Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Use of Estimates | |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
|
These estimates and assumptions include estimates for reserves of uncollectible accounts, analysis of impairments of recorded goodwill and intangibles, accruals for potential liabilities and assumptions made in valuing equity instruments issued for services or acquisitions. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Concentration of Credit Risk | Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions and at times may exceed the FDIC $250,000 insurance limit. The Company does not anticipate incurring any losses related to these credit risks. The Company extends credit based on an evaluation of the customer's financial condition, generally without collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each customer's financial condition. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and intends to maintain allowances for anticipated losses, as required. |
|
Cash denominated in Euros with a US Dollar equivalent of $125,275 and $166,723 at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively, was held by Reprints Desk in accounts at financial institutions located in Europe. |
|
The following table summarizes revenue concentrations: |
|
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | | | | |
March 31, | March 31, | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | | | |
Customer A | | | * | | | * | | | * | | | 13 | % | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The following table summarizes vendor concentrations: |
|
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
March 31, | March 31, |
| | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | |
Vendor A | | | 25 | % | | | 18 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % |
Vendor B | | | 10 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 10 | % | | | 11 | % |
Vendor C | | | * | | | | * | | | | * | | | | 11 | % |
Vendor D | | | 10 | % | | | * | | | | 12 | % | | | * | |
|
* Less than 10% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company’s policy is to recognize revenue when services have been performed, risk of loss and title to the product transfers to the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. We generate revenue by providing two types of services to our customers: Article Galaxy, and Reprints and ePrints. |
|
Article Galaxy |
|
We charge a transactional service fee for the electronic delivery of single articles, and a corresponding copyright fee for the permitted use of the content. This service, known in the industry as single article delivery or document delivery, generates nearly all of the revenue attributable to the Article Galaxy journal article platform. We recognize revenue from single article delivery services upon delivery to the customer only when the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Reprints and ePrints |
|
We charge a transactional fee for each Reprint or ePrint order and are responsible for printing and delivery of Reprint orders, and the electronic delivery and, in some cases, the electronic delivery mechanism of ePrint orders. The majority of content publishers prints their content in-house and prohibits others from printing their content; however, when not prohibited by the content publisher, we use third parties to print Reprint orders. We recognize revenue from reprints and ePrints services upon shipment or electronic delivery to the customer only when the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company periodically issues stock options, warrants and restricted stock to employees and non-employees for services, in capital raising transactions, and for financing costs. The Company accounts for share-based payments under the guidance as set forth in the Share-Based Payment Topic 718 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees, officers, directors, and consultants, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values. The Company estimates the fair value of stock option and warrant awards to employees and directors on the date of grant using an option-pricing model, and the value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the required service period in the Company's Statements of Operations. The Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock awards to employees and directors using the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and the value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the required service period in the Company's Statements of Operations. The Company accounts for share-based payments to non-employees in accordance with Topic 505 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, whereby the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Stock-based compensation is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, as necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Translation | Foreign Currency |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars, the functional currency of the Company. Capital accounts of foreign subsidiaries are translated into US Dollars from foreign currency at their historical exchange rates when the capital transactions occurred. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. Income and expenditures are translated at the average exchange rate of the period. Although the majority of our revenue and costs are in US dollars, the discontinued operations of our former French subsidiary are in Euros, and the costs of Reprints Desk Latin America are in Mexican Pesos. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact our revenue and the costs of our operations. We currently do not engage in any currency hedging activities. |
|
Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, which result from a change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a foreign currency transaction is denominated, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and amounted to $57,647 and $94,118, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015, respectively. |
|
The following table summarizes the exchange rates used: |
|
| | Nine Months Ended | | Year Ended | | | | |
March 31, | June 30, | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
Period end Euro : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 1.09 | | | 1.38 | | | 1.36 | | | 1.3 | | | | |
Average period Euro : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 1.24 | | | 1.35 | | | 1.36 | | | 1.29 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period end Mexican Peso : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 0.07 | | | 0.08 | | | 0.08 | | | 0.08 | | | | |
Average period Mexican Peso : US Dollar exchange rate | | | 0.07 | | | 0.08 | | | 0.08 | | | 0.08 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) Per Share | Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unvested restricted common stock. Shares of restricted stock are included in the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding from the time they vest. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income applicable to common stock holders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued, using the treasury stock method. Shares of restricted stock are included in the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding from the date they are granted. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation when their effect is antidilutive. At March 31, 2015 potentially dilutive securities include options to acquire 1,978,391 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 305,000 shares of common stock. At March 31, 2014 potentially dilutive securities include options to acquire 1,885,437 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 904,998 shares of common stock. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted net income per share if the exercise prices were lower than the average fair market value of common shares during the reporting period. |
|
For the nine months ended March 31, 2015, the calculation of diluted earnings per share includes stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted common stock, calculated under the treasury method. Basic and diluted net loss per common share is the same for all periods presented with a net loss because all stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted common stock are anti-dilutive. |
|
The calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is presented below: |
|
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | | | | |
March 31, | March 31, | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | | | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations | | $ | -1,816 | | $ | -459,754 | | $ | -102,928 | | $ | -1,024,408 | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | - | | | -216,579 | | | 1,152,951 | | | -241,428 | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | -1,816 | | $ | -676,333 | | $ | 1,050,023 | | $ | -1,265,836 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) | | | 17,457,404 | | | 17,392,213 | | | 17,440,275 | | | 17,176,541 | | | | |
Effect of dilutive unvested restricted common stock | | | - | | | - | | | 449,212 | | | - | | | | |
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants | | | - | | | - | | | 3,730 | | | - | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted) | | | 17,457,404 | | | 17,392,213 | | | 17,893,217 | | | 17,176,541 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | - | | $ | -0.03 | | $ | -0.01 | | $ | -0.06 | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | - | | $ | -0.03 | | $ | -0.01 | | $ | -0.06 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | - | | $ | -0.01 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | -0.01 | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | - | | $ | -0.01 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | -0.01 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | - | | $ | -0.04 | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | -0.07 | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | - | | $ | -0.04 | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | -0.07 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and has not determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-15 on the Company’s financial statement presentation and disclosures. |
|
In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-01 (Subtopic 225-20) - Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items. ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of an extraordinary item from GAAP. As a result, an entity will no longer be required to segregate extraordinary items from the results of ordinary operations, to separately present an extraordinary item on its income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations or to disclose income taxes and earnings-per-share data applicable to an extraordinary item. However, ASU 2015-01 will still retain the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature and occur infrequently. ASU 2015-01 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. |
|
In February, 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 provides guidance on the consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). ASU 2015-02 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. |
|
In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting ASU 2015-5, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-4) which provides guidance regarding whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the entity should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the entity should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance will not change GAAP for an entity’s accounting for service contracts. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2015-03 on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures. |
|
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |