Ceres Abingdon 10K 2011 Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

OR¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-53210

ABINGDON FUTURES FUND L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York

20-3845005

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC

522 Fifth Avenue — 14th Floor

New York, New York 10036

(Address and Zip Code of principal executive offices)

(212) 296-1999

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-Kþ.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer þ	Smaller reporting company ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes ¨ No þ

Limited Partnership Redeemable Units with aggregate values of $192,004,033 of Class A and $10,033,119 of Class D were outstanding and held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of February 29, 2012, there were 196,572.2642 Limited Partnership Redeemable Units of Class A outstanding, 11,453.7739 Limited Partnership Redeemable Units of Class D outstanding and 566.2369 Limited Partnership Redeemable Units of Class Z outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

[None]

PART I

Item 1.Business.

(a)General Development of Business. Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized on November 8, 2005, under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage, directly or indirectly, in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options, swaps and forward contracts. The sectors traded include currencies, energy, grains, indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, lumber, metals and softs. The Partnership commenced trading on February 1, 2007. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership through its investment in the Master (as defined below) are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Partnership privately and continuously offers redeemable units of limited partnership interest (“Redeemable Units”) in the Partnership to qualified investors. There is no maximum number of Redeemable Units that may be sold by the Partnership.

Subscriptions of additional Redeemable Units and additional general partner contributions and redemptions of Redeemable Units for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are reported in the Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital on page 22 under “Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. The General Partner is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSB Holdings”). Morgan Stanley, indirectly through various subsidiaries, owns a majority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) indirectly owns a minority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Citigroup also indirectly owns Citigroup Global Markets (“CGM”), the commodity broker and selling agent for the Partnership. Prior to July 31, 2009, the date as of which MSSB Holdings became its owner, the General Partner was wholly owned by Citigroup Financial Products Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the sole owner of which is Citigroup. As of December 31, 2011, all trading decisions for the Partnership are made by the Advisor (defined below).

On February 1, 2007, the Partnership allocated substantially all of its capital to the CMF Winton Master L.P. (the “Master”), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the state of New York, having the same investment objective as the Partnership. The Partnership purchased 9,017.0917 units of the Master with cash equal to $12,945,000. The Master was formed in order to permit accounts managed by Winton Capital Management Limited (“Winton” or the “Advisor”) using the Diversified Program, the Advisor’s proprietary, systematic trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. A description of the trading activities and focus of the Advisor is included on page 8 under “Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The General Partner is also the general partner of the Master. The General Partner and the Advisor believe that trading through this master/feeder structure promotes efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to investors as a result of the investment in the Master are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

The financial statements of the Master, including the Condensed Schedule of Investments, are contained, elsewhere in this report and should be read together with the Partnership’s financial statements.

For the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, the approximate average market sector distribution for the Partnership was as follows:

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership owned approximately 29.2% and 18.3%, respectively, of the Master. The Partnership intends to continue to invest substantially all of its assets in the Master. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Master.

The Master’s trading of futures, forwards, swaps and options contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. The Master engages in such trading through a commodity brokerage account maintained with CGM.

The Partnership will be liquidated upon the first to occur of the following: December 31, 2025; when the net asset value per Redeemable Unit decreases to less than $400 per Redeemable Unit as of the close of business on any business day; a decline in net assets after trading commences to less than $1,000,000; or under certain circumstances as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Partnership (the “Limited Partnership Agreement”).

The General Partner administers the business and affairs of the Partnership. The Partnership pays the General Partner a monthly administrative fee in return for its services to the Partnership equal to 1/24 of 1% (0.5% per year) per class of month-end Net Assets per Class, for each outstanding Class. Month-end Net Assets per Class, for the purpose of calculating administrative fees are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s management fee, incentive fee accrual, the General Partner’s administrative fee and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. This fee may be increased or decreased at the discretion of the General Partner.

The General Partner, on behalf of the Partnership, has entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Advisor. The Management Agreement provides that the Advisor has sole discretion in determining the investment of the assets of the Partnership allocated to the Advisor by the General Partner. The Partnership is obligated to pay the Advisor a monthly management fee equal to 1/12 of 1.5% (1.5% per year) of month-end Net Assets per Class, for each outstanding Class, allocated to the Advisor. Month-end Net Assets per Class, for each outstanding Class, for the purpose of calculating management fees are Net Assets per Class, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s management fee, incentive fee accrual, the General Partner’s administrative fee and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. Effective April 1, 2011, the Advisor reduced the management fee it receives from the Partnership from an annual rate of 2% of adjusted net assets to an annual rate of 1.5% of adjusted net assets. The Management Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

In addition, the Partnership is obligated to pay the Advisor an incentive fee, payable quarterly, equal to 20% of the New Trading Profits, as defined in the Management Agreement, allocated pro-rata from the Master, earned by the Advisor for the Partnership during each calender quarter. The Advisor will not be paid incentive fees until the Advisor recovers the net loss incurred and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

The Partnership has entered into a customer agreement (the “Customer Agreement”) which provides that the Partnership will pay CGM a monthly brokerage fee equal to (i) 4.5% per year of month-end Net Assets for Class A units (ii) 1.875% per year of month-end Net Assets Class D units (iii) 1.125% per year of month-end Net Assets for Class Z units, each allocated pro rata from the Master, in lieu of brokerage fees on a per trade basis. Month-end Net Assets, for the purpose of calculating brokerage fees are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s brokerage fees, management fee, incentive fee accrual, the General Partner’s administrative fee, other expenses and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. Brokerage fees will be paid for the life of the Partnership, although the rate at which such fees are paid may be changed. This fee may be increased or decreased at any time at CGM’s discretion upon written notice to the Partnership. CGM will pay a portion of its brokerage fees to other properly registered selling agents and to financial advisors who have sold Redeemable Units. All National Futures Association (“NFA”) fees, exchange, clearing, user, give-up and floor brokerage fees (collectively, the “clearing fees”) will be borne by the Master and allocated to the Partnership through its investment in the Master. The Partnership’s assets not held in the Master’s account at CGM are held in the Partnership’s account at CGM. The Partnership’s cash was deposited by CGM in segregated bank accounts to the extent required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulations. CGM will pay the Partnership interest on its allocable share of 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Master’s brokerage account during each month at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined weekly by CGM based on the average noncompetitive yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills maturing in 30 days from the date on which such weekly rate is determined. The Customer Agreement between the Partnership and CGM and the Master and CGM gives the Partnership and the Master, respectively, the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures and forward contracts. The Customer Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

(b) Financial Information about Segments. The Partnership’s business consists of only one segment, speculative trading of commodity interests. The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services. The Partnership’s net income (loss) from operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is set forth under “Item 6.Selected Financial Data.” The Partnership’s Capital as of December 31, 2011 was $237,068,136.

See Paragraphs (a) and (b) above.

(i) through (xii) — Not applicable.

(xiii) — The Partnership has no employees.

(d) Financial Information About Geographic Areas. The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services or own any long-lived assets, and therefore this item is not applicable.

(e) Available Information. The Partnership does not have an internet address. The Partnership will provide paper copies of its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports free of charge upon request.

(f) Reports to Security Holders. Not applicable.

(g) Enforceability of Civil Liabilities Against Foreign Persons. Not applicable.

(h) Smaller Reporting Companies. Not applicable.

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

As a result of leverage, small changes in the price of the Partnership’s positions may result in major losses.

The trading of commodity interests is speculative, volatile and involves a high degree of leverage. A small change in the market price of a commodity interest contract can produce major losses for the Partnership. Market prices can be influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events, weather and climate conditions, insects and plant disease, purchases and sales by foreign countries and changing interest rates.

An investor may lose all of its investment.

Due to the speculative nature of trading commodity interests, an investor could lose all of its investment in the Partnership.

The Partnership will pay substantial fees and expenses regardless of profitability.

Regardless of its trading performance, the Partnership will incur fees and expenses, including brokerage and management fees. Fees will be paid to the trading Advisor even if the Partnership experiences a net loss for the full year.

An investor’s ability to redeem or transfer units is limited.

An investor’s ability to redeem units is limited, and no market exists for the units.

Conflicts of interest exist.

The Partnership is subject to numerous conflicts of interest including those that arise from the facts that:

The General Partner and the Partnership’s/Master’s commodity broker are affiliates;

The Advisor, the Partnership’s/Master’s commodity broker and their principals and affiliates may trade in commodity interests for their own accounts; and

An investor’s financial advisor will receive ongoing compensation for providing services to the investor’s account.

Investing in units might not provide the desired diversification of an investor’s overall portfolio.

The Partnership will not provide any benefit of diversification of an investor’s overall portfolio unless it is profitable and produces returns that are independent from stock and bond market returns.

Past performance is no assurance of future results.

The Advisor’s trading strategies may not perform as they have performed in the past. The Advisor has from time to time incurred substantial losses in trading on behalf of clients.

An investor’s tax liability may exceed cash distributions.

Investors are taxed on their share of the Partnership’s income, even though the Partnership does not intend to make any distributions.

Regulatory changes could restrict the Partnership’s operations.

Regulatory changes could adversely affect the Partnership by restricting its markets or activities, limiting its trading and/or increasing the taxes to which investors are subject. Pursuant to the mandate of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law on July 21, 2010, the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are in the process of promulgating rules to regulate swaps dealers, to require that swaps be traded on an exchange or swap execution facilities, to mandate additional reporting and disclosure requirements and to require that derivatives (such as those traded by the Partnership) be moved into central clearinghouses. These rules may negatively impact the manner in which swap contracts are traded and/or settled and limit trading by speculators (such as the Partnership) in futures and over-the-counter markets.

Speculative position and trading limits may reduce profitability.

The CFTC and U.S. exchanges have established speculative position limits on the maximum net long or net short positions which any person may hold or control in particular futures and options on futures. In addition, the CFTC has adopted new speculative position limits on economically equivalent futures, options and swaps. The trading instructions of an advisor may have to be modified, and positions held by the Partnership may have to be liquidated in order to avoid exceeding these limits. Such modification or liquidation could adversely affect the operations and profitability of the Partnership by increasing transaction costs to liquidate positions and foregoing potential profits.

Item 2.Properties.

The Partnership does not own or lease any properties. The General Partner operates out of facilities provided by MSSB Holdings.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which CGM or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

CGM is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 388 Greenwich St., New York, New York 10013. CGM is registered as a broker-dealer and futures commission merchant (“FCM”), and provides futures brokerage and clearing services for institutional and retail participants in the futures markets. CGM and its affiliates also provide investment banking and other financial services for clients worldwide.

There have been no material administrative, civil or criminal actions within the past five years against CGM (formerly known as Salomon Smith Barney) or any of its individual principals and no such actions are currently pending, except as follows.

Mutual Funds

Several issues in the mutual fund industry have come under the scrutiny of federal and state regulators. Citigroup has received subpoenas and other requests for information from various government regulators regarding market timing, financing, fees, sales practices and other mutual fund issues in connection with various investigations. Citigroup is cooperating with all such reviews. Additionally, CGM has entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC with respect to revenue sharing and sales of classes of funds.

In May 2007, CGM finalized settlements agreement with the NYSE and the New Jersey Bureau of Securities relating to alleged improper market-timing of mutual funds by certain of its brokers prior to September 2003. The allegations included failure to supervise trading of mutual fund shares and variable annuity mutual fund sub-accounts, failure to prevent market-timing by its brokers and failure to comply with applicable recordkeeping requirements. CGM neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing or liability, and paid $50 million in disgorgement and penalties.

FINRA Settlement

On October 12, 2009, FINRA announced its acceptance of an Award Waiver and Consent (“AWC”) in which CGM, without admitting or denying the findings, consented to the entry of the AWC and a fine and censure of $600,000. The AWC includes findings that CGM failed to adequately supervise the activities of its equities trading desk in connection with swap and related hedge trades in U.S. and Italian equities that were designed to provide certain perceived tax advantages. CGM was charged with failing to provide for effective written procedures with respect to the implementation of the trades, failing to monitor Bloomberg messages and failing to properly report certain of the trades to the NASDAQ.

Auction Rate Securities

On May 31, 2006, the SEC instituted and simultaneously settled proceedings against CGM and 14 other broker-dealers regarding practices in the auction rate securities market. The SEC alleged that the broker-dealers violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The broker-dealers, without admitting or denying liability, consented to the entry of an SEC cease-and-desist order providing for censures, undertakings and penalties. CGM paid a penalty of $1.5 million.

On August 7, 2008, Citigroup reached a settlement with the New York Attorney General, the SEC, and other state regulatory agencies, pursuant to which Citigroup agreed to offer to purchase at par auction rate securities from all Citigroup individual investors, small institutions (as defined by the terms of the settlement), and charities that purchased auction rate securities from Citigroup prior to February 11, 2008. In addition, Citigroup agreed to pay a $50 million fine to the State of New York and a $50 million fine to the other state regulatory agencies.

Beginning in March 2008, Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, including CGM, have been named as defendants in numerous actions and proceedings brought by Citigroup shareholders and customers concerning auction-rate securities (“ARS”), many of which have been resolved. These have included, among others: (i) numerous lawsuits and arbitrations filed by customers of Citigroup and its affiliates seeking damages in connection with investments in ARS; (ii) a consolidated putative class action asserting claims for federal securities violations, which has been dismissed and is now pending on appeal; (iii) two putative class actions asserting violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which have been dismissed and are now pending on appeal; and (iv) a derivative action filed against certain Citigroup officers and directors, which has been dismissed. In addition, based on an investigation, report and recommendation from a committee of Citigroup’s Board of Directors, the Board refused a shareholder demand that was made after dismissal of the derivative action. Additional information relating to certain of these actions is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 08 Civ. 3095 (S.D.N.Y.) (Swain, J.), 10-722 (2d Cir.); 10-867 (2d Cir.); 11-1270 (2d Cir.).

Subprime Mortgage-Related Litigation and Other Matters

The SEC, among other regulators, is investigating Citigroup’s subprime and other mortgage-related conduct and business activities, as well as other business activities affected by the credit crisis, including an ongoing inquiry into Citigroup’s structuring and sale of CDOs. Citigroup is cooperating fully with the SEC’s inquiries.

On July 29, 2010, the SEC announced the settlement of an investigation into certain of Citigroup’s 2007 disclosures concerning its subprime-related business activities. The SEC alleged misleading statements about the extent of its holdings of assets backed by subprime mortgages. On October 19, 2010, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a Final Judgment approving the settlement, pursuant to which Citigroup agreed to pay a $75 million civil penalty and to maintain certain disclosure policies, practices and procedures for a three-year period. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 10 Civ. 1277 (D.D.C.) (Huvelle, J.).

On October 19, 2011, the SEC and Citigroup announced a settlement, subject to judicial approval, in connection with the SEC’s investigation into the structuring and sale of CDOs. Pursuant to the proposed settlement, CGM agreed to pay $160 million in disgorgement, $30 million in prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty of $95 million relating to CGM’s role in the structuring and sale of the Class V Funding III CDO transaction. On November 28, 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York declined to approve the settlement on the grounds that the court was not presented with enough facts to approve the settlement. A trial date was set for July 16, 2012. On December 15 and 19, 2011, respectively, the SEC and s filed notices of appeal. On December 27, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted an emergency stay of further proceedings in the district court, pending the Second Circuit’s ruling on the SEC’s motion to stay the district court proceedings during the pendency of the appeals. Additional information relating to this matter is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 11 Civ. 7387 (S.D.N.Y.) (Rakoff, J.).

Citigroup and certain of its affiliates have also been named as defendants in actions brought by counterparties and investors that have suffered losses as a result of the credit crisis. Those actions include claims asserted by investors in CDO-related transactions, including Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc., which filed a lawsuit in Minnesota state court on October 26, 2011, alleging misstatements in connection with the sale of CDO securities. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under docket number 102611H-10 (Minn. 4th Judicial District, Hennepin Cnty.). Additional actions asserting claims related to investments or participation in CDO-related transactions may be filed in the future.

On February 9, 2012, Citigroup announced that CitiMortgage, along with other mortgage servicers, had reached an agreement in principle with the United States and with the Attorneys General for 49 states (Oklahoma did not participate) and the District of Columbia to settle a number of related investigations into residential loan servicing and origination practices. In conjunction with this settlement, Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, including CGM, also entered into a settlement with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York of a “qui tam” action. This action alleged that, as a participant in the Direct Endorsement Lender program, CitiMortgage had certified to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) that certain loans were eligible for FHA insurance when in fact they were not. The settlement releases Citigroup from claims arising out of its acts or omissions relating to the origination, underwriting, or endorsement of all FHA-insured loans prior to the effective date of the settlement. Under the settlement, Citigroup will pay the United States $158.3 million, for which Citigroup had fully provided as of December 31, 2011. CitiMortgage will continue to participate in the Direct Endorsement Lender program. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 11 Civ. 5423 (S.D.N.Y.) (Marrero, J.).

The Federal Reserve Bank, the OCC and the FDIC, among other federal and state authorities, are investigating issues related to the conduct of certain mortgage servicing companies, including Citigroup affiliates, in connection with mortgage foreclosures. Citigroup is cooperating fully with these inquiries.

Credit Crisis Related Matters

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, certain of Citigroup’s, and CGM’s regulators and other state and federal government agencies commenced formal and informal investigations and inquiries, and issued subpoenas and requested information, concerning Citigroup’s subprime mortgage-related conduct and business activities. Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, including CGM, are involved in discussions with certain of its regulators to resolve certain of these matters.

Certain of these regulatory matters assert claims for substantial or indeterminate damages. Some of these matters already have been resolved, either through settlements or court proceedings, including the complete dismissal of certain complaints or the rejection of certain claims following hearings.

In the course of its business, CGM, as a major futures commission merchant and broker-dealer, is a party to various civil actions, claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the General Partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of CGM. GCM may establish reserves from time to time in connections with such actions.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures. Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

(a) Market Information. The Partnership has issued no stock. There is no public market for the Redeemable Units.

(b) Holders. The number of holders of Redeemable Units as of December 31, 2011 was 1,784.

(c) Dividends. The Partnership did not declare a distribution in 2011 or 2010. The Partnership does not intend to declare distributions in the foreseeable future.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. None.

(e) Performance Graph. Not Applicable.

(f) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, the aggregate subscriptions, of the classes were 100,330.3744 Redeemable Units totaling $115,980,924 and 2,212.7189 General Partner unit equivalents totaling $2,190,348. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, there were additional subscriptions of 46,787.6554 Redeemable Units totaling $51,731,500 and 189.5034 General Partner unit equivalents totaling $200,000. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, there were additional subscriptions of 50,991.4781 Redeemable Units totaling $58,153,000 and 945.3583 General Partner unit equivalents totaling $1,000,000.

The Redeemable Units were issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The Redeemable Units were purchased by accredited investors, as described in Regulation D. In determining the applicability of the exemption, the General Partner relied on the face that the Redeemable Units were purchased by accredited investors in a private offering.

Proceeds of net offering were used for the trading of commodity interests including futures contracts, options, swaps and forward contracts.

(g) Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.


Period	(a) Total Class A of Number of Redeemable Units Purchased*		Class A (b) Average Price Paid per Redeemable Unit**		(c) Total Number Redeemable Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Redeemable Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1, 2011— October 31, 2011		3,954.8516	$	1,165.90		N/A		N/A
November 1, 2011— November 30, 2011		3,912.7620	$	1,171.96		N/A		N/A
December 1, 2011— December 31, 2011		1,311.0980	$	1,186.26		N/A		N/A
		9,178.7116	$	1,171.39

Generally, limited partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption, although to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership’s business in connection with effecting redemptions for limited partners.

**	Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of that day.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses), interest income, net income (loss), increase (decrease) in net asset value per unit and net asset value per unit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008 and for the period from February 1, 2007 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2007, and total assets at December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:


	2011		2010		2009			2008		2007
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of expenses allocated from Master and brokerage fees (including clearing fees) of $9,261,975, $6,320,914, $5,574,180, $5,061,166 and $2,526,887, respectively	$	9,501,119	$	15,962,149	$	(11,732,036)		$	21,503,248	$	9,521,062
Interest income allocated from Master		49,042		124,011		86,538			1,127,937		1,825,352

	$	9,550,161	$	16,086,160	$	(11,645,498)		$	22,631,185	$	11,346,414

Net income (loss)	$	3,856,266	$	12,299,168	$	(15,052,188)		$	15,682,974	$	8,236,695

Total assets	$	240,025,121	$	161,871,435	$	123,296,613		$	119,320,005	$	92,726,408

Increase (decrease) in net asset value per unit
Class A	$	22.59	$	97.13	$	(137.66	)	$	161.77	$	42.43

Class D	$	28.28		—		—			—		—

Class Z	$	12.87		—		—			—		—

Net asset value per unit
Class A	$	1,186.26	$	1,163.67	$	1,066.54		$	1,204.20	$	1,042.43

Class D	$	1,028.28	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—

Class Z	$	1,012.87	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

The Partnership, through its investment in the Master, aims to achieve substantial capital appreciation through speculative trading, directly and indirectly, in U.S. and international markets for currencies, interest rates, stock indices, agricultural and energy products and precious and base metals. The Partnership, through its investment in the Master may employ futures, options on futures, forward and swap contracts in those markets.

The General Partner manages all business of the Partnership/Master. The General Partner has delegated its responsibility for the investment of the Partnership’s assets to the Advisor. The Partnership has invested these assets in the Master. The General Partner employs a team of approximately 47 professionals whose primary emphasis is on attempting to maintain quality control among the advisors to the partnerships operated or managed by the General Partner. A full-time staff of due diligence professionals use proprietary technology and on-site evaluations to monitor new and existing futures money managers. The accounting and operations staff provides processing of subscriptions and redemptions and reporting to limited partners and regulatory authorities. The General Partner also includes staff involved in marketing and sales support. In selecting the Advisor for the Partnership/Master, the General Partner considered past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets to the Advisor at any time.

Responsibilities of the General Partner include:

•

due diligence examinations of the Advisor;

•

selection, appointment and termination of the Advisor;

•

negotiation of the Management Agreement; and

•

monitoring the activity of the Advisor.

In addition, the General Partner prepares the books and records and provides the administrative and compliance services that are required by law or regulation, from time to time, in connection with the operation of the Partnership/Master. These services include the preparation of required books and records and reports to limited partners, government agencies and regulators; computation of net asset value; calculation of fees; assistance in connection with subscriptions, redemptions and limited partner communications; and preparation of offering documents and sales literature.

The General Partner seeks the best prices and services available in its commodity futures brokerage transactions.

The Partnership’s assets allocated to the Advisor for trading are not invested in commodity interests directly. The Advisor’s allocation of the Partnership’s assets is currently invested in the Master. The Advisor trades the Master’s, and thereby the

Partnership’s, assets in accordance with its Diversified Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system. The Diversified Program trades approximately 95 futures and forward contracts on U.S. and non-U.S. exchanges and markets.

Winton employs a fully systematic, computerized, technical, trend-following trading system developed by its principals. This system tracks the daily price movements from these markets around the world, and carries out certain computations to determine each day how long or short the portfolio should be in an attempt to maximize profit within a certain range of risk. If rising prices in a particular market are anticipated, a long position will be established in that market; if prices in a particular market are expected to fall, a short position in that market will be established.

Technical analysis refers to analysis based on data intrinsic to a market, such as price and volume. In contrast, fundamental analysis relies on factors external to a market, such as supply and demand. The Diversified Program employs no fundamental factors.

A trend-following system is one that attempts to take advantage of the observable tendency of the markets to trend, and to tend to make exaggerated movements in both upward and downward directions as a result of such trends. These exaggerated movements are largely explained as a result of the influence of crowd psychology or the “herd instinct” among market participants.

A trend-following system does not anticipate a trend. In fact, trend-following systems are frequently unprofitable for long periods of time in particular markets or market groups, and occasionally they are unprofitable for periods of more than a year. However, the principals believe that such an approach will, in the long term, be profitable.

Trade selection is not subject to intervention by Winton’s principals and therefore is not subject to the influences of individual judgment. As a mechanical trading system, the Winton model embodies all the expert knowledge required to analyze market data and direct trades, thus eliminating the risk of basing a trading program on one indispensable person. Equally as important is the fact that mechanical systems can be tested in simulation for long periods of time and the model’s empirical characteristics can be measured.

The system’s output is rigorously adhered to in trading the portfolio and intentionally no importance is given to any external or fundamental factors. While it may be seen as unwise to ignore information of obvious value, such as that pertaining to political or economic developments, Winton believes that the disadvantage of this approach is far outweighed by the advantage of the discipline that rigorous adherence to such a system instills. Winton believes that significant profits may be realized by the Winton system by holding on to positions for much longer than conventional wisdom would dictate. Winton believes that a trader who pays attention to day-to-day events could be distracted from the chance of fully capitalizing on such trends.

The Winton system trades in all liquid U.S. and non-U.S. futures and forward contracts. Forward markets include major currencies and precious and base metals, the latter two categories being traded on the London Metal Exchange. Winton seeks out new opportunities to add additional markets to the portfolio, with the goal of increasing the portfolio’s diversification.

Winton believes that taking positions in a variety of unrelated markets will, over time, decrease system volatility. By employing a sophisticated and systematic method for placing orders in a wide array of markets, Winton believes that profits can be realized over time.

As a managed futures partnership, the Partnership’s/Master’s performance is dependent upon the successful trading of the Partnership’s/Master’s Advisor to achieve the Partnership’s/Master’s objectives. It is the business of the General Partner to monitor the Advisor’s performance to ensure compliance with the Partnership’s/Master’s trading policies and to determine if the Advisor’s performance is meeting the Partnership’s/Master’s objectives.

(a) Liquidity.

The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services. Its only assets are its investment in the Master and cash. The Master does not engage in sales of goods of services. The Master’s only assets are its equity in its trading accounts, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts, net unrealized appreciation on forward contracts, options and swaps, if applicable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership, through its investment in the Master. While substantial losses could lead to a material decrease in liquidity, no such illiquidity occurred during the year ended December 31, 2011.

To minimize the risk relating to low margin deposits, the Master follows certain trading policies, including:

(i)

The Master invests its assets only in commodity interests that the Advisor believes are traded in sufficient volume to permit ease of taking and liquidating positions. Sufficient volume, in this context, refers to a level of liquidity that the Advisor believes will permit it to enter and exit trades without noticeably moving the market.

(ii)	The Advisor will not initiate additional positions in any commodity if these positions would result in aggregate positions requiring a margin of more than 66 2/3% of the Master’s net assets allocated to the Advisor.

(iii)

The Master may occasionally accept delivery of a commodity. Unless such delivery is disposed of promptly by retendering the warehouse receipt representing the delivery to the appropriate clearinghouse, the physical commodity position is fully hedged.

(iv)	The Master does not employ the trading technique commonly known as “pyramiding,” in which the speculator uses unrealized profits on existing positions as margin for the purchases or sale of additional positions in the same or related commodities.

(v)	The Master does not utilize borrowings other than short-term borrowings if the Master takes delivery of any cash commodities.

(vi)

The Advisor may, from time to time, employ trading strategies such as spreads or straddles on behalf of the Master. “Spreads” and “Straddles” describe commodity futures trading strategies involving the simultaneous buying and selling of futures contracts on the same commodity but involving different delivery dates or markets.

(vii)

The Master will not permit the churning of its commodity trading account. The term “churning” refers to the practice of entering and exiting trades with a frequency unwarranted by legitimate efforts to profit from the trades, indicating the desire to generate commission income.

From January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, the Partnership’s average margin to equity ratio (i.e., the percentage of assets on deposit required for margin) was approximately 7.4%. The foregoing margin to equity ratio takes into account cash held in the Partnership’s name, as well as the allocable value of the positions and cash held on behalf of the Partnership in the name of the Master.

In the normal course of business, the Partnership, through its investment in the Master, is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain forwards and option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include swaps and certain forwards and option contracts. Specific market movements of commodities of futures contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted. The purchaser of an option may lose the entire premium paid for the option. The writer, or seller, of an option has unlimited risk. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract. The General Partner estimates that at any given time approximately 3.0% to 12.6% of its contracts are traded OTC.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units limited to the amount of their capital contributions to the Partnership and their share of the Partnership’s assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a result of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Partnership/Master due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Partnership/Master is exposed to a market risk equal to the value of futures and forward contracts purchased and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Master’s risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Master’s risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/Master to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Master have credit risk and concentration risk as CGM or a CGM affiliate is the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Partnership’s/Master’s assets. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that through CGM, the Partnership’s/Master’s counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

purchased options, the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Master does not consider these contracts to be guarantees.

The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Master’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Master may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards, swaps and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions. (See also “Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on financial instrument risk included in the notes to financial statements.)

Other than the risks inherent in commodity futures and other derivatives trading, the Master knows of no trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties which will result in or which are reasonably likely to result in the Master’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. The Limited Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partner may, in its discretion, cause the Partnership to cease trading operations under certain circumstances including a decrease in net asset value per Redeemable Unit to less than $400 as of the close of business on any business day.

(b) Capital Resources.

(i) The Partnership has made no material commitments for capital expenditures.

(ii) The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by gains or losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any. Gains or losses on trading cannot be predicted. Market movements in commodities are dependent upon fundamental and technical factors which the Advisor may or may not be able to identify, such as changing supply and demand relationships, weather, government agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. Partnership expenses consist of, among other things, brokerage fees, advisory fees and administrative fees. The level of these expenses is dependent upon trading performance and the level of Net Assets maintained. In addition, the amount of interest income payable by CGM is dependent upon interest rates over which the Partnership has no control.

No forecast can be made as to the level of redemptions in any given period. A limited partner may require the Partnership to redeem their Redeemable Units at their net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of the last day of any month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. There is no fee charged to limited partners in connection with redemptions. Redemptions generally are funded out of the Partnership’s cash holdings. For the year ended December 31, 2011, 34,488.0029 Redeemable Units were redeemed of Class A totaling $40,552,499, 1,878.6760 General Partner unit equivalents of Class A were redeemed totaling $2,190,348 and 73.0000 Redeemable Units of Class Z were redeemed totaling $74,248. For the year ended December 31, 2010, 24,572.2721 Redeemable Units of Class A were redeemed totaling $27,158,954. For the year ended December 31, 2009, 32,096.1158 Redeemable Units of Class A were redeemed totaling $36,076,960 and 1,877.9696 General Partner unit equivalents totaling $1,982,873.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, there were additional subscriptions of 88,367.6340 Redeemable Units of Class A totaling $103,880,764, subscriptions of 11,453.7739 Redeemable Units of Class D totaling $11,584,785, subscriptions of 508.9665 Redeemable Units of Class Z totaling $515,375 and 2,212.7189 General Partner unit equivalents of Class Z totaling $2,190,348. For the year ended December 31, 2010, there were additional subscriptions of 46,787.6554 Redeemable Units of Class A totaling $51,731,500 and 189.5034 General Partner unit equivalents of Class A totaling $200,000. For the year ended December 31, 2009, there were additional subscriptions of 50,991.4781 Redeemable Units of Class A totaling $58,153,000 and 945.3583 General Partner unit equivalents of Class A totaling $1,000,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the net asset value per unit for Class A increased 1.9% from $1,163.67 to $1,186.26. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the net asset value per unit for Class D increased 2.8% from $1,000.00 to $1,028.28 from April 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the net asset value per unit for Class Z increased 1.3% from $1,000.00 to $1,012.87 from August 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the net asset value per unit increased 9.1% from $1,066.54 to $1,163.67. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the net asset value per unit decreased 11.4% from $1,204.20 to $1,066.54.

The Partnership, through its investment in the Master, experienced a net trading gain before brokerage fees and related fees of $18,903,064 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of currencies, energy, metals, softs and U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by losses in grains, livestock and indices. The net trading gain (or loss) realized from the Partnership’s investment in the Master is disclosed on page 22 under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

The most significant gains during the year were achieved within the global interest rate sector, primarily during the third quarter, from long positions in European, U.S., and Australian fixed income futures as prices advanced due to concern about the European sovereign debt crisis and a faltering global economy. Additional gains were recorded within this sector during December from long positions in European and U.S. fixed income futures as prices increased while European leaders struggled to find funding for the euro-zone rescue plan. Within the metals markets, gains were recorded during February from long futures positions in gold and silver as gold futures prices reached an all-time high and silver futures prices extended a rally to a 30-year high. Further gains were experienced during April due to long positions in gold futures as prices continued their upward trend, reaching a new all-time high. During July and August, long positions in gold futures resulted in further gains after prices increased as escalating concern that the global economy is slowing boosted demand for the precious metal. Gains were recorded within the currency markets, primarily during April, from long positions in the Swiss franc, Australian dollar, and New Zealand dollar versus the U.S. dollar as the value of these currencies rose against the U.S. dollar after better-than-expected corporate earnings reports and signs of global growth spurred demand for higher-yielding currencies. Additional gains were experienced in this sector during December from short positions in the euro and Swiss franc versus the U.S. dollar as the value of these European currencies declined after European consumer confidence dropped more than economists forecast in December to the lowest level in more than two years. Within the energy sector, gains were achieved primarily during the first four months of the year from long futures positions in crude oil and its related products as prices rose amid an escalation in political instability in the Middle East and North Africa. Small gains were also recorded within the agricultural complex from long positions in cotton futures as prices increased on signs that global output may fail to keep pace with rising demand in China, the world’s biggest buyer of the fiber. A portion of the Partnership’s gains for the year was offset by losses incurred within the global stock index markets during June, July, and August as prices fell amid concern about the European sovereign debt crisis and a faltering global economy. Within the agricultural complex, losses were recorded primarily during June from long positions in corn futures as prices declined sharply after the U.S. Department of Agriculture revealed larger-than-expected plantings.

The Partnership, through its investment in the Master, experienced a net trading gain before brokerage fees and related fees of $22,418,528 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of currencies, grains, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, metals and softs, and were partially offset by losses in energy and indices.

Most financial risk assets recovered well in 2010 due to expansionary monetary and fiscal policies adopted by most central banks. However, this recovery came amidst global unrest due to geographically localized crises, such as the European sovereign debt crisis and inflationary headwinds in emerging markets. Global weather conditions also played a significant role in 2010 in affecting commodity prices. Many agricultural products remained at record price levels as extreme weather conditions such as drought, floods and winter storms affected production.

The Partnership was profitable in agricultural markets, currencies, interest rates and metals, while registering losses in the energy sector and equity indices.

In the agricultural sector, prices of products such as wheat, corn, sugar, cotton, coffee and soybeans reached record price levels. In the case of cotton, prices reached 140-year highs. Extreme weather conditions in some of the biggest exporters of these products significantly disrupted the global supply. Several exporting countries even imposed an export ban to meet the internal demand. The Partnership capitalized on the strong trends in such agricultural products and remained profitable in this sector.

In currencies, the Partnership registered its most significant gains in the Australian dollar, euro and Japanese yen. As the European debt crisis loomed, the euro dropped to some of the lowest levels against the U.S. dollar. Separately, Japanese yen reached its highest level in 14 years compared to the U.S. dollar. The Australian dollar also strengthened considerably against the U.S. dollar due to strong economic growth and materials exports. The Partnership was favorably positioned to profit from these trends.

In metals, the Partnership was profitable in precious and some industrial metals as they reached record prices. Precious metals, such as gold and silver, appealed to many investors as both inflation hedges and a flight to quality. Industrial metals such as copper and tin also reached record prices due to demand from resilient emerging markets such as China and India.

In interest rates, the Partnership recorded gains in both U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates. The Federal Reserve kept U.S. interest rates at historically low levels amid a consistently high unemployment rate at above 9%. Also, as the European debt crisis seemed to engulf several countries, most notably Greece and Ireland, investors flocked to U.S. and German bonds as a flight to quality. Thus the yields remained at historically low levels reaffirming the trend from earlier in the year.

In equity indices, the Partnership recorded losses earlier in the year as global equities sharply corrected. The European debt crisis and “Flash crash” of equities on May 6th came around the time that many economists were actively discussing the possibility of a double dip recession. Equity indices recovered from the lowest levels following the announcement of a European Union bailout of troubled nations within the European Union. Also, later in the year, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced a second round of quantitative easing which increased the appetite for risk assets.

The Partnership registered losses in the energy sector, primarily from crude oil and its derivatives, as oil remained range bound on concerns over global economic growth. Oil markets remained very volatile through most of the year and reacted sharply to global events and economic factors.

Interest income on 80% of the Partnership’s daily average equity allocated to it by the Master was earned at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined weekly by CGM based on the average non-competitive yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills maturing in 30 days. Interest income allocated from the Master for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 decreased by $36,137 and $74,969, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to lower U.S. Treasury bill rates during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership.

Brokerage fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Brokerage fees for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 increased by $783,443 and $2,941,061, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. The increase in brokerage fees is due to higher net assets during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Management fees for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 increased by $95,302 and $571,979, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. The increase in management fees is due to higher net assets during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010.

Administrative fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, additions and redemptions. Administrative fees for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 increased by $96,617 and $349,591, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010. The increase in administrative fees is due to higher net assets during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2010.

Incentive fees paid by the Partnership are based on the new trading profits generated by the Advisor at the end of the quarter, as defined in the management agreement. Trading performance for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2011 resulted in an incentive fee accrual of $0 and $948,965, respectively. There were no incentive fees earned for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2010. The Advisor will not be paid incentive fees until the Advisor recovers the net loss incurred and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

The Partnership pays professional fees, which generally include legal and accounting expenses. Professional fees for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $283,453 and $234,872, respectively.

The Partnership pays other expenses, which generally include filing, reporting and data processing fees. Other expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $44,743 and $56,956, respectively.

The Partnership, through its investment in the Master, experienced a net trading loss before brokerage fees and related fees of $6,064,987 for the year ended December 31, 2009. Losses were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of currencies, energy, indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, lumber and softs and were partially offset by gains in grains, livestock, and metals.

2009 was a volatile year for the financial markets. The U.S. stock market entered 2009 reeling from the financial turmoil of 2008. The results of the sub-prime fallout, bank bailouts, auto industry bankruptcies, and capitulating economic data overwhelmed not just stock prices, but fueled extraordinarily high levels of risk aversion. The market’s recovery was driven by stability in the banking sector and a rapid recovery in global markets. By mid-year 2009, the market had hit bottom in March, banks were seeking to return TARP bailout money and other leading indicators were recovering.

The Partnership recorded losses in currencies, energy, fixed income, softs and stock indices and profits in grains, livestock and metals.

In currencies, the Partnership registered losses as the U.S. dollar reversed the strong trend earlier in the year and started weakening against the other major currencies. Trading in Japanese yen also contributed to these losses following speculation that the Japanese government may interfere in the markets to reverse a strong yen. In the energy sector, most of the products did not exhibit any strong trends and mostly remained range bound after the reversals earlier in the year. This pattern of sharp reversal followed by non-directional volatility attributed to the losses in this sector. The fixed-income sector also incurred losses. With the economic backdrop of 2008, yields started to exhibit asymmetric volatility due to extreme uncertainty prevailing in the longer time horizon. Encouraged by the continuing fiscal and monetary efforts of the U.S. government to stabilize the economy, the markets finally began to recover. In softs, the Partnership recorded losses in cocoa, cotton and coffee. In stock indices, the sharp reversal of trends earlier in the year caused losses that could be only modestly offset by the gains later in the year when strong bullish trends emerged.

In agricultural commodities, gains were recorded primarily from wheat trading. In livestock, the Partnership was profitable in hogs and cattle futures trading. The Partnership recorded gains in the metals sector primarily from gold. Investors across the world chose to buy gold through ETFs and bullion as a hedge against inflation, driven by the massive monetary influx of the central banks.

In the General Partner’s opinion, the Advisor continues to employ its trading methods in a consistent and disciplined manner and its results are consistent with the objectives of the Partnership and expectations for the Advisor’s programs. The General Partner continues to monitor the Advisor’s performance on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis to ensure that these objectives are met.

Commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisor to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisor is able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.

In allocating substantially all of the assets of the Partnership to the Master, the General Partner considers the Advisor’s past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets to the Advisor at any time.

(d) Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. None.

(e) Contractual Obligations. None.

(f) Operational Risk.

The Partnership, through its investment in the Master is directly exposed to market risk and credit risk, which arise in the normal course of its business activities. Slightly less direct, but of critical importance, are risks pertaining to operational and back office support. This is particularly the case in a rapidly changing and increasingly global environment with increasing transaction volumes and an expansion in the number and complexity of products in the marketplace.

Such risks include:

Operational/Settlement Risk— the risk of financial and opportunity loss and legal liability attributable to operational problems, such as inaccurate pricing of transactions, untimely trade execution, clearance and/or settlement, or the inability to process large volumes of transactions. The Partnership/Master are subject to increased risks with respect to their trading activities in emerging market securities, where clearance, settlement, and custodial risks are often greater than in more established markets. Additionally, the General Partner’s computer systems may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, mishandling or misuse, computer viruses or malware, cyber attacks and other events that could have a security impact on such systems. If one or more of such events occur, this potentially could jeopardize a limited partner’s personal, confidential, proprietary or other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, the General Partner’s computer systems, and adversely affect the Partnership’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Technological Risk— the risk of loss attributable to technological limitations or hardware failure that constrain the Partnership’s/Master’s ability to gather, process, and communicate information efficiently and securely, without interruption, to customers, and in the markets where the Partnership/Master participates.

Legal/Documentation Risk— the risk of loss attributable to deficiencies in the documentation of transactions (such as trade confirmations) and customer relationships (such as master netting agreements) or errors that result in noncompliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Financial Control Risk— the risk of loss attributable to limitations in financial systems and controls. Strong financial systems and controls ensure that assets are safeguarded, that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization, and that

financial information utilized by management and communicated to external parties, including the Partnership’s Redeemable Unit holders, creditors, and regulators, is free of material errors.

(g) Critical Accounting Policies.

Partnership’s Investments.The Partnership values its investment in the Master at its net asset value per unit as calculated by the Master. The Master values its investments as described in note 2 of the Master’s notes to the annual financial statements as of December 31, 2011.

Partnership’s and Master’s Fair Value Measurements.Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Management has concluded that based on available information in the marketplace, the Master’s Level 1 assets and liabilities are actively traded.

U.S. generally accepted accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) also requires the use of judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive. Management has concluded that based on available information in the marketplace, there has not been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in the Partnership’s and the Master’s Level 2 assets and liabilities.

The Partnership and the Master will separately present purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in their reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements (i.e., to present such items on a gross basis rather than on a net basis), and makes disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for measurements that fall within either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as required under GAAP.

The Partnership values its investments in the Master where there are no other rights or obligations inherent within the ownership interest held by the Partnership based on the end of the day net asset value of the Master (Level 2). The value of the Partnership’s investment in the Master reflects its proportional interest in the Master. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership did not hold any derivative instruments that were based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) or priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of management’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3).

The Master considers prices for exchange-traded commodity futures, forwards and options contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1). The values of non-exchange-traded forwards, swaps and certain options contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker-dealers who derive fair values for those assets from observable inputs (Level 2). As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Master did not hold any derivative that are priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of management’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3).

Futures Contracts.The Master trades futures contracts. A futures contract is a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of investments, currency or a standardized amount of a deliverable grade commodity, at a specified price on a specified future date, unless the contract is closed before the delivery date or if the delivery quantity is something where physical delivery cannot occur (such as the S&P 500 Index), whereby such contract is settled in cash. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Master each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master. When the contract is closed, the Master records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in futures contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Net realized gains (losses) and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. Forward foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Master agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Forward foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Master’s net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts, as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur, respectively, and are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

The Master does not isolate that portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in net gain (loss) on investments in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts.Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the Master are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Master each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with a like number of short positions settling on the same prompt date. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Master records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME. Net realized gains (losses) and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Options.The Master may purchase and write (sell) both exchange-listed and OTC options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Master writes an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily. When the Master purchases an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily. Net realized gains (losses) and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on options contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Introduction

All of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investment in the Master. The Master is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investment in the Master. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Master’s and the Partnership’s main line of business.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their capital contributions to the Partnership and their share of Partnership assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a result of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Master’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Master’s and Partnership’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Master’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Master rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Master’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

“Value at Risk” is a measure of the maximum amount which the Master could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Master’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Master of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Master’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Master’s losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Master’s attempts to manage its market risk.

Materiality as used in this section, “Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, optionality and multiplier features of the Partnership’s market sensitive instruments.

Quantifying the Partnership’s/Master’s Trading Value at Risk

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Master’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor except for statements of historical fact (such as the terms of particular contracts and the number of market risk sensitive instruments held during or at the end of the reporting period).

The Master’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Advisor is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to the Master’s mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Master’s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings (realized or unrealized allocated from Master). Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Master as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%—99% of any one-day intervals. The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component which is not relevant to Value at Risk.

In the case of market sensitive instruments which are not exchange-traded (almost exclusively currencies in the case of the Master) the margin requirements for the equivalent futures positions have been used as Value at Risk. In those rare cases in which a futures-equivalent margin is not available, dealers’ margins have been used.

The fair value of the Master’s futures and forward positions does not have any optionality component. However, the Advisor may trade commodity options. Where this instrument is a futures contract, the futures margin, and where this instrument is a physical commodity, the futures-equivalent maintenance margin has been used. This calculation is conservative in that it assumes that the fair value of an option will decline by the same amount as the fair value of the underlying instrument, whereas, in fact, the fair values of the options traded by the Master in almost all cases fluctuate to a lesser extent than those of the underlying instruments.

In quantifying the Master’s Value at Risk, 100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have simply been added to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Master’s positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated have not been reflected.

The Master’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

Value at Risk tables represent a probabilistic assessment of the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments. The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Master’s open positions by market category as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the highest, lowest and average value at any point during the years. All open position trading risk exposures of the Master have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of December 31, 2011, the Master’s total capitalization was $822,273,776 and the Partnership owned approximately 29.2% of the Master. The Partnership invests substaintially all of its assets in the Master. The Master’s Value at Risk as of December 31, 2011 was as follows:

December 31, 2011


Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk		Low Value at Risk		Average Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	19,312,483		2.35	%	$	19,312,483	$	6,398,762	$	12,470,587
Energy		1,525,274		0.19	%		4,524,046		1,245,529		2,842,674
Grains		2,535,708		0.31	%		4,371,245		540,481		2,326,464
Indices		6,526,149		0.79	%		17,629,694		3,776,392		10,297,535
Interest Rates U.S.		5,466,250		0.67	%		8,976,950		539,209		4,614,681
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		12,924,419		1.57	%		15,134,879		2,448,536		8,402,040
Livestock		262,550		0.03	%		340,400		42,650		213,377
Metals		6,253,557		0.76	%		7,869,347		3,994,864		5,990,862
Softs		1,583,804		0.19	%		2,456,982		329,218		1,207,483

Total	$	56,390,194		6.86	%

*	Annual average of month-end Value at Risk.

As of December 31, 2010, the Master’s total capitalization was $883,719,871 and the Partnership owned approximately 18.3% of the Master. The Partnership invests substaintially all of its assets in the Master. The Master’s Value at Risk as of December 31, 2010 was as follows:

December 31, 2010


Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk		Low Value at Risk		Average Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	8,969,665		1.01	%	$	13,529,797	$	3,127,432	$	9,858,603
Energy		3,277,769		0.37	%		4,944,082		236,988		2,213,508
Grains		3,992,796		0.45	%		4,064,389		556,164		2,285,359
Indices		15,987,691		1.81	%		22,020,780		2,382,812		12,021,182
Interest Rates U.S.		1,387,025		0.16	%		10,348,050		275,672		5,195,958
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		3,521,207		0.40	%		13,490,861		1,949,046		7,347,287
Livestock		268,200		0.03	%		437,350		158,080		263,226
Metals		6,416,979		0.73	%		8,963,451		3,939,668		5,989,765
Softs		1,393,632		0.16	%		2,071,953		538,916		1,029,710

Total	$	45,214,964		5.12	%

*	Annual average of month-end Value at Risk.

Material Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Master is typically many times the applicable maintenance margin requirement (margin requirements generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face value) as well as many times the capitalization of the Master. The magnitude of the Master’s open positions creates a “risk of ruin” not typically found in most other investment vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions — unusual, but historically recurring from time to time — could cause the Master to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The foregoing Value at Risk table — as well as the past performance of the Partnership/Master — give no indication of this “risk of ruin.”

Non-Trading Risk

The Master has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as any market risk they represent) are immaterial.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Master’s market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Master manages its primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The Master’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by the General Partner and the Advisor for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Master’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the management strategies of the Master. There can be no assurance that the Master’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short or long term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Master as of December 31, 2011, by market sector.

Interest Rates. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the futures positions held by the Master and indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact the Master’s profitability. The Master’s primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United States and the other G-8 countries. However, the Master also takes futures positions on the government debt of smaller nations —e.g.,Australia.

Currencies. The Master’s currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The General Partner does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Master’s currency sector will change significantly in the future. The currency trading Value at Risk figure includes foreign margin amounts converted into U.S. dollars with an incremental adjustment to reflect the exchange rate risk inherent to the dollar-based Partnership in expressing Value at Risk in a functional currency other than U.S. dollars.

Stock Indices. The Master’s primary equity exposure is to equity price risk in the G-8 countries. The stock index futures traded by the Master are limited to futures on broadly based indices. As of December 31, 2011, the Master’s primary exposures were in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) stock indices. The General Partner anticipates little, if any, trading in non-G-8 stock indices. The Master is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Japanese indices. (Static markets would not cause major market changes but would make it difficult for the Master to avoid being “whipsawed” into numerous small losses.)

Metals. The Master’s primary metal market exposure is to fluctuations in the price of gold, aluminum and copper.

Energy. The Master’s primary energy market exposure is to gas and oil price movements, often resulting from political developments in the Middle East. Oil prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure

The following were the only non-trading risk exposures of the Master as of December 31, 2011.

Foreign Currency Balances. The Master’s primary foreign currency balances are in Turkish Lira, Norwegian Krone, Euro and Russian Ruble. The Advisor regularly converts foreign currency balances to dollars in an attempt to control the Master’s non-trading risk.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure

The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Partnership’s, through its investment in the Master, risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Master may be subject.

The General Partner monitors the Master’s performance and the concentration of its open positions, and consults with the Advisor concerning the Master’s overall risk profile. If the General Partner felt it necessary to do so, the General Partner could require the Advisor to close out positions as well as enter positions traded on behalf of the Master. However, any such intervention would be a highly unusual event. The General Partner primarily relies on the Advisor’s own risk control policies while maintaining a general supervisory overview of the Master’s market risk exposures.

The Advisor applies its own risk management policies to its trading. The Advisor often follows diversification guidelines, margin limits and stop loss points to exit a position. The Advisor’s research of risk management often suggests ongoing modifications to its trading programs.

As part of the General Partner’s risk management, the General Partner periodically meets with the Advisor to discuss its risk management and to look for any material changes to the Advisor’s portfolio balance and trading techniques. The Advisor is required to notify the General Partner of any material changes to its programs.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

The following financial statements and related items of the Partnership are filed under this Item 8: Oath or Affirmation, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and 2010; Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; and Notes to Financial Statements.

To the Limited Partners of

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.



By:		Walter Davis President and Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC General Partner, Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC
522 Fifth Avenue 14th Floor New York, NY 10036 212-296-1999

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”), Ceres Managed Futures LLC, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15d - 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for our assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Partnership; and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The management of Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. has assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in theInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, management concluded that the Partnership maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on the criteria referred to above.

Walter Davis

President and Director

Ceres Managed Futures LLC

General Partner,

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Brian Centner

Chief Financial Officer

Ceres Managed Futures LLC

General Partner,

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of income and expenses and changes in partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its changes in partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

March 23, 2012

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

December 31, 2011 and 2010


	2011		2010
Assets:
Investment in Master, at fair value	$	239,855,276	$	161,648,425
Cash		169,845		223,010

Total assets	$	240,025,121	$	161,871,435

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses:
Brokerage fees	$	866,663	$	607,018
Management fees		298,777		268,559
Administrative fees		99,592		67,140
Professional fees		128,187		99,017
Other		8,463		29,876
Redemptions payable		1,555,303		2,942,132

Total liabilities		2,956,985		4,013,742

Partners’ Capital:
General Partner, Class A, (0.0000 and 1,878.6760 unit equivalents outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)		—		2,186,159
General Partner, Class D, (0.0000 unit equivalents outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010)		—		—
General Partner, Class Z (2,212.7189 and 0.0000 unit equivalents outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)		2,241,197		—
Limited Partners, Class A, (187,655.6606 and 133,776.0295 Redeemable Units outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)		222,607,691		155,671,534
Limited Partners, Class D, (11,453.7739 and 0.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)		11,777,664		—
Limited Partners, Class Z, (435.9665 and 0.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)		441,584		—

Total partners’ capital		237,068,136		157,857,693

Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	240,025,121	$	161,871,435

Class A, net asset value per redeemable unit	$	1,186.26	$	1,163.67

Class D, net asset value per redeemable unit	$	1,028.28	$	—

Class Z, net asset value per redeemable unit	$	1,012.87	$	—

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses

for the years ended

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009


	2011			2010			2009
Income:
Interest income allocated from Master	$	49,042		$	124,011		$	86,538

Expenses:
Expenses allocated from Master		139,970			135,465			92,869
Brokerage fees (Note 3c)		9,261,975			6,320,914			5,574,180
Management fees (Note 3b)		3,368,110			2,796,131			2,465,031
Administrative fees (Note 3a)		1,048,624			699,033			616,256
Incentive fees (Note 3b)		948,965			—			—
Professional fees		283,453			234,872			272,846
Other		44,743			56,956			52,557

Total expenses		15,095,840			10,243,371			9,073,739

Net investment income (loss)		(15,046,798	)		(10,119,360	)		(8,987,201	)

Trading results:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from Master		21,110,601			17,776,842			(4,959,083	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from Master		(2,207,537	)		4,641,686			(1,105,904	)

Net trading gain (loss) allocated from Master		18,903,064			22,418,528			(6,064,987	)

Net income (loss)		3,856,266			12,299,168			(15,052,188	)

Net income (loss) allocation from Master
Class A		3,612,081			12,299,168			(15,052,188	)

Class D		192,879			—			—

Class Z		51,306			—			—

Net income (loss) per unit* (Note 6)
Class A	$	22.59		$	97.13		$	(137.66	)

Class D	$	28.28		$	—		$	—

Class Z	$	12.87		$	—		$	—

Weighted average units outstanding
Class A		170,725.9659			125,922.1016			111,135.6454

Class D		9,856.8457			—			—

Class Z		1,239.2200			—			—

*	Based on change in net asset value per unit.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

for the years ended

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009


	Class A						Class D				Class Z						Total
	Amount			Units			Amount		Units		Amount			Units			Amount			Units
Partner’s Capital at December 31, 2008	$	114,745,000			95,287.0678		$	—		—	$	—			—		$	114,745,000			95,287.0678
Subscriptions—Limited Partners		58,153,000			50,991.4781			—		—		—			—			58,153,000			50,991.4781
Subscriptions—General Partner		1,000,000			945.3583			—		—		—			—			1,000,000			945.3583
Net Income (Loss)		(15,052,188	)		—			—		—		—			—			(15,052,188	)		—
Redemptions—General Partner		(1,982,873	)		(1,877.9696	)		—		—		—			—			(1,982,873	)		(1,877.9696	)
Redemptions—Limited Partners		(36,076,960	)		(32,096.1158	)		—		—		—			—			(36,076,960	)		(32,096.1158	)

Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2009		120,785,979			113,249.8188			—		—		—			—			120,785,979			113,249.8188
Subscriptions—Limited Partners		51,731,500			46,787.6554			—		—		—			—			51,731,500			46,787.6554
Subscriptions—General Partner		200,000			189.5034			—		—		—			—			200,000			189.5034
Net Income (Loss)		12,299,168			—			—		—		—			—			12,299,168			—
Redemptions—Limited Partners		(27,158,954	)		(24,572.2721	)		—		—		—			—			(27,158,954	)		(24,572.2721	)

Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2010		157,857,693			135,654.7055			—		—		—			—			157,857,693			135,654.7055
Subscriptions—Limited Partners		103,880,764			88,367.6340			11,584,785		11,453.7739		515,375			508.9665			115,980,924			100,330.3744
Subscriptions—General Partner		—			—			—		—		2,190,348			2,212.7189			2,190,348			2,212.7189
Net Income (Loss)		3,612,081			—			192,879		—		51,306			—			3,856,266			—
Redemptions—General Partner		(2,190,348	)		(1,878.6760	)		—		—		—			—			(2,190,348	)		(1,878.6760	)
Redemptions—Limited Partners		(40,552,499	)		(34,488.0029	)		—		—		(74,248	)		(73.0000	)		(40,626,747	)		(34,561.0029	)

Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2011	$	222,607,691			187,655.6606		$	11,777,664		11,453.7739	$	2,682,781			2,648.6854		$	237,068,136			201,758.1199

Net asset value per unit:


2009:	Class A	$	1,066.54

2010:	Class A	$	1,163.67

2011:	Class A	$	1,186.26

	Class D	$	1,028.28

	Class Z	$	1,012.87

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

1. Partnership Organization:

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized on November 8, 2005, under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage, directly or indirectly, in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options, swaps and forward contracts. The sectors traded include currencies, energy, grains, indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, lumber, metals and softs. The Partnership commenced trading on February 1, 2007. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership through its investment in the Master (as defined below) are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Partnership privately and continuously offers up to 300,000 redeemable units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership (“Redeemable Units”) to qualified investors. There is no maximum number of Redeemable Units that may be sold by the Partnership.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. The General Partner is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSB Holdings”). Morgan Stanley, indirectly through various subsidiaries, owns a majority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) indirectly owns a minority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Citigroup also indirectly wholly owns Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”), the commodity broker for the Partnership. Prior to July 31, 2009, the date as of which MSSB Holdings became its owner, the General Partner was wholly owned by Citigroup Financial Products Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the sole owner of which is Citigroup. As of December 31, 2011, all trading decisions for the Partnership are made by the Advisor (defined below).

On February 1, 2007, the Partnership allocated substantially all of its capital to the CMF Winton Master L.P. (the “Master”), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York, having the same investment objective as the Partnership. The Partnership purchased 9,017.0917 units of the Master with cash equal to $12,945,000. The Master was formed in order to permit accounts managed by Winton Capital Management Limited (the “Advisor”) using the Diversified Program, the Advisor’s proprietary, systematic trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of the Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by the Advisor, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of the Master. The General Partner and the Advisor believe that trading through this master/feeder structure promotes efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to investors as a result of the investment in the Master are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

On April 1, 2011, the Redeemable Units offered pursuant to the Limited Partnership Agreement were deemed “Class A Units.” The rights, liabilities, risks, and fees associated with investment in the Class A Units did not change. In addition, beginning on April 1, 2011, Class D Units were offered and on August 1, 2011, Class Z Units were offered. Class A, Class D and Class Z will each be referred to as a “Class” and collectively referred to as the “Classes.” The Class of Redeemable Units that a Limited Partner receives upon a subscription will generally depend upon the amount invested in the Partnership, although the General Partner may determine to offer Redeemable Units to investors at its discretion. Class Z units were offered to certain employees of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney and its affiliates (and their family members). Class A Units, Class D Units, and Class Z Units are identical, except that Class D Units will be subject to a monthly commission fee equal to 1/12th of 1.875% (a 1.875% annual rate) of the net assets of Class D as of the ending of each month, and Class Z Units will be subject to a monthly commission fee equal to 1/12th of 1.125% (a 1.125% annual rate) of the net assets of Class Z as of the ending of each month which differs from the Class A monthly commission fee of 1/12th of 4.5% (a 4.5% annual rate) of the net assets of Class A.

The financial statements of the Master, including the Condensed Schedules of Investments, are contained elsewhere in this report and should be read together with the Partnership’s financial statements.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

The General Partner and each limited partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of Partnership interest owned by each except that no limited partner shall be liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of their initial capital contribution and profits, if any, net of distributions.

2. Accounting Policies:

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Statement of Cash Flows. The Partnership is not required to provide a Statement of Cash Flows.

Partnership’s Investments. The Partnership values its investment in the Master at its net asset value per unit as calculated by the Master. The Master values its investments as described in Note 2, “Accounting Policies”, on the attached Master’s financial statements.

Partnership’s Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

GAAP also requires the use of judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive. Management has concluded that based on available information in the marketplace, there has not been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in the Partnership’s Level 2 assets and liabilities.

The Partnership will separately present purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in its reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements (i.e., to present such items on a gross basis rather than on a net basis), and makes disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for measurements that fall within either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as required under GAAP.

The Partnership values investments in the Master where there are no other rights or obligations inherent within the ownership interest held by the Partnership based on the end

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

of the day net asset value of the Master (Level 2). The value of the Partnership’s investment in the Master reflects its proportional interest in the Master. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership did not hold any derivative instruments that were based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) or priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of management’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3).


	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical sets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Investment in Master	$	239,855,276	$	—	$	239,855,276	$	—

Net fair value	$	239,855,276	$	—	$	239,855,276	$	—


	December 31, 2010		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical sets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Investment in Master	$	161,648,425	$	—	$	161,648,425	$	—

Net fair value	$	161,648,425	$	—	$	161,648,425	$	—

Master’s Investments and Fair Value Measurements. For disclosures regarding the Master’s investments and fair value measurements, see Note 2, “Accounting Policies”, on the attached Master’s financial statements.

Income Taxes. Income taxes have not been provided as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Partnership’s income and expenses.

GAAP provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements and requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions with respect to tax at the Partnership level not deemed to meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The General Partner concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Partnership’s financial statements

The Partnership files U.S. federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The 2008 through 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities. The General Partner does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

Subsequent Events. The General Partner evaluates events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are filed. The General Partner has assessed the subsequent events through the date of filings and determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment of or disclosure in the financial statements.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between GAAP and IFRS. However, some of the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for public entities. This new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

In October 2011, FASB issued a proposed ASU intended to improve and converge financial reporting by setting forth consistent criteria for determining whether an entity is an investment company. Under longstanding GAAP, investment companies carry all of their investments at fair value, even if they hold a controlling interest in another company. The primary changes being proposed by the FASB relate to which entities would be considered investment companies as well as certain disclosure and presentation requirements. In addition to the changes to the criteria for determining whether an entity is an investment company, the FASB also proposes that an investment company consolidate another investment company if it holds a controlling financial interest in the entity. The Partnership will evaluate the impact that this proposed update would have on the financial statements once the pronouncement is issued.

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” which creates a new disclosure requirement about the nature of an entity’s rights of setoff and the related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The disclosure requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Partnership should also provide the disclosures retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact that the pronouncement would have on the financial statements.

Net Income (Loss) per unit. Net income (loss) per unit is calculated in accordance with investment company guidance. See Note 6, “Financial Highlights”.

3. Agreements:

Limited Partnership Agreement:

The General Partner administers the business and affairs of the Partnership. The Partnership pays the General Partner a monthly administrative fee in return for its services to the Partnership equal to¹/24 of 1% (0.5% per year) of month-end Net Assets per Class, for each outstanding Class. Month-end Net Assets per Class, for the purpose of calculating administrative fees are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s management fee, incentive fee accrual, the General Partner’s administrative fee and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. This fee may be increased or decreased at the discretion of the General Partner.

Management Agreement:

The General Partner, on behalf of the Partnership, has entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Advisor. The Management Agreement

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

provides that the Advisor has sole discretion in determining the investment of the assets of the Partnership allocated to the Advisor by the General Partner. The Partnership is obligated to pay the Advisor a monthly management fee equal to¹/12 of 1.5% (1.5% per year) of month-end Net Assets per Class, for each outstanding Class, allocated to the Advisor. Month-end Net Assets per Class, for each outstanding Class, for the purpose of calculating management fees are Net Assets per Class, for each outstanding Class, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s management fee, incentive fee accrual, the General Partner’s administrative fee and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. Effective April 1, 2011, the Advisor reduced the management fee it receives from the Partnership from an annual rate of 2% of adjusted net assets to an annual rate of 1.5% of adjusted net assets. The Management Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

Customer Agreement:

The Partnership has entered into a customer agreement (the “Customer Agreement”) which provides that the Partnership will pay CGM a monthly brokerage fee equal to (i) 4.5% per year of month-end Net Assets for Class A Units, (ii) 1.875% per year of month-end net assets for Class D Units and (iii) 1.125% per year of month-end net assets for Class Z Units, each allocated pro rata from the Master, in lieu of brokerage fees on a per trade basis. Month-end Net Assets, for the purpose of calculating brokerage fees are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s brokerage fees, management fee, incentive fee accrual, the General Partner’s administrative fee, other expenses and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. Brokerage fees will be paid for the life of the Partnership, although the rate at which such fees are paid may be changed. This fee may be increased or decreased at any time at CGM’s discretion upon written notice to the Partnership. CGM will pay a portion of its brokerage fees to other properly registered selling agents and to financial advisors who have sold Redeemable Units. All National Futures Association fees, exchange, clearing, user, give-up and floor brokerage fees (collectively, the “clearing fees”) will be borne by the Master and allocated to the Partnership through its investment in the Master. The Partnership’s assets not held in the Master’s account at CGM are held in the Partnership’s account at CGM. The Partnership’s cash is deposited by CGM in segregated bank accounts to the extent required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations. CGM has agreed to pay the Partnership interest on its allocable share of 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in each of the Fund’s brokerage accounts at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined by CGM based on the average non-competitive yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills maturing in 30 days from the date on which such weekly rate is determined. The Customer Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

4. Trading Activities:

The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading commodity interest, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. The Partnership invests substantially all of its assets through a “master-feeder” structure. The Partnership’s pro rata share of the results of the Master’s trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

The Customer Agreements between the Partnership and CGM and the Master and CGM give the Partnership and the Master, respectively, the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures and open forward contracts. The Master nets, for financial reporting purposes, the unrealized gains and losses on open futures and forward contracts on the Statements of Financial Condition as the criteria under ASC 210-20, Balance Sheet have been met.

Brokerage fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions.

For disclosures regarding the Master’s trading activities, see Note 4, “Trading Activities”, on the attached Master’s financial statements.

5. Subscriptions, Distributions and Redemptions:

Subscriptions are accepted monthly from investors and they become limited partners on the first day of the month after their subscription is processed. Distributions of profits, if any, will be made at the sole discretion of the General Partner and at such times as the General Partner may decide. A limited partner may require the Partnership to redeem their Redeemable Units at their net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of the last day of any month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. There is no fee charged to limited partners in connection with redemptions.

6. Financial

Highlights:

Changes in the net asset value per unit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows.


	2011			For the period April 1, 2011 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2011			For the period August 1, 2011 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2011			2010			2009
	Class A			Class D			Class Z			Class A			Class A
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)*	$	54.57		$	53.71		$	26.22		$	126.39		$	(107.51	)
Interest income allocated from Master		0.30			0.06			0.02			0.96			0.79
Expenses**		(32.28	)		(25.49	)		(13.37	)		(30.22	)		(30.94	)

Increase (decrease) for the year		22.59			28.28			12.87			97.13			(137.66	)
Net asset value per unit, beginning of year		1,163.67			1,000.00			1,000.00			1,066.54			1,204.20

Net asset value per unit, end of year	$	1,186.26		$	1,028.28		$	1,012.87		$	1,163.67		$	1,066.54

*	Includes brokerage fees.

**	Excludes brokerage fees.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011


	2011			For the period April 1, 2011 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2011			For the period August 1, 2011 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2011			2010******			2009******
	Class A			Class D			Class Z			Class A			Class A
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Net investment income (loss)		(7.6	)%		(4.9	)%		(2.3	)%		(7.4	)%		(7.6	)%
Incentive fees		0.5	%		0.6	%		0.0	%*****		—	%		—	%

Net investment income (loss) before incentive fees ****		(7.1	)		(4.3	)***		(2.3	)%***		(7.4	)%		(7.6	)%

Operating expenses		7.2	%		4.3	%***		2.3	%***		7.5	%		7.7	%
Incentive fees		0.5	%		0.6	%		0.0	%*****		—	%		—	%

Total expenses and incentive fee		7.7			4.9			2.3	%		7.5	%		7.7	%

Total return:
Total return before incentive fees		2.3	%		3.4	%		1.3	%		9.1	%		(11.4	)%
Incentive fees		(0.4	)%		(0.6	)%		(0.0	)%*****		—	%		—	%

Total return after incentive fees		1.9	%		2.8	%		1.3	%		9.1	%		(11.4	)%

***	Annualized.

****	Interest income less total expenses.

*****

Due to rounding.

******

The ratios are shown net and gross of incentive fees to conform to current year presentation.

The above ratios may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the year. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner class using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average net assets.

7. Financial Instrument Risks:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership, through its investment in the Master, is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain forwards and option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include certain swaps, forwards and option contracts. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their capital contributions to the Partnership and their share of the Partnership’s assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a consequence of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Master’s risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and is not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Master’s risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/Master to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Master have credit risk and concentration risk as CGM or a CGM affiliate is the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Partnership’s/Master’s assets. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that through CGM, the Partnership’s/Master’s counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

As both a buyer and seller of options, the Master pays or receives a premium at the outset and then bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the Master to potentially unlimited liability; for purchased options the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Master does not consider these contracts to be guarantees.

The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Partnership’s/Master’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Master may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Partnership’s/Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below:


	For the period from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011		For the period from July 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011		For the period from April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011		For the period from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses), expenses and interest income allocated from Master, net of brokerage fees	$	(1,375,763)	$	14,624,204	$	(6,025,615)	$	2,327,335
Net income (loss)	$	(2,658,758)	$	12,491,760	$	(7,122,934)	$	1,146,198
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Unit of Class A	$	(15.07)	$	67.03	$	(37.23)	$	7.86
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Unit of Class D	$	(6.23)	$	62.71	$	(28.20)	$	—
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Unit of Class Z	$	(4.23)	$	17.10	$	—	$	—


	For the period from October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010		For the period from July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010		For the period from April 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010		For the period from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses), expenses and interest income allocated from Master, net of brokerage fees	$	5,827,417	$	3,132,612	$	2,553,355	$	4,572,776
Net income (loss)	$	4,792,420	$	2,169,059	$	1,629,734	$	3,707,955
Increase (decrease) in net asset value per unit	$	35.71	$	16.93	$	13.36	$	31.13

To the Limited Partners of

CMF Winton Master L.P.

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.




By:		Walter Davis President and Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC General Partner, CMF Winton Master L.P.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC
522 Fifth Avenue 14th Floor New York, NY 10036 212-296-1999

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of

CMF Winton Master L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of CMF Winton Master L.P. (the “Partnership”), including the condensed schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of income and expenses and changes in partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CMF Winton Master L.P. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its changes in partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

March 23, 2012

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

December 31, 2011 and 2010


	2011		2010
Assets:
Equity in trading account:
Cash (Note 3c)	$	743,904,052	$	807,251,910
Cash margin (Note 3c)		61,613,736		49,613,732
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts		15,688,785		23,451,496
Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts		1,153,132		3,491,675
Options purchased, at fair value (cost $52,300 and $46,200 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)		18,204		33,670

Total assets	$	822,377,909	$	883,842,483

Liabilities and Partners' Capital:
Liabilities:
Options premium received, at fair value (premium $107,195 and $85,275 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)	$	42,095	$	65,795
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees		62,038		56,817

Total liabilities		104,133		122,612

Partners' Capital:
General Partner, 0.0000 unit equivalents at December 31, 2011 and 2010		—		—
Limited Partners, 332,858.7283 and 391,924.9266 Redeemable Units outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively		822,273,776		883,719,871

Total liabilities and partners' capital	$	822,377,909	$	883,842,483

Net asset value per unit	$	2,470.34	$	2,254.82

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2011


	Notional ($)/ Number of Contracts		Fair Value			% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		1,681	$	2,316,160			0.28	%
Energy		625		110,182			0.01
Grains		39		37,976			0.01
Indices		1,128		690,394			0.08
Interest Rates U.S.		5,207		2,104,584			0.26
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		9,189		7,688,333			0.94
Livestock		110		(229,020	)		(0.03	)
Metals		202		(3,126,860	)		(0.38	)
Softs		176		(230,591	)		(0.03	)

Total futures contracts purchased				9,361,158			1.14

Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies		3,507		6,207,281			0.76
Energy		880		804,857			0.10
Grains		1,425		(2,112,969	)		(0.26	)
Indices		591		90,767			0.01
Interest Rates U.S.		699		(72,787	)		(0.01	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		93		62,360			0.01
Livestock		211		35,660			0.00	*
Metals		58		(38,740	)		(0.00	)*
Softs		550		1,351,198			0.16

Total futures contracts sold				6,327,627			0.77

Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	84,923,180		515,291			0.07
Metals		1,086		3,802,144			0.46

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts				4,317,435			0.53

Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	137,405,398		(279,763	)		(0.03	)
Metals		869		(2,884,540	)		(0.35	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts				(3,164,303	)		(0.38	)

Options Purchased
Puts
Indices		58		18,204			0.00	*

Total options purchased				18,204			0.00	*

Options Premium Received
Puts
Indices		58		(42,095	)		(0.01	)

Total options premium received				(42,095	)		(0.01	)

Net fair value			$	16,818,026			2.05	%

*	Due to rounding.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2010


	Notional ($)/ Number of Contracts		Fair Value			% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		3,180	$	9,643,771			1.09	%
Energy		853		1,746,824			0.20
Grains		1,967		6,773,822			0.77
Indices		3,730		802,802			0.09
Interest Rates U.S.		460		75,260			0.01
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		2,060		180,335			0.02
Livestock		258		440,485			0.05
Metals		661		5,059,533			0.57
Softs		466		1,890,590			0.21

Total futures contracts purchased				26,613,422			3.01

Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies		619		(1,141,369	)		(0.13	)
Energy		237		(565,450	)		(0.06	)
Indices		145		66,307			0.01
Interest Rates U.S.		1,002		(480,409	)		(0.05	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		1,369		(1,041,005	)		(0.12	)

Total futures contracts sold				(3,161,926	)		(0.35	)

Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	28,330,202		473,215			0.05
Metals		686		6,967,880			0.79

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts				7,441,095			0.84

Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	59,051,932		(318,217	)		(0.04	)
Metals		382		(3,631,203	)		(0.41	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts				(3,949,420	)		(0.45	)

Options Purchased
Puts
Indices		75		33,670			0.00	*

Total options purchased				33,670			0.00	*

Options Premium Received
Puts
Indices		75		(65,795	)		(0.01	)

Total options premium received				(65,795	)		(0.01	)

Net fair value			$	26,911,046			3.04	%

*	Due to rounding.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses

for the years ended

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009


	2011			2010		2009
Investment Income:
Interest income	$	275,575		$	772,036	$	409,649

Expenses:
Clearing fees		478,247			642,797		341,844
Professional fees		97,568			121,381		55,604

Total expenses		575,815			764,178		397,448

Net investment income (loss)		(300,240	)		7,858		12,201

Trading Results:
Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts		89,756,766			97,108,793		(17,779,700	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts		(10,077,200	)		25,087,960		(7,253,764	)

Total trading results		79,679,566			122,196,753		(25,033,464	)

Net income (loss)	$	79,379,326		$	122,204,611	$	(25,021,263	)

Net income (loss) per unit* (Note 6)	$	216.22		$	332.88	$	(95.69	)

Weighted average units outstanding		381,489.6331			366,445.3887		282,761.8879

*	Based on change in net asset value per unit.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

for the years ended

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009


	Partners’ Capital
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2008	$	547,751,543
Net income (loss)		(25,021,263	)
Subscriptions of 144,987.2822 Redeemable Units		282,055,852
Redemptions of 117,441.5362 Redeemable Units		(229,968,170	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds		(409,649	)

Partner’s Capital at December 31, 2009		574,408,313
Net income (loss)		122,204,611
Subscriptions of 169,470.0690 Redeemable Units		343,898,266
Redemptions of 76,085.3805 Redeemable Units		(156,019,283	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds		(772,036	)

Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2010		883,719,871
Net income (loss)		79,379,326
Subscriptions of 113,373.5444 Redeemable Units		265,775,380
Redemption of 172,439.7427 Redeemable Units		(406,325,226	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds		(275,575	)

Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2011	$	822,273,776

Net asset value per unit:


2009:	$	1,924.06

2010:	$	2,254.82

2011:	$	2,470.34

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

1. Partnership Organization:

CMF Winton Master L.P. (the “Master”) is a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options, swaps and forward contracts. The sectors traded include currencies, energy, grains, indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, lumber, metals and softs. The commodity interests that are traded by the Master are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Master may sell an unlimited number of redeemable units of limited partnership interest (“Redeemable Units”).

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Master. The General Partner is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSB Holdings”). Morgan Stanley, indirectly through various subsidiaries, owns a majority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) indirectly owns a minority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Citigroup also indirectly owns Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGM), the commodity broker for the Master. Prior to July 31, 2009, the date as of which MSSB Holdings became its owner, the General Partner was wholly owned by Citigroup Financial Products Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the sole owner of which is Citigroup. As of December 31, 2011, all trading decisions for the Master are made by the Advisor (defined below).

On November 1, 2004 (commencement of trading operations), CMF Winton Feeder I L.P. (“Winton Feeder”) allocated substantially all of its capital, and Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. (“Diversified”) and Orion Futures Fund L.P. (“Orion”) allocated a portion of their capital to the Master. Winton Feeder purchased 2,000.0000 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $2,000,000. Orion purchased 35,389.8399 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $33,594,083 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward contracts with a fair value of $1,795,757. Diversified purchased 15,054.1946 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $14,251,586 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward contracts with a fair value of $802,609. On December 1, 2004, Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (“Tactical Diversified”) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 52,981.2908 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $57,471,493. On August 31, 2011, Tactical Diversified redeemed its investment in the Master. This amounted to 12,054.4847 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $29,538,004. On July 1, 2005, Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. (“Institutional Portfolio”) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 5,741.8230 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $7,000,000. On February 1, 2007, Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. (“Abingdon”) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 9,017.0917 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $12,945,000. On March 1, 2007, Global Futures Fund Ltd. (“Global Futures”) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 1,875.7046 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $2,500,000. On April 1, 2009, Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd. (“Orion Cayman”) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 319.5126 Redeemable Units with cash equal to $640,000. The Master was formed to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Winton Capital Management Limited (the “Advisor”) using the Diversified Program, the Advisor’s proprietary, systematic trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle.

The Master’s investors consist of Diversified, Orion, Winton Feeder, Institutional Portfolio, Abingdon, Global Futures and Orion Cayman (each a “Feeder,” collectively the “Funds”). Diversified, Orion, Winton Feeder, Institutional Portfolio, Abingdon, Global Futures and Orion Cayman owned approximately 0.9%, 65.6%, 0.1%, 2.3%, 29.2%, 1.5%, and 0.4% investments in the Master at December 31, 2011, respectively. Diversified, Orion, Winton Feeder, Tactical Diversified, Institutional Portfolio, Abingdon, Global Futures and Orion Cayman owned approximately 0.8%, 61.9%, 0.3%, 14.0%, 2.4%, 18.3%, 1.7%, and 0.6% investments in the Master at December 31, 2010, respectively.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

The Master will be liquidated upon the first to occur of the following: December 31, 2024: or under certain other circumstances as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Master (the “Limited Partnership Agreement”).

2. Accounting Policies:

Statement of Cash Flows. The Master is not required to provide a Statement of Cash Flows.

Master’s Investments. All commodity interests of the Master (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are held for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded at fair value (as described below) at the measurement date. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the measurement date. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are included as a component of equity in trading account on the Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains or losses and any change in net unrealized gains or losses from the preceding period are reported in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Master’s Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The General Partner has concluded that based on available information in the marketplace, the Master’s Level 1 assets and liabilities are actively traded.

The Master will separately present purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in its reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements (i.e., to present such items on a gross basis rather than on a net basis), and make disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for measurements that fall within either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as required under GAAP.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker-dealers that derive fair values for those assets and liabilities from observable inputs (Level 2). As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Master did not hold any derivative instruments that are priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of management’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3).


	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Futures	$	24,525,313	$	24,525,313	$	—	$	—
Forwards		4,317,435		3,802,144		515,291		—
Options purchased		18,204		18,204		—		—

Total Assets		28,860,952		28,345,661		515,291		—

Liabilities
Futures		8,836,528		8,836,528		—		—
Forwards		3,164,303		2,884,540		279,763		—
Options premium received		42,095		42,095		—		—

Total Liabilities		12,042,926		11,763,163		279,763		—

Net fair value	$	16,818,026	$	16,582,498	$	235,528	$	—


	December 31, 2010*		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Futures	$	28,137,105	$	28,137,105	$	—	$	—
Forwards		7,441,095		6,967,880		473,215		—
Options purchased		33,670		33,670		—		—

Total Assets		35,611,870		35,138,655		473,215		—

Liabilities
Futures		4,685,609		4,685,609		—		—
Forwards		3,949,420		3,631,203		318,217		—
Options premium received		65,795		65,795		—		—

Total Liabilities		8,700,824		8,382,607		318,217		—

Net fair value	$	26,911,046	$	26,756,048	$	154,998	$	—

*	The amounts have been reclassified from the December 31, 2010 prior year financial statements to conform to current year presentation.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. Forward foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Master agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Forward foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Master’s net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur, respectively, and are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts. Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the Master are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Master each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with a like number of short positions settling on the same prompt date. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Master records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME. Net realized gains (losses) and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Options. The Master may purchase and write (sell) both exchange-listed and over-the-counter options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Master writes an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the Statements of Financial

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

Condition and marked to market daily. When the Master purchases an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily. Net realized gains (losses) and changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on options contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Income and Expenses Recognition. All of the income and expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading of commodity interests are determined on each valuation day and allocated pro rata among the Funds at the time of such determination.

Income Taxes. Income taxes have not been provided as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Master’s income and expenses.

GAAP provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements and requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Master’s financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions with respect to tax at the Master level not deemed to meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The General Partner concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Master’s financial statements.

The Master files U.S. federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The 2008 through 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities. The General Partner does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

Subsequent Events. The General Partner evaluates events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are filed. The General Partner has assessed the subsequent events through the date of filing and determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment of or disclosure in the financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards” (“IFRS”). The amendments within this ASU change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between GAAP and IFRS. However, some of the amendments clarify FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurements requirements and other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for public entities. This new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Master’s financial statements.

In October 2011, FASB issued a proposed ASU intended to improve and converge financial reporting by setting forth consistent criteria for determining whether an entity is an investment company. Under longstanding GAAP, investment companies carry all of their investments at fair value, even if they hold a controlling interest in another company. The primary changes being proposed by FASB relate to which entities would be considered investment companies as well as certain disclosure and presentation requirements. In addition to the changes to the criteria for determining whether an entity is an investment company, FASB also proposes that an investment company consolidate another investment company if it holds a controlling financial interest in the entity. The Master will evaluate the impact that this proposed update would have on the financial statements once the pronouncement is issued.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” which creates a new disclosure requirement about the nature of an entity’s rights of setoff and the related arrangement associated with its financial instrument and derivative instrument. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The disclosure requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Master should also provide the disclosures retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Master is currently evaluating the impact that the pronouncement would have on the financial statements.

Net Income (Loss) per unit. Net income (loss) per unit is calculated in accordance with investment company guidance. See Note 6, “Financial Highlights”.

3. Agreements:

Limited Partnership Agreement:

The General Partner administers the business and affairs of the Master including selecting one or more advisors to make trading decisions for the Master.

Management Agreement:

The General Partner, on behalf of the Master, has entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Advisor, a registered commodity trading advisor. The Advisor is not affiliated with the General Partner or CGM and is not responsible for the organization or operation of the Master. The Management Agreement provides that the Advisor has sole discretion in determining the investment of the assets of the Master. All management fees in connection with the Management Agreement are borne by the Funds. The Management Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

Customer Agreement:

The Master has entered into a customer agreement (the “Customer Agreement”) with CGM whereby CGM provides services which include, among other things, the execution of transactions for the Master’s account in accordance with orders placed by the Advisor. All exchange, clearing, user, give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association fees (collectively the “clearing fees”) are borne by the Master. All other fees including CGM’s direct brokerage fees shall be borne by the Funds. All of the Master’s assets are deposited in the Master’s account at CGM. The Master’s cash is deposited by CGM in segregated bank accounts to the extent required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the amount of cash held by the Master for margin requirements was $61,613,736 and $49,613,732, respectively. The Customer Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

4. Trading Activities:

The Master was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity interests. The results of the Master’s trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

The Customer Agreement between the Master and CGM gives the Master the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures and forward contracts. The Master nets, for financial reporting purposes, the unrealized gains and losses on open futures and open forward contracts on the Statements of Financial Condition as the criteria under ASC 210-20, Balance Sheet, have been met.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Master are held for trading purposes. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were 22,885 and 25,549, respectively. The monthly average number of metals forward contracts traded during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were 1,183 and 970, respectively. The monthly average notional values of currency forward contracts held during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $206,333,139 and $44,208,677, respectively. The monthly average number of options contracts traded during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were 139 and 140, respectively.

The following tables indicate the gross fair values of derivative instruments of futures, forward and options contracts as separate assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.


	December 31, 2011
Assets
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	8,917,759
Energy		1,944,705
Grains		393,448
Indices		1,087,634
Interest Rates U.S.		2,552,715
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		8,108,532
Livestock		79,405
Metals		29,367
Softs		1,411,748

Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	24,525,313

Liabilities
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	(394,318	)
Energy		(1,029,666	)
Grains		(2,468,441	)
Indices		(306,473	)
Interest Rates U.S.		(520,918	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		(357,839	)
Livestock		(272,765	)
Metals		(3,194,967	)
Softs		(291,141	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts	$	(8,836,528	)

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	15,688,785	*

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011


Assets
Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	515,291
Metals		3,802,144

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	4,317,435

Liabilities
Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	(279,763	)
Metals		(2,884,540	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	(3,164,303	)

Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	1,153,132	**

Assets
Options Purchased
Indices	$	18,204

Total options purchased	$	18,204	***

Liabilities
Options Premium Received
Indices	$	(42,095	)

Total options premium received	$	(42,095	)****

*	This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

**	This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

***	This amount is in “Options purchased, at fair value” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

****	This amount is in “Options premium received, at fair value” on the Statements of Financial Condition.


	December 31, 2010
Assets
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	9,644,271
Energy		1,844,471
Grains		6,777,945
Indices		1,799,439
Interest Rates U.S.		204,140
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		455,439
Livestock		440,768
Metals		5,063,713
Softs		1,906,919

Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	28,137,105

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011


Liabilities
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	(1,141,869	)
Energy		(663,097	)
Grains		(4,123	)
Indices		(930,330	)
Interest Rates U.S.		(609,289	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		(1,316,109	)
Livestock		(283	)
Metals		(4,180	)
Softs		(16,329	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts	$	(4,685,609	)

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	23,451,496	*


Assets
Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	473,215
Metals		6,967,880

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	7,441,095

Liabilities
Forward Contracts
Currencies	$	(318,217	)
Metals		(3,631,203	)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts	$	(3,949,420	)

Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts	$	3,491,675	**

Assets
Options Purchased
Indices	$	33,670

Total options purchased	$	33,670	***

Liabilities
Options Premium Received
Indices	$	(65,795	)

Total options premium received	$	(65,795	)****

*	This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

**	This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

***	This amount is in “Options purchased, at fair value” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

****	This amount is in “Options premium received, at fair value” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

The following tables indicate the trading gains and losses, by market sector, on derivative instruments for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.


Sector	2011			2010			2009
Sector	2011			2010			2009
Currencies	$	522,432		$	29,698,244		$	(3,376,768	)
Energy		1,964,631			(13,842,877	)		(8,697,471	)
Grains		(4,917,914	)		12,296,993			1,313,879
Indices		(14,405,969	)		(2,685,317	)		(11,148,536	)
Interest Rates U.S.		31,680,751			33,533,117			(3,881,924	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		45,040,584			33,093,365			(1,931,326	)
Livestock		(593,735	)		28,404			1,189,446
Lumber		—			—			(4,378	)
Metals		14,687,201			26,377,845			2,572,570
Softs		5,701,585			3,696,979			(1,068,956	)

Total	$	79,679,566	*****	$	122,196,753	*****	$	(25,033,464	)*****

*****

This amount is in “Total trading results” on the Statements of Income and Expenses.

5.	Subscriptions, Distributions and Redemptions:

Subscriptions are accepted monthly from investors and they become limited partners on the first day of the month after their subscription is processed. A limited partner may withdraw all or part of their capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Master in multiples of the net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of the end of any day (the “Redemption Date”) after a request for redemption has been made to the General Partner at least 3 days in advance of the Redemption Date. The Redeemable Units are classified as a liability when the limited partner elects to redeem and informs the Master.

6.	Financial Highlights:

Changes in the net asset value per unit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:


	2011			2010			2009
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)*	$	215.80		$	331.10		$	(97.03	)
Interest income		0.70			2.12			1.51
Expenses**		(0.28	)		(0.34	)		(0.17	)

Increase (decrease) for the year		216.22			332.88			(95.69	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds		(0.70	)		(2.12	)		(1.51	)
Net asset value per unit, beginning of year		2,254.82			1,924.06			2,021.26

Net asset value per unit, end of year	$	2,470.34		$	2,254.82		$	1,924.06

*	Includes clearing fees.

**	Excludes clearing fees.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011


	2011			2010			2009
Ratios to average net assets:
Net investment income (loss)***		(0.0	)%****		0.0	%****		0.0	%****

Operating expenses		0.1	%		0.1	%		0.1	%

Total return		9.6	%		17.3	%		(4.7	)%

***	Interest income less total expenses.

****	Due to rounding.

7.	Financial Instrument Risks:

In the normal course of business, the Master is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures, options and swaps whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain forwards and option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include certain forwards, swaps and option contracts. Specific market movements of commodities or futures contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted. The purchaser of an option may lose the entire premium paid for the option. The writer, or seller, of an option has unlimited risk. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Master due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Master is exposed to a market risk equal to the value of futures and forward contracts purchased and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Master’s risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Master’s risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Master to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Master has credit risk and concentration risk as CGM or a CGM affiliate is the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Master’s assets. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that through CGM, the Master’s counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

CMF Winton Master L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Master’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Master may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for Winton Master for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below.


	For the period from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011		For the period from July 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011		For the period from April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011		For the period from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of clearing fees including interest income	$	3,481,411	$	65,463,536	$	(11,778,867)	$	22,310,814
Net income (loss)	$	3,452,981	$	65,442,094	$	(11,796,566)	$	22,280,817
Increase (decrease) in net asset value per unit	$	10.22	$	184.94	$	(35.36)	$	56.42


	For the period from October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010		For the period from July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010		For the period from April 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010		For the period from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of clearing fees including interest income	$	41,770,790	$	26,142,443	$	22,188,206	$	32,224,553
Net income (loss)	$	41,730,356	$	26,114,191	$	22,152,876	$	32,207,188
Increase (decrease) in net asset value per unit	$	108.12	$	70.15	$	62.00	$	92.61

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.

The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership on the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods expected in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports it files is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.

Management is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.

The General Partner’s CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2011 and, based on that evaluation, the General Partner’s CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership’sinternal control over financial reportingis a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s CEO and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These controls include policies and procedures that:

•

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

•

provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and

•

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The report included in “Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” includes management’s report on internal control over financial reporting (“Management’s Report”).

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The Partnership has no officers, directors or employees and its affairs are managed by its General Partner. Investment decisions are made by the Advisor.

The officers and directors of the General Partner are Walter Davis (President and Chairman of the Board of Directors), Brian Centner (Chief Financial Officer), Colbert Narcisse (Director), Douglas J. Ketterer (Director), Ian Bernstein (Director), Harry Handler (Director), Patrick T. Egan (Director) and Alper Daglioglu (Director). Each director of the General Partner holds office until the earlier of his or her death, resignation or removal. Vacancies on the board of directors may be filled by either (i) the majority vote of the remaining directors or (ii) Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC, as the sole member of the General Partner. The officers of the General Partner are designated by the General Partner’s board of directors. Each officer will hold office until his or her successor is designated and qualified or until his or her death, resignation or removal.

Walter Davis, age 47, has been President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the General Partner since June 2010, where his responsibilities include oversight of the General Partner’s funds and accounts. Since June 2010, Mr. Davis has been a principal and registered as an associated person of the General Partner, and is an associate member of the NFA. Since June 2009, Mr. Davis has been employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (“Morgan Stanley Smith Barney”), a financial services firm, where his responsibilities include serving as Managing Director and the Director of the Managed Futures Department. Since June 2009, Mr. Davis has been registered as an associated person of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. From May 2006 through June 2010, Mr. Davis served as President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Demeter Management LLC (“Demeter”), a registered commodity pool operator, where his responsibilities included oversight of Demeter’s funds and accounts. From May 2006 through December 2010, Mr. Davis was listed as a principal of Demeter, and from July 2006 through December 2010, Mr. Davis was registered as an associated person of Demeter. From April 2007 through June 2009, Mr. Davis was employed by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS & Co.”), a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as the Managing Director and the Director of the Managed Futures Department. From April 2007 through June 2009, Mr. Davis was registered as an associated person of MS & Co. From August 2006 through April 2007, Mr. Davis was employed by Morgan Stanley DW Inc., a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as Managing Director and the Director of the Managed Futures Department. From August 2006 through April 2007, Mr. Davis was registered as an associated person of Morgan Stanley DW Inc. From September 1999 through August 2006, Mr. Davis was employed by MS & Co., a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included oversight of the sales and marketing of MS & Co.’s managed futures funds to high net worth and institutional investors on a global basis. From January 1992 through September 1999, Mr. Davis was employed by Chase Manhattan Bank’s Alternative Investment Group, an alternative investment group, where his responsibilities included marketing managed futures funds to high net worth investors, as well as developing and structuring managed futures funds. Mr. Davis earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics in May 1987 from the University of the South and his Master of Business Administration in Finance and International Business in May 1992 from Columbia University Graduate School of Business.

Brian Centner, age 34, has been the Chief Financial Officer and a principal of the General Partner since September 2011. Since July 2009, Mr. Centner has been employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a financial services firm, where his responsibilities include oversight of accounting and financial and regulatory reporting of the General Partner’s managed futures funds. From February 2003 through July 2009, Mr. Centner was employed by Citi Alternative Investments (“CAI”), a division of Citigroup, a financial services firm, which administered Citigroup’s hedge fund and fund of funds business, where he served as Senior Vice President responsible for the accounting and financial and regulatory reporting of CAI’s managed futures funds. From June 2002 through February 2003, Mr. Centner was employed by KPMG LLP, a U.S. audit, tax and advisory services firm, as a Senior Associate within the Investment Management division, where his responsibilities included performing audits and attestation services for financial services firms. From September 2000 through June 2002, Mr. Centner was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP, a U.S. audit, tax and advisory services firm, where he served in the Financial Services division and his responsibilities included performing audits and attestation services for financial services firms. Mr. Centner earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting in May 2000 from Binghamton University and his Master of Business Administration degree in May 2011 from New York University’s Leonard N. Stern School of Business. Mr. Centner is a Certified Public Accountant.

Colbert Narcisse, age 45, has been a Director and a principal of the General Partner since December 2011. Since February 2011, Mr. Narcisse has been a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a financial services firm, where his responsibilities have included serving as Head of the Alternative Investment Group, Head of the Corporate Equity Solutions Group, and Chief Operating Officer of the Investment Strategy and Client Solutions Division. From July 2009 until February 2011, Mr. Narcisse served as Chief Executive Officer of Gold Bullion International, a business services company that enables retail investors to acquire, manage and store physical precious metals through their financial advisor. From March 2009 until July 2009, Mr. Narcisse took personal leave. From August 1990 until March 2009, Mr. Narcisse was employed by Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as Chief Operating Officer of Americas Investment Banking, Chief Operating Officer of the Global Wealth Management Division, and as an investment banker in both the Financial Institutions and Public Finance Groups. From July 1987 until August 1990, Mr. Narcisse was employed by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, where his responsibilities included serving as a Bank Examiner. Additionally, Mr. Narcisse serves on the Board of Harlem RBI, as the Vice Chair of Finance for the Montclair Cooperative School Board of Trustees, as an Audit Committee Member of the New York City Housing Authority, and as a Member of the Executive Leadership Council. Mr. Narcisse received his Bachelor of Science degree in Finance in June 1987 from New York University. He received his Master of Business Administration degree in July 1992 from Harvard Business School.

Douglas J. Ketterer, age 46, has been a Director and a principal of the General Partner since December 2010. From October 2003 through December 2010, Mr. Ketterer was listed as a principal of Demeter, a commodity pool operator, until Demeter’s combination with the General Partner. From July 2010 through the present, Mr. Ketterer has been employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a financial services firm, as Managing Director and Head of the U.S. Private Wealth Management Group, where his responsibilities include overseeing the U.S. Private Wealth Management Group. From March 1990 through July 2010, Mr. Ketterer was employed by MS & Co., a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as Chief Operating Officer of the Wealth Management Group and Head of the Products Group. During Mr. Ketterer’s employment at MS & Co. his responsibilities included oversight over a number of departments including the Alternative Investments Group, the Consulting Services Group, the Annuities & Insurance Department, and the Retirement & Equity Solutions Group, which offered products and services through MS & Co.’s Global Wealth Management Group. Mr. Ketterer received his Master of Business Administration degree from New York University’s Leonard N. Stern School of Business in January 1994 and his Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from the University at Albany’s School of Business in May 1987.

Ian Bernstein, age 49, has been a Director of the General Partner and listed as a principal of the General Partner since December 2010. From June 2009 through the present, Mr. Bernstein has been employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a financial services firm, as Managing Director of Capital Markets, with oversight of risk and infrastructure, joint venture negotiations and integration. From April 2007 through the present, Mr. Bernstein has been employed by MS & Co., a financial services firm, where his responsibilities include serving as Managing Director of the Capital Markets group, the head of the Global Wealth Management group, and serving as market risk manager. From October 1984 through April 2007, Mr. Bernstein was employed by Morgan Stanley DW Inc., a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as a Repo trader, manager of the Repo trading desk, and Chief Operating Officer for fixed income. Mr. Bernstein also served as Managing Director of Morgan Stanley DW Inc. from March 2004 through April 2007. Mr. Bernstein earned his Bachelor of Arts in May 1980 from the University of Buckingham and his Master of Business Administration in May 1988 from New York University’s Leonard N. Stern School of Business.

Harry Handler, age 52, has been a Director of the General Partner since December 2010. Since December 2010, Mr. Handler has been registered as an associated person and listed as a principal of the General Partner, and is an associate member of the NFA. Mr. Handler was listed as a principal of Demeter from May 2005, and was registered as an associated person of Demeter from April 2006, until Demeter’s combination with the General Partner in December 2010. Mr. Handler was registered as an associated person of Morgan Stanley DW Inc., a financial services firm, from February 1984 until on or about April 2007, when, because of the merger of Morgan Stanley DW Inc. into MS & Co., he became registered as an associated person of MS & Co. due to the transfer of his original registration as an associated person of Morgan Stanley DW Inc. Mr. Handler withdrew as an associated person of MS & Co. in June 2009. Mr. Handler has been registered as an associated person of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney since June 2009. Mr. Handler serves as an Executive Director at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney in the Global Wealth Management Group. Mr. Handler works in the Capital Markets Division and is responsible for Electronic Equity and Securities Lending. Additionally, Mr. Handler serves as Chairman of the Global Wealth Management Group’s Best Execution Committee. In his prior position, Mr. Handler was a Systems Director in Information Technology, in charge of Equity and Fixed Income Trading Systems along with the Special Products, such as Unit Trusts, Managed Futures, and Annuities. Prior to his transfer to the Information Technology Area, Mr. Handler managed the Foreign Currency and Precious Metals Trading Desk of Dean Witter, a financial services firm and predecessor company to Morgan Stanley, from July 1982 until January 1984. He also held various positions in the Futures Division where he helped to build the Precious Metals Trading Operation at Dean Witter. Before joining Dean Witter, Mr. Handler worked at Mocatta Metals, a precious metals trading firm and futures broker that was sold to Standard Charted Bank in the 1980’s, as an Assistant to the Chairman from March 1980 until June 1982. His roles at Mocatta Metals included positions on the Futures Order Entry Desk and the Commodities Exchange Trading Floor. Additional work included building a computerized Futures Trading System and writing a history of the company. Mr. Handler graduated on the Dean’s List from the University of Wisconsin-Madison with a Bachelor of Arts degree in History and Political Science.

Patrick T. Egan, age 42, has been a Director of the General Partner since December 2010. Since December 2010, Mr. Egan has been a principal and registered as an associated person of the General Partner, and is an associate member of the NFA. Since June 2011, Mr. Egan has been employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a financial services firm, where his responsibilities include serving as Executive Director and as Chief Risk Officer for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Managed Futures. From June 2009 through June 2011, Mr. Egan was employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, where his responsibilities included serving as Co-Chief Investment Officer for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Managed Futures. Since November 2010, Mr. Egan has been registered as an associated person of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. From April 2007 through June 2009, Mr. Egan was employed by MS & Co., a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as Head of Due Diligence and Manager Research for Morgan Stanley’s Managed Futures Department. From April 2007 through November 2010, Mr. Egan was registered as an associated person of MS & Co. From March 1993 through April 2007, Mr. Egan was employed by Morgan Stanley DW Inc., a financial services firm, where his initial responsibilities included serving as an analyst and manager within the Managed Futures Department (with primary responsibilities for product development, due diligence, investment analysis and risk management of the firm’s commodity pools) and later included serving as Head of Due Diligence and Manager Research for Morgan Stanley’s Managed Futures Department. From February 1998 through April 2007, Mr. Egan was registered as an associated person of Morgan Stanley DW Inc. From August 1991 through March 1993, Mr. Egan was employed by Dean Witter Intercapital, the asset management arm of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., where his responsibilities included serving as a mutual fund administration associate. Mr. Egan also served as a Director from November 2004 through October 2006, and from November 2006 through October 2008 of the Managed Funds Association’s Board of Directors, a position he was elected to by industry peers for two consecutive two-year terms. Mr. Egan earned his Bachelor of Business Administration degree with a concentration in Finance in May 1991 from the University of Notre Dame.

Alper Daglioglu, age 34, has been a Director and listed as a principal of the General Partner since December 2010. Since December 2010, Mr. Daglioglu has been employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a financial services firm, where his responsibilities include serving as Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Managed Futures and serving on the Alternative Investments Product Review Committee of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney’s Alternative Investments Group. From June 2009 through December 2010, Mr. Daglioglu was employed by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as a Senior Analyst in the Product Origination Group. From December 2003 through June 2009, Mr. Daglioglu was employed by Morgan Stanley, a financial services firm, where his responsibilities included serving as a Senior Analyst in the Product Origination Group, and serving as the lead investment analyst for Global Macro and Managed Futures strategies within Morgan Stanley Graystone Research Group from February 2007 through June 2009. Mr. Daglioglu earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering in June 2000 from Galatasaray University and his Master of Business Administration degree in Finance in May 2003 from the University of Massachusetts-Amherst’s Isenberg School of Management. Mr. Daglioglu was awarded a full merit scholarship and research assistantship at the Center for International Securities and Derivatives Markets during his graduate studies. In this capacity, he worked with various major financial institutions in performance monitoring, asset allocation and statistical analysis projects and specialized on alternative approaches to risk assessment for hedge funds and managed futures. Mr. Daglioglu wrote and published numerous research papers on alternative investments. Mr. Daglioglu is a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst charterholder.

The Partnership has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to officers because it has no officers. In addition, the Partnership has not adopted any procedures by which investors may recommend nominees to the Partnership’s board of directors, and has not established an audit committee because it has no board of directors.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

The Partnership has no directors or officers. Its affairs are managed by its General Partner. CGM, an affiliate of the General Partner, is the commodity broker for the Partnership and receives brokerage fees for such services, as described under “Item 1. Business.” During the year ended December 31, 2011, CGM earned $9,261,975 in brokerage fees from the Partnership. Management fees of $3,368,110 were earned by the Advisor for the year ended December 31, 2011. Administrative fees of $1,048,624 were earned by the General Partner for the year ended December 31, 2011. Incentive fees of $948,965 were earned by the Advisor for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Advisor will not be paid incentive fees until the Advisor recovers the net loss incurred and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

(a) Security ownership of certain beneficial owners. As of February 29, 2012, the Partnership knows of no person who beneficially owns more than 5% of the Redeemable Units outstanding.

(b) Security ownership of management. Under the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership’s affairs are managed by the General Partner. The following table indicates securities owned by management as of December 31, 2011:

(1) Title of Class

(2) Name of
Beneficial Owner

(3) Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership

(4) Percent of
Classes

Class Z General Partner unit equivalents

General Partner

2,212.7189

1.1%

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

(a)Transactions with related persons.None.

(b) Review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons.Not applicable.

(c) Promoters and certain control persons. CGM and the General Partner would be considered promoters for purposes of item 404(d) of Regulation S-K. The nature and the amounts of compensation each promoter will receive, if any, from the Partnership are set forth under “Item 1.Business” and “Item 11.Executive Compensation.”

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(1) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 for the audit of the Partnership’s annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in the Partnership’s Forms 10-Q and 10-K and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filings or engagements were:


2011	$	70,400
2010	$	60,700

(2) Audit-Related Fees. None.

(3) Tax Fees. In the last two fiscal years, Deloitte did not provide any professional services for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for tax compliance and tax advice given in the preparation of the Partnership’s Schedule K1s, the preparation of the Partnership’s Form 1065 and preparation of all State Tax Returns were:


2011	$	25,850
2010	$	21,000

(4) All Other Fees. None.

(5) Not Applicable.

(6) Not Applicable.

PART IV

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) (1) Financial Statements:

Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Notes to Financial Statements.

(2) Exhibits:


3.1(a)		Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated November 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration on Form 10-12G filed on April 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

(b)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 19, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.1(b) to the Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(c)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 28, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

(d)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated June 30, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 3.1(d) to the Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

(e)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of the State of New York, dated September 2, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2(a)		Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated December 21, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1		Customer Agreement between the Partnership, the General Partner and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dated April 29, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration on Form 10-12G filed on April 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2(a)		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Winton Capital Management Limited, dated November 21, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration on Form 10-12G filed on April 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

(b)		Amended and Restated Management Agreement dated April 29, 2011 by and among the Partnership, Ceres Managed Futures LLC and Winton Capital Management Limited (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed May 2, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

(c)		Letter from the General Partner extending Management Agreement with Winton Capital Management Limited for 2011, dated June 1, 2011 (filed herein).

(d)		Amendment to the Management Agreement dated January 1, 2012 by and among the Partnership, Ceres Managed Futures LLC and Winton Capital Management Limited (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed January 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3		Agency Agreement between the Partnership, Citigroup Managed Futures LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dated May 27, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration on Form 10-12G filed on April 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4		Form of Subscription Agreement for Credit Suisse Securities LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5		Form of Subscription Agreement for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).



10.6		Joinder Agreement among the General Partner, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC dated as of June 1, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7		Form of Selling Agreement between the Partnership, Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., and Credit Suisse Securities, (USA) LLC, dated September 30, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

16.1		Letter dated July 23, 2009 from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission (filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Form 8-K, filed on July 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

16.2		Letter dated June 26, 2008 from KPMG LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission (filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Form 8-K, filed on July 1, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of regulation S-K are incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit 31.1 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of President and Director).

Exhibit 31.2 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer).

Exhibit 32.1 — Section 1350 Certification (Certification of President and Director).

Exhibit 32.2 — Section 1350 Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer).


101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.


By:		Ceres Managed Futures LLC
		(General Partner)

By:		/s/ Walter Davis

		Walter Davis, President & Director Date: March 30, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.


/s/ Walter Davis	/s/ Colbert Narcisse	/s/ Patrick T. Egan
Walter Davis	Colbert Narcisse	Patrick T. Egan
President and Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC	Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC	Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC
Date: March 30, 2012	Date: March 30, 2012	Date: March 30, 2012

/s/ Brian Centner	/s/ Douglas J. Ketterer	/s/ Alper Daglioglu
Brian Centner	Douglas J. Ketterer	Alper Daglioglu
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) Ceres Managed Futures LLC	Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC Date: March 30, 2012	Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC Date: March 30, 2012
Date: March 30, 2012

/s/ Ian Bernstein	/s/ Harry Handler
Ian Bernstein	Harry Handler
Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC	Director Ceres Managed Futures LLC
Date: March 30, 2012	Date: March 30, 2012

Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.

Annual Report to Limited Partners

No proxy material has been sent to Limited Partners.

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	8th grade Avg

Ceres Abingdon (ABFF) 10-K2011 FY Annual report

Content analysis