UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
R QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
or
£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from__________ to ___________
Commission File Number: 000-52891
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
| 20-8429087 |
(State of incorporation) |
| (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
50 Rockefeller Plaza |
|
|
New York, New York |
| 10020 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
Investor Relations (212) 492-8920
(212) 492-1100
(Registrant’s telephone numbers, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer £ | Accelerated filer £ | Non-accelerated filer R | Smaller reporting company £ |
|
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No R
Registrant has 317,451,400 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding at November 4, 2013.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”), including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in Item 2 of Part I of this Report, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. It is important to note that our actual results could be materially different from those projected in such forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in relying on forward-looking statements as they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may materially affect our future results, performance, achievements or transactions. Information on factors which could impact actual results and cause them to differ from what is anticipated in the forward-looking statements contained herein is included in this Report as well as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including but not limited to those described in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the SEC on March 8, 2013 (the “2012 Annual Report”). Except as required by federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not undertake to revise or update any forward-looking statements.
Additionally, a description of our critical accounting estimates is included in the MD&A section of our 2012 Annual Report. There has been no significant change in our critical accounting estimates. All references to “Notes” throughout the document refer to the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements of the registrant in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements (Unaudited).
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 1
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
Assets |
|
|
|
| ||
Investments in real estate: |
|
|
|
| ||
Real estate, at cost (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) of $150,378 and $133,472, respectively) |
| $ | 2,293,833 |
| $ | 2,105,772 |
Operating real estate, at cost (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $12,557 and $0, respectively) |
| 280,429 |
| 254,805 | ||
Accumulated depreciation (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $7,260 and $3,801, respectively) |
| (127,978) |
| (85,002) | ||
Net investments in properties |
| 2,446,284 |
| 2,275,575 | ||
Real estate under construction (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $17,224 and $12,629, respectively) |
| 98,357 |
| 71,285 | ||
Net investments in direct financing leases (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $243,611 and $242,175, respectively) |
| 478,346 |
| 475,872 | ||
Equity investments in real estate |
| 363,727 |
| 275,133 | ||
Assets held for sale |
| 11,896 |
| - | ||
Net investments in real estate |
| 3,398,610 |
| 3,097,865 | ||
Note receivable |
| 40,000 |
| 40,000 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $538 and $1,529, respectively) |
| 441,802 |
| 652,330 | ||
In-place lease intangible assets, net (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $17,512 and $6,040, respectively) |
| 436,417 |
| 423,084 | ||
Other intangible assets, net |
| 94,498 |
| 78,239 | ||
Other assets, net (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $17,241 and $14,780, respectively) |
| 148,488 |
| 124,781 | ||
Total assets |
| $ | 4,559,815 |
| $ | 4,416,299 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Non-recourse debt (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $200,585 and $123,413, respectively) |
| $ | 1,795,336 |
| $ | 1,633,452 |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $3,208 and $2,249, respectively) |
| 81,084 |
| 74,384 | ||
Prepaid and deferred rental income and security deposits (inclusive of amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs of $5,935 and $5,710, respectively) |
| 121,963 |
| 118,017 | ||
Due to affiliates |
| 20,799 |
| 29,527 | ||
Distributions payable |
| 51,130 |
| 46,412 | ||
Total liabilities |
| 2,070,312 |
| 1,901,792 | ||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Equity: |
|
|
|
| ||
CPA®:17 – Global stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| - |
| - | ||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 900,000,000 shares authorized; 319,718,689 and 310,548,664 shares issued, respectively; and 314,648,689 and 306,903,020 shares outstanding, respectively |
| 320 |
| 310 | ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 2,874,248 |
| 2,786,855 | ||
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
| (396,599) |
| (277,224) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (17,060) |
| (35,366) | ||
Less: treasury stock at cost, 5,070,000 and 3,645,644 shares, respectively |
| (47,781) |
| (34,293) | ||
Total CPA®:17 – Global stockholders’ equity |
| 2,413,128 |
| 2,440,282 | ||
Noncontrolling interests |
| 76,375 |
| 74,225 | ||
Total equity |
| 2,489,503 |
| 2,514,507 | ||
Total liabilities and equity |
| $ | 4,559,815 |
| $ | 4,416,299 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 2
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Rental income |
| $ | 58,981 |
| $ | 44,289 |
| $ | 170,681 |
| $ | 127,253 |
Interest income from direct financing leases |
| 13,408 |
| 13,189 |
| 40,190 |
| 40,003 | ||||
Lease revenues |
| 72,389 |
| 57,478 |
| 210,871 |
| 167,256 | ||||
Other real estate income |
| 11,643 |
| 8,286 |
| 36,093 |
| 25,799 | ||||
Other operating income |
| 5,707 |
| 817 |
| 15,174 |
| 2,634 | ||||
Other interest income |
| 1,880 |
| 1,560 |
| 5,199 |
| 4,781 | ||||
|
| 91,619 |
| 68,141 |
| 267,337 |
| 200,470 | ||||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 23,595 |
| 17,841 |
| 69,287 |
| 49,403 | ||||
Property expenses |
| 13,687 |
| 7,755 |
| 37,258 |
| 22,042 | ||||
Acquisition expenses |
| 8,510 |
| 1,008 |
| 10,305 |
| 1,634 | ||||
Other real estate expenses |
| 7,983 |
| 5,149 |
| 24,911 |
| 16,073 | ||||
General and administrative |
| 4,847 |
| 3,407 |
| 14,596 |
| 10,561 | ||||
Impairment charges |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 2,019 | ||||
|
| 58,622 |
| 35,160 |
| 156,357 |
| 101,732 | ||||
Other Income and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income from equity investments in real estate |
| 513 |
| 954 |
| 3,380 |
| 5,220 | ||||
Other income and (expenses) |
| 1,299 |
| 2,779 |
| 8,035 |
| 4,070 | ||||
Interest expense |
| (22,807) |
| (18,134) |
| (66,468) |
| (52,579) | ||||
|
| (20,995) |
| (14,401) |
| (55,053) |
| (43,289) | ||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
| 12,002 |
| 18,580 |
| 55,927 |
| 55,449 | ||||
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes |
| (710) |
| 20 |
| (2,280) |
| (299) | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
| 11,292 |
| 18,600 |
| 53,647 |
| 55,150 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 249 |
| 329 |
| 740 |
| 1,694 | ||||
Net Income |
| 11,541 |
| 18,929 |
| 54,387 |
| 56,844 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (inclusive of Available Cash Distributions to advisor of $3,557 $3,667, $12,681, and $10,225, respectively) |
| (6,515) |
| (6,634) |
| (21,734) |
| (19,160) | ||||
Net Income Attributable to CPA®:17 – Global Stockholders |
| $ | 5,026 |
| $ | 12,295 |
| $ | 32,653 |
| $ | 37,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.05 |
| $ | 0.10 |
| $ | 0.15 |
Income from discontinued operations attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 0.01 | ||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.05 |
| $ | 0.10 |
| $ | 0.16 |
|
|
| �� |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
| 314,353,314 |
| 256,954,985 |
| 311,634,668 |
| 236,785,886 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Amounts Attributable to CPA®:17 – Global Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
| $ | 4,777 |
| $ | 11,966 |
| $ | 31,913 |
| $ | 35,990 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 249 |
| 329 |
| 740 |
| 1,694 | ||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| $ | 5,026 |
| $ | 12,295 |
| $ | 32,653 |
| $ | 37,684 |
Distributions Declared Per Share |
| $ | 0.1625 |
| $ | 0.1625 |
| $ | 0.4875 |
| $ | 0.3250 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 3
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Net Income |
| $ | 11,541 |
| $ | 18,929 |
| $ | 54,387 |
| $ | 56,844 |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| 32,477 |
| 13,905 |
| 15,614 |
| (2,432) | ||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments |
| (10,222) |
| (7,203) |
| 3,190 |
| (10,119) | ||||
Change in unrealized appreciation on marketable securities |
| 24 |
| 23 |
| 71 |
| 1,006 | ||||
|
| 22,279 |
| 6,725 |
| 18,875 |
| (11,545) | ||||
Comprehensive Income |
| 33,820 |
| 25,654 |
| 73,262 |
| 45,299 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Amounts Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
| (6,515) |
| (6,634) |
| (21,734) |
| (19,160) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| (408) |
| (222) |
| (173) |
| 64 | ||||
Change in unrealized gain on derivative instrument |
| (142) |
| (109) |
| (396) |
| (259) | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (7,065) |
| (6,965) |
| (22,303) |
| (19,355) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive Income Attributable to CPA®:17 – Global Stockholders |
| $ | 26,755 |
| $ | 18,689 |
| $ | 50,959 |
| $ | 25,944 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 4
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and the Year Ended December 31, 2012
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
| CPA®:17 – Global Stockholders |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Distributions |
| Accumulated |
|
|
| Total |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| Total |
|
|
| Additional |
| in Excess of |
| Other |
|
|
| CPA®:17 – |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| Outstanding |
| Common |
| Paid-In |
| Accumulated |
| Comprehensive |
| Treasury |
| Global |
| Noncontrolling |
|
| ||||||||
|
| Shares |
| Stock |
| Capital |
| Earnings |
| Loss |
| Stock |
| Stockholders |
| Interests |
| Total | ||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2012 |
| 206,148,818 |
| $ | 208 |
| $ | 1,863,227 |
| $ | (157,062) |
| $ | (32,601) |
| $ | (17,104) |
| $ | 1,656,668 |
| $ | 70,791 |
| $ | 1,727,459 |
Shares issued, net of offering costs |
| 100,529,436 |
| 100 |
| 903,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 903,229 |
|
|
| 903,229 | ||||||||
Shares issued to affiliates |
| 2,043,451 |
| 2 |
| 20,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20,501 |
|
|
| 20,501 | ||||||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
| 762 |
| 762 | ||||||||
Distributions declared ($0.6500 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (161,773) |
|
|
|
|
| (161,773) |
|
|
| (161,773) | ||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
| (24,427) |
| (24,427) | ||||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41,611 |
|
|
|
|
| 41,611 |
| 26,542 |
| 68,153 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13,323 |
|
|
| 13,323 |
| 192 |
| 13,515 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (17,123) |
|
|
| (17,123) |
| 365 |
| (16,758) | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,035 |
|
|
| 1,035 |
|
|
| 1,035 | ||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
| (1,818,685) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (17,189) |
| (17,189) |
|
|
| (17,189) | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
| 306,903,020 |
| 310 |
| 2,786,855 |
| (277,224) |
| (35,366) |
| (34,293) |
| 2,440,282 |
| 74,225 |
| 2,514,507 | ||||||||
Shares issued, net of offering costs |
| 7,628,290 |
| 8 |
| 71,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71,921 |
|
|
| 71,921 | ||||||||
Shares issued to affiliates |
| 1,541,735 |
| 2 |
| 15,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,482 |
|
|
| 15,482 | ||||||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
| 2 |
| 2 | ||||||||
Distributions declared ($0.4875 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (152,028) |
|
|
|
|
| (152,028) |
|
|
| (152,028) | ||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
| (20,155) |
| (20,155) | ||||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32,653 |
|
|
|
|
| 32,653 |
| 21,734 |
| 54,387 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,441 |
|
|
| 15,441 |
| 173 |
| 15,614 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,794 |
|
|
| 2,794 |
| 396 |
| 3,190 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
|
|
| 71 |
|
|
| 71 | ||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
| (1,424,356) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (13,488) |
| (13,488) |
|
|
| (13,488) | ||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2013 |
| 314,648,689 |
| $ | 320 |
| $ | 2,874,248 |
| $ | (396,599) |
| $ | (17,060) |
| $ | (47,781) |
| $ | 2,413,128 |
| $ | 76,375 |
| $ | 2,489,503 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 5
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||
|
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||
Cash Flows — Operating Activities |
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
| $ | 54,387 |
| $ | 56,844 |
Adjustments to net income: |
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization, including intangible assets and deferred financing costs |
| 72,119 |
| 52,184 | ||
Loss from equity investments in real estate in excess of distributions received |
| 2,891 |
| 178 | ||
Gain on sale of real estate |
| (78) |
| (740) | ||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments and others |
| 424 |
| 671 | ||
Realized gain on foreign currency transactions and others |
| (3,251) |
| (907) | ||
Straight-line rent adjustment, amortization of rent-related intangibles, and others |
| (15,254) |
| (9,678) | ||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 538 |
| - | ||
Accretion on commercial mortgage-backed securities |
| (510) |
| - | ||
Impairment charges |
| - |
| 2,019 | ||
Settlement of derivative asset |
| 2,964 |
| - | ||
Net changes in other operating assets and liabilities |
| 21,595 |
| 25,028 | ||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
| 135,825 |
| 125,599 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows — Investing Activities |
|
|
|
| ||
Distributions received from equity investments in real estate in excess of equity income |
| 5,325 |
| 10,412 | ||
Acquisitions of real estate and direct financing leases |
| (275,156) |
| (402,594) | ||
Capital contributions to equity investments in real estate |
| (93,115) |
| (7,890) | ||
Value added taxes (“VAT”) paid in connection with acquisition of real estate |
| (28,959) |
| (3,609) | ||
VAT refunded in connection with acquisitions of real estate |
| 32,618 |
| 2,663 | ||
Proceeds from sale of real estate |
| 93 |
| 12,657 | ||
Funds placed in escrow |
| (36,085) |
| (34,479) | ||
Funds released from escrow |
| 18,380 |
| 24,423 | ||
Payment of deferred acquisition fees to an affiliate |
| (10,556) |
| (11,881) | ||
Purchase of securities |
| - |
| (7,071) | ||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (387,455) |
| (417,369) | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows — Financing Activities |
|
|
|
| ||
Distributions paid |
| (147,310) |
| (105,935) | ||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
| 2 |
| 173 | ||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| (20,155) |
| (17,445) | ||
Scheduled payments of mortgage principal |
| (16,858) |
| (13,119) | ||
Prepayments of mortgage principal |
| (6,410) |
| - | ||
Proceeds from mortgage financing |
| 175,826 |
| 214,808 | ||
Funds placed in escrow |
| 20 |
| 8,613 | ||
Funds released from escrow |
| (5,076) |
| (1,515) | ||
Deferred financing costs and mortgage deposits |
| (2,560) |
| 1,876 | ||
Proceeds from issuance of shares, net of issuance costs |
| 73,044 |
| 526,202 | ||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| (13,488) |
| (12,197) | ||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
| 37,035 |
| 601,461 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents During the Period |
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
| 4,067 |
| 258 | ||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
| (210,528) |
| 309,949 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
| 652,330 |
| 180,726 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
| $ | 441,802 |
| $ | 490,675 |
(Continued)
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 6
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(Continued)
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities:
A summary of our non-cash investing and financing activities for the periods presented is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||
Deferred acquisition fees payable (Notes 3, 4) |
| $ | 2,811 |
| $ | 7,710 |
Reclassification of Real estate, at cost (Note 4) |
| 26,141 |
| 140,141 | ||
Reclassification of Operating real estate, at cost (Note 4) |
| (609) |
| - | ||
Reclassification of Real estate under construction (Note 4) |
| (38,698) |
| (140,141) | ||
Reclassification of Accumulated depreciation (Note 4) |
| 1,270 |
| - | ||
Assets held for sale (Note 4) |
| 11,896 |
| - | ||
Asset retirement obligations (Note 4) |
| - |
| 3,684 | ||
Third quarter distributions declared |
| 51,130 |
| 41,712 | ||
Asset management fees settled in shares (Note 3) |
| 15,482 |
| 15,431 | ||
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 7
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 – GLOBAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Organization and Offering
Organization
Corporate Property Associates 17 – Global Incorporated (“CPA®:17 – Global” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors, “we,” “us” or “our”) is a publicly owned, non-listed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that invests primarily in commercial properties leased to companies domestically and internationally. We were formed in 2007 and are managed by W. P. Carey Inc. (“WPC”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “advisor”). As a REIT, we are not subject to United States (“U.S.”) federal income taxation as long as we satisfy certain requirements, principally relating to the nature of our income, the level of our distributions and other factors. We earn revenue principally by leasing the properties we own to single corporate tenants, primarily on a triple-net-lease basis, which requires the tenant to pay substantially all of the costs associated with operating and maintaining the property. Revenue is subject to fluctuation primarily because of the timing of new lease transactions, lease terminations, lease expirations, contractual rent adjustments, tenant defaults, sales of properties and changes in foreign currency exchange rates, if any.
Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are held by CPA®:17 Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) and at September 30, 2013, we owned approximately 99.985% of the general and limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership. The remaining interest in the Operating Partnership is held by a subsidiary of WPC.
At September 30, 2013, our portfolio was comprised of our full or partial ownership interests in 343 properties, substantially all of which were net-leased to 88 tenants, and totaled approximately 33 million square feet. In addition, our portfolio was comprised of our full or partial ownership interests in 69 self-storage, three hotel properties, and one shopping center for an aggregate of approximately 6 million square feet.
Public Offerings
We issued approximately 289,000,000 shares of our common stock and raised aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $2.9 billion from our initial public offering, which ended in April 2011, and our follow-on offering, which closed on January 31, 2013. Through September 30, 2013, we have issued 25,236,318 shares ($239.7 million) through our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan (“DRIP”). We repurchased 5,070,000 shares ($47.7 million) of our common stock under our redemption plan from inception through September 30, 2013.
In January 2013, we amended our articles of incorporation to increase the number of shares authorized to 950,000,000 consisting of 900,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. In January 2013, we also filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-186182) with the SEC regarding 200,000,000 shares of our common stock to be offered through our DRIP.
Note 2. Basis of Presentation
Our interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared, without audit, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not necessarily include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair statement of our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”).
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial information for the interim periods presented in this Report reflects all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Our interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are included in the 2012 Annual Report, as certain disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the audited consolidated financial statements have not been included in this Report. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts in our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. The unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Report have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the disposition (or planned disposition) of certain properties as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Basis of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements reflect all of our accounts, including those of our controlled subsidiaries and our tenancy-in-common interests as described below. The portion of equity in a consolidated subsidiary that is not attributable, directly or indirectly, to us is presented as noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
We have investments in tenancy-in-common interests in various domestic and international properties. Consolidation of these investments is not required as such interests do not qualify as VIEs and do not meet the control requirement required for consolidation. Accordingly, we account for these investments using the equity method of accounting. We use the equity method of accounting because the shared decision-making involved in a tenancy-in-common interest investment provides us with significant influence on the operating and financial decisions of these investments.
Additionally, we own interests in single-tenant net leased properties leased to companies through noncontrolling interests in partnerships and limited liability companies that we do not control but over which we exercise significant influence. We account for these investments under the equity method of accounting. At times, the carrying value of our equity investments may fall below zero for certain investments. We intend to fund our share of the jointly-owned investments’ future operating deficits should the need arise. However, we have no legal obligation to pay for any of the liabilities of such investments nor do we have any legal obligation to fund operating deficits.
We apply accounting guidance for consolidation of VIEs to certain entities in which the equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. Fixed price purchase and renewal options within a lease as well as certain decision-making rights within a loan can cause us to consider an entity a VIE.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Information about Geographic Areas
Our portfolio is comprised of domestic and international investments. At the end of the reporting period, our international investments were comprised of investments primarily in Europe and, to a lesser extent, Asia. Foreign currency exposure and risk management are discussed in Note 9. The following tables present information about our investments on a geographic basis (in thousands):
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Domestic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenues |
| $ | 64,343 |
| $ | 47,312 |
| $ | 190,195 |
| $ | 137,041 |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
| 8,667 |
| 9,936 |
| 32,389 |
| 29,012 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (6,401) |
| (6,488) |
| (21,219) |
| (18,639) | ||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| 3,888 |
| 3,614 |
| 11,277 |
| 12,029 | ||||
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenues |
| $ | 27,276 |
| $ | 20,829 |
| $ | 77,142 |
| $ | 63,429 |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
| 3,335 |
| 8,644 |
| 23,538 |
| 26,437 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (114) |
| (146) |
| (515) |
| (521) | ||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| 1,138 |
| 8,681 |
| 21,376 |
| 25,655 | ||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenues |
| $ | 91,619 |
| $ | 68,141 |
| $ | 267,337 |
| $ | 200,470 |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
| 12,002 |
| 18,580 |
| 55,927 |
| 55,449 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (6,515) |
| (6,634) |
| (21,734) |
| (19,160) | ||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| 5,026 |
| 12,295 |
| 32,653 |
| 37,684 | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||
Domestic |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Long-lived assets (a) |
| $ | 2,673,786 |
| $ | 2,510,238 | ||||||
Non-recourse debt |
| 1,267,108 |
| 1,135,321 | ||||||||
International |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Long-lived assets (a) |
| $ | 1,255,739 |
| $ | 1,088,950 | ||||||
Non-recourse debt |
| 528,228 |
| 498,131 | ||||||||
Total |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Long-lived assets (a) |
| $ | 3,929,525 |
| $ | 3,599,188 | ||||||
Non-recourse debt |
| 1,795,336 |
| 1,633,452 |
_________
(a) Consists of Net investment in properties; Real estate under construction; Net investment in direct financing leases; Equity investments in real estate; Assets held for sale; In-place lease intangible assets, net; and Other intangible assets, net, as applicable.
Recent Accounting Requirements
The following Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) are applicable to us as indicated:
ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities — In January 2013, the FASB issued an update to ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2013-01 clarifies that the scope of ASU 2011-11 applies to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting or similar arrangement. These amendments did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations and are applicable to us for our interim and annual reports beginning in 2013 and has been applied retrospectively.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ASU 2013-02, Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income — In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02 requiring entities to disclose additional information about items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This ASU impacts the form of our disclosures only, is applicable to us for our interim and annual reports beginning in 2013, and has been applied retrospectively. The related additional disclosures are located in Note 12.
ASU 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date, a Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force — In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, which requires entities to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements (in our case, tenancy-in-common arrangements, Note 6) for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed as the sum of the amount the entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. This ASU is applicable to us for our interim and annual reports beginning in 2014 and shall be applied retrospectively; however, we elected to adopt this ASU early in 2013 and it did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations for any of the periods presented.
ASU 2013-10, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, a Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force — In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-10, which permits the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate, also referred to as the “Overnight Index Swap Rate,” to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815, in addition to the U.S. government and London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) swap rate. The update also removes the restriction on the use of different benchmark rates for similar hedges. This ASU will be applicable to us for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. Through the date of this Report, we had not entered into any transactions to which this ASU applies.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 11
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3. Agreements and Transactions with Related Parties
Transactions with the Advisor
We have an advisory agreement with the advisor whereby the advisor performs certain services for us under a fee arrangement. On September 28, 2012, we amended and restated certain terms in that advisory agreement, as described below. The fee structure related to asset management fees, initial acquisition fees, subordinated acquisition fees and subordinated disposition fees was unchanged by the amendment and restatement, and the advisor remained entitled to 10% of the available cash of the Operating Partnership (the “Available Cash Distribution”), as described below. The term of the advisory agreement, which was scheduled to expire on September 31, 2013, has been extended to January 31, 2014. We also have certain agreements with affiliates regarding jointly-owned investments. In addition, we reimbursed the advisor for organization and offering costs incurred in connection with our offering through its closing on January 31, 2013 and for certain administrative duties performed on our behalf. The following tables present a summary of fees we paid and expenses we reimbursed to the advisor in accordance with the advisory agreement (in thousands):
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Amounts Included in the Consolidated Statements of Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Transaction fees |
| $ | 5,720 |
| $ | 996 |
| $ | 6,891 |
| $ | 996 |
Asset management fees |
| 5,658 |
| 4,906 |
| 16,131 |
| 14,224 | ||||
Available Cash Distribution |
| 3,557 |
| 3,667 |
| 12,681 |
| 10,225 | ||||
Personnel and overhead reimbursements |
| 2,262 |
| 1,181 |
| 6,529 |
| 3,322 | ||||
Office rent reimbursements |
| 366 |
| 214 |
| 949 |
| 561 | ||||
|
| $ | 17,563 |
| $ | 10,964 |
| $ | 43,181 |
| $ | 29,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Transaction Fees Capitalized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Current acquisition fees |
| $ | 1,824 |
| $ | 3,620 |
| $ | 4,011 |
| $ | 9,201 |
Deferred acquisition fees |
| 1,460 |
| 3,016 |
| 2,678 |
| 7,367 | ||||
|
| $ | 3,284 |
| $ | 6,636 |
| $ | 6,689 |
| $ | 16,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||
Unpaid Transaction Fees: |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Deferred acquisition fees |
| $ | 17,140 |
| $ | 26,246 | ||||||
Subordinated disposition fees |
| 202 |
| 202 | ||||||||
|
| $ | 17,342 |
| $ | 26,448 |
Transaction Fees
We pay the advisor acquisition fees for structuring and negotiating investments and related mortgage financing on our behalf, a portion of which is payable upon acquisition of investments with the remainder subordinated to the achievement of a preferred return, a non-compounded cumulative distribution of 5% per annum (based initially on our invested capital). Acquisition fees payable to the advisor with respect to our long-term net lease investments is 4.5% of the total cost of those investments and is comprised of a current portion of 2.5%, typically paid upon acquisition, and a deferred portion of 2%, typically paid over three years and subject to a 5% preferred return. For certain types of non-long term net lease investments, initial acquisition fees may range from 0% to 1.75% of the equity invested plus the related acquisition fees, with no portion of the fee being deferred. Unpaid installments of deferred acquisition fees are included in Due to affiliates in the consolidated financial statements.
The advisor may be entitled to receive a disposition fee in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 50.0% of the competitive real estate commission (as defined in the advisory agreement) or (ii) 3.0% of the contract sales price of the investment being sold; however, payment of such fees is subordinated to the 5% preferred return. These fees, which are paid at the discretion of our board of directors are deferred and are payable to the advisor only in connection with a liquidity event.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 12
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Asset Management Fees and Available Cash Distribution
As defined in the advisory agreement, we pay the advisor asset management fees that vary based on the nature of the underlying investment. We pay 0.5% per annum of average market value for long-term net leases and certain other types of real estate investments, and 1.5% to 1.75% per annum of average equity value for certain types of securities. The asset management fees are payable in cash or shares of our common stock at the option of the advisor. If the advisor elects to receive all or a portion of its fees in shares, the number of shares issued is determined by dividing the dollar amount of fees by our most recently published net asset value per share (“NAV”) or, if an NAV has not yet been published as currently is the case, $10.00 per share, which was the price at which our shares were sold in our recently completed public offering. For both 2013 and 2012, the advisor elected to receive its asset management fees in shares of our common stock, which vest over a period of three years. At September 30, 2013, the advisor owned 5,495,057 shares (1.7%) of our common stock. We also pay the advisor, depending on the type of investments we own, up to 10% of available cash of the Operating Partnership, which is defined as cash generated from operations, excluding capital proceeds, as reduced by operating expenses and debt service, excluding prepayments and balloon payments. Asset management fees and Available Cash Distributions are included in Property expenses and Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, respectively, in the consolidated financial statements.
Personnel and Overhead Reimbursements
Under the terms of the advisory agreement, the advisor allocates a portion of its personnel and overhead expenses to us and the other publicly-owned, non-listed REITs, which are managed by our advisor under the Corporate Property Associates brand name (the “CPA REITs”) and Carey Watermark Investors Incorporated (“CWI”). Effective as of October 1, 2012, the advisor allocates these expenses on the basis of our trailing four quarters of reported revenues and those of WPC, the CPA REITs, and CWI. Prior to that date, these costs were allocated on the basis of time charges incurred by the advisor’s personnel on behalf of the CPA REITs and CWI.
We reimburse the advisor for various expenses it incurs in the course of providing services to us. We reimburse certain third-party expenses paid by the advisor on our behalf, including property-specific costs, professional fees, office expenses and business development expenses. In addition, we reimburse the advisor for the allocated costs of personnel and overhead in managing our day-to-day operations, including accounting services, stockholder services, corporate management, and property management and operations. We do not reimburse the advisor for the cost of personnel if these personnel provide services for transactions for which the advisor receives a transaction fee, such as acquisitions and dispositions. Personnel and office rent reimbursements are included in General and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements.
The advisor is obligated to reimburse us for the amount by which our operating expenses exceeds the “2%/25% guidelines” (the greater of 2% of average invested assets or 25% of net income) as defined in the advisory agreement for any 12-month period. If in any year our operating expenses exceed the 2%/25% guidelines, the advisor will have an obligation to reimburse us for such excess, subject to certain conditions. If our independent directors find that the excess expenses were justified based on any unusual and nonrecurring factors that they deem sufficient, the advisor may be paid in future years for the full amount or any portion of such excess expenses, but only to the extent that the reimbursement would not cause our operating expenses to exceed this limit in any such year. We record the reimbursement as a reduction of asset management fees at such time that a reimbursement is fixed, determinable and irrevocable. Our operating expenses have not exceeded the amount that would require the advisor to reimburse us.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 13
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Organization and Offering Expenses
Through the termination of our public offering on January 31, 2013, we incurred expenses in connection with the offering of our securities. These expenses were deducted from the gross proceeds of our offering. Total organization and offering expenses, including underwriting compensation, did not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of our offering and our DRIP, consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. Under the terms of a dealer manager agreement between Carey Financial, LLC (“Carey Financial”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of our advisor, and us, Carey Financial received a selling commission of $0.65 per share sold and a dealer manager fee of $0.35 per share sold in our public offering. Carey Financial re-allowed all or a portion of selling commissions to selected dealers participating in the offering and re-allowed up to the full dealer manager fee to the selected dealers. Total underwriting compensation paid in connection with our offering, including selling commissions, the dealer manager fee, and reimbursements made by Carey Financial to selected dealers and investment advisors, did not exceed the limitations prescribed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., which limit underwriting compensation to 10% of gross offering proceeds. We also reimbursed Carey Financial up to an additional 0.5% of offering proceeds for bona fide due diligence expenses. We reimbursed the advisor or one of its affiliates for other organization and offering expenses (including, but not limited to, filing fees, legal, accounting, printing and escrow costs). The advisor agreed to be responsible for the payment of organization and offering expenses (excluding selling commissions and dealer manager fees) that exceed 4% of the gross offering proceeds.
During the offering period, we accrued costs incurred in connection with the raising of capital as deferred offering costs. Upon receipt of offering proceeds and reimbursement to the advisor for costs incurred, we charged the deferred costs to equity. The total costs paid by the advisor and its affiliates in connection with the organization and offering of our securities were $20.9 million from inception through January 31, 2013 and were fully reimbursed upon termination of our public offering.
Jointly-Owned Investments and Other Transactions with Affiliates
We own interests ranging from 12% to 85% in jointly-owned investments, with the remaining interests generally held by affiliates. We consolidate certain of these investments and account for the remainder under the equity method of accounting. We also own interests in jointly-controlled tenancy-in-common interests in properties, which we account for under the equity method of accounting.
On August 20, 2013, we and our affiliate, Corporate Property Associates 18 – Global Incorporated (“CPA®:18 – Global”), acquired an office facility located in Austin, Texas from State Farm Mutual Automobile Company (“State Farm”) through a jointly-owned investment for $115.6 million, of which our share was $57.8 million. We account for this investment under the equity method of accounting (Note 6).
Note 4. Net Investments in Properties and Real Estate Under Construction
Real Estate
Real estate, which consists of land and buildings leased to others under operating leases and are carried at cost, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
Land |
| $ | 537,784 |
| $ | 491,584 |
Buildings |
| 1,756,049 |
| 1,614,188 | ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (114,888) |
| (77,245) | ||
|
| $ | 2,178,945 |
| $ | 2,028,527 |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we entered into the following domestic investments, which were deemed to be real estate asset acquisitions because we entered into new leases in connection with the acquisitions, at a total cost of $44.4 million, including net lease intangible assets of $8.1 million (Note 7) and acquisition-related costs and fees of $2.2 million, which were capitalized:
· two parcels of land for $18.2 million, which were then leased to a provider of private school education that intends to construct two buildings on the site;
· an automotive dealership for $15.3 million; and
· an investment of $10.9 million for a manufacturing and office facility.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Additionally, we acquired the following investments, which were deemed to be business combinations because we assumed the existing leases on the properties, at a total cost of $140.3 million, including land of $18.4 million, buildings of $83.2 million, and net lease intangible assets of $38.6 million (Note 7):
· an international investment of $78.1 million for a logistics facility located in Poland. Amount is based on the exchange rate of the euro on the date of acquisition;
· an international investment of $38.6 million for an office facility located in the Netherlands. Amount is based on the exchange rate of the euro on the date of acquisition;
· a domestic investment of $15.7 million for an entertainment complex; and
· a domestic investment of $7.9 million for a building with a ground lease.
In connection with these investments, we expensed acquisition-related costs and fees of $8.9 million, which are included in General and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we funded an additional $5.1 million for building improvements with existing tenants and $2.3 million for build-to-suit projects that were placed into service during the period.
During this period, the U.S. dollar weakened against the euro, as the end-of-period rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the euro at September 30, 2013 increased by 2.3% to $1.3525 from $1.3218 at December 31, 2012. The impact of this weakening was a $15.2 million increase in the carrying value of Real estate from December 31, 2012 to September 30, 2013.
Operating Real Estate
Operating real estate, which consists of our hotel and self-storage operations, at cost, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
Land |
| $ | 64,237 |
| $ | 60,493 |
Buildings |
| 216,192 |
| 193,067 | ||
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment |
| - |
| 1,245 | ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (13,090) |
| (7,757) | ||
|
| $ | 267,339 |
| $ | 247,048 |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we acquired seven self-storage properties for $28.4 million. The total cost includes buildings of $19.7 million, land of $5.1 million, and lease intangible assets of $3.6 million (Note 7). As these acquisitions were deemed to be business combinations, we expensed the acquisition-related costs of $0.6 million, which are included in General and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements.
During this period, one of our hotels, with a carrying value of $11.9 million, was reclassified to Assets held for sale, as discussed in Note 13. We completed the sale of the hotel in October 2013.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Real Estate Under Construction
The following table provides a reconciliation of our Real estate under construction for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Year Ended | ||
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
Balance - beginning of period |
| $ | 71,285 |
| $ | 90,176 |
Capitalized funds |
| 62,243 | (a) | 121,003 | ||
Placed into service |
| (38,698) | (b) | (142,085) | ||
Capitalized interest |
| 3,568 |
| 2,100 | ||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| (41) |
| 91 | ||
Balance - end of period |
| $ | 98,357 | (c) | $ | 71,285 |
__________
(a) Includes five build-to-suit projects, of which three remained as open projects at September 30, 2013, and includes acquisition-related costs and fees of $2.3 million, which were capitalized.
(b) Includes three build-to-suit projects, of which two are completed and one is partially-completed, that were placed into service during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The two completed build-to-suit projects for $26.1 million were reclassified as Real estate, at cost, and the partially-completed build-to-suit project for $12.6 million was reclassified as Operating real estate, at cost, at September 30, 2013.
(c) The aggregate unfunded commitment on the remaining three open projects totaled approximately $70.4 million at September 30, 2013.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We have recorded asset retirement obligations for the removal of asbestos and environmental waste in connection with several of our acquisitions. We estimated the fair value of the asset retirement obligations based on the estimated economic lives of the properties and the estimated removal costs provided by the inspectors. The liability was discounted using the weighted-average interest rate on the associated fixed-rate mortgage loans at the time the liability was incurred.
The following table provides a reconciliation of our asset retirement obligations, which are included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Year Ended | ||
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
Balance - beginning of period |
| $ | 19,194 |
| $ | 11,453 |
Additions |
| - |
| 6,842 | ||
Accretion expense (a) |
| 894 |
| 890 | ||
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other |
| 14 |
| 9 | ||
Balance - end of period |
| $ | 20,102 |
| $ | 19,194 |
__________
(a) Accretion of the liability is included in Property expenses and recognized over the economic life of the properties.
Note 5. Finance Receivables
Assets representing rights to receive money on demand or at fixed or determinable dates are referred to as finance receivables. Our finance receivable portfolios consist of our Note receivable and Net investments in direct financing leases.
Note Receivable
In December 2010, we provided financing of $40.0 million to China Alliance Properties Limited, a subsidiary of Shanghai Forte Land Co., Ltd (“Forte”). The interest-only mortgage note was provided through a collateralized loan that is guaranteed by Forte’s parent company, Fosun International Limited, and has an interest rate of 11% and matures in December 2015. At both September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the principal balance of the note receivable was $40.0 million.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 16
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Credit Quality of Finance Receivables
We generally seek investments in facilities that we believe are critical to each tenant’s business and that we believe have a low risk of tenant defaults. At both September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, none of the balances of our finance receivables were past due and we had not established any allowances for credit losses. Additionally, there have been no modifications of finance receivables during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. We evaluate the credit quality of our tenant receivables utilizing an internal 5-point credit rating scale, with 1 representing the highest credit quality and 5 representing the lowest. The credit quality evaluation of our tenant receivables was last updated in the third quarter of 2013.
A summary of our finance receivables by internal credit quality rating for the periods presented is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| Number of Tenants at |
| Net Investments in Direct Financing Leases at | ||||||
Internal Credit Quality Indicator |
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| $ | 2,247 |
| $ | 2,239 |
2 |
| - |
| 2 |
| - |
| 60,218 | ||
3 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 389,402 |
| 413,415 | ||
4 |
| 3 |
| - |
| 86,697 |
| - | ||
5 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 478,346 |
| $ | 475,872 |
At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Other assets, net included $3.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of accounts receivable related to amounts billed under these direct financing leases.
|
| Number of Obligor at |
| Note Receivable at | ||||||
Internal Credit Quality Indicator |
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
1 |
| - |
| - |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
2 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||
3 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 40,000 |
| 40,000 | ||
4 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||
5 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 40,000 |
| $ | 40,000 |
Note 6. Equity Investments in Real Estate
We own equity interests in single-tenant net leased properties that are generally leased to companies through noncontrolling interests (i) in partnerships and limited liability companies that we do not control but over which we exercise significant influence or (ii) as tenants-in-common subject to common control. Generally, the underlying investments are jointly-owned with affiliates. We account for these investments under the equity method of accounting. Earnings for each investment are recognized in accordance with each respective investment agreement and where applicable, based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period. Investments in unconsolidated investments are required to be evaluated periodically. We periodically compare an investment’s carrying value to its estimated fair value and recognize an impairment charge to the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair value and such decline is determined to be other than temporary. Additionally, we provide funding to developers for the acquisition, development and construction of real estate (“ADC Arrangement”). Under ADC Arrangements, we have provided two loans to third-party developers of real estate projects, which we account for as equity investments.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table sets forth our ownership interests in our equity investments in real estate and their respective carrying values along with those ADC Arrangements that are recorded as equity investments (dollars in thousands):
|
| Ownership Interest |
| Carrying Value at | ||||
Lessee/Counterparty |
| at September 30, 2013 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
C1000 Logistiek Vastgoed B.V. (a) (b) |
| 85% |
| $ | 81,853 |
| $ | 81,516 |
U-Haul Moving Partners, Inc. and Mercury Partners, LP (c) (d) |
| 12% |
| 27,367 |
| 28,019 | ||
BPS Nevada, LLC (formerly known as BPS Parent, LLC) |
| 15% |
| 26,767 |
| 26,253 | ||
Madison Storage NYC, LLC (e) |
| 85% |
| 22,731 |
| - | ||
State Farm (f) |
| 50% |
| 21,182 |
| - | ||
Hellweg Die Profi-Baumärkte GmbH & Co. KG (a) (c) (d) (g) |
| 33% |
| 20,750 |
| 22,827 | ||
Berry Plastics Corporation (c) (h) |
| 50% |
| 17,875 |
| 18,529 | ||
Tesco plc (a) (c) |
| 49% |
| 17,231 |
| 17,487 | ||
Eroski Sociedad Cooperativa - Mallorca (a) (d) |
| 30% |
| 9,649 |
| 9,336 | ||
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (c) |
| 45% |
| 4,668 |
| 5,010 | ||
|
|
|
| 250,073 |
| 208,977 | ||
Shelborne Property Associates, LLC (i) |
| N/A |
| 107,707 |
| 63,896 | ||
IDL Wheel Tenant, LLC (j) |
| N/A |
| 5,947 |
| 2,260 | ||
|
|
|
| $ | 363,727 |
| $ | 275,133 |
__________
(a) The carrying value of this investment is affected by the impact of fluctuations in the exchange rate of the euro.
(b) This investment represents a tenancy-in-common interest, whereby the property is encumbered by debt for which we are jointly and severally liable. For this investment, the co-obligor is WPC and the total amount due under the arrangement was approximately $94.4 million at September 30, 2013. Of this amount, $80.2 million represents the amount we agreed to pay and is included within the carrying value of this investment. We received distributions of $4.7 million and $8.2 million from this investment during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(c) This investment is jointly-owned with Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated.
(d) This investment is jointly-owned with WPC.
(e) In June 2013, we acquired an interest in Madison Storage NYC, LLC (“Madison Storage”), which is a VIE. This ownership interest represents our effective economic interest based upon certain contractual arrangements with our partner in this entity that enable or could require us to purchase their interest.
(f) This investment is jointly-owned with CPA®:18 – Global. See “Acquisition of Equity Investment” below.
(g) We received distributions of $1.3 million and $2.3 million from this investment during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(h) We received distributions of $1.8 million and $1.7 million from this investment during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(i) Represents a domestic ADC Arrangement that we account for under the equity method of accounting as the characteristics of the arrangement with the third-party developer are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership rather than a loan. This investment is a VIE. We provided funding of $45.3 million to this investment during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. At September 30, 2013, the unfunded balance on the loan related to this investment was $18.7 million.
(j) Represents a domestic ADC Arrangement that we account for under the equity method of accounting as the characteristics of the arrangement with the third-party developer are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership rather than a loan. This investment is a VIE. We provided funding of $3.7 million to this investment during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. At September 30, 2013, the unfunded balance on the loan related to this investment was $44.5 million.
We recognized net income from equity investments in real estate of $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $3.4 million and $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Acquisition of Equity Investment
In August 2013, we and CPA®:18 – Global acquired an office facility from State Farm through a jointly-owned investment for a total cost of $115.6 million, which includes capitalized acquisition-related costs and fees totaling $5.6 million. We acquired a 50% interest
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 18
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
in this venture for $57.8 million and account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. In connection with this transaction, the jointly-owned investment obtained non-recourse financing totaling $72.8 million, of which our share is $36.4 million, which is included within the carrying value of this investment. This mortgage loan bears a fixed annual interest rate of 4.5% and matures in September 2023.
Note 7. Intangible Assets and Liabilities
In connection with our acquisitions of properties, we have recorded net lease intangibles that are being amortized over periods ranging from one year to 40 years. In addition, we have several ground leases with lives up to 94 years. In-place lease intangibles are included in In-place lease intangible assets, net in the consolidated financial statements. Tenant relationship, above-market rent, and below-market ground lease (as lessee) intangibles are included in Other intangible assets, net in the consolidated financial statements. Below-market rent and above-market ground lease (as lessor) intangibles are included in Prepaid and deferred rental income and security deposits in the consolidated financial statements.
In connection with our investment activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we have recorded intangibles as follows (life in years, dollars in thousands):
|
| Weighted-Average |
| Amount | |
Amortizable Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
| |
Lease intangibles: |
|
|
|
| |
In-place leases |
| 13.9 |
| $ | 35,127 |
Above-market rent |
| 34.6 |
| 13,769 | |
Below-market ground lease |
| 54.6 |
| 5,714 | |
Total intangible assets |
|
|
| $ | 54,610 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Amortizable Intangible Liabilities |
|
|
|
| |
Below-market rent |
| 33.8 |
| $ | (4,061) |
Above-market ground lease |
| 48.6 |
| (157) | |
Total intangible liabilities |
|
|
| $ | (4,218) |
Intangible assets and liabilities are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
|
| Gross Carrying |
| Accumulated |
| Net Carrying |
| Gross Carrying |
| Accumulated |
| Net Carrying | ||||||
Amortizable Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Lease intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
In-place leases |
| $ | 507,050 |
| $ | (70,633) |
| $ | 436,417 |
| $ | 467,846 |
| $ | (44,762) |
| $ | 423,084 |
Above-market rent |
| 89,118 |
| (10,875) |
| 78,243 |
| 74,491 |
| (7,584) |
| 66,907 | ||||||
Tenant relationship |
| 13,361 |
| (4,183) |
| 9,178 |
| 13,231 |
| (3,307) |
| 9,924 | ||||||
Below-market ground leases |
| 7,124 |
| (47) |
| 7,077 |
| 1,410 |
| (2) |
| 1,408 | ||||||
Total intangible assets |
| $ | 616,653 |
| $ | (85,738) |
| $ | 530,915 |
| $ | 556,978 |
| $ | (55,655) |
| $ | 501,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Amortizable Intangible Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Below-market rent |
| $ | (88,597) |
| $ | 6,972 |
| $ | (81,625) |
| $ | (84,130) |
| $ | 3,675 |
| $ | (80,455) |
Above-market ground lease |
| (157) |
| 2 |
| (155) |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||||||
Total intangible liabilities |
| $ | (88,754) |
| $ | 6,974 |
| $ | (81,780) |
| $ | (84,130) |
| $ | 3,675 |
| $ | (80,455) |
Net amortization of intangibles, including the effect of foreign currency translation, was $8.9 million and $7.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $26.3 million and $20.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization of below-market rent and above-market rent intangibles is recorded as an adjustment to Lease revenues, amortization of below-market ground lease and above-market ground lease intangibles is included in Property expenses, and amortization of in-place lease and tenant relationship intangibles is included in Depreciation and amortization.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 19
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Based on the intangible assets and liabilities recorded at September 30, 2013, scheduled annual net amortization of intangibles for the remainder of 2013, each of the next four calendar years following December 31, 2013, and thereafter is as follows (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31, |
| Total | |
2013 (remainder) |
| $ | 8,970 |
2014 |
| 34,466 | |
2015 |
| 32,408 | |
2016 |
| 30,195 | |
2017 |
| 28,655 | |
Thereafter |
| 314,441 | |
Total |
| $ | 449,135 |
Note 8. Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of an asset is defined as the exit price, which is the amount that would either be received when an asset is sold or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are: Level 1, for which quoted market prices for identical instruments are available in active markets, such as money market funds, equity securities and U.S. Treasury securities; Level 2, for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the instrument, such as certain derivative instruments including an interest rate cap and swaps; and Level 3, for securities and other derivative assets that do not fall into Level 1 or Level 2 and for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring us to develop our own assumptions.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The methods and assumptions described below were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument.
Derivative Assets — Our derivative assets, which are included in Other assets, net in the consolidated financial statements, are comprised of an interest rate cap, interest rate swaps, foreign currency collars, foreign currency forward contracts, stock warrants, and a swaption (Note 9). The interest rate cap, interest rate swaps, foreign currency collars, foreign currency forward contracts, and swaption were measured at fair value using readily observable market inputs, such as quotations on interest rates, and were classified as Level 2 as these instruments are custom, over-the-counter contracts with various bank counterparties that are not traded in an active market. The stock warrants were measured at fair value using internal valuation models that incorporate market inputs and our own assumptions about future cash flows. We classified these assets as Level 3 because these assets are not traded in an active market.
Derivative Liabilities — Our derivative liabilities, which are included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements, are comprised of interest rate swaps, foreign currency forward contracts, and embedded derivatives (Note 9). These derivative instruments were measured at fair value using readily observable market inputs, such as quotations on interest rates and were classified as Level 2 because they are custom, over-the-counter contracts with various bank counterparties that are not traded in an active market. The embedded derivatives were measured at fair value using internal valuation models that incorporate market inputs and our own assumptions about future cash flows. We classified these liabilities as Level 3 because these liabilities are not traded in an active market.
We did not have any transfers into or out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 measurements during either the three or nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings are reported in Other income and (expenses) in the consolidated financial statements.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 20
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Our other financial instruments had the following carrying values and fair values as of the dates shown (in thousands):
|
|
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||||
|
| Level |
| Carrying Value |
| Fair Value |
| Carrying Value |
| Fair Value |
| ||||
Non-recourse debt (a) |
| 3 |
| $ | 1,795,336 |
| $ | 1,805,930 |
| $ | 1,633,452 |
| $ | 1,674,019 |
|
Note receivable (a) |
| 3 |
| 40,000 |
| 43,840 |
| 40,000 |
| 43,957 |
| ||||
CMBS (b) |
| 3 |
| 2,648 |
| 5,370 |
| 2,075 |
| 2,980 |
| ||||
Other securities (c) |
| 3 |
| 8,301 |
| 12,889 |
| 8,301 |
| 10,800 |
| ||||
Deferred acquisition fees payable (d) |
| 3 |
| 17,140 |
| 18,130 |
| 26,246 |
| 30,875 |
| ||||
_________
(a) | We determined the estimated fair value of these financial instruments using a discounted cash flow model with rates that take into account the credit of the tenant/obligor and interest rate risk. We also considered the value of the underlying collateral taking into account the quality of the collateral, the credit quality of the tenant/obligor, the time until maturity and the current market interest rate. |
(b) | The carrying value of our commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) is inclusive of impairment charges recognized during 2012, as well as accretion related to the estimated cash flows expected to be received. There were no purchases, sales or impairment charges recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. |
(c) | Reflects equity securities in a warehouse and logistics company. |
(d) | We determined the estimated fair value of our deferred acquisition fees based on an estimate of discounted cash flows using two significant unobservable inputs, which are the leverage adjusted unsecured spread and an illiquidity adjustment of 380 bps and 75 bps, respectively. Significant increases or decreases to these inputs in isolation would result in a significant change in the fair value measurement. |
We estimated that our remaining financial assets and liabilities (excluding net investments in direct financing leases) had fair values that approximated their carrying values at both September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis (Including Impairment Charges)
We periodically assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our real estate investments may be impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. For investments in real estate for which an impairment indicator is identified, we follow a two-step process to determine whether an investment is impaired and the amount of the charge. First, we compare the carrying value of the property’s asset group to the future undiscounted net cash flows that we expect the property’s asset group will generate, including any estimated proceeds from the eventual sale of the property’s asset group. If this amount is less than the carrying value, the property’s asset group is considered to be impaired, and we then measure the impairment charge as the excess of the carrying value of the property’s asset group over the estimated fair value of the property’s asset group, which is primarily determined using market information such as recent comparable sales or broker quotes. If relevant market information is not available or is not deemed appropriate, we perform a future net cash flow analysis discounted for inherent risk associated with each investment. We determined that the significant inputs used to value these investments fall within Level 3 for fair value accounting. As a result of our assessments, we calculated impairment charges based on market conditions and assumptions that existed at the time. The valuation of real estate is subject to significant judgment and actual results may differ materially if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change.
During the first quarter of 2012, we incurred other-than-temporary impairment charges on our CMBS portfolio totaling $2.0 million to reduce the carrying values of three CMBS tranches to zero as a result of non-performance and the advisor’s assessment that the likelihood of receiving further interest payments or return of principal was remote. All of the impairment charges were measured using unobservable inputs (Level 3) and were recorded based on market conditions.
Note 9. Risk Management and Use of Derivative Financial Instruments
Risk Management
In the normal course of our ongoing business operations, we encounter economic risk. There are three main components of economic risk that impact us: interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. We are primarily subject to interest rate risk on our interest-bearing assets and liabilities. Credit risk is the risk of default on our operations and tenants’ inability or unwillingness to make contractually required payments. Market risk includes changes in the value of our properties and related loans as well as changes in the value of our other investments due to changes in interest rates or other market factors. In addition, we own investments in Europe and in Asia and are subject to the risks associated with changing foreign currency exchange rates.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 21 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Use of Derivative Financial Instruments
When we use derivative instruments, it is generally to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rate movements. We have not entered, and do not plan to enter, into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In addition to derivative instruments that we entered into on our own behalf, we may also be a party to derivative instruments that are embedded in other contracts, and we may own common stock warrants, granted to us by lessees when structuring lease transactions, which are considered to be derivative instruments. The primary risks related to our use of derivative instruments include default by a counterparty to a hedging arrangement on its obligation and a downgrade in the credit quality of a counterparty to such an extent that our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction is impaired. While we seek to mitigate these risks by entering into hedging arrangements with counterparties that are large financial institutions that we deem to be creditworthy, it is possible that our hedging transactions, which are intended to limit losses, could adversely affect our earnings. Furthermore, if we terminate a hedging arrangement, we may be obligated to pay certain costs, such as transaction or breakage fees. We have established policies and procedures for risk assessment and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument activities.
We measure derivative instruments at fair value and record them as assets or liabilities, depending on our rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. For a derivative designated and that qualified as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. For a derivative designated and that qualified as a net investment hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value and/or the net settlement of the derivative are reported in Other comprehensive income (loss) as part of the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. Amounts are reclassified out of Other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings when the hedged investment is either sold or substantially liquidated.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 22 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our derivative instruments (in thousands):
|
|
|
| Asset Derivatives Fair Value at |
| Liability Derivatives Fair Value at | ||||||||
|
| Balance Sheet Location |
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forwards |
| Other assets, net |
| $ | 1,524 |
| $ | 4,229 |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
Foreign currency collars |
| Other assets, net |
| 1,041 |
| 2,743 |
| - |
| - | ||||
Interest rate cap |
| Other assets, net |
| - |
| 1 |
| - |
| - | ||||
Interest rate swap |
| Other assets, net |
| 962 |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||||
Foreign currency forwards |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
| - |
| - |
| (6,977) |
| (2,533) | ||||
Interest rate swaps |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
| - |
| - |
| (14,288) |
| (20,142) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Embedded derivatives (a) |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
| - |
| - |
| (1,629) |
| (1,141) | ||||
Stock warrants (b) |
| Other assets, net |
| 1,716 |
| 1,485 |
| - |
| - | ||||
Foreign currency forward |
| Other assets, net |
| 1,076 |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||||
Swaption (c) |
| Other assets, net |
| 1,015 |
| - |
| - |
| - | ||||
Total derivatives |
|
|
| $ | 7,334 |
| $ | 8,458 |
| $ | (22,894) |
| $ | (23,816) |
_________
(a) | In connection with an ADC Arrangement with IDL Wheel Tenant, LLC, we agreed to fund a portion of the loan in euros and we locked the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate at $1.278 with the developer at the time of the transaction (Note 6). This component of the loan is deemed to be an embedded derivative. |
(b) | As part of our purchase of an interest in Hellweg Die Profi-Baumärkte GmbH & Co. KG (“Hellweg 2”) from Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated (“CPA®:14”), an affiliate at that time, in May 2011, we acquired warrants from CPA®:14, which were granted by Hellweg 2 to CPA®:14. These warrants give us participation rights to any distributions made by Hellweg 2 and we are entitled to a cash distribution that equals a certain percentage of the liquidity event price of Hellweg 2, should such a liquidity event occur. |
(c) | In connection with the non-recourse debt financing related to our Cuisine Solutions, Inc. investment, we executed a swap and purchased a swaption, which grants us the right to enter into a new swap with a predetermined fixed rate should there be an extension of the loan maturity date. |
All derivative transactions with an individual counterparty are governed by a master International Swap and Derivatives Association agreement, which can be considered as a master netting arrangement; however, we report all our derivative instruments on a gross basis on the balance sheet. At September 30, 2013, no cash collateral had been posted nor received for any of our derivative positions.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 23 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following tables present the impact of our derivative instruments on the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
|
| Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||||
|
| Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | ||||||||||
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Interest rate swaps |
| $ | (744) |
| $ | (3,780) |
| $ | 7,712 |
| $ | (10,109) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
| (7,449) |
| (1,777) |
| (4,012) |
| (268) | ||||
Interest rate cap (a) |
| 315 |
| 242 |
| 880 |
| 576 | ||||
Foreign currency collars |
| (1,410) |
| (1,119) |
| (1,471) |
| (1,326) | ||||
Put options |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 192 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives in Net Investment Hedging Relationships (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
| (934) |
| (769) |
| 82 |
| 816 | ||||
Total |
| $ | (10,222) |
| $ | (7,203) |
| $ | 3,191 |
| $ | (10,119) |
|
| Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from | ||||||||||
|
| Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Effective Portion) | ||||||||||
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Foreign currency collars(c) |
| $ | (188) |
| $ | (273) |
| $ | (1,129) |
| $ | (1,719) |
Foreign currency forward contracts(c) |
| (353) |
| (228) |
| (724) |
| (366) | ||||
Interest rate cap |
| 316 |
| 247 |
| 881 |
| 653 | ||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 1,595 |
| 1,164 |
| 4,501 |
| 2,532 | ||||
Total |
| $ | 1,370 |
| $ | 910 |
| $ | 3,529 |
| $ | 1,100 |
_________
(a) Includes gains attributable to noncontrolling interests of $0.1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(b) The effective portion of the change in fair value and the settlement of these contracts is reported in the foreign currency translation adjustment section of Other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying investment is sold, at which time we reclassify the gain or loss to earnings.
(c) Gains (losses) reclassified from Other comprehensive income (loss) into income (loss) for contracts and collars that have matured are included in Other income and (expenses).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | ||||||||||
Derivatives Not in Cash Flow |
| Location of Gain (Loss) |
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
Hedging Relationships |
| Recognized in Income |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
| Other income and (expenses) |
| $ | 59 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 822 |
| $ | - |
Swaption |
| Other income and (expenses) |
| 58 |
| - |
| 237 |
| - | ||||
Interest rate swaps (a) |
| Interest expense |
| (50) |
| (18) |
| 154 |
| 5 | ||||
Put options |
| Other income and (expenses) |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| (2) | ||||
Stock warrants |
| Other income and (expenses) |
| 66 |
| (66) |
| 231 |
| (66) | ||||
Embedded derivatives |
| Other income and (expenses) |
| (1,093) |
| - |
| (540) |
| - | ||||
Total |
|
|
| $ | (960) |
| $ | (84) |
| $ | 904 |
| $ | (63) |
_________
(a) Relates to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationship.
See below for information on our purposes for entering into derivative instruments and for information on derivative instruments owned by unconsolidated investments, which are excluded from the tables above.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 24 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Interest Rate Swaps, Cap, and Swaption
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities. To limit this exposure, we attempt to obtain mortgage financing on a long-term, fixed-rate basis. However, from time to time, we or our investment partners may obtain variable-rate mortgage loans and, as a result, may enter into interest rate swap agreements or interest rate cap agreements with counterparties. Interest rate swaps, which effectively convert the variable-rate debt service obligations of the loan to a fixed rate, are agreements in which one party exchanges a stream of interest payments for a counterparty’s stream of cash flow over a specific period. The notional, or face, amount on which the swaps are based is not exchanged. An interest rate cap limits the effective borrowing rate of variable-rate debt obligations while allowing participants to share in downward shifts in interest rates. A swaption gives us the right but not the obligation to enter into an interest rate swap, of which the terms and conditions are set on the trade date, on a specified date in the future. Our objective in using these derivatives is to limit our exposure to interest rate movements.
The interest rate swaps, cap, and swaption that we had outstanding on our consolidated subsidiaries at September 30, 2013 are summarized as follows (currency in thousands):
|
|
|
| Notional |
| Contractual |
| Effective |
| Expiration |
| Fair Value at |
| ||
Description |
| Type |
| Amount |
| Interest Rate |
| Date |
| Date |
| September 30, 2013 (a) |
| ||
Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
6-Month Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“Euribor”) |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| € | 164,250 |
| 4.2% |
| 9/2011 |
| 9/2016 |
| $ | (8,289 | ) |
3-Month Euribor |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| € | 9,828 |
| 4.4% |
| 2/2013 |
| 2/2018 |
| (134 | ) | |
3-Month Euribor |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| € | 5,753 |
| 5.8% |
| 7/2010 |
| 11/2017 |
| (503 | ) | |
3-Month Euribor |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| € | 3,803 |
| 6.5% |
| 6/2012 |
| 5/2017 |
| (120 | ) | |
3-Month Euribor |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| € | 2,922 |
| 4.2% |
| 4/2013 |
| 4/2018 |
| (5 | ) | |
3-Month LIBOR (b) |
| Interest rate cap |
| $ | 116,581 |
| N/A |
| 8/2009 |
| 8/2014 |
| - |
| |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 92,400 |
| 3.9% |
| 2/2012 |
| 2/2017 |
| (1,532 | ) | |
3-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 25,482 |
| 5.7% |
| 1/2010 |
| 12/2019 |
| (2,567 | ) | |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 22,841 |
| 5.7% |
| 12/2019 |
| 1/2024 |
| (29 | ) | |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 19,673 |
| 4.8% |
| 12/2012 |
| 12/2022 |
| 688 |
| |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 14,880 |
| 4.3% |
| 4/2013 |
| 4/2018 |
| (510 | ) | |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 12,374 |
| 4.8% |
| 7/2013 |
| 1/2024 |
| (265 | ) | |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 8,886 |
| 5.0% |
| 3/2012 |
| 3/2022 |
| 31 |
| |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 4,368 |
| 4.6% |
| 6/2012 |
| 7/2022 |
| 114 |
| |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 4,225 |
| 4.8% |
| 10/2012 |
| 11/2022 |
| 129 |
| |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 4,049 |
| 6.0% |
| 1/2011 |
| 1/2021 |
| (333 | ) | |
1-Month LIBOR |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| $ | 1,572 |
| 4.8% |
| 12/2011 |
| 12/2021 |
| (1 | ) | |
Not Designated as a Hedging Instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
1-Month LIBOR |
| Swaption |
| $ | 13,230 |
| N/A |
| 4/2018 |
| 4/2023 |
| 1,015 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (12,311 | ) |
__________
(a) Amounts are based on the exchange rate of the euro at September 30, 2013, as applicable.
(b) The applicable interest rate of the related debt was 2.8%, which was below the strike price of the cap of 4.0% at September 30, 2013. The notional amount and fair value of $52.5 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, attributable to noncontrolling interests is included in this swap.
The interest rate swap that one of our unconsolidated jointly-owned investments had outstanding at September 30, 2013 and was designated as cash flow hedge is summarized as follows (currency in thousands):
|
| Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Interest in Investee |
|
|
| Notional |
| Contractual |
| Effective |
| Expiration |
| Fair Value at | |||
Description |
| at September 30, 2013 |
| Type |
| Amount |
| Interest Rate |
| Date |
| Date |
| September 30, 2013 | |||
3-Month Euribor (a) |
| 85.0% |
| “Pay-fixed” swap |
| € | 14,648 |
| 1.2% |
| 3/2013 |
| 3/2020 |
| $ | 16 | |
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 25 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
__________
(a) Amounts are based on the exchange rate of the euro at September 30, 2013, as applicable.
Foreign Currency Contracts
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate movements, primarily in the euro and, to a lesser extent, the British pound sterling and the Japanese yen. We manage foreign currency exchange rate movements by generally placing our debt service obligation on an investment in the same currency as the tenant’s rental obligation to us. This reduces our overall exposure to the net cash flow from that investment. However, we are subject to foreign currency exchange rate movements to the extent of the difference in the timing and amount of the rental obligation and the debt service. Realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings related to foreign currency transactions are included in Other income and (expenses) in the consolidated financial statements.
In order to hedge certain of our foreign currency cash flow exposures, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and collars. A foreign currency forward contract is a commitment to deliver a certain amount of currency at a certain price on a specific date in the future. By entering into forward contracts and holding them to maturity, we are locked into a future currency exchange rate for the term of the contract. A foreign currency collar consists of a written call option and a purchased put option to sell the foreign currency. These instruments lock the range in which the foreign currency exchange rate may fluctuate.
The following table presents the foreign currency derivative contracts we had outstanding and their designations at September 30, 2013 (currency in thousands, except strike price):
|
| Notional |
| Strike |
| Effective |
| Expiration |
| Fair Value at | |||
Type |
| Amount |
| Price |
| Date |
| Date |
| September 30, 2013 | |||
Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Collars |
| € | 20,444 |
| $ | 1.40 - 1.42 |
| 9/2011 |
| 12/2013 - 9/2014 |
| $ | 1,041 |
Forward contracts |
| € | 56,700 |
| 1.28 - 1.29 |
| 5/2012 |
| 12/2014 - 6/2017 |
| (3,967) | ||
Forward contracts |
| € | 18,500 |
| 1.34 - 1.35 |
| 9/2011 |
| 3/2014 - 3/2015 |
| (210) | ||
Forward contracts |
| € | 17,100 |
| 1.34 |
| 12/2012 |
| 9/2017 - 3/2018 |
| (610) | ||
Forward contracts |
| € | 12,000 |
| 1.38 |
| 8/2013 |
| 12/2018 - 3/2019 |
| (231) | ||
Forward contracts |
| € | 11,800 |
| 1.41 |
| 9/2013 |
| 6/2019 - 9/2019 |
| (51) | ||
Forward contracts |
| € | 11,400 |
| 1.35 |
| 6/2013 |
| 6/2018 - 9/2018 |
| (423) | ||
Forward contracts |
| € | 11,342 |
| 1.34 |
| 1/2013 |
| 9/2015 - 3/2016 |
| (184) | ||
Forward contracts |
| ¥ | 776,666 |
| .0122 - .0128 |
| 12/2012 |
| 12/2013 - 12/2017 |
| 1,524 | ||
Designated as Net Investment Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Forward contracts |
| € | 45,000 |
| 1.33 |
| 7/2013 |
| 7/2015 |
| (1,301) | ||
Not Designated as a Hedging Instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Forward contracts |
| ¥ | 610,129 |
| .0128 |
| 12/2012 |
| 12/2017 |
| 1,076 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (3,336) | ||
Other
Amounts reported in Other comprehensive income (loss) related to interest rate swaps will be reclassified to Interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt. Amounts reported in Other comprehensive income (loss) related to foreign currency derivative contracts will be reclassified to Other income and (expenses) when the hedged foreign currency proceeds from foreign operations are repatriated to the U.S. At September 30, 2013, we estimate that an additional $7.1 million, inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $0.6 million, and $1.1 million will be reclassified as interest expense and other income, respectively, during the next 12 months.
We measure our credit exposure on a counterparty basis as the net positive aggregate estimated fair value of our derivatives, net of collateral received, if any. No collateral was received as of September 30, 2013. At September 30, 2013, our total credit exposure was $2.7 million, inclusive of noncontrolling interest, and the maximum exposure to any single counterparty was $1.9 million.
Some of the agreements we have with our derivative counterparties contain certain credit contingent provisions that could result in a declaration of default against us regarding our derivative obligations if we either default or are capable of being declared in default on certain of our indebtedness. At September 30, 2013, we had not been declared in default on any of our derivative obligations. The
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 26 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
estimated fair value of our derivatives that were in a net liability position was $22.5 million and $23.0 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which included accrued interest and any adjustment for nonperformance risk. If we had breached any of these provisions at either September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012, we could have been required to settle our obligations under these agreements at their aggregate termination value of $24.1 million or $25.1 million, respectively.
Portfolio Concentration Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a group of tenants is engaged in similar business activities or is subject to similar economic risks or conditions that could cause them to default on their lease obligations to us. We regularly monitor our portfolio to assess potential concentrations of credit risk. While we believe our portfolio is reasonably well diversified, it does contain concentrations in excess of 10%, based on the percentage of our annualized contractual minimum base rent for the third quarter of 2013, in certain areas. There were no significant changes to our portfolio concentrations at September 30, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012.
Note 10. Non-recourse Debt
Non-recourse debt consists of mortgage notes payable, which are collateralized by an assignment of real property and direct financing leases, with an aggregate carrying value of approximately $2.6 billion and $2.4 billion at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. At September 30, 2013, our mortgage notes payable bore interest at fixed annual rates ranging from 2.0% to 8.0% and variable contractual annual rates ranging from 2.8% to 6.1%, with maturity dates ranging from 2013 to 2038.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we obtained new non-recourse mortgage financings totaling $178.2 million with a weighted-average annual interest rate and term of 4.7% and 10.2 years, respectively. Of the total, $36.3 million related to investments acquired during 2013, $115.4 million related to investments acquired during prior years, $14.3 million related to five self-storage properties acquired during 2013, and $12.2 million related to an international investment for which we have entered into a purchase commitment on an acquisition that closed in October 2013.
Additionally, we refinanced a non-recourse mortgage loan of $13.3 million with new financing of $9.7 million with an annual interest rate and term of 4.9% and 10 years, respectively, related to six self-storage properties acquired during prior years.
Scheduled Debt Principal Payments
Scheduled debt principal payments during the remainder of 2013, each of the next four calendar years following December 31, 2013, and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31, |
| Total | |
2013 (remainder) |
| $ | 28,378 |
2014 |
| 39,987 | |
2015 |
| 70,880 | |
2016 |
| 298,889 | |
2017 |
| 347,419 | |
Thereafter through 2038 |
| 1,015,824 | |
|
| 1,801,377 | |
Unamortized discount, net (a) |
| (6,041) | |
Total |
| $ | 1,795,336 |
_________
(a) Represents the unamortized discount on two non-recourse mortgage loans.
Certain amounts in the table above are based on the applicable foreign currency exchange rate at September 30, 2013. Additionally, due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the carrying value of our debt increased by $7.0 million from December 31, 2012 to September 30, 2013.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 27 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
At September 30, 2013, we were not involved in any material litigation. Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business are pending against us. The results of these proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. See Note 4 for unfunded construction commitments.
Purchase Commitments
During the periods presented and through the date of this report, we have entered into various agreements to purchase properties in the ordinary course of business. With certain of these agreements we have provided deposits, that, if the associated arrangement is canceled, may only be refunded to us under limited circumstances.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 28 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12. Equity
Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following tables present a reconciliation of changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| Unrealized |
|
| Unrealized |
|
| Foreign Currency |
|
| Total |
| ||||
Balance - beginning of period |
|
| $ | (12,730 | ) |
| $ | (423 | ) |
| $ | (25,636 | ) |
| $ | (38,789 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
|
| (11,592 | ) |
| 24 |
|
| 32,477 |
|
| 20,909 |
| ||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
| 1,911 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,911 |
| ||||
Other (income) and expense |
|
| (541 | ) |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (541 | ) | ||||
Total |
|
| 1,370 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,370 |
| ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
| (10,222 | ) |
| 24 |
|
| 32,477 |
|
| 22,279 |
| ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
| (142 | ) |
| - |
|
| (408 | ) |
| (550 | ) | ||||
Balance - end of period |
|
| $ | (23,094 | ) |
| $ | (399 | ) |
| $ | 6,433 |
|
| $ | (17,060 | ) |
|
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| Unrealized |
|
| Unrealized |
|
| Foreign Currency |
|
| Total |
| ||||
Balance - beginning of period |
|
| $ | (25,888 | ) |
| $ | (470 | ) |
| $ | (9,008 | ) |
| $ | (35,366 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
|
| (339 | ) |
| 71 |
|
| 15,614 |
|
| 15,346 |
| ||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
| 5,382 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 5,382 |
| ||||
Other (income) and expense |
|
| (1,853 | ) |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,853 | ) | ||||
Total |
|
| 3,529 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 3,529 |
| ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
| 3,190 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 15,614 |
|
| 18,875 |
| ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
| (396 | ) |
| - |
|
| (173 | ) |
| (569 | ) | ||||
Balance - end of period |
|
| $ | (23,094 | ) |
| $ | (399 | ) |
| $ | 6,433 |
|
| $ | (17,060 | ) |
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 29
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| Unrealized Gains |
|
| Unrealized |
|
| Foreign Currency |
|
| Total |
| ||||
Balance - beginning of period |
|
| $ | (11,831 | ) |
| $ | (523 | ) |
| $ | (38,381 | ) |
| $ | (50,735 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications |
|
| (8,113 | ) |
| (731 | ) |
| 13,905 |
|
| 5,061 |
| ||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
| 1,411 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,411 |
| ||||
Other (income) and expense |
|
| (501 | ) |
| 754 |
|
| - |
|
| 253 |
| ||||
Total |
|
| 910 |
|
| 754 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,664 |
| ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
| (7,203 | ) |
| 23 |
|
| 13,905 |
|
| 6,725 |
| ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
| (109 | ) |
| - |
|
| (222 | ) |
| (331 | ) | ||||
Balance - end of period |
|
| $ | (19,143 | ) |
| $ | (500 | ) |
| $ | (24,698 | ) |
| $ | (44,341 | ) |
|
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| Unrealized Gains |
|
| Unrealized |
|
| Foreign Currency |
|
| Total |
| ||||
Balance - beginning of period |
|
| $ | (8,765 | ) |
| $ | (1,506 | ) |
| $ | (22,330 | ) |
| $ | (32,601 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications |
|
| (11,219 | ) |
| 252 |
|
| (2,432 | ) |
| (13,399 | ) | ||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
| 3,185 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 3,185 |
| ||||
Other (income) and expense |
|
| (2,085 | ) |
| 754 |
|
| - |
|
| (1,331 | ) | ||||
Total |
|
| 1,100 |
|
| 754 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,854 |
| ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
| (10,119 | ) |
| 1,006 |
|
| (2,432 | ) |
| (11,545 | ) | ||||
Net current-period Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
| (259 | ) |
| - |
|
| 64 |
|
| (195 | ) | ||||
Balance - end of period |
|
| $ | (19,143 | ) |
| $ | (500 | ) |
| $ | (24,698 | ) |
| $ | (44,341 | ) |
Note 13. Discontinued Operations
From time to time, we may decide to sell a property. We may make a decision to dispose of a property when it is vacant as a result of tenants vacating space, tenants electing not to renew their leases, tenant insolvency, or lease rejection in the bankruptcy process. In such cases, we assess whether we can obtain the highest value from the property by selling it, as opposed to re-leasing it. We may also sell a property when we receive an unsolicited offer or negotiate a price for an investment that is consistent with our strategy for that investment. When it is appropriate to do so, we classify the property as an asset held for sale on our consolidated balance sheet and the current and prior period results of operations of the property are reclassified as discontinued operations.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 30
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The results of operations for properties that are held for sale or have been sold and with which we have no continuing involvement are reflected in the consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations and are summarized as follows (in thousands, net of tax):
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||||||||
|
| 2013 |
|
| 2012 |
|
| 2013 |
|
| 2012 |
| ||||
Revenues |
| $ | 1,325 |
|
| $ | 1,214 |
|
| $ | 3,702 |
|
| $ | 3,496 |
|
Expenses |
| (1,076 | ) |
| (885 | ) |
| (2,962 | ) |
| (2,542 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 740 |
| ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| $ | 249 |
|
| $ | 329 |
|
| $ | 740 |
|
| $ | 1,694 |
|
2013 – During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we entered into a contract to sell one of our hotels for $24.0 million. At September 30, 2013, this property was classified as Assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets. We completed the sale of the hotel property in October 2013 and paid off the outstanding non-recourse mortgage loan of $5.1 million.
2012 – During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we sold 12 domestic properties for a total cost of $12.7 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a net gain on the sales of the properties totaling $0.7 million.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 31
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
MD&A is intended to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements and the reasons for changes in certain key components of our financial statements from period to period. MD&A also provides the reader with our perspective on our financial position and liquidity, as well as certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with our 2012 Annual Report.
Business Overview
As described in more detail in Item 1 in our 2012 Annual Report, we are a publicly owned, non-listed REIT that invests primarily in commercial properties leased to companies domestically and internationally. As opportunities arise, we also make other types of commercial real estate related investments. As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. federal income taxation as long as we satisfy certain requirements, principally relating to the nature of our income, the level of our distributions to our stockholders and other factors. We earn revenue principally by leasing the properties we own to single corporate tenants, primarily on a net-lease basis, which requires the tenant to pay substantially all of the costs associated with operating and maintaining the property. Revenue is subject to fluctuation because of the timing of new lease transactions, lease terminations, lease expirations, contractual rent adjustments, tenant defaults and sales of properties.
Financial and Operating Highlights
(In thousands)
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||||||||
|
| 2013 |
|
| 2012 |
|
| 2013 |
|
| 2012 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
| $ | 91,619 |
|
| $ | 68,141 |
|
| $ | 267,337 |
|
| $ | 200,470 |
|
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders |
| 5,026 |
|
| 12,295 |
|
| 32,653 |
|
| 37,684 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash distributions paid |
| 50,689 |
|
| 38,542 |
|
| 147,310 |
|
| 105,935 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 135,825 |
|
| 125,599 |
| ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (387,455 | ) |
| (417,369 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 37,035 |
|
| 601,461 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Supplemental financial measure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Modified funds from operations (a) |
| 36,387 |
|
| 29,564 |
|
| 105,812 |
|
| 89,208 |
| ||||
__________
(a) We consider the performance metrics listed above, including Modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), a supplemental measure that is not defined by GAAP (“non-GAAP”), to be important measures in the evaluation of our results of operations and capital resources. We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on the ability to generate cash flow necessary to meet our objectives of funding distributions to stockholders. See Supplemental Financial Measures below for our definition of this non-GAAP measure and a reconciliation to its most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Total revenues, Net cash provided by operating activities, and MFFO all increased for the current year periods as compared to the same periods in 2012, primarily reflecting the increase in the number of and the performance of our investments during 2013 and 2012.
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012 despite the contribution from the properties we acquired during 2013 and 2012. This contribution was offset by an increase in acquisition expenses recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 (Note 4), an increase in general and administrative expense due to an amendment to our advisory agreement (Note 3), and an increase in property expenses due to the growth in our real estate assets.
Our quarterly cash distribution was $0.1625 per share for the third quarter of 2013, which equated to $0.6500 per share on an annualized basis, and was paid on October 15, 2013 to stockholders of record at September 30, 2013.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 32
Results of Operations
The following tables present other operating data that management finds useful in evaluating results of operations:
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 |
|
Occupancy rate - leased properties (a) |
| 100 % |
| 100 % |
|
Number of leased properties (a) |
| 343 |
| 335 |
|
Number of operating properties (b) |
| 73 |
| 59 |
|
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| |||||
|
| 2013 |
|
| 2012 |
| ||
Acquisition volume - consolidated subsidiaries (in millions) |
| $ | 252.0 |
|
| $ | 415.9 |
|
Acquisition volume - equity investments (in millions) |
| $ | 139.0 |
|
| $ | - |
|
Financing obtained (in millions) (c) |
| $ | 186.4 |
|
| $ | 214.8 |
|
Funds raised (in millions) (d) |
| $ | 1.3 |
|
| $ | 539.2 |
|
Average U.S. dollar/euro exchange rate (e) |
| $ | 1.3173 |
|
| $ | 1.2824 |
|
U.S. Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) (f) |
| 234.1 |
|
| 231.4 |
|
__________
(a) Reflects net-leased properties in which we had a full or partial ownership interest.
(b) Operating properties are comprised of full or partial ownership interests in 69 self-storage properties, three hotel properties, and one shopping center, all of which are managed by third parties. We sold one of our hotels in October 2013 (Note 13).
(c) Amount in 2013 includes a refinancing of $9.7 million. We did not refinance any debt in 2012.
(d) Reflects funds raised in our follow-on offering, which closed on January 31, 2013.
(e) The average conversion rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the euro increased by approximately 2.7% during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 in comparison to the same period in 2012, resulting in a positive impact on earnings for our euro-denominated investments in the current year period.
(f) Most of our domestic lease agreements include contractual increases indexed to the change in the CPI.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 33
The following table sets forth the net lease revenues (i.e., rental income and interest income from direct financing leases) that we earned from lease obligations through our consolidated real estate investments (in thousands):
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||
Lessee |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| ||
“Same Store” Properties: (a) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Domestic: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
The New York Times Company (b) |
| $ | 20,842 |
| $ | 20,600 |
|
General Parts Inc., Golden State Supply LLC, Straus-Frank Enterprises LLC, General Parts Distribution LLC and Worldpac Inc. |
| 14,747 |
| 14,477 |
| ||
Terminal Freezers, LLC |
| 7,959 |
| 7,732 |
| ||
Flanders Corporation (c) |
| 5,429 |
| 4,939 |
| ||
LifeTime Fitness, Inc. |
| 5,134 |
| 5,136 |
| ||
Angelica Corporation |
| 3,933 |
| 3,781 |
| ||
Flint River Services, LLC |
| 3,805 |
| 3,804 |
| ||
Frontier Spinning Mills, Inc. (b) |
| 3,454 |
| 3,420 |
| ||
The Sun Products Corporation |
| 3,382 |
| 3,380 |
| ||
McKesson Corporation (formerly US Oncology, Inc.) |
| 3,142 |
| 3,142 |
| ||
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and AT&T Wireless Services |
| 3,045 |
| 2,997 |
| ||
Kronos Products, Inc. |
| 2,944 |
| 2,904 |
| ||
Harbor Freight Tools, USA, Inc. (d) |
| 2,659 |
| 2,525 |
| ||
Laureate Education, Inc. |
| 2,197 |
| 2,224 |
| ||
Berry Plastics Corporation |
| 2,140 |
| 2,090 |
| ||
Mori Seiki USA, Inc. |
| 2,108 |
| 2,108 |
| ||
Various |
| 5,164 |
| 5,018 |
| ||
|
| 92,084 |
| 90,277 |
| ||
International: (e) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Metro Cash & Carry Italia S.p.A. |
| 22,756 |
| 21,781 |
| ||
Agrokor d.d. |
| 15,336 |
| 14,404 |
| ||
Eroski Sociedad Cooperativa |
| 8,009 |
| 7,630 |
| ||
DTS Distribuidora de Television Digital SA |
| 6,870 |
| 6,544 |
| ||
Actebis Peacock GmbH (b) |
| 3,109 |
| 2,973 |
| ||
Waldaschaff Automotive Nagold GmbH (b) |
| 2,448 |
| 2,401 |
| ||
TDG Limited (f) |
| 2,094 |
| 2,160 |
| ||
Various (e) (f) |
| 3,088 |
| 3,002 |
| ||
|
| 63,710 |
| 60,895 |
| ||
|
| 155,794 |
| 151,172 |
| ||
Recent Acquisitions (Date Acquired): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Domestic: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
KBR, Inc. (11/2012) |
| 12,076 |
| - |
| ||
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Inc. (1/2012) |
| 10,142 |
| 9,692 |
| ||
RLJ-McLarty-Landers Automotive Holdings, LLC (9/2012) |
| 4,292 |
| 251 |
| ||
Walgreens Co. (3/2012) |
| 2,541 |
| 2,997 |
| ||
Sabre Communications Corporation and Cellxion, LLC (6/2012, 3/2012) |
| 2,381 |
| 1,134 |
| ||
RR Donnelley & Sons Company (9/2012) |
| 2,315 |
| 82 |
| ||
Cuisine Solutions, Inc. (10/2012) |
| 1,902 |
| - |
| ||
Education Management Corporation (12/2012, 9/2012) |
| 1,816 |
| 121 |
| ||
Various |
| 8,357 |
| 1,624 |
| ||
|
| 45,822 |
| 15,901 |
| ||
International: (e) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Agrokor d.d. (12/2012) |
| 3,022 |
| - |
| ||
Wanbishi Archives Co. Ltd (12/2012) (b) (g) |
| 2,396 |
| - |
| ||
Various |
| 3,837 |
| 183 |
| ||
|
| 9,255 |
| 183 |
| ||
|
| 55,077 |
| 16,084 |
| ||
|
| $ | 210,871 |
| $ | 167,256 |
|
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 34
__________
(a) Represent properties we owned for 21 months or more.
(b) These revenues were generated in consolidated investments, which are jointly-owned with our affiliates, and on a combined basis include revenues attributable to noncontrolling interests totaling $12.6 million and $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(c) This increase was due to a lease amendment in the second quarter of 2012.
(d) This increase was due to a lease restructuring in the first quarter of 2013.
(e) Unless otherwise noted, amounts are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the euro. The average conversion rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the euro increased by approximately 2.7% during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 in comparison to the same period in 2012, resulting in a positive impact on lease revenues for our euro-denominated investments in the current year period.
(f) Amounts are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the British pound sterling. The average conversion rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the British pound sterling decreased by approximately 2.4% during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 in comparison to the same period in 2012, resulting in a negative impact on lease revenues for this investment in the current year period.
(g) Amount is subject to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the Japanese yen.
We recognize income from equity investments in real estate, of which lease revenues are a significant component. The following table sets forth the net lease revenues earned by these investments from the investee’s operations. Amounts provided are the total amounts attributable to the investments and do not represent our proportionate share (dollars in thousands):
|
| Ownership Interest |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||
Lessee (Date Acquired)(a) |
| at September 30, 2013 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| ||
Hellweg Die Profi-Baumärkte GmbH & Co. KG (5/2011) (b) |
| 33% |
| $ | 26,998 |
| $ | 25,780 |
|
U-Haul Moving Partners, Inc. and Mercury Partners, LP (5/2011) |
| 12% |
| 24,276 |
| 24,276 |
| ||
C1000 Logistiek Vastgoed B.V. (1/2011) (b) |
| 85% |
| 11,369 |
| 10,773 |
| ||
Tesco plc (7/2009) (b) |
| 49% |
| 5,623 |
| 5,379 |
| ||
Berry Plastics Corporation (12/2007) (c) |
| 50% |
| 5,318 |
| 5,240 |
| ||
State Farm (8/2013) |
| 50% |
| 2,862 |
| - |
| ||
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (5/2011) |
| 45% |
| 2,499 |
| 2,486 |
| ||
Eroski Sociedad Cooperativa - Mallorca (6/2010) (b) |
| 30% |
| 2,296 |
| 2,235 |
| ||
|
|
|
| $ | 81,241 |
| $ | 76,169 |
|
__________
(a) Excludes operating revenue for Madison Storage investment of $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
(b) Amounts are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The average conversion rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the euro during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased by approximately 2.7% in comparison to the same period in 2012, resulting in a positive impact on lease revenues for our euro-denominated investments in the current year period.
(c) We also consolidate an investment with one of our affiliates that leases another property to this lessee.
Leasing Activity
The following discussion presents a summary of our leasing activity on our existing properties for the periods presented and does not include new acquisitions.
During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we did not modify any existing leases.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we modified one lease with an existing tenant to add approximately 1.0 million square feet of leased space at the same rental rate per square foot. The average rent for this leased space was $3.22 per square foot. None of the tenants received tenant improvement allowances or concessions.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we modified five leases totaling approximately 2.2 million square feet with existing tenants. These leases were either lease extensions or expansions of leased space with existing tenants. The average rent for this leased space increased from $4.33 per square foot to $4.86 per square foot after the renewals. None of the tenants received tenant improvement allowances or concessions.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 35
Lease Revenues
As of September 30, 2013, approximately 54.9% of our net leases, based on annualized contractual minimum base rent, provide for adjustments based on formulas indexed to changes in the CPI, or other similar indices for the jurisdiction in which the property is located, some of which have caps and/or floors. In addition, approximately 44.6% of our net leases on that same basis have fixed rent adjustments with contractual minimum base rent scheduled to increase by an average of 1.4% in the next 12 months. We own international investments and, therefore, lease revenues from these investments are subject to fluctuations in exchange rate movements in foreign currencies, primarily the euro.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, lease revenues increased by $14.9 million and $43.6 million, respectively, primarily due to our investment activity during 2013 and 2012, which contributed revenues of $13.1 million and $39.0 million, respectively, and scheduled rent increases at several properties, which contributed $0.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
Other Real Estate Operations
Other real estate operations represent the results of operations (revenues and operating expenses) of our hotel investments and 69 self-storage properties. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, Other real estate income increased by $3.4 million and $10.3 million, respectively, and Other real estate expenses increased by $2.8 million and $8.8 million, respectively. The increases were primarily due to the acquisition of seven self-storage properties during the first, second, and third quarters of 2013 and a total of nine self-storage properties during the third and fourth quarters of 2012.
Other Operating Income
Other operating income generally consists of costs reimbursable by tenants and non-rent related revenues. To the extent a property is leased on a net-lease basis, reimbursable tenant costs are recorded as both income and property expense and, therefore, have no impact on net income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, other operating income increased by $4.9 million and $12.5 million, respectively, primarily due to increases of $3.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively, in reimbursable tenant costs as a result of our investment activity in 2013 and 2012.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, depreciation and amortization increased by $5.8 million and $19.9 million, respectively, as a result of investments we entered into during 2013 and 2012.
Property Expenses
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, property expenses increased by $5.9 million and $15.2 million, respectively, primarily due to increases in reimbursable tenant costs of $3.8 million and $9.8 million, respectively, as a result of investments we entered into in 2013 and 2012. In addition, asset management fees increased by $0.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, as a result of 2013 and 2012 investment volume, which increased the asset base from which the advisor earns a fee.
Acquisition Expenses
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, acquisition expenses increased by $7.5 million and $8.7 million, respectively, primarily as a result of two international investments we entered into during the three months ended September 30, 2013, which are accounted for as business combinations because we assumed existing leases on the properties (Note 4). Acquisition expenses represent direct costs incurred to acquire operating properties, which are accounted for as business combinations, whereby such costs are required to be expensed as incurred.
General and Administrative
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, general and administrative expense increased by $1.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively, primarily due to increases in management expenses of $1.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively. Management expenses increased primarily due to an amendment to our advisory agreement in 2012 related to the basis of allocating advisor personnel expenses amongst WPC, the CPA REITs and CWI (Note 3) based on each entity’s
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 36
revenues. Additionally, the revenue base from which the advisor allocates personnel expenses increased as a result of 2013 and 2012 investment volume. Management expenses include our reimbursements to the advisor for the allocated costs of personnel and overhead in providing management of our day-to-day operations, including accounting services, stockholder services, corporate management, and property management and operations.
Impairment Charges
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred other-than-temporary impairment charges of $2.0 million to reduce the carrying values of three CMBS tranches to zero as a result of non-performance and the advisor’s assessment that the likelihood of receiving further interest payments or return of principal was remote. At September 30, 2013, the carrying value of our remaining CMBS securities was $2.6 million (Note 8). We did not incur any impairment charges during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Net Income from Equity Investments in Real Estate
Net income from equity investments in real estate are recognized in accordance with each respective investment agreement and, where applicable, based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, income from equity investments in real estate decreased by $0.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, primarily due to operating losses incurred by one of our hotels being taken out of service while undergoing significant renovations.
Other Income and (Expenses)
Other income and (expenses) primarily consists of gains and losses on foreign currency transactions and derivative instruments. We and certain of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries have intercompany debt or advances that are not denominated in the investment’s functional currency. For intercompany transactions that are of a long-term investment nature, the gain or loss is recognized as a cumulative translation adjustment in Other comprehensive income or loss. We also recognize gains or losses on foreign currency transactions when we repatriate cash from our foreign investments. In addition, we have certain derivative instruments, including common stock warrants and foreign currency contracts that are not designated as hedging, for which realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in earnings. The timing and amount of such gains or losses cannot always be estimated and are subject to fluctuation.
For the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012, net Other income decreased by $1.5 million due to an increase in net realized losses on derivatives of $0.8 million as a result of a decrease in market value of the embedded derivatives (Note 9) and a $0.5 million write-off of unamortized debt discount related to a seller financing note that was paid off during the third quarter of 2013.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012, net Other income increased by $4.0 million, primarily due to an increase in realized foreign currency transaction gains of $1.8 million on cash repatriation from our foreign investments during 2013, an increase in net realized gains on derivatives of $0.6 million as a result of gains recognized on the settlement of foreign currency forward contracts, and an increase in interest income of $0.5 million as a result of higher cash balances.
Interest Expense
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, interest expense increased by $4.7 million and $13.9 million, respectively, primarily as a result of mortgage financing obtained or assumed in connection with our investment activity during 2013 and 2012.
(Provision for) Benefit from Income Taxes
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012, provision for income taxes increased by $2.0 million, primarily due to changes in accruals for foreign taxes of $1.5 million as a result of the increase in international investments we entered into during 2013.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 37
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax represents the net income (revenue less expenses) from the operations of properties that were sold or held for sale (Note 13).
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, income from discontinued operations, net of tax was $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively, as a result of income generated from the operations of one of our hotels, which was reclassified to Assets held for sale in the third quarter of 2013. We completed the sale of this hotel in October 2013 (Note 13).
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, income from discontinued operations, net of tax was $0.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively, primarily due to income generated from the operations of the hotel that was reclassified to Assets held for sale in the third quarter of 2013, as well as from properties sold in the first quarter of 2012. Additionally, income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included a gain on the sale of these properties totaling $0.7 million.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased by $2.6 million, primarily due to an increase in the Available Cash Distribution paid to the advisor as a result of our 2013 and 2012 investment activity (Note 3).
Net Income Attributable to CPA®:17 – Global Stockholders
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, the resulting net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders decreased by $7.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
Modified Funds from Operations (“MFFO”)
MFFO is a non-GAAP measure that we use to evaluate our business. For a definition of MFFO and a reconciliation to net income attributable to CPA®:17 – Global stockholders, see Supplemental Financial Measures below. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012, MFFO increased by $6.8 million and $16.6 million, respectively, primarily as a result of the increase in the number of and the performance of our investments during 2013 and 2012.
Financial Condition
Sources and Uses of Cash During the Period
We expect to continue to invest the proceeds of our follow-on offering in a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial properties and other real estate related assets. We use the cash flow generated from our investments primarily to meet our operating expenses, service debt and fund distributions to our stockholders. Our cash flows fluctuate from period to period due to a number of factors, which may include, among other things, the timing of purchases and sales of real estate, the timing of the receipt of the proceeds from and the repayment of mortgage loans and receipt of lease revenues, the advisor’s annual election to receive fees in shares of our common stock or cash, the timing and characterization of distributions received from equity investments in real estate, the timing of payments of the Available Cash Distribution to the advisor, and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Despite these fluctuations, we believe our net leases and other real estate related assets will generate sufficient cash from operations and from equity distributions in excess of equity income in real estate to meet our normal recurring short-term and long-term liquidity needs. However, until we have fully invested the proceeds of our follow-on offering, we have used, and may in the future use, a portion of the offering proceeds to fund our operating activities. We assess our ability to access capital on an ongoing basis. Our sources and uses of cash during the period are described below.
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased by $10.2 million compared to the same period in 2012, primarily as a result of the increase in the number of and the performance of our investments during 2013 and 2012.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 38
Investing Activities
Our investing activities are generally comprised of real estate-related transactions (purchases and sales), payment of deferred acquisition fees to the advisor related to asset acquisitions and capitalized property-related costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we used $275.2 million primarily to acquire 14 investments and to fund construction costs on our build-to-suit projects (Note 4). We contributed $93.1 million to jointly-owned investments, including $49.0 million to fund ADC Arrangements and $43.5 million to acquire our equity interests in the Madison Storage and State Farm investments (Note 6). We received $5.3 million in distributions from our equity investments in real estate in excess of cumulative equity in net income. Funds totaling $36.1 million and $18.4 million, respectively, were invested in and released from lender-held investment accounts. We paid VAT, totaling $29.0 million, in connection with several international investments and recovered $32.6 million of foreign VAT during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, including amounts paid in prior years. Payments of deferred acquisition fees to the advisor totaled $10.6 million.
Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we paid distributions of $147.3 million to our stockholders, which were comprised of cash distributions of $75.6 million and distributions that were reinvested in shares of our common stock by stockholders through our DRIP of $71.7 million. We paid distributions of $20.2 million to affiliates that hold noncontrolling interests in various investments owned jointly with us. We received $73.0 million in net proceeds from investors, primarily from our DRIP, and $175.8 million in proceeds from mortgage financings related to 2013 and 2012 investment activity. We paid financing costs totaling $2.6 million and we made scheduled and unscheduled mortgage principal installments totaling $23.3 million. Funds totaling $5.1 million were released from lender-held investment accounts.
Our objectives are to generate sufficient cash flow over time to provide our stockholders with increasing distributions and to seek investments with potential for capital appreciation throughout varying economic cycles. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we declared distributions to our stockholders totaling $152.0 million, which were comprised of cash distributions of $78.4 million and $73.6 million of distributions reinvested by stockholders through our DRIP. We funded 89% of these distributions from Net cash provided by operating activities, with the remainder being funded from proceeds of our public offerings. We funded 93% of our cumulative distributions from Net cash provided by operating activities, with the remainder being funded from proceeds of our public offerings. In determining our distribution policy during the periods in which we are investing capital, we place primary emphasis on projections of cash flow from operations, together with cash distributions from our unconsolidated investments, rather than on historical results of operations (though these and other factors may be a part of our consideration). In setting a distribution rate, we thus focus primarily on expected returns from those investments we have already made, as well as our anticipated rate of return from future investment, to assess the sustainability of a particular distribution rate over time.
We maintain a quarterly redemption plan pursuant to which we may, at the discretion of our board of directors, redeem shares of our common stock from stockholders seeking liquidity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we received requests to redeem 1,424,356 shares of our common stock pursuant to our redemption plan, all of which were redeemed in the same period, at a weighted-average price of $9.47 per share, which is net of redemption fees, totaling $13.5 million.
Liquidity is affected adversely by unanticipated costs and greater-than-anticipated operating expenses. To the extent that our cash reserves are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, additional funds may be provided from cash generated from operations. In addition, we may incur indebtedness in connection with the acquisition of any property, financing or refinancing of any debt on the property, or arranging for the leveraging of any previously unfinanced property.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 39
Summary of Financing
The table below summarizes our non-recourse debt (dollars in thousands):
|
| September 30, 2013 |
| December 31, 2012 | ||
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
| ||
Fixed rate |
| $ | 1,207,600 |
| $ | 1,096,488 |
Variable rate (a) |
| 587,736 |
| 536,964 | ||
Total |
| $ | 1,795,336 |
| $ | 1,633,452 |
Percent of Total Debt |
|
|
|
| ||
Fixed rate |
| 67% |
| 67% | ||
Variable rate (a) |
| 33% |
| 33% | ||
|
| 100% |
| 100% | ||
Weighted-Average Interest Rate at End of Period |
|
|
|
| ||
Fixed rate |
| 5.4% |
| 5.5% | ||
Variable rate (a) |
| 4.0% |
| 4.0% |
___________
(a) Variable-rate debt at September 30, 2013 primarily consisted of (i) $439.2 million that was effectively converted to fixed-rate debt through interest rate swap derivative instruments, (ii) $116.4 million that was subject to an interest rate cap, but for which the applicable interest rate was below the interest rate of the cap at September 30, 2013, (iii) $27.2 million of floating-rate debt, and (iv) $4.9 million in mortgage loan obligations that bore interest at fixed rates but have interest rate reset features that may change the interest rates to then-prevailing market fixed rates at certain points during their term.
Cash Resources
At September 30, 2013, our cash resources consisted of cash and cash equivalents totaling $441.8 million. Of this amount, $48.7 million, at then-current exchange rates, was held in foreign subsidiaries, and we could be subject to restrictions or significant costs should we decide to repatriate these amounts. We also had unleveraged properties that had an aggregate carrying value of $349.7 million at September 30, 2013, although there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain financing for these properties. Our cash resources may be used for future investments and can be used for working capital needs and other commitments.
Cash Requirements
During the next 12 months, we expect that our cash payments will include acquiring new investments, funding capital commitments, paying distributions to our stockholders and to our affiliates that hold noncontrolling interests in entities we control and making scheduled and unscheduled mortgage loan principal payments, as well as other normal recurring operating expenses. Balloon payments totaling $31.6 million on our consolidated mortgage loan obligations are due during the next 12 months. In addition, our share of balloon payments due during the next 12 months on our unconsolidated jointly-owned investments totaled $16.7 million. Our advisor is actively seeking to refinance certain of these loans, although there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all. Capital commitments totaling $105.4 million are expected to be funded during the next 12 months.
We expect to fund future investments, capital commitments such as build-to-suit projects and ADC Arrangements, any capital expenditures on existing properties, and scheduled debt maturities on mortgage loans through the use of our cash reserves and cash generated from operations. We intend to continue to use the remaining net proceeds of our follow-on offering to acquire, own and manage a portfolio of commercial real estate properties leased to a diversified group of companies primarily on a single tenant net lease basis.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 40
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The table below summarizes our debt, off-balance sheet arrangements and other contractual obligations at September 30, 2013 and the effect that these arrangements and obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in the specified future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
| Less than |
|
|
|
|
| More than | |||||
|
| Total |
| 1 year |
| 1-3 years |
| 3-5 years |
| 5 years | |||||
Non-recourse debt — principal (a) |
| $ | 1,801,377 |
| $ | 59,394 |
| $ | 358,180 |
| $ | 509,803 |
| $ | 874,000 |
Deferred acquisition fees — principal |
| 17,140 |
| 10,662 |
| 6,478 |
| - |
| - | |||||
Interest on borrowings and deferred acquisition fees |
| 1,273,888 |
| 29,316 |
| 68,750 |
| 312,173 |
| 863,649 | |||||
Subordinated disposition fees (b) |
| 202 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 202 | |||||
Capital commitments (c) |
| 134,278 |
| 105,363 |
| 28,462 |
| 453 |
| - | |||||
Operating and other lease commitments (d) |
| 46,166 |
| 2,837 |
| 5,395 |
| 6,374 |
| 31,560 | |||||
Asset retirement obligations, net (e) |
| 20,102 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 20,102 | |||||
|
| $ | 3,293,153 |
| $ | 207,572 |
| $ | 467,265 |
| $ | 828,803 |
| $ | 1,789,513 |
___________
(a) Excludes $6.0 million of unamortized discount on two notes, which was included in Non-recourse debt at September 30, 2013.
(b) Represents amounts that may be payable to the advisor in connection with sales of assets if minimum stockholder returns are satisfied (Note 3). There can be no assurance as to whether or when these fees will be paid.
(c) Capital commitments include (i) current build-to-suit projects of $70.4 million (Note 4), (ii) capital commitments related to the ADC Arrangements of $63.2 million (Note 6), and (iii) $0.7 million related to other construction commitments. Amounts are based on the exchange rate of the euro at September 30, 2013, as applicable.
(d) Operating and other lease commitments consist of rental obligations under ground leases and our share of future minimum rents payable pursuant to our advisory agreement for the purpose of leasing office space used for the administration of real estate entities as well as future minimum rents payable under a ground lease executed in June 2010 (denominated in British pound sterling) in conjunction with an investment in the United Kingdom. Amounts are allocated among WPC, the CPA REITs and CWI based on gross revenues and are adjusted quarterly.
(e) Represents the future amount of obligations estimated for the removal of asbestos and environmental waste in connection with several of our acquisitions upon the retirement or a sale of the asset (Note 4).
Amounts in the table above related to our foreign operations are based on the exchange rate of the local currencies at September 30, 2013, which consisted primarily of the euro. At September 30, 2013, we had no material capital lease obligations for which we were the lessee, either individually or in the aggregate.
Equity Method Investments
We have interests in unconsolidated investments that own single-tenant properties net leased to companies. Generally, the underlying investments are jointly-owned with our affiliates. At September 30, 2013, on a combined basis, these investments had total assets of approximately $1.5 billion, third-party non-recourse mortgage debt of $1.0 billion, and total asset retirement obligations of $1.6 million. At that date, our pro rata share of their aggregate debt was $470.1 million. Cash requirements with respect to our share of these debt obligations are discussed above under Cash Requirements.
Supplemental Financial Measures
In the real estate industry, analysts and investors employ certain non-GAAP supplemental financial measures in order to facilitate meaningful comparisons between periods and among peer companies. Additionally, in the formulation of our goals and in the evaluation of the effectiveness of our strategies, we use supplemental non-GAAP measures which are uniquely defined by our management. We believe these measures are useful to investors to consider because they may assist them to better understand and measure the performance of our business over time and against similar companies. A description of these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided below.
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 41
Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Modified Funds from Operations (“MFFO”)
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”), an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to nor a substitute for net income or loss as determined under GAAP.
We define FFO consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property, impairment charges on real estate and depreciation and amortization; and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly-owned investments. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly-owned investments are calculated to reflect FFO.
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or is requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate-related depreciation and amortization as well as impairment charges of real estate-related assets, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. In particular, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions, which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO described above, investors are cautioned that, due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and the relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges. However, FFO and MFFO, as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating the operating performance of the company. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) were put into effect in 2009. These other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, such as acquisition fees, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. Management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after acquisition activity ceases. As disclosed in the prospectus for our follow-on offering dated April 7, 2011 (the “Prospectus”), we intend to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our common stock on a national exchange, a merger or sale of our assets or another similar transaction) within eight to 12 years following the investment of substantially all of the net proceeds from our initial offering, which terminated in April 2011. Thus, we do not intend to continuously purchase assets and intend to have a limited life. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association (“IPA”), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating
performance of a non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance now that our offering has been completed and once all of our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance since our offering and most of our acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of a company’s operating performance after a company’s offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on a company’s operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.
We define MFFO consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; nonrecurring impairments of real estate-related investments (i.e., infrequent or unusual, not reasonably likely to recur in the ordinary course of business); mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and jointly-owned investments, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. While we are responsible for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, we retain an outside consultant to review all our hedging agreements. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of our operations, we believe it is appropriate to exclude such infrequent gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are not reflective of on-going operations.
In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition-related expenses, amortization of above- and below-market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by a company. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, we view fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from dispositions of assets as infrequent items or items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized, and which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for assessing operating performance.
Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. For example, acquisition costs are generally funded from the proceeds of our offering and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates,
may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or income from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance.
MFFO has limitations as a performance measure in an offering such as ours, where the price of a share of common stock is a stated value and there is no estimated NAV determination during the offering stage and for a period thereafter. MFFO is useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and NAV is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating NAV because impairments are taken into account in determining NAV but not in determining MFFO.
Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO accordingly.
FFO and MFFO were as follows (in thousands):
|
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 | ||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:17 — Global stockholders |
| $ | 5,026 |
| $ | 12,295 |
| $ | 32,653 |
| $ | 37,684 |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
| 23,010 |
| 17,345 |
| 67,540 |
| 47,997 | ||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
| (78) |
| - |
| (78) |
| (740) | ||||
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of partially- owned entities to arrive at FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
| 4,274 |
| 4,011 |
| 11,501 |
| 12,457 | ||||
Proportionate share of adjustments for noncontrolling interests to arrive at FFO |
| (177) |
| (145) |
| (485) |
| (424) | ||||
Total adjustments |
| 27,029 |
| 21,211 |
| 78,478 |
| 59,290 | ||||
FFO — as defined by NAREIT |
| 32,055 |
| 33,506 |
| 111,131 |
| 96,974 | ||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other depreciation, amortization and non-cash charges |
| 342 |
| (178) |
| (887) |
| 827 | ||||
Straight-line and other rent adjustments (a) |
| (4,648) |
| (3,364) |
| (15,255) |
| (10,581) | ||||
Impairment charges (b) |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 2,019 | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 535 |
| - |
| 535 |
| - | ||||
Acquisition expenses (c) |
| 9,185 |
| 1,598 |
| 12,321 |
| 3,323 | ||||
Above- and below-market rent intangible lease amortization, net (d) |
| 86 |
| 96 |
| (80) |
| 629 | ||||
(Accretion) of discounts / amortization of premiums on debt investments, net |
| (490) |
| 35 |
| (421) |
| 104 | ||||
Realized gains on foreign currency, derivatives and other |
| (1,067) |
| (1,630) |
| (3,964) |
| (3,299) | ||||
Unrealized losses on mark-to-market adjustments |
| 6 |
| - |
| 6 |
| - | ||||
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of partially- owned entities to arrive at MFFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other depreciation, amortization and non-cash charges |
| (59) |
| 2 |
| (47) |
| 11 | ||||
Straight-line and other rent adjustments (a) |
| (2) |
| (11) |
| (21) |
| (39) | ||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| (1,914) | ||||
Acquisition expenses (c) |
| 64 |
| 80 |
| 1,379 |
| 208 | ||||
Above- and below-market rent intangible lease amortization, net (d) |
| 311 |
| 47 |
| 931 |
| 60 | ||||
Realized (gains) losses on foreign currency, derivatives and other |
| (3) |
| (9) |
| (1) |
| 8 | ||||
Proportionate share of adjustments for noncontrolling interests to arrive at MFFO |
| 72 |
| (608) |
| 185 |
| 878 | ||||
Total adjustments |
| 4,332 |
| (3,942) |
| (5,319) |
| (7,766) | ||||
MFFO |
| $ | 36,387 |
| $ | 29,564 |
| $ | 105,812 |
| $ | 89,208 |
____________
(a) Under GAAP, rental receipts are allocated to periods using an accrual basis. This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items (to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), management believes that MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments, provides insight on the contractual cash flows of such lease terms and debt investments, and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance.
(b) Impairment charges were incurred on our CMBS portfolio and are considered non-real estate impairments. As such, these impairment charges were not included in our computation of FFO as defined by NAREIT but are included as an adjustment in arriving at MFFO as these charges are not directly related or attributable to our operations.
(c) Includes Acquisition expenses and amortization of deferred acquisition fees. In evaluating investments in real estate, management differentiates the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition costs and amortization of deferred acquisition fees, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our advisor or third parties. Acquisition fees and expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income and income from continuing operations, both of which are performance
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 45
measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to stockholders, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property.
(d) Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed at least annually for impairment, and certain intangibles are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges relating to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. The primary risks to which we are exposed are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk. We are also exposed to further market risk as a result of concentrations of tenants in certain industries and/or geographic regions. Adverse market factors can affect the ability of tenants in a particular industry/region to meet their respective lease obligations. In order to manage this risk, we view our collective tenant roster as a portfolio, and in its investment decisions the advisor attempts to diversify our portfolio so that we are not overexposed to a particular industry or geographic region.
Generally, we do not use derivative instruments to hedge credit/market risks or for speculative purposes. However, from time to time, we may enter into foreign currency derivative contracts to hedge our foreign currency cash flow exposures.
Interest Rate Risk
The carrying value of our real estate, related fixed-rate debt obligations and note receivable is subject to fluctuations based on changes in interest rates. The value of our real estate is also subject to fluctuations based on local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees, all of which may affect our ability to refinance property-level mortgage debt when balloon payments are scheduled. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and other factors beyond our control. An increase in interest rates would likely cause the fair value of our owned assets to decrease. Increases in interest rates may also have an impact on the credit profile of certain tenants.
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities. To limit this exposure, we attempt to obtain mortgage financing on a long-term, fixed-rate basis. However, from time to time, we or our investment partners may obtain variable-rate mortgage loans and, as a result, may enter into interest rate swap agreements or interest rate cap agreements with lenders that effectively convert the variable-rate debt service obligations of the loan to a fixed rate or limit the underlying interest rate from exceeding a specified strike rate, respectively. Interest rate swaps are agreements in which one party exchanges a stream of interest payments for a counterparty’s stream of cash flows over a specific period, and interest rate caps limit the effective borrowing rate of variable-rate debt obligations while allowing participants to share in downward shifts in interest rates. These interest rate swaps and caps are derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the forecasted interest payments on the debt obligation. The notional, or face, amount on which the swaps or caps are based is not exchanged. Our objective in using these derivatives is to limit our exposure to interest rate movements. The net fair value of our interest rate cap and interest rate swaps, which are included in Other assets, net and Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements, was in a net liability position of $12.3 million at September 30, 2013 (Note 9).
At September 30, 2013, all of our debt either bore interest at fixed rates, was swapped to a fixed rate, was subject to an interest rate cap, or bore interest at fixed rates that were scheduled to convert to then-prevailing market fixed rates at certain future points during their term. The annual interest rates on our fixed-rate debt at September 30, 2013 ranged from 2.0% to 8.0%. The contractual interest rates on our variable-rate debt at September 30, 2013 ranged from 2.8% to 6.1%. Our debt obligations are more fully described under Financial Condition in Item 2 above. The following table presents principal cash flows based upon expected maturity dates of our debt obligations outstanding at September 30, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| (Remainder) |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2016 |
| 2017 |
| Thereafter |
| Total |
| Fair value | ||||||||
Fixed-rate debt (a) |
| $ | 25,605 |
| $ | 32,072 |
| $ | 63,930 |
| $ | 72,917 |
| $ | 202,873 |
| $ | 810,328 |
| $ | 1,207,725 |
| $ | 1,210,587 |
Variable-rate debt (a) |
| $ | 2,773 |
| $ | 7,915 |
| $ | 6,950 |
| $ | 225,972 |
| $ | 144,546 |
| $ | 205,496 |
| $ | 593,652 |
| $ | 595,343 |
____________
(a) Amounts are based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2013, as applicable.
The estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt and our variable-rate debt that currently bears interest at fixed rates or has effectively been converted to a fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps or that has been subject to an interest rate cap is affected by changes in interest rates. A decrease or increase in interest rates of 1% would change the estimated fair value of this debt at September 30, 2013 by an aggregate increase of $65.9 million or an aggregate decrease of $84.6 million, respectively. This debt is generally not subject to short-term fluctuations in interest rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We own investments in Europe and in Asia, and as a result are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate movements in the euro and, to a lesser extent, the British pound sterling and the Japanese yen, which may affect future costs and cash flows. Although all of our foreign investments through the third quarter of 2013 were conducted in these currencies, we are likely to conduct business in other currencies in the future as we seek to invest funds from our offering internationally. We manage foreign currency exchange rate movements by generally placing both our debt obligation to the lender and the tenant’s rental obligation to us in the same currency. This reduces our overall exposure to the net cash flow from that investment. In addition, we may use currency hedging to further reduce the exposure to our equity cash flow. However, we are subject to foreign currency exchange rate movements to the extent of the difference in timing and amount of the rental obligation and the debt service. We are generally a net receiver of these currencies (we receive more cash than we pay out), and therefore our foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar, and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar, relative to the foreign currency.
We obtain mortgage financing in the local currency. To the extent that currency fluctuations increase or decrease rental revenues as translated to U.S. dollars, the change in debt service, as translated to U.S. dollars, will partially offset the effect of fluctuations in revenue and mitigate the risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals, under non-cancelable operating leases for our foreign operations for the remainder of 2013, each of the next four calendar years following December 31, 2013, and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
|
| 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Lease Revenues (a) |
| (Remainder) |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2016 |
| 2017 |
| Thereafter |
| Total | |||||||
Euro (b) |
| $ | 24,787 |
| $ | 99,109 |
| $ | 99,136 |
| $ | 99,138 |
| $ | 99,137 |
| $ | 1,068,825 |
| $ | 1,490,132 |
British pound sterling (c) |
| 1,455 |
| 5,779 |
| 5,779 |
| 5,780 |
| 5,779 |
| 75,893 |
| 100,465 | |||||||
Japanese yen (d) |
| 753 |
| 3,012 |
| 3,012 |
| 3,080 |
| 3,102 |
| 13,169 |
| 26,128 | |||||||
|
| $ | 26,995 |
| $ | 107,900 |
| $ | 107,927 |
| $ | 107,998 |
| $ | 108,018 |
| $ | 1,157,887 |
| $ | 1,616,725 |
Scheduled debt service payments (principal and interest) for mortgage notes payable for our foreign operations for the remainder of 2013, each of the next four calendar years following December 31, 2013, and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
|
| 2013 |
|
|
| �� |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Debt Service (a) (e) |
| (Remainder) |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2016 |
| 2017 |
| Thereafter |
| Total | |||||||
Euro (b) |
| $ | 30,495 |
| $ | 32,181 |
| $ | 73,394 |
| $ | 256,998 |
| $ | 148,236 |
| $ | 27,541 |
| $ | 568,845 |
British pound sterling (c) |
| 120 |
| 478 |
| 478 |
| 13,832 |
| - |
| - |
| 14,908 | |||||||
Japanese yen (d) |
| 133 |
| 529 |
| 529 |
| 530 |
| 27,023 |
| - |
| 28,744 | |||||||
|
| $ | 30,748 |
| $ | 33,188 |
| $ | 74,401 |
| $ | 271,360 |
| $ | 175,259 |
| $ | 27,541 |
| $ | 612,497 |
_________
(a) Amounts are based on the applicable exchange rates at September 30, 2013. Contractual rents and debt obligations are denominated in the functional currency of the country of each property.
(b) We estimate that for a 1% increase or decrease in the exchange rate between the euro and the U.S. dollar, there would be a corresponding change in the projected estimated property-level cash flow at September 30, 2013 of $9.2 million.
(c) We estimate that for a 1% increase or decrease in the exchange rate between the British pound sterling and the U.S. dollar, there would be a corresponding change in the projected estimated property-level cash flow at September 30, 2013 of $0.9 million.
(d) We estimate that for a 1% increase or decrease in the exchange rate between the Japanese yen and the U.S. dollar, there would be a corresponding change in the projected estimated property-level cash flow at September 30, 2013 of less than $0.1 million.
(e) Interest on unhedged variable-rate debt obligations was calculated using the applicable annual interest rates and balances outstanding at September 30, 2013.
As a result of scheduled balloon payments on our international non-recourse mortgage loans, projected debt service obligations exceed projected lease revenues in 2016 and 2017. In 2016 and 2017, balloon payments totaling $246.4 million and $163.6 million, respectively, are due on three and eight non-recourse mortgage loans, respectively, that are collateralized by properties that we own with affiliates. We currently anticipate that, by their respective due dates, we will have refinanced certain of these loans, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all. If that has not occurred, we would expect to use our cash resources to make these payments, if necessary.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures include our controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in this and other reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. It should be noted that no system of controls can provide complete assurance of achieving a company’s objectives and that future events may impact the effectiveness of a system of controls.
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, after conducting an evaluation, together with members of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures at September 30, 2013, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of September 30, 2013 at a reasonable level of assurance.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
For the three months ended September 30, 2013, we issued 547,125 shares of our common stock to the advisor as consideration for asset management fees. These shares were issued at $10.00 per share, which was the price at which our shares were sold in our recently completed follow-on offering. Since none of these transactions were considered to have involved a “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, the shares issued were deemed to be exempt from registration. In acquiring our shares, the advisor represented that such interests were being acquired by it for the purposes of investment and not with a view to the distribution thereof.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information with respect to repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maximum number (or | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total number of shares |
| approximate dollar value) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| purchased as part of |
| of shares that may yet be | |
|
| Total number of |
| Average price |
| publicly announced |
| purchased under the | |
2013 Period |
| shares purchased (a) |
| paid per share |
| plans or program (a) |
| plans or program (a) | |
July |
| - |
| $ | - |
| N/A |
| N/A |
August |
| - |
| - |
| N/A |
| N/A | |
September |
| 445,330 |
| 9.41 |
| N/A |
| N/A | |
Total |
| 445,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_________
(a) Represents shares of our common stock repurchased under our redemption plan, pursuant to which we may elect to redeem shares at the request of our stockholders who have held their shares for at least one year from the date of their issuance, subject to certain exceptions, conditions and limitations. The maximum amount of shares purchasable by us in any period depends on a number of factors and is at the discretion of our board of directors. We satisfied all of the above redemption requests received during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The redemption plan will terminate if and when our shares are listed on a national securities market or upon the occurrence of a liquidity event. We receive fees in connection with share redemptions.
The following exhibits are filed with this Report, except where indicated.
Exhibit No. |
| Description |
31.1 |
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32 |
| Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101 |
| The following materials from Corporate Property Associates 17 – Global Incorporated’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended at September 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| Corporate Property Associates 17 – Global Incorporated |
Date: November 7, 2013 |
|
|
| By: | /s/ Catherine D. Rice |
|
| Catherine D. Rice |
|
| Chief Financial Officer |
|
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: November 7, 2013 |
|
|
| By: | /s/ Hisham A. Kader |
|
| Hisham A. Kader |
|
| Chief Accounting Officer |
|
| (Principal Accounting Officer) |
CPA®:17 – Global 9/30/2013 10-Q — 51 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed with this Report, except where indicated.
Exhibit No. |
| Description |
31.1 |
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32 |
| Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101 |
| The following materials from Corporate Property Associates 17 – Global Incorporated’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended at September 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |