, 2015, purporting to allege claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. On July 15, 2015, defendants filed demurrers to the consolidated complaint, which are scheduled for hearing on December 4, 2015. Based on information currently available, the Company has determined that the amount of any possible loss or range of possible loss is not reasonably estimable. On April 28, 2015, a lawsuit was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery by a purported stockholder against the Company, seeking production of certain books and records pursuant to Delaware law. The Company filed a motion to dismiss, which the court denied at a hearing on August 11, 2015. On September 3, 2015, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, the court dismissed the action. We are also subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation, including intellectual property litigation, arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes, and are not predictable with assurance. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding amounts already recognized may be incurred, and the amount of such additional loss would be material, we will either disclose the estimated additional loss or state that such an estimate cannot be made. We do not currently believe that it is reasonably possible that additional losses in connection with litigation arising in the ordinary course of business would be material. Indemnification Under the indemnification provisions of our standard sales related contracts, we agree to defend our customers against third-party claims asserting infringement of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, and to pay judgments entered on such claims. Our exposure under these indemnification provisions is generally limited to the total amount paid by our customer under the agreement. However, certain agreements include indemnification provisions that could potentially expose us to losses in excess of the amount received under the agreement. In addition, we indemnify our officers, directors, and certain key employees for actions taken while they are or were serving in good faith in such capacities. Through September 30, 2015 , there have been no claims under any indemnification provisions. |