Loans Held-for-Sale, Loans, Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses | Note 4. Loans Held-for-Sale, Loans, Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, loans held-for-sale consisted of the following: June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 350,016 $ 146,126 Lower cost or market adjustment (259 ) (160 ) Gross loans held-for-sale 349,757 145,966 Deferred loan fees, net (3,131 ) (1,906 ) Loans held-for-sale, net $ 346,626 $ 144,060 These loans are carried at the lower of aggregate cost, net of any deferred origination costs or fees, or fair value. At June 30, 2017, loans held-for-sale consisted of loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $350.0 million that were intended to be sold to credit funds managed by the Company. The Company sold loans with an outstanding balance totaling $34.7 million to entities other than credit funds managed by the Company for an aggregate gain of $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company sold loans with an outstanding balance of $129.4 million for a net loss of $0.09 million to entities other than credit funds managed by the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2016. As of June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, loans consisted of the following: June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance (1) $ 3,099,400 $ 3,308,926 Real Estate 10,673 10,624 Gross loans 3,110,073 3,319,550 Deferred loan fees and discount, net (25,898 ) (29,423 ) Allowance for loan losses (46,812 ) (50,936 ) Total loans, net $ 3,037,363 $ 3,239,191 (1) Includes loans at fair value of $ 403.1 million and $403.7 million, respectively. The Company holds broadly syndicated loans in our fair value portfolio as part of our liquid credit strategy, which by nature tend to experience higher prepayment and refinancing rates compared to our middle market loans. As a result this portfolio may be more actively managed to optimize performance. The Company provides commercial loans to customers throughout the United States. The Company’s borrowers may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and, as a result, may have a lower capacity to make scheduled payments of interest or principal on their borrowings during these periods. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, certain events may occur, including, but not limited to, adverse economic conditions and adverse events affecting specific clients, industries or markets, that could adversely affect the ability of borrowers to make timely scheduled principal and interest payments on their loans. The Company internally risk rates loans based on individual credit criteria on at least a quarterly basis. Borrowers provide the Company with financial information on either a quarterly or monthly basis. Loan ratings as well as identification of impaired loans are dynamically updated to reflect changes in borrower condition or profile. A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due to it according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include all non-accrual loans, loans with partial charge-offs and loans which are troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). The Company utilizes a number of analytical tools for the purpose of estimating probability of default and loss given default for its lending groups. The quantitative models employed by the Company in its Leveraged Finance business utilize Moody’s KMV RiskCalc credit risk model in combination with a proprietary qualitative model, which generates a rating that maps to a probability of default estimate. For real estate loans, the Company utilizes a proprietary model that has been developed to capture risk characteristics unique to the lending activities in that line of business. Together, these models produce a suggested obligor risk rating which corresponds to a probability of default and also produces a loss given default. In each case, the probability of default and the loss given default are used to calculate an expected loss for those lending groups. P rior to the sale of the Equipment Finance assets, management used similar models for its Equipment Finance portfolio as its Leveraged Finance group. Prior to the sale of Loans which are rated at or better than a specified threshold are typically classified as “Pass”, and loans rated worse than that threshold are typically classified as “Criticized”, a characterization that may apply to impaired loans, including TDR. As of June 30, 2017, $101.8 million of the Company’s loans were classified as “Criticized,” all of which were impaired loans, and $3.0 billion were classified as “Pass”. As of December 31, 2016, $118.7 million of the Company’s loans were classified as “Criticized” all of which were impaired loans, and $3.2 billion were classified as “Pass”. When the Company determines a loan is impaired, the Company will evaluate the loan individually and, if necessary, establish a specific allowance. The loan will be analyzed and may be placed on non-accrual status. If the asset deteriorates further, the specific allowance may increase, and ultimately may result in a loss and charge-off. A TDR that performs in accordance with the terms of its restructuring may improve its risk profile over time. While the concessions in terms of pricing or amortization may not have been reversed and further amended to “market” levels, the financial condition of the borrower may improve over time to the point where the rating improves from the “Criticized” classification that was appropriate immediately prior to, or at, restructuring. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The measurement of impairment of a loan is based upon (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (ii) the loan’s observable market price, or (iii) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, depending on the circumstances and our collection strategy. Impaired loans are identified based on the loan-by-loan risk rating process described above. It is the Company’s policy during the reporting period to record a specific provision for credit losses and/or partial or full charge off for all loans for which we have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had investments, net of charge-offs in impaired loans with a balance of $121.8 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $94.9 million have been restructured and classified as TDRs. At June 30, 2017, additional funding commitments for TDRs totaled $5.4 million. As of June 30, 2017, the aggregate carrying value of equity investments in certain of the Company’s borrowers in connection with troubled debt restructurings totaled $9.9 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $95.1 million were also on non-accrual status. These non-accrual loans had a carrying value of $88.7 million before specific reserves. For impaired loans on non-accrual status, the Company’s policy is to reverse the accrued interest previously recognized as interest income subsequent to the last cash receipt in the current year. The recognition of interest income on the loan only resumes when factors indicating doubtful collection no longer exist and the non-accrual loan payment status has been brought current. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company charged off $7.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively of non-accruing loan balances. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company placed no new loans on non-accrual status. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company placed loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $8.5 million on non-accrual status. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded $3.3 million and $9.6 million, respectively, of net specific provisions for impaired loans. At June 30, 2017, the Company had a $16.4 million specific allowance for impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $79.1 million. At June 30, 2017, additional funding commitments for impaired loans totaled $8.3 million. The Company’s obligation to fulfill the additional funding commitments on impaired loans is generally contingent on the borrower’s compliance with the terms of the credit agreement, or if the borrower is not in compliance additional funding commitments may be made at the Company’s discretion. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had loans totaling $14.1 million on non-accrual status which were greater than 60 days past due and classified as delinquent by the Company. Included in the $16.4 million specific allowance for impaired loans was $1.8 million related to delinquent loans. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had investments, net of charge offs in impaired loans with a balance of $133.4 million. At that date, impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $114.8 million had been restructured and classified as TDR. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate carrying value of equity investments in certain of the Company’s borrowers in connection with troubled debt restructurings totaled $9.9 million. Impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $99.2 million were also on non-accrual status. These non-accrual loans had a carrying value of $92.9 million before specific reserves. During 2016, the Company charged off $25.7 million of outstanding non-accrual loans. During 2016, the Company placed loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $27.1 million on non-accrual status and no loans were returned to performing status. During 2016, the Company recorded $24.8 million of net specific provisions for impaired loans. At December 31, 2016, the Company had a $19.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $73.5 million. At December 31, 2016, additional funding commitments for impaired loans totaled $11.9 million. As of December 31, 2016, loans to two borrowers totaling approximately $21.1 million were on non-accrual status and were greater than 60 days past due and classified as delinquent by the Company. Included in the $19.8 million specific allowance for impaired loans was $7.9 million related to delinquent loans. A summary of impaired loans is as follows: Investment, Net of Charge-offs Investment, Net of Unamortized Discount/Premium Unpaid Principal ($ in thousands) June 30, 2017 Impaired loans $ 121,822 $ 115,207 $ 151,190 December 31, 2016 Impaired loans $ 133,413 $ 126,839 $ 154,879 Recorded Investment Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment, net, with a Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment without a Related Allowance for Credit Losses Recorded Investment, net, without a Related Allowance for Credit Losses ($ in thousands) June 30, 2017 Impaired loans $ 79,116 $ 74,497 $ 42,706 $ 40,710 December 31, 2016 Impaired loans $ 73,499 $ 68,924 $ 59,914 $ 57,915 During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded net partial charge-offs of $7.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded net charge-offs of $6.9 million and $14.2 million, respectively. When a loan is determined to be uncollectible, the specific allowance is charged off, which reduces the gross investment in the loan. The Company may record the initial specific allowance related to an impaired loan in the same period as it records a partial charge-off in certain circumstances such as if the terms of a restructured loan are finalized during that period. While charge-offs typically have no net impact on the carrying value of net loans, charge-offs lower the level of the allowance for loan losses, and, as a result, reduce the percentage of allowance for loans to total loans, and the percentage of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans. Below is a summary of the Company’s evaluation of its amortized cost portfolio and allowance for loan losses by impairment methodology: Leveraged Finance Real Estate June 30, 2017 Investment Allowance Investment Allowance ($ in thousands) Collectively evaluated (1)(2) $ 2,574,449 $ 30,357 $ 10,673 $ 92 Individually evaluated (3) 121,822 16,363 — — Total $ 2,696,271 $ 46,720 $ 10,673 $ 92 Leveraged Finance Real Estate December 31, 2016 Investment Allowance Investment Allowance ($ in thousands) Collectively evaluated (1)(2) $ 2,771,768 $ 31,073 $ 10,624 $ 92 Individually evaluated (3) 133,413 19,771 — — Total $ 2,905,181 $ 50,844 $ 10,624 $ 92 (1) Represents loans collectively evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, and pursuant to amendments by ASU 2010-20 regarding allowance for unimpaired loans. These loans had a weighted average risk rating of 5.3 and 5.2 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, based on the Company’s internally developed 12 point scale for the Leveraged Finance and Real Estate loans. (2) Excludes $403.1 million at June 30, 2017 and $403.7 million at December 31, 2016 of Leveraged Finance loans which the Company elected to record at fair value. (3) Represents loans individually evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASU 310-10, Receivables, Below is a summary of the Company’s investment in nonaccrual loans. Recorded Investment in Nonaccrual Loans June 30, 2017 December ($ in thousands) Nonaccrual loans $ 95,102 $ 99,233 Less: Deferred loan fees (6,615 ) (6,485 ) Add back: Interest receivable 182 116 Total $ 88,669 $ 92,864 Loans being restructured have typically developed adverse performance trends as a result of various factors, the result of which is an inability to comply with the terms of the applicable credit agreement governing the borrowers’ obligations to the Company. In order to mitigate default risk and/or liquidation, assuming that liquidation proceeds are not viewed as a more favorable outcome to the Company and other lenders, the Company will enter into negotiations with the borrower and its shareholders on the terms of a restructuring. When restructuring a loan, the Company undertakes an extensive diligence process which typically includes (i) development of a financial model with a forecast horizon that matches the term of the proposed restructuring, (ii) meetings with management of the borrower, (iii) engagement of third party consultants and (iv) other internal analyses. Once a restructuring proposal is developed, it is subject to approval by both the Company’s Underwriting and Investment Committee. Loans are only removed from TDR classification after a period of performance following the refinancing of outstanding obligations on terms which are determined to be “market” in all material respects. The Company may modify loans that are not determined to be a TDR. Where a loan is modified or restructured but loan terms are considered market and no concessions were given on the loan terms, including price, principal amortization or obligation, or other restrictive covenants, a loan will not be classified as a TDR. The Company has made the following types of concessions in the context of a TDR: Group I: • extension of principal repayment term • principal holidays • interest rate adjustments Group II: • partial forgiveness • conversion of debt to equity A summary of the types of concessions that the Company made with respect to TDRs at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is provided below: Group I Group II ($ in thousands) June 30, 2017 $ 94,881 $ 62,057 December 31, 2016 $ 114,803 $ 77,061 Note: A loan may be included in both restructuring groups, but not repeated within each group. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded $7.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively, of partial charge-offs related to loans previously classified as TDR. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had not removed the TDR classification from any loan previously identified as such during the quarter, but had charged-off, sold and received repayments of outstanding TDRs. The Company measures TDRs similarly to how it measures all loans for impairment. The Company performs a discounted cash flow analysis on cash flow dependent loans and assesses the underlying collateral value less reasonable costs of sale for collateral dependent loans. Management analyzes the projected performance of the borrower to determine if it has the ability to service principal and interest payments based on the terms of the restructuring. Loans will typically not be returned to accrual status until at least six months of contractual payments have been made in a timely manner or the borrower shows significant ability to maintain servicing of the restructured debt. Additionally, at the time of a restructuring and quarterly thereafter, an impairment analysis is undertaken to determine the measurement of specific reserve, if any, on each impaired loan. Below is a summary of the Company’s loans which were newly classified as TDR and existing TDR loans which subsequently defaulted, in each during the periods presented. As of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Investment in TDR Subsequently Defaulted ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ — $ — $ 14,615 Total $ — $ — $ 14,615 As of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Investment in TDR Subsequently Defaulted ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ — $ — $ 29,971 Total $ — $ — $ 29,971 As of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Investment in TDR Subsequently Defaulted ($ in thousands) Leveraged Finance $ 1,775 $ 1,308 $ — Real Estate — — 4,483 Total $ 1,775 $ 1,308 $ 4,483 The following sets forth a breakdown of troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016: As of June 30, 2017 Accrual Status For the six months ($ in thousands) Loan Type Accruing Nonaccrual Impaired Balance Specific Allowance Charged-off Leveraged Finance $ 16,087 $ 78,801 $ 94,888 $ 10,791 $ 7,494 Total $ 16,087 $ 78,801 $ 94,888 $ 10,791 $ 7,494 As of December 31, 2016 Accrual Status For the year ($ in thousands) Loan Type Accruing Nonaccrual Impaired Balance Specific Allowance Charged-off Leveraged Finance $ 24,367 $ 90,436 $ 114,803 $ 15,939 $ 26,684 Total $ 24,367 $ 90,436 $ 114,803 $ 15,939 $ 26,684 The Company classifies a loan as delinquent when it is over 60 days past due. An age analysis of the Company’s delinquent receivables is as follows: 60-89 Days Past Due Greater than 90 Days Total Past Due Current Total Loans Investment > 60 Days & Accruing ($ in thousands) June 30, 2017 Leveraged Finance $ — $ 14,110 $ 14,110 $ 3,085,290 $ 3,099,400 $ — Real Estate — — — 10,673 10,673 — Total $ — $ 14,110 $ 14,110 $ 3,095,963 $ 3,110,073 $ — 60-89 Days Past Due Greater than 90 Days Total Past Due Current Total Loans Investment in > 60 Days & Accruing ($ in thousands) December 31, 2016 Leveraged Finance $ — $ 21,135 $ 21,135 $ 3,287,791 $ 3,308,926 $ — Real Estate — — — 10,624 10,624 — Total $ — $ 21,135 $ 21,135 $ 3,298,415 $ 3,319,550 $ — A general allowance is provided for loans within the amortized portfolio that are not impaired. The Company employs a variety of internally developed and third-party modeling and estimation tools for measuring credit risk, which are used in developing an allowance for loan losses on outstanding loans held at amortized cost. The Company’s allowance framework addresses economic conditions, capital market liquidity and industry circumstances from both a top-down and bottom-up perspective. The Company considers and evaluates a number of factors, including but not limited to, changes in economic conditions, credit availability, industry, loss emergence period, and multiple obligor concentrations in assessing both probabilities of default and loss severities as part of the general component of the allowance for loan losses. The Company continually evaluates the appropriateness of its allowance for credit losses methodology. Based on the Company’s evaluation process to determine the level of the allowance for loan losses, management believes the allowance to be adequate as of June 30, 2017 in light of the estimated known and inherent risks identified through its analysis. The Company closely monitors the credit quality of its loans which is partly reflected in its credit metrics such as loan delinquencies, non-accruals and charge-offs. Changes in these credit metrics are largely due to changes in economic conditions and seasoning of the loan portfolio. On at least a quarterly basis, loans are internally risk-rated based on individual credit criteria, including loan type, loan structures (including balloon and bullet structures common in the Company’s Leveraged Finance and Real Estate cash flow loans), borrower industry, payment capacity, location and quality of collateral if any (including the Company’s Real Estate loans). Borrowers provide the Company with financial information on either a monthly or quarterly basis. Ratings, corresponding assumed default rates and assumed loss severities are dynamically updated to reflect any changes in borrower condition and/or profile. For Leveraged Finance loans and Equipment Finance loans and leases (prior to the sale of the latter), the data set used to construct probabilities of default in its allowance for loan losses model, Moody’s CRD Private Firm Database, primarily contains middle market loans that share attributes similar to the Company’s loans. The Company also considers the quality of the loan terms and lender protections in determining a loan loss in the event of default. For Real Estate loans, the Company employs two mechanisms to capture the impact of industry and economic conditions. First, a loan’s risk rating, and thereby its assumed default likelihood, can be adjusted to account for overall commercial real estate market conditions. Second, to the extent that economic or industry trends adversely affect a substandard rated borrower’s loan-to-value ratio enough to impact its repayment ability, the Company applies a stress multiplier to the loan’s probability of default. The multiplier is designed to account for default characteristics that are difficult to quantify when market conditions cause commercial real estate prices to decline. Prior to the sale of Business Credit, the Company utilized a proprietary model to risk rate the loans on a monthly basis. This model captured the impact of changes in industry and economic conditions as well as changes in the quality of the borrower’s collateral and financial performance to assign a final risk rating. The Company also evaluated historical net loss trends by risk rating from a comprehensive industry database covering more than twenty-five years of experience of the majority of the asset based lenders operating in the United States. Based upon the monthly risk rating from the model, the reserve was adjusted to reflect the historical average for expected loss from the industry database. The Company periodically reviews its allowance for credit loss methodology to assess any necessary adjustments based upon changing economic and capital market conditions. If the Company determines that changes in its allowance for credit losses methodology are advisable, as a result of changes in the economic environment or otherwise, the revised allowance methodology may result in higher or lower levels of allowance. Additionally, when determining the amount of the general allowance, the Company supplements the base amount with an environmental reserve amount which is governed by a score card system comprised of seven risk factors. The risk factors are designed based on those outlined in the Comptrollers of the Currency’s Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Handbook. The Company also performs a ratio analysis of comparable money center banks, regional banks and finance companies. While the Company does not rely on this peer group comparison to set the level of allowance for credit losses, use of the peer group does assist management in identifying market trends and serves as an overall reasonableness check on the allowance for credit losses computation. A summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses is as follows: Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Leveraged Finance Real Estate Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 51,989 $ 92 $ 52,081 Provision (reversal) for credit losses—general (600 ) — (600 ) Provision for credit losses—specific 3,297 — 3,297 Loans charged off, net of recoveries (7,494 ) — (7,494 ) Balance, end of period $ 47,192 $ 92 $ 47,284 Balance, end of period—specific $ 16,363 $ — $ 16,363 Balance, end of period—general $ 30,829 $ 92 $ 30,921 Average balance of impaired loans $ 129,780 $ — $ 129,780 Interest recognized from impaired loans $ 267 $ — $ 267 Loans (1) Loans individually evaluated with specific allowance $ 79,116 $ — $ 79,116 Loans individually evaluated with no specific allowance 42,706 — 42,706 Loans collectively evaluated with general allowance 2,574,449 10,673 2,585,122 Total loans $ 2,696,271 $ 10,673 $ 2,706,944 (1) Excludes $403.1 million of Leveraged Finance loans which the Company elected to record at fair value. Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Leveraged Finance Real Estate Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 51,316 $ 92 $ 51,408 Provision for credit losses—general (715 ) — (715 ) Provision for credit losses—specific 9,561 — 9,561 Loans charged off, net of recoveries (12,970 ) — (12,970 ) Balance, end of period $ 47,192 $ 92 $ 47,284 Balance, end of period—specific $ 16,363 $ — $ 16,363 Balance, end of period—general $ 30,829 $ 92 $ 30,921 Average balance of impaired loans $ 210,441 $ — $ 210,441 Interest recognized from impaired loans $ 1,915 $ — $ 1,915 Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Leveraged Finance Real Estate Equipment Finance Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 61,528 $ 4,422 $ 1,342 $ 67,292 Provision for credit losses—general 1,198 44 (35 ) 1,207 Provision for credit losses—specific 2,308 108 — 2,416 Loans charged off, net of recoveries (2,389 ) (4,483 ) — (6,872 ) Balance, end of period $ 62,645 $ 91 $ 1,307 $ 64,043 Balance, end of period—specific $ 32,880 $ — $ — $ 32,880 Balance, end of period—general $ 29,765 $ 91 $ 1,307 $ 31,163 Average balance of impaired loans $ 177,654 $ 34,209 $ — $ 211,863 Average net book value of impaired leases $ — $ — $ 660 $ 660 Interest recognized from impaired loans $ 3,083 $ 785 $ 12 $ 3,880 Loans (1) Loans individually evaluated with specific allowance $ 117,501 $ — $ — $ 117,501 Loans individually evaluated with no specific allowance 39,981 7,188 623 47,792 Loans collectively evaluated with general allowance 2,720,144 10,553 164,611 2,895,308 Total loans $ 2,877,626 $ 17,741 $ 165,234 $ 3,060,601 (1) Excludes $167.2 million of Leveraged Finance loans which the Company elected to record at fair value. Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Leveraged Finance Business Credit Real Estate Equipment Finance Total ($ in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $ 54,788 $ 1,991 $ 656 $ 1,291 $ 58,726 Provision for credit losses—general 1,425 (172 ) 1,009 16 2,278 Provision for credit losses—specific 14,881 — 4,177 — 19,058 Reversal due to sale of Business Credit — (1,819 ) 0 — (1,819 ) Loans charged off, net of recoveries (8,449 ) — (5,751 ) — (14,200 ) Balance, end of period $ 62,645 $ — $ 91 $ 1,307 $ 64,043 Balance, end of period—specific $ 32,880 $ — $ — $ — $ 32,880 Balance, end of period—general $ 29,765 $ — $ 91 $ 1,307 $ 31,163 Average balance of impaired loans $ 177,181 $ — $ 34,540 $ — $ 211,721 Average net book value of impaired leases $ — $ — $ — $ 723 $ 723 Interest recognized from impaired loans $ 4,979 $ — $ 832 $ 12 $ 5,823 Included in the allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is an allowance for unfunded commitments of $0.5 million, which is recorded as a component of other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with changes recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The methodology for determining the allowance for unfunded commitments is consistent with the methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a total provision for credit losses of $8.8 million. The Company decreased its allowance for credit losses to $47.3 million as of June 30, 2017 from $51.4 million at December 31, 2016. The general allowance for credit losses covers probable incurred losses in the Company’s loan portfolio with respect to loans for which no specific impairment has been identified. When a loan is classified as impaired, the loan is evaluated for a specific allowance and a specific provision may be recorded, thereby removing it from consideration under the general component of the allowance analysis. Loans that are deemed to be uncollectible are charged off and deducted from the allowance, and recoveries on loans previously charged off are netted against loans charged off. A specific provision for credit losses is recorded with respect to impaired loans for which it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement for which there is impairment recognized. The outstanding balance of impaired loans, which include all of the outstanding balances of the Company’s delinquent loans and its troubled debt restructurings, as a percentage of “Loans, net” was 4 % as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. |