Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE B. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Preparation The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The interim financial data as of September 30, 2016 is unaudited and is not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the interim data includes only normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations relating to interim financial statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 that has been filed with the SEC. Initial Public Offering In February 2015, the Company completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) by issuing 5.3 million shares of common stock, at an offering price of $17.00 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $81.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company. In connection with the IPO, the Company’s outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock were automatically converted into an aggregate of 11.4 million shares of common stock, and the Company’s outstanding warrants to purchase shares of convertible preferred stock were automatically converted into warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of less than 0.1 million shares of common stock, resulting in the reclassification of the related redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability of $0.6 million to additional paid-in-capital. 1-for-4 Reverse Stock Split In connection with the IPO, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock on a 1-for-4 basis. The reverse stock split became effective on January 12, 2015. The par value of the common stock was not adjusted as a result of the reverse stock split. Adjustments corresponding to the reverse stock split were made to the ratio at which the convertible preferred stock converted into common stock immediately prior to the closing of the IPO. Accordingly, all share and per share amounts for all periods presented in these financial statements and notes thereto have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect the reverse stock split and adjustment of the preferred stock’s conversion ratios. Business Combination On June 29, 2016, the Company acquired and entered into an exclusive license for the XeroGel™ assets with CogENT Therapeutics, LLC for $11.0 million in cash (the “XeroGel acquisition”). T (in thousands) Purchase Price Allocation Technologies $ 6,000 Trade names 350 Tangible assets 323 Total identifiable assets 6,673 Goodwill $ 4,327 The Company incurred transaction costs in connection with the acquisition of approximately $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which are included in general and administrative expenses. The estimated fair value of the net assets acquired is preliminary and subject to change. While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions as a part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets acquired at the acquisition date, its estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Under the terms of the XeroGel acquisition agreements, the Company became the manufacturer of XeroGel and will continue to market and sell XeroGel to hospitals, offices and ambulatory surgery centers. Prior to the transaction, the Company was the exclusive distributor of XeroGel in the United States. The distribution agreement between the two parties was terminated in connection with the transaction. As a result of the XeroGel acquisition, the Company began recognizing all XeroGel revenue on a gross basis effective June 29, 2016. The Company has concluded that the XeroGel acquisition was not material for purposes of including pro forma information in this report and therefore has not provided any such information herein. Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Intangible assets are recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. In the year following the period in which identified intangible assets become fully amortized, the fully amortized balances are removed from the gross asset and accumulated amortization amounts. Goodwill is not amortized, but is instead subject to impairment testing. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using a straight-line method over their respective useful lives. Goodwill Impairment Policy The Company chose November 1 as the date to assess its On an annual basis, or more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events, the Company will test for goodwill impairment using a three-step process. T The second step is to identify a potential impairment by comparing the calculated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The fair value of a reporting unit is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis and further analyzed using other methods of valuation. A discounted cash flow analysis requires the Company to make various assumptions, including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the Company’s long-term projections. In addition, an assumed terminal value is used to project future cash flows beyond base years. Assumptions used in the Company’s impairment testing will be consistent with the Company’s internal forecasts and operating plans. The Company’s discount rate will be based on its debt and equity balances, adjusted for current market conditions and investor expectations of return on its equity. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, there will be no impairment. If the calculated fair value is less than the carrying value, the third step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with its carrying amount. To the extent the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, a write-down of the reporting unit’s goodwill would be necessary. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant Accounting Policies There have been no changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the significant accounting policies described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, other than the new policies described above which have become significant accounting policies for the Company as a result of the XeroGel acquisition. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This standard will eliminate the transaction and industry specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principles based approach for determining revenue recognition. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. Under ASU 2015-03, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 . Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. A company should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, a company is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. The guidance only affects the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet and has no impact on results of operations. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect that adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires that lease arrangements longer than twelve months result in an entity recognizing an asset and liability. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the updated guidance on its consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations - Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net. This ASU clarifies the revenue recognition implementation guidance for preparers on certain aspects of principal versus agent consideration. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods therein. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation, which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, to require the measurement of expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable forecasts. The main objective of this ASU is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years; the ASU allows for early adoption as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statements of Cash Flows – Classifications of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, to clarify how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years; the ASU allows for early adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements. |