UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___ to ___.
Commission file number: 1-33266
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 20-5639997 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) | |
| | |
| 1100 Louisiana, 10th Floor | |
| Houston, Texas 77002 | |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code) | |
| | |
| (713) 381-6500 | |
| (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) | |
| | |
| | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
There were 20,301,571 common units of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. outstanding at August 1, 2007. These common units trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “DEP.”
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | Page No. |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION. |
Item 1. | Financial Statements. | |
| Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | 2 |
| Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations | |
| and Comprehensive Income | 3 |
| Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows | 5 |
| Unaudited Condensed Statement of Consolidated Partners’ Equity | 7 |
| Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: | |
| 1. Background and Basis of Financial Statement Presentation | 8 |
| 2. General Accounting Policies and Related Matters | 10 |
| 3. Financial Instruments | 12 |
| 4. Inventories | 13 |
| 5. Property, Plant and Equipment | 13 |
| 6. Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliate | 14 |
| 7. Intangible Assets | 14 |
| 8. Debt Obligations | 15 |
| 9. Parent Interest in Subsidiaries | 17 |
| 10. Partners’ Equity and Distributions | 17 |
| 11. Business Segments | 19 |
| 12. Related Party Transactions | 23 |
| 13. Earnings Per Unit | 26 |
| 14. Commitments and Contingencies | 27 |
| 15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information | 29 |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition | |
| and Results of Operations. | 30 |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. | 51 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. | 52 |
| | |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. | 53 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. | 53 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. | 53 |
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities. | 53 |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Unit Holders. | 53 |
Item 5. | Other Information. | 53 |
Item 6. | Exhibits. | 53 |
| | |
Signatures | 55 |
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
Item 1. Financial Statements.
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(See Note 1 for Basis of Financial Statement Presentation)
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | June 30, | December 31, |
ASSETS | 2007 | 2006 |
Current assets: | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ 5,996 | $ -- |
| Accounts receivable - trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | | |
| | of $50 at June 30, 2007 and $402 at December 31, 2006 | 84,017 | 71,776 |
| Accounts receivable – related parties | 7,151 | -- |
| Inventories | | 8,564 | 13,538 |
| Prepaid and other current assets | 964 | 792 |
| | | Total current assets | 106,692 | 86,106 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 792,271 | 707,649 |
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliate | 3,641 | 3,391 |
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,277 at | | |
| June 30, 2007 and $1,161 at December 31, 2006 | 6,850 | 6,966 |
Other assets | 332 | -- |
Total assets | $ 909,786 | $ 804,112 |
| | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | |
Current liabilities: | | |
| Accounts payable – trade | $ 11,333 | $ 702 |
| Accounts payable – related parties | 26,945 | -- |
| Accrued gas payables | 77,256 | 62,571 |
| Accrued costs and expenses | 58 | 5,093 |
| Accrued interest | 118 | -- |
| Other current liabilities | 7,858 | 9,263 |
| | | Total current liabilities | 123,568 | 77,629 |
Long-term debt (see Note 8) | 190,000 | -- |
Other long-term liabilities | 951 | 686 |
Parent interest in subsidiaries (see Note 9) | 270,802 | -- |
Commitments and contingencies | -- | -- |
Partners’ equity: | | |
| Limited partners (20,301,571 common units outstanding at June 30, 2007) | 324,038 | -- |
| General partner | 674 | -- |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | (247) | -- |
| Owners’ net investment – predecessor | -- | 725,797 |
| | | Total partners’ equity | 324,465 | 725,797 |
| | | Total liabilities and partners’ equity | $ 909,786 | $ 804,112 |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(See Note 1 for Basis of Financial Statement Presentation)
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
| | Duncan Energy |
| Duncan Energy Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues: | | |
Third parties | $ 153,566 | $ 117,642 |
Related parties | 83,330 | 103,707 |
Total (see Note 11) | 236,896 | 221,349 |
Costs and expenses: | | |
Operating costs and expenses: | | |
Third parties | 210,327 | 196,947 |
Related parties | 12,384 | 11,455 |
Total operating costs and expenses | 222,711 | 208,402 |
General and administrative costs: | | |
Third parties | 480 | 9 |
Related parties | 546 | 950 |
Total general and administrative costs | 1,026 | 959 |
Total costs and expenses | 223,737 | 209,361 |
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate | 114 | 200 |
Operating income | 13,273 | 12,188 |
Other income (expense): | | |
Interest expense | (2,410) | -- |
Interest income | 229 | -- |
Other, net | -- | -- |
Other expense | (2,181) | -- |
Income before provision for income taxes, parent interest in the income | | |
of subsidiaries and the cumulative effect of a change in | | |
accounting principle | 11,092 | 12,188 |
Provision for income taxes | 59 | (21) |
Income before parent interest in income of subsidiaries and the | | |
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 11,151 | 12,167 |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (6,603) | -- |
Income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 4,548 | 12,167 |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | -- | -- |
Net income | 4,548 | 12,167 |
Change in fair value of commodity financial instruments | (214) | 54 |
Comprehensive income | $ 4,334 | $ 12,221 |
| | |
Net income allocation: (see Note 13) | | |
Limited partners’ interest in net income | $ 4,457 | |
General partner interest in net income | 91 | |
| | |
Earnings per unit: (see Note 13) | | |
Basic and diluted income per unit | $ 0.22 | |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(See Note 1 for Basis of Financial Statement Presentation)
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues: | | | |
Third parties | $ 245,060 | $ 42,657 | $ 296,500 |
Related parties | 125,710 | 24,017 | 207,291 |
Total (see Note 11) | 370,770 | 66,674 | 503,791 |
Costs and expenses: | | | |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | |
Third parties | 330,405 | 58,038 | 453,936 |
Related parties | 16,737 | 3,149 | 24,650 |
Total operating costs and expenses | 347,142 | 61,187 | 478,586 |
General and administrative costs: | | | |
Third parties | 613 | 22 | 32 |
Related parties | 770 | 455 | 1,703 |
Total general and administrative costs | 1,383 | 477 | 1,735 |
Total costs and expenses | 348,525 | 61,664 | 480,321 |
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate | 160 | 25 | 354 |
Operating income | 22,405 | 5,035 | 23,824 |
Other income (expense): | | | |
Interest expense | (3,541) | -- | -- |
Interest income | 373 | -- | -- |
Other, net | -- | -- | 4 |
Other expense | (3,168) | -- | 4 |
Income before provision for income taxes, parent interest in the income | | | |
of subsidiaries and the cumulative effect of a change in | | | |
accounting principle | 19,237 | 5,035 | 23,828 |
Provision for income taxes | (114) | -- | (21) |
Income before parent interest in income of subsidiaries and the | | | |
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 19,123 | 5,035 | 23,807 |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (10,652) | -- | -- |
Income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | 8,471 | 5,035 | 23,807 |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (see Note 2) | -- | -- | 9 |
Net income | 8,471 | 5,035 | 23,816 |
Change in fair value of commodity financial instruments | (247) | -- | (18) |
Comprehensive income | $ 8,224 | $ 5,035 | $ 23,798 |
| | | |
Net income allocation: (see Note 13) | | | |
Limited partners’ interest in net income | $ 8,302 | | |
General partner interest in net income | 169 | | |
| | | |
Earnings per unit: (see Note 13) | | | |
Basic and diluted income per unit | $ 0.41 | | |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(See Note 1 for Basis of Financial Statement Presentation)
(Dollars in thousands)
| | Duncan Energy |
| Duncan Energy Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Operating activities: | | |
Net income | $ 4,548 | $ 12,167 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows | | |
provided by operating activities: | | |
| Depreciation, amortization and accretion | | |
| in operating costs and expenses | 7,203 | 5,308 |
| Depreciation and amortization in general | | |
| and administrative costs | 60 | -- |
| Amortization in interest expense | 32 | -- |
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate | (114) | (200) |
| Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | -- | -- |
| Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | 6,603 | -- |
| Gain on sale of assets | -- | (6) |
| Deferred income tax expense | 83 | 21 |
| Changes in fair market value of financial instruments | 1 | -- |
| Net effect of changes in operating accounts (see Note 15) | (2,217) | 6,396 |
Net cash flows provided by operating activities | 16,199 | 23,686 |
Investing activities: | | |
Capital expenditures | (34,434) | (19,202) |
Contributions in aid of construction costs | 134 | 369 |
Proceeds from sale of assets | -- | 6 |
Advances to unconsolidated affiliate | (13) | (3) |
Cash used in investing activities | (34,313) | (18,830) |
Financing activities: | | |
Repayments of debt | (25,000) | -- |
Borrowings under debt agreements | 46,000 | -- |
Net contributions from Parent to subsidiaries | 4,896 | -- |
Adjustment to net proceeds from initial public offering | (828) | -- |
Net cash contributions from and distributions | | |
to owners – predecessor (see Note 2) | -- | (4,856) |
Distributions paid to partners | (5,055) | -- |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 20,013 | (4,856) |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 1,899 | -- |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 4,097 | -- |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period (see Note 2) | $ 5,996 | $ -- |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(See Note 1 for Basis of Financial Statement Presentation)
(Dollars in thousands)
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ 8,471 | $ 5,035 | $ 23,816 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows | | | |
provided by operating activities: | | | |
| Depreciation, amortization and accretion | | | |
| in operating costs and expenses | 11,718 | 2,209 | 10,149 |
| Depreciation and amortization in general | | | |
| and administrative costs | 60 | -- | -- |
| Amortization in interest expense | 53 | -- | -- |
| Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate | (160) | (25) | (354) |
| Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | -- | -- | (9) |
| Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | 10,652 | -- | -- |
| Gain on sale of assets | (2) | -- | (13) |
| Deferred income tax expense | 62 | -- | 21 |
| Changes in fair market value of financial instruments | (1) | -- | (53) |
| Net effect of changes in operating accounts (see Note 15) | 34,042 | (10,754) | (6,681) |
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities | 64,895 | (3,535) | 26,876 |
Investing activities: | | | |
Capital expenditures | (82,914) | (5,348) | (33,564) |
Contributions in aid of construction costs | 288 | 349 | 383 |
Proceeds from sale of assets | 2 | -- | 13 |
Advances to unconsolidated affiliate | (64) | -- | (59) |
Cash used in investing activities | (82,688) | (4,999) | (33,227) |
Financing activities: | | | |
Repayments of debt | (56,000) | -- | -- |
Borrowings under debt agreements | 246,000 | -- | -- |
Debt issuance costs | (510) | -- | -- |
Distributions paid to Parent at time of initial public offering | (459,551) | -- | -- |
Net contributions from Parent to subsidiaries | 7,858 | -- | -- |
Net proceeds from issuance of common units | 291,044 | -- | -- |
Net cash contributions from and distributions | | | |
to owners – predecessor (see Note 2) | -- | 8,534 | 6,351 |
Distributions paid to partners | (5,055) | -- | -- |
Cash provided by financing activities | 23,786 | 8,534 | 6,351 |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 5,993 | -- | -- |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 3 | -- | -- |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period (see Note 2) | $ 5,996 | $ -- | $ -- |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED PARTNERS’ EQUITY
(See Note 1 for Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Note 10 for Unit History)
(Dollars in thousands)
| | Duncan | | | | |
| | Energy | | | | |
| | Partners | | | | |
| | Predecessor | Duncan Energy Partners | |
| | Owners’ | Limited | | | |
| | Net | Partner | General | | |
| | Investment | Interests | Partner | AOCI | Total |
Balance, December 31, 2006 | $ 725,797 | | | | $ 725,797 |
| Net income – January 1, 2007 to January 31, 2007 | 5,035 | | | | 5,035 |
| Net cash contribution from owners | 8,534 | | | | 8,534 |
| Non-cash contribution from owners | 6 | | | | 6 |
Balance, January 31, 2007 | 739,372 | | | | 739,372 |
| Adjustment for Predecessor liabilities not | | | | | |
| transferred to Duncan Energy Partners | 2,664 | | | | 2,664 |
| Retention by Parent of 34% ownership interest | | | | | |
| in certain operating subsidiaries | (252,292) | | | | (252,292) |
| Allocation of Predecessor equity to Parent in exchange | | | | | |
| for 5,351,571 common units of Duncan Energy Partners and | | | | | |
| general partner interest | (489,744) | $ 479,948 | $ 9,796 | $ -- | -- |
| Net proceeds from issuance of 14,950,000 common units | | | | | |
| to public at initial public offering | -- | 291,044 | -- | -- | 291,044 |
| Cash distribution to Parent at time of initial public offering | -- | (450,360) | (9,191) | -- | (459,551) |
Balance after completion of initial public offering | | | | | |
and related transactions | -- | 320,632 | 605 | -- | 321,237 |
| Net income – February 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007 | -- | 8,302 | 169 | -- | 8,471 |
| Amortization of Equity Awards | -- | 58 | 1 | -- | 59 |
| Distributions | -- | (4,954) | (101) | -- | (5,055) |
| Change in fair value of commodity financial instruments - | | | | | |
| February 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007 | -- | -- | -- | (247) | (247) |
Balance, June 30, 2007 | $ -- | $ 324,038 | $ 674 | $ (247) | $ 324,465 |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Background and Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
Significant Relationships Referenced in these Notes
Duncan Energy Partners L.P. did not own any assets prior to February 5, 2007, which was the date it completed its initial public offering of common units. The business and operations of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. prior to February 5, 2007 are referred to as “Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor” or “Predecessor.” Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Partnership” or “Duncan Energy Partners” are intended to mean the business and operations of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries since February 5, 2007. When used in a historical context (i.e. prior to February 5, 2007), these terms are intended to mean the combined business and operations of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. For financial reporting purposes, the effective date of the closing of our initial public offering and related transactions was February 1, 2007.
References to “DEP GP” mean DEP Holdings, LLC, which is our general partner. |
References to “DEP Operating Partnership” mean DEP Operating Partnership, L.P., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Duncan Energy Partners that conducts substantially all of its business.
References to “Enterprise Products Partners” mean Enterprise Products Partners L.P., which owns 100% of Enterprise Products Operating LLC.
References to “EPO” mean Enterprise Products Operating LLC (as successor in interest by merger to Enterprise Products Operating L.P.), which is our Parent, and its consolidated subsidiaries. EPO has a controlling interest in the Partnership’s general partner and is a significant owner of the Partnership’s common units.
References to “Enterprise Products GP” mean Enterprise Products GP, LLC, the general partner of Enterprise Products Partners.
References to “Enterprise GP Holdings” mean Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., which owns Enterprise Products GP.
References to “EPE Holdings” mean EPE Holdings, LLC, which is the general partner of Enterprise GP Holdings.
References to “TEPPCO” mean TEPPCO Partners, L.P., a publicly traded affiliate, the units of which are listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “TPP.” References to “TEPPCO GP” refer to Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, which is the general partner of TEPPCO and is wholly owned by Enterprise GP Holdings.
References to “EPCO” mean EPCO, Inc., which is a related party affiliate to all of the foregoing named entities.
All of the aforementioned entities are affiliates and under common control of Dan L. Duncan, the Chairman and controlling shareholder of EPCO.
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
Our results of operations since the completion of our initial public offering are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year.
8
Except per unit amounts, or as noted within the context of each footnote disclosure, dollar amounts presented in the tabular data within these footnote disclosures are stated in thousands of dollars.
The financial information and related notes included under this Item 1 that pertain to periods prior to our initial public offering reflect the assets, liabilities and operations contributed to us by EPO at the closing of our initial public offering on February 5, 2007. We refer to these historical assets, liabilities and operations as the assets, liabilities and operations of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. We have elected February 1, 2007 as the effective closing date for financial accounting and reporting purposes with respect to Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor.
The financial information of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor reflects EPO’s historical ownership of these assets, liabilities and operations. The principal business entities included in the historical combined financial statements of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor are (on a 100% basis): (i) Mont Belvieu Caverns, LLC (“Mont Belvieu Caverns”), a Delaware limited liability company; (ii) Acadian Gas, LLC (“Acadian Gas”), a Delaware limited liability company; (iii) Enterprise Lou-Tex Propylene Pipeline L.P. (“Lou-Tex Propylene”), a Delaware limited partnership, including its general partner; (iv) Sabine Propylene Pipeline L.P. (“Sabine Propylene”), a Delaware limited partnership, including its general partner; and (v) South Texas NGL Pipelines, LLC (“South Texas NGL”), a Delaware limited liability company. EPO contributed a 66% equity interest in each of these five entities to us on February 5, 2007. EPO retained the remaining 34% equity interests in each of these subsidiaries.
We have presented our results of operations following the completion of our initial public offering separately from those pertaining to Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. We acquired substantially all of the assets and operations of the Predecessor that are included in our consolidated financial statements. There are a number of agreements and other items that went into effect at the time of our initial public offering that affect the comparability of our current operating results with the historical operating results of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. These differences include:
• | the fees we charge EPO for underground storage services at the facility owned by Mont Belvieu Caverns increased as a result of new agreements executed in connection with our initial public offering; |
• | all storage well measurement gains and losses relating to Mont Belvieu Caverns’ facility are now retained by EPO; |
• | Mont Belvieu Caverns now makes a special allocation of operational measurement gains and losses to EPO; and |
• | the transportation revenues recorded by Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine Propylene decreased after our initial public offering due to the assignment of certain exchange agreements to us by EPO. |
In our opinion, the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary for fair presentation. Although we believe the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC.”) These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (Commission File No. 1-33266).
Overview of Business
Duncan Energy Partners is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership, the common units of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “DEP.” The Partnership was formed by Enterprise Products Partners in September 2006 to acquire, own and operate a
9
diversified portfolio of midstream energy assets. We are owned 98% by our limited partners and 2% by our general partner, DEP GP, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of EPO. DEP GP is responsible for managing all of our operations and activities. EPCO provides all employees and certain administrative services for us.
On February 5, 2007, the Partnership completed its initial public offering of 14,950,000 common units (including an overallotment amount of 1,950,000 common units) at a price of $21.00 per unit, which generated net proceeds to the Partnership of $291.0 million. As consideration for assets contributed and reimbursement for capital expenditures related to these assets, the Partnership distributed $260.6 million of these net proceeds to EPO, along with $198.9 million in borrowings under its revolving credit facility and a final amount of 5,351,571 common units of the Partnership. The Partnership used $38.5 million of net proceeds from the overallotment to redeem 1,950,000 of the 7,301,571 common units it had originally issued to EPO, resulting in the final amount of 5,351,571 common units beneficially owned by EPO.
The following is a brief description of the operations contributed to us by EPO on February 5, 2007:
• | Mont Belvieu Caverns owns and operates salt dome caverns and a brine system located in Mont Belvieu, Texas. |
• | Acadian Gas gathers, transports, stores and markets natural gas in Louisiana utilizing over 1,000 miles of high-pressure transmission lines and lateral and gathering lines with an aggregate throughput capacity of one billion cubic feet per day (the “Acadian Gas System”), including a 27-mile pipeline owned by its unconsolidated affiliate Evangeline Gas Pipeline L.P. (“Evangeline”) and a leased storage cavern with three billion cubic feet of storage capacity. |
• | Lou-Tex Propylene owns a 263-mile pipeline used to transport chemical-grade propylene from Sorrento, Louisiana to Mont Belvieu, Texas. |
• | Sabine Propylene owns a 21-mile pipeline used to transport polymer-grade propylene from Port Arthur, Texas to a pipeline interconnect in Cameron Parish, Louisiana on a transport-or-pay basis. |
• | South Texas NGL owns a 220-mile pipeline extending from Corpus Christi, Texas to Pasadena, Texas that was purchased by EPO from a third party in August 2006 for $97.7 million. Beginning in January 2007, this pipeline (together with other pipelines constructed, leased or acquired since August 2006) commenced transportation of NGLs from two of EPO’s processing facilities located in South Texas to Mont Belvieu, Texas. Collectively, these pipelines are referred to as the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System. |
EPO has owned controlling interests in and operated the underlying assets of, Mont Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine Propylene for several years. On February 5, 2007, DEP Operating Partnership (the primary operating subsidiary of the Partnership) directly or indirectly assumed such operating responsibilities.
EPO may contribute or sell other equity interests in its subsidiaries or other of its or its subsidiaries’ assets to the Partnership and use the proceeds it receives to fund its capital spending program. EPO has no obligation or commitment to make such contributions or sales to the Partnership.
Note 2. General Accounting Policies and Related Matters
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Prior to our initial public offering in February 2007, we operated within the EPO cash management program. For purposes of presentation in the Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, cash flows received (or used) in financing activities represent transfers of excess
10
cash from us to our prior owners equal to net cash flow provided by operating activities less cash used in investing activities. Such transfers of excess cash are shown as distributions to owners on our Unaudited Condensed Statement of Partners’ Equity prior to February 2007. Conversely, if cash used in investing activities is greater than net cash flow provided by operating activities, then a deemed contribution by owners was reflected. As a result, our financial statements prior to February 2007 do not present cash balances. Following our initial public offering, we ceased participation in the EPO cash management program and maintain our cash balances separately from affiliates.
Cash and cash equivalents represent unrestricted cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months from the date of purchase.
Our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows are prepared using the indirect method. The indirect method derives net cash flows from operating activities by adjusting net income to remove (i) the effects of all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments, such as changes during the period in inventory, deferred income and similar transactions, (ii) the effects of all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and cash payments, such as changes during the period in receivables and payables, (iii) the effects of all items classified as investing or financing cash flows, such as gains or losses on sale of property, plant and equipment or extinguishment of debt, and (iv) other non-cash amounts such as depreciation, amortization and changes in the fair market value of financial instruments.
Consolidation Policy
We evaluate our financial interests in business enterprises to determine if they represent variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary. If such criteria are met, we consolidate the financial statements of such businesses with those of our own. Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling interest, after the elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions.
If an investee is organized as a limited partnership or limited liability company and maintains separate ownership accounts, we account for our investment using the equity method if our ownership interest is between 3% and 50% and we exercise significant influence over the investee’s operating and financial policies. For all other types of investments, we apply the equity method of accounting if our ownership interest is between 20% and 50% and we exercise significant influence over the investee’s operating and financial policies. Our proportionate share of profits and losses from transactions with our equity method unconsolidated affiliate are eliminated in consolidation and remain on our balance sheet (or those of our equity method investee) in inventory or similar accounts.
To the extent applicable, we would also consolidate other entities and ventures in which we possess a controlling financial interest as well as partnership interests where we are the sole general partner of the partnership. If our ownership interest in an investee does not provide us with either control or significant influence over the investee, we would account for the investment using the cost method.
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
We recognized, as a nominal benefit, the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $9 thousand in January 2006 due to the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.”
Estimates
Preparing our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates.
11
Income Taxes
We are organized as a pass-through entity for income tax purposes. As a result, our partners are responsible for federal income taxes on their share of our taxable income. Our provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2007 reflects a credit of $59 thousand and was $21 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Our provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is $114 thousand and $21 thousand, respectively. The provision for income taxes is applicable to state tax obligations under the Texas Margin Tax.
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” we recognize the tax effects of any uncertain tax positions we may adopt, if the position taken by us is more likely than not sustainable. If a tax position meets such criteria, the tax effect to be recognized by us would be the largest amount of benefit with more than a 50% chance of being realized upon settlement. This guidance was effective January 1, 2007, and our adoption of this guidance had no material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Developments
SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and we will be required to adopt SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. We do not believe SFAS 157 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows since we already apply its basic concepts in measuring fair values used to record various transactions such as business combinations and asset acquisitions.
SFAS 159, “Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” permits entities to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected would be reported in net income. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to draw comparisons between the different measurements attributes the company elects for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not believe SFAS 159 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Note 3. Financial Instruments
In addition to its natural gas transportation business, Acadian Gas engages in the purchase and sale of natural gas. The price of natural gas fluctuates in response to changes in supply, market uncertainty, and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Acadian Gas may enter into risk management transactions to manage price risk, basis risk, physical risk or other risks related to its commodity positions on both a short-term (less than 30 days) and a long-term basis, not to exceed 24 months.
Acadian Gas may use commodity financial instruments such as futures, swaps and forward contracts to mitigate such risks. In general, the types of risks Acadian Gas attempts to hedge are those related to the variability of its future earnings and cash flows resulting from changes in applicable commodity prices. The commodity financial instruments that Acadian Gas utilizes may be settled in cash or with another financial instrument. As a matter of policy, Acadian Gas does not use financial instruments for speculative (or “trading”) purposes.
Acadian Gas enters into a small number of cash flow hedges in connection with its purchase of natural gas held-for-sale. In addition, Acadian Gas enters into a limited number of offsetting financial instruments that effectively fix the price of natural gas for certain of its customers.
12
The fair value of the Acadian Gas commodity financial instrument portfolio was a liability of $307 thousand at June 30, 2007 and a negligible amount at December 31, 2006. We recorded a gain of $53 thousand and loss of $260 thousand related to our commodity financial instruments during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We also recorded losses of $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note 4. Inventories
Our inventory consists of natural gas volumes valued at the lower of average cost or market. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the value of our natural gas inventory was $8.6 million and $13.5 million, respectively.
Operating costs and expenses, as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income included cost of sales amounts related to the sale of natural gas inventory. Our costs of sales were $202.7 million and $189.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We recorded costs of sales of $368.9 million and $442.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As a result of fluctuating market conditions, we recognize lower of average cost or market (“LCM”) adjustments when the historical cost of our inventory exceeds its net realizable value. These non-cash adjustments are recorded as a component of cost of sales. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized LCM adjustments of approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. No LCM adjustments were required during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006.
Note 5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Our property, plant and equipment values and accumulated depreciation balances were as follows at the dates indicated:
| Estimated Useful | June 30, | December 31, |
| Life in Years | 2007 | 2006 |
Natural gas and petrochemical pipelines | | | |
and related equipment (1) | 3-35 (4) | $ 404,332 | $ 350,360 |
Underground storage wells and related assets (2) | 5-35 (5) | 345,878 | 324,685 |
NGL pipelines and related equipment | 5-35 (6) | 133,181 | 98,148 |
Transportation equipment (3) | 3-10 | 1,302 | 1,240 |
Land | | 17,734 | 15,809 |
Construction in progress | | 47,869 | 61,839 |
Total | | 950,296 | 852,081 |
Less accumulated depreciation | | 158,025 | 144,432 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | $ 792,271 | $ 707,649 |
| | | |
(1) Includes natural gas and petrochemical pipelines, office furniture and equipment, buildings, and related assets. (2) Underground storage facilities include underground product storage caverns and related assets such as pipes and compressors. (3) Transportation equipment includes vehicles and similar assets used in our operations. (4) In general, the estimated useful lives of major components of this category are: pipelines, 18-35 years (with some equipment at 5 years); office furniture and equipment, 3-20 years; and buildings 20-35 years. (5) In general, the estimated useful life of underground storage facilities is 20-35 years (with some components at 5 years). (6) In general, the estimated useful life of NGL pipelines will be 20-35 years (with some equipment at 5 years). |
Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $7.2 million, and $5.3 million, respectively. For the five months ended June 30, 2007, one month ended January 31, 2007 and six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded depreciation expense of $11.7 million, 2.2 million, and $10.1 million, respectively. We capitalized $0.8 million and $0.3 million of interest in connection with
13
capital projects during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $1.7 million and $0.7 million during the five months ended June 30, 2007 and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
The initial phase of the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System was placed in service in January 2007. This event resulted in the reclassification of associated construction-in-progress amounts to NGL pipelines and related equipment (as shown in the preceding table).
Note 6. Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliate
Acadian Gas, through a wholly owned subsidiary, owns a collective 49.51% equity interest in Evangeline, which consists of a 45% direct ownership interest in Evangeline Gas Pipeline Company, L.P. (“EGP”) and a 45.05% direct interest in Evangeline Gas Corp. (“EGC”). EGC also owns a 10% direct interest in EGP. Third parties own the remaining equity interests in EGP and EGC.
Evangeline owns a 27-mile natural gas pipeline system extending from Taft, Louisiana to Westwego, Louisiana that connects three electric generation stations owned by Entergy Louisiana. Evangeline’s most significant contract is a 21-year natural gas sales agreement with Entergy. Acadian Gas does not have a controlling interest in the Evangeline entities, but does exercise significant influence on Evangeline’s operating policies. Acadian Gas accounts for its financial investment in Evangeline using the equity method.
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the carrying value of our investment in Evangeline was $3.6 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income reflect equity earnings from Evangeline of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income reflect equity earnings from Evangeline of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Our investment in Evangeline is classified within our Natural Gas Pipelines & Services business segment.
Summarized Financial Information of Unconsolidated Affiliate
The following table presents unaudited summarized income statement data of Evangeline for the periods indicated (on a 100% basis):
| | | For the Three Months | For the Six Months |
| | | Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, |
| | | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 |
Revenues | $ 78,733 | $ 75,581 | $ 131,107 | $ 156,123 |
Operating income (loss) | 1,667 | 1,970 | 3,270 | 3,911 |
Net income (loss) | 230 | 404 | 374 | 718 |
Note 7. Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets represent the value attributable to renewable storage contracts with various customers. We acquired these assets in connection with the purchase of storage caverns from a third party in January 2002. Due to the renewable nature of the underlying contracts, we amortize our intangible assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated remaining economic life of the storage assets to which they relate. We classify these intangible assets within our NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services business segment (see Note 11).
The gross value of these intangible assets was $8.1 million at inception. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the carrying value of these intangible assets was $6.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively. We recorded $58 thousand of amortization expense associated with these intangible assets during each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. For the six month periods ended
14
June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recorded $116 thousand of amortization expense associated with these intangible assets. For the remainder of 2007, we estimate that the amortization expense associated with these intangible assets will be $116 thousand.
Note 8. Debt Obligations
On February 5, 2007, we entered into a $300.0 million revolving credit facility having a $30.0 million sublimit for Swingline loans. We may also issue up to $300.0 million of letters of credit under this facility. Letters of credit outstanding under this facility reduce the amount available for borrowings. At the closing of our initial public offering, we made an initial draw of $200.0 million under this facility to fund the $198.9 million cash distribution to EPO and the remainder to pay debt issuance costs. At June 30, 2007, the balance outstanding under this facility was $190 million.
This credit facility matures in February 2011 and will be used by us in the future to fund working capital and other capital requirements and for general partnership purposes. We may make up to two requests for one-year extensions of the maturity date (subject to certain restrictions). The revolving credit facility is also available to help fund distributions. We can increase the borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, without consent of the lenders, by an amount not to exceed $150.0 million, by adding to the facility one or more new lenders and/or increasing the commitments of existing lenders. No existing lender is required to increase its commitment, unless it agrees to do so in its sole discretion.
Our revolving credit facility offers the following unsecured loans (as defined in the credit agreement), each having different minimum borrowing amounts and interest requirements:
• | London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) Loans. LIBOR loans can be exercised in a minimum borrowing amount of $5.0 million and multiples of $1.0 million thereafter. No more than eight LIBOR loans may be outstanding at any time under the revolving credit facility. LIBOR loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin. Unless LIBOR loans are repaid on interest payment dates, breakage costs could be incurred. |
• | Base Rate Loans. Base Rate loans can be exercised in a minimum borrowing amount of $1.0 million and multiples of $500.0 thousand thereafter. These loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Base Rate. The Base Rate is the higher of (i) the rate of interest publicly announced by the administrative agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as its Base Rate and (ii) 0.5% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate in effect on such date. |
• | Swingline Loans. Swingline loans can be exercised in a minimum borrowing amount of $1.0 million and multiples of $100.0 thousand thereafter. These loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin. |
For the three month period ending June 30, 2007, our weighted-average variable interest rate paid on borrowings outstanding under this facility was 6.17%. Our weighted-average variable interest rate paid was 6.17% for the year to date at June 30, 2007.
As defined in our revolving credit facility, we are required to maintain a leverage ratio for the prior four fiscal quarters of not more than 4.75 to 1.00 at the last day of each fiscal quarter commencing June 30, 2007; provided that, upon the closing of a permitted acquisition, such ratio shall not exceed (a) 5.25 to 1.00 at the last day of the fiscal quarter in which such specified acquisition occurred and at the last day of each of the two fiscal quarters following the fiscal quarter in which such specified acquisition occurred, and (b) 4.75 to 1.00 at the last day of each fiscal quarter thereafter. In addition, prior to obtaining an investment-grade rating by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch Ratings, our interest coverage ratio, for the prior four fiscal quarters shall not be less than 2.75 to 1.00 at the last day of each fiscal quarter commencing June 30, 2007.
15
Our revolving credit facility contains other customary covenants, including those restricting or limiting our ability, and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries, to:
• | incur additional indebtedness; |
• | grant liens or make certain negative pledges; |
• | engage in certain asset conveyances, sales, leases, transfers, distributions or otherwise dispose of certain assets, businesses or operations; |
• | make certain investments; |
• | enter into a merger, consolidation, or dissolution; |
• | engage in certain transactions with affiliates; |
• | directly or indirectly make or permit any payment or distribution in respect of our partnership interests; or |
• | permit or incur any limitation on the ability of any of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions to, repay indebtedness to, or make subordinated loans or advances to us. |
If an event of default exists under the credit agreement, the lenders will be able to accelerate the maturity of the credit agreement and exercise other rights and remedies. Each of the following is an event of default under the credit agreement:
• | non-payment of any principal, interest or fees when due under the credit agreement subject to grace periods; |
• | non-performance of covenants subject to grace periods; |
• | failure of any representation or warranty to be true and correct in any material respect when made; |
• | failure to pay any other material debt exceeding $10.0 million in the aggregate; |
• | a change of control; and |
• | other customary defaults. |
Evangeline joint venture debt obligation
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, long-term debt for Evangeline consisted of (i) $18.2 million in principal amount of 9.9% fixed interest rate senior secured notes due December 2010 (the “Series B” notes) and (ii) a $7.5 million subordinated note payable to an affiliate of the other co-venture participant (the “LL&E Note”). The Series B notes are collateralized by (i) Evangeline’s property, plant and equipment; (ii) proceeds from its Entergy natural gas sales contract; and (iii) a debt service reserve requirement. Scheduled principal repayments on the Series B notes are $5.0 million annually through 2009 with a final repayment in 2010 of approximately $3.2 million. The trust indenture governing the Series B notes contains covenants such as requirements to maintain certain financial ratios. Evangeline was in compliance with such covenants during the periods presented.
Evangeline incurred the LL&E Note obligations in connection with its acquisition of the Entergy natural gas sales contract in 1991 and formation of the venture. The LL&E Note is subject to a subordination agreement which prevents the repayment of principal and accrued interest on the note until
16
such time as the Series B note holders are either fully cash secured through debt service accounts or have been completely repaid. Variable rate interest accrues on the subordinated note at a LIBOR rate plus 0.5%. The weighted-average variable interest rate paid on this debt was 5.87% during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the amount of accrued but unpaid interest on the LL&E Note was approximately $8.4 million and $7.9 million, respectively.
Note 9. Parent Interest in Subsidiaries
In connection with our initial public offering (see Note 1), EPO contributed to us a 66% equity interest in Mont Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Lou-Tex Propylene, Sabine Propylene and South Texas NGL. EPO retained the remaining 34% equity interest in each of these entities. We account for EPO’s share of our subsidiaries’ net assets and income as Parent interest in a manner similar to minority interest.
The following table presents the change in Parent interest in subsidiaries as shown on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007:
Retention by Parent of 34% ownership interest in certain | |
operating subsidiaries contributed to us on February 1, 2007 | $ 252,292 |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries – February 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 | 10,652 |
Parent capital contributions to subsidiaries, net – February 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007 | 7,858 |
Parent interest in subsidiaries, June 30, 2007 | $ 270,802 |
The Parent made net capital contributions of $7.9 million to us during the five months ended June 30, 2007. This amount consisted of $21.7 million of contributions primarily related to normal capital project expenditures less $13.8 million of cash distributions.
The following table presents our calculation of Parent interest in income of subsidiaries for the three months and five months ended June 30, 2007:
| | | | |
| | For The Three | | For The Five |
| | Months Ended | | Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2007 | | June 30, 2007 |
Net income amounts: | | | | |
Mont Belvieu Caverns’ net income (before special allocation of operational | | | | |
measurement gains and losses see Note 12) | $ 6,998 | | $ 11,552 | |
Less operational measurement gain allocated to Parent | 2,818 | $ 2,818 | 4,146 | $ 4,146 |
Remaining Mont Belvieu Caverns’ net income to allocate to partners | 4,180 | | 7,406 | |
Multiplied by Parent 34% interest in remaining net income | x 34% | | x 34% | |
Mont Belvieu Caverns’ net income allocated to Parent | 1,421 | 1,421 | 2,518 | 2,518 |
| | | | |
Acadian Gas net income multiplied by Parent 34% interest | | 30 | | 246 |
Lou-Tex Propylene net income multiplied by Parent 34% interest | | 756 | | 1,262 |
Sabine Propylene net income multiplied by Parent 34% interest | | 95 | | 149 |
South Texas NGL net income multiplied by Parent 34% interest | | 1,483 | | 2,331 |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | | $ 6,603 | | $ 10,652 |
Note 10. Partners’ Equity and Distributions
We are a Delaware limited partnership that was formed in September 2006. We are owned 98% by our limited partners and 2% by our general partner, DEP GP, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of EPO.
Capital accounts, as defined in our Partnership Agreement, are maintained by us for our general partner and our limited partners. The capital account provisions of our Partnership Agreement incorporate principles established for U.S. Federal income tax purposes and are not comparable to the equity accounts
17
reflected under GAAP in our consolidated financial statements. Earnings and cash distributions are allocated to our partners in accordance with their respective percentage interests.
As discussed in Note 1, we completed our initial public offering of 14,950,000 common units (including an overallotment amount of 1,950,000 common units) on February 5, 2007 at a price of $21.00 per unit, which generated net proceeds to the Partnership of $291.0 million. As consideration for assets contributed and reimbursement for capital expenditures related to these assets, we distributed $260.6 million of these net proceeds to EPO, along with $198.9 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility (see Note 8) and a final amount of 5,351,571 common units of the Partnership.
The following table presents the adjustments made to the owners’ net investment balance of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor at December 31, 2006 to arrive at our total partners’ equity balance after completion of our initial public offering effective February 1, 2007:
Balance, December 31, 2006 | $ 725,797 |
| Net income – January 1, 2007 to January 31, 2007 | 5,035 |
| Net cash contribution from owners | 8,534 |
| Non-cash contribution from owners | 6 |
Balance, January 31, 2007 | 739,372 |
| Adjustment for Predecessor liabilities not | |
| transferred to Duncan Energy Partners (1) | 2,664 |
| Retention by Parent of 34% ownership interest | |
| in certain operating subsidiaries (2) | (252,292) |
| Allocation of Predecessor equity to Parent in exchange | |
| for 5,351,571 common units of Duncan Energy Partners | (489,744) |
Balance after completion of initial public offering | |
and related transactions | $ -- |
| | |
(1) Reflects the retention by EPO of the storage well measurement imbalance account. (2) Reflects the retention by EPO (the sponsor of the Partnership) of a 34% ownership interest in each of operating subsidiaries. |
Unit History
The following table details changes in our outstanding common units since our initial public offering on February 5, 2007. The Partnership used $38.5 million of net proceeds from the overallotment to redeem 1,950,000 of the 7,301,571 common units it had originally issued to EPO, resulting in a final amount of 5,351,571 common units beneficially owned by EPO.
Activity on February 5, 2007: | |
Common units originally issued to EPO in connection with its contribution of assets to us | 7,301,571 |
Common units originally issued in connection with our initial public offering | 13,000,000 |
Redemption of common units using proceeds of overallotment | (1,950,000) |
Additional common units issued to public in connection with our initial public offering (overallotment amount) | 1,950,000 |
Common units outstanding, June 30, 2007 | 20,301,571 |
Distributions
Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our Partnership Agreement) to our partners on a quarterly basis. Such distributions are not cumulative. In addition, we do not have a legal obligation to pay distributions at our initial distribution rate or at any other rate except as provided in our partnership agreement. Our general partner is entitled to 2% of all distributions; however, it has no incentive distribution rights.
On May 9, 2007, we paid a prorated quarterly distribution of $0.244 per unit or a total of $5.1 million (based on our initial declared quarterly distribution of $0.40 per unit) for the 55-day period from and including February 5, 2007 (the closing date of our initial public offering) through March 31, 2007.
18
We have declared and on August 8, 2007, we expect to pay a quarterly distribution of $0.40 per unit or a total of $8.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Note 11. Business Segments
We classify our midstream energy operations in four reportable business segments: NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services; Natural Gas Pipelines & Services; Petrochemical Pipeline Services; and NGL Pipeline Services. Our business segments are generally organized and managed according to the type of services rendered (or technologies employed) and products produced and/or sold.
We evaluate segment performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of gross operating margin. Gross operating margin (either in total or by individual segment) is an important performance measure of the core profitability of our operations. This measure forms the basis of our internal financial reporting and is used by senior management in deciding how to allocate capital resources among business segments. We believe that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures that our management uses in evaluating segment results. The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to total segment gross operating margin is operating income. Our non-GAAP financial measure of total segment gross operating margin should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP operating income.
We define total segment gross operating margin as consolidated operating income before: (i) depreciation, amortization and accretion expense; (ii) gains and losses on the sale of assets; and (iii) general and administrative expenses. Gross operating margin is exclusive of other income and expense transactions, provision for income taxes, extraordinary charges and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Gross operating margin by segment is calculated by subtracting segment operating costs and expenses (net of the adjustments noted above) from segment revenues, with both segment totals before the elimination of any intersegment and intrasegment transactions. In accordance with GAAP, intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
We include equity earnings from Evangeline in our measurement of segment gross operating margin and operating income. Our equity investment in Evangeline is a vital component of our business strategy and important to the operations of Acadian Gas. This method of operation enables us to achieve favorable economies of scale relative to the level of investment and business risk assumed versus what we could accomplish on a stand-alone basis. Evangeline performs complementary roles to the other business operations of Acadian Gas. As circumstances dictate, we may increase our ownership interest in Evangeline or make other equity method investments.
All of our consolidated revenues were earned in the United States. Our underground storage wells in Mont Belvieu, Texas receive, store and deliver NGLs and petrochemical products for refinery and other customers along the U.S. Gulf Coast. Acadian Gas gathers, transports, stores and markets natural gas to customers in Louisiana. Our petrochemical pipelines provide propylene transportation services to shippers in southeast Texas and southwestern Louisiana. Our DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System commenced transportation of NGLs from south Texas to Mont Belvieu, Texas in January 2007 for EPO.
Combined property, plant and equipment and investments in and advances to our unconsolidated affiliate are allocated to each segment based on the primary operations of each asset or investment. The principal reconciling item between combined property, plant and equipment and the total value of segment assets is construction-in-progress. Segment assets represent the net carrying value of assets that contribute to the gross operating margin of a particular segment. Since assets under construction generally do not contribute to segment gross operating margin until completed, such assets are excluded from segment asset totals until they are deemed operational.
19
The following table shows our measurement of total segment gross operating margin for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues (1) | $ 236,896 | $ 221,349 |
Less: Operating costs and expenses (1) | (222,711) | (208,402) |
Add: Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate (1) | 114 | 200 |
Depreciation, amortization and accretion | | |
in operating costs and expenses (2) | 7,203 | 5,308 |
Gain on sale of assets (2) | -- | (6) |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 21,502 | $ 18,449 |
| | |
(1) These amounts are taken from our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income. (2) These non-cash amounts are taken from the operating activities section of our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. |
The following table shows our measurement of total segment gross operating margin for the periods indicated:
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues (1) | $ 370,770 | $ 66,674 | $ 503,791 |
Less: Operating costs and expenses (1) | (347,142) | (61,187) | (478,586) |
Add: Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate (1) | 160 | 25 | 354 |
Depreciation, amortization and accretion | | | |
in operating costs and expenses (2) | 11,718 | 2,209 | 10,149 |
Gain on sale of assets (2) | (2) | -- | (13) |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 35,504 | $ 7,721 | $ 35,695 |
| | | | |
(1) These amounts are taken from our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income. (2) These non-cash amounts are taken from the operating activities section of our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. |
20
A reconciliation of our measurement of total gross operating margin to operating income and further to income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follows:
| Duncan Energy Partners | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 21,502 | $ 18,449 |
Adjustments to reconcile total non-GAAP segment gross | | |
operating margin to operating income: | | |
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating | | |
costs and expenses | (7,203) | (5,308) |
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses | -- | 6 |
General and administrative costs | (1,026) | (959) |
Operating income | 13,273 | 12,188 |
Other income (expense), net | (2,181) | -- |
Provision for income taxes | 59 | (21) |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (6,603) | -- |
Income before the cumulative effect of a change in | | |
accounting principle | $ 4,548 | $ 12,167 |
A reconciliation of our measurement of total gross operating margin to operating income and further to income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the periods indicated follows:
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 35,504 | $ 7,721 | $ 35,695 |
Adjustments to reconcile total non-GAAP segment gross | | | |
operating margin to operating income: | | | |
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating | | | |
costs and expenses | (11,718) | (2,209) | (10,149) |
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses | 2 | -- | 13 |
General and administrative costs | (1,383) | (477) | (1,735) |
Operating income | 22,405 | 5,035 | 23,824 |
Other income (expense), net | (3,168) | -- | 4 |
Provision for income taxes | (114) | -- | (21) |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (10,652) | -- | -- |
Income before the cumulative effect of a change in | | | |
accounting principle | $ 8,471 | $ 5,035 | $ 23,807 |
21
Information by segment, together with reconciliations to our consolidated totals, is presented in the following table:
| | | Reportable Segments | | |
| | | NGL and | Natural Gas | | | | |
| | | Petrochemical | Pipelines | Petrochemical | NGL | Adjustments | |
| | | Storage | & | Pipeline | Pipeline | and | Consolidated |
| | | Services | Services | Services | Services | Eliminations | Totals |
Revenues from third parties: | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2007 | $ 10,214 | $ 139,252 | $ 4,100 | $ -- | $ -- | $ 153,566 |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2006 | 10,361 | 107,281 | -- | -- | -- | 117,642 |
| | Five months ended June 30, 2007 | 16,886 | 221,399 | 6,775 | -- | -- | 245,060 |
| | One month ended January 31, 2007 | 3,630 | 39,027 | -- | -- | -- | 42,657 |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2006 | 19,118 | 277,382 | -- | -- | -- | 296,500 |
Revenues from related parties: | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2007 | 7,325 | 70,348 | -- | 5,657 | -- | 83,330 |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2006 | 4,257 | 89,599 | 9,851 | -- | -- | 103,707 |
| | Five months ended June 30, 2007 | 12,092 | 104,496 | -- | 9,122 | -- | 125,710 |
| | One month ended January 31, 2007 | 1,534 | 17,742 | 2,990 | 1,751 | -- | 24,017 |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2006 | 8,723 | 180,252 | 18,316 | -- | -- | 207,291 |
Total revenues: | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2007 | 17,539 | 209,600 | 4,100 | 5,657 | -- | 236,896 |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2006 | 14,618 | 196,880 | 9,851 | -- | -- | 221,349 |
| | Five months ended June 30, 2007 | 28,978 | 325,895 | 6,775 | 9,122 | -- | 370,770 |
| | One month ended January 31, 2007 | 5,164 | 56,769 | 2,990 | 1,751 | -- | 66,674 |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2006 | 27,841 | 457,634 | 18,316 | -- | -- | 503,791 |
Equity in income in unconsolidated affiliate: | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2007 | -- | 114 | -- | -- | -- | 114 |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2006 | -- | 200 | -- | -- | -- | 200 |
| | Five months ended June 30, 2007 | -- | 160 | -- | -- | -- | 160 |
| | One month ended January 31, 2007 | -- | 25 | -- | -- | -- | 25 |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2006 | -- | 354 | -- | -- | -- | 354 |
Gross operating margin by individual | | | | | | |
| business segment and in total: | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2007 | 10,741 | 2,179 | 3,288 | 5,294 | -- | 21,502 |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2006 | 5,745 | 3,955 | 8,749 | -- | -- | 18,449 |
| | Five months ended June 30, 2007 | 17,421 | 4,056 | 5,504 | 8,523 | -- | 35,504 |
| | One month ended January 31, 2007 | 1,770 | 1,605 | 2,700 | 1,646 | -- | 7,721 |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2006 | 8,870 | 10,882 | 15,943 | -- | -- | 35,695 |
Segment assets: | | | | | | |
| | At June 30, 2007 | 315,523 | 206,753 | 90,838 | 131,288 | 47,869 | 792,271 |
| | At December 31, 2006 | 246,068 | 209,550 | 92,044 | 98,148 | 61,839 | 707,649 |
Investments in and advances | | | | | | |
| to unconsolidated affiliate (see Note 6): | | | | | | |
| | At June 30, 2007 | -- | 3,641 | -- | -- | -- | 3,641 |
| | At December 31, 2006 | -- | 3,391 | -- | -- | -- | 3,391 |
Intangible Assets (see Note 7): | | | | | | |
| | At June 30, 2007 | 6,850 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 6,850 |
| | At December 31, 2006 | 6,966 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 6,966 |
See Note 1, “Background and Basis of Financial Statement Presentation,” for a summary of factors that affect the comparability of our segment totals for the five months ended June 30, 2007 with prior periods.
22
Note 12. Related Party Transactions
The following table summarizes our related party transactions for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
| Duncan Energy Partners | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues: | | |
EPO | $ 18,061 | $ 30,546 |
Evangeline | 65,269 | 73,161 |
Total | $ 83,330 | 103,707 |
Operating costs and expenses: | | |
EPCO | $ 5,032 | $ 7,756 |
EPO | 7,279 | 3,699 |
TEPPCO | 72 | -- |
Evangeline | 1 | -- |
Total | $ 12,384 | $ 11,455 |
General and administrative costs: | | |
EPCO | $ 546 | $ 950 |
The following table summarizes our related party transactions for the periods indicated
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues: | | | |
EPO | $ 28,191 | $ 8,602 | $ 55,910 |
Evangeline | 97,519 | 15,415 | 151,381 |
Total | $ 125,710 | $ 24,017 | $ 207,291 |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | |
EPCO | $ 7,645 | $ 2,487 | $ 16,613 |
EPO | 9,019 | 654 | 8,037 |
TEPPCO | 72 | -- | -- |
Evangeline | 1 | 8 | -- |
Total | $ 16,737 | $ 3,149 | $ 24,650 |
General and administrative costs: | | | |
EPCO | $ 770 | $ 455 | $ 1,703 |
Relationship with EPO
Prior to our initial public offering, EPO was the shipper of record on our Sabine Propylene and Lou-Tex Propylene Pipelines through exchange agreements EPO had with third parties. Our Predecessor recorded $9.8 million and $18.3 million of related party revenues from EPO in connection with these pipelines during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, and $3.0 million during the one month ended January 31, 2007. In connection with our initial public offering, EPO assigned these third party exchange agreements to us. However, EPO remains jointly and severally liable with us to such third parties for our performance of these agreements. We recorded $4.1 million and $6.8 million of revenues from these exchange agreements during the three and five months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
23
Our related party revenues from EPO include $5.2 million and $16.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for the sale of natural gas. Our related party revenues also include $7.0 million, $2.3 million and $28.9 million for the five months ended June 30, 2007, one month ended January 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, for the sale of natural gas.
Our related party operating costs and expenses include the cost of natural gas EPO sold to us. Such amounts were $8.9 million and $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the five months ended June 30, 2007 and one month ended January 31, 2007, these costs were $10.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, such costs were $8.0 million.
We provide underground NGL and petrochemical storage services to EPO. Historically, our related party revenues from such services were based on fees that were below market. Effective with the closing of our initial public offering, we increased the storage fees we charge EPO to equal the market rates we charge third parties for storage services of similar scope, volume and duration. Our Predecessor recorded $4.3 million and $8.7 million of related party revenues from EPO in connection with these storage services during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, and $1.5 million during the one month ended January 31, 2007. We recorded $7.3 million and $12.1 million of revenues under the new storage agreements during the three and five months ended June 30, 2007.
Storage well measurement gains and losses occur when product movements into a storage well are different than those redelivered to customers. In connection with storage agreements entered into between EPO and Mont Belvieu Caverns effective concurrently with the closing of our initial public offering, EPO has agreed to assume all storage well measurement gains and losses.
Operational measurement gains and losses are created when product is moved between storage wells and are attributable to pipeline and well connection measurement variances. Beginning February 2007, the Mont Belvieu Caverns’ limited liability company agreement allocates to EPO any items of income or loss relating to net operational measurement gains and losses, including amounts that Mont Belvieu Caverns may retain as handling losses. As such, EPO is required each period to contribute cash to Mont Belvieu Caverns for net operational measurement losses and is entitled to receive distributions from Mont Belvieu Caverns for net operational measurement gains. We continue to record operational measurement gains and losses associated with the operation of our Mont Belvieu storage facility. However, these operational measurement gains and losses should not affect our net income or have a significant impact on us with respect to the timing of our net cash flows provided by operating activities and, accordingly, we have not established a reserve for operational measurement losses on our balance sheet.
In connection with our initial public offering, South Texas NGL entered into a ten-year contract with EPO for the transportation of NGLs from south Texas to Mont Belvieu, Texas. Under this contract, EPO pays us a dedication fee of no less than $0.02 per gallon for all NGLs it produces at its Shoup and Armstrong NGL fractionation plants, whether or not any such volumes are actually shipped on our DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System. EPO is currently the sole shipper on this pipeline system.
South Texas NGL does not take title to products transported on its pipeline system. EPO retains title and associated commodity risk for products it transports on the pipeline. Our Predecessor recorded $1.8 million of related party revenues from our DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System in January 2007, and we recorded $5.6 million and $9.1 million during the three and five months ended June 30, 2007.
Omnibus Agreement. On February 5, 2007, EPO entered into an Omnibus Agreement with the Partnership that governs our relationship with the Partnership regarding the following matters:
• | indemnification for certain environmental liabilities, tax liabilities and right-of-way defects; |
• | reimbursement of certain expenditures for South Texas NGL and Mont Belvieu Caverns; |
24
• | a right of first refusal to EPO on the Partnership’s current and future subsidiaries and a right of first refusal on the material assets of these entities, other than sales of inventory and other assets in the ordinary course of business; and |
• | a preemptive right with respect to equity securities issued by certain of the Partnership’s subsidiaries, other than as consideration in an acquisition or in connection with a loan or debt financing. |
As stated above, in the Omnibus Agreement, EPO has indemnified us against certain environmental and related liabilities arising out of or associated with the operation of the contributed assets prior to February 5, 2007. These liabilities include both known and unknown environmental and related liabilities. The indemnification will terminate on February 5, 2010 and there is an aggregate cap of $15.0 million on the amount of indemnity coverage. In addition, we are not entitled to indemnification until the aggregate amount of claims exceeds $250 thousand. Liabilities resulting from a change of law after February 5, 2007 are excluded from the environmental indemnity.
In the Omnibus Agreement, EPO has also indemnified us for liabilities related to: |
• | certain defects in the easement rights or fee ownership interests in and to the lands on which any assets contributed to us are located and failure to obtain certain consents and permits necessary to conduct our operations that arise through February 5, 2010; and |
• | certain income tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the contributed assets prior to February 5, 2007. |
EPO has agreed to fund all construction costs in excess of amounts we expected to spend on our planned expansions of the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System (i.e. Phase II) and brine production capacity and above-ground reservoir projects of Mont Belvieu Caverns at the time of our initial public offering. We retained $30.6 million of the net proceeds from our initial public offering to fund our 66% share of post-February 5, 2007 estimated construction costs and liabilities.
The Omnibus Agreement may not be amended without the prior approval of the Audit, Conflicts and Governance Committee if the proposed amendment will, in the reasonable discretion of our general partner, adversely affect holders of our common units.
Relationship with EPCO
We have no employees. All of our operating functions are performed by employees of EPCO pursuant to an administrative services agreement (the “ASA”). EPCO also provides general and administrative support services to us in accordance with the ASA. Enterprise Products Partners, EPO and the other affiliates of EPCO, including the Partnership, are parties to the ASA. We are required to reimburse EPCO for its services in an amount equal to the sum of all costs and expenses incurred by EPCO which are directly or indirectly related to our business or activities (including EPCO expenses reasonably allocated to us). In addition, we have agreed to pay all sales, use, excise, value added or similar taxes, if any, which may be applicable with respect to services provided by EPCO.
EPCO allows us to participate as named insureds in its overall insurance program with a portion of the premiums and related costs being allocated to us. We and our Predecessor reimbursed EPCO $0.4 million and $0.5 million for insurance costs for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We and our Predecessor reimbursed EPCO $0.7 million and $0.8 million for insurance costs for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Our operating costs and expenses also include reimbursement payments to EPCO for the costs it incurs to operate our facilities, including the compensation of employees. We reimburse EPCO for actual direct and indirect expenses it incurs related to the operation of our assets. We and our Predecessor reimbursed EPCO $5.0 million and $7.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
25
respectively, for operating costs and expenses. We and our Predecessor reimbursed EPCO $7.6 million, $2.5 million and $16.6 million for the five months ended June 30, 2007, the month of January 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, for operating costs and expenses.
Likewise, our general and administrative costs include amounts we reimburse to EPCO for administrative services, including compensation of employees. In general, our reimbursement to EPCO for administrative services is either (i) on an actual basis for direct expenses it may incur on our behalf (e.g., the purchase of office supplies) or (ii) based on an allocation of such charges between the various parties to the ASA, which in turn is based on the estimated use of such services by each party (e.g., the allocation of general, legal or accounting salaries based on estimates of time spent on each entity’s business and affairs). We and our Predecessor reimbursed EPCO $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for general and administrative costs. We and our Predecessor reimbursed EPCO $0.7 million, $0.5 million and $1.7 million for the five months ended June 30, 2007, the month of January 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, for general and administrative costs.
A small number of key employees of EPCO that devote a portion of their time to our operations and affairs also participate in long-term incentive compensation plans managed by EPCO. These plans include the issuance of restricted units of Enterprise Products Partners and limited partner interests in EPE Unit L.P. The amount of equity-based compensation allocable to us was immaterial during all periods presented.
Relationship with Evangeline
We sell natural gas to Evangeline, which, in turn, uses such natural gas to satisfy its sales commitments to Entergy. Our sales of natural gas to Evangeline totaled $65.3 million and $73.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our sales of natural gas to Evangeline totaled $97.5 million, $15.4 million and $151.4 million for the five months ended June 30, 2007, the month of January 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
Additionally, we have a service agreement with Evangeline whereby we provide Evangeline with construction, operations, maintenance and administrative support related to its pipeline system. Evangeline paid us $0.1 million and $0.2 million for such services for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Evangeline paid us $0.2 million, $37 thousand and $0.3 million for such services for the five months ended June 30, 2007, the month of January 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
Relationship with TEPPCO
We lease an 11-mile pipeline extending from Pasadena, Texas to Baytown, Texas that is part of the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System. The primary term of this lease will expire on September 15, 2007, and will continue on a month-to-month basis subject to termination by either party upon 60 days notice. This pipeline will be leased by us until we complete the construction of a parallel pipeline in December 2007. Lease expense associated with this agreement was $72 thousand for the five months ended June 30, 2007.
Note 13. Earnings Per Unit
Basic and diluted earnings per unit is computed by dividing net income or loss allocated to limited partner interests by the weighted-average number of common units outstanding during a period. The following calculation is based on common units outstanding since the completion of our initial public offering in February 2007. At present, we have no dilutive securities.
26
The amount of net income or loss allocated to limited partner interests is net of our general partner’s share of such earnings. The following table presents the allocation of net income to DEP GP for the periods indicated:
| | For the Three | For the Five |
| | Months Ended | Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2007 |
Net income | $ 4,548 | $ 8,471 |
Multiplied by DEP GP ownership interest | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Net income allocation to DEP GP | $ 91 | $ 169 |
The following table presents our calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the period indicated:
| | For the Three | For the Five |
| | Months Ended | Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2007 |
Net income | $ 4,548 | $ 8,471 |
Less net income allocation to DEP GP | 91 | 169 |
Net income available to limited partners | $ 4,457 | $ 8,302 |
| | |
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Unit: | | |
Numerator: | | |
| Net income available to limited partners | $ 4,457 | $ 8,302 |
Denominator: | | |
| Common units | 20,302 | 20,302 |
| | |
Earnings per unit | $ 0.22 | $ 0.41 |
Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
On occasion, we are named as a defendant in litigation relating to our normal business operations, including regulatory and environmental matters. Although we insure against various business risks to the extent we believe it is prudent, there is no assurance that the nature and amount of such insurance will be adequate, in every case, to indemnify us against liabilities arising from future legal proceedings as a result of our ordinary business activity.
In 1997, Acadian Gas and numerous other energy companies were named as defendants in actions brought by Jack Grynberg on behalf of the U.S. Government under the False Claims Act. Generally, these complaints allege an industry-wide conspiracy to under report the heating value, as well as the volumes, of natural gas produced from federal and Native American lands. The complaint alleges that the U.S. Government was deprived of royalties as a result of this conspiracy. The plaintiff in this case seeks royalties that he contends the U.S. government should have received had the heating value and volume been differently measured, analyzed, calculated and reported, together with interest, treble damages, civil penalties, expenses and future injunctive relief to require the defendants to adopt allegedly appropriate gas measurement practices. These matters have been consolidated for pretrial purposes (In re: Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation, U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming, filed June 1997). On October 20, 2006, the U.S. District Court dismissed all of Grynberg’s claims with prejudice. We expect Grynberg to appeal.
We are not aware of any other significant litigation, pending or threatened, that may have a significant adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
27
Redelivery Commitments
We transport natural gas and store natural gas, NGL and petrochemical products for third parties under various contracts. Under the terms of these agreements, we are generally required to redeliver volumes to the owner on demand. We are insured for any physical loss of such volumes resulting from catastrophic events. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, NGL and petrochemical products aggregating 15.7 million barrels and 8.5 million barrels, respectively, were due to be redelivered to their owners along with 632 billion British thermal units (“BBtus”) and 748 BBtus, respectively, of natural gas.
Operating lease
We lease certain property, plant and equipment under non-cancelable and cancelable operating leases. Our significant lease agreements involve the lease of an underground storage cavern for the storage of natural gas held-for-sale and land held pursuant to right-of-way agreements. The current term of the cavern lease expires in December 2012, but may be extended through negotiations with the lessor. Our significant right-of-way agreements have original terms that range from five to 50 years and include renewal options that could extend the agreements for up to an additional 25 years.
Lease expense included in operating costs and expenses was $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Lease expense included in operating costs and expenses was $0.8 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. There have been no material changes in our operating lease commitments since December 31, 2006.
Purchase Obligations
Acadian Gas has a product purchase commitment for the purchase of natural gas in Louisiana from the co-venture party in Evangeline. This purchase agreement expires in January 2013. Our purchase price under this contract approximates the market price of natural gas at the time we take delivery of the volumes.
We also have short-term payment obligations relating to capital projects we have initiated. These commitments represent unconditional payment obligations to pay vendors for services to be rendered or products to be delivered in connection with our capital spending programs. At June 30, 2007, we had approximately $25.2 million in outstanding purchase commitments. These commitments primarily relate to announced expansions of our DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System (Phase II) and Mont Belvieu Caverns’ storage facility. Both expansions are expected to be completed in 2007.
28
Note 15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The net effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities is as follows for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
| | Duncan Energy Partners | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor |
| | For The Three | For the Three |
| | Months Ended | Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2007 | June, 2006 |
Decrease (increase) in: | | |
| Accounts receivable | $ (13,066) | $ 21,365 |
| Inventories | (1,305) | (643) |
| Prepaid and other current assets | 218 | 514 |
| Other assets | 89 | (10) |
Increase (decrease) in: | | |
| Accounts payable | (6,858) | 303 |
| Accrued gas payable | 19,844 | (18,958) |
| Accrued expenses | (2,775) | 2,710 |
| Accrued interest | 11 | -- |
| Other current liabilities | 1,467 | 1,132 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 158 | (17) |
Net effect of changes in operating accounts | $ (2,217) | $ 6,396 |
The net effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities is as follows for the periods indicated:
| | Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| | Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| | For The Five | One Month | For the Six |
| | Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Decrease (increase) in: | | | |
| Accounts receivable | $ (27,570) | $ 8,088 | $ 47,513 |
| Inventories | 805 | 4,169 | (3,782) |
| Prepaid and other current assets | (57) | 13 | 368 |
| Other assets | 103 | -- | (10) |
Increase (decrease) in: | | | |
| Accounts payable | 37,568 | 65 | (269) |
| Accrued gas payable | 27,826 | (13,080) | (45,545) |
| Accrued expenses | (8,630) | (7,148) | (1,872) |
| Accrued interest | 118 | -- | -- |
| Other current liabilities | 3,721 | (2,841) | (3,072) |
| Other long-term liabilities | 158 | (20) | (12) |
Net effect of changes in operating accounts | $ 34,042 | $ (10,754) | $ (6,681) |
On certain of our capital projects, third parties are obligated to reimburse us for all or a portion of project expenditures based on activities initiated by the party. The majority of such arrangements are associated with projects related to pipeline construction and well tie-ins. We received $0.1 million and $0.4 million as contributions in aid of our construction costs during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We received $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million as contributions in aid of our construction costs during the five months ended June 30, 2007, the month of January 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
Accounts payable related to our capital spending projects totaled $10.7 million, $16.2 million, and $12.5 million at June 30, 2007, January 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively.
29
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
The following information should be read in conjunction with our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and our accompanying notes included under Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and with the information contained within our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our discussion and analysis includes the following:
• | Results of Operations – Discusses material period-to-period variances in our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations. |
• | Liquidity and Capital Resources – Addresses available sources of liquidity and analyzes cash flows. |
• | Critical Accounting Policies – Presents accounting policies that are among the most significant to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. |
• | Other Items – Includes information related to contractual obligations, off-balance sheet arrangements, related party transactions, recent accounting pronouncements and similar disclosures. |
This discussion contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on our beliefs and those of our general partner, as well as assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. When used in this document, words such as “anticipate,” “project,” “expect,” “plan,” “goal,” “forecast,” “intend,” “could,” “believe,” “may” and similar expressions and statements regarding our plans and objectives for future operations, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we and our general partner believe that such expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither we nor our general partner can give any assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct. Such statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions as described in more detail in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” included in our annual report on Form 10-K for 2006. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
As generally used in the energy industry and in this discussion, the identified terms have the following meanings:
/d | = per day | |
BBtus | = billion British thermal units | |
Bcf | = billion cubic feet | |
MBPD | = thousand barrels per day | |
Mdth | = thousand decatherms | |
MMBbls | = million barrels | |
MMBtus | = million British thermal units |
MMcf | = million cubic feet | |
Mcf | = thousand cubic feet | |
TBtu | = trillion British thermal units | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
30
Significant Relationships Referenced in this Quarterly Report
Duncan Energy Partners L.P. did not own any assets prior to February 5, 2007, which was the date it completed its initial public offering of common units. The business and operations of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. prior to February 5, 2007 are referred to as “Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor” or “Predecessor.” Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Partnership” or “Duncan Energy Partners” are intended to mean the business and operations of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries since February 5, 2007. When used in a historical context (i.e. prior to February 5, 2007), these terms are intended to mean the combined business and operations of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. For financial reporting purposes, the effective date of the closing of our initial public offering and related transactions was February 1, 2007.
References to “DEP GP” mean DEP Holdings, LLC, which is our general partner. |
References to “DEP Operating Partnership” mean DEP Operating Partnership, L.P., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Duncan Energy Partners that conducts substantially all of its business.
References to “Enterprise Products Partners” mean Enterprise Products Partners L.P., which owns 100% of Enterprise Products Operating LLC.
References to “EPO” mean Enterprise Products Operating LLC (as successor in interest by merger to Enterprise Products Operating L.P.), which is our Parent, and its consolidated subsidiaries. EPO has a controlling interest in the Partnership’s general partner and is a significant owner of the Partnership’s common units.
References to “Enterprise Products GP” mean Enterprise Products GP, LLC, the general partner of Enterprise Products Partners.
References to “Enterprise GP Holdings” mean Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., which owns Enterprise Products GP.
References to “EPE Holdings” mean EPE Holdings, LLC, which is the general partner of Enterprise GP Holdings.
References to “TEPPCO” mean TEPPCO Partners, L.P., a publicly traded affiliate, the units of which are listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “TPP.” References to “TEPPCO GP” refer to Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, which is the general partner of TEPPCO and is wholly owned by Enterprise GP Holdings.
References to “EPCO” mean EPCO, Inc., which is a related party affiliate to all of the foregoing named entities.
All of the aforementioned entities are affiliates and under common control of Dan L. Duncan, the Chairman and controlling shareholder of EPCO.
Overview of Business
Duncan Energy Partners is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership, the common units of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “DEP.” We were formed by Enterprise Products Partners in September 2006 to acquire, own and operate a diversified portfolio of midstream energy assets. On February 5, 2007, we completed our initial public offering of 14,950,000 common units. See “Recent Developments” for additional information regarding our initial public offering and related transactions.
31
We are owned 98% by our limited partners and 2% by our general partner, DEP GP, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of EPO. DEP GP is responsible for managing all of our operations and activities. EPCO provides all employees and certain administrative services for us.
Basis of Presentation
The historical combined financial information and operating data included in this discussion pertaining to periods prior to our initial public offering reflect the assets, liabilities and operations contributed to us by EPO at the closing of our initial public offering on February 5, 2007. We refer to these historical assets, liabilities and operations as the assets, liabilities and operations of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. We have elected February 1, 2007 as the effective closing date for financial accounting and reporting purposes with respect to Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor.
Our discussion of amounts attributable to Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor reflects EPO’s historical ownership of these assets, liabilities and operations. The principal business entities included in the historical combined financial statements of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor are (on a 100% basis): (i) Mont Belvieu Caverns, LLC (“Mont Belvieu Caverns”), a Delaware limited liability company; (ii) Acadian Gas, LLC (“Acadian Gas”), a Delaware limited liability company; (iii) Enterprise Lou-Tex Propylene Pipeline L.P. (“Lou-Tex Propylene”), a Delaware limited partnership, including its general partner; (iv) Sabine Propylene Pipeline L.P. (“Sabine Propylene”), a Delaware limited partnership, including its general partner; and (v) South Texas NGL Pipelines, LLC (“South Texas NGL”), a Delaware limited liability company. EPO contributed a 66% equity interest in each of these five entities to us on February 5, 2007. EPO retained the remaining 34% equity interests in each of these subsidiaries.
In addition to the aforementioned contribution of equity interests, there were changes to the historical operations and certain agreements of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor as discussed under “Results of Operations – Factors Affecting Comparability of Results” within this Item 2. See Note 1 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the basis of presentation of our financial information.
Recent Developments
On February 5, 2007, the Partnership completed its initial public offering of 14,950,000 common units (including an overallotment amount of 1,950,000 common units) at a price of $21.00 per unit, which generated net proceeds to the Partnership of $291.0 million. As consideration for assets contributed and reimbursement for capital expenditures related to these assets, the Partnership distributed $260.6 million of these net proceeds to EPO, along with $198.9 million in borrowings under its revolving credit facility (see below) and a final amount of 5,351,571 common units of the Partnership. The Partnership used $38.5 million of net proceeds from the overallotment to redeem 1,950,000 of the 7,301,571 common units it had originally issued to EPO, resulting in the final amount of 5,351,571 common units beneficially owned by EPO. EPO used the cash it received from the Partnership to temporarily reduce amounts outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
In connection with its initial public offering, the Partnership entered into a $300 million revolving credit facility. On February 5, 2007, the Partnership borrowed $200 million under this facility to fund the $198.9 million cash distribution to EPO and the remainder to pay debt issuance costs. This credit facility matures in February 2011 and will be used by the Partnership in the future to fund working capital and other capital requirements and for general partnership purposes. The Partnership can increase the revolving credit facility, without consent of the lenders, by an amount not to exceed $150 million by adding to the facility one or more new lenders and/or increasing the commitments of existing lenders. The Partnership’s borrowings under this credit facility are unsecured general obligations that are non-recourse to DEP GP.
The following is a brief description of the businesses of which 66% of the ownership interests were contributed to us by EPO effective February 1, 2007:
32
• | Mont Belvieu Caverns owns and operates salt dome caverns and a brine system located in Mont Belvieu, Texas. |
• | Acadian Gas gathers, transports, stores and markets natural gas in Louisiana utilizing over 1,000 miles of high-pressure transmission lines and lateral and gathering lines with an aggregate throughput capacity of one billion cubic feet per day (the “Acadian Gas System”), including a 27-mile pipeline owned by its unconsolidated affiliate Evangeline Gas Pipeline L.P. (“Evangeline”) and a leased storage cavern with three billion cubic feet of storage capacity. |
• | Lou-Tex Propylene owns a 263-mile pipeline used to transport chemical-grade propylene from Sorrento, Louisiana to Mont Belvieu, Texas. |
• | Sabine Propylene owns a 21-mile pipeline used to transport polymer-grade propylene from Port Arthur, Texas to a pipeline interconnect in Cameron Parish, Louisiana on a transport-or-pay basis. |
• | South Texas NGL owns a 220-mile pipeline extending from Corpus Christi, Texas to Pasadena, Texas that was purchased by EPO from a third party in August 2006 for $97.7 million. Beginning in January 2007, this pipeline (together with other pipelines constructed, leased or acquired since August 2006) commenced transportation of NGLs from two of EPO’s processing facilities located in South Texas to Mont Belvieu, Texas. Collectively, these pipelines are referred to as the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System. |
EPO has owned controlling interests in and operated the underlying assets of Mont Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine Propylene for several years. On February 5, 2007, DEP Operating Partnership (the primary operating subsidiary of the Partnership) directly or indirectly assumed such operating responsibilities. We believe our relationship with EPO and Enterprise Products Partners will enhance our ability to maintain stable cash flows and optimize our economies of scale, strategic location and pipeline connections.
EPO may contribute or sell other equity interests in its subsidiaries or other of its or its subsidiaries’ assets to the Partnership and use the proceeds it receives to fund its capital spending program. EPO has no obligation or commitment to make such contributions or sales to the Partnership.
On May 9, 2007, we paid a prorated quarterly distribution of $0.244 per unit or a total of $5.1 million (based on our initial declared quarterly distribution of $0.40 per unit) for the 55-day period from and including February 5, 2007 (the closing date of our initial public offering) through March 31, 2007. On August 8, 2007, we expect to pay a quarterly distribution of $0.40 per unit or a total of $8.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Capital Spending
Our capital expenditures consist of sustaining capital expenditures and those related to growth projects. Sustaining capital expenditures are capital expenditures resulting from improvements to and major renewals of assets. Such expenditures serve to maintain (or sustain) existing operations but do not generate additional revenues. Growth capital spending relates to projects that (i) result in additional revenue streams from existing assets or (ii) expand our asset base through construction of new facilities that will generate additional revenue streams.
Our total capital expenditures were $34.4 million and $19.2 million for the three months ended June 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $82.9 million, $5.3 million and $33.6 million during the five months ended June 30, 2007, one month ended January 31, 2007 and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System. We completed Phase I of our 286-mile DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System growth capital project in January 2007 and placed the asset into service. The total estimated cost of the Phase I work was approximately $135.4 million, which included $97.7 million paid by EPO to acquire 220 miles of this system in August 2006.
33
During Phase II, we are constructing 22 miles of pipeline to replace certain sections of this pipeline, including an 11-mile section that we lease from TEPPCO. The Phase II upgrade will provide a significant increase in pipeline capacity and is expected to be operational during the fourth quarter of 2007. We expect the total cost of the Phase II upgrades to approximate $28.6 million, of which our 66% share would be $18.9 million. We expect to lease the pipeline segment from TEPPCO until December 2007.
Our Predecessor and South Texas NGL spent $17.8 million and $16.1 million on the Phase I and Phase II projects, respectively, through June 30, 2007.
Mont Belvieu Caverns’ Brine-Related Projects. During 2005 and 2006, we began construction of additional brine production capacity and above-ground storage reservoirs in Mont Belvieu. These growth capital projects were placed into operation during the second quarter of 2007. We spent $16.7 million in 2007.
Commitments. We also have short-term payment obligations relating to capital projects we have initiated. These commitments represent unconditional payment obligations to pay vendors for services to be rendered or products to be delivered in connection with our capital spending programs. At June 30, 2007, we had approximately $25.2 million in outstanding purchase commitments. These commitments primarily relate to announced expansions of our DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System (Phase II) and Mont Belvieu Caverns’ brine-related projects.
Reimbursement for Certain Expenditures. EPO has agreed to make additional contributions to us as reimbursement for our 66% share of any excess construction costs above (i) the $28.6 million of estimated capital expenditures to complete planned Phase II expansions of the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System and (ii) $14.1 million of estimated construction costs for additional planned brine production capacity and above-ground storage reservoir projects at Mont Belvieu, Texas. We retained $30.6 million of the net proceeds from our initial public offering to fund our 66% share of post-February 5, 2007 estimated construction costs and liabilities. This retained amount consists of (i) $18.9 million for the Phase II expansion of the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System, (ii) $7.8 million for the brine-related expansion projects and (iii) $3.9 million for remaining liabilities associated with the initial construction phase of the DEP South Texas Pipeline System.
Sustaining Capital Expenditures. Our sustaining capital expenditures for the five months ended June 30, 2007 were $6.1 million, which primarily consist of $2.6 million of improvements to our Mont Belvieu storage facilities and $2.5 million of pipeline integrity costs related to our Acadian Gas pipeline system.
Results of Operations
We classify our midstream energy operations in four reportable business segments: NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services; Natural Gas Pipelines & Services; Petrochemical Pipeline Services; and NGL Pipeline Services. Our business segments are generally organized and managed according to the type of services rendered (or technologies employed) and products produced and/or sold.
We evaluate segment performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of gross operating margin. Gross operating margin (either in total or by individual segment) is an important performance measure of the core profitability of our operations. This measure forms the basis of our internal financial reporting and is used by senior management in deciding how to allocate capital resources among business segments. We believe that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures that our management uses in evaluating segment results. The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to total segment gross operating margin is operating income. Our non-GAAP financial measure of total segment gross operating margin should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP operating income.
34
We define total segment gross operating margin as consolidated operating income before: (i) depreciation, amortization and accretion expense; (ii) gains and losses on the sale of assets; and (iii) general and administrative expenses. Gross operating margin is exclusive of other income and expense transactions, provision for income taxes, extraordinary charges and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Gross operating margin by segment is calculated by subtracting segment operating costs and expenses (net of the adjustments noted above) from segment revenues, with both segment totals before the elimination of any intersegment and intrasegment transactions. In accordance with GAAP, intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
We include equity earnings from Evangeline in our measurement of segment gross operating margin and operating income. Our equity investment in Evangeline is a vital component of our business strategy and important to the operations of Acadian Gas. This method of operation enables us to achieve favorable economies of scale relative to the level of investment and business risk assumed versus what we could accomplish on a stand-alone basis. Evangeline performs complementary roles to the other business operations of Acadian Gas. As circumstances dictate, we may increase our ownership interest in Evangeline or make other equity method investments.
For additional information regarding our business segments, see Note 11 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Factors Affecting Comparability of Results
Our discussion of the financial condition and results of operations for Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Duncan Energy Partners included under Item 1 of this quarterly report. Our future results could differ significantly from our historical results due to a variety of factors, including the following:
Partial Ownership of Operating Assets. As a result of contributions completed in connection with our initial public offering, we own 66% of the equity interests in the subsidiaries that hold our operating assets, and affiliates of EPO continue to own the remaining 34%. Accordingly, our discussion of results prior to February 2007 reflects 100% of the results of operations of these assets. We recognize EPO’s current 34% ownership of our operating subsidiaries as “Parent interest in subsidiaries” in our consolidated financial statements.
No Historical Results for Our NGL Pipeline Services Segment. Our discussion of historical results prior to January 2007 does not reflect any operations related to our DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System, which did not commence operations until January 2007.
Increase in Outstanding Indebtedness. Prior to our initial public offering, we did not have any consolidated indebtedness and, therefore, we did not have interest expense. We borrowed $200.0 million under a revolving credit facility at the time of our initial public offering, of which $198.9 million was paid to EPO in connection with its contribution of certain equity interests to us.
Increased Storage Fees. As a result of contracts executed in connection with our initial public offering, we increased certain storage fees charged to EPO for use of our facilities owned by Mont Belvieu Caverns. Historically, such intercompany charges were below market and eliminated in the consolidated revenues and costs and expenses of Enterprise Products Partners. Such rates are now market-based. See “Relationship with EPCO” under Note 12 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding revenues recorded by the Predecessor versus those we record for the three and five months ended June 30, 2007.
Special Allocation of Storage Well and Operational Measurement Gains and Losses. Storage well measurement gains and losses occur when product movements into a storage well are different than those redelivered to customers. In connection with storage agreements entered into between EPO and Mont
35
Belvieu Caverns effective concurrently with the closing of our initial public offering, EPO has agreed to assume all storage well measurement gains and losses.
Operational measurement gains and losses are created when product is moved between storage wells and are attributable to pipeline and well connection measurement variances. Beginning February 2007, the Mont Belvieu Caverns’ limited liability company agreement allocates to EPO any items of income or loss relating to net operational measurement gains and losses, including amounts that Mont Belvieu Caverns may retain as handling losses. As such, EPO is required each period to contribute cash to Mont Belvieu Caverns for net operational measurement losses and is entitled to receive distributions from Mont Belvieu Caverns for net operational measurement gains. We continue to record operational measurement gains and losses associated with the operation of our Mont Belvieu storage facility. However, these operational measurement gains and losses should not affect our net income or have a significant impact on us with respect to the timing of our net cash flows provided by operating activities and, accordingly, we have not established a reserve for operational measurement losses on our balance sheet.
Decrease in Propylene Transportation Rates. Beginning February 2007, the transportation fees we received from customers utilizing our Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine Propylene Pipelines were lower than those we realized in prior periods. Historically, EPO was the shipper of record on these pipelines, and we charged it the maximum tariff rate for using these assets. EPO then contracted with third parties to ship volumes on these pipelines under product exchange agreements. In general, the revenues recognized by EPO in connection with these exchange agreements were lower than the maximum tariff rate it paid us. In connection with our initial public offering, EPO assigned its third party product exchange agreements to us. Accordingly, the transportation fees we receive for use of our Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine Propylene Pipelines are less than the fees we received from EPO prior to February 2007. See “Relationship with EPCO” under Note 12 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding revenues recorded by the Predecessor versus those we record for the three and five months ended June 30, 2007.
Additional General and Administrative Expenses. We expect to incur additional general and administrative expenses as a result of becoming a publicly traded entity. These costs include fees associated with annual and quarterly reports to unitholders, tax returns and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution, investor relations, registrar and transfer agent fees, incremental insurance costs, and accounting and legal services. These costs also include estimated related party amounts payable to EPCO in connection with the administrative services agreement. For additional information regarding the administrative services agreement, see Note 12 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
36
Selected Volumetric Data
The following table presents selected average pipeline throughput volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
| | | | Duncan Energy | |
| | | Duncan Energy Partners | Partners Predecessor | |
| | | For the Three | For the Three |
| | | Months Ended | Months Ended |
| | | June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services, net: | | |
| Natural gas throughput volumes (BBtus/d) | | |
| | Natural gas transportation volumes | 434 | 415 |
| | Natural gas sales volumes | 312 | 396 |
| | Total natural gas throughput volumes | 746 | 811 |
Petrochemical Pipeline Services, net: | | |
| Propylene throughput volumes (MBPD) | | |
| | Lou-Tex Propylene Pipeline | 25 | 28 |
| | Sabine Propylene Pipeline | 12 | 9 |
| | Total propylene throughput volumes | 37 | 37 |
NGL Pipeline Services, net: | | |
| NGL throughput volumes (MBPD) | | |
| | DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System | 74 | -- |
The following table presents selected average pipeline throughput volumes for the periods indicated:
| | | Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| | | Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| | | For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| | | Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| | | June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services, net: | | | |
| Natural gas throughput volumes (BBtus/d) | | | |
| | Natural gas transportation volumes | 406 | 420 | 446 |
| | Natural gas sales volumes | 290 | 281 | 343 |
| | Total natural gas throughput volumes | 696 | 701 | 789 |
Petrochemical Pipeline Services, net: | | | |
| Propylene throughput volumes (MBPD) | | | |
| | Lou-Tex Propylene Pipeline | 24 | 24 | 26 |
| | Sabine Propylene Pipeline | 12 | 13 | 10 |
| | Total propylene throughput volumes | 36 | 37 | 36 |
NGL Pipeline Services, net: | | | |
| NGL throughput volumes (MBPD) | | | |
| | DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System | 72 | 67 | -- |
37
The following table summarizes the key components of our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| | Duncan Energy |
| Duncan Energy Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues | $ 236,896 | $ 221,349 |
Operating costs and expenses | 222,711 | 208,402 |
General and administrative costs | 1,026 | 959 |
Operating income | 13,273 | 12,188 |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (6,603) | -- |
Net income | 4,548 | 12,167 |
The following table summarizes the key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues | $ 370,770 | $ 66,674 | $ 503,791 |
Operating costs and expenses | 347,142 | 61,187 | 478,586 |
General and administrative costs | 1,383 | 477 | 1,735 |
Operating income | 22,405 | 5,035 | 23,824 |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (10,652) | -- | -- |
Net income | 8,471 | 5,035 | 23,816 |
In connection with our initial public offering, EPO contributed to us 66% of the equity interests in Mont Belvieu Caverns, Acadian Gas, Lou-Tex Propylene, Sabine Propylene and South Texas NGL. EPO retained the remaining 34% equity interest in each of these entities. We account for EPO’s share of our subsidiaries’ net assets and income as “Parent interest in subsidiaries” and “Parent interest in income of subsidiaries,” respectively, in a manner similar to minority interest.
Our gross operating margin by business segment and in total is as follows for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| | Duncan Energy |
| Duncan Energy Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Gross operating margin by segment: | | |
NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services | $ 10,741 | $ 5,745 |
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services | 2,179 | 3,955 |
Petrochemical Pipeline Services | 3,288 | 8,749 |
NGL Pipeline Services | 5,294 | -- |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 21,502 | $ 18,449 |
38
Our gross operating margin by business segment and in total is as follows for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Gross operating margin by segment: | | | |
NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services | $ 17,421 | $ 1,770 | $ 8,870 |
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services | 4,056 | 1,605 | 10,882 |
Petrochemical Pipeline Services | 5,504 | 2,700 | 15,943 |
NGL Pipeline Services | 8,523 | 1,646 | -- |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 35,504 | $ 7,721 | $ 35,695 |
For a reconciliation of non-GAAP gross operating margin to GAAP operating income and further to GAAP income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, see “Other Items – Non-GAAP reconciliations” included within this Item 2.
The following table summarizes the contribution to revenues from each business segment during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| | Duncan Energy |
| Duncan Energy Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services | $ 17,539 | $ 14,618 |
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services | 209,600 | 196,880 |
Petrochemical Pipeline Services | 4,100 | 9,851 |
NGL Pipeline Services | 5,657 | -- |
Total revenues | $ 236,896 | $ 221,349 |
The following table summarizes the contribution to revenues from each business segment during the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services | $ 28,978 | $ 5,164 | $ 27,841 |
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services | 325,895 | 56,769 | 457,634 |
Petrochemical Pipeline Services | 6,775 | 2,990 | 18,316 |
NGL Pipeline Services | 9,122 | 1,751 | -- |
Total revenues | $ 370,770 | $ 66,674 | $ 503,791 |
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 with Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
As mentioned above in “Factors Affecting Comparability of Results,” there are several factors that affect the comparability of our results for the second quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2006. Amounts referenced below for the second quarter of 2007 reflect the consolidated results of the Partnership. Amounts referenced below for the second quarter of 2006 reflect the combined results of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor.
39
Revenues were $236.9 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $221.3 million for the second quarter of 2006. The $15.6 million increase in revenues quarter-to-quarter is primarily due to higher revenues associated with our natural gas marketing activities. Revenues from the sale of natural gas increased $12.7 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher natural gas sales prices. Revenues from our NGL and petrochemical storage business increased $2.9 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher storage fee revenues and volumes. Revenues from propylene transportation decreased $5.8 million quarter-to-quarter due to lower transportation fees. In addition, the second quarter of 2007 includes $5.7 million of revenues from the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System, which was placed in service during January 2007.
Operating costs and expenses were $222.7 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $208.4 million for the second quarter of 2006. The $14.3 million quarter-to-quarter increase in operating costs and expenses is primarily due to an increase in the cost of sales associated with our natural gas marketing activities. The cost of sales of our natural gas marketing activities increased $13.4 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher natural gas prices. Equity earnings from Evangeline were $0.1 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $0.2 million for the second quarter of 2006.
Changes in our revenues and costs and expenses quarter-to-quarter are explained in part by changes in energy commodity prices. In general, higher natural gas prices result in an increase in our revenues attributable to the sale of natural gas by Acadian Gas; however, these same commodity prices also increase the associated cost of sales as purchase prices rise. The market price of natural gas (as measured at Henry Hub) averaged $7.55 per MMBtu for the second quarter of 2007 versus $6.80 per MMBtu for the second quarter of 2006.
To a lesser extent, changes in our revenues and costs and expenses are attributable to demand for NGL and petrochemical storage services. Demand for storage services affects the reservation, excess storage and throughput fee revenues earned by our NGL and petrochemical storage business. In turn, demand for our storage services is driven by factors such as demand for petrochemical feedstocks by the petrochemical industry and the quantity of NGLs extracted from natural gas streams at regional gas processing facilities.
Operating income for the second quarter of 2007 was $13.3 million compared to $12.2 million for the second quarter of 2006. Collectively, the changes in revenues, costs and expenses and equity earnings described above contributed to the $1.1 million increase in operating income quarter-to-quarter. Interest expense increased $2.4 million quarter-to-quarter attributable to debt we borrowed at the time of our initial public offering. In addition, the second quarter of 2007 includes $6.6 million of expense for “Parent interest in income of subsidiaries,” which represents EPO’s current 34% ownership interest in each of our operating subsidiaries.
As a result of the items noted in the previous paragraphs, our net income decreased $7.7 million quarter-to-quarter to $4.5 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $12.2 million for the second quarter of 2006.
The following information highlights significant quarter-to-quarter variances in gross operating margin by business segment.
NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $10.7 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $5.7 million for the second quarter of 2006. Revenues from this business segment increased $2.9 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher storage fees. Operating costs and expenses decreased $2.1 million quarter-to-quarter attributable to reduced measurement losses, which were partially offset by higher maintenance and integrity management costs during the second quarter of 2007 relative to the second quarter of 2006.
Storage revenues for the second quarter of 2007 were $2.7 million higher than the second quarter of 2006 primarily as a result of contracts executed in connection with our initial public offering, which increased certain storage fees charged to EPO. Historically, such intercompany charges were below market
40
and eliminated in the consolidated revenues and costs and expenses of Enterprise Products Partners. The changes in these contracts resulted in a $2.3 million increase in storage revenues for the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006. In addition, our storage revenues increased $0.4 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher storage volumes, which increased reservation and excess storage and throughput revenues. Brine production revenues increased $0.2 million quarter-to-quarter.
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $2.2 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $4.0 million for the second quarter of 2006. Natural gas throughput volumes decreased to 746 BBtu/d during the second quarter of 2007 from 811 BBtu/d during the second quarter of 2006. The quarter-to-quarter decrease in segment gross operating margin is primarily due to (i) lower natural gas sales margins attributable in part to measurement losses, (ii) lower natural gas sales volumes and (iii) higher maintenance costs in the second quarter of 2007 relative to the second quarter of 2006. Also, equity earnings from our investment in Evangeline decreased $0.1 million quarter-to-quarter.
Petrochemical Pipeline Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $3.3 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $8.7 million for the second quarter of 2006. Petrochemical transportation volumes were 37 MBPD for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006. Transportation revenues decreased $5.8 million quarter-to-quarter attributable to lower transportation rates. Historically, EPO was the shipper of record on our petrochemical pipelines, and we charged EPO the maximum tariff rate for using these assets. EPO then contracted with third parties to ship volumes on these pipelines under product exchange agreements. In general, the revenues recognized by EPO in connection with these exchange agreements were lower than the maximum tariff rate it paid us. In connection with our initial public offering, EPO assigned its third party product exchange agreements to us. Accordingly, the transportation fees we currently receive for use of our Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine Propylene Pipelines are less than the fees we received from EPO prior to February 2007.
Operating costs and expenses decreased $0.4 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to a reduction in property taxes associated with the Lou-Tex Propylene Pipeline. During 2006, we successfully negotiated a lower property tax rate with the Louisiana state taxing authority.
NGL Pipeline Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $5.3 million for the second quarter of 2007. NGL transportation volumes were 74 MBPD during the second quarter of 2007. Results from this business segment are attributable to the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System, which was placed in service during January 2007.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 with Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
As mentioned above in “Factors Affecting Comparability of Results,” there are several factors that affect the comparability of our results for the first six months of 2007 and the first six months of 2006. Amounts referenced below for the 2007 period reflect the combined results of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor for January 2007 and the consolidated results of the Partnership for the five months ended June 30, 2007. Likewise, amounts referenced below for the first six months of 2006 reflect the combined results of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor.
Revenues were $437.4 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $503.8 million for the first six months of 2006. The $66.4 million decrease in revenues period-to-period is primarily due to lower revenues associated with our natural gas marketing activities. Revenues from the sale of natural gas decreased $74.8 million period-to-period due to lower natural gas sales volumes and prices. Revenues from our NGL and petrochemical storage business increased $6.3 million period-to-period primarily due to higher storage fee revenues. Revenues from propylene transportation decreased $8.6 million period-to-period due to lower transportation rates. In addition, the first six months of 2007 include $10.9 million of revenues from the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System.
41
Operating costs and expenses were $408.3 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $478.6 million for the first six months of 2006. The $70.3 million period-to-period decrease in combined costs and expenses is primarily due to a decrease in the cost of sales associated with our natural gas marketing activities. The cost of sales of our natural gas marketing activities decreased $73.2 million period-to-period as a result of a decrease in volumes and lower natural gas prices. General and administrative costs increased $0.1 million period-to-period. Equity earnings from Evangeline were $0.2 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $0.4 million for the first six months of 2006.
Changes in our revenues and costs and expenses period-to-period are explained in part by changes in energy commodity prices. In general, lower natural gas prices result in a decrease in our combined revenues attributable to the sale of natural gas by Acadian Gas; however, these same commodity prices also decrease the associated cost of sales as purchase prices decline. The market price of natural gas (as measured at Henry Hub) averaged $7.16 per MMBtu for the first six months of 2007 versus $7.91 per MMBtu for the first six months of 2006.
To a lesser extent, changes in our revenues and costs and expenses are attributable to demand for NGL and petrochemical storage services. Demand for storage services affects the reservation, excess storage and throughput fee revenues earned by our NGL and petrochemical storage business. In turn, demand for our storage services is driven by factors such as demand for petrochemical feedstocks by the petrochemical industry and the quantity of NGLs extracted from natural gas streams at regional gas processing facilities.
Operating income for the first six months of 2007 was $27.4 million compared to $23.8 million for the first six months of 2006. Collectively, the aforementioned changes in revenues, costs and expenses and equity earnings contributed to the $3.6 million increase in operating income period-to-period. Interest expense increased $3.5 million period-to-period attributable to debt we borrowed at the time of our initial public offering. In addition, the first six months of 2007 include $10.7 million of expense for “Parent interest in income of subsidiaries,” which represents EPO’s current 34% ownership interest in each of our operating subsidiaries.
As a result of the items noted in the previous paragraphs, our net income decreased $10.3 million period-to-period to $13.5 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $23.8 million for the first six months of 2006. Net income for the first six months of 2006 includes the recognition of non-cash amounts related to a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. For additional information regarding the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle we recorded in 2006, see “Other Items” below.
The following information highlights significant period-to-period variances in gross operating margin by business segment.
NGL & Petrochemical Storage Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $19.2 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $8.9 million for the first six months of 2006. Revenues increased $6.3 million period-to-period primarily due to higher storage fees. Operating costs and expenses decreased $4.0 million period-to-period attributable to reduced measurement losses, which were partially offset by higher maintenance and integrity management costs during the first six months of 2007 relative to the first six months of 2006. In addition, operating costs and expenses for the first six months of 2006 includes $0.4 million of storage fees we paid to a third party to accommodate overflow storage volumes.
Storage revenues for the first six months of 2007 were $5.8 million higher than the first six months of 2006 primarily as a result of contracts executed in connection with our initial public offering, which increased certain storage fees charged to EPO. Historically, such intercompany charges were below market and eliminated in the consolidated revenues and costs and expenses of Enterprise Products Partners. The changes in these contracts resulted in a $4.1 million increase in storage revenues for the first six months of 2007 compared to the first six months of 2006. In addition, our storage revenues increased $1.6 million period-to-period primarily due to higher storage volumes, which increased reservation and excess storage and throughput revenues. Brine production revenues increased $0.5 million period-to-period.
42
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $5.7 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $10.9 million for the first six months of 2006, a $5.2 million decrease period-to-period. Natural gas throughput volumes decreased to 697 BBtu/d during the first six months of 2007 from 789 BBtu/d during the first six months of 2006. Segment gross operating margin decreased $2.6 million period-to-period attributable to our collection of a contingent asset during the first six months of 2006 that related to a prior business acquisition. The remainder of the period-to-period decrease in segment gross operating margin is primarily due to (i) lower natural gas sales margins attributable in part to measurement losses, (ii) lower natural gas sales volumes and (iii) higher maintenance costs in the second quarter of 2007 relative to the first six months of 2006. Also, equity earnings from our investment in Evangeline decreased $0.2 million period-to-period.
Petrochemical Pipeline Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $8.2 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $15.9 million for the first six months of 2006. Petrochemical transportation volumes remained steady at 36 MBPD during the first six months of 2007 and 2006. Transportation revenues decreased $8.6 million period-to-period as a result of EPO assigning its third party product exchange agreements to us in connection with our initial public offering. Accordingly, the transportation fees we currently receive for use of our Lou-Tex Propylene and Sabine Propylene Pipelines are less than the fees we received from EPO prior to February 2007. Operating costs and expenses decreased $0.9 million period-to-period primarily due to a reduction in property taxes associated with the Lou-Tex Propylene Pipeline. During 2006, we successfully negotiated a lower property tax rate with the Louisiana state taxing authority.
NGL Pipeline Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $10.2 million for the first six months of 2007. NGL transportation volumes were 71 MBPD during the first six months of 2007. Results from this business segment are attributable to the DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System, which was placed in-service during January 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary cash requirements, in addition to normal operating and general and administrative expenses are for capital expenditures, business acquisitions, distributions to partners and debt service. We expect to fund our short-term needs for such items as operating expenses and sustaining capital expenditures with cash flows from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Capital expenditures for long-term needs resulting from internal growth projects and business acquisitions are expected to be funded by a variety of sources (either separately or in combination), including cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and the issuance of debt securities or additional equity. We expect to fund cash distributions to partners primarily with cash flows from operations. Debt service requirements are expected to be funded by cash flows from operations or refinancing arrangements.
Initial Public Offering
On February 5, 2007, we completed our initial public offering of 14,950,000 common units (including an overallotment amount of 1,950,000 common units) at a price of $21.00 per unit, which generated net proceeds of $291.0 million after deducting applicable underwriting discounts, commissions, structuring fees and other offering expenses. As consideration for assets contributed and reimbursement for capital expenditures related to these assets, we distributed $260.6 million of these net proceeds to EPO, along with $198.9 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility (see below) and a final amount of 5,351,571 of our common units. We used $38.5 million of net proceeds from the overallotment to redeem 1,950,000 of the 7,301,571 common units we had originally issued to EPO, resulting in the final amount of 5,351,571 common units beneficially owned by EPO.
43
Revolving Credit Facility
On February 5, 2007, we entered into a $300.0 million revolving credit facility having a $30.0 million sublimit for Swingline loans. We may also issue up to $300.0 million of letters of credit under this facility. Letters of credit outstanding under this facility reduce the amount available for borrowings. At the closing of our initial public offering, we made an initial draw of $200.0 million under this facility to fund the $198.9 million cash distribution to EPO and the remainder to pay debt issuance costs. At June 30, 2007, the balance outstanding under this facility was $190.0 million.
This credit facility matures in February 2011 and will be used by us in the future to fund working capital and other capital requirements and for general partnership purposes. We may make up to two requests for one-year extensions of the maturity date (subject to certain restrictions). The revolving credit facility is also available to help fund distributions. We can increase the borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, without consent of the lenders, by an amount not to exceed $150.0 million, by adding to the facility one or more new lenders and/or increasing the commitments of existing lenders. No lender is required to increase its commitment, unless it agrees to do so in its sole discretion.
Our revolving credit facility offers the following unsecured loans, each having different interest requirements: (i) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin (as defined in the credit agreement), (ii) Base Rate loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the rate of interest publicly announced by the administrative agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as its Base Rate and (b) 0.5% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate in effect on such date. Swingline loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin.
Our revolving credit facility requires us to maintain a leverage ratio for the prior four fiscal quarters of not more than 4.75 to 1.00 at the last day of each fiscal quarter commencing June 30, 2007; provided that, upon the closing of a permitted acquisition, such ratio shall not exceed (a) 5.25 to 1.00 at the last day of the fiscal quarter in which such specified acquisition occurred and at the last day of each of the two fiscal quarters following the fiscal quarter in which such specified acquisition occurred, and (b) 4.75 to 1.00 at the last day of each fiscal quarter thereafter. In addition, prior to obtaining an investment-grade rating by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch Ratings, our interest coverage ratio, for the prior four fiscal quarters shall not be less than 2.75 to 1.00 at the last day of each fiscal quarter commencing June 30, 2007.
If an event of default exists under the credit agreement, the lenders will be able to accelerate the maturity date of amounts borrowed under the credit agreement and exercise other rights and remedies. See Note 8 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of such covenants and events of default.
44
Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities
The following tables summarize our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands). For information regarding the individual components of our cash flow amounts, please see the Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
| Duncan Energy Partners | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor |
| For The Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities | $ 16,199 | $ 23,686 |
Net cash used in investing activities | (34,313) | (18,830) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 20,013 | (4,856) |
| | |
| Duncan Energy Partners | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | For the One | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Month Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities | $ 64,895 | $ (3,535) | $ 26,876 |
Net cash used in investing activities | (82,688) | (4,999) | (33,227) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 23,786 | 8,534 | 6,351 |
| | | |
We have presented our cash flow information following the completion of our initial public offering separately from those pertaining to Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. We acquired substantially all of the assets and operations of the Predecessor that are included in our consolidated financial statements. There are a number of agreements and other items that went into effect at the time of our initial public offering that affect the comparability of our current operating results with the historical operating results of Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor. For information regarding factors affecting the comparability of our operating results, see “Results of Operations” within this Item 2.
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 with Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
The following information highlights significant factors affecting our cash flow amounts:
Operating activities. Net cash provided by (or used in) operating activities is primarily influenced by earnings and the timing of cash receipts from sales and cash payments for purchases and other expenses between periods. Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $16.2 million. This amount is attributable to strong earnings (as indicated by $21.5 million of gross operating margin for the period), partially offset by the net effect of changes in operating accounts. Gross operating margin is discussed under “Results of Operations” within this Item 2.
Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor generated $23.7 million of operating cash flows during the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Investing activities. On a combined quarterly basis, net cash used in investing activities was $34.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $18.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $15.5 million increase in cash payments is primarily due to higher capital expenditures quarter-to-quarter.
We retained $30.6 million of the net proceeds from our initial public offering to fund our 66% share of post-February 1, 2007 estimated construction costs and liabilities. For additional information regarding our capital spending program, see “Overview of Business – Capital Spending” within this Item 2.
45
Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $20.0 million. This amount is primarily attributable to net borrowings of $21.0 million from our credit facility and net cash contributions from our Parent of $4.9 million, offset by cash distributions to partners of $5.1 million.
As a result of contributions EPO made to us at the time of our initial public offering, it owns a 34% interest in certain of our operating subsidiaries and is responsible for funding its share of the cash calls of these subsidiaries. It also receives 34% of the cash distributions paid by these subsidiaries. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, EPO contributed a net $4.9 million to these entities primarily due to capital expenditure commitments of these subsidiaries.
Prior to our initial public offering, we operated within the EPO cash management program. For purposes of presentation in the Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, cash flows provided by financing activities prior to February 1, 2007 represent deemed contributions from our prior owners equal to net cash used in investing activities less net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash distribution to owners was $4.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. As a result of this procedure, our financial statements prior to February 1, 2007 do not reflect cash balances.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 with Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
The following information highlights significant factors affecting our cash flow amounts:
Operating activities. Net cash provided by (or used in) operating activities is primarily influenced by earnings and the timing of cash receipts from sales and cash payments for purchases and other expenses between periods. Net cash provided by operating activities for the five months ended June 30, 2007 was $64.9 million. This amount is attributable to strong earnings (as indicated by $35.5 million of gross operating margin for the period) and the net effect of changes in operating accounts.
Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor had a $3.5 million operating cash flow deficit in January 2007 and generated $26.9 million of such cash flows during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Investing activities. On a combined quarterly basis, net cash used in investing activities was $82.7 million for the five months ended June 30, 2007 and $5.0 million for the month of January 2007 compared to $33.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The $54.5 million increase in cash payments is primarily due to higher capital expenditures year-to-year.
We retained $30.6 million of the net proceeds from our initial public offering to fund our 66% share of post-February 1, 2007 estimated construction costs and liabilities. For additional information regarding our capital spending program, see “Overview of Business – Capital Spending” within this Item 2.
Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the five months ended June 30, 2007 was $23.8 million. On February 5, 2007, we completed our initial public offering of 14,950,000 common units (including an overallotment amount of 1,950,000 common units) at a price of $21.00 per unit, which generated net proceeds of $291.0 million after deducting applicable underwriting discounts, commissions, structuring fees and other offering expenses. As consideration for assets contributed and reimbursement for capital expenditures related to these assets, we distributed $260.6 million of these net proceeds to EPO, along with $198.9 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility and a final amount of 5,351,571 of our common units. EPO used the $459.5 million in cash it received from us to temporarily reduce amounts outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
As a result of contributions EPO made to us at the time of our initial public offering, it owns a 34% interest in certain of our operating subsidiaries and is responsible for funding its share of the cash calls of these subsidiaries. It also receives 34% of the cash distributions paid by these subsidiaries. For the five months ended June 30, 2007, EPO contributed a net $7.9 million to these entities primarily due to capital expenditure commitments of these subsidiaries. For the five months ended June 30, 2007, we distributed $5.1 million to our partners.
46
Prior to our initial public offering, we operated within the EPO cash management program. For purposes of presentation in the Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, cash flows provided by financing activities prior to February 1, 2007 represent deemed contributions from our prior owners equal to net cash used in investing activities less net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash contributions from owners were $8.5 million for the month of January 2007 and $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. As a result of this procedure, our financial statements prior to February 1, 2007 do not present cash balances.
Critical Accounting Policies
In our financial reporting process, we employ methods, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of our financial statements. These methods, estimates and assumptions also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Investors should be aware that actual results could differ from these estimates if the underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect.
In general, there have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies since December 31, 2006. For a detailed discussion of these policies, please read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” in our annual report on Form 10-K for 2006. The following describes the current estimation risk underlying our most significant financial statement items:
Depreciation methods and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment
In general, depreciation is the systematic and rational allocation of an asset’s cost, less its residual value (if any), to the periods it benefits. The majority of our property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method, which results in depreciation expense being incurred evenly over the life of the assets. Our estimate of depreciation incorporates assumptions regarding the useful economic lives and residual values of our assets. At the time we place our assets in service, we believe such assumptions are reasonable; however, circumstances may develop that would cause us to change these assumptions, which would change our depreciation amounts prospectively.
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was $792.3 million and $707.6 million, respectively. We recorded $7.2 million and $5.3 million in depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We recorded $11.7 million for the five months ended June 30, 2007; $2.2 million for the month ended of January 31, 2007 and $10.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. For additional information regarding our property, plant and equipment, see Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Measuring recoverability of long-lived assets and equity method investments
In general, long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite useful lives and property, plant and equipment) are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. An equity method investment is evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that there is a possible loss in value of the investment other than a temporary decline. Measuring the potential impairment of such assets and investments involves the estimation of future cash flows to be derived from the asset being tested. Our estimates of such cash flows are based on a number of assumptions including anticipated margins and volumes; estimated useful life of the asset or asset group; and salvage values. A significant change in these underlying assumptions could result in our recording an impairment charge.
We did not recognize any asset impairment charges during the periods presented. In addition, we did not recognize any impairment charges related to our Evangeline unconsolidated affiliate during the periods presented.
47
Amortization methods and estimated useful lives of qualifying intangible assets
The specific, identifiable intangible assets of a business enterprise depend largely upon the nature of its operations. The method used to value each intangible asset will vary depending upon the nature of the asset, the business in which it is utilized, and the economic returns it is generating or is expected to generate. If our underlying assumptions regarding the estimated useful life of an intangible asset change, then the amortization period for such asset would be adjusted accordingly. Additionally, if we determine that an intangible asset’s unamortized cost may not be recoverable due to impairment, we may be required to reduce the carrying value and the subsequent useful life of the asset. Any such write-down of the value and unfavorable change in the useful life of an intangible asset would increase operating costs and expenses at that time.
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the net book values of our intangible assets were $6.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively. We recorded $58 thousand in amortization expense for each of the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $116 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For additional information regarding our intangible assets, see Note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Our revenue recognition policies and use of estimates for revenues and expenses
We make estimates for certain revenue and expense items due to time constraints on the financial accounting and reporting process. At times, we must estimate revenues from a customer before we actually bill the customer or accrue an expense we incur before physically receiving a vendor’s invoice. Such estimates reverse in the following period and are offset by our recording the actual customer billing and vendor invoice amounts. If the basis of our estimates proves to be substantially incorrect, it could result in material adjustments in results of operations between periods. For all periods presented, our revenue and cost estimates were substantially the same as the actual amounts.
Other Items
Contractual Obligations
With the exception of the $200.0 million of debt we incurred in connection with our initial public offering in February 2007, there have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations since those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. See Note 8 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report for additional information regarding our credit facility.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no significant changes with regards to our off-balance sheet arrangements since those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
48
Summary of Related Party Transactions
The following table summarizes our related party transactions for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| Duncan Energy Partners | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues: | | |
EPO | $ 18,061 | $ 30,546 |
Evangeline | 65,269 | 73,161 |
Total | $ 83,330 | $ 103,707 |
Operating costs and expenses: | | |
EPCO | $ 5,032 | $ 7,756 |
EPO | 7,279 | 3,699 |
TEPPCO | 72 | -- |
Evangeline | 1 | -- |
Total | $ 12,384 | $ 11,455 |
General and administrative costs: | | |
EPCO | $ 546 | $ 950 |
The following table summarizes our related party transactions for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Revenues: | | | |
EPO | $ 28,191 | $ 8,602 | $ 55,910 |
Evangeline | 97,519 | 15,415 | 151,381 |
Total | $ 125,710 | $ 24,017 | $ 207,291 |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | |
EPCO | $ 7,645 | $ 2,487 | $ 16,613 |
EPO | 9,019 | 654 | 8,037 |
TEPPCO | 72 | -- | -- |
Evangeline | 1 | 8 | -- |
Total | $ 16,737 | $ 3,149 | $ 24,650 |
General and administrative costs: | | | |
EPCO | $ 770 | $ 455 | $ 1,703 |
For additional information regarding our related party transactions, see Note 12 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
We have an extensive and ongoing relationship with EPCO and its affiliates, including TEPPCO. Our relationship with EPO includes various storage contracts, transportation agreements and partnership interests held by EPO in us. Our relationship with TEPPCO involves the short-term lease of a pipeline segment that is currently used by our DEP South Texas NGL Pipeline System. Our relationship with EPCO includes the provision of employees to us and other arrangements as governed by the EPCO administrative services agreement.
49
Non-GAAP reconciliations
A reconciliation of our measurement of total gross operating margin to operating income and further to income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follows (dollars in thousands):
| Duncan Energy Partners | Duncan Energy Partners Predecessor |
| For the Three | For the Three |
| Months Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 21,502 | $ 18,449 |
Adjustments to reconcile total non-GAAP segment gross | | |
operating margin to operating income: | | |
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating | | |
costs and expenses | (7,203) | (5,308) |
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses | -- | 6 |
General and administrative costs | (1,026) | (959) |
Operating income | 13,273 | 12,188 |
Other income (expense), net | (2,181) | -- |
Provision for income taxes | 59 | (21) |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (6,603) | -- |
Income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | $ 4,548 | $ 12,167 |
| | |
A reconciliation of our measurement of total gross operating margin to operating income and further to income before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the periods indicated follows (dollars in thousands):
| Duncan Energy | Duncan Energy |
| Partners | Partners Predecessor |
| For the Five | One Month | For the Six |
| Months Ended | Ended | Months Ended |
| June 30, 2007 | January 31, 2007 | June 30, 2006 |
Total segment gross operating margin | $ 35,504 | $ 7,721 | $ 35,695 |
Adjustments to reconcile total non-GAAP segment gross | | | |
operating margin to operating income: | | | |
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating | | | |
costs and expenses | (11,718) | (2,209) | (10,149) |
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses | 2 | -- | 13 |
General and administrative costs | (1,383) | (477) | (1,735) |
Operating income | 22,405 | 5,035 | 23,824 |
Other income (expense), net | (3,168) | -- | 4 |
Provision for income taxes | (114) | -- | (21) |
Parent interest in income of subsidiaries | (10,652) | -- | -- |
Income before the cumulative effect of a change in | | | |
accounting principle | $ 8,471 | $ 5,035 | $ 23,807 |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
We recognized, as a nominal benefit, the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $9 thousand in January 2006 due to the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.”
50
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The accounting standard setting bodies and the SEC have recently issued the following accounting guidance that will or may affect our financial statements:
• | SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” and |
• | SFAS 159, “Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” |
For additional information regarding these recent accounting developments and others that may affect our future financial statements, see Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We use financial instruments to secure certain fixed price natural gas sales contracts (referred to as “customer fixed-price arrangements”). We also enter into a limited number of cash flow hedges in connection with such business. We recognize such instruments on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities based on an instrument’s fair value. Fair value is generally defined as the amount at which the financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, not in a forced or liquidation sale. Changes in fair value of financial instrument contracts are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
Commodity financial instrument portfolio
In addition to its natural gas transportation business, Acadian Gas engages in the purchase and sale of natural gas to third party customers in the Louisiana area. The price of natural gas fluctuates in response to changes in supply, market uncertainty, and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. We may use commodity financial instruments such as futures, swaps and forward contracts to mitigate such risks. In general, the types of risks we attempt to hedge are those related to the variability of future earnings and cash flows resulting from changes in applicable commodity prices. The commodity financial instruments we utilize may be settled in cash or with another financial instrument. As a matter of policy, we do not use financial instruments for speculative (or “trading”) purposes.
Acadian Gas also enters into a small number of cash flow hedges in connection with its purchase of natural gas held-for-sale to third parties. In addition, Acadian Gas enters into a limited number of offsetting financial instruments that effectively fix the price of natural gas for certain of its customers.
Historically, the use of commodity financial instruments by Acadian Gas was governed by policies established by the general partner of Enterprise Products Partners. Our general partner now monitors the hedging strategies associated with the physical and financial risks of Acadian Gas, approves specific activities subject to the policy (including authorized products, instruments and markets) and establishes specific guidelines and procedures for implementing and ensuring compliance with the policy.
The fair value of our commodity financial instrument portfolio was a liability of $307 thousand at June 30, 2007 and a negligible amount at December 31, 2006. We recorded a gain of $53 thousand and loss of $260 thousand related to our commodity financial instruments during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We also recorded a loss of $0.4 million and loss of $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We assess the risk of our commodity financial instrument portfolio using a sensitivity analysis model. The sensitivity analysis applied to this portfolio measures the potential income or loss (i.e., the change in fair value of the portfolio) based upon a hypothetical 10% movement in the underlying quoted market prices of the commodity financial instruments outstanding at the dates indicated within the
51
following table. The following table presents the effect of hypothetical price movements on the estimated fair value (“FV”) of this portfolio at the dates presented (dollars in thousands):
| | | | Resulting | Commodity Financial Instrument Portfolio FV |
Scenario | Classification | June 30, 2007 | July 24, 2007 |
FV assuming no change in underlying commodity prices | Asset (Liability) | $ (307) | $ (349) |
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying commodity prices | Asset (Liability) | (11) | (62) |
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying commodity prices | Asset (Liability) | (604) | (636) |
Product purchase commitments
Acadian Gas has a long-term natural gas purchase contract with a third party. This purchase agreement expires in January 2013. Our purchase price under this contract approximates the market price of natural gas at the time we take delivery of the volumes. For additional information regarding our commitments, see Note 14 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of the chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”) of DEP GP, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, including internal controls over financial reporting, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, the CEO and CFO of DEP GP have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to our partnership is made known to management on a timely basis. Our CEO and CFO noted no material weaknesses in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that are likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information. Also, they detected no fraud involving management or employees who have a significant role in our internal controls over financial reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have not been evaluated by management and no other factors that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
Collectively, these disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide us with reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed with the SEC is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. Based on the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Partnership have been detected.
The certifications of our general partner’s CEO and CFO required under Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been included as exhibits to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
52
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 14, “Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation,” of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In general, there have been no significant changes in our risk factors since December 31, 2006. For a detailed discussion of our risk factors, please read, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for 2006.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On February 5, 2007, we completed our initial public offering. See “Overview of Business – Recent Developments” included under Part I, Item 2 for information regarding the net proceeds generated by this offering and the subsequent use of proceeds. We did not repurchase any of our common units during the three and five months ended June 30, 2007.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Unit Holders.
Item 5. Other Information.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit Number | Exhibit * |
3.1 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-138371) filed November 2, 2006). |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Duncan Energy Partners L.P., dated February 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed February 5, 2007). |
3.3 | Certificate of Formation of DEP Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-138371) filed November 2, 2006). |
3.4 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of DEP Holdings, LLC, dated May 3, 2007. (incorportated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Duncan Energy Partners L.P. Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 4, 2007). |
3.5 | Certificate of Formation of DEP OLPGP, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-138371) filed November 2, 2006). |
3.6 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of DEP OLPGP, LLC, dated January 19, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-138371) filed January 22, 2007). |
53
3.7 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of DEP Operating Partnership, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-138371) filed November 2, 2006). |
3.8 | Agreement of Limited Partnership of DEP Operating Partnership, L.P., dated September 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-138371) filed December 15, 2006). |
4.1 | Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2007, among Duncan Energy Partners L.P., as borrower, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, The Bank of Nova Scotia and Citibank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agents, and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, The Bank of Nova Scotia and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-138371) filed January 12, 2007). |
4.2# | First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2007, among Duncan Energy Partners L.P., as borrower, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, The Bank of Nova Scotia and Citibank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agents, and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, The Bank of Nova Scotia and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners. |
10.1# | Second Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement dated August 7, 2007, but effective as of May 7, 2007. |
10.2*** | EPE Unit III, L.P. Agreement of limited partnership dated May 7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Enterprise G.P. Holdings L.P. on May 10, 2007). |
10.3# | First Amendment to EPE Unit L.P. Agreement of limited partnership dated August 7, 2007. |
10.4# | First Amendment to EPE Unit II, L.P. Agreement of limited partnership dated August 7, 2007. |
10.5# | First Amendment to EPE Unit III, L.P. Agreement of limited partnership dated August 7, 2007. |
31.1# | Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Richard H. Bachmann for Duncan Energy Partners L.P. for the June 30, 2007 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
31.2# | Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of W. Randall Fowler for Duncan Energy Partners L.P. for the June 30, 2007 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
32.1# | Section 1350 certification of Richard H. Bachmann for the June 30, 2007 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
32.2# | Section 1350 certification of W. Randall Fowler for the June 30, 2007 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
* | With respect to exhibits incorporated by reference to Exchange Act filings, the Commission file number for Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. is 1-32610. |
*** | Identifies management contract and compensatory plan arrangements. |
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Houston, State of Texas on August 8, 2007.
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P. |
(A Delaware Limited Partnership) | |
By: | DEP Holdings, LLC, |
| as General Partner | |
By: | ___/s/ Michael J. Knesek___________________ |
Name: | Michael J. Knesek | |
Title: | Senior Vice President, Controller | |
| and Principal Accounting Officer | |
| of the General Partner | |
| | | | | |
55