Amazing Energy Oil & Gas 10K 2009 Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

[ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number 000-52392

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	82-0290112
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)

724 E. Metler Lane, Spokane, WA 99218

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(509) 893-0171

SECURITIES RESGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT: Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. YESx NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨		Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨ Nox

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2009, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the last reported trading price of the registrant’s common stock on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board was $638,842.

At March 3, 2010, 85,705,828 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.

ANNUAL REORT ON FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PART I

Item1.	Business	3
Item1A.	Risk Factors	5
Item1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	5
Item2.	Properties	6
Item3.	Legal Proceedings	14
Item4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	14

	PART II

Item5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	15
Item6.	Selected Financial Data	15
Item7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20
Item8.	Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	21
Item9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	41
Item 9A(T).	Controls and Procedures	41
Item9B.	Other Information	42

	PART III

Item10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	43
Item11.	Executive Compensation	45
Item12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	46
Item13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	48
Item14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	49

	PART IV

Item15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	51

	Signatures	52

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

This annual report on Form 10-K, includes forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements include our current expectations and projections about future results, performance, results of litigation, prospects and opportunities. We have tried to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “feel,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.

Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Gold Crest Mines, Inc. or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Except as required by federal securities laws, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The safe harbors of forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Exchange Act are unavailable to issuers of penny stock. As we issued securities at a price below $5.00 per share, our shares are considered penny stock and such safe harbors set forth under Section 21E are unavailable to us.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

Silver Crest Mines, Inc., the Company’s predecessor, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Idaho in 1968. The Company was organized to develop mineral properties located in the State of Idaho. The Company’s initial and subsequent efforts in the acquisition, exploration and development of potentially viable and commercial properties were unsuccessful. The Company has a history of losses and no revenues from operations. The Company’s capital needs have historically been met by the issuance of securities either through private placements, the issuance of shares for debt or the joint venture or lease of mineral properties. In June 2003, the Company merged into its wholly-owned subsidiary, Silver Crest Resources, Inc., for the purpose of changing the Company’s state of domicile to Nevada.

The Company was thereafter dormant until the completion of the share exchange effective August 1, 2006 with Niagara Mining & Development Company, Inc. (“Niagara”), an Idaho corporation formed on January 11, 2005, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. (“Kisa”), an Alaskan corporation formed on July 28, 2006. Under the terms of the share exchange, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Niagara in exchange for 37,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. At the time of the share exchange, Niagara was in the process of completing the acquisition and staking of mining claims in Alaska and Idaho. On June 20, 2008, 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Kisa were transferred from Niagara to the Company.

In October 2007, our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Electronic Bulletin Board (OTCBB) under the symbol “GCMN”. Prior to October 2007 our common stock was traded on the over the counter market in the pink sheets under the symbol “GCMN.”

Any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings

There have been no bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings.

BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY

General Description of the Business

We are in the business of exploration, development, and if warranted the mining of properties containing valuable mineral deposits. The focus of our exploration programs is directed at precious metals, primarily gold. We continue to identify, investigate and acquire potential properties for future exploration and development when warranted.

Alaska Properties

geophysical surveys completed in the fall of 2006 and spring of 2007 and results of data compilations conducted over the winter months, the Company identified additional ground for acquisition. Approximately 8,000 acres in the Southwest Kuskokwim Project area known as the Luna claim group and approximately 50,560 acres, known as the Buckstock Project claim groups located approximately 30-80 miles south of the Donlin Creek deposit and north of the Company’s other claim groups were acquired based on the results.

On September 1, 2008, the Company elected to abandon approximately 43,520 of the Buckstock acres leaving only the Chilly claim group covering 7,040 acres for lack of interest in joint ventures and due to the financial situation of the Company. During the 2008 season, an additional 4,720 acres were staked as part of the Kisa and Gold Lake claim groups bringing the total acres in the Southwest Kuskokwim Project area to 35,240.

In Alaska, the lands are held under and are subject to the State’s mining laws and regulations. Of the 35,240 acres in our Southwest Kuskokwim Project area, approximately 20,040 were placed with Golden Lynx, LLC as part of a joint venture originally with Cougar Gold LLC who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold). In December 2009 TintinaGold notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Idaho Properties

In central Idaho, Niagara Mining and Development Co., Inc., (Niagara) a wholly owned subsidiary of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. had controlled approximately 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District covering approximately 3,930 acres. The Stibnite gold district is located east of McCall in Valley County, Idaho, approximately 45 miles northeast of Cascade, Idaho. On March 13, 2009, we signed a purchase agreement (the "Agreement") between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and Frank Duval for the sale of our Idaho unpatented claims. Under the terms of the agreement we sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to our 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as our Golden Meadows Project.

The selling price for the claims and the assignment of the agreements was $50,000. The closing date of the sale was September 25, 2009 when the second $25,000 payment was received. As part of the agreement, on October 2, 2009, the Company signed a quit claim deed transferring all rights, title and interest in and to the unpatented mining claims to the Purchaser. As a result of this sale, the Company recognized a gain on sale of mineral property of $16,875 during the year ended December 31, 2009. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Asset Purchase Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Competitive Business Conditions

There is aggressive competition within the minerals industry to discover and acquire properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company competes for the opportunity to participate in promising exploration projects with other entities, many of which have greater resources than the Company. In addition, the Company competes with others in efforts to obtain financing to explore and develop mineral properties.

Regulation

The Company’s activities in the United States are subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, production, labor standards, occupational health and mine safety, control of toxic substances, and other matters involving environmental protection and taxation. It is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant impact on the Company’s business, causing those activities to be economically reevaluated at that time.

Estimate of the Amount Spent on Exploration for the Last Two Years

During the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008, we have spent $32,648 and $159,201, respectively, on exploration activities.

Employees

The Company’s total number of employees is 3 which includes the CFO, who at this time is the only paid employee working part time. The other two employees are both directors serving for no pay who include Terry Dunne who serves as the President and John Ryan who serves at the CEO of the Company. We intend to utilize the services of consultants and contractors to provide additional services to the Company as needed.

Reports to Security Holders

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and therefore file periodic reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These reports may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet web site atwww.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

Our filings under the Exchange Act (including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to these reports) are also available free of charge on our web site atwww.goldcrestminesinc.com. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The reference to our web site address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the web site, and the information contained on the web site is not part of this document.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

ALASKA PROPERTIES

[gcmn10kmar2310002.gif]

SOUTHWEST KUSKOKWIM PROJECT

Summary

In the Kisaralik Lake area of southwest Alaska, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. (KGMI) controls or has interests in seven claim blocks consisting of 230 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 35,240 acres. Of the 35,240 acres in our Southwest Kuskokwim Project area, approximately 20,040 were placed with Golden Lynx, LLC as part of a joint venture originally with Cougar Gold LLC who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold). In December 2009 TintinaGold, who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC, notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

The Company calls the seven claim blocks the Southwest Kuskokwim Project and the individual names of each claim block are Kisa, Gold Lake, Luna, AKO, Gold Creek, Gossan Valley and Little Swift. Previous workers located and prospected several significant precious metal showings in this remote, highly prospective portion of the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt nearly 20 years ago. The showings show many similarities in mineralization style, alteration and general geologic characteristics to Nova Gold Resources and Barrick’s Donlin Creek project and other major Kuskokwim Mineral Belt gold deposits.

On January 27, 2010, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Golden Lynx, LLC signed an option agreement with North Fork Resources Pty Ltd (“North Fork”) which grants North Fork an exclusive option to purchase and/or earn an interest in the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area.

Under the terms of the option, North Fork will make a payment to the Company in the amount of $20,000 which was received on February 16, 2010, for the exclusive right to explore the claims up until October 31, 2010. During the option period, North Fork agrees to meet the minimum annual expenditure requirements on the claims for the period up to September 1, 2010. Following the expiration of the option on October 31, 2010, North Fork will have 30 days to notify the Company of its decision to exercise its option to purchase and/or earn into any or all of the claim groups. See “Note 14. Subsequent Events –North Fork Option” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Location and Access

The Southwest Kuskokwim Project area is situated in a mountainous, high relief area located approximately 100 miles east of Bethel, Alaska and approximately 120 miles southwest of Donlin Creek and 40 miles west of the Shotgun Deposit. The project area lies along the boundary between the Bristol Bay, Kuskokwim and Bethel Recording Districts in southwest Alaska on State of Alaska lands. Bethel is the nearest community with full, year-round services. Commercial barge service from Anchorage is available from late May through early October at Bethel.

The effective work season in the project area is from July through September. The lakes in the immediate area typically remain frozen and snow covers ridges and upper slopes until late June or early July. Currently, personnel and equipment access to the area is limited to float planes capable of landing on lakes, via helicopter or via small fixed wing aircraft equipped with tundra tires.

The nearest areas to the prospects that are closed to mineral entry include Wood – Tikchik State Park located to the east of the Gold Lake and Kisa claim groups. Areas to the west and south are property of the Federal government and include the Yukon Flats National Wildlife and Togiak National Wildlife Refuges respectively. There currently are no unusual social, political or environmental encumbrances to exploration, development or production on the prospects. There are currently no roads or power available to the properties. Should attempts to develop one or more of the prospects occur, there is no guarantee that controversy will not arise as a result of any proposed development.

Geologic Setting and Deposit Types

The properties are situated in the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt in the southern portion of the Aniak-Tuluksak and southeastern portion of the Bethel Mining Districts. Historically the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt has been a major placer and lode gold producer as well as the major source of mercury in Alaska since the turn of the twentieth century. Recent regional- to deposit-scale investigations by industry, academic institutions and government workers have helped better define the mineral deposit types and geologic controls in the Mineral Belt. This work has been spurred on by the discovery of major gold deposits throughout the northern and central portion of the belt, including the largest known deposit in the belt, the Donlin Creek deposit located approximately 120 miles to the northeast.

Rock sequences exposed in the Kuskokwim region consist of fault-bounded blocks consisting of Jurassic- to Tertiary-age assemblages of sedimentary, volcanic and intrusive rocks. These rocks were subsequently deformed, weakly metamorphosed and intruded by middle Cretaceous to Tertiary plutons, and associated dikes and sills, often in swarms along structural corridors. Glacial and modern flood plain deposits typically fill the broad glacially-carved valleys.

Previous Work by the Company

The Company’s past exploration efforts on the project include:

Completion of 2,100 square miles of high resolution airborne geophysical surveys over the project area and south of the Donlin Creek gold deposit in 2006 and 2007;

Completion of 17-line miles of induced polarization/resistivity surveys, 120-line miles of ground magnetics, collection of over 300 stream sediments and 250 rock samples and three soil grids on anomalies in the seven claim block area in 2006 and 2007;

Completion of over 3,100 feet of drilling at the Kisa Breccia target in the Kisa claim group with encouraging results in 2007;

Acquisition of two historic district-scale industry reconnaissance data sets and development of a proprietary steam sediment database that includes over 3,000 conventional silt and pan concentrate stream sediment samples. These samples define district-scale anomalies along distinct trends identified by the airborne geophysics and cover an area beginning at Kisa and extending 100 miles to northeast to the southern reaches of the Donlin Creek deposit;

Discovery and staking of a new mineral occurrence at the Luna Prospect 6 miles west of the Company’s Kisa claim group;

Entry into a Joint Venture with Newmont Mining Corporation on the AKO and Luna prospects on May 8, 2008 which later terminated on December 12, 2008. While they were the Company’s Joint Venture partner they completed systematic rock and soil sampling on the Luna and AKO claim groups.

Entry into a Joint Venture with Cougar Gold LLC, who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC on the Kisa, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gossan Valley and Gold Creek prospects. In December 2009 TintinaGold, notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details. The work performed by Cougar Gold while they were the Company’s Joint Venture partner included the completion of over 3,200 feet of drilling on the Gossan Ridge prospect, Gold Lake claim group with encouraging results, the completion of a soil grid on the Gold Lake and Kisa prospects extending areas of anomalous gold mineralization and the staking of additional mining claims over the Kisa, Gold Lake, Gold Creek, Gossan Valley and Little Swift pr ospect areas.

Southwest Kuskokwim Project Descriptions

AKO Prospect

The AKO claim group is located in the southwestern Kuskokwim mountains approximately 9 miles southwest of the Kisa Prospect. The Company controls approximately 7,200 acres on 45 state mining claims. The AKO prospects were first discovered 20 years ago during a regional reconnaissance program. Follow-up included limited rock-chip sampling and field examination of several linear to ovoid iron-oxide stained ridgeline and valley-wall color anomalies within and along the faulted, western margin of the Crooked Mountain Pluton. These color anomalies are found at the headwaters of streams with strong gold and multi-element anomalies in stream sediments and pan concentrates and they are aligned along a pronounced, linear topographic feature that stretches for several miles. These prospects have never been drilled.

The Company’s exploration in the area includes compilation of historic data, completion of fixed-wing aeromagnetic and electromagnetic surveys, aerial reconnaissance mapping, stream sediment sampling and preliminary prospecting on several of the color anomalies identified to date. Stream-sediment samples from below the area of the known color anomalies and gold showings contain highly anomalous gold, arsenic, antimony, molybdenum and bismuth. Pan concentrates from streams draining these areas also contain visible gold. Follow-up work in 2007 has identified a number of targets on the property for further follow-up and possibly drill testing.

On May 8, 2008, the Company signed three separate joint venture agreements with Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (”Newmont”). During the joint venture Newmont completed a systematic reconnaissance type soil and rock chip sampling program over the AKO claim group which resulted in the delineation of two contiguous large gold anomalies on the claim group, The largest anomaly is centered over a distinctive aeromagnetic anomaly thought to represent a separate intrusive phase of the Crooked Mountain Pluton, consists of soils and rocks containing gold values greater than 0.02 ppm. This anomaly is over 13,500 feet long and 2,400 feet wide and is associated with multiple sets of sheeted quartz-sulfide vein systems. A similar and contiguous anomaly is situated adjacent to the main anomaly and has a slightly different trend and consists of soils and rock samples defining an anomalous area over 20,000 feet long and 2,700 feet wide. Neither of these anomalies has been drill tested. However on December 12, 2008, the Company received from Newmont a letter that notified of its intent to terminate the three venture agreements effective immediately.

Luna Prospect

The Luna claim group is located in the southern Kuskokwim mountains of southwestern Alaska approximately 100 miles to the southeast of Bethel and 6 miles west of the Kisa prospect. The project area is accessed by helicopter or by small aircraft capable of landing on a tundra dirt strip. The Company staked the property in mid-2007, which consists of 50 state mining claims covering approximately 8,000 acres.

The Luna prospect was discovered during follow-up of an airborne geophysical anomaly identified from proprietary surveys completed in the fall of 2006 and spring of 2007. A regional-scale structural zone was interpreted from the airborne geophysical data. Follow-up exploration involving IP, resistivity and ground magnetic surveys, systematic stream-sediment and rock-chip sampling and geologic mapping led to the discovery.

Follow-up exploration involving IP, resistivity and ground magnetic surveys, systematic stream-sediment and rock-chip sampling and geologic mapping led to the discovery. Over 16 line-miles of IP-resistivity and 40 line-miles of ground magnetics were completed in 2007. The geophysical surveys define a 4.8 miles long by 1.4 miles wide IP and resistivity anomaly coinciding with a ground and aerial magnetic anomaly. Several conductors identified from the airborne electromagnetic surveys correspond with zones of semi-massive sulfide replacement mineralization located on the ground.

A total of 41 stream-sediment samples collected from streams draining the prospect area outline a distinct 10 square mile gold, arsenic, and antimony anomaly. A total of 40 of 72 rock chip samples collected from the prospect area contain anomalous gold. Gold is associated with anomalous arsenic, antimony, bismuth, molybdenum, silver, copper, lead and zinc.

Mineralization is hosted in calcareous siltstones, cherts and tuffaceous sedimentary rocks as well as in porphyritic intrusive rocks. Gold has been found in a broad area that exhibits pervasive fracturing and clay alteration. The prospective area contains ubiquitous disseminated, vein and stockwork sulfide accumulations. Intrusive rocks occur as dikes, sills and small stocks and compositionally include diorites and granodiorites as well as rhyolites. Several zones of stratiform sulfide replacement mineralization with cherty silica alteration containing up to 70% sulfides, primarily fine-grained pyrite, arsenopyrite and stibnite and to a lesser extent chalcopyrite and sphalerite have been located within the claim group.

The presence of widespread base and precious metals anomalies in stream sediments and rocks along this newly located structural zone and the association of these anomalies with intrusive rocks and reactive sedimentary rocks opens up a wide range of opportunities for future discoveries.

On May 8, 2008, the Company signed three separate joint venture agreements with Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (”Newmont”). During the joint venture Newmont conducted rock sampling and mapping on the project in 2008 and confirmed previous sampling results produced by the Company. However on December 12, 2008, the Company received from Newmont a letter that notified of its intent to terminate the three venture agreements effective immediately.

Kisa Prospect

The Kisa claim group is made up of 38 state mining claims covering approximately 5,840 acres. The property was held under a joint venture agreement with Cougar Gold LLC, who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC on the Kisa, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gossan Valley and Gold Creek prospects. In December 2009 TintinaGold, notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

The mining claims encompass a narrow, linear, northeast trending ridge held up with hornfelsed Jurassic- to Cretaceous-age sedimentary rocks intruded by rhyolite to gabbroic dikes and sills. Several northwest-trending spurs off the main ridge appear to be related to crosscutting dikes of a different age and composition. Geochemical analyses suggest associations similar to those known from other gold deposits within the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt including the producing Fort Knox Mine and advanced exploration projects at Donlin Creek to the north and Shotgun Hills to the east.

During 2007, the Company completed over 3,100 feet of core drilling with encouraging results on one of the main targets of the Kisa claim group, known as theKisa BrecciaTarget. A poorly exposed, extensively silica-carbonate-sulfide altered breccia body is located along a ridge crest and steep, north-facing valley walls. The breccia is composed of a mixture of altered sedimentary and igneous clasts, many of which exhibit multiple generations of veining and brecciation. The breccia body is exposed over an area approximately 1000 feet wide x 1600 feet long and roughly 800 feet high. Systematic rock chip samples from outcropping exposures of this breccia average 1.25 parts per million (0.036 troy ounces per short ton) gold. The Company completed six core holes into the target during the 2007 drilling campaign. All

six holes cut broad zones of intensely altered igneous breccia containing low grade gold mineralization including narrower higher grade intervals. Hole K07-04 cut 678 feet averaging 0.3 parts per million gold; hole K07-05 cut 378 feet averaging 0.7 parts per million (0.02 ounces per ton) gold, including an intercept of 144 feet averaging 1.3 parts per million (0.038 ounces per ton) and hole K07-06 cut 485 feet averaging 0.4 parts per million (0.012 ounces per ton) gold.

TheGolden DikeTarget includes the rocks exposed on and under a prominent northeast trending ridgeline running through the center of the Kisa claim group. The ridge contains numerous silica-carbonate-sulfide altered felsic rhyolite dikes and sills exposed over an area 900 feet wide x 9800 feet long with at least 650 feet of exposed vertical extent. Float mapping, aerial photographic linears, airborne geophysical data and soil sampling suggest the dike swarm may extend in both directions under talus covered slopes and into the adjacent valleys. Sedimentary rocks are heavily iron oxide stained and fractured in the hornfelsed zones adjacent to and along the dike and sill margins and contain various oxidation products after sulfides. The dikes are often bleached, silicified and typically contain disseminated to stockwork sulfide veining. The large spatial extent and intense alteration of this dike swarm a nd the heavily iron-stained host rocks suggest the presence of a mineralized system at the surface and underlying the ridge. The length-weighted average grade sampled from the dike swarm averaged greater than 0.1 parts per million of gold. Similar dikes swarms and alteration zones are associated with the mineralized zones in the Donlin Creek deposit.

Work in 2007 included detailed rock chip and soil sampling, ground and airborne geophysics and geologic mapping. This work has now expanded the target area to a zone approximately 850 feet to 1,500 feet wide x 15,000 feet long with at least 525 feet and locally up to 1,150 feet of exposed vertical extent. Additional soil and rock chip sampling and geologic mapping were completed during the 2008 field season and expanded the areas of known gold mineralization considerably.

ThePirate’s PickTarget is located in the northern portion of the Kisa claim group and consists of a large northwest-trending quartz-carbonate-sulfide veined fault zone. The intensely stockwork-veined fault is intermittently exposed over the crest and flanks of a small ridge in an area roughly 650 feet wide by 1150 feet long with several hundreds of feet of exposed vertical extent. The fault occurs along the northern end of the ridge hosting the dike-sill complex and field evidence suggests the fault may offset and displace the dike swarm. The length-weighted average grade of 18 rock chip samples collected from this zone is 1.95 parts per million (0.057 ounces per ton) gold.

Additional targets occur along the projections of the dike swarm and fault systems into the adjacent talus covered slopes and glacial drift filled valleys, but will require additional work prior to definition of drill targets. Several small rubble crop and/or outcrop showings along the valley edge to the northwest of the main ridge contain anomalous pathfinder element suites and gold values. These showings correspond with a marked airborne magnetic geophysical anomaly identical to that over the main ridge to the southeast and make an intriguing target.

Gold Lake Prospect

The Gold Lake claim group is made up of 69 state mining claims covering approximately 9,720 acres approximately 8 miles west of the Kisa Prospect. The property was held under a joint venture agreement with Cougar Gold LLC, who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC on the Kisa, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gossan Valley and Gold Creek prospects. In December 2009 TintinaGold, notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details. The claims cover a broad, bright red, iron oxide stained, northwest trending ridge several miles long and nearly a mile wide adjacent to Gold Lake. The claim group contains at least two generations of crosscutting igneous dikes and sills similar to the Kisa showing and drill targets have been defined at several prospects within the claim package.

TheGossan RidgeTarget consists of a series of banded quartz-sulfide veins associated with a dike-sill swarm that runs along the crest and flanks of rust-colored ridgeline exhibiting heavily iron oxide-staining reflecting weathering and oxidation of widespread disseminated sulfides in the rocks exposed along the ridge. The vein system has an exposed strike length of over 1600 feet and exposed widths up to 150 feet and the alteration zone and lower grade old mineralization is up to 350 feet wide and 4900 feet long with up to 650 feet of exposed vertical extent. Samples from the vein system consistently carry highly anomalous gold and pathfinder elements. The vein system appears to be associated with a series of porphyritic dikes that have produced pervasive and intense hydrothermal alteration of the host sedimentary rocks. The dikes and sills typically contain lower grade gold mineralization, but their wides pread presence and intense alteration associated with the igneous rocks throughout the complex suggest the presence of a larger, potentially mineralized igneous body at depth.

During 2007, additional rock and soil sampling was completed and the previously outlined soil anomaly was extended to more than 1 kilometer along strike. Over 51 line-miles of ground magnetics were completed and located a distinctive circular magnetic anomaly adjacent to, and overlapping with the main soil and rock chip anomaly. The magnetic feature extends beneath a glacial drift-filled valley and underlies another prominent alteration zone on the adjacent ridge slopes.

Prospecting this feature in 2007 confirmed the presence of quartz-arsenopyrite-stibnite veins and fracture-controlled sulfides potentially indicative of cupola-related mineralization above a buried intrusion. A single 3-mile long, induced polarization and resistivity survey line was run adjacent to the main showing and generated a good IP response over the circular ground magnetics feature. A large area of anomalous gold and intense alteration and the numerous dikes suggests the Gold Lake prospect may overlie a larger potentially mineralized intrusive hosted system at depth.

During 2008, four drill holes were completed totaling 3,227.5 feet and cut thick intervals of moderately to strongly altered and weakly gold mineralized sediments and intrusives. All the holes bottomed in hornfels indicating proximity to a larger intrusive body at depth which is still untested by drilling. Geologic mapping and soil and rock sampling were completed along favorable trends. Detailed sampling and structural analysis indicates the main mineralized zone, exposed on steep nearly inaccessible cliffs, was not completely tested by the 2008 drilling, in part due to difficulties in establishing a stable drill platform on the steep slopes. Detailed continuous rock chip sampling across the mineralized zone exposed on the cliffs outlined a zone approximately 30 meters true thickness averaging 1 part per million (0.029 ounces per ton)

The Golden AlderTarget consists of a linear fault zone exposed along the bottom and valley walls of a small drainage over a strike length of approximately 600 meters. Soils collected over covered areas on the valley walls and adjacent uplands suggests the zone may be as wide as 200 meters. A pronounced circular airborne geophysical anomaly underlies a portion of the fault system and its projection into an alluvium covered area and may represent a leakage halo emanating from a potentially mineralized intrusion at depth over 1.5 parts per million (0.044 ounces per ton) gold. During 2008, additional soil and rock sampling surveys were completed with encouraging results.

Little Swift Prospect

Little Swift consists of 14 state mining claims covering approximately 2,240 acres and were staked to prospect a distinctively linear, contact zone between the Crooked Mountain quartz monzonite pluton and the cupola of hornfelsed sedimentary rocks. The property was held under a joint venture agreement with Cougar Gold LLC, who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC on the Kisa, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gossan Valley and Gold Creek prospects. In December 2009 TintinaGold, notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

The prospect sites are staked over six large linear to ovoid iron-oxide stained ridgeline and valley wall color anomalies along the contact zone. Previous workers collected highly anomalous stream silt samples from below the area of the color anomalies.

Gold Creek Prospect

Gold Creek consists of 12 state mining claims covering approximately 1,920 acres and were staked to prospect several iron-oxide stained color anomalies developed within the cupola of hornfelsed sedimentary rocks associated with the eastern margin of Crooked Mountain quartz monzonite pluton. The property was held under a joint venture agreement with Cougar Gold LLC, who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC on the Kisa, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gossan Valley and Gold Creek prospects. In December 2009 TintinaGold, notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

The prospect sites are staked over four large ovoid-valley wall color anomalies that appear to be stratiform in character. Previous workers collected highly anomalous stream-sediment samples from below the area of the color anomalies. In 2008, Cougar Gold LLC, an affiliate of Electrum USA Ltd., operator of the Golden Lynx LLC at the time, completed sampling and mapping of the Gold Creek prospects. Mapping located a series of large quartz monzonite to diorite dikes in the headwaters of the streams reporting anomalous gold and pathfinder elements. Large color anomalies noted previously were examined and found to be associated with extensive fracture controlled sulfide development. The most intense sulfide development and fracturing were found to be stratigraphically controlled and associated with distinctive chert and black siltite sections. Weak gold and pathfinder anomalies are associated with these fracture zones. Much of the prospect area is covered with glac ial alluvium and talus potentially masking potential mineralized areas within the claim group.

Gossan Valley Prospect

Gossan Valley consists of 2 state mining claims covering approximately 320 acres located approximately 6 miles south of the AKO prospect. The property was held under a joint venture agreement with Cougar Gold LLC, who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC on the Kisa, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gossan Valley and Gold Creek prospects. In December 2009 TintinaGold, notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

The prospect was first discovered 20 years ago during a regional reconnaissance program. Follow-up included limited rock-chip sampling and field examination of several ridgeline and valley-wall color anomalies within and along the faulted, eastern margin of the Crooked Mountain Pluton. The color anomalies are found at the headwaters of streams with gold and multi-element anomalies in stream sediments and pan concentrates and they are aligned along a pronounced, linear topographic feature that stretches for approximately one mile. Previous rock sampling in the area, was limited to the collection of ten float, talus and outcrop samples below and within one of several color anomalies present in the area. Two of the ten samples returned detectable gold. The prospect was never drilled.

The Company’s exploration in the area includes compilation of historic data, completion of fixed-wing aeromagnetic and electromagnetic surveys, aerial reconnaissance mapping, stream sediment sampling and preliminary prospecting on several of the color anomalies. Stream-sediment samples from below the area of the known color anomalies contain highly anomalous gold, arsenic, antimony, molybdenum and bismuth. Pan concentrates from streams draining these areas also contain visible gold. A brief examination of the showing in 2007 included collection of a single representative rock chip sample over a 3 meter thick exposure of gossanous hornfels. The rock chip sample reported 0.199 ppm gold and 462 ppm copper consistent with previous sample results from the area.

In 2008, Cougar Gold LLC, an affiliate of Electrum USA Ltd., operator of the Golden Lynx LLC at the time, completed sampling and mapping of the prospect and identified a broad area of stockwork veining, potassium feldspar and biotite flooding similar to that found in many porphyry-style gold and copper systems.

BUCKSTOCK PROJECT

Summary

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Kisa Gold Mining, Inc., (KGMI) had staked 316 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 51,560 acres in seven claim groups. The Company abandoned 6 of the claim groups leaving only the Chilly group with 44 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 7,040 acres. The claims are situated approximately 50 miles southwest of Donlin Creek and 45 miles northeast of KGMI’s Kisa Project area. KGMI initiated an active and aggressive exploration program in the region as part of a regional program approach expanding on the Company’s results in the Kisa Project area. These prospects have been identified through multiple sources including a review and compilation of data from published federal, state and academic manuscripts, published and unpublished geochemical data and corporate proprietary data sets.

Over 1,600 stream sediment, heavy mineral concentrate and rock samples cover the area and the claim groups are staked in areas determined to be prospective as potential source areas for the placer occurrences identified from the company’s proprietary geochemical database. Each of these prospects falls within much larger, poorly defined regional-scale geochemical anomalies that represent district-scale exploration plays.

The project area is underlain by sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Triassic and Cretaceous Gemuk Group; sedimentary rocks of the Cretaceous Kuskokwim Group; and Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary mafic to felsic volcanic rocks, small granitic intrusions, and granite porphyry dikes and sills. Locally there are small accumulations of Quaternary age olivine basalt. The project area lies within a structurally complex flexure zone within a series of crustal-scale wrench faults.

Deformation associated with these faults and splays appears to be at least locally important in the location of both igneous rocks and mineralized showings. Both high level epithermal and deeper-level shallow intrusive and subvolcanic alteration and mineralization systems are present in the project. Initial field follow-up in late 2007 was encouraging with gold showings identified in bedrock on several claim groups.

Chilly Prospect

This prospect consists of a semicircular, 25-square mile multi-element stream geochemical anomaly draining a large Late Cretaceous to Early Tertiary, zoned, quartz monzonitic intrusive complex. Highly anomalous arsenic in stream silts outlines this intrusive complex at the regional scale. Placer gold has been found around the flanks of the complex coincident with highly anomalous stream silts containing pathfinder elements. Seven rock chip samples collected from outcrops in the headwaters of the anomalous streams contain anomalous gold.

On May 8, 2008, the Company signed three separate joint venture agreements with Newmont North America Exploration Limited, a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (”Newmont”). During the joint venture Newmont completed a systematic rock and soil sampling program on the claims in the summer of 2008 and delineated a large gold in soils anomaly on the claim group. However on December 12, 2008, the Company received from Newmont a letter that notified of its intent to terminate the three venture agreements effective immediately.

IDAHO PROPERTIES

[gcmn10kmar2310004.gif]

County, Idaho, approximately 45 miles northeast of Cascade, Idaho. On March 13, 2009 we signed a purchase agreement (the "Agreement") between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and Frank Duval for the sale of our Idaho unpatented claims. Under the terms of the agreement we sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to our 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as our Golden Meadows Project.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any legal proceedings and are not aware of any such proceedings known to be contemplated.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of the security holders through the solicitation of proxies, or otherwise, during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

In October 2007, our common stock began quotation on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board (OTCBB) under the symbol “GCMN”. Prior to October 2007 our common stock was quoted on the over the counter market in the Pink Sheets.

The following table sets forth for our common stock, the high and low closing bid quotations per share, taken from the internet, for our common stock for each quarter for the periods indicated. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Year	Quarter	High Closing	Low Closing
2008	First Quarter	$0.290	$0.140
	Second Quarter	$0.150	$0.075
	Third Quarter	$0.090	$0.020
	Fourth Quarter	$0.035	$0.002
2009	First Quarter	$0.015	$0.006
	Second Quarter	$0.041	$0.005
	Third Quarter	$0.019	$0.006
	Fourth Quarter	$0.055	$0.015

Holders

As of March 3, 2010, there were approximately 380 shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock as furnished to the Company by its transfer agent and does not account for shares owned through clearing houses.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

On December 31, 2009, the Company completed an offering of units consisting of its common stock in a non-brokered private placement which began on October 31, 2009. The Company issued 928,833 shares of common stock to six purchasers for a total of $27,865 in total proceeds. Under the private placement we offered a maximum of 2,000,000 shares at $0.03 per share for a maximum of $60,000 in proceeds.

The shares above were issued without registration under the Securities Act by reason of the exemption from registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(2), and Rule 506 promulgated by the SEC, and Section 4(6) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering. Each participant was an accredited investor at the time of the issuance. They delivered appropriate investment representations with respect to the issuance of the shares and consented to the imposition of a restrictive legend upon the certificate representing their shares. They represented that they had not entered into the transaction with us as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or broadcast on television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting. They represented that they had been afforded the opportunity to ask questions of our management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the share purchase. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with these transactions.

Dividends

The Company has never paid any dividends and does not anticipate the payment of dividends in the foreseeable future.

See Item 12 herein for information relating to our equity compensation plan.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion contains various statements regarding our current strategies, financial position, results of operations, cash flows, operating and financial trends and uncertainties, as well as certain forward-looking statements regarding our future expectations. When used in this discussion, words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "could," "may," "will," "should," "plan," "predict," "potential," and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Our forward- looking statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. As such, our actual future results, performance or achievements may differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, our forward-looking statements. Please refer to our "Risk Factors" elsewhere in this Annual Repor t on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. We assume no future obligation to update our forward-looking statements or to provide periodic updates or guidance.

Overview and Plan of Operation

As discussed in “Note 3. Going Concern” to our consolidated financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and incurred an accumulated deficit of $9,517,419 through December 31, 2009. Another factor is that the Company has a negative current ratio of 0.34: 1 at December 31, 2009. The current ratio is a measurement of the degree to which current assets cover current liabilities (current assets/ current liabilities). A high ratio indicates a good probability the enterprise can retire current debts. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to seek additional capital from new equity securities offerings and joint venture agreements that will provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business plan.

We are in the business of exploration, development, and if warranted the mining of properties containing valuable mineral deposits. We are traded on the over the counter market in the United States and, as is typical with such companies, losses are incurred in the stages of exploration and development, which typically need to be funded through equity or debt financing.

The Company calls the seven claim blocks the Southwest Kuskokwim Project and the individual names of each claim block are Kisa, Gold Lake, Luna, AKO, Gold Creek, Gossan Valley and Little Swift. On January 27, 2010, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Golden Lynx, LLC signed an option agreement with North Fork Resources Pty Ltd (“North Fork”) which grants North Fork an exclusive option to purchase and/or earn an interest in the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area.

The Company also received a total of $50,000 on an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") signed on March 13, 2009 with Frank Duval for the purpose of acquiring the mining claims in Idaho known as our Golden Meadows Project. Under the terms of the Agreement the Company sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to its 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as the Golden Meadows Project. In addition, the Company also agreed to assign its rights under the Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with the Bradley Mining Company, the Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC, and the Option and Royalty Sales Agreement with the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig, to Mr. Duval. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Asset Purchase Agreement”to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Officers and Board of Directors

On January 20, 2009 Gold Crest received a letter of resignation from Howard Crosby as director and chairman of the board effective immediately.

On July 13, 2009 Gold Crest received a letter of resignation from Bobby Cooper as director effective immediately.

On July 15, 2009 Gold Crest received a letter of resignation from Thomas Parker as director effective immediately.

On December 16, 2009, the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of John P. Ryan as the President of the Company. Mr. Ryan will continue in his duties as CEO and a director of the Company.

On December 16, 2009, the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Terrance Dunne as the Secretary/Treasurer of the Company. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Dunne as the new President of the Company and Chairman of the Board of Directors by unanimous consent.

On December 16, 2009, the Board of Directors appointed Matt J. Colbert as the new Secretary/Treasurer of the Company by unanimous consent. Mr. Colbert is currently the CFO of the Company.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared with the year ended December 31, 2008. These tables are provided to assist in assessing differences in our overall performance:

			The Year Ended
			December 31,		December 31,
			2009		2008		$ Change		% Change
REVENUES		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
OPERATING EXPENSES:
	Exploration expenditures		32,648		159,201		(126,553)		-79.5%
	Settlement of drilling contract		-		161,813		(161,813)		-100.0%
	Abandonment of mineral lease		-		83,600		(83,600)		-100.0%
	Gain on sale of mineral lease		(16,875)		-		(16,875)		100.0%
	Impairment of mineral properties
	and royalty interest		-		616,875		(616,875)		-100.0%
	Impairment of investment in Golden
	Lynx LLC		43,202		-		43,202		100.0%
	Loss on disposal of equipment		11,784		11,204		580		5.2%
	Legal and accounting expenses		35,515		150,828		(115,313)		-76.5%
	Directors' fees		-		40,000		(40,000)		-100.0%
	General and administrative		65,241		672,987		(607,746)		-90.3%
	TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		171,515		1,896,508		(1,724,993)		-91.0%
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS			(171,515)		(1,896,508)		1,724,993		-91.0%
	Interest income		-		5,571		(5,571)		-100.0%
	Interest expense		-		(7,787)		7,787		-100.0%
	TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		-		(2,216)		2,216		-100.0%
NET LOSS		$	(171,515)	$	(1,898,724)	$	1,727,209	$	-91.0%

Overview of Operating Results

Operating Expenses

The decrease of $1,724,993 in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of our entrance into a joint venture agreement. Our partner in this joint venture agreement was conducting exploration activities on our behalf as part of the agreements’ “earn-in” provisions.

Another reason for the decrease is that the Company has made a concerted effort to curtail costs by reducing the employee base to one part time employee and by choosing not to renew the office lease.

These decreases in operating expenses were further reduced by $161,813 due to the settlement of a drilling contract which occurred in the second quarter of 2008 and by $83,600 and $616,875 which corresponded to the abandonment of a mineral lease and the impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest in the third and fourth quarters of 2008. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties –Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC”,“Note 5. Mineral Properties –Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Bradley Mining company” and“Note 6. Royalty Interest in Mineral Property” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Also contributing to the decrease in operating expenses during 2009, although to a significantly lesser extent, was a decrease in directors’ fees. During the 2008 second quarter we issued 400,000 shares of common stock to two new directors at a price of $0.10 per share. During 2009 there were no director shares issued.

Overview of Financial Position

At December 31, 2009, Gold Crest had cash of $12,931 and total liabilities of $76,512. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received $15,000 for the sale of miscellaneous equipment to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder. At the time of the sale, the equipment had an original cost of $30,494 with accumulated depreciation of $12,353 for a carrying value of $18,141 and as such, a loss on the sale of equipment of $3,141 was recorded. We also received proceeds of $50,000 from the sale of our Idaho unpatented claims as part of the Asset Purchase Agreement with Frank Duval. The carrying value of the claims was $33,125 and as such, a gain on the sale of mineral properties was recorded. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties –Asset Purchase Agreement” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

On March 13, 2009, the Company completed an offering of units consisting of its common stock in a non-brokered private placement which began on February 2, 2009. The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for a total of $10,000 in total proceeds. Under the private placement we offered a maximum of 5,000,000 shares at $0.01 per share for a maximum of $50,000 in proceeds.

On December 31, 2009, the Company completed an offering of units consisting of its common stock in a non-brokered private placement which began on October 31, 2009. The Company issued 928,833 shares of common stock for a total of $27,865 in total proceeds. Under the private placement we offered a maximum of 2,000,000 shares at $0.03 per share for a maximum of $60,000 in proceeds.

Prepaid Expenses and Deposits

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the balance in the prepaid insurance and prepaid claim fees captions decreased by $9,141. Of this decrease, $6,276 related to amortization of the “prepaid claim fees” and the other $2,865 related to the cancellation of our Director’s and Officer’s insurance.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the balance in “Deposits” decreased by $3,682. The decrease is entirely due to the termination of our lease of our offices and the deposit amount held with the landlord.

Equipment

The decrease in equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, was $33,449 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was due to the following transactions:

In September 2009, we disposed of miscellaneous equipment with an original cost of $14,004 with accumulated depreciation of $7,845 and recorded a loss on the disposal of equipment of $6,159.

In July and September 2009, we received a total of $1,000 for the sale of miscellaneous equipment with an original cost of $2,282 with accumulated depreciation of $1,241 and recorded a loss on the sale of equipment of $41.

In May 2009, we received $15,000 for the sale of miscellaneous equipment with an original cost of $30,494 with accumulated depreciation of $12,353 and recorded a loss on the sale of equipment of $3,141.

In February 2009, we received $500 for the sale of a piece of office equipment with an original cost of $3,096 with accumulated depreciation of $1,156 and recorded a loss on sale of equipment of $1,440.

In February 2009, we received $229 for the sale of office furniture with a cost of $2,000 with accumulated depreciation of $767 and recording a loss on sale of equipment of $1,004.

Mineral Properties

The decrease in mineral properties of $33,125 during the year ended December 31, 2009 was due to the Company on March 13, 2009, signing an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") with Frank Duval for the purpose of acquiring the mining claims in Idaho known as our Golden Meadows Project. Under the terms of the Agreement the Company sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to its 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as the Golden Meadows Project for a total of $50,000. As a result of this sale, the Company recognized a gain on sale of mineral property of $16,875 during the year ended December 31, 2009. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Asset Purchase Agreement”to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Investment in Golden Lynx LLC

On April 18, 2008, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kisa, entered into an agreement with Cougar Gold LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“Cougar”), a greater than 5% shareholder, who was the operator of the Golden Lynx, LLC (“Golden Lynx”) and an affiliate of Electrum USA Ltd. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company transferred 15,320 acres under State of Alaska jurisdiction into Golden Lynx. The Company accounts for this investment under the cost method of accounting. Accordingly, the carrying value of the contributed property of $54,575 was reclassed from mineral properties to “Investment in Golden Lynx LLC”.

On May 1, 2009 Cougar transferred all of its membership interest in Golden Lynx and its economic interest therein to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold) formerly known as Mantra Mining, Inc., (MAN-TSX.V) and TintinaGold took over as the manager of the Golden Lynx. On December 23, 2009 the Company was notified by TintinaGold that it had elected to resign its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. During the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008, our joint venture partners in the Golden Lynx spent approximately $214,056 and $1,746,721, respectively, on exploration activities on our properties.

After receiving the notice of TintinaGold’s resignation, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Investment in Golden Lynx LLC had been impaired. The Company recorded a write-down of $43,202, which was recognized as an impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC in the fourth quarter of 2009 leaving a carrying value of $11,373 at December 31, 2009. The $11,373 carrying value was based primarily on the ongoing negotiations with a very interested third party who was looking at entering into an option agreement with the Company worth $20,000 on the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area. The option agreement was in fact entered into on January 27, 2010 for the agreed on amount of $20,000 which was received on February 16, 2010. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” and “Note 14. Subsequent Events –North Fork Option” to our consolidated financial statements for further det ails.

Additional Paid-In Capital

The increase in additional paid-in capital during the year ended December 31, 2008, was primarily due to the following:

Stock based compensation of $13,355 related to the vesting of stock options;

On December 31, 2009, the Company completed an offering of units consisting of its common stock in a non-brokered private placement which began on October 31, 2009. The Company issued 928,833 shares of common stock for a total of $27,865 in total proceeds. Under the private placement we offered a maximum of 2,000,000 shares at $0.03 per share for a maximum of $60,000 in proceeds.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have limited capital resources and thus have had to rely upon the sale of equity securities for the cash required for exploration and development purposes, for acquisitions and to fund our administration. Since we do not expect to generate any revenues in the near future, we must continue to rely upon the sale of our equity securities to raise capital. There can be no assurance that financing, whether debt or equity, will always be available to us in the amount required at any particular time or for any period or, if available, that it can be obtained on terms satisfactory to us.

$10,000 in total proceeds. Under the private placement we offered a maximum of 5,000,000 shares at $0.01 per share for a maximum of $50,000 in proceeds. The shares were being offered and sold by officers and directors of the Company who received no remuneration for the sale of the shares.

On December 31, 2009, the Company completed an offering of units consisting of its common stock in a non-brokered private placement which began on October 31, 2009. The Company issued 928,833 shares of common stock for a total of $27,865 in total proceeds. Under the private placement we offered a maximum of 2,000,000 shares at $0.03 per share for a maximum of $60,000 in proceeds. The shares were being offered and sold by officers and directors of the Company who received no remuneration for the sale of the shares.

The Company also received a total of $50,000 on an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") signed on March 13, 2009 with Frank Duval for the purpose of acquiring the mining claims in Idaho known as our Golden Meadows Project. Under the terms of the Agreement the Company sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to its 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as the Golden Meadows Project. In addition, the Company also agreed to assign its rights under the Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with the Bradley Mining Company, the Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC, and the Option and Royalty Sales Agreement with the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig, to the Purchaser. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Asset Purchase Agreement”to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Future Outlook

Based on the current market environment and our low share price it is not likely we will be able to raise enough money through a private placement of our common stock. We have cut our operating costs down to the bare minimum by reducing our employee base down to only one employee with reduced time and pay and we currently intend to rely on the use of outside consultants to provide certain services to the Company. As of January 31, 2009 we did not re-new our office lease and moved operations to the home of the Chief Financial Officer which reduced the rent to zero and other overhead costs will be greatly reduced.

We are currently seeking a new joint venture opportunity concerning our Alaska claim groups. A stipulation of any joint venture we enter would be an upfront cash infusion to cover our operating costs. On January 27, 2010, the Company signed an option agreement with North Fork Resources Pty Ltd (“North Fork”) which grants North Fork an exclusive option to purchase and/or earn an interest in the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area. Under the terms of the option, North Fork will make a payment to the Company in the amount of $20,000 which was received on February 16, 2010, for the exclusive right to explore the claims up until October 31, 2010. See “Note 14. Subsequent Events –North Fork Option” to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Changes in Accounting Policies

We did not change our accounting policies during fiscal 2008 or 2009.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.

ITEM 8.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		22
Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008		23
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and for the period from inception until December 31, 2009		24
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and from inception to December 31, 2006		25
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and for the period from inception until December 31, 2009		27
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		28

[gcmn10kmar2310006.gif]

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
						December 31,		December 31,
						2009		2008
ASSETS
	CURRENT ASSETS
		Cash and cash equivalents			$	12,931	$	924
		Miscellaneous receivable				-		3,000
		Prepaid insurance				-		2,865
		Prepaid claim fees				12,974		19,250
		Deposits, current				-		3,682
				Total Current Assets		25,905		29,721
	Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
		of $1,889 and $20,315, respectively				1,524		34,973
	Mineral properties					-		33,125
	Investment in Golden Lynx LLC					11,373		54,575
		TOTAL ASSETS			$	38,802	$	152,394

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
	CURRENT LIABILITIES
		Accounts payable			$	34,773	$	35,924
		Accounts payable – related party				36,000		30,000
		Accrued liabilities				5,739		3,885
				Total Current Liabilities		76,512		69,809

		Total Liabilities				76,512		69,809

	Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

	STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
		Preferred stock; no par value; 10,000,000 shares
			authorized, none issued or outstanding			-		-
		Common stock; $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares
			authorized; 85,705,828 and 83,776,995 shares issued
			and outstanding, respectively			85,706		83,777
		Additional paid-in capital				9,394,003		9,344,712
		Accumulated deficit during exploration stage				(9,517,419)		(9,345,904)
				Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(37,710)		82,585

		TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)			$	38,802	$	152,394
	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statements of Operations

								From Inception
								January 11, 2005
				Years Ended				to
				December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
				2009		2008		2009

REVENUES			$	-	$	-	$	-

OPERATING EXPENSES:
	Exploration expenditures			32,648		159,201		4,336,939
	Settlement of drilling contract		��	-		161,813		161,813
	Abandonment of mineral lease			-		83,600		83,600
	Gain on sale of mineral lease			(16,875)		-		(16,875)
	Impairment of mineral properties and
	royalty interest			-		616,875		616,875
	Impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC			43,202		-		43,202
	Loss on disposal of equipment			11,784		11,204		22,988
	Legal and accounting expenses			35,515		150,828		504,214
	Directors' fees			-		40,000		844,000
	General and administrative			65,241		672,987		2,977,285
	TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES			171,515		1,896,508		9,574,041

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS				(171,515)		(1,896,508)		(9,574,041)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
	Interest income			-		5,571		79,182
	Interest expense			-		(7,787)		(22,560)
	TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)			-		(2,216)		56,622

LOSS BEFORE TAXES				(171,515)		(1,898,724)		(9,517,419)
INCOME TAXES				-		-		-

NET LOSS			$	(171,515)	$	(1,898,724)	$	(9,517,419)


NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC
		AND DILUTED	$	Nil	$	(0.02)


WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
	OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
	BASIC AND DILUTED			84,759,232		80,739,603

	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

					Deficit
					Accumulated
	Common Stock		Additional	Common	During
			Paid-in	Stock	Exploration
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Subscribed	Stage	Total
Balances, January 11, 2005 and
December 31, 2005	-	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -

Issuance of Common Stock:
for cash, pre-merger
at $0.004 per share	37,500,000	37,500	112,500	-	-	150,000
In connection with reverse
merger (Note 1)	14,600,100	14,600	(7,144)	-	-	7,456
for cash, post-merger
at $0.30 per share	10,797,062	10,797	2,887,910	-	-	2,898,707
for interest at $0.30 per share	41,667	42	12,458	-	-	12,500
for share-based compensation
at $0.59 and $0.63 per share	1,800,000	1,800	1,064,200	-	-	1,066,000
Stock options granted
at $0.30 per share	-	-	72,000	-	-	72,000
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2006	-	-	-	-	(1,845,103)	(1,845,103)
Balances, December 31, 2006	64,738,829	$ 64,739	$ 4,141,924	$ -	$ (1,845,103)	$ 2,361,560

Issuance of Common Stock:
for directors fees between
$0.53 and $0.54 per share	400,000	400	213,600	-	-	214,000
for share-based compensation
at $0.28 per share	50,000	50	13,950	-	-	14,000
for cash at $0.30 per share	7,529,999	7,530	2,251,470	-	-	2,259,000
for brokerage fees	-	-	(77,335)	-	-	(77,335)
for cash at $0.20 per share
with warrants attached	4,035,000	4,035	802,965	-	-	807,000
for common stock issuable
at $0.20 per share with
warrants attached	662,500	663	131,837	-	-	132,500
for common stock subscribed	-	-	-	(132,500)	-	(132,500)
Stock options granted
at $0.28 and $0.53 per share	-	-	1,032,772	-	-	1,032,772
Net Loss for the year ended
December 31, 2007				-	(5,602,077)	(5,602,077)
Balances, December 31, 2007	77,416,328	$ 77,417	$ 8,511,183	$ (132,500)	$ (7,447,180)	$ 1,008,920

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
(Continued)

					Deficit
					Accumulated
	Common Stock		Additional	Common	During
			Paid-in	Stock	Exploration
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Subscribed	Stage	Total

Balances, December 31, 2007	77,416,328	$ 77,417	$ 8,511,183	$ (132,500)	$ (7,447,180)	$ 1,008,920

Stock warrants:
Exercised at $0.30 per share	300,000	300	89,700	-	-	90,000
Stock options:
for share-based compensation
at $0.28 per share	-	-	121,089	-	-	121,089
Issuance of Common Stock:
for directors fees at
$0.10 per share	400,000	400	39,600	-	-	40,000
for services at $0.10 per share	100,000	100	9,900	-	-	10,000
for cash ranging from $0.05
to $0.15 per share	5,666,667	5,666	594,334	-	-	600,000
for common stock subscribed	-	-	-	111,300	-	111,300
Forgiveness of remaining
common stock subscribed	(106,000)	(106)	(21,094)	21,200	-	-
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2008				-	(1,898,724)	(1,898,724)
Balances, December 31, 2008	83,776,995	$ 83,778	$ 9,344,712	$ -	$ (9,345,904)	$ 82,585

Stock options:
for share-based compensation
at $0.28 per share	-	-	13,355	-	-	13,355
Issuance of Common Stock:
for cash at $0.01 per share	1,000,000	1,000	9,000	-	-	10,000
for cash at $0.03 per share	928,833	929	26,936	-	-	27,865
Net loss for year ended
December 31, 2009				-	(171,515)	(171,515)
Balances, December 31, 2009	85,705,828	$ 85,706	$ 9,394,003	$ -	$ (9,517,419)	$ (37,710)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
				Year Ended		Year Ended		From Inception
				December 31,		December 31,		January 11, 2005 to
				2009		2008		December 31, 2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss		$	(171,515)	$	(1,898,724)	$	(9,517,419)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
	by operating activities:
		Depreciation		4,936		22,739		51,669
		Common stock and options issued for services		-		10,000		1,368,976
		Equity compensation for management and directors		13,355		161,089		1,214,241
		Interest paid with common shares		-		-		12,500
		Settlement of drilling contract		-		161,813		161,813
		Gain recognized on equipment exchanged in settlement
		of accounts payable		-		(3,421)		(3,421)
		Loss on disposal of equipment		11,784		11,204		22,988
		Abandonment of mineral lease		-		83,600		83,600
		Impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest		-		616,875		616,875
		Impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC		43,202		-		43,202
		Gain on sale of mineral properties		(16,875)		-		(16,875)
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Interest receivable		-		(2,346)		(6,266)
		Prepaid expenses and deposits		12,823		50,392		45,025
		Miscellaneous receivable		3,000		-		3,000
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		6,703		(242,293)		106,341
		Net cash used by operating activities		(92,587)		(1,029,072)		(5,813,751)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Cash received in reverse merger			-		-		7,456
	Note receivable issued			-		-		(200,000)
	Purchase of royalty interest in mineral property			-		(400,000)		(400,000)
	Purchase of mineral properties			-		(150,000)		(388,175)
	Proceeds from the sale of equipment			16,729		-		16,729
	Proceeds from the sale of mineral properties			50,000		-		50,000
	Purchase of equipment			-		-		( 134,971)
		Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		66,729		(550,000)		(1,048,961)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Borrowings under line of credit			-		-		250,000
	Payments on line of credit			-		-		(250,000)
	Proceeds from the issuance of stock on the exercise of warrants			-		201,300		201,300
	Sale of common stock, net of issuance costs			37,865		600,000		6,674,343
		Net cash provided by financing activities		37,865		801,300		6,875,643

	Net change in cash and cash equivalents			12,007		(777,772)		12,931
	Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			924		778,696		-
	Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	12,931	$	924	$	12,931

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Interest paid		$	-	$	-	$	2,273
	Taxes paid		$	-	$	-	$	-

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
	Land contributed in exchange for investment in Golden Lynx LLC		$	-	$	54,575	$	54,575
	Note receivable forgiven in connection
	with settlement agreement		$	-	$	120,000	$	120,000
	Equipment relinquished in connection
	with settlement agreement		$	-	$	12,654	$	12,654
	Equipment exchanged for settlement of accounts payable		$	-	$	29,828	$	29,828
		The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Gold Crest Mines, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1. Organization and Description of Business

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Gold Crest” and “the Company”) is a Nevada corporation originally incorporated on August 20, 1968, as Silver Crest Mines, Inc., an Idaho corporation.

On August 1, 2006, Gold Crest acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Niagara Mining and Development Co., (“Niagara”), an Idaho corporation formed on January 11, 2005, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. (“Kisa”), an Alaskan corporation formed on July 28, 2006. Gold Crest’s sole asset on the merger date was cash of $7,456, which was accounted for as being acquired by Niagara in exchange for 14,600,100 common shares of Niagara. Niagara’s sole asset on the merger date was cash of $150,000. Neither company had liabilities on the date of the merger. This transaction has been treated as a reverse merger, effectively as if Niagara had issued shares for consideration equal to the net monetary assets of Gold Crest. Under reverse acquisition accounting, the consolidated financial statements of the entity are considered a continuation of the financial statements of Niagara, the accounting acquirer. On June 20, 2008, 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Kisa were transferred from Niagara to the Company.

The Company is in the business of exploration, development, and if warranted the mining of properties containing valuable mineral deposits. The focus of the Company’s exploration programs is directed at precious metals, primarily gold.

Certain amounts in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the net loss, accumulated deficit or cash flows as previously recorded.

NOTE 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Consolidation of Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and the accounts of wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Accounting for Investments

The Company uses the cost method to account for its investments in companies that it does not control and for which the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies. Management of the Company periodically reviews the carrying value of its investments. These reviews consider the net realizable value of each investment to determine whether a permanent impairment in value has occurred and the need for any write-down.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid short-term investments with a remaining maturity when purchased of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents. The Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents in high quality financial institutions.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in those statements and accompanying notes. Examples of areas requiring the use of estimates include the recoverability of mineral property and investments accounted for on the cost basis, assumptions used in determining the fair value of stock-based compensation and the expected economic lives and rates for depreciation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Exploration Stage Enterprise

The Company's financial statements are prepared pursuant to the accounting principles for development stage enterprises as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mining interests that will eventually provide sufficient net profits to sustain the Company’s existence. Until such interests are engaged in major commercial production, the Company will continue to prepare its financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with entities in the development stage. Mining companies subject to development stage financial statement presentation are required to label their financial statements as an “Exploration Stage Company,” pursuant to guidance provided by SEC Guide 7 for Mining Companies.

Mine Exploration and Development Costs

All exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mine development costs are capitalized after proven and probable reserves have been identified. Amortization is calculated using the units-of-production method over the expected life of the operation based on the estimated recoverable mineral ounces.

Mineral Properties

Significant payments related to the acquisition of mineral properties, mineral rights, and mineral leases are capitalized. If a commercially mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins using the units-of-production method based on proven and probable reserves. If no commercially mineable ore body is discovered, or such rights are otherwise determined to have no value, such costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value.

Property Evaluations

Management of the Company periodically reviews the net carrying value of its properties on a property-by-property basis. These reviews consider the net realizable value of each property to determine whether a permanent impairment in value has occurred and the need for any asset write-down. An impairment loss will be recognized when the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to result from the use of an asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset. Measurement of an impairment loss will be based on the estimated fair value of the asset if the asset is expected to be held and used.

Although management will make its best estimate of the factors that affect net realizable value based on current conditions, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely affect management's estimate of net cash flows expected to be generated from its assets, and necessitate asset impairment write-downs.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents and miscellaneous receivable approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2008 and 2009.

Fair Value Accounting

Accounting guidance has established a hierarchy of assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The three levels included in the hierarchy are:

Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2: significant other observable inputs

Level 3: significant unobservable inputs

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has no assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost is recognized when the event occurs. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted. For stock awards that do not vest immediately, the Company recognizes the compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net loss per share for the Company is the same as basic net loss per share, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2009, the common stock equivalents consisted of 5,280,000 options exercisable at prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.53 per share. At December 31, 2008, the common stock equivalents consisted of 6,150,000 options exercisable at prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.53 per share and 4,291,500 common stock warrants exercisable at $0.30 per share.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes will be actually paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the deferred tax assets, if there is uncertainty regarding their realization.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost and depreciated using the straight line method over five to seven years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Betterments of a major nature are capitalized. When assets are retired or sold, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

Reclamation and Remediation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)

The Company had no operating properties at December 31, 2008 and 2009, but the Company’s mineral properties will be subject to standards for mine reclamation that are established by various governmental agencies. For these non-operating properties, the Company accrues costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present value. Such costs are based on management's current estimate of amounts that are expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and regulations.

It is reasonably possible that due to uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of environmental contamination, application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities, and changes in remediation technology, the ultimate cost of remediation and reclamation could change in the future. The Company continually reviews its accrued liabilities for such remediation and reclamation costs as evidence becomes available indicating that its remediation and reclamation liability has changed.

The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and depreciated over the lives of the assets on a units-of-production basis. Reclamation costs are accreted over the life of the related assets and are adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate on the underlying obligation.

NOTE 3. Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and incurred an accumulated deficit of $9,517,419 through December 31, 2009. Another factor is that the Company has a negative current ratio of 0.34: 1 at December 31, 2009. The current ratio is a measurement of the degree to which current assets cover current liabilities (current assets/ current liabilities). A high ratio indicates a good probability the enterprise can retire current debts. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to seek additional capital from new equity securities offerings and joint venture agreements that will provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business plan.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Should the Company be unable to raise capital through future private placements and/or joint venture agreements, its business, and, as a result, its financial position, results of operations and cash flow will likely be materially adversely impacted. As such, substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern remains as of the date of these financial statements.

The Company drastically reduced its overhead expenses going into 2009 such as reducing staff on payroll to one part time employee and eliminating its office space. With these reductions in overhead, the Company believes it will only need an estimated $50,000 to $100,000 to continue operations through the next twelve months. The timing and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including the Company’s ability to successfully enter into a joint venture on our Alaska properties and the Company’s future personnel requirements.

On January 27, 2010, the Company signed an option agreement with North Fork Resources Pty Ltd (“North Fork”) which grants North Fork an exclusive option to purchase and/or earn an interest in the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area. Under the terms of the option, North Fork will make a payment to the Company in the amount of $20,000 within 14 days of the signing of the agreement dated January 27, 2010, which was received on February 16, 2010, for the exclusive right to explore the claims up until October 31, 2010. See “Note 8. Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants” and “Note 14. Subsequent Events –North Fork Option”.

NOTE 4. Equipment

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had the following transactions relating to equipment:

Sold equipment at a price of $729. At the time of the sale, the equipment had an original cost of $5,096 with accumulated depreciation of $1,923 for a carrying value of $3,173 and as such, a loss on the sale of equipment of $2,444 was recorded.

Sold equipment to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder, at a price of $15,000. At the time of the sale, the equipment had an original cost of $30,494 with accumulated depreciation of $12,353 for a carrying value of $18,141 and as such, a loss on the sale of equipment of $3,141 was recorded.

Sold equipment to Midas Gold, Inc. whose President is Frank Duval, a greater than 5% shareholder, for a price of $1,000. At the time of the sale, the equipment had an original cost of $2,282 with accumulated depreciation of $1,241 for a carrying value of $1,041 and as such, a loss on the sale of equipment of $41 was recorded.

Sold equipment with an original cost of $14,004 with accumulated depreciation of $7,845 for a carrying value of $6,159 and as such, a loss on the disposal of equipment of $6,159 was recorded.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company had the following transactions relating to equipment:

Settled an outstanding payable of $29,828 to a vendor by trading equipment with a cost of $35,820 with accumulated depreciation of $9,413 and exploration expense charged with the difference of $3,421.

Received $3,000 for the sale of a piece of equipment with a cost of $7,741 with accumulated depreciation of $3,587 and recording a loss on sale of equipment for $1,154.

Wrote off miscellaneous equipment with a cost of $18,300 with accumulated depreciation of $8,250 and recording a loss on disposal of equipment for $10,050.

Per the settlement of the Diamond Drilling Contract we gave up equipment with a cost of $17,822 with accumulated depreciation of $5,168.

NOTE 5. Mineral Properties

The Company’s mineral properties consist of various mining claims in Alaska. The Company had controlled claims in Idaho covering over 3,930 acres of unpatented mill site and load claims under Federal jurisdiction but on March 13, 2009, the Company signed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") with Frank Duval, a related party who, up until November 3, 2009, owned greater than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company (the “Purchaser”). Under the terms of the Agreement the Company sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to its 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as the Golden Meadows Project. See “Asset Purchase Agreement”.

Alaska Properties

In August 2006, the Company acquired exploration properties in southwest Alaska approximately 90 miles east of the village of Bethel covering approximately 22,520 acres of State of Alaska-owned lands in 6 claim groups known as the Kisa, Gold Lake, Ako, Little Swift, Gold Creek and Gossan Valley within the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt known as the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project. Based on field work completed in late 2006 and summer of 2007, airborne geophysical surveys completed in the fall of 2006 and spring of 2007 and results of data compilations conducted over the winter months, the Company identified additional ground for acquisition. Approximately 8,000 acres in the Southwest Kuskokwim Project area known as the Luna claim group and approximately 50,560 acres, known as the Buckstock Project claim groups located approximately 30-80 miles south of the Donlin Creek deposit and north of the Company’s other claim groups were acquired based on the results.

In Alaska, the lands are held under and are subject to the State’s mining laws and regulations. Of the 35,240 acres in our Southwest Kuskokwim Project area, approximately 20,040 were placed with Golden Lynx, LLC as part of a joint venture in 2008 originally with Cougar Gold LLC who later transferred their interest to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TintinaGold). In December 2009 TintinaGold notified the Company that it was resigning its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC. See “Golden Lynx, LLC”.

Golden Lynx, LLC

On May 1, 2009, the Company signed a Cumulative Restated Amendment dated May 1, 2009 to the Golden Lynx agreement. Under the terms of the amendment, the expiration of the first earn-in period under the Golden Lynx was changed from April 18, 2011 to April 18, 2013 and the expiration of the second earn-in period under the Golden Lynx was changed from April 18, 2013 to April 18, 2015. All other terms of the agreement remained the same.

On May 1, 2009 Cougar transferred all of its membership interest in Golden Lynx and its economic interest therein to TintinaGold Resources Inc. (TAU-TSX.V) a British Columbia corporation (TintinaGold) formerly known as Mantra Mining, Inc., (MAN-TSX.V) and TintinaGold took over as the manager of the Golden Lynx. The details below show what the new terms of the agreement were with TintinaGold as manager.

TintinaGold had an initial 55% interest and Kisa had an initial 45% interest in Golden Lynx. The members appointed TintinaGold as the manager with overall management responsibility for operations. TintinaGold would have been entitled to retain its 55% interest by making the following contributions to Golden Lynx, used to fund exploration expenditures, on the following timetable:

$750,000 on or before April 18, 2009, the first anniversary of the effective date of the agreement;

An additional $1,250,000 on or before April 18, 2010, the second anniversary of the effective date of the agreement; and

An additional $1,500,000 on or before April 18, 2013, the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the agreement.

On December 23, 2009 the Company was notified by TintinaGold that it had elected to resign its membership in the Golden Lynx LLC, in accordance with the Golden Lynx LLC agreement dated April 18, 2008.

The resignation of TintinaGold as a member of the Golden Lynx and TintinaGold’s failure to meet the initial contribution requirements of the Golden Lynx LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”) terminates its interests in Golden Lynx, LLC. TintinaGold will have no further rights to receive distributions, or any other payments from Golden Lynx or Kisa, except as provided for in Section 6.3 of the Operating Agreement. A copy of the Operating

Agreement was attached as Exhibit 10.6 to Gold Crest’s Quarterly Report Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2008. Therefore, at December 31, 2009, the Company is the sole shareholder of Golden Lynx LLC.

After having received the notice of TintinaGold’s resignation, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Investment in Golden Lynx LLC had been impaired. The Company recorded a write-down of $43,202, which was recognized as an impairment of investment in Golden Lynx LLC in the fourth quarter of 2009 leaving a carrying value of $11,373 at December 31, 2009. The $11,373 carrying value was based primarily on the ongoing negotiations with an interested third party who was looking at entering into an option agreement with the Company worth $20,000 on the Company’s Southwest Kuskokwim Project area. The option agreement was entered into on January 27, 2010 for the agreed on amount of $20,000 which was received on February 16, 2010. See “Note 14. Subsequent Events –North Fork Option” for further details.

The $20,000 proposed payment was allocated by the number of acres to the five claim groups which were part of the Golden Lynx LLC, as well as the Company’s other two claim groups known as AKO and Luna which make up the rest of the Southwest Kuskowim Project area. Another deciding factor for the impairment was because the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the option agreement with North Fork would not be exercised when it expires on October 31, 2010.

The following is a summary of the Company’s mineral properties in Alaska.

Alaska Mineral Properties	Number of Claims	Acres
Southwest Kuskokwim Project
AKO	45	7,200
Luna	50	8,000
Kisa	38	5,840
Gold Lake	69	9,720
Gold Creek	12	1.920
Little Swift	14	2,240
Gosson Valley	2	320
TOTAL Southwest Kuskokwim Project	230	35,240

Buckstock Project
Chilly	44	7,040
TOTAL Buckstock Project	44	7,040

The Company is required to perform certain work commitments and pay annual assessments to the States of Alaska to hold these claims in good standing. See “Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies”.

Idaho Properties

Asset Purchase Agreement

On March 13, 2009, the Company signed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") with Frank Duval, a related party who, up until November 3, 2009, owned greater than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company, as an individual or agent for and on behalf of a company to be formed for the purpose of acquiring the mining claims in Idaho known as the Golden Meadows Project (the “Purchaser”). On April 3, 2009 the Company signed an amended and restated Asset Purchase Agreement entering into a more formal definitive agreement which supersedes the original Purchase Agreement dated March 13, 2009 with Frank Duval. The terms remain the same as under the first agreement dated March 13, 2009.

Under the terms of the Agreement the Company sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to its 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as the Golden Meadows Project. In addition, the Company also agreed to assign its rights under the Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with the Bradley Mining Company, the Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC, and the Option and Royalty Sales Agreement with the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig, to Mr. Duval. See “Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Bradley Mining Company”and “Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC.” See“Note 6. Royalty Interest in Mineral Property” for further details.

The selling price for the claims and the assignment of the agreements was $50,000 payable as follows:

(a) $25,000 within 10 days of the execution of the Agreement which was received by check on March 17, 2009, and

(b) $25,000 by October 1, 2009. This payment was received on September 25, 2009 as payment in full.

The closing date of the sale was September 25, 2009 when the second $25,000 payment was received. As part of the agreement, on October 2, 2009, the Company signed a quit claim deed transferring all rights, title and interest in and to the unpatented mining claims to the Purchaser. As a result of this sale, the Company recognized a gain on sale of mineral property of $16,875 during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Bradley Mining Company

On March 31, 2008, the Company entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with the Bradley Mining Company (the “Bradley Option Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company had been granted an exclusive option through March 30, 2009 to purchase for $300,000 real property located in the Stibnite mining district, Valley County, Idaho (“the Bradley Property”). The Bradley Property consisted of nine patented mining claims comprising approximately 175 acres. As consideration for entering into the Bradley Option Agreement, the Company paid $75,000. If the Company had elected to exercise this option on or before March 30, 2009, then there would have been another payment due upon closing in the amount of $225,000.

During the second half of 2008, the Company determined that the carrying value of the property had been impaired based on the fact that the Company had been unsuccessful in finding any potential joint venture partners and there was a very high probability that the Company would not exercise the option to purchase. The Company recorded a write-down of $75,000 which was recognized as an impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest in the fourth quarter of 2008 leaving a carrying value of zero.

On March 13, 2009, the Company signed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement"). Under the terms of the Agreement the Company agreed to assign its rights under the Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with the Bradley Mining Company to Mr. Duval. See “Asset Purchase Agreement.”

Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC.

On January 24, 2008, the Company entered into an Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC, (“JJO”) an Idaho limited liability company and personal representative of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig. This option gave the Company the right to acquire approximately 255 acres of patented mining and mill site claims in the Stibnite area from the Oberbillig Estate. The property had a total purchase price of $435,620. As consideration for entering into the Option Agreement, the Company paid $125,000.

During the second half of 2008, the Company determined that the carrying value of the property had been impaired based on the fact that the Company had been unsuccessful in finding any potential joint venture partners and there was a very high probability that the Company would not exercise the option to purchase which had been extended to May 1, 2009. The Company wrote-down the property’s carrying value of $125,000 and recognized the write down as an impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest in the fourth quarter of 2008 leaving a carrying value of zero.

On March 13, 2009, the Company signed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement"). Under the terms of the Agreement the Company agreed to assign its rights under the Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC to Mr. Duval. See “Asset Purchase Agreement.”

NOTE 6. Royalty Interest in Mineral Property

On January 24, 2008, the Company entered into an Option and Royalty Sales Agreement with the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig (the “Oberbillig Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the original Agreement, the Company was granted an exclusive option through August 15, 2008 to purchase a 5% (five percent) net smelter royalty interest (“NSR”) in real property located in Valley County, Idaho. This royalty applied to any metal produced from lands sold by the estate of J.J. Oberbillig to Bradley Mining Co. in 1941. The NSR has a total Purchase Price of $1,642,480. As consideration for entering into the Option Agreement, the Company paid $400,000.

During the second half of 2008, the Company determined that the $400,000 carrying value of the royalty interest had been impaired based on the fact that the Company had been unsuccessful in finding any potential joint venture partners and there was a very high probability that the Company would not exercise the option to purchase, which had been extended to May 1, 2009, and recorded a write-down of $400,000 which was recognized as an impairment of mineral properties and royalty interest in the fourth quarter of 2008 leaving a carrying value of zero.

On March 13, 2009 the Company assigned the Option and Royalty Sales Agreement with the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig (the “Oberbillig Agreement”) to Frank Duval, a related party who, up until November 3, 2009, owned greater than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Asset Purchase Agreement”.

NOTE 7. Note Receivable

On January 11, 2007, the Company advanced Diamond Drilling Consultants Con Ag., Inc. (“Diamond Drilling”) $150,000 of a $200,000 secured promissory note to finance the construction of a drilling rig for use by the Company. The final $50,000 was advanced during May 2007, when the drilling rig construction was completed. Interest accrued at six percent (6%) per annum, from June 15, 2007, through June 12, 2008. This note, including principal and interest, was payable in full on or before January 15, 2009, or at the termination of the drilling contract between the parties, whichever occurred first. In consideration for the Company providing this note, the Company was to have exclusive use of the drilling rig for two calendar years, which also served as collateral for the note.

Upon successful completion of the contractual obligations of the note, the Company agreed to grant Diamond Drilling a forty percent (40%) reduction in the amount of principal and accrued interest payable. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company determined that the 40% reduction was probable and likely to occur. Therefore 40% of the note receivable, or $80,000, had been recorded as “Prepaid Exploration Costs” and was being amortized over the life of the note receivable. The amortized expense was being charged to exploration expenditures.

As part of the contract with Diamond Drilling for the 2008 drilling season, the Company had a 10,000 foot minimum drilling requirement at a cost of $23.00 per foot for a total potential liability of $230,000 for undrilled footage (the “Diamond Drilling Contract”).

During 2008, it became apparent that the Company would not satisfy its minimum drilling requirement under the Diamond Drilling Contract. On June 12, 2008, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Diamond Drilling (the “Settlement Agreement”). The terms of the Settlement Agreement require Diamond Drilling to release Gold Crest from its obligation to pay the $230,000 drilling commitment in exchange for the following:

The forgiveness by the Company of a $120,000 note receivable from Diamond Drilling;

The forgiveness by the Company of $7,160 of accrued interest receivable related to the note receivable from Diamond Drilling;

The sale to Diamond Drilling for $1 of a water line with a carrying value of $12,654 and miscellaneous tools with zero carrying value; and

The write off by the Company of the $22,000 remaining balance in the Prepaid Exploration Costs.

As a result of this settlement transaction, the Company recognized a loss of $161,814 in 2008.

NOTE 8. Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of its common stock. All shares of common stock are equal to each other with respect to voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights. Owners of shares are entitled to one vote for each share owned at any Shareholders’ meeting. The common stock of the Company does not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares voting in an election of directors may

elect all of the directors if they choose to do so.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had the following issuances of common stock:

On December 31, 2009, the Company completed an offering of units consisting of its common stock in a non-brokered private placement which began on October 31, 2009. The Company issued 928,833 shares of common stock for a total of $27,865 in total proceeds. Under the private placement the Company offered a maximum of 2,000,000 shares at $0.03 per share for a maximum of $60,000 in proceeds.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company had the following issuances of common stock:

The Company issued 556,500 shares of restricted common stock upon the payment of promissory notes in the amount of $111,300 issued as part of the November 2007 private placement;

The Company issued 300,000 shares of restricted common stock upon the exercise of 300,000 warrants and received gross proceeds in the amount of $90,000;

The Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock for $10,000 worth of services performed;

The Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock to two newly appointed directors valued at $40,000;

The Company issued 1,666,667, 3,000,000 and 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock for cash proceeds of $250,000, $300,000 and $50,000, respectively.

Common Stock Warrants

In November 2007 the Company completed a private placement of 4,697,500 units for gross proceeds of $939,500. Of the total units, 662,500 units were subscribed in exchange for promissory notes with a value of $132,500 and due dates extending through September 1, 2008. The units were priced at $0.20 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one full common stock purchase warrant. Each warrant was exercisable for a period of two (2) years from the closing to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.30 per share. At December 31, 2008 there were 4,291,500 warrants outstanding exercisable at $0.30 per share with expiration dates ranging from October 21, 2009 to November 19, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company received payments on the promissory notes in the amount of $111,300 which constituted partial payments on the promissory notes and issued a total of 556,500 units.

In December, 2008 the Company decided to forgive the final $21,200 worth of outstanding promissory notes which constituted 106,000 units that would not be issued bringing down the total units issued as part of the November 2007 private placement to only 4,591,500 units.

The following is a summary of warrant activity in 2008 and 2009:

	Number of Warrants	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding January 1, 2008	4,697,500	$ 0.30
Issued	—	—
Exercised	(300,000)	0.30
Forfeited	(106,000)	0.30
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	4,291,500	$ 0.30
Expired	4,291,500	0.30
Outstanding at December 31, 2009	—	—
Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2009	—	—

See Note 10 for stock issued under stock based compensation plans.

NOTE 9. Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is entitled to preference over the common stock with respect to the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, or in the event of any other distribution of assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs. The authorized but un-issued shares of Preferred Stock may be divided into and issued in designated series from time to time by one or more resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors. The Directors in their sole discretion have the power to determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of each series of Preferred Stock within the limits set forth in the Nevada Business Corporation Act. At December 31, 2009, no preferred stock has been issued.

NOTE 10. Stock Based Compensation

Stock Based Compensation Plans

In June 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Gold Crest Stock Plan (the “Plan”) which was approved by shareholders in December 2007. The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of the Company’s business.

The maximum number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Plan adopted by the Company is currently set at 12,000,000 shares of which 4,000,000 may be granted as Incentive Stock Options to employees. As of December 31, 2009, the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan was 6,270,000.

Stock Options

During the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company did not issue any new options under the 2007 Stock Plan. During that same period, 200,000 stock options issued before the 2007 Stock Plan with an exercise price of $0.30 expired on August, 20, 2009 and 1,000,000 stock options under the 2007 Stock Plan with an exercise price of $0.53 were forfeited due to a board member resigning. Compensation expense was recorded of $13,355 and was recognized in 2009 for the options issued in 2007, which vested during the year ended December 31, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company did not issue any new options under the 2007 Stock Plan. During that same period, 100,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.28 were forfeited due to a board member resigning. Compensation expense was recorded of $121,089 and was recognized in 2008 for the options issued in 2007, which vested during the year ended December 31, 2008.

The following is a summary of stock option activity in 2008 and 2009:

	Number of Shares Under Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding January 1, 2008	6,580,000	$ 0.51
Granted	—	—
Exercised	—	—
Forfeited	(100,000)	0.28
Expired	—	—
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	6,480,000	$ 0.51
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008	6,150,000	$ 0.51
Outstanding January 1, 2009	6,480,000	$ 0.51
Granted	—	—
Exercised	—	—
Forfeited	(1,000,000)	0.53
Expired	(200,000)	0.30
Outstanding at December 31, 2009	5,280,000	$ 0.52
Options exercisable at December 31, 2009	5,280,000	$ 0.52

The 5,280,000 shares under options at December 31, 2009 have expiration dates ranging as follows: 5,000,000 expire on June 18, 2012 and 280,000 expire on September 11, 2012. At December 31, 2009 the fully vested stock options have no intrinsic value due to the fact that the option exercise prices are greater than the market price on that date.

Stock Awards Under the 2007 Stock Plan

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not issue any shares of fully-vested common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 400,000 shares of fully-vested common stock to two newly appointed board members of the Company that was earned based on board compensation. The total value of the stock awards granted and expensed during the year ended December 31, 2008 was calculated at $40,000.

NOTE 11. Income Taxes

The Company did not recognize a provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008 the Company had deferred tax assets principally arising from the net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes multiplied by an expected rate of 34%. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has be established at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The significant components of the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
Net operating loss carry forward	$	4,600,000		$	4,400,000
Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss carry forward	$	1,798,000		$	1,644,000
Exploration costs		841,000			938,000
Stock based compensation		397,000			392,000
		3,036,000			2,974,000
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		(3,036,000	)		(2,974,000	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

At December 31, 2009 and 2008 the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $4,600,000 and $4,400,000 respectively, which expire in the years 2020 through 2029.

The income tax benefit shown in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 differs from the federal statutory rate as follows:

	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
Benefit at federal statutory rate	$	(62,000)	$	(646,000)
Increase in valuation allowance		62,000		646,000
Other		0		0
Total provision	$	0	$	0

The Company has analyzed its filing positions in all jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns and found no positions that would require a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits to be recognized.

We have determined that we are subject to examination of our income tax filings in the United States and state jurisdictions for the 2007 through 2009 tax years. In the event that the Company is assessed penalties and or interest, penalties will be charged to other operating expense and interest will be charged to interest expense.

NOTE 12. Related Party Transactions

In addition to transactions with Frank Duval discussed in Notes 4, 5 and 6, during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the following related transactions occurred:

On April 23, 2008, the Company issued 1,666,667 shares at $0.15 per share for total cash received of $250,000 to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder. The shares were part of the Golden Lynx LLC agreement we entered into on April 18, 2008. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC” for further details.

On June 16, 2008, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares at $0.10 per share for total cash received of $300,000 to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder. The shares were part of the letter of intent with Cougar Gold for a joint venture on our Idaho properties.

On August 26, 2008, the Company issued 500,000 shares at $0.10 per share for total cash received of $50,000 to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder. The shares were part of the sixty day extension to the letter of intent with Cougar Gold for them to perform additional due diligence on the property. As part of the extension deal, if Cougar Gold decided not to go forward with the Idaho joint venture then the Company would issue another 500,000 shares at no cost to Cougar Gold bringing the average share price down to $0.05 per share. On September 9, 2008, after being informed by Cougar Gold that they did not intend to go forward with the joint venture on our Idaho properties we issued the other 500,000 shares at no cost.

On May 1, 2009 the Company sold miscellaneous equipment to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder, at a price of $15,000. At the time of the sale, the equipment had a carrying value of approximately $18,141 and as such, a loss on the sale of equipment of $3,141 was recorded. See “Note 4. Equipment”.

On June 1, 2007, the Company entered into a twenty-one month consulting agreement with Janice Duval, the wife of Frank Duval, who, up until November 3, 2009, was a greater than 5% shareholder, for professional services to be rendered to the Company. The agreement is for $3,000 per month for twenty-one months ending February 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company recognized an expense in the amount of $36,000, paid Mrs. Duval $6,000 and accrued in accounts payable the other $30,000. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized an expense in the amount of $6,000 by accruing in accounts payable the last two months of the contract totaling $6,000. As of December 31, 2009 the total outstanding payable is $36,000.

NOTE 13. Commitments and Contingencies

Alaska Mineral Property Rent and Assessment Work Commitments

In Alaska, land holdings consist of state mining claims and prospecting sites totaling 42,280 acres of land. Annual rental payments in the amount of $30,835 for these claims are due by November 30, 2010. If these rental payments are not paid by the due date, the claims will be considered abandoned.

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water requires that upon the prospecting, and the discovery of a locatable mineral and the staking of mineral location, annual labor must be performed on the location each labor year in further development of the locatable mineral so that it can be mined. The labor year for the claims begins on September 1 and ends the following September 1. The Company would have been required to perform qualified labor in the amount of $105,700 by September 1, 2010 except we have qualified carry-over amounts that can be applied to the labor year ending September 1, 2010 in the amount of $82,673 leaving only $23,027 to be performed by the September 1, 2010 deadline. If these labor requirements are not met by the due date, the claims will be considered abandoned.

Environmental Matters

A predecessor entity to the Company owned mineral property interests on certain public and private lands in Idaho and Montana. Holdings included lands in mining districts designated as “Superfund” sites pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"). The properties were, and are, subject to a variety of federal and state regulations governing land use and environmental matters. A consultant reviewed the potential environmental impact of the prior mineral exploration and development activities, and believes there was substantial compliance with all such regulations, and is unaware of any pending action or proceedings relating to regulatory matters that would affect the financial position of the Company. Management acknowledges, however, that the possibility exists that the Company may be subject to environmental liabilities associated with its prior activities in the unforeseeable future, although t he likelihood of such is deemed remote and the amount and nature of the liabilities is impossible to estimate.

NOTE 14. Subsequent Events

North Fork Option

of Bethel covering approximately 35,240 acres of State of Alaska-owned lands in 7 claim groups known as the Kisa, Luna, AKO, Gold Lake, Little Swift, Gold Creek and Gossan Valley (“The Projects”) within the Kuskokwim Mineral Belt.

Under the terms of the option, North Fork will make a payment to the Company in the amount of $20,000 within 14 days of the signing of the agreement dated January 27, 2010, which was received on February 16, 2010, for the exclusive right to explore the claims up until October 31, 2010. During the option period, North Fork agrees to meet the minimum annual expenditure requirements on the claims for the period up to September 1, 2010. Following the expiration of the option on October 31, 2010, North Fork will have 30 days to notify the Company of its decision to exercise its option to purchase and/or earn into any or all of the claim groups.

The following is a breakdown of the proposed earn-in terms:

The initial interest at the time North Fork exercises its option to earn into ”The Projects” will be as follows:

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. – 100%

North Fork – 0%

North Fork can earn a 51% interest in ”The Projects” by the expenditure of $3,000,000 on ”The Projects” by October 31, 2013.

If North Fork withdraws from the Joint Venture prior to earning a 51% interest in ”The Projects”, it will have no further interest in ”The Projects”.

North Fork can earn an additional 24% interest in ”The Projects”, taking its total interest to 75% by the expenditure of an additional $3,000,000USD by October 31, 2016.

North Fork can earn a total interest of 90% in any of ”The Projects” claim blocks by the completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study.

Gold Crest Mines, Inc. will retain a free carried 10% interest in ”The Projects” up to a Decision to Mine at which point it can elect to contribute at 10% or dilute to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty.

North Fork is obliged to keep the Projects in “good standing”.

North Fork is the sole manager of ”The Projects” and will make all decisions in regards to the exploration programs.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A(T).

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of, and with the participation of, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(e) and Rule 15d – 15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)).

Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed and effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports that it files or submits to the SEC under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in applicable rules and forms and to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely det ection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud that could occur. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur b ecause of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Based on our assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective, as of the end of the fiscal year, for a company of our size, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting

During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table provides the names, positions and ages of our directors and officers:

Name	Age	Position
John P. Ryan	47	Chief Executive Officer and Director
Terrence J. Dunne(1)	61	President and Director
Robert O’Brien(1)	75	Director
Daniel R. McKinney Sr.	60	Director
Matthew J. Colbert	41	Chief Financial Officer and Secretary/Treasurer
____________________________________
(1) Member of the Audit Committee

We have no knowledge of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in our control. We are not, to the best of our knowledge, directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or foreign government.

John P. Ryan. Mr. Ryan was appointed as President and CEO of the Company on November 13, 2008. On December 16, 2009 Mr. Ryan resigned his position as the Company’s President. Mr. Ryan has been a Director of the Company since June, 2008. Mr. Ryan has extensive experience with development-stage resource companies. Mr. Ryan was Founder and Chairman of U.S. Silver Corporation (a producing silver company) from June, 2006 until September, 2008. Mr. Ryan was Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of High Plains Uranium, Inc. (a uranium exploration and production company) ("High Plains") from incorporation in February 2005 until September 2006 (High Plains became a reporting issuer in all jurisdictions in Canada in November 2005). He also served from April 2004 to February 2005 as a director (in addition to Secretary and Chief Financial Officer) of High Plains Uranium, Inc. (Idaho), the predecessor to High Plains. During the p eriod of 1996 until 2006, he held various positions with Cadence Resources Corporation, a U.S. public natural resources company, including Vice President of Corporate Development (1996-2005), Secretary (1998-2006) and a director (1997-2005). Mr. Ryan has also been Chief Financial Officer and a director of Trend Mining Company since August 2000. He served as President and a director of Grand Central Silver Mines Inc. from 1998 until 2000 and was a director of Metalline Mining Company from 1996 until 1999. Mr. Ryan attended the University of Idaho where he received a B.S. degree in Mining Engineering, and he also received a Juris Doctor from Boston College. Mr. Ryan is a former U.S. Naval Officer.

Terrence J. Dunne. Mr. Dunne was appointed as President of the Company on December 16, 2009. Mr. Dunne has served as a director of the Company since 2006 and up until December 16, 2009 he had also served as the Company’s Secretary/Treasurer. For more than the past six years Mr. Dunne has operated Terrence J. Dunne & Associates, a sole proprietorship which provides bookkeeping, income tax return preparation and business consulting services for small businesses. Mr. Dunne is a business consultant, primarily focused on business acquisitions and corporate reorganizations. Mr. Dunne currently serves as a director of Rock Energy Resources, Inc., which trades on the OTCBB.PK. Mr. Dunne is currently serving as a director for Superior Silver Mines, Inc., which trades on the OTCBB and he also serves as President and Director of Silver Butte Co. which trades on the OTCBB. Mr. Dunne received a degree in Business Administration from Gonzaga University in 1970. He received his Masters Degree in Business Administration in 1975 from Gonzaga University. In addition, he received a Masters Degree in Taxation from Gonzaga University in 1984. Mr. Dunne is a former adjunct professor in the School of Business Administration of Gonzaga University, teaching courses in corporate mergers, acquisitions and reorganizations.

Robert O’Brien. Mr. O’Brien has served as a director of the Company since 2004. Mr. O’Brien has over 45 years experience with private and publicly held companies. He has served as an Owner, CEO, Officer, Director, and Accredited Investor in various categories including: Direct Management, Public and Investor Relations, Corporate Relations and Reverse Mergers and Acquisitions. Since July 1996, Mr. O'Brien has owned and operated Spokane Quotation Bureau, LLC, a company that tracks and publishes stock quotations for selected over-the-counter stock trades. Mr. O’Brien graduated from Gonzaga University with a BA degree in Economics.

Daniel R. McKinney, Sr. Mr. McKinney joined Gold Crest Mines, Inc. as a Director in April of 2008. Mr. McKinney has been a real estate broker for approximately 30 years. He is a principal and developer of commercial and residential real estate projects in Washington, Idaho and Arizona. Since 1989 he has owned and operated a disability management consulting firm and has worked as a senior consultant specializing in negotiated settlements and forensic testimony on

disability related court cases. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from Eastern Washington University in 1973 and a Master of Education Degree from Whitworth University in 1977. Mr. McKinney is a past director and officer of Silver Crest Resources, Inc. and a past director and officer of Hanover Gold/Rock Energy Resources.

Matthew J. Colbert. Mr. Colbert has served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since December 2007. Mr. Colbert was appointed as Secretary/Treasurer of the Company on December 16, 2009. Mr. Colbert has over eleven years of experience in public and corporate accounting. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Idaho and is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Washington. Before being appointed CFO, Mr. Colbert had been the Controller of the Company since August 2007. Most recently, Mr. Colbert Served as Chief Financial Officer and President of Lifestream Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded company. Lifestream Technologies, Inc. was a leading supplier of cholesterol monitors. Mr. Colbert also served on Lifestream’s Board of Directors. Earlier in his career, Mr. Colbert served as a Business Assurance Associate in the audit department of PricewaterhouseCoopers , LLP, an international accounting and consulting firm.

Audit Committee

As of December 31, 2009 Terrence Dunne and Robert O’Brien now comprise the Company’s Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approves the selection of the Company’s independent certified public accountants to audit the annual financial statements and review the quarterly financial statements, discusses with the auditors and approves in advance the scope of the audit and reviews, reviews management’s administration of the system of internal controls, and reviews the Company’s procedures relating to business ethics. The Board of Directors has determined that Terrence Dunne meets the SEC definition of an “audit committee financial expert”.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The entire board of directors comprise the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. McKinney and Mr. O’Brien are independent members of that Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing the Company’s approach to corporate governance issues and compliance with governance rules. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is also mandated to plan for the succession of the Company, including recommending director candidates, review of board procedures, size and organization, and monitoring of senior management with respect to governance issues. The committee is responsible for the development and implementation of corporate communications to ensure the integrity of the Company’s internal control and management information systems. The purview of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also includes the administration of the board’s relationship with the management of the Company, monitoring the quality and effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance system and ensuring the effectiveness and integrity of the Company’s communication and reporting to shareholders and the public generally.

Compensation Committee

The entire board of directors comprise the Company’s Compensation Committee. Mr. McKinney and Mr. O’Brien are independent members of that Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the compensation for the officers and the other agents and employees of the corporation. The Committee may delegate the authority to set the compensation of the officers, agents, and employees to the President. No officer may be prevented from receiving compensation as an officer solely because the officer is also a director of the corporation. The Committee shall fix the amount or salary to be paid to each director for service as a director or for attendance at each meeting of the Board. Salary or payment for service as a director shall not preclude a director from serving the corporation in any other capacity or from receiving compensation for service in that other capacity.

Legal Proceedings

No Director, or person nominated to become a Director or Executive Officer, has been involved in any legal action involving the Company during the past five years.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated or chosen by the Company to become a director or executive officer.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers, directors, and any person who beneficially owns more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and

Exchange Commission. Executive officers, directors, and more than 10% shareholders are required by regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms which they file.

During 2009, certain of our directors and executive officers who own our stock filed Forms 3, 4 or 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information on these filings reflects the current ownership position of all such individuals. To the best of our knowledge, during 2009 all such filings by our officers and directors were made timely.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics for our Directors, Officers and employees. A copy of our Code of Conduct and Ethics can be obtained at no cost, by telephone at (509) 893-0171, by mail at: Gold Crest Mines, Inc., 724 East Metler Lane, Spokane, Washington 99218, attention: Investor Relations, or at our website: www.goldcrestminesinc.com. We believe our Code of Conduct and Ethics is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure prompt internal reporting of code violations; and provide accountability for adherence to the code.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 and 2008

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Total ($)
John P. Ryan(1)	2009	—	—	—	—
Chief Executive Officer	2008	—	$ 20,000	—	$ 20,000

Thomas H. Parker(2)	2009	—	—	—	—
Former President and Chief	2008	$ 143,304	—	—	$ 143,304
Executive Officer

Terrence J. Dunne(3)	2009	—	—	—	—
President	2008	—	—	—	—

Matt J. Colbert(4)	2009	$ 24,000	—	—	$ 24,000
Chief Financial Officer	2008	$ 70,000	—	—	$ 70,000

(1)

Mr. Ryan was appointed Chief Executive Officer on November 13, 2008 and Director on June 5, 2008. The $20,000 Stock Award was for services as a Director. Mr. Ryan later resigned as President on December 16, 2009. Mr. Ryan receives no compensation for his role as CEO or when he served as President.

(2)

Mr. Parker was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer and Director on March 13, 2007. Mr. Parker later resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer effective November 13, 2008 and as a director on July 15, 2009.

(3)

Mr. Dunne was appointed President on December 16, 2009. Mr. Dunne receives no compensation for his role as President.

(4)

Mr. Colbert went from a full-time to a part-time employee beginning on September 16, 2008.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning year-end number and value of unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each of the Named Executive Officers.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)

Option
Exercise
Price

Option
Expiration

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

Name

Exercisable

Unexercisable

($)

Date

(#)

($)

John P. Ryan

—

Chief Executive Officer

Thomas H. Parker(1)

—

Former President and Chief

Executive Officer

Terrence J. Dunne

1,500,000

—

0.53

6/18/12

President

Matt J. Colbert

125,000

—

0.28

9/11/12

Chief Financial Officer

(1)

Employment Agreements

There are no employment agreements that were in effect between us and each of the Named Executive Officers during the last fiscal year.

Director Compensation

There was no director compensation paid for the year ended December 31, 2009 to directors and as such, no table is provided.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information as of March 3, 2010 regarding the ownership of our Common Stock by:

· each person who is known by us to own more than 5% of our shares of common stock;

· each of our named executive officers and directors; and

· all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage of shares beneficially owned are based on 85,705,828 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 3, 2010.

For the purposes of the information provided below, beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and for each person includes shares that person has the right to acquire within 60 days following March 3, 2010 subject to options, warrants or similar instruments.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Owner

Percent of Class

John P. Ryan

301 Central Ave., Apt. 384,

Hilton Head, SC 29926

3,535,000

4.12%

Robert W. O’Brien

1511 S. Riegel Ct., Spokane, WA 99212

3,223,935

3.76%

Terrence J. Dunne⁽¹⁾

1224 W. Riverside Ave., Apt 1006

Spokane, WA 99201

10,279,585

11.79%

Daniel R. McKinney Sr.⁽²⁾

607 S. Government Way, Spokane, WA 99224

1,417,500

1.65%

Matt J. Colbert⁽³⁾

724 E. Metler Lane, Spokane, WA 99218

125,000

0.15%

Total of all executive officers and directors

(5 individuals)⁽⁴⁾

18,581,020

21.28%

Tony Alford⁽⁵⁾

7040 Interlaken Dr., Kernersville, NC 27284

4,520,520

5.27%

Cougar Gold LLC⁽⁶⁾

1700 Lincoln St., Ste 2600,

Denver, CO 80203

5,666,667

6.61%

^{__________________________________________________}

⁽¹⁾

Includes 1,500,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested options.

⁽²⁾

Includes 18,500 shares held in spouse’s IRA.

⁽³⁾

Includes 125,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested options.

⁽⁴⁾

Includes 1,625,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of vested options.

⁽⁵⁾

Mr. Alford is not an Officer or Director of the Company but is a 5% or greater shareholder. The shares were verified by a shareholder of record report dated March 3, 2010 obtained from Columbia Stock Transfer Company and by confirmation by Mr. Alford.

⁽⁶⁾

Cougar Gold LLC is a 5% or greater shareholder. The shares were verified by the schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2008.

There are no arrangements known to the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent time result in the change of control of the Company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009:

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options		Weighted average excise price of outstanding options			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
2007 Stock Plan		5,280,000		$	0.52		6,270,000	(1)
Total		5,280,000		$	0.52		6,270,000

(1) The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2007 Stock Plan will not exceed 12,000,000.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and to date in 2010, the following related transactions occurred:

On March 26, 2008, Terry Dunne, the President and a director of the Company exercised 71,788 warrants to purchase shares at $0.30 per share and paid the Company $21,536. Also on April 28, 2008 he exercised another 23,333 warrants to purchase shares at $0.30 per share and paid the Company $7,000. The warrants were part of the November 2007 private placement.

On March 26, 2008, Howard Crosby, at the time, a director of the Company exercised 90,340 warrants to purchase shares at $0.30 per share and paid the Company $27,102. The warrants were part of the November 2007 private placement.

On March 26, 2008, Frank Duval, who, up until November 3, 2009, was a greater than 5% shareholder of the Company exercised 66,900 warrants to purchase shares at $0.30 per share and paid the Company $20,070. Also on April 28, 2008 he exercised another 16,667 warrants to purchase shares at $0.30 per share and paid the Company $5,000. The warrants were part of the November 2007 private placement.

On April 23, 2008, the Company issued 1,666,667 shares at $0.15 per share for total cash received of $250,000 to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder. The shares were part of the Golden Lynx LLC we entered into on April 18, 2008. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Golden Lynx, LLC”to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

On August 26, 2008, the Company issued 500,000 shares at $0.10 per share for total cash received of $50,000 to Cougar Gold LLC, a greater than 5% shareholder. The shares were part of the sixty day extension to the letter of intent with Cougar Gold for them to perform additional due diligence on our Idaho properties. As part of the extension deal, if Cougar Gold decided not to go forward with the Idaho joint venture then the Company would issue another 500,000 shares at no cost to Cougar Gold bringing the average share price down to $0.05 per share. On September 9, 2008, after being informed by Cougar Gold that they did not intend to go forward with the joint venture on our Idaho properties we issued the other 500,000 shares at no cost.

On March 13, 2009, the Company signed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") with Frank Duval for the purpose of acquiring the mining claims in Idaho known as our Golden Meadows Project. Under the terms of the Agreement the Company sold all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in and to its 46 unpatented federal mill site claims and 185 unpatented federal lode claims in the Stibnite District of Idaho known as the Golden Meadows Project for a total of $50,000. In addition, the Company also agreed to assign its rights under the Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with the Bradley Mining Company, the Option and Real Property Sales Agreement with JJO, LLC, and the Option and Royalty Sales Agreement with the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig, to Mr. Duval. See “Note 5. Mineral Properties -Asset Purchase Agreement”to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

In July and September the Company sold miscellaneous equipment to Midas Gold, Inc. whose President is Frank Duval, who, up until November 3, 2009, was a greater than 5% shareholder, for a price of $1,000. At the time of the sale, the equipment had an original cost of $2,282 with accumulated depreciation of $1,241 for a carrying value of $1,041 and as such, a loss on the sale of equipment of $41 was recorded. See “Note 4. Equipment”.

On June 1, 2007, the Company entered into a twenty-one month consulting agreement with Janice Duval, the wife of Frank Duval, who, up until November 3, 2009, was a greater than 5% (five percent) shareholder, as payment for professional services rendered to the Company. The agreement was for $3,000 per month for twenty-one months ending February 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company paid Mrs. Duval $6,000 and accrued in accounts payable another $30,000 and in 2009 accrued another $6,000. As of December 31, 2009 the total outstanding payable is $36,000.

Director Independence

Directors Robert W. O’Brien and Daniel R. McKinney are independent members of the board of directors as defined by NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

In determining the matter of independence, Mr. O’Brien and Mr. McKinney had no transactions, relationships or arrangements with the Company within the last three years. Mr. McKinney had shares granted to him as directors’ fees, and both Mr. O’Brien and Mr. McKinney had investment participation in the Company’s private placements on the same terms as all other investors in that offering.

“Independent director” means a person other than an executive officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

In determining the matter of director independence, the following independence criteria were utilized:

(1)

a director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the company or by any parent or subsidiary of the company;

(2)

a director who accepted or who has a Family Member who accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $60,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence, other than the following:

(i)

compensation for board or board committee service;

(ii)

compensation paid to a Family Member who is an employee (other than an executive officer) of the company ; or

(iii)

benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation

(3)

Other relationships include:

(i)

a director who is a Family Member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the Company as an executive officer, or a director who is, or has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than (a) payments arising solely from investments in the company's securities; or(b) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs.

(ii)

a director of the Company who is, or has a Family Member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the executive officers of the Company serve on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

(iii)

a director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a current partner of the Company's outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the Company's outside auditor who worked on the company's audit at any time during any of the past three years.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q were $18,000 and $22,800, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no fees billed in the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements except as set forth in the preceding paragraph.

Tax Fees

The Company’s auditors billed $2,500 and $800 for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.

All Other Fees

The Company incurred no fees from the principal accountant during the last two fiscal years for products and services other than as set forth above.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee meets prior to the filing of any Form 10-Q or 10-K to approve those filings. In addition, the Company’s audit committee pre-approves all services provided to the Company by DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. or any other professional services firm that are related to the preparation of the Company’s financial statements.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
3.1	Articles of Incorporation for Silver Crest Mines, Inc. 9/11/1968. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.2	Articles of Merger of Domestic Corporations into Silver Crest Mines, Inc. 12/20/1982. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.3	Articles of Incorporation of Silver Crest Resources, Inc. 1/28/2003. Filed as Exhibit 3.3 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.4	Articles of Merger between Silver Crest Mines, Inc. into Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Nevada on 6/11/2003. Filed as Exhibit 3.4 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.5	Articles of Merger between Silver Crest Mines, Inc. into Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Idaho on 6/11/2003. Filed as Exhibit 3.5 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.6	Articles of Exchange of Niagara Mining and Development Company, Inc., and Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Nevada on 8/4/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.6 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.7	Articles of Exchange of Niagara Mining and Development Company, Inc., and Silver Crest Resources, Inc. as filed in Idaho on 8/4/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.7 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.8	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation for a Nevada Corporation 8/14/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.8 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.9	Articles of Incorporation for Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. 7/28/2006. Filed as Exhibit 3.9 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.10	Articles of Incorporation for Niagara Mining and Development Company, Inc. 1/11/2005. Filed as Exhibit 3.10 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
3.11	Amended Bylaws adopted September 12, 2007. Filed as Exhibit 3.11 with the Company’s 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.
10.1	Option and Royalty Sales Agreement between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and the heirs of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 with the Company’s 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.
10.2	Option and Real Property Sales Agreement between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and JJO, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company and personal representative of the Estate of J.J. Oberbillig. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 with the Company’s 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.
10.3	Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement dated March 31, 2008, between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and Bradley Mining Company, a California Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 with the Company’s 10-Q on August 11, 2008.
10.4	Golden Lynx, LLC, Limited Liability Company Agreement dated April 18, 2008, between Kisa Gold Mining, Inc. and Cougar Gold LLC. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 with the Company’s 10-Q on August 11, 2008.
10.5	Purchase Agreement dated March 13, 2009, between Gold Crest Mines, Inc. and Frank Duval. Filed as Exhibit 10.9 with the Company’s 10-K on March 25, 2009.
14	Code of Conduct and Ethics of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. adopted March 3, 2008. Filed as Exhibit 14.1 with the Company’s 8-K on March 3, 2008.
21	Subsidiaries of the Issuer. Filed as Exhibit 21 with the Company’s 10-SB12G on January 8, 2007.
99	Gold Crest Mines, Inc., 2007 Stock Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99 with the Company’s 10-SB12G/A on August 6, 2007.
31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. Filed herewith.
31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. Filed herewith
32.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. Filed herewith
32.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in Spokane, Washington on March 23, 2010.

GOLD CREST MINES, INC.

By: /s/ John P. Ryan

John P. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

In accordance with the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on March 23, 2010.

/s/ JOHN P. RYAN				Chief Executive Officer and Director
John P. Ryan
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ MATT J. COLBERT				Chief Financial Officer and Secretary/Treasurer
Matt J. Colbert
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ TERRENCE J. DUNNE				President and Director
Terrence J. Dunne
/s/ ROBERT W. O’BRIEN				Director
Robert W. O’Brien
/s/ DANIEL R. MCKINNEY, SR.				Director
Daniel R. McKinney, Sr.

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigious
Readability	8th grade Avg

Amazing Energy Oil & Gas (AMAZ) 10-K2009 FY Annual report

Content analysis