This Amendment No. 3 (this “Amendment No. 3”) amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule14D-9 filed by Aerohive Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Aerohive” or the “Company”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 12, 2019 (together with subsequent amendments and supplements thereto, including this Amendment No. 3, the “Schedule14D-9”). TheSchedule 14D-9 relates to the tender offer by Clover Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Extreme Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Extreme”), as disclosed in the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (together with the exhibits thereto, as amended, the “Schedule TO”), filed by Purchaser and Extreme with the SEC on July 12, 2019 pursuant to which Purchaser has offered to purchase all of the outstanding Shares for a purchase price of $4.45 per Share, in cash (the “Offer Price”), without interest, subject to any applicable withholding of taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in Purchaser’s Offer to Purchase, dated July 12, 2019 (the “Offer to Purchase”), and in the related Letter of Transmittal (the “Letter of Transmittal”), which, together with the Offer to Purchase and other related materials, as each may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with the Merger Agreement (as defined below), constitute the “Offer.” A copy of the Offer to Purchase and Letter of Transmittal are filed as Exhibits (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B) to the Schedule14D-9, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Except to the extent specifically provided in this Amendment No. 3, the information set forth in the Schedule 14D-9 remains unchanged and is incorporated herein by reference as relevant to the items in this Amendment No. 3. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Schedule14D-9.
Explanatory Note
As previously disclosed, subsequent to the Company filing the Schedule 14D-9, five actions relating to the Transactions were filed by purported Company shareholders against the Company and the Board. The Company believes that the claims asserted in the actions are without merit and denies the allegations in each of the actions. However, in order to alleviate the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation and to provide additional information to its stockholders, the Company has provided certain additional disclosures in this Amendment No. 3 to the Schedule 14D-9 (the“Supplemental Disclosures”). Counsel for plaintiffs in four of the actions have confirmed that the Supplemental Disclosures will moot their claims and that they will accordingly dismiss the actions with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs, and without prejudice as to other shareholders. The Supplemental Disclosures should be read in conjunction with the Schedule 14D-9, which should be read in its entirety. The Supplemental Disclosures should not be regarded as an indication that any of the Company, Extreme, the Purchaser or their respective affiliates, officers, directors or other representatives, or any recipient of this information, considered or now considers the information contained in the Supplemental Disclosures to be material. The Company believes that the Schedule 14D-9 had disclosed all material information, and denies that any additional disclosures are or were required under any applicable federal or state law, rule or regulation. To the extent that the information in the Supplemental Disclosures differs from information that had been disclosed in the Schedule 14D-9, the information in the Supplemental Disclosures supersedes such information that had been disclosed in the Schedule 14D-9. Additional complaints containing substantially similar allegations may be filed in the future.
Item 4. The Solicitation or Recommendation.
Item 4 of the Schedule14D-9 is hereby amended and supplemented as follows:
The third paragraph on page 20 of the Schedule14D-9 under the subheading “Background” under the heading “Recommendation of the Board” is deleted and replaced with the following sentences:
“On May 21, 2019, Aerohive and Party B entered into a letter agreement extending to April 1, 2020 the terms of a previously executednon-disclosure agreement. Thenon-disclosure agreement did not contain a standstill provision. Party B and Aerohive have no standstill provision in effect.”
The third paragraph on page 33 of the Schedule14D-9 under the subheading “Discounted Cash Flow Analysis” under the heading “Opinion of Aerohive’s Financial Advisor” is deleted and replaced with the following sentences:
“Under the perpetuity growth methodology, Evercore estimated a terminal value for Aerohive by applying a perpetuity growth rate of 2.5% to 4.5% to the estimated fiscal year 2023 unlevered free cash flow, adjusted to assume an equivalent level of projected capital expenditure and projected depreciation and amortization. The cash flows and terminal value were then discounted to present value using a range of discount rates from 11.5% to 13.5%, based on an estimate of Aerohive’s weighted average cost of capital. Evercore estimated Aerohive’s weighted average cost of capital based on application of the capital asset pricing model, details regarding the capitalization of the companies included in the selected publicly traded companies analysis described below, and its professional judgment given the nature of Aerohive’s business and its industry. The resulting range of implied enterprise values for Aerohive was then adjusted by the amount of Aerohive’s net debt as of June 21, 2019 (calculated as the difference between debt of $20 million, and cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $84 million) to produce a range of implied equity values for Aerohive. Under the perpetuity growth methodology, Evercore’s discounted cash flow analysis indicated impliedper-share equity values for Aerohive on a standalone basis of approximately $3.86 to $5.16.”
The first paragraph on page 33 of the Schedule14D-9 under the subheading “Selected Public Companies Trading Multiples” under the heading “Opinion of Aerohive’s Financial Advisor” is deleted and replaced with the following sentences:
“Evercore reviewed publicly available financial and market information for Aerohive and the selected public companies listed in the table below, which were the companies in theWi-Fi Solutions and Enterprise Networking industries which Evercore deemed most relevant to consider in relation to Aerohive, based on Evercore’s professional judgment and experience.”