Spotlight Innovation 10-K 2010 FY Annual report

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Mark One

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to _______

COMMISSION FILE NO. 333-141060

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

NEVADA	90-0335743
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

520 5th AVENUE SW, SUITE 2600

CALGARY, ALBERTA

CANADA T2P 3R7

(Address of principal executive offices)

(403) 233-8484

(Issuer's telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:	Name of each exchange on which registered:
NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

COMMON STOCK, $0.001

(Title of Class)

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13

or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 403 of the Securities Act. o Yes  x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  x Yes   o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has (i) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes   x  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated file, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filed	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of the common equity, as of the last business of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: June 30, 2010 is $5,424,599.

ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS

N/A

Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes o Noo

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.

Class Outstanding as of April 5, 2011 Common Stock, $0.001 60,273,333 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

If the following documents are incorporated by reference, briefly describe them and identify the part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (i) any annual report to security holders; (ii) any proxy or information statement; and (iii) any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"). The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g. annual reports to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1990).

N/A

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes o No x

2

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

INDEX

Item      1.	Business	5
Item      1A.	Risk Factors	16
Item      1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	26
Item      2.	Properties	26
Item      3.	Legal Proceedings	27
Item      4.	Removed and Reserved	27
Item      5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity,  Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	27
Item      6.	Selected Financial Data	30
Item      7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	30
Item      7A.	Quantity and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks
Item      8.	Financial Statements and Supplemental Data	36
Item      9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	54
Item      9A.	Controls and Procedures	54
Item      9B.	Other Information	55
Item      10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	55
Item      11.	Executive Compensation	59
Item      12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	63
Item      13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	65
Item      14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	66
Item      15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	67

3

Statements made in this Form 10-K that are not historical or current facts are "forward-looking statements" made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements often can be identified by the use of terms such as "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "approximate" or "continue," or the negative thereof. We intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors for such statements. We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Any forward-looking statements represent management's best judgment as to what may occur in the future. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and important factors beyond our control that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from historical results of operations and events and those presently anticipated or projected. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statement or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

American Exploration Corporation files annual, quarterly, current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). You may read and copy documents referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that have been filed with the Commission at the Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also obtain copies of our Commission filings by going to the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov.

4

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

American Exploration Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 11, 2006 under the name of Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc. Previously, we were engaged in the business of providing professional engineering consulting services to the oil and gas industry, including clients such as petroleum and natural gas companies, oil service companies, utilities and manufacturing companies with petroleum and/or natural gas interests and government agencies. After the effective date of March 14, 2007 of our registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we commenced trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.

On August 6, 2008, with the approval of our Board of Directors, we merged with our subsidiary, American Exploration Corporation, and amended our Articles of Incorporation to change our name to "American Exploration Corporation". We are an exploration stage, natural resource exploration and production company currently engaged in the exploration, acquisition and development of oil and gas properties in the United States and within North America. Effective at the opening for trading on August 19, 2008, our trading symbol for our shares that trade on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board changed to "AEXP.OB".

Please note that throughout this Annual Report, and unless otherwise noted, the words "we," "our," "us," the "Company," or "American Exploration," refers to American Exploration Corporation.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Certificates of Change

On August 18, 2008, we effected a 14:1 forward stock split (the “2008 Forward Split”) in accordance with documentation filed with NASDAQ.  The total issued and outstanding 6,475,000 shares of our common stock prior to the 2008 Forward Stock Split were increased to 90,650,000 shares of common stock after givng effect to the 2008 Forward Stock Split.

The 2008 Forward Stock Split was not properly documented under Nevada law by the filing of a certificate of change pursuant to NRS 78.209 (the “First Certificate of Change”) indicating an increase in the issued and outstanding shares and a corresponding increase in our authorized common stock. Therefore, our Board of Directors, pursuant to unanimous written consent, authorized the filing of a First Certificate of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State increasing our authorized capital to 1,400,000,000 shares of common stock.

Further, on March 26, 2009, we effected a 1.5:1 forward stock split (the “2009 Forward Split”) in accordance with documentation filed with FINRA.  The total issued and outstanding 36,575,000 shares of our common stock prior to the 2009 Forward Stock Split were increased to 54,862,500 shares of common stock after givng effect to the 2009 Forward Stock Split.

5

The 2009 Forward Stock Split was not properly documented under Nevada law by the filing of a certificate of change pursuant to NRS 78.209 (the “Second Certificate of Change”) indicating an increase in the issued and outstanding shares and a corresponding increase in our authorized common stock. Therefore, our Board of Directors, pursuant to unanimous written consent, authorized the filing of a Second Certificate of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State increasing our authorized capital to 2,100,000,000 shares of common stock.

TRANSFER AGENT

Our transfer agent is Routh Stock Transfer Inc., 6860 N Dallas Parkway, Suite 200, Plano, Texas 75024.

BUSINESS OPERATIONS

We are an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties in North America, primarily in the United States. Our primary focus has been the acquisition of mineral leases located in Mississippi previously owned by Westrock Land Corp, a private Texas corporation ("Westrock"). We identified a prospect with an over-thickened Bossier/Haynesville Shale gas reservoir situated below the properties covered by these leases.

Merger Agreement

Our Board of Directors has authorized and approved the execution of a definitive merger agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated March 22, 2010 (the “Execution Date”) with Mainland Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Mainland Resources”). The Merger Agreement provides for a stock-for-stock merger to be effected under the laws of the State of Nevada whereby it is contemplated that our shareholders will receive one share of common stock of Mainland Resources for every four shares of our common stock held of record. The specific share exchange ratio will be negotiated upon the completion of “fairness opinions” conducted by independent financial advisors and technical due diligence by both Mainland and American. As of the date of the Merger Agreement, there were 60,273,333 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding with the result that 15,068,333 shares of common stock of Mainland Resources are to be issued to our shareholders upon consummation and completion of the Merger Agreement, which shares may be increased based upon an increase in the number of our shares issued and outstanding subsequent to the Merger Agreement. In further accordance with the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement, and based upon the closing market price of Mainland Resource’s common stock of $1.25 per share as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on March 18, 2010, the total share consideration to be issued to our shareholders at the date of the Merger Agreement will be valued at $18,741,666. In the event the Merger Agreement is consummated and the merger is completed: (i) Mainland Resources will be the surviving corporation; (ii) Mainland Resources will be vested with all of our assets and property (as discussed below); and (iii) our shareholders will hold approximately twenty percent (20%) of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Mainland Resources.

The Merger Agreement is subject to various conditions precedent including, but not limited to, the following: (i) approval by our shareholders and the shareholders of Mainland Resources of the Merger Agreement; (ii) completion of satisfactory due diligence by both us and Mainland Resources within thirty (30) days of the Execution Date of the business and affairs of each respective company to determine the general and economic feasibility of the merger; (iii) the number of Mainland Resources’ shareholders exercising dissenter rights available to them under Nevada law, which shall not exceed 5% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Mainland Resources common stock; (iv) receipt by us and Mainland Resources of a draft fairness opinion (each a “Fairness Opinion”) of its own independent financial advisor to the effect that, as of the Execution Date, the merger is fair from a financial point of view to the shareholders of each respective company (subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations relating to such opinion); (v) the acceptance and approval of the Fairness Opinion by our Board of Directors and the board of directors of Mainland Resources, respectively; and (vi) confirmation of the accuracy and material compliance of our representations, warranties and covenants and those representations, warranties and covenants of Mainland Resources.

6

On May 5, 2010, we issued a press release announcing that we and Mainland Resources have each completed, to our satisfaction, respective due diligence investigations of the other party's business and affairs within the thirty day due diligence period contemplated by the Merger Agreement.  In addition, each party has received a fairness opinion (each, a "Fairness Opinion") of its own independent financial advisor to the effect that, as of the date of the Merger Agreement, the merger is fair from a financial point of view to holders of such party's shares (subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations relating to such opinion). Each Fairness Opinion sets forth the procedures followed, the assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken, and various other matters, and will be annexed to the joint proxy statement/ prospectus that will be included in a Registration Statement on Form S-4 that Mainland Resources will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the securities of Mainland Resources to be issued in exchange for securities of American Exploration. If the merger is completed, Mainland Resources will be the surviving corporation, and will become vested with all of the Company’s assets and property. Each Fairness Opinion will not constitute a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote on the merger or any matter relevant to the Merger Agreement.

Our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution approving the merger on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, and recommending the merger to the stockholders of the Company. Furthermore, our Special Committee of the Board of Directors has also adopted a resolution approving the merger on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, and recommending the merger to our stockholders.

Amending Agreements

Effective July 28, 2010, we entered into that certain letter agreement dated July 28, 2010 (the “Letter Agreement”) with Mainland Resources in regards to the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement is subject to termination by either us or Mainland Resources if certain conditions specified in the Merger Agreement are not satisfied at or before September 30, 2010 or such later date as may be mutually agreed upon (the “Termination Date”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement, the Termination Date was extended to September 30, 2010.

Effective on September 7, 2010, we entered into an amending agreement (the “September 2010 Amending Agreement”) with Mainland Resources in regards to the Merger Agreement. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the September 2010 Amending Agreement, the Termination Date was extended to December 31, 2010.

Effective on December 23, 2010, we entered into an amending agreement (the “December 2010 Amending Agreement”) with Mainland Resources in regards to the Merger Agreement. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the December 2010 Amending Agreement, the Termination Date was extended to March 31, 2011.

Effective on March 14, 2011, we entered into an amending agreement (the “March 2011 Amending Agreement”) with Mainland Resources in regards to the Merger Agreement.  In accordance with the terms and provisions of the March 2011 Amending Agreement, the Termination Date was extended to May 31, 2011.

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have filed, jointly with Mainland Resources, an S-4 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission and plan to distribute the associated proxy material presenting the Merger Agreement to our shareholders for approval.

7

Fairness Opinion

We retained Working Capital Corporation (“WCC”) as our financial advisor pursuant to an engagement agreement (the "Engagement Agreement") dated March 18, 2010, to provide an opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Merger Agreement exchange ratio to our shareholders. WCC did not determine the Merger Agreement exchange ratio, however, they were asked to evaluate its fairness. WCC provided their opinion to our Board of Directors on or about April 22, 2010 in the form of a fairness opinion letter dated April 22, 2010.

In preparing the fairness opinion, WCC reviewed and where appropriate, relied upon (without attempting to verify independently the completeness or accuracy of) certain financial and operational information and documents, including but not limited to the following: (i) the Merger Agreement; (ii) certain historical publicly available business and financial information concerning us and Mainland Resources; (iii) certain internal financial statements and other financial and operating data concerning us and Mainland Resources; (iv) historical market prices and trading volumes of our common stock and Mainland Resources common stock; (v) the terms of recent merger and acquisition transactions, to the extent publicly available, involving oil & gas companies that WCC considered relevant; (vi) corporate presentations on both us and Mainland Resources; (vii) technical reports and well log data on gas projects held by us and Mainland Resources; (viii) publicly available information on our financial partners and those of Mainland Resources; (ix) press releases of both us and Mainland Resources; and (x) performed such other analyses and considered such other factors as WCC has deemed appropriate.

In addition, WCC held discussions with members of our senior management and of Mainland Resources for the purpose of reviewing our future prospects and those of Mainland Resources, including exploration plans related to the respective businesses, earnings, assets, liabilities and the amount and timing of cost savings (the "Synergies") expected to be achieved as a result of the Merger Agreement. WCC also took into account the assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions and WCC's experience in other transactions, as well as WCC's knowledge of oil and gas companies, and WCC's general experience in securities valuations.

Subject to the assumptions and limitations set forth in their fairness opinion, WCC advised that it was of the opinion that, as of the date of their fairness opinion letter, the merger consideration (being the shares of Mainland to be received by our shareholders) as a result of the Merger Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view.

Westrock Option Agreement

Effective on November 3, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the execution of an option agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with Westrock. Westrock owned all right, title and interest in and to approximately 5,000 net acres in oil and gas leases located in Mississippi (collectively, the ”Leases”). We had an option to acquire 100% of the working interest and 75% of the net revenue interest in the Leases at $625 per net acre for a total purchase price of $3,125,000. The contiguous acreage involves several landowners, with mineral lease expiry extending beyond 2011. The original terms of the Option Agreement required spudding a well on or before October 1, 2009. The effective date of the conveyance of the revenue interest in the Leases to us was to be no later than May 15, 2009 upon final payment of the remaining balance of $2,018,750.

Effective on January 8, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the Option Agreement (the “Amended Option Agreement”) with Westrock. Pursuant to the Amended Option Agreement, Westrock granted to us until February 2, 2009 to complete our due diligence. Effective on March 18, 2009, we entered into a further amendment to the Option Agreement (“the “Second Amended Option Agreement”) with Westrock. Pursuant to the Second Amended Option Agreement: (i) Westrock granted to us until May 15, 2009 to complete our due diligence; (ii) we paid to Westrock an additional non-refundable amount of $325,000 as consideration for the extension; and (iii) the effective date of the conveyance of the revenue interest in the Leases to us would be no later than May 15, 2009.

8

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, two separate evaluations were undertaken to review the land title status of the Leases. Both evaluations concluded that all was satisfactory and title could be cleanly transferred to us from Westrock. Therefore, effective on August 17, 2009, we entered into a further amendment to the Option Agreement (the “Third Amended Option Agreement”) with Westrock. Pursuant to the Third Amended Option Agreement: (i) we agreed to issue an aggregate of 4,037,500 shares, valued at $2,664,750, of our restricted common stock to Westrock as satisfaction for an aggregate amount of $2,108,750, which remained due and owing from the aggregate purchase price of $3,125,000 (the “Purchase Price”); and (ii) we agreed to drill and complete a minimum of at least one well on the properties in the Haynesville geological zone no later than December 31, 2010.

The transaction with Westrock is deemed finalized. The 4,037,500 shares of restricted common stock have been issued by us to Westrock and the transfer of title to the Leases has been finalized.

On November 2, 2010, we executed a letter amendment to the Option Agreement with Westrock.  In the November 2, 2010 letter agreement, we agreed to drill and complete at least one well on the Leases in the Haynesville geological zone no later than December 31, 2011.

Mainland Resources Letter Agreement

Effective on September 17, 2009, our Board of Directors authorized the execution of a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) with Mainland Resources to jointly develop contiguous acreage known as the Buena Vista Area located in Mississippi (the “Joint Development Project”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement: (i) we agreed to commit approximately 5,000 net acres and Mainland Resources agreed to commit approximately 8,225 net acres to the Joint Development Project; (ii) Mainland Resources would be the operator pursuant to the Joint Operating Agreement; (iii) Mainland Resources agreed to pay 80% of the initial well drilling and completion costs to earn a 51% working interest in the well and the total Joint Operating Area; and (iv) we agreed to pay 20% of the initial well drilling and completion costs to earn a 49% working interest in the well and the total Joint Operating Area. In further accordance with the terms and provisions of the Joint Operating Agreement, future costs, including drilling and completions, for oil and gas activities of the net acreage in the Joint Operating Area would have been split on a 51%/49% basis between Mainland Resources and us, respectively.

On March 25, 2010, Mainland Resources had issued an authorization for expenditure (“AFE”) for the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well, which contemplated drilling to a depth of 22,000 feet or a depth sufficient to evaluate the Haynesville Formation. The total completed well cost was estimated at $13,550,000. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement, we had thirty days to contribute our 20% share of the total completed well cost or $2,710,000.

On April 27, 2010, we failed to fund our 20% share of the estimated total well costs ($2,710,000) of the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well within the thirty - day period provided for in the joint development agreement, (the 30 day period expired on April 23, 2010). As a result, we forfeited our 29% (of the total 49% held by American) working interest in the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well and the prospect in favor of Mainland Resources. We continued to be entitled to a 20% working interest in the Burkley-Phillips No.1 well and the prospect after completion (subject to compliance by us with all other terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement and the related joint operating agreement). If the Merger Agreement is approved and proceeds as proposed, our 20% working interest in the well and the prospect after completion will be owned by Mainland Resources, the resultant merged entity.

9

Mainland subsequently renegotiated the term on the leases originally held by American as well as those they had secured on the Buena Vista structure in Mississippi. The leases have been extended beyond 2011.

Burkley-Phillips No. 1 Well

Management believed that over-thickened gas-charged Bossier/Haynesville Shale reservoir existed within the mineral leases acquired from Westrock in Mississippi.  A deep well drilled to a depth of 22,000 feet on the said leases in 1981 confirmed the presence of highly over-pressured natural gas within an exceptionally thick Bossier/Haynesville section. The well was drilled to a depth of 22,000 feet, reaching total depth while still within the Bossier/Haynesville shale.

Extensive geo-technical work was completed pre-drill on data from the old well and geophysical data from the area, which supported the drilling of a new well. Two independent geophysical assessments of the property were completed and a gas in place assessment was completed by a leading petrophysical group who has experience with the Bossier/Haynesville shale gas interval. The results of these studies suggested that the leases of interest contain significant hydrocarbons. In that the Bossier/Haynesville is so thick in this locale, vertical wells may potentially be used to develop the property, reducing costs and many of the drilling challenges associated with horizontal wellbores. Drilling costs were estimated by an engineering company experienced in the project area, to a depth of 22,000 ft. Based on observed production rates within the Haynesville Formation of NW Louisiana and other Bossier Formation wells in East Texas, the highly over-pressured Bossier/Haynesville observed within the leases of interest may produce at very high rates.

As discussed above, Mainland Resources issued an Authority for Expenditure (AFE) for the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well in early April, 2010 and engaged RAPAD Drilling & Well Service, Inc., of Jackson, Mississippi, as the drilling contractor. Drilling commenced on July 21, 2010 and located approximately 1,000 ft. away from the original well drilled on the property in 1981 and was planned for a total depth of 22,000 ft. The Bossier/Haynesville interval was the primary target, although other secondary targets were identified as possible targets.

The Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well reached the projected total depth of 22,000 feet on December 27, 2010. The well was logged to a depth of approximately 21,040 ft., as the wireline logging tools were unable to safely descend past a perceived restriction in the wellbore at that depth. Production casing was set on the well shortly afterwards in early January 2011. It is the only well drilled in the Buena Vista area testing the Bossier/Haynesville shale since shale gas has emerged as a major natural gas resource.

As noted above, the AFE estimated the drilling cost to be approximately $8,650,000 and completion cost to be approximately $4,900,000 for a total completed well cost of approximately $13,550,000. The actual total drilling cost was approximately $10,200,000 (unaudited), and Mainland Resources anticipates that it will incur approximately $5,000,000 in additional post-drilling completion costs.

Large amounts of data were captured in the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well which may be used to better quantify the nature of gas contained within the reservoir intervals. A 21-foot full core was cut within the Bossier/Haynesville interval (taken from approximately 20,415 feet to 20,436 feet measured depth) in early December, 2010. The core was transported to the Houston, Texas facilities of Core Laboratories NV's Core Lab Petroleum Services Division for comprehensive core analysis, with the view to determining potential volumes of gas in place within the matrix, porosity, permeability, gas quality, mineralogy and total organic content.

In late January 2011, results were received by Mainland Resources from the first series of core analyses which it believes supports excellent gas potential within the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well. The reservoir characteristics observed in the cored interval were found to be consistent with other gas producing shales when compared to an existing dataset of gas producing shales held by Core Lab. In addition, an extreme over-pressure was observed in the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well, which is expected will lend itself to enhanced gas recovery.

10

The initial core analysis results also confirmed that mineralogy and total organic carbon percentage measured are within prospective ranges for the shale-dominated reservoir encountered. Porosity, permeability and water saturation values were also calculated. These values were plotted against other known gas producing shale reservoirs, and were used to "fingerprint" the reservoir, allowing Mainland Resources to draw direct comparisons with regards to shale gas potential.

It is believed that the laboratory measurement of gas filled porosity supports the multiple mud log gas shows within the Burkley-Phillips well observed while drilling the well.

The Company is currently working with Mainland Resources to best design a completion program for the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well. The well was successfully drilled on the Westrock leases through the target shale gas zone, with plans to complete this well in 2011. Completion of the well during 2011 will satisfy all requirements related to the Westrock agreement.

Furthermore, Mainland Resources has engaged a leading reservoir completions expert to design and supervise the fracture treatment ("frac") of the Burkley Phillips No. 1 well.

Avere Energy Letter of Intent

Effective on April 20, 2010, we received notice from Avere Energy, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Avere Energy”) that Avere is terminating that certain letter of intent (the “Letter of Intent”), which was previously entered into between us and Avere Energy on January 15, 2010, and as amended on March 1, 2010, regarding the Mississippi project area as described below.

As discussed above, effective September 17, 2009, our Board of Directors authorized the execution of the Letter Agreement with Mainland Resources to jointly develop contiguous acreage located in Mississippi. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement: (i) we had agreed to commit approximately 5,000 net acres and Mainland Resources had agreed to commit approximately 8,225 net acres to the project area; (ii) Mainland Resources would have been the operator of the Mississippi Project in accordance with a joint operating agreement (the “Mainland-Guggenheim-American Joint Operating Agreement, which was signed on October 12, 2009”); (iii) Mainland Resources had agreed to pay 80% of the initial well drilling and completion costs to earn a 51% working interest in the well and the total pooled mineral leases; and (iv) we had agreed to pay 20% of the initial well drilling and completion costs to earn a 49% working interest in the well and the total pooled mineral leases.

On January 15, 2010, as amended on March 1, 2010, we entered into the Letter of Intent with Avere Energy.  Simultaneously with execution of the Letter of Intent, Avere Energy paid to us a $75,000 non-refundable deposit, which was used by us in our sole discretion. The execution of a definitive farm-in agreement and closing of the transactions contemplated in the Letter of Intent were anticipated to close on March 28, 2010, which closing was subject to the following conditions: (i) execution of a definitive farm-in agreement; (ii) completion of a financing by Avere Energy to raise sufficient funds as described above for the farm-in; and (iii) receipt of the approval of the shareholders of Avere Energy and of the TSX Venture Exchange to the farm-in.

Avere Energy was unable to raise the required funds and obtain the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange to the definitive farm-in agreement. Therefore, in accordance with the notice of termination from Avere Energy to us, we will not be entering into a definitive farm-in agreement with Avere Energy. A negotiated break fee of $75,000 was paid to us by Avere on June 9, 2010.

11

DRILLING ACTIVITY

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have drilled one well on our Jefferson County, Mississippi acreage, which is unevaluated and subject to completion as of December 31, 2010 and the date of this filing.

GROSS WELLS			NET WELLS
Total	Producing	Dry	Total	Producing	Dry
1	-0-	-0-	0.2	-0-	-0-

PRODUCTION INFORMATION

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and previous, we had no oil and gas production.

GROSS AND NET PRODUCTIVE GAS WELLS, DEVELOPED ACREAGE

PRODUCTIVE WELLS AND DEVELOPED ACRES

As of the date of this Annual Report, the tables below set forth our leasehold interest in productive and shut-in gas wells, and in developed acres:

PROSPECT	GROSS (1)		NET (2)
Buena Vista		0		0
Total		0		0

(1) A gross well is a well in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned.

(2) A net well is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interest in gross wells equals one. The number of net wells is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have drilled one well on our Jefferson County, Mississippi acreage, which is unevaluated and subject to completion as of December 31, 2010 and the date of this filing.

12

DEVELOPED ACREAGE TABLE (1)

PROSPECT	GROSS (1)		NET (2)
Haynesville		0		0
Buena Vista		0		0
Total		0		0

(1) Consists of acres spaced or assignable to productive wells.

(2) A gross acre is an acre in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross acres is the total number of acres in which a working interest is owned.

(3) A net acre is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross acres equals one. The number of net acres is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.

COMPETITION

We operate in a highly competitive industry, competing with major oil and gas companies, independent producers and institutional and individual investors, which are actively seeking oil and gas properties throughout the world together with the equipment, labor and materials required to operate properties. Most of our competitors have financial resources, staffs and facilities substantially greater than ours. The principal area of competition is encountered in the financial ability to acquire good acreage positions and drill wells to explore for oil and gas, then, if warranted, drill production wells and install production equipment. Competition for the acquisition of oil and gas wells is intense, with many oil and gas properties and/or leases or concessions available in a competitive bidding process in which we may lack the financial resources or technological information or expertise available to other bidders. Therefore, we may not be successful in acquiring and developing profitable properties in the face of this competition. No assurance can be given that a sufficient number of suitable oil and gas wells will be available for acquisition and development.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The production and sale of oil and gas are subject to various federal, state and local governmental regulations, which may be changed from time to time in response to economic or political conditions and can have a significant impact upon overall operations. Matters subject to regulation include discharge permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds, reports concerning operations, the spacing of wells, unitization and pooling of properties, taxation, abandonment and restoration and environmental protection. These laws and regulations are under constant review for amendment or expansion. From time to time, regulatory agencies have imposed price controls and limitations on production by restricting the rate of flow of oil and gas wells below actual production capacity in order to conserve supplies of oil and gas. Changes in these regulations could require us to expend significant resources to comply with new laws or regulations or changes to current requirements and could have a material adverse effect on our future business operations.

13

Regulation of Oil and Natural Gas Production

Our future oil and natural gas exploration, production and related operations will be subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local authorities and agencies. Failure to comply with such rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. The regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases our cost of doing business and affects our profitability. Although we believe we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, because such rules and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such laws.

Many states require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations and impose other requirements relating to the exploration and production of oil and natural gas. Such states also have statutes or regulations addressing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from wells, and the regulation of spacing, plugging and abandonment of such wells.

Federal Regulation of Natural Gas

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") regulates interstate natural gas transportation rates and service conditions, which affect the marketing of natural gas produced by us, as well as the revenues received by us for sales of such production. Since the mid-1980's, FERC has issued a series of orders that have significantly altered the marketing and transportation of natural gas. These orders mandated a fundamental restructuring of interstate pipeline sales and transportation service, including the unbundling by interstate pipelines of the sale, transportation, storage and other components of the city-gate sales services such pipelines previously performed. One of FERC's purposes in issuing the orders was to increase competition within all phases of the natural gas industry. Certain aspects of these orders may be modified as a result of various appeals and related proceedings and it is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of the orders on us and others. Generally, the orders eliminated or substantially reduced the interstate pipelines' traditional role as wholesalers of natural gas in favor of providing only storage and transportation service, and have substantially increased competition and volatility in natural gas markets.

The price, which we may receive for the sale of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, would be affected by the cost of transporting products to markets. FERC has implemented regulations establishing an indexing system for transportation rates for oil pipelines, which, generally, would index such rates to inflation, subject to certain conditions and limitations. We are not able to predict with certainty the effect, if any, of these regulations on any future operations. However, the regulations may increase transportation costs or reduce wellhead prices for oil and natural gas liquids.

Environmental Matters

Our operations and properties will be subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation  and discharge of materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation generally is toward stricter standards, and this trend will likely continue. These laws and regulations may (i) require the acquisition of a permit or other authorization before construction or drilling commences and for certain other activities; (ii) limit or prohibit construction, drilling and other activities on certain lands lying within wilderness and other protected areas; and (iii) impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations. The permits required for several of our operations are subject to revocation, modification and renewal by issuing authorities. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce their regulations, and violations are subject to fines or injunctions, or both. In the opinion of management, we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental law and regulations, and we have no material commitments for capital expenditures to comply with existing environmental requirements. Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or in interpretations thereof could have a significant impact on our business operations, as well as the oil and natural gas industry in general.

14

The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA ") and comparable state statutes impose strict, joint and several liability on owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of "hazardous substances" found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of "solid waste" and "hazardous waste" and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance. Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of "hazardous substance," state laws affecting our operations impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil field wastes as "non-hazardous," such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes, thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent handling and disposal requirements.

We intend to acquire leasehold interests in properties that for many years have produced oil and natural gas. Although the previous owners of these interests may have used operating and disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time, hydrocarbons or other wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties. In addition, some of our properties may be operated in the future by third parties over which we have no control. Notwithstanding our lack of control over properties operated by others, the failure of the operator to comply with applicable environmental regulations may, in certain circumstances, adversely impact our business operations.

The National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") is applicable to many of our planned activities and operations. NEPA is a broad procedural statute intended to ensure that federal agencies consider the environmental impact of their actions by requiring such agencies to prepare environmental impact statements ("EIS") in connection with all federal activities that significantly affect the environment. Although NEPA is a procedural statute only applicable to the federal government, a portion of our properties may be acreage located on federal land. The Bureau of Land Management's issuance of drilling permits and the Secretary of the Interior's approval of plans of operation and lease agreements all constitute federal action within the scope of NEPA. Consequently, unless the responsible agency determines that our drilling activities will not materially impact the environment, the responsible agency will be required to prepare an EIS in conjunction with the issuance of any permit or approval.

The Endangered Species Act ("ESA") seeks to ensure that activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animals, fish and plant species, nor destroy or modify the critical habitat of such species. Under ESA, exploration and production operation, as well as actions by federal agencies, may not significantly impair or jeopardize the species or their habitat. ESA provides for criminal penalties for willful violations of the Act. Other statutes that provide protection to animal and plant species and that may apply to our operations include, but are not necessarily limited to, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the National Historic Preservation Act. Although we believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with such statutes, any change in these statutes or any reclassification of a species as endangered could subject us to significant expense to modify our operations or could force us to discontinue certain operations altogether.

Management believes that we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

No research and development expenditures have been incurred, either on our account or sponsored by customers, from the date of our inception.

EMPLOYEES

We do not employ any persons on a full-time or on a part-time basis. We have two contract employees, Steve Harding is our President/Chief Executive Officer and Brian Manko is our Chief Financial Officer/Corporate Secretary. These individuals are primarily responsible for all of our day-to-day operations. Other services are provided by outsourcing and consultant and special purpose contracts.

15

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a number of very significant risks. You should carefully consider the following risks and uncertainties in addition to other information in evaluating us and our business before purchasing shares of our common stock. Our business, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed due to any of the following risks. The risks described below are all of the material risks that we are currently aware of that we are facing. Additional risks not presently known to us may also impair our business operations. You could lose all or part of your investment due to any of these risks.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

WE WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO COMPLETE FURTHER EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES.

In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we will require significant additional financing in order to commence and continue our developmental activities and our production activities and our assessment of our acquired lease and the commercial viability of certain of our oil and gas properties. Furthermore, if the cost of our planned exploration, development and production programs are greater than anticipated, we may have to seek additional funds through public or private share offerings or arrangements with corporate partners. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to raise these required funds, or on terms satisfactory to us. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, the continued exploration and development and production of our oil and gas properties and the development of our business will depend upon our ability to establish the commercial viability of our oil and gas properties and to ultimately develop cash flow from operations and reach profitable operations. We currently are in the exploration stage. We are experiencing significant negative cash flow. Accordingly, the sources of funds presently available to us are through the sale of equity. We presently believe that debt financing will not be an alternative to us as certain of our properties are in the exploration stage. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we may finance our business by offering an interest in our oil and gas properties to be earned by another party or parties carrying out further exploration and development thereof or to obtain project or operating financing from financial institutions, neither of which is presently intended. If we are unable to obtain this additional financing, we will not be able to continue our exploration activities and our assessment of the commercial viability of our oil and gas property. Further, if we are able to establish that development of our oil and gas property is commercially viable, our inability to raise additional financing at this stage would result in our inability to place our oil and gas properties into production and recover our investment and potentially dilute our interest in the property with the drilling of future wells.

As our oil and gas property does not contain any proved reserves, we may not discover commercially exploitable quantities of oil or gas on our property that would enable us to enter into commercial production, achieve revenues and recover the money we spend on exploration.

Our property does not contain proved reserves in accordance with the definitions adopted by the SEC and there is no assurance that any exploration programs that we carry out will establish reserves. Our oil and gas property is in the exploration stage as opposed to the development stage and has no known body of reserves. Any reserves at these projects have not yet been determined to be economic, and may never be determined to be economic. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we plan to conduct further exploration activities on our oil and gas property, which future exploration may include the completion of feasibility studies necessary to evaluate whether commercial reserves exist on any of our oil and gas leases. There is a substantial risk that these exploration activities will not result in discoveries of commercially recoverable reserves of oil or gas. Any determination that our property contains commercially recoverable quantities of oil or gas may not be reached until such time that final comprehensive feasibility studies have been concluded that establish that a potential reserve is likely to be economic. There is a substantial risk that any preliminary or final feasibility studies carried out by us will not result in a positive determination that our oil and gas property can be commercially developed.

16

Our Exploration Activities on Our Oil and Gas Property and Potential Lease Acquisitions May Not Be Commercially Successful, Which Could Lead Us to Abandon Our Plans to Develop the Property and Our Investments in Exploration.

In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, our long-term success depends on our ability to establish commercially recoverable quantities of oil and natural gas on the property that constitutes the Westrock Leases and the property under the Joint Development Project that can then be developed into commercially viable operations. Oil and gas exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently non-productive. These risks include unusual or unexpected geologic formations, and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor. The success of oil and gas exploration is determined in part by the following factors:

·identification of potential oil and natural gas reserves based on technical analyses;

·availability of government-granted exploration permits;

·the quality of management and geological and technical expertise; and

·the capital available for exploration.

Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop processes to extract oil and gas, and to develop the drilling and processing facilities and infrastructure at any chosen site. Whether an oil and gas reserve will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, which include, without limitation, the particular attributes of the reserve; oil and natural gas prices, which fluctuate widely; and government regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of oil and gas and environmental protection. We may invest significant capital and resources in exploration activities and abandon such investments if we are unable to identify commercially exploitable reserves. The decision to abandon a project may reduce the trading price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise future financing. We cannot provide any assurance to investors that we will discover or acquire any oil or gas reserves in sufficient quantities on our property to justify commercial operations. Further, we will not be able to recover the funds that we spend on exploration if we are not able to establish commercially recoverable reserves of oil or natural gas on our property.

Our Business is Difficult to Evaluate Because We Have a Limited Operating History.

In considering whether to invest in our common stock, you should consider that there is only limited historical financial and operating information available on which to base your evaluation of our performance and the potential consummation of the Merger Agreement. Our inception was May 11, 2006 and, as a result, we have a limited operating history and are still in the exploration stage.

17

We Have a History of Operating Losses and There Can Be No Assurance We Will Be Profitable in the Future.

We have a history of operating losses, expect to continue to incur losses, and may never be profitable, and we must be considered to be in the exploration stage. Further, we have been dependent on sales of our equity securities and debt financing to meet our cash requirements. We have incurred losses from operations totaling $2,703,267 from May 11, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, we had an accumulated deficit of $2,608,146 and had incurred losses of $536,685 during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Further, we do not expect positive cash flow from operations in the near term. There is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. In particular, additional capital may be required in the event that: (i) the costs to acquire additional leases are more than we currently anticipate; (ii) drilling and completion costs for additional wells increase beyond our expectations; or (iii) we encounter greater costs associated with general and administrative expenses or offering costs.

Our development of and participation in what could evolve into an increasing number of oil and gas prospects may require substantial capital expenditures. The uncertainty and factors described throughout this section may impede our ability to economically find, develop, produce, and acquire natural gas and oil reserves. As a result, we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability or positive cash flows from operating activities in the future.

We Have Received a Going Concern Opinion In the Report of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Accompanying Our December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 Financial Statements.

The independent registered public accounting firm’s report accompanying our December 31, 2010 and 2009 audited financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared "assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern." Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on raising additional capital to fund our operations and ultimately on generating future profitable operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient additional capital or eventually have positive cash flow from operations to address all of our cash flow needs. If we are not able to find alternative sources of cash or generate positive cash flow from operations, our business and shareholders will be materially and adversely affected

We Will Require Additional Funding in the Future.

Based upon our historical losses from operations and in the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we will require additional funding in the future. If we cannot obtain capital through financings or otherwise, our ability to execute our exploration plans and achieve production levels will be greatly limited. Our current exploration plans require us to make capital expenditures for the drilling and completion of our oil and natural gas property. Historically, we have funded our operations through the issuance of equity. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all. Our future cash flows and the availability of financing will be subject to a number of variables, including potential production and the market prices of oil and natural gas. Further, debt financing, if utilized, could lead to a diversion of cash flow to satisfy debt-servicing obligations and create restrictions on business operations. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated and we are unable to raise additional funds, it would have a material adverse effect upon our operations.

18

In the Event the Merger Agreement is Not Consummated, as Part of Our Potential Growth Strategy, We May Acquire Additional Oil and Gas Properties.

In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated and as part of our growth strategy, we may acquire additional oil and gas production properties. Current and subsequent acquisitions may pose substantial risks to our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In pursuing potential acquisitions, we will compete with other companies, many of which have greater financial and other resources to acquire attractive properties. Even if we are successful in acquiring additional properties, some of the properties may not produce revenues at  anticipated levels, or failure to conduct drilling on prospects within specified time periods may cause the forfeiture of the lease in that prospect. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate acquired properties, which could result in substantial costs and delays or other operational, technical, or financial problems. Further, acquisitions could disrupt ongoing business operations. If any of these events occur, it would have a material adverse effect upon our operations and results from operations.

We Are a New Entrant Into the Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Industry Without Profitable Operating History.

Since inception, our activities have been limited to organizational efforts, obtaining working capital, acquiring the Westrock Lease and consummating the Joint Development Project. As a result, there is limited information regarding property related production potential or revenue generation potential. Further, our Westrock Lease has no probable, proved or developed producing reserves.

The business of oil and gas exploration and production is subject to many risks and if oil and natural gas is found in economic production quantities, the potential profitability of future possible oil and gas ventures depends upon factors beyond our control. The potential profitability of oil and natural gas properties, if economic quantities are found, is dependent upon many factors and risks beyond our control, including, but not limited to: (i) unanticipated ground conditions; (ii) geological problems; (iii) drilling and other processing problems; (iv) the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions and other force majeure events; (v) lower than expected reserve quantities; (vi) accidents; (vii) delays in the receipt of or failure to receive necessary government permits; (viii) delays in transportation; (ix) labor disputes; (x) government permit restrictions and regulation restrictions; (xi) unavailability of materials and equipment; and (xii) the failure of equipment or drilling to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations.

In the Event the Merger Agreement is Not Consummated, Our Potential Drilling Operations May Not Be Successful.

In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we intend to technically evaluate certain zones on our property and if results are positive and capital is available, to drill wells and begin production operations. There can be no assurance that our current well activities or future drilling activities will be successful, and we cannot be sure that our overall drilling success rate or our production operations within a particular area will ever come to fruition, and if it does, will not decline over time. We may not recover all or any portion of our capital investment in the wells or the underlying leaseholds. Unsuccessful drilling activities would have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations and financial condition. The cost of drilling, completing, and operating wells is often uncertain, and a number of factors can delay or prevent drilling operations including: (i) unexpected drilling conditions; (ii) pressure or irregularities in geological formations; (iii) equipment failures or accidents; (iv) adverse weather conditions; and (iv) shortages or delays in availability of drilling rigs and delivery of equipment.

In the Event the Merger Agreement is Not Consummated, Our Future Production Initiatives May Not Prove Successful.

There is no guarantee that our current acquisition activities or potential drilling locations we have or acquire in the future will ever produce natural gas or oil, which could have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations.

19

In the Event the Merger Agreement is Not Consummated, Prospects That We Decide to Drill May Not Yield Natural Gas or Oil in Commercially Viable Quantities.

We describe our current prospects in this Annual Report. Our prospects are in various stages of preliminary evaluation and assessment and we have not reached the point where we have committed to drill on the prospects. However, the use of seismic data, historical drilling logs, offsetting well information, and other technologies and the study of producing fields in the same area will not enable us to know conclusively prior to drilling and testing whether natural gas or oil will be present in sufficient quantities or quality to recover drilling or completion costs or to be economically viable. In sum, the cost of drilling, completing and operating any wells is often uncertain and new wells may not be productive.

We May Be Unable to Identify Liabilities Associated With the Properties or Obtain Protection From Sellers Against Them.

In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, one of our growth strategies is to capitalize on opportunistic acquisitions of oil and natural gas reserves. However, our reviews of future acquired properties will be inherently incomplete because it generally is not feasible to review in depth every individual property involved in each acquisition. A detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit a buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and potential. Further, environmental problems, such as ground water contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken. We may not be able to obtain indemnification or other protections from the sellers against such potential liabilities, which would have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations.

The Potential Profitability of Oil and Gas Ventures Depends Upon Global Political and Market Related Factors Beyond Our Control.

World prices and markets for oil and gas are unpredictable, highly volatile, potentially subject to governmental fixing, pegging, controls, or any combination of these and other factors, and respond to changes in domestic, international, political, social, and economic environments. Additionally, due to worldwide economic uncertainty, the availability and cost of funds for production and other expenses have become increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to project. These and other changes and events may materially affect our financial performance. The potential profitability of oil and gas properties is dependent on these and other factors beyond our control.

Production of Oil and Gas Resources if Found Are Dependent on Numerous Operational Uncertainties Specific to the Area of the Resource That Affects its Profitability.

Production area specifics affect profitability. Adverse weather conditions can hinder drilling operations and ongoing production work. A productive well may become uneconomic in the event water or other deleterious substances are encountered which impair or prevent the production of oil and/or gas from the well. Production and treatments on other wells in the area can have either a positive or negative effect on our production and wells. In addition, production from any well may be unmarketable if it is impregnated with water or other deleterious substances. The marketability of oil and gas from any specific reserve which may be acquired or discovered will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines, availability of capacity in the pipelines to accommodate additional production, processing and production equipment operating costs and equipment efficiency, market fluctuations of prices and oil and gas marketing relationships, local and state taxes, mineral owner and other royalties, land tenure, lease bonus costs and lease damage costs, allowable production, and environmental protection. These factors cannot be accurately predicted and the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on our invested capital.

20

If Production Results From Operations, We are Dependent Upon Transportation and Storage Services Provided by Third Parties.

We will be dependent on the transportation and storage services offered by various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies for the delivery and sale of our gas supplies. Both the performance of transportation and storage services by interstate pipelines and the rates charged for such services are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or state regulatory agencies. An inability to obtain transportation and/or storage services at competitive rates could hinder our processing and marketing operations and/or affect our sales margins.

Our Results of Operations are Dependent Upon Market Prices for Oil and Gas, Which Fluctuate Widely and are Beyond Our Control.

If and when production from oil and gas properties is reached, our revenue, profitability, and cash flow depend upon the prices and demand for oil and natural gas. The markets for these commodities are very volatile and even relatively modest drops in prices can significantly affect our financial results and impede our growth. Prices received also will affect the amount of future cash flow available for capital expenditures and may affect our ability to raise additional capital. Lower prices may also affect the amount of natural gas and oil that can be economically produced from reserves either discovered or acquired. Factors that can cause price fluctuations include: (i) the level of consumer product demand; (ii) domestic and foreign governmental regulations; (iii) the price and availability of alternative fuels; (iv) technical advances affecting energy consumption; (v) proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and other transportation facilities; (vi) political conditions in natural gas and oil producing regions; (vii) the domestic and foreign supply of natural gas and oil; (viii) the ability of members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls; (ix) the price of foreign imports; and (x) overall domestic and global economic conditions.

The availability of a ready market for our oil and gas depends upon numerous factors beyond our control, including the extent of domestic production and importation of oil and gas, the relative status of the domestic and international economies, the proximity of our properties to gas gathering systems, the capacity of those systems, the marketing of other competitive fuels, fluctuations in seasonal demand and governmental regulation of production, refining, transportation and pricing of oil, natural gas and other fuels.

The Oil and Gas Industry in Which We Operate Involves Many Industry Related Operating and Implementation Risks That Can Cause Substantial Losses Including, But not Limited to, Unproductive Wells, Natural Disasters, Facility and Equipment Problems and Environmental Hazards.

Our future drilling activities will be subject to many risks, including the risk that we will not discover commercially productive reservoirs. Drilling for oil and natural gas can be unprofitable, not only from dry holes, but from productive wells that do not produce sufficient revenues to return a profit. In addition, our drilling and producing operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of other drilling and production, weather and natural disaster, equipment and service failure, environmental and regulatory, and site specific related factors, including but not limited to: (i) fires; (ii) explosions; (iii) blow-outs and surface cratering; (iv) uncontrollable flows of underground natural gas, oil, or formation water; (v) natural disasters; (vi) facility and equipment failures; (vii) title problems; (viii) shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services; (ix) abnormal pressure formations; and (x) environmental hazards such as natural gas leaks, oil spills, pipeline ruptures and discharges of toxic gases.

If any of these events occur, we could incur substantial losses as a result of: (i) injury or loss of life; (ii) severe damage to and destruction of property, natural resources or equipment; (iii) pollution and other environmental damage; (iv) clean-up responsibilities; (v) regulatory investigation and penalties; (vi) suspension of our operations; or (vii) repairs necessary to resume operations.

If we were to experience any of these problems, it could affect well bores, gathering systems and processing facilities, any one of which could adversely affect our ability to conduct operations. We may be affected by any of these events more than larger companies, since we have limited working capital.

21

The Oil and Gas Industry is Highly Competitive and There is No Assurance That We Will Be Successful in Acquiring Leases.

The oil and natural gas industry is intensely competitive, and we compete with other companies that have greater resources. Many of these companies not only explore for and produce oil and natural gas, but also carry on refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. These companies may be able to pay more for productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects or define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit. In addition, these companies may have a greater ability to continue exploration activities during periods of low oil and natural gas market prices. Our larger competitors may be able to absorb the burden of present and future federal, state, local and other laws and regulations more easily than we can, which would adversely affect our competitive position. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the future will be dependent upon our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. In addition, because we have fewer financial and human resources than many companies in our industry, we may be at a disadvantage in bidding for exploratory prospects and producing oil and natural gas properties.

The Marketability of Natural Resources Will be Affected by Numerous Factors Beyond Our Control, Which May Result in Us not Receiving an Adequate Return on Invested Capital to be Profitable or Viable.

The marketability of natural resources which may be acquired or discovered by us will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include market fluctuations in oil and gas pricing and demand, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, governmental regulations, land tenure, land use, regulation concerning the importing and exporting of oil and gas and environmental protection regulations. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

Oil and Gas Operations are Subject to Comprehensive Regulation Which May Cause Substantial Delays or Require Capital Outlays in Excess of Those Anticipated, Causing an Adverse Effect on Our Business Operations.

Oil and gas operations are subject to federal, state, and local laws relating to the protection of the environment, including laws regulating removal of natural resources from the ground and the discharge of materials into the environment. Oil and gas operations are also subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of drilling methods and equipment. Various permits from government bodies are required for drilling operations to be conducted; no assurance can be given that such permits will be received. Environmental standards imposed by federal, state, or local authorities may be changed and any such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us. Additionally, we may be subject to liability for pollution or other environmental damages which we may elect not to insure against due to prohibitive premium costs and other reasons. To date we have not been required to spend material amounts on compliance with environmental regulations. However, we may be required to do so in future and this may affect our ability to expand or maintain our operations.

In general, our future exploration and production activities will be subject to certain federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental quality and pollution control. Such laws and regulations increase the costs of these activities and may prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of a given operation. Compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a material effect on our operations or financial condition to date. Specifically, we are subject to legislation regarding emissions into the environment, water discharges and storage and disposition of hazardous wastes. In addition, legislation has been enacted which requires well and facility sites to be abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of state authorities. However, such laws and regulations are frequently changed and we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance. Generally, environmental requirements do not appear to affect us any differently or to any greater or lesser extent than other companies in the industry.

22

We believe that our operations comply, in all material respects, with all applicable environmental regulations. We need insurance to protect us against risks associated with the leases obtained. The leases allow for entry onto the properties for the purposes of oil and gas exploration. The insurance we require relates solely to developments on the properties for the purposes of oil and gas exploration.

Any Change to Government Regulation/Administrative Practices May Have a Negative Impact on Our Ability to Operate and Our Profitability.

The laws, regulations, policies or current administrative practices of any government body, organization or regulatory agency in the United States or any other jurisdiction, may be changed, applied or interpreted in a manner which will fundamentally alter our ability to carry on business. The actions, policies or regulations, or changes thereto, of any government body or regulatory agency, or other special interest groups, may have a detrimental effect on us. Any or all of these situations may have a negative impact on our ability to operate and/or our profitability.

We May be Unable to Retain Key Employees or Consultants or Recruit Additional Qualified Personnel.

Our extremely limited personnel means that we would be required to spend significant sums of money to locate and train new employees in the event any of our employees resign or terminate their employment with us for any reason. Due to our limited operating history and financial resources, we are entirely dependent on the continued service of Steve Harding, our Chief Executive Officer, and Brian Manko, our Chief Financial Officer. Further, we do not have key man life insurance on either of these individuals. We may not have the financial resources to hire a replacement if one or both of our officers were to die. The loss of service of either of these employees could therefore significantly and adversely affect our operations.

Our Officers and Directors May be Subject to Conflicts of Interest.

Some of our officers and directors serve only part time and can become subject to conflicts of interest. Some devote part of their working time to other business endeavors, including consulting relationships with other entities, and have responsibilities to these other entities. Such conflicts include deciding how much time to devote to our affairs, as well as what business opportunities should be presented to us. Because of these relationships, our officers and directors could be subject to conflicts of interest. Currently, we have no policy in place to address such conflicts of interest.

Nevada Law and Our Articles of Incorporation May Protect our Directors From Certain Types of Lawsuits.

Nevada law provides that our officers and directors will not be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for all but certain types of conduct as officers and directors. Our Bylaws permit us broad indemnification powers to all persons against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law. The exculpation provisions may have the effect of preventing stockholders from recovering damages against our officers and directors caused by their negligence, poor judgment or other circumstances. The indemnification provisions may require us to use our limited assets to defend our officers and directors against claims, including claims arising out of their negligence, poor judgment, or other circumstances.

23

A Majority of Our Directors and Officers Are Nationals and/or Residents of Canada.

Currently, the majority of our directors and officers reside in Canada. Therefore, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or any of our directors or officers. All or a substantial portion of such persons' assets may be located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process on our directors or officers, or enforce within the United States or Canada any judgments obtained against us or our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. Consequently, you may be effectively prevented from pursuing remedies under U.S. federal securities laws against them. In addition, investors may not be able to commence an action in a Canadian court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States. We have been advised by our Canadian counsel that there is doubt as to the enforceability, in original actions in Canadian courts, of liability based upon the U.S. federal securities laws and as to the enforceability in Canadian courts of judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Therefore, it may not be possible to enforce those actions against us or any of our directors or officers.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Sales of a Substantial Number of Shares of Our Common Stock Into the Public Market by Certain Stockholders May Result in Significant Downward Pressure on the Price of Our Common Stock and Could Affect Your Ability to Realize the Current Trading Price of Our Common Stock.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market by certain stockholders could cause a reduction in the market price of our common stock.  As of the date of this Annual Report, we have 60,273,333 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock, certain stockholders are able to resell up to 41,475,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the Registration Statement declared effective on March 17, 2007. As a result of the Registration Statement, 44,437,500 shares of our common stock were issued and are available for immediate resale which could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

As of the date of this Annual Report, there are 60,273,333 outstanding shares of our common stock that are restricted securities as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Although the Securities Act and Rule 144 place certain prohibitions on the sale of restricted securities, restricted securities may be sold into the public market under certain conditions. Further, as of the date of this Annual Report, there are an aggregate of 100,000 whole warrants outstanding and an aggregate of 2,700,000 stock options outstanding. See “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”

Any significant downward pressure on the price of our common stock as the selling stockholders sell their shares of our common stock could encourage short sales by the selling stockholders or others. Any such short sales could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock.

The Trading Price of Our Common Stock on the OTC Bulletin Board Will Fluctuate Significantly and Stockholders May Have Difficulty Reselling Their Shares.

As of the date of this Annual Report, our common stock trades on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. There is a volatility associated with Bulletin Board securities in general and the value of your investment could decline due to the impact of any of the following factors upon the market price of our common stock: (i) disappointing results from our exploration or development efforts; (ii) failure to meet our revenue or profit goals or operating budget; (iii) decline in demand for our common stock; (iv) downward revisions in securities analysts' estimates or changes in general market conditions; (v) technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies; (vi) lack of funding generated for operations; (vii) investor perception of our industry or our prospects; (viii) general economic trends; and ix) Commodity price fluctuation

In addition, stock markets have experienced price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of securities have been highly volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating performance and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As a result, investors may be unable to sell their shares at a fair price and you may lose all or part of your investment.

24

Additional Issuance of Equity Securities May Result in Dilution to Our Existing Stockholders.

Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, authorize the issuance of 2,100,000,000 shares of common stock. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue additional shares of our capital stock to provide additional financing in the future and the issuance of any such shares may result in a reduction of the book value or market price of the then outstanding shares of our common stock. If we do issue any such additional shares, such issuance also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. As a result of such dilution, your proportionate ownership interest and voting power will be decreased accordingly. Further, any such issuance could result in a change of control.

Our Common Stock is Classified as a “Penny Stock” Under SEC Rules Which Limits the Market for Our Common Stock.

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks." Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system). Penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which specifies information about penny stocks and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. A broker-dealer must also provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer, and sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for stock that becomes subject to those penny stock rules. If a trading market for our common stock develops, our common stock will probably become subject to the penny stock rules, and shareholders may have difficulty in selling their shares.

A Majority of Our Directors and Officers are Outside the United States With the Result That it May Be Difficult for Investors to Enforce Within the United States Any Judgments Obtained Against Us or Any of Our Directors or Officers.

A majority of our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of such persons' assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process on our directors or officers, or enforce within the United States or Canada any judgments obtained against us or our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. Consequently, you may be effectively prevented from pursuing remedies under U.S. federal securities laws against them. In addition, investors may not be able to commence an action in a Canadian court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States.

RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT

The Exchange Ratio in the Merger Agreement is Generally Fixed. Because the Market Price of Shares of Mainland Resources Common Stock May Fluctuate, Our Shareholders Cannot be Sure of the Market Value of the Shares of Mainland Resources Common Stock That Will be Issued in Connection with the Merger.

It is presently contemplated that our shareholders will receive one share of common stock of Mainland Resources for every four shares of our common stock they hold of record. Currently, there are 60,273,333 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding with the result that approximately 15,068,333 shares of Mainland Resources’ common stock are anticipated to be issued to our shareholders upon completion of the merger. The specific share exchange ratio will be negotiated following the completion of “fairness opinions” conducted by independent financial advisors and technical due diligence by both Mainland and American. Based on the closing market price of Mainland Resources’ common stock of $1.25 per share as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board on March 18, 2010, the total share consideration to be issued to our shareholders will be worth approximately $18,741,666 and our shareholders will hold approximately twenty percent (20%) of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Mainland Resources as the surviving corporation.

25

The ratio (the “Exchange Ratio”) which determines the number of shares of Mainland Resources common stock that are to be issued on completion of the merger for all of our shares of common stock is subject to reduction by the shares of our common stock held by those stockholders, if any, who elect to exercise dissent rights under Nevada law.  The Exchange Ratio also may be adjusted by good faith negotiation between the parties, if required, having regard to: (i) the results of the due diligence investigation of a party’s business and affairs by the other party; (ii) the Fairness Opinions.

The Merger Agreement also contemplates that: (i) all of our outstanding stock options (the “Stock Options”) will be disposed of by the holders thereof in consideration for the issue by Mainland Resources of non-transferable stock options (the “Mainland Exchange Options”); and (b) all of our outstanding common stock purchase warrants (the “Warrants”) will be disposed of by the holders thereof in consideration for the issue by Mainland Resources of non-transferable common stock purchase warrants (the “Mainland Exchange Warrants”). The number of Mainland Exchange Options and Mainland Exchange Warrants issuable, and the respective exercise prices thereof, will be determined with reference to the Exchange Ratio. Currently, the Exchange Ratio is anticipated to be one Mainland Exchange Option or one Mainland Exchange Warrant for every four of our Stock Options or every four of our Warrants, as the case may be, and the exercise price of each Mainland Exchange Option or each Mainland Exchange Warrant is anticipated to be determined by multiplying the per share exercise price of the corresponding American Exploration Options or American Exploration Warrants by four.

The Merger Agreement initially provided that not more than 15,000,000 shares of Mainland Resources common stock shall be issued in exchange for our shares of common stock pursuant to the merger (exclusive of any shares of Mainland Resources’ common stock issued in exchange for shares of our common stock which are issued upon exercise prior to closing of any of our outstanding Options or Warrants). With approval from Mainland, a small Private Placement was completed by the Company in 2010, that increased total shares outstanding to 60,273,333. This financing resulted in the required Mainland share issuance to exceed the 15,000,000 by 68,333 shares.

The Price of Mainland Resources’ Common Stock After Consummation of the Merger May be Volatile and Subject to Wide Fluctuations.

The trading price of Mainland Resources’ common stock has historically fluctuated significantly. The price of Mainland Resources’ common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in the future in response to many events or factors, including those related to the merger, as well as: (i) actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results; (ii)  changes in expectations as to future financial performance or buy/sell recommendations of securities analysts; (iii) its inability to raise additional capital; (iv) actions of Mainland Resources’ current shareholders, including sales of common stock by directors and executive officers of Mainland Resources; and (v) the arrival or departure of key personnel.

General market conditions and domestic or international factors unrelated to the performance by Mainland Resources may also affect the price of Mainland Resources’ common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

No report is required.

ITEM 2. PROPERTY

Our principal office space is located at Suite 2600, 520 5th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3R7. The office space is for corporate identification, mailing, and courier purposes only and is provided to American Exploration at no cost, relating to a previous business relationship between us and our President/Chief Executive Officer. The office and services related thereto may be cancelled at any time.

26

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Management is not aware of any legal proceedings contemplated by any governmental authority or any other party involving us or our properties. As of the date of this Annual Report, no director, officer or affiliate is (i) a party adverse to us in any legal proceeding, or (ii) has an adverse interest to us in any legal proceedings. Management is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or that have been threatened against us or our properties.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY

Shares of our common stock commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “AEXP:OB” in December 2008. The market for our common stock is limited, and can be volatile. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices relating to our common stock on a quarterly basis for the periods indicated as quoted by the NASDAQ OTC:BB stock market. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commissions, and may not reflect actual transactions.

Quarter Ended	High Bid	Low Bid
March 31, 2009	$0.84	$0.35
June 30, 2009	$1.05	$0.35
September 30, 2009	$2.55	$0.65
December 31, 2009	$1.50	$0.35
March 31, 2010	$0.90	$0.25
June 30, 2010	$0.32	$0.05
September 30, 2010	$0.11	$0.05
December 31, 2010	$0.12	$0.05

All amounts have been adjusted for stock splits.

As of March 23, 2011, we had 33 shareholders of record, which does not include shareholders whose shares are held in street or nominee names.

DIVIDEND POLICY

No dividends have ever been declared by the Board of Directors on our common stock. Our losses do not currently indicate the ability to pay any cash dividends, and we do not have the intention of paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

27

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER COMPENSATION PLANS

We have one equity compensation plan, the American Exploration Corporation 2009 Stock Option Plan (the “2009 Plan”). The table set forth below presents information relating to our equity compensation plans as of the date of this Annual Report:

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a)		Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b)		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding column (a))
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders 2009 Stock Option Plan		2,700,000	$	0.80		4,200,000
Equity Compensation   Plans Not Approved by Security Holders Warrants		100,000		0.50		-0-
Total		2,800,000

2009 Stock Option Plan

On September 14, 2009, our Board of Directors authorized and approved the adoption of the 2009 Plan effective September 14, 2009, under which an aggregate of 7,000,000 of our shares may be issued.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we granted an aggregate 2,700,000 Stock Options. Of the 2,700,000 Stock Options, 2,150,000 were granted to our directors, 150,000 were granted to our Chief Financial Officer, and 400,000 were granted to consultants. The 2,150,000 Stock Options granted to our directors, the 150,000 Stock Options granted to our Chief Financial Officer and 350,000 of the Stock Options granted to consultants, vest in increments of one third (883,333 Stock Options) during September 2009, one-third (883,333 Stock Options) during September 2012 and one-third (883,334 Stock Options) during September 2015, at an exercise price of $0.80 per share with a life of ten years commencing on September 14, 2009. The remaining 50,000 Stock Options granted to consultants vested immediately, are exercisable at $0.80 per share for a period of ten years from the date of grant.

We did not grant any Stock Options during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. On March 14, 2011, we granted a further 50,000 Stock Options each to two of our directors for services rendered in their capacity as members of our Board of Directors. These Stock Options are exercisable for a ten year period at $0.13 per share and vested immediately.

The purpose of the 2009 Plan is to enhance our long-term stockholder value by offering opportunities to our directors, officers, employees and eligible consultants to acquire and maintain stock ownership in order to give these persons the opportunity to participate in our growth and success, and to encourage them to remain in our service.

The 2009 Plan is to be administered by our Board of Directors or a committee appointed by and consisting of one or more members of the Board of Directors, which shall determine (i) the persons to be granted Stock Options under the 2009 Plan; (ii) the number of shares subject to each option, the exercise price of each Stock Option; and (iii) whether the Stock Option shall be exercisable at any time during the option period up to ten (10) years or whether the Stock Option shall be exercisable in installments or by vesting only. The 2009 Plan provides authorization to the Board of Directors to grant Stock Options to purchase a total number of shares of Common Stock of the Company, not to exceed 7,000,000 shares as at the date of adoption by the Board of Directors of the 2009 Plan. At the time a Stock Option is granted under the 2009 Plan, the Board of Directors shall fix and determine the exercise price at which shares of our common stock may be acquired.

28

In the event an optionee ceases to be employed by or to provide services to us for reasons other than cause, retirement, disability or death, any Stock Option that is vested and held by such optionee generally may be exercisable within up to ninety (90) calendar days after the effective date that his position ceases, and after such 90-day period any unexercised Stock Option shall expire. In the event an optionee ceases to be employed by or to provide services to us for reasons of retirement, disability or death, any Stock Option that is vested and held by such optionee generally may be exercisable within up to one-year after the effective date that his position ceases, and after such one-year period, any unexercised Stock Option shall expire.

No Stock Options granted under the Stock Option Plan will be transferable by the optionee, and each Stock Option will be exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee subject to the option period up to ten (10) years or the limitations described above. Any Stock Option held by an optionee at the time of his death may be exercised by his estate within one (1) year of his death or such longer period as the Board of Directors may determine.

The exercise price of a Stock Option granted pursuant to the 2009 Plan shall be paid in full to us by delivery of consideration equal to the product of the Stock Option in accordance with the requirements of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Any Stock Option settlement, including payment deferrals or payments deemed made by way of settlement of pre-existing indebtedness, may be subject to such conditions, restrictions and contingencies as may be determined.

 Incentive Stock Options

The 2009 Plan further provides that, subject to the provisions of the Stock Option Plan and prior shareholder approval, the Board of Directors may grant to any key individuals who are our employees eligible to receive options, one or more incentive stock options to purchase the number of shares of common stock allotted by the Board of Directors (the "Incentive Stock Options"). The option price per share of common stock deliverable upon the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option shall be at least 100% of the fair market value of our common shares, and in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an optionee who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock, shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common shares. The option term of each Incentive Stock Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, which shall not commence sooner than from the date of grant and shall terminate no later than ten (10) years from the date of grant of the Incentive Stock Option, subject to possible early termination as described above.

As of the date of this Annual Report, no Stock Options have been exercised.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

As of the date of this Annual Report, there are an aggregate of 100,000 common stock whole purchase warrants issued and outstanding (the “Warrants). During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, an aggregate of 652,916 Warrants were issued to purchase shares of our common stock in a private placement by us with exercise prices ranging from $0.50, $1.00, $1.25, $1.33 and $1.50 respectively, and are exercisable for a period of twelve months from the date of share issuance.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, a further 250,000 Warrants were issued at an exercise price of $0.50.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, an aggregate of 652,916 Warrants expired by their terms. As of the date of this Annual Report, a further 150,000 Warrants expired by their terms. Therefore, as of the date of this Annual Report, an aggregate of 100,000 Warrants remain issued and outstanding.

29

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

As of the date of this Annual Report and during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, to provide capital, we sold stock in private placement offerings, issued stock in exchange for our debts or pursuant to contractual agreements as set forth below.

2010 PRIVATE PLACEMENTS

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we completed two private placement offerings. Effective on February 24, 2010, we completed a certain private placement offering (the “First Private Placement Offering”) with a certain non-United States resident. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the First Private Placement, we issued to certain investors an aggregate of 300,000 units at a per unit price of $0.25 for aggregate proceeds of $75,000. Each Unit was comprised of one share of restricted common stock and one-half non-transferrable Warrant or 150,000 Warrants. Each whole Warrant is exercisable at $0.50 per share for a period of one year.

Effective on April 5, 2010, we completed a certain private placement offering (the “Second Private Placement”) with a certain non-United States resident. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the 2010 Private Placement, we issued to certain investors an aggregate of 200,000 units at a per unit price of $0.25 for aggregate proceeds of $50,000. Each Unit was comprised of one share of restricted common stock and one-half non-transferrable Warrant or 100,000 Warrants. Each whole Warrant is exercisable at $0.50 per share for a period of one year.

The Units under the First Private Placement Offering and the Second Private Placement Offering were sold to non-United States residents in reliance on Regulation S promulgated under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The First Private Placement Offering and the Second Private Placement Offering have not been registered under the Securities Act or under any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold without registration with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements. The investors executed subscription agreements and acknowledged that the securities to be issued have not been registered under the Securities Act, that they understood the economic risk of an investment in the securities, and that they had the opportunity to ask questions of and receive answers from our management concerning any and all matters related to acquisition of the securities.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULT OF OPERATION

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors." Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

30

We are an exploration stage company and have not generated any revenue to date. We have incurred recurring losses to date. Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern and, accordingly, do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and realization of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in operation.

We expect we will require additional capital to meet our long term operating requirements. We expect to raise additional capital through, among other things, the sale of equity or debt securities.

RESULTS OF OPERATION

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009.

Our net loss for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was $536,685 compared to a net loss of $1,896,158 during fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,359,473. During fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we did not generate any revenue.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred operating expenses of $694,619 compared to $1,834,506 incurred during fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,139,887. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the following items: (i) professional fees of $120,072 (2009: $206,202); (ii) investor relations of $7,200 (2009: $504,131); and (iii) stock option expense of $267,772 (2009: $968,511).

Operating expenses also decreased due to general and administrative expenses associated with the decreased scope and scale of our business operations and fees pertaining to investor relations. During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we had engaged Media Plan AG (“Media Plan”) to provide us with investor relations and promotional services in order to enhance our visibility and marketability of our shares in the marketplace.  General and administrative expenses generally include corporate overhead, financial and administrative contracted services, marketing, and consulting costs.

Of the $ 694,619 incurred as operating expenses during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred management fees of $213,000 to our officers and directors. See "Item 11. Executive Compensation”.

Interest expense of $15,866 (2009: $61,652) incurred during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was recorded. We also recorded $173,800 (2009: $-0-) of other income consisting of: (i) a non-refundable deposit of $75,000, as well as a break fee of $75,000, paid to us after Avere Energy cancelled their Farm-In Agreement; and (ii) $23,800 associated with a one-time technical services consulting agreement related to the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well. Therefore, our net loss and loss per share during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was $536,685 or $0.01 per share compared to a net loss and loss per share of $1,896,158 or $0.02 per share during fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 60,177,991 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 76,873,982 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010

As of December 31, 2010, our current assets were $10,733 and our current liabilities were $353,676, which resulted in a working capital deficit of $342,943. As of December 31, 2010, current assets were comprised of $10,733 in cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2010, current liabilities were comprised of: (i) $16,530 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities; (ii) $44,110 in accounts payable– related party; (iii) $50,000 in short-term note payable; (iv) $147,809 in short-term notes payable – related party; and (v) $95,227 in convertible notes – related party.

31

As of December 31, 2010, our total assets were $3,784,758 comprised of: (i) $10,733 in current assets; (ii) $3,024 in website, net of amortization; and (iii) $3,771,001 in oil and gas properties –unevaluated not subject to amortization. The slight decrease in total assets during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily due to the amortization of the website cost.

As of December 31, 2010, our total liabilities were $353,676, comprised entirely of current liabilities. The increase in liabilities during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 from fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily due to the short-term notes payable – related parties and as increase in short-term note payable.

Stockholders’ equity decreased from $3,565,995 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 to $3,431,082 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 due to losses incurred from operations during the period, partially offset by the issuance of shares in certain private placements.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

We have not generated positive cash flows from operating activities. For fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, net cash flows used in operating activities was $233,827 compared to $843,000 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. Net cash flows used in operating activities consisted primarily of a net loss of $536,685 (2009: $1,896,158), which was partially offset by $3,368 (2009: $64,278) in depletion, depreciation and amortization expense and $276,772 (2009: $968,511) in share-based compensation. Net cash flows used in operating activities was further changed by $(15,970) (2009: $14,948) of accounts payable and $38,688 (2009: $5,421) in accounts payable - related parties.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

For fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, net cash flows used in investing activities was $-0- compared to $325,001 during fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which consisted of cash paid for the acquisition of unproved oil and gas properties.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

We have financed our operations primarily from debt or the issuance of equity instruments. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, net cash flows provided from financing activities was $235,000 compared to $1,018,036 for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. Cash flows from financing activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 consisted of $125,000 in proceeds from sale of common stock and warrants, and $110,000 in borrowings on debt. Cash flows from financing activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 consisted of $835,000 in proceeds from sale of common stock and warrants, $87,809 in proceeds from notes payable – related parties and $95,227 in proceeds from issuance of convertible debt- related parties.

We fully anticipate that the Merger Agreement will be consummated and the merger transaction effected. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we expect that working capital requirements would continue to be funded through a combination of our existing funds and further issuances of securities. In such an event, our working capital requirements would be expected to increase in line with the growth of our business.
 

32

PLAN OF OPERATION AND FUNDING

A substantial portion of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was dedicated to financing and identification of a potential drilling partner and merger candidate. Financing partners were sought with the intent of conducting a private placement to raise funds to finalize the mineral lease acquisition in Mississippi and for the participation in the drilling of a well on those lands. As of the date of this Annual Report, management fully anticipates that the Merger Agreement will be consummated and the merger transaction effected. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, possible further advances from related parties and the sale of securities would be required to fund our operations over the next six months. We have no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements. Generally, we have financed operations to date through the proceeds of the private placement of equity and debt instruments. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated and in connection with our future business plan, management anticipates additional increases in operating expenses and capital expenditures relating to: (i) possible drilling initiatives on current Lease and future properties; and (ii) future property acquisitions. We would finance these expenses with further issuances of equity securities and debt issuances. We expect we would need to raise additional capital and generate revenues to meet long-term operating requirements. Additional issuances of equity or convertible debt securities could result in dilution to our current shareholders. Further, such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all.

In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated and if adequate funds were not available or were not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of prospective new business endeavors or opportunities or develop our unevaluated oil and gas assets, which could significantly and materially restrict our business operations.

Private Placements

During fiscal year 2010, we completed private placements under Regulation S for proceeds of $125,000, the proceeds of which were largely directed towards providing working capital during the process of the Merger.

MATERIAL COMMITMENTS

Promissory Notes

A future material commitment during fiscal year 2011 relates to those certain unsecured promissory notes entered into by us as follows (i) May 15, 2009 in the amount of $30,000 with a related party; (ii) May 29, 2009 in the amount of $7,809 with a related party; (iii) June 5, 2009 in the amount of $50,000 with one of our previous directors; and (iv) June 2, 2010 in the amount of $50,000 with an unrelated third party.

Effective on September 27, 2010, we entered into a promissory note in the principal amount of $60,000 (the “Note”) with Mainland Resources. The Note evidences monies advanced by Mainland Resources to us in order to assist us with various costs associated with the completion of the proposed merger between us and Mainland Resources pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement, as amended. The Note matured December 31, 2010, bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum and is unsecured.  Effective on December 23, 2010, we entered into amendment no. 1 to the Note (the “Amended Note”) with Mainland Resources to extend the due date to March 31, 2011. We entered into a further amendment (the Amended Note no. 2) with Mainland Resources to extend the due date to May 31st, 2011.

33

Debenture

Effective on October 13, 2009, our Board of Directors authorized the execution of a 5% convertible debenture in the principal amount of $95,227 (the “Debenture”) with DMS Ltd. (“DMS”).  In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Debenture: (i) accrues interest at the rate of 5% per annum; (ii) the maturity date for repayment is the earlier of: (a) that date when we are able to meet the insolvency test (i.e., when we have sufficient funds in our cash account to meet our obligations as they arise on a daily basis, which shall be determined by management in good faith); or (b) January 13, 2010; and (iii) DMS has the right at any time to convert the unpaid principal amount of the Debenture into shares of our common stock at the price of $0.50 per share. The conditions above were not met and the note is in default.

PURCHASE OF SIGNIFICANT EQUIPMENT

We do not intend to purchase any significant equipment during the next twelve months.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of the date of this Annual Report, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

GOING CONCERN

The independent auditors' report accompanying our December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared "assuming that we will continue as a going concern," which contemplates that we will realize our assets and satisfy our liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business.We have suffered recurring losses from operations, have a working capital deficit and are currently in default of the payment terms of certain note agreements. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following describes the critical accounting policies used in reporting our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, accounting standards allow more than one alternative accounting method for reporting. Such is the case with accounting for oil and gas activities described below. In those cases, our reported results of operations would be different should we employ an alternative accounting method.

34

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Oil and Gas Properties, Full Cost Method

The Company has elected to use the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells used to find proved reserves, and to drill and equip development wells, including directly related overhead costs and related asset retirement costs, are capitalized.

Under this method, all costs, including internal costs directly related to acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized as oil and gas property costs on a county by county basis. Properties not subject to amortization consist of exploration and development costs which are evaluated on a property-by-property basis. Amortization of these unproved property costs begins when the properties become proved or their values become impaired. The Company assesses the realizability of unproved properties, if any, on at least an annual basis or when there has been an indication that impairment in value may have occurred. Impairment of unproved properties is assessed based on management's intention with regard to future exploration and development of individually significant properties and the ability of the Company to obtain funds to finance such exploration and development. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized costs to be amortized.

In applying the full cost method, the Company performs an impairment test (ceiling test) at each reporting date, whereby the carrying value of property and equipment is compared to the “estimated present value” of its proved reserves.  The estimated present value of proved reserves is based upon future net revenues (after consideration of current economic and operating conditions at the end of the period) discounted at a 10 percent interest rate, plus the cost of properties not being amortized, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties included in costs being amortized, less the income tax effects related to book and tax basis differences of the properties. If capitalized costs exceed this limit, the excess is charged as an impairment expense.

As of December 31, 2010 the Company had no proved properties and no impairment of unevaluated oil and gas properties was indicated.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock and stock options based on the grant date fair value of the awards under FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). The Company determines the fair value of stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determines the fair value of shares of nonvested stock (also commonly referred to as restricted stock) based on the last quoted price of our stock on the date of the share grant. The fair value determined represents the cost for the award and is recognized over the vesting period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. As share-based compensation expense is recognized based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the Company reduces the expense for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates. Previously recognized compensation costs may be adjusted to reflect the actual forfeiture rate for the entire award at the end of the vesting period. Excess tax benefits, as defined in ASC 718, if any, are recognized as an addition to paid-in capital..

35

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	37
BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009.	38
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (MAY 11, 2006) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010.	39
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (MAY 11, 2006) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010.	41
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (MAY 11, 2006) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010.	42
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.	43

36

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

American Exploration Corporation (f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Calgary, Canada

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of American Exploration Corporation (f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.) (An Exploration Stage Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the period from inception (May 11, 2006) to December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements for the period from May 11, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2007, were audited by other auditors and our opinion, insofar as it relates to cumulative amounts included for such periods, is based solely on the reports of other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American Exploration Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the period from inception (May 11, 2006) to December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a working capital deficit and is in default of certain debt agreements. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ GBH CPAs, PC

GBH CPAs, PC

www.gbhcpas.com

Houston, Texas

April 5, 2011

37

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

(f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.)

 (An Exploration Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,733		$	9,560
Total Current Assets		10,733			9,560
Oil and gas properties – unevaluated, not subject to amortization		3,771,001			3,771,001
Website, net of amortization		3,024			6,392
Total Assets	$	3,784,758		$	3,786,953
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	16,530		$	32,500
Accounts payable – related parties		44,110			5,422
Short-term note payable		50,000			-
Short-term notes payable – related parties		147,809			87,809
Convertible notes – related party		95,227			95,227
Total Current Liabilities		353,676			220,958
Commitments and contingencies		-			-
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 2,100,000,000 shares authorized:
60,273,333 and  59,773,333 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		60,273			59,773
Additional paid-in capital		5,978,955			5,577,683
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage		(2,608,146	)		(2,071,461	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		3,431,082			3,565,995
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	3,784,758		$	3,786,953

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

38

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

(f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

and For the Period from Inception (May 11, 2006) to December 31, 2010

							Inception
							(May 11, 2006) to
	For the Year Ended December 31,						December 31,
	2010			2009			2010
Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-
Operating Expenses
General and administrative		691,251			1,831,173			2,695,014
Depreciation and amortization		3,368			3,333			8,253
Total Operating Expenses		694,619			1,834,506			2,703,267
Loss from operations		(694, 619	)		(1,834,506	)		(2,703,267	)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(15,866	)		(61,652	)		(77,518	)
Loss on sale of assets		-			-			(1,161	)
Other income		173,800			-			173,800
Total other income (expense)		157,934			(61,652	)		95,121
Net loss	$	(536,685	)	$	(1,896,158	)	$	(2,608,146	)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average common shares - basic and diluted		60,177,991			76,873,982

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

39

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

(f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Period from Inception (May 11, 2006) to December 31, 2010

										Deficit
										Accumulated
							Additional			During the			Total
	Common Stock						Paid-in			Exploration			Stockholders’
	Shares			Amount			Capital			Stage			Equity
Balance at inception on May 11, 2006		-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Initial capitalization, sale of
of common stock to directors on
May 2006 $0.00005/share		94,500,000			94,500			(90,000	)		-			4,500
Private Placement - September 2006
at 0.0024/share		41,475,000			41,475			57,275			-			98,750
Net loss		-			-			-			(9,055	)		(9,055	)
Balance, December 31, 2006		135,975,000			135,975			(32,725	)		(9,055	)		94,195
Net loss		-			-			-			(60,078	)		(60,078	)
Balance, December 31, 2007		135,975,000			135,975			(32,725	)		(69,133	)		34,117
Private Placement- November
2008 at $0.67/share		1,350,000			1,350			898,650			-			900,000
Private Placement - November
2008 at $0.67/share		150,000			150			99,850			-			100,000
Net loss		-			-			-			(106,170	)		(106,170	)
Balance, December 31, 2008		137,475,000			137,475			965,775			(175,303	)		927,947
Private Placement - February 2009
at $0.667/share		487,500			488			324,512			-			325,000
Forgiven loan from director		-			-			5,000			-			5,000
Cancellation of shares		(83,100,000	)		(83,100	)		83,100			-			-
Shares issued for oil and  gas lease
August 2009 at $0.66/share		4,037,500			4,037			2,660,713			-			2,664,750
Private Placements – August 2009
at $0.50/share		660,000			660			329,340			-			330,000
Private Placements – September 2009
at $0.75 and $1.00/share		158,333			158			124,842			-			125,000
Private Placement - October 2009
at $1.00/share		55,000			55			54,945			-			55,000

40

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

(f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Period from Inception (May 11, 2006) to December 31, 2010

(Continued)

							Deficit
							Accumulated
					Additional		During the			Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Exploration			Shareholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Stage			Equity
Amortization of share-based compensation		-	$	-	$	968,511	$	-		$	968,511
Discount on convertible debt		-		-		60,945		-			60,945
Net loss		-		-		-		(1,896,158	)		(1,896,158	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		59,773,333		59,773		5,577,683		(2,071,461	)		3,565,995
Private Placement – February 2010
at $0.25 per share		300,000		300		74,700		-			75,000
Private Placement – April 2010
at $0.25 per share		200,000		200		49,800		-			50,000
Amortization of share-based compensation		-		-		276,772		-			276,772
Net loss		-		-		-		(536,685	)		(536,685	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		60,273,333	$	60,273	$	5,978,955	$	(2,608,146	)	$	3,431,082

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

41

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

(f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

and For the Period from Inception (May 11, 2006) to December 31, 2010

	For the Year Ended December 31,						Inception (May 11, 2006) to
	2010			2009			December 31, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(536,685	)	$	(1,896,158	)	$	(2,608,146	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		3,368			3,333			8,253
Amortization of debt discount		-			60,945			60,945
Share-based compensation		276,772			968,511			1,245,283
Loss on sale of assets		-			-			1,161
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(15,970	)		14,948			16,392
Accounts payable - related parties		38,688			5,421			44,110
Net cash used in operating activities		(233,827	)		(843,000	)		(1,232,002	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Payments for website development		-			-			(10,000	)
Acquisition of unproved oil and gas properties		-			(325,001	)		(1,108,551	)
Net cash used in investing activities					(325,001	)		(1,118,551	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants		125,000			835,000			2,063,250
Proceeds from notes payable		50,000			-			50,000
Proceeds from notes payable - related parties		60,000			87,809			152,809
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt - related parties		-			95,227			95,227
Net cash provided by financing activities		235,000			1,018,036			2,361,286
Increase (decrease) in cash during the period		1,173			(149,965	)		10,733
Cash, beginning of the period		9,560			159,525			-
Cash, end of the period	$	10,733		$	9,560		$	10,733
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
Common stock issued for oil and gas property	$	-		$	2,664,750		$	2,664,750
Cancellation of  loan from director	$	-		$	5,000		$	5,000
Cancellation of shares	$	-		$	83,100		$	83,100

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

42

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

(f.k.a. Minhas Energy Consultants, Inc.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company was originally incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on May 11, 2006. The Company has limited operations, is considered an exploration stage company, and has had no revenues from operations to date.

Initial operations have included capital formation, organization, target market identification and marketing plans. On August 6, 2008, the Company merged with its wholly-owned subsidiary and changed its name to American Exploration Corporation.  Concurrent with the name change, management changed the focus of operations from the provision of consulting engineering services to oil and gas exploration and development.

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying balance sheets and related statements of income and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP").

On August 18, 2008, the Company affected a 14 for 1 forward stock split of its issued and outstanding par value $0.001 common shares.  On April 13, 2009, a 1.5 for 1 forward stock split took effect.  All share and per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of these forward stock splits.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Significant estimates include those regarding the recoverability of the Company’s unevaluated oil and gas properties and valuation of option and warrant transactions

Reclassification

Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

43

Loss per Share

Pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common share equivalents included in the diluted computation represent shares issuable upon assumed exercise of stock options and warrants  or the assumed conversion of convertible debt instruments, using the treasury stock and “if converted” method. For periods in which net losses are incurred, weighted average shares outstanding is the same for basic and diluted loss per share calculations, as the inclusion of common share equivalents would have an anti-dilutive effect.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, options to purchase 2,700,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 250,000 and 652,916 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately 200,000 shares of common stock associated with the conversion feature in the convertible note entered into in January 2010 (as more fully described in Note 4) were also excluded.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Concentrations of Risks - Cash Balances

The Company maintains its cash in institutions insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).  As of December 31, 2010, the FDIC insured all amounts in non-interest bearing accounts and the CDIC had insured limits of up to $100,000 per depositor as of December 31, 2010.

Oil and Gas Properties, Full Cost Method

The Company has elected to use the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells used to find proved reserves, and to drill and equip development wells, including directly related overhead costs and related asset retirement costs, are capitalized.

44

Under this method, all costs, including internal costs directly related to acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized as oil and gas property costs on a county by county basis. Properties not subject to amortization consist of exploration and development costs which are evaluated on a property-by-property basis. Amortization of these unproved property costs begins when the properties become proved or their values become impaired. The Company assesses the realizability of unproved properties, if any, on at least an annual basis or when there has been an indication that impairment in value may have occurred. Impairment of unproved properties is assessed based on management's intention with regard to future exploration and development of individually significant properties and the ability of the Company to obtain funds to finance such exploration and development. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized costs to be amortized.

In applying the full cost method, the Company performs an impairment test (ceiling test) at each reporting date, whereby the carrying value of property and equipment is compared to the “estimated present value” of its proved reserves.  The estimated present value of proved reserves is based upon future net revenues (after consideration of current economic and operating conditions at the end of the period) discounted at a 10 percent interest rate, plus the cost of properties not being amortized, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties included in costs being amortized, less the income tax effects related to book and tax basis differences of the properties. If capitalized costs exceed this limit, the excess is charged as an impairment expense.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had no proved properties and, based upon the current status of the exploratory well in progress at December 31, 2010 on the Company’s properties, no impairment of unevaluated oil and gas properties was indicated.

Foreign exchange and currency translation

For the periods presented, the Company maintained cash accounts in Canadian and U.S. dollars, and incurred certain expenses denominated in Canadian dollars.  The Company's functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect on the date of the transactions. Assets and liabilities are translated using exchange rates at the end of each period. Exchange gains or losses on transactions are included in earnings. Adjustments resulting from the translation process are reported in a separate component of other comprehensive income and are not included in the determination of the results of operations.  For all periods presented, any exchange gains or losses or translation adjustments resulting from foreign currency transactions were immaterial.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock and stock options based on the grant date fair value of the awards under FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). The Company determines the fair value of stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determines the fair value of shares of nonvested stock (also commonly referred to as restricted stock) based on the last quoted price of our stock on the date of the share grant. The fair value determined represents the cost for the award and is recognized over the vesting period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. As share-based compensation expense is recognized based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the Company reduces the expense for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates. Previously recognized compensation costs may be adjusted to reflect the actual forfeiture rate for the entire award at the end of the vesting period. Excess tax benefits, as defined in ASC 718, if any, are recognized as an addition to paid-in capital.

45

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance that requires more robust disclosures about the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and the transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 (which is January 1, 2010 for the Company) except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years (which is January 1, 2011 for the Company). Early application is encouraged. The revised guidance was adopted as of January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

There were various accounting standards and interpretations issued recently, none of which are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s operations, financial position or cash flows.

NOTE 2. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net losses for the period from inception to December 31, 2010 of $2,608,146, has negative working capital at December 31, 2010 and is currently in default of certain outstanding debt obligations. The Company intends to fund initial operations through equity financing arrangements and current efforts are further described in Note 3.

The ability of the Company to emerge from the exploration stage is dependent upon the Company’s successful efforts to raise sufficient capital and then attain profitable operations.  In response to these problems, management has planned or completed the following actions:

• The Company has completed a Registration Statement and obtained a trading symbol for its common shares on the OTCBB.

• Management intends to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt offerings.

• Management has changed the focus of the Company’s operations to oil and gas exploration and development from the provision of engineering services.

There can be no assurances, however, that management’s expectations of future revenues will be realized.

Mainland Resources, Inc. Merger Agreement

Earlier this year our Board of Directors authorized and approved the execution of a definitive merger agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated March 22, 2010 (the “Execution Date”) with Mainland Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Mainland Resources”). The Merger Agreement provides for a stock-for-stock merger to be effected under the laws of the State of Nevada whereby it is contemplated that our shareholders will receive one share of common stock of Mainland Resources for every four shares of our common stock held of record. The share exchange ratio is subject to adjustment.  The Merger Agreement is subject to various conditions precedent including, but not limited to, approval by our shareholders and the shareholders of Mainland Resources of the Merger Agreement, and the number of Mainland Resources’ shareholders exercising dissenter rights available to them under Nevada law cannot exceed 5% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Mainland Resources common stock. The Merger Agreement, as amended, is subject to termination by either us or Mainland Resources if certain conditions specified in the Merger Agreement are not satisfied at or before May 31, 2011, or such later date as may be mutually agreed upon (the “Termination Date”).

46

If the merger is completed, Mainland Resources will be the surviving corporation, and will acquire all of the Company’s assets and property.

NOTE 3. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock - Issued and Outstanding

On May 11, 2006 (inception), the Company issued 94,500,000 shares of its common stock to its Directors for cash of $4,500.  On September 30, 2006, the Company closed a private placement for 41,475,000 common shares for an aggregate of $98,750.

On November 19th and 24th of 2008, the Company closed two private placements for 1,350,000 and 150,000 shares respectively, at a price of $0.67 per share, for a total of $1,000,000. Included with each share in these private placements was one-half non-transferable share purchase warrant, for a total of 750,000 warrants with a fair value on the date of grant of $26,012.  Each warrant had a term of 12 months and entitled the subscriber to purchase one additional share of the company at an exercise price of $1.33 per share.  These warrants expired without exercise during 2009.

In February 2009, the Company completed two private placements for 487,500 shares for a total of $325,000, or $0.67 per share.  Included with each share in these private placements was one-half non-transferable share purchase warrant, for a total of 243,750 warrants with a fair value on the date of grant of $48,716.  Each warrant had a term of 12 months and entitled the subscriber to purchase one additional share of the Company’s stock at an exercise price of $1.33 per share.  These warrants expired without exercise during 2010.

On March 21, 2009 our prior executive officers and founders agreed to return an aggregate 83,100,000 shares of our common stock to the Company.  They did not receive any compensation for the return to and cancellation of these shares by the Company.

On August 19, 2009, 4,037,500 shares were issued to Westrock to acquire the balance of an oil and gas lease (see Note 6).  These shares were valued at $0.66 per share for a total of $2,664,750, based upon the Company’s share price on the date of agreement.

47

On August 17, 2009, a private placement closed for 400,000 shares at $0.50 per share or $200,000.  On August 31, 2009, a private placement closed, for 260,000 shares at $0.50 per share or $130,000.  On September 21, 2009, a private placement closed for 133,333 shares at $0.75 per share, or $100,000.  On September 25, 2009, a private placement closed for 25,000 shares at $1.00 per share, or $25,000.  Included with each share in these private placements was one-half non-transferable share purchase warrant for a total of 409,166 warrants with an exercise term of 12 months and a fair value on the grant date of $356,761.  The warrants had exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $1.50 and expired without exercise during 2010.

On October 8, 2009 a private placement closed for 55,000 shares at $1.00 per share, or a total of $55,000, with no warrants attached.

On February 24, 2010 a private placement closed for 300,000 shares at $0.25 per share or $75,000. The investor also received 150,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.50 per share with a one year term.  These warrants had a grant date fair value of $20,495 and expired without exercise in February 2011.

On April 5, 2010 a private placement closed for 200,000 shares at $0.25 per share or $50,000. The investor also received 100,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.50 per share with a one year term. These warrants had a grant date fair value of $17,403.

Stock Options

In September 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Stock Option Plan (“2009 Plan”).  The 2009 Plan allows the Company to issue options to officers, directors and employees, as well as consultants, to purchase up to 7,000,000 shares of common stock.

During September 2009, the following options were granted:

·  1,000,000 options to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who is also a director of the Company.

·  1,150,000 options to three directors of the Company

·  150,000 options to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer

·  400,000 options to three consultants to the Company

All the options granted have an exercise price of $0.80 per share and a 10 year life. With the exception of 50,000 options granted to a consultant that vested immediately, one third of the options granted vested at the date of grant, with the remainder vesting in equal parts in September 2012 and September 2015.

Fair value of the options granted was $2,559,954, or $0.95 per share, and was calculated in accordance with the Black-Sholes valuation model based on the following assumptions: (a) risk free interest rate 3.47%, (b) expected volatility of 192.35% (c) expected life of 5.75 years, and (d) zero expected future dividends. The options qualify as ‘plain vanilla’ under the accounting literature and therefore, the expected life has been calculated pursuant to the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $968,511 related to these option issuances during the year ended December 31, 2009, and $276,772 during the year ended December 31, 2010.

48

No options were issued during the year ended December 31, 2010.

A summary of stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is presented below:

	Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2009		-	$	-	$	-
Granted		2,700,000		0.80		-
Exercised		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-
Outstanding at December 31, 2009		2,700,000		0.80		-
Granted		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		2,700,000	$	0.80	$	-
Exercisable at December 31, 2010		933,333	$	0.80	$	-

The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $276,772 related to these options during the year ended December 31, 2010.  As of December 31, 2010, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was $1,314,671.  The unrecognized stock-based compensation is expected to be ratably amortized to expense over a period of 4.7 years. The weighted average remaining contractual term of the outstanding options and exercisable options at December 31, 2010 is 8.75 years.  Options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2010 had no intrinsic value.

Warrants

A summary of warrant activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is presented below:

	Warrants			Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2009		750,000		$	1.33	$	-
Granted		652,916			1.01		-
Exercised		-			-		-
Forfeited or expired		(750,000	)		1.33		-
Outstanding at December 31, 2009		652,916			1.01		-
Granted		250,000			0.50		-
Exercised		-			-		-
Forfeited or expired		(652,916	)	$	1.01	$	-
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2010		250,000		$	0.50	$	-

49

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 250,000 warrants outstanding with a remaining weighted average contractual life of 2.1 months.  The weighted average exercise price for all remaining outstanding warrants was $0.50 per share.  Outstanding warrants had an aggregate fair market value of $37,898 at the date of grant, which was calculated in accordance with the Black-Sholes valuation model based on the following assumptions:  (a) risk free interest rate 3.5%, (b) expected volatility of 192.35% (c) expected life of 1 year, and (d) zero expected future dividends.

Other Capital Transactions

On January 1, 2009, a $5,000 advance payable to a director of the Company and outstanding as of December 31, 2008, was forgiven and recorded as a contribution to capital.

On July 16, 2010 our Board of Directors, pursuant to unanimous written consent, authorized the filing of a Statement of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State increasing our authorized shares to 2,100,000,000 shares of common stock.

NOTE 4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the second quarter of 2009, directors of the Company loaned approximately $88,000 to cover operating expenses of the Company.  Interest of 10% per annum will be paid to the lenders beginning July 1, 2009 and the loans are due upon demand.  All of these loans are unsecured and, as of December 31, 2010, the Company had not received a demand from any of the lenders for payment on this short term notes payable.  No interest has been paid to date.

A 5% unsecured convertible debenture, due January 13, 2010, was also issued by the Company to a related party on October 13, 2009 for CDN$100,000 (USD $95,227).  The unpaid principal amount can be converted into common stock at the price of $0.50 per share.  Management assessed the convertible note pursuant to ASC 470 - Debt and determined that the convertible note had a beneficial conversion feature that resulted in a debt discount of $60,945.  The terms of convertible note allow for the holder to convert principal and interest at any time into common shares.  Therefore, pursuant to ASC 470, the Company immediately expensed as interest expense the debt discount of $60,945 related to the convertible note.  The convertible note was not redeemed or converted at the maturity date, is currently in default and is still accruing interest.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company owed $44,110 to related parties which consisted of $20,750 of professional fees owed to entities owned by the Company’s CEO and CFO, and $16,610 of accrued interest on related party notes from above.

Mainland Resources Note Payable

In September 2010, the Company borrowed $60,000 from Mainland Resources to cover operating costs during the merger.  The note bears interest at 12% and was due on December 31, 2010.  Effective on December 23, 2010, we entered into amendment no. 1 to the Note (the “Amended Note”) with Mainland Resources to extend the due date to March 31, 2011.  We are currently in discussions to further extend the maturity date of this Note. We entered into a further amendment (the Amended Note no. 2) with Mainland Resources to extend the due date to May 31st, 2011.

50

NOTE 5.  NOTES PAYABLE

In June 2010, the Company borrowed $50,000 pursuant to a note payable agreement with an unrelated third party.  The note bears interest at 5% per annum, is unsecured and matures on June 2, 2011.   Interest together with principal is due at the maturity date.

NOTE 6.  UNEVALUATED OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES

In  November 2008,  the Company executed an option  agreement  (the "Option  Agreement") to purchase a 75% net  revenue  interest  (100% working interest) in approximately  5,000 net acres in oil and gas  leases  located in Mississippi in the onshore region of the Gulf Coast of the United States.  The purchase price was $625 per net acre, or a total of $3,125,000.  The Option Agreement required that a well be spud no later than May 31, 2009 and provided the Company until November 17, 2008 to complete its due diligence (the "Option Period").  The Company made a payment of $781,250 upon execution of the Option Agreement.

The Option Agreement was amended a number of times to extend the Option Period and through August 2009, the Company made additional cash payments totaling $325,001 to the counterparty.

On August 19, 2009, the Company entered into a final amendment to the Option Agreement whereby the Company (i) agreed to issue 4,037,500 shares of its restricted common stock as satisfaction for the remaining balance due under the Option Agreement, and (ii) agreed to drill and complete a minimum of at least one well on the properties in the Haynesville geological zone no later than December 31, 2010. On November 2, 2010 an agreement was signed between Westrock and the Company which extends the deadline for drilling and completing a well in the Haynesville Formation one year, to December 31, 2011.

The 4,037,500 shares issued to satisfy the remaining purchase price were valued at $2,664,750, based upon the Company’s share price on the date of agreement, bringing the total acquisition price to $3,771,001.  The properties acquired have no proved reserves and therefore, have been classified as unevaluated in the accompanying financial statements.

Mainland Resources, Inc. Joint Development Project

On September 17, 2009, we executed a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) with Mainland Resources to jointly develop contiguous acreage known as the Buena Vista Area located in Mississippi (the “Joint Development Project”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement: (i) we agreed to commit approximately 5,000 net acres and Mainland Resources agreed to commit approximately 8,225 net acres to the Joint Development Project; (ii) Mainland Resources would be the operator pursuant to the Joint Operating Agreement; (iii) Mainland Resources agreed to pay 80% of the initial well drilling and completion costs to earn a 51% working interest in the well and the total Joint Operating Area; and (iv) we agreed to pay 20% of the initial well drilling and completion costs to earn a 49% working interest in the well and the total Joint Operating Area.  Future costs, including drilling and completions, for oil and gas activities of the net acreage in the Joint Operating Area would have been split on a 51%/49% basis between Mainland Resources and us, respectively.

51

On March 25, 2010, Mainland Resources issued an authorization for expenditure (“AFE”) for the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 Well which contemplated drilling to a depth of 22,000 feet, or a depth sufficient to evaluate the Haynesville Shale formation. The total completed well cost was estimated at $13,550,000. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement, we had thirty days to contribute our 20% share of the total completed well cost, or $2,710,000.

On April 27, 2010, we failed to fund our 20% of the estimated total well costs of the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well on the Buena Vista prospect. As a result, we forfeited our right to a 29% working interest in the well and in the Buena Vista prospect in favor of Mainland Resources. We will continue to be entitled to receive a 20% working interest in the well and the prospect after completion (subject to compliance by us with all other terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement and the related Joint Operating Agreement).

In July 2010, the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well commenced drilling on the Buena Vista prospect in Mississippi. The Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well reached the projected total depth of 22,000 feet on December 27, 2010. The Company is currently working with Mainland Resources to best design a completion program for the Burkley-Phillips No. 1 well, such that the well can be properly tested and evaluated within 2011.

Avere Energy  Inc. Farm-In Agreement

Effective on January 15, 2010, we executed a letter of intent with Avere Energy Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Avere Energy”), regarding our Mississippi project. On March 1, 2010, the letter of intent with Avere Energy was amended (the “Amended Letter of Intent”).

Pursuant to the Amended Letter of Intent, Avere Energy was to enter into a definitive farm-in agreement with us whereby Avere would farm-in on our interest in the Mississippi Project by paying 20% of the total well costs (which is 100% of our capital commitment under the Mainland Letter Agreement) to earn a 20% net interest in the Mississippi Project, which is 40.81% of our working interest (the “Earned Interest’). On January 27, 2010, pursuant to the Amended Letter of Intent, Avere Energy paid to us a $75,000 non-refundable deposit.

Effective on April 20, 2010, we received notice from Avere Energy they were terminating the Amended Letter of Intent. Avere Energy was unable to raise the required funds and obtain the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange to the definitive farm-in agreement. Therefore, in accordance with the notice of termination from Avere Energy to us, we did not enter into a definitive farm-in agreement with Avere Energy. An additional negotiated break fee of $75,000 was paid to us by Avere Energy on June 9, 2010, which has been recorded as other income in the accompanying statement of operations.

52

NOTE 7.  INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the difference between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the period that deductible temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income.

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss carry forwards.  For December 31, 2010 and 2009, the material reconciling items between the tax benefit computed at the statutory rate and the actual benefit recognized the financial statement consisted of expenses related to share-based compensation and the change in the valuation allowance during the applicable year.  At December 31, 2010 the Company has recorded a 100% valuation allowance as management believes it is likely that any deferred tax assets will not be realized.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company has a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $1.3 million, which will expire between years 2026 and 2030. Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards could be subject to annual limitations should a change in ownership occur.

NOTE 8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 4, 2011 the Company issued an unsecured promissory note from an unrelated third party for $30,000 to continue its business activities prior to proposed merger with Mainland Resources.  The promissory note has an interest rate of 5% and principal and accrued interest are due upon demand.  If the principal and accrued interest are not paid on the demand date, the promissory note is convertible, at the option of the lender, into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.03 per share.

In February 2011, warrants to purchase 150,000 share of our common stock expired unexercised.

On March 14, 2011, we granted 50,000 stock options each to two of our directors for services rendered in their capacity as members of our Board of Directors. These Stock Options are exercisable for a ten year period at $0.13 per share.  Fair value of the options granted was $14,927, or $0.15 per share, and was calculated in accordance with the Black-Sholes valuation model based on the following assumptions: (a) risk free interest rate 3.36%, (b) expected volatility of 173.17% (c) expected life of 10 years, and (d) zero expected future dividends.

In accordance with ASC 855-10, the Company’s management reviewed all material events from December 31, 2010 through the issuance date of this report and there are no other material subsequent events to report.  

53

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There are no disagreements with our current accountants on any matters related to accounting and financial disclosure issues.  Our principal independent registered public accounting firm is GBH, CPAs, PC. Their address is 6002 Rogerdale, Suite 500, Houston TX, 77072 and telephone number is 713.482.0000.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We have performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2010 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective at December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. We identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting primarily attributable to limited accounting and SEC reporting expertise within the Company. Due to our exploration stage, we have limited financial ability to remedy this staffing deficiency at this time; however, we will add additional accounting and SEC reporting expertise in the future as funds permit.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

54

INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS

We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our CEO and our CFO have concluded that these controls and procedures are not effective at the “reasonable assurance” level.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS

No significant changes were implemented in our internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Our Board of Directors has not established an audit committee. The respective role of an audit committee has been conducted by our Board of Directors. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we intend to establish an audit committee during fiscal year 2011. When established, the audit committee's primary function will be to provide advice with respect to our financial matters and to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding finance, accounting, and legal compliance. The audit committee's primary duties and responsibilities will be to: (i) serve as an independent and objective party to monitor our financial reporting process and internal control system; (ii) review and appraise the audit efforts of our independent accountants; (iii) evaluate our quarterly financial performance as well as its compliance with laws and regulations; (iv) oversee management's establishment and enforcement of financial policies and business practices; and (v) provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, management and our Board of Directors.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

All of our directors hold office until the next annual general meeting of the shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal.

Our directors and executive officers, their ages and positions held are as follows:

55

Name	Age	Position with the Company
Steven Harding	51	President, Chief Executive Officer/Principal Executive Officer and a Director
Brian Manko	44	Chief Financial Officer,
Manmohan Minhas	56	Treasurer and a Director
Herb Dhaliwal	58	Director

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director, executive officer and key employee during at least the past five years, indicating each person's principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he or she was employed, and including other directorships held in reporting companies.

Steve Harding. Mr. Harding has been our President/Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since October 29, 2008.  Mr. Harding has twenty-seven years of experience in the oil and gas exploration industry within numerous geological basins both within and outside of North America.  He has occupied various senior positions within EnCana Corp., and its predecessors Alberta Energy and Husky Energy. From October 2003 to December 2004 he was the vice president, Northern Canada and the vice president Alaska/MacKenzie Delta from 2002 to September 2003. From 1998 to 2002 he was an exploration manager for Alberta Energy in their New Ventures Group and the chief geologist/geoscientist at Husky Energy from 1994 to 1998.  Since March 2005 he has acted as a self employed consultant, responsible for evaluating oil and gas assets for a number of  private  and  public  companies  from a  technical  and  business  viability perspective. In the latter half of the 1980's, he was responsible for developing the geological model, which lead to the discovery of the White Rose field in offshore Newfoundland. The White Rose field is believed to hold estimated reserves of 450 - 500 Million barrels of oil and 3-4 trillion cubic feet of gas, and currently produces approximately 110,000 barrels per day. While at EnCana, he also negotiated and secured the largest exploration position in the US and Canadian Arctic, leading to the discovery of the Umiak field 2004 and receiving a Department of Minerals Management Service corporate citizen award in 2003 for outstanding cultural and environmental efforts in Alaska.

Mr. Harding received his Honours Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from McMaster University in 1982 and his Masters degree in Geology from the University of Alberta in 1985.

Brian Manko. Mr. Manko has been our Chief Financial Officer since February 1, 2009. During the past eighteen years, Mr. Manko has been involved with private and public companies involving a wide range of industries. From approximately 2000 to present, Mr. Manko has been directly involved with private money management as an institutional investor and private investor specializing in both the capital and currency markets. From approximately 2003 to present, Mr. Manko has been a director for Morbank Mortgage Investment Company. From approximately 1996 to 2000 to 2003, Mr. Manko worked as an equity broker with Levesque Securities and Research Capital. From approximately 1992 to 1996, Mr. Manko was employed by Johnson & Johnson is its pharmaceuticals divisions. Mr. Manko is also currently working in an executive financial position with a chapter of a national volunteer group.

56

Mr. Manko earned a Bachelor of Commerce degree in 1992 from the University of Calgary. In addition, he completed his CMA accounting designation in June 2010.

Manmohan Minhas. Mr. Minhas has been our Treasurer and on our Board of Directors since May 11, 2006 and was our prior President/Chief Executive Officer resigning effective October 29, 2008. Mr. Manmohan Minhas worked for PanCanadian Petroleum (now EnCana Corporation) from May 1980 to August 1993. He started as a Project Engineer and worked on the design and construction of oil and gas production facilities for the company. These facilities included gas plants, compressor stations, pipelines, and oil production batteries. By August 1985, he had successfully completed over $100,000,000 worth of projects and led a department with twenty employees.  On July 1986, he was transferred to Reservoir Exploitation Department, where he worked on conceptual planning, reservoir engineering studies, primary and secondary petroleum recovery studies, reserve estimates, and production forecasts. These projects were all based in central and southern Alberta. In this position, he was responsible for the supervision of twelve engineers.

From June 1988 to September 1990, Mr. Minhas was the leader of the Reserves Task Force for Pan Canadian, with a group of fifteen engineers, geologists and computer personnel. The group reviewed over 15,000 oil and gas properties the company had interest in Alberta, Saskatchewan, BC, Colorado and California for purposes of regulatory disclosure of oil and gas reserves reporting.  On September 1990, he was appointed Supervisor, Production Revenue Department, and was responsible for acquisitions and divestures of producing properties, and an operations budget for the company of over $500,000,000 annually.  He was also responsible for contracts for processing and transportation of oil and gas through the company's facilities, and supervised a staff of approximately twenty personnel. During his tenure with Pan Canadian, Mr. Minhas supervised seven Alberta based oil and gas exploration projects through conceptual development, drilling and production, with an aggregate expenditure budget in excess of $150,000,000. Mr. Minhas left PanCanadian in August 1993. From August 1993 to September 1994, Mr. Minhas acted as a Principal Consulting Engineer with Quantel Engineering Ltd. At Quantel, Mr. Minhas did conceptual, detailed engineering and project management of oil and gas  field  production  facilities  in  Southern  Alberta,  including compressor  stations,  pipelines,  gas plants and gas wellsite  construction and development.

In April  1990,  he  founded  and  acted  as  President  of  Minhas  Training  & Development,  Inc., which conducted  seminars for  multi-national  oil companies located throughout the world, including Indonesia,  Malaysia,  Thailand, Brunei, Canada,   USA,   Singapore  and  Russia.   Subjects taught included reservoir engineering, petroleum economic evaluations, petroleum production facilities and project management. He taught these seminars until July 2000.

57

Mr. Minhas received his B.Sc. (Mechanical Engineering) from the University of Calgary in 1980. He is a registered professional engineer with Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta ("APEGGA").  He was given an Exemplary Voluntary Service Award by APEGGA in 1992.  He has also completed numerous seminars and courses in many facets of petroleum production and facilities, reservoir engineering, drilling, well testing and log analysis.

Mr. Minhas is a member of the Board of Directors of American Oil & Gas Inc., a publicly traded US oil and gas exploration and development company based in Denver, Colorado. The company is listed on the AMEX and trades under the symbol "AEZ".  He is also a member of the company's audit committee and compensation committee.

Herb Dhaliwal. Mr. Dhaliwal has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 25, 2009. The Honorable Herb Dhaliwal is a strategic advisor to private and public companies in Canada. During the past thirty years, Mr. Dhaliwal has been involved in national electoral politics in Canada. From approximately 1997 through 2004, Mr. Dhaliwal successively held the portfolios of National Revenue, Fisheries & Oceans and Natural Resources in Ottawa. He was also the senior Minister for Western Canada in the federal Cabinet of Prime Minister Jean Chretien. Prior to entering national electoral politics, and including current date, Mr. Dhaliwal is also an entrepreneur, business owner, corporate director and advisor with interests in transportation, building maintenance, housing construction and real estate development. Before sitting the Parliament of Canada for Vancouver-South/Burnaby constituency from October 1993 through June 2004, Mr. Dhaliwal had been appointed by the British Columbia government as Vice-Chair of the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority board of directors, where he chaired the budget and audit committees.

During his early tenure in the House of Commons, Mr. Dhaliwal: (i) served on the Standing Committees on Finance and Fisheries; (ii) was parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Fisheries & Oceans; and (iii) was Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Health. He played an active role as a prominent member of the Prime Minister’s “TEAM CANADA” 1996 trade mission to India and led the Canadian Parliamentary Observer presence for presidential elections in the Dominican Republic. He also participated in parliamentary delegations to Cuba and UNESCO and addressed an International Parliamentary Association Conference in Beijing China on behalf of Canada regarding the elimination of land mines.

Among his accomplishments while a Minster, Mr. Dhaliwal restructured Revenue Canada into the re-named Canada Customers & Revenue Agency, accompanied the Governor-General on state visits to India, and instituted an annual international conference on ocean stewardship. During 1997 through 2004, Mr. Dhaliwal’s ministerial career also included three key economic assignments during which he had the rare distinction of being the first South Asian to hold a Cabinet position anywhere in a Western democracy.

Mr. Dhaliwal is a graduate in commerce from the University of British Columbia.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have not established an audit committee, a compensation committee nor a nominating committee. In the event the Merger Agreement is not consummated, we intend within the next fiscal quarter to establish such committees and adopt and authorize certain corporate governance policies and documentation.

58

FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers.

INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

During the past five years, none of our directors, executive officers or persons that may be deemed promoters is or have been involved in any legal proceeding concerning: (i) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (ii) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (iii) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activity; or (iv) being found by a court, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law (and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated).

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers, and the persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of all filed reports are required to be furnished to us pursuant to Rule 16a-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based solely on the reports received by us and on the representations of the reporting persons, we believe that these persons have complied with all applicable filing requirements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and those executive officers that earned in excess of $100,000 during fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”):

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($) (2)(3)
Steve Harding  President and	2010	180,000	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-	180,000
CEO	2009	125,000	-0-	-0-	(1)883,812	-0-	-0-	-0-	441,666
Brian Manko, Chief	2010	33,000	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-	33,000
Financial Officer	2009	33,000	-0-	-0-	(1)132,572	-0-	-0-	-0-	175,500

(1)   This amount represents the fair value of these Stock Options at the date of grant which was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

59

STOCK OPTIONS/SAW GRANTS IN FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

The following table sets forth information as at December 31, 2010 relating to Stock Options that have been granted to the Named Executive Officers:

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDS											STOCK AWARDS
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable  (#)			Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable  (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options  (#)		Option Exercise Price  ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested  (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested  ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested  (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested  (#)
Steve Harding, President/CEO		333,333	(1)		-0-		666,667		0.80	9/14/19		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
Brian Manko CFO		50,000	(2)		-0-		100,000		0.80	9/14/19		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-

(1) Mr. Harding was granted 1,000,000 Stock Options on September 14, 2009 of which 333,333 Stock Options vested immediately, 333,333 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2012 and the remaining 333,334 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2015. The 333,333 Stock Options are exercisable into 333,333 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share with a Black Scholes valuation of $316,666. See "Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters."

60

(2) Mr. Manko was granted 150,000 Stock Options on September 14, 2009 of which 50,000 Stock Options vested immediately, 50,000 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2012 and the remaining 50,000 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2015. The 50,000 Stock Options are exercisable into 50,000 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share with a Black Scholes valuation of $47,500.

The following table sets forth information relating to compensation paid to our directors during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash  ($)			Stock Awards  ($)		Option Awards  ($)			Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation  ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings  ($)		All  Other Compensation  ($)		Total  ($)
Manmohan Minhas							(1	)
2010		-0-			-0-		-0-			-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
2009		-0-			-0-		31,666			-0-		-0-		-0-		31,666
Steve Harding		(2	)
2010		-0-			-0-		-0-			-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
2009		-0-			-0-		-0-			-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
Devinder Randhawa							(3	)
2010	$	-0-			-0-		-0-			-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
2009		15,000			-0-		237,500			-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
Herb Dhaliwal
2010		-0-			-0-		-0-			-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
2009		-0-			-0-		95,000	(4)		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-

61

(1)   Mr. Minhas was granted 100,000 Stock Options on September 14, 2009 of which 33,333 Stock Options vested immediately, 33,333 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2012 and the remaining 33,334 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2015. The 33,333 Stock Options are exercisable into 33,333 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share with a Black Scholes valuation of $31,666.

(2)   Mr. Harding’s compensation has been disclosed above in the “Summary Compensation Table” as compensation related to his executive position as President/Chief Executive Officer.

(3)   Mr. Randhawa was granted 750,000 Stock Options on September 14, 2009 of which 250,000 Stock Options vested immediately, 250,000 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2012 and the remaining 250,000 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2015. The 250,000 Stock Options are exercisable into 250,000 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share with a Black Scholes valuation of $237,500. Mr. Randhawa resigned effective as of November 25, 2009 but continues to serve us as a consultant. The Board of Directors has authorized the retention of the 250,000 Stock Options.

(4)   Mr. Dhaliwal was granted 300,000 Stock Options on September 25, 2009 of which 100,000 Stock Options vested immediately, 100,000 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2012 and the remaining 100,000 Stock Options shall vest September 14, 2015. The 100,000 Stock Options are exercisable into 100,000 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share with a Black Scholes valuation of $95,000.00

EMPLOYMENT AND CONSULTING AGREEMENTS

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have entered into verbal month-to-month contractual relationships with certain of our executive officers and directors as follows. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.”

President/Chief Executive Officer

As of November 1, 2008, we entered into a contractual relationship with Perfect Ocean Investments Inc. (“POI”) regarding the engagement and compensation of Steve Harding, our President/Chief Executive Officer (the “Harding Arrangement”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Harding Arrangement, we will pay a monthly salary of $10,000 to POI as compensation for Mr. Harding.  A Board Resolution was passed on November 24, 2009, by Board members excluding Mr. Harding, that his monthly salary would be increased to $15,000, to better align with professional compensation recognized from salary surveys conducted by the Association of Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (A.P.E.G.G.A.).

Chief Financial Officer

As of February 1, 2009, we entered into a contractual relationship with Manko Business Consulting Corp. (“MBCC”) regarding the engagement and compensation of Brian Manko, our Chief Financial Officer (the “Manko Arrangement”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Manko Arrangement, we will pay a monthly salary of $2,750 to MBCC as compensation for Mr. Manko.

62

Arrangement, we will pay a monthly salary of $2,750 to MBCC as compensation for Mr. Manko.

Director

As of November 1, 2008, we entered into a contractual relationship with Devinder Randhawa regarding the engagement and compensation of Mr. Randhawa as a member of our Board of Directors (the “Randhawa Arrangement”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Randhawa Arrangement, we will pay a monthly salary of $5,000 to Mr. Randhawa as compensation. This compensation relationship continued until March 31st, 2009 when such compensation was waived. Mr. Randhawa resigned from our Board of Directors effective November 25, 2009, however remained involved with the Company in an advisory capacity. The Board of Directors ratified and approved that the options granted to Mr. Randhawa in connecting to his position as a Director would not be terminated.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

As of the date of this Annual Report, the following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and executive officers. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. As of the date of this Annual Report, there are 60,273,333 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)			Percentage of Beneficial Ownership
Directors and Officers:
Steve Harding                                              407 2nd Street SW                                      Calgary, Alberta		(2	)
Canada T2P 2Y3		2,483,333			3.10	%
Brian Manko                                               407 2nd Street SW                                      Calgary, Alberta		(3	)
Canada T2P 2Y3		350,000		Nil
Herb Dhaliwal                                                407 2nd Street SW                                      Calgary, Alberta		(4	)
Canada T2P 2Y3		1,920,750			2.39	%
Manmohan Minhas                                             407 2nd Street SW                                      Calgary, Alberta		(5	)
Canada T2P 2Y3		1,058,333			1.32	%
All executive officers and directors as a		(6	)
group (4 persons)		4,516,666			5.59	%
5% or Greater Beneficial Owners:
Westrock Land Corp. Address		5,812,416			6.73	%
Dev Randhawa                                              407 2nd Street SW                                      Calgary, Alberta		(7	)
Canada T2P 2Y3		3,450,000			5.73	%

* Less than one percent.

63

(1)   Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding as of the date of this Annual Report. As of the date of this Annual Report, there are 80,273,333 shares issued and outstanding. Beneficial ownership amounts reflect the 2009 Forward Stock Split.

(2)   This figure consists of: (i) 2,150,000 shares of common stock; and (ii) 333,333 vested Stock Options which are exercisable by Mr. Harding to purchase 333,333 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share expiring on September 14, 2019.

(3)   This figure consists of: (i) 300,000 shares of common stock; and (ii) 50,000 vested Stock Options which are exercisable by Mr. Manko to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share expiring on September 14, 2019.

(4)   This figure consists of: (i) 1,770,750 shares of common stock; (ii) 100,000 vested Stock Options which are exercisable by Mr. Dhaliwal to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share expiring on September 25, 2019; and (iii) 50,000 Stock Options which are exercisable by Mr. Dhaliwal to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.13 per share expiring on March 14, 2021.

64

(5)   This figure consists of: (i) 975,000 shares of common stock; (ii) 33,333 vested Stock Options which are exercisable by Mr. Minhas to purchase 33,333 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share expiring on September 14, 2019; and (iii) 50,000 Stock Options which are exercisable by Mr. Minhas to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.13 per share expiring on March 14, 2021.

(6)   This figure consists of: (i) 5,195,750 shares of common stock; (ii) 516,666 vested Stock Options to purchase 516,666 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.80; and (iii) 100,000 Stock Options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.13 per share.

(7)   This figure consists of: (i) 3,200,000 shares of common stock; and (ii) 250,000 vested Stock Options exercisable by Mr. Randhawa to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share expiring on September 14, 2019. Due to Mr. Randhawa’s resignation effective November 25, 2009, the Stock Options were to expire within ninety days from the date of resignation. The Board of Directors has authorized the retention of the Stock Options based upon Mr. Randhawa’s continuing service to us as a consultant.

CHANGES IN CONTROL

We are unaware of any contract, or other arrangement or provision, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

As of the date of this Annual Report, other than as disclosed below, none of our directors, officers or principal stockholders, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing, have any interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction or in any proposed transactions, which has materially affected or will materially affect us during fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have verbally agreed to pay certain of our executive officers and directors compensation for services rendered as follows:

President/Chief Executive Officer

As of November 1, 2008, we entered into a contractual relationship with POI regarding the engagement and compensation of Steve Harding, our President/Chief Executive Officer (the “Harding Arrangement”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Harding Arrangement, we will pay a monthly salary of $10,000 to POI as compensation for Mr. Harding. A Board Resolution was passed on November 24th 2009,by Board members excluding Mr. Harding, that his monthly salary would be increased to $15,000, to better align with professional compensation recognized from salary surveys conducted by the Association of Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (A.P.E.G.G.A.).

65

Chief Financial Officer

As of February 1, 2009, we entered into a contractual relationship with MBCC regarding the engagement and compensation of Brian Manko, our Chief Financial Officer (the “Manko Arrangement”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Manko Arrangement, we will pay a monthly salary of $2,750 to MBCC as compensation for Mr. Manko.

Director

As of November 1, 2008, we entered into a contractual relationship with Devinder Randhawa regarding the engagement and compensation of Mr. Randhawa as a member of our Board of Directors (the “Randhawa Arrangement”). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Randhawa Arrangement, we will pay a monthly salary of $5,000 to Mr. Randhawa as compensation. This compensation relationship continued until March 31st, 2009 when such compensation was waived. Mr. Randhawa resigned from our Board of Directors effective November 25, 2009. Mr. Randhawa continues to serve us as a consultant.

DIRECTOR LOANS

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, a director and an unrelated third party advanced $87,548 to us. Interest of 10% per annum will be paid to the lenders beginning July 1, 2009 and the loans are due upon demand.

Except for the transactions described above, none of our directors, officers or principal stockholders, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing, have any interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction or in any proposed transactions, which has materially affected or will materially affect us during fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred approximately $44,000 in fees to our principal independent accountant for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and for the review of our financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and August 31, 2010.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we also incurred $950 in fees to our principal independent accountant for preparation of our 2009 income tax return.  We did not incur any other fees for professional services rendered by our principal independent accountant for all other non-audit services which may include, but is not limited to, tax-related services, actuarial services or valuation services.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we incurred $21,530 in fees to our principal independent accountant for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and for the review of our financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and August 31, 2009.

During fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we did not incur any other fees for professional services rendered by our principal independent accountant for all other non-audit services which may include, but is not limited to, tax-related services, actuarial services or valuation services.

66

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL SCHEDULES

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report.

EXHIBIT NO.    DOCUMENT

3.1 Articles of Incorporation (1)

3.1.2  Articles of Incorporation as amended.

3.1.3 Articles of Merger between Minhas Energy Consultants and American Energy Corp. (2)

3.1.4 Certificate of Change dated October 7, 2010 filed with the Nevada Secretary of State. (8)

3.2 Bylaws (1)

10.1 Option Agreement between American Energy Corporation  and Westrock Land Corporation dated October 2008. (3)

10.2 5% Convertible Debenture dated October 13, 2009 between American Exploration Corporation and DMS Ltd. (4)

10.3 Stock Option Plan of American Exploration Corporation dated September 14, 2009. (5)

10.4 Merger Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 30, 2010 between American Exploration Corporation and Mainland Resources Inc.

10.5 Promissory Note between American Exploration Corporation and Mainland Resources Inc. dated September 27, 2010 (9)

10.6 Amending Agreement between American Exploration Corporation and Mainland Resources Inc. dated September 7, 2010 (10)

10.7 Amending Agreement between American Exploration Corporation and Mainland Resources Inc. dated December 23, 2010. (11)

10.8 Amendment to Promissory Note between American Exploration Corporation and Mainland Resources Inc. dated December 23, 2010. (12)

10.9 Amending Agreement between American Exploration Corporation and Mainland Resources Inc. dated March 14, 2011. (13)

10.10  Amendment No. 2 to Promissory Note between American Exploration Corporation and Mainland Resources Inc. dated March 30, 2011.

16.1 Letter from Moore & Associates dated August 11, 2009.  (6)

16.2 Letter from Seale & Beers, CPAs dated November 2, 2009. (7)

31.1  Certification  of  Chief  Executive   Officer  Pursuant  to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.

31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant  to  Rule13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.

32.1  Certification  of Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial Officer Under Section 1350 as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

67

(1) Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Commission on March 5, 2006.

(2) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 8, 2008.

(3) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 6, 2008 and our Amendment No. 1 to Current Report filed with the Commission on January 25, 2009.

(4) Incorporated by reference from Form Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 19, 2009.

(5)  Incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 20, 2009.

(6)  Incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 17, 2009.

(7) Incorporation by referenced from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission November 4, 2009.

(8)  Incorporation by referenced from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission October 14, 2010

(9)  Incorporation by referenced from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission October 6, 2010

(10)  Incorporation by referenced from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission October 19, 2010

(11)  Incorporation by referenced from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission January 3, 2011

(12)  Incorporation by referenced from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission January 3, 2011

(13)  Incorporation by referenced from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission March 18, 2011

68

AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Dated: April 5, 2011	By:	/s/STEVE HARDING
		Steve Harding, President/Chief
		Executive Officer
Dated: April 5, 2011	By:	/s/ BRIAN MANKO
		Brian Manko, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated: April 5, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVE HARDING
		Director

Dated: April 5, 2011	By:	/s/ HERB DHALIWAL
		Director

Dated: April 5, 2011	By:	/s/ MANMOHAN MINHAS
		Director

69