NanoViricides (NNVC) 10-Q 2013 Q1 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

Commission File Number:333-148471

NANOVIRICIDES, INC.

(Exact name of Company as specified in its charter)

NEVADA	76-0674577
(State or other jurisdiction)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)

135 Wood Street, Suite 205

West Haven, Connecticut 06516

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(203) 937-6137

(Company’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Company has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to submit and post such files). Yesx   No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a larger accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨    Nox

The number of shares outstanding of the Company's Common Stock as of November19, 2012 was: 158,391,699.

NanoViricides, Inc.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2012	3
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the Period from May 12, 2005 (Inception) through September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)	4
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the Period from May 12, 2005 (Inception) through September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)	5
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity	7
Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8
Item 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures	28
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings	30
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30
Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31
Item 4.   Mine Safety Disclosures	31
Item 5.   Other Information	31
Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	31
Signatures	31
Certifications

2

Nanoviricides, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

	September 30, 2012			June 30, 2012
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,929,665		$	14,274,985
Prepaid expenses		438,341			314,174
Total Current Assets		13,368,006			14,589,159
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment		1,440,717			1,440,717
Accumulated depreciation		(878,594	)		(825,875	)
Property and equipment, net		562,123			614,842
TRADEMARK
Trademark		458,954			458,954
Accumulated amortization		(35,340	)		(33,147	)
Trademark, net		423,614			425,807
Total Assets	$	14,353,743		$	15,629,808
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	384,367		$	238,358
Accounts payable – related parties		441,111			365,681
Accrued expenses		98,258			96,878
Derivative liability		633,430			1,078,698
Total Current Liabilities		1,557,166			1,779,615
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Series A Convertible Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares designated, 9,871,250, and 9,871,250 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		9,872			9,872
Series B Convertible Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares designated, 0 shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Series C Convertible Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares designated, 1,002 and 2,353 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		1			2
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 158,391,799, and 155,612,293 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		158,422			155,645
Additional paid-in capital		43,856,353			43,108,790
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(31,228,071	)		(29,424,116	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		12,796,577			13,850,193
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	14,353,743		$	15,629,808

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-3

Nanoviricides, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

							For the Period from
	For the 3 Months			For the 3 Months			May 12, 2005
	Ended			Ended			(inception) through
	September 30, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
OPERATING EXPENSES
Research and development	$	1,209,818		$	691,699		$	19,720,969
Refund credit research and development costs		-			-			(420,842	)
General and administrative		381,167			448,729			11,098,545
Total operating expenses		1,590,985			1,140,428			30,398,672
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(1,590,985	)		(1,140,428	)		(30,398,672	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income, net		33,303			8,904			245,414
Discount on convertible debentures		-			-			(73,930	)
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debentures		-			-			(713,079	)
Change in fair market value of derivatives		(246,273	)		(8,452	)		(287,804	)
Other income (expense), net		(212,970	)		452			(829,399	)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(1,803,955	)		(1,139,976	)		(31,228,071	)
INCOME TAX PROVISION		-			-			-
NET LOSS	$	(1,803,955	)	$	(1,139,976	)	$	(31,228,071	)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		156,777,106			144,570,447

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-4

NanoViricides, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statement of Stockholders' Equity

For the periood June 30, 2009 Through September 30, 2012

																											Deficit
																											Accumulated
	Series A Preferred Stock: Par $0.001				Series B Preferred Stock: Par $0.001						Series C Preferred Stock: Par $0.001						Common Stock: Par $0.001				Additional			Stock			During the			Total
	Number of				Number of						Number of						Number of				Paid-in			Subscription			Development			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Capital			Receivable			Stage			Equity
Please refer to Form 10K for the fisacal year ended June 30, 2011 filed with SEC on October 13, 2011 for equity transactions occurred prior to June 30, 2009
Balance, June 30, 2009		-	$	-		-		$	-					$				125,299,457	$	125,299	$	14,455,778		$	(100,000	)	$	(11,995,535	)	$	2,485,542
Collection of stock subscription receivable																									100,000						100,000
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $ .66 per share, July 31, 2009			��															7,576		8		4,992									5,000
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $.66 per share, July 31, 2009																		8,485		8		5,592									5,600
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, August 15, 2009																						41,400									41,400
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $ .86 per share, August 31, 2009																		6,512		7		4,993									5,000
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $.86 per share, August 31, 2009																		5,814		6		5,594									5,600
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $ .89 per share, September 30, 2009																		6,292		6		5,594									5,600
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $ .89 per share, September 30, 2009																		5,618		6		4,994									5,000
Payment of Finder's Fee																						(5,250	)								(5,250	)
Common shares and warrants issued in connection with private placement of common stock, September 30, 2009																		2,675,000		2,675		1,334,825									1,337,500
Common shares and warrants issued in connection with warrant conversion, September 30, 2009																		3,759,800		3,760		1,876,140									1,879,900
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $ .57 per share, October 1, 2009																		35,088		35		19,965									20,000
Common shares issued for Legal services valued at $56.50 per share, October 26, 2009																		12,500		13		7,050									7,063
Warrants issued for commissions, October 26, 2009																						3,570									3,570
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $ .73 per share, October 31, 2009																		6,859		7		4,993									5,000
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $.73 per share, October 31, 2009																		7,682		8		5,592									5,600
Common shares issued upon conversion of Warrants, November 10, 2009																		10,000		10		1,430									1,440
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, November 15, 2009																						39,600									39,600
Common shares issued in payment of accounts payable, November 25, 2009																		32,500		33		25,167									25,200
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $ .86 per share, November 30, 2009																		5,814		6		4,994									5,000
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $.86 per share, November 30, 2009																		9,767		10		8,390									8,400
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $ .85 per share, December 31, 2009																		9,917		10		8,390									8,400
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $ .85 per share, December 31, 2009																		5,903		6		4,994									5,000
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.043 per share, January 31, 2010																		4,794		5		4,995									5,000
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, February 15, 2010																						40,200									40,200
Series A Preferred Shares issued for TheraCour license valued at $.001 par value, February 15, 2010		7,000,000		7,000																											7,000
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $1.096 per share, February 28, 2010																		4,562		5		4,995									5,000
Common shares issued for employee stock compensation valued at $1.25 per share, March 3, 2010																		125,000		125		156,125									156,250
Common shares issued for employee stock compensation valued at $1.25 per share, March 3, 2010																		125,000		125		156,125									156,250
Series A Preferred Shares issued for employee stock compensation, March 3, 2010		250,000		250																		513,573									513,823
Series A Preferred Shares issued for employee stock compensation, March 3, 2010		250,000		250																		513,573									513,823
Series A Preferred Shares issued for employee stock compensation, March 3, 2010		93,750		94																		192,590									192,684
Common shares issued for consulting and legal servies valued at $1.25 per share, March 3, 2010																		1,000		1		1,249									1,250
Common shares issued for consulting services valued at $1.417 per share, March 31, 2010																		3,529		4		4,996									5,000
Common shares issued in lieu of payment of accounts payable - All Sciences																		39,625		40		31,660									31,700
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $2.087 per share, April 30, 2010																		2,396		2		4,998									5,000
Series B Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, May 12, 2010						500,000			500													4,999,500									5,000,000
Placement Agents Fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares, May 12, 2010																						(400,000	)								(400,000	)
Legal Fees related to Sale of Convertible Preferred Stock, May 12, 2010																						(50,000	)								(50,000	)
Derivative Liability - Issuance of Series B Preferred Shares																						(1,787,379	)								(1,787,379	)
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.88 per share, May 12, 2010																		319,331		319											319
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, May 12, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, May 12, 2010																						128,053									128,053
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, May 15, 2010																						82,800									82,800
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.51 per share, May 26, 2010																		398,189		398											398
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, May 26, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, May 26, 2010																						(16,877	)								(16,877	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.64, May 26, 2010																		10,300		10		16,867									16,877
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, May 26, 2010																						151,852									151,852
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $2.083 per share, May 31, 2010																		2,400		2		4,998									5,000
Common shares issued for conversion of warrants to Common Stock at $1.00 per share, June 9, 2010																		195,000		195		194,805									195,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.41 per share, June 9, 2010																		426,721		427											427
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, June 9, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, June 9, 2010																						(14,575	)								(14,575	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.41, June 9, 2010																		10,366		10		14,565									14,575
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, June 9, 2010																						149,364									149,364
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.77 per share, June 9, 2010																		11,300		11		19,989									20,000
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.77 per share, June 9, 2010																		2,000		2		3,538									3,540
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.59 per share, June 23, 2010																		377,905		378											378
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, June 23, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, June 23, 2010																						(12,274	)								(12,274	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.59, June 23, 2010																		7,731		7		12,268									12,275
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, June 23, 2010																						120,254									120,254
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.043 per share, June 30, 2010																		2,738		2		4,998									5,000
Net loss																												(4,744,208	)		(4,744,208	)
Balance, June 30, 2010		7,593,750		7,594		260,000			260									133,980,471		133,981		23,116,612			-			(16,739,743	)		6,518,704
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.51 per share, July 7, 2010																		397,088		397											397
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, July 7, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, July 7, 2010																						(9,973	)								(9,973	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.65 per share, July 7, 2010																		6,061		6		9,967									9,973
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, July 7, 2010																						116,715									116,715
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.30 per share, July 21, 2010																		463,177		463											463
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, July 21, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, July 21, 2010																						(7,671	)								(7,671	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.32 per share, July 21, 2010																		5,794		6		7,665									7,671
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, July 21, 2010																						113,700									113,700
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $2.087 per share, July 31, 2010																		3,086		3		4,997									5,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.14 per share, August 4, 2010																		526,916		527											527
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, August 4, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, August 4, 2010																						(5,370	)								(5,370	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP, at $1.14 per share, August 4, 2010																		4,716		5		5,365									5,370
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, August 4, 2010																						104,480									104,480
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, August 15, 2010																						45,000									45,000
Common shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.99 per share, August 18, 2010																		606,367		606											606
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, August 18, 2010						(60,000	)		(60	)																					(60	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, August 18, 2010																						(3,068	)								(3,068	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.99 per share, August 18, 2010																		3,101		3		3,065									3,068
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, August 18, 2010																						104,795									104,795
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.24 per share, August 31, 2010																		4,032		4		4,996									5,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.93 per share, September 1, 2010																		215,332		215											215
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, September 1, 2010						(20,000	)		(20	)																					(20	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, September 1, 2010																						(767	)								(767	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.00 per share, September 1, 2010																		766		1		766									767
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, September 1, 2010																						34,841									34,841
Series B Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, September 21, 2010						250,000			250													2,499,750									2,500,000
Placement Agents fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares, September 21, 2010																						(195,000	)								(195,000	)
Legal fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred Stock, September 21, 2010																						(10,000	)								(10,000	)
Derivative liability - issuance of Series B Preferred Shares																						(328,086	)								(328,086	)
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.93 per share, September 21, 2010																		430,015		430											430
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, September 21, 2010						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, September 21, 2010																						103,012									103,012
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.07 per share, September 30, 2010																		4,673		5		4,995									5,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.87 per share, October 5, 2010																		460,346		460											460
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, October 5, 2010						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, on October 5, 2010																						(8,055	)								(8,055	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.87 per share, October 5, 2010																		9,268		9		8,046									8,055
Derivative liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, October 5, 2010																						103,330									103,330
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.88 per share, October 19, 2010																		452,965		453											453
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, October 19, 2010						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, October 19, 2010																						(6,521	)								(6,521	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.88 per share, October 19, 2010																		7,384		7		6,514									6,521
Derivative liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, October 19, 2010																						69,635									69,635
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.03 per share, October 31, 2010																		4,854		5		4,995									5,000
Series A Preferred Shares issued for employee stock compensation, November 1, 2010		30,000		30																		53,903									53,933
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.87 per share, November 2, 2010																		461,313		461											461
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, August 4, 2010						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, November 2, 2010																						(4,986	)								(4,986	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.87 per share, November 2, 2010																		5,751		6		4,980									4,986
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, November 2, 2010																						69,104									69,104
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, November 15, 2010																						55,800									55,800
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.16 per share, November 16, 2010																		345,817		346											346
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, November 16, 2010						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, November 16, 2010																						(3,452	)								(3,452	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.16 per share, November 16, 2010																		2,984		3		3,449									3,452
Derivative liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, November 16, 2010																						69,187		��							69,187
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.35 per share, November 30, 2010																		310,566		311											311
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, November 30, 2010						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, November 30, 2010																						(1,918	)								(1,918	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.35 per share, November 30, 2010																		1,417		1		1,917									1,918
Derivative liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, November 30, 2010																						69,449									69,449
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.46 per share, November 30, 2010																		3,425		3		4,997									5,000
Common shares issued for conversion of warrants to Common Stock at $1.00 per share, December 10, 2010																		25,000		25		24,975									25,000
Common shares issued as compensation pursuant to S-8 at $1.28 per share, December 10, 2010																		50,000		50		63,950									64,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.10 per share, December 14, 2010																		90,840		91											91
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, December 14, 2010						(10,000	)		(10	)																					(10	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, December 14 2010																						(384	)								(384	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, at $1.10 per share, December 14, 2010																		348		-		384									384
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, December 14, 2010																						17,438									17,438
Series B Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, December 21, 2010						250,000			250													2,499,750									2,500,000
Placement Agents fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares, December 21, 2010																						(200,000	)								(200,000	)
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.32 per share, December 31, 2010																		4,545		5		5,995									6,000
Adjustment																				33											33
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.16 per share, January 3, 2011																		343,796		344											344
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, January 3, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, January 3, 2011																						(8,904	)								(8,904	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.16 per share, January 3, 2011																		7,653		8		8,896									8,904
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, January 3, 2011																						73,532									73,532
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.26 per share, January 17, 2011																		317,965		318											318
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, January 17, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, January 17, 2011																						(8,055	)								(8,055	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.26 per share, January 17, 2011																		6,403		6		8,049									8,055
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, January 17, 2011																						70,882									70,882
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.12 per share, January 31, 2011																		356,422		356											356
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, January 31, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, January 31, 2011																						(6,521	)								(6,521	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.24 per share, January 31, 2011																		5,271		5		6,516									6,521
Derivative liability - retirement ofSeries B Preferred Shares, January 31, 2011																						72,432									72,432
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.47 per share, January 31, 2011																		4,087		4		5,996									6,000
Common shares issued for conversion of warrants at $1.00 per share, February 4, 2011																		25,000		25		24,975									25,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.08 per share, February 14, 2011																		370,017		370											370
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, February 14, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, February 14, 2011																						(4,986	)								(4,986	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP, at $1.08 per share, February 14, 2011																		4,613		5		4,981									4,986
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, February 14, 2011																						71,699									71,699
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, Feburary 15, 2011																						54,000									54,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.99 per share, February 28, 2011																		405,610		406											406
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, February 28, 2011																						71,490									71,490
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, February 28, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, February 28, 2011																						(3,452	)								(3,452	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.99 per shares, February 28, 2011																		3,500		4		3,448									3,452
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.22 per share, February 28, 2011																		4,902		5		5,995									6,000
Common shares issued for employee stock compensation at $1.32 per share, March 3, 2011																		250,000		250		316,000									316,250
Series A Preferred Shares issued for employee stock compensation, March 3, 2011		593,750		594																		1,364,036									1,364,630
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.09 per share, March 14, 2011																		367,274		367											367
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, March 14, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, March 14, 2011																						(1,918	)								(1,918	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.09 per shares, March 14, 2011																		1,761		2		1,916									1,918
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, March 14, 2011																						70,566									70,566
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.11 per share, March 28, 2011																		89,986		90											90
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, March 28, 2011						(10,000	)		(10	)																					(10	)
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, March 28, 2011																						(384	)								(384	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP, at $1.11 per share, March 28, 2011																		345		-		384									384
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, March 28, 2011																						17,525									17,525
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.28 per share, March 31, 2011																		4,680		5		5,995									6,000
Common shares issued for conversion of warrants to common stock at $1.00 per share, April 10, 2011																		10,000		10		9,990									10,000
Series B Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, April 18, 2011						250,000			250													2,499,750									2,500,000
Placement Agents fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares, April 18, 2011																						(160,000	)								(160,000	)
Legal fees related to Sale of Convertible Preferred Stock, April 18, 2011																						(25,000	)								(25,000	)
Derivative liability - issuance of Series B Preferred Shares																						(429,725	)								(429,725	)
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.28 per share, April 18, 2011																		312,163		312		(272	)								40
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, April 18, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, April 18, 2011																						68,756									68,756
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.47 per share, April 30, 2011																		4,087		4		5,996									6,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.18 per share, May 2, 2011																		339,726		340		(300	)								40
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, May 2, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, May 2, 2011																						68,941									68,941
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, May 2, 2011																						(8,055	)								(8,055	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.18 per shares, May 2, 2011																		6,841		7		8,048									8,055
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, May 15, 2011																						50,400									50,400
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.19 per share, May 16, 2011																		336,501		337		(297	)								40
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, May 16, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, May 16, 2011																						69,194									69,194
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, May 16, 2011																						(6,521	)								(6,521	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.20 per shares, May 16, 2011																		5,438		5		6,516									6,521
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.23 per share, May 30, 2011																		326,480		326		(286	)								40
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, May 30, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, May 30, 2011																						69,464									69,464
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, May 30, 2011																						(4,986	)								(4,986	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.23 per share, May 30, 2011																		4,070		4		4,982									4,986
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.47 per share, May 31, 2011																		4,087		4		5,996									6,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.18 per share, June 13, 2011																		339,971		340		(300	)								40
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, June 13, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, June 13, 2011																						69,727									69,727
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, June 13, 2011																						(3,452	)								(3,452	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.18 per share, June 13, 2011																		2,934		3		3,449									3,452
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.02 per share, June 27, 2011																		391,850		392		(352	)								40
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, June 27, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Series B Preferred Share, June 27, 2011																						69,973									69,973
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, June 27, 2011																						(1,918	)								(1,918	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.10 per share, June 27, 2011																		1,741		2		1,916									1,918
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.22 per share, June 30, 2011																		4,902		5		5,995									6,000
Net loss																												(6,477,165	)		(6,477,165	)
Balance, June 30, 2011		8,217,500		8,218		10,000			10			-			-			143,548,494		143,582		33,235,990			-			(23,216,908	)		10,170,891
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $1.11 per share, July 11, 2011																		89,986		90											90
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, July 11, 2011						(10,000	)		(10	)																					(10	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, July 11, 2011																						17,881									17,881
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on July 11, 2011																						(381	)								(381	)
Common shares issued as dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $1.18 per share, July 11, 2011																		345		-		381									381
Series B Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, on July 26, 2011						250,000			250													2,499,750									2,500,000
Placement Agents fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares, July 26, 2011																						(150,000	)								(150,000	)
Derivative liability - issuance of Series B Preferred Shares																						(429,768	)								(429,768	)
Legal Fees related to Sale of Convertible Preferred Stock, July 26, 2011																						(6,250	)								(6,250	)
Common shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to common stock at $1.18 per share, July 26, 2011																		377,800		378											378
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, July 26, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, July 26, 2011																						68,425									68,425
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.26 per share, July 31, 2011																		4,762		5		5,995									6,000
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board, August 15, 2011																						56,400									56,400
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.92 per share, August 8, 2011																		437,187		437											437
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, August 8, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, August 8, 2011																						69,193									69,193
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on August 8, 2011																						(8,055	)								(8,055	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.98 per share, August 8, 2011																		8,205		8		8,047									8,055
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.95 per share, August 23, 2011																		419,829		420											420
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, August 23, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, August 23, 2011																						69,351									69,351
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, August 23, 2011																						(6,521	)								(6,521	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.95 per share, August 23, 2011																		6,844		7		6,514									6,521
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.14 per share, August 31, 2011																		5,263		5		5,995									6,000
Common shares issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.95 per share, September 6, 2011																		422,873		423											423
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, September 6, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Shares, September 6, 2011																						69,887									69,887
Dividend paid to Seaside 88, LP, September 6, 2011																						(4,986	)								(4,986	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.95 per share, September 6, 2011																		5,264		5		4,981									4,986
Common shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares at $0.94 per share, September 19, 2011																		427,652		428											428
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, September 19, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative liability - retirement of Series B Preferred Share, September 19, 2011																						69,970									69,970
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on September 19, 2011																						(3,452	)								(3,452	)
Common shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP at $0.94 per share, September 19, 2011																		3,691		3		3,449									3,452
Common shares issued for consulting and legal services valued at $1.07 per share, September 30, 2011																		5,607		6		5,994									6,000
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $.78 per share, .001 par value, on October 3, 2011																		514,311		514											514
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on October 3, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on October 3, 2011																						69,496									69,496
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.85 on October 3, 2011																		2,270		2		1,916									1,918
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on October 3, 2011																						(1,918	)								(1,918	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.69 per share, .001 par value, on October 17, 2011																		144,484		144											144
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on October 17, 2011						(10,000	)		(10	)																					(10	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on October 17, 2011																						17,790									17,790
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.75 on October 17, 2011																		510		1		383									384
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on October 17, 2011																						(384	)								(384	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0..92 per share on October 31, 2011																		6,537		5		5,995									6,000
Series B Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, $.001 par value on November 1, 2011						250,000			250													2,499,750									2,500,000
Placement Agents Fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares on November 1, 2011																						(160,000	)								(160,000	)
Derivative Liability - Issuance of Preferred Series B																						(429,804	)								(429,804	)
Legal Fees related to Sale of Convertible Preferred Stock November 1, 2011																						(25,000	)								(25,000	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.78 per share, .001 par value, on November 1, 2011																		511,787		512											512
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on November 2, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on November 1, 2011																						68,297									68,297
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board on November 15, 2011																						56,400									56,400
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.69 per share, .001 par value, on November 15, 2011																		578,595		579											579
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on November 15, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on November 15, 2011																						68,411									68,411
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0..73 onNovember 15, 2011																		10,311		10		7,469									7,479
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on November 15, 2011																						(7,479	)								(7,479	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.62 per share, .001 par value, on November 29, 2011																		642,735		643											643
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on November 29, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on November 29, 2011																						68,591									68,591
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.64 on November 29, 2011																		10,139		10		6,511									6,521
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on November 29, 2011																						(6,521	)								(6,521	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.81 per share on November 30, 2011																		7,373		7		5,993									6,000
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.53 per share, .001 par value, on December 13, 2011																		751,315		751											751
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on December 13, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on December 13, 2011																						68,753									68,753
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.57 on December 13, 2011																		8,798		9		4,977									4,986
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on December 13, 2011																						(4,986	)								(4,986	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.51 per share, .001 par value, on December 27, 2011																		796,785		798											798
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on December 27, 2011						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on December 27, 2011																						68,965									68,965
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.57 on December 27, 2011																		6,818		7		3,443									3,450
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on December 27, 2011																						(3,452	)								(3,452	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.64 per share on December 31, 2011																		9,403		9		5,991									6,000
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $.51 per share, .001 par value, on January 10, 2012																		788,053		788											788
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on January 10,2012						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on January 10, 2012																						69,222									69,222
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.51 onJanuary 10, 2012																		3,742		4		1,914									1,918
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on January 10, 2012																						(1,918	)								(1,918	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.48 per share, .001 par value, on January 24, 2012																		208,546		209											209
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on January 24, 2012						(10,000	)		(10	)																					(10	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on January 24, 2012																						69,883									69,883
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.49 on January 24, 2012																		786				383									384
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on January 24, 2012																						(384	)								(384	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.58 per share on January 31, 2012																		10,367		10		5,990									6,000
Series B Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, $.001 par value on February 8, 2012						250,000			250													2,499,750									2,500,000
Placement Agents Fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares on February 8, 2012																						(150,000	)								(150,000	)
Derivative Liability - Issuance of Preferred Series B																						(430,283	)								(430,283	)
Legal Fees related to Sale of Convertible Preferred Stock February 8, 2012																						(6,250	)								(6,250	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.56 per share, .001 par value, on February 8, 2012																		717,142		717											717
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on February 8, 2012						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on February 8, 2012																						68,169									68,169
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board on February 15, 2012																						51,000									51,000
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.69 per share, .001 par value, on February 22, 2012																		576,062		576											576
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on February 22, 2012						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on February 22, 2012																						68,424									68,423
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.69 on February 22, 2012																		11,600		12		7,467									7,479
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on February 22, 2012																						(7,479	)								(7,479	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.77 per share on February 29, 2012																		7,767		8		5,992									6,000
Common shares issued for employee stock compensation at $.73 per share, March 3, 2012																		250,000		250		181,624									181,874
Series A Preferred Shares issued for employee stock compensation, March 3, 2012		593,750		594																		633,814									634,408
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.64 per share, .001 par value, on March 07, 2012																		628,289		628											628
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on March 7, 2012						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on March 7, 2012																						68,602									68,602
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.64 on March 7, 2012																		10,242		10		6,511									6,521
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on March 7, 2012																						(6,521	)								(6,521	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.63 per share, .001 par value, on March 21, 2012																		635,991		636											636
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on March 21, 2012						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on March 21, 2012																						68,862									68,862
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.64 on March 21, 2012																		7,812		8		4,978									4,986
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on March 21, 2012																						(4,986	)								(4,986	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.78 per share on March 31, 2012																		7,728		8		5,992									6,000
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $.61 per share, .001 par value, on April 4, 2012																		661,496		661											661
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on April 4, 2012						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on April 4, 2012																						69,098									69,098
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.61 on April 4, 2012																		5,709		6		3,446									3,452
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on April 4, 2012																						(3,452	)								(3,452	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.51 per share, .001 par value, on April 18, 2012																		785,453		785											785
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on April 18, 2012						(40,000	)		(40	)																					(40	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on April 18, 2012																						69,224									69,224
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.54 on April 18, 2012																		3,579		4		1,914									1,918
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on April 18, 2012																						(1,918	)								(1,918	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.63 per share on April 30, 2012																		9,547		9		5,990									5,999
Shares issued in conversion of Series B Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.50 per share, .001 par value, on May 2, 2012																		198,354		199											199
Retirement of Series B Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on May 2, 2012						(10,000	)		(10	)																					(10	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on May 2, 2012																						69,892									69,892
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board on May 15, 2012																						47,400									47,400
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.51 on May 2, 2012																		754		1		383									384
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on May 2, 2012																						(384	)								(384	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.67 per share on May 31, 2012																		8,962		9		5,991									6,000
Series C Preferred Shares issued to SeaSide 88, LP, $.001 par value on June 28, 2012												2,500			3							2,499,997									2,500,000
Placement Agents Fees related to sale of Convertible Preferred shares on June 28, 2012																						(150,000	)								(150,000	)
Derivative Liability - Issuance of Preferred Series C																						(1,090,017	)								(1,090,017	)
Legal Fees related to Sale of Convertible Preferred Stock June 28, 2012																						(25,000	)								(25,000	)
Sharees of Series A Preferred issued for legal services rendered		10,000		10																		3,277									3,287
Shares issued in conversion of Series C Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.49 per share, .001 par value, on June 28, 2012																		298,472		298											298
Retirement of Series C Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on June 28, 2012												(147	)		-																-
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series C on June 28, 2012																						63,704									63,704
Series A Preferred Shares issued for employee stock compensation, June 28, 2012		1,050,000		1,050																		344,122									345,172
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.61 per share on June 30, 2012																		9,867		10		5,990									6,000
Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2012																												(6,207,207	)		(6,207,207	)
Balance, June 30, 2012		9,871,250		9,872		-			-			2,353			3			155,612,293		155,644		43,108,790			-			(29,424,116	)		13,850,193
Shares issued in conversion of Series C Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $.49 per share, .001 par value, on July 12, 2012																		212,398		212											212
Retirement of Series C Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value onJuly 12, 2012												(103	)		(0	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series C on July 12, 2012																						44,190									44,190
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.49 on JULY 12, 2012																		18,397		18		9,008									9,026
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on July 12, 2012																						(9,026	)								(9,026	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series C Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.47 per share, .001 par value, on July 26, 2012																		271,373		271											271
Retirement of Series C Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on July 26, 2012												(128	)		(0	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series B on July 26, 2012																						53,032									53,032
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.47 on July 26, 2012																		18,275		18		8,611									8,629
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on July 26, 2012																						(8,629	)								(8,629	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.55 per share on July 31, 2012																		10,909		11		5,989									6,000
Shares issued in conversion of Series C Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.42 per share, .001 par value, on August 8, 2012																		280,944		281											281
Retirement of Series C Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on August 8, 2012												(118	)		(0	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series C on August 8, 2012																						51,555									51,555
Warrants issued to Scientific Advisory Board on May 15, 2012																						40,800									40,800
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.43 on August 8, 2012																		18,868		19		8,119									8,138
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on August 8, 2012																						(8,138	)								(8,138	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series C Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.48 per share, .001 par value, on August 23, 2012																		574,792		575											575
Retirement of Series C Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on August 23, 2012												(276	)		(0	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series C on August 23, 2012																						121,054									121,054
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.43 on August 23, 2012																		16,006		16		7,668									7,684
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on August 23, 2012																						(7,684	)								(7,684	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.58 per share on August 31, 2012																		10,345		10		5,990									6,000
Shares issued in conversion of Series C Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.58 per share, .001 par value, on September 5, 2012																		763,135		763											763
Retirement of Series C Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on September 5, 2012												(441	)		(0	)															(0	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series C on September 5, 2012																						236,481									236,481
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.58 on September 5, 2012																		11,478		11		6,614									6,625
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on September 5, 2012																						(6,625	)								(6,625	)
Shares issued in conversion of Series C Preferred Shares to Common Stock at $0.52 per share, .001 par value, on September 19, 2012																		553,337		553											553
Retirement of Series C Preferred Shares converted into common stock by SeaSide 88, LP, .001 par value on September 19, 2012												(285	)		(0	)
Derivative Liability - Retirement of Preferred Series C on September 19, 2012																						182,575									182,575
Shares issued as Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, .001 par value common stock at $0.52 on September 19, 2012																		9,572		10		4,926									4,936
Dividend to Seaside 88, LP, paid on September 19 2012																						(4,936	)								(4,936	)
Shares issued for consulting and legal services rendered at $0.62 per share on September 30, 2012																		9,677		10		5,990									6,000
Net loss for the Quarter ended September 30, 2012																												(1,803,955	)		(1,803,955	)
Balance, September 30, 2012		9,871,250	$	9,872		-		$	-			1,002		$	1			158,391,799	$	158,422	$	43,856,353		$	-		$	(31,228,071	)	$	12,796,577

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-5

Nanoviricides, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

							For the Period from
	For the 3 Months			For the 3 Months			May 12, 2005
	Ended			Ended			(inception) through
	September 30, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1,803,955	)	$	(1,139,976	)	$	(31,228,071	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Preferred shares issued for license		-			-			7,000
Preferred shares issued as compensation		-			-			2,203,197
Common shares and warrants issued for services		18,000			18,000			3,415,367
Warrants granted to scientific advisory board		40,800			56,400			1,106,038
Amortization of deferred compensation		-			-			121,424
Depreciation		52,719			52,719			878,594
Amortization		2,193			2,194			35,339
Change in fair value of derivative liability		246,273			(8,452	)		287,810
Amortization of deferred financing expenses		-			-			51,175
Discount convertible debentures		-			-			73,930
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debentures		-			-			713,079
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		(124,167	)		10,408			(430,341	)
Other current assets		-			-			(8,001	)
Deferred expenses		-			-			(2,175	)
Accounts payable - trade		146,008			18,255			728,746
Accounts payable - related parties		75,430			247,433			441,111
Accrued expenses		1,379			66,746			98,257
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(1,345,320	)		(676,273	)		(21,507,521	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(23,352	)		(1,440,717	)
Purchase of trademark		-			(5,733	)		(458,955	)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		-			(29,085	)		(1,899,672	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of Convertible Preferred Series B stock, net		-			2,360,654			19,462,500
Proceeds from issuance of Convertible Preferred Series C stock, net		-			-			2,325,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants in connection with private placements of common stock, net of issuance costs		-			-			11,296,748
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		-			-			90,000
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		-			-			3,162,590
Collection of stock subscriptions received		-			-			20
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		-			2,360,654			36,336,858
NET CHANGE IN CASH		(1,345,320	)		1,655,296			12,929,665
Cash at beginning of period		14,274,985			9,224,023			-
Cash at end of period	$	12,929,665		$	10,879,319		$	12,929,665
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
NON CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock issued for services rendered	$	18,000		$	18,000		$	11,996,802
Preferred stock issued as compensation		-			-			3,621,782
Stock options issued to the officers as compensation		-			-			121,424
Stock warrants granted to scientific advisory board		50,800			56,400			1,116,038
Stock warrants granted to brokers		-			-			3,563
Common stock issued for interest on debentures		-			-			73,930
Shares of common stock issued in connection with debenture offering		-			-			49,000
Common stock issued upon conversion of convertible debentures		-			-			1,000,000
Common stock issued upon conversion of Series B Preferred Stock		-			2,175,327			20,320,630
Common stock issued upon conversion of Series C Preferred Stock		-			-			298,472
Common stock issued for dividends on Series B Preferred Stock		-			24,349			234,508
Debt discount related to beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt		-			-			713,079
Stock Warrants issued in connection with Private Placement		-			-			7,681,578
Common stock issued for accounts payable		-			-			175,020
Common stock issued for equipment		-			-			137,500

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-6

NANOVIRICIDES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

September 30, 2012 AND 2011

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization and Nature of Business

NanoViricides, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado on July 25, 2000 as Edot-com.com, Inc. and was organized for the purpose of conducting internet retail sales.  On April 1, 2005, Edot-com.com, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada for the purpose of re-domiciling the Company as a Nevada corporation.  On May 12, 2005, the corporations were merged and Edot-com.com, Inc., the Nevada corporation, became the surviving entity.

On June 1, 2005, Edot-com.com, Inc. (“ECMM”) acquired Nanoviricide, Inc., a privately owned Florida corporation (“NVI”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange (the “Exchange”).  Nanoviricide, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on May 12, 2005.

Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange, ECMM acquired NVI in exchange for an aggregate of 80,000,000 newly issued shares of ECMM common stock resulting in an aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of ECMM common stock issued and outstanding.  NVI then became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ECMM. The ECMM shares were issued to the NVI shareholders on a pro rata basis, on the basis of 4,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of NVI common stock held by such NVI shareholder at the time of the Exchange.

As a result of the Exchange transaction, the former NVI stockholders held approximately 80% of the voting capital stock of the Company immediately after the Exchange.  For financial accounting purposes, this acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by NVI, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with NVI as the acquirer. Accordingly, the financial statements have been prepared to give retroactive effect to May 12, 2005 (date of inception), of the reverse acquisition completed on June 1, 2005, and represent the operations of NVI.

On June 28, 2005, NVI was merged into its parent ECMM and the separate corporate existence of NVI ceased.   Effective on the same date, Edot-com.com, Inc. changed its name to NanoViricides, Inc. and its stock symbol to “NNVC”, respectively.  The Company is considered a development stage company at this time.

NanoViricides,  Inc. (the “Company”), is a nano-biopharmaceutical company whose business goals are to discover, develop and commercialize therapeutics to advance the care of patients suffering from life-threatening viral infections. We are a development stage company with several drugs in various stages of early development. Our drugs are based on several patents, patent applications, provisional patent applications, and other proprietary intellectual property held by TheraCour Pharma, Inc. (“TheraCour”), to which we have the necessary exclusive licenses in perpetuity. The first agreement we executed with TheraCour Pharma on  September 1, 2005, gave us an exclusive, worldwide license for the treatment of the following human viral diseases: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV/AIDS), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), Influenza and Asian Bird Flu Virus.

On February 15, 2010 the Company executed an Additional License Agreement with TheraCour Pharma, Inc. (“TheraCour”).  Pursuant to the Additional License Agreement, the Company was granted exclusive licenses, in perpetuity, for technologies, developed by TheraCour, for the development of drug candidates for the treatment of Dengue viruses, Ebola/Marburg viruses, Japanese Encephalitis, viruses causing viral Conjunctivitis (a disease of the eye) and Ocular Herpes.  As consideration for obtaining these exclusive licenses, we agreed to pay a onetime licensing fee equal to 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”).  The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, only upon sale or merger of the company, or the sale of or license of substantially all of the Company’s intellectual property, into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of four shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock.  The Series A Preferred Stock has a preferred voting preference at the rate of four votes per share. The Preferred Series A do not contain any rights to dividends, have no liquidation preference, and are not to be amended without the holder’s approval. The 7,000,000 shares were valued at the par value of $7,000.

F-7

We focus our research and clinical programs on specific anti-viral therapeutics. We are seeking to add to our existing portfolio of products through our internal discovery and clinical development programs and through an in-licensing strategy. The Company has recently filed a pre-IND application to the US FDA for its clinical candidate NV-INF-1 in the FluCide™ program. This anti-influenza therapeutic candidate is expected to be effective against most if not all types of influenzas including Bird Flu H5N1, Highly Pathogenic Influenzas (HPI/HPAI), Epidemic Influenzas such as the 2009 “swine flu” H1N1/A/2009, and Seasonal Influenzas. To date, the Company does not have any commercialized products.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation – Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Interim Reporting.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management,   considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented.  Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  The accompanying financial statements and the information included under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” should be read in conjunction with our company’s audited financial statements and related notes included in our company’s form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on October 15, 2012.

For a summary of significant accounting policies (which have not changed from June 30, 2012), see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05

In June 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), whichwas the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220,Comprehensive Income,by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now gives entities the option to present all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.

The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively and are effective for public entity for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08

In September 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”).This Update is to simplify how public and nonpublic entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.

F-8

The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10“Property, Plant and Equipment: Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification” (“ASU 2011-09”).This Update is to resolve the diversity in practice as to how financial statements have been reflecting circumstances when parent company reporting entities cease to have controlling financial interests in subsidiaries that are in substance real estate, where the situation arises as a result of default on nonrecourse debt of the subsidiaries.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2012for public entities. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11“Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 2011-12”).This Update is a deferral of the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05. FASB is to going to reassess the costs and benefits of those provisions in ASU 2011-05 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Due to the time required to properly make such a reassessment and to evaluate alternative presentation formats, the FASB decided that it is necessary to reinstate the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05.

All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

Other Recently Issued, but Not Yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

F-9

Note 3 – Financial Condition

The Company’s financial statements for the interim period ended September 30, 2012 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.  The Company has a deficit accumulated during the development stage.  In addition, the Company has not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated in the short-term.  Since May 2005, the Company has been engaged exclusively in research and development activities focused on developing targeted antiviral drugs.  The Company has not yet commenced any product commercialization.  Such losses are expected to continue for the foreseeable future and until such time, if ever, as the Company is able to attain sales levels sufficient to support its operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve or maintain profitability in the future. As of September 30, 2012 the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $12,929,665. The Company does not currently have any long term debt. The Company has sufficient capital to continue its business, at least, through September 30, 2014, at the current rate of expenditure. The Company therefore would not be considered to have risks relative to its ability to continue as a going concern within the applicable guidelines.

While the Company continues to incur significant operating losses and has significant capital requirements, the Company has been able to finance its business through the sale of its securities (See Note 6). On November 2, 2011, the Company entered into an Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Seaside 88, LP (“Seaside”), relating to the offering and sale (the “Offering”) of up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) at the purchase price of $10.00 per share (the “Purchase Price”).  On November 2, 2011, Seaside purchased an initial 250,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Initial Closing”).  On February 8, 2012 Seaside purchased the remaining 250,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock for the purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Subsequent Closing”).   The Company has sufficient capital to continue its business, at least, through September 30, 2014, at the current rate of expenditure. The Company therefore would not be considered to have risks relative to its ability to continue as a going concern within the applicable guidelines.

Since May 2005, the Company has been engaged exclusively in research and development activities focused on developing targeted antiviral nanomedicines.  The Company has not yet commenced any product commercialization.  The Company has incurred significant losses from operations since its inception, resulting in a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $31,228,071at September 30, 2012 and expects recurring losses from operations to continue for the foreseeable future and until such time, if ever, as the Company is able to attain sales levels sufficient to support its operations.  There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve or maintain profitability in the future.  Despite the Company’s financings in 2012 and 2011 and a cash and cash equivalent balance of $12,929,665 at September 30, 2012, substantial additional financing will be required in future periods.  The Company may require additional capital to finance planned and currently unplanned capital costs, and additional staffing requirements during the next twenty four months.  The Company has, in the past, adjusted its priorities and goals in line with the cash on hand and capital availability. The Company believes it can adjust its priorities of drug development and its Plan of Operations as necessary, if it is unable to raise such additional funds.

The Company continues to successfully raise additional capital: 

On June 28, 2012, the Company entered into an additional Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Seaside, relating to the offering and sale (the “Offering”) of up to 5,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) at the purchase price of $1,000.00 per share (the “Purchase Price”). On June 28, 2012, Seaside purchased an initial 2,500 shares of the Series C Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Initial Closing”). Following the Initial Closing, Seaside will purchase the remaining 2,500 shares of the Series C Preferred Stock for the purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Subsequent Closing”).

As a result of the successful sale of the Company’s Series B and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to Seaside, LP the management believes that the Company has sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its budgeted expenditures through, at least, September 30, 2014 at current rate of expenditures.

F-10

Note 4 – Significant Alliances and Related Parties

TheraCour Pharma, Inc.

Pursuant to an Exclusive License Agreement we entered into with TheraCour Pharma, Inc., (TheraCour), the Company was granted exclusive licenses in perpetuity for technologies developed by TheraCour for the virus types: HIV, HCV, Herpes, Asian (bird) flu, Influenza and rabies.  In consideration for obtaining this exclusive license, we agreed: (1) that TheraCour can charge its costs (direct and indirect) plus no more than 30% of direct costs as a Development Fee and such development fees shall be due and payable in periodic installments as billed, (2) we will pay $25,000 per month for usage of lab supplies and chemicals from existing stock held by TheraCour, (3) we will pay $2,000 or actual costs, whichever is higher for other general and administrative expenses incurred by TheraCour on our behalf, (4) make royalty payments (calculated as a percentage of net sales of the licensed drugs) of 15% to TheraCour Pharma, Inc. and (5) agreed that TheraCour Pharma, Inc. retains the exclusive right to develop and manufacture the licensed drugs. TheraCour Pharma, Inc. agreed that it will manufacture the licensed drugs exclusively for NanoViricides, and unless such license is terminated, will not manufacture such product for its own sake or for others.

On February 15, 2010, the Company executed an Additional License Agreement with TheraCour Pharma, Inc. (“TheraCour”).  Pursuant to the exclusive Additional License Agreement, the Company was granted exclusive licenses, in perpetuity, for technologies developed by TheraCour for the development of drug candidates for the treatment of Dengue viruses, Ebola/Marburg viruses, Japanese Encephalitis, viruses causing viral Conjunctivitis (a disease of the eye) and Ocular Herpes.  As consideration for obtaining these exclusive licenses, we agreed to pay a onetime licensing fee equal to seven million shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”).  The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, only upon sale or merger of the company, or the sale of or license of substantially all of the Company’s intellectual property, into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of four shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock.  The Series A Preferred Stock has a preferred voting preference at the rate of four votes per share. The Preferred Series A do not contain any rights to dividends; have no liquidation preference and are not to be amended without the holders approval. The issuance of the 7,000,000 shares was valued at their par value or $7,000.

TheraCour Pharma, Inc. may terminate these licenses upon a material breach by us as specified in the agreement.

Development costs charged by and paid to TheraCour were $948,026 and $416,679 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively and $7,565,030 since inception. As of September 30, 2012, pursuant to its license agreement, the Company has paid a security advance of $386,608 to and held by TheraCour which is reflected in Prepaid Expenses.  No royalties are due TheraCour from the Company’s inception through September 30, 2012.

Anil R. Diwan, President, and a director of the Company, is also a Director and President of TheraCour. Dr. Diwan owns approximately 70% of the common stock of TheraCour, which itself owns approximately 21% of the Common stock of the Company.

TheraCour owns 33,360,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of September 30, 2012.

KARD Scientific, Inc.

In June 2005, the Company engaged KARD Scientific to conduct preclinical animal studies and provide the Company with a full history of the study and final report with the data collected from Good Laboratory Practices (CGLP) style studies. Dr. Krishna Menon, the Company’s Consulting Chief Regulatory Officer, a non-executive position, is also an officer and principal owner of KARD Scientific. Lab fees charged by KARD Scientific for services for the three months ended September 30, 2012, and 2011, were $561,618 and $-0-  respectively, and $2,421,755 since inception.

KARD Scientific Inc. of Beverly, Massachusetts, is currently our primary vendor for animal model study design and performance. KARD operates its own facilities in Beverly, Massachusetts.

F-11

NanoViricides has a fee for service arrangement with KARD. We do not have an exclusive arrangement with KARD; we do not have a contract with KARD; any work to be performed by KARD must be commissioned by the executive officers of NanoViricides; and we retain all intellectual property resulting from the services by KARD.

Note 5 - Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid Expenses are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2012		June 30, 2012
TheraCour Pharma, Inc.	$	386,607	$	281,775
Prepaid Others		51,734		32,399
	$	438,341	$	314,174

Note 6 – Equity Transactions

On June 28, 2012, the Company entered into an additional Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Seaside, relating to the offering and sale (the “Offering”) of up to 5,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) at the purchase price of $1,000.00 per share (the “Purchase Price”). On June 28, 2012, Seaside purchased an initial 2,500 shares of the Series C Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Initial Closing”). Following the Initial Closing, Seaside will purchase the remaining 2,500 shares of the Series C Preferred Stock for the purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Subsequent Closing”).

The conversion price per share for the Initial Closing of the Series C Preferred Stock was $.49181 and the Company raised gross proceeds from the offering of $2,500,000 before estimated offering expenses of approximately $200,000, which includes placement agents and attorneys’ fees.

The Offerings were made pursuant to the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-165221), which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2010. The Company, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a prospectus supplement relating to the Offering.

In connection with the Offering, pursuant to a Placement Agency Agreement entered into by and between Midtown and the Company, as amended by an Underwriter Agent Agreement Amendment No. 1, dated March 28, 2011 (as amended, the “Placement Agency Agreement”), the Company paid Midtown a cash fee representing 6% of the gross purchase price paid by Seaside for the Series B Preferred Stock.

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, Seaside converted the following amounts of Series C Preferred Stock into the Company’s Common Stock:

Date of Conversion	Number of Shares of Series C Converted		Conversion Price		Number of Shares of .001 par value Common Stock Issued Pursuant to Conversion		Dividend Conversion Price		Dividend Shares Issued		Total Shares of .001 par value Common Stock Issued to Seaside
07/12/2012		103		.48717		212,398		.49062		18,397		230,795
07/26/2012		128		.47218		271,373		.47218		18,275		289,648
08/08/2012		118		.42073		280,944		.43129		18,868		299,812
08/23/2012		276		.48008		574,792		.48008		16,006		590,798
09/06/2012		441		.57728		763,135		.57728		11,478		774,613
09/19/2012		285		.51570		553,337		.51570		9,572		562,909

F-12

Unregistered Securities

In August, 2012, the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) was granted warrants to purchase 60,000 shares of common stock at $0.68 per share expiring in August ,2016.  These warrants were valued at $40,800 and recorded as consulting expense.

For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 30,931 shares of its common stock with a restrictive legend for consulting services. The Company recorded an expense of $18,000.

Note 7 - Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 135 Wood Street, West Haven, Connecticut, and include approximately 7,000 square feet of office and laboratory space at a base monthly rent of $8,695. The term of lease expired on February 28, 2011 and is now on a month-by-month basis.

Total rent expense amounted to $26,085 and $26,085 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Legal Proceedings

On or around April 13, 2012, the Nevada Agency and Transfer Company, as agent for service of process for the Company in Nevada, was served with a Summons and Complaint in the case entitled Yidam, Ltd. v. Eugene Seymour, Anil Diwan, and Nanoviricides, Inc. ((Case No. A-12-659535-B) answerable in the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada – Clark County (“Court”). The Complaint seeks to compel inspection of the Company’s books and records. On or about May 2, 2012, we filed a Demand for Security of Costs. Upon filing of the Demand, proceedings relative to the Company are stayed pending posting of the demanded security (or plaintiff engages in motion practice about the Demand).  The Company may seek dismissal of the complaint if plaintiff has not posted the demanded security (or engaged the court). The Complaint further seeks unspecified “injunctive relief” in furtherance of the demand for inspection to which the Company believes it is not entitled. The Complaint, by a holder of less than 1 percent of the common stock of the Company, seeks to, inter alia, inspect documents and records of the company to which it is not entitled and in a form and manner the Company argues is not authorized by statute. On or July 18, 2012, the Plaintiff moved to amend its answer. On or about August 8, 2012, we filed our opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On September 13, 2012 the court granted the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend. On or about September 17, 2012 the Plaintiff served its “Second Amended Shareholder Derivative Complaint” upon our Counsel in Nevada. As in the prior two complaints that this Plaintiff has filed in this action, this Second Amended Complaint seeks to compel inspection of the Company’s books and records, seeks injunctive relief, an accounting and alleges breach of fiduciary dutiesby Dr. Seymour and Dr. Diwan. On or about October 11, 2012, we filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, which is currently being considered by the Court. Management believes that this lawsuit has no merit or basis and intends to vigorously defend it. Specific monetary damages have not been claimed and as a result no accrual has been made in relation to this litigation.

There are no other legal proceedings against the Company to the best of the Company’s knowledge as of the date hereof and to the Company’s knowledge, no action, suit or proceeding has been threatened against the Company.

Note 8 – Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when these financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company has determined that there was a reportable subsequent event to be disclosed as follows:

F-13

1. On October 26, 2012, the Company’s filed a Form S-3 Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission which seeks to register up to $40,000.000 of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities and units comprised of those securities.

2. On November 13, 2012 the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. to conduct drug development studies required for submission of Investigational New Drug Applications to the FDA for its nanoviricides® drug candidates against various viral diseases

F-14

PART I

SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information in this report contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact made in this report are forward looking. In particular, the statements herein regarding industry prospects and future results of operations or financial position are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “estimates,” “could,” “possibly,” “probably,” anticipates,” “projects,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” or “should,” or other variations or similar words. No assurances can be given that the future results anticipated by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from management’s expectations.

Although these forward-looking statements reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based upon facts and factors currently known to us. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. As a result, our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth below under the caption “Risk Factors.” For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they were made. They give our expectations regarding the future but are not guarantees. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law.

ITEM I: BUSINESS

Organization and Nature of Business

NanoViricides, Inc. is a leading company in the application of nanomedicine technologies to the complex issues of viral diseases. The nanoviricide® technology enables direct attacks at multiple points on a virus particle. It is believed that such attacks would lead to the virus particle becoming ineffective at infecting cells. Antibodies in contrast attack a virus particle at only a maximum of two attachment points per antibody.

Of note for the quarter ending September 30, 2012 is that the Company has made significant progress in advancing our pipeline. In March 2012, we held a pre-IND meeting with the United States Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”)for our anti-influenza drug candidate, NV-INF-1. We obtained valuable advice from the US FDA regarding the requirements for filing an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) for this anti-influenza drug candidate.

Additional major events occurred after the end of the year. In August, 2012, we announced that we were successful in developing an anti-influenza drug candidate that was orally effective. We believe this may be the very first targeted nanomedicine that is available via the oral route. Oral availability of FluCide would open up a much larger market than the injectable version. The Company intends to continue to develop the injectable version for hospitalized patients. For severe, hospitalized cases of influenza, we are developing a concentrated solution that is administered by “piggy-back” incorporation into the standard IV fluid supplement system that is commonly used in hospitalized patients. In addition, we now plan to develop an oral version for out-patients and later also for pediatric patient populations. This oral version will replace the injectable drug that we were developing out-patients.

Another major event also occurred very recently. In September 2012, we announced that the oral version of FluCide was also highly effective against a different strain of influenza A, namely H3N2, in addition to the influenza strain of H1N1 that we had been using for development, in the same lethal animal challenge model. This is an important indication that our drug candidates against influenza are indeed broad-spectrum, i.e. capable of combating most if not all influenza viruses. We will need to perform animal studies against a few additional strains of influenza viruses in order to substantiate that this drug is indeed a broad-spectrum drug candidate. Additional studies in cell cultures against different strains of influenza are also planned. All of these studies are necessary for filing an IND application.

15

This year, we also announced certain important issuances of patents on the TheraCour® technology underlying our nanoviricides® drugs. Most importantly, a fundamental patent on the polymeric micelles composition, structure and uses was issued in the USA with substantially broad claims. This validates the novelty of our approach as well as our leadership position in the nanomedicines based on polymeric micelle technologies. All of the patent applications have been filed internationally. To date 17 patent grants have occurred and additional grants continue as the applications progress through review.

These events have been the result of continuing progress and development work that the Company has been performing through several years. We had undertaken the challenge of developing an orally available anti-influenza drug nearly three years ago. The chemistry work was already completed by June 2012 and the first animal testing results became available in August, 2012.

We are also working on developing cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practices) manufacturing capabilities for clinical product. A group of private financiers that includes our founder Dr. Anil Diwan has acquired an 18,000 sqft building on 4 acres with possibilities of expansion, in Shelton, CT, via Inno-Haven, LLC, a company formed specifically for that purpose. The plans for renovating this building are being designed. The project had several changes of scope as a result of the constraints in the current financial markets. A highly optimized floor plan has now been developed and the Company is in the process of guiding the contract proposals and selection of architectural, design and engineering teams. The building construction will be phased based on available financing, with priority for the cGMP facility build-out. The Company is evaluating various options for the cGMP facility build-out. We intend to lease the building from Inno-Haven, LLC. The terms of the lease have not been finalized. We believe that from the time that the proposals are accepted, the cGMP facility can be ready in about one year to begin actual manufacturing. Soon thereafter, the Company will be able to make cGMP-like material using the same processes as c-GMP material but prior to undergoing the FDA registration process. Such c-GMP-like product can be used for clinical batches for human clinical studies in several countries around the world. The Company is currently investigating all such options in order to expedite the timeline to entering human clinical trials. The Company intends to contract out clinical batch fulfillments to outside contract manufacturers.

While we continue to make significant progress towards human clinical trials and approval of our drug candidates, our programs have been hampered by the weak financial markets that have resulted in substantial limitations on our capital-raising efforts. We have scaled down our programs, particularly the cGMP manufacturing facility program, to meet with these financial challenges.

We have been aggressively expanding our portfolio of virus targets and drug candidates every year since our inception in May 2005. We began with drug candidates against Influenza. We then shortly added a drug candidate against Rabies, one of the most difficult diseases to tackle. We started working on Ebola/Marburg viruses (filoviruses) and developed drug candidates worthy of further drug development. Shortly thereafter, we developed a drug candidate against Adenoviral Epidemic Kerato-conjunctivitis (EKC). In 2008, we added anti-HIV drug candidates to our growing portfolio. In 2009, we improved upon our EKC drug candidates to develop new drug candidates that may be effective potentially against most known viral diseases of the external eye. Most of these viral diseases are caused by a wide variety of adenoviruses and herpes simplex viruses. We also developed new drug candidates against the herpes viruses (HSV-1 and HSV-2), for the treatment of recurrent HSV skin infections, such as cold sores and genital warts. Then last year we added drug candidates effective against Dengue viruses to our pipeline. In 2012 we developed an oral version of our anti-influenza drug candidate, Flucide. Thus, in just about five years we have developed a very broad pipeline of drug candidates. We believe that we will have clinically relevant drug candidates in many, if not all, of these disease areas.

Last year we also conducted an anti-HIV study in the standard humanized mouse model in the HIVCide program. In this model, the immune system of the mouse is replaced by human immune system. Then HIV infection is given. HIV infects the human immune system. The antivirals are then given and tested for their effect on the interaction of HIV with the implanted human immune system. In the previous anti-HIV study, we had found that three different unoptimized anti-HIV nanoviricides exhibited extremely strong effectiveness that was equal to or better than a three drug HAART cocktail (highly effective antiretroviral treatment) in this animal model. We have since developed better optimized ligands to attack the HIV virus particle. In order to find the best ligand, we reduced the amount of ligand attached to the polymer chain in this new study. We were able to select the best nanoviricide anti-HIV ligand in the new study, which appears to be better than all the ligands tested in the previous study. This nanoviricide’s effect was still equal to or better than the same 3 drug HAART cocktail, although we had expected a substantially reduced effect.

16

What is more, the new anti-HIV nanoviricide drug candidate continued to maintain HIV-1 viral load suppression for at least 28 days after last drug dosing in this recent study. So we believe that an intermittent therapy against HIV/AIDS is feasible with nanoviricides. We believe that such a therapy would allow patients to achieve nominally HIV-free status, and have a normal life, for long periods, without drugs. We are now further optimizing the HIVCide drug candidates. In effect, we believe that HIVCide would enable a “functional cure” for HIV, although much work needs to be done as this program matures into a clinical candidate.

Nanoviricide technology is built on the TheraCour® polymeric micelle platform technology. The design of these materials is like building blocks. We can select components to achieve desired effects. This tailor-made customizability has many implications. It allows us to (1) rapidly create a new drug against a different virus; (2) rapidly develop a drug with desired length of time for which its effect should persist; and (3) quickly develop new drugs with different routes of administration; among many other benefits.

We had always suspected that the polymeric nature of nanoviricides would enable a long drug effectiveness time frame, thus enabling infrequent dosing. We have indications now that this is very likely true, from both FluCide™ and HIVCide™ programs. We have observed sustained antiviral effects for a long time after last drug administration in various animal model studies.

Infrequent dosing would translate into ease of patient compliance. Patient compliance is a major issue for all antiviral drug therapies, and particularly for HIV/AIDS.

We have been able to develop drugs using many different routes of administration with very little development time and effort.

Initially we focused on developing only injectable formulations since these afford the maximum bioavailability of the drug inside the body. We have also developed eye drop solutions against EKC in a very short time frame.

A skin cream appears to be the right formulation for the treatment of oral and genital warts caused by HSV-1 and HSV-2. Last year we had already observed that our drug candidates, in the solution form, were effective in cell cultures against at least two different strains of HSV-1 in two different laboratories. We needed to make skin creams for conducting animal studies and selected different building blocks for our backbone polymer, and built new drugs against HSV this year. The skin cream drug candidates against HSV were developed within a matter of weeks. The formulation development itself took only a few days. In contrast, many drug development companies spend years in formulations development.

We have successfully developed what may be the first ever orally available targeted nanomedicine, in our Flucide program.

We demonstrated that we can rapidly develop different formulations because of the inherent strength of the nanoviricide platform technology. The technology also enables us to develop nasal sprays and bronchial aerosols. We plan to develop the appropriate formulations as necessary.

We have limited our expenditures on socially conscious projects such as “Neglected Tropical Diseases” (NTD’s), and “Bio-defense” projects to the extent that participatory funding from third parties is available. To this end, we attempt to obtain grants and contracts financing from government and non-government sources. We will continue to work on these programs as time and resources permit. In addition, we continue to develop novel technologies such as ADIF™ (“Accurate-Drug-In-Field™��) which may possibly represent one of the best scientific approaches against manmade and natural novel disease agents. Outbreaks of natural novel viral diseases, such as SARS will continue to occur. At present, there is no feasible therapeutic intervention for outbreaks of novel viruses, such as new coronavirus outbreak reported recently.

17

We continued to raise financing successfully, but at a much slower pace than last year. To date, Seaside 88, LP (“Seaside”), has continued its investment in the Company and has invested an aggregate of $20M thus far. On June 28, 2012 Seaside invested an additional $5M with its agreement to purchase the Company’s $0.001 par value Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. With this funding, and our continuing controlled rate of expenditure, as of June 30, 2012, we had $14,274,985 in cash and cash equivalents on hand. This cash reserve now enables us to start moving our drug candidates forward in the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and International regulatory approval processes.

We now have six commercially significant active, drug development programs: (1) Oral FluCide^TM, against all Influenzas, (2)A Piggy-back version of Flucide for hospitalized patients, (3) nanoviricide eye drops against adenoviral EKC and herpes keratitis, (4) HIVCide™-I against HIV/AIDS, (5) HerpeCide™-I skin cream formulation for herpes cold sores and genital warts, and (6) DengueCide™, a broad spectrum nanoviricide designed to attack all types of dengue viruses and expected to be effective in the Severe Dengue Disease syndromes including Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHS) and Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS). We continue to achieve very strong performance in the testing of these drug candidates. All of our biological testing is conducted by third parties.

We have continued to achieve significant milestones in our drug development activities. All of our drug development programs are presently at pre-clinical stage. We continue to test several drug candidates under each program even though we may achieve extremely strong results with some of the candidates.

Our strategy is to minimize capital expenditure. We therefore rely on third party collaborations for the testing of our drug candidates. We continue to engage with our previous collaborators. In addition, towards the end of this year, we engaged Biologics Consulting Group, Inc., to help us with the FDA regulatory submissions. We are also engaged with Australian Biologics Pty, Ltd to help us with clinical trials and regulatory approvals in Australia. We believe that cGMP-like manufactured product is acceptable for entering human clinical trials in Australia.

The Company reports summaries of its studies as the data becomes available to the Company, after analyzing and verifying same, in its press releases.

In July-August 2011, we reported on the anti-HIV studies that were designed to discriminate the comparative effectiveness of different ligands. We reported that our lead anti-HIV candidate achieved anti-HIV efficacy equivalent to a HAART (highly active anti-retroviral therapy) triple drug cocktail in this recently completed animal study. Treatment with this lead anti-HIV nanoviricide reduced HIV levels and protected the human T cells (CD4+/CD8+) to the same extent as treatment with the HAART cocktail. The three drug HAART cocktail used for comparison in this study is one of the combination therapies recommended for initial therapy in humans. No evidence of drug toxicity was observed in the case of nanoviricide drug candidates. We later reported that this lead anti-HIV drug candidate achieved a long term anti-HIV effect with a much shorter dosing regimen and a markedly lower total drug dose than the HAART drug cocktail therapy in a recent animal study. The antiviral effect of the anti-HIV nanoviricide (“HIVCide™”) continued throughout the 48 days of study even though HIVCide dosing was discontinued after only 20 days. The clinical benefit of HIVCide was found to be sustained for at least four weeks after the last drug dose. Treatment with the lead anti-HIV nanoviricide both (1) reduced the HIV viral load and (2) also protected the human T cells (CD4+,CD8+), equally well as compared to treatment with the three-drug HAART cocktail, at 24-days as well as at 48-days, even though the HIVCide treatment was stopped at 20 days. The lead candidate is now undergoing further optimization.

A long and sustained effect of HIVCide would lead to improved patient compliance, which is a sought after goal in HIV therapy. With this new study, we believe that we are close to a “Functional Cure” of HIV wherein the patient can take treatment until the viral load is undetectable and then stop treatment until an episode of virus reawakening occurs.

In September 2011, we announced that we have selected a clinical candidate, now designated NV-INF-1, for FDA submission in our highly successful FluCide™ anti-influenza therapeutics program. The Company is now developing certain additional information on NV-INF-1, with input from its FDA consultants, for the pre-IND application to the FDA. The Company is planning on two separate indications for NV-INF-1: High strength dosage form for hospitalized patients with severe influenza, and a single course therapy for the out-patients with less severe influenza. We are currently working on putting together the FluCide information in a pre-IND application to the US FDA.

18

In July 2011, we retained the Biologics Consulting Group to help us with our regulatory filings. This led to our pre-IND meeting request to the US FDA in December, 2011, and a pre-IND meeting with the US FDA in March, 2012.

In July 2012, we retained Australian Biologics Pty. Ltd., a regulatory affairs consulting firm, to coordinate the regulatory review and approval to conduct the first human trials in Australia for Flucide™, the Company’s broad-spectrum anti-influenza drug. Australian Biologics will also facilitate clinical trial site(s) selection and development of the clinical trials agreements. Dr. Jim Ackland, the Manager of Australian Biologics Pty, Ltd, has extensive experience in this field. Prior to becoming managing director of this company, he was Vice-President, West Coast and Asia Pacific operations for the Biologics Consulting Group, the Company’s US FDA regulatory affairs consulting group. In the 1990’s, he was the Head of Regulatory Affairs, Vaccines, for the CSL Group in Australia. The CSL Group is a global, specialty biopharmaceutical company that researches, develops, manufactures and markets products to treat and prevent serious human medical conditions.

In August 2012, we reported that oral effectiveness of anti-influenza FluCide drug was demonstrated in a lethal animal model. Certain anti-influenza drug candidates under our FluCide™ program, when given orally, were nearly as effective as when administered as IV injections. Two different anti-influenza drug candidates were tested in Oral vs. IV comparison, and both of them showed similar results that indicated strong oral effectiveness. The results clearly demonstrated that oral administration of both of these FluCide drug candidates resulted in substantially superior animal protection compared to oseltamivir (Tamiflu®), a standard of care for influenza at present. The studies involved the same highly lethal animal model the Company has continued to use for its influenza drug development program.

One of the FluCide drug candidates, when administered orally, enabled the animals to survive as long as 347.4±4.6 hrs. (14.5 days), and when given as an injectable, it allowed the animals to combat the lethal influenza infection for 376.8±7.5 hrs. (15.7 days). Another drug candidate (with a different anti-viral ligand), when given orally, resulted in the animals surviving for as long as 301.3±5.2 hrs. (12.6 days), and when given as a tail-vein injection, for 349.0±3.9 hrs. (14.5 days). For comparison, untreated control animals died in 119.5±1 hrs. (5 days), and oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) treated animals died within just 181.7±4.6 hrs. (7.6 days).

The survival data clearly showed that oral as well as IV administration of FluCide drug candidates was substantially superior to oseltamivir. In addition, they showed that FluCide drug candidates when given orally had substantial efficacy, almost matching the effectiveness of the injectable form given at 0.3X of the oral dosage level.

One of the FluCide drug candidates, when administered orally, resulted in 1.30 log reduction (or 20X reduction) in lung viral load and matched the viral load reduction on the same drug candidate given as an IV injection. Another drug candidate resulted in 1.23 log viral load reduction when given orally and 1.31 log viral load reduction when given as an injectable. In contrast, oseltamivir (Tamiflu®, given orally at 40mg/kg/d) resulted in only 0.6 log viral load reduction (or only 4X reduction) compared to negative controls. These were the results of lung viral load measured at 108 hours post-infection (hpi). Further, at 180 hpi, the lung viral load remained controlled at about the same level as at 108 hpi with the nanoviricide® drug candidates. In contrast, lung viral load in the oseltamivir treated mice increased to the same level as the negative control (infected untreated) animals prior to their death and the oseltamivir group exhibited a survival of only 182±4 hours.

The number of lung plaques and plaque areas (resulting from the influenza virus infection) also were consistent with the data from the lung viral load, and were minimal in the case of the nanoviricide drug candidates whether given as IV or orally. Oseltamivir treatment did not protect the lungs of infected animals anywhere close to the protection afforded by the FluCide drug candidates.

These data clearly demonstrated that both oral and IV treatment with nanoviricide drug candidates protected the lungs of the mice infected with influenza virus equally well. It is also clear that this lung protection was the result of the substantial decrease in the lung viral load. In addition, they show that FluCide drug candidates when given orally had substantial efficacy, almost matching the effectiveness of the injectable form given at 0.3X of the oral dosage level.

19

In addition to the antiviral effects, the oral FluCide drug candidates also led to generation of a strong antiviral antibody response. Two different anti-influenza drug candidates were tested in Oral vs. IV comparison. One of the FluCide drug candidates, when administered orally, resulted in 1866±90 micro-g/ml-plasma of anti-influenza antibody, and 1258±59 when administered as IV injections. Another FluCide candidate, when given orally, resulted in 1491±37 ug/ml plasma of anti-influenza antibody, and 1151±53 when administered as IV injections. The untreated infected animals had 190±22 ug/ml antibody response, which was the weakest of all, as expected. Of significance, oseltamivir (Tamiflu) resulted in only 950±64 ug/ml level of antibody response, which was far less than the two oral FluCide groups (p-value <0.0003), and also substantially less than the two IV FluCide groups (p-value <0.04). These p-values were determined for a comparison of FluCide groups against the oseltamivir group using the most stringent parameters, viz. two-tailed, paired, t-test. A smaller p-value indicates a greater confidence that the difference in observations cannot be a result of pure chance. These data also indicated that the antibody response was stronger when FluCide was given orally rather than as IV injection.

The generation of a strong antibody response is important. We believe that the strong reduction in viral load caused by FluCide treatment allows the immune system to function normally and generate appropriate antibodies. A strong antibody response implies that the FluCide drug candidates may also be useful as prophylactic therapy of uninfected health care workers and close associates of a patient in addition to treatment of infected patients.

All of these data also clearly demonstrated that both injectable and oral FluCide™ candidates were superior to oral oseltamivir (Tamiflu®, Roche), a current standard of care for influenza, in all parameters evaluated.

No adverse effects were found, indicating that the FluCide dose could be increased further to achieve much greater levels of effectiveness.

The oral FluCide candidate development was the result of chemistry optimization program that the Company has been working on.

In September 2012, we announced that the oral FluCide™ drug candidates demonstrated dramatically improved survival in animals administered a lethal dose of the H3N2 influenza A virus. Animals treated with the oral anti-influenza nanoviricide drug candidates survived for much longer as compared to Tamiflu® treated animals.

In this H3N2 infection study, Animals treated with the best of the oral FluCide™ nanoviricide drug candidates survived 15.6 days while the animals treated with oral Tamiflu survived only 9.6 days. The control animals died within 5 days. The Company has previously reported that animals treated with these same oral anti-influenza nanoviricides protected mice infected with the H1N1 influenza A virus and were similarly substantially superior to oral oseltamivir (Tamiflu).

This is the first demonstration of efficacy of the Company’s FluCide drug candidates against a completely unrelated type of influenza A virus (viz. H3N2) in contrast to the H1N1 Influenza A virus that the Company has used for its recent development work leading to its pre-IND application with the US FDA. H3N2 influenza virus is one of the multiple sub-types of influenza A that cause seasonal epidemics. According to the CDC, influenza causes approximately 36,000 deaths every year in the U.S. alone. The Hong Kong Flu pandemic of 1968-1969, which killed an estimated one million people worldwide, was caused by a variant strain of H3N2. The Company believes an orally administered nanoviricide that protect against multiple influenza virus sub-types would be effective in season after season of influenza epidemics. Such a highly effective, broad-spectrum anti-influenza drug is widely anticipated to be highly successful.

The Company believes that the anti-influenza drug candidates it has developed are broad-spectrum, i.e. they should work against most if not all of influenza viruses. This is because, in spite of mutations and antigenic drift, all influenza viruses bind to the same cell surface receptor called sialic acid, and the Company has developed small chemical ligands that mimic this receptor, to attack the influenza viruses. These ligands are chemically attached to the Company’s polymeric micelle backbones that mimic the cell membrane, to create the nanoviricides. The Company has previously shown effectiveness of its very early anti-influenza drug candidates against two different strains of H5N1 Bird Flu virus in cell culture studies. The Company has since then improved the ligands as well as the chemistries as reported from time to time.

The Company intends to develop data about effectiveness of its drug candidates against certain unrelated influenza A viruses using both cell culture studies and animal models in a reasonable manner. These data will be needed as part of the IND application that the Company is working on. An IND application will be required for the Company to enter into human clinical trials.

20

Previously, in June 2010, the Company reported successful studies in two different cell culture models of dengue virus type 2 infection. These studies were conducted at the Prof. Eva Harris lab at the UC Berkeley. Our results were later confirmed and extended to animal studies.

The Company reported that its anti-Dengue drug candidates demonstrated significant protection in the initial animal survival studies of Dengue virus infection, in an animal study protocol modeled to simulate the ADE syndrome. The best nanoviricide drug candidates demonstrated 50% animal survival in this uniformly lethal mouse model. The studies were performed in the laboratory of Dr. Eva Harris, Professor of Infectious Diseases at the University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley).

Based on this data, the Company believes that it is feasible to develop a single nanoviricide drug against all types of dengue viruses that circumvents the primary issue of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of dengue virus infection. ADE is thought to result in severe dengue disease syndromes such as dengue shock syndrome (DSS) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF).

In June, 2010, we also reported that our anti-HIV drug candidates demonstrated efficacy in the recently completed cell culture studies using two distinctly different HIV-1 isolates. These studies were performed in the laboratory of Carol Lackman-Smith at the Southern Research Institute, Frederick, Maryland. These results corroborating our previous findings in Animal Studies. The Company had reported that its best nanoviricide drug candidate against HIV was more than 25 times superior to a three drug combo anti-HIV cocktail based on biomarker test response in all parameters tested. The parameters included improvement in human T cell populations in the animal model and reduction in HIV viral load. The Company has since performed additional studies to optimize the HIV binding ligand and has found ligands that are superior to the one that yielded these strong results. The Company now plans to deploy this new anti-HIV ligand connected to the full strength polymeric micelle that we have also optimized as a new anti-HIV nanoviricide drug candidate. We plan to test this optimized anti-HIV drug candidate in animal studies. Anti-HIV studies are extremely expensive. As such, the Company’s HIVCide program has been slowed down with the current slow financial markets.

In August 2010, we reported that our anti-HSV drug candidates exhibited almost complete inhibition of herpes simplex virus HSV-1 in cell culture studies conducted in Professor Ken Rosenthal lab at the Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy. These studies employed the H129 strain of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). H129 is an encephalitic strain that closely resembles a clinical isolate; it is known to be more virulent than classic HSV-1 laboratory strains.

In March through May 2011, the Company reported that further chemistry optimization led to dramatically improved antiviral efficacy with its optimized FluCide™ drug candidates in its most recent animal study. In the influenza mouse lethal infection model, animals treated with one of the optimized FluCide™ nanoviricide drug candidates survived beyond the stated full duration of study (21 days), and those treated with two additional drug candidates survived almost the full duration of the study. Animals in these three groups survived significantly longer (20.2 to 22.2 days) as compared to the animals treated with Oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) only 8.3 days. In addition, the post-infection treatment with these optimized FluCide™ drug candidates resulted in dramatic reduction in the number of lung lesions that are caused by a lethal influenza virus infection. Four days post virus infection, animals treated with three of the optimized FluCide™ nanoviricide drug candidates exhibited greater than 95% reduction in the number of lung lesions as compared to the infected yet untreated control animals (p-values < 0.001). In contrast, animals treated with Oseltamivir (Tamiflu®, Roche) showed only a 50% reduction. In another significant finding, no increase in the number or size of the lung lesions was observed over the entire duration of the study in the FluCide™-treated animals. This was not the case for the Oseltamivir-treated animals. This demonstrated that treatment with FluCide drug candidates provided clear and strong protection against lung damage caused by the severe influenza infection. In addition, in this study, these optimized FluCide™ drug candidates achieved 1,000-fold reduction in the levels of infectious virus in the lungs of animals with a lethal level of influenza virus infection. The amount of infectious virus in the lungs of the infected animals treated with three of the optimized FluCide™ nanoviricide drug candidates was reduced by greater than 1000-fold as compared to the infected untreated control animals (p-values < 0.001), four days after virus infection. In contrast, animals treated with Oseltamivir (Tamiflu®, Roche) showed less than a 2-fold reduction in lung viral load at the same time point. This indicated a 500-fold greater reduction in viral load by FluCide drug candidates over Oseltamivir. Of great clinical significance is the fact that 2 of the optimized FluCide™ drug candidates maintained this greatly reduced lung viral load at 7, 13 and 19 days after virus infection in this 21 day study. Thus, treatment with the optimized FluCide drug candidates appeared to protect against the complete cycle of infection, virus expansion and spread of infection in the lungs that follows the initial virus infection. This was not the case for the Oseltamivir-treated animals. Animals treated with Oseltamivir (Tamiflu®, Roche) showed less than a 2-fold reduction in lung viral load at 4 days and the viral load was increased at 7 days to the same level as that found in the infected, untreated control animals shortly before their death.

21

In September 2011, we announced that we have selected a clinical candidate, designated NV-INF-1, for FDA submission in our highly successful FluCide™ anti-influenza therapeutics program. The Company submitted a pre-IND application to the FDA for this clinical candidate and held a pre-IND meeting with the US FDA in March, 2012. In addition, the Company is planning a high strength “piggy-back infusion” dosage form for hospitalized patients with severe influenza. The Company will continue the development of these two drug candidates towards an IND, based on the guidance it received in the first pre- IND meeting.

The studies of biological testing of materials provide information that is relatively easy to understand and therefore readily reported. In addition, we continue to engage in substantial work that is needed for the optimization of synthesis routes and for the chemical characterization of the nanoviricide drug candidates. We also continue to work on improving the drug candidates and the virus binding ligands where necessary. We continue to work on creating the information needed for the development of controlled chemical synthesis procedures that is vital for developing c-GMP manufacturing processes.

We are also making progress in development of our cGMP manufacturing capability. The Company announced in May 2012 that it had appointed Mr. Andrew Hahn to help with the overall design and construction of its laboratory and cGMP pilot production facility. Mr. Hahn recently retired as the Senior Director of Engineering, Pharmaceutical Facilities, Global Engineering, at the Bristol-Myers-Squibb Company Worldwide Medicines Group (BMS). He has almost 30 years of experience in architecture, design and project management in the creation of new and refurbished facilities at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

In addition, the Company announced on October 24, 2011, that information about its novel, proprietary anti-virus platform technology has been published in the book “Bionanotechnology II: Global Prospects.” The chapter entitled “Nanoviricides - A Novel Approach to Antiviral Therapeutics” provides an in-depth presentation of the NanoViricides platform technology.

The Company also announced in May 2012 that a fundamental patent, on which the nanoviricides® technology is based, is due to be issued in the USA on May 8, 2012. The US Patent (No. 8,173,764) is granted for "Solubilization and Targeted Delivery of Drugs with Self-Assembling Amphiphilic Polymers." It was issued on May 8, 2012. The patent term is expected to last through October 1, 2028, including anticipated extensions in compensation for time spent in clinical trials. This US Patent has been allowed with a very broad range of claims to a large number of families of chemical structure compositions, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of making the same, and uses of the same. The disclosed structures enable self-assembling, biomimetic nanomedicines. NanoViricides, Inc. holds exclusive, perpetual, worldwide licenses to these technologies for a broad range of antiviral applications and diseases. The other national and regional counterparts of the international Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) application number PCT/US06/01820, which was filed in 2006,. have issued as a Singapore National Patent Publication, a South African patent, and also as an OAPI regional patent covering Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. It has also issued as a granted patent in New Zealand, China, Mexico, and Japan. Estimated expiry dates range nominally from 2026 to 2028 with various extensions accounting for delays in clinical trials. Additional issuances are expected in Europe, and in several other countries around the world. 

22

In addition, the counterparts of the international PCT application PCT/US2007/001607 have issued as a granted patent in New Zealand, OAPI, Pakistan, Australia, South Africa, and Mexico to date. Additional issuances are expected in Europe, USA, and in several other countries around the world. This patent application teaches antivirals based on the TheraCour polymeric micelle technologies, their broad structures and compositions of matter, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of making the same, and their uses. The nominal expiry dates are expected to range from 2027 to 2029.

We have taken an important step towards improving our corporate governance this year. On June 22, 2012, we appointed Mr. Stanley Glick, CPA, as an independent Director of the Company and the Chairman of its Audit Committee. Mr. Glick has over forty years of experience in his long career of providing auditing, accounting, tax, and management advisory services, to clients in various industries. Mr. Glick has been a member of several Boards of Directors for not-for-profit organizations in the Westport, CT area. In particular, he has served as a Director and member of Audit Committee of “A Better Chance” of Westport, CT, from 2000 to 2005. From 1977 until present, Mr. Glick has managed an independent practice as a Certified Public Accountant in Connecticut and New York States. Prior to forming his own CPA firm, Mr. Glick was employed by local and regional CPA firms where he performed and supervised audits and financial reporting. Mr. Glick is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, The Connecticut Society of Certified Public Accountants, and the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Baruch College of Business (now Baruch College of the City University of New York). Mr. Glick is married and lives in Trumbull, CT.

23

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein and in conjunction with the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012. Readers should carefully review the risk factors disclosed in this Form 10-K and other documents filed by the Company with the SEC.

As used in this report, the terms "Company", "we", "our", "us" and "NNVC" refer to NanoViricides, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

PRELIMINARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These include statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, which we indicate by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "will," "we believe," "NNVC believes," "management believes" and similar language. The forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of NNVC and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those set forth in the discussion under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this report. Actual results may differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We base the forward-looking statements on information currently available to us, and we assume no obligation to update them.

Investors are also advised to refer to the information in our previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in which we discuss in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historic results. It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors. As such, investors should not consider any list of such factors to be an exhaustive statement of all risks and uncertainties or potentially inaccurate assumptions.

Management’s Plan of Operation

The Company’s drug development business model was formed in May 2005 with a license to the patents and intellectual property held by TheraCour Pharma, Inc., that enabled creation of drugs engineered specifically to combat viral diseases in humans. This exclusive, perpetual, world-wide license from TheraCour Pharma serves as the foundation for our intellectual property. The Company was granted a worldwide exclusive perpetual license to this technology for several drugs with specific targeting mechanisms in perpetuity for the treatment of the following human viral diseases: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV/AIDS), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Rabies, Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), Influenza and Asian Bird Flu Virus. The Company has entered into an Additional License Agreement with TheraCour granting the Company the exclusive licenses in perpetuity for technologies developed by TheraCour for the additional virus types: Dengue viruses, Japanese Encephalitis virus, West Nile Virus, Viruses causing viral Conjunctivitis (a disease of the eye) and Ocular Herpes, and Ebola/Marburg viruses. The Company may want to add further virus types to its drug pipeline. The Company would then need to negotiate with TheraCour an amendment to the Licensing Agreement to include those of such additional viruses that the Company determines it wants to follow for further development. We are seeking to add to our existing portfolio of products through our internal discovery pre-clinical development programs and through an in-licensing strategy.

The Company intends to perform the regulatory filings and own all the regulatory licenses for the drugs it is currently developing. The Company will develop these drugs in part via subcontracts to TheraCour Pharma, Inc., the exclusive source for these nanomaterials. The Company may manufacture these drugs itself, or under subcontract arrangements with external manufacturers that carry the appropriate regulatory licenses and have appropriate capabilities. The Company intends to distribute these drugs via subcontracts with distributor companies or in partnership arrangements. The Company plans to market these drugs either on its own or in conjunction with marketing partners. The Company also plans to actively pursue co-development, as well as other licensing agreements with other Pharmaceutical companies. Such agreements may entail up-front payments, milestone payments, royalties, and/or cost sharing, profit sharing and many other instruments that may bring early revenues to the Company. Such licensing and/or co-development agreements may shape the manufacturing and development options that the company may pursue. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to enter into co-development or other licensing agreements.

24

To date, we have engaged in organizational activities; developing and sourcing compounds and preparing nano-materials; and experimentation involving preclinical studies using cell cultures and animals. Several of the Company’s drug candidates have shown excellent levels of efficacy and preliminary safety in animal studies in many different animal models against many different viruses. The Company determined that its anti-Influenza program, “FluCide™”, was the most advanced and obtained and held a pre-IND meeting with the US FDA for the same on March 29, 2012. The Company believes it has gained valuable guidance from the FDA that enables us to develop and execute a product development plan for our anti-influenza drug candidate with the goal of filing an Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the US FDA, and similar applications in other countries in the world.

As the Company’s drug candidates progress towards human clinical studies, it has become necessary to enable that they can be produced under “current Good Manufacturing Practices” (cGMP) guidelines of the US FDA, and other applicable international guidelines (such as WHO and ICH guidelines, as well as other country-specific and region-specific guidelines). In the US, the US FDA requires that at least two validated and consistent batches of the drug be produced under cGMP conditions before any human clinical trials can be allowed. Some other countries may allow research product materials for certain phases of human clinical trials. The Company’s management has studied the possibilities of contract manufacturing of its drug candidates over the last several years and has concluded that building a small pilot scale manufacturing facility where the special needs of the manufacture of its nanomedicines can be met is the most appropriate solution. This approach provides the highest level of control over the quality of the materials and also keeps the intellectual property of the Company well protected. Further, to minimize capital costs to the Company, management determined that a separate entity should be allowed to purchase the real estate, renovate, build and maintain the facilities under the Company’s direction and control. Subsequently, a separate entity, Inno-Haven, LLC (“Inno-Haven”), controlled by Anil R. Diwan, the Company’s founder, was created for this purpose. Inno-Haven purchased an 18,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing building on a 4.2 acre land lot in Shelton, Connecticut in August, 2011. The purchase and related costs were financed by Dr. Diwan through his personal savings, and the sale of NanoViricides common stock that he had acquired as a founder, that netted approximately $900,000 after expenses and income taxes. Dr. Diwan disposed of his shares in accordance with a 10b5.1 trading plan which concluded in October, 2011. Inno-Haven has also obtained additional financing from certain other unrelated parties. Inno-Haven intends to obtain additional financing from investors other than Dr. Diwan. Dr. Diwan has also agreed to provide personal guarantees for potential loans and mortgages which could be drawn for the purpose of financing the building and construction costs for the extensive renovation intended.

The Company has agreed to provide Inno-Haven the specifications and plans for the cGMP pilot facility and laboratory and office spaces that are anticipated to be built by renovating the existing building. As of date, the Company does not have a lease or other written contract agreement with Inno-Haven other than an intent, and the Company is not bound to execute on this plan if it can find a superior alternative.

The Company does not currently have any revenue. All of the Company’s products are in development stage and require require successful; development through regulatory processes before commercialization. During the development phase, we have generated funding through the issuances of debt and private placement of common stock (see Item 5 Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities), and also the sale of our registered securities. The Company does not currently have any long term debt. We have not generated any revenues and we may not be able to generate revenues in the near future. We may not be successful in developing our drugs and start selling our products when planned, or we may not become profitable in the future. We have incurred net losses in each fiscal period since inception of our operations.

25

The Company’s Drug Pipeline

We currently have, in early, active development, products against Epidemic Influenzas including the current novel H1N1/2009 “Swine flu” virus, H5N1 and other Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenzas (H5N, H7N, H9N HPAI, Bird Flu), common seasonal human Influenzas, (2) HIV (3) Eye drops against viral diseases of the eye such as conjunctivitis and keratitis, (4) Herpes virus cold sores and genital Herpes, and (5) Dengue viruses. In addition, we have research programs against Rabies virus, Ebola/Marburg family of viruses, as well as other Viral hemorrhagic fevers. We also have a research program called ADIF(™) “Accurate-Drug-In-Field”, that we believe is the only way to combat a novel viral threat right in the field before it becomes an epidemic like SARS, bird flu H5N1, Ebola, or other viral outbreak. Adenoviral Epidemic Kerato-Conjunctivitis (EKC) is a severe pink eye disease that may lead to blurry vision in certain patients after recovery. Herpes simplex viral infections cause keratitis of the eye, and severe cases of infection may sometimes necessitate corneal transplants. The Company's ability to achieve progress in the drugs in development is dependent upon available financing and upon the Company's ability to raise capital. The Company will negotiate with TheraCour to obtain licenses for additional viral diseases as necessary. However, there can be no assurance that TheraCour will agree to license these materials to the Company, or to do so on terms that are favorable to the Company.

Research and Development Costs

The Company does not maintain separate accounting line items for each project in development. The Company maintains aggregate expense records for all research and development conducted. Because at this time all of the Company’s projects share a common core material, the Company allocates expenses across all projects at each period-end for purposes of providing accounting basis for each project. Project costs are allocated based upon labor hours performed for each project.

The Company has signed several cooperative research and development agreements with different agencies and institutions The Company expects to enter into additional cooperative agreements with other governmental and non-governmental, academic, or commercial, agencies, institutions, and companies. There can be no assurance that a final agreement may be achieved and that the Company will execute any of these agreements. However, should any of these agreements materialize, the Company will implement a system to track these costs by project and account for these projects as customer-sponsored activities and show these project costs separately.

Requirement for Additional Capital

As of September 30, 2012, we have a cash and cash equivalent balance of $12,929,665 which combined with the $2,500,000 which will be obtained through the follow on sale of the Company’s Convertible Preferred Stock, will be sufficient to fund our operations through more than two years or September 30, 2014, at the Company’s current rate of expenditure.

While we now have the necessary funds based on our current operations to last more than the next 24 months, we anticipate undertaking additional expenditures to accelerate our progress to regulatory submissions. With our current funds and the follow on tranche of the June 28, 2012 sale of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, we believe that we currently have sufficient funding available to perform Toxicology Package studies, and additional animal efficacy studies, to move at least one of our drug candidates into an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”) with the US FDA. In order to file an IND application, we also need to enable manufacturing of the drug under US FDA guidelines called cGMP. We estimate that a small, 1kg/batch, production facility would be sufficient to satisfy the Company’s near future needs for supporting the FluCide clinical studies, at least through Phase II. This small batch size requirement is based on the extremely high effectiveness of the influenza clinical candidate observed in animal studies, and therefore must be treated with caution.  We intend to enter into lease negotiations with Inno-Haven, LLC (“Inno-Haven”) to enable cGMP manufacture of our drug products. Inno-Haven is managed by its member Dr. Anil R. Diwan, who is our President and Chairman. Inno-Haven raised financing from Dr. Diwan and others, including some earlier investors of NanoViricides, Inc., and has purchased an 18,000 square foot building in Shelton, CT, on a 4.2 acre lot, enabling future expansion of operations.  Dr. Diwan raised additional financing through the sale of his NanoViricides stock that he had obtained as a founder under a 10b5-1 plan that was concluded in October, 2011. Inno-Haven plans to raise the balance of financing through applicable and available loan programs such as the SBA-guaranteed bank loans and mortgages, the State of Connecticut programs for development of high tech industry, and additional investors. No lease agreement has been drawn up and the terms of lease have not yet been negotiated.

26

We anticipate that as we file an IND application, we may need an additional $10M to $15M to take one of our drug candidates through certain phases of human clinical trials.  Further additional funding, if available, will allow us to move our other drug candidates towards IND filings. These additional funds will be needed to pay for additional personnel, increased subcontract costs related to the expansion and further development of our drug pipeline, and for additional capital and operational expenditures required to file IND applications. We will accelerate our business plans provided that we can obtain such additional funding. We believe that we currently have adequate financing for our current business plan of operations.

Assuming that we are successful in raising this additional financing, we anticipate that we will incur the following additional expenses over the next 24 months.

1. Research and Development of $5,000,000: Planned costs for in-vivo and in-vitro studies for pan-influenza FluCide, Eye nanoviricide, HIVCide, HerpeCide, Dengue, and Ebola/Marburg and Rabies programs.

2. Corporate overhead of $1,250,000: This amount includes budgeted office salaries, legal, accounting, investor relations, public relations, and other costs expected to be incurred by being a public reporting company.

3. Capital costs of $1,500,000: This is the estimated cost for equipment and laboratory improvements..

4. Staffing costs of $1,500,000: This is the estimated cost of hiring additional scientific staff and consulting firms to assist with FDA compliance, material characterization, pharmaco-kinetic, pharmaco-dynamic and toxicology studies, and other items related to FDA compliance, as required for development of necessary data for filing an Investigational New Drug with the United States Food and Drug Administration.

In addition the Company anticipates estimated capital costs of $5,000,000 for infrastructure and laboratory facilities for a scaled up research pilot production facility. The Company anticipates that some of this infrastructure funding will be obtained through real estate and industrial loans and related instruments.

In March, 2010, the Company filed a Form S-3 Shelf Registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the sale from time to time of up to $40 million of the Company’s securities.  The registration statement became effective on April 29, 2010. As of September 30, 2012, the Company has drawn down $22,500,000 of the $40,000,000 S-3 Shelf Registration. In addition, on October 26, 2012, the Company has filed a new S-3 Shelf Registration Statement for $40,000,000 of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities and units comprised of those securities. We intend to combine the unused portion of the prior shelf registration for a total available Shelf Registration of $57,500,000. The Company anticipates it will have sufficient access to capital even if it decides to develop FluCide through Phase III on its own. The Company anticipates further draw downs on this S-3 Shelf Registration to fund its additional capital requirements and expenditures as required.  If we are unable to obtain additional financing, our business plan will be significantly delayed.

The Company has limited experience with pharmaceutical drug development. Thus, our budget estimates are not based on experience, but rather based on advice given by our associates and consultants. As such these budget estimates may not be accurate. In addition, the actual work to be performed is not known at this time, other than a broad outline, as is normal with any scientific work. As further work is performed, additional work may become necessary or change in plans or workload may occur. Such changes may have an adverse impact on our estimated budget. Such changes may also have an adverse impact on our projected timeline of drug development.

We believe that our current work-plan will lead us to obtain certain information about the safety and efficacy of some of the drugs under development in animal models. If our studies are not successful, we will have to develop additional drug candidates and perform further studies. If our studies are successful, then we expect to be able to undertake further studies in animal models to obtain necessary data regarding the pharmaco-kinetic and pharmaco-dynamic profiles of our drug candidates. We believe these data will then enable us to file an Investigational New Drug (IND) application, towards the goal of obtaining FDA approval for testing the drugs in human patients.

Most pharmaceutical companies expect 4 to 10 years of study to be required before a drug candidate reaches the IND stage. We believe that because we are working in the infectious agents area, our studies will have objective response end points, and most of our studies will be of relatively short durations. Our business plan is based on these assumptions. If we find that we have underestimated the time duration of our studies, or we have to undertake additional studies, due to various reasons within or outside of our control, this will grossly and adversely impact both our timelines and our financing requirements.

27

Management intends to use capital and debt financing, as required, to fund the Company’s operations. Management also intends to pursue non-diluting funding sources such as government grants and contracts as well as licensing agreements with other pharmaceutical companies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the additional capital resources necessary to fund its anticipated obligations beyond September 30, 2014. The Company currently has no long term debt.

The Company is considered to be a development stage company and will continue in the development stage until it generates revenues from the sales of its products or services.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We currently have no foreign operations and are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our short term cash equivalent investments, which the Company deems to be non-material. The Company does not have any financial instruments held for trading or other speculative purposes and does not invest in derivative financial instruments, interest rate swaps or other investments that alter interest rate exposure. The Company does not have any credit facilities with variable interest rates.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Management has designed our disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), we have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012.

(a) Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by the Annual Report on Form 10-K our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. Since the Company is not listed on a national exchange or on an automated interdealer quotation system, it is not required to have an audit committee or independent directors. We consider this to be a material weakness. The Company has addressed this issue by establishing an Audit Committee and appointing an independent director having financial expertise.

28

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a- 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We recognize that because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012. To evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Framework”). Based on its evaluation under theInternal Control - Evaluation Framework, due to the material weakness described above, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2012. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Board in the normal course of their duties.

Based on its evaluation under the Internal Control - Evaluation Framework, due to the material weakness described above, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2012.

The material weakness relates to a lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of outside directors on the Company’s Board during the period of the evaluation. We have initiated measures to remediate the identified material weakness by establishing a formal audit committee and the appointment of an additional outside director.

During the period ended June 30, 2009, the Company implemented additional segregation of responsibilities and authorizations for initiating, authorizing and recording transactions. In addition, the Company has engaged the services of a financial consultant to assist in reviewing significant transactions and the Company’s quarterly and annual financial statements. In June 2012, Company appointed an Independent Director who also is the Chair of our Audit Committee to further strengthen our internal controls.

b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

Other than as described above, there were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a- 15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred as of September 30, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

29

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may be a party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business in addition to those described below. We do not, however, expect such other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

On or around April 13, 2012, the Nevada Agency and Transfer Company, as agent for service of process for the Company in Nevada, was served with a Summons and Complaint in the case entitled Yidam, Ltd. v. Eugene Seymour, Anil Diwan, and Nanoviricides, Inc. ((Case No. A-12-659535-B) answerable in the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada – Clark County (“Court”). The Complaint seeks to compel inspection of the Company’s books and records. On or about May 2, 2012, we filed a Demand for Security of Costs. Upon filing of the Demand, proceedings relative to the Company are stayed pending posting of the demanded security (or plaintiff engages in motion practice about the Demand).  The Company may seek dismissal of the complaint if plaintiff has not posted the demanded security (or engaged the court). The Complaint further seeks unspecified “injunctive relief” in furtherance of the demand for inspection to which the Company believes it is not entitled. The Complaint, by a holder of less than 1 percent of the common stock of the Company, seeks to, inter alia, inspect documents and records of the company to which it is not entitled and in a form and manner the Company argues is not authorized by statute. On or July 18, 2012, the Plaintiff moved to amend its answer. On or about August 8, 2012, 2012, we filed our opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On or September 13, 2012 the court granted the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend. On or about September 17, 2012 the Plaintiff served its “Second Amended Shareholder Derivative Complaint” upon our Counsel in Nevada. As in the prior two complaints that this Plaintiff has filed in this action, this Second Amended Complaint seeks to compel inspection of the Company’s books and records, seeks injunctive relief, an accounting and alleges breach of Fiduciary by Dr. Seymour and Dr. Diwan. On or about October 11, 2012, we filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Management believes that this lawsuit has no merit or basis and intends to vigorously defend it. Specific monetary damages have not been claimed and as a result no accrual has been made in relation to this litigation.

There are no other legal proceedings against the Company to the best of the Company’s knowledge as of the date hereof and to the Company’s knowledge, no action, suit or proceeding has been threatened against the Company.

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

In August, 2012, the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) was granted warrants to purchase 60,000 shares of common stock at $0.68 per share expiring in August, 2016.  These warrants were valued at $40,800 and recorded as consulting expense.

For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 30,931 shares of its common stock with a restrictive legend for consulting services. The Company recorded an expense of $18,000.

The securities described above were offered and sold in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The agreements executed in connection with this sale contain representations to support the Registrant’s reasonable belief that the Investor had access to information concerning the Registrant’s operations and financial condition, the Investor acquired the securities for their own account and not with a view to the distribution thereof in the absence of an effective registration statement or an applicable exemption from registration, and that the Investor are sophisticated within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and are “accredited investors” (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act). In addition, the issuances did not involve any public offering; the Registrant made no solicitation in connection with the sale other than communications with the Investor; the Registrant obtained representations from the Investor regarding their investment intent, experience and sophistication; and the Investor either received or had access to adequate information about the Registrant in order to make an informed investment decision.  The Company has not utilized an underwriter for an offering of its securities, except in the recent financing completed on June 28, 2012, with Seaside 88, LP, wherein Midtown Capital Partners, LLC were engaged as placement agent for the Company’s securities sold in the offering.

30

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)    Exhibit index

Exhibit
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive and Interim Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer  required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b)  Reports on Form 8-K.  During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012, the Company filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K:

None

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: November 19, 2012

NANOVIRICIDES, INC.

/s/ Eugene Seymour, MD

Name:  Eugene Seymour, M.D.

Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Interim

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Anil Diwan

Name:  Anil Diwan

Title:  President and Chairman of the Board of Directors

31