Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2008
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 001-33666
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 74-3204509 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) | |
16666 Northchase Drive | ||
Houston, Texas | 77060 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(281) 836-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerþ | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filero | Smaller reporting companyo | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso Noþ
Number of shares of the Common Stock of the registrant outstanding as of April 30, 2008: 65,634,963 shares.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of dollars, except for par value and share amounts)
(unaudited)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 125,328 | $ | 149,224 | ||||
Restricted cash | 15,603 | 9,133 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $11,919 and $10,846, respectively | 603,978 | 516,072 | ||||||
Inventory, net | 482,012 | 411,436 | ||||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts | 168,870 | 203,932 | ||||||
Current deferred income taxes | 35,785 | 41,648 | ||||||
Other current assets | 170,370 | 145,159 | ||||||
Total current assets | 1,601,946 | 1,476,604 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 3,563,528 | 3,533,505 | ||||||
Goodwill, net | 1,458,916 | 1,455,881 | ||||||
Intangible and other assets | 313,868 | 311,457 | ||||||
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates | 92,169 | 86,076 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 7,030,427 | $ | 6,863,523 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 177 | $ | 997 | ||||
Accounts payable, trade | 197,751 | 221,391 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 324,458 | 326,163 | ||||||
Advance billings | 189,706 | 169,830 | ||||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated earnings | 202,453 | 87,741 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 914,545 | 806,122 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 2,325,927 | 2,332,927 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 137,278 | 89,012 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 278,108 | 281,898 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 3,655,858 | 3,509,959 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) | ||||||||
Minority interest | 188,227 | 191,304 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; zero issued | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 66,918,498 and 66,574,419 shares issued, respectively | 670 | 666 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 3,323,505 | 3,317,321 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (18,473 | ) | 13,004 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (19,362 | ) | (68,733 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock—1,295,808 and 1,287,237 common shares, at cost, respectively | (99,998 | ) | (99,998 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 3,186,342 | 3,162,260 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 7,030,427 | $ | 6,863,523 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
North America contract operations | $ | 199,076 | $ | 99,635 | ||||
International contract operations | 119,892 | 67,291 | ||||||
Aftermarket services | 84,172 | 47,301 | ||||||
Fabrication | 336,949 | 233,751 | ||||||
740,089 | 447,978 | |||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||
North America contract operations | 88,288 | 39,982 | ||||||
International contract operations | 39,385 | 23,305 | ||||||
Aftermarket services | 66,927 | 36,631 | ||||||
Fabrication | 263,743 | 193,503 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 89,687 | 49,906 | ||||||
Merger and integration expenses | 4,439 | 324 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 90,449 | 49,488 | ||||||
Fleet impairment | 1,450 | — | ||||||
Interest expense | 33,220 | 28,272 | ||||||
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates | (6,093 | ) | (5,683 | ) | ||||
Other (income) expense, net | (12,999 | ) | (7,597 | ) | ||||
658,496 | 408,131 | |||||||
Income before income taxes and minority interest | 81,593 | 39,847 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 29,977 | 14,445 | ||||||
Minority interest, net of tax | 2,643 | — | ||||||
Income from continuing operations | 48,973 | 25,402 | ||||||
Gain from sales of discontinued operations, net of tax | 398 | — | ||||||
Net income | $ | 49,371 | $ | 25,402 | ||||
Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic | 65,065 | 33,607 | ||||||
Diluted | 68,831 | 38,226 | ||||||
Earnings per share – Basic: | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.76 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations | 0.01 | — | ||||||
Net income | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.76 | ||||
Earnings per share – Diluted: | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.71 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations | — | — | ||||||
Net income | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.71 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 49,371 | $ | 25,402 | ||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (25,204 | ) | — | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (6,273 | ) | 628 | |||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 17,894 | $ | 26,030 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 49,371 | $ | 25,402 | ||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 90,449 | 49,488 | ||||||
Fleet impairment | 1,450 | — | ||||||
Deferred financing cost amortization | 657 | 1,408 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | (398 | ) | — | |||||
Minority interest | 2,643 | — | ||||||
Bad debt expense | 954 | 500 | ||||||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | (331 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates, net of dividends received | (6,093 | ) | (767 | ) | ||||
Interest rate swaps | (1,354 | ) | — | |||||
(Gain) loss on remeasurement of intercompany balances | (3,154 | ) | 588 | |||||
Net realized gain on trading securities | (2,964 | ) | (6,129 | ) | ||||
Stock compensation expense | 3,808 | 2,866 | ||||||
Sales of trading securities | 8,374 | 14,209 | ||||||
Purchases of trading securities | (5,410 | ) | (8,080 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes | 16,084 | 5,900 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable and notes | (85,915 | ) | (28,883 | ) | ||||
Inventory | (67,724 | ) | 9,828 | |||||
Costs and estimated earnings versus billings on uncompleted contracts | 148,721 | (1,895 | ) | |||||
Prepaid and other current assets | (23,719 | ) | (5,409 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | (48,272 | ) | (14,518 | ) | ||||
Advance billings | 39,437 | (34,627 | ) | |||||
Other | (4,197 | ) | (4,643 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations | 112,417 | 5,234 | ||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | — | — | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 112,417 | 5,234 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (102,575 | ) | (72,746 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 2,527 | 11,798 | ||||||
Cash paid in acquisition | (25,091 | ) | — | |||||
Increase in restricted cash | (6,470 | ) | — | |||||
Cash advanced to/invested in non-consolidated affiliates | — | (3,095 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in continuing activities | (131,609 | ) | (64,043 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | 2,632 | — | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (128,977 | ) | (64,043 | ) | ||||
6
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities | 257,000 | 106,000 | ||||||
Repayments on revolving credit facilities | (72,000 | ) | (63,000 | ) | ||||
Repayments of convertible senior notes due 2008 | (192,000 | ) | — | |||||
Payments for debt issue costs | (41 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised | 854 | 2,378 | ||||||
Proceeds from stock issued pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan | 1,698 | — | ||||||
Proceeds (repayments) of other debt, net | (828 | ) | (3,531 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefit | 55 | 478 | ||||||
Distributions to non-controlling partners in Exterran Partners, L.P. | (3,544 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations | (8,806 | ) | 42,325 | |||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | — | — | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (8,806 | ) | 42,325 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents | 1,470 | 133 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (23,896 | ) | (16,351 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 149,224 | 73,286 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 125,328 | $ | 56,935 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: | ||||||||
Conversion of debt to common stock | $ | — | $ | 46,089 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Exterran Holdings, Inc. (“Exterran,” “we,” “us” or “our”) included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”) are not required in these interim financial statements and have been condensed or omitted. It is the opinion of management that the information furnished includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated.
We were incorporated on February 2, 2007 as Iliad Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (“Universal”), and thereafter changed our name to Exterran Holdings, Inc. On August 20, 2007, in accordance with their merger agreement, Universal and Hanover Compressor Company (“Hanover”) merged into our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and we became the parent entity of Universal and Hanover. Immediately following the completion of the merger, Universal merged with and into us. Hanover was determined to be the acquirer for accounting purposes and, therefore, our financial statements reflect Hanover’s historical results for periods prior to the merger date. We have included the financial results of Universal’s operations in our consolidated financial statements beginning August 20, 2007. References to “our,” “we” and “us” refer to Hanover for periods prior to the merger date and to Exterran for periods on or after the merger date. The financial statement information included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
As a result of the merger between Hanover and Universal, each outstanding share of common stock of Universal was converted into one share of Exterran common stock and each outstanding share of Hanover common stock was converted into 0.325 shares of Exterran common stock. All share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the conversion ratio of Hanover common stock for all periods presented.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic income per common share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted for the incremental common stock equivalents attributed to outstanding options to purchase common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock issued pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan, convertible senior notes and convertible junior subordinated notes, unless their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The table below indicates the potential shares of common stock that were included in computing the dilutive potential shares of common stock used in diluted income per common share (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding—used in basic income per common share | 65,065 | 33,607 | ||||||
Net dilutive potential common stock issuable: | ||||||||
On exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units | 641 | 491 | ||||||
On settlement of employee stock purchase plan shares | 11 | — | ||||||
On conversion of convertible senior notes due 2008 | * | * | * | * | ||||
On conversion of convertible junior subordinated notes due 2029 | — | 1,014 | ||||||
On conversion of convertible senior notes due 2014 | 3,114 | 3,114 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares and dilutive potential common shares—used in diluted income per common share | 68,831 | 38,226 | ||||||
** | Excluded from diluted income per common share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
8
Table of Contents
Net income for the diluted earnings per share calculation for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 is adjusted to add back interest expense and amortization of financing costs totaling $1.2 million, net of tax, relating to our convertible senior notes due 2014. Net income for the diluted earnings per share calculation for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 is adjusted to add back interest expense and amortization of financing costs totaling $1.6 million, net of tax, relating to our convertible senior notes due 2014 and convertible subordinated notes due 2029.
The table below indicates the potential shares of common stock issuable that were excluded from net dilutive potential shares of common stock issuable as their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net dilutive potential common shares issuable: | ||||||||
On exercise of options where exercise price is greater than average market value for the period | 179 | 10 | ||||||
On conversion of convertible senior notes due 2008 | 1,202 | 1,420 | ||||||
Net dilutive potential common shares issuable | 1,381 | 1,430 | ||||||
Stock Options and Stock-based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS No. 123R”), using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized beginning in the first quarter of 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value, and (b) compensation cost for any share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value.
Other (income) expense, net
Other (income) expense, net is primarily comprised of gains and losses on foreign currency translation adjustments and on the sale of assets and trading securities.
Minority Interest
As of March 31, 2008, minority interest is primarily comprised of the portion of Exterran Partners, L.P.’s (together with its subsidiaries, the “Partnership”) capital and earnings that is applicable to the 49% limited partner interest in the Partnership we do not own (see further discussion of the Partnership in Note 2, below).
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior periods’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 financial statement classification, including the reclassification of our used equipment sales to report these transactions within other income and expense, and the reclassification of installation sales from Aftermarket Services to our Fabrication segment. Additionally, we reclassified our supply chain department to include it as part of cost of sales rather than a component of selling, general and administrative expense.
Our Fabrication segment previously reported three product lines: Compressor and Accessory Fabrication, Production and Processing Fabrication — Surface Equipment and Production and Processing Fabrication — Belleli. We also renamed three of our other segments as follows: U.S. Rentals is now referred to as North America Contract Operations; International Rentals is now referred to as International Contract Operations; and Parts, Service and Used Equipment is now referred to as Aftermarket Services. North America Contract Operations includes U.S. and Canada contract operations. We have made these reclassifications to all periods presented within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These reclassifications have no impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
9
Table of Contents
2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On August 20, 2007, pursuant to the merger agreement, dated as of February 5, 2007, as amended, by and among us, Hanover, Universal, Hector Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary, and Ulysses Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ulysses Sub, Inc. merged with and into Universal and Hector Sub, Inc. merged with and into Hanover. As a result of the merger, each of Universal and Hanover became our wholly-owned subsidiary. Immediately following the completion of the merger, Universal merged with and into us.
As a result of the merger, each outstanding share of common stock of Universal was converted into one share of Exterran common stock, which resulted in the issuance of approximately 30.3 million shares of Exterran common stock. Additionally, each outstanding share of Hanover common stock was converted into 0.325 shares of common stock of Exterran, which resulted in the issuance of approximately 35.6 million shares of Exterran common stock. Exterran’s common stock, listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “EXH,” began trading on August 21, 2007, concurrent with the cessation of the trading of Hanover and Universal common stock. The merger has been accounted for as a purchase business combination. We determined that Hanover was the acquirer for accounting purposes and therefore our financial statements reflect Hanover’s historical results for periods prior to the merger date. We have included the financial results of Universal in our consolidated financial statements beginning August 20, 2007.
The total preliminary purchase price of Universal was $2.1 billion, including the fair value of Universal stock options assumed and acquisition related transaction costs. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values as of August 20, 2007. The purchase price has been calculated as follows (in thousands except share and per share amounts and ratios):
Number of shares of Universal common stock outstanding at August 20, 2007 | 30,273,866 | |||
Conversion ratio | 1.0 | |||
Number of shares of Exterran that were issued | 30,273,866 | |||
Assumed market price of an Exterran share that was issued(1) | $ | 66.18 | ||
Aggregate value of the Exterran shares that were issued | $ | 2,003,524 | ||
Fair value of vested and unvested Universal stock options outstanding as of August 20, 2007, which were converted into options to purchase Exterran common stock(2) | 67,574 | |||
Capitalizable transaction costs | 11,469 | |||
Preliminary purchase price | $ | 2,082,567 | ||
(1) | The stock price is based on the average close price of Hanover’s stock for the two days before and through the two days after the announcement of the merger on February 5, 2007, divided by the exchange ratio. | |
(2) | The majority of Universal’s stock options and stock-based compensation vested upon consummation of the merger. |
Under the purchase method of accounting, the total preliminary purchase price was allocated to Universal’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of August 20, 2007, as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill resulting from the allocation of the purchase price was primarily associated with Universal’s market presence in certain geographic locations where Hanover did not have a presence, the advantage of a lower cost of capital that we believe results from the Partnership’s structure, growth opportunities in the markets that the combined companies serve, the expected cost saving synergies from the merger, the expertise of Universal’s experienced workforce and its established operating infrastructure.
The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon preliminary valuations and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change upon the completion of management’s review of the final valuations. We are in the process of finalizing valuations related to identifiable intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, capitalized transaction costs, certain acquired contracts and residual goodwill. Changes to the preliminary purchase price could impact future depreciation and amortization expense as well as income tax expense. In addition, upon the finalization of our legal entity structure, additional adjustments to deferred taxes may be required. The final valuation of net assets is expected to be completed as soon as possible, but no later than one year from the acquisition date, in accordance with GAAP.
10
Table of Contents
The table below indicates the preliminary purchase price allocation to Universal’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of August 20, 2007 (in thousands):
Preliminary | ||||
Fair Value | ||||
Current assets | $ | 482,791 | ||
Property, plant and equipment | 1,634,925 | |||
Goodwill | 1,265,475 | |||
Intangible and other assets | 274,413 | |||
Current liabilities | (307,141 | ) | ||
Long-term debt | (812,969 | ) | ||
Deferred income taxes | (240,244 | ) | ||
Other long-term liabilities | (22,223 | ) | ||
Minority interest | (192,460 | ) | ||
Preliminary purchase price | $ | 2,082,567 | ||
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Acquired
The preliminary amount of goodwill of $1,265.5 million resulting from the merger is considered to have an indefinite life and will not be amortized. Instead, goodwill will be reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. Approximately $91.5 million of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The preliminary amount of finite life intangible assets includes $188.0 million and $54.4 million associated with customer relationships and contracts, respectively. The intangible assets for customer relationships and contracts will be amortized through 2024 and 2015, respectively, based on the present value of expected income to be realized from these assets. Finite life intangible assets also include $12.2 million for the Universal backlog that existed on the date of the merger and will be amortized over 15 months.
Exterran Partners, L.P.
As a result of the merger, we became the indirect majority owner of the Partnership. The Partnership is a master limited partnership that was formed to provide natural gas contract operations services to customers throughout the U.S. In October 2006, the Partnership completed its initial public offering, as a result of which the common units owned by the public represented a 49% limited partner ownership interest in the Partnership and Universal owned the remaining equity interest in the Partnership. The general partner of the Partnership is our subsidiary and we consolidate the financial position and results of operations of the Partnership. It is our intention for the Partnership to be our primary growth vehicle for the U.S contract operations business and for us to continue to contribute U.S. contract operations customers and assets to the Partnership over time in exchange for cash and/or additional interests in the Partnership. As of March 31, 2008, the Partnership had a fleet of approximately 1,733 compressor units comprising approximately 720,000 horsepower, or 16% (by available horsepower) of our and the Partnership’s combined total U.S. horsepower.
We are party to an omnibus agreement with the Partnership and others (as amended and restated, the “Omnibus Agreement”), the terms of which include, among other things, our agreement to provide to the Partnership operational staff, corporate staff and support services, sales to the Partnership of newly fabricated equipment, transfers between the Partnership and us of idle compression equipment and an agreement by us to provide caps on the amount of cost of sales and selling, general and administrative costs that the Partnership must pay.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of Hanover and Universal, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of the period presented. The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transaction been consummated at the beginning of each period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results. The pro forma amounts represent the historical operating results of Hanover and Universal with adjustments for purchase accounting expenses and to conform accounting policies that affect revenues, cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, other income (expense) and income taxes (in thousands, except per share amounts).
11
Table of Contents
Three months ended | ||||
March 31, | ||||
2007 | ||||
Total revenues | $ | 695,094 | ||
Net income | $ | 39,636 | ||
Basic income per common share | $ | 0.62 | ||
Diluted income per common share | $ | 0.60 | ||
In January 2008, we acquired GLR Solutions LTD. (“GLR”), a Canadian provider of water treatment products for the upstream petroleum and other industries, for approximately $25 million plus certain working capital adjustments and contingent payments of up to $22 million (Canadian) based on the performance of GLR over each of the three years ending December 31, 2010. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total preliminary purchase price was allocated to GLR’s net tangible and intangible assets based on their estimated fair value at the purchase date. This allocation resulted in preliminary amounts of goodwill and intangible assets of $13.2 million and $15.3 million, respectively. The intangible assets for customer relationships and patents will be amortized through 2027 based on the present value of expected income to be realized from these assets. The intangible assets for non-competes and backlog will be amortized over five years and one year, respectively. The final valuation of net assets is expected to be completed as soon as possible, but no later than one year from the acquisition date, in accordance with GAAP.
3. INVENTORY
Inventory, net of reserves, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Parts and supplies | $ | 266,151 | $ | 246,540 | ||||
Work in progress | 184,661 | 139,956 | ||||||
Finished goods | 31,200 | 24,940 | ||||||
Inventory, net of reserves | $ | 482,012 | $ | 411,436 | ||||
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had inventory reserves of approximately $20.6 million and $21.5 million, respectively.
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Compression equipment, facilities and other fleet assets | $ | 4,430,747 | $ | 4,359,936 | ||||
Land and buildings | 181,678 | 175,925 | ||||||
Transportation and shop equipment | 160,726 | 147,797 | ||||||
Other | 85,516 | 72,395 | ||||||
4,858,667 | 4,756,053 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (1,295,139 | ) | (1,222,548 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 3,563,528 | $ | 3,533,505 | ||||
During the first quarter of 2008, management identified certain fleet units that will not be used in our contract operations business in the future. We compared the expected proceeds from the disposition to determine the fair value for the fleet assets we will no longer utilize in our operations. The net book value of these assets exceeded the fair value by $1.5 million, and this difference was recorded as a long-lived asset impairment in the first quarter of 2008. The impairment is recorded in fleet impairment expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
12
Table of Contents
5. FAIR VALUE OF INTEREST RATE SWAPS
SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. We have performed an analysis of our interest rate swaps to determine the significance and character of all inputs to their fair value determination. Based on this assessment, the adoption of the required portions of this standard did not have a material effect on our net asset values. However, the adoption of the standard does require us to provide additional disclosures about the inputs we use to develop the measurements and the effect of certain measurements on changes in net assets for the reportable periods as contained in our periodic filings.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following three broad categories.
• | Level 1— Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which we have access at the date of measurement. | ||
• | Level 2— Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Level 2 inputs are those in markets for which there are few transactions, the prices are not current, little public information exists or prices vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers. | ||
• | Level 3— Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect our own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the asset or liability based on the best available information. |
The following table summarizes the valuation of our interest rate swaps under SFAS No. 157 pricing levels as of March 31, 2008 (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | ||||||||||||||||
market | ||||||||||||||||
prices in | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
active | other | unobservable | ||||||||||||||
markets | observable | inputs | ||||||||||||||
Total | (Level 1) | inputs (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps asset (liability) | $ | (71,512 | ) | $ | — | $ | (71,512 | ) | $ | — |
Our interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value utilizing a combination of the market and income approach to fair value. We used discounted cash flows and market based methods to compare similar interest rate swaps.
6. DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Revolving credit facility due August 2012 | $ | 365,000 | $ | 180,000 | ||||
Term loan | 800,000 | 800,000 | ||||||
2007 asset backed securitization facility notes due 2012 | 800,000 | 800,000 | ||||||
Partnership’s revolving credit facility due 2011 | 217,000 | 217,000 | ||||||
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2008 | — | 192,000 | ||||||
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2014 | 143,750 | 143,750 | ||||||
Other, interest at various rates, collateralized by equipment and other assets | 354 | 1,174 | ||||||
2,326,104 | 2,333,924 | |||||||
Less current maturities | (177 | ) | (997 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt | $ | 2,325,927 | $ | 2,332,927 | ||||
On August 20, 2007, we entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with various financial institutions as the lenders. The Credit Agreement consists of (a) a five-year revolving credit facility in the aggregate amount of $850 million, which includes a
13
Table of Contents
variable allocation for a Canadian tranche and (b) a six-year term loan credit facility, in the aggregate amount of $800 million (collectively, the “Credit Facility”). Subject to certain conditions, at our request and with the approval of the lenders, the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility may be increased by an additional $400 million less certain adjustments.
As of March 31, 2008, we had $365.0 million in outstanding borrowings and $357.1 million in letters of credit outstanding under our revolving credit facility. Additional borrowings of up to approximately $127.9 million were available under that facility as of March 31, 2008.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, if they are in U.S. dollars, at our option, at a Base Rate as defined below or LIBOR plus an applicable margin or, if the borrowings are in Canadian dollars, at our option, at U.S. dollar LIBOR, U.S. dollar Base Rate or Canadian prime rate plus the applicable margin or the Canadian Dollar bankers’ acceptance rate. The applicable margin varies depending on our debt ratings (i) in the case of LIBOR loans, from 0.65% to 1.75% or (ii) in the case of Base Rate or Canadian prime rate loans, from 0.0% to 0.75%. The Base Rate is the higher of the U.S. Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%. At March 31, 2008, all amounts outstanding were LIBOR loans. The applicable margin at March 31, 2008 was 0.825%. The weighted average interest rate at March 31, 2008 on the outstanding balance, excluding the effect of related cash flow hedges, was 4.0%.
On August 20, 2007, Exterran ABS 2007 LLC entered into a $1.0 billion asset-backed securitization facility (the “2007 ABS Facility”) and issued $400 million of Series 2007-1 notes under this facility. On September 18, 2007, an additional $400 million of Series 2007-1 notes (collectively with the August 20, 2007 issuance, the “Series 2007-1 Notes”) was issued under this facility. Interest and fees payable to the noteholders will accrue on the Series 2007-1 Notes at a variable rate consisting of LIBOR plus an applicable margin. For outstanding amounts up to $800 million, the applicable margin is 0.825%. For amounts outstanding over $800 million, the applicable margin is 1.35%. The weighted average interest rate at March 31, 2008 on the Series 2007-1 Notes, excluding the effect of related cash flow hedges, was 3.4%. The Series 2007-1 Notes are revolving in nature and are payable in July 2012.
Our 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2008 were repaid using funds from our revolving credit facility in March 2008.
The Partnership, as guarantor, and EXLP Operating LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, entered into a senior secured credit agreement in 2006. The five year revolving credit facility under the credit agreement was expanded in 2007 from $225 million to $315 million and matures in October 2011. As of March 31, 2008, there were $217.0 million in outstanding borrowings under the Partnership’s revolving credit facility and $98.0 million was available for additional borrowings. Subject to certain conditions, at the request of the Partnership, and with the approval of the lenders, the aggregate commitments under the credit agreement may be increased by an additional $135 million.
The Partnership’s revolving credit facility bears interest at a Base Rate or LIBOR, at the Partnership’s option, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin, depending on the Partnership’s Leverage Ratio, varies (i) in the case of LIBOR loans, from 1.0% to 2.0% or (ii) in the case of Base Rate loans, from 0.0% to 1.0%. The Base Rate is the higher of the U. S. Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%. At March 31, 2008 all amounts outstanding were LIBOR loans and the applicable margin was 1.0%. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balance at March 31, 2008, excluding the effect of related cash flow hedges, was 5.6%.
We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of March 31, 2008.
7. ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVES
We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with financial activities by managing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our debt obligations. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. Cash flows from hedges are classified in our consolidated statements of cash flows under the same category as the cash flows from the underlying assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions.
As a result of the merger we assumed ten interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $556.6 million as of March 31, 2008 that we designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of variability of LIBOR based interest rate payments related to variable rate debt.
In September 2007, we entered into three interest rate swaps that we designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of variability of LIBOR interest rate payments related to variable rate debt. The three swap agreements have notional amounts as of March 31, 2008 of $151.9 million, $226.5 million and $150.0 million, respectively.
14
Table of Contents
In January 2008, we entered into six interest rate swaps that we designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of variability of LIBOR interest rate payments related to variable rate debt. The six swap agreements each have notional amounts as of March 31, 2008 of $50.0 million.
The following table summarizes, by individual hedge instrument, our interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Fair Value of | ||||||||||||||
Floating Rate to be | Notional | Swap at | ||||||||||||
Fixed Rate to be Paid | Maturity Date | Received | Amount | March 31, 2008 | ||||||||||
4.035 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | $ | 50,000 | (1) | $ | (856 | ) | |||||
4.007 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (1) | (840 | ) | |||||||
3.990 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (1) | (830 | ) | |||||||
4.037 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (1) | (857 | ) | |||||||
4.675 | % | August 20, 2012 | One Month LIBOR | 151,882 | (2) | (11,598 | ) | |||||||
4.744 | % | July 20, 2012 | One Month LIBOR | 226,482 | (2) | (17,605 | ) | |||||||
4.668 | % | July 20, 2012 | One Month LIBOR | 150,000 | (2) | (11,335 | ) | |||||||
5.210 | % | January 20, 2013 | One Month LIBOR | 58,706 | (2) | (3,814 | ) | |||||||
4.450 | % | September 20, 2019 | One Month LIBOR | 41,818 | (2) | (1,830 | ) | |||||||
5.020 | % | September 20, 2019 | One Month LIBOR | 51,112 | (2) | (4,199 | ) | |||||||
5.275 | % | December 1, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 125,000 | (10,322 | ) | ||||||||
5.343 | % | October 20, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 40,000 | (3,472 | ) | ||||||||
5.315 | % | October 20, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 40,000 | (3,432 | ) | ||||||||
3.080 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.075 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.062 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.100 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.065 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.072 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) |
(1) | These swaps amortize ratably over the life of the swap. | |
(2) | Certain of these swaps amortize while the notional amounts of others increase in corresponding amounts to maintain a consistent outstanding notional amount of $680 million. |
All of the swaps, which we have designated as cash flow hedging instruments, meet the specific hedge criteria of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”), so that any change in their fair values is recognized as a component of comprehensive income or loss and is included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The swap terms substantially coincide with the hedged item and are expected to offset changes in expected cash flows due to fluctuations in the variable rate, and therefore we currently do not expect a significant amount of ineffectiveness on these hedges. We perform quarterly calculations to determine if the swap agreements are still effective and to calculate any ineffectiveness. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we recorded approximately $0.8 million of interest expense due to the ineffectiveness related to these swaps.
The counterparties to our interest rate swap agreements are major international financial institutions. We monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and do not expect non-performance by any counterparty, although such non-performance could have a material adverse effect on us.
8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
At the time of the merger, each outstanding share of restricted stock and each stock option granted prior to the date of the merger agreement under the Hanover equity incentive plans, whether vested or unvested, was fully vested. Stock options granted under the Hanover equity incentive plans outstanding on the merger date were converted into options to acquire a number of shares of Exterran common stock equal to the number of shares of Hanover common stock subject to that stock option immediately before the merger multiplied by 0.325, and at a price per share of Exterran common stock equal to the price per share under the Hanover option divided by 0.325. Similarly, each outstanding stock option granted prior to the date of the merger agreement under the Universal equity incentive plans (other than options to purchase Universal common stock under the Universal employee stock purchase plan), whether vested or unvested, was fully vested. Stock options granted under the Universal equity incentive plans outstanding on the merger date were converted into options to acquire the same number of shares of Exterran common stock at the same price per share. There was no stock-based compensation cost capitalized during the three months ended March 31, 2008 or 2007.
15
Table of Contents
Stock Incentive Plan
On August 20, 2007, we adopted the Exterran Holdings, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), which was previously approved by the stockholders of each of Hanover and Universal. The 2007 Plan provides for the granting of stock-based awards in the form of options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and performance awards to our employees and directors. Under the 2007 Plan, the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued shall not exceed 4,750,000. Grants of options and stock appreciation rights count as one share against the aggregate share limit, and grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units count as two shares against the aggregate share limit. Awards granted under the 2007 Plan that are subsequently cancelled, terminated or forfeited remain available for future grant. Option grants under the 2007 Plan expire no later than seven years from the date of grant. The 2007 Plan is administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors (“Compensation Committee”).
Stock Options
Under the 2007 Plan, stock options are granted at fair market value at the date of grant, are exercisable in accordance with the vesting schedule established by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion and expire no later than seven years after the date of grant. Options generally vest 33 1/3% on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.
The weighted average fair value at date of grant for options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $18.88, and was estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Three Months | ||||
Ended | ||||
March 31, | ||||
2008 | ||||
Expected life in years | 4.5 | |||
Risk-free interest rate | 2.36 | % | ||
Volatility | 28.66 | % | ||
Dividend yield | 0.00 | % |
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant for a period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the stock options. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over the most recent period commensurate with the expected life of the stock options and other factors. We have not historically paid a dividend and do not expect to pay a dividend during the expected life of the stock options.
The following table presents stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (in thousands, except per share data and remaining life in years). The number of stock options and related exercise prices have been adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio in the merger.
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Stock | Average | Remaining | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Options | Exercise Price | Life | Value | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2007 | 1,798 | $ | 36.37 | |||||||||||||
Granted | 411 | 67.30 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised | (45 | ) | 21.64 | |||||||||||||
Cancelled | (6 | ) | 53.93 | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding, March 31, 2008 | 2,158 | $ | 42.52 | 5.6 | $ | 47,519 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable, March 31, 2008 | 1,574 | $ | 32.31 | 5.0 | $ | 50,733 | ||||||||||
Intrinsic value is the difference between the market value of our stock and exercise price of each option multiplied by the number of options outstanding. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $1.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2008, $11.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
16
Table of Contents
Restricted Stock
For grants of restricted stock and stock-settled restricted stock units, we recognize compensation expense over the vesting period equal to the fair value of our common stock at the date of grant. Common stock subject to restricted stock grants generally vests 33 1/3% on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.
The following table presents restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (shares in thousands). The number of non-vested restricted shares and grant-date fair value have been adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio in the merger.
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
Shares | Per Share | |||||||
Non-vested restricted stock, December 31, 2007 | 299 | $ | 71.52 | |||||
Granted | 364 | 67.34 | ||||||
Cancelled | (10 | ) | 71.47 | |||||
Non-vested restricted stock, March 31, 2008 | 653 | $ | 69.29 | |||||
As of March 31, 2008, $38.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
Partnership Phantom Units
The Partnership has granted phantom units to directors of the general partner of the Partnership’s general partner and to our employees. The Partnership expects to settle the phantom units granted to our employees in cash instead of common units of the Partnership and therefore we are required to re-measure the fair value of these phantom units each period and record a cumulative adjustment of the expense previously recognized. The cumulative expense related to grants to our employees is recorded as a liability.
As of March 31, 2008, the Partnership had 53,742 outstanding phantom units. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, 44,310 phantom units were granted with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $32.22 per phantom unit. The phantom units outstanding at March 31, 2008 vest and settle on various dates ranging from December 2008 to March 2011 and have various contractual lives. As of March 31, 2008, no phantom units were exercisable. As of March 31, 2008, $1.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested phantom units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
We have an aggregate of 300,000,000 shares authorized, of which 250,000,000 can be issued as common stock and 50,000,000 can be issued as preferred stock. All shares have a par value of $0.01 per share.
On August 20, 2007, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock through August 19, 2009. Under the stock repurchase program, we may repurchase shares in open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations. We may also implement all or part of the repurchases under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, so as to provide the flexibility to extend our share repurchases beyond the quarterly purchasing window. The timing and extent to which we repurchase our shares will depend upon market conditions and other corporate considerations, and will be at management’s discretion. Repurchases under the program may commence or be suspended at any time without prior notice. The stock repurchase program may be funded through cash provided by operating activities or borrowings. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the period January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008.
17
Table of Contents
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We have issued the following guarantees that are not recorded on our accompanying balance sheet (dollars in thousands):
Maximum Potential | ||||||||
Undiscounted | ||||||||
Payments as of | ||||||||
Term | March 31, 2008 | |||||||
Indebtedness of non-consolidated affiliates: | ||||||||
El Furrial (1) | 2013 | $ | 23,006 | |||||
Other: | ||||||||
Performance guarantees through letters of credit (2) | 2008-2012 | 348,958 | ||||||
Standby letters of credit | 2008-2010 | 26,641 | ||||||
Commercial letters of credit | 2008 | 10,527 | ||||||
Bid bonds and performance bonds (2) | 2008-2012 | 91,067 | ||||||
Maximum potential undiscounted payments | $ | 500,199 | ||||||
(1) | We have guaranteed the amounts included above, which is a percentage of the total debt of this non-consolidated affiliate equal to our ownership percentage in such affiliate. | |
(2) | We have issued guarantees to third parties to ensure performance of our obligations, some of which may be fulfilled by third parties. |
As part of our acquisition of Production Operators Corporation in 2001, we may be required to make contingent payments of up to $46 million to Schlumberger based on our realization of certain U.S. federal income tax benefits through the year 2016. To date, we have not realized any such benefits that would require a payment to Schlumberger and do not anticipate realizing any such benefits that would require a payment before the year 2013.
In January 2007, Universal acquired B.T.I. Holdings Pte Ltd (“B.T.I.”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary B.T. Engineering Pte Ltd, a Singapore based fabricator of oil and natural gas, petrochemical, marine and offshore equipment, including pressure vessels, floating, production, storage and offloading process modules, terminal buoys, turrets, natural gas compression units and related equipment. We may be required to pay up to $20 million in the future based on the earnings of B.T.I. over the two years ending March 31, 2009.
The natural gas service operations business can be hazardous, involving unforeseen circumstances such as uncontrollable flows of natural gas or well fluids and fires or explosions. As is customary in the natural gas service operations industry, we review our safety equipment and procedures and carry insurance against some, but not all, risks of our business. Our insurance coverage includes property damage, general liability and commercial automobile liability and other coverage we believe is appropriate. We believe that our insurance coverage is customary for the industry and adequate for our business; however, losses and liabilities not covered by insurance would increase our costs.
Additionally, we are substantially self-insured for worker’s compensation and employee group health claims in view of the relatively high per-incident deductibles we absorb under our insurance arrangements for these risks. Losses up to the deductible amounts are estimated and accrued based upon known facts, historical trends and industry averages.
We are involved in a project in the Cawthorne Channel in Nigeria (the “Cawthorne Channel Project”), in which Global Gas and Refining Ltd., a Nigerian entity (“Global”), has contracted with an affiliate of Royal Dutch Shell plc (“Shell”) to process natural gas from some of Shell’s Nigerian oil and natural gas fields. Pursuant to a contract between us and Global, we provide natural gas compression and natural gas processing services from a barge-mounted facility we own that is stationed in a Nigerian coastal waterway. We completed the building of the required barge-mounted facility and our portion of the project was declared commercial by Global in November 2005. The contract runs for a ten-year period which commenced when the project was declared commercial, subject to a purchase option by Global, which is exercisable for the remainder of the term of the contract. Under the terms of a series of contracts between us, Global, Shell and several other counterparties, Global is primarily responsible for the overall project.
The area in Nigeria where the Cawthorne Channel Project is located has experienced civil unrest and violence, and natural gas delivery from Shell to the Cawthorne Channel Project was stopped from June 2006 to June 2007. As a result, the Cawthorne Channel Project did not operate from early June 2006 to June 2007. From July 2007 through March 31, 2008, we received some natural gas
18
Table of Contents
from Shell and we have been processing the natural gas received. In early April 2008, shipments of natural gas from Shell to us were halted due to Shell’s mechanical issues. We anticipate receiving natural gas from Shell in the second quarter of 2008.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we received approximately $4.3 million in payments related to the Cawthorne Channel Project, which we applied against outstanding receivables. Although we believe we are entitled to payments from Global and have accordingly invoiced Global for such, collectibility is not reasonably assured due to uncertainty regarding when the Cawthorne Channel Project will receive natural gas from Shell and due to Global’s dependence on natural gas production by the Cawthorne Channel Project to pay us. Therefore, we billed but did not recognize revenue of approximately $4.2 million related to the Cawthorne Channel Project during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Based on our analysis of estimated future cash flows, we believe we will recover all of our receivables and our full investment in the Cawthorne Channel Project over the term of the contract.
However, if Shell does not provide natural gas to the project or if Shell were to terminate its contract with Global for any reason or if we were to terminate our involvement in the Cawthorne Channel Project, we would be required to find an alternative use for the barge facility, which could potentially result in an impairment and write-down of our investment and receivables related to this project and could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operation. Additionally, due to the environment in Nigeria and Global’s capitalization level, inexperience with projects of a similar nature and lack of a successful track record with respect to this project as well as other factors, there is no assurance that Global can satisfy its obligations under its various contracts, including its contract with us.
This project and our other projects in Nigeria are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties associated with operating in Nigeria. Such risks include, among other things, political, social and economic instability, civil uprisings, riots, terrorism, kidnapping, the taking of property without fair compensation and governmental actions that may restrict payments or the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contract rights. Any of these risks could adversely impact any of our operations in Nigeria, and could affect the timing and decrease the amount of revenue we may ultimately realize from our investments in Nigeria. At March 31, 2008, we had net assets of approximately $74 million related to our operations in Nigeria, a majority of which are related to our capital investment and advances/accounts receivable for the Cawthorne Channel Project.
In the ordinary course of business we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions. While management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, it believes that any ultimate liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, because of the inherent uncertainty of litigation, we cannot provide assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding to which we are a party will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operation or cash flows for the period in which the resolution occurs.
11. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, which provides a single definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years; however, in February 2008, the FASB issued a FASB Staff Position that defers the effective date for us to January 1, 2009 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value on at least an annual basis. We adopted the required provisions that were not deferred of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008, and the adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. We do not expect the adoption of the deferred provisions of SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 provided entities the one-time election to measure financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis under a fair value option. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Its provisions may be applied to an earlier period only if the following conditions are met: (1) the decision to adopt is made after the issuance of SFAS No. 159 but within 120 days after the first day of the fiscal year of adoption, and no financial statements, including footnotes, for any interim period of the adoption year have yet been issued and (2) the requirements of SFAS No. 157 are adopted concurrently with or prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 159. We adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, and the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not impact our consolidated financial statements.
19
Table of Contents
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141 and requires that all assets, liabilities, contingent consideration, contingencies and in-process research and development costs of an acquired business be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date; that acquisition costs generally be expensed as incurred; that restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date; and that changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period impact income tax expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests such that minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be required to be reported as a component of equity, and requires that purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control be accounted for as equity transactions and, upon a loss of control, requires the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, to be recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”). This new standard requires enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments, including those used in hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have on our financial statements.
12. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
We manage our business segments primarily based upon the type of product or service provided. We have four principal industry segments: North America Contract Operations, International Contract Operations, Aftermarket Services and Fabrication. The North America and International Contract Operations segments primarily provide natural gas compression services, production and processing operations and maintenance services to meet specific customer requirements utilizing Exterran-owned assets. The Aftermarket Services segment provides a full range of services to support the surface production compression and processing needs of customers, from parts sales and normal maintenance services to full operation of a customer’s owned assets. The Fabrication segment involves the design, engineering, installation, fabrication and sale of (i) natural gas compression units, accessories and equipment, (ii) equipment used in the production, treating and processing of crude oil and natural gas, and (iii) engineering, procurement and construction services primarily related to the manufacturing of critical process equipment for refinery and petrochemical facilities, the construction of tank farms and the construction of evaporators and brine heaters for desalination plants.
We evaluate the performance of our segments based on segment gross margin. Revenues include only sales to external customers. We do not include intersegment sales when we evaluate the performance of our segments. Our chief executive officer does not review asset information by segment.
20
Table of Contents
The following table presents sales and other financial information by industry segment for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands).
North America | International | Reportable | ||||||||||||||||||
Contract | Contract | Aftermarket | Segments | |||||||||||||||||
Three months ended | Operations | Operations | Services | Fabrication | Total | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2008: | �� | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers | $ | 199,076 | $ | 119,892 | $ | 84,172 | $ | 336,949 | $ | 740,089 | ||||||||||
Gross margin(1) | 110,788 | 80,507 | 17,245 | 73,206 | 281,746 | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers | $ | 99,635 | $ | 67,291 | $ | 47,301 | $ | 233,751 | $ | 447,978 | ||||||||||
Gross margin(1) | 59,653 | 43,986 | 10,670 | 40,248 | 154,557 |
(1) | Gross margin, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled to net income below. |
We define gross margin as total revenue less cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense). Gross margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a primary measure used by our management as it represents the results of revenue and cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense), which are key components of our operations. As an indicator of our operating performance, gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss) as determined in accordance with GAAP. Our gross margin may not be comparable to a similarly titled measure of another company because other entities may not calculate gross margin in the same manner.
The following table reconciles net income to gross margin (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 49,371 | $ | 25,402 | ||||
Selling, general and administrative | 89,687 | 49,906 | ||||||
Merger and integration expenses | 4,439 | 324 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 90,449 | 49,488 | ||||||
Fleet impairment | 1,450 | — | ||||||
Interest expense | 33,220 | 28,272 | ||||||
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates | (6,093 | ) | (5,683 | ) | ||||
Other (income) expense, net | (12,999 | ) | (7,597 | ) | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 29,977 | 14,445 | ||||||
Minority interest, net of tax | 2,643 | — | ||||||
Gain from sales of discontinued operations, net of tax | (398 | ) | — | |||||
Gross margin | $ | 281,746 | $ | 154,557 | ||||
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In April 2008, we entered into a foreign currency hedge to reduce our foreign exchange risk associated with cash flows we will receive under a contract in Kuwaiti Dinars. The notional amount of the derivative is approximately $29 million Kuwaiti Dinars.
On May 8, 2008, the Partnership entered into an amendment to its senior secured credit agreement increasing the aggregate commitments under the facility by an amount of $117.5 million (see Note 6, above). The aggregate commitment increase is in the form of a term loan due October 20, 2011. Subject to certain conditions, at the request of the Partnership, and with the approval of the lenders, the aggregate commitments under this facility may be increased by an additional $17.5 million. The Partnership expects to borrow the funds in connection with a proposed transaction in which it would acquire customer contracts and compressor equipment from our subsidiary, Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P. Any such transaction will be subject to the parties’ reaching mutually agreeable terms and executing definitive transaction documents, the Partnership’s ability to finance the purchase and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, and therefore, we can give no assurance that any such transaction and related Partnership borrowing will occur. Please see Part I, Item 2 (“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”) of this report.
The Partnership’s new term loan will bear interest at a Base Rate, or LIBOR, at the Partnership’s option, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin, depending on the Partnership’s leverage ratio, varies (i) in the case of LIBOR loans, from 1.5% to 2.5% or (ii) in the case of Base Rate loans, from 0.5% to 1.5%, with initial pricing set at LIBOR plus 2.0%. Borrowings under the term loan will be subject to the same credit agreement and covenants as the Partnership’s revolving credit facility, except for an additional covenant requiring mandatory prepayment of the term loan from future equity offerings, on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
21
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial position, business strategy, proposed acquisitions, budgets, litigation, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by that section. You can identify many of these statements by looking for words such as “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or similar words or the negative thereof.
Such forward-looking statements in this report include, without limitation, statements regarding:
• | our business growth strategy and projected costs; | ||
• | our future financial position; | ||
• | the sufficiency of available cash flows to fund continuing operations; | ||
• | the expected amount of our capital expenditures; | ||
• | anticipated cost savings, future revenue, gross margin and other financial or operational measures related to our business and our primary business segments; | ||
• | the future value of our equipment; and | ||
• | plans and objectives of our management for our future operations. |
Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this report. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and those set forth from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are available through our website at www.exterran.com and through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Retrieval System at www.sec.gov. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements include, among other things:
• | conditions in the oil and gas industry, including a sustained decrease in the level of supply or demand for natural gas and the impact on the price of natural gas, which could cause a decline in the demand for our compression and oil and natural gas production and processing equipment and services; | ||
• | reduced profit margins or the loss of market share resulting from competition or the introduction of competing technologies by other companies; | ||
• | the success of our subsidiaries, including Exterran Partners, L.P. (along with its subsidiaries, the “Partnership”); | ||
• | our inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the merger of Hanover Compressor Company (“Hanover”) and Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (“Universal”); | ||
• | changes in economic or political conditions in the countries in which we do business, including civil uprisings, riots, terrorism, kidnappings, the taking of property without fair compensation and legislative changes; | ||
• | changes in currency exchange rates; | ||
• | the inherent risks associated with our operations, such as equipment defects, malfunctions and natural disasters; |
22
Table of Contents
• | our ability to timely and cost-effectively obtain components necessary to conduct our business; | ||
• | employment workforce factors, including our ability to hire, train and retain key employees; | ||
• | our inability to implement certain business and financial objectives, such as: |
• | international expansion; | ||
• | sales of additional U.S. contract operations contracts to the Partnership; | ||
• | timely and cost-effective execution of integrated projects; | ||
• | integrating acquired businesses; | ||
• | generating sufficient cash; and | ||
• | accessing the capital markets; |
• | liability related to the use of our products and services; | ||
• | changes in governmental safety, health, environmental and other regulations, which could require us to make significant expenditures; and | ||
• | our level of indebtedness and ability to fund our business. |
All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this report.
GENERAL
Exterran Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (“Exterran,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), is a global market leader in the full service natural gas compression business and a premier provider of operations, maintenance, service and equipment for oil and natural gas production, processing and transportation applications. We operate in three primary business lines: contract operations, fabrication and aftermarket services. In our contract operations business line, we own a fleet of natural gas compression and crude oil and natural gas production and processing equipment that we utilize to provide operations services to our customers. In our fabrication business line, we fabricate and sell equipment that is similar to the equipment that we own and utilize to provide contract operations to our customers and we utilize our expertise and fabrication facilities to build equipment utilized in our contract operations services. Our fabrication business line also provides engineering, procurement and construction services for tank farms for crude oil and other liquids storage, as well as evaporators and brine heaters for desalination plants. In what we call “Total Solutions” projects, we provide the engineering design, project management, procurement and construction services necessary to consolidate some or all of our products into complete production, processing and compression facilities. These surface solutions are offered to our customers on a contract operations or sales commercial basis. In addition, we manufacture critical process equipment used in oil refineries, petrochemical plants and gas-to-liquids plants. In our aftermarket services business line, we sell parts and components and provide operations, maintenance, overhaul and reconfiguration services to customers who own compression, production, gas treating and oilfield power generation equipment or use equipment provided by companies other than us.
Hanover and Universal Merger
On August 20, 2007, Hanover and Universal completed their business combination pursuant to the merger agreement by and among us, Hanover, Universal, and two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. As a result of the merger, each of Universal and Hanover became our wholly-owned subsidiary, and Universal merged with and into us. Hanover was determined to be the acquirer for accounting purposes and, therefore, our financial statements and the financial information included in this Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” reflect Hanover’s historical results for the periods prior to
23
Table of Contents
the merger date. For more information regarding the merger, please see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 (“Financial Statements”) of this report.
Exterran Partners, L.P.
As a result of the merger, we became the indirect majority owner of the Partnership. The Partnership is a master limited partnership that was formed to provide natural gas contract operations services to customers throughout the United States of America (“U.S.”). In October 2006, the Partnership completed its initial public offering, as a result of which the common units owned by the public represented a 49% limited partner ownership interest in the Partnership and Universal owned the remaining equity interest in the Partnership.
The general partner of the Partnership is our subsidiary and we consolidate the financial position and results of operations of the Partnership. It is our intention for the Partnership to be the primary growth vehicle for our U.S. contract operations business and to continue to contribute U.S. contract operations customer contracts and assets in exchange for cash or additional interest in the Partnership. As of March 31, 2008, the Partnership had a fleet of approximately 1,733 compressor units comprising approximately 720,000 horsepower, or 16% (by available horsepower) of our and the Partnership’s combined total U.S. horsepower.
Debt Refinancing
On August 20, 2007, we completed a refinancing of much of the outstanding debt of Hanover and Universal by entering into two new debt facilities. We entered into a $1.65 billion senior secured credit facility, consisting of an $850 million five-year revolving credit facility and an $800 million six-year term loan, with a syndicate of financial institutions, as well as a $1.0 billion asset-backed securitization facility. As a result of these new credit facilities, all of the debt of Universal and Hanover that existed on the merger date has been replaced, other than Hanover’s convertible notes due 2014 and the credit facility of the Partnership.
OVERVIEW
Industry Conditions and Trends
Natural gas consumption in the U.S. for the twelve months ended January 31, 2008 increased by approximately 6% over the twelve months ended January 31, 2007 and is expected to increase by 0.7% per year until 2030, according to the Energy Information Administration (“EIA”).
The U.S. accounted for an estimated annual production of approximately 19 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in calendar year 2006, or 18% of the worldwide total, compared to an estimated annual production of approximately 86 trillion cubic feet in the rest of the world. Industry sources estimate that the U.S.’ natural gas production level will be approximately 21 trillion cubic feet in calendar year 2025, or 13% of the worldwide total, compared to an estimated annual production of approximately 144 trillion cubic feet in the rest of the world.
Natural Gas Compression Services Industry. The natural gas compression services industry has experienced a significant increase in the demand for its products and services from the early 1990s, and we believe the contract compression services industry in the U.S. will continue to have growth opportunities due to the following factors, among others:
• | aging producing natural gas fields will require more compression to continue producing the same volume of natural gas; and | ||
• | increasing production from unconventional sources, which include tight sands, shale and coal bed methane, generally require more compression than production from conventional sources to produce the same volume of natural gas. |
While the international contract compression services market is currently smaller than the U.S. market, we believe there are growth opportunities in international demand for compression services and products due to the following factors:
24
Table of Contents
• | implementation of international environmental and conservation laws preventing the practice of flaring natural gas and recognition of natural gas as a clean air fuel; | ||
• | a desire by a number of oil exporting nations to replace oil with natural gas as a fuel source in local markets to allow greater export of oil; | ||
• | increasing development of pipeline infrastructure, particularly in Latin America and Asia, necessary to transport natural gas to local markets; | ||
• | growing demand for electrical power generation, for which the fuel of choice tends to be natural gas; and | ||
• | privatization of state-owned energy producers, resulting in increased outsourcing due to the focus on reducing capital expenditures and enhancing cash flow and profitability. |
Company Performance Trends and Outlook
For the year ending December 31, 2008, we expect the overall market demand for contract operations services to be good. Given our recent declines in working horsepower in North America, however, we expect less growth in our contract operations business than for the market overall in North America. In international markets, we continue to expect strong demand for our contract operations services, particularly for our Total Solutions projects throughout Latin America and the Eastern Hemisphere. As a result of this continued strong demand, we expect to add an amount of growth capital investment in 2008 that is similar to the amount we added on a combined basis during 2007; however, we anticipate our capital expenditure levels will exceed those of 2007 as the year ending December 31, 2008 will include a full year of capital additions related to Universal’s operations. Within the North America contract operations segment, we expect that operating costs will moderate during 2008. We expect our 2008 fabrication revenue to exceed our 2007 reported fabrication revenue as the 2008 amount will include a full year of Universal’s operations.
We are investing in key initiatives to help support the future growth of our company. These initiatives include an increased marketing and business development commitment targeted at international expansion and the conversion of certain of our locations to our enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system.
We intend for the Partnership to be the primary growth vehicle for our U.S. contract operations business. To this end, we may contribute additional U.S. contract operations customers to the Partnership in exchange for cash and/or additional interests in the Partnership. Such transactions would depend on, among other things, reaching agreement with the Partnership regarding the terms of the purchase, which may require approval of the conflicts committee of the board of directors of the general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, and the Partnership’s ability to finance any such purchase.
Financial Highlights
Financial highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the prior year period, which are discussed in greater detail below in “Results of Operations,” were as follows:
• | Revenue.Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $740.1 million compared to $448.0 million for the prior year period, an increase of 65%. The increase in revenues in the current year was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results. | ||
• | Net Income.Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $49.4 million, an increase of $24.0 million over the prior year period. The increase in net income in the current year was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results. The increase in net income was partially offset by $4.4 million of merger and integration expenses incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. |
25
Table of Contents
Operating Highlights
The following tables summarize our total available and operating horsepower, horsepower utilization percentage and fabrication backlog.
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||
(Horsepower in thousands) | ||||||||
Total Available Horsepower (at period end): | ||||||||
North America | 4,476 | 4,514 | ||||||
International | 1,461 | 1,447 | ||||||
Total | 5,937 | 5,961 | ||||||
Total Operating Horsepower (at period end): | ||||||||
North America | 3,535 | 3,632 | ||||||
International | 1,350 | 1,306 | ||||||
Total | 4,885 | 4,938 | ||||||
Horsepower Utilization: | ||||||||
Spot (at period end) | 82 | % | 83 | % |
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Compressor and Accessory Fabrication Backlog | $ | 354.1 | $ | 321.9 | $ | 354.0 | ||||||
Production and Processing Equipment Fabrication Backlog | 919.2 | 787.6 | 418.5 | |||||||||
Fabrication Backlog | $ | 1,273.3 | $ | 1,109.5 | $ | 772.5 | ||||||
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007
Our results of operations after the merger date of August 20, 2007 include Universal’s results of operations and periods prior to the merger date reflect only Hanover’s historical results of operations.
Summary of Business Segment Results
North America Contract Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 199,076 | $ | 99,635 | 100 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) | 88,288 | 39,982 | 121 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin | $ | 110,788 | $ | 59,653 | 86 | % | ||||||
Gross margin percentage | 56 | % | 60 | % | (4 | )% |
The increase in revenue, cost of sales and gross margin (defined as revenue less cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense)) was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results after the merger. Gross margin percentage (defined as revenue less cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, divided by revenue) was negatively impacted in the current year as compared to the prior year due to higher repair and maintenance expenses.
26
Table of Contents
International Contract Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 119,892 | $ | 67,291 | 78 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) | 39,385 | 23,305 | 69 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin | $ | 80,507 | $ | 43,986 | 83 | % | ||||||
Gross margin percentage | 67 | % | 65 | % | 2 | % |
The increase in revenue, cost of sales and gross margin was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results after the merger. Increased activity in Argentina, Venezuela and Brazil accounted for approximately 73% of the increase in revenues. Gross margin percentage increased primarily due to an improvement in our gross margin percentage in Latin America during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year.
Aftermarket Services
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 84,172 | $ | 47,301 | 78 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) | 66,927 | 36,631 | 83 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin | $ | 17,245 | $ | 10,670 | 62 | % | ||||||
Gross margin percentage | 20 | % | 23 | % | (3 | )% |
The increase in revenue, cost of sales and gross margin was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results after the merger. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily due to reduced margins on aftermarket services provided internationally.
Fabrication
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 336,949 | $ | 233,751 | 44 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) | 263,743 | 193,503 | 36 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin | $ | 73,206 | $ | 40,248 | 82 | % | ||||||
Gross margin percentage | 22 | % | 17 | % | 5 | % |
The increase in revenue, cost of sales and gross margin was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results after the merger. Our compressor and accessory fabrication and production and processing equipment fabrication product line revenues increased by $68.9 million and $52.2 million, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in gross margin percentage is primarily due to an increase in the gross margin percentage in our production and processing equipment fabrication product line caused by improved market conditions that have led to higher sales levels and better pricing.
27
Table of Contents
Costs and Expenses
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | $ | 89,687 | $ | 49,906 | 80 | % | ||||||
Merger and integration expenses | 4,439 | 324 | 1,270 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 90,449 | 49,488 | 83 | % | ||||||||
Fleet impairment | 1,450 | — | n/a | |||||||||
Interest expense | 33,220 | 28,272 | 18 | % | ||||||||
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates | (6,093 | ) | (5,683 | ) | 7 | % | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net | (12,999 | ) | (7,597 | ) | 71 | % |
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results after the merger. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was 12% and 11%, respectively.
Merger and integration expenses related to the merger between Hanover and Universal were $4.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008. These expenses were primarily related to retention bonuses, severance and other costs associated with integrating Hanover’s and Universal’s operations following the merger.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to the inclusion of Universal’s results after the merger and property, plant and equipment additions.
The increase in interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007, was primarily due to a higher average debt balance due to the addition of Universal’s debt after the merger compared to our average debt balance before the merger. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in our weighted average effective interest rate, including the impact of interest rate swaps, to 5.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from 7.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2007. For more information regarding the refinancing of debt, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 (“Financial Statements”) of this report.
The increase in equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates was primarily caused by higher earnings from our Venezuelan joint venture PIGAP II. PIGAP II is a joint venture in which we have a 30% ownership interest, that operates natural gas compression plants in Venezuela.
The increase in other (income) expense, net, was primarily due to an increase of approximately $8.1 million in foreign currency translation gains for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. The gain is primarily related to the remeasurement of our international subsidiaries’ net assets exposed to changes in foreign currency rates. The increase in other (income) expense, net, was partially offset by a $3.2 million decrease in gains on sales of trading securities. From time to time, we purchase short-term debt securities denominated in U.S. dollars and exchange them for short-term debt securities denominated in local currency in Latin America to achieve more favorable exchange rates. These funds are utilized in our international contract operations, which have experienced an increase in operating costs due to local inflation.
Income Taxes
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 29,977 | $ | 14,445 | 108 | % | ||||||
Effective tax rate | 36.7 | % | 36.3 | % | 1 | % |
The increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to an increase in income before income taxes from the inclusion of Universal’s results after the merger. Income tax expense was further increased by $3.1 million for the tax effect of uncertain tax positions, including penalties and interest, related to foreign jurisdictions which was partially offset by a net benefit of $3.0 million
28
Table of Contents
from claiming foreign taxes as credits rather than deductions during the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year.
Minority Interest
As of March 31, 2008, minority interest is primarily comprised of the portion of the Partnership’s capital and earnings that is applicable to the 49% limited partner interest in the Partnership not owned by us. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our unrestricted cash balance was $125.3 million at March 31, 2008, compared to $149.2 million at December 31, 2007. Working capital increased to $687.4 million at March 31, 2008 from $670.5 million at December 31, 2007. The increase in working capital was primarily attributable to an increase in accounts receivable and inventory, partially offset by an increase in billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated earnings.
Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, are summarized in the table below (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations: | ||||||||
Operating activities(1) | $ | 112,417 | $ | 5,234 | ||||
Investing activities | (131,609 | ) | (64,043 | ) | ||||
Financing activities | (8,806 | ) | 42,325 | |||||
Discontinued Operations | 2,632 | — | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 1,470 | 133 | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (23,896 | ) | $ | (16,351 | ) | ||
(1) | Our net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 includes Universal’s operations while our net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 reflects only Hanover’s historical results of operations. |
Operating Activities: The increase in cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily due to the inclusion of operating cash flows from Universal in the three months ended March 31, 2008 and changes in working capital.
Investing Activities: The increase in cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily attributable to increased capital expenditures primarily due to our larger contract operations business after the merger, $25 million cash paid for an acquisition in the first quarter of 2008 and a $6.5 million increase in restricted cash.
Financing Activities: The increase in cash used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily attributable to reduced needs for borrowings caused by increased cash flows from operating activities, partially offset by increased capital expenditures and the purchase of a business in the first quarter of 2008.
Capital Expenditures: We generally invest funds necessary to fabricate fleet additions when our idle equipment cannot be reconfigured to economically fulfill a project’s requirements and the new equipment expenditure is expected to generate economic returns, over its expected useful life, that exceed our return on capital targets. We currently plan to spend approximately $400 million to $500 million in net capital expenditures during 2008 including (1) fleet equipment additions and (2) approximately $110 million to $120 million on equipment maintenance capital.
Long-Term Debt and Debt Refinancing: Following the merger of Hanover and Universal, we completed a refinancing of a significant amount of our outstanding debt on the merger date. We entered into a $1.65 billion senior secured credit facility and a $1.0 billion asset-backed securitization facility. As a result of this and a subsequent refinancing, substantially all of the debt of Universal and Hanover outstanding on the merger date has been retired or redeemed, with the exception of Hanover’s convertible senior notes due 2014 and the Partnership’s credit facility. For more information regarding the refinancing and the repayment of debt, see Note 6 to the Financial Statements.
29
Table of Contents
On August 20, 2007, we entered into a five-year credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with various financial institutions as the lenders. The Credit Agreement consists of (a) a five-year revolving senior secured credit facility in the aggregate amount of $850 million, which includes a variable allocation for a Canadian tranche and the ability to issue letters of credit under the facility and (b) a six-year term loan senior secured credit facility, in the aggregate amount of $800 million with principal payments due on multiple dates through June 2013 (collectively, the “Credit Facility”). Subject to certain conditions, at our request and with the approval of the lenders, the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility may be increased by an additional $400 million less certain adjustments, including the amount of any outstanding borrowing under the 2007 ABS Facility (described below) in excess of $800 million.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, if they are in U.S. dollars, at LIBOR or a Base Rate, at our option, plus an applicable margin or, if the borrowings are in Canadian dollars, at our option, at U.S. dollar LIBOR, U.S. dollar Base Rate or Canadian prime rate plus the applicable margin or the Canadian Dollar bankers’ acceptance rate. The applicable margin varies depending on the debt ratings of our senior secured indebtedness (i) in the case of LIBOR loans, from 0.65% to 1.75% or (ii) in the case of Base Rate or Canadian prime rate loans, from 0.0% to 0.75%. The applicable margin at March 31, 2008 was 0.825%. The Base Rate is the higher of the U.S. Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%. At March 31, 2008, all amounts outstanding were LIBOR loans and the weighted average interest rate, excluding the effect of related cash flow hedges, was 4.0%.
The Credit Agreement contains various covenants with which we must comply, including, but not limited to, limitations on incurrence of indebtedness, investments, liens on assets, transactions with affiliates, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and other provisions customary in similar types of agreements. We must also maintain, on a consolidated basis, required leverage and interest coverage ratios. Additionally, the Credit Agreement contains customary conditions, representations and warranties, events of default and indemnification provisions. Our indebtedness under the Credit Facility is collateralized by liens on substantially all of our personal property in the U.S. and Canada. The assets of the Partnership and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Exterran ABS 2007 LLC (along with its subsidiaries, “Exterran ABS”), are not collateral under the Credit Agreement. We have executed a U.S. Pledge Agreement pursuant to which we and our Significant Subsidiaries (as defined in the Credit Agreement) are required to pledge our equity and the equity of certain subsidiaries. The Partnership and Exterran ABS are not pledged under this agreement and do not guarantee debt under the Credit Facility.
As of March 31, 2008, we had $365.0 million in outstanding borrowings and $357.1 million in letters of credit outstanding under our revolving credit facility. Additional borrowings of up to approximately $127.9 million were available under that facility as of March 31, 2008.
On August 20, 2007, Exterran ABS entered into a $1.0 billion asset-backed securitization facility (the “2007 ABS Facility”) and issued $400 million of Series 2007-1 notes under this facility. On September 18, 2007, an additional $400 million of Series 2007-1 notes (collectively with the August 20, 2007 issuance, the “Series 2007-1 Notes”) was issued under this facility. Interest and fees payable to the noteholders will accrue on the Series 2007-1 Notes at a variable rate consisting of LIBOR plus an applicable margin. For outstanding amounts up to $800 million, the applicable margin is 0.825%. For amounts outstanding over $800 million, the applicable margin is 1.35%. The weighted average interest rate at March 31, 2008 on the Series 2007-1 Notes, excluding the effect of related cash flow hedges, was 3.4%. The Series 2007-1 Notes are revolving in nature and are payable in July 2012. The amount outstanding at any time is limited to the lower of (i) 80% of the appraised value of the natural gas compression equipment owned by Exterran ABS and its subsidiaries, (ii) 4.5 times free cash flow or (iii) the amount calculated under an interest coverage test. The related indenture contains customary terms and conditions with respect to an issuance of asset-backed securities, including representations and warranties, covenants and events of default.
Repayment of the Series 2007-1 Notes has been secured by a pledge of all of the assets of Exterran ABS, consisting primarily of a fleet of natural gas compressors and related contracts to provide compression services to our customers. Under the 2007 ABS Facility, we had $15.6 million of restricted cash as of March 31, 2008.
The Partnership, as guarantor, and EXLP Operating LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership (together with the Partnership, the “Partnership Borrowers”), entered into a senior secured credit agreement in 2006 (the “Partnership Credit Agreement”). The revolving credit facility under the Partnership Credit Agreement was expanded in 2007 and consists of a five-year $315 million revolving credit facility, which matures in October 2011. As of March 31, 2008, there was $217.0 million in outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and $98.0 million was available for additional borrowings. Subject to certain conditions, at the request of the Partnership, and with the approval of the lenders, the aggregate commitments under the Partnership Credit Agreement may be increased by an additional $135 million (see Note 13 to the Financial Statements).
The Partnership’s revolving credit facility bears interest at a Base Rate or LIBOR, at the Partnership’s option, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin, depending on the Partnership’s Leverage Ratio, varies (i) in the case of LIBOR loans, from 1.0% to
30
Table of Contents
2.0% or (ii) in the case of Base Rate loans, from 0.0% to 1.0%. The Base Rate is the higher of the U.S. Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%. At March 31, 2008 all amounts outstanding were LIBOR loans and the applicable margin was 1.0%. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balance at March 31, 2008, excluding the effect of related cash flow hedges, was 5.6%.
Borrowings under the credit agreement are secured by substantially all of the personal property assets of the Partnership Borrowers. In addition, all of the capital stock of the Partnership’s U.S. restricted subsidiaries has been pledged to secure the obligations under the credit agreement.
Under the credit agreement, the Partnership Borrowers are subject to certain limitations, including limitations on their ability to incur additional debt or sell assets, with restrictions on the use of proceeds; to make certain investments and acquisitions; to grant liens; and to pay dividends and distributions. The Partnership Borrowers are also subject to financial covenants which include a total leverage and an interest coverage ratio.
As of March 31, 2008, we had approximately $2.3 billion in outstanding debt obligations, consisting of $800.0 million outstanding under the 2007 ABS Facility, $800.0 million outstanding under our term loan, $365.0 million outstanding under our $850 million revolving credit facility, $143.8 million outstanding under our 4.75% convertible notes and $217.0 million outstanding under the Partnership’s revolving credit facility. During March 2008, we repaid our 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2008 using funds from our revolving credit facility. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of March 31, 2008. We have entered into interest rate swap agreements related to a portion of our variable rate debt. See Part I, Item 3 “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for further discussion of our interest rate swap agreements.
The interest rate we pay under our Credit Agreement can be affected by changes in our credit rating. As of March 31, 2008, our credit ratings as assigned by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s were:
Standard | ||||
Moody’s | & Poor’s | |||
Outlook | Stable | Stable | ||
Corporate Family Rating | Ba2 | BB | ||
Exterran Senior Secured Credit Facility | Ba2 | BB+ | ||
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2014 | — | BB |
Historically, we have financed capital expenditures with a combination of net cash provided by operating and financing activities. Based on current market conditions, we expect that net cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to finance our operating expenditures, capital expenditures and scheduled interest and debt repayments through December 31, 2008, but to the extent it is not, we may borrow additional funds under our credit facilities or we may obtain additional debt or equity financing.
Stock Repurchase Program. On August 20, 2007, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock through August 19, 2009. See further discussion of the stock repurchase program in Note 9 to the Financial Statements. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the period January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008.
Dividends. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since formation, and we do not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. Our board of directors anticipates that all cash flow generated from operations in the foreseeable future will be retained and used to repay our debt, repurchase our stock or develop and expand our business. Any future determinations to pay cash dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our results of operations and financial condition, credit and loan agreements in effect at that time and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
Partnership Distributions to Unitholders. The Partnership’s partnership agreement requires it to distribute all of its “available cash” quarterly. Under the partnership agreement, available cash is defined to generally mean, for each fiscal quarter, (1) cash on hand at the Partnership at the end of the quarter in excess of the amount of reserves its general partner determines is necessary or appropriate to provide for the conduct of its business, to comply with applicable law, any of its debt instruments or other agreements or to provide for future distributions to its unitholders for any one or more of the upcoming four quarters, plus, (2) if the Partnership’s general partner so determines, all or a portion of the Partnership’s cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter.
Under the terms of the partnership agreement, there is no guarantee that unitholders will receive quarterly distributions from the Partnership. The Partnership’s distribution policy, which may be changed at anytime, is subject to certain restrictions, including (1) restrictions contained in the Partnership’s $315 million revolving credit facility, (2) the Partnership’s general partner’s
31
Table of Contents
establishment of reserves to fund future operations or cash distributions to the Partnership’s unitholders, (3) restrictions contained in the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act and (4) the Partnership’s lack of sufficient cash to pay distributions.
Through our ownership of common and subordinated units and all of the equity interests in the general partner of the Partnership, we expect to receive cash distributions from the Partnership. Our rights to receive distributions of cash from the Partnership as holder of subordinated units are subordinated to the rights of the common unitholders to receive such distributions.
On February 14, 2008, the Partnership distributed approximately $7.3 million, including distributions to its general partner on its incentive distribution rights, or $0.425 per limited partner unit, covering the period from October 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. On April 28, 2008, the board of directors of the general partner of the Partnership approved a cash distribution of approximately $7.3 million, including distributions to its general partner on its incentive distribution rights, or $0.425 per limited partner unit, covering the period from January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008. The record date for this distribution is May 9, 2008 and payment is expected to occur on May 14, 2008.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements that may affect us, please see Note 11 to the Financial Statements.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE
We define gross margin as total revenue less cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense). Gross margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a primary measure used by our management as it represents the results of revenue and cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense), which are key components of our operations. We believe gross margin is important because it focuses on the current operating performance of our operations and excludes the impact of the prior historical costs of the assets acquired or constructed that are utilized in those operations, the indirect costs associated with our selling, general and administrative activities, the impact of our financing methods and income taxes. Depreciation expense may not accurately reflect the costs required to maintain and replenish the operational usage of our assets and therefore may not portray the costs from current operating activity. As an indicator of our operating performance, gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). Our gross margin may not be comparable to a similarly titled measure of another company because other entities may not calculate gross margin in the same manner.
Gross margin has certain material limitations associated with its use as compared to net income. These limitations are primarily due to the exclusion of interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense and selling, general and administrative expense. Each of these excluded expenses is material to our consolidated results of operations. Because we intend to finance a portion of our operations through borrowings, interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and our ability to generate revenue. Additionally, because we use capital assets, depreciation expense is a necessary element of our costs and our ability to generate revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses are necessary costs to support our operations and required corporate activities. To compensate for these limitations, management uses this non-GAAP measure as a supplemental measure to other GAAP results to provide a more complete understanding of our performance.
For a reconciliation of gross margin to net income, see Note 12 to the Financial Statements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have agreed to guarantee certain obligations of indebtedness of the SIMCO/Harwat Consortium, a joint venture in which we own a 35.5% interest, and of El Furrial, a joint venture in which we own a 33.3% interest. Each of these joint ventures is our non-consolidated affiliate, and our guarantee obligations are not recorded on our accompanying balance sheet. In each case, our guarantee obligation is a percentage of the guaranteed debt of the non-consolidated affiliate equal to our ownership percentage in such affiliate. At March 31, 2008, we have guaranteed approximately $23 million of the debt of the El Furrial joint venture. Our obligation to perform under the guarantees arises only in the event that our non-consolidated affiliate defaults under the agreements governing the indebtedness. We currently have no reason to believe that either of these non-consolidated affiliates will default on its indebtedness. For more information on these off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 10 to the Financial Statements and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
32
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Variable Rate Debt
We are exposed to market risk due to variable interest rates under our financing arrangements.
As of March 31, 2008, after taking into consideration interest rate swaps, we had approximately $797.0 million of outstanding indebtedness that was effectively subject to floating interest rates. A 1.0% increase in interest rates would result in an annual increase in our interest expense of approximately $8.0 million.
Interest Rate Swap Arrangements
We are a party to interest rate swap agreements that are recorded at fair value in our financial statements. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. A change in the underlying interest rates may also result in a change in their recorded value.
The following table summarizes, by individual hedge instrument, our interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Fair Value of | ||||||||||||||
Floating Rate to be | Notional | Swap at | ||||||||||||
Fixed Rate to be Paid | Maturity Date | Received | Amount | March 31, 2008 | ||||||||||
4.035 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | $ | 50,000 | (1) | $ | (856 | ) | |||||
4.007 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (1) | (840 | ) | |||||||
3.990 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (1) | (830 | ) | |||||||
4.037 | % | March 31, 2010 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (1) | (857 | ) | |||||||
4.675 | % | August 20, 2012 | One Month LIBOR | 151,882 | (2) | (11,598 | ) | |||||||
4.744 | % | July 20, 2012 | One Month LIBOR | 226,482 | (2) | (17,605 | ) | |||||||
4.668 | % | July 20, 2012 | One Month LIBOR | 150,000 | (2) | (11,335 | ) | |||||||
5.210 | % | January 20, 2013 | One Month LIBOR | 58,706 | (2) | (3,814 | ) | |||||||
4.450 | % | September 20, 2019 | One Month LIBOR | 41,818 | (2) | (1,830 | ) | |||||||
5.020 | % | September 20, 2019 | One Month LIBOR | 51,112 | (2) | (4,199 | ) | |||||||
5.275 | % | December 1, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 125,000 | (10,322 | ) | ||||||||
5.343 | % | October 20, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 40,000 | (3,472 | ) | ||||||||
5.315 | % | October 20, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 40,000 | (3,432 | ) | ||||||||
3.080 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.075 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.062 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.100 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.065 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) | ||||||||
3.072 | % | January 28, 2011 | Three Month LIBOR | 50,000 | (87 | ) |
(1) | These swaps amortize ratably over the life of the swap. | |
(2) | Certain of these swaps amortize while the notional amounts of others increase in corresponding amounts to maintain a consistent outstanding notional amount of $680 million. |
All of the swaps, which we have designated as cash flow hedging instruments, meet the specific hedge criteria of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” so that any change in their fair values is recognized as a component of comprehensive income or loss and is included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The swap terms substantially coincide with the hedged item and are expected to offset changes in expected cash flows due to fluctuations in the variable rate, and therefore we currently do not expect a significant amount of ineffectiveness on these hedges. We perform quarterly calculations to determine if the swap agreements are still effective and to calculate any ineffectiveness. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we recorded approximately $0.8 million of interest expense due to the ineffectiveness related to these swaps.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We operate in numerous countries throughout the world and a fluctuation in the value of the currencies of these countries relative to the U.S. dollar could reduce our profits from international operations and the value of the net assets of our international operations
33
Table of Contents
when reported in U.S. dollars in our financial statements. The impact of foreign exchange on our statements of operations will depend on the amount of our net asset and liability positions exposed to currency fluctuations in future periods.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of March 31, 2008. Based on the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, and made known to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, on a timely basis to ensure that it is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Subsequent to the merger between Hanover and Universal, we commenced a project to transition a substantial portion of Universal’s U.S. based operations from its pre-merger enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system, which includes its financial reporting software such as its general ledger, onto our existing ERP system. The conversion was implemented in February 2008 and had a material effect on our internal controls over financial reporting in the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
34
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions. While management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, it believes that any ultimate liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, because of the inherent uncertainty of litigation, we cannot provide assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding to which we are a party will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operation or cash flows for the period in which the resolution occurs.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors that were previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
35
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description | |
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 5, 2007, by and among Hanover Compressor Company, Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., Iliad Holdings, Inc., Hector Sub, Inc. and Ulysses Sub, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
2.2 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 25, 2007, to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 5, 2007, by and among Hanover Compressor Company, Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., Exterran Holdings, Inc. (formerly Iliad Holdings, Inc.), Hector Sub, Inc. and Ulysses Sub, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
2.3 | Amended and Restated Contribution Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated July 6, 2007, by and among Universal Compression, Inc., UCO Compression 2005 LLC, UCI Leasing LLC, UCO GP, LLC, UCI GP LP LLC, UCO General Partner, LP, UCI MLP LP LLC, UCLP Operating LLC, UCLP Leasing LLC and Universal Compression Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 11, 2007 | |
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
4.1 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 20, 2007, by and between Hanover Compressor Company, Exterran Holdings, Inc., and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, for the 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2007 | |
4.2 | Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 20, 2007, by and between Hanover Compressor Company, Exterran Holdings, Inc., and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, for the 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2007 | |
10.1* | Form of Directors’ Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Notice | |
10.2* | Form of Directors’ Restricted Stock Award Notice | |
31.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Filed herewith. |
36
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC. | ||||
Date: May 8, 2008 | ||||
By: | /s/ J. MICHAEL ANDERSON | |||
J. Michael Anderson | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
By: | /s/ KENNETH R. BICKETT | |||
Kenneth R. Bickett | ||||
Vice President, Accounting and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||
37
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 5, 2007, by and among Hanover Compressor Company, Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., Iliad Holdings, Inc., Hector Sub, Inc. and Ulysses Sub, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
2.2 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 25, 2007, to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 5, 2007, by and among Hanover Compressor Company, Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., Exterran Holdings, Inc. (formerly Iliad Holdings, Inc.), Hector Sub, Inc. and Ulysses Sub, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
2.3 | Amended and Restated Contribution Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated July 6, 2007, by and among Universal Compression, Inc., UCO Compression 2005 LLC, UCI Leasing LLC, UCO GP, LLC, UCI GP LP LLC, UCO General Partner, LP, UCI MLP LP LLC, UCLP Operating LLC, UCLP Leasing LLC and Universal Compression Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 11, 2007 | |
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Exterran Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 20, 2007 | |
4.1 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 20, 2007, by and between Hanover Compressor Company, Exterran Holdings, Inc., and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, for the 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2007 | |
4.2 | Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 20, 2007, by and between Hanover Compressor Company, Exterran Holdings, Inc., and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, for the 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2007 | |
10.1* | Form of Directors’ Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Notice | |
10.2* | Form of Directors’ Restricted Stock Award Notice | |
31.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Filed herewith. |
38