Loans | NOTE 3. LOANS As a result of adopting the CECL standard on January 1, 2020, the Company’s prior distinction between the originated loan portfolio and the acquired loan portfolio is no longer necessary. Accordingly, prior period disclosures have been revised to conform to the current period presentation. People’s United has identified two loan portfolio segments, Commercial and Retail, which are comprised of the following loan classes: • Commercial Portfolio : commercial real estate; commercial and industrial; equipment financing; and mortgage warehouse/asset based lending ("MWABL"). • Retail Portfolio : residential mortgage; home equity; and other consumer. These portfolio segments and loan classes are unchanged following the adoption of the CECL standard with the exception of MWABL which, prior to January 1, 2020, was included in commercial and industrial. The following table summarizes People’s United’s loans by loan portfolio segment and class: (in millions) March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Commercial: Commercial real estate $ 14,651.6 $ 14,762.3 Commercial and industrial 9,097.7 8,693.2 Equipment financing 5,012.7 4,910.4 MWABL 2,948.0 2,348.4 Total Commercial Portfolio 31,710.0 30,714.3 Retail: Residential mortgage: Adjustable-rate 6,825.2 7,064.8 Fixed-rate 3,256.7 3,253.3 Total residential mortgage 10,081.9 10,318.1 Home equity and other consumer: Home equity 2,349.9 2,406.5 Other consumer 142.2 157.2 Total home equity and other consumer 2,492.1 2,563.7 Total Retail Portfolio 12,574.0 12,881.8 Total loans $ 44,284.0 $ 43,596.1 In connection with the Company’s adoption of the CECL standard, selected accounting policies related to loans have been revised and/or certain accounting policy elections have been implemented. These policies are described below. Basis of Accounting Loans are reported at amortized cost less the ACL. Interest on loans is accrued to income monthly based on outstanding principal balances. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized in interest income as an adjustment of yield. Depending on the loan portfolio, amounts are amortized or accreted using the level yield method over either the actual life or the estimated average life of the loan. Net deferred loan costs, which are included in loans by respective class, totaled $73.5 million at March 31, 2020 and $87.5 million at December 31, 2019. Allowance for Credit Losses The ACL on loans, calculated in accordance with the CECL standard, is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected. The amount of the allowance represents management's best estimate of current expected credit losses on loans considering available information, from both internal and external sources, deemed relevant to assessing collectability over the loans' contractual terms, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. Accrued interest on loans is excluded from the calculation of the ACL due to the Bank’s established non-accrual policy which results in the reversal of uncollectible accrued interest on non-accrual loans against interest income in a timely manner (see below). Accrued interest receivable associated with loans totaling $111.9 million at March 31, 2020 is reported in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. See Note 4, “Allowance for Credit Losses”. Purchased Credit Deteriorated (“PCD”) Loans In addition to originating loans, the Company may acquire loans through portfolio purchases or acquisitions of other companies. Purchased loans that have evidence of more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination are deemed PCD loans. In connection with its adoption of the CECL standard, the Company did not reassess whether previously recognized purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans accounted for under prior accounting guidance met the criteria of a PCD loan as of the date of adoption. PCD loans are initially recorded at fair value along with an ACL determined using the same methodology as originated loans. The sum of the loan's purchase price and ACL becomes its initial amortized cost basis. The difference between the initial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loan is a noncredit discount or premium, which is amortized into interest income over the life of the loan. Subsequent changes to the ACL are recorded through provision for credit losses. Past Due and Non-Accrual Loans Loans are considered past due if required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were contractually due. A loan is generally considered “non-performing” when it is placed on non-accrual status. A loan is generally placed on non-accrual status when it becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal payments. A loan may be placed on non-accrual status before it reaches 90 days past due if such loan has been identified as presenting uncertainty with respect to the collectability of interest and principal. A loan past due 90 days or more may remain on accruing status if such loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. All previously accrued but unpaid interest on non-accrual loans is reversed from interest income in the period in which the accrual of interest is discontinued. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans are generally applied as a reduction of principal if future collections are doubtful, although such interest payments may be recognized as income. Interest income recognized on non-accrual loans for the three months ended March 31, 2020 totaled less than $0.5 million. A loan remains on non-accrual status until the factors that indicated doubtful collectability no longer exist or until a loan is determined to be uncollectible and is charged-off against the ACL. There were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at March 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019. The following tables summarize aging information by class of loan: Past Due As of March 31, 2020 (in millions) Current 30-89 Days 90 Days or More Total Total Commercial: Commercial real estate $ 14,580.0 $ 43.7 $ 27.9 $ 71.6 $ 14,651.6 Commercial and industrial 9,055.4 18.8 23.5 42.3 9,097.7 Equipment financing 4,853.2 136.4 23.1 159.5 5,012.7 MWABL 2,948.0 — — — 2,948.0 Total 31,436.6 198.9 74.5 273.4 31,710.0 Retail: Residential mortgage 9,978.3 64.2 39.4 103.6 10,081.9 Home equity 2,325.3 13.3 11.3 24.6 2,349.9 Other consumer 141.2 0.9 0.1 1.0 142.2 Total 12,444.8 78.4 50.8 129.2 12,574.0 Total loans $ 43,881.4 $ 277.3 $ 125.3 $ 402.6 $ 44,284.0 Included in the “Current” and “30-89 Days” categories above are early non-performing commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, equipment financing loans and MWABL loans totaling $24.2 million, $33.6 million, $19.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and $38.0 million of retail loans in the process of foreclosure or bankruptcy. These loans are less than 90 days past due but have been placed on non-accrual status as a result of having been identified as presenting uncertainty with respect to the collectability of interest and principal. Past Due As of December 31, 2019 (in millions) Current 30-89 Days 90 Days or More Total Total Commercial: Commercial real estate $ 14,713.8 $ 22.3 $ 26.2 $ 48.5 $ 14,762.3 Commercial and industrial 11,010.7 13.1 17.8 30.9 11,041.6 Equipment financing 4,791.0 97.9 21.5 119.4 4,910.4 Total 30,515.5 133.3 65.5 198.8 30,714.3 Retail: Residential mortgage 10,215.9 65.5 36.7 102.2 10,318.1 Home equity 2,385.7 9.9 10.9 20.8 2,406.5 Other consumer 156.1 1.1 — 1.1 157.2 Total 12,757.7 76.5 47.6 124.1 12,881.8 Total loans $ 43,273.2 $ 209.8 $ 113.1 $ 322.9 $ 43,596.1 Included in the “Current” and “30-89 Days” categories above are early non-performing commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and equipment financing loans totaling $27.6 million, $23.0 million and $26.2 million, respectively, and $36.8 million of retail loans in the process of foreclosure or bankruptcy. These loans are less than 90 days past due but have been placed on non-accrual status as a result of having been identified as presenting uncertainty with respect to the collectability of interest and principal. The recorded investment in non-accrual loans, by class of loan and year of origination, is summarized as follows: March 31, 2020 Dec. 31, 2019 Non-Accrual Loans (in millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Total Non-Accrual Loans With No ACL Non-Accrual Loans Commercial: Commercial real estate $ — $ 16.3 $ 2.1 $ 2.1 $ 4.9 $ 28.0 $ 0.1 $ 53.5 $ 5.3 $ 53.8 Commercial and industrial 0.3 2.9 0.6 2.2 2.1 14.7 31.7 54.5 7.2 38.5 Equipment financing 0.9 10.6 13.4 8.6 4.3 4.7 — 42.5 1.9 47.7 MWABL — — — — — — 1.1 1.1 — — Total (1) 1.2 29.8 16.1 12.9 11.3 47.4 32.9 151.6 14.4 140.0 Retail: Residential mortgage — 1.3 3.2 2.3 1.4 58.4 — 66.6 22.0 63.3 Home equity — — 0.1 — 0.2 3.7 18.1 22.1 5.6 20.8 Other consumer — — 0.1 — — — — 0.1 — — Total (2) — 1.3 3.4 2.3 1.6 62.1 18.1 88.8 27.6 84.1 Total $ 1.2 $ 31.1 $ 19.5 $ 15.2 $ 12.9 $ 109.5 $ 51.0 $ 240.4 $ 42.0 $ 224.1 (1) Reported net of government guarantees totaling $1.2 million and $1.3 million at March 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2019, respectively. These government guarantees relate, almost entirely, to guarantees provided by the Small Business Administration as well as selected other Federal agencies and represent the carrying value of the loans that are covered by such guarantees, the extent of which (i.e. full or partial) varies by loan. At March 31, 2020, all of the government guarantees related to commercial and industrial loans. (2) Includes $25.4 million and $17.0 million of loans in the process of foreclosure at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Collateral Dependent Loans Loans for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral are considered to be collateral dependent loans. Collateral can have a significant financial effect in mitigating exposure to credit risk and, where there is sufficient collateral, an allowance for expected credit losses is not recognized or is minimal. For collateral dependent commercial loans, the allowance for expected credit losses is individually assessed based on the fair value of the collateral. Various types of collateral are used, including real estate, inventory, equipment, accounts receivable, securities and cash, among others. For commercial real estate loans, collateral values are generally based on appraisals which are updated based on management judgment under the specific circumstances on a case-by-case basis. The collateral value for other financial assets is generally based on quoted market prices or broker quotes (in the case of securities) or appraisals. Commercial loan balances are charged-off at the time all or a portion of the balance is deemed uncollectible.
At March 31, 2020, the Company had collateral dependent commercial loans totaling $28.1 million. Collateral dependent residential mortgage and home equity loans are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value of the collateral less costs to sell, with any excess in the carrying amount of the loan representing the related ACL. Collateral values are based on broker price opinions or appraisals. At March 31, 2020, the Company had collateral dependent residential mortgage and home equity loans totaling $29.2 million. Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) TDRs, which, beginning in 2020, also includes loans reasonably expected to become TDRs, represent loans for which the original contractual terms have been modified to provide for terms that are less than what the Company would be willing to accept for new loans with comparable risk because of deterioration in the borrower's financial condition. Such loan modifications are handled on a case-by-case basis and are negotiated to achieve mutually agreeable terms that maximize loan collectability and meet the borrower’s financial needs. Modifications may include changes to one or more terms of the loan, including, but not limited to: (i) payment deferral; (ii) a reduction in the stated interest rate for the remaining contractual life of the loan; (iii) an extension of the loan’s original contractual term at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar risk; (iv) capitalization of interest; or (v) forgiveness of principal or interest. TDRs may either be accruing or placed on non-accrual status (and reported as non-accrual loans) depending upon the loan’s specific circumstances, including the nature and extent of the related modifications. TDRs on non-accrual status remain classified as such until the loan qualifies for return to accrual status. Loans qualify for return to accrual status once they have demonstrated performance with the restructured terms of the loan agreement for a minimum of six months in the case of a commercial loan or, in the case of a retail loan, when the loan is less than 90 days past due. Loans may continue to be reported as TDRs after they are returned to accrual status. In accordance with regulatory guidance, residential mortgage and home equity loans restructured in connection with the borrower’s bankruptcy and meeting certain criteria are also required to be classified as TDRs, included in non-accrual loans and written down to the estimated collateral value, regardless of delinquency status. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, People’s United’s recorded investment in loans classified as TDRs totaled $178.9 million and $177.0 million, respectively. The related ACL was $13.1 million at March 31, 2020 and $4.3 million at December 31, 2019. Interest income recognized on TDRs totaled $1.3 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Funding under commitments to lend additional amounts to borrowers with loans classified as TDRs was immaterial for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. Loans that were modified and classified as TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 principally involve reduced payment and/or payment deferral, extension of term (generally no more than two years for commercial loans and five years for retail loans)
and/or a temporary reduction of interest rate (generally less than 200 basis points). The CARES Act and guidance recently issued by the Federal banking agencies provides that certain short-term loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial distress as a result of the economic impacts created by the COVID-19 pandemic are not required to be treated as TDRs under GAAP. As such, the Company suspended TDR accounting for COVID-19 related loan modifications meeting the loan modification criteria set forth under the CARES Act or as specified in the regulatory guidance. Further, loans granted payment deferrals related to COVID-19 are not required to be reported as past due or placed on non-accrual status (provided the loans were not past due or on non-accrual status prior to the deferral). The following tables summarize, by class of loan, the recorded investments in loans modified as TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. For purposes of this disclosure, recorded investments represent amounts immediately prior to and subsequent to the restructuring. Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 (dollars in millions) Number of Contracts Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Commercial: Commercial real estate (1) 5 $ 3.7 $ 3.7 Commercial and industrial (2) 10 9.0 9.0 Equipment financing (3) 9 3.1 3.1 MWABL — — — Total 24 15.8 15.8 Retail: Residential mortgage (4) 13 6.2 6.2 Home equity (5) 17 2.1 2.1 Other consumer — — — Total 30 8.3 8.3 Total 54 $ 24.1 $ 24.1 (1) Represents the following concessions: extension of term (4 contracts; recorded investment of $3.2 million); or a reduced payment and/or payment deferral (1 contract; recorded investment of $0.5 million). (2) Represents the following concessions: extension of term (5 contracts; recorded investment of $7.4 million); reduced payment and/or payment deferral (1 contract; recorded investment of $0.3 million); or a combination of concessions
(4 contract; recorded investment of $1.3 million). (3) Represents the following concessions: extension of term (1 contract; recorded investment of $1.2 million); reduced payment and/or payment deferral (5 contracts; recorded investment of $0.5 million); or a combination of concessions
(3 contracts; recorded investment of $1.4 million). (4) Represents the following concessions: loans restructured through bankruptcy (3 contracts; recorded investment of $0.6 million); reduced payment and/or payment deferral (9 contracts; recorded investment of $5.5 million); or a combination of concessions (1 contract; recorded investment of $0.1 million). (5) Represents the following concessions: loans restructured through bankruptcy (5 contracts; recorded investment of $0.5 million); reduced payment and/or payment deferral (1 contract; recorded investment of $0.1 million); or a combination of concessions (11 contracts; recorded investment of $1.5 million). Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 (dollars in millions) Number of Contracts Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Commercial: Commercial real estate (1) 2 $ 3.0 $ 3.0 Commercial and industrial (2) 4 1.4 1.4 Equipment financing (3) 14 7.3 7.3 Total 20 11.7 11.7 Retail: Residential mortgage (4) 20 5.6 5.6 Home equity (5) 22 2.1 2.1 Other consumer — — — Total 42 7.7 7.7 Total 62 $ 19.4 $ 19.4 (1) Represents the following concession: reduced payment and/or payment deferral (2 contracts; recorded investment of $3.0 million). (2) Represents the following concessions: extension of term (4 contracts; recorded investment of $1.4 million). (3) Represents the following concessions: extension of term (8 contracts; recorded investment of $6.6 million); reduced payment and/or payment deferral (5 contracts; recorded investment of $0.5 million); or a combination of concessions
(1 contract; recorded investment of $0.2 million). (4) Represents the following concessions: loans restructured through bankruptcy (9 contracts; recorded investment of $1.1 million); reduced payment and/or payment deferral (5 contracts; recorded investment of $2.2 million); or a combination of concessions (6 contracts; recorded investment of $2.3 million). (5) Represents the following concessions: loans restructured through bankruptcy (9 contracts; recorded investment of $0.6 million); reduced payment and/or payment deferral (3 contracts; recorded investment of $0.5 million); or a combination of concessions (10 contracts; recorded investment of $1.0 million). The following is a summary, by class of loan, of information related to TDRs completed within the previous 12 months that subsequently defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. For purposes of this disclosure, the previous 12 months is measured from April 1 of the respective prior year and a default represents a previously-modified loan that became past due 30 days or more during the three months ended March 31, 2020 or 2019. Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 2019 (dollars in millions) Number of Contracts Recorded Investment as of Period End Number of Contracts Recorded Investment as of Period End Commercial: Commercial real estate — $ — — $ — Commercial and industrial 1 0.1 — — Equipment financing 4 2.5 2 2.9 MWABL — — — — Total 5 2.6 2 2.9 Retail: Residential mortgage 3 1.3 3 1.3 Home equity 1 — 2 0.4 Other consumer — — — — Total 4 1.3 5 1.7 Total 9 $ 3.9 7 $ 4.6 Loan Charge-Offs The Company’s charge-off policies, which comply with standards established by banking regulators, are consistently applied from period to period. Charge-offs are recorded on a monthly basis. Partially charged-off loans continue to be evaluated on a monthly basis and additional charge-offs or credit loss provisions may be recorded on the remaining loan balance based on the same criteria. For unsecured consumer loans, charge-offs are generally recorded when the loan is deemed to be uncollectible or
120 days past due, whichever occurs first. For consumer loans secured by real estate, including residential mortgage loans, charge-offs are generally recorded when the loan is deemed to be uncollectible or 180 days past due, whichever occurs first, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that repayment will occur regardless of the delinquency status. Factors that demonstrate an ability to repay may include: (i) a loan that is secured by adequate collateral and is in the process of collection; (ii) a loan supported by a valid guarantee or insurance; or (iii) a loan supported by a valid claim against a solvent estate. For commercial loans, a charge-off is recorded when the Company determines that it will not collect all amounts contractually due based on the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell. The decision whether to charge-off all or a portion of a loan rather than to record a specific or general loss allowance is based on an assessment of all available information that aids in determining the loan’s net realizable value. Typically, this involves consideration of both (i) the fair value of any collateral securing the loan, including whether the estimate of fair value has been derived from an appraisal or other market information and (ii) other factors affecting the likelihood of repayment, including the existence of guarantees and insurance. If the amount by which the Company’s recorded investment in the loan exceeds its net realizable value is deemed to be a confirmed loss, a charge-off is recorded. Otherwise, a specific or general reserve is established, as applicable. The comparatively low level of net loan charge-offs in recent years, in terms of absolute dollars and as a percentage of average total loans, may not be sustainable in the future. Credit Quality Indicators As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to: (i) internal Commercial loan risk ratings; (ii) internal Retail loan risk classification; and (iii) non-accrual loans (see details above). Commercial Credit Quality Indicators The Company utilizes an internal loan risk rating system as a means of monitoring portfolio credit quality and identifying both problem and potential problem loans. Under the Company’s risk rating system, loans not meeting the criteria for problem and potential problem loans as specified below are considered to be “Pass”-rated loans. Problem and potential problem loans are classified as either “Special Mention,” “Substandard” or “Doubtful.” Loans that do not currently expose the Company to sufficient enough risk of loss to warrant classification as either Substandard or Doubtful, but possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention, are classified as Special Mention. Substandard loans represent those credits characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loans classified as Doubtful possess all the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of existing facts, conditions and values, is highly questionable and/or improbable. Risk ratings on commercial loans are subject to ongoing monitoring by lending and credit personnel with such ratings updated annually or more frequently, if warranted. The Company’s internal Loan Review function is responsible for independently evaluating the appropriateness of those credit risk ratings in connection with its cyclical reviews, the approach to which is risk-based and determined by reference to underlying portfolio credit quality and the results of prior reviews. Differences in risk ratings noted in conjunction with such periodic portfolio loan reviews, if any, are reported to management each month. The following table presents Commercial loan risk ratings, by class of loan and year of origination, as of March 31, 2020: (in millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Total Commercial real estate: Pass $ 335.3 $ 1,762.3 $ 1,730.4 $ 1,703.1 $ 1,584.0 $ 6,615.0 $ 380.7 $ 14,110.8 Special Mention — 8.7 91.4 28.0 38.6 115.3 2.4 284.4 Substandard 2.3 29.3 22.9 29.2 6.6 161.6 2.9 254.8 Doubtful — — — — — 1.6 — 1.6 Total $ 337.6 $ 1,800.3 $ 1,844.7 $ 1,760.3 $ 1,629.2 $ 6,893.5 $ 386.0 $ 14,651.6 Commercial and industrial: Pass $ 674.1 $ 1,876.3 $ 1,015.3 $ 801.6 $ 635.6 $ 1,930.1 $ 1,635.0 $ 8,568.0 Special Mention 2.1 11.5 22.3 6.1 39.8 63.1 41.9 186.8 Substandard 0.7 11.5 57.0 37.0 12.3 127.4 93.5 339.4 Doubtful — — — 0.6 1.2 — 1.7 3.5 Total $ 676.9 $ 1,899.3 $ 1,094.6 $ 845.3 $ 688.9 $ 2,120.6 $ 1,772.1 $ 9,097.7 Equipment financing: Pass $ 556.4 $ 1,843.0 $ 1,068.9 $ 587.7 $ 303.1 $ 164.3 $ — $ 4,523.4 Special Mention 13.5 33.7 16.1 10.9 4.4 1.7 — 80.3 Substandard 45.2 161.2 101.8 56.5 13.1 31.2 — 409.0 Doubtful — — — — — — — — Total $ 615.1 $ 2,037.9 $ 1,186.8 $ 655.1 $ 320.6 $ 197.2 $ — $ 5,012.7 MWABL: Pass $ 2.6 $ 10.8 $ 15.0 $ 6.6 $ 21.0 $ 62.7 $ 2,697.0 $ 2,815.7 Special Mention — 7.3 — — — — 68.6 75.9 Substandard — — — 1.9 0.7 1.9 51.9 56.4 Doubtful — — — — — — — — Total $ 2.6 $ 18.1 $ 15.0 $ 8.5 $ 21.7 $ 64.6 $ 2,817.5 $ 2,948.0 Retail Credit Quality Indicators Pools of Retail loans with similar risk and loss characteristics are also assessed for losses. These loan pools include residential mortgage, home equity and other consumer loans that are not assigned individual loan risk ratings. Rather, the assessment of these portfolios is based upon a consideration of recent historical loss experience, broader portfolio indicators, including trends in delinquencies, non-accrual loans and portfolio concentrations, and portfolio-specific risk characteristics, the combination of which determines whether a loan is classified as “High”, “Moderate” or “Low” risk. The portfolio-specific risk characteristics considered include: (i) collateral values/loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios (above and below 70%); (ii) borrower credit scores under the FICO scoring system (above and below a score of 680); and (iii) other relevant portfolio risk elements such as income verification at the time of underwriting (stated income vs. non-stated income) and the property’s intended use (owner-occupied, non-owner occupied, second home, etc.). In classifying a loan as either “High”, “Moderate” or “Low” risk, the combination of each of the aforementioned risk characteristics is considered for that loan, resulting, effectively, in a “matrix approach” to its risk classification. These risk classifications are reviewed quarterly to ensure that they continue to be appropriate in light of changes within the portfolio and/or economic indicators as well as other industry developments. For example, to the extent LTV ratios exceed 70% (reflecting a weaker collateral position for the Company) or borrower FICO scores are less than 680 (reflecting weaker financial standing and/or credit history of the customer), the loans are considered to have an increased level of inherent loss. As a result, a loan with a combination of these characteristics would generally be classified as “High” risk. Conversely, as LTV ratios decline (reflecting a stronger collateral position for the Company) or borrower FICO scores exceed 680 (reflecting stronger financial standing and/or credit history of the customer), the loans are considered to have a decreased level of inherent loss. A loan with a combination of these characteristics would generally be classified as “Low” risk. This analysis also considers (i) the extent of underwriting that occurred at the time of origination (direct income verification provides further support for credit decisions) and (ii) the property’s intended use (owner-occupied properties are less likely to default compared to ‘investment-type’ non-owner occupied properties, second homes, etc.). Loans not otherwise deemed to be “High” or “Low” risk are classified as “Moderate” risk. LTV ratios and FICO scores are determined at origination and updated periodically throughout the life of the loan. LTV ratios are updated for loans 90 days past due and FICO scores are updated for the entire portfolio quarterly. The portfolio stratification (“High”, “Moderate” and “Low” risk) and identification of the corresponding credit quality indicators also occurs quarterly. The following table presents Retail loan risk classification, by class of loan and year of origination, as of March 31, 2020: (in millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Total Residential mortgage: Low Risk $ 51.5 $ 400.9 $ 423.9 $ 560.7 $ 1,130.5 $ 1,937.1 $ — $ 4,504.6 Moderate Risk 132.7 640.0 835.4 967.7 928.3 1,335.1 — 4,839.2 High Risk 26.4 79.8 117.6 114.1 104.8 295.4 — 738.1 Total $ 210.6 $ 1,120.7 $ 1,376.9 $ 1,642.5 $ 2,163.6 $ 3,567.6 $ — $ 10,081.9 Home equity: Low Risk $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 31.7 $ 335.2 $ 366.9 Moderate Risk 0.4 15.3 12.1 6.1 3.2 35.2 689.5 761.8 High Risk 2.0 27.9 83.0 68.0 27.5 14.3 998.5 1,221.2 Total $ 2.4 $ 43.2 $ 95.1 $ 74.1 $ 30.7 $ 81.2 $ 2,023.2 $ 2,349.9 Other consumer: Low Risk $ 1.6 $ 10.0 $ 6.3 $ 1.5 $ 0.5 $ 4.8 $ — $ 24.7 Moderate Risk — 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 5.3 — 5.9 High Risk 3.3 58.2 42.5 3.8 0.8 3.0 — 111.6 Total $ 4.9 $ 68.3 $ 49.0 $ 5.4 $ 1.5 $ 13.1 $ — $ 142.2 The following tables present Commercial and Retail credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2019: (in millions) Commercial Real Estate Commercial and Industrial Equipment Financing Total Commercial: Pass $ 14,222.3 $ 10,391.7 $ 4,433.5 $ 29,047.5 Special mention 334.3 330.4 76.5 741.2 Substandard 202.6 315.8 400.4 918.8 Doubtful 3.1 3.7 — 6.8 Total $ 14,762.3 $ 11,041.6 $ 4,910.4 $ 30,714.3 (in millions) Residential Mortgage Home Equity Other Consumer Total Retail: Low risk $ 4,410.0 $ 747.3 $ 24.9 $ 5,182.2 Moderate risk 4,958.3 548.5 5.9 5,512.7 High risk 949.8 1,110.7 126.4 2,186.9 Total $ 10,318.1 $ 2,406.5 $ 157.2 $ 12,881.8 Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Assets (included in Other Assets) Other real estate owned (“REO”) was comprised of residential and commercial properties totaling $9.5 million and $7.3 million, respectively, at March 31, 2020, and $11.9 million and $7.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2019. Repossessed assets totaled $4.6 million and $4.2 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Loans Held for Sale Loans held-for-sale at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 included newly-originated residential mortgage loans with carrying amounts of $19.2 million and $19.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019, loans held-for-sale also included $333.7 million of consumer loans and $157.9 million of commercial loans previously acquired in the United Financial Bancorp, Inc. acquisition. All of the consumer and commercial loans were sold during the first quarter of 2020, resulting in a gain, net of expenses, of $16.9 million. |