CombiMatrix 10-Q 2009 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM            TO           

Commission File Number 001-33523

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	47-0899439
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)
6500 Harbour Heights Pkwy., Suite 303, Mukilteo, WA	98275
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (425) 493-2000

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes o   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   Yes o  No x

As of August 7, 2009, 7,510,073 shares of CombiMatrix Corporation common stock were issued and outstanding.

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

Table of Contents

Part I.   Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	23
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	23
Part II.   Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	24
Item 6.	Exhibits	25
Signatures		26
Exhibit Index		27

2

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,985		$	7,579
Available-for-sale investments	—			1,526
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $644 and $378	835			916
Inventory	868			725
Prepaid expenses and other assets	203			219
Total current assets	12,891			10,965
Property and equipment, net	564			743
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries	417			938
Patents and licenses, net	4,389			4,970
Goodwill	16,918			16,918
Total assets	$	35,179		$	34,534
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other	$	2,717		$	2,130
Credit line borrowings	—			820
Current portion of deferred revenues	381			418
Total current liabilities	3,098			3,368
Deferred revenues, net of current portion	25			125
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion	37			43
Secured convertible debenture	6,959			6,483
Other liabilities	1,825			469
Total liabilities	11,944			10,488
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 7,479,466 and 6,288,033 shares issued and outstanding	7			6
Additional paid-in capital	53,601			43,650
Accumulated net losses	(30,373		)	(19,610		)
Total shareholders’ equity	23,235			24,046
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	35,179		$	34,534

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share information)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Revenues:
Government contracts	$	291		$	968		$	816		$	2,037
Products	300			623			557			1,198
Services	582			414			1,278			697
Collaboration agreements	63			62			125			124
Total revenues	1,236			2,067			2,776			4,056
Operating expenses:
Cost of government contract revenues	242			955			737			1,969
Cost of products and services	521			484			1,178			888
Research and development expenses	1,282			913			2,413			2,259
Marketing, general and administrative expenses	2,861			2,397			5,630			4,480
Patent amortization and royalties	333			361			679			722
Equity in loss of investee	261			241			511			490
Total operating expenses	5,500			5,351			11,148			10,808
Operating loss	(4,264		)	(3,284		)	(8,372		)	(6,752		)
Other income (expense):
Interest income	5			25			15			125
Interest expense	(509		)	(4		)	(1,022		)	(5		)
Derivatives credits (charges)	137			—			(1,384		)	—
Total other income (expense)	(367		)	21			(2,391		)	120
Net loss	$	(4,631	)	$	(3,263	)	$	(10,763	)	$	(6,632	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.65	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(1.60	)	$	(1.10	)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	7,103,330			6,025,844			6,714,149			6,011,465

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2009			2008
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(10,763	)	$	(6,632	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	775			908
Non-cash stock compensation	1,646			769
Derivatives charges	1,384			—
Equity in loss of investees	511			490
Warrants issued to consultants	190			—
Allowance for bad debt	287			84
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs	571			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(206		)	(898		)
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other assets	(131		)	(162		)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other	839			405
Deferred revenues	(137		)	(155		)
Net cash flows from operating activities	(5,034		)	(5,191		)
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	(15		)	(42		)
Sale of available-for-sale investments	1,526			4,030
Net cash flows from investing activities	1,511			3,988
Financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock, net	7,761			111
(Repayment) draw on credit line	(820		)	808
Repayment of capital lease obligations	(12		)	(14		)
Net cash flows from financing activities	6,929			905
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	3,406			(298		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning	7,579			2,314
Cash and cash equivalents, ending	$	10,985		$	2,016
Non-cash financing activities:
Accrued interest paid in common stock	$	451		$	—
Conversion of secured convertible debenture to common stock	$	100		$	—
Accrued financing costs	$	205		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.    OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

CombiMatrix Corporation (the “Company” “we” “us” and “our”) was originally incorporated in October 1995 as a California corporation and later reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in September 2000.  On December 13, 2002 (the “Merger Date”), we merged with and became a wholly owned subsidiary of Acacia Research Corporation (“Acacia”).  Also on the Merger Date, Acacia entered into a recapitalization transaction whereby Acacia created two classes of registered common stock called Acacia Research-CombiMatrix common stock (“AR-CombiMatrix stock”) and Acacia Research-Acacia Technologies common stock (“AR-Acacia Technologies stock”) and divided its existing Acacia common stock into shares of the two new classes of common stock.  On August 15, 2007, we split-off from Acacia (the “Redemption Date”), and all currently issued and outstanding shares of AR-CombiMatrix stock were redeemed and exchanged for shares of CombiMatrix common stock at a redemption ratio of ten shares of AR-CombiMatrix stock for one share of CombiMatrix common stock (the “Redemption Ratio”), which is currently traded on the Nasdaq Global Market.  Also, warrants to purchase AR-CombiMatrix stock became exercisable to purchase CombiMatrix common stock, adjusted for the Redemption Ratio.  As of the Redemption Date, we ceased to be a subsidiary of, or affiliated with, Acacia.

Description of the Company

We are a diversified biotechnology business that develops proprietary technologies, including products and services in the areas of drug development, genetic analysis, molecular diagnostics, nanotechnology and defense and homeland security markets, as well as in other potential markets where our products and services could be utilized. The technologies we have developed include a platform technology to rapidly produce user-defined, in-situ synthesized, oligonucleotide arrays for use in identifying and determining the roles of genes, gene mutations and proteins. This technology has a wide range of potential applications in the areas of genomics, proteomics, biosensors, drug discovery, drug development, diagnostics, combinatorial chemistry, material sciences and nanotechnology. Other technologies include proprietary molecular synthesis and screening methods for the discovery of potential new drugs.  We currently recognize revenues from selling these products and services and providing research and development services for organizations including the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) and other strategic partners.

CombiMatrix Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (“CMDX”), our wholly owned subsidiary located in Irvine, California, has developed capabilities of producing arrays that utilize bacterial artificial chromosomes, or “BACs,” which also enable genetic analysis.  CMDX functions primarily as a diagnostics reference laboratory.

Leuchemix Inc. (“Leuchemix”), a minority owned subsidiary, is developing a series of compounds to address a number of oncology-related diseases.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, certain information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in annual financial statements have been omitted or condensed in accordance with quarterly reporting requirements of the SEC.  These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008, as reported by us in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 27, 2009.  The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of our financial position as of June 30, 2009, and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

6

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Liquidity and Risks

We have a history of incurring net losses and net operating cash flow deficits.  We are also deploying new and unproven technologies and continue to develop commercial products. We have several ongoing long-term development projects that involve experimental technology and may require several years and substantial expenditures to complete.  Based on our cash and investment balances as of December 31, 2008, we believed that our cash and cash equivalent balances, anticipated cash flows from operations and other external sources of available credit would be sufficient to meet our cash requirements to September 2009, which raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern beyond this point.  On May 1, 2009, we closed a registered direct offering of our common stock and warrants which, after placement agent fees and other costs, netted approximately $7.6 million to us (see Note 7), which management believes extends our going concern through June 2010.

In order for us to continue operating as a going concern beyond June 2010, we will be required to increase revenues, reduce operating costs and possibly to obtain capital from external sources.  However, there can be no assurances that additional sources of financing, including the issuance of debt and/or equity securities will be available at times and at terms acceptable to us.  The issuance of equity securities, should that occur, will cause dilution to our shareholders.  If external sources of financing are not available or are inadequate to fund our operations, we will be required to reduce operating costs including research projects and personnel, which could jeopardize the future strategic initiatives and business plans of the Company.  For example, reductions in research and development activities and/or personnel at our Mukilteo, Washington facility could result in the inability to invest the resources necessary to continue to develop next-generation products and improve existing product lines in order to remain competitive in the marketplace, resulting in reduced revenues and cash flows from the sales of our CustomArrayTM products and services.  Also, reduction in operating costs at CMDX, should they occur, could jeopardize its ability to launch, market and sell additional products and services necessary in order to grow and sustain its operations and eventually achieve profitability.

Our business operations are also subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including:

·market acceptance of products and services;

·technological advances that may make our products and services obsolete or less competitive;

·increases in operating costs, including costs for supplies, personnel and equipment;

·the availability and cost of capital;

·the financial crisis affecting the global banking system and financial markets; and

·governmental regulation that may restrict our business.

Our success also depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property, the loss thereof or our failure to secure the issuance of additional patents covering elements of our business processes could materially harm our business and financial condition.  The patents covering our core technology begin to expire in 2018.

Our products and services are concentrated in a highly competitive market that is characterized by rapid technological advances, frequent changes in customer requirements and evolving regulatory requirements and industry standards.  Failure to anticipate or respond adequately to technological advances, changes in customer requirements, changes in regulatory requirements or industry standards, or any significant delays in the development or introduction of planned products or services, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company continues as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the matters discussed herein.

7

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and related authoritative pronouncements.  Revenues from multiple-element arrangements are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.”  Revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been performed, (iii) amounts are fixed or determinable and (iv) collectibility of amounts is reasonably assured.

Revenue from the sale of products and services, including shipping and handling fees but excluding statutory taxes collected from customers, as applicable, are recognized when delivery has occurred or services have been rendered.  We sell our products and services directly to customers and also through distributors, and our right to collection is not dependent upon installation or a subsequent sale of our products to end-users.  Our standard agreements do not provide for credits, returns or exchanges with our customers or distributors.  Our distribution agreements include fixed pricing arrangements for our products and after customer acceptance, there is no written or implied right to return or exchange the products.

Revenues from government grants and contracts are recognized in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, “Government Contracts,” and related pronouncements, such as Statement of Position 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.”  Accordingly, revenues are recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, using the cost-to-cost approach to measure completeness at each reporting period.  Under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, contract revenues and costs are recognized in the period that work is performed based on the percentage of actual incurred costs to total contract costs.  Actual contract costs include direct charges for labor and materials and indirect charges for labor, overhead and certain general and administrative charges.  Contract change orders and claims are included when they can be reliably estimated and are considered probable.  For contracts that extend over a one-year period, revisions in contract cost estimates, if they occur, have the effect of adjusting current period earnings applicable to performance in prior periods.  Should current contract estimates indicate an overall future loss to be incurred, a provision is made for the total anticipated loss in the current period.  Historically, contract revenue recognized approximates the amounts invoiced, resulting in no estimated costs and earnings in excess of billings or billings in excess of estimated costs and earnings.

Revenues from multiple-element arrangements involving license fees, up-front payments, milestone payments, products and/or services, which are received and/or billable by us in connection with other rights and services that represent continuing obligations of ours, are deferred until all of the elements have been delivered or until we have established objective and verifiable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered elements.

Deferred revenues arise from payments received in advance of the culmination of the earnings process.  Deferred revenues expected to be recognized within the next twelve months are classified within current liabilities.  Deferred revenues will be recognized as revenue in future periods when the applicable revenue recognition criteria as described above are met.

8

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Stock-Based Compensation.  The compensation cost for all stock-based awards is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense, on a straight-line basis, over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award) which is generally three years.  The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model.  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”) requires stock-based compensation expense to be recorded only for those awards expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate.  We estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures at the time of grant and reflect the impact of estimated pre-vesting option forfeitures in compensation expense recognized.  Stock-based compensation expense for all periods presented attributable to our functional expense categories were as follows (in thousands; unaudited):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Cost of products and services	$	23	$	6	$	48	$	11
Research and development	152		71		289		140
Marketing, general and administrative	655		331		1,309		618
Total non-cash stock compensation	$	830	$	408	$	1,646	$	769

Net Loss Per Share.  Basic and diluted net loss per share has been computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the periods presented.  Options and warrants to purchase CombiMatrix stock are anti-dilutive and therefore are not included in the determination of the diluted net loss per share.  The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted loss per share for all periods presented (in thousands, except share and per-share data; unaudited):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Numerator:
Loss applicable to common shareholders	$	(4,631	)	$	(3,263	)	$	(10,763	)	$	(6,632	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	7,103,330			6,025,844			6,714,149			6,011,465
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.65	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(1.60	)	$	(1.10	)
Common stock options	2,059,502			1,010,229			2,059,502			1,010,229
Common stock warrants	3,813,646			2,305,274			3,813,646			2,305,274
Convertible debenture	1,120,000			—			1,120,000			—
Excluded potentially dilutive securities	6,993,148			3,315,503			6,993,148			3,315,503

Available-For-Sale Investments.  Investments in marketable securities are accounted for and classified in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”).  Investments in securities with original maturities of less than three months are included in cash and cash equivalents, and investments with original maturities of greater than three months and less than one year are classified as short-term.  Investments in marketable securities are typically classified as available-for-sale, which are reported at fair value with related unrealized gains and losses in the value of such securities recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until realized.  The fair value of available-for-sale investments is determined in accordance with SFAS No. 157 (see “Fair Value Measurements” below and Note 3).  We account for investments with fair values less than historical cost in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position 115-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“FSP 115-1”), as amended.  Under FSP 115-1, an impairment is deemed other than temporary based on a variety of factors including:  (a) the duration and severity of the impairment; (b) the ability and intent to hold an investment for a period of time sufficient for recovery of its carrying amount; and (c) the financial condition of the issuer.  All available evidence, both positive and negative, is considered to determine whether the carrying amount of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time.  In general, management does not consider an investment impairment to be other-than-temporary if the duration and amount of the impairment is less than twelve months and five percent of the historical cost of the investment, respectively.

9

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements.  We adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which applies to certain accounting standards that require or permit fair value measurements, on January 1, 2008.  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis.  SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.  As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.  As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

·	Level 1:	Observable market inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
·	Level 2:	Observable market inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
·	Level 3:	Unobservable inputs where there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

We adopted SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which provides entities the option to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  We have currently chosen not to elect the fair value option for any items that are not already required to be measured at fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Derivatives Embedded in Certain Debt Securities.  We evaluate financial instruments for freestanding or embedded derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), and related guidance.  Derivative instruments that have been separated from the host contract and do not qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value with changes in value recognized in as other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations in the period of change.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (the “Codification”).  The Codification, which was launched on July 1, 2009, became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”), EITF and related literature. The Codification eliminates the GAAP hierarchy contained in SFAS No. 162 and establishes one level of authoritative GAAP.  All other literature is considered non-authoritative.  The Codification is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  We will adopt the Codification for our quarter ending September 30, 2009.  We do not expect there to be any changes to our consolidated financial statements due to the implementation of the Codification.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”), and SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and requires ongoing qualitative reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.  SFAS 166 amends SFAS No. 140 by removing the exemption from consolidation for Qualifying Special Purpose Entities and also limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire original financial asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset.  We will adopt SFAS 167 and 166 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2010.  We do not expect the adoption of these statements to have any material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” (“SFAS 165”), which provides guidance on events that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements.  SFAS 165 distinguishes events requiring recognition in the financial statements and those that may require disclosure in the financial statements.  Furthermore, SFAS 165 requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events were evaluated.  SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual periods after June 15, 2009.  We have adopted SFAS 165 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and have evaluated subsequent events through August 14, 2009.

In April 2009, the FASB issued three Staff Positions (“FSPs”) that are intended to provide additional application guidance and enhance disclosures about fair value measurements and impairments of securities. FSP FAS 157-4 clarifies the objective and method of fair value measurement even when there has been a significant decrease in market activity for the asset being measured. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 establish a new model for measuring other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities, including establishing criteria for when to recognize a write-down through earnings versus other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 expands the fair value disclosures required for all financial instruments within the scope of SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to interim periods.  All of these FSPs became effective for us beginning April 1, 2009, and did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

10

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-5”).  EITF 07-5 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.  EITF 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, although early adoption is allowed.  We chose to early-adopt EITF 07-5 in 2008.  See Note 6 below for discussion of the impact on EITF 07-5 to our consolidated financial statements.

3.     FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table summarizes, for each major category of financial assets or liabilities measured on a recurring basis, the respective fair value at June 30, 2009 and the classification by level of input within the fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS 157 (in thousands; unaudited):

	June 30,			Fair Value Measurements at
	2009			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	10,342		$	10,342	$	—	$	—
Available-for-sale investments (1)	—			—		—		—
Total	$	10,342		$	10,342	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Embedded derivatives (2)	$	(1,825	)	$	—	$	—	$	(1,825	)

(1)All available-for-sale investments previously categorized as Level 3 assets were redeemed in January 2009.

(2)Included in “other liabilities” in the accompanying June 30, 2009 consolidated balance sheet.  See Note 6 below for discussion of fair value measurements relating to embedded derivatives.

Beginning January 1, 2009, SFAS 157 also requires that assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis to be reflected at fair value when an other-than-temporary impairment has been deemed to occur.  We did not have any such impairments as of or for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

The following table is a reconciliation of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands; unaudited):

	Available-
	For-Sale			Embedded
	Investments			Derivatives
Balances, December 31, 2008	$	1,526		$	(469	)
Redemption of ARS	(1,526		)	—
Conversions	—			28
Realized losses	—			(1,384		)
Balances, June 30, 2009	$	—		$	(1,825	)

At December 31, 2008, our available-for-sale investments included $1.5 million of auction rate securities (“ARS”) at par value. Historically, the carrying value of our ARS approximated fair value due to active, liquid markets for these securities as well as the frequent resetting of the interest rates at auction, which typically occurred every 7 to 30 days.  However, in mid-February 2008, the market for ARS collapsed and as a result, our ARS experienced multiple failed auctions during 2008.  During the fourth quarter of 2008, one of the issuers of our holdings in ARS redeemed $350,000 at par value, bringing the total amount of ARS held by us as of December 31, 2008 to $1.5 million.  On January 2, 2009, all of our remaining ARS were liquidated at par value.

11

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

From mid-February 2008 through the third quarter of 2008, the fair values of our holdings in ARS were estimated using discounted cash flow models.  These models consider, among other things, the timing of expected future successful auctions, estimated future cash flows, collateralization and credit worthiness of underlying security investments and discount rates applied to the estimated future cash flows.  Since these inputs were not observable, they were classified as Level 3 inputs under SFAS 157.  As a result of the lack of liquidity in the ARS market and not as a result of the quality of the underlying collateral, we recorded unrealized losses on our ARS of $66,000 and $135,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.  However, due to liquidations of our ARS at par value prior to and subsequent to December 31, 2008, we reversed our previously recognized unrealized losses and classified our ARS as current assets at par value in our December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet.

4.     COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following table shows our comprehensive net loss in accordance with SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” for all periods presented (in thousands; unaudited):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments	$	—		$	(66	)	$	—		$	(135	)
Net loss	(4,631		)	(3,263		)	(10,763		)	(6,632		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(4,631	)	$	(3,329	)	$	(10,763	)	$	(6,767	)

5.  CREDIT LINE BORROWINGS

On May 9, 2008 and pursuant to a Loan Management Account agreement (the “LMA”) with a financial institution (the “Lender”), we borrowed $808,000 from the Lender, secured by investments held in an investment account with the Lender.  The LMA is similar to a revolving line of credit borrowing facility.  The LMA provided that we accrue monthly interest charges at an annual, variable rate of 1% plus the 30-day LIBOR rate.  The total amount available under the LMA ranged from 50% to 92% of investments pledged as collateral, based upon the amount and security type in our investment portfolio, up to a maximum amount of $2.8 million.  The LMA had no stated maturity for the principal and interest amounts borrowed by us.  However, because the Lender has the ability under the terms of the LMA to call in the principal amount of the borrowings at any time, we classified the liability as a component of current liabilities in the accompanying December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet.  The LMA balance of $820,000 as of December 31, 2008 was repaid by us during the first quarter of 2009, however the LMA remains available for future borrowings at similar terms if so chosen by management.

6.  SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE

On July 10, 2008 (the “Closing Date”), we issued to YA Global Investments, L.P. (“YA”): (i) a secured convertible debenture (the “Debenture”) with an aggregate principal amount of $10 million, which was convertible into shares of our common stock at a fixed conversion price of $11.87 per share (and was recently reduced to $7.50 per share - see Note 7); and (ii) warrants (the “YA Warrants”) to purchase up to 336,984 shares of our common stock.  The Debenture is due on the earlier of July 10, 2010 (the “Term”) or within four months after receipt of payment of judgment or settlement proceeds from National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”) in accordance with the $35.7 million judgment (the “Judgment”) issued by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”).  The Debenture bears interest at an annual rate of 10%, with interest payments due quarterly in either cash or our common stock, beginning October 2008.  We have the right to force conversion of the Debenture into our common stock if the volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) of our stock exceeds between 125% and 135% of the fixed conversion price for a period of thirty consecutive trading days, among other conditions and restrictions.  We also have a cash redemption option whereby we have the right to pre-pay the Debenture during the Term, but only if our common stock is trading below the fixed conversion price, among other conditions.  Prepayment penalties range between 0% and 10% of the principal amount due, depending upon when the cash redemption occurs during the Term.  The number of shares issuable to YA upon conversion of the Debenture may increase due to certain anti-dilution adjustments, including if we issue common stock at a price lower than the $7.50 fixed conversion price while the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture is at least $5 million.  As the result of our registered direct offering that closed on May 1, 2009, the fixed conversion price of the Debenture was reduced from $11.87 per share to $7.50 per share pursuant to an anti-dilution adjustment (see Note 7).  The Debenture is secured by the Judgment as well as our intellectual property.  The YA Warrants have a five-year term and allow YA to purchase: (i) 168,492 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.87; and (ii) 168,492 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $13.65.  We have the right to call the YA Warrants, but only if the VWAP of our common stock is at or greater than 130% of the YA Warrants’ exercise price for at least twenty consecutive trading days, among other conditions.  We have registered the shares of our common stock that are issuable to YA upon conversion of the Debenture and exercise of the YA Warrants on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the SEC during the third quarter of 2008.

12

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Recognition on the Closing Date

On the Closing Date, we recognized the Debenture and YA Warrants based on their relative fair values of $8.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in accordance with APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.”  The fair value of the Debenture was determined using the convertible bond model, assuming a 15% yield.  The relative fair value of the YA Warrants was classified as a component of additional paid-in capital in accordance with SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS 150”) and EITF Issue No. 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock” (“EITF 00-19”), with the corresponding amount reflected as a contra-liability to the Debenture.  The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model, assuming a term of five years, volatility of 75%, no dividends, and a risk-free interest rate of 3.1%.

In accordance with SFAS 133, Derivative Implementation Group Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. B16, “Embedded Derivatives: Calls and Puts in Debt Instruments” and related guidance as well as the early adoption of EITF 07-5, the conversion feature, cash redemption option, potential acceleration of maturity of the Debenture upon payment of the Judgment proceeds and potential adjustments to the fixed conversion price all represent embedded derivatives that, as of the Closing Date, were valued in aggregate at $927,000 and recorded separately from the Debenture as other liabilities, with a corresponding amount reflected as an additional contra-liability to the Debenture.  The fair value of the embedded derivatives was determined using the convertible bond model, discounted cash flows and binomial lattice models.

As a result of separating the YA Warrants and embedded derivatives from the Debenture, the aggregate contra-liability totaling $2.9 million was recognized as of the Closing Date and was netted against the Debenture, which will accrete to the face amount due YA over the Term using the effective interest method, with the corresponding charges recorded as interest expense.

Recognition Subsequent to the Closing Date

Since the Closing Date through June 30, 2009, YA has converted $1.6 million of the Debenture into common stock, $1.5 million of which was converted in 2008 and $100,000 of which was converted during the three months ended June 30, 2009.  As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the remaining amount of the Debenture, net of the aggregate contra-liability, was $7.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively.  The embedded derivative liabilities were marked to fair value of $1.8 million as of June 30, 2009, resulting in net non-operating derivative credits (charges) of $137,000 and $(1.4 million) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, inclusive of the impact from reducing the fixed conversion price of the Debenture as described in Note 7 below.  As of June 30, 2009, the remaining principal amount of the Debenture was $8.4 million, with an estimated fair value of $8.1 million (excluding the imbedded derivative features).

Since the issuance of the Debenture through June 30, 2009, accrued interest to YA in the amount of $637,000 has been paid by issuing 73,072 shares of our common stock.  Subsequent to June 30, 2009 but prior to the issuance of this report, accrued interest to YA as of June 30, 2009 in the amount of $211,000 was paid by issuing 30,607 shares of our common stock.

13

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

7.  SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

On May 1, 2009, we closed a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) of our common stock and warrants for gross proceeds of $8.25 million.  Under the terms of the Offering, we sold 1.1 million units for $7.50 per unit to certain investors.  Each unit consisted of one share of our common stock and one warrant, each warrant to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $9.00 per share.  The warrants may not be exercised until six months after the Offering and have a term of five years.  The warrants are also callable if our common stock trades at or above $22.50 per share during any 20 trading days during a period of 30 consecutive trading days, with a minimum daily trading volume of 50,000 shares each day during that 30 trading day period.  Subsequent to the date of the Offering but prior to June 30, 2009, we listed the warrants on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “CBMXW”.  Net proceeds from the Offering, net of placement agent fees and expenses, were approximately $7.6 million.  As a result of executing the Offering, the fixed conversion price of the Debenture has been reduced to $7.50 per share, effective May 1, 2009.

Warrants

Prior to the Redemption Date, Acacia had issued warrants to purchase approximately 23.8 million shares of AR-CombiMatrix stock in connection with various financing transactions.  As of the Redemption Date, all previously outstanding AR-CombiMatrix common stock warrants became exercisable for CombiMatrix common stock, adjusted for the Redemption Ratio discussed above.

Outstanding warrants to purchase CombiMatrix common stock are as follows (unaudited):

	Shares of Common Stock
	Issuable from Warrants
	June 30,	December 31,	Exercise
Date of Issue	2009	2008	Price	Expiration
June 2009	129,688	—	$7.50 - $9.00	May 2014 - June 2014
May 2009	1,100,000	—	$9.00	May 2014
July 2008	336,984	336,984	$11.87 - $13.65	July 2013
May 2007	959,390	959,390	$5.50	May 2012
December 2006	1,127,936	1,127,936	$8.70 - $10.88	December 2011
September 2005	159,648	159,648	$24.00	September 2010
Total	3,813,646	2,583,958

On May 19, 2009 (the “Grant Date”), we issued three warrants (the “Consultant Warrants”) to a consultant to purchase a total of 125,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $9.00 per share and a term of five years.  The first warrant is for 25,000 shares and becomes fully vested six months after the Grant Date.  The second and third warrants (the “Contingent Warrants”) are for 50,000 shares each of common stock, and become fully vested only if our underlying stock price achieves or exceeds $12.00 and $14.00 per share, respectively, for five consecutive trading days as quoted on Nasdaq, over a period of twenty-four months from the Grant Date.  If these terms are not achieved during this twenty-four month period, the Contingent Warrants will expire on May 19, 2011.  Otherwise, if the vesting conditions are achieved within twenty-four months from the Grant Date, the Contingent Warrants will become fully exercisable for the remainder of the five-year term.

The fair value of the Consultant Warrants of $171,000 was classified as a component of additional paid-in capital in accordance with SFAS 150, EITF 07-5 and EITF 00-19, with the corresponding amount reflected as a component of marketing, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2009.  The fair value of the Consultant Warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model, assuming a remaining term of 4.9 years, volatility of 70%, no dividends, and a risk-free interest rate of 2.5%.  In addition, the fair value of the Contingent Warrants was determined using a Monte Carlo binomial stock simulation model to determine the probability that the vesting conditions will be achieved.  We will continue to recognize mark-to-model adjustments to the Consultant Warrants during their respective vesting periods.

14

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

8.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Collaboration and Research Agreements

On March 10, 2009, we executed a four-year, $858,000 contract with the NASA Ames Research Center (“NASA”) for further development of our microarray technologies.  The primary objective of the contract is to design and test a microfluidics system that incorporates our semiconductor-based microarray platform as part of an integrated genetic analysis system that can be deployed in space.  Under the terms of this contract, we will perform research and development activities during the first year (“Phase I”) for a fixed fee of $214,000.  If NASA chooses to continue development for each of the subsequent years two through four of the contract, we will continue development at similar funding levels to the first year, not to exceed a maximum fee of $858,000 for the entire contract period.  As of June 30, 2009, we had incurred $23,000 in actual costs for Phase I of this contract, which was approximately 15% complete.

On July 31, 2008, we executed a $250,000 contract with the DoD for the development of label-free detection techniques using our microarray technology.  These detection techniques involve the synthesis of molecules known as “aptamers,” which are molecules with unique biological properties.  We substantially completed this contract during the first quarter of 2009 and do not expect to incur additional costs or revenues from this contract beyond 2009.

On July 11, 2008, we executed a fifteen-month, $923,000 contract with the DoD to further development of our microarray technologies for a multipathogen detection system.  The primary objectives of the contract are to continue development of an automated biothreat agent detection system based upon our complementary metal oxide semiconductor microarray and electrochemical detection techniques, to continue the integration of serological and genomic assays for orthogonal testing and to explore new methods of detection that expand target identification, reduce reagent burden, and improve assay time.  Under the terms of this contract, we will perform research and development activities, as described under the contract, and will be reimbursed on a periodic basis for actual costs incurred to perform these obligations, plus a fixed fee, of up to $923,000.  As of June 30, 2009, we had substantially completed this contract and do not expect to incur additional costs or revenues from this contract beyond 2009.

On July 26, 2007, we executed a one-year, $2.2 million contract with the DoD to further development of our microarray technologies.  The primary objectives of the contract were to continue development of a multipathogen and chemical detection system.  Under the terms of this contract, we performed research and development activities, as described under the contract, and were reimbursed on a periodic basis for actual costs incurred to perform these obligations, plus a fixed fee, of up to $2.2 million.  We substantially completed this contract during the third quarter of 2008 and do not expect to incur additional costs or revenues from this contract beyond 2008.

On March 13, 2007, we executed a one-year, $869,000 contract with the DoD, focusing on the development of a field-deployable influenza genotyping system based on our electrochemical detection technology to be used for military and homeland security applications.  Under the terms of this contract, we performed research and development activities, as described under the contract, and were reimbursed on a periodic basis for actual costs incurred to perform our obligations, plus a fixed fee, of up to $869,000.  We substantially completed this contract during the second quarter of 2008 and do not expect to incur significant costs or revenues from this contract beyond 2008.

On August 9, 2006, we executed a two-year, $1.9 million contract with the DoD, focusing on the integration of our electrochemical detection technology currently under development with our microfluidics “lab-on-a-chip” technology to be used for military and homeland security applications. Under the terms of this contract, we performed research and development activities, as described under the contract, and were reimbursed on a periodic basis for actual costs incurred to perform our obligations, plus a fixed fee, of up to $1.9 million.  We substantially completed this contract during the fourth quarter of 2008 and do not expect to incur significant costs or revenues from this contract beyond 2008.

15

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Unaudited)

Human Resources

We provide certain severance benefits such that if an executive of CombiMatrix who is a vice president or higher is terminated for other than cause, death or disability, the executive will receive payments equal to three months’ base salary plus medical and dental benefits.  If termination occurs as a result of a change in control transaction, these benefits will be extended by three months.  Also, if our chief executive officer is terminated for other than cause, or for death or disability, he will receive payments equal to one year’s base salary plus medical and dental benefits.

Litigation

On September 30, 2002, we entered into a settlement agreement with Nanogen, Inc. (“Nanogen”) to settle all pending litigation between the parties.  Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, we agreed to make quarterly payments to Nanogen equal to 12.5% of total sales of products developed by us and our affiliates based on the patents that had been in dispute in the litigation, up to an annual maximum amount of $1.5 million.  The minimum quarterly payments under the settlement agreement are $25,000 per quarter until the patents expire in 2018.  Royalty expenses recognized under the agreement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $25,000, $50,000, 48,000 and $91,000, respectively, and are included in patent amortization and royalties in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In April 2005, Acacia and CombiMatrix filed a complaint against our insurance carrier, National Union, seeking reimbursement of litigation and settlement costs for a lawsuit, pursuant to our directors’ and officers’ insurance policy with National Union.  A trial was held and concluded during the fourth quarter of 2007.  In March 2008, the Court issued its Judgment in favor of Acacia and us, and awarded approximately $32.1 million in monetary damages to be paid by National Union.  In accordance with the distribution agreement entered into between Acacia and us prior to our separation, all proceeds from the lawsuit will be paid to us.  In May 2008, the Court awarded us an additional $3.6 million in attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, thereby increasing the overall award to $35.7 million.  This award was entered as a final Judgment in May 2008 and will continue to earn interest until paid.  National Union has appealed the Judgment to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and we intend to vigorously defend against the appeal.  In September 2008, the Court required National Union to post an appellate bond in the amount of $39.2 million to cover the Judgment as well as accrued interest charges.  The appellate bond will remain in place until the appeal process is concluded.  As of June 30, 2009, all appellate briefs by us and National Union had been filed.

We are subject to other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business.  We believe that the ultimate liability with respect to these claims and legal actions, if any, will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  Based on a distribution agreement executed between us and Acacia, it is expected that such claims, legal actions, etc. attributable to CombiMatrix Corporation prior to the Redemption Date will remain with the Company subsequent to the Redemption Date.  As of the date of this report and for all periods presented, we are not aware of the existence of any such claims or legal actions, however.

16

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report.  The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our businesses or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock.  We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC,” including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 27, 2009.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Reference is made in particular to the description of our plans and objectives for future operations, assumptions underlying such plans and objectives, and other forward-looking statements included in this report. Such statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of such terms.  Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.  Such statements address future events and conditions concerning product development, capital expenditures, earnings, litigation, regulatory matters, markets for products and services, liquidity and capital resources and accounting matters.  Actual results in each case could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements by reason of factors such as future economic conditions, changes in consumer demand, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments in markets in which we and our subsidiaries operate, results of litigation and other circumstances affecting anticipated revenues and costs.  We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.  Additional factors that could cause such results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements are set forth in connection with the forward-looking statements and in the “Risk Factors” described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 27, 2009.

General

We are a diversified biotechnology business that develops proprietary technologies, including products and services in the areas of drug development, genetic analysis, molecular diagnostics, nanotechnology and defense and homeland security markets, as well as in other potential markets where our products and services could be utilized. The technologies we have developed include a platform technology to rapidly produce user-defined, in-situ synthesized, oligonucleotide arrays for use in identifying and determining the roles of genes, gene mutations and proteins. This technology has a wide range of potential applications in the areas of genomics, proteomics, biosensors, drug discovery, drug development, diagnostics, combinatorial chemistry, material sciences and nanotechnology. Other technologies include proprietary molecular synthesis and screening methods for the discovery of potential new drugs.  We currently recognize revenues from selling these products and services and providing research and development services for organizations including the U.S. Department of Defense, or “DoD” and other strategic partners.

CombiMatrix Molecular Diagnostics, Inc., or “CMDX,” our wholly owned subsidiary located in Irvine, California, has developed capabilities of producing arrays that utilize bacterial artificial chromosomes, or “BACs,” which also enable genetic analysis.  CMDX functions primarily as a diagnostics reference laboratory.

Leuchemix Inc. (“Leuchemix”), a minority owned subsidiary, is developing a series of compounds to address a number of oncology-related diseases.

17

Relationship With Acacia Research Corporation

We were originally incorporated in October 1995 as a California corporation and later reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in September 2000. On December 13, 2002, we merged with and became a wholly owned subsidiary of Acacia Research Corporation, or “Acacia.” On the same date, Acacia entered into a recapitalization transaction whereby Acacia created two classes of registered common stock called Acacia Research-CombiMatrix common stock (“AR-CombiMatrix stock”) and Acacia Research-Acacia Technologies common stock (“AR-Acacia Technologies stock”) and divided its existing Acacia common stock into shares of the two new classes of common stock.  On August 15, 2007 (the “Redemption Date”), we split-off from Acacia and all issued and outstanding shares of AR-CombiMatrix stock were redeemed and exchanged for shares of CombiMatrix common stock at a redemption ratio of ten shares of AR-CombiMatrix stock for one share of CombiMatrix common stock (the “Redemption Ratio”), which is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Global Market (symbol: “CBMX”).  Also, warrants to purchase AR-CombiMatrix stock became exercisable to purchase CombiMatrix common stock, adjusted for the Redemption Ratio.  As of the Redemption Date, we ceased to be a subsidiary of, or affiliated with, Acacia.

Liquidity

At December 31, 2008, we had cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments of $9.1 million, which we believed would be sufficient to meet our cash requirements to September 2009.  On May 1, 2009, we closed a registered direct offering of our common stock and warrants which, after placement agent fees and other costs, netted approximately $7.6 million to us, and thereby extending our ability to continue operating as a going concern into 2010 (see Liquidity and Capital Resources below as well as Note 7 to the consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere herein for further discussion).

In order for our company to continue as a going concern beyond 2010 and ultimately to achieve profitability, we will be required to increase revenues, reduce operating costs and possibly to obtain capital from external sources.  However, there can be no assurance that such capital will be available at times and at terms acceptable to us, or that higher levels of product and service revenues will be achieved.  The issuance of additional equity securities, should that occur, will cause dilution to our shareholders.  If external financing sources are not available or are inadequate to fund our operations, we will be required to reduce operating costs including research projects and personnel, which could jeopardize our future strategic initiatives and business plans.  See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional discussion of these matters.

Basis Of Presentation Of Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are consistent with our historical financial statements included in our Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Overview Of Recent Business Activities

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, our operating activities included the recognition of $1.2 million and $2.8 million in revenues, respectively, including $291,000 and $816,000 in government contract revenues, respectively, $339,000 and $627,000 in CustomArray product and service revenues, respectively, and $606,000 and $1.3 million in diagnostic lab revenues, respectively.  Research and development expenses, excluding government contract costs and non-cash stock based compensation, increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 due primarily to the increased activities on our comprehensive cancer array test currently under development.  Marketing, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash stock compensation, also increased over the same periods due primarily to increased sales and marketing efforts at CMDX and also due to increased investor and public relations costs.

Significant business developments that occurred during and subsequent to the second quarter ended June 30, 2009 were:

·In April 2009, Dr. Karine Hovanes joined CMDX, as its Laboratory Director.  Dr. Hovanes is a Diplomat of the American Board of Medical Genetics in Clinical Molecular Genetics and Clinical Cytogenetics and is also licensed in New York and California in both cytogenetics and molecular genetics. Dr. Hovanes joins CMDX from the Laboratory Corporation of America, otherwise known as LabCorp.

·Also in April 2009, we announced an update to our Influenza-Detection Microarray to include sequence information of the latest strain of Swine Flu. The previous version of the Influenza-Detection Microarray already detected several strains of Swine Flu as well as the pathogenic Bird Flu.  Within one day of receiving sequence information of the new strain, we were able to update the array to definitively identify the Swine Flu strain.

·In May 2009, we closed a registered direct offering of our common stock and warrants for gross proceeds of $8.25 million.

18

·In June 2009, we announced that the validation study performed by CMDX, in collaboration with the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, TX of our HerScanTM breast cancer test, was available as an advance online publication in the official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Modern Pathology.

·Also in June 2009, we announced that all of the appellate briefs associated with our ongoing litigation against National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburg, PA had been filed with the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Appeals Court”), and that the next step in the appellate process is for the Appeals Court to schedule oral hearings.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Preparation of these statements requires management to make judgments and estimates.  Some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these financial statements.  A summary of significant accounting policies and a description of accounting policies that are considered critical may be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 27, 2009, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Critical Accounting Estimates section.  In addition, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated interim financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three and Six months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Revenues and Cost of Revenues (In thousands)

	Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
	June 30,						Change					June 30,						Change
	2009			2008			$			%		2009			2008			$			%
Government contracts	$	291		$	968		$	(677	)	(70	)%	$	816		$	2,037		$	(1,221	)	(60	)%
Cost of government contract revenues	(242		)	(955		)	713			(75	)%	(737		)	(1,969		)	1,232			(63	)%
Products	300			623			(323		)	(52	)%	557			1,198			(641		)	(54	)%
Services	582			414			168			41	%	1,278			697			581			83	%
Cost of products and services	(521		)	(484		)	(37		)	8	%	(1,178		)	(888		)	(290		)	33	%
Collaboration agreements	63			62			1			2	%	125			124			1			1	%

Government Contracts and Cost of Government Contracts.  Under the terms of our contracts with the DoD, we are reimbursed on a periodic basis for actual costs incurred to perform our obligations, plus a fixed fee.  Under the terms of our contract with NASA, we are reimbursed on a periodic basis based on scheduled, contractual fixed amounts.  Revenues are recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, using the cost-to-cost approach to measure completeness at the end of the each reporting period.  Cost of government contracts reflect research and development expenses incurred in connection with our commitments under our current contracts with the DoD.

The decrease in government contract revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the comparable periods in 2008 was due primarily to fewer active contracts during 2009 versus 2008.  The recent completion of our multipathogen and electrochemical detection contracts resulted in a decrease in government contract activity and thus lower government contract revenues recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the comparable periods in 2008.  See Note 8 to our consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a detailed description of the amounts, completion rates and estimated costs to complete of our government contracts that are ongoing as well as prior contracts that were completed during the periods presented.  As these contracts near completion, future contract revenues could be volatile in the short-term and decrease in the longer term if new government contracts are not awarded or executed.

19

Products and Cost of Products.  Product revenues and costs of products relate to domestic and international sales of our array products, which include DNA synthesizer instruments, CustomArray 12K, 4X2K, 2X40K and 90K DNA expression arrays, ElectraSense® microarray readers and related hardware.  Product revenues decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the comparable periods in 2008 due primarily to lower instrument sales in 2009 than 2008.  As we expand our business focus from exclusively selling array-based research and development products to providing array-based diagnostic services, we have reduced internal sales staff, marketing and production efforts regarding sales of CustomArray products and instead have executed product distribution and manufacturing agreements with various third-party distributors for the sales of our suite of CustomArray products into the research and development markets.  Also, declining global economic conditions have negatively impacted the sales of our instruments.  As a result, CustomArray product revenues will likely be volatile and could decrease in future periods, depending largely on the sales efforts of our distributors.

Services.  Services revenues are comprised primarily of diagnostic lab services provided by CMDX as well as the amortization of one-year equipment maintenance and service contracts executed with certain customers of our DNA synthesizers.  Diagnostic services revenue from CMDX was $565,000 and $1.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, versus $369,000 and $622,000 in the comparable periods in 2008.  These revenues have increased due to an increased number of diagnostic test offerings as well as increased customer demand for our suite of diagnostic lab services provided by CMDX, which is due primarily to increased sales and marketing efforts.  Including BAC array product sales, total diagnostic lab revenues at CMDX were $606,000 and $1.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 versus $395,000 and $668,000 in the comparable periods in 2008.

Operating Expenses (In thousands)

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Change					June 30,				Change
	2009		2008		$			%		2009		2008		$			%
Research and development expenses	$	1,282	$	913	$	369		40	%	$	2,413	$	2,259	$	154		7	%
Marketing, general and admin. expenses	2,861		2,397		464			19	%	5,630		4,480		1,150			26	%
Patent amortization and royalties	333		361		(28		)	(8	)%	679		722		(43		)	(6	)%
Equity in loss of of investees	261		241		20			8	%	511		490		21			4	%

Research and Development Expenses.  The increases in internal research and development expenses for the periods presented were due primarily to the increased development efforts underway on our comprehensive cancer array test.  In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, research and development expenses included $152,000, $289,000, $71,000 and $140,000, respectively, of non-cash stock compensation expense recognized under SFAS No. 123R.  These increases were due primarily to increases in the overall number of stock option awards granted to our employees during the past twelve months.  See Note 2 to our consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a detailed description of the amounts recognized for the periods presented.

Future research and development expenses will continue to be incurred in connection with our ongoing internal research and development efforts in the areas of genomics, diagnostics, drug discovery and product development.   We expect our research and development expenses to continue to fluctuate and such expenses could increase in future periods as additional internal research and development agreements are undertaken and/or as new research and development collaborations are executed with strategic partners.

Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses.  The increases in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the periods presented were due primarily to increases in sales and marketing expenses at CMDX, as well as increased investor and public relations expenses.  In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, marketing, general and administrative expenses included $655,000, $1.3 million, $331,000 and $618,000, respectively, of non-cash stock compensation expense recognized under SFAS No. 123R.  These increases were due primarily to increases in the overall number of stock option awards granted to our employees during the past twelve months.  See Note 2 to our consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a detailed description of the amounts recognized for the periods presented.

20

Other Non-Operating Items

	Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
	June 30,						Change					June 30,						Change
	2009			2008			$			%		2009			2008			$			%
Interest expense	$	(509	)	$	(4	)	$	(505	)	12625	%	$	(1,022	)	$	(5	)	$	(1,017	)	20340	%
Derivative credits (charges)	137			—			137			—		(1,384		)	—			(1,384		)	—

Interest Expense.  Since July 2008, interest expense is recognized from the issuance of a secured convertible debenture (the “Debenture”), which accrues interest at an annual rate of 10% and with a current principal amount of $8.4 million as of June 30, 2009.  Interest expense also includes amortization of the $2.9 million of debt discount recognized from issuance of the Debenture and warrants using the effective interest method for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

Derivative Credits (Charges).  These amounts represent the net credits or charges recognized during the periods from mark-to-model adjustments to the embedded derivatives associated with the Debenture that were outstanding as of June 30, 2009.  There were no such debenture or embedded derivatives outstanding during the periods ended June 30, 2008.  In accordance with SFAS 133, Derivative Implementation Group Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. B16, “Embedded Derivatives: Calls and Puts in Debt Instruments” and related guidance as well as the early adoption of EITF 07-5, the conversion feature, cash redemption option, potential acceleration of maturity of the Debenture and potential adjustments to the fixed conversion price all represent embedded derivatives of the Debenture that are recorded separately at fair value as other liabilities, with the corresponding fair value adjustments reflected as non-operating charges or credits, depending upon the results of mark-to-model valuation adjustments.  The fair value of the embedded derivatives was determined using the convertible bond model, discounted cash flows and binomial lattice models.

Inflation

Inflation has not had a significant impact on our Company.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2009, cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments totaled $11.0 million versus to $9.1 million at December 31, 2008.  Working capital at June 30, 2009 was 9.8 million, compared to $7.6 million at December 31, 2008.  The change in working capital was due primarily to the impact of our registered direct offering executed May 1, 2009 as well as our net cash flow activities as discussed below.  The net change in cash and cash equivalents for the periods presented was comprised of the following (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2009			2008
Net cash provided by (used in) operations:
Operating activities	$	(5,034	)	$	(5,191	)
Investing activities	1,511			3,988
Financing activities	6,929			905
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	3,406		$	(298	)

Operating Activities.  The overall net decrease in cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the comparable period in 2008 was due primarily to a decrease in operating cash outflows, which totaled $7.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus $8.2 million in the comparable period in 2008.  This decrease was due primarily from reduced litigation expenses in 2009 versus 2008 as well as variances in timing of vendor payments.  The improvement in net cash used in operating activities from this activity was partially offset by a decrease in cash inflows from customers, which were $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus $3.0 million in the comparable period in 2008.  Cash inflows from customers decreased for the periods presented primarily due to a decrease in billable DoD activity and reduced product sales as discussed above.

21

Investing Activities.  The change in net cash flows from investing activities was due primarily to net sales of available-for-sale investments in connection with ongoing cash management activities during the periods presented.  Also, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we incurred $15,000 and $42,000, respectively, of capital expenditures.

Financing Activities.  The overall net increase in financing activities was due to the execution of a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) of our common stock and warrants for gross proceeds of $8.25 million, which we closed on May 1, 2009.  Under the terms of the Offering, we sold 1.1 million units for $7.50 per unit to certain investors.  Each unit consisted of one share of our common stock and one warrant, each warrant to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $9.00 per share.  The warrants may not be exercised until six months after the Offering and have a term of five years.  Net proceeds from the Offering, net of placement agent fees and expenses, were approximately $7.6 million.  This increase in net cash flows from financing activities was partially offset by the repayment of credit line borrowings totaling $820,000 during the period ended June 30, 2009 versus our draw on the same credit line of $808,000 in the comparable period in 2008.  Also, proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and warrants were $89,000 during the period ended June 30, 2009 versus $111,000 in the comparable period in 2008.

Future Liquidity.  We believe that the additional capital from the Offering will allow us to meet our operating cash requirements through June of 2010.  In order for us to continue to meet our cash requirements beyond this point, we will be required to increase revenues, reduce operating costs and possibly to obtain capital from external sources.  However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to secure additional sources of financing at times and at terms acceptable to management.  The issuance of additional equity securities, should that occur, will cause dilution to our shareholders.  If external financing sources are not available or are inadequate to fund our operations, management will be required to reduce our operating costs including research projects and personnel, which could jeopardize our future strategic initiatives and business plans.  For example, reductions in research and development activities and/or personnel at our Mukilteo, Washington facility could result in the inability to invest the resources necessary to continue to develop next-generation products and improve existing product lines in order to remain competitive in the marketplace, resulting in reduced revenues and cash flows from the sales of our CustomArray products and services.  Also, reductions in operating costs at CMDX, should they occur, could jeopardize our ability to launch, market and sell additional products and services necessary to grow and sustain our operations and eventually achieve profitability.

Capital Requirements.  We may also encounter unforeseen difficulties that may deplete our capital resources more rapidly than anticipated.  Any efforts to seek additional funding could be made through equity, debt or other external financing, and there can be no assurance that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, if at all.  Our long-term capital requirements will be substantial and the adequacy of available funds will depend upon many factors, including:

·the costs of commercialization activities, including sales and marketing, manufacturing and capital equipment;

·our continued progress in research and development programs;

·the costs involved in filing, prosecuting, enforcing and defending any patents claims, should they arise;

·the costs involved in defending our Judgment against the appeal brought by National Union;

·our ability to license technology;

·competing technological developments;

·the creation and formation of strategic partnerships; and

·the costs associated with leasing and improving our Irvine, California facility.

Pursuant to the tax allocation agreement executed between us and Acacia, we have agreed not to take certain actions for two years following the split off, unless we obtain an IRS ruling or an opinion of counsel to the effect that these actions will not affect the tax-free nature of the split off.  These actions include certain issuances of our stock, a liquidation or merger of our company, and dispositions of assets outside the ordinary course of our business.  If any of these transactions were to occur, the split off could be deemed to be a taxable distribution to Acacia.  In particular, we have agreed to indemnify Acacia for any tax resulting from an acquisition by one or more persons of a 50% or greater interest in our company.

22

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into off-balance sheet financing arrangements, other than operating leases for our office and laboratory premises.  We have no significant commitments for capital expenditures in 2009 or beyond.  We have executed two capital leases totaling $109,000 for certain laboratory equipment.  The following table lists our material known future cash commitments as of June 30, 2009:

	Payments Due by Period (in thousands)
									2013 and
	2009		2010		2011		2012		Thereafter
Operating leases	$	273	$	367	$	—	$	—	$	—
Capital leases	6		13		14		15		1
Minimum royalty payments	50		100		100		100		575
Secured convertible debenture (1)	—		8,400		—		—		—
Total contractual obligations	$	329	$	8,880	$	114	$	115	$	576

(1)The principal amount of the Debenture as of June 30, 2009, which is due the earlier of July 10, 2010 or four months after receiving the settlement payment from National Union, is reflected as being due in July, 2010 (the maturity date of the Debenture), assuming no additional conversions or early prepayments occur.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 2 to our consolidated interim financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Item 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 4T.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.  Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives, and management necessarily is required to use its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.  Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act as of June 30, 2009.  Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2009, the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter (the quarter ended June 30, 2009) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

23

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In April of 2005, Acacia and we filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) against our insurance carrier, National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”), seeking reimbursement of litigation and settlement costs for a lawsuit, pursuant to our directors’ and officers’ insurance policy with National Union.  A trial was held and concluded during the fourth quarter of 2007.  In March 2008, the Court issued the Judgment in favor of Acacia and us, and awarded approximately $32.1 million in monetary damages to be paid by National Union.  In accordance with the distribution agreement entered into between Acacia and us prior to our separation, all proceeds from the lawsuit will be paid to us.  In May 2008, the Court awarded us an additional $3.6 million in attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, thereby increasing the overall award to $35.7 million.  This award was entered as a final Judgment in May 2008 and will continue to earn interest until paid.  National Union has appealed the Judgment to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and we intend to vigorously defend against the appeal.  The Court has required, and National Union has posted, an appellate bond in the amount of $39.2 million to cover the Judgment as well as accrued interest charges.  The appellate bond will remain in place until the appeal process is concluded.  As of June 30, 2009, all appellate briefs by us and National Union had been filed.

Item 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the first and second quarters of 2009, we issued 31,053 and 27,614 shares of our common stock, respectively, to YA in consideration of our quarterly interest charges accrued during the fourth quarter of 2008 under the terms of the Debenture.  The issuance of common stock to YA was made pursuant to an exemption under Rule 506 of Regulation D and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On May 19, 2009 (the “Grant Date”), we issued three warrants (the “Consultant Warrants”) to a consultant to purchase a total of 125,000 unregistered shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $9.00 per share and a term of five years.  The first warrant is for 25,000 shares and becomes fully vested six months after the Grant Date.  The second and third warrants (the “Contingent Warrants”) are for 50,000 shares each of common stock, and become fully vested only if our underlying stock price achieves or exceeds $12.00 and $14.00 per share, respectively, for five consecutive trading days as quoted on Nasdaq, over a period of twenty-four months from the Grant Date.  If these terms are not achieved during this twenty-four month period, the Contingent Warrants will expire on May 19, 2011.  Otherwise, if the vesting conditions are achieved within twenty-four months from the Grant Date, the Contingent Warrants will become fully exercisable for the remainder of the five-year term.  The warrants were issued pursuant to an exemption under Rule 506 and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Item 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At an annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders on June 11, 2009, the shareholders re-elected John H. Abeles, M.D., Thomas B. Akin, Brooke P. Anderson, Ph.D., F. Rigdon Currie, and Amit Kumar, Ph.D. and elected Scott Gottlieb, M.D., to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.  Approximately 69% of outstanding votable shares were represented in person or by proxy at the meeting.  The voting results for each matter were as follows:

Proposal No. 1:  Election of Directors

Director	For	Withheld
John H. Abeles. M.D.	4,132,510	244,030
Thomas B. Akin	3,444,222	932,318
Brooke P. Anderson, Ph.D.	4,234,603	141,937
F. Rigdon Currie	3,848,791	527,749
Amit Kumar, Ph.D.	4,235,113	141,427
Scott Gottlieb, M.D.	4,237,006	139,534

24

Item 6.  EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.1a	Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws (3)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to CombiMatrix Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-139679), which became effective June 8, 2007.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1A to CombiMatrix Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2008.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to CombiMatrix Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-139679), which became effective June 8, 2007.

25

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION
By:	/s/ AMIT KUMAR, PH.D.
	Amit Kumar, Ph.D.
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Authorized Signatory and Principal Executive Officer)
By:	/s/ SCOTT R. BURELL
	Scott R. Burell
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date:  August 14, 2009

26

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.1a	Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws (3)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to CombiMatrix Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-139679), which became effective June 8, 2007.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1A to CombiMatrix Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2008.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to CombiMatrix Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-139679), which became effective June 8, 2007.

27