Loans Held-for-Sale, Loans and Leases, and Allowance for Credit Losses | Note 4. Loans Held-for-Sale, Loans and Leases, and Allowance for Credit Losses Although, the Company operates as a single segment, it derives revenues from its asset management activities and four specialized lending groups that target market segments in which it believes it has competitive advantages: · Leveraged Finance, provides senior, secured cash flow loans and, to a lesser extent, first out, second lien and unitranche loans, which are primarily used to finance acquisitions of mid-sized companies by private equity investment funds managed by established professional alternative asset managers; · Business Credit, provides senior, secured asset-based loans primarily to fund working capital needs of mid-sized companies; · Real Estate, provides first mortgage debt primarily to finance acquisitions of commercial real estate properties; and · Equipment Finance, provides leases, loans and lease lines to finance equipment purchases and other capital expenditures. The Company’s loan portfolio consists primarily of loans to medium-sized, privately-owned companies, most of which do not publicly report their financial condition. Compared to larger, publicly traded firms, loans to these types of companies may carry higher inherent risk. The companies that the Company lends to generally have more limited access to capital and higher funding costs, may be in a weaker financial position, may need more capital to expand or compete, and may be unable to obtain financing from public capital markets or from traditional sources, such as commercial banks. Loans classified as held-for-sale may consist of loans originated by the Company and intended to be sold or syndicated to third parties (including credit funds managed by the Company) or impaired loans for which a sale of the loan is expected as a result of a workout strategy. At December 31, 2015 loans held-for-sale consisted of $485.9 million leveraged finance loans. These loans are carried at the lower of aggregate cost, net of any deferred origination costs or fees, or fair value. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, loans held-for-sale consisted of the following: December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 485,874 $ 202,369 Gross loans held-for-sale 485,874 202,369 Deferred loan fees, net (7,089 ) (1,800 ) Total loans, net $ 478,785 $ 200,569 At December 31, 2015, loans held-for-sale include loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $485.9 million that were intended to be sold to credit funds managed by the Company. As of February 29, 2016, the Company had sold $37.8 million of the loans intended to be sold to credit funds managed by the Company. The Company sold loans with an outstanding balance totaling $105.3 million for an aggregate gain of $0.5 million to entities other than credit funds during 2015. The Company sold loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $59.0 million for a gain of $0.2 million to entities other than the credit funds during 2014. The Company sold loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $32.0 million for a gain of $0.01 million to entities other than the NewStar Credit Opportunities Fund (“NCOF”) during 2013. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, loans and leases consisted of the following: December 31, 2015 2014 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 2,627,314 $ 1,881,277 Business Credit 342,281 286,918 Real Estate 100,732 105,394 Equipment Finance 173,253 96,666 Gross loans and leases 3,243,580 2,370,255 Deferred loan fees, net (51,249 ) (21,376 ) Allowance for loan and lease losses (58,259 ) (42,983 ) Total loans and leases, net $ 3,134,072 $ 2,305,896 The Company provides commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, and leases to customers throughout the United States. The Company’s borrowers may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and, as a result, may have a lower capacity to make scheduled payments of interest or principal on their borrowings during these periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the estimated value of the collateral, particularly real estate, securing some of the Company’s loans. Although the Company has a diversified loan and lease portfolio, certain events may occur, including, but not limited to, adverse economic conditions and adverse events affecting specific clients, industries or markets, that could adversely affect the ability of borrowers to make timely scheduled principal and interest payments on their loans and leases. The Company internally risk rates loans based on individual credit criteria on at least a quarterly basis. Borrowers provide the Company with financial information on either a quarterly or monthly basis. Loan ratings as well as identification of impaired loans are dynamically updated to reflect changes in borrower condition or profile. A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due to it according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include all non-accrual loans, loans with partial charge-offs and loans which are troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”). The Company utilizes a number of analytical tools for the purpose of estimating probability of default and loss given default for its four specialized lending groups. The quantitative models employed by the Company in its Leveraged Finance and Equipment Finance businesses utilize Moody’s KMV RiskCalc credit risk model in combination with a proprietary qualitative model, which generates a rating that maps to a probability of default estimate. Real Estate utilizes a proprietary model that has been developed to capture risk characteristics unique to the lending activities in that line of business. The model produces an obligor risk rating which corresponds to a probability of default and also produces a loss given default. In each case, the probability of default and the loss given default are used to calculate an expected loss for those lending groups. Due to the nature of its borrowers and the structure of its loans, Business Credit utilizes a proprietary model that produces a rating that corresponds to an expected loss, without calculating a probability of default and loss given default. For variable interest entities for which the Company is providing transitional capital, a qualitative analysis is used to determine expected loss. In each case, the expected loss is the primary component in a formulaic calculation of general reserves attributable to a given loan. Loans and leases which are rated at or below a specified threshold are typically classified as “Pass”, and loans and leases rated above that threshold are typically classified as “Criticized”, a characterization that may apply to impaired loans, including TDR. As of December 31, 2015, $152.1 million of the Company’s loans were classified as “Criticized”, including $143.6 million of the Company’s impaired loans, and $3.1 billion were classified as “Pass”. As of December 31, 2014, $133.2 million of the Company’s loans were classified as “Criticized”, including $121.8 million of the Company’s impaired loans, and $2.2 billion were classified as “Pass”. When the Company determines a loan is deemed to be impaired, the Company will establish a specific allowance, and the loan will be analyzed and may be placed on non-accrual. If the asset deteriorates further, the specific allowance may increase, and ultimately may result in a loss and charge-off. A TDR that performs in accordance with the terms of the restructuring may improve its risk profile over time. While the concessions in terms of pricing or amortization may not have been reversed and further amended to “market” levels, the financial condition of the Borrower may improve over time to the point where the rating improves from the “Criticized” classification that was appropriate immediately prior to, or at, restructuring. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $193.2 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $183.6 million have been restructured and classified as TDR. As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate carrying value of equity investments in certain of the Company’s borrowers in connection with TDRs totaled $11.4 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $111.3 million were also on non-accrual status. For impaired loans on non-accrual status, the Company’s policy is to reverse the accrued interest previously recognized as interest income subsequent to the last cash receipt in the current year. The recognition of interest income on the loan only resumes when factors indicating doubtful collection no longer exist and the non-accrual loan has been brought current. During 2015, the Company charged off $4.0 million of outstanding non-accrual loans. During 2015, the Company placed loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $38.2 million on non-accrual status and returned loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $0.9 million to performing status. During 2015, the Company recorded $9.5 million of net specific provisions for impaired loans. At December 31, 2015, the Company had a $26.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $121.1 million. At December 31, 2015, additional funding commitments for impaired loans totaled $10.9 million. The Company’s obligation to fulfill the additional funding commitments on impaired loans is generally contingent on the borrower’s compliance with the terms of the credit agreement and the borrowing base availability for asset-based loans, or if the borrower is not in compliance additional funding commitments may be made at the Company’s discretion. As of December 31, 2015, loans to three borrowers totaling approximately $18.6 million were on non-accrual status and were greater than 60 days past due and classified as delinquent by the Company. Included in the $26.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans was $2.8 million related to delinquent loans. During 2012, as part of the resolution of two impaired commercial real estate loans, the Company took control of the underlying commercial real estate properties. The Company recorded a partial charge-off of $2.7 million and classified the commercial real estate properties as other real estate owned. During 2014, the Company sold one of the commercial real estate properties for $9.5 million resulting in a gain on sale of $0.01 million. During 2015, the Company sold the remaining commercial real estate property for $3.0 million resulting in a loss on sale of $0.01 million. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The measurement of impairment of a loan is based upon (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (ii) the loan’s observable market price, or (iii) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, depending on the circumstances and our collection strategy. Impaired loans are identified based on the loan-by-loan risk rating process described above. It is the Company’s policy during the reporting period to record a specific provision for credit losses for all loans for which we have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $217.2 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $175.6 million have been restructured and classified as TDR. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate carrying value of equity investments in certain of the Company’s borrowers in connection with TDRs totaled $16.4 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $87.8 million were also on non-accrual status. During 2014, the Company charged off $18.8 million of outstanding non-accrual loans. During 2014, the Company placed loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $43.5 million on non-accrual status and returned loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $1.9 million to performing status. During 2014, the Company recorded $22.2 million of net specific provisions for impaired loans. At December 31, 2014, the Company had a $20.7 million specific allowance for impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $103.2 million. At December 31, 2014, additional funding commitments for impaired loans totaled $10.9 million. As of December 31, 2014, $43.6 million of loans on non-accrual status were greater than 60 days past due and classified as delinquent by the Company. Included in the $20.7 million specific allowance for impaired loans was $8.7 million related to delinquent loans. A summary of impaired loans is as follows: Investment, Net of Charge-offs Investment, Net of Unamortized Discount/Premium Unpaid Principal ($ in thousands) December 31, 2015 Leveraged Finance $ 157,446 $ 150,692 $ 188,453 Business Credit — — — Real Estate 34,941 34,915 38,286 Equipment Finance 772 709 772 Total $ 193,159 $ 186,316 $ 227,511 December 31, 2014 Leveraged Finance $ 164,886 $ 160,223 $ 186,002 Business Credit — — 366 Real Estate 52,309 52,230 55,661 Equipment Finance — — — Total $ 217,195 $ 212,453 $ 242,029 Recorded Investment Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment, net, with a Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment without a Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment, net, without a Related Allowance for Credit Losses ($ in thousands) December 31, 2015 Leveraged Finance $ 113,397 $ 106,762 $ 44,049 $ 43,930 Business Credit — — — — Real Estate 7,705 7,705 27,236 27,210 Equipment Finance — — 772 709 Total $ 121,102 $ 114,467 $ 72,057 $ 71,849 December 31, 2014 Leveraged Finance $ 103,159 $ 98,528 $ 61,727 $ 61,695 Business Credit — — — — Real Estate — — 52,309 52,230 Equipment Finance — — — — Total $ 103,159 $ 98,528 $ 114,036 $ 113,925 During 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Company recorded net charge-offs of $3.4 million, $25.3 million and $17.8 million, respectively. During 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Company recorded recoveries of previously charged-off loans of $0.8 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The Company’s general policy is to record a specific allowance for an impaired loan to cover the identified impairment of that loan. Any potential charge-off of such loan would typically occur in a subsequent period. The Company may record the initial specific allowance related to an impaired loan in the same period as it records a partial charge-off in certain circumstances such as if the terms of a restructured loan are finalized during that period. When a loan is determined to be uncollectible, the specific allowance is charged off, which reduces the gross investment in the loan. While charge-offs typically have no net impact on the carrying value of net loans and leases, charge-offs lower the level of the allowance for loan and lease losses; and, as a result, reduce the percentage of allowance for loans and leases to total loans and leases, and the percentage of allowance for loan and leases losses to non-performing loans. Below is a summary of the Company’s evaluation of its portfolio and allowance for loan and lease losses by impairment methodology: Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance December 31, 2015 Investment Allowance Investment Allowance Investment Allowance Investment Allowance ($ in thousands) Collectively evaluated (1) $ 2,469,868 $ 27,874 $ 342,281 $ 1,991 $ 65,791 $ 350 $ 172,481 $ 1,291 Individually evaluated (2) 157,446 26,447 — — 34,941 306 772 — Total $ 2,627,314 $ 54,321 $ 342,281 $ 1,991 $ 100,732 $ 656 $ 173,253 $ 1,291 Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance December 31, 2014 Investment Allowance Investment Allowance Investment Allowance Investment Allowance ($ in thousands) Collectively evaluated (1) $ 1,716,391 $ 20,045 $ 286,918 $ 1,334 $ 53,085 $ 257 $ 96,666 $ 622 Individually evaluated (2) 164,886 20,725 — — 52,309 — — — Total $ 1,881,277 $ 40,770 $ 286,918 $ 1,334 $ 105,394 $ 257 $ 96,666 $ 622 (1) Represents loans and leases collectively evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, (2) Represents loans individually evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASU 310-10, Receivables, Below is a summary of the Company’s investment in nonaccrual loans: Recorded Investment in Nonaccrual Loans December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 103,563 $ 84,704 Business Credit — — Real Estate 7,705 3,103 Equipment Finance — — Total $ 111,268 $ 87,807 Loans being restructured typically develop adverse performance trends as a result of internal or external factors, the result of which is an inability to comply with the terms of the applicable credit agreement governing their obligations to the Company. In order to mitigate default risk and/or liquidation, assuming that liquidation proceeds are not viewed as a more favorable outcome to the Company and other lenders, the Company will enter into negotiations with the borrower and its shareholders on the terms of a restructuring. When restructuring a loan, the Company undertakes an extensive diligence process which typically includes (i) construction of a financial model that runs through the tenor of the restructuring term, (ii) meetings with management of the borrower, (iii) engagement of third party consultants and (iv) internal analysis. Once a restructuring proposal is developed, it is subject to approval by both the Company’s Underwriting Committee and the Company’s Investment Committee. Loans will only be removed from TDR classification after a period of performance following the refinancing of outstanding obligations on terms which are determined to be “market” in all material respects, or upon full payoff of the loan. The Company may modify loans that are not determined to be a TDR. Where a loan is modified or restructured but loan terms are considered market and no concessions were given on the loan terms, including price, principal amortization or obligation, or other restrictive covenants, a loan will not be classified as a TDR. The Company has made the following types of concessions in the context of a TDR: Group I: · extension of principal repayment term · principal holidays · interest rate adjustments Group II: · partial forgiveness · conversion of debt to equity A summary of the types of concessions that the Company made with respect to TDRs at December 31, 2015 and 2014 is provided below: ($ in thousands) Group I Group II December 31, 2015 $ 183,573 $ 162,986 December 31, 2014 $ 175,589 $ 135,748 Note: A loan may be included in both restructuring groups, but not repeatedly within each group. For 2015 and 2014, the Company had charge-offs totaling $4.0 million and $18.7 million, respectively, related to loans previously classified as a TDR. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had not removed the TDR classification from any loan previously identified as such, but had charged-off, sold and received repayments of outstanding TDRs. The Company measures TDRs similarly to how it measures all loans for impairment. The Company performs a discounted cash flow analysis on cash flow dependent loans and we assess the underlying collateral value less reasonable costs of sale for collateral dependent loans. Management analyzes the projected performance of the borrower to determine if it has the ability to service principal and interest payments based on the terms of the restructuring. Loans will typically not be returned to accrual status until at least six months of contractual payments have been made in a timely manner or the borrower shows significant ability to maintain servicing of the restructured debt. Additionally, at the time of a restructuring and quarterly thereafter, an impairment analysis is undertaken to determine the measurement of specific reserve, if any, on each impaired loan. Below is a summary of the Company’s loans which were classified as TDR: For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Investment in TDR Subsequently Defaulted ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 13,650 $ 13,650 $ 29,339 Business Credit — — — Real Estate 207,704 207,704 — Equipment Finance 922 922 — Total $ 222,276 $ 222,276 $ 29,339 For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Investment in TDR Subsequently Defaulted ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ — $ — $ 25,933 Business Credit — — — Real Estate — — — Equipment Finance — — — Total $ — $ — $ 25,933 The following sets forth a breakdown of TDRs at December 31, 2015 and 2014: As of December 31, 2015 ($ in thousands) Accrual Status Impaired Specific For the year Loan Type Accruing Nonaccrual Balance Allowance Charged-off Leveraged Finance $ 53,883 $ 93,977 $ 147,860 $ 24,958 $ 4,000 Business Credit — — — — — Real Estate 27,236 7,705 34,941 — — Equipment Finance 772 — 772 — — Total $ 81,891 $ 101,682 $ 183,573 $ 24,958 $ 4,000 As of December 31, 2014 ($ in thousands) Accrual Status Impaired Specific For the year Loan Type Accruing Nonaccrual Balance Allowance Charged-off Leveraged Finance $ 80,182 $ 70,734 $ 150,916 $ 19,885 $ 18,709 Business Credit — — — — — Real Estate 21,570 3,103 24,673 — — Equipment Finance — — — — — Total $ 101,752 $ 73,837 $ 175,589 $ 19,885 $ 18,709 The Company classifies a loan as Past Due when it is over 60 days delinquent. An aged analysis of the Company’s past due receivables is as follows: 60-89 Days Past Due Greater than 90 Days Total Past Due Current Total Loans and Leases Investment in > 60 Days & Accruing December 31, 2015 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ — $ 27,165 $ 27,165 $ 2,600,149 $ 2,627,314 $ 8,530 Business Credit — — $ — 342,281 342,281 — Real Estate — — $ — 100,732 100,732 — Equipment Finance — — $ — 173,253 173,253 — Total $ — $ 27,165 $ 27,165 $ 3,216,415 $ 3,243,580 $ 8,530 December 31, 2014 Leveraged Finance $ 25,412 $ 18,151 $ 43,563 $ 1,837,714 $ 1,881,277 $ — Business Credit — — — 286,918 286,918 — Real Estate — — — 105,394 105,394 — Equipment Finance — — — 96,666 96,666 — Total $ 25,412 $ 18,151 $ 43,563 $ 2,326,692 $ 2,370,255 $ — A general allowance is provided for loans and leases that are not impaired. The Company employs a variety of internally developed and third-party modeling and estimation tools for measuring credit risk, which are used in developing an allowance for loan and lease losses on outstanding loans and leases. The Company’s allowance framework addresses economic conditions, capital market liquidity and industry circumstances from both a top-down and bottom-up perspective. The Company considers and evaluates a number of factors, including but not limited to, changes in economic conditions, credit availability, industry, loss emergence period, and multiple obligor concentrations in assessing both probabilities of default and loss severities as part of the general component of the allowance for loan and lease losses. On at least a quarterly basis, loans and leases are internally risk-rated based on individual credit criteria, including loan and lease type, loan and lease structures (including balloon and bullet structures common in the Company’s Leveraged Finance and Real Estate cash flow loans), borrower industry, payment capacity, location and quality of collateral if any (including the Company’s Real Estate loans). Borrowers provide the Company with financial information on either a monthly or quarterly basis. Ratings, corresponding assumed default rates and assumed loss severities are dynamically updated to reflect any changes in borrower condition and/or profile. For Leveraged Finance loans and Equipment Finance loans and leases, the data set used to construct probabilities of default in its allowance for loan losses model, Moody’s CRD Private Firm Database, primarily contains middle market loans that share attributes similar to the Company’s loans. The Company also considers the quality of the loan or lease terms and lender protections in determining a loan loss in the event of default. For Business Credit loans, the Company utilizes a proprietary model to risk rate the loans on a monthly basis. This model captures the impact of changes in industry and economic conditions as well as changes in the quality of the borrower’s collateral and financial performance to assign a final risk rating. The Company has also evaluated historical net loss trends by risk rating from a comprehensive industry database covering more than twenty-five years of experience of the majority of the asset based lenders operating in the United States. Based upon the monthly risk rating from the model, the reserve is adjusted to reflect the historical average for expected loss from the industry database. For Real Estate loans, the Company employs two mechanisms to capture the impact of industry and economic conditions. First, a loan’s risk rating, and thereby its assumed default likelihood, can be adjusted to account for overall commercial real estate market conditions. Second, to the extent that economic or industry trends adversely affect a substandard rated borrower’s loan-to-value ratio enough to impact its repayment ability, the Company applies a stress multiplier to the loan’s probability of default. The multiplier is designed to account for default characteristics that are difficult to quantify when market conditions cause commercial real estate prices to decline. For consolidated VIEs to which the Company is providing transitional capital, we utilize a qualitative analysis which considers the business plans related to the entity, including expected hold periods, the terms of the agreements related to the entity, the Company’s historical credit experience, the credit migration of the entity’s loans in determining expected loss, as well as conditions in the capital markets. The Company was providing capital on a transitional basis to the Arlington Fund, prior to the completion of its term debt securitization on June 26, 2014. During the transitional hold period, the expected and actual loss on the Arlington Fund was zero and no allowance was recorded. The Company deconsolidated the Arlington Fund on June 26, 2014. The Company did not recognize any losses on loans on the date of deconsolidation. If the Company determines that changes in its allowance for credit losses methodology are advisable, as a result of changes in the economic environment or otherwise, the revised allowance methodology may result in higher or lower levels of allowance. Moreover, given uncertain market conditions, actual losses under the Company’s current or any revised allowance methodology may differ materially from the Company’s estimate. A summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2015 Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 41,480 $ 1,334 $ 257 $ 622 $ 43,693 Provision for credit losses—general 7,473 657 93 669 8,892 Provision for credit losses—specific 9,043 — 306 146 9,495 Loans charged off, net of recoveries (3,208 ) — — (146 ) (3,354 ) Balance, end of period $ 54,788 $ 1,991 $ 656 $ 1,291 $ 58,726 Balance, end of period—specific $ 26,447 $ — $ 306 $ — $ 26,753 Balance, end of period—general $ 28,341 $ 1,991 $ 350 $ 1,291 $ 31,973 Average balance of impaired loans $ 172,578 $ — $ 36,106 $ 863 $ 209,547 Interest recognized from impaired loans $ 11,370 $ — $ 1,584 $ 36 $ 12,990 Loans and leases Loans individually evaluated with specific allowance $ 113,397 $ — $ 7,705 $ — $ 121,102 Loans individually evaluated with no specific allowance 44,049 — 27,236 772 72,057 Loans and leases collectively evaluated without specific allowance 2,469,868 342,281 65,791 172,481 3,050,421 Total loans and leases $ 2,627,314 $ 342,281 $ 100,732 $ 173,253 $ 3,243,580 Year Ended December 31, 2014 Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 36,803 $ 973 $ 3,653 $ 425 $ 41,854 Provision for credit losses—general 4,400 561 (120 ) 197 5,038 Provision for credit losses—specific 22,201 (200 ) 69 — 22,070 Loans charged off, net of recoveries (21,924 ) — (3,345 ) — (25,269 ) Balance, end of period $ 41,480 $ 1,334 $ 257 $ 622 $ 43,693 Balance, end of period—specific $ 20,725 $ — $ — $ — $ 20,725 Balance, end of period—general $ 20,755 $ 1,334 $ 257 $ 622 $ 22,968 Average balance of impaired loans $ 172,379 $ 525 $ 56,995 $ — $ 229,899 Interest recognized from impaired loans $ 9,888 $ — $ 2,173 $ — $ 12,061 Loans and leases Loans individually evaluated with specific allowance $ 103,159 $ — $ — $ — $ 103,159 Loans individually evaluated with no specific allowance 61,727 — 52,309 — 114,036 Loans and leases collectively evaluated without specific allowance 1,716,391 286,918 53,085 96,666 2,153,060 Total loans and leases $ 1,881,277 $ 286,918 $ 105,394 $ 96,666 $ 2,370,255 Included in the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2015 and 2014 is an allowance for unfunded commitments of $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, which is recorded as a component of other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with changes recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The methodology for determining the allowance for unfunded commitments is consistent with the methodology for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses. During 2015, the Company recorded a total provision for credit losses of $18.4 million. The Company increased its allowance for credit losses to $58.7 million as of December 31, 2015 from $43.7 million at December 31, 2014. The Company had $3.4 million of net charge-offs and decreased its general allowance for credit losses by three basis points during 2015, and recorded new specific provisions for credit losses of $9.5 million. The general allowance for credit losses covers probable losses in the Company’s loan and lease portfolio with respect to loans and leases for which no specific impairment has been identified. When a loan is classified as impaired, the loan is evaluated for a specific allowance and a specific provision may be recorded, thereby removing it from consideration under the general component of the allowance analysis. Loans that are deemed to be uncollectible are charged off and deducted from the allowance, and recoveries on loans previously charged off are netted against loans charged off. A specific provision for credit losses is recorded with respect to impaired loans for which it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement for which there is impairment recognized. The outstanding balance of impaired loans, which include all of the outstanding balances of the Company’s delinquent loans and its TDRs, as a percentage of “Loans and leases, net” was 6% as of December 31, 2015 and 9% as of December 31, 2014. The Company closely monitors the credit quality of its loans and leases which is partly reflected in its credit metrics such as loan delinquencies, non-accruals and charge-offs. Changes in these credit metrics are largely due to changes in economic conditions and seasoning of the loan and lease portfolio. The Company continually evaluates the appropriateness of its allowance for credit losses methodology. Based on the Company’s evaluation process to determine the level of the allowance for loan and lease losses, management believes the allowance to be adequate as of December 31, 2015 in light of the estimated known and inherent risks identified through its analysis. |