UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 333-138916
Sabine Pass LNG, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
20-0466069
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
700 Milam Street, Suite 800
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
77002
(Zip Code)
(713) 375-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | x | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ | | |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
i
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 183,913 | | | $ | 191,179 | |
Accounts and interest receivable | | | 432 | | | | 3,249 | |
Accounts receivable—affiliate | | | 20,909 | | | | — | |
Advances to affiliate | | | 33,466 | | | | 1,707 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 6,999 | | | | 432 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | | | 245,719 | | | | 196,567 | |
NON-CURRENT RESTRICTED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | 26,829 | | | | 442,019 | |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | | 1,417,341 | | | | 1,127,289 | |
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS, NET | | | 28,010 | | | | 29,895 | |
ADVANCES UNDER LONG-TERM CONTRACTS | | | 10,378 | | | | 28,497 | |
ADVANCES TO AFFILIATE—LNG HELD FOR COMMISSIONING | | | 64,459 | | | | — | |
LNG HELD FOR COMMISSIONING | | | 957 | | | | — | |
OTHER | | | 5,046 | | | | 2,614 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 1,798,739 | | | $ | 1,826,881 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ DEFICIT | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 1,569 | | | $ | 55 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 50,458 | | | | 52,056 | |
Accrued liabilities—affiliate | | | 3,574 | | | | 1,048 | |
Derivative liabilities—affiliate | | | 7,740 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | 63,341 | | | | 53,159 | |
LONG-TERM DEBT | | | 2,032,000 | | | | 2,032,000 | |
DEFERRED REVENUE | | | 44,971 | | | | 42,583 | |
OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | 2,914 | | | | 3,827 | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | — | | | | — | |
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL DEFICIT | | | | | | | | |
Partners’ deficit, including deficits accumulated during development stage of $163,577 at June 30, 2008 and $123,778 at December 31, 2007 | | | (344,487 | ) | | | (304,688 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL PARTNERS’ DEFICIT | | | (344,487 | ) | | | (304,688 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ DEFICIT | | $ | 1,798,739 | | | $ | 1,826,881 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
1
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Period from October 20, 2003 (Date of Inception) to June 30, 2008 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | |
REVENUES | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Legal | | | 11 | | | | — | | | | 12 | | | | — | | | | 2,274 | |
Professional | | | 246 | | | | 47 | | | | 490 | | | | 158 | | | | 2,487 | |
Technical consulting | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,577 | |
Land site rental | | | 341 | | | | 370 | | | | 746 | | | | 771 | | | | 3,778 | |
Depreciation expense | | | 19 | | | | 43 | | | | 37 | | | | 64 | | | | 136 | |
Labor and overhead charge from affiliate | | | 1,546 | | | | 2,268 | | | | 4,309 | | | | 3,592 | | | | 20,075 | |
Phase 2–Stage 1 development reimbursement to affiliate | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,527 | |
Public relations | | | 46 | | | | — | | | | 46 | | | | — | | | | 1,191 | |
Other | | | 359 | | | | 28 | | | | 578 | | | | 31 | | | | 1,210 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | | 2,568 | | | | 2,756 | | | | 6,218 | | | | 4,616 | | | | 40,255 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | | | (2,568 | ) | | | (2,756 | ) | | | (6,218 | ) | | | (4,616 | ) | | | (40,255 | ) |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 2,704 | | | | 13,370 | | | | 8,609 | | | | 28,137 | | | | 66,974 | |
Interest expense, net | | | (13,571 | ) | | | (23,666 | ) | | | (29,853 | ) | | | (49,483 | ) | | | (133,964 | ) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (23,761 | ) |
Derivative loss, net | | | (11,537 | ) | | | — | | | | (12,367 | ) | | | — | | | | (32,601 | ) |
Other | | | 20 | | | | — | | | | 30 | | | | — | | | | 30 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE | | | (22,384 | ) | | | (10,296 | ) | | | (33,581 | ) | | | (21,346 | ) | | | (123,322 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET LOSS | | $ | (24,952 | ) | | $ | (13,052 | ) | | $ | (39,799 | ) | | $ | (25,962 | ) | | $ | (163,577 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
2
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ DEFICIT
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | General Partner | | Limited Partner | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | | Total Partners’ Deficit | |
| | Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc. | | Sabine Pass LNG-LP, LLC | | | |
Balance at October 20, 2003 (inception) | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Net loss | | | — | | | (2,763 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,763 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2003 | | | — | | | (2,763 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,763 | ) |
Distributions | | | — | | | (10,000 | ) | | | — | | | | (10,000 | ) |
Net loss | | | — | | | (4,654 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,654 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2004 | | | — | | | (17,417 | ) | | | — | | | | (17,417 | ) |
Capital contributions | | | — | | | 196,658 | | | | — | | | | 196,658 | |
Rescinded distribution | | | — | | | 10,000 | | | | — | | | | 10,000 | |
Change in fair value of derivative instrument | | | — | | | — | | | | 1,814 | | | | 1,814 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | (4,255 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,255 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2005 | | | — | | | 184,986 | | | | 1,814 | | | | 186,800 | |
Capital contributions | | | — | | | 780 | | | | — | | | | 780 | |
Distributions | | | — | | | (378,348 | ) | | | — | | | | (378,348 | ) |
Change in fair value of derivative instrument | | | — | | | — | | | | (1,814 | ) | | | (1,814 | ) |
Net loss | | | — | | | (60,760 | ) | | | — | | | | (60,760 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | | | — | | | (253,342 | ) | | | — | | | | (253,342 | ) |
Net loss | | | — | | | (51,346 | ) | | | — | | | | (51,346 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | | | — | | | (304,688 | ) | | | — | | | | (304,688 | ) |
Net loss | | | — | | | (39,799 | ) | | | — | | | | (39,799 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2008 | | $ | — | | $ | (344,487 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (344,487 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
3
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Period from October 20, 2003 (Date of Inception) to June 30, 2008 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (39,799 | ) | | $ | (25,962 | ) | | $ | (163,577 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 37 | | | | 64 | | | | 135 | |
Non-cash derivative loss | | | 7,740 | | | | — | | | | 7,401 | |
Amortization of debt issuance costs | | | 1,898 | | | | 1,895 | | | | 6,386 | |
Interest income on restricted cash and cash equivalents | | | (10,880 | ) | | | (28,137 | ) | | | (57,210 | ) |
Use of restricted cash and cash equivalents | | | 67,988 | | | | 64,254 | | | | 171,031 | |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23,750 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 3,716 | | | | (11,913 | ) | | | 5,484 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities—affiliate | | | 2,526 | | | | (217 | ) | | | 3,573 | |
Accounts and interest receivable | | | 2,817 | | | | — | | | | (2,408 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | | 2,388 | | | | — | | | | 44,971 | |
Advance to affiliate | | | (31,759 | ) | | | — | | | | (31,759 | ) |
Prepaid and other | | | (6,672 | ) | | | 16 | | | | (6,058 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,719 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of (investment in) restricted cash and cash equivalents | | | 365,335 | | | | 230,581 | | | | (322,714 | ) |
LNG terminal construction-in-process | | | (292,447 | ) | | | (215,340 | ) | | | (1,347,735 | ) |
Advances to affiliate—LNG held for commissioning, net of amounts transferred to LNG terminal construction-in-process | | | (64,459 | ) | | | — | | | | (64,459 | ) |
Purchases of LNG held for commissioning, net of amounts transferred to LNG terminal construction-in-process | | | (957 | ) | | | — | | | | (957 | ) |
Advances under long-term contracts | | | (7,472 | ) | | | (13,956 | ) | | | (53,109 | ) |
Other | | | — | | | | (1,285 | ) | | | (1,995 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,790,969 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,032,000 | |
Debt issuance costs | | | (13 | ) | | | (641 | ) | | | (61,798 | ) |
Use of restricted cash and cash equivalents | | | 13 | | | | 641 | | | | 738 | |
Proceeds from subordinated note—affiliate | | | — | | | | — | | | | 37,377 | |
Repayment of subordinated note—affiliate | | | — | | | | — | | | | (37,377 | ) |
Borrowings from Sabine Pass credit facility | | | — | | | | — | | | | 383,400 | |
Repayment of Sabine Pass credit facility | | | — | | | | — | | | | (383,400 | ) |
Distribution to partner | | | — | | | | — | | | | (378,348 | ) |
Capital contributions by partner | | | — | | | | — | | | | 196,658 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,789,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—beginning of period | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—end of period | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
4
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE 1—Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Sabine Pass LNG, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, is a Texas-based partnership formed with one general partner, Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc. (“Sabine Pass GP”), a Cheniere Energy, Inc. (“Cheniere”) indirect subsidiary, and one limited partner, Sabine Pass LNG-LP, LLC (“Sabine Pass LNG-LP”), an indirect subsidiary of Cheniere. Cheniere has a 90.6% ownership interest in Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P., which is the indirect parent of Sabine Pass GP, Sabine Pass LNG-LP and us. As used in these Notes to Financial Statements, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. We are in the development stage, and the purpose of this limited partnership is to own, develop and operate a liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) receiving and regasification terminal in western Cameron Parish, Louisiana on the Sabine Pass Channel (the “LNG receiving terminal”). After construction is completed, we will own and operate the LNG receiving terminal.
The accompanying unaudited Financial Statements of Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation, have been included.
Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that will be realized for the year ending December 31, 2008.
We are not a taxable entity for federal income tax purposes. As such, we do not directly pay federal income tax. Our taxable income or loss, which may vary substantially from the net income or loss reported in the Statements of Operations, is includable in the federal income tax returns of each partner. The aggregate difference in the basis of our net assets for financial and income tax purposes cannot be readily determined as we do not have access to the information about each partner’s tax attributes related to us.
For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
NOTE 2—Development Stage Operations
We were formed on October 20, 2003. Operations to date have been devoted to pre-construction and construction activities. Our ultimate profitability will depend on, among other factors, the successful completion of construction of our LNG receiving terminal and commencement of commercial operation. As of June 30, 2008, we had a cumulative net loss of $163.6 million since inception.
NOTE 3—Advances to Affiliate-LNG Held for Commissioning and LNG Held for Commissioning
In connection with the construction of our LNG receiving terminal, we require LNG to perform certain commissioning activities, as follows:
| • | | Cool down—A minimum amount of LNG will be used to cool down the LNG receiving terminal. Cool down represents the amount of LNG required to cool the LNG receiving terminal to its normal operating temperature. |
5
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
| • | | LNG heel—A certain amount of LNG will be used to establish a level of LNG inventory in each LNG storage tank and in the LNG receiving terminal piping in order for the LNG receiving terminal to function properly. |
| • | | Equipment commissioning—The remaining amount of the LNG will be used to commission the equipment in the LNG receiving terminal to ensure that it performs at designed specifications. Equipment commissioning will result in natural gas being sold. |
LNG purchased directly by us is recorded at historical cost and classified as a non-current asset on our Balance Sheets as LNG Held for Commissioning. LNG purchased on our behalf by Cheniere Marketing that has been funded by us is recorded at historical cost and classified as a non-current asset on our Balance Sheets as Advances to Affiliate—LNG Held for Commissioning (see Note 11—Related Party Transactions); for this LNG, Cheniere Marketing holds title to the LNG at all times, sells all redelivered LNG and remits the net proceeds from such sales back to us. The LNG used in the commissioning process is capitalized net of amounts received from the sale of natural gas.
As of June 30, 2008, we or Cheniere Marketing on our behalf had acquired a total of three LNG commissioning cargoes for the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and we have unloaded the LNG into our LNG receiving terminal. As of June 30, 2008, our Advances to Affiliate—LNG Held for Commissioning were $64.5 million and our LNG Held for Commissioning was $1.0 million.
NOTE 4—Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted cash and cash equivalents and treasury securities are comprised of cash that has been contractually restricted as to usage or withdrawal, as follows:
Sabine Pass LNG Receiving Terminal Construction Reserve
In November 2006, we issued an aggregate principal amount of $2,032.0 million of Senior Secured Notes consisting of $550.0 million of 7 1/4% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 (the “2013 Notes”) and $1,482.0 million of 7 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 (the “2016 Notes” and collectively with the 2013 Notes, the “Senior Notes”) (see Note 9—“Long-term Debt”). Under the terms and conditions of the Senior Notes, we were required to fund a cash reserve account for approximately $887 million to pay construction costs for our LNG receiving terminal. The cash account is controlled by a collateral trustee, and therefore, is shown as restricted cash and cash equivalents on our Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $42.6 million and $40.2 million related to accrued construction costs were classified as part of current restricted cash and cash equivalents, and $26.8 million and $380.2 million related to remaining construction costs were classified as a non-current asset on our Balance Sheets, respectively.
Sabine Pass LNG Notes Debt Service Reserve
As described above, we consummated a private offering of an aggregate principal amount of $2,032.0 million of Senior Notes (see Note 9—“Long-term Debt”). Under the terms and conditions of the Senior Notes, we were required to fund a cash reserve account for $335.0 million related to future interest payments on the
6
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
Senior Notes through May 2009. The cash account is controlled by a collateral trustee, and therefore, is shown as restricted cash and cash equivalents on our Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $141.3 million and $151.0 million, respectively, related to the payment of interest due within twelve months had been classified as part of current restricted cash. As of December 31, 2007, $61.8 million related to the remaining payments of interest through May 2009 had been classified as part of non-current restricted cash.
NOTE 5—Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of LNG terminal construction-in-process expenditures, LNG site and related costs and fixed assets, as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
LNG TERMINAL COSTS | | | | | | | | |
LNG terminal construction-in-process | | $ | 1,416,187 | | | $ | 1,126,162 | |
LNG site and related costs, net | | | 187 | | | | 191 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total LNG terminal costs | | $ | 1,416,374 | | | $ | 1,126,353 | |
| | | | | | | | |
FIXED ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Computer and office equipment | | | 204 | | | | 203 | |
Vehicles | | | 421 | | | | 522 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 751 | | | | 411 | |
Other | | | 84 | | | | 68 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | (493 | ) | | | (268 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total fixed assets, net | | $ | 967 | | | $ | 936 | |
| | | | | | | | |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | $ | 1,417,341 | | | $ | 1,127,289 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Once our LNG receiving terminal is placed into service, the LNG terminal construction-in-process costs will be depreciated using the straight-line depreciation method. The identifiable components of our LNG receiving terminal with similar estimated useful lives have a depreciable range between 10 and 50 years. Depreciation will begin once construction is complete.
Costs associated with the construction of our LNG receiving terminal have been capitalized as construction-in-process since the date the project satisfied our criteria for capitalization. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and from the date of inception through June 30, 2008, we capitalized $47.6 million, $27.9 million and $141.4 million of interest expense related to the construction of our LNG receiving terminal, respectively.
NOTE 6—Advances Under Long-term Contracts
We have entered into certain engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) contracts and purchase agreements related to the construction of our LNG receiving terminal that require us to make payments to fund costs that will be incurred or equipment that will be received in the future. Advances made under long-term contracts on purchase commitments are carried at face value and transferred to Property, Plant and Equipment as the costs are incurred or equipment is received. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our Advances Under Long-term Contracts were $10.4 million and $28.5 million, respectively.
7
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
NOTE 7—Accrued Liabilities
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 |
Interest and related debt fees | | $ | 13,005 | | $ | 13,005 |
LNG terminal construction costs | | | 37,453 | | | 39,051 |
Affiliate | | | 3,574 | | | 1,048 |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 54,032 | | $ | 53,104 |
| | | | | | |
NOTE 9—Long-term Debt
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 |
Senior Notes | | $ | 2,032,000 | | $ | 2,032,000 |
In November 2006, we issued an aggregate principal amount of $2,032.0 million of Senior Notes, consisting of $550.0 million of the 2013 Notes and $1,482.0 million of the 2016 Notes.
We placed $335.0 million of the net proceeds in a reserve account to fund scheduled interest payments on the Senior Notes through May 2009. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 30 and November 30 of each year. The Senior Notes are secured on a first-priority basis by a security interest in all of our equity interests and substantially all of our operating assets.
Under the indenture governing the Senior Notes, except for permitted tax distributions, we may not make distributions until certain conditions are satisfied. The indenture requires that we apply our net operating cash flow (i) first, to fund with monthly deposits our next semiannual payment of approximately $75.5 million of interest on the Senior Notes, and (ii) second, to fund a one-time, permanent debt service reserve fund equal to one semiannual interest payment of approximately $75.5 million on the Senior Notes. Distributions will be permitted only after phase 1 target completion of our LNG receiving terminal, as defined in the indenture governing the Senior Notes, or such earlier date as project revenues are received, upon satisfaction of the foregoing funding requirements, after satisfying a fixed charge coverage ratio test of 2:1 and after satisfying other conditions specified in the indenture. We achieved phase 1 target completion in July 2008.
NOTE 10—Financial Instruments
On our behalf, Cheniere Marketing has entered into financial derivatives to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to the future sale of natural gas from our LNG commissioning cargoes (“LNG commissioning cargo derivatives”). The net cost (LNG commissioning cargo purchase price less natural gas sales proceeds) of our LNG commissioning cargoes is capitalized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as it is directly related to the LNG receiving terminal construction and is incurred to place the LNG receiving terminal in usable condition. However, changes in the fair value of our LNG commissioning cargo derivatives are reported in earnings because they are not able to be designated in a qualifying hedging relationship in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
8
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) and SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets andFinancial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). As a result of the adoption, we elected not to measure any additional financial assets or liabilities at fair value, other than those which were recorded at fair value prior to the adoption.
The estimated fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged currently between willing parties. The financial liabilities at June 30, 2008 measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical instruments (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total Carrying Value at June 30, 2008 |
Derivatives payables | | $ | 7,704 | | $ | 36 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,740 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities at fair value | | $ | 7,704 | | $ | 36 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,740 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives payables reflect positions held by us related to natural gas swaps entered into to mitigate the price risk from sales of excess LNG purchased for commissioning and performance testing.
SFAS No. 107,Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS 107) requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments, including those financial instruments for which the SFAS 159 fair value option was not elected. The carrying amounts reported on our Balance Sheets for Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivables, Interest Receivable and Accounts Payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments for which SFAS 159 was not elected are as follows:
Financial Instruments (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 |
| Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair Value |
2013 Notes (1) | | $ | 550,000 | | $ | 497,750 | | $ | 550,000 | | $ | 525,250 |
2016 Notes (1) | | | 1,482,000 | | | 1,326,390 | | | 1,482,000 | | | 1,404,195 |
(1) | The fair value of the Senior Notes is based on quotations obtained from broker-dealers who made markets in these and similar instruments as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, as applicable. |
NOTE 11—Related Party Transactions
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had $33.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of Advances to Affiliates. As of June 30, 2008, we had $64.5 million of Advances to Affiliate—LNG Held for Commissioning on our Balance Sheets.
Under the LNG lease agreement described below, we had $64.5 million recorded as Advances to Affiliate—LNG Held for Commissioning on our Balance Sheets related to the purchase by Cheniere Marketing of commissioning cargoes, and had $30.7 million recorded as current Advances to Affiliate on our Balance Sheets related to the establishment of broker margins by Cheniere Marketing for financial hedging of these commissioning cargoes as of June 30, 2008.
9
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
Under the service agreements described below, we paid $1.3 million during each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. For both the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we paid $2.6 million. For the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008, we paid $17.0 million.
LNG Lease Agreement
In June 2008, we entered into an agreement in the form of a lease with Cheniere Marketing that enabled us to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows of our commissioning cargoes. The agreement permits Cheniere Marketing to deliver LNG to our LNG receiving terminal and to receive regasified LNG for redelivery as natural gas in exchange for the use of the properties of the LNG to cool our LNG receiving terminal down. Under the terms of the agreement, we pay Cheniere Marketing a fixed fee based on the delivered quantity of LNG in each LNG cargo. We assume full price risk of the purchase and sale of the LNG and also finance all activities relating to the LNG. Cheniere Marketing holds title to the LNG at all times and sells all redelivered LNG and remits the net proceeds from such sales back to us.
LNG purchased on our behalf by Cheniere Marketing that has been funded by us is recorded at historical cost and classified as a non-current asset on our Balance Sheets as Advances to Affiliate—LNG Held for Commissioning. LNG that is lost, used as fuel or sold results in the reduction of Advances to Affiliate—LNG Held for Commissioning on our Balance Sheets at historical cost. During the second quarter of 2008, we advanced Cheniere Marketing funds to purchase LNG. At June 30, 2008, we had $64.5 million recorded as Advances to Affiliate—LNG Held for Commissioning on our Balance Sheets related to the purchase of commissioning cargoes, and $30.7 million recorded as current Advances to Affiliate on our Balance Sheets related to the establishment of broker margins by Cheniere Marketing for financial hedging of the leased LNG. In addition, during the second quarter of 2008, we incurred fixed fees from Cheniere Marketing of $0.6 million that we capitalized as Property, Plant and Equipment on our Balance Sheets.
Service Agreements
Operation and Maintenance Agreement
In February 2005, we entered into an Operation and Maintenance Agreement (“O&M Agreement”) with Cheniere LNG O&M Services, LLC (“O&M Services”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheniere. Pursuant to the O&M Agreement, O&M Services has agreed to provide all necessary services required to construct, operate and maintain our LNG receiving terminal. The O&M Agreement will remain in effect until 20 years after substantial completion of the facility. Prior to substantial completion of our LNG receiving terminal, we are required to pay a fixed monthly fee of $95,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010). The fixed monthly fee will increase to $130,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010) upon substantial completion of our LNG receiving terminal, and O&M Services may thereafter be entitled to a bonus equal to 50% of the salary component of labor costs in certain circumstances to be agreed upon at the beginning of each operating year. In addition, we are required to reimburse O&M Services for its expenditures incurred on our behalf for operating expenses, which are comprised primarily of labor expenses.
O&M Services has assigned the O&M Agreement to Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheniere, and O&M Services and Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC have entered into a services and secondment agreement pursuant to which certain employees of O&M Services have been seconded to Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC to provide operating and routine maintenance services with respect to our LNG receiving terminal under the direction, supervision and control of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC.
10
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
Under this agreement, Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC pays O&M Services amounts that it receives from us under the O&M Agreement. The services and secondment agreement will remain in effect until the O&M Agreement is terminated; however, Cheniere Energy Partners GP may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice. Under the O&M Agreement, we paid $0.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we paid $0.6 million. For the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008, we paid $3.7 million.
Management Services Agreements
In February 2005, we entered into a Management Services Agreement (the “Sabine Pass LNG MSA”) with Sabine Pass GP. Pursuant to the Sabine Pass LNG MSA, we appointed Sabine Pass GP to manage the construction and operation of our LNG receiving terminal, excluding those matters provided for under the O&M Agreement. The Sabine Pass LNG MSA terminates 20 years after the commercial start date set forth in our terminal use agreement with Total LNG USA, Inc. Prior to substantial completion of construction of our LNG receiving terminal, we are required to pay Sabine Pass GP a monthly fixed fee of $340,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010); thereafter, the monthly fixed fee will increase to $520,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010). Under the Sabine Pass LNG MSA, we paid $1.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. We paid $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. For the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008, we paid $13.3 million.
In September 2006, Sabine Pass GP entered into a Management Services Agreement with Cheniere LNG Terminals, Inc. (“Cheniere Terminals”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheniere. Pursuant to this agreement, Cheniere Terminals provides Sabine Pass GP with technical, financial, staffing and related support necessary to allow it to meet its obligations to us under the Sabine Pass LNG MSA. Under this agreement with Cheniere Terminals, Sabine Pass GP pays Cheniere Terminals amounts that it receives from us for the management of our LNG receiving terminal. Under this services agreement, Sabine Pass GP paid $1.0 million during each of the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Sabine Pass GP paid $2.0 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. For the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008, Sabine Pass GP paid $7.5 million.
Agreement to Fund Our Cooperative Endeavor Agreements
In July 2007, we executed Cooperative Endeavor Agreements (“CEAs”) with various Cameron Parish, Louisiana taxing authorities that allow them to accelerate certain of our property tax payments scheduled to begin in 2019. This ten-year initiative represents an aggregate $25.0 million commitment and will make resources available to the Cameron Parish taxing authorities on an accelerated basis in order to aid in their reconstruction efforts following Hurricane Rita. In exchange for our advance payments of ad valorem taxes, Cameron Parish will grant us a dollar for dollar credit against future ad valorem taxes to be levied against our LNG receiving terminal starting in 2019. In September 2007, we entered into an agreement with Cheniere Marketing, pursuant to which Cheniere Marketing will advance us any and all amounts payable under the CEAs in exchange for a similar amount of credits against future ad valorem reimbursements they would owe us under its terminal use agreement (“TUA”) starting in 2019. These advance ad valorem tax payments were recorded to Other Assets, and payments from Cheniere Marketing that we utilized to make the early payment of taxes were recorded as Deferred Revenue on the Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, we had $5.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of Other Assets and Deferred Revenue resulting from accelerated ad valorem tax payments.
11
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
Contracts for Sale and Purchase of Natural Gas
In 2007, we entered into the following natural gas purchase and sale contracts with Cheniere Marketing:
Contract for the Sale of Natural Gas from Commissioning Cargoes
We require several LNG cargoes to cool down and commission our LNG receiving terminal at the end of the construction process. We entered into a contract with Cheniere Marketing for the sale of natural gas regasified from commissioning LNG cargoes at a sales price equal to the actual market price received by Cheniere Marketing in reselling the natural gas less any third-party costs incurred by Cheniere Marketing in respect of the receipt, delivery and resale of the natural gas, and less an administrative fee paid to Cheniere Marketing. We sold $7.3 million of natural gas to Cheniere Marketing under this contract during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. For the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008, we sold $7.3 million of natural gas to Cheniere Marketing under this contract.
Sale of Natural Gas from Boil-off
We entered into a contract for the sale to Cheniere Marketing of natural gas that has boiled off from LNG inventory in our facility at a sales price equal to the actual market price received by Cheniere Marketing in reselling the natural gas less any third-party costs incurred by Cheniere Marketing in respect of the receipt, delivery and resale of the natural gas and less an administrative fee paid to Cheniere Marketing. We did not sell any natural gas to Cheniere Marketing under this contract for the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008.
Purchase of Natural Gas for Fuel
We entered into a contract for the purchase of natural gas from Cheniere Marketing to use as fuel at our LNG receiving terminal at a sales price equal to the actual purchase cost paid by Cheniere Marketing to suppliers of the natural gas less any third-party costs incurred by Cheniere Marketing in respect of the receipt, purchase, and delivery of the natural gas to our LNG receiving terminal and less an administrative fee paid to Cheniere Marketing. We did not purchase any natural gas from Cheniere Marketing under this contract for the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008.
Contract for the Purchase of LNG Commissioning Cargoes
In November 2007, we entered into a contract with Cheniere Marketing to procure and deliver to our facility the LNG cargoes we require for commissioning. We will reimburse Cheniere Marketing for its actual third-party costs incurred in obtaining these cargoes. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we paid zero and $25.6 million, respectively, to Cheniere Marketing under this contract for the purchase of LNG commissioning cargoes. For the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008, we paid $25.6 million to Cheniere Marketing under this contract for the purchase of LNG commissioning cargoes.
Contract for the Sale of Retained LNG
As partial compensation for the terminalling services that we provide our customers at our LNG receiving terminal, we retain 2% of the LNG that customers bring to our LNG receiving terminal, which we will use primarily as fuel for revaporization and self-generated power. In September 2007, we entered into a contract with Cheniere Marketing for the sale of excess retainage at a market index-related sales price. We did not sell any
12
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
excess retainage to Cheniere Marketing under this contract for the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008.
Contract for the Exclusive Use of a LNG Vessel During the Commissioning Process
J & S Cheniere S.A. (“J&S Cheniere”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Cheniere, and Cheniere Marketing are parties to a time charter agreement for the Celestine River LNG vessel. In March 2008, we entered into a contract with J&S Cheniere and Cheniere Marketing for exclusive use of this LNG vessel during our commissioning process until our LNG receiving terminal commercial start date. We are responsible for all amounts that would otherwise be payable by J&S Cheniere or Cheniere Marketing under their time charter agreement. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we capitalized $4.4 million and $16.3 million, respectively, related to LNG vessel costs incurred under this contract.
Contract for the Exclusive Use of Tugs During the Commissioning Process
Sabine Pass Tug Services, LLC (“Sabine Pass Tug Services”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Cheniere, and Cheniere Marketing are parties to a marine services sharing agreement for the use of tug boats (“tugs”). In March 2008, we entered into a contract with Sabine Pass Tug Services and Cheniere Marketing for exclusive use of the tugs during our commissioning process until our LNG receiving terminal commercial start date. We are responsible for all amounts that would otherwise be payable by Sabine Pass Tug Services and Cheniere Marketing under their marine services sharing agreement. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we capitalized $1.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively, related to tug costs incurred under this contract.
TUA Agreement
Cheniere Marketing has reserved approximately 2.0 Bcf/d of regasification capacity under a firm commitment TUA and has agreed to make monthly payments to us aggregating approximately $250.0 million per year for at least 19 years commencing January 1, 2009, plus payments of $5.0 million per month in 2008 commencing with commercial operations. Cheniere has guaranteed Cheniere Marketing’s obligations under its TUA.
NOTE 15—Supplemental Cash Flow Information and Disclosures of Non-cash Transactions
The following table provides supplemental disclosure of cash flow information (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | Period from October 20, 2003 (Date of Inception) to June 30, 2008 |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Cash paid for: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest, net of amounts capitalized | | $ | 27,932 | | $ | 56,388 | | $ | 121,574 |
Construction-in-process additions recorded as accrued liabilities | | $ | 77,368 | | $ | 29,120 | | $ | 77,368 |
13
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein are “forward-looking statements.” Included among “forward-looking statements” are, among other things:
| • | | statements relating to the construction and operation of the Sabine Pass liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) receiving terminal, including statements concerning the completion or expansion thereof by certain dates or at all, the costs related thereto and certain characteristics, including amounts of regasification and storage capacity, the number of storage tanks and docks; |
| • | | statements relating to the construction and operation of facilities related to the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal; |
| • | | statements regarding any financing transactions or arrangements, or ability to enter into such transactions or arrangements; |
| • | | statements regarding any terminal use agreement (“TUA”) or other agreement to be entered into or performed substantially in the future, including any cash distributions and revenues anticipated to be received and the anticipated timing thereof, and statements regarding the amounts of total LNG regasification capacity that are, or may become, subject to TUAs or other contracts; |
| • | | statements regarding counterparties to our TUAs, construction contracts and other contracts; |
| • | | statements regarding any business strategies, any business plans or any other plans, forecasts, projections or objectives, any or all of which are subject to change; |
| • | | statements regarding any assumptions, estimates, projections or conclusions; |
| • | | statements regarding conflicts of interest with Cheniere Energy, Inc. (“Cheniere Energy”) and its affiliates; |
| • | | statements regarding legislative, governmental, regulatory, administrative or other public body actions, requirements, permits, investigations, proceedings or decisions; and |
| • | | any other statements that relate to non-historical or future information. |
These forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of terms such as “achieve,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “propose,” “strategy” and similar terms. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, they involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and these expectations may prove to be incorrect. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly report.
Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these risk factors. Other than as required under the securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements or provide reasons why actual results may differ.
The following discussion and analysis presents management’s view of our business, financial condition and overall performance and should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and the accompanying notes in Item 1. “Financial Statements.” This information is intended to provide investors with an understanding of our past performance, current financial condition and outlook for the future.
14
OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS
We are a development stage company without any revenues, operating cash flows or operating history. We expect that we will begin receiving $5 million per month of TUA payments commencing when we begin commercial operations and Cheniere Marketing, Inc. (“Cheniere Marketing”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheniere Energy, begins making capacity reservation fee payments under its TUA with us. This is currently anticipated to occur in the third quarter or fourth quarter of 2008.
Subject to the completion of routine punch list items, as of June 30, 2008, we had completed construction of the initial 2.6 Bcf/d of send out capacity and 10.1 Bcf of storage capacity at our LNG receiving terminal. The terminal is operating and able to accept commercial cargoes. The commissioning process was initiated in April 2008 and is estimated to be completed in the third or fourth quarter of 2008. To date, three LNG cargoes have been obtained for the commissioning process and we expect to obtain one more cargo to complete the process. Construction for the remaining 1.4 Bcf/d was approximately 79% complete as of the end of the second quarter.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Construction Costs
Our estimated aggregate cost to construct our LNG receiving terminal is approximately $1,462 million, before operating expenses during construction, future commissioning costs, and financing costs, an increase of approximately $36 million from our estimate as of March 31, 2008 due to commissioning costs not previously budgeted. Our estimated total construction, commissioning and operating cost budget through the achievement of full operability is approximately $1,559 million. As of June 30, 2008, we incurred approximately $1,437 million of our total budget. Our remaining construction, commissioning and operating costs are anticipated to be funded from restricted cash and cash equivalents designated for construction, working capital or additional financing.
TUA Revenues
Beginning in 2009, each of our customers must make the full contracted amount of capacity reservation fee payments under its TUA whether or not it uses any of its reserved capacity. Provided we have achieved commercial operations, capacity reservation fee TUA payments will be made by the following customers:
| • | | Total LNG USA, Inc. (“Total”) has reserved approximately 1.0 Bcf/d of regasification capacity and has agreed to make monthly capacity payments aggregating approximately $125 million per year for 20 years commencing April 1, 2009. Total, S.A. has guaranteed Total’s obligations under its TUA up to $2.5 billion, subject to certain exceptions; |
| • | | Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (“Chevron”) has reserved approximately 1.0 Bcf/d of regasification capacity and has agreed to make monthly capacity payments aggregating approximately $125 million per year for 20 years commencing not later than July 1, 2009. Chevron Corporation has guaranteed Chevron’s obligations under its TUA up to 80% of the fees payable by Chevron; and |
| • | | Cheniere Marketing has reserved the remaining 2.0 Bcf/d of regasification capacity, and is entitled to use any capacity not utilized by Total and Chevron. Cheniere Marketing has agreed to make monthly capacity payments aggregating approximately $250 million per year for at least 19 years commencing January 1, 2009, plus capacity payments of $5 million per month during 2008 after our receiving terminal commences commercial operations. Cheniere Energy has guaranteed Cheniere Marketing’s obligations under its TUA. |
Cheniere Marketing has a limited operating history, limited capital, and no credit rating. Cheniere Energy, which has a non-investment grade corporate rating, has guaranteed the obligations of Cheniere Marketing under its TUA. In addition, the LNG and natural gas marketing business activities of Cheniere Marketing have recently been downsized.
15
In April 2008, Cheniere Energy, the parent company of Cheniere Marketing, reported that unless it was successful in obtaining a sufficient number of LNG cargoes within the next 12 months or entering into a strategic transaction, it would need to obtain additional sources of funding during the first quarter of 2009. On August 11, 2008, Cheniere Energy announced that it had accepted a commitment for a $250.0 million financing, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including regulatory approvals, completion of definitive documentation and the absence of any change, development or event that would be expected to have a material adverse effect on Cheniere Energy or its industry, business, financial condition or prospects.
Cheniere Energy advised that, assuming closing of the $250.0 million convertible security financing, it is confident that they will be able to conduct its business, including making payments pursuant to its TUA, for at least the next 3 years. However, if Cheniere Energy is not successful in closing this $250 million financing, or entering into another strategic transaction, or obtaining a sufficient number of LNG cargos, it will be required to obtain an alternative source of funding during the first quarter of 2009 in order to ensure Cheniere Marketing’s ability to meet its obligations under its TUA.
Available Cash
As of June 30, 2008, we had no unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. However, we had $210.7 million in restricted cash and cash equivalents, which were designated for the following purposes: $69.4 million for construction costs on the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and $141.3 million for interest payments through May 2009 related to the Senior Notes described below.
The foregoing reserved funds are anticipated to be sufficient to fund our operating expenditures and debt service requirements for the next 12 months. Regardless whether we receive revenues from Cheniere Marketing (or Cheniere Energy, on its guarantee), we thereafter expect to have sufficient cash flow from payments made under our Total and Chevron TUAs to meet our future operating expenditures and debt service requirements.
Future Uses of Cash
Senior Notes
Interest payments of approximately $75.5 million are due on May 30 and November 30 of each year on the $2,032.0 million of Senior Notes, consisting of $550.0 million of 7 1/4% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and $1,482.0 million of 7 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2016. Under the indenture governing the Senior Notes, except for permitted tax distributions, we may not make distributions until certain conditions are satisfied. The indenture requires that we apply our net operating cash flow (i) first, to fund with monthly deposits our next semiannual payment of approximately $75.5 million of interest on the Senior Notes, and (ii) second, to fund a one-time, permanent debt service reserve fund equal to one semiannual interest payment of approximately $75.5 million on the Senior Notes. Distributions will be permitted only after phase 1 target completion of our LNG receiving terminal, as defined in the indenture governing the Senior Notes, or such earlier date as we receive project revenues, upon satisfaction of the foregoing funding requirements, after satisfying a fixed charge coverage ratio test of 2:1 and after satisfying other conditions specified in the indenture. We achieved phase 1 target completion in July 2008. As of June 30, 2008, we had $141.3 million in an interest reserve account as restricted cash and cash equivalents for interest payments through May 2009 related to the Senior Notes. Beginning with the payment due November 30, 2009, we intend to make interest payments primarily from operating cash flows.
Services Agreements
We have entered into a 20-year operation and maintenance agreement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheniere Energy pursuant to which we receive all necessary services required to construct, operate and maintain our LNG receiving terminal. Prior to substantial completion of our LNG receiving terminal, we are required to pay a fixed monthly fee of $95,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010) under the agreement. The fixed monthly fee will increase to $130,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010) upon substantial completion of the facility, and the counterparty will thereafter be entitled to a bonus equal to 50% of the salary component of
16
labor costs in certain circumstances to be agreed upon between us and the counterparty at the beginning of each operating year. In addition, we are required to reimburse the counterparty for its operating expenses, which are comprised primarily of labor expenses.
We have also entered into a 20-year management services agreement with our general partner, pursuant to which our general partner has been appointed to manage the construction and operation of our LNG receiving terminal, excluding those matters provided for under the foregoing operation and maintenance agreement. Our general partner has correspondingly entered into a management services agreement with Cheniere LNG Terminals, Inc. (“Cheniere Terminals”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheniere Energy, pursuant to which Cheniere Terminals provides our general partner with technical, financial, staffing and related support necessary to allow it to meet its obligations to us under its management services agreement. Prior to substantial completion of our LNG receiving terminal, we are required to pay our general partner a monthly fixed fee of $340,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010); thereafter, the monthly fixed fee will increase to $520,000 (indexed for inflation beginning in 2010). Our general partner is required to pay Cheniere Terminals for all amounts that it receives under its management services agreement with us.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we paid an aggregate of $1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively, under the foregoing services agreement from restricted cash and cash equivalents. For the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008, we paid $17.0 million. Until substantial completion of our LNG receiving terminal and revenues are received under our TUAs, we anticipate continuing to utilize restricted cash and cash equivalents to satisfy our obligations under these service agreements.
State Tax Sharing Agreement
In November 2006, we entered into a state tax sharing agreement with Cheniere Energy. Under this agreement, Cheniere Energy has agreed to prepare and file all Texas franchise tax returns which it and we are required to file on a combined basis and to timely pay the combined tax liability. If Cheniere Energy, in its sole discretion, demands payment, we will pay to Cheniere Energy an amount equal to the Texas franchise tax that we would be required to pay if our Texas franchise tax liability were computed on a separate company basis. This agreement contains similar provisions for other state and local taxes that we and Cheniere Energy are required to file on a combined, consolidated or unitary basis. The agreement is effective for tax returns first due on or after January 1, 2008. We do not expect to make any tax payments under this agreement for 2008.
Historical Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table summarizes the sources and uses of our cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the period from October 20, 2003 (date of inception) to June 30, 2008. The table presents capital expenditures on a cash basis; therefore, these amounts differ from the amounts of capital expenditures, including accruals, that are referred to elsewhere in this document. Additional discussion of these items follows the table (in thousands).
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | Period from October 20, 2003 (Date of Inception) to June 30, 2008 |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
SOURCES OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | | | | | | | |
Use of restricted cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 365,348 | | $ | 231,222 | | $ | 738 |
Borrowings from debt | | | — | | | — | | | 2,415,400 |
Capital contribution by partner | | | — | | | — | | | 196,658 |
Proceeds from subordinated note—affiliate | | | — | | | — | | | 37,377 |
Operating cash flow | | | — | | | — | | | 1,719 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total sources of cash and cash equivalents | | | 365,348 | | | 231,222 | | | 2,651,892 |
| | | | | | | | | |
17
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | Period from October 20, 2003 (Date of Inception) to June 30, 2008 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | |
USES OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LNG terminal construction-in- process | | | (292,447 | ) | | | (215,340 | ) | | | (1,347,735 | ) |
Advances to affiliate—LNG held for commissioning, net of amounts transferred to LNG terminal construction-in-process | | | (64,459 | ) | | | — | | | | (64,459 | ) |
Purchases of LNG for commissioning, net of amounts transferred to LNG terminal construction-in-process | | | (957 | ) | | | — | | | | (957 | ) |
Other | | | — | | | | (1,285 | ) | | | (1,995 | ) |
Investment in restricted cash and cash equivalents | | | — | | | | — | | | | (322,714 | ) |
Repayment of debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | (383,400 | ) |
Repayment of debt—affiliate | | | — | | | | — | | | | (37,377 | ) |
Distributions to partner | | | — | | | | — | | | | (378,348 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | | | (13 | ) | | | (641 | ) | | | (61,798 | ) |
Advances under long-term contracts | | | (7,472 | ) | | | (13,956 | ) | | | (53,109 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total uses of cash and cash equivalents | | | (365,348 | ) | | | (231,222 | ) | | | (2,651,892 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—beginning of period | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—end of period | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of restricted cash and cash equivalents
Under the indenture governing the Senior Notes, a portion of the proceeds from the Senior Notes are required to be used for scheduled interest payments through May 2009 and to fund the cost to complete construction of our LNG receiving terminal. Due to these restrictions imposed by the indenture, the proceeds are not presented as cash and cash equivalents. Therefore, when proceeds from the Senior Notes are used, they are presented as a source of cash and cash equivalents. In the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the $365.3 million and $231.2 million, respectively, of restricted cash and cash equivalents were primarily used to pay for construction activities at our LNG receiving terminal.
LNG terminal construction-in-process
Capital expenditures for our LNG receiving terminal were $292.4 million, $215.3 million and $1,347.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the period from October 20, 2003 (inception) to June 30, 2008, respectively. Our capital expenditures increased in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 as a result of the commissioning process at our LNG receiving terminal.
Advances to affiliate—LNG held for commissioning, net of amounts transferred to LNG terminal construction-in- process
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we advanced $64.5 million for LNG commissioning cargoes, net of amounts transferred to LNG terminal construction-in- process.
Advances under long-term contracts
Advances under long-term contracts decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 as a result of us nearing construction completion of the initial send out capacity of approximately 2.6 Bcf/d and storage capacity of approximately 10.1 Bcf at our LNG receiving terminal. During
18
the six months ended June 30, 2008, our LNG receiving terminal received equipment that we had previously advanced payment for under long-term contracts.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2008, we had no “off-balance sheet arrangements” that may have a current or future material affect on our financial position or results of operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Overall Operations
Our net loss was $25.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008, or a 91% increase from our net loss in the three months ended June 30, 2007. The $11.9 million increase in the net loss was primarily due to losses on derivatives and decreased interest income, which was partially offset by decreased interest expense.
Derivative Loss
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we incurred $11.5 million of derivative losses. We entered into natural gas swaps to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows from sales of excess LNG purchased for commissioning and performance testing during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Interest Income
Interest income decreased $10.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease was a result of less restricted cash invested during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, decreased $10.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease in interest expense primarily resulted from an increase in construction costs and consequently an increase in capitalized interest in the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Overall Operations
Our net loss was $39.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008, a 53% increase from our net loss in the six months ended June 30, 2007. The $13.8 million increase in the net loss was primarily due to losses on derivatives and decreased interest income, which was partially offset by decreased interest expense.
Derivative Loss
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we incurred $12.4 million of derivative losses. We entered into natural gas swaps to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows from sales of excess LNG purchased for commissioning and performance testing during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Interest Income
Interest income decreased $19.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease was a result of less restricted cash invested during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
19
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, decreased $19.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease in interest expense primarily resulted from an increase in construction costs and consequently an increase in capitalized interest in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
OTHER MATTERS
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
The selection and application of accounting policies is an important process that has developed as our business activities have evolved and as the accounting rules have developed. Accounting rules generally do not involve a selection among alternatives but involve an implementation and interpretation of existing rules, and the use of judgment, to the specific set of circumstances existing in our business. In preparing our financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we make every effort to comply properly with all applicable rules on or before their adoption, and we believe that the proper implementation and consistent application of the accounting rules are critical. However, not all situations are specifically addressed in the accounting literature. In these cases, we must use our best judgment to adopt a policy for accounting for these situations. We accomplish this by analogizing to similar situations and the accounting guidance governing them.
Accounting for LNG Activities
Generally, expenditures for direct construction activities, major renewals and betterments are capitalized, while expenditures for maintenance and repairs and general and administrative activities are charged to expense as incurred.
Beginning in 2006, site rental costs have been expensed as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position 13-1,Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred During a Construction Period.
During the construction period of our LNG receiving terminal, we capitalize interest and other related debt costs in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 34,Capitalization of Interest Cost, as amended by SFAS No. 58,Capitalization of Interest Cost in Financial Statements That Include Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method (an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 34). Upon commencement of operations, capitalized interest, as a component of the total cost, will be amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset.
In connection with the construction of our LNG receiving terminal, we require LNG to perform certain commissioning activities, as follows:
| • | | Cool down—A minimum amount of LNG will be used to cool down the LNG receiving terminal. Cool down represents the amount of LNG required to cool the LNG receiving terminal to its normal operating temperature. |
| • | | LNG heel—A certain amount of LNG will be used to establish a level of LNG inventory in each LNG storage tank and in the LNG receiving terminal piping in order for the LNG receiving terminal to function properly. |
| • | | Equipment commissioning—The remaining amount of the LNG will be used to commission the equipment in the LNG receiving terminal to ensure that it performs at designed specifications. Equipment commissioning will result in natural gas being sold. |
20
LNG purchased for commissioning activities is recorded at cost and classified as a non-current asset on our Balance Sheets as LNG held for commissioning. As the LNG held for commissioning is used to cool down the LNG receiving terminal and establish LNG heel in the LNG receiving terminal, we capitalize the portion used. The LNG used in the commissioning process is capitalized net of amounts received from the sale of natural gas.
Revenue Recognition
LNG receiving terminal capacity reservation fees are recognized as revenue over the term of the respective TUAs. Advance capacity reservation fees are initially deferred and recognized as earned.
Cash Flow Hedges
We have used, and may in the future use, derivative instruments to limit our exposure to variability in expected future cash flows. As defined in SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, cash flow hedge transactions hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows (i.e., in our case, the variability of floating interest rate exposure). In the case of cash flow hedges, the hedged item (the underlying risk) is generally unrecognized (i.e., not recorded on the balance sheet prior to settlement), and any changes in the fair value, therefore, will not be recorded within earnings. Conceptually, if a cash flow hedge is effective, this means that a variable, such as a movement in interest rates, has been effectively fixed so that any fluctuations will have no net result on either cash flows or earnings. Therefore, if the changes in fair value of the hedged item are not recorded in earnings, then the changes in fair value of the hedging instrument (the derivative) must also be excluded from the income statement or else a one-sided net impact on earnings will be reported, despite the fact that the establishment of the effective hedge results in no net economic impact. To prevent such a scenario from occurring, SFAS No. 133 requires that the fair value of a derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge be recorded as an asset or liability on the balance sheet, but with the offset reported as part of other comprehensive income, to the extent that the hedge is effective. We assess, both at the inception of each hedge and on an on-going basis, whether the derivatives that are used in our hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. On an on-going basis, we monitor the actual dollar offset of the hedges’ market values compared to hypothetical cash flow hedges. Any ineffective portion of the cash flow hedges will be reflected in earnings. Ineffectiveness is the amount of gains or losses from derivative instruments that are not offset by corresponding and opposite gains or losses on the expected future transaction.
New Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis (the fair value option) with changes in fair value reported in earnings. We recorded our derivative contracts at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (SFAS 133). The adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on the Financial Statements, as management did not elect the fair value option for any financial instruments or other assets and liabilities.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) as it relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis, until January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end entities. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including (i) how and why an entity uses derivative
21
instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This standard becomes effective for us on January 1, 2009. Earlier adoption of SFAS 161 and, separately, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption are encouraged. As SFAS 161 only requires enhanced disclosures, this standard will have no impact on the Financial Statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets(“FSP FAS 142-3”). This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of FSP FAS 142-3, but do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on our Financial Statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162,The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This statement will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU section 411,The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 162, but do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on our Financial Statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Cash Investments
We have cash investments that we manage based on internal investment guidelines that emphasize liquidity and preservation of capital. Such cash investments are stated at historical cost, which approximates fair market value on our Balance Sheets.
Derivative Commodity Price Risk
We entered into natural gas NYMEX swaps accounted for as derivatives. The NYMEX swaps were entered into to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows related to commissioning cargoes purchased by Cheniere Marketing in the second quarter of 2008 that are expected to be sold as part of the testing phase of the commissioning process. We entered into a total of 4,495,000 MMBtu of August 2008 NYMEX swaps with one counterparty for which we will receive fixed prices of $11.87 to $13.41 per MMBtu. At June 30, 2008, the value of the derivatives was a liability of $7.7 million.
Item 4. | Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our general partner’s management, including our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
In the future, we may be involved as a party to various legal proceedings, which are incidental to the ordinary course of business. We regularly analyze current information and, as necessary, provide accruals for probable liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. In the opinion of management of our general partner and legal counsel, as of June 30, 2008, there were no known threatened or pending legal matters that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
(a) | Each of the following exhibits is filed herewith: |
| | | | |
| | 10.1 | | Change Orders 57 and 58 to Lump Sum Turnkey Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement, dated December 18, 2004, between Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. and Bechtel Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Cheniere Energy, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 001-16383), filed on August 11, 2008) |
| | |
| | 10.2 | | LNG Lease Agreement, dated June 24, 2008, between Cheniere Marketing, Inc. and Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Cheniere Energy, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 001-16383), filed on August 11, 2008) |
| | |
| | 31.1 | | Certification by Chief Executive Offer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act |
| | |
| | 31.2 | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act |
| | |
| | 32.1 | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
| | 32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P. |
|
By: Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc., its general partner |
|
/s/ JERRY D. SMITH |
Chief Accounting Officer of Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc., general partner of SABINE PASS LNG, L.P. |
(on behalf of the registrant and as principal accounting officer) |
|
Date: August 11, 2008 |
24