Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for year-end financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, since they are year-end statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements, but reflect all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, that are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position for the year ended December 31, 2014 and results of operations and cash flows for the annual periods presented. The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 were derived from the audited financial statements as of that date. |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Principles of Consolidation |
|
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include all of its accounts and any intercompany balances have been eliminated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company has one subsidiary, Six Dimensions, Inc. organized as two operating segments that are combined into one reporting segment. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s). Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such differences may be material. |
|
Management believes the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates are those related to revenue recognition, allowances, leases and income taxes. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company has categorized its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three level hierarchy in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Fair value is defined as an exit price, the amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial assets and liabilities with readily available, actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and require less judgment in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial assets and liabilities that are rarely traded or not quoted have less price observability and are generally measured at fair value using valuation models that require more judgment. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency of the asset, liability or market and the nature of the asset or liability. |
|
The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy are described below: |
|
Level 1 | Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2 | Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 | Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, unbilled revenues, prepaid expense and other current assets, accounts payable, and due to factor, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. |
|
The Company’s capital lease liability and notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash |
|
Cash consists of checking accounts, marketable securities and money market accounts. The Company considers all highly-liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash. |
Receivables, Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. |
|
Management charges balances off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company determines when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received. |
|
Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the allowance for doubtful accounts was not material. Additionally there were no write-offs of the Company accounts receivables for the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013. |
|
The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows: |
|
| Estimated Useful Life (Years) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Machinery and Equipment | 1 – 3 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture | 4 – 4.5 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Software | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lease, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Leases |
|
Lease agreements are evaluated to determine if they are capital leases meeting any of the following criteria at inception: (a) Transfer of ownership; (b) Bargain purchase option; (c) The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property; (d) The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor. |
|
If at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease criteria above, the lease is classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria are met, the lease is classified by the lessee as an operating lease. |
Commitments and Contingencies, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Contingencies |
|
Occasionally, the Company may be involved in claims and legal proceedings arising from the ordinary course of its business. The Company records a provision for a liability when it believes that is both probable that a liability has been incurred, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If these estimates and assumptions change or prove to be incorrect, it could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Contingencies are inherently unpredictable and the assessments of the value can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company provides its services primarily under time-and-materials contracts. Revenues earned under time-and-material arrangements are recognized as services are provided. The Company recognizes revenue from the provision of professional services when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Appropriate allowances for discounts are recorded concurrent with revenue recognition. |
|
In accordance with ASC 605, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses, the Company classifies reimbursed expenses as revenue and the related expense within cost of revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the reimbursed expenses of $732,107 and $439,973 respectively, were included in revenue. |
|
For fixed price service arrangements the Company applies the proportional performance model to recognize revenue. When customer acceptance provisions exist, the Company is generally able to reliably demonstrate that the service meets, or will meet upon completion, the customer acceptance criteria. If circumstances exist which prevent the Company from verifying compliance with the acceptance provisions until the service has been completed, revenue is not recognized until compliance can be verified. |
|
Revenues recognized in excess of the amounts invoiced to clients are classified as unbilled revenues in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 the balance of unbilled revenue was $62,049 and $131,844, respectively. |
|
The Company may record deferred revenue in circumstances where the customer’s contract calls for pre-billing of services. Amounts in deferred revenue are realized when the services are provided and the criteria noted above are met. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the balance of deferred revenues was $68,420 and $0, respectively. |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Advertising Costs |
|
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses and amounted to $75,707 and $31,967 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Research and Development |
|
Because the industries in which we compete are characterized by rapid technological advances, our ability to compete successfully depends heavily upon our ability to ensure a continual and timely flow of competitive services to the marketplace. Total research and development expense was $0 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Operating Expenses |
|
Our operating expenses encompass selling, general and administrative expenses consisting primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel and costs related to our facilities, finance, human resources, information technology and fees for professional services. Professional services are principally comprised of outside legal, audit, information technology consulting, marketing and outsourcing services as well as the costs related to being a publically traded company. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
The Company follows ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“EPS”), which requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the income statements for all entities with complex capital structures, and requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation. In the accompanying financial statements, basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. |
|
The following is the computation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013: |
|
| | Year ended December 31, 2014 | |
| | Net income (Numerator) | | | Shares (Denominator) | | | Per Share Amount | |
Basic EPS | | $ | 470,565 | | | | 48,500,156 | | | $ | 0.01 | |
Dilutive shares related to warrants | | | - | | | | 168,564 | | | | | |
Dilutive EPS | | $ | 470,565 | | | | 48,668,720 | | | $ | 0.01 | |
|
| | Year ended December 31, 2013 | |
| | Net loss (Numerator) | | | Shares (Denominator) | | | Per Share Amount | |
Basic and Diluted EPS | | $ | (812,563 | ) | | | 38,215,054 | | | $ | (0.02 | ) |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes |
|
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. This approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities of the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The U.S. GAAP guidance for income taxes prescribes a two-step approach for the financial statement recognition and measurement of income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. The first step evaluates an income tax position in order to determine whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. The second step measure the benefit to be recognized in the financial statements for those income tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold. U.S. GAAP also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, recognition and classification of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosers and transition. Under U.S. GAAP, the Company may recognize a previously unrecognized tax benefits if the tax position is effectively (rather than “ultimately”) settled through examination, negotiation or litigation. The Company reevaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluations based on factor including, but not limited to, changes in facts and circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues, and new audit activity. Any changes in these factors could result in changes to a tax benefit or tax provision. |
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Receivables under Factoring Agreement |
|
The Company factors its receivables with recourse and, as a result, accounts for the factoring akin to a secured borrowing. The Company does maintain the gross receivable asset and due to factor liability on its books and records. The financial institution makes available 90% of the face value of the eligible receivables to the Company and retains the remaining 10% as a guaranteed until receipt of the proceeds associated with the factored invoices. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded factor fees of approximately $97,218 and $97,716, respectively, which are included within interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Amendments in this ASU create Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments supersede the cost guidance in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and create new Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is the final version of Proposed ASU 2011-230 – Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Proposed ASU 2011–250 – Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Codification Amendments, both of which have been deleted. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014-09 on the financial statements. |
|
In November 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-17, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) Pushdown Accounting a consensus of the FASM Emerging Issues Task Force.” The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs. An acquired entity should determine whether to elect to apply pushdown accounting for each individual change-in-control event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. If pushdown accounting is not applied in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs, an acquired entity will have the option to elect to apply pushdown accounting in a subsequent reporting period to the acquired entity’s most recent change-in-control event. An election to apply pushdown accounting in a reporting period after the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurred should be considered a change in accounting principle in accordance with Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. If pushdown accounting is applied to an individual change-in-control event, that election is irrevocable. The amendments in this ASU 2014-17 became effective on November 18, 2014 and are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. |
|
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, “Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20) Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items.” The amendments in this Update eliminate from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. The FASB concluded that the amendments in this Update will not result in a loss of information because although the amendments will eliminate the requirements in Subtopic 225-20 for reporting entities to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. The amendments in this ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Reclassification |
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used in December 31, 2014 consolidated financial statements. The results of the reclassification did not affect our consolidated Statement of Operations. |