UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO _______ |
Commission File Number 000-53175
Apple REIT Eight, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia | 20-8268625 |
(State or other jurisdiction | (IRS Employer |
of incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
| |
814 East Main Street | 23219 |
Richmond, Virginia | (Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) | |
(804) 344-8121
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | | Accelerated filer ¨ | | Non-accelerated filer x | | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
| | | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Number of registrant’s common shares outstanding as of August 1, 2013: 92,140,005
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
| | | Page Number |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
This Form 10-Q includes references to certain trademarks or service marks. The SpringHill Suites® by Marriott, TownePlace Suites® by Marriott, Fairfield Inn® by Marriott, Residence Inn® by Marriott, Courtyard® by Marriott, Marriott®, and Renaissance® trademarks are the property of Marriott International, Inc. or one of its affiliates. The Homewood Suites® by Hilton, Hilton Garden Inn®, Hampton Inn® and Hampton Inn & Suites® trademarks are the property of Hilton Worldwide or one or more of its affiliates. For convenience, the applicable trademark or service mark symbol has been omitted but will be deemed to be included wherever the above referenced terms are used.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Investment in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation of $182,022 and $163,209, respectively | | $ | 873,976 | | | $ | 889,222 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 0 | | | | 68 | |
Restricted cash-furniture, fixtures and other escrows | | | 14,525 | | | | 14,420 | |
Due from third party managers, net | | | 9,815 | | | | 4,391 | |
Other assets, net | | | 5,755 | | | | 4,763 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 904,071 | | | $ | 912,864 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Credit facilities | | $ | 64,790 | | | $ | 45,300 | |
Mortgage debt | | | 216,784 | | | | 218,719 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 22,916 | | | | 20,796 | |
Intangible liabilities, net | | | 8,443 | | | | 8,874 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 312,933 | | | | 293,689 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Shareholders' Equity | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, authorized 15,000,000 shares; none issued andoutstanding | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Series A preferred stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 92,140,005 and 92,840,914 shares, respectively | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Series B convertible preferred stock, no par value, authorized 240,000 shares; issued and outstanding 240,000 shares | | | 24 | | | | 24 | |
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 92,140,005 and 92,840,914 shares, respectively | | | 912,063 | | | | 919,605 | |
Distributions greater than net income | | | (320,949 | ) | | | (300,454 | ) |
Total Shareholders' Equity | | | 591,138 | | | | 619,175 | |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | | $ | 904,071 | | | $ | 912,864 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | Three months ended | | | Six months ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Room revenue | | $ | 51,590 | | | $ | 49,984 | | | $ | 91,855 | | | $ | 90,224 | |
Other revenue | | | 3,945 | | | | 3,647 | | | | 7,240 | | | | 6,624 | |
Total revenue | | | 55,535 | | | | 53,631 | | | | 99,095 | | | | 96,848 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expense | | | 14,089 | | | | 13,630 | | | | 26,639 | | | | 25,855 | |
Hotel administrative expense | | | 4,281 | | | | 4,145 | | | | 8,268 | | | | 8,063 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 4,105 | | | | 4,032 | | | | 7,654 | | | | 7,602 | |
Utilities | | | 2,022 | | | | 1,981 | | | | 3,958 | | | | 3,928 | |
Repair and maintenance | | | 2,746 | | | | 2,587 | | | | 5,198 | | | | 4,936 | |
Franchise fees | | | 2,209 | | | | 2,124 | | | | 3,907 | | | | 3,794 | |
Management fees | | | 1,968 | | | | 1,895 | | | | 3,529 | | | | 3,429 | |
Property taxes, insurance and other | | | 2,484 | | | | 2,448 | | | | 4,838 | | | | 4,785 | |
Land lease expense | | | 1,605 | | | | 1,603 | | | | 3,205 | | | | 3,203 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,558 | | | | 1,655 | | | | 2,789 | | | | 3,502 | |
Depreciation expense | | | 9,437 | | | | 9,249 | | | | 18,813 | | | | 18,326 | |
Total expenses | | | 46,504 | | | | 45,349 | | | | 88,798 | | | | 87,423 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 9,031 | | | | 8,282 | | | | 10,297 | | | | 9,425 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | | (3,416 | ) | | | (3,629 | ) | | | (7,152 | ) | | | (7,040 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 5,615 | | | | 4,653 | | | | 3,145 | | | | 2,385 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | (51 | ) | | | (47 | ) | | | (102 | ) | | | (97 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 5,564 | | | $ | 4,606 | | | $ | 3,043 | | | $ | 2,288 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net income per common share | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | 0.02 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted | | | 92,373 | | | | 93,105 | | | | 92,494 | | | | 93,202 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
| | Six months ended | |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 3,043 | | | $ | 2,288 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 18,813 | | | | 18,326 | |
Amortization of deferred financing costs, fair value adjustments and other non-cash expenses, net | | | 314 | | | | 322 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Increase in due from third party managers, net | | | (5,424 | ) | | | (5,550 | ) |
Increase in other assets, net | | | (865 | ) | | | (567 | ) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 2,185 | | | | 2,731 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 18,066 | | | | 17,550 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Capital improvements | | | (3,632 | ) | | | (7,064 | ) |
Decrease (increase) in capital improvement reserves | | | 75 | | | | (1,677 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (3,557 | ) | | | (8,741 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds related to issuance of Units | | | 4,288 | | | | 5,775 | |
Redemptions of Units | | | (12,003 | ) | | | (9,991 | ) |
Distributions paid to common shareholders | | | (23,538 | ) | | | (25,630 | ) |
Net proceeds from existing credit facilities | | | 19,490 | | | | 56,500 | |
Net payments on extinguished credit facilities | | | 0 | | | | (73,213 | ) |
Proceeds from mortgage debt | | | 0 | | | | 40,000 | |
Payments of mortgage debt | | | (2,043 | ) | | | (1,307 | ) |
Deferred financing costs | | | (771 | ) | | | (943 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (14,577 | ) | | | (8,809 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | | (68 | ) | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 68 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Apple REIT Eight, Inc., together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company was formed to invest in income-producing real estate in the United States. Initial capitalization occurred on January 22, 2007 and operations began on November 9, 2007 when the Company acquired its first hotels. The Company concluded its best-efforts offering of Units (each Unit consists of one common share and one Series A preferred share) in April 2008. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31. The Company has no foreign operations or assets, and its operating structure includes two reportable segments. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. As of June 30, 2013, the Company owned 51 hotels located in 19 states with an aggregate of 5,914 rooms.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2013.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the 2012 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2013 presentation with no effect on previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated after giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding for the period. There were no potential common shares with a dilutive effect for the three or six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012. As a result, basic and diluted outstanding shares were the same. Series B convertible preferred shares are not included in earnings per common share calculations until such time that such shares are eligible to be converted to common shares.
2. Credit Facilities and Mortgage Debt
In March 2012, the Company entered into a $60 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a commercial bank that is utilized for working capital, hotel renovations, and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company may make voluntary prepayments in whole or in part at any time. The Company entered into a modification of this facility during the second quarter of 2013 in order to extend the maturity date of the facility; the Company also increased the available borrowing commitment to $70 million. The credit facility, as amended, matures in April 2015; however, the Company has the right, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including covenant compliance and payment of an extension fee, to extend the maturity date to April 2016. Interest payments are due monthly, and the interest rate is equal to either one-month LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate for a one-month term) plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 3.00%, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio as calculated under the terms of the credit agreement, or the prime interest rate plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.00%, at the Company’s option. The Company is also required to pay an unused facility fee of 0.25% to 0.35% on the average unused portion of the credit facility.
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $64.7 million and $45.3 million and an annual interest rate of approximately 2.95% and 3.21%, respectively. The Company incurred loan modification costs of approximately $0.4 million, which will be amortized as interest expense from the date of modification to the loan’s April 2015 maturity date. The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants and negative covenants and events of defaults. The amended credit facility contains the following quarterly financial covenants (capitalized terms are defined in the loan agreement):
· | Tangible Net Worth must exceed $275 million; |
· | Total Debt to Asset Value must not exceed 55%; |
· | Distributions, net of proceeds from the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Program, cannot exceed $16.5 million during the second quarter of 2013 and $12.5 million during any quarter thereafter, and quarterly dividends cannot exceed $0.1169 per share, effective with the second quarter of 2013, unless such Distributions are less than total Funds From Operations for the quarter; |
· | Loan balance must not exceed 50% of the Unencumbered Asset Value; |
· | Ratio of Net Operating Income, for the Company’s unencumbered properties compared to an Implied Debt Service for the properties must exceed two; and |
· | Ratio of net income before depreciation and interest expense to total Fixed Charges, on a cumulative 12 month basis, must exceed two. |
The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at June 30, 2013.
In April 2013, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with the same commercial bank, providing for up to $15 million in unsecured borrowings. Proceeds of the term loan facility were used for general working capital purposes, including reduction of the Company’s outstanding balance on its unsecured credit facility. Borrowings under this facility bore interest at 2.5% plus one-month LIBOR. The financial covenants applicable to the Company’s $70 million unsecured credit facility were also applicable to the term loan agreement. In June 2013, this term loan facility was paid in full and extinguished.
In April 2013, the Company entered into a modification of loan terms with the lender for the mortgage note payable jointly secured by the Company’s Burbank, California Residence Inn and Oceanside, California Residence Inn. The mortgage loan’s maturity was extended from January 2015 to January 2017, with an option for the Company to extend the maturity for one additional year. The mortgage loan’s variable interest rate was reduced from one-month LIBOR plus 4.25% to one-month LIBOR plus 3.24%. Additionally, effective in January 2015 the loan’s variable rate interest will be further reduced by 0.10%, to an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3.14%. The mortgage loan had a balance outstanding of approximately $39.7 million at June 30, 2013; interest and principal payments of $65,000 are payable each month through maturity of the loan. The Company incurred loan modification costs of approximately $0.2 million, which will be amortized as interest expense from date of modification to the loan’s January 2017 maturity date. To effectively fix the interest rate on the mortgage loan for the period from the original maturity date in January 2015 through the modified maturity date in January 2017, the Company entered into a forward interest rate swap agreement with the same commercial lender simultaneous with the loan modification agreement. Under terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company agrees, effective in January 2015, to pay a monthly fixed interest rate of 1.10% and receive a floating rate of interest equal to the one-month LIBOR, effectively fixing the interest rate of the modified mortgage loan at 4.24% for the period from January 2015 through maturity in January 2017. The Company also has an interest rate swap through the original maturity of January 2015 that effectively fixes the interest rate from the date of amendment through January 2015 at 4.24%. The notional amounts of the swaps will amortize in tandem with the amortization of the loan.
In June 2013, the Company entered into an $8.3 million secured revolving credit facility with a commercial bank that is available for working capital, hotel renovations, and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. This facility is jointly secured by the Company’s Texarkana, Texas Courtyard and Texarkana, Texas TownePlace Suites. The credit facility matures in June 2014. Interest payments are due monthly, and the interest rate is equal to the greater of the prime interest rate or 4.50%. The Company incurred loan origination costs of approximately $0.1 million, which will be amortized as interest expense from date of origination to the loan’s June 2014 maturity date. As of June 30, 2013, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $0.1 million and an annual interest rate of 4.50%. The credit facility is subject to the same financial covenants as the Company’s unsecured credit facility.
3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company estimates the fair value of its debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates consistent with the maturity of the debt obligation with similar credit terms and credit characteristics, which are Level 3 inputs. Market rates take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. As of June 30, 2013, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was approximately $281.6 million and $284.8 million. As of December 31, 2012, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $264.0 million and $275.4 million.
As of June 30, 2013, the Company had three outstanding interest rate swap agreements that effectively fix the interest rate on two separate variable-rate mortgage loans. The notional amounts, effective dates, maturity dates, and fair values for these agreements are as follows (all dollars in thousands):
Related property/mortgage | | Effective date | | Notional amount at 6/30/13 | | Maturity date | | Fair value | |
Westford Residence Inn | | 10/1/2010 | | $ | 6,630 | | 10/1/2015 | | $ | (197 | ) |
Oceanside Residence Inn/Burbank Residence Inn | | 1/13/2012 | | | 39,675 | | 1/13/2015 | | | (386 | ) |
Oceanside Residence Inn/Burbank Residence Inn | | 1/13/2015 | | | 38,440 | | 1/13/2017 | | | 245 | |
Total | | | | | | | | | $ | (338 | ) |
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s outstanding interest rate swap agreements were recorded at a fair value of $0.3 million (liability) and $0.8 million (liability), respectively and were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts, which is considered a Level 2 measurement within the Accounting Standards Codification’s fair value hierarchy. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. These derivatives are not designated by the Company as hedges for accounting purposes, and the changes in the fair value are recorded to interest expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the change in fair value resulted in a net decrease of approximately $0.4 million and a net increase of $0.2 million, respectively, to interest expense, net. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the change in fair value resulted in a net decrease of approximately $0.5 million and a net increase of $0.1 million, respectively, to interest expense, net.
The carrying value of the Company’s other financial instruments approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
4. Related Parties
The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties. These transactions cannot be construed to be at arm’s length and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties. The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2013 (other than the transactions related to the completion of Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s merger with a third party discussed below). The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.
The term the “Apple REIT Entities” means Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. The term the “Advisors” means Apple Six Advisors, Inc., Apple Seven Advisors, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors (“A8A”), Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”), Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”) and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. The Advisors are wholly owned by Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. Members of the Company’s Board of Directors are also on the Board of Directors of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
On May 14, 2013, Apple REIT Six, Inc. merged with and into an entity that is not affiliated with the Apple REIT Entities or its Advisors. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, dated as of November 29, 2012, upon completion of the merger, the separate corporate existence of Apple REIT Six, Inc. ceased (the “Merger”). Prior to the Merger, Glade M. Knight was Chairman and Chief Executive Office of Apple REIT Six, Inc. and members of the Company’s Board of Directors were also on the Board of Directors of Apple REIT Six, Inc.
A8A Agreement
The Company is party to an advisory agreement with A8A, pursuant to which A8A provides management services to the Company. A8A provides these management services through Apple Fund Management, LLC (“AFM”), which immediately after the Merger became a wholly-owned subsidiary of A9A. This transaction between A9A and Apple REIT Six, Inc. was made with no cash consideration exchanged between the entities. Prior to May 14, 2013, AFM was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apple REIT Six, Inc. An annual advisory fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses as described below, are payable to A8A for these management services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled approximately $0.5 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Apple REIT Entities and Advisors Cost Sharing Structure
In addition to the fees payable to A8A, the Company reimbursed A8A, or paid directly to AFM on behalf of A8A, approximately $0.8 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The costs are included in general and administrative expenses and are for the Company’s allocated share of the staffing and related costs provided by AFM at the direction of A8A.
AFM is an affiliate of each of the Advisors. Each of the Advisors provides management services through the use of AFM to, respectively, Apple REIT Six, Inc. (prior to the Merger), Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten. In connection with the Merger, effective May 14, 2013, the entire membership interest of Apple REIT Six, Inc. in AFM was transferred and assigned to A9A, which then became the sole member of AFM. As part of the assignment, A9A and the other Advisors agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple REIT Six, Inc. for liabilities related to AFM. The assignment of AFM’s interest to A9A had no impact on the Company’s advisory agreement with A8A or the process of allocating costs from AFM to the Apple REIT Entities or Advisors as described below, except Apple REIT Six, Inc. and its advisors, Apple Six Advisors, Inc. and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. (collectively “A6 Advisors”), no longer participate in the cost sharing arrangement, thereby increasing the remaining companies’ share of the allocated costs.
Also, in connection with the Merger, on May 13, 2013, Apple REIT Nine, Inc. acquired from Apple REIT Six, Inc. the Apple REIT Entities’ and Advisors’ headquarters in Richmond, Virginia (“Headquarters”) and assumed the Fort Worth, Texas office lease agreement. As described below, any costs associated with the Headquarters and office lease, including office rent, utilities, office supplies, etc. (“Office Related Costs”) will continue to be allocated to the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors.
Prior to the Merger, amounts reimbursed to AFM included both compensation for personnel and Office Related Costs used by the companies. As discussed above, as a result of the Merger, beginning on May 14, 2013, Office Related Costs are now allocated from Apple REIT Nine, Inc. to the other Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors. Each of these companies has agreed to reimburse Apple REIT Nine, Inc. for its share of these costs. From the period May 14, 2013 through June 30, 2013, the Company reimbursed Apple REIT Nine, Inc. approximately $25,000 for its share of Office Related Costs, which are included in general and administrative costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
All of the Office Related Costs and costs of AFM are allocated among the Apple REIT Entities and the Advisors excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger. The allocation of costs is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the Apple REIT Entities. In making the allocation, management of each of the entities and their Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to each company’s level of business activity and the extent to which each company requires the services of particular personnel of AFM. Such payments are based on the actual costs of the services and are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to the Company. Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of employees due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement described above allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Since the employees of AFM perform services for the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors at the direction of the Advisors, individuals, including executive officers, receive their compensation at the direction of the Advisors and may receive consideration directly from the Advisors.
As part of the cost sharing arrangements, the day-to-day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors (excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger). To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger) may make payments for any or all of the related companies. The amounts due to or from the related Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger) are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.
The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings and Related Matters discussed herein. The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting. These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Entities. The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services. The total costs for the Legal Proceedings and Related Matters discussed herein for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, of which approximately $0.4 million was allocated to the Company. Total costs for the six months ended June 30, 2012 for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $3.2 million, of which approximately $0.7 million was allocated to the Company.
Apple Air Holding, LLC (“Apple Air”) Membership Interest
Included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet is a 24% equity investment in Apple Air. The other current members of Apple Air are Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. In connection with the Merger, on May 13, 2013, Apple REIT Ten, Inc. acquired its membership interest in Apple Air from Apple REIT Six, Inc. Through its equity investment, the Company has access to Apple Air’s aircraft for asset management and renovation purposes. The Company’s equity investment was approximately $1.8 million and $1.9 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company has recorded its share of income and losses of the entity under the equity method of accounting and adjusted its investment in Apple Air accordingly. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $102,000 and $95,000 respectively, as its share of the net loss of Apple Air, which primarily relates to the depreciation of the aircraft, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
5. Shareholder’s Equity
Unit Redemption Program
In October 2008, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than three years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than three years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is five percent of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. As noted below, since the first quarter of 2011, the total redemption requests have exceeded the authorized amount of redemptions and, as a result, the Board of Directors has limited the amount of redemptions as deemed prudent. Effective June 19, 2013, the Board of Directors suspended the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, as it evaluates a potential consolidation transaction in which the Company, Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. would be combined (the “Consolidation Transaction”).
Since inception of the program through June 30, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 8.5 million Units representing $91.3 million, including 1.1 million Units in the amount of $12.0 million and 0.9 million Units in the amount of $10.0 million redeemed during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the first quarter 2011 redemption, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis. Prior to 2011, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The following is a summary of Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first six months of 2013:
Redemption Date | | Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date | | | Units Redeemed | | | Total Redemption Requests not Redeemed at Redemption Date | |
First Quarter 2012 | | | 18,910,430 | | | | 454,405 | | | | 18,456,025 | |
Second Quarter 2012 | | | 18,397,381 | | | | 454,638 | | | | 17,942,743 | |
Third Quarter 2012 | | | 18,607,044 | | | | 362,553 | | | | 18,244,491 | |
Fourth Quarter 2012 | | | 19,112,925 | | | | 391,142 | | | | 18,721,783 | |
First Quarter 2013 | | | 19,485,287 | | | | 434,573 | | | | 19,050,714 | |
Second Quarter 2013 | | | 20,938,382 | | | | 657,736 | | | | 20,280,646 | |
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
In the second quarter of 2008, the Company instituted a Dividend Reinvestment Plan for its shareholders. The plan provides a way to increase shareholder investment in the Company by reinvesting dividends to purchase additional Units of the Company. The uses of the proceeds from this plan may include purchasing Units under the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, enhancing properties, satisfying financing obligations and other expenses, increasing working capital, funding various corporate operations, and acquiring hotels. The Company has registered 10 million Units for potential issuance under the plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, approximately 0.4 million and 0.5 million Units were issued under the plan representing approximately $4.3 million and $5.8 million in proceeds to the Company, respectively. Since inception of the plan through June 30, 2013, the Company has issued approximately 9.5 million Units representing approximately $104.2 million in proceeds to the Company. Effective June 19, 2013, the Board of Directors suspended the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan, as it assesses the Consolidation Transaction.
Distributions
For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company made distributions of $0.1169 and $0.1375 per common share, for a total of $10.8 million and $12.8 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company made distributions of $0.2544 and $0.2750 per common share, for a total of $23.5 million and $25.6 million, respectively. In 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a reduction of the monthly distribution rate to $0.038958 ($0.4675 on an annual basis) effective for the distribution paid in April 2013. The Company’s distributions continue to be paid monthly.
6. Industry Segments
The Company has two reportable segments: the New York hotel and all other hotels. The New York hotel is a full service hotel in New York City, New York. The Company’s other hotels are extended-stay and select service hotel properties throughout the United States that generate rental and other property related income. The Company separately evaluates the performance of each of its hotel properties. However, because each of the hotels has similar economic characteristics, facilities, and services, and each hotel is not individually significant, other than the New York hotel, the other properties have been aggregated into a single reportable segment. The Company does not allocate corporate-level accounts to its reportable segments, including corporate general and administrative expenses, non-operating interest income and interest expense. The following table summarizes the results of operations and assets for each segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Dollar amounts are in thousands.
| | For the three months ended June 30, 2013 | |
| | New York, | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York | | | All Other | | | | | | | |
| | Hotel | | | Hotels | | | Corporate | | | Consolidated | |
Total revenue | | $ | 6,144 | | | $ | 49,391 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 55,535 | |
Hotel expenses | | | 5,021 | | | | 30,488 | | | | 0 | | | | 35,509 | |
General and administrative expense | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,558 | | | | 1,558 | |
Depreciation expense | | | 1,630 | | | | 7,807 | | | | 0 | | | | 9,437 | |
Operating income/(loss) | | | (507 | ) | | | 11,096 | | | | (1,558 | ) | | | 9,031 | |
Interest expense, net | | | 0 | | | | (2,879 | ) | | | (537 | ) | | | (3,416 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | 0 | | | | (51 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (51 | ) |
Net income/(loss) | | $ | (507 | ) | | $ | 8,166 | | | $ | (2,095 | ) | | $ | 5,564 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 104,364 | | | $ | 797,271 | | | $ | 2,436 | | | $ | 904,071 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended June 30, 2013 | |
| | New York, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York | | | All Other | | | | | | | | | |
| | Hotel | | | Hotels | | | Corporate | | | Consolidated | |
Total revenue | | $ | 10,970 | | | $ | 88,125 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 99,095 | |
Hotel expenses | | | 9,772 | | | | 57,424 | | | | 0 | | | | 67,196 | |
General and administrative expense | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,789 | | | | 2,789 | |
Depreciation expense | | | 3,261 | | | | 15,552 | | | | 0 | | | | 18,813 | |
Operating income/(loss) | | | (2,063 | ) | | | 15,149 | | | | (2,789 | ) | | | 10,297 | |
Interest expense, net | | | 0 | | | | (6,093 | ) | | | (1,059 | ) | | | (7,152 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | 0 | | | | (102 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (102 | ) |
Net income/(loss) | | $ | (2,063 | ) | | $ | 8,954 | | | $ | (3,848 | ) | | $ | 3,043 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 104,364 | | | $ | 797,271 | | | $ | 2,436 | | | $ | 904,071 | |
| | For the three months ended June 30, 2012 | |
| | New York, | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York | | | All Other | | | | | | | |
| | Hotel | | | Hotels | | | Corporate | | | Consolidated | |
Total revenue | | $ | 5,960 | | | $ | 47,671 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 53,631 | |
Hotel expenses | | | 5,186 | | | | 29,259 | | | | 0 | | | | 34,445 | |
General and administrative expense | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,655 | | | | 1,655 | |
Depreciation expense | | | 1,655 | | | | 7,594 | | | | 0 | | | | 9,249 | |
Operating income/(loss) | | | (881 | ) | | | 10,818 | | | | (1,655 | ) | | | 8,282 | |
Interest expense, net | | | 0 | | | | (3,072 | ) | | | (557 | ) | | | (3,629 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | 0 | | | | (47 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (47 | ) |
Net income/(loss) | | $ | (881 | ) | | $ | 7,699 | | | $ | (2,212 | ) | | $ | 4,606 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 109,602 | | | $ | 821,168 | | | $ | 2,468 | | | $ | 933,238 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended June 30, 2012 | |
| | New York, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York | | | All Other | | | | | | | | | |
| | Hotel | | | Hotels | | | Corporate | | | Consolidated | |
Total revenue | | $ | 10,613 | | | $ | 86,235 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 96,848 | |
Hotel expenses | | | 10,102 | | | | 55,493 | | | | 0 | | | | 65,595 | |
General and administrative expense | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 3,502 | | | | 3,502 | |
Depreciation expense | | | 3,291 | | | | 15,035 | | | | 0 | | | | 18,326 | |
Operating income/(loss) | | | (2,780 | ) | | | 15,707 | | | | (3,502 | ) | | | 9,425 | |
Interest expense, net | | | 0 | | | | (5,982 | ) | | | (1,058 | ) | | | (7,040 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | 0 | | | | (97 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (97 | ) |
Net income/(loss) | | $ | (2,780 | ) | | $ | 9,628 | | | $ | (4,560 | ) | | $ | 2,288 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 109,602 | | | $ | 821,168 | | | $ | 2,468 | | | $ | 933,238 | |
7. Legal Proceedings and Related Matters
On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in the Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc. et al. putative class action lawsuit, which was filed on June 20, 2011.
On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, which was dismissed in April 2013, was purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, and alleges that the Apple REIT Entities “misrepresented the investment objectives of the Apple REITs, the dividend payment policy of the Apple REITs, and the value of their Apple REIT investments.” The consolidated complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.
On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013, and filed their Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants on July 26, 2013. Defendants-Appellees have requested that their brief be due on October 25, 2013. The Company believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Entities were properly dismissed by the lower court, and intends to vigorously defend the judgment as entered. In the event some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are revived as a result of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Company will, once again, defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff has been conducting a non-public investigation, which is focused principally on the adequacy of certain disclosures in the Company's filings with the SEC beginning in 2008, as well as the Company's review of certain transactions involving the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities. The Company intends to continue to cooperate with the SEC staff, and it is engaging in a dialogue with the SEC staff concerning these issues and the roles of certain officers. The Company does not believe the issues raised by the SEC staff affect the material accuracy of the Company's consolidated financial statements. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this investigation as to the Company or any of its officers, nor can it predict the timing associated with any such conclusion or resolution.
8. Subsequent Events
In July 2013, the Company declared and paid approximately $3.6 million, or $0.038958 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders.
On August 7, 2013, after the approval by its Board of Directors, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., where Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and the Company would merge into Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, each outstanding Unit of Apple REIT Seven, Inc. would be exchanged for one common share of Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and each outstanding Unit of the Company would be exchanged for 0.85 common shares of Apple REIT Nine, Inc. The transaction is subject to shareholder approval by each of the companies and to customary closing conditions. As a result, there is no assurance that the merger will occur.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by use of terms such as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “target,” “goal,” “plan,” “should,” “will,” “predict,” “potential,” and similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the ability of the Company to implement its acquisition strategy and operating strategy; the Company’s ability to manage planned growth; changes in economic cycles; financing risks; the outcome of current and future litigation, regulatory proceedings or inquiries; changes in laws or regulations or interpretations of current laws and regulations that impact the Company’s business, assets or classifications as a real estate investment trust; and competition within the hotel and real estate industry. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore there can be no assurance that such statements included in the quarterly report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved. In addition, the Company’s qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Readers should carefully review the Company’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any forward-looking statement that the Company makes speaks only as of the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publically update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.
Overview
Apple REIT Eight, Inc., together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), was formed to invest in income-producing real estate in the United States. The Company was initially capitalized on January 22, 2007, with its first investor closing on July 27, 2007. The Company completed its best-efforts offering of Units (each Unit consists of one common share and one Series A preferred share) in April 2008. The Company has elected to be treated as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. As of June 30, 2013, the Company owned 51 hotels within different markets in the United States. The Company’s first hotels were acquired on November 9, 2007.
Hotel Operations
Although hotel performance can be influenced by many factors including local competition, local and general economic conditions in the United States and the performance of individual managers assigned to each hotel, performance of the hotels as compared to other hotels within their respective local markets, in general, has met the Company’s expectations for the period owned. With the significant decline in economic conditions throughout the United States over the 2008 through 2010 time period, overall performance of the Company’s hotels has not met expectations since acquisition. The hotel industry and the Company continue to see improvement in revenue as compared to the prior year. The Company’s growth rate has trailed that of the industry due to certain of its markets trailing average growth. Most of the trailing markets have been impacted by declines in government spending. Although there is no way to predict future general economic conditions, and there are several key factors that may continue to negatively affect the economic recovery in the United States and add to general market uncertainty, including but not limited to continued high levels of unemployment, the slow pace of the economic recovery in the United States, and the uncertainty surrounding the fiscal policy of the United States, the Company and industry are forecasting a mid-single-digit percentage increase in revenue for 2013 as compared to 2012 revenue.
In evaluating financial condition and operating performance, the most important indicators on which the Company focuses are revenue measurements, such as average occupancy, average daily rate (“ADR”), revenue per available room (“RevPAR”), and market yield which compares an individual hotel’s results to others in its local market, and expenses, such as hotel operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and other expenses described below.
The following is a summary of the Company’s results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
| | Three months ended June 30, | | | Six months ended June 30, | |
| | | | Percent of | | | | | Percent of | | | Percent | | | | | Percent of | | | | | Percent of | | | Percent | |
(in thousands, except statistical data) | | 2013 | | Revenue | | | 2012 | | Revenue | | | Change | | | 2013 | | Revenue | | | 2012 | | Revenue | | | Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 55,535 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 53,631 | | | 100 | % | | | 4 | % | | $ | 99,095 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 96,848 | | | 100 | % | | | 2 | % |
Hotel operating expenses | | | 31,420 | | | 57 | % | | | 30,394 | | | 57 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 59,153 | | | 60 | % | | | 57,607 | | | 59 | % | | | 3 | % |
Property taxes, insurance and other expense | | | 2,484 | | | 4 | % | | | 2,448 | | | 5 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 4,838 | | | 5 | % | | | 4,785 | | | 5 | % | | | 1 | % |
Land lease expense | | | 1,605 | | | 3 | % | | | 1,603 | | | 3 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 3,205 | | | 3 | % | | | 3,203 | | | 3 | % | | | 0 | % |
General and administrative expense | | | 1,558 | | | 3 | % | | | 1,655 | | | 3 | % | | | -6 | % | | | 2,789 | | | 3 | % | | | 3,502 | | | 4 | % | | | -20 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 9,437 | | | | | | | 9,249 | | | | | | | 2 | % | | | 18,813 | | | | | | | 18,326 | | | | | | | 3 | % |
Interest expense, net | | | 3,416 | | | | | | | 3,629 | | | | | | | -6 | % | | | 7,152 | | | | | | | 7,040 | | | | | | | 2 | % |
Income tax expense | | | 51 | | | | | | | 47 | | | | | | | 9 | % | | | 102 | | | | | | | 97 | | | | | | | 5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of hotels | | | 51 | | | | | | | 51 | | | | | | | 0 | % | | | 51 | | | | | | | 51 | | | | | | | 0 | % |
Average Market Yield(1) | | | 127 | | | | | | | 124 | | | | | | | 2 | % | | | 127 | | | | | | | 126 | | | | | | | 1 | % |
ADR | | $ | 121 | | | | | | $ | 118 | | | | | | | 3 | % | | $ | 117 | | | | | | $ | 113 | | | | | | | 4 | % |
Occupancy | | | 79 | % | | | | | | 78 | % | | | | | | 1 | % | | | 74 | % | | | | | | 74 | % | | | | | | 0 | % |
RevPAR | | $ | 96 | | | | | | $ | 92 | | | | | | | 4 | % | | $ | 86 | | | | | | $ | 83 | | | | | | | 4 | % |
Room nights sold (2) | | | 425,765 | | | | | | | 418,466 | | | | | | | 2 | % | | | 789,491 | | | | | | | 787,329 | | | | | | | 0 | % |
Room nights available (3) | | | 538,023 | | | | | | | 534,330 | | | | | | | 1 | % | | | 1,071,492 | | | | | | | 1,068,598 | | | | | | | 0 | % |
(1) Calculated from data provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc.® Excludes hotels under renovation during the applicable periods. (2) Represents the number of room nights sold during the period. (3) Represents the number of rooms owned by the Company multiplied by the number of nights in the period. |
Potential Consolidation Transaction
During June 2013, the Boards of Directors of the Company, Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. authorized the evaluation of a potential consolidation transaction in which the Company, Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. would be combined (the “Consolidation Transaction”). Each of the companies’ respective Board of Directors has designated a special committee consisting of two non-management directors to evaluate the Consolidation Transaction. The special committee of each Board has retained third party financial and legal advisors to assist the special committee in its evaluation of the Consolidation Transaction. Effective June 19, 2013, the Board of Directors suspended the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Unit Redemption Programs, as it assesses the Consolidation Transaction. On August 7, 2013 the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. See further discussion in Subsequent Events.
Legal Proceedings
The term the “Apple REIT Entities” means Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in the Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc. et al. putative class action lawsuit, which was filed on June 20, 2011.
On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, which was dismissed in April 2013, was purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, and alleges that the Apple REIT Entities “misrepresented the investment objectives of the Apple REITs, the dividend payment policy of the Apple REITs, and the value of their Apple REIT investments.” The consolidated complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.
On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013, and filed their Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants on July 26, 2013. Defendants-Appellees have requested that their brief be due on October 25, 2013. The Company believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Entities were properly dismissed by the lower court, and intends to vigorously defend the judgment as entered. In the event some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are revived as a result of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Company will, once again, defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.
Hotels Owned
The following table summarizes the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each of the 51 hotels the Company owned at June 30, 2013. All dollar amounts are in thousands.
| | | | | | | | Date | | | | | Purchase | |
City | | State | | Brand | | Manager | | Acquired | | Rooms | | | Price | |
Birmingham | | AL | | Homewood Suites | | McKibbon | | 5/23/2008 | | | 95 | | | $ | 16,500 | |
Rogers | | AR | | Fairfield Inn & Suites | | Intermountain | | 2/29/2008 | | | 99 | | | | 8,000 | |
Rogers | | AR | | Residence Inn | | Intermountain | | 2/29/2008 | | | 88 | | | | 11,744 | |
Springdale | | AR | | Residence Inn | | Intermountain | | 3/14/2008 | | | 72 | | | | 5,606 | |
Burbank | | CA | | Residence Inn | | Marriott | | 5/13/2008 | | | 166 | | | | 50,500 | |
Cypress | | CA | | Courtyard | | Dimension | | 4/30/2008 | | | 180 | | | | 31,164 | |
Oceanside | | CA | | Residence Inn | | Marriott | | 5/13/2008 | | | 125 | | | | 28,750 | |
Sacramento | | CA | | Hilton Garden Inn | | Dimension | | 3/7/2008 | | | 154 | | | | 27,630 | |
San Jose | | CA | | Homewood Suites | | Dimension | | 7/2/2008 | | | 140 | | | | 21,862 | |
Tulare | | CA | | Hampton Inn & Suites | | Inn Ventures | | 6/26/2008 | | | 86 | | | | 10,331 | |
Jacksonville | | FL | | Homewood Suites | | McKibbon | | 6/17/2008 | | | 119 | | | | 23,250 | |
Sanford | | FL | | SpringHill Suites | | LBA | | 3/14/2008 | | | 105 | | | | 11,150 | |
Tallahassee | | FL | | Hilton Garden Inn | | LBA | | 1/25/2008 | | | 85 | | | | 13,200 | |
Tampa | | FL | | TownePlace Suites | | McKibbon | | 6/17/2008 | | | 95 | | | | 11,250 | |
Port Wentworth | | GA | | Hampton Inn | | Newport | | 1/2/2008 | | | 106 | | | | 10,780 | |
Savannah | | GA | | Hilton Garden Inn | | Newport | | 7/31/2008 | | | 105 | | | | 12,500 | |
Overland Park | | KS | | SpringHill Suites | | True North | | 3/17/2008 | | | 102 | | | | 8,850 | |
Overland Park | | KS | | Residence Inn | | True North | | 4/30/2008 | | | 120 | | | | 15,850 | |
Overland Park | | KS | | Fairfield Inn & Suites | | True North | | 8/20/2008 | | | 110 | | | | 12,050 | |
Wichita | | KS | | Courtyard | | Intermountain | | 6/13/2008 | | | 90 | | | | 8,874 | |
Bowling Green | | KY | | Hampton Inn | | Newport | | 12/6/2007 | | | 130 | | | | 18,832 | |
Marlborough | | MA | | Residence Inn | | True North | | 1/15/2008 | | | 112 | | | | 20,200 | |
Westford | | MA | | Hampton Inn & Suites | | True North | | 3/6/2008 | | | 110 | | | | 15,250 | |
Westford | | MA | | Residence Inn | | True North | | 4/30/2008 | | | 108 | | | | 14,850 | |
Annapolis | | MD | | Hilton Garden Inn | | White | | 1/15/2008 | | | 126 | | | | 25,000 | |
Kansas City | | MO | | Residence Inn | | True North | | 4/30/2008 | | | 106 | | | | 17,350 | |
Carolina Beach | | NC | | Courtyard | | Crestline | | 6/5/2008 | | | 144 | | | | 24,214 | |
Concord | | NC | | Hampton Inn | | Newport | | 3/7/2008 | | | 101 | | | | 9,200 | |
Dunn | | NC | | Hampton Inn | | McKibbon | | 1/24/2008 | | | 120 | | | | 12,500 | |
Fayetteville | | NC | | Residence Inn | | Intermountain | | 5/9/2008 | | | 92 | | | | 12,201 | |
Greensboro | | NC | | SpringHill Suites | | Newport | | 11/9/2007 | | | 82 | | | | 8,000 | |
Matthews | | NC | | Hampton Inn | | Newport | | 1/15/2008 | | | 92 | | | | 11,300 | |
Wilmington | | NC | | Fairfield Inn & Suites | | Crestline | | 12/11/2008 | | | 122 | | | | 14,800 | |
Winston-Salem | | NC | | Courtyard | | McKibbon | | 5/19/2008 | | | 122 | | | | 13,500 | |
Somerset | | NJ | | Courtyard | | Newport | | 11/9/2007 | | | 162 | | | | 16,000 | |
New York | | NY | | Renaissance | | Marriott | | 1/4/2008 | | | 204 | | | | 99,000 | |
Tulsa | | OK | | Hampton Inn & Suites | | Western | | 12/28/2007 | | | 102 | | | | 10,200 | |
Columbia | | SC | | Hilton Garden Inn | | Newport | | 9/22/2008 | | | 143 | | | | 21,200 | |
Greenville | | SC | | Residence Inn | | McKibbon | | 5/19/2008 | | | 78 | | | | 8,700 | |
Hilton Head | | SC | | Hilton Garden Inn | | McKibbon | | 5/29/2008 | | | 104 | | | | 13,500 | |
Chattanooga | | TN | | Homewood Suites | | LBA | | 12/14/2007 | | | 76 | | | | 8,600 | |
Texarkana | | TX | | Courtyard | | Intermountain | | 3/7/2008 | | | 90 | | | | 12,924 | |
Texarkana | | TX | | TownePlace Suites | | Intermountain | | 3/7/2008 | | | 85 | | | | 9,057 | |
Charlottesville | | VA | | Courtyard | | Crestline | | 6/5/2008 | | | 139 | | | | 27,900 | |
Chesapeake | | VA | | Marriott | | Crestline | | 10/21/2008 | | | 226 | | | | 38,400 | |
Harrisonburg | | VA | | Courtyard | | Newport | | 11/16/2007 | | | 125 | | | | 23,219 | |
Suffolk | | VA | | Courtyard | | Crestline | | 7/2/2008 | | | 92 | | | | 12,500 | |
Suffolk | | VA | | TownePlace Suites | | Crestline | | 7/2/2008 | | | 72 | | | | 10,000 | |
Virginia Beach | | VA | | Courtyard | | Crestline | | 6/5/2008 | | | 141 | | | | 27,100 | |
Virginia Beach | | VA | | Courtyard | | Crestline | | 6/5/2008 | | | 160 | | | | 39,700 | |
Tukwila | | WA | | Homewood Suites | | Dimension | | 7/2/2008 | | | 106 | | | | 15,707 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 5,914 | | | $ | 950,745 | |
Results of Operations
As of June 30, 2013, the Company owned 51 hotels with 5,914 rooms. The Company’s portfolio of hotels owned is unchanged since 2008. Hotel performance is impacted by many factors including economic conditions in the United States as well as each locality. Although hampered by government spending uncertainty, economic indicators in the United States have shown evidence of a sustainable recovery, which continues to overall positively impact the lodging industry. As a result, the Company’s revenue improved in the three and six-month periods ending June 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods of 2012 and the Company expects continued improvement in revenue in 2013 as compared to 2012. The Company’s hotels in general have shown results consistent with their markets and brand averages for the period of ownership.
The Company separately evaluates the performance of each of its hotel properties. Due to the significance of the New York, New York hotel, the Company has two reportable segments.
Revenues
The Company’s principal source of revenue is hotel revenue consisting of room and other related revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had total revenue of $55.5 million and $53.6 million. Revenue for the hotel located in New York, New York (the “New York hotel”) was $6.1 million or 11% of total revenue for the second quarter of 2013 and $6.0 million or 11% of total revenue for the first quarter of 2012. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 79%, ADR of $121 and RevPAR of $96. The New York hotel had average occupancy of 89%, ADR of $312 and RevPAR of $279. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 78%, ADR of $118 and RevPAR of $92. For the same period, the New York hotel had average occupancy of 88%, ADR of $302 and RevPAR of $267. RevPAR is calculated as ADR multiplied by the occupancy percentage. ADR is calculated as room revenue divided by the number of rooms sold.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had total revenue of $99.1 million and $96.8 million. Revenue for the New York hotel was $11.0 million or 11% of total revenue for the first half of 2013 and $10.6 million or 11% of total revenue for the first half of 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 74%, ADR of $117, and RevPAR of $86. The New York hotel had average occupancy of 87%, ADR of $284, and RevPAR of $246. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 74%, ADR of $113, and RevPAR of $83. The New York hotel had average occupancy of 87%, ADR of $270, and RevPAR of $234.
During the first six months of 2013, the Company experienced demand consistent with the same period of 2012. The Company experienced an increase in ADR of 4% for its hotels during the first six months of 2013 as compared to the same period of 2012. This resulted in a 4% increase in RevPAR for the first six months of 2013, in comparison to the same period of 2012. Although certain markets have been negatively impacted by reduced government spending, with overall continued room rate improvement, the Company and industry are forecasting a mid-single digit percentage increase in revenue as compared to 2012, with stable to improving demand expected in most markets. The Company’s hotels continue to be leaders in their respective markets. The Company’s average Market Yield for the first six months of 2013 and 2012 was 127 and 126, respectively. The Market Yield is a measure of each hotel’s RevPAR compared to the average in the market, with 100 being the average (the index excludes hotels under renovation) and is provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc.®, an independent company that tracks historical hotel performance in most markets throughout the world. The Company will continue to pursue market opportunities to improve revenue.
Expenses
Hotel operating expenses consist of direct room expense, hotel administrative expense, sales and marketing expense, utilities expense, repair and maintenance expense, franchise fees and management fees. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, hotel operating expenses totaled $31.4 million or 57% of total revenue (the New York hotel had operating expenses of $3.2 million or 53% of its total revenue for the quarter) and $30.4 million or 57% of total revenue (the New York hotel had operating expenses of $3.4 million or 57% of its total revenue for the quarter). For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, hotel operating expenses totaled $59.2 million or 60% of total revenue (the New York hotel had operating expenses of $6.2 million or 56% of its total revenue for the period) and $57.6 million or 59% of total revenue (the New York hotel had operating expenses of $6.6 million or 62% of its total revenue for the period). Overall results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 reflect the impact of an increase in revenue at the Company’s hotels, and the Company’s efforts to control costs. Certain operating costs, such as management costs, certain utility costs and minimum supply and maintenance costs are relatively fixed in nature. The Company has been able to reduce, relative to revenue, other more variable costs such as room wages, marketing expenses, and other sales expenses. With the uncertainty associated with government regulation surrounding healthcare, the Company does anticipate increases above revenue rate increases in healthcare costs. The New York hotel experienced a decrease in several operating costs during the first six months of 2013, in comparison to the same period of 2012, in part reflecting cost control efforts by the Company and prior year expenses for repairs and maintenance and union contract negotiations. Although operating expenses will, in general, increase as occupancy or revenue increases, the Company has and will continue to work with its management companies to reduce costs as a percentage of revenue where possible while maintaining quality and service levels at each property.
Property taxes, insurance, and other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $2.5 million and $2.4 million, or 4% and 5% of total revenue for the respective periods (of which approximately $318,000 and $264,000 related to the New York hotel, for each respective period). Property taxes, insurance, and other expense for the both six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $4.8 million, or 5% of total revenue (of which approximately $631,000 and $554,000 related to the New York hotel, for each respective period). Property tax expense increased for some properties in the first six months of 2013, arising from upward reassessment of property values by the applicable localities, reflecting an improved economy. These increases were partially offset by successful appeals of tax assessments at certain locations. With the improved economy, the Company anticipates continued increases in real estate tax assessments during 2013. The Company’s New York property will also continue to experience increased costs in future periods, as real estate tax incentives in place at purchase will decline over time. The Company expects property insurance rates for 2013 to increase modestly over 2012.
Land lease expense was $1.6 million for both of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and $3.2 million for both of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. This expense represents the expense incurred by the Company to lease land for five hotel properties. Land lease expense for the New York hotel was $1.5 million for both of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and $2.9 million for both of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
General and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1.6 million and $1.7 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, general and administrative expense was $2.8 million and $3.5 million. The principal components of general and administrative expense are advisory fees and reimbursable expenses, legal fees, accounting fees, the Company’s share of loss from its investment in Apple Air Holding LLC, and reporting expenses. Legal and potential consolidation costs are described below.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred approximately $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively in legal costs related to the legal matters discussed herein and continued costs related to responding to requests from the staff of the SEC. The SEC staff has been conducting a non-public investigation, which is focused principally on the adequacy of certain disclosures in the Company’s filings with the SEC beginning in 2008, as well as the Company’s review of certain transactions involving the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities. The Company intends to continue to cooperate with the SEC staff, and it is engaging in a dialogue with the SEC staff concerning these issues and the roles of certain officers. The Company does not believe the issues raised by the SEC staff affect the material accuracy of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this investigation as to the Company or any of its officers, nor can it predict the timing associated with any such conclusion or resolution. As discussed below under Related Parties, the Company shares legal counsel with the other Apple REIT Entities. Total costs for these legal matters for all of the Apple REIT Entities were approximately $1.7 million and $3.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company anticipates it will continue to incur costs associated with these matters.
In conjunction with the potential Consolidation Transaction discussed herein, the Company incurred approximately $0.1 million in expenses during the second quarter of 2013. The Company will continue to incur these costs during 2013 if a transaction is pursued. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company began to incur costs associated with its evaluation of a prior potential consolidation transaction with Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. (the “other Apple REITs”). Total costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2012 related to the prior potential consolidation transaction were approximately $0.5 million. In May 2012, it was determined by the Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of each of the other Apple REITs not to move forward with the prior potential consolidation transaction at that time.
Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $9.4 million and $9.2 million (of which $1.6 million and $1.7 million related to the New York hotel, for each respective period). For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, depreciation expense was $18.8 million and $18.3 million (of which $3.3 million related to the New York hotel for both periods). Depreciation expense represents the expense of the Company’s hotel buildings and related improvements, and associated furniture, fixtures and equipment, for the respective periods owned. The increase for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, in comparison to the same period of 2012, is a result of capital improvements made by the Company during 2012 and the first six months of 2013.
Interest expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $3.4 million and $3.6 million. Interest expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $7.2 million and $7.0 million. Interest expense for all periods primarily represents interest incurred on mortgage loans and the Company’s credit facilities outstanding during the applicable periods of 2013 and 2012, net of fair value changes to interest rate swaps. The increase in interest expense from 2012 to 2013 primarily reflects higher loan balances outstanding during the first six months of 2013 compared to same period of 2012.
Related Parties
The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties. These transactions cannot be construed to be at arm’s length and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties. The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2013 (other than the transactions related to the completion of Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s merger with a third party discussed below). The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.
The term the “Apple REIT Entities” means Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. The term the “Advisors” means Apple Six Advisors, Inc., Apple Seven Advisors, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors (“A8A”), Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”), Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”) and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. The Advisors are wholly owned by Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. Members of the Company’s Board of Directors are also on the Board of Directors of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
On May 14, 2013, Apple REIT Six, Inc. merged with and into an entity that is not affiliated with the Apple REIT Entities or its Advisors. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, dated as of November 29, 2012, upon completion of the merger, the separate corporate existence of Apple REIT Six, Inc. ceased (the “Merger”). Prior to the Merger, Glade M. Knight was Chairman and Chief Executive Office of Apple REIT Six, Inc. and members of the Company’s Board of Directors were also on the Board of Directors of Apple REIT Six, Inc.
A8A Agreement
The Company is party to an advisory agreement with A8A, pursuant to which A8A provides management services to the Company. A8A provides these management services through Apple Fund Management, LLC (“AFM”), which immediately after the Merger became a wholly-owned subsidiary of A9A. This transaction between A9A and Apple REIT Six, Inc. was made with no cash consideration exchanged between the entities. Prior to May 14, 2013, AFM was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apple REIT Six, Inc. An annual advisory fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses as described below, are payable to A8A for these management services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled approximately $0.5 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Apple REIT Entities and Advisors Cost Sharing Structure
In addition to the fees payable to A8A, the Company reimbursed A8A, or paid directly to AFM on behalf of A8A approximately $0.8 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The costs are included in general and administrative expenses and are for the Company’s allocated share of the staffing and related costs provided by AFM at the direction of A8A.
AFM is an affiliate of each of the Advisors. Each of the Advisors provides management services through the use of AFM to, respectively, Apple REIT Six, Inc. (prior to the Merger), Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten. In connection with the Merger, effective May 14, 2013, the entire membership interest of Apple REIT Six, Inc. in AFM was transferred and assigned to A9A, which then became the sole member of AFM. As part of the assignment, A9A and the other Advisors agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple REIT Six, Inc. for liabilities related to AFM. The assignment of AFM’s interest to A9A had no impact on the Company’s advisory agreement with A8A or the process of allocating costs from AFM to the Apple REIT Entities or Advisors as described below, except Apple REIT Six, Inc. and its advisors, Apple Six Advisors, Inc. and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. (collectively “A6 Advisors”), no longer participate in the cost sharing arrangement, thereby increasing the remaining companies’ share of the allocated costs.
Also, in connection with the Merger, on May 13, 2013, Apple REIT Nine, Inc. acquired from Apple REIT Six, Inc. the Apple REIT Entities’ and Advisors’ headquarters in Richmond, Virginia (“Headquarters”) and assumed the Fort Worth, Texas office lease agreement. As described below, any costs associated with the Headquarters and office lease, including office rent, utilities, office supplies, etc. (“Office Related Costs”) will continue to be allocated to the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors.
Prior to the Merger, amounts reimbursed to AFM included both compensation for personnel and Office Related Costs used by the companies. As discussed above, as a result of the Merger, beginning on May 14, 2013, Office Related Costs are now allocated from Apple REIT Nine, Inc. to the other Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors. Each of these companies has agreed to reimburse Apple REIT Nine, Inc. for its share of these costs. From the period May 14, 2013 through June 30, 2013, the Company reimbursed Apple REIT Nine, Inc. approximately $25,000 for its share of Office Related Costs, which are included in general and administrative costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
All of the Office Related Costs and costs of AFM are allocated among the Apple REIT Entities and the Advisors excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger. The allocation of costs is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the Apple REIT Entities. In making the allocation, management of each of the entities and their Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to each company’s level of business activity and the extent to which each company requires the services of particular personnel of AFM. Such payments are based on the actual costs of the services and are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to the Company. Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of employees due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement described above allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Since the employees of AFM perform services for the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors at the direction of the Advisors, individuals, including executive officers, receive their compensation at the direction of the Advisors and may receive consideration directly from the Advisors.
As part of the cost sharing arrangements, the day-to-day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors (excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger). To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger) may make payments for any or all of the related companies. The amounts due to or from the related Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. and A6 Advisors after the Merger) are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.
The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings and Related Matters discussed herein. The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting. These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Entities. The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services. The total costs for the Legal Proceedings and Related Matters discussed herein for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, of which approximately $0.4 million was allocated to the Company. Total costs for the six months ended June 30, 2012 for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $3.2 million, of which approximately $0.7 million was allocated to the Company.
Apple Air Holding, LLC (“Apple Air”) Membership Interest
Included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet is a 24% equity investment in Apple Air. The other current members of Apple Air are Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. In connection with the Merger, on May 13, 2013, Apple REIT Ten, Inc. acquired its membership interest in Apple Air from Apple REIT Six, Inc. Through its equity investment, the Company has access to Apple Air’s aircraft for asset management and renovation purposes. The Company’s equity investment was approximately $1.8 million and $1.9 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company has recorded its share of income and losses of the entity under the equity method of accounting and adjusted its investment in Apple Air accordingly. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $102,000 and $95,000 respectively, as its share of the net loss of Apple Air, which primarily relates to the depreciation of the aircraft, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Resources
In March 2012, the Company entered into a $60 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a commercial bank that is utilized for working capital, hotel renovations, and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company may make voluntary prepayments in whole or in part at any time. The Company entered into a modification of this facility during the second quarter of 2013 in order to extend the maturity date of the facility; the Company also increased the available borrowing commitment to $70 million. The credit facility, as amended, matures in April 2015; however, the Company has the right, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including covenant compliance and payment of an extension fee, to extend the maturity date to April 2016. Interest payments are due monthly, and the interest rate is equal to one-month LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate for a one-month term) plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 3.00%, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio as calculated under the terms of the credit agreement, or the prime interest rate plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.00%, at the Company’s option. The Company is also required to pay an unused facility fee of 0.25% to 0.35% on the average unused portion of the credit facility.
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $64.7 million and $45.3 million and an annual interest rate of approximately 2.95% and 3.21%, respectively.
The credit facility, as amended, contains the following quarterly financial covenants (capitalized terms are defined in the loan agreement):
· | Tangible Net Worth must exceed $275 million; |
· | Total Debt to Asset Value must not exceed 55%; |
· | Distributions, net of proceeds from the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Program, cannot exceed $16.5 million during the second quarter of 2013 and $12.5 million during any quarter thereafter, and quarterly dividends cannot exceed $0.1169 per share, effective with the second quarter of 2013, unless such Distributions are less than total Funds From Operations for the quarter; |
· | Loan balance must not exceed 50% of the Unencumbered Asset Value; |
· | Ratio of Net Operating Income, for the Company’s unencumbered properties compared to an Implied Debt Service for the properties must exceed two; and |
· | Ratio of net income before depreciation and interest expense to total Fixed Charges, on a cumulative 12 month basis, must exceed two. |
The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at June 30, 2013.
In June 2013, the Company entered into an $8.3 million secured revolving credit facility with a commercial bank that is available for working capital, hotel renovations, and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. This facility is jointly secured by the Company’s Texarkana, Texas Courtyard and Texarkana, Texas TownePlace Suites. The credit facility matures in June 2014. Interest payments are due monthly, and the interest rate is equal to the greater of the prime interest rate or 4.50%. The Company incurred loan origination costs of approximately $0.1 million, which will be amortized as interest expense from date of origination to the loan’s June 2014 maturity date. As of June 30, 2013, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $0.1 million and an annual interest rate of 4.50%. The credit facility is subject to the same financial covenants as the Company’s unsecured credit facility.
Capital Uses
The Company anticipates that its principal sources of liquidity, cash flow from operations, availability under its credit facilities and access to credit markets, will be adequate to meet its anticipated liquidity requirements in 2013, including required distributions to shareholders (the Company is not required to make distributions at its current rate for REIT purposes), planned Unit redemptions, capital expenditures and debt service. Although the Board of Directors reduced the Company’s annual distribution rate to $0.4675 effective with the April 2013 distribution, the Company’s goal is to maintain a relatively stable distribution rate instead of raising and lowering the distribution rate with varying economic cycles. With the depressed financial results of the Company and the lodging industry as compared to pre-recession levels, the Company has and will attempt if necessary to utilize additional financing to achieve this objective. Although the Company has relatively low levels of debt, there can be no assurances it will be successful with this strategy and may need to reduce its distributions further to required levels. If the Company were unable to refinance maturing debt or enter into new borrowing agreements, or if it were to default on its debt, it may be unable to make distributions.
To maintain its REIT status the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary income. Distributions in the first six months of 2013 totaled $23.5 million, and were paid monthly at a rate of $0.045833 for the first three months of the year and at a rate of $0.038958 thereafter. For the same six-month period, the Company’s cash generated from operations was approximately $18.1 million. This shortfall includes a return of capital and was funded primarily by additional borrowings by the Company. Since a portion of distributions has been funded with borrowed funds, the Company’s ability to maintain its current intended rate of distribution will be primarily based on the ability of the Company’s properties to generate cash from operations at this level, the Company’s ability to utilize currently available financing, or the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing. The Company intends to continue paying distributions on a monthly basis. Since there can be no assurance of the ability of the Company’s properties to provide income at this level, there can be no assurance as to the classification or duration of distributions at the current monthly rate. The Board of Directors monitors the Company’s distribution rate relative to the performance of the hotels on an ongoing basis and may make further adjustments to the distribution rate as determined to be prudent in relation to other cash requirements of the Company.
In October 2008, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than three years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than three years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is five percent of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. As noted below, since the first quarter of 2011, the total redemption requests have exceeded the authorized amount of redemptions and, as a result, the Board of Directors has limited the number of redemptions as deemed prudent. Effective June 19, 2013, the Board of directors suspended the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, as it assesses the Consolidation Transaction.
Since inception of the program through June 30, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 8.5 million Units representing $91.3 million, including 1.1 million Units in the amount of $12.0 million and 0.9 million Units in the amount of $10.0 million redeemed during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the first quarter 2011 redemption, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis. Prior to 2011, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The following is a summary of Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first six months of 2013:
Redemption Date | | Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date | | | Units Redeemed | | | Total Redemption Requests not Redeemed at Redemption Date | |
First Quarter 2012 | | | 18,910,430 | | | | 454,405 | | | | 18,456,025 | |
Second Quarter 2012 | | | 18,397,381 | | | | 454,638 | | | | 17,942,743 | |
Third Quarter 2012 | | | 18,607,044 | | | | 362,553 | | | | 18,244,491 | |
Fourth Quarter 2012 | | | 19,112,925 | | | | 391,142 | | | | 18,721,783 | |
First Quarter 2013 | | | 19,485,287 | | | | 434,573 | | | | 19,050,714 | |
Second Quarter 2013 | | | 20,938,382 | | | | 657,736 | | | | 20,280,646 | |
In the second quarter of 2008, the Company instituted a Dividend Reinvestment Plan for its shareholders. The plan provides a way to increase shareholder investment in the Company by reinvesting dividends to purchase additional Units of the Company. The uses of the proceeds from this plan may include purchasing Units under the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, enhancing properties, satisfying financing obligations and other expenses, increasing working capital, funding various corporate operations, and acquiring hotels. The Company has registered 10 million Units for potential issuance under the plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, approximately 0.4 million and 0.5 million Units were issued under the plan representing approximately $4.3 million and $5.8 million in proceeds to the Company, respectively. Since inception of the plan through June 30, 2013, the Company has issued approximately 9.5 million Units representing approximately $104.2 million in proceeds to the Company. Effective June 19, 2013, the Board of Directors suspended the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan, as it assesses the Consolidation Transaction.
The Company has on-going capital commitments to fund its capital improvements. The Company is required, under all of the hotel management agreements, and under certain loan agreements, to make available, for the repair, replacement, refurbishing of furniture, fixtures, and equipment, a percentage of gross revenues provided that such amount may be used for the Company’s capital expenditures with respect to the hotels. The Company expects that this amount will be adequate to fund required repairs, replacements and refurbishments and to maintain the Company’s hotels in a competitive position. As of June 30, 2013, the Company held $12.6 million in reserve for capital expenditures. Total capital expenditures in the first six months of 2013 were approximately $3.6 million. The Company anticipates total 2013 capital improvements to be in the range of $14 to $17 million. The Company does not currently have any existing or planned projects for new development.
Impact of Inflation
Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the effects of inflation. Competitive pressures may, however, limit the operators’ ability to raise room rates. Currently the Company is not experiencing any material impact from inflation.
Business Interruption
Being in the real estate industry, the Company is exposed to natural disasters on both a local and national scale. Although management believes there is adequate insurance to cover this exposure, there can be no assurance that such events will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Seasonality
The hotel industry historically has been seasonal in nature. Seasonal variations in occupancy at the Company’s hotels may cause quarterly fluctuations in its revenues. Generally, occupancy rates and hotel revenues are greater in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. To the extent that cash flow from operations is insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in revenue, the Company expects to utilize cash on hand or available credit to make distributions.
Subsequent Events
In July 2013, the Company declared and paid approximately $3.6 million, or $0.038958 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders.
On August 7, 2013, after the approval by its Board of Directors, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., where Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and the Company would merge into Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, each outstanding Unit of Apple REIT Seven, Inc. would be exchanged for one common share of Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and each outstanding Unit of the Company would be exchanged for 0.85 common shares of Apple REIT Nine, Inc. The transaction is subject to shareholder approval by each of the companies and to customary closing conditions. As a result, there is no assurance that the merger will occur.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
With the exception of three interest rate swap transactions, the Company has not engaged in transactions in derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. The Company entered into an interest rate swap in October 2010, with a notional amount at June 30, 2013 of $6.6 million, and based on the London Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), to increase stability and manage interest rate fluctuations related to interest expense on a variable rate loan. The Company entered into a second interest rate swap in January 2012, with a notional amount at June 30, 2013 of $39.7 million, and based on LIBOR, to increase stability and manage interest rate fluctuations related to a newly originated variable rate loan. In connection with the extension of the January 2012 variable rate loan in April 2013, the Company entered into a third agreement, which is a forward interest rate swap that commences upon the maturity of the second interest rate swap discussed above. This third swap agreement had a notional amount of $38.4 million at June 30, 2013. None of these derivative instruments is designated as a hedge, therefore the changes in the fair market values of each swap transaction are recorded in earnings. The Company recognized a net gain of approximately $0.5 million in the first six months of 2013 from the combined changes in fair value of the three derivative instruments.
As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s financial instruments were not exposed to significant market risk due to foreign currency exchange risk, commodity price risk or equity price risk. The Company will be exposed to interest rate risk due to possible changes in short term interest rates as it invests its cash or borrows on its credit facility and due to its variable interest rate term loans. The Company had an outstanding balance of $64.8 million on its credit facilities at June 30, 2013, and to the extent it utilizes the credit facilities, the Company will be exposed to changes in short-term interest rates. Additionally, the outstanding balance of the Company’s variable rate term loans was $46.3 million at June 30, 2013. Based on these outstanding balances at June 30, 2013, every 100 basis point change in interest rates can potentially impact the Company’s annual net income by approximately $1.1 million, with all other factors remaining the same. The Company’s cash balance at June 30, 2013 was $0.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation process, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2013. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The term the “Apple REIT Entities” means the Company, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in the Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc. et al. putative class action lawsuit, which was filed on June 20, 2011.
On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, which was dismissed in April 2013, was purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, and alleges that the Apple REIT Entities “misrepresented the investment objectives of the Apple REITs, the dividend payment policy of the Apple REITs, and the value of their Apple REIT investments.” The consolidated complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.
On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013, and filed their Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants on July 26, 2013. Defendants-Appellees have requested that their brief be due on October 25, 2013. The Company believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Entities were properly dismissed by the lower court, and intends to vigorously defend the judgment as entered. In the event some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are revived as a result of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Company will, once again, defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unit Redemption Program
Effective in October 2008, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than three years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than three years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is five percent of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. As noted below, since the first quarter of 2011, the total redemption requests have exceeded the authorized amount of redemptions and, as a result, the Board of Directors has limited the amount of redemptions as deemed prudent. Effective June 19, 2013, the Board of Directors suspended the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, as it evaluates a potential consolidation transaction in which the Company, Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. would be combined.
Since inception of the program through June 30, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 8.5 million Units representing $91.3 million, including 1.1 million Units in the amount of $12.0 million and 0.9 million Units in the amount of $10.0 million redeemed during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the first quarter 2011 redemption, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis. Approximately 63%, 48%, 9%, and 4% of requested Units were redeemed in the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2011, respectively. Approximately 2% of Units requested were redeemed in each quarter of 2012. Approximately 2% and 3% of the Units requested were redeemed in the first and second quarters of 2013, respectively, leaving approximately 20.3 million Units requested but not redeemed as of the last scheduled redemption date in the second quarter of 2013. Prior to 2011, the Company had redeemed 100% of the redemption requests. The Company has a number of cash sources including cash from operations, dividend reinvestment plan proceeds, borrowings under its credit facility and asset sales from which it can make redemptions. See the Company’s complete consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 included in the Company’s interim financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for a description of the sources and uses of the Company’s cash flows. The following is a summary of Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first six months of 2013:
Redemption Date | | Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date | | | Units Redeemed | | | Total Redemption Requests not Redeemed at Redemption Date | |
First Quarter 2012 | | | 18,910,430 | | | | 454,405 | | | | 18,456,025 | |
Second Quarter 2012 | | | 18,397,381 | | | | 454,638 | | | | 17,942,743 | |
Third Quarter 2012 | | | 18,607,044 | | | | 362,553 | | | | 18,244,491 | |
Fourth Quarter 2012 | | | 19,112,925 | | | | 391,142 | | | | 18,721,783 | |
First Quarter 2013 | | | 19,485,287 | | | | 434,573 | | | | 19,050,714 | |
Second Quarter 2013 | | | 20,938,382 | | | | 657,736 | | | | 20,280,646 | |
The following is a summary of redemptions during the second quarter of 2013 (no redemptions occurred in June of 2013):
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | |
| | (a) | | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | |
Period | | Total Number of Units Purchased | | | Average Price Paid per Unit | | | Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | | Maximum Number of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any 12 month period is limited to up to five percent (5.0%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding from the beginning of the 12 month period, subject to the Company’s right to change the number of Units to be redeemed.
Exhibit Number | | Description of Documents |
| | | |
| 3.1 | | Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-140548) effective July 19, 2007) |
| 3.2 | | Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to amendment no. 1 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-140548) effective July 19, 2007) |
| 31.1 | | |
| 31.2 | | |
| 32.1 | | |
| 101 | | The following materials from Apple REIT Eight, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail (FURNISHED HEREWITH) |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Apple REIT Eight, Inc. | | |
| | | | |
By: | /s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT | | | Date: August 8, 2013 |
| Glade M. Knight, | | | |
| Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | | | |
| | | | |
By: | /s/ BRYAN PEERY | | | Date: August 8, 2013 |
| Bryan Peery, | | | |
| Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer) | | | |