Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 6 Months Ended |
Oct. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year or for any other interim period. Further information on potential factors that could affect the Company's financial results can be found in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. |
Liquidity Disclosure [Policy Text Block] | ' |
c) | Liquidity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company has incurred net losses and negative operating cash flows since inception. As of October 31, 2014, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $159.3 million. As of October 31, 2014, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities balance was approximately $22.8 million as compared to $28.4 million at April 30, 2014. Based upon the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities balance as of October 31, 2014, the Company believes that it will be able to finance its capital requirements and operations through at least the fourth calendar quarter of 2015. In addition, as of October 31, 2014, the Company’s restricted cash balance was approximately $0.6 million, which reflects a significant decrease from the Company’s restricted cash balance of approximately $7.3 million as of April 30, 2014. See Note 2(f). |
|
During 2014 and 2013, the Company continued to make investments in ongoing product development efforts in anticipation of future growth. The Company’s future results of operations involve significant risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect the Company’s future operating results and cause actual results to vary materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, risks from insufficiencies of capital, technology development, scalability of technology and production, dependence on skills of key personnel, concentration of customers and suppliers, performance of PowerBuoys, deployment risks and laws, regulations and permitting. In order to complete its future growth strategy, the Company will require additional equity and/or debt financing. There is no assurance that additional equity and/or debt financing will be available to the Company as needed. If sufficient financing is not obtained by the Company, we may be required to further curtail or limit certain product development costs, and/or selling, general and administrative activities in order to reduce our cash expenditures. |
|
In January 2013, we filed an S-3 Shelf. The S-3 Shelf was declared effective in February 2013. Under the S-3 Shelf, in June 2013, we established an at the market offering facility (the “ATM Facility”) with Ascendiant Capital Markets, LLC (the “Manager”) via an At the Market Offering Agreement (the “ATM Agreement”). Under the ATM Agreement, we offered and sold shares of our common stock from time to time through the Manager, acting as sales agent, in ordinary brokerage transactions at prevailing market prices. Under the ATM Facility, we issued 3,306,334 shares of our common stock at an average price to the public of $3.02 per share. Net proceeds from the ATM Facility were approximately $9,698,000 during fiscal 2014. |
|
Also in fiscal 2014, we entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Roth Capital Partners, LLC (the “Underwriter”) on April 4, 2014, with respect to the issuance and sale in an underwritten public offering (the “Public Offering”) of an aggregate of 3,800,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $3.10 per share. The Underwriting Agreement contained customary representations, warranties and agreements by us, customary conditions to closing and indemnification obligations, and a 90 day lock-up period that limited transactions in our common stock by us. Net proceeds from the Public Offering were approximately $10,828,000. |
|
|
|
Form S-3 limits the aggregate market value of securities that we are permitted to offer in any 12-month period under Form S-3, whether under the ATM Agreement, the Underwriting Agreement or otherwise, to one third of our public float. Given the fiscal 2014 share sales, we fully utilized the ATM Agreement and reached the applicable limit under Form S-3. Of the $40 million authorized under the S-3 Shelf, approximately $18.2 million remains available for issuance. During the six months ended October 31, 2014, there were no proceeds from the sale of stock under the S-3 Shelf. |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(a) Consolidation and Cost Method Investment |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Participation of stockholders other than the Company in the net assets and in the earnings or losses of a consolidated subsidiary is reflected as a noncontrolling interest in the Company's |
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations, which adjusts the Company's consolidated results of operations to reflect only the Company's share of the earnings or losses of the consolidated subsidiary. As of October 31, 2014, there was one noncontrolling interest, consisting of 11.8% of the Company's Australian subsidiary, Ocean Power Technologies (Australasia) Pty. Ltd. (“OPTA”). OPTA owns 100% of Victorian Wave Partners Pty. Ltd. (“VWP”), which is also organized under the laws of Australia. |
|
|
In addition, the Company evaluates its relationships with other entities to identify whether they are variable interest entities, and to assess whether it is the primary beneficiary of such entities. If the determination is made that the Company is the primary beneficiary, then that entity is included in the consolidated financial statements. As of October 31, 2014, there were no such entities. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(b) |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the recoverability of the carrying amount of property and equipment and patents; valuation allowances for receivables and deferred income tax assets; estimated costs to complete for projects; and percentage of completion of customer contracts for purposes of revenue recognition. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The current economic environment, particularly the macroeconomic pressures in certain European countries, has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in those estimates and assumptions. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(c) Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company’s contracts are either cost plus or fixed price contracts. Under cost plus contracts, customers are billed for actual expenses incurred plus an agreed-upon fee. Currently, the Company has two types of fixed price contracts, firm fixed price and cost-sharing. Under firm fixed price contracts, the Company receives an agreed-upon amount for providing products and services specified in the contract. Under cost-sharing contracts, the fixed amount agreed upon with the customer is only intended to fund a portion of the costs on a specific project. |
|
Generally, the Company recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs at completion. In certain circumstances, revenue under contracts that have specified milestones or other performance criteria may be recognized only when the customer acknowledges that such criteria have been satisfied. In addition, recognition of revenue (and the related costs) may be deferred for fixed-price contracts until contract completion if the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the total costs of the project prior to completion. These contracts are subject to interpretation and management may make a judgment as to the amount of revenue earned and recorded. Because the Company has a small number of contracts, revisions to the percentage-of-completion determination, management interpretation or delays in meeting performance and contractual criteria or in completing projects may have a significant effect on revenue for the periods involved. Upon anticipating a loss on a contract, the Company recognizes the full amount of the anticipated loss in the current period. |
|
Under cost plus and firm fixed price contracts, a profit or loss on a project is recognized depending on whether actual costs are more or less than the agreed upon amount. Under cost sharing contracts, an amount corresponding to the revenue is recorded in cost of revenues, resulting in gross profit on these contracts of zero. The Company’s share of the costs is recorded as product development expense. |
|
Unbilled receivables represent expenditures on contracts, plus applicable profit margin, not yet billed. Unbilled receivables are normally billed and collected within one year. Billings made on contracts are recorded as a reduction of unbilled receivables, and to the extent that such billings and cash collections exceed costs incurred plus applicable profit margin, they are recorded as unearned revenues. |
|
Most of the Company’s projects are under cost-sharing contracts. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash equivalents consist of investments in short-term financial instruments with initial maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents include the following: |
|
|
| | 31-Oct-14 | | | 30-Apr-14 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Checking and savings accounts | | $ | 3,349,284 | | | $ | 1,917,176 | | | | | | | | | |
Certificates of deposits and US Treasury obligations | | | 847,039 | | | | 11,499,768 | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | | 2,042,385 | | | | 441,715 | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 6,238,708 | | | $ | 13,858,659 | | | | | | | | | |
Marketable Securities, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(e) Marketable Securities |
|
Marketable securities with original maturities longer than three months but that mature in less than one year from the balance sheet date are classified as current assets. Marketable securities that mature more than one year from the balance sheet date are classified as noncurrent assets. Marketable securities that the Company has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as investments held-to-maturity and are reported at amortized cost. The difference between the acquisition cost and face values of held-to-maturity investments is amortized over the remaining term of the investments and added to or subtracted from the acquisition cost and interest income. As of October 31, 2014 and April 30, 2014, all of the Company’s investments were classified as held-to-maturity. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(f) Restricted Cash and Credit Facility |
|
A portion of the Company’s cash is restricted under the terms of three security agreements. |
|
|
One agreement is between Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Barclays Bank. Under this agreement, the cash is on deposit at Barclays Bank and serves as security for letters of credit and bank guarantees that are expected to be issued by Barclays Bank on behalf of OPT LTD, one of the Company's subsidiaries, under a credit facility established by Barclays Bank for OPT LTD. The credit facility carries a fee of 1% per annum of the amount of any such obligations issued by Barclays Bank. The credit facility does not have an expiration date, but is cancelable at the discretion of the bank. During the three months ended October 31, 2014, the Company reduced the credit facility from €800,000 ($964,656) to approximately €307,000 ($387,097). As of October 31, 2014, there was €278,892 ($351,655) in letters of credit outstanding under this agreement. |
|
The second agreement is between Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU). The Company received a $500,000 recoverable grant award from the NJBPU of which $200,000 is outstanding at October 31, 2014. Under this arrangement, the Company annually assigns to the NJBPU a certificate of deposit in an amount equal |
to the outstanding grant balance. See Note 6. |
|
The third agreement concerns letters of credit issued by PNC Bank for the benefit of the Oregon Department of State Lands for the removal of certain of the Company’s anchoring and mooring equipment from the seabed off the coast of Oregon. During the three months ended October 31, 2014, the Company substantially completed the removal activity and reduced the letters of credit from $1,200,000 to $22,000. This letter of credit is secured by a certificate of deposit with PNC Bank and has a credit term through January 31, 2015. |
|
|
The Company had classified the initial grant funding received from the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (“ARENA”) of A$5,595,723 ($5,179,960), which includes an amount required to be submitted as goods and services tax (GST), as restricted cash as of April 30, 2014. |
|
During the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Company remitted the GST in the amount of A$508,702 ($470,905) to the Australian Tax Office (ATO) in accordance with local tax laws and also reclaimed this amount from the ATO during such six month period. The Company also returned the initial grant funding received of A$5,595,723 ($5,179,960) and interest of A$109,051 ($102,061) to ARENA in accordance with the Deed Of Variation and Termination of Funding Deed executed between the parties in August 2014. The Company had accrued this amount in accrued expenses and recorded this amount as restricted cash at April 30, 2014. Restricted cash includes the following: |
|
| | 31-Oct-14 | | | 30-Apr-14 | | | | | | | | | |
Current: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) | | ? | | | $ | 5,179,960 | | | | | | | | | |
NJBPU agreement | | | 125,000 | | | | 100,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Oregon Department of State Lands | | | 22,000 | | | | 845,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Barclay's Bank Agreement | | | 387,097 | | | ? | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 534,097 | | | $ | 6,124,960 | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | 31-Oct-14 | | | 30-Apr-14 | | | | | | | | | |
Long Term: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Barclay's Bank Agreement | | ? | | | $ | 996,696 | | | | | | | | | |
NJBPU agreement | | | 100,000 | | | | 225,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 1,221,696 | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(g) Foreign Exchange Gains and Losses |
|
The Company has invested in certain certificates of deposit and has maintained cash accounts that are denominated in British pounds sterling, Euros and Australian dollars. These amounts are included in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Such positions may result in realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains or losses from exchange rate fluctuations, which gains and losses are included in foreign exchange loss in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
| | Three Months Ended October 31, | | | Six Months Ended October 31, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign exchange (loss) gain | | $ | (216,249 | ) | | $ | 107,357 | | | $ | (221,907 | ) | | $ | 129,127 | |
|
Foreign currency denominated certificates of deposit |
and cash accounts: |
|
| | 31-Oct-14 | | | 30-Apr-14 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted | | $ | 387,097 | | | $ | 6,176,656 | | | | | | | | | |
Unrestricted | | | 1,748,725 | | | | 1,232,111 | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,135,822 | | | $ | 7,408,767 | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(h) Long-Lived Assets |
|
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and patents subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, then an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Company reviewed its long-lived assets for impairment and estimated that the remaining useful lives, for purposes of amortizing capitalized external patent costs, should be reduced from approximately five years to one year. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(i) Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash balances, bank certificates of deposit and trade receivables. The Company invests its excess cash in highly liquid investments (principally, short-term bank deposits, Treasury bills, Treasury notes and money market funds) and does not believe that it is exposed to any significant risks related to its cash accounts, money market funds or certificates of deposit. |
|
The table below shows the percentage of the Company's revenues derived from customers whose revenues accounted for at least 10% of the Company's consolidated revenues for at least one of the periods indicated: |
|
| | Three months ended October 31, | | | Six months ended October 31, | |
Customer | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US Department of Energy | | | 65 | % | | | 22 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 24 | % |
Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding | | | 35 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 33 | % | | | 8 | % |
European Union (WavePort project) | | ? | | | | 61 | % | | | 29 | % | | | 46 | % |
UK Government's Technology Strategy Board | | ? | | | ? | | | ? | | | | 19 | % |
| | | 100 | % | | | 98 | % | | | 100 | % | | | 97 | % |
|
|
The loss of, or a significant reduction in revenues from, any of the current customers could significantly impact the Company's financial position or results of operations. The Company does not require its customers to maintain collateral. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(j) Net Loss per Common Share |
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share for all periods presented is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Due to the Company's net losses, potentially dilutive securities, consisting of outstanding stock options and non-vested performance-based shares, were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect. |
|
In computing diluted net loss per share, options to purchase shares of common stock and non-vested restricted stock issued to employees and non-employee directors, totaling 1,649,813 for the three and six months ended October 31, 2014, and 1,493,353 for the three and six months ended October 31, 2013, were excluded from the computations as the effect would be anti-dilutive due to the Company's losses. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(k) |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
|
On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, |
Revenue from Contracts with Customers |
, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for us on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or the cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, |
Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern |
, which describes how an entity should assess its ability to meet obligations and sets rules for how this information should be disclosed in the financial statements. The standard provides accounting guidance that will be used along with existing auditing standards. The new standard applies to all entities for the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. We are evaluating the effect ASU 2014-15 will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures and have not yet determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting at this time. |