Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Use of Estimates | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
|
These estimates and assumptions include estimates for reserves of uncollectible accounts, inventory obsolescence, analysis of impairments of recorded goodwill and intangibles, accruals for potential liabilities and assumptions made in valuing equity instruments issued for services or acquisitions. |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | ' |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company defines cash equivalents as all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less. |
| | | | | | | | |
Fair value of financial instruments | ' |
Fair value of financial instruments |
|
Effective January 1, 2008, fair value measurements are determined by the Company's adoption of authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”), with the exception of the application of the statement to non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities as permitted. Fair value is defined in the authoritative guidance as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows: |
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 – Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, are observable either directly or indirectly. |
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs based on the Company's assumptions. |
|
The Company is required to use observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort. The Company has no fair value items required to be disclosed as of June 30, 2014 or 2013. |
| | | | | | | | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | ' |
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
The Company evaluates the collectability of its trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors. In circumstances where the Company becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the Company, a specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded, which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount the Company believes will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on the Company’s historical losses and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable outstanding. The Company established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $321,698 and $211,743 as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | |
Concentration of Credit Risk | ' |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions and at times may exceed the FDIC $250,000 insurance limit. The Company does not anticipate incurring any losses related to these credit risks. The Company extends credit based on an evaluation of the customer's financial condition, generally without collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each customer's financial condition. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and intends to maintain allowances for anticipated losses, as required. |
|
Cash denominated in Euros with a US Dollar equivalent of $191,259 and $393,093 at June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was held in accounts at financial institutions located in Europe. |
|
The following table summarizes accounts receivable concentrations: |
|
| | As of | | |
June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | |
Customer A | | | * | | | 11 | % | |
|
The following table summarizes revenue concentrations: |
|
| | Twelve Months Ended | | |
June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | |
Customer A | | | 12 | % | | 11 | % | |
Customer B | | | * | | | 14 | % | |
|
The following table summarizes vendor concentrations: |
|
| | Twelve Months Ended | |
June 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | |
Vendor A | | | 22 | % | | | 16 | % |
Vendor B | | | 12 | % | | | * | |
Vendor C | | | 11 | % | | | 11 | % |
Vendor D | | | * | | | | 22 | % |
|
* Less than 10% |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment | ' |
Property and equipment |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 7 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful lives of the related assets, or the lease term. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred while renewals and betterments are capitalized. Gains and losses on disposals are included in the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
Management assess the carrying value of property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If there is indication of impairment, management prepares an estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value. For the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not recognize any impairments for its property and equipment. |
| | | | | | | | |
Intangible Assets | ' |
Intangible Assets |
|
Management performs impairment tests of indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually, or whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate impairment has more likely than not occurred. |
|
The Company reviews intangible assets subject to amortization at least annually to determine if any adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances has occurred that would indicate impairment or a change in the remaining useful life. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, the Company writes down the carrying value of the intangible asset to its fair value in the period identified. If the carrying value of assets is determined not to be recoverable, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the assets. The Company’s estimate of fair value is based on the best information available, in the absence of quoted market prices. The Company generally calculates fair value as the present value of estimated future cash flows that the Company expects to generate from the asset using a discounted cash flow income approach as described above. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the Company amortizes the remaining carrying value of the intangible asset prospectively over the revised remaining useful life. |
|
As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company determined that there were no indicators of impairment of its recorded intangible assets. |
| | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company’s policy is to recognize revenue when services have been performed, risk of loss and title to the product transfers to the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. At June 30, 2014, we generate revenue by providing three types of services to our customers: Article Galaxy, Reprints and ePrints, and Printing and Logistics. |
|
Article Galaxy |
|
We charge a transactional service fee for the electronic delivery of single articles, and a corresponding copyright fee for the permitted use of the content. This service, known in the industry as single article delivery or document delivery, generates nearly all of the revenue attributable to the Article Galaxy journal article platform. We recognize revenue from single article delivery services upon delivery to the customer only when the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Reprints and ePrints |
|
We charge a transactional fee for each Reprint or ePrint order and are responsible for printing and delivery of Reprint orders, and the electronic delivery and, in some cases, the electronic delivery mechanism of ePrint orders. The majority of content publishers print their content in-house and prohibit others from printing their content; however, when not prohibited by the content publisher, we use a third parties to print Reprint orders delivered to North American customers, and TAAG or third parties to print Reprint orders delivered to European customers. We recognize revenue from reprints and ePrints services upon shipment or electronic delivery to the customer only when the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Printing and Logistics |
|
We charge a transactional fee for each order of hard copy printed material. We are responsible for printing and delivering the order. Printing and Logistics services are performed by TAAG. The majority of TAAG’s customers are in France. Only a small percentage of the printing work performed by TAAG is for Reprint orders for North American operations delivered to mostly European customers. We recognize revenue from printing services when the selling price is fixed or determinable, the printed materials have been shipped to the customer, and collectability is reasonably assured. |
| | | | | | | | |
Stock-Based Compensation | ' |
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for share-based payments under the guidance as set forth in the Share-Based Payment Topic 718 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees, officers, directors, and consultants, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values. The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards to employees and directors on the date of grant using an option-pricing model, and the value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the required service period in the Company's Statements of Operations. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with Topic 505 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, whereby the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Stock-based compensation is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, as necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Translation | ' |
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars, the functional currency of the Company. Capital accounts of foreign subsidiaries are translated into US Dollars from foreign currency at their historical exchange rates when the capital transactions occurred. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. Income and expenditures are translated at the average exchange rate of the period. Although the majority of our revenue and costs are in US dollars, the revenue and costs of TAAG are in Euros, and the costs of Reprints Desk Latin America are in Mexican Pesos. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact our revenue and the costs of our operations. We currently do not engage in any currency hedging activities. |
|
The following table summarizes the exchange rates used: |
|
| | Year Ended | | |
June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | |
Period end Euro : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 1.36 | | | 1.3 | | |
Average period Euro : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 1.36 | | | 1.29 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Period end Mexican Peso : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 0.08 | | | 0.08 | | |
Average period Mexican Peso : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 0.08 | | | 0.08 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) Per Share | ' |
Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
|
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unvested restricted common stock. Diluted net income per share is computed similar to basic net income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. At June 30, 2014 potentially dilutive securities include options to acquire 1,888,851 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 904,998 shares of common stock. At June 30, 2013 potentially dilutive securities include options to acquire 1,692,898 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 2,376,173 shares of common stock. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted net income per share if the exercise prices were lower than the average fair market value of common shares during the reporting period. |
|
Net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, excluding unvested restricted common stock. Basic and diluted net loss per common share is the same for all periods presented with a net loss because all warrants and stock options outstanding are anti-dilutive. |
|
The calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is presented below: |
|
| | Years Ended | | |
June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | -1,866,418 | | $ | 191,922 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) | | | 17,230,311 | | | 17,123,460 | | |
Effect of diluted securities | | | - | | | 139,192 | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted) | | | 17,230,311 | | | 17,262,652 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | -0.11 | | $ | 0.01 | | |
Diluted | | $ | -0.11 | | $ | 0.01 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income taxes | ' |
Income taxes |
|
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. |
| | | | | | | | |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and has not determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. This new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. |
|
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | |