Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Leases During the second quarter of 2020, the Company entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for certain executive, administrative, and general business office space for its headquarters in New York, New York, which began on June 5, 2020 and has a term through December 31, 2024. At inception, the Company recognized a current operating lease liability of $0.1 million and a non-current operating lease liability of $0.9 million with a corresponding right of use asset ("ROU") of $1.0 million, which is based on the present value of the minimum rental payments of the lease. The discount rate of the Company's operating lease under ASC 842: Leases is the Company's estimated incremental borrowing rate of 13%. As of March 31, 2021, the lease has a remaining term of 3.76 years. Rent expense related to the Company's operating lease was approximately $0.1 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020. The Company made cash payments related to its operating lease of approximately $0.1 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020. Future minimum lease payments under the Company's non-cancelable operating lease are as follows as of March 31, 2021 (in thousands): Future minimum lease payments: 2021 (remaining) $ 227 2022 311 2023 321 2024 330 Total future minimum lease payments 1,189 Less: imputed interest (240) Current and non-current operating lease liability $ 949 Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company is subject to various pending or threatened legal actions and proceedings, including those that arise in the ordinary course of its business, which may include employment matters, breach of contract disputes and stockholder litigation. Such actions and proceedings are subject to many uncertainties and to outcomes that are not predictable with assurance and that may not be known for extended periods of time. The Company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements for costs related to claims, including future legal costs, settlements and judgments, when the Company has assessed that a loss is probable and an amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range, the Company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount. The Company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable, or both, if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred. In the opinion of management, as of the date hereof, the amount of liability, if any, with respect to these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not materially affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The Company’s predecessor company, Galena, was involved in multiple legal proceedings and administrative actions, including stockholder class actions, both state and federal. The remaining legal proceedings to which the Company is now subject are as follows: On February 13, 2017, certain putative shareholder securities class action complaints were filed in federal court alleging, among other things, that Galena and certain of Galena's former officers and directors failed to disclose that Galena’s promotional practices for Abstral® (fentanyl sublingual tablets) were allegedly improper and that Galena may be subject to civil and criminal liability, and that these alleged failures rendered Galena’s statements about its business misleading. The actions were consolidated, lead plaintiffs were named by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and a consolidated complaint was filed. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint. On August 21, 2018, the Company's motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint was granted without prejudice to file an amended complaint. On September 20, 2018, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On October 22, 2018, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On November 13, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted the Company's motion to dismiss without prejudice to file an amended complaint. On December 20, 2019, the lead plaintiffs filed a second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. On January 29, 2020, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On January 5, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted the Company's motion to dismiss without prejudice to file an amended complaint. On February 18, 2021, the lead plaintiffs filed a third Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. The Company has reached a settlement in principle with the plaintiffs in this action which is subject to final documentation and court approval. In March 2017, a derivative complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company’s former directors and Galena, as a nominal defendant. In July 2017, a derivative complaint was filed in California state court against the Company’s former directors and Galena, as a nominal defendant. In January 2018, a derivative complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company’s former directors, officers and employees, and the Company as a nominal defendant. These complaints purport to assert derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty on the Company’s behalf against the Company’s former directors and, in certain of the complaints, the Company’s current directors, and the Company’s former officers and former employees, based on substantially similar facts as alleged in the putative shareholder securities class action complaints mentioned above. The derivative lawsuit filed in California state court is currently stayed pending resolution of a motion to dismiss in the referenced securities class action. On July 13, 2020 and July 16, 2020, respectively, the Company filed motions to dismiss the two complaints filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Company has reached a settlement in principle with the plaintiffs in these three cases which is subject to final documentation and court approval. |