Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
| | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Average Recorded Investment | | | Interest Income Recognized | |
With no related allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 9 | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 393 | | | | 393 | | | | - | | | | 396 | | | | 17 | |
Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 130 | | | | 130 | | | | - | | | | 131 | | | | 8 | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 244 | | | | 244 | | | | - | | | | 246 | | | | 14 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | 6 | | | | 6 | | | | - | | | | 9 | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With an allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 302 | | | | 302 | | | | 24 | | | | 304 | | | | 13 | |
Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 364 | | | | 364 | | | | 88 | | | | 366 | | | | 15 | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 62 | | | | 62 | | | | 28 | | | | 64 | | | | 4 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 9 | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 695 | | | | 695 | | | | 24 | | | | 700 | | | | 30 | |
Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 494 | | | | 494 | | | | 88 | | | | 497 | | | | 23 | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 306 | | | | 306 | | | | 28 | | | | 310 | | | | 18 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | 6 | | | | 6 | | | | - | | | | 9 | | | | 1 | |
At March 31, 2013, the Company had eight loans totaling $613,000 identified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). All eight loans are considered impaired. Any TDR that is placed on non-accrual is not reverted back to accruing status until the borrower makes timely payments as contracted for at least six months and future collection under the revised terms is probable. None of the restructurings were made under a government assistance program. These restructurings were allowed in an effort to maximize the Company’s ability to collect on loans where borrowers were experiencing financial difficulty. All the Company’s TDRs as of March 31, 2013 have modifications with terms of interest-only payments for a period of nine months. In some cases the modification terms may include a small payment of principal in addition to interest. The following table presents the Company’s TDR loans as of March 31, 2013 (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | March 31, 2013 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | | 1 | | | $ | 69 | | | | - | | | $ | 69 | | | $ | - | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 4 | | | | 301 | | | | - | | | | 301 | | | | - | |
Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 3 | | | | 243 | | | | - | | | | 243 | | | | - | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | | 8 | | | $ | 613 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 613 | | | $ | - | |
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
| | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | | 1 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 4 | | | | 302 | | | | - | | | | 302 | | | | 10 | |
Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 3 | | | | 245 | | | | - | | | | 245 | | | | 1 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | | 8 | | | $ | 618 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 547 | | | $ | 11 | |
The contractual aging of the TDRs in the table above as of March 31, 2013 is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | March 31, 2013 | | | | | |
| | Current & Past Due Less than 30 Days | | | | | | | | | Non-Accrual | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 69 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 69 | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | - | | | | - | | | | 301 | | | | - | | | | 301 | |
Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 179 | | | | - | | | | 64 | | | | - | | | | 243 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | $ | 248 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 365 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 613 | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2013 there were no new TDRs identified.
The reserve for an impaired TDR loan is based upon the present value of the future expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective rate or upon the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell, if the loan is deemed collateral dependent. At March 31, 2013 there were no commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose loan terms have been modified as TDRs.
The general practice of the Bank is to work with borrowers so that they are able to pay back their loan in full. If a borrower continues to be delinquent or cannot meet the terms of a TDR modification and the loan is determined to be uncollectible, the loan will be charged off. As March 31, 2013 all of our loans identified as TDRs were performing in accordance with their modified terms.
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
Following is a summary, by loan portfolio class, of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and recorded investment in loans receivable as of March 31, 2013 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | March 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1-4 Family Residential Owner Occupied | | | | 1-4 Family Residential Non-Owner Occupied | | | | Multi- Family | | | | Commercial Real Estate and Lines of Credit | | | | Construction | | | | Home Equity | | | | Consumer Non-Real Estate | | | | Unallocated | | | | Total | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 368 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 63 | | | $ | 68 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 860 | |
Charge-offs | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Recoveries | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Provision | | | (5 | ) | | | 64 | | | | 5 | | | | (46 | ) | | | 12 | | | | 21 | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | 52 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 432 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 173 | | | $ | 75 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 912 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually | | $ | - | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 151 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 360 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 147 | | | $ | 75 | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 761 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance: | | $ | 9,991 | | | $ | 37,121 | | | $ | 4,070 | | | $ | 22,917 | | | $ | 11,497 | | | $ | 5,646 | | | $ | 126 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 91,368 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
impairment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually | | $ | 368 | | | $ | 1,138 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 314 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 531 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,351 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively | | $ | 9,623 | | | $ | 35,983 | | | $ | 4,070 | | | $ | 22,603 | | | $ | 11,497 | | | $ | 5,115 | | | $ | 126 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 89,017 | |
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
Following is a summary, by loan portfolio class, of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2012 and recorded investment in loans receivable as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | December 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1-4 Family Residential Owner Occupied | | | | 1-4 Family Residential Non-Owner Occupied | | | | Multi- Family | | | | Commercial Real Estate and Lines of Credit | | | | Construction | | | | Home Equity | | | | Consumer Non-Real Estate | | | | Unallocated | | | | Total | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 351 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 805 | |
Charge-offs | | | - | | | | (103 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (4 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (107 | ) |
Recoveries | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Provision | | | (37 | ) | | | 120 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 71 | | | | 28 | | | | (11 | ) | | | - | | | | (3 | ) | | | 162 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 368 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 63 | | | $ | 68 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 860 | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually | | $ | - | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 88 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 28 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 140 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 344 | | | $ | 20 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 63 | | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 720 | |
Loans receivable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 10,272 | | | $ | 35,118 | | | $ | 3,315 | | | $ | 20,595 | | | $ | 9,765 | | | $ | 6,029 | | | $ | 162 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 85,256 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 695 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 494 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 306 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,632 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively | | $ | 10,141 | | | $ | 34,423 | | | $ | 3,315 | | | $ | 20,101 | | | $ | 9,765 | | | $ | 5,723 | | | $ | 156 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 83,624 | |
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
Following is a summary, by loan portfolio class, of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | March 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1-4 Family Residential Owner Occupied | | | 1-4 Family Residential Non-Owner Occupied | | | Multi-Family | | | Commercial Real Estate and Lines of Credit | | | Construction | | | Home Equity | | | Consumer Non-Real Estate | | | Unallocated | | | Total | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 351 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 805 | |
Charge-offs | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3 | ) |
Recoveries | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Provision | | | (7 | ) | | | 24 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 34 | | | | 7 | | | | 5 | | | | - | | | | 10 | | | | 71 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 107 | | | $ | 375 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 182 | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 873 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually | | $ | - | | | $ | 105 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 59 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 206 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collectively | | $ | 107 | | | $ | 270 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 123 | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 43 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 667 | |
The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 299 | | | $ | 131 | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 837 | | | | 488 | |
Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 314 | | | | 445 | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 288 | | | | 256 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | |
| | $ | 1,738 | | | $ | 1,320 | |
Non-performing loans, which consist of non-accruing loans plus accruing loans 90 days or more past due, amounted to $2.6 million and $2.1 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. For the delinquent loans in our portfolio, we have considered our ability to collect the past due interest, as well as the principal balance of the loan, in order to determine whether specific loans should be placed on non-accrual status. In cases where our evaluations have determined that the principal and interest balances are collectible, we have continued to accrue interest.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately $12,000 and $16,000 of interest income was recognized on non-accrual loans. Gross interest income that would have been recorded on non-accrual loans had they been current in accordance with their original terms, was approximately $20,000 and $40,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | |
| | | | | Greater | | | | | | | | | | | | Loans Receivable > 90 Days and Accruing | |
| | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 635 | | | $ | 299 | | | $ | 934 | | | $ | 9,057 | | | $ | 9,991 | | | $ | - | |
One-to-four family residential non- owner occupied | | | 925 | | | | 1,472 | | | | 2,397 | | | | 34,724 | | | | 37,121 | | | | 635 | |
Multi-family residential | | | 77 | | | | - | | | | 77 | | | | 3,993 | | | | 4,070 | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 1,861 | | | | 420 | | | | 2,281 | | | | 20,636 | | | | 22,917 | | | | 106 | |
Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 11,497 | | | | 11,497 | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 543 | | | | 384 | | | | 927 | | | | 4,719 | | | | 5,646 | | | | 96 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | 22 | | | | 5 | | | | 27 | | | | 99 | | | | 126 | | | | 5 | |
| | $ | 4,063 | | | $ | 2,580 | | | $ | 6,643 | | | $ | 84,725 | | | $ | 91,368 | | | $ | 842 | |
| | | |
| | | | | Greater | | | | | | | | | | | | Loans Receivable > 90 Days and Accruing | |
| | | |
One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 348 | | | $ | 373 | | | $ | 721 | | | $ | 9,551 | | | $ | 10,272 | | | $ | 242 | |
One-to-four family residential non- owner occupied | | | 1,506 | | | | 790 | | | | 2,296 | | | | 32,822 | | | | 35,118 | | | | 302 | |
Multi-family residential | | | 79 | | | | - | | | | 79 | | | | 3,236 | | | | 3,315 | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 756 | | | | 657 | | | | 1,413 | | | | 19,182 | | | | 20,595 | | | | 212 | |
Construction | | | 382 | | | | - | | | | 382 | | | | 9,383 | | | | 9,765 | | | | - | |
Home equity | | | 238 | | | | 321 | | | | 559 | | | | 5,470 | | | | 6,029 | | | | 65 | |
Consumer non-real estate | | | 6 | | | | - | | | | 6 | | | | 156 | | | | 162 | | | | - | |
| | $ | 3,315 | | | $ | 2,141 | | | $ | 5,456 | | | $ | 79,800 | | | $ | 85,256 | | | $ | 821 | |
Note 6 – Deposits
Deposits consist of the following classifications (in thousands):
| | | | | | | |
| Passbook savings accounts | | $ | 2,861 | | | $ | 2,890 | |
| Statement savings accounts | | | 5,863 | | | | 5,843 | |
| eSavings accounts | | | 13,424 | | | | 10,604 | |
| Certificates of deposit | | | 80,937 | | | | 77,701 | |
| Total deposits | | $ | 103,085 | | | $ | 97,038 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 – Borrowings
Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of the following at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| Maturity Period | | Amount | | | Weighted Interest Rate | |
| 1 to 12 months | | $ | 2,000 | | | | 4.19 | % |
Note 8 – Stock Compensation Plans
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) during fiscal 2007 for the benefit of employees who meet the eligibility requirements of the plan. Using proceeds from a loan from the Company, the ESOP purchased 8%, or 111,090 shares of the Company’s then outstanding common stock in the open market at an average price of $9.35 for a total of $1.0 million. The Bank makes cash contributions to the ESOP on a quarterly basis sufficient to enable the ESOP to make the required loan payments to the Company. The loan bears an interest rate of 7.75% per annum, with principal and interest to be paid quarterly in equal installments over 15 years. The loan is secured by the unallocated shares of common stock held by the ESOP.
Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the ESOP are held in a suspense account and reported as unallocated common stock held by the ESOP in stockholders’ equity until released for allocation to participants. As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral and are allocated to each eligible participant based on the ratio of each such participant’s base compensation to the total base compensation of eligible plan participants. As the unearned shares are committed to be released and allocated among participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market value of the shares, and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations. During the three months March 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company recognized $26,000 and $16,000 of ESOP expense, respectively.
Recognition & Retention Plan
In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan (the “RRP”) and Trust Agreement. In order to fund the RRP, the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan Trust (the “RRP Trust”) acquired 55,545 shares of the Company’s stock in the open market at an average price of $9.36 totaling $520,000. Pursuant to the RRP, 43,324 shares acquired by the RRP Trust were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008, with 12,221 shares remaining available for future grant. Due to forfeiture of shares by certain employees in addition to unawarded shares, as of March 31, 2013, 12,459 shares remain available for future grant. The RRP share awards have vesting periods from five to seven years.
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
Recognition & Retention Plan (Continued)
A summary of the status of the shares under the RRP as of March 31, 2013 and 2012 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | Number of | | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | | Number of | | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
Unvested at the beginning of the period | | | 8,894 | | | $ | 9.05 | | | | 17,440 | | | $ | 9.05 | |
Granted | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Vested | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9.05 | |
Forfeited | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Unvested at the end of the period | | | 8,894 | | | $ | 9.05 | | | | 17,440 | | | $ | 9.05 | |
The weighted average grant date fair value is the last sale price as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board on May 14, 2008. Compensation expense on the RRP shares granted is recognized ratably over the five to seven year vesting period in an amount which is equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant. During each of the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately $19,000 in compensation expense was recognized. A tax benefit of approximately $6,000 was recognized during each of these periods. As of March 31, 2013, approximately $13,000 in additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 0.2 years.
Stock Option Plan
In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”). The Option Plan authorizes the grant of stock options to officers, employees and directors of the Company to acquire 138,863 shares of common stock with an exercise price no less than the fair market value on the date of the grant. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined to grant the stock options in May 2008 at an exercise price equal to $10.00 per share which is higher than the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. All incentive stock options issued under the Option Plan are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Options will become vested and exercisable over a five to seven year period and are generally exercisable for a period of ten years after the grant date. Pursuant to the Option Plan, 108,311 stock options were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008. Due to forfeiture of stock options by certain employees in addition to unawarded stock options, as of March 31, 2013, 31,293 stock options remain available for future grant.
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
Stock Option Plan (Continued)
A summary of option activity under the Company’s Option Plan as of March 31, 2013 and 2012 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
| | 2013 | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 5.4 | | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
Granted | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Exercised | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Forfeited | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | -- | | | | - | |
Outstanding at the end of the period | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
Exercisable at the end of the period | | | 85,332 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 63,999 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
During each of the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately $11,000 in compensation expense was recognized. A tax benefit of approximately $2,000 was recognized during each of these periods. As of March 31, 2013, approximately $7,000 in additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 0.2 years.
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements
Fair value estimates are based on quoted market prices, if available, quoted market prices of similar assets or liabilities, or the present value of expected future cash flows and other valuation techniques. These valuations are significantly affected by discount rates, cash flow assumptions, and risk assumptions used. Therefore, fair value estimates may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not intended to reflect the proceeds that may be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instruments.
Fair value is determined at one point in time and is not representative of future value. These amounts do not reflect the total value of a going concern organization. Management does not have the intention to dispose of a significant portion of its assets and liabilities and therefore, the unrealized gains or losses should not be interpreted as a forecast of future earnings and cash flows.
The following is a discussion of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and valuation techniques applied:
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities Available-For-Sale: The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
We may be required from time to time to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with US GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Impaired Loans: Impaired loans are carried at the lower of cost or the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans. Collateral is primarily in the form of real estate. The use of independent appraisals, discounted cash flow models and management’s best judgment are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value measure of the underlying collateral and impaired loans are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of the investment in the real estate or the fair value of the real estate less estimated selling costs. The use of independent appraisals and management’s best judgment are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value measure of the underlying collateral and therefore other real estate owned is classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The table below sets forth the financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for on a recurring and nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2013 (in thousands):
| | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |
| | | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Recurring fair value measurements | | | |
Investment securities available for sale | | | |
Corporate securities | | $ | 1,854 | | | $ | 1,854 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Short-term bond fund | | | 1,149 | | | | 1,149 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Limited-term bond fund | | | 527 | | | | 527 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total investment securities available for sale | | $ | 3,530 | | | $ | 3,530 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Total recurring fair value measurements | | $ | 3,350 | | | $ | 3,350 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | |
Nonrecurring fair value measurements | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 883 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 883 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | | 199 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 199 | |
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements | | $ | 1,082 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,082 | |
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The table below sets forth the financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for on a recurring and nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |
| | | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Recurring fair value measurements | | | |
Investment securities available for sale | | | |
U.S. Government agency securities | | $ | 501 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 501 | | | $ | - | |
Corporate securities | | | 1,826 | | | | 1,826 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Short-term bond fund | | | 1,142 | | | | 1,142 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Limited-term bond fund | | | 525 | | | | 525 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total investment securities available for sale | | $ | 3,994 | | | $ | 3,493 | | | $ | 501 | | | $ | - | |
Total recurring fair value measurements | | $ | 3,994 | | | $ | 3,493 | | | $ | 501 | | | $ | - | |
| | | |
Nonrecurring fair value measurements | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 588 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 588 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | | 170 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 170 | |
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements | | $ | 758 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 758 | |
The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Company has used level 3 inputs to determine fair value as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | |
| | Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
| | | Total Fair | | Valuation | | Unobservable | | Range (Weighted |
| | | Value | | Techniques | | Input | | Average) |
Impaired loans | | $ | 883 | | Appraisal of collateral (1) | | Appraisal adjustments (2) | | 8%-40% (24%) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | $ | 199 | | Appraisal of collateral (1) | | Appraisal adjustments (2) | | 8%-29% (17%) |
| | |
| | Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
| | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 588 | | Appraisal of collateral (1) | | Appraisal adjustments (2) | | | 8%-58% (31%) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | $ | 170 | | Appraisal of collateral (1) | | Appraisal adjustments (2) | | | 8%-29% (17%) |
(1) | Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 inputs which are identifiable. |
(2) | Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percentage of the appraisal. |
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | Fair Value Measurements at | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Financial Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 11,994 | | | $ | 11,994 | | | $ | 11,994 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Investment in interest-earning time deposits | | | 8,137 | | | | 8,316 | | | | - | | | | 8,316 | | | | - | |
Investment securities available for sale | | | 3,530 | | | | 3,530 | | | | 3,530 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Loans held for sale | | | 5,090 | | | | 5,252 | | | | - | | | | 5,252 | | | | - | |
Loans receivable, net | | | 90,302 | | | | 91,485 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 91,485 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 736 | | | | 736 | | | | 736 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Investment in FHLB stock | | | 373 | | | | 373 | | | | - | | | | 373 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 103,085 | | | | 105,498 | | | | 22,148 | | | | 83,350 | | | | - | |
FHLB advances, short-term | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,000 | | | | - | | | | 2,000 | | | | - | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 84 | | | | 84 | | | | 84 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | Fair Value Measurements at | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
Financial Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 12,400 | | | $ | 12,400 | | | $ | 12,400 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Investment in interest-earning time deposits | | | 8,132 | | | | 8,234 | | | | - | | | | 8,234 | | | | - | |
Investment securities available for sale | | | 3,994 | | | | 3,994 | | | | 3,493 | | | | 501 | | | | - | |
Loans held for sale | | | 4,875 | | | | 5,053 | | | | - | | | | 5,053 | | | | - | |
Loans receivable, net | | | 84,291 | | | | 86,503 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 86,503 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 657 | | | | 657 | | | | 657 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Investment in FHLB stock | | | 437 | | | | 437 | | | | - | | | | 437 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 97,038 | | | | 98,279 | | | | 19,337 | | | | 78,942 | | | | - | |
FHLB advances, short-term | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,000 | | | | - | | | | 2,000 | | | | - | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 81 | | | | 81 | | | | 81 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The following methods and assumptions were used to measure the fair value of financial instruments recorded at cost on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.
Interest-Earning Time Deposits. Fair values for interest-earning time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. The Company generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.
Loans Held for Sale. Fair values of loans held for sale are based on commitments on hand from investors at prevailing market rates.
Loans Receivable, Net. The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow methodology. The discount rates take into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms, the credit risk associated with the loan and market factors, including liquidity. The valuation of the loan portfolio reflects discounts that the Company believes are consistent with transactions occurring in the market place for both performing and distressed loan types. The carrying value that fair value is compared to is net of the allowance for loan losses and other associated premiums and discounts. Due to the significant judgment involved in evaluating credit quality, loans are classified with level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Accrued Interest Receivable. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The carrying amount of restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.
Deposits. The carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value for demand savings deposit accounts. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by a discounted cash flow method using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar maturities.
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings. Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated based on rates currently available to the Company for similar terms and remaining maturities.
Accrued Interest Receivable. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments. Off-balance sheet financial instruments consist of commitments to extend credit. Fair values for commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the present credit standing of the counterparties. The estimated fair value of the commitments to extend credit are insignificant and therefore are not presented in the above table.
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements Are Subject to Change
We make certain statements in this document as to what we expect may happen in the future. These statements usually contain the words "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," "anticipate," "intend" or similar expressions. Because these statements look to the future, they are based on our current expectations and beliefs. Actual results or events may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. You should be aware that our current expectations and beliefs as to future events are subject to change at any time, and we can give you no assurances that the future events will actually occur.
General
The Company was formed in connection with the Bank’s conversion to a stock savings bank completed on July 3, 2007. The Company’s results of operations are dependent primarily on the results of the Bank, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Bank’s results of operations depend, to a large extent, on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its loan and investment portfolios and the cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by provisions for loan losses, fee income and other non-interest income and non-interest expense. Non-interest expense principally consists of compensation, directors’ fees and expenses, office occupancy and equipment expense, professional fees, FDIC deposit insurance assessment and other expenses. Our results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.
At March 31, 2013 the Bank had five subsidiaries, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, Quaint Oak Real Estate, LLC, Quaint Oak Abstract, LLC, Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC, and QOB Properties, LLC, each a Pennsylvania limited liability company. The mortgage, real estate and abstract companies offer mortgage banking, real estate sales and title abstract services, respectively, in the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania, and began operation in July 2009. QOB Properties, LLC began operations in July 2012 and holds Bank properties acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC is currently inactive. The mortgage company also began operating at our main office in the Delaware Valley Region of Pennsylvania in October 2010. In connection with the expansion into these activities, the Company acquired an office building in Allentown, Pennsylvania from which the subsidiaries operate. The Bank also opened a new branch office at this location in February 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices within the banking industry. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements require certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions, which are believed to be reasonable, based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the periods presented. The following accounting policies comprise those that management believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. These policies require numerous estimates or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or may be subject to variations which may significantly affect our reported results and financial condition for the period or in future periods.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are designated as impaired. For loans that are designated as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment. Residential owner occupied mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish a specific reserve for loss on any delinquent loan when it determines that a loss is probable. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not considered impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.
A loan is identified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary or permanent reduction in payments or interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date at less than a current market rate of interest. Loans identified as TDRs are designated as impaired.
For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for all loans (except one-to-four family residential owner-occupied loans) where the total amount outstanding to any borrower or group of borrowers exceeds $500,000, or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities. Securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. To determine whether a loss in value is other-than-temporary, management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the decline and whether or not management intends to sell or expects that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to an anticipated recovery of the fair value. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value for a debt security is determined to be other-than-temporary, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, except for equity securities, where the full amount of the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings.
Income Taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. The realization of our deferred tax assets principally depends upon our achieving projected future taxable income. We may change our judgments regarding future profitability due to future market conditions and other factors. We may adjust our deferred tax asset balances if our judgments change.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012
General. The Company’s total assets at March 31, 2013 were $122.8 million, an increase of $5.4 million, or 4.6%, from $117.4 million at December 31, 2012. This growth in total assets was primarily due to increases in loans receivable, net of $6.0 million and loans held for sale of $215,000. Offsetting these increases were decreases in investment securities of $464,000, as a result of calls, and cash and cash equivalents of $406,000.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $406,000 or 3.3%, from $12.4 million at December 31, 2012 to $12.0 million at March 31, 2013 as excess liquidity was used to fund loans.
Investment Securities Available for Sale. Investment securities decreased $464,000, or 11.6%, to $3.5 million at March 31, 2013 from $4.0 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease was due primarily to a call of a U.S. Government agency security in the amount of $500,000.
Loans Held for Sale. Loans held for sale increased $215,000 to $5.1 million at March 31, 2013 from $4.9 million at December 31, 2012 as the Bank’s mortgage banking subsidiary, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, originated $12.4 million of one-to-four family residential loans during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and sold $12.2 million of these loans in the secondary market during this same period.
Loans Receivable, Net. Loans receivable, net, increased $6.0 million, or 7.1%, to $90.3 million at March 31, 2013 from $84.3 million December 31, 2012. This increase was funded primarily from the increase in deposits, proceeds from the call of investment securities available for sale, and excess liquidity in cash and cash equivalents. Increases within the portfolio occurred in the commercial real estate category which increased $2.0 million, or 10.9%, in one-to-four family residential non-owner occupied loans which increased $2.0 million, or 5.7%, in construction loans which increased $1.7 million, or 17.7%, in multi-family residential loans which increased $755,000, or 22.8%, and in commercial lines of credit which increased $290,000, or 15.3%. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $383,000, or 6.4%, in home equity loans and $281,000, or 2.7%, in residential mortgage one-to-four family owner occupied loans. The Company continues its strategy of diversifying its loan portfolio with higher yielding and shorter-term loan products and selling substantially all of its newly originated one-to-four family owner-occupied loans into the secondary market.
Premises and Equipment, Net. Premises and equipment, net, increased $99,000, or 6.2%, to $1.7 million at March 31, 2013 from $1.6 million at December 31, 2012 primarily due to the capital expenditures made during the three months ended March 31, 2013 in connection with the Company’s upgrade of its core processing computer system.
Other Real Estate Owned, Net. Other real estate owned (OREO) amounted to $199,000 at March 31, 2013, consisting of three properties. These are the same three properties that totaled $170,000 at December 31, 2012. The $29,000 increase is attributable to capital improvements made on two of the properties during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Deposits. Total interest-bearing deposits increased $6.0 million, or 6.2%, to $103.1 million at March 31, 2013 from $97.0 million at December 31, 2012. This increase in deposits was primarily attributable to increases of $3.2 million in certificates of deposit and $2.8 million in eSavings accounts.
Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity decreased $38,000 to $16.80 million at March 31, 2013 from $16.84 million at December 31, 2012. Contributing to the decrease were dividends paid of $40,000 and the purchase of 13,900 shares of the Company’s stock as part of the Company’s stock repurchase program, for an aggregate purchase price of $210,000. These decreases were partially offset by net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 of $140,000, amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans of $30,000, common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan of $26,000, and accumulated other comprehensive income of $16,000.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012
General. Net income amounted to $140,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $36,000, or 20.5%, compared to net income of $176,000 for three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in net income on a comparative quarterly basis was primarily the result of an increase in non-interest expense of $305,000, offset by increases in net interest income of $75,000 and non-interest income of $148,000, and decreases in the provision for loan losses of $19,000 and the provision for income taxes of $27,000.
Net Interest Income.Net interest income increased $75,000, or 7.6%, to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $984,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase was driven by a $59,000, or 4.1%, increase in interest income and a $16,000, or 3.5%, decrease in interest expense.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $59,000, or 4.1%, to $1.49 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $1.44 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a $13.4 million increase in average loans receivable, net, including loans held for sale, which had the effect of increasing interest income $222,000, and a $1.2 million increase in average short-term investments and investment securities available for sale, which had the effect of increasing interest income $5,000. Offsetting these increases was a 41 basis point decline in the yield on loans receivable, net, including loans held for sale which had the effect of decreasing interest income $96,000, and a 47 basis point decline in average short-term investments and investment securities available for sale which had the effect of decreasing interest income $27,000. Also contributing to offsetting the increases in interest income was the $3.8 million decrease in average mortgage-backed securities held to maturity which had the effect of decreasing interest income $45,000. The decrease in rates was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from March 2012 to March 2013. The decrease in average mortgage-backed securities held to maturity was due to the sale of mortgage-backed securities in the second quarter of 2012 after their transfer to the available for sale category at the end of the first quarter of 2012. In accordance with regulatory and accounting requirements, the Company is prohibited from classifying security purchases as held to maturity for a period of two years after the transfer.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $16,000, or 3.5%, to $435,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $451,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 28 basis point decline in the overall cost of average interest-bearing liabilities from 1.98% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to 1.70% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 which had the effect of decreasing interest expense by $48,000. This decrease due to rate combined with a decrease of $1.8 million in average FHLB advances which had the effect of decreasing interest expense by $19,000. These decreases were offset by an increase of $7.8 million in average eSavings accounts which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $18,000, and an increase of $6.2 million in average certificates of deposits which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $33,000. The overall decrease in rates was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from March 2012 to March 2013. The decrease in the average FHLB advances was attributable to the scheduled repayments while the increases in average eSavings accounts and certificates of deposit accounts on a comparative quarterly basis were due to rates offered by the Company in these two deposit categories.
Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin. All average balances are based on daily balances.
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | | | | | |
| | Average | | | | | | Average Yield/ | | | Average | | | | | | Average Yield/ | |
Interest-earning assets: | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Short-term investments and investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale | | $ | 22,975 | | | $ | 64 | | | | 1.11 | % | | $ | 1,792 | | | $ | 87 | | | | 1.60 | % |
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,787 | | | | 45 | | | | 4.75 | |
Loans receivable, net (1) (2) | | | 99,991 | | | | 1,430 | | | | 6.22 | | | | 78,574 | | | | 1,303 | | | | 6.63 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 114,966 | | | | 1,494 | | | | 5.20 | % | | | 104,153 | | | | 1,435 | | | | 5.51 | % |
Non-interest-earning assets | | | 5,083 | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,796 | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 120,049 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 107,949 | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Passbook accounts | | $ | 2,853 | | | | 2 | | | | 0.28 | % | | $ | 2,948 | | | | 2 | | | | 0.27 | % |
Statement savings accounts | | | 5,720 | | | | 6 | | | | 0.42 | | | | 6,674 | | | | 7 | | | | 0.42 | |
eSavings accounts | | | 12,021 | | | | 26 | | | | 0.87 | | | | 4,258 | | | | 10 | | | | 0.94 | |
Certificate of deposit accounts | | | 79,608 | | | | 380 | | | | 1.91 | | | | 73,449 | | | | 392 | | | | 2.13 | |
Total deposits | | | 100,202 | | | | 414 | | | | 1.65 | | | | 87,329 | | | | 411 | | | | 1.88 | |
FHLB advances | | | 2,000 | | | | 21 | | | | 4.20 | | | | 3,800 | | | | 40 | | | | 4.21 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 102,202 | | | | 435 | | | | 1.70 | % | | | 91,129 | | | | 451 | | | | 1.98 | % |
Non-interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1,056 | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,031 | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 103,258 | | | | | | | | | | | | 92,160 | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity | | | 16,791 | | | | | | | | | | | | 15,789 | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 120,049 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 107,949 | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest-earning assets | | $ | 12,764 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 11,489 | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income; average interest rate spread | | | | | | $ | 1,059 | | | | 3.50 | % | | | | | | $ | 984 | | | | 3.53 | % |
Net interest margin (3) | | | | | | | | | | | 3.68 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 3.78 | % |
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | 112.49 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 114.29 | % |
_______________________
(1) | Includes loans held for sale. |
(2) | Includes non-accrual loans during the respective periods. Calculated net of deferred fees and discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses. |
(3) | Equals net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. |
Provision for Loan Losses. The Company’s provision for loan losses decreased by $19,000, or 26.8%, from $71,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to $52,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, based on an evaluation of the allowance relative to such factors as volume of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit risk, prevailing economic conditions, prior loan loss experience and amount of non-performing loans at March 31, 2013.
Non-performing loans amounted to $2.6 million, or 2.86% of net loans receivable at March 31, 2013, consisting of thirty-two loans, twenty-one of which are on non-accrual status and eleven of which are 90 days or more past due and accruing interest. Comparably, non-performing loans amounted to $2.1 million, or 2.54% of net loans receivable at December 31, 2012, consisting of twenty-six loans, seventeen of which were on non-accrual status and nine of which were 90 days or more past due and accruing interest. The non-performing loans at March 31, 2013 include sixteen one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loans, nine home equity loans, three commercial real estate loans, three one-to-four family owner-occupied residential loans, and one consumer non-real estate loan, and all are generally well-collateralized or adequately reserved for. During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, six loans were placed on non-accrual status resulting in the reversal of approximately $17,000 of previously accrued interest income and two loans that were on non-accrual were returned to accrual status. Included in non-performing loans are six loans identified as troubled debt restructurings which totaled $365,000 at March 31, 2013. The Company had two additional troubled debt restructuring not included in non-performing loans at March 31, 2013 in the amount of $248,000 that were current. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans receivable was 1.00% at March 31, 2013 and 1.01% at December 31, 2012.
Other real estate owned (OREO) amounted to $199,000 at March 31, 2013, consisting of three properties. These are the same three properties that totaled $170,000 at December 31, 2012. The $29,000 increase is attributable to capital improvements made on two of the properties during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $148,000 or 74.4%, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 over the comparable period in 2012 due primarily to a $106,000 increase in the net gain on the sales of loans held for sale and a $74,000 increase in fee income generated by Quaint Oak Bank’s mortgage banking and title abstract subsidiaries. These increases were offset by a $32,000 decrease in the gain on sale of an SBA loan which was sold during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $305,000, or 37.1%, from $823,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Salaries and employee benefits expense accounted for $212,000 of the change as this expense increased 43.0%, from $493,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to $705,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 due primarily to increased staff as the Company expanded its mortgage banking and lending operations. Also contributing to the period over period increase was a $33,000, or 44.0%, increase in occupancy and equipment expense, a $23,000, or 33.8%, increase in other expense, a $22,000, or 28.2%, increase in professional fees, and a $12,000, or 85.7%, increase in advertising expense. The increase in occupancy and equipment expense was primarily related to the move of our Delaware Valley office from 607 Lakeside Office Park, Southampton, PA to a larger facility at 501 Knowles Avenue, Southampton, PA and computer system upgrades. The increase in professional fees was primarily due to costs related to compliance and loan collections.
Provision for Income Tax. The provision for income tax decreased $27,000, or 23.9%, from $113,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to $86,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 due primarily to the increase in pre-tax income, as our effective tax rate remained relatively consistent at 38.1% for the 2013 period compared to 39.1% for the comparable period in 2012.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans and to a lesser extent, loan sales and other funds provided from operations. While scheduled principal and interest payments on loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Company sets the interest rates on its deposits to maintain a desired level of total deposits. In addition, the Company invests excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets that provide additional liquidity. At March 31, 2013 the Company's cash and cash equivalents amounted to $12.0 million. At such date, the Company also had $2.6 million invested in interest-earning time deposits maturing in one year or less.
The Company uses its liquidity to fund existing and future loan commitments, to fund deposit outflows, to invest in other interest-earning assets and to meet operating expenses. At March 31, 2013, Quaint Oak Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $3.5 million and commitments under unused lines of credit of $11.1 million.
At March 31, 2013, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled $28.8 million. Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although it is dependent on our deposit pricing strategy at the time of maturity and there can be no assurance that this will be the case.
In addition to cash flow from loan payments and prepayments and deposits, the Company has significant borrowing capacity available to fund liquidity needs. If the Company requires funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, which provide an additional source of funds. As of March 31, 2013, we had $2.0 million of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and had $46.7 million in borrowing capacity. We are reviewing our continued utilization of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a source of funding based on the decision in December 2008 by the Federal Home Loan Bank to suspend the dividend on, and restrict the repurchase of, Federal Home Loan Bank stock. The amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock that a member institution is required to hold is directly proportional to the volume of advances taken by that institution. Should we decide to utilize sources of funding other than advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, we believe that additional funding is available in the form of advances or repurchase agreements through various other sources. As of March 31, 2013 Quaint Oak Bank has $2.1 million in borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. There were no borrowings under this facility at March 31, 2013. Quaint Oak Bank currently has two additional line of credit commitments with two different banks totaling $1.5 million. There were no borrowings under these lines of credit at March 31, 2013.
Our stockholders’ equity amounted to $16.80 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $38,000 from $16.84 million at December 31, 2012. Contributing to the decrease were dividends paid of $40,000 and the purchase of 13,900 shares of the Company’s stock as part of the Company’s stock repurchase program, for an aggregate purchase price of $210,000. These decreases were partially offset by net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 of $140,000, amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans of $30,000, common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan of $26,000, and accumulated other comprehensive income of $16,000. For further discussion of the stock compensation plans, see Note 8 in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.
Quaint Oak Bank is required to maintain regulatory capital sufficient to meet tier 1 leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 4.00%, 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively. At March 31, 2013, Quaint Oak Bank exceeded each of its capital requirements with ratios of 12.93%, 19.75% and 20.93% , respectively. As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is not currently subject to any regulatory capital requirements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers' requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. Our exposure to credit loss from non-performance by the other party to the above-mentioned financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. In general, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off–balance sheet credit risk.
Commitments. At March 31, 2013, we had unfunded commitments under lines of credit of $11.1 million and $3.5 million of commitments to originate loans. We had no commitments to advance additional amounts pursuant to outstanding lines of credit or undisbursed construction loans.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which generally require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in relative purchasing power over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance than does the effect of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation to a larger extent than interest rates.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not Applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2013. Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations are operating in an effective manner.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.