Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Nordic Agreement In June 2022, the Company entered into a collaboration agreement (the “ Nordic Agreement ”) with Nordic Bioscience Clinical Development A/S (“ NBCD ”) to provide full operational support for the Company’s KOA clinical trial program. Under the terms of the Nordic Agreement, the Company was obligated to pay $10.2 million upon the achievement of specified milestones over the course of the clinical trial. On June 23, 2023, the Company submitted notice to NBCD to immediately suspend all trial activities and terminate the Nordic Agreement. Pursuant to the Nordic Agreement, the Company is obligated to reimburse NBCD for services performed through the effective termination date and for noncancelable obligations reasonably incurred prior to that date. If the Company has prepaid NBCD for services performed, the Company is entitled to reimbursement to the extent that such funds have not been consumed. In addition, the Company and NBCD have certain regulatory obligations for all trial participants enrolled in the study prior to the suspension of clinical trial activities. Refer to Note 16, “ Restructuring, ” for additional discussion. Turn Agreement On December 7, 2022, the Company acquired certain intellectual property rights pursuant to a Platform Intellectual Property License Agreement (the “ Turn Agreement ”) with Global Health Solutions, Inc. (d.b.a. Turn Therapeutics; “ Turn ”). The Turn Agreement provided the Company with an exclusive, worldwide, sub-licensable license to use Turn’s proprietary antimicrobial technology platform (PermaFusion®) to develop antimicrobial product line extensions and new products. In addition, the Turn Agreement granted the Company the commercial rights to Turn’s placental collagen matrix product, FleX™ AM (“ Flex ”), contingent upon Turn’s receipt of FDA 510(k) clearance and other conditions. The Turn Agreement provided for a potential milestone payment by the Company of $9.6 million upon Turn’s receipt of 510(k) clearance for FleX. As of June 30, 2023, FleX has not received 510(k) clearance. Litigation and Regulatory Matters In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries may be a party to pending and threatened legal, regulatory, and governmental actions and proceedings (including those described below). In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly where the plaintiffs or claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages or where the matters present novel legal theories or involve a large number of parties, the Company generally cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual recovery, loss, fines or penalties related to each pending matter may be. The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2023 reflects the Company’s current best estimate of probable losses associated with these matters, including costs to comply with various settlement agreements, where applicable. For more information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings, refer to Note 16, “ Commitments and Contingencies ” in the 2022 Form 10-K. The Company has not accrued for any potential losses related to legal matters as of June 30, 2023. The Company paid $0.2 million toward the resolution of legal matters involving the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2023. The following is a description of certain litigation and regulatory matters to which the Company is a party: Securities Class Action On January 16, 2019, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entered an order consolidating two purported securities class actions (MacPhee v. MiMedx Group, Inc., et al. filed February 23, 2018 and Kline v. MiMedx Group, Inc., et al. filed February 26, 2018). The order also appointed Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois (“ CPFI ”) as lead plaintiff. On May 1, 2019, CPFI filed a consolidated amended complaint, naming as defendants the Company, Michael J. Senken, Parker H. “Pete” Petit, William C. Taylor, Christopher M. Cashman and Cherry Bekaert & Holland LLP. The amended complaint (the “ Securities Class Action Complaint ”) alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”), Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. It asserted a class period of March 7, 2013 through June 29, 2018. Following the filing of motions to dismiss by the various defendants, CPFI was granted leave to file an amended complaint. CPFI filed its amended complaint against the Company, Michael J. Senken, Parker H. Petit, William C. Taylor, and Cherry Bekaert & Holland (Christopher Cashman was dropped as a defendant) on March 30, 2020. The defendants filed motions to dismiss on May 29, 2020. On March 25, 2021, the Court granted defendants’ respective motions to dismiss, finding that CPFI lacked standing to bring the underlying claims and also could not establish loss causation because it sold all of its shares in the Company prior to any corrective disclosures, and dismissed the case. On April 22, 2021, CPFI filed a motion for reconsideration of the dismissal and for leave to amend to add a new plaintiff to attempt to cure the standing and loss causation issues. On January 28, 2022, the Court denied CPFI’s motion to reconsider and motion to substitute class representative. On February 25, 2022, CPFI filed a Notice of Appeal in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. On July 10, 2023, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the case and the denial of the motion for leave to amend. On July 31, 2023, CPFI filed a petition for rehearing en banc , which remains pending. Welker v. MiMedx, et. al. On November 4, 2022, Troy Welker and Min Turner, former option holders of the Company, brought a lawsuit in Fulton County State Court against the Company, former directors Terry Dewberry and Charles Evans, and former officers Parker H. “Pete” Petit, William C. Taylor, and Michael Senken alleging violations of the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“ RICO ”) Act against all defendants, and conspiracy to violate the Georgia RICO Act and breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants. The Company is defending against the allegations and removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand back to state court, which was granted. The Company has filed its answer and a motion to dismiss, which is currently pending. Former Employee Litigation and Related Matters On January 12, 2021, the Company filed suit in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial District in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida (MiMedx Group, Inc. v. Petit, et. al.) against its former CEO, Parker H. “Pete” Petit, and its former COO, William C. Taylor, seeking a determination of its rights and obligations under indemnification agreements with Petit and Taylor following a federal jury’s guilty verdict against Petit for securities fraud and Taylor for conspiracy to commit securities fraud. The Company is seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not obligated to indemnify or advance expenses to Petit and Taylor in connection with certain cases to which Petit and Taylor are parties and also seeking to recoup amounts previously paid on behalf of Petit and Taylor in connection with such cases. On April 22, 2021, Petit and Taylor filed an answer and asserted counterclaims against the Company alleging breach of their indemnification agreements, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing with respect to their indemnification agreements, and seeking a declaration that the Company remains obligated to indemnify and advance fees in connection with certain cases. Petit and Taylor simultaneously also filed a motion seeking to compel the Company to advance and reinstate its payments of Petit and Taylor’s legal expenses. The Company opposed Petit and Taylor’s motion and a hearing was set for June 23, 2021. At the joint request of the parties, the hearing was cancelled to allow the parties to attend a mediation to attempt a resolution of this matter; such mediation was held on August 11, 2021. Following the mediation, the Company and Mr. Taylor reached an agreement to settle the matter between them. Negotiations with Mr. Petit are ongoing. Other Matters Under the Florida Business Corporation Act and agreements with its current and former officers and directors, the Company is obligated to indemnify its current and former officers and directors who are made party to a proceeding, including a proceeding brought by or in the right of the corporation, with certain exceptions, and to advance expenses to defend such matters. The Company has already borne substantial costs to satisfy these indemnification and expense advance obligations and may continue to do so in the future. Costs incurred pursuant to these agreements are included in investigation, restatement and related expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. In addition to the matters described above, the Company is a party to a variety of other legal matters that arise in the ordinary course of the Company’s business, none of which are deemed to be individually material at this time. Due to the inherent |