Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013 included elsewhere in the Company’s 8-K filed on October 1, 2014. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, since they are interim statements, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements, but reflect all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, that are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of September 30, 2014 and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future period. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013 was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date. |
|
The Company’s financial statements include all of its accounts and any intercompany balances have been eliminated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions |
|
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s). |
|
Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the condensed consolidated financial statements were: |
|
(i) | Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(ii) | Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value. |
|
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. |
|
Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. |
|
Due to inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in these estimates. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company has categorized its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three level hierarchy in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Fair value is defined as an exit price, the amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial assets and liabilities with readily available, actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and require less judgment in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial assets and liabilities that are rarely traded or not quoted have less price observability and are generally measured at fair value using valuation models that require more judgment. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency of the asset, liability or market and the nature of the asset or liability. |
|
The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy are described below: |
|
Level 1 | Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2 | Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 | Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, unbilled revenues, prepaid expense and other current assets, accounts payable, and due to factor, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. |
|
The Company’s capital lease liability and notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. |
Receivables, Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. |
|
Management charges balances off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company determines when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received. |
|
Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the allowance for doubtful accounts was not material. |
|
The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company provides its services primarily under time-and-materials contracts. Revenues earned under time-and-material arrangements are recognized as services are provided. The Company recognizes revenue from the provision of professional services when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Appropriate allowances for returns and discounts are recorded concurrent with revenue recognition. |
|
Revenues recognized in excess of the amounts invoiced to clients are classified as unbilled revenues. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
The Company follows ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“EPS”), which requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the income statements for all entities with complex capital structures, and requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation. In the accompanying financial statements, basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. |
|
The following is the computation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014: |
|
| | Three months ended September 30, 2014 | | | Nine months ended September 30, 2014 | |
| | Net income (Numerator) | | | Shares (Denominator) | | | Per Share Amount | | | Net income (Numerator) | | | Shares (Denominator) | | | Per Share Amount | |
Basic EPS | | $ | 31,589 | | | | 39,499,702 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 731,007 | | | | 38,696,586 | | | $ | 0.02 | |
Dilutive shares related to warrants | | | | | | | 116,090 | | | | | | | | | | | | 143,136 | | | | | |
Dilutive EPS | | $ | 31,589 | | | | 39,615,792 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 731,007 | | | | 38,839,722 | | | $ | 0.02 | |
|
| | Three months ended September 30, 2013 | | | Nine months ended September 30, 2013 | |
| | Net income (Numerator) | | | Shares (Denominator) | | | Per Share Amount | | | Net income (Numerator) | | | Shares (Denominator) | | | Per Share Amount | |
Basic EPS | | $ | (492,872 | ) | | | 38,215,054 | | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (714,920 | ) | | | 38,215,054 | | | $ | (0.02 | ) |
Dilutive shares related to warrants | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | |
Dilutive EPS | | $ | (492,872 | ) | | | 38,215,054 | | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (714,920 | ) | | | 38,215,054 | | | $ | (0.02 | ) |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income Tax Provision |
|
On June 25, 2014, Initial Koncepts, Inc. converted from an S-Corporation into a California limited liability company (“LLC”) and changed its name to Six Dimensions, LLC. From inception through June 26, 2014, the Company was taxed as an S Corporation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and applicable state statutes. Under an S-Corporation election, the income of the Company flows through to the stockholders to be taxed at the individual level rather than the corporate level. Accordingly, the Company had no tax liability at the federal level (with limited exceptions) as long as the S-Corporation election was in effect. On June 27, 2014, Six Dimensions, LLC converted into a Nevada C-Corporation and changed its name to Six Dimensions, Inc. |
|
In addition, the Company had elected to be treated as a Subchapter S corporation for Arizona, California, Colorado, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Ohio and Virginia corporate for income tax purposes. This treatment imposes individual income taxes on the shareholder’s respective shares of corporate profits and results in reduced corporate level state tax. |
|
The income allocable to each shareholder is subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. In the event of an examination of the income tax returns, the tax liability of the stockholders could be changed if an adjustment in the income is ultimately determined by the taxing authorities. As of September 30, 2014, the tax returns of the Company for the years 2011 through 2013 remain open for the Internal Revenue Service and various state authorities. |
|
Deferred taxes are computed based on the tax liability or benefit in future years of the reversal of temporary differences in the recognition of income or deduction of expenses between financial and tax reporting purposes. The net difference, if any, between the provision for taxes and taxes currently payable is reflected in the balance sheet as deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets and/or liabilities, if any, are classified as current and non-current based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting purposes, or based on the expected reversal date for deferred taxes that are not related to an asset or liability. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to that amount which is more likely than not to be realized. |
|
The Company records interest and penalties as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. There were no amounts accrued for penalties or interest as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 or during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Management is currently unaware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviations from its position. |
|
Certain transactions of the Company may be subject to accounting methods for federal income tax purposes that differ significantly from the accounting methods used in preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, the taxable income of the Company reported for federal income tax purposes may differ from net income in these condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. |
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Receivables under Factoring Agreement |
|
The Company factors its receivables with recourse and, as a result, accounts for the factoring akin to a secured borrowing, maintaining the gross receivable asset and due to factor liability on its books and records. The financial institution makes available 90% of the face value of the eligible receivables to the company and retains the remaining 10% as a guaranteed until receipt of the proceeds associated with the factored invoices. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-08, “Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360).” This new standard raises the threshold for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations, allows companies to have significant continuing involvement and continuing cash flows with the discontinued operation and provides for new and additional disclosures of discontinued operations and individually material disposal transactions. The Company anticipates adopting the new standard when it becomes effective in the first quarter of 2015. ASU 2014-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Amendments in this ASU create Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments supersede the cost guidance in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and create new Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is the final version of Proposed ASU 2011-230 – Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Proposed ASU 2011–250 – Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Codification Amendments, both of which have been deleted. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014-09 on the financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing. The amendments in this ASU require that repurchase-to-maturity transactions be accounted for as secured borrowings consistent with the accounting for other repurchase agreements. In addition, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty (a repurchase financing), which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The amendments require an entity to disclose information about transfers accounted for as sales in transactions that are economically similar to repurchase agreements, in which the transferor retains substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction. In addition the amendments require disclosure of the types of collateral pledged in repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and repurchase-to-maturity transactions and the tenor of those transactions. This ASU is the final version of Proposed ASU 2013-10 – Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860), which has been deleted. The accounting changes in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. ASU 2014-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Compensation- Stock Compensation. The amendments in this ASU apply to reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target can be achieved after the requisite service period. This ASU is the final version of Proposed ASU EITF-13D – Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which has been deleted. The proposed amendments would apply to reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. This ASU is the final version of Proposed ASU EITF-13D – Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which has been deleted. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. |