SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | NOTE 3—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The complexity of the estimation process and issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent in the application of the proportional performance method of accounting affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, unbilled receivables and deferred revenue. Numerous internal and external factors can affect estimates. Estimates are also used for, but not limited to: allowance for doubtful accounts, useful lives of furniture, fixtures and equipment, depreciation expense, contingent consideration, fair value assumptions in analyzing goodwill and intangible asset impairments, income taxes and deferred tax asset valuation, and the valuation of stock based compensation. Fair Value The carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, accounts payable, other current liabilities, and accrued interest approximated their fair values at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Fair value is the price that would be received upon a sale of an asset or paid upon a transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). Market participants can use market data or assumptions in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or generally unobservable. The use of unobservable inputs is intended to allow for fair value determinations in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Under the fair-value hierarchy: · Level 1 measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market; · Level 2 measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions for transferability and those that are not quoted but are observable through corroboration with observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets; and · Level 3 measurements include those that are unobservable and of a highly subjective measure. The following tables summarize assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated: Basis of Fair Value Measurements June 30, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Cash equivalents $ 5,533 $ — $ — $ 5,533 Total $ 5,533 $ — $ — $ 5,533 Liabilities: Contingent consideration (1) $ — $ — $ 3,665 $ 3,665 Total $ — $ — $ 3,665 $ 3,665 Basis of Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Cash equivalents $ 22 $ — $ — $ 22 Total $ 22 $ — $ — $ 22 Liabilities: Contingent consideration (1) $ — $ — $ 6,073 $ 6,073 Total $ — $ — $ 6,073 $ 6,073 (1) The short-term portion is included in “Accrued expenses.” The long-term portion is included in “Other liabilities.” The Company’s contingent consideration liability was $3.7 million and $6.1 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The fair value measurement of this contingent consideration is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and reflects the Company’s own assumptions in measuring fair values using the income approach. In developing these estimates, the Company considered certain performance projections, historical results, and industry trends. This amount was estimated through a valuation model that incorporated probability-weighted assumptions related to the achievement of these milestones and the likelihood of the Company making payments. These cash outflow projections have then been discounted using a rate ranging from 13.5% to 19.8%. The Company’s financial instruments include outstanding borrowings of $122.5 million at June 30, 2017 and $125.3 million at December 31, 2016, which are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of debt is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company's outstanding borrowings is approximately $122.4 million and $124.9 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The fair values of debt have been estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company's incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements. The incremental borrowing rate used to discount future cash flows ranged from 2.00% to 4.80%. The Company also considered recent transactions of peer group companies for similar instruments with comparable terms and maturities as well as an analysis of current market conditions. The following table represents the change in the contingent consideration liability during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016: Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 Beginning Balance $ 6,073 $ 4,019 Payment of contingent consideration (3,245) (2,483) Acquisitions — 4,634 Change in fair value of contingent consideration — (19) Accretion of contingent consideration 739 152 Unrealized gain (loss) related to currency translation 98 (40) Ending Balance $ 3,665 $ 6,263 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue. Under the guidance, revenue is recognized when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard is effective for public entities with annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of the new revenue guidance by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption being permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective transition method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The guidance also requires significantly expanded disclosures around the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, which we are currently compiling. We have completed an initial assessment of the impact of the guidance on our existing revenue recognition policies. We currently anticipate that we will see the most impact in contracts which include variable consideration, Network Contingency, subscription services around Robotic Process Automation, and will be adopting the standard using the cumulative catch-up transition method of adoption on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidance, including required disclosures, and based upon our current analysis, does not expect a significant impact on processes, systems or controls. We will continue to evaluate the impact of our pending adoption of this guidance to our consolidated financial statements and our preliminary assessments are subject to change. In November 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standards update to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes on the balance sheet. The update requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent. The current guidance that deferred tax assets and liabilities of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not impacted by this update. The provisions of the new standard are effective beginning January 1, 2017, for annual and interim periods and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance on a prospective method; therefore, prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. As a result of this adoption, $1.5 million of net current deferred tax assets are included in the net noncurrent deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2017. The adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2017 by the Company did not have a material impact on its results of operations. In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for leases which requires lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The guidance requires enhanced disclosures regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases and will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance requires the use of a modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the impact of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, amended guidance related to employee share-based payment accounting. The new guidance requires all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, allows an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares than previously allowed for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting, allows a company to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur, and eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. The new guidance also requires excess tax benefits and tax shortfalls to be presented on the cash flow statement as an operating activity rather than as a financing activity, and clarifies that cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation are to be presented as a financing activity. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2016. We have adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017 on a prospective basis as permitted by the new standard. As a result of this adoption: · Tax expenses of $0.3 million were recognized on stock-based compensation expense were reflected as a component of the provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2017. · We elected to adopt the cash flow presentation of the excess tax benefits prospectively where these benefits are classified along with other income tax cash flows as operating cash flows. · We have elected to continue to estimate the number of stock-based awards expected to vest, rather than electing to account for forfeitures as they occur to determine the amount of compensation cost to be recognized in each period. · We presented employee taxes paid as a financing activity on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows retrospectively, as such the comparable period within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows has been recast to reflect the adoption. The adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2017 by the Company did not have a material impact on its results of operations. In August 2016, the FASB issued new guidance intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and payments are classified in the statement of cash flows, including debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, and distributions from certain equity method investees. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company is evaluating the impact of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In November 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard to requires that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents be presented with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. If different, a reconciliation of the cash balances reported in the cash flow statement and the balance sheet would need to be provided along with explanatory information. The guidance is effective on January 1, 2018. We have started an initial assessment of the impact of the guidance, and we do not expect it will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard that changes the GAAP definition of a business which can impact the accounting for asset purchases, acquisitions, goodwill impairment, and other assessments. The guidance is effective on January 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard that eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which required us to determine the implied fair value of goodwill by allocating the reporting unit's fair value to each of its assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit was acquired in a business acquisition. Instead, the updated guidance requires an entity to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, and recognizing a non-cash impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the reporting unit's fair value with the loss not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The updated guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, and will be applied on a prospective basis. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |