UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-33196
Isilon Systems, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 91-2101027 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
| | |
3101 Western Ave | | |
Seattle, WA | | 98121 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
206-315-7500
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YesoNoþ
As of March 17, 2008, 62,918,671 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.
Part I – Financial Information | |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 14 |
| 22 |
| 22 |
| |
Part II – Other Information | 23 |
| 23 |
| 23 |
| 23 |
| 23 |
| 23 |
| 24 |
| 26 |
| 27 |
| |
| |
EXHIBIT 31.1 | |
| |
EXHIBIT 31.2 | |
| |
EXHIBIT 32.1 | |
| |
EXHIBIT 32.2 | |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
| |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2007 | | | October 1, 2006 | | | September 30, 2007 | | | October 1, 2006 | |
| | | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 17,627 | | | $ | 15,506 | | | $ | 52,197 | | | $ | 36,214 | |
Services | | | 4,016 | | | | 2,280 | | | | 10,203 | | | | 5,409 | |
Total revenue | | | 21,643 | | | | 17,786 | | | | 62,400 | | | | 41,623 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | | 7,059 | | | | 7,464 | | | | 24,365 | | | | 17,549 | |
Services (1) | | | 2,524 | | | | 978 | | | | 5,794 | | | | 2,314 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of revenue | | | 9,583 | | | | 8,442 | | | | 30,159 | | | | 19,863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 12,060 | | | | 9,344 | | | | 32,241 | | | | 21,760 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development (1) | | | 5,374 | | | | 4,404 | | | | 14,778 | | | | 11,858 | |
Sales and marketing (1) | | | 11,282 | | | | 6,704 | | | | 30,111 | | | | 17,205 | |
General and administrative (1) | | | 3,687 | | | | 2,116 | | | | 9,769 | | | | 5,186 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 20,343 | | | | 13,224 | | | | 54,658 | | | | 34,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | | (8,283 | ) | | | (3,880 | ) | | | (22,417 | ) | | | (12,489 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense), net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income and other | | | 1,141 | | | | 54 | | | | 3,472 | | | | 48 | |
Interest expense | | | — | | | | (438 | ) | | | — | | | | (894 | ) |
Warrant revaluation expense | | | — | | | | (690 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,634 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income (expense), net | | | 1,141 | | | | (1,074 | ) | | | 3,472 | | | | (2,480 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss before income tax expense | | | (7,142 | ) | | | (4,954 | ) | | | (18,945 | ) | | | (14,969 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | (41 | ) | | | (60 | ) | | | (116 | ) | | | (60 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (7,183 | ) | | $ | (5,014 | ) | | $ | (19,061 | ) | | $ | (15,029 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | | $ | (0.12 | ) | | $ | (0.70 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (2.36 | ) |
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per common share | | | 61,771 | | | | 7,172 | | | | 61,217 | | | | 6,381 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Includes stock-based compensation as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 92 | | | $ | 11 | |
Research and development | | | 167 | | | | 58 | | | | 488 | | | | 96 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 509 | | | | 84 | | | | 1,059 | | | | 116 | |
General and administrative | | | 522 | | | | 34 | | | | 1,081 | | | | 82 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
| | As of | |
| | September 30, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 Restated (1) | |
| | | | | | |
ASSETS | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 57,306 | | | $ | 99,899 | |
Marketable securities | | | 34,781 | | | | — | |
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $228 and $501, respectively | | | 18,604 | | | | 23,248 | |
Inventories | | | 6,808 | | | | 4,125 | |
Other current assets | | | 6,372 | | | | 2,304 | |
Total current assets | | | 123,871 | | | | 129,576 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 10,528 | | | | 7,158 | |
Total assets | | $ | 134,399 | | | $ | 136,734 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 13,156 | | | $ | 6,777 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 2,079 | | | | 3,249 | |
Accrued compensation and related benefits | | | 4,630 | | | | 3,463 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 11,124 | | | | 7,568 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 30,989 | | | | 21,057 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred revenue, net of current portion | | | 5,213 | | | | 3,284 | |
Deferred rent, net of current portion | | | 3,454 | | | | 2,186 | |
Total liabilities | | | 39,656 | | | | 26,527 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 189,590 | | | | 185,947 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (129 | ) | | | (83 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (94,719 | ) | | | (75,658 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 94,743 | | | | 110,207 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 134,399 | | | $ | 136,734 | |
(1) See Note 2, "Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements," of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2007 | | | October 1, 2006 | |
| | | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (19,061 | ) | | $ | (15,029 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 3,835 | | | | 3,006 | |
Realized gain on sale of marketable securities | | | — | | | | (14 | ) |
Non-cash interest expense | | | — | | | | 222 | |
Amortization of discount on marketable securities | | | (83 | ) | | | — | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 2,720 | | | | 305 | |
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | | | — | | | | 80 | |
Warrant revaluation expense | | | — | | | | 1,634 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 4,604 | | | | (11,305 | ) |
Inventories | | | (2,683 | ) | | | (1,473 | ) |
Other current assets | | | (3,859 | ) | | | (178 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | 7,046 | | | | 5,013 | |
Accrued liabilities, compensation payable and deferred rent | | | 134 | | | | 1,714 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 5,485 | | | | 4,946 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (1,862 | ) | | | (11,079 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (5,675 | ) | | | (3,872 | ) |
Purchases of marketable securities | | | (48,333 | ) | | | (691 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities | | | 13,695 | | | | 2,508 | |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | | — | | | | 21 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (40,313 | ) | | | (2,034 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock | | | — | | | | 9,945 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, option exercises | | | 424 | | | | 652 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, employee stock purchase plan | | | 365 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from notes payable | | | — | | | | 36,724 | |
Repurchases of unvested common stock | | | (78 | ) | | | — | |
Payment of offering costs | | | (1,135 | ) | | | (803 | ) |
Payments of notes payable and capital lease obligations | | | — | | | | (26,396 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | (424 | ) | | | 20,122 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | 6 | | | | 1 | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | (42,593 | ) | | | 7,010 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 99,899 | | | | 10,853 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 57,306 | | | $ | 17,863 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Isilon Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on January 24, 2001. The Company designs, develops and markets clustered storage systems for storing and managing digital content and unstructured data. The Company began selling its products and services in January 2003. The Company sells systems that generally include a software license, hardware, post-contract customer support and, in some cases, additional elements.
Significant Accounting Policies
Accounting Principles
The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Isilon Systems, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007, which is being filed concurrently with this document. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in conformity with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
These financial statements reflect all adjustments, which in the opinion of the Company’s management, are necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the year ending December 30, 2007. The Company operates on a 52/53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. Accordingly, the Company’s fiscal year 2007 ends on December 30, 2007 and its fiscal year 2006 ended on December 31, 2006. The fiscal year 2007 quarters ended on April 1, July 1, and September 30, 2007.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are inherent in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and include accounting for revenue, the allowance for doubtful accounts, obsolete and excess inventory, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, and the valuation of preferred stock warrants and stock-based compensation expense. Some of these estimates require difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Concentration of Risks
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are invested with financial institutions in deposits that may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents. Management believes that the institutions are financially sound and, accordingly, that minimal credit risk exists.
Isilon Systems, Inc
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The Company does not require collateral to support credit sales. Allowances are maintained for potential credit losses. Customer concentrations of greater than 10% were as follows:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | October 1, | | | September 30, | | | October 1, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
% of Total Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comcast Corporation (2) | | less than 10 | % | | 11 | % | | less than 10 | % | | | 14 | % |
Eastman Kodak Company | | less than 10 | % | | 11 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 13 | % |
XM Satellite Radio | | less than 10 | % | | 15 | % | | less than 10 | % | | less than 10 | % |
| | As of | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | Restated(1) | |
% of Gross Accounts Receivable | | | | | | |
Comcast Corporation (2) | | less than 10 | % | | 14 | % |
| (1) | See Note 2, "Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements," of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| (2) | Comcast Corporation purchases through one of the Company's resellers, Computer Design and Integration LLC. |
The Company is dependent on a single contract manufacturer, and some of the key components in the Company’s products come from single or limited sources of supply.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenue from sales of its products and services. Product revenue consists of revenue from sales of systems and software. Shipping charges billed to customers are included in product revenue and the related shipping costs are included in cost of product revenue.
The Company’s software is integrated with industry standard hardware and is essential to the functionality of the integrated system product. The Company provides unspecified software updates and enhancements related to its products through service contracts. As a result, the Company accounts for revenue in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, or SOP 97-2, as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions, or SOP 98-9, for all transactions involving the sale of software. The Company recognizes product revenue when it has entered into an arrangement with a customer, delivery has occurred, the fee is deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies and significant uncertainties, and collection is reasonably assured.
On sales to channel partners, the Company evaluates whether fees are considered fixed or determinable by considering a number of factors, including the Company’s ability to estimate returns, the geography in which a sales transaction originates, payment terms and the Company’s relationship and past history with the particular channel partner. If fees are not considered fixed or determinable at the time of sale to a channel partner, revenue recognition is deferred until there is persuasive evidence indicating product has sold-through to an end-user. Persuasive evidence of sell-through may include reports from channel partners documenting sell-through activity, copies of end-user purchase orders, data indicating an order has shipped to an end-user, cash payments or letters of credit guaranteeing cash payments or other similar information.
At the time of shipment, the Company records revenue reserves for estimated sales returns and stock rotation arrangements. Sales returns and stock rotation reserves are estimated based on historical activity and expectations of future experience. The Company monitors and analyzes actual experience and adjusts these reserves on a quarterly basis.
Substantially all of the Company’s products are sold in combination with services, which primarily consist of hardware and software support. Software support provides customers with rights to unspecified software updates and to maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period. Hardware support includes Internet access to technical content through Isilon Insight, the Company’s knowledge database, repair or replacement of hardware in the event of breakage or failure, and telephone and Internet access to technical support personnel during the term of the support period. Installation services, when provided, are also included in services revenue.
Sales generally consist solely of hardware and software products and support services. The Company has established vendor specific objective evidence, or VSOE, for the fair value of its support services as measured by the renewal prices offered to and paid by its customers. The Company uses the residual method, as allowed by SOP 98-9, to determine the amount of product revenue to be recognized. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered element, support services, is deferred and the remaining portion of the sales amount is recognized as product revenue. This product revenue is recognized upon shipment, based on freight terms, assuming all other criteria for recognition discussed above have been met. The fair value of the support services is recognized as services revenue on a straight-line method over the term of the related support period, which is typically one to three years.
Isilon Systems, Inc
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
On January 2, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R), using the prospective transition method. Under this method, the Company’s stock-based compensation costs recognized during 2006 were comprised of compensation costs for all share-based payment awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on their grant-date fair value estimated using the Black-Scholes model, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).
The Company chose the straight-line method of allocating compensation cost over the requisite service period of the related award under SFAS 123(R). The Company calculated the expected term based on the provisions outlined in SFAS 123(R), which, for options granted in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, resulted in an expected term of approximately four years. The Company based its estimate of expected volatility on the estimated volatility of similar entities whose share prices are publicly available.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, the Company recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $1.2 million and $186,000, and $2.7 million and $305,000, respectively. As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company’s total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based awards granted since January 2, 2006 was $19.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively, which will be recognized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of approximately 3.0 years. The Company recorded no tax benefit related to these options during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 since the Company currently maintains a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets. In future periods, stock-based compensation expense is expected to increase as the Company records expense related to previously issued stock-based compensation awards and issues additional equity-based awards to continue to attract and retain key employees.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not expect its adoption will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-b, Fair Value Measurements, or FSP 157-b. FSP 157-b delays the effective date of SFAS 157 until January 1, 2009, for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Nonfinancial assets and liabilities include, among others: intangible assets acquired through business combinations; long-lived assets when assessing potential impairment; and liabilities associated with restructuring activities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), Business Combinations, or SFAS 141R and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, or SFAS 160. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable assets acquired. SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. The calculation of earnings per share will continue to be based on income amounts attributable to the parent. SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. We have not yet determined the effect on our consolidated financial statements, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 141R or SFAS 160.
Isilon Systems, Inc
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
2. Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Restatement of Previously Issued Consolidated Financial Statements
On February 29, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors, based upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, determined that the Company should restate its financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007, ended April 1, 2007 and July 1, 2007, respectively. As announced on November 8, 2007, the Company's Audit Committee, assisted by independent forensic accountants and legal advisors, has been conducting an independent investigation of certain of its sales to resellers and other customers to determine whether commitments were made that have an impact on the timing and treatment of revenue recognition, and whether the Company's internal controls relating to revenue recognition are sufficient.
Summary of the Restatement Adjustments
As a result of the Audit Committee’s review, the Company identified errors in its previous recognition of revenue. The restatement adjustments did not affect the Company's previously reported cash, cash equivalents, or short-term investment balances in any of the periods being restated.
Selected information about the impact of the restatement on the Company's previously filed fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007, ended April 1, 2007 and July 1, 2007, respectively is provided in Part II, Item 5 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
3. Initial Public Offering
On December 14, 2006, the Company completed its initial public offering selling 8,940,717 shares of common stock at $13.00 per share generating net proceeds of approximately $105.7 million. Simultaneous with its initial public offering, the Company’s shares of mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock were automatically converted into 43.5 million shares of common stock, and 409,478 warrants to purchase mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted into warrants to purchase common stock.
4. Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share was the same for all periods presented as the impact of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding was anti-dilutive. Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the period that are not subject to vesting provisions. The following table presents the potentially dilutive securities outstanding that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share for the periods presented because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect:
| | As of | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
Options to purchase common stock | | | 8,578,890 | | | | 6,356,275 | |
Common stock subject to vesting provisions | | | 235,212 | | | | 1,190,095 | |
Common stock purchaseable under Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | 24,402 | | | | — | |
Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock | | | — | | | | 43,496,144 | |
Warrants to purchase mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock | | | — | | | | 409,478 | |
Warrants to purchase common stock | | | 129,992 | | | | — | |
| | | 8,968,496 | | | | 51,451,992 | |
5. Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, was $7.2 million and $5.0 million, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, was $19.1 million and $15.1 million, respectively. The other components of comprehensive loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, aside from net loss for the periods reported, were net unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities and foreign currency translation adjustments.
6. Marketable Securities
At their date of acquisition, the Company’s marketable securities are classified into categories in accordance with the provisions of statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. During the periods presented, the Company had securities classified as available-for-sale, which were reported at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value of securities judged to be other than temporary are included in other income (expense), net. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are based on the specific identification method. The Company’s investments in marketable securities are diversified among high-credit quality securities in accordance with the Company’s investment policy.
Marketable securities totaled $34.8 million as of September 30, 2007 and consisted of investments in commercial paper, corporate bonds and notes, and U.S. government securities. There were no realized gains or losses on the sales of marketable securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. Gross unrealized gains and losses at September 30, 2007 were not significant.
The fair value of the Company’s marketable securities fluctuates based on changes in market conditions and interest rates; however, given the short-term maturities, management believes that these instruments are not subject to significant market or interest rate risk. Investments in fixed rate, interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their market value adversely impacted due to rising interest rates. In a declining interest rate environment, as short term investments mature, reinvestment occurs at less favorable market rates. Given the short term nature of the Company's investments, anticipated declining interest rates will negatively impact the Company’s investment income.
Isilon Systems, Inc
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
7. Inventories
The Company outsources the manufacturing of its products to a contract manufacturer that assembles each product to the Company’s specifications. As protection against component shortages and to provide replacement parts for its service teams, the Company also stocks limited supplies of certain key product components. The Company reduces inventory to its estimated net realizable value by reserving for excess and obsolete inventories determined primarily based on historical usage, forecasted demand and evaluation unit conversion rate and age. Inventories have been reduced by $1.1 million as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Inventories consisted of the following:
| | As of | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | Restated(1) | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Finished goods | | $ | 3,088 | | | $ | 1,530 | |
Evaluation units | | | 3,720 | | | | 2,595 | |
| | $ | 6,808 | | | $ | 4,125 | |
| (1) | See Note 2, "Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements," of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
8. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following:
| | As of | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Software and computer equipment | | $ | 11,922 | | | $ | 8,569 | |
Furniture, office equipment and other | | | 5,733 | | | | 3,581 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 5,019 | | | | 3,308 | |
| | | 22,674 | | | | 15,458 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (12,146 | ) | | | (8,300 | ) |
| | $ | 10,528 | | | $ | 7,158 | |
Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.4 million and $3.8 million, and $1.3 million and $3.0 million, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, respectively.
9. Stockholders’ Equity
Warrants
On June 29, 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 150-5, Issuer’s Accounting under FASB Statement No. 150 for Freestanding Warrants and Other Similar Instruments on Shares That Are Redeemable, or FSP 150-5. FSP 150-5 affirms that warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock are subject to the requirements in FSP 150-5 and requires the Company to classify these warrants as liabilities and revalue them to fair value at the end of each reporting period. For the nine months ended October 1, 2006, the Company recorded a charge of $1.6 million, reflecting the increase in fair value between January 2, 2006 and October 1, 2006. The Company revalued the warrants through December 20, 2006, the date of the closing of the Company’s initial public offering and conversion of preferred stock to common stock. Subsequent to December 20, 2006, the warrants no longer were marked to market because they were converted into warrants to purchase common stock.
The Company’s common stock warrants consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | Number of Shares | |
| | | | | | | | Subject to Warrants | |
| | | | Exercise | | Expiration | | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | Issue Date | | Price | | Date | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants to purchase common stock | | March 2006 | | $2.3078 | | March 2016 | | 129,992 | | 129,992 | |
| | | | | | | | 129,992 | | 129,992 | |
Isilon Systems, Inc
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Stock Options and Unvested Common Stock
The Company accounts for cash received for the purchase of unvested shares of common stock or the early-exercise of unvested stock options as a current liability, included as a component of accrued liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, there were 235,212 and 921,292 unvested shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock outstanding and $226,000 and $506,000, respectively, of the related recorded liability.
Detail related to activity of unvested shares of common stock is as follows:
| | Number of | | | Weighted-Average | |
| | Unvested Shares | | | Exercise/Purchase | |
| | Outstanding | | | Price | |
Balance as of January 1, 2007 | | | 921,292 | | | $ | 0.55 | |
Issued | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Vested | | | (516,804 | ) | | $ | 0.38 | |
Repurchased | | | (169,276 | ) | | $ | 0.47 | |
Balance as of September 30, 2007 | | | 235,212 | | | $ | 0.96 | |
Detail related to stock option activity is as follows:
| | | | | Weighted- | |
| | Number of | | | Average | |
| | Shares | | | Exercise | |
| | Outstanding | | | Price | |
Balance as of January 1, 2007 | | | 6,753,969 | | | $ | 1.77 | |
Options granted | | | 3,436,894 | | | $ | 13.13 | |
Options exercised | | | (872,004 | ) | | $ | 0.49 | |
Options forfeited | | | (739,969 | ) | | $ | 4.74 | |
Balance as of September 30, 2007 | | | 8,578,890 | | | $ | 6.20 | |
The total intrinsic value for options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, was $10.2 million and $4.4 million, respectively, representing the difference between the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock underlying these options at the dates of exercise and the exercise prices paid.
The fair value of each employee option on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under SFAS 123(R). The following assumptions were used for the valuations of options granted to employees during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2007 | | | October 1, 2006 | | | September 30, 2007 | | | October 1, 2006 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 4.2% - 4.9% | | | 4.7% - 5.1% | | | 4.2% - 5.1% | | | 4.5% - 5.1% | |
Expected term | | 4 years | | | 4 years | | | 4 years | | | 4 years | |
Dividend yield | | None | | | None | | | None | | | None | |
Volatility | | 40% | | | 47% | | | 39 - 41% | | | 47% | |
The Company estimated its expected volatility based on reported market value data for a group of publicly traded companies, which were selected from certain market indices that the Company believes were relatively comparable after consideration of their size, industry, stage of lifecycle, profitability, growth, and risk and return on investment.
The estimated weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, with exercise prices that equaled the estimated per share fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant, was $4.99. The estimated weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended October 1, 2006, with exercise prices less than the estimated per share fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant, was $1.02.
The Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2006 ESPP”) in the fourth quarter of 2006. A total of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for sale under the 2006 ESPP. Under the 2006 ESPP, employees may purchase shares of common stock through payroll deductions at a price per share that is 85% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the applicable purchase date. The first purchase period ended in August 2007 and $429,000 was reclassified to stockholders’ equity which included employee withholdings and the related stock-based compensation expense. The total liability for the 2006 ESPP, including the related 15% discount, is $188,000 as of September 30, 2007, and is included in accrued compensation and related benefits in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Isilon Systems, Inc
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
10. Income Taxes
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had total net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of $54.7 million. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. Accordingly, the Company’s gross deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. If not utilized, these net operating loss carryforwards will expire for federal purposes between 2021 and 2027. Utilization of these net operating loss carryforwards is subject to an annual limitation due to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Events that cause limitations in the amount of net operating losses that the Company may utilize in any one year include, but are not limited to, a cumulative ownership change of more than 50%, as defined, over a three-year period.
The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate as follows:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | September 30, | | | October 1, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax at statutory rate | | | 34.0 | % | | | 34.0 | % | | | 34.0 | % | | | 34.0 | % |
State taxes, net of federal benefit | | | 2.2 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 2.2 | | | | 2.7 | |
Permanent difference | | | (0.4 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.5 | ) | | | — | |
Stock compensation | | | 0.3 | | | | — | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | — | |
Other | | | 0.4 | | | | — | | | | 0.3 | | | | (0.4 | ) |
Change in valuation allowance | | | (37.1 | ) | | | (38.4 | ) | | | (35.8 | ) | | | (36.7 | ) |
Total | | | (0.6 | )% | | | (1.2 | )% | | | (0.6 | )% | | | (0.4 | )% |
For three and nine months ended, September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, the Company recorded income tax expense of $41,000 and $60,000, and $116,000 and $60,000, respectively, comprised primarily of foreign taxes. The actual expense recorded for each of these respective periods differs from the federal tax benefit at 34% primarily due to current tax expense in foreign jurisdictions and the fact that the tax benefit of U.S. losses is not recognized.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, or FIN 48. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition issues. The Company elected to include interest on tax positions as a component of interest expense and penalties as a component ofincome tax expense. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 orSeptember 30, 2007.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company was open to examination in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction for the 2004 to 2006 tax years and various foreign, state and local jurisdictions for the 2003 to 2006 tax years.
11. Segment Information
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company is organized as, and operates in, one reportable segment: the development and sale of clustered storage solutions. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is its chief executive officer. The Company’s chief executive officer reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by information about revenue by geographic region, for purposes of evaluating financial performance and allocating resources. The Company and its chief executive officer evaluate performance based primarily on revenue in the geographic locations in which the Company operates. Revenue is attributed by geographic region based on the location of the end customer. The Company’s assets are primarily located in the United States of America and not allocated to any specific region; therefore, geographic information is presented only for total revenue.
Isilon Systems, Inc
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The following presents total revenue by geographic region:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | September 30, | | | October 1, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | |
United States of America | | $ | 17,393 | | | $ | 14,361 | | | $ | 46,856 | | | $ | 33,173 | |
Asia | | | 1,974 | | | | 2,372 | | | | 8,616 | | | | 5,142 | |
EMEA | | | 2,078 | | | | 826 | | | | 6,247 | | | | 2,331 | |
Other | | | 198 | | | | 227 | | | | 681 | | | | 977 | |
Total | | $ | 21,643 | | | $ | 17,786 | | | $ | 62,400 | | | $ | 41,623 | |
12. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company maintains, with its contract manufacturer, a rolling 90-day firm order for products it manufactures for the Company, and these orders may only be rescheduled or cancelled by its contract manufacturer under certain limited conditions and, even then, with certain restrictions and penalties up to the full cost of the product. The remaining amount on the open purchase order with its contract manufacturer and other partners and suppliers at September 30, 2007 was approximately $18.6 million.
13. Subsequent Events
On December 7, 2007, we provided notice to our initial contract manufacturer, Sanmina-SCI Corporation, of our intent to terminate for convenience the Manufacturing Services Agreement we entered into on February 17, 2006. In an agreement dated August 30, 2007, we established a contract manufacturing relationship with Solectron Corporation, subsequently acquired by Flextronics International Ltd. This agreement provides current terms and operating conditions while we are continuing to negotiate a master services agreement.
On November 1, 2007, a putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated there under, as well as under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. Substantially similar complaints were filed in the same court on December 12, 2007 and December 17, 2007. These cases, which were subsequently consolidated, purport to be brought on behalf of a class of purchasers and acquirers of the Company's stock during the period December 16, 2006 to October 3, 2007. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants violated the federal securities laws during this period of time by, among other things, issuing a false and misleading registration statement and prospectus in connection with the Company's December 16, 2006 initial public offering, and by thereafter publicly misrepresenting the Company's current and prospective business and financial results. Plaintiffs claim that, as a result of these alleged wrongs, the Company's stock price was artificially inflated during the purported class period. Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified compensatory damages, interest, an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs have until April 18, 2008 to file a consolidated amended complaint.
In addition, on March 18, 2008, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington (King County), allegedly on behalf of and for the benefit of the Company, against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers. The Company was named as a nominal defendant. The derivative complaint alleges that the individual defendants breached fiduciary duties owed to the Company by publicly misrepresenting Isilon’s business prospects, and by failing to properly account for certain revenues earned in the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and first and second quarters in fiscal 2007. A substantially similar complaint was filed in the same court on March 24, 2008. The revenues referenced in the complaints were the subject of the Company’s February 29, 2008 announcement that it would restate its financial statements for those periods. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and equitable relief, disgorgement of compensation, attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. Because the complaints are derivative in nature they do not seek monetary damages from the Company. However, the Company may be required throughout the course of the action to advance the legal fees and costs incurred by the individual defendants.
We are unable to predict the outcome of these cases. A court determination against us could result in significant liability and could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company has also provided information on a voluntary basis to the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning the Audit Committee's independent review and the Company's financial restatement.
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. Forward-looking statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to them. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “potential,” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Examples of these statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our competitive environment; the anticipated growth of digital content; the expected demand for and benefits of our storage products; our future business plans and growth strategy; our ability to improve existing products and to develop new and future products; our anticipated revenue and expenses; our ability to add value-added resellers and distributors and to sell our products internationally; our ability to realize operating leverage and realize efficiencies in our sales model by leveraging partners and selling to existing customers; anticipated results of potential or actual litigation; statements relating to our financial restatement and the remediation of our internal controls; the anticipated sufficiency of our current office space and ability to find additional space as needed; anticipated development or acquisition of intellectual property and resulting benefits; expected impacts of changes in accounting rules, including the impact on deferred tax benefits; the impact of governmental regulation; employee hiring and retention, including anticipated reductions in force and headcount; the future payment of dividends, use of cash, cash needs and ability to raise capital; and potential liability from contractual relationships. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks faced by us and described in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our other filings with the SEC. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q . You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Restatement of Previously Issued Consolidated Financial Statements
On February 29, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors, based upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, determined that we should restate our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007, ended April 1, 2007 and July 1, 2007, respectively, as a result of errors in those financial statements. As announced on November 8, 2007, our Audit Committee, assisted by independent forensic accountants and legal advisors, has been conducting an independent investigation of certain of our sales to resellers and other customers to determine whether commitments were made that have an impact on the timing and treatment of revenue recognition, and whether our internal controls relating to revenue recognition are sufficient.
Summary of the Restatement Adjustments
As a result of the Audit Committee’s review, we identified errors in our previous recognition of revenue. The restatement adjustments did not affect our previously reported cash, cash equivalents, or short-term investment balances in any of the periods being restated.
Selected information about the impact of the restatement on our previously filed fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007, ended April 1, 2007 and July 1, 2007, respectively is provided in Part II, Item 5 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
We were founded in January 2001 specifically to create a solution that addressed the unique challenges associated with the storage and management of digital content and unstructured data. From January 2001 to January 2003, we were focused on designing and developing our OneFS® operating system software used in all of our storage systems. We began commercial shipments of our first systems in January 2003, and since then we have been focused on optimizing our solution to meet our customers’ needs and establishing development, manufacturing and marketing partnerships. Today, our solution includes a suite of systems, software and services.
We believe we are the leading provider of clustered storage systems for digital content and unstructured data. We sell clustered storage systems that consist of three or more storage nodes. Each node is comprised of our proprietary OneFS operating system software and industry standard hardware components integrated into a self-contained, 3.5-inch or 1.75-inch high, rack-mountable chassis. Customers can scale our clustered storage systems incrementally as their needs grow by purchasing additional nodes or clusters of nodes from us to enhance storage capacity, performance or both. Our future revenue growth will depend upon further penetration of our existing customers as well as expansion of our customer base in existing and other industries that depend upon digital content. We consider the development of direct and indirect sales channels in domestic and international markets a key to our future revenue growth and the global acceptance of our products. We also are dependent on the development, adoption and acceptance of new software and systems to increase our overall margins and achieve profitability.
Our product revenue growth rate will depend significantly on continued growth in our target industries and our ability to continue to attract new customers in those industries. Our growth in services revenue will depend upon increasing the number of systems under service contracts. Any such increases will depend on a growing customer base and on our customers renewing existing service contracts.
Key Business Metrics
We monitor a number of key metrics to help forecast growth, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts, and measure operational effectiveness.
New Customers and Repeat Sales Orders. Our goal is to attract a significant number of new customers and to encourage existing customers to purchase additional products, specifically our higher margin software applications, SyncIQ®, SnapshotIQ™, SmartConnect™, Migration IQ™, and SmartQuotas™. A majority of our customers buy our storage systems and later add additional nodes or software applications as the need arises under our ‘pay-as-you-grow’ model.
Channel Leverage. We are actively growing our relationships with channel partners to further penetrate our targeted markets domestically and internationally. We track our sales orders by direct or indirect customers with the goal of increasing revenue from channel partners.
Gross Margin. Our goal is to grow our gross margin to increase the profitability of our business. Some of the key factors affecting our gross margin are average sales prices of our systems, the revenue attributable to software applications as a percentage of total revenue, the rate at which our customers adopt our higher margin products, the timing of component cost reductions through product redesign, the timing of supplier cost reductions, the ability to manage inventory levels, the ability to control costs associated with servicing our customers and overall market conditions. We consider our ability to monitor and manage these factors to be a key aspect of attaining and expanding our profitability.
Operating Cash Flow. We closely monitor operating cash flow as a measure of our business performance. Some of the key factors affecting operating cash flows are our ability to generate net income and manage working capital. Increasing inventory turns and reducing days sales outstanding in accounts receivable are both contributors to improving working capital. Our goal is to maximize cash flows while continuing to invest in our business. Our close tracking of operating cash flow allows us to better manage the cash needs of our business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates and judgments that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated financial statements, the disclosure of contingencies as of the dates of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. We believe the following to be our critical accounting policies because they are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and they require critical management estimates and judgments about matters that are uncertain: revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation, estimation of fair value of warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock, inventory valuation, and accounting for income taxes. See “Risk Factors” for certain matters that may affect our future financial condition or results of operations. Although we believe that our estimates and judgments are reasonable under the circumstances, actual results may differ from those estimates. These critical accounting policies are consistent with those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, except for the following updated revenue recognition policy.
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenue from sales of our products and services. Product revenue consists of revenue from sales of systems and software. Shipping charges billed to customers are included in product revenue and the related shipping costs are included in cost of product revenue.
Our software is integrated with industry standard hardware and is essential to the functionality of the integrated system product. We provide unspecified software updates and enhancements related to its products through service contracts. As a result, we account for revenue in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, or SOP 97-2, as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions, or SOP 98-9, for all transactions involving the sale of software. We recognize product revenue when it has entered into an arrangement with a customer, delivery has occurred, the fee is deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies and significant uncertainties, and collection is reasonably assured.
On sales to channel partners, we evaluate whether fees are considered fixed or determinable by considering a number of factors, including our ability to estimate returns, the geography in which a sales transaction originates, payment terms and our relationship and past history with the particular channel partner. If fees are not considered fixed or determinable at the time of sale to a channel partner, revenue recognition is deferred until there is persuasive evidence indicating product has sold-through to an end-user. Persuasive evidence of sell-through may include reports from channel partners documenting sell-through activity, copies of end-user purchase orders, data indicating an order has shipped to an end-user, cash payments or letters of credit guaranteeing cash payments or other similar information.
At the time of shipment, we record revenue reserves for estimated sales returns and stock rotation arrangements. Sales returns and stock rotation reserves are estimated based on historical activity and expectations of future experience. We monitor and analyze actual experience and adjust these reserves on a quarterly basis.
Substantially all of our products are sold in combination with services, which primarily consist of hardware and software support. Software support provides customers with rights to unspecified software updates and to maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period. Hardware support includes Internet access to technical content through Isilon Insight, our knowledge database, repair or replacement of hardware in the event of breakage or failure, and telephone and Internet access to technical support personnel during the term of the support period. Installation services, when provided, are also included in services revenue.
Sales generally consist solely of hardware and software products and support services. We have established vendor specific objective evidence, or VSOE, for the fair value of its support services as measured by the renewal prices offered to and paid by its customers. We use the residual method, as allowed by SOP 98-9, to determine the amount of product revenue to be recognized. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered element, support services, is deferred and the remaining portion of the sales amount is recognized as product revenue. This product revenue is recognized upon shipment, based on freight terms, assuming all other criteria for recognition discussed above have been met. The fair value of the support services is recognized as services revenue on a straight-line method over the term of the related support period, which is typically one to three years.
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes and risk factors included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Revenue. We derive our revenue from sales of our products and services. Our customers typically purchase a cluster of our storage devices comprised of three or more nodes and related support services. Each node includes our OneFS™ operating system software and industry standard hardware. In addition, customers may purchase separate additional software applications for enhanced functionality.
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30, | | October 1, | | September 30, | | October 1, |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
Revenue by type: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 17,627 | | | $ | 15,506 | | | $ | 52,197 | | | $ | 36,214 | |
Services | | | 4,016 | | | | 2,280 | | | | 10,203 | | | | 5,409 | |
Total revenue | | $ | 21,643 | | | $ | 17,786 | | | $ | 62,400 | | | $ | 41,623 | |
% revenue by type: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | | 81 | % | | | 87 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 87 | % |
Services | | | 19 | | | | 13 | | | | 16 | | | | 13 | |
Total | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Revenue by geography: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | $ | 17,393 | | | $ | 14,361 | | | $ | 46,856 | | | $ | 33,173 | |
International | | | 4,250 | | | | 3,425 | | | | 15,544 | | | | 8,450 | |
Total revenue | | $ | 21,643 | | | $ | 17,786 | | | $ | 62,400 | | | $ | 41,623 | |
% revenue by geography: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | | 80 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 75 | % | | | 80 | % |
International | | | 20 | | | | 19 | | | | 25 | | | | 20 | |
Total | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Revenue by sales channel: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct | | $ | 9,077 | | | $ | 11,175 | | | $ | 28,142 | | | $ | 24,406 | |
Indirect | | | 12,566 | | | | 6,611 | | | | 34,258 | | | | 17,217 | |
Total revenue | | $ | 21,643 | | | $ | 17,786 | | | $ | 62,400 | | | $ | 41,623 | |
% revenue by sales channel: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct | | | 42 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 45 | % | | | 59 | % |
Indirect | | | 58 | | | | 39 | | | | 55 | | | | 41 | |
Total | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Total revenue increased 22% and 50% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, from the comparable periods in the prior year. This growth was primarily due to an increase in our customer base and expanded product offerings offset by a decrease in average order sizes. The number of new customers added for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 76 and 237, respectively, representing a 25% and 74% increase over the number of new customers added in the comparable periods in the prior year. New customer growth was driven by penetration in our target markets, our expanded sales force and continued traction in international markets. A wider range of product offerings and greater overall acceptance of the clustered storage category contributed to both initial and repeat orders from customers. The decrease in average order sizes year-over-year is attributable to increased diversification of customers and product mix, specifically a greater number of new customers purchasing our entry level IQ 200 system. We experience seasonality in our revenue growth based on historical customer demand and therefore expect revenue growth to be higher during the second and fourth quarters of the fiscal year.
The increase in indirect channel revenue was due to the growing market for our products and our increased focus on expanding our indirect channel sales by hiring dedicated sales managers and expanding our group of value-added resellers. Computer Design and Integration LLC, the reseller that sells to Comcast, is the only reseller that accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue during the first nine months of 2006. No reseller accounted for more than 10% of our revenue during the first nine months of 2007. We plan to continue to expand our relationships with channel partners and over time expect the percent of revenue generated through the channel to grow.
The percentage of our total revenue derived from support services was 19% and 16% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and 13% for both the three and nine months ended October 1, 2006. As our installed customer base continues to grow, we expect our proportion of services revenue to continue to increase over time in proportion with our total revenue.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin. Cost of product revenue consists primarily of amounts paid to our contract manufacturer in connection with the procurement of hardware components and assembly of those components into our systems, costs of shipping and logistics, and valuation reserves taken for excess and obsolete inventory. Cost of services revenue is primarily comprised of salaries and employee benefits and third-party costs in providing technical support. Our gross margin has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including average sales prices of our systems, the revenue attributable to sales of software applications as a percentage of total revenue, the rate at which our customers adopt our higher margin products and software applications, the timing of component cost reductions, the timing of supplier cost reductions, and overall market conditions.
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30, | | October 1, | | September 30, | | October 1, |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | (dollars in thousands) |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 7,059 | | | $ | 7,464 | | | $ | 24,365 | | | $ | 17,549 | |
Services | | | 2,524 | | | | 978 | | | | 5,794 | | | | 2,314 | |
Total cost of revenue | | $ | 9,583 | | | $ | 8,442 | | | $ | 30,159 | | | $ | 19,863 | |
Gross margin: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | | 60.0 | % | | 51.9 | % | | | 53.3 | % | | 51.5 | % |
Services | | | 37.2 | | | | 57.1 | | | | 43.2 | | | | 57.2 | |
Total gross margin | | | 55.7 | | | | 52.5 | | | | 51.7 | | | | 52.3 | |
Overall gross margin increased 320 basis points and decreased 60 basis points for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, from the comparable periods in the prior year.
Gross margin for product revenue increased 810 basis points and 180 basis points for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, from the comparable periods in the prior year. These increases were primarily due to customer adoption of our new generation of software applications together with a reduction in component costs. Since the third quarter of 2006, we expanded from a single software application, SyncIQ, to create a suite of five applications including the additions of SnapshotIQ, SmartConnect, Migration IQ, and SmartQuotas. All of our software applications carry a higher gross margin than our overall product margin. During the first nine months of 2007, approximately 50% of our new customers purchased one or more of our five software applications.
We expect to continue to experience pricing pressures within our industry as the price per megabyte of storage decreases year-over-year. This downward pricing pressure is primarily due to the decreasing prices of disk drives and other industry standard hardware components. Depending on the product type, disk drives can represent approximately one-third of our material cost. Historically, disk drives have decreased in price approximately 30% from year to year. Thus, the decline in product prices that we experienced was more than offset by a greater percentage decrease in cost of product revenue on a per unit basis resulting in an overall increase in product gross margin the first nine months of 2007 compared with the first nine months of 2006.
Gross margin for services revenue decreased 35% and 24% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, from the comparable periods in the prior year. Services revenue includes support services for both our software and our hardware products. Software support provides customers with software updates, maintenance releases and patches, which have minimal costs. Hardware support includes Internet access to our technical knowledge database and to technical support personnel, and third-party costs in providing technical support. During the first nine months of 2007, we continued to make investments in our customer service and support structure, including hiring new personnel, and expanding our service organization geographically to enhance the reliability and responsiveness for our customers. As a result, gross margin for services revenue for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 30, 2007 decreased from the comparable periods in the prior year.
As our customer base continues to grow, it will be necessary for us to continue to make significant upfront investments in our customer service and support structure to support this growth. The rate at which we add new customers will affect the amount of these upfront investments. The timing of these additional expenditures could materially affect our cost of revenue, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenue, in any particular period. This could cause downward pressure on services and total gross margins. We believe that we will experience increases in gross margin as software revenue, which has a higher gross margin, increases as a percent of our total revenue.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses primarily include personnel costs, prototype expenses, facilities expenses and depreciation of equipment used in research and development. In addition to our United States development teams, we use an offshore development team from a third-party contract engineering provider in Moscow, Russia. Research and development expenses are recorded when incurred. We are devoting substantial resources to the development of additional functionality for existing products and the development of new systems and software products. We intend to continue to invest significantly in our research and development efforts because we believe they are essential to maintaining and improving our competitive position. Accordingly, we expect research and development expenses to continue to increase in total dollars and as a percent of revenue in the near term, although we expect these expenses to decrease as a percentage of total revenue over the next several years.
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | | | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Research and development expenses | | $ | 5,374 | | | $ | 4,404 | | | | 970 | | | $ | 14,778 | | | $ | 11,858 | | | | 2,920 | |
Percent of total revenue | | | 25 | % | | | 25 | % | | | | | | | 24 | % | | | 28 | % | | | | |
Research and development expenses increased primarily due to an increase in employee headcount to 106 at September 30, 2007 from 96 at October 1, 2006. The absolute dollar increases period-to-period were primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits, professional services, prototype expenses, and stock-based compensation expense. Stock-based compensation expense related to research and development increased to $167,000 in the third quarter of 2007 from $58,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and to $488,000 in the first nine months of 2007 from $96,000 in the first nine months of 2006.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses primarily include personnel costs, sales commissions, professional services fees, trade shows, marketing programs, facilities and depreciation expenses. We plan to continue to invest heavily in sales and marketing by increasing the size of our field sales force and the number of our channel partners to allow us to expand into existing and new geographic and vertical markets. We also plan to continue to invest in expanding our domestic and international sales and marketing activities and building brand awareness. We expect that sales and marketing expenses will increase in absolute dollars and grow at a faster rate than our research and development expenses and thus remain our largest expense category. However, we expect sales and marketing expenses to decrease as a percentage of total revenue in the future due to our expected revenue growth and attainment of economies of scale. Generally, sales personnel are not immediately productive and thus sales and marketing expenses do not immediately result in revenue. Hiring additional sales personnel reduces short-term operating margins until the sales personnel become fully productive. Accordingly, the timing of sales personnel hiring and the rate at which they become productive will affect our future performance.
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | | | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Sales and marketing expenses | | $ | 11,282 | | | $ | 6,704 | | | | 4,578 | | | $ | 30,111 | | | $ | 17,205 | | | | 12,906 | |
Percent of total revenue | | | 52 | % | | | 38 | % | | | | | | | 48 | % | | | 41 | % | | | | |
Sales and marketing expenses increased primarily due to an increase in employee headcount to 141 at September 30, 2007 from 96 at October 1, 2006. The absolute dollar increases period-to-period were primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits, sales commissions, travel and entertainment, tradeshows and advertising, and stock-based compensation expense. Stock-based compensation expense related to sales and marketing increased to $509,000 in the third quarter of 2007 from $84,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and to $1,059,000 in the first nine months of 2007 from $116,000 in the first nine months of 2006.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses primarily include personnel costs; facilities expenses related to our executive, finance, human resources, information technology and legal organizations; bad debt expense; and fees for professional services such as legal, accounting, compliance and information systems. Since our initial public offering, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant additional accounting, legal and compliance costs, as well as additional insurance, investor relations, and other costs associated with being a public company. Accordingly, we expect general and administrative expenses to continue to increase in total dollars although we expect these expenses to decrease as a percentage of total revenue.
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | | | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | (dollars in thousands) | |
General and administrative expenses | | $ | 3,687 | | | $ | 2,116 | | | | 1,571 | | | $ | 9,769 | | | $ | 5,186 | | | | 4,583 | |
Percent of total revenue | | | 17 | % | | | 12 | % | | | | | | | 16 | % | | | 12 | % | | | | |
General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to an increase in employee headcount to 48 at September 30, 2007 from 32 at October 1, 2006. The absolute dollar increases period-to-period were primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits, stock-based compensation and professional services. The additional personnel and professional services fees were primarily the result of our efforts to build our legal, financial, human resources, and information technology functions required of a public company. We expect to continue to incur significant additional expenses as a result of operating as a public company, including costs to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules and regulations applicable to public companies. However, we expect total general and administrative costs to decrease as a percentage of revenue over time. Stock-based compensation expense related to general and administrative increased to $522,000 in the third quarter of 2007 from $34,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and to $1,081,000 in the first nine months of 2007 from $82,000 in the first nine months of 2006.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net primarily includes interest income on cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances and interest expense on our outstanding debt. In addition, the three and nine months ended October 1, 2006, included the warrant revaluation expense adjustment to record our preferred stock warrants at fair value in accordance with FSP 150-5.
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | | | September 30, | | | October 1, | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | $ change | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | |
Interest income and other | | $ | 1,141 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 1,087 | | | $ | 3,472 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 3,424 | |
Interest expense. | | | — | | | | (438 | ) | | | 438 | | | | — | | | | (894 | ) | | | 894 | |
Warrant revaluation expense | | | — | | | | (690 | ) | | | 690 | | | | — | | | | (1,634 | ) | | | 1,634 | |
Other income (expense), net | | $ | 1,141 | | | $ | (1,074 | ) | | $ | 2,215 | | | $ | 3,472 | | | $ | (2,480 | ) | | $ | 5,952 | |
Other income (expense), net increased by $2.2 million and $6.0 million from the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 to the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively, due to a $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, increase in interest income related to our higher average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances during the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 from the comparable period in the prior year, and a reduction in interest and warrant revaluation expense of $1.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively, year over year. The higher average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance during the first nine months of 2007 resulted from the proceeds received from our initial public offering in December 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2007, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $92.1 million and net accounts receivable of $18.6 million.
The following table shows our working capital and cash and cash equivalents as of the stated dates:
| As of | |
| September 30, | | December 31, | |
| 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Working capital | | $ | 92,882 | | | $ | 108,519 | |
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. | | | 92,087 | | | | 99,899 | |
The following table shows our cash flows from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the stated periods:
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | October 1, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | $ | (1,862 | ) | | $ | (11,079 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (40,313 | ) | | | (2,034 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | (424 | ) | | | 20,122 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $1.9 million and $11.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006. Net cash used in operating activities during the first nine months of 2007 consisted primarily of our net loss of $19.1 million, offset by net changes in current assets and liabilities of $10.7 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $3.8 million and stock-based compensation expense of $2.7 million.
Net cash used in operating activities during the first nine months of 2006 primarily consisted of our net loss of $15.0 million and $1.3 million net changes in our operating assets and liabilities, reduced by depreciation and amortization expense of $3.0 million and warrant revaluation expense of $1.6 million.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities primarily relate to capital expenditures to support our growth. Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $40.3 million, comprised of $34.6 million of net purchases of marketable securities and $5.7 million of capital expenditures, primarily related to improvements for additional leased space for our headquarters and increased research and development lab equipment. Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended October 1, 2006, was $2.0 million, comprised of $3.9 million in net capital expenditures offset by net sales of marketable securities of $1.8 million.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $424,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $20.1 million during the nine months ended October 1, 2006. In the first nine months of 2007, the net cash used in financing activities primarily related to payments of previously accrued public offering costs of $1.1 million, offset by $789,000 in proceeds from issuance of common stock. In the first nine months of 2006, the net cash provided by financing activities of $20.1 million was primarily due to net borrowings of $10.3 million under our line of credit facilities, $9.9 million in proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and $652,000 in proceeds from issuance of common stock.
We believe that our $92.1 million of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at September 30, 2007, will be sufficient to fund our projected operating requirements for at least twelve months. However, we may need to raise additional capital or incur additional indebtedness to continue to fund our operations in the future. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of our expansion into new territories, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, potential acquisitions of new businesses, and the continuing market acceptance of our products.
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2007, our principal commitments consisted of obligations outstanding under operating leases. We lease our facilities under operating leases that expire at various dates through 2014. There have been no material changes in our principal lease commitments compared to those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We outsource the manufacturing of our products to a contract manufacturer in which we maintain a rolling 90-day firm order based on production forecast. These orders may only be rescheduled or cancelled by Sanmina under certain limited conditions and, even then, with certain restrictions and penalties up to the full cost of the product. The remaining amount on the open purchase order with our contract manufacturer and other partners and suppliers at September 30, 2007 was approximately $18.6 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the periods presented, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not expect its adoption will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-b, Fair Value Measurements, or FSP 157-b. FSP 157-b delays the effective date of SFAS 157 until January 1, 2009, for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Nonfinancial assets and liabilities include, among others: intangible assets acquired through business combinations; long-lived assets when assessing potential impairment; and liabilities associated with restructuring activities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations, or SFAS 141R and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, or SFAS 160. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable assets acquired. SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. The calculation of earnings per share will continue to be based on income amounts attributable to the parent. SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. We have not yet determined the effect on our consolidated financial statements, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 141R or SFAS 160.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
A description of our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks is set forth in Part II, Item 7A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007 filed simultaneously with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (together, our “certifying officers”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that the information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on their evaluation, our certifying officers concluded that because of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2007.
A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Management identified the following deficiencies in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, which aggregated to a material weakness:
The Company did not maintain effective internal communication and risk assessment processes to keep pace with the Company's growth and transition to a public company in 2007. Specifically, the Company did not maintain effective lines of communication regarding certain sales transactions involving unique or non-standard terms and conditions among sales, finance, accounting, legal and senior management personnel for evaluation of revenue recognition. When persuasive evidence of an end-user did not exist, when oral or side arrangements existed, when contingencies existed with respect to the acceptance of the product by the end-user, or when resellers did not have the ability or intent to pay independent of payment by the end-user customer, this information was not properly communicated among sales, finance, accounting, legal and senior management personnel for such evaluation. In addition, the Company's risk assessment process did not evolve during 2007 to provide an adequate consideration to the risks resulting from the increase in the number of sales representatives, channel partners, complexity of sales arrangements and the use of unique and non standard terms and conditions by sales, finance, accounting, legal and senior management personnel.
These control deficiencies could result in misstatements, which we could fail to prevent or detect, of the consolidated financial statements affecting revenue and accounts receivable.
b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In response to the identification of the aforementioned material weakness, we took a number of actions during the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as outlined below.
| · | We enhanced our existing revenue recognition training for sales personnel and instituted new hire and recurring revenue recognition training for sales personnel; |
| · | We implemented additional controls regarding our sales to channel distributors designed to ensure appropriate revenue recognition and we documented and communicated these enhanced revenue recognition controls to our sales force; and |
| · | We took steps to ensure that effective communication occurs between sales, finance, accounting, legal and senior management. |
As described above, there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
On November 1, 2007, a putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated there under, as well as under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. Substantially similar complaints were filed in the same court on December 12, 2007 and December 17, 2007. These cases, which were subsequently consolidated, purport to be brought on behalf of a class of purchasers and acquirers of the Company's stock during the period December 16, 2006 to October 3, 2007. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants violated the federal securities laws during this period of time by, among other things, issuing a false and misleading registration statement and prospectus in connection with the Company's December 16, 2006 initial public offering, and by thereafter publicly misrepresenting the Company's current and prospective business and financial results. Plaintiffs claim that, as a result of these alleged wrongs, the Company's stock price was artificially inflated during the purported class period. Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified compensatory damages, interest, an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs have until April 18, 2008 to file a consolidated amended complaint.
In addition, on March 18, 2008, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington (King County), allegedly on behalf of and for the benefit of the Company, against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers. The Company was named as a nominal defendant. The derivative complaint alleges that the individual defendants breached fiduciary duties owed to the Company by publicly misrepresenting Isilon’s business prospects, and by failing to properly account for certain revenues earned in the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and first and second quarters in fiscal 2007. A substantially similar complaint was filed in the same court on March 24, 2008. The revenues referenced in the complaints were the subject of the Company’s February 29, 2008 announcement that it would restate its financial statements for those periods. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and equitable relief, disgorgement of compensation, attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. Because the complaints are derivative in nature they do not seek monetary damages from the Company. However, the Company may be required throughout the course of the action to advance the legal fees and costs incurred by the individual defendants.
We are unable to predict the outcome of these cases. A court determination against us could result in significant liability and could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company has also provided information on a voluntary basis to the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning the Audit Committee's independent review and the Company's financial restatement.
A description of the risks associated with our business, financial condition, and results of operations is set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007 filed simultaneously with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Contemporaneously with the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Form 10-K, for the year ended December 30, 2007, in which we restated our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the quarterly periods ended April 1, and July 1, 2007 as a result of errors in those financial statements. The Form 10-K also includes our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006.We have not amended any of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q that were filed prior to today's date. You should not rely on any of these annual or quarterly reports.
On February 29, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors, based upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, determined that we should restate our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007, ended April 1, 2007 and July 1, 2007, respectively. As announced on November 8, 2007, our Audit Committee, assisted by independent forensic accountants and legal advisors, has been conducting an independent investigation of certain of our sales to resellers and other customers to determine whether commitments were made that have an impact on the timing and treatment of revenue recognition, and whether our internal controls relating to revenue recognition are sufficient.
Unless otherwise indicated, all financial information in this Form 10-Q gives effect to the restatement.
Background of the Restatement
In late October 2007, as part of our finance department’s efforts to monitor our outstanding accounts receivable, our recently appointed Chief Financial Officer identified concerns regarding the recognition of revenue for certain sales to resellers and other customers. These concerns were promptly communicated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. After receiving additional information from our Chief Financial Officer, on November 4, 2007, the Audit Committee decided to conduct an independent investigation of the issues identified by management and the Board of Directors concurred in that decision. The Audit Committee subsequently retained independent legal counsel, Heller Ehrman LLP, and independent forensic accounting experts, Huron Consulting Group, to assist in the investigation.
The Audit Committee and its advisors investigated certain sales to resellers and other customers to determine whether commitments were made that have an impact on the timing and treatment of revenue recognition and whether our internal controls related to revenue recognition were sufficient. The Audit Committee and its advisors also considered risk areas other than revenue recognition.
The investigation focused on revenue recorded in fiscal 2006 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2007. During the course of the investigation, the Audit Committee and its advisors collected and reviewed over 80,000 pages of hard copy documents from individual custodians, department files and central files, and also collected and searched over 166 gigabytes of electronically stored information. The Audit Committee and its advisors conducted over 40 interviews of current and former employees and customers. The information obtained through this investigation was analyzed in conjunction with accounts receivable aging reports, credit memos, return materials authorizations, evaluation agreements, sales return reserves, bad debt write-offs, and reserves for bad debts. From this and other information, specific transactions were identified and tested for compliance with our revenue recognition policies. Testing procedures included review of customer contracts, customer correspondence and emails, sales quotes, customer purchase orders, shipping documentation, invoices, and cash receipts.
On February 29, 2008, the Audit Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Board of Directors, which are summarized below. Based on the Audit Committee’s recommendation, our Board of Directors concluded that as a result of errors identified we should restate our financial statements for fiscal year 2006 and the first and second quarters of 2007, and that our previously filed financial statements for these periods should not be relied on. On February 29, 2008, we issued a press release announcing the restatement and non-reliance on our previously published financial information for those periods, and we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing equivalent information.
On April 2, 2008, we filed this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007. We also issued a press release and filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to announce the final restated financial information and conclusions of our Audit Committee's investigation. In our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we identified a material weakness which rendered our disclosure controls and procedures ineffective.
Audit Committee Findings and Recommendations
Our Audit Committee determined that revenue was recognized prematurely on certain transactions and that revenue should not have been recognized on certain transactions. Specifically, the following principal errors were identified:
Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2006
· | A single transaction with a reseller was identified for $1.1 million where a contingency related to the qualification of the product performing to certain specifications in the identified end user network existed at the time of sale. This qualification was not communicated to legal and finance personnel or the Company's independent registered public accounting firm in order to facilitate a proper evaluation of the transaction for revenue recognition purposes. The reseller paid for only a portion of the original transaction and the Company has since negotiated a return for the remaining product. |
First and Second Quarters of Fiscal Year 2007
· | In the first quarter of 2007, we recognized revenue in a transaction with a customer that included a commitment from us to acquire software from the customer. Based upon facts discovered during the investigation, we have now concluded that the end user did not have the ability or intent to pay and revenue recognition was inconsistent with the accounting rules applicable to reciprocal sales transactions. |
· | In the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007, transactions with resellers were identified where the timing of revenue recognition was improper. In certain instances, revenue was recognized when persuasive evidence of an end-user did not exist, when oral arrangements existed that would have precluded revenue recognition, or when resellers did not have the ability or intent to pay independent of payment by the end-user customer. Revenue from these transactions was adjusted and will only be recognized upon sell-through of the product to end-users and when collection is reasonably assured and all other criteria for the recognition of revenue are met. |
· | We originally recognized revenue in the second quarter of 2007 on a sale directly to an end-user customer for which the terms and conditions were not fixed or determinable. This revenue has now been recognized in the fourth quarter of 2007 when the terms became fixed or determinable and all other criteria for the recognition of revenue were met. |
Summary of the Restatement Adjustments
The following tables summarize the impact of the restatement on our financial statements for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2006 and the three months ended April 1, and the three and six months ended July 1, 2007.
| | Three Months Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | December 31, 2006 | | | December 31, 2006 | |
| | As previously | | | | | | | | | As previously | | | | | | | |
| | reported | | | Adjustments | | | As restated | | | reported | | | Adjustments | | | As restated | |
Statement of Operations | | (in thousands, except per share data) | | | (in thousands, except per share data) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 20,656 | | | $ | (1,073 | ) | | $ | 19,583 | | | $ | 62,279 | | | $ | (1,073 | ) | | $ | 61,206 | |
Total cost of revenue | | | 9,468 | | | | (523 | ) | | | 8,945 | | | | 29,331 | | | | (523 | ) | | | 28,808 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 14,076 | | | | – | | | | 14,076 | | | | 48,325 | | | | – | | | | 48,325 | |
Loss from operations | | | (2,888 | ) | | | (550 | ) | | | (3,438 | ) | | | (15,377 | ) | | | (550 | ) | | | (15,927 | ) |
Net loss | | | (10,409 | ) | | | (550 | ) | | | (10,959 | ) | | | (25,438 | ) | | | (550 | ) | | | (25,988 | ) |
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | | $ | (0.72 | ) | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.75 | ) | | $ | (3.02 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | (3.09 | ) |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Three Months Ended | |
| | April 1, 2007 | | | July 1, 2007 | |
| | As previously | | | | | | | | | As previously | | | | | | | |
| | reported | | | Adjustments | | | As restated | | | reported | | | Adjustments | | | As restated | |
Statement of Operations | | (in thousands, except per share data) | | | (in thousands, except per share data) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 21,607 | | | $ | (3,761 | ) | | $ | 17,846 | | | $ | 25,116 | | | $ | (2,205 | ) | | $ | 22,911 | |
Total cost of revenue | | | 9,837 | | | | (569 | ) | | | 9,268 | | | | 11,999 | | | | (691 | ) | | | 11,308 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 16,645 | | | | (86 | ) | | | 16,559 | | | | 17,869 | | | | (113 | ) | | | 17,756 | |
Loss from operations | | | (4,875 | ) | | | (3,106 | ) | | | (7,981 | ) | | | (4,752 | ) | | | (1,401 | ) | | | (6,153 | ) |
Net loss | | | (3,750 | ) | | | (3,106 | ) | | | (6,856 | ) | | | (3,621 | ) | | | (1,401 | ) | | | (5,022 | ) |
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.11 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.08 | ) |
| | Six Months Ended | |
| | July 1, 2007 | |
| | As previously | | | | | | | |
| | reported | | | Adjustments | | | As restated | |
Statement of Operations | | (in thousands, except per share data) | |
Total revenue | | $ | 46,723 | | | $ | (5,966 | ) | | $ | 40,757 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 34,514 | | | | (199 | ) | | | 34,315 | |
Loss from operations | | | (9,627 | ) | | | (4,507 | ) | | | (14,134 | ) |
Net loss | | | (7,371 | ) | | | (4,507 | ) | | | (11,878 | ) |
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | | $ | (0.12 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) |
Our Audit Committee determined that no senior executives currently employed by the Company engaged in any improper practices or are otherwise responsible for improper revenue recognition. The Audit Committee determined that no sales personnel currently employed by the Company directly participated in negotiating oral side arrangements or reciprocal sales transactions, though several sales personnel appear to have been aware of such transactions. The Audit Committee found evidence that our former Chief Executive Officer, former Chief Financial Officer, and former Vice President of North America Sales participated directly in certain of the transactions for which adjustments are being recorded, but the Audit Committee concluded that the evidence about their roles, knowledge and intent is conflicting, disputed, and ultimately inconclusive.
During the course of its investigation, our Audit Committee identified internal control weaknesses relating primarily to the failure to communicate complete information regarding certain sales transactions containing non-standard terms between sales, finance, accounting, legal and members of senior management and an ineffective risk assessment process.
As a result of its investigation, our Audit Committee has made recommendations to the Board of Directors and management and those recommendations have been approved. These recommendations include: (i) the Board and senior management to consider possible remedial actions for any of our remaining personnel who may have been aware or involved in the subject transactions; (ii) expanding and clarifying our revenue recognition policy; (iii) conducting enhanced revenue recognition training for all sales, sales operations and accounting personnel as soon as practicable, instituting enhanced revenue recognition training for all new sales and sales operations personnel, and instituting enhanced annual revenue recognition training for all sales and sales operations personnel; (iv) documenting and communicating in writing to our sales force clearly stated revenue recognition policies; and (v) management, working with the Audit Committee, to further document our revenue recognition policy and further develop related procedures and controls to enhance and improve transaction related communications throughout our business.
In addition, with the concurrence of the Audit Committee, we have modified certain policies and procedures in an effort to avoid a recurrence of the issues that caused this restatement, including: (i) requiring documented evidence of sell-through for all sales transactions with certain resellers prior to revenue recognition; (ii) enhancing our process of requiring quarterly certifications by our sales force to note that they have disclosed all non-standard terms and conditions; (iii) revising our sales commission structure to defer commissions on transactions that include non-standard terms and conditions; and (iv) implementing enhanced processes to assess the creditworthiness of customers.
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for this period-ended September 30, 2007, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or filed herewith.
| | | | Incorporation by Reference Herein |
Exhibit | | | | | | |
Number | | Description | | Form | | Date |
| | | | | | |
| | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | | | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ISILON SYSTEMS, INC. |
Date: April 2, 2008 | By: | /s/ Sujal Patel | |
| | Sujal Patel |
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
| |
| By: | /s/ William Richter | |
| | William Richter |
| | Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
| | |
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | | | Incorporation by Reference Herein |
Exhibit | | | | | | |
Number | | Description | | Form | | Date |
| | | | | | |
31.1* | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
31.2 * | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
32.1 ‡ | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
32.2 ‡ | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | | | | |