SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | NOTE 3—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The complexity of the estimation process and issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent in the application of the proportional performance method of accounting affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, unbilled receivables and deferred revenue. Numerous internal and external factors can affect estimates. Estimates are also used for but not limited to: allowance for doubtful accounts, useful lives of furniture, fixtures and equipment, depreciation expense, contingent consideration, fair value assumptions in analyzing goodwill and intangible asset impairments, income taxes and deferred tax asset valuation, and the valuation of stock based compensation. Fair Value The carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, accounts payable, other current liabilities, and accrued interest approximated their fair values at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Fair value is the price that would be received upon a sale of an asset or paid upon a transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). Market participants can use market data or assumptions in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or generally unobservable. The use of unobservable inputs is intended to allow for fair value determinations in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Under the fair-value hierarchy: · Level 1 measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market; · Level 2 measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions for transferability and those that are not quoted but are observable through corroboration with observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets; and · Level 3 measurements include those that are unobservable and of a highly subjective measure. The following tables summarize assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated: Basis of Fair Value Measurements September 30, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Cash equivalents $ $ — $ — $ Total $ $ — $ — $ Liabilities: Contingent consideration (1) $ — $ — $ $ Foreign currency exchange forward contract (2) — — $ — $ $ $ Basis of Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2015 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Cash equivalents $ $ — $ — $ Total $ $ — $ — $ Liabilities: Contingent consideration (1) $ — $ — $ $ (1) The short-term portion is included in “Accrued expenses.” The long-term portion is included in “Other liabilities.” (2) Included in “Accrued Expenses.” The Company’s contingent consideration liability was $6.7 million and $4.0 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The fair value measurement of this contingent consideration is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and reflects the Company’s own assumptions in measuring fair values using the income approach. In developing these estimates, the Company considered certain performance projections, historical results, and industry trends. This amount was estimated through a valuation model that incorporated probability-weighted assumptions related to the achievement of these milestones and the likelihood of the Company making payments. These cash outflow projections have then been discounted using a rate ranging from 13.5% to 19.8%. In January 2016, the Company entered into four foreign exchange forward contracts to partially hedge exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates. There is one remaining foreign exchange forward contract with a EUR notional of 3.0 million and USD notional of 3.3 million at September 30, 2016. The remaining contract is scheduled to settle at December 31, 2016. These contracts are marked-to-market with the resulting gains and losses recognized in earnings offsetting the gains and losses on the non-functional currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities being hedged. These derivative contracts are not designated as hedges and are carried at fair value, with changes in the fair value recorded to foreign currency transaction gain (loss) in the condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income. We recognized a $0.1 million of unrealized loss on forward exchange contracts which is reflected on the foreign currency transaction gain (loss) line for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The foreign currency exchange contracts agreement is valued using broker quotations or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets. These derivative instruments are classified within level 2. The Company’s financial instruments include outstanding borrowings of $59.4 million at September 30, 2016 and $50.8 million at December 31, 2015, which are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of debt is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company's outstanding borrowings is approximately $59.4 million and $50.8 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The fair values of debt have been estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company's incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements. The incremental borrowing rate used to discount future cash flows ranged from 3.16% to 3.48%. The Company also considered recent transactions of peer group companies for similar instruments with comparable terms and maturities as well as an analysis of current market conditions. The following table represents the change in the contingent consideration liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015: Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 2015 Beginning Balance $ $ Payment of contingent consideration Acquisition Change in fair value of contingent consideration Accretion of contingent consideration Unrealized gain (loss) related to currency translation Ending Balance $ $ Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue. Under the guidance, revenue is recognized when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard is effective for public entities with annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of the new revenue guidance by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption being permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt the guidance. In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. In May 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify guidance in certain areas and add some practical expedients to the guidance. The amendments in these 2016 updates do not change the core principle of the previously issued guidance in May 2014. The Company is currently assessing the effects this guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements, as well as the method of transition that the Company will use in adopting the new standard. In April 2015, the FASB issued guidance require the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements as a direct reduction of related debt liabilities with amortization of debt issuance costs reported as interest expense. Under current U.S. GAAP standards, debt issuance costs are reported as deferred charges (i.e., as an asset). In August 2015, the FASB clarified the guidance that debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements could continue to be presented as an asset and be subsequently amortized over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the arrangement. This guidance is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and is to be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The Company adopted the guidance effective January 1, 2016 and presented $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of debt issuance costs as a direct deduction to the debt liability as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. This change in accounting principle did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or stockholders’ equity . In November 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standards update to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes on the balance sheet. The update requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent. The current guidance that deferred tax assets and liabilities of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not impacted by this update. The provisions of the new standard are effective beginning January 1, 2017, for annual and interim periods and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its results of operations, but will result in a reclassification of current net deferred tax on its balance sheet in future years. Adoption of the guidance as of September 30, 2016 would result in a reclassification of current net deferred tax of $2.0 million and $2.1 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for leases which requires lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The guidance requires enhanced disclosures regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases and will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance requires the use of a modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the impact of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance related to employee share-based payment accounting. The guidance requires all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled and will be applied on a prospective basis. The guidance also requires presentation of excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity, and can be applied retrospectively or prospectively. The guidance increases the amount companies can withhold to cover income taxes on awards without triggering liability classification for shares used to satisfy statutory income tax withholding obligations and requires application of a modified retrospective transition method. The amended guidance will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016; early adoption is permitted if all provisions are adopted in the same period. The Company is evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In August 2016, the FASB issued new guidance intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and payments are classified in the statement of cash flows, including debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, and distributions from certain equity method investees. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company is evaluating the impact of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. |