UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-33197
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
| 95-4661210 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
| (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
| Identification No.) |
215 North Marengo Avenue |
|
|
Pasadena, California 91101 |
| (626) 229-9191 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
| Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non- accelerated filer x |
| Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of May 9, 2011, there were approximately 25,315,000 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| March 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 25,180 |
| $ | 27,621 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $563 and $558, respectively |
| 16,862 |
| 16,344 |
| ||
Inventory |
| 922 |
| 987 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
| 2,089 |
| 1,934 |
| ||
Total current assets |
| 45,053 |
| 46,886 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property and equipment, net |
| 11,326 |
| 11,351 |
| ||
Intangible assets, net |
| 4,786 |
| 5,058 |
| ||
Goodwill, net |
| 3,711 |
| 3,711 |
| ||
Other assets |
| 434 |
| 434 |
| ||
Total long-term assets |
| 20,257 |
| 20,554 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 65,310 |
| $ | 67,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 2,466 |
| $ | 2,568 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
| 6,662 |
| 7,255 |
| ||
Capital lease obligations |
| 74 |
| 76 |
| ||
Deferred revenues |
| 30,038 |
| 30,279 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
| 39,240 |
| 40,178 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rent incentives |
| 1,019 |
| 1,221 |
| ||
Capital lease obligations |
| 97 |
| 116 |
| ||
Deferred revenues |
| 4,033 |
| 3,335 |
| ||
Deferred tax liabilities |
| 131 |
| 61 |
| ||
Total long-term liabilities |
| 5,280 |
| 4,733 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 24,025,000 and 23,873,000 shares issued, respectively; and 23,080,000 and 22,976,000 shares outstanding, respectively |
| 23 |
| 23 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 69,966 |
| 68,311 |
| ||
Treasury stock, at cost, 945,000 and 897,000 shares, respectively |
| (4,388 | ) | (4,039 | ) | ||
Accumulated deficit |
| (44,811 | ) | (41,766 | ) | ||
Total stockholders’ equity |
| 20,790 |
| 22,529 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
| $ | 65,310 |
| $ | 67,440 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Product revenue |
| $ | 9,554 |
| $ | 8,442 |
|
Services and maintenance revenue |
| 14,023 |
| 10,953 |
| ||
Total revenues |
| 23,577 |
| 19,395 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of product revenue |
| 1,285 |
| 688 |
| ||
Cost of services and maintenance revenue |
| 6,298 |
| 4,241 |
| ||
Total cost of revenues |
| 7,583 |
| 4,929 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Gross profit |
| 15,994 |
| 14,466 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating expenses : |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Selling and marketing |
| 8,129 |
| 8,225 |
| ||
Research and development |
| 4,772 |
| 4,086 |
| ||
General and administrative |
| 4,807 |
| 3,257 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 1,241 |
| 1,014 |
| ||
Total operating expenses |
| 18,949 |
| 16,582 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating income (loss) |
| (2,955 | ) | (2,116 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other income and expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest income |
| 9 |
| 37 |
| ||
Interest expense |
| (4 | ) | (2 | ) | ||
Other income, net |
| 1 |
| — |
| ||
Total other income and expense |
| 6 |
| 35 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
| (2,949 | ) | (2,081 | ) | ||
Income tax provision |
| 96 |
| 49 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
| $ | (3,045 | ) | $ | (2,130 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
| $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Diluted |
| $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average number of shares used in per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
| 23,041 |
| 23,016 |
| ||
Diluted |
| 23,041 |
| 23,016 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
| $ | (3,045 | ) | $ | (2,130 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 1,241 |
| 1,014 |
| ||
Benefit for doubtful accounts |
| — |
| (100 | ) | ||
Share-based compensation |
| 1,554 |
| 1,100 |
| ||
Deferred taxes |
| 70 |
| — |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trade receivables |
| (518 | ) | 4,904 |
| ||
Inventory |
| 65 |
| (22 | ) | ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
| (155 | ) | (250 | ) | ||
Accounts payable |
| (101 | ) | (521 | ) | ||
Accrued liabilities |
| (795 | ) | 1,036 |
| ||
Deferred revenues |
| 457 |
| (2,294 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
| (1,227 | ) | 2,737 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchase of property and equipment |
| (945 | ) | (548 | ) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| (945 | ) | (548 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
| 101 |
| 112 |
| ||
Common stock repurchased or withheld |
| (349 | ) | (131 | ) | ||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
| (21 | ) | (21 | ) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (269 | ) | (40 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| (2,441 | ) | 2,149 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
| 27,621 |
| 36,585 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
| $ | 25,180 |
| $ | 38,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest |
| $ | 2 |
| $ | 1 |
|
Income taxes |
| $ | 3 |
| $ | 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital lease obligations incurred to acquire assets |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Purchase of property and equipment included in accounts payable |
| $ | 150 |
| $ | 488 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Description of the Business
General
Guidance Software, Inc. was incorporated in the state of California in 1997 and reincorporated in Delaware on December 11, 2006. Guidance and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “Guidance,” “we” or the “Company.” Headquartered in Pasadena, California, Guidance is the leading global provider of software and hardware solutions used to conduct digital investigations.
Our main products are: EnCase® eDiscovery, which automates the search, collection preservation and processing of electronically stored information for litigation and compliance purposes; EnCase® Enterprise, a comprehensive, network-enabled digital investigative solution that enables corporations and government agencies to search, collect, preserve and analyze data across all of the servers, desktops and laptops that comprise their entire network from a single location; EnCase® Forensic, a desktop-based product primarily used by law enforcement and government agencies for collecting, preserving, analyzing and authenticating electronic computer forensic data for use in criminal and civil court proceedings; and EnCase® Legal Hold, which automates the sending and tracking of litigation hold notices, and provides online interviewing capabilities. In 2009, we launched EnCase® Portable, a data acquisition solution that enables customers to leverage the search and acquisition capabilities of EnCase® software in a wide range of field applications through the use of a portable device and EnCase® Cybersecurity, which provides the ability to identify and analyze undiscovered threats, such as polymorphic or metamorphic malware, and other advanced hacking techniques that evade traditional network or host-based defenses and includes investigative capabilities that target confidential or sensitive data and risk mitigation by wiping sensitive data from unauthorized locations. In May 2010, we added a family of data acquisition forensic hardware products including forensic duplicators, multiple write blockers and other hardware through our acquisition of Tableau, LLC (“Tableau”). In addition, we complement our product offerings with a comprehensive array of professional and training services including technical support and maintenance services to help our customers implement our solutions, conduct investigations and train their IT and legal professionals to effectively and efficiently use our products.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 and the condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are unaudited. These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial position and results of operations, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 2, 2011. The operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 and cash flows for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be achieved for the full fiscal year or for future periods.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial reporting. In the opinion of our management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position as of March 31, 2011 and our results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 has been derived from the December 31, 2010 audited financial statements. The interim financial information contained in this Quarterly Report is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Guidance and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On
an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, share-based compensation, bad debts, income taxes, commitments, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We invest excess cash in money market funds and highly liquid debt instruments of the US government and its agencies. Highly liquid investments with stated maturities of three months or less from date of purchase are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. Based on borrowing rates currently available to us for borrowings with similar terms, the carrying values of our capital lease obligations also approximate fair value.
Inventory
Inventory is comprised of hardware components, packaged software components and finished goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market, using the weighted average cost method. We conduct quarterly inventory reviews for obsolescence, and inventory considered unlikely to be sold is adjusted to net realizable value.
Amortization of Intangible Assets with Finite Lives
Intangible assets with finite lives are carried at the implied fair value of such assets at the time of acquisition. With the exception of our customer relationships intangible asset, which is amortized on a double-declining basis, the implied fair values of such assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired and is assigned to a reporting unit at the date the goodwill is initially recorded. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but evaluated for impairment annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the value may not be recoverable. A two-step test is performed at the reporting unit level to assess goodwill for impairment. First, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, the reporting unit is not impaired and no further testing is performed. The second step is performed if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss equal to the difference will be recorded. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment by comparing the carrying value of the assets with their fair values. If the carrying value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss equal to the difference will be recorded.
Application of the impairment test requires significant judgment to estimate the fair value. Changes in estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or impairment.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We restrict our investments in cash and cash equivalents to financial institutions, US government or federal agency instruments and obligations of corporations with high credit standing. At March 31, 2011, the majority of our cash balances were held at financial institutions located in California in accounts that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for up to $250,000. Uninsured balances aggregate approximately $24.1 million as of March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011, all of our cash equivalents consisted of financial institution and US governmental obligations. We periodically perform credit evaluations of our customers and maintain reserves for potential losses on our accounts receivable. We do not believe we are subject to concentrations of credit risk with respect to such receivables.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350): In December 2010, an update was made to Intangibles — Goodwill and Other - “When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The update to Intangibles — Goodwill and Other modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. Effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010, we have adopted this standard with no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Business Combinations (ASC 805): In December 2010, an update was made to Business Combinations - “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” The update to Business Combinations clarifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. Effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010, we have adopted this standard with no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Business Combination
On May 7, 2010, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Tableau, a privately-held developer and manufacturer of computer forensic products for approximately $10.7 million in cash (net of cash acquired of $1.6 million). We incurred $0.2 million in acquisition-related costs. We acquired Tableau to extend our existing leadership in computer forensics technology by offering software and hardware to better fulfill the needs of the computer forensic community. This transaction closed on May 7, 2010 and the results of operations of Tableau have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements subsequent to the date of acquisition.
Based upon the estimated fair values as of May 7, 2010, we made an allocation of the purchase price to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets has been recorded as goodwill. The factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill included intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition and expected synergies that will increase revenue and profits. Goodwill is assigned to our products reporting segment and we expect the full balance of goodwill to be tax deductible for tax purposes.
Purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):
|
| Weighted Average |
|
|
| Fair Market Values |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
| $ | 1,643 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
|
|
| 523 |
| |
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
| 730 |
| |
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
| 185 |
| |
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Core technology |
| 10 |
| 1,100 |
|
|
| |
Existing and developed technology |
| 2 |
| 1,200 |
|
|
| |
In-process research and development |
| Indefinite-lived |
| 1,100 |
|
|
| |
Customer relationships |
| 5 |
| 575 |
|
|
| |
Trade name |
| 10 |
| 1,800 |
|
|
| |
Total identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
| 5,775 |
| |
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
| 3,711 |
| |
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
| (185 | ) | |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| (53 | ) | |
Total purchase price |
|
|
|
|
| $ | 12,329 |
|
The following is the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statement of the combined entity as though the business combination had been as of the beginning of the comparable annual reporting period for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands, except per share amounts). The three-month period ended March 31, 2011 represents our actual condensed consolidated financial statement and is presented for comparability purposes.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Total revenues |
| $ | 23,577 |
| $ | 20,901 |
|
Total net expenses |
| 26,526 |
| 22,818 |
| ||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
| (2,949 | ) | (1,966 | ) | ||
Income tax provision |
| 96 |
| 49 |
| ||
Net income (loss) |
| $ | (3,045 | ) | $ | (1,966 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted |
| $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Note 4. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of the shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and upon the vesting of restricted stock awards under the treasury stock method. In net loss periods, basic net loss per share and diluted net loss per share are identical since the effect of potential common shares is anti-dilutive and therefore excluded.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
| $ | (3,045 | ) | $ | (2,130 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
| 23,041 |
| 23,016 |
| ||
Effect of dilutive share-based awards |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
| 23,041 |
| 23,016 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
| $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Diluted |
| $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Antidilutive securities, which consist of stock options and restricted stock awards that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation, consisted of an aggregate of approximately 5,635,000 and 5,015,000 shares as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Note 5. Inventory
Inventory is comprised of hardware components, packaged software components and finished goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market, using the weighted average cost method. The following table sets forth, by major classes, inventory as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
| March 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Components |
| $ | 327 |
| $ | 306 |
|
Finished goods |
| 595 |
| 681 |
| ||
Total inventory |
| $ | 922 |
| $ | 987 |
|
Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangibles
We assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually as of April 30, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. There were no impairment charges related to goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets as of March 31, 2011. Goodwill is assigned to our products reporting segment and we expect the full balance of goodwill to be tax deductible for tax purposes. In-process research and development intangible assets acquired are considered to be indefinite-lived until completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. The Company will determine the estimated useful lives and amortization method of the asset upon completion of the research and development efforts. During the period the assets are considered infinite-lived, impairment will be assessed annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable.
The following table summarizes goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Goodwill acquired |
| $ | 3,711 |
|
In-process research and development |
| 1,015 |
| |
Total |
| $ | 4,726 |
|
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Tableau resulting in acquired intangible assets. With the exception of customer relationships, which is amortized on a double-declining basis, the acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful life as noted in Note 3 above.
The following table summarizes cumulative amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization as of March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
| Gross |
| Accumulated |
| Net |
| |||
Core technology |
| $ | 1,100 |
| $ | (99 | ) | $ | 1,001 |
|
Existing and developed technology |
| 1,285 |
| (549 | ) | 736 |
| |||
Customer relationships |
| 575 |
| (179 | ) | 396 |
| |||
Trade names |
| 1,800 |
| (162 | ) | 1,638 |
| |||
Total |
| $ | 4,760 |
| $ | (989 | ) | $ | 3,771 |
|
The following table summarizes the estimated remaining amortization expense through the year 2015 and thereafter (in thousands):
Year ending |
| Amortization |
| |
2011 |
| $ | 793 |
|
2012 |
| 627 |
| |
2013 |
| 398 |
| |
2014 |
| 373 |
| |
2015 |
| 318 |
| |
Thereafter |
| 1,262 |
| |
Total amortization expense |
| $ | 3,771 |
|
Note 7. Share Repurchase Program
In August 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase shares of our common stock having an aggregate value of up to $8.0 million. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $4.8 million remaining under this authorization. The authorization allows us to repurchase our common stock from time to time through open market purchases and negotiated transactions, or otherwise. The timing, nature and amount of such transactions will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, and the program may be suspended, discontinued or accelerated at any time. The sources of funds for the purchases under the remaining authorization are our existing cash on hand and cash from operations. Purchases are made in the open market, through block trades and other negotiated transactions. Repurchased shares are held in Treasury Stock and have not been retired.
In addition to the repurchased shares, the Company withheld approximately 48,000 common shares for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from employees to satisfy their personal income tax withholding requirements upon the vesting of restricted stock awards issued under our equity compensation plans. The Company may engage in similar transactions from time to time related to future vesting of employee restricted stock awards. See Part II. Item 2 of this Quarterly Report for further information regarding the share repurchase program.
Note 8. Debt Obligations
We maintain a $3.0 million revolving line of credit with a bank. Borrowings under this line of credit would be collateralized by substantially all our assets. The line of credit requires that we remain in compliance with certain financial covenants and in March 2010, an amendment to the credit agreement was entered into to extend the expiration date to May 31, 2012 and decrease the maximum cumulative net loss permitted under the credit facility to $5.0 million (excluding non-cash share-based compensation) during any one fiscal year. Borrowings under the amended credit agreement bear interest at one of the following rates (as selected by us): a rate equal to the bank’s alternate base rate plus 2% or the bank’s LIBOR plus 3%. As of March 31, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under this line of credit and we were in compliance with the covenants associated with the revolving line of credit.
As of March 31, 2011, we had an outstanding stand-by letter of credit in the amount of $225,000, related to one of our facility leases, secured by the revolving line of credit. There were no amounts outstanding under this line of credit at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
Note 9. Equity Incentive Plan
In 2004, our Board of Directors and stockholders approved the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). A total of 2,062,000 shares of common stock was initially authorized and reserved for issuance under the Plan in the form of incentive and non-qualified stock options and stock purchase rights for restricted stock. The Plan was amended in 2005 to increase the number of shares available for issuance to 3,977,000. In May 2006, the Board of Directors and stockholders approved the First Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “First Amended and Restated Plan”), which amended and restated the Plan in its entirety, and provided for increases in the number of shares available for issuance by an additional 1,126,994 shares on May 3, 2006, an additional 828,073 shares on January 1, 2007, and an additional 828,123 shares on each of January 1, 2008 and 2009. At our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved an amendment to the First Amended and Restated Plan that accelerated to July 1, 2008 the automatic increase in the number of shares available under the plan that was scheduled to occur on January 1, 2009.
At our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved the Second Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Second Amended and Restated Plan”), which amended and restated the First Amended and Restated Plan in its entirety, and provided for an increase in the number of shares available for issuance by an additional 1,500,000 shares to a total of 9,088,313 shares. On April 22, 2010, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Plan that accelerated the vesting of new grants of annual restricted stock awards granted to independent directors to occur on the earlier of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date or the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to the independent director’s continued status as a service provider through such date. Employees, officers and directors are eligible to receive awards under the Second Amended and Restated Plan, which is generally administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, who determines the terms and conditions of each grant.
At March 31, 2011, approximately 1,234,000 shares remain available for grant as options or nonvested share awards under the Second Amended and Restated Plan.
Stock Options
The terms of the options granted under the Plan are determined at the time of grant, and generally vest 25% annually over a four-year service period and typically must be exercised within 10 years from the date of grant.
A summary of stock option activity follows:
|
| Number of |
| Weighted |
| Weighted Average |
| Aggregate |
| ||
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 |
| 3,639,000 |
| $ | 8.37 |
| 6.1 |
| $ | 4,432,000 |
|
Granted |
| 4,000 |
| $ | 6.92 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Exercised |
| (23,000 | ) | $ | 4.47 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Forfeited or expired |
| (29,000 | ) | $ | 10.00 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
| 3,591,000 |
| $ | 8.38 |
|
|
| $ | 6,543,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exercisable, March 31, 2011 |
| 2,445,000 |
| $ | 7.80 |
|
|
| $ | 4,979,000 |
|
We define in-the-money options at March 31, 2011 as options that had exercise prices that were lower than the $8.38 fair market value of our common stock at that date. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at March 31, 2011 is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the fair market value of our common stock for the 1,841,000 shares that were in-the-money at that date, of which 1,409,000 were exercisable.
Restricted Stock Awards
During 2007, we began issuing restricted stock awards to certain directors, officers and employees under the Plan. Compensation expense for such awards, based on the fair market value of the awards on the grant date, is recorded during the vesting period. Restricted stock awards generally vest 25% annually over a four-year service period.
A summary of restricted stock awards activity follows:
|
| Number of |
| Weighted Average |
| |
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 |
| 1,861,000 |
| $ | 6.25 |
|
Granted |
| 349,000 |
| 6.92 |
| |
Vested |
| (129,000 | ) | 5.80 |
| |
Forfeited |
| (37,000 | ) | 6.16 |
| |
Outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
| 2,044,000 |
| $ | 6.40 |
|
The total grant date fair value of shares vested under such grants during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $750,000.
Note 10. Share-Based Compensation
We account for share-based compensation in accordance with Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718). Share-based compensation expense for all share-based awards is recognized using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the grant date fair value of share-based payments. We recognize the cost, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
With the exception of one grant issued in December 2007 with market-based vesting conditions, discussed further below, the fair values of awards granted under the Second Amended and Restated Plan were estimated at the date of grant and the following weighted average assumptions:
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Risk-free interest rate |
| 2.4 | % | 2.8 | % | ||
Dividend yield |
| — | % | — | % | ||
Expected life (years) |
| 6.25 |
| 6.25 |
| ||
Volatility |
| 65.5 | % | 52.9 | % | ||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
| $ | 4.27 |
| $ | 2.80 |
|
The volatility of our common stock is estimated at the date of grant based on a weighted-average of the implied volatility of publicly traded 30-day to 270-day options on the common stock of a select peer group of similar companies (“Similar Companies”), the historical volatility of the common stock of Similar Companies and, beginning in late 2007, the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield in effect at the time of each option grant, based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with equivalent remaining terms. We use an expected dividend yield of zero as we have no intention of paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Compensation-Stock Compensation requires us to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. We amortize share-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. The expected term (life) of all stock option awards has been calculated using the “simplified method” because, due to the limited time our common stock has been publicly traded, we lack sufficient historical data to provide a reasonable basis to estimate the expected term of these options.
In December 2007, we granted our President and Chief Executive Officer an option to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at the price of $12.80 per share which vests, in 25% increments, only upon attainment of specified market-based conditions tied to the market value of our common stock. Under the provisions of Compensation —Stock Compensation, the fair value of share-based grants with a market vesting condition must be modeled and valued with a path-dependent valuation technique. Accordingly, we estimate the value of such awards using the Monte Carlo binomial simulation model. The primary assumptions used in the model are volatility, a risk-free interest rate, starting stock price, transferability restrictions and the terms of the award, as follows:
· Risk-free interest rate of 3.98%;
· Dividend yield of zero;
· Expected option life of 10 years; and
· Volatility of the expected market price of our common stock over that term of 53.9%.
Using these assumptions and inputs, we estimated that the weighted average grant date fair value of this award was $5.68 per option, with derived service periods ranging from 15 to 32 months for the four performance levels, and averaging 24 months. Under Compensation —Stock Compensation, the calculated $2.8 million fair value of this award must be recognized as expense over a
weighted average period of approximately two years whether the market conditions are met or not so long as the grantee meets the service condition.
The following table summarizes the share-based compensation expense we recorded (in thousands):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Stock option awards |
| $ | 433 |
| $ | 505 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
| 1,121 |
| 595 |
| ||
Share-based compensation expense |
| $ | 1,554 |
| $ | 1,100 |
|
As of March 31, 2011, there was approximately $1.6 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years and approximately $9.8 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years. We expect to record approximately $4.0 million in share-based compensation for the remainder of fiscal year 2011 related to stock options and restricted stock awards outstanding at March 31, 2011.
Note 11. Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with Income Taxes (ASC 740). Deferred income taxes are recorded for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and amounts recognized for income tax purposes. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount of future tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized. As of March 31, 2011, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets resulting in a carrying value of zero.
Management’s judgment is required in assessing the realizability of future deferred tax assets. We consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. If we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously provided valuation allowance. Likewise, in the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to earnings in the period in which we make such a determination.
We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and the taxing authorities of various state and foreign jurisdictions. We periodically perform a review of our uncertain tax position. An uncertain tax position represents our expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our liability for uncertain tax positions was $0.3 million and the balance remains unchanged at March 31, 2011. We do not expect there to be any material changes to the estimated amount of liability associated with our uncertain tax positions over the next twelve months. The tax years 2007 through 2009 remain subject to review by the taxing authorities in several jurisdictions. Most foreign jurisdictions have statute of limitations that range from three to six years.
Note 12. Fair Value Measurements
We adopted Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820) effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. There was no impact upon the adoption to the consolidated financial statements. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Under this standard, fair value is defined as the price that would be received in exchange for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring the use of observable market data when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on active market data. Unobservable inputs would be inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. The statement requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
| Level 1: | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities. |
| Level 2: | Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, and corroborated by market data. |
| Level 3: | Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, financial assets (we have no financial liabilities) that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
| Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2011 |
| ||||||||||
|
| Total |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| ||||
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
US Treasury Securities |
| $ | 9,000 |
| $ | 9,000 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Money market account |
| 8,596 |
| 8,596 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||
Total cash equivalents |
| $ | 17,596 |
| $ | 17,596 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
|
| Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||
|
| Total |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| ||||
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
US Treasury Securities |
| $ | 9,000 |
| $ | 9,000 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Money market account |
| 9,587 |
| 9,587 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||
Total cash equivalents |
| $ | 18,587 |
| $ | 18,587 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Note 13. Contingencies
Legal Matters
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently involved in any litigation the outcome of which would, based on information currently available, have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Indemnifications
We have agreed to indemnify our directors and executive officers for costs associated with any fees, expenses, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by them in any action or proceeding to which any of them is, or is threatened to be, made a party by reason of his or her services in their role as a director or officer.
We have also agreed to indemnify the pre-initial public offering stockholders for any increases in their tax liabilities for the periods during which we were an S Corporation.
Sales Tax Liabilities
The Company’s sales and use tax filings are subject to customary audits by authorities in the jurisdictions where it conducts business in the United States, which may result in assessments of additional taxes. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we determined that additional sales taxes were probable of being assessed by a certain state as a result of the preliminary findings specific to a sales and use tax audit. As a result, we estimated an incremental sales tax liability of approximately $1.3 million, including interest and penalties of approximately $300,000, where applicable, during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The estimated incremental sales and use tax liability was based on a similar model that was being used by the state conducting the sales and use tax audit. The estimated liability is recorded in general and administrative expenses.
Note 14. Related Party Transactions
Certain of our stockholders guarantee substantially all of the obligations due under our capital and operating leases as disclosed in Note 10 and Note 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
In May 2010, we executed a 4-year lease with an entity owned by one of our executives for our facility in Waukesha, Wisconsin. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we made payments for rent and operating expenses of approximately $37,500 and have a remaining obligation under this lease of approximately $462,500.
Note 15. Segment Information
We have adopted Segment Reporting (ASC 280) requiring segmentation based on our internal organization and reporting of revenue and other performance measures. Our segments are designed to allocate resources internally and provide a framework to determine management responsibility. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which discrete financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how
to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. We have four operating segments, as summarized below:
· Products segment—Includes EnCase® Enterprise, EnCase® eDiscovery, EnCase® Cybersecurity, EnCase® Forensic, EnCase® Portable, Premium License Support Program and hardware sales.
· Professional services segment—Performs consulting services and implementations. Consulting services include conducting investigations using our software products.
· Training segment—Provides training classes in which we train our customers to effectively and efficiently use our software products.
· Maintenance segment—Includes maintenance related revenue and costs.
We refer to the revenue generated by our professional services, training and maintenance segments, collectively, as services revenue. Currently, we do not separately allocate operating expenses to these segments, nor do we allocate specific assets, with the exception of goodwill, to these segments. Therefore, the segment information reported includes only revenues, cost of revenues and gross profit. The following tables present the results of operations for each operating segment:
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Product |
| Professional |
| Training |
| Maintenance |
| Total |
| |||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||||
Revenues |
| $ | 9,554 |
| $ | 5,425 |
| $ | 1,676 |
| $ | 6,922 |
| $ | 23,577 |
|
Cost of revenues |
| 1,285 |
| 4,315 |
| 1,426 |
| 557 |
| 7,583 |
| |||||
Gross profit |
| $ | 8,269 |
| $ | 1,110 |
| $ | 250 |
| $ | 6,365 |
| 15,994 |
| |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18,949 |
| |||||
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (2,955 | ) |
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Product |
| Professional |
| Training |
| Maintenance |
| Total |
| |||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||||
Revenues |
| $ | 8,442 |
| $ | 3,043 |
| $ | 1,872 |
| $ | 6,038 |
| $ | 19,395 |
|
Cost of revenues |
| 688 |
| 2,404 |
| 1,275 |
| 562 |
| 4,929 |
| |||||
Gross profit (loss) |
| $ | 7,754 |
| $ | 639 |
| $ | 597 |
| $ | 5,476 |
| 14,466 |
| |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,582 |
| |||||
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (2,116 | ) |
Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas in which we operate, is as follows (in thousands):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
| ||
United States |
| $ | 19,805 |
| $ | 15,943 |
|
Europe |
| 2,275 |
| 1,982 |
| ||
Asia |
| 541 |
| 524 |
| ||
Other |
| 956 |
| 946 |
| ||
|
| $ | 23,577 |
| $ | 19,395 |
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in this Quarterly Report under “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under “Risk Factors” and in other parts of this Quarterly Report.
Overview
We develop and provide the leading software and hardware solutions for digital investigations, including EnCase® Enterprise, a network-enabled product primarily for large corporations and government agencies, and EnCase® Forensic, a desktop-based product primarily for law enforcement agencies.
We were incorporated and commenced operations in 1997. From 1997 through 2002, we generated a substantial portion of our revenues from the sale of our EnCase® Forensic products and related services. We have experienced increases in our revenue as a result of the release of our EnCase® Enterprise products in late 2002, which expanded our customer base into corporate enterprises and federal government agencies. In addition, the releases of our EnCase® eDiscovery solution in late 2005 and EnCase® Information Assurance solution in late 2006 (which has now been replaced by our EnCase® Cybersecurity solution) have increased our average transaction size. In May 2010, we added a family of data acquisition forensic hardware products including forensic duplicators, multiple write blockers and other hardware through our acquisition of Tableau, LLC (“Tableau”). We anticipate that sales of our EnCase® Enterprise products and related services, in particular our EnCase® eDiscovery and EnCase® Cybersecurity solutions, and the sales of our forensic hardware products will comprise a substantial portion of our future revenues.
Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
There are a number of trends that may affect our business and our industry. Some of these trends or other factors include:
· Legislative and regulatory developments. Our digital investigation solutions allow law enforcement agencies, government organizations and corporations to conduct investigations within the legal and regulatory framework. Historically, the implementation of new laws and regulations surrounding digital investigations has helped create demand for our products. Future changes in applicable laws or regulations could enhance or detract from the desirability of our products.
· Information technology budgets. Deployment of our solutions may require a substantial capital expenditure by our customers. Budgets for information technology-related capital expenditures at corporations and all levels of government organizations are typically cyclical in nature, with generally higher budgets in times of improving economic conditions and lower budgets in times of economic slowdowns.
· Law enforcement agency budgets. We sell our EnCase® Forensic products and training services primarily to law enforcement agencies. Because of the limited nature of law enforcement budgets, funds are typically initially allocated toward solving issues perceived to be the most pressing. Sales of our products could be impacted by changes in the budgets of law enforcement agencies or in the relative priority assigned to digital law enforcement investigations.
· Prevalence and impact of hacking incidents and spread of malicious software. The increasing sophistication of hacking attacks on government and private networks and the global spread of malicious software, such as viruses, worms and rootkits, have increased the focus of corporations and large government organizations on digital investigations and other aspects of network security, which has, in turn, increased demand for our products. Future changes in the number and severity of such attacks or the spread of malicious software could have an effect on the demand for our products.
· Seasonality in revenues. We experience seasonality in our revenues, with the third and fourth quarters typically having the highest revenues for the year. We believe that this seasonality results primarily from our customers’ budgeting cycles. The federal government budget year ends in the third calendar quarter of the year and a majority of corporate budget years end in the fourth calendar quarter of the year. In addition, our customers also tend to make software purchases near the end of a particular quarter, which tends to make our revenues for a particular period unpredictable for a significant portion of that period. We expect that this seasonality within particular years and unpredictability within particular quarterly periods will continue for the foreseeable future.
· Amount of commercial litigation. Because commercial litigation often involves eDiscovery, an increase in commercial litigation could increase demand for our products and services, while a decrease in commercial litigation could decrease demand.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on our net revenue, operating income or loss and net income or loss, as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider them to be our critical accounting policies and estimates. There have no significant changes in those critical accounting policies and estimates during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, expressed as a percentage of total revenues:
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
| 40.5 | % | 43.5 | % |
Services and maintenance revenue |
| 59.5 |
| 56.5 |
|
Total revenues |
| 100.0 |
| 100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
| 5.4 |
| 3.5 |
|
Cost of services and maintenance revenue |
| 26.7 |
| 21.9 |
|
Total cost of revenues |
| 32.1 |
| 25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
| 67.9 |
| 74.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
| 34.5 |
| 42.4 |
|
Research and development |
| 20.2 |
| 21.1 |
|
General and administrative |
| 20.4 |
| 16.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
| 5.3 |
| 5.2 |
|
Total operating expenses |
| 80.4 |
| 85.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
| (12.5 | ) | (10.9 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
| 0.0 |
| 0.2 |
|
Interest expense |
| 0.0 |
| 0.0 |
|
Other income, net |
| 0.0 |
| 0.0 |
|
Loss before income taxes |
| (12.5 | ) | (10.7 | ) |
Income tax provision |
| 0.4 |
| 0.3 |
|
Net loss |
| (12.9 | )% | (11.0 | )% |
The following table sets forth share-based compensation expense recorded in each of the respective periods (in thousands):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Non-Cash Share-Based Compensation Data(1): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of product revenue |
| $ | 22 |
| $ | 5 |
|
Cost of services and maintenance revenue |
| 253 |
| 205 |
| ||
Selling and marketing |
| 437 |
| 360 |
| ||
Research and development |
| 421 |
| 189 |
| ||
General and administrative |
| 421 |
| 341 |
| ||
Total non-cash share-based compensation |
| $ | 1,554 |
| $ | 1,100 |
|
(1) Non-cash share-based compensation recorded in the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 relates to stock options and restricted share awards granted to employees measured under the fair value method. See Notes 9 and 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
Sources of Revenues
Our software product sales transactions typically include the following elements: (i) a software license fee paid for the use of our products under a perpetual license term, or for a specific term; (ii) an arrangement for first-year support and maintenance, which includes unspecified software updates, upgrades and post-contract support; (iii) and professional services for installation, implementation, consulting and training. We derive the majority of our revenues from sales of our software products. We sell our software products and services primarily through our direct sales force and in some cases we utilize resellers. We sell our hardware products primarily through resellers.
We recognize revenue in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Software Industry—Revenue Recognition topic (ASC 985-605), which, if revenues are to be recognized upon product delivery, requires among other things vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, or VSOE, for each undelivered element of multiple element customer contracts. Revenue associated with the sale of our forensic hardware is recognized upon shipment to the customer, provided that all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
| 2011 |
| Change % |
| 2010 |
| ||
Product revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Enterprise |
| $ | 4,490 |
| 5% |
| $ | 4,292 |
|
Forensic |
| 5,064 |
| 22% |
| 4,150 |
| ||
Total product revenues |
| 9,554 |
| 13% |
| 8,442 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Services and maintenance revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Professional services |
| 5,425 |
| 78% |
| 3,043 |
| ||
Training |
| 1,676 |
| (11)% |
| 1,872 |
| ||
Maintenance and other |
| 6,922 |
| 15% |
| 6,038 |
| ||
Total services and maintenance revenues |
| 14,023 |
| 28% |
| 10,953 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total revenues |
| $ | 23,577 |
| 22% |
| $ | 19,395 |
|
Product Revenues
We generate product revenues principally from two product categories: Enterprise and Forensic products. In late 2009, we redefined the categories that made up our product revenues. Our Enterprise products now include perpetual licenses and Pay-Per-Use fees related to our EnCase® Enterprise, eDiscovery, Legal Hold, Data Audit & Policy Enforcement, EnCase® Cybersecurity and OEM add-on products. Our Forensic products now includes revenues related to EnCase® Forensic, Portable, Neutrino® mobile forensic device, Field Intelligence Model, and other third-party hardware. Our Forensic products also include our Premium License Support Program product, which is sold on a subscription basis for a term of one or three years. As of May 2010, we added a line of forensic hardware products to our Forensic products. Revenues from OEM, Neutrino®, Field Intelligence Model and other hardware were previously reported as Other product revenue. For comparability purposes, we have reclassified the 2010 categories as specified above; however total product revenues remain unchanged as a result of the reclassification. During the first two quarters of each fiscal year, we typically experience our lowest levels of product sales due to the seasonal budgetary cycles of our customers. The third quarter is typically the strongest quarter for sales to our federal government customers. Typically, sales to our corporate customers are highest in the fourth quarter.
Product revenues for the first quarter of 2011 was $9.6 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 13%, from $8.4 million for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in product revenues was primarily an increase in forensic hardware products partially offset by lower forensic software revenue.
Services and Maintenance Revenues
Services and maintenance revenue for the first quarter of 2011 was $14.0 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or 28%, from $11.0 million for the first quarter of 2010. Professional services revenues for the first quarter of 2011 was $5.4 million, an increase of $2.4 million, or 78%, from $3.0 million for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in professional services revenues was primarily due to a general increase in demand for our eDiscovery services and revenue from certain significant consulting engagement performed during the first quarter of 2011. We expect professional services revenue to decrease slightly during the next few quarters due to the completion of these engagements during the first quarter. Training revenue for the first quarter of 2011 was $1.7 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 11%, from $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2010. The reduction in training revenue was primarily due to the continued restrictive travel and training budgets of our customers during the economic recovery, as well as a delay in training classes being scheduled due to the anticipation of new product releases later in the year. Maintenance and other revenue for the first quarter of 2011 was $6.9 million, an increase of $0.9 million, or 15%, from $6.0 million for the first quarter of 2010. The increase was primarily a result of an on-going increase in our installed product base and high annual renewal rates by customers desiring continuing maintenance support on our products.
Cost of Revenues
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
| 2011 |
| Change % |
| 2010 |
| ||
Cost of product revenues |
| $ | 1,285 |
| 87% |
| $ | 688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of services and maintenance revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Professional services |
| 4,315 |
| 80% |
| 2,404 |
| ||
Training |
| 1,426 |
| 12% |
| 1,275 |
| ||
Maintenance and other |
| 557 |
| (1)% |
| 562 |
| ||
Total cost of services and maintenance revenues |
| 6,298 |
| 49% |
| 4,241 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total cost of revenues |
| $ | 7,583 |
| 54% |
| $ | 4,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Share-based compensation included above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of product revenues |
| $ | 22 |
|
|
| $ | 5 |
|
Cost of services and maintenance revenues |
| $ | 253 |
|
|
| $ | 205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Gross Margin Percentages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Products |
| 86.6 | % |
|
| 91.9 | % | ||
Services and maintenance |
| 55.1 | % |
|
| 61.3 | % | ||
Total |
| 67.8 | % |
|
| 74.6 | % |
Cost of Product Revenues
Cost of product revenues consists principally of the cost of producing our software products, the cost of manufacturing our hardware products and product distribution costs, including the cost of compact discs, packaging, shipping, customs duties, and, to a lesser extent, compensation and related overhead expenses. While these costs are primarily variable with respect to sales volumes, they remain low in relation to the revenues generated and result in higher gross margins than our services and training businesses. Our gross margins can be affected by product mix, as our enterprise products are generally higher margin products than our forensic products, which include software and hardware.
Cost of product revenues for the first quarter of 2011 was $1.3 million, an increase of $0.6 million, or 87%, from $0.7 million for the first quarter of 2010. This increase was primarily a result of an increase in forensic hardware product revenues due to our acquisition of Tableau in May 2010. Product revenue gross margin decreased slightly to 86.6% in the first quarter of 2011, compared with 91.9% in the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily due to lower margins on forensic hardware products.
Cost of Services and Maintenance Revenues
The costs of services and maintenance revenues are largely comprised of employee compensation costs, including share-based compensation, and related overhead, travel and facilities costs. The cost of maintenance revenue is primarily outsourced, but also includes employee compensation cost for customer technical support and related overhead costs.
Total cost of services and maintenance revenue for the first quarter of 2011 was $6.3 million, a increase of $2.1 million, or 49%, from $4.2 million in the first quarter of 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation and benefits costs associated with the increase in headcount and utilization rates in our professionals services organization year-over-year, as well as the use of third-party consultants on certain engagements. Services and maintenance gross margin for the first quarter of 2011 decreased to 55.1%, compared to 61.3% in the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in gross margin was primarily a result of the higher mix of lower-margin services revenues versus maintenance revenues during the quarter.
Operating Expenses
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
| 2011 |
| Change % |
| 2010 |
| ||
Selling and marketing expenses |
| $ | 8,129 |
| (1)% |
| $ | 8,225 |
|
Research and development expenses |
| $ | 4,772 |
| 17% |
| $ | 4,086 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
| $ | 4,807 |
| 48% |
| $ | 3,257 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses |
| $ | 1,241 |
| 22% |
| $ | 1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Share-based compensation included above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Selling and marketing expenses |
| $ | 437 |
|
|
| $ | 360 |
|
Research and development expenses |
| $ | 421 |
|
|
| $ | 189 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
| $ | 421 |
|
|
| $ | 341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
As a percentage of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Selling and marketing expenses |
| 34.5 | % |
|
| 42.4 | % | ||
Research and development expenses |
| 20.2 | % |
|
| 21.1 | % | ||
General and administrative expenses |
| 20.4 | % |
|
| 16.8 | % | ||
Depreciation and amortization expenses |
| 5.3 | % |
|
| 5.2 | % |
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and costs related to our sales force and marketing staff. Selling and marketing expenses also include expenses relating to advertising, brand building, marketing promotions and trade show events (net of amounts received from sponsors and participants), product management, and travel and allocated overhead. We employed approximately 120 sales and marketing personnel at March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Selling and marketing expenses for the first quarter of 2011 was flat compared to the first quarter for 2010 with approximate headcount and related expenses comparable in both periods.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation, including share-based compensation, and related overhead expenses. In order to develop new product offerings, continue developing existing products and improve quality assurance, we increased the number of research and development personnel that we employ to 97 at March 31, 2011 from 84 at March 31, 2010.
Research and development expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 17%, during the first quarter of 2011 as compared with the first quarter of 2010. The higher expenses were driven primarily by an increase in headcount and related expenses and an increase in the number of products in development.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist of personnel and related costs for accounting, legal, information systems, human resources and other administrative functions. In addition, general and administrative expenses include professional service fees, bad debt expense, and other corporate expenses and related overhead. We employed approximately 60 general and administrative personnel at March 31, 2011 and 2010.
General and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2011 was $4.8 million, a $1.5 million, or 48%, increase from $3.3 million for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to a charge of $1.3 million related to certain state sales tax obligations including related interest penalties, as well as an increase in compensation and benefits expenses and a reduction in bad debt expense during the first quarter of 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of depreciation and amortization of our leasehold improvements, furniture, computer hardware and software, and intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $0.2 million, or 22%, in the first quarter 2011 as compared to the same period of the prior year primarily as a result of the amortization of intangibles assets we acquired through our acquisition of Tableau in May 2010.
Other Income and Expense
Interest income (expense) and other income (expense), net consist of interest earned on cash balances and other miscellaneous income and expense items. Interest income decreased by $28,000 for the first quarter of 2011 due to our lower cash and cash equivalents balance, and the corresponding decrease in earned interest, compared with the same period in 2010.
Income Tax Provision
The Company recorded an income tax provision for the first quarter of 2011 of $96,000 as compared to a $49,000 provision for the same period of the prior year. The income tax provision is based on our estimated effective annual tax rate and taxable income (loss) for the respective years. Our estimated effective tax rate is 3.3%, and 2.0% for three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, which differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 34% primarily due to research and development credits, offset by the tax impact of certain share-based compensation charges not deductible for tax, and the impact of providing a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have largely financed our operations from the cash flow generated from the sale of our products and services. As of March 31, 2011, we had $25.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. We believe that our cash flow from operations and our cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Changes in Cash Flow
We generate cash from operating activities primarily from cash collections related to the sale of our products and services. Net cash used in operating activities was $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The change to cash used in operating activities for the first quarter of 2011 from cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter of 2010 was primarily a result of an increase in trade receivables of $0.5 million during the first quarter of 2011, compared to a decrease $4.9 million in the prior year period, offset by an increase in deferred revenues of $0.5 million in the first quarter or 2011 compared to a decrease of $2.3 million in the prior year period.
Net cash used in investing activities of $0.9 million in the first quarter of 2011 and $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 resulted from additions to property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million for the first quarter of 2011, as compared to cash used in financing activities of $40,000 during the first quarter of 2010. The increase in cash used in financing activities was due primarily to an increase in common stock withheld.
We maintain a $3.0 million revolving line of credit with a bank. Borrowings under this line of credit would be collateralized by substantially all our assets. The line of credit requires that we remain in compliance with certain financial covenants and in March 2010, an amendment to the credit agreement was entered into to extend the expiration date to May 31, 2012 and decrease the maximum cumulative net loss permitted under the credit facility to $5.0 million (excluding non-cash share-based compensation) during any one fiscal year. Borrowings under the amended credit agreement bear interest at one of the following rates (as selected by us): a rate equal to the bank’s alternate base rate plus 2% or the bank’s LIBOR plus 3%. As of March 31, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under this line of credit and we were in compliance with the covenants associated with the revolving line of credit.
As of March 31, 2011, we had an outstanding stand-by letter of credit in the amount of $225,000, related to one of our facility leases, secured by the revolving line of credit. There were no amounts outstanding under this line of credit at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We currently have no material cash commitments, except our normal recurring trade payables, expense accruals and leases, all of which are currently expected to be funded through existing working capital and future cash flows from operations. At March 31, 2011, our outstanding contractual cash commitments were largely limited to our non-cancellable lease obligations, primarily relating to office facilities. In “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, we reported that our contractual obligation for these non-cancellable lease obligations as of December 31, 2009 was approximately $10.9 million, of which $3.8 million is due during 2011. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the expansion of our selling and marketing activities, the timing and extent of research and development spending to support product development and enhancement efforts, costs associated with expansion into new territories or markets, the timing of the introduction of new products and services, the enhancement of existing products and the continuing market acceptance of our products and services. To the extent that our existing cash, cash from operations or the availability of cash under our line of credit are insufficient to fund our future activities and planned growth, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Furthermore, although we cannot accurately anticipate the effect of inflation or foreign exchange markets on our operations, we do not believe these external economic forces have had, or are likely in the foreseeable future to have, a material impact on our results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At March 31, 2011, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K. We do not have material relationships or transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their non-independent relationship with us or our related parties except as disclosed in this report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350): In December 2010, an update was made to Intangibles — Goodwill and Other - “When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The update to Intangibles — Goodwill and Other modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. Effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010, we have adopted this standard with no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Business Combinations (ASC 805): In December 2010, an update was made to Business Combinations - “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” The update to Business Combinations clarifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. Effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010, we have adopted this standard with no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Market Risk. Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and credit risk. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
Foreign Currency Risk. To date, substantially all of our international sales have been denominated in US dollars, and therefore, the majority of our revenues are not subject to foreign currency risk. Our operating expenses and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, but such changes have historically had relatively little impact on our operating results and cash flows. A strengthening of the dollar could make our products and services less competitive in foreign markets and therefore could reduce our revenues. In the future, an increased portion of our revenues and costs may be denominated in foreign currencies. We do not enter into derivative instrument transactions for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Risk. At March 31, 2011, our investment portfolio, consisting of highly liquid debt instruments of the US government is subject to interest rate risk. The fair value of our investment portfolio would not be significantly impacted by either a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates due mainly to the short-term nature of the major portion of our investment portfolio.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Management, with the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has performed an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). This evaluation includes consideration of the controls, processes and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are not currently aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Except for the risk factors presented below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors as presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2011.
Due to uncertainty in the application and interpretation of applicable state sales tax laws, we may be exposed to additional sales tax liability.
The application and interpretation of various state sales tax laws to certain of our products and services is uncertain. Accordingly, we may be exposed to additional sales tax liability to the extent various state jurisdictions determine that certain of our products and services are subject to their state’s sales tax. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded a liability of approximately $1.3 million reflecting our best estimate of our potential sales tax liability and associated interest and penalties thereon. While we believe all of our estimates and assumptions are reasonable and will be sustained upon audit, the actual liabilities may be more or less than such estimates, and if so, such liability may negatively impact our financial condition.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
In August 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase shares of our common stock having an aggregate value of up to $8.0 million. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $4.8 million remaining under this authorization. The authorization allows us to repurchase our common stock from time to time through open market purchases and negotiated transactions, or otherwise. The timing, nature and amount of such transactions will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, and the program may be suspended, discontinued or accelerated at any time. The sources of funds for the purchases under the remaining authorization are our existing cash on hand and cash from operations. Purchases are made in the open market, through block trades and other negotiated transactions. Repurchased shares are held in Treasury Stock and have not been retired.
In addition to the repurchased shares outlined below, we withheld approximately 48,000 common shares for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from employees to satisfy their personal income tax withholding requirements upon the vesting of share awards issued under our equity compensation plans. We may engage in similar transactions from time to time related to future vesting of employee restricted stock awards.
The following table summarizes our purchases of common stock:
Calendar Month |
| Total Number |
| Average |
| Total Number |
| Approximate |
| ||
July 2008 |
| — |
| $ | — |
| — |
| $ | 8,000,000 |
|
August 2008 |
| 22,500 |
| $ | 5.99 |
| 22,500 |
| $ | 7,866,000 |
|
September 2008 |
| 20,000 |
| $ | 5.98 |
| 20,000 |
| $ | 7,750,000 |
|
May 2009 |
| 98,915 |
| $ | 3.31 |
| 98,915 |
| $ | 7,422,000 |
|
June 2009 |
| 173,100 |
| $ | 3.63 |
| 173,100 |
| $ | 6,794,000 |
|
July 2009 |
| 95,836 |
| $ | 3.78 |
| 95,836 |
| $ | 6,432,000 |
|
August 2009 |
| 54,850 |
| $ | 3.86 |
| 54,850 |
| $ | 6,220,000 |
|
August 2010 |
| 141,356 |
| $ | 5.07 |
| 141,356 |
| $ | 5,503,000 |
|
September 2010 |
| 125,045 |
| $ | 5.27 |
| 125,045 |
| $ | 4,844,000 |
|
October 2010 |
| 13,003 |
| $ | 5.85 |
| 13,003 |
| $ | 4,768,000 |
|
November 2010 |
| 224 |
| $ | 6.00 |
| 224 |
| $ | 4,766,000 |
|
Total |
| 744,829 |
|
|
| 744,829 |
| $ | 4,766,000 |
|
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
No information is required in response to this item.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]
No information is required in response to this item.
No information is required in response to this item.
Exhibit |
| Description of Documents |
|
|
|
31.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1† |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2† |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
† These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this Quarterly Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Guidance Software, Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| Guidance Software, Inc. | |
|
| |
| By: | /s/ Barry J. Plaga |
|
| Barry J. Plaga |
|
| Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: May 11, 2011