Loans Held-for-Sale, Loans and Leases, and Allowance for Credit Losses | Note 4. Loans Held-for-Sale, Loans and Leases, and Allowance for Credit Losses As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, loans held-for-sale consisted of the following: December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 145,966 $ 485,874 Gross loans held-for-sale 145,966 485,874 Deferred loan fees, net (1,906 ) (7,089 ) Total loans, net $ 144,060 $ 478,785 These loans are carried at the lower of aggregate cost, net of any deferred origination costs or fees, or fair value. At December 31, 2016, loans held-for-sale consisted of loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $146.0 million that were intended to be sold to credit funds managed by the Company. The Company sold loans with an outstanding balance totaling $638.3 million for an aggregate loss of $0.9 million to credit funds managed by the Company during 2016. The Company sold loans with an outstanding balance totaling $188.2 million for an aggregate loss of $1.5 million to entities other than credit funds during 2016. The Company sold loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $105.3 million for a gain of $0.5 million to entities other than credit funds during 2015. The Company sold loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $59.0 million for a gain of $0.2 million to entities other than credit funds during 2014. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, loans and leases consisted of the following: December 31, 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance (1) $ 3,308,926 $ 2,627,314 Business Credit — 342,281 Real Estate 10,624 100,732 Equipment Finance — 173,253 Gross loans and leases 3,319,550 3,243,580 Deferred loan fees, net (29,423 ) (51,249 ) Allowance for loan and lease losses (50,936 ) (58,259 ) Total loans and leases, net $ 3,239,191 $ 3,134,072 (1) Includes loans at fair value of $403.7 and $0, respectively. The Company provides commercial loans and commercial real estate loans to customers throughout the United States. The Company’s borrowers may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and, as a result, may have a lower capacity to make scheduled payments of interest or principal on their borrowings during these periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the estimated value of the collateral, particularly real estate, securing some of the Company’s loans. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, certain events may occur, including, but not limited to, adverse economic conditions and adverse events affecting specific clients, industries or markets, that could adversely affect the ability of borrowers to make timely scheduled principal and interest payments on their loans. The Company internally risk rates loans based on individual credit criteria on at least a quarterly basis. Borrowers provide the Company with financial information on either a quarterly or monthly basis. Loan ratings as well as identification of impaired loans are dynamically updated to reflect changes in borrower condition or profile. A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due to it according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include all non-accrual loans, loans with partial charge-offs and loans which are troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”). The Company utilizes a number of analytical tools for the purpose of estimating probability of default and loss given default for its lending groups. The quantitative models employed by the Company in its Leveraged Finance business utilize Moody’s KMV RiskCalc credit risk model in combination with a proprietary qualitative model, which generates a rating that maps to a probability of default estimate. The Real Estate lending group utilizes a proprietary model that has been developed to capture risk characteristics unique to the lending activities in that line of business. The model produces an obligor risk rating which corresponds to a probability of default and also produces a loss given default. In each case, the probability of default and the loss given default are used to calculate an expected loss for those lending groups. P rior to the sale of the Equipment Finance assets, management used similar models for its Equipment Finance portfolio as its Leveraged Finance group. Prior to the sale of Loans and leases which are rated at or below a specified threshold are typically classified as “Pass”, and loans and leases rated above that threshold are typically classified as “Criticized”, a characterization that may apply to impaired loans, including TDR. As of December 31, 2016, $118.7 million of the Company’s loans were classified as “Criticized”, all of which were impaired loans, and $3.2 billion were classified as “Pass”. As of December 31, 2015, $152.1 million of the Company’s loans were classified as “Criticized”, including $143.6 million of the Company’s impaired loans, and $3.1 billion were classified as “Pass”. When the Company determines a loan is impaired, the Company will evaluate the loan individually and if necessary establish a specific allowance. The loan will be analyzed and may be placed on non-accrual status. If the asset deteriorates further, the specific allowance may increase, and ultimately may result in a loss and charge-off. A TDR that performs in accordance with the terms of the restructuring may improve its risk profile over time. While the concessions in terms of pricing or amortization may not have been reversed and further amended to “market” levels, the financial condition of the borrower may improve over time to the point where the rating improves from the “Criticized” classification that was appropriate immediately prior to, or at, restructuring. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The measurement of impairment of a loan is based upon (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (ii) the loan’s observable market price, or (iii) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, depending on the circumstances and our collection strategy. Impaired loans are identified based on the loan-by-loan risk rating process described above. It is the Company’s policy during the reporting period to record a specific provision for credit losses for all loans for which we have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $133.4 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $114.8 million have been restructured and classified as TDR. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate carrying value of equity investments in certain of the Company’s borrowers in connection with TDRs totaled $9.9 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $99.2 million were also on non-accrual status. These non-accrual loans had a carrying value of $92.9 million before specific reserves. For impaired loans on non-accrual status, the Company’s policy is to reverse the accrued interest previously recognized as interest income subsequent to the last cash receipt in the current year. The recognition of interest income on the loan only resumes when factors indicating doubtful collection no longer exist and the non-accrual loan has been brought current. During 2016, the Company charged off $25.7 million of outstanding non-accrual loans. During 2016, the Company placed loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $27.1 million on non-accrual status and no loans were returned to performing status. During 2016, the Company recorded $24.8 million of net specific provisions for impaired loans. At December 31, 2016, the Company had a $19.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $73.5 million. At December 31, 2016, additional funding commitments for impaired loans totaled $11.9 million. The Company’s obligation to fulfill the additional funding commitments on impaired loans is generally contingent on the borrower’s compliance with the terms of the credit agreement and the borrowing base availability for asset-based loans, or if the borrower is not in compliance additional funding commitments may be made at the Company’s discretion. As of December 31, 2016, loans to two borrowers totaling approximately $21.1 million were on non-accrual status and were greater than 60 days past due and classified as delinquent by the Company. Included in the $19.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans was $7.9 million related to delinquent loans. During 2016, the Company foreclosed on a held-for-sale impaired real estate loan. Simultaneous with the foreclosure, the Company sold a portion of the property for $8.5 million and applied the proceeds to the principal loan balance. The remaining $15.8 million was transferred to Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”). During 2015, the Company sold one commercial real estate OREO property for $3.0 million resulting in a loss on sale of $0.01 million. During 2014, the Company sold one commercial real estate OREO property for $9.5 million resulting in a gain on sale of $0.01 million. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $193.2 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $183.6 million had been restructured and classified as TDR. As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate carrying value of equity investments in certain of the Company’s borrowers in connection with TDRs totaled $11.4 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $111.3 million were also on non-accrual status. These non-accrual loans had a carrying value of $104.7 million before specific reserves. During 2015, the Company charged off $4.0 million of outstanding non-accrual loans. During 2015, the Company placed loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $38.2 million on non-accrual status and returned loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $0.9 million to performing status. During 2015, the Company recorded $9.5 million of net specific provisions for impaired loans. At December 31, 2015, the Company had a $26.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $121.1 million. At December 31, 2015, additional funding commitments for impaired loans totaled $10.9 million. As of December 31, 2015, $18.6 million of loans on non-accrual status were greater than 60 days past due and classified as delinquent by the Company. Included in the $26.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans was $2.8 million related to delinquent loans. A summary of impaired loans is as follows: Investment, Net of Charge-offs Investment, Net of Unamortized Discount/Premium Unpaid Principal ($ in thousands) December 31, 2016 Leveraged Finance $ 133,413 $ 126,839 $ 154,879 Real Estate — — — Total $ 133,413 $ 126,839 $ 154,879 December 31, 2015 Leveraged Finance $ 157,446 $ 150,692 $ 188,453 Business Credit — — — Real Estate 34,941 34,915 38,286 Equipment Finance 772 709 772 Total $ 193,159 $ 186,316 $ 227,511 Recorded Investment Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment, net, with a Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment without a Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment, net, without a Related Allowance for Credit Losses ($ in thousands) December 31, 2016 Leveraged Finance $ 73,499 $ 68,924 $ 59,914 $ 57,915 Total $ 73,499 $ 68,924 $ 59,914 $ 57,915 December 31, 2015 Leveraged Finance $ 113,397 $ 106,762 $ 44,049 $ 43,930 Real Estate 7,705 7,705 27,236 27,210 Equipment Finance — — 772 709 Total $ 121,102 $ 114,467 $ 72,057 $ 71,849 During 2016, 2015 and 2014 the Company recorded net charge-offs of $33.0 million, $3.4 million and $25.3 million, respectively. During 2016, 2015 and 2014 the Company recorded recoveries of previously charged-off loans of $0.4 million, $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively. When a loan is determined to be uncollectible, the specific allowance is charged off, which reduces the gross investment in the loan. The Company may record the initial specific allowance related to an impaired loan in the same period as it records a partial charge-off in certain circumstances such as if the terms of a restructured loan are finalized during that period. While charge-offs typically have no net impact on the carrying value of net loans and leases, charge-offs lower the level of the allowance for loan and lease losses; and, as a result, reduce the percentage of allowance for loans and leases to total loans and leases, and the percentage of allowance for loan and leases losses to non-performing loans. Below is a summary of the Company’s evaluation of its amortized cost portfolio and allowance for loan and lease losses by impairment methodology: Leveraged Finance Real Estate December 31, 2016 Investment Allowance Investment Allowance ($ in thousands) Collectively evaluated (1)(2) $ 2,771,768 $ 31,073 $ 10,624 $ 92 Individually evaluated (3) 133,413 19,771 — — Total $ 2,905,181 $ 50,844 $ 10,624 $ 92 Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance December 31, 2015 Investment Allowance Investment Allowance Investment Allowance Investment Allowance ($ in thousands) Collectively evaluated (1) $ 2,469,868 $ 27,874 $ 342,281 $ 1,991 $ 65,791 $ 350 $ 172,481 $ 1,291 Individually evaluated (3) 157,446 26,447 — — 34,941 306 772 — Total $ 2,627,314 $ 54,321 $ 342,281 $ 1,991 $ 100,732 $ 656 $ 173,253 $ 1,291 (1) Represents loans and leases collectively evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, and pursuant to amendments by ASU 2010-20 regarding allowance for unimpaired loans and leases. (2) Excludes $403.7 million Leveraged Finance loans which the Company elected to record at fair value. (3) Represents loans individually evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASU 310-10, Receivables, Below is a summary of the Company’s net investment in nonaccrual loans: Recorded Investment in Nonaccrual Loans December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 99,233 $ 103,563 Real Estate — 7,705 Total $ 99,233 $ 111,268 Less: Deferred fees (6,485 ) (6,616 ) Add back: Interest Receivable 116 34 Total $ 92,864 $ 104,686 Loans being restructured typically develop adverse performance trends as a result of internal or external factors, the result of which is an inability to comply with the terms of the applicable credit agreement governing their obligations to the Company. In order to mitigate default risk and/or liquidation, assuming that liquidation proceeds are not viewed as a more favorable outcome to the Company and other lenders, the Company will enter into negotiations with the borrower and its shareholders on the terms of a restructuring. When restructuring a loan, the Company undertakes an extensive diligence process which typically includes (i) construction of a financial model that runs through the tenor of the restructuring term, (ii) meetings with management of the borrower, (iii) engagement of third party consultants and (iv) internal analysis. Once a restructuring proposal is developed, it is subject to approval by both the Company’s Underwriting Committee and the Company’s Investment Committee. Loans will be removed from TDR classification after a period of performance following the refinancing of outstanding obligations on terms which are determined to be “market” in all material respects, or upon full payoff of the loan. The Company may modify loans that are not determined to be a TDR. Where a loan is modified or restructured but loan terms are considered market and no concessions were given on the loan terms, including price, principal amortization or obligation, or other restrictive covenants, a loan will not be classified as a TDR. The Company has made the following types of concessions in the context of a TDR: Group I: • extension of principal repayment term • principal holidays • interest rate adjustments Group II: • partial forgiveness • conversion of debt to equity A summary of the types of concessions that the Company made with respect to TDRs at December 31, 2016 and 2015 is provided below: ($ in thousands) Group I Group II December 31, 2016 $ 114,803 $ 77,061 December 31, 2015 $ 183,573 $ 162,986 Note: A loan may be included in both restructuring groups, but not repeated within each group. For 2016 and 2015, the Company had net charge-offs totaling $26.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, related to loans previously classified as a TDR. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had not removed the TDR classification from any loan previously identified as such, but had charged-off, sold and received repayments of outstanding TDRs. The Company measures TDRs similarly to how it measures all loans for impairment. The Company performs a discounted cash flow analysis on cash flow dependent loans and assesses the underlying collateral value less reasonable costs of sale for collateral dependent loans. Management analyzes the projected performance of the borrower to determine if it has the ability to service principal and interest payments based on the terms of the restructuring. Loans will typically not be returned to accrual status until at least six months of contractual payments have been made in a timely manner or the borrower shows significant ability to maintain servicing of the restructured debt. Additionally, at the time of a restructuring and quarterly thereafter, an impairment analysis is undertaken to determine the measurement of specific reserve, if any, on each impaired loan. Below is a summary of the Company’s loans which were classified as TDR: For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Investment in TDR Subsequently Defaulted ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 49,536 $ 27,216 $ 18,916 Real Estate (1) — — 4,483 Total $ 49,536 $ 27,216 $ 23,399 (1) Amount reflects charge-off on an impaired Real Estate TDR that was taken prior to transfer to held-for-sale. For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Investment in TDR Subsequently Defaulted ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 13,650 $ 13,650 $ 29,339 Business Credit — — — Real Estate 27,704 27,704 — Equipment Finance 922 922 — Total $ 42,276 $ 42,276 $ 29,339 The following sets forth a breakdown of TDRs at December 31, 2016 and 2015: As of December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands) Accrual Status Impaired Specific For the year Loan Type Accruing Nonaccrual Balance Allowance Charged-off Leveraged Finance $ 24,367 $ 90,436 $ 114,803 $ 15,939 $ 26,684 Total $ 24,367 $ 90,436 $ 114,803 $ 15,939 $ 26,684 As of December 31, 2015 ($ in thousands) Accrual Status Impaired Specific For the year Loan Type Accruing Nonaccrual Balance Allowance Charged-off Leveraged Finance $ 53,883 $ 93,977 $ 147,860 $ 24,958 $ 4,000 Real Estate 27,236 7,705 34,941 — — Equipment Finance 772 — 772 — — Total $ 81,891 $ 101,682 $ 183,573 $ 24,958 $ 4,000 The Company classifies a loan as Past Due when it is over 60 days delinquent. An aged analysis of the Company’s past due receivables is as follows: 60-89 Days Past Due Greater than 90 Days Total Past Due Current Total Loans and Leases Investment in > 60 Days & Accruing December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ — $ 21,135 $ 21,135 $ 3,287,791 $ 3,308,926 $ — Real Estate — — $ — 10,624 10,624 — Total $ — $ 21,135 $ 21,135 $ 3,298,415 $ 3,319,550 $ — December 31, 2015 Leveraged Finance $ — $ 27,165 $ 27,165 $ 2,600,149 $ 2,627,314 $ 8,530 Business Credit — — — 342,281 342,281 — Real Estate — — — 100,732 100,732 — Equipment Finance — — — 173,253 173,253 — Total $ — $ 27,165 $ 27,165 $ 3,216,415 $ 3,243,580 $ 8,530 A general allowance is provided for loans and leases within the amortized portfolio that are not impaired. The Company employs a variety of internally developed and third-party modeling and estimation tools for measuring credit risk, which are used in developing an allowance for loan and lease losses on outstanding loans and leases held at amortized cost. The Company’s allowance framework addresses economic conditions, capital market liquidity and industry circumstances from both a top-down and bottom-up perspective. The Company considers and evaluates a number of factors, including but not limited to, changes in economic conditions, credit availability, industry, loss emergence period, and multiple obligor concentrations in assessing both probabilities of default and loss severities as part of the general component of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The Company continually evaluates the appropriateness of its allowance for credit losses methodology. Based on the Company’s evaluation process to determine the level of the allowance for loan and lease losses, management believes the allowance to be adequate as of December 31, 2016 in light of the estimated known and inherent risks identified through its analysis. The Company closely monitors the credit quality of its loans and leases which is partly reflected in its credit metrics such as loan delinquencies, non-accruals and charge-offs. Changes in these credit metrics are largely due to changes in economic conditions and seasoning of the loan and lease portfolio. On at least a quarterly basis, loans and leases are internally risk-rated based on individual credit criteria, including loan and lease type, loan and lease structures (including balloon and bullet structures common in the Company’s Leveraged Finance and Real Estate cash flow loans), borrower industry, payment capacity, location and quality of collateral if any (including the Company’s Real Estate loans). Borrowers provide the Company with financial information on either a monthly or quarterly basis. Ratings, corresponding assumed default rates and assumed loss severities are dynamically updated to reflect any changes in borrower condition and/or profile. For Leveraged Finance loans and Equipment Finance loans and leases (prior to the latter being sold), the data set used to construct probabilities of default in its allowance for loan losses model, Moody’s CRD Private Firm Database, primarily contains middle market loans that share attributes similar to the Company’s loans. The Company also considers the quality of the loan or lease terms and lender protections in determining a loan loss in the event of default. For Real Estate loans, the Company employs two mechanisms to capture the impact of industry and economic conditions. First, a loan’s risk rating, and thereby its assumed default likelihood, can be adjusted to account for overall commercial real estate market conditions. Second, to the extent that economic or industry trends adversely affect a substandard rated borrower’s loan-to-value ratio enough to impact its repayment ability, the Company applies a stress multiplier to the loan’s probability of default. The multiplier is designed to account for default characteristics that are difficult to quantify when market conditions cause commercial real estate prices to decline. Prior to the sale of Business Credit, the Company utilized a proprietary model to risk rate the loans on a monthly basis. This model captured the impact of changes in industry and economic conditions as well as changes in the quality of the borrower’s collateral and financial performance to assign a final risk rating. The Company also evaluated historical net loss trends by risk rating from a comprehensive industry database covering more than twenty-five years of experience of the majority of the asset based lenders operating in the United States. Based upon the monthly risk rating from the model, the reserve was adjusted to reflect the historical average for expected loss from the industry database. For consolidated VIEs to which the Company had provided transitional capital, we utilized a qualitative analysis which considered the business plans related to the entity, including expected hold periods, the terms of the agreements related to the entity, the Company’s historical credit experience, the credit migration of the entity’s loans to determine expected loss, as well as conditions in the capital markets. The Company provided capital on a transitional basis to the Arlington Fund, prior to the completion of its term debt securitization on June 26, 2014. During the transitional hold period, the expected and actual loss on the Arlington Fund was zero and no allowance was recorded. The Company deconsolidated the Arlington Fund on June 26, 2014. The Company did not recognize any losses on loans on the date of deconsolidation. If the Company determines that changes in its allowance for credit losses methodology are advisable, as a result of changes in the economic environment or otherwise, the revised allowance methodology may result in higher or lower levels of allowance. Moreover, given uncertain market conditions, actual losses under the Company’s current or any revised allowance methodology may differ materially from the Company’s estimate. A summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2016 Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 54,788 $ 1,991 $ 656 $ 1,291 $ 58,726 Provision for credit losses—general 3,204 (172 ) 1,010 (1,291 ) 2,751 Provision for credit losses—specific 20,483 — 4,307 — 24,790 Reversal due to sale of Business Credit — (1,819 ) — — (1,819 ) Loans charged off, net of recoveries (27,159 ) — (5,881 ) — (33,040 ) Balance, end of period $ 51,316 $ — $ 92 $ — $ 51,408 Balance, end of period—specific $ 19,771 $ — $ — $ — $ 19,771 Balance, end of period—general $ 31,545 $ — $ 92 $ — $ 31,637 Average balance of impaired loans $ 176,286 $ — $ 24,595 $ — $ 200,881 Average net book value of impaired leases — — — 542 542 Interest recognized from impaired loans and leases $ 9,679 $ — $ 1,220 $ 12 $ 10,911 Loans and leases (1) Loans individually evaluated with specific allowance $ 73,499 $ — $ — $ — $ 73,499 Loans individually evaluated with no specific allowance 59,914 — — — 59,914 Loans and leases collectively evaluated without specific allowance 2,771,768 — 10,624 — 2,782,392 Total loans and leases $ 2,905,181 $ — $ 10,624 $ — $ 2,915,805 (1) Excludes $403.7 million of Leveraged Finance loans which the Company elected to record at fair value. Year Ended December 31, 2015 Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 41,480 $ 1,334 $ 257 $ 622 $ 43,693 Provision for credit losses—general 7,473 657 93 669 8,892 Provision for credit losses—specific 9,043 — 306 146 9,495 Loans charged off, net of recoveries (3,208 ) — — (146 ) (3,354 ) Balance, end of period $ 54,788 $ 1,991 $ 656 $ 1,291 $ 58,726 Balance, end of period—specific $ 26,447 $ — $ 306 $ — $ 26,753 Balance, end of period—general $ 28,341 $ 1,991 $ 350 $ 1,291 $ 31,973 Average balance of impaired loans $ 172,578 $ — $ 36,106 $ — $ 208,684 Average net book value of impaired leases — — — 863 863 Interest recognized from impaired loans and leases $ 11,370 $ — $ 1,584 $ 36 $ 12,990 Loans and leases Loans individually evaluated with specific allowance $ 113,397 $ — $ 7,705 $ — $ 121,102 Loans individually evaluated with no specific allowance 44,049 — 27,236 772 72,057 Loans and leases collectively evaluated without specific allowance 2,469,868 342,281 65,791 172,481 3,050,421 Total loans and leases $ 2,627,314 $ 342,281 $ 100,732 $ 173,253 $ 3,243,580 Included in the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2016 and 2015 is an allowance for unfunded commitments of $0.5 million, which is recorded as a component of other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with changes recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The methodology for determining the allowance for unfunded commitments is consistent with the methodology for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses. During 2016, the Company recorded a total provision for credit losses of $27.5 million. The Company decreased its allowance for credit losses to $51.4 million as of December 31, 2016 from $58.7 million at December 31, 2015. The Company had $33.0 million of net charge-offs and increased its general allowance for credit losses by 10 basis points during 2016, and recorded new specific provisions for credit losses of $24.8 million. The general allowance for credit losses covers probable losses incurred in the Company’s loan and lease amortized cost portfolio with respect to loans and leases for which no specific impairment has been identified. When a loan is classified as impaired, the loan is evaluated for a specific allowance and a specific provision may be recorded, thereby removing it from consideration under the general component of the allowance analysis. Loans that are deemed to be uncollectible are charged off and deducted from the allowance, and recoveries on loans previously charged off are netted against loans charged off. A specific provision for credit losses is recorded with respect to impaired loans for which it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement for which there is impairment recognized. The outstanding balance of impaired loans, which include all of the outstanding balances of the Company’s delinquent loans and its TDRs, as a percentage of “Loans and leases, net” was 4% as of December 31, 2016 and 6% as of December 31, 2015. |