Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse, these guarantees are limited to the collateral each provided to the lender.
The Company and Bank of America have agreed with BlueCrest Capital Finance, L.P., the lender of the BlueCrest Loan (defined below), that the Company will not individually make any payments due under the Bank of America loan while the BlueCrest Loan is outstanding. For the Company’s benefit, the Guarantors agreed to provide Bank of America in the aggregate up to $5.5 million of funds and/or securities to make these payments.
The Company has agreed to reimburse the Guarantors with interest at an annual rate of the prime rate plus 5.0% for any and all payments made by them under the Bank of America loan as well as to pay them certain cash fees in connection with their provision of collateral to guarantee the loan. Upon entering into the loan agreement, the Company issued to each Guarantor warrants to purchase 3,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.69 per share for each $100,000 of principal amount of the loan guaranteed by such Guarantor. The warrants have a ten-year term and became exercisable one year following the date the warrants were issued. Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 216,095 shares of common stock were issued to the Guarantors. These warrants had an aggregate fair value of $1,437,638, which amount was accounted for as additional paid in capital and reflected as a component of deferred loan costs and amortized as interest expense over the initial term of the loan using the effective interest method. As discussed below, certain of these Guarantors were replaced in September 2007. The unamortized fair value of the warrants issued to the Guarantors that were replaced, which was previously reflected as a component of deferred loan costs, was recorded as interest expense in September 2007.
In September 2007, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and two of the Company’s shareholders agreed to provide collateral valued at $750,000, $600,000 and $500,000, respectively, to secure the loan. The collateral provided by these new Guarantors fully replaced the collateral originally provided by one of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors and partially replaced the collateral originally provided by another member of the Company’s Board of Directors whose collateral now secures $400,000 of the loan. In consideration for providing the collateral, the Company issued to the new Guarantors warrants to purchase 3,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.69 per share for each $100,000 of principal amount of the loan guaranteed by such new Guarantor. The warrants have a ten-year term and became exercisable one year following the date the warrants were issued. Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 60,118 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to the new Guarantors. These warrants had an aggregate fair value of $380,482, which was accounted for as additional paid in capital and reflected as a component of deferred loan costs and amortized as interest expense over the initial term of the loan using the effective interest method.
In accordance with the provisions of the warrants issued to the Guarantors, the aggregate number of shares of common stock underlying such warrants increased on September 30, 2007 as the Bank of America loan remained outstanding at that date. The additional 38,861 warrant shares had an aggregate fair value of $244,463. The portion of this amount attributed to the Guarantors that were replaced in September 2007 was accounted for as additional paid in capital and immediately recorded as interest expense with the remainder accounted for as additional paid in capital and reflected as a component of deferred loan costs and amortized as interest expense over the initial term of the loan using the effective interest method.
In October 2007, the Company's Chief Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse agreed to provide an additional $2.2 million limited personal guarantee of the loan and pledged securities accounts to backup this limited personal guarantee. The additional collateral provided by the Company's Chief Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse fully replaced the collateral provided by one of the original Guarantors. The Company's Chief Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse by then had personally guaranteed an aggregate of $3.3 million of the loan. The Company's agreement with the Company's Chief Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse with respect to the additional collateral is substantially similar to the Company's
agreement with them in connection with the $1.1 million personal guarantee they originally provided in June 2007. In consideration for providing the collateral, the Company issued to the Company's Chief Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse, a warrant to purchase 81,547 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $7.69 per share. The warrant has a ten-year term and became exercisable one year following the date the warrant was issued. The warrant had a fair value of $516,193, which was accounted for as additional paid in capital and reflected as a component of deferred loan costs and amortized as interest expense over the initial term of the loan using the effective interest method.
As a result of this replacement of the collateral originally provided by one of the original Guarantors in October 2007, the unamortized fair value of the warrant to purchase 81,548 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $7.69 per share issued to that Guarantor was recorded as interest expense in October 2007. In October 2007, the Company cancelled the warrant previously issued to such original Guarantor, which warrant included the adjustment provisions discussed above, and, in exchange, issued to them a warrant to purchase 101,934 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $7.69 per share, which new warrant does not contain the adjustment provisions discussed above. The additional 20,386 warrant shares had an aggregate fair value of $128,228, which was accounted for as additional paid in capital and immediately recorded as interest expense.
In accordance with the provisions of the warrants issued to the Guarantors, the aggregate number of shares of common stock underlying such warrants increased on June 1, 2008 as the Bank of America loan remained outstanding at that date. The additional 78,773 warrant shares had an aggregate fair value of $168,387. The portion of this amount attributed to the Guarantors that were replaced in September 2007 was accounted for as additional paid in capital and immediately recorded as interest expense with the remainder accounted for as additional paid in capital and reflected as a component of deferred loan costs to be amortized as interest expense over the term of the loan using the effective interest method. In the event that as of the second anniversary and third anniversary of the closing date of the loan, the Company has not reimbursed the Guarantors in full for payments made by them in connection with the loan, the number of shares subject to the warrants will further increase.
The amount of interest expense on the principal amount of the loan for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2008 totaled approximately $23,700 and $68,000, respectively. Fees and interest earned by the Guarantors, which are recorded as interest expense, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2008 totaled approximately $140,000 and $88,000, respectively. Interest due on the principal amount of the loan has been paid by the Guarantors. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, that amount totaled approximately $445,000 and $692,000, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses at those dates.
In March 2009, the Company’s Chief Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse repaid $3.0 million of principal and a pro rata portion of accrued interest on behalf of the Company. The Company then owed this $3.0 million to the Company's Chief Science and Technology Officer and his former spouse. . This liability was reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet on a separate line titled “Subordinated related party loan.” This amount continued to accrue interest at an annual rate of the prime rate plus 5.0%.
In February 2010 the Company’s Chief Science and Technology Officer and his spouse filed divorce papers. Pursuant to the divorce, their jointly owned shares and their ownership of the loan to Bioheart which they hold as a result of their payment of $3 million of principal and related interest to Bank of America on behalf of Bioheart, would be divided equally between them. As a result, the Chief Science and Technology Officer’s common shares were then reduced to 2,513,840 and his percentage shareholding of the Company to 13.8%, with his former spouse assuming ownership of the same number of common shares and percentage shareholding of the Company. Their commonly owned loan and related interest, as of March 29, 2010, $4,140,201, was been equally split. The Chief Science and Technology Officer on March 29, 2010, elected to convert his portion of the loan and related interest to
17
restricted common stock and warrants. As a result, Howard Leonhardt, the Company’s Chief Science and Technology Officer, as of March 31, 2010, owns approximately 22 % of the Company.
In March of 2010, one of the Guarantors paid directly to Bank of America the $666,600 of principal that he had been guaranteeing, and a pro rata portion of accrued interest on behalf of the Company. That Guarantor agreed to accept from the Company the equivalent of his payment to Bank of America in restricted common stock and warrants. With his acceptance of the restricted common stock and warrants, the former Guarantor owned, at March 31, 2010, approximately 8% of the Company.Thus, the outstanding obligation to Bank of America was reduced to $1.3 million plus interest.
On July 16, 2010, the Company received a written notice of an event of default under the Bank of America Loan, by reason of the Company’s failure to pay the loan in full at maturity on July 5, 2010 and failure to pay the extension fee of $30,000 by June 28, 2010, as required by the loan documents, as amended. The Company is engaged in discussions with the 3rd parties who have provided the loan collateral regarding a restructuring of the indebtedness in the event Bank of America seeks recourse against the collateral and those 3rd parties, by reason of such action, become the successors to Bank of Americas rights and interests under the Bank of America Loan.
Guarantees Provided By Mr. Leonhardt
In addition to the guarantee arrangement described above, from time to time, Mr. Leonhardt has, without compensation, personally guaranteed certain of our financial obligations. As of the date of this report, he is the guarantor of our obligations under the lease for our facilities in Sunrise, Florida. He is also the guarantor of our obligations under corporate credit cards issued by Bank of America. Mr. Leonhardt does not receive any compensation for providing these guarantee services.
Mr. Leonhardt has guaranteed Dr. Murphy, a director, the repayment of his initial $200,000 investment in the Company.
Placement Fee
None.
Research Fee
In August 2007, we also entered into a research agreement with Ascent Medical Product Development Centre, Inc., an affiliate of Ms. Farley and Dr. Groth, pursuant to which we agreed to pay an aggregate fee of $150,000 for the research services contracted for. We paid $75,000 of this fee in 2007, $10,000 in 2008, and the balance was paid in 2009. {credit for $10k in expenses & balance of $65k was credited for issuance of shares}.
On February 2, 2010, Bioheart, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Ascent Medical Product Development Centre Inc. (“Ascent”) entered into an agreement whereby Ascent would oversee the conduct of a Phase I Clinical Trial for the Company, namely the REGEN trial. Ascent is owned by the Ascent Medical Technology Fund II, LP, (the “Fund”). The Fund’s General Partner is Ascent Private Equity II, LLC, which is controlled by Karl E. Groth, Ph.D. and Peggy A. Farley, who were, respectively, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer of the Company.
Review of Related Party Transactions
The Board of Directors has delegated to the Audit Committee the responsibility to review and approve all transactions or series of transactions in which we or a subsidiary is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a “Related Person” (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K”) has a direct or indirect material
18
interest. Transactions that fall within this definition will be referred to the Audit Committee for approval, ratification or other action. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Audit Committee will decide whether or not to approve such transaction and will approve only those transactions that are in the best interests of the Company.
Board Committee Independence
��
Our Board of Directors has three committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance & Nominating Committee.
Audit Committee
The members of our Audit Committee from January 1, 2009 through January 19, 2009 included Mr. Timmins, who served as Chairperson of the Audit Committee, Ms. Farley and Mr. Carson. On January 19, 2009 Ms. Farley replaced Mr. Timmins as Chairperson of the Committee upon his resignation from the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee. Mr. Carson and Dr. Groth were both appointed to the Audit Committee. On May 12, 2009 Mr. Borman replaced Mr. Carson. As of June 18, 2010 our Audit Committee consists of Mr. Borman as Chairperson of the Audit Committee and Dr. Murphy. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Borman is independent pursuant to the NASDAQ Rules and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.
Compensation Committee
The members of our Compensation Committee from January 1, 2009 through January 19, 2009 included Ms. Farley who served as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Carson, and Mr. Timmins. On January 19, 2009 Mr. Carson replaced Ms. Farley as Chairperson and Dr. Groth replaced Mr. Timmins upon his resignation from the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee. On May 12, 2009 Mr. Hart replaced Ms. Farley. On February 10, 2010 Ms. Farley replaced Dr. Groth. As of June 18, 2010 the members of our Compensation Committee include Mr. Carson, who serves as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee, Ms. Farley, and Mr. Hart. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Carson and Mr. Hart are independent pursuant to the NASDAQ Rules and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.
Governance & Nominating Committee
The members of our Governance & Nominating Committee from January 1, 2009 through Janaury 19, 2009 included Ms. Farley who served as Chairperson and Mr. Timmins. On January 19, 2009, Dr. Groth replaced Ms. Farley as Chairperson of the Governance & Nominating Committee and Mr. Carson replaced Mr. Timmins upon his resignation from the Board of Directors and Governance and Nominating Committee. On February 10, 2010 Ms. Jones replaced Dr. Groth as Chairperson. Mr. Borman and Mr. Spencer replaced Mr. Carson and Ms. Farley. As of June 18, 2010 the members of our Governance and Nominating Committee include Mr. Borman and Mr.Spencer. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Borman is independent pursuant to the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees
On January 13, 2009, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received a letter from Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) notifying the Company of Grant Thornton’s resignation as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. On February 12, 2009, the Company engaged Jewett Schwartz Wolfe & Associates to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Aggregate fees billed to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2009 by our independent registered public accounting firms are as follows:
Types of Fees | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Audit Fees (1) | | $ | 96,900 | | | $ | 158,633 | (2) |
Audit Related Fees | | | — | | | | — | |
Tax Fees | | | — | | | | — | |
All Other Fees | | | — | | | | — | |
19
| | |
(1) | | This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements or the reviews of the interim financial statements. |
| | |
(2) | | Includes the aggregate fees billed to us by Grant Thornton LLP and Jewett Schwartz Wolfe & Associates for professional services rendered for the audit of our 2009 and 2008 annual consolidated financial statements. Also includes the aggregate fees billed to us by Jewett Schwartz Wolfe & Associates during 2009 for professional services rendered for the reviews of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with consents and other services related to SEC matters, including our Registration Statement on Form S-1. |
| | |
| | |
See Item 9 “Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2009, for further discussion.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy
Consistent with policies of the SEC regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has adopted, and our Board has ratified, an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy pursuant to which the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that these services do not impair the auditor’s independence from us.
Prior to engagement of the independent auditor for the next year’s audit, the independent auditor and the Audit Committee will review a list of services and related fees expected to be rendered during that year within each of four categories of services to the Audit Committee for approval:
(i) Audit Services: Audit services include the annual financial statement audit (including required quarterly reviews), subsidiary audits, equity investment audits and other procedures required to be performed by the independent auditor to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements. Audit Services also include information systems and procedural reviews and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal control, and consultations relating to the audit or quarterly review as well as the attestation engagement for the independent auditor’s report on management’s report on internal controls for financial reporting.
(ii) Audit-Related Services: Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including due diligence related to potential business acquisitions/dispositions, accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as “Audit Services,” assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities, financial audits of employee benefit plans, agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters and assistance with internal control reporting requirements.
(iii) Tax Services: Tax services include services such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice; however, the Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent registered public accounting firm, the sole business purpose of which may be tax avoidance and treatment which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations.
20
(iv) All Other Services: All other services are those permissible non-audit services that the Audit Committee believes are routine and recurring and would not impair the independence of the auditor and are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.
Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves the services and fees of the independent auditor within each of the above categories. During the year, it may become necessary to engage the independent auditor for additional services not previously contemplated as part of the engagement. In those instances, the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy requires that the Audit Committee specifically approve the services prior to the independent auditor’s commencement of those additional services. Under the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee may delegate the ability to pre-approve audit and non-audit services to one or more of its members provided the delegate reports any pre-approval decision to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. As of the date hereof, the Audit Committee has not delegated its ability to pre-approve audit services.
All of the 2009 and 2008 fees paid to Grant Thornton LLP and Jewett Schwartz Wolfe & Associates described above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy.
21
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(3) Exhibits
| | |
Exhibit | | |
No. | | Exhibit Description |
31.1* | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32.1* | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| BIOHEART, INC. | |
| By: | /s/Mike Tomas | |
| | | |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
|
Dated: August 11, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE | | TITLE | | DATE |
/s/ Karl E. Groth | | Chairman of the Board | | August 11, 2010 |
Karl E. Groth | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Mike Tomas | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | August 11, 2010 |
Mike Tomas | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Peggy A. Farley | | Director | | August 11, 2010 |
Peggy A. Farley | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Mark Borman | | Director | | August 10, 2010 |
Mark Borman | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Bruce C. Carson | | Director | | August 11, 2010 |
Bruce C. Carson | | | | |
23
| | | | |
/s/ William P. Murphy, Jr., M.D. | | Director | | August 10, 2010 |
William P. Murphy, Jr., M.D. | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Richard T. Spencer III | | Director | | August 11, 2010 |
Richard T. Spencer III | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Charles A. Hart | | Director | | August 10, 2010 |
Charles A. Hart | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Howard Leonhardt | | Director and Chief Technology Officer | | August 10, 2010 |
Howard Leonhardt | | | | |
24
Table of Contents
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
As required under Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, the exhibits filed as part of this report are provided in this separate section. The exhibits included in this section are as follows:
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
| 31.1 | | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| 32.1 | | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
25