Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto.
Forward Looking Statements: This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements in this document, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements which may be identified by the use of the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "will," "would," "should," "may," "estimates" and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause our actual results and performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. As a result, you should not rely on any forward-looking statements in this report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, as predictions of future events nor guarantees of future performance. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report or as of the dates indicated in the statements. All of our forward-looking statements, including those in this report, are qualified in their entirety by this statement.
Factors and risks that may impact our future results and performance include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 27, 2012 and in our other filings with the SEC and the following:
· | general risks associated with the ownership and operation of real estate including changes in demand, potential liability for environmental contamination, natural disasters, and adverse changes in laws and regulations governing property tax, real estate and zoning; |
· | risks associated with downturns in the national and local economies in the markets in which we operate, including risks related to current economic conditions and the economic health of our tenants; |
· | the impact of competition from new and existing self-storage and commercial facilities and other storage alternatives; |
· | difficulties in our ability to successfully evaluate, finance, integrate into our existing operations, and manage acquired and developed properties; |
· | risks associated with international operations including, but not limited to, unfavorable foreign currency rate fluctuations and local and global economic uncertainty that could adversely affect our earnings and cash flows; |
· | risks related to our participation in joint ventures; |
· | the impact of the regulatory environment as well as national, state, and local laws and regulations including, without limitation, those governing environmental, tax and tenant insurance matters and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), and risks related to the impact of new laws and regulations; |
· | risk of increased tax expense associated either with a possible failure by us to qualify as a REIT, or with challenges to intercompany transactions with our taxable REIT subsidiaries; |
· | disruptions or shutdowns of our automated processes and systems or breaches of our data security; |
· | difficulties in raising capital at a reasonable cost; and |
· | economic uncertainty due to the impact of war or terrorism. |
We expressly disclaim any obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, new estimates, or other factors, events or circumstances after the date of this document, except where required by law. Accordingly, you should use caution in relying on forward-looking statements to anticipate future results.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP and our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. The notes to our September 30, 2012 financial statements, primarily Note 2, summarize the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures.
We believe the following are our critical accounting policies, because they have a material impact on the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and they require us to make judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Income Tax Expense: We have elected to be treated as a REIT, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. As a REIT, we do not incur federal income tax if we distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income (generally, net rents and gains from real property, dividends, and interest) each year, and if we meet certain organizational and operational rules. We believe we have met these REIT requirements in 2011 and for all other periods presented herein. Accordingly, we have recorded no federal income tax expense related to our REIT taxable income.
Our evaluation that we have met the REIT requirements could be incorrect, because compliance with the tax rules requires factual determinations, and circumstances we have not identified could result in noncompliance with the tax requirements in current or prior years. For any taxable year that we fail to qualify as a REIT and for which applicable statutory relief provisions did not apply, we would be taxed at the regular corporate rates on all of our taxable income for at least that year and the ensuing four years, we could be subject to penalties and interest, and our net income would be materially different from the amounts estimated in our financial statements.
In addition, our taxable REIT subsidiaries are taxable as regular corporations. To the extent that amounts paid to us by our taxable REIT subsidiaries are determined by the taxing authorities to be in excess of amounts that would be paid under similar arrangements among unrelated parties, we could be subject to a 100% penalty tax on the excess payments. If we became subject to such a penalty tax, our net income could be materially overstated from our current estimates.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: Substantially all of our assets, consisting primarily of real estate, are long-lived assets. The evaluation of long-lived assets for impairment involves identification of indicators of impairment, projections of future operating cash flows, and determining fair values, all of which require significant judgment and subjectivity. Others could come to materially different conclusions than we did regarding impairment. In addition, we may not have identified all current facts and circumstances that may affect impairment. Any unidentified impairment loss, or change in assumptions as to cash flows or fair values, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Accruals for Operating Expenses: Certain of our expenses are estimated based upon assumptions regarding past trends and future expectations, such as losses for workers compensation, employee health plans, and estimated claims for our tenant reinsurance program. Our property tax expense represents one of our largest operating expenses and has significant estimated components. Most notably, in certain jurisdictions we do not receive tax bills for the current fiscal year until after our earnings are finalized, and as a result, we must estimate tax expense based upon anticipated implementation of regulations and trends. If these estimates and assumptions with respect to these operating expenses were incorrect, our expenses could be misstated.
Accruals for Contingencies: We are exposed to business and legal liability risks with respect to events that have occurred, but in accordance with GAAP, we have not accrued for certain potential liabilities because the loss is either not probable or not reasonably estimable or because we are not aware of the event. We could in the future accrue additional amounts for such liabilities, due to future events and the results of further investigation or litigation. Such accruals could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Valuation of Real Estate and Intangible Assets Acquired: In reporting the acquisition of operating self-storage facilities in our financial statements, we must estimate the fair value of the land, buildings, and intangible assets acquired in these transactions. These estimates are based upon many assumptions, subject to a significant degree of judgment, including estimating discount rates, replacement costs of land and buildings, future cash flows from the tenant base in place at the time of the acquisition, and future revenues to be earned and expenses to be incurred with respect to acquired properties. We believe that the assumptions we used are reasonable, however, others could come to materially different conclusions as to the estimated values, which would result in different depreciation and amortization expense, gains and losses on sale of real estate assets, as well as the amounts included on our balance sheets for real estate and intangible assets.
Overview
Our principal business activities include the acquisition, development, ownership and operation of self-storage facilities which offer storage spaces for lease, generally on a month-to-month basis, for personal and business use. We are the largest owner of self-storage facilities in the U.S., which represents our Domestic Self-Storage segment. A large portion of management time is focused on maximizing revenues and managing expenses at our self-storage facilities, which is the primary driver of our net income and cash flow from operations and represent 93% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Most of our facilities compete with other well-managed and well-located competitors. In addition, we are subject to general economic conditions, particularly conditions that affect the spending habits of consumers and moving trends. We believe that we possess several business characteristics, as described in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which enable us to compete effectively, including our centralized information networks, national telephone and online reservation system, the brand name “Public Storage,” and our economies of scale.
The remainder of our operations is comprised of our European Self-Storage segment through our investment in Shurgard Europe, our Commercial segment primarily through our investment in PS Business Parks, Inc. (“PSB”), and the operations not allocated to any segment, each of which is described in Note 11 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements.
Our ability to effectively deploy capital to expand our asset base is an important component of our long-term growth strategy. Since the beginning of 2010, we have acquired 67 self-storage facilities for approximately $464 million, noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries owning self-storage facilities for $196 million, and we invested $117 million in Shurgard Europe which it used to acquire interests in self-storage facilities.
We believe that there may be opportunities to acquire additional self-storage facilities from third parties in the remainder of 2012. There is significant competition for facilities marketed in many of the geographic locations we find attractive. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire additional facilities.
We have a nominal pipeline of identified and committed development projects at September 30, 2012. In part due to the significant increase in prices being paid for existing facilities, in many cases well above replacement cost, we have expanded our new property development efforts and we expect to increase our level of development activities over the next 12 to 18 months. However, we believe that there are limitations on the level of investment that we can undertake. Such limitations include limited attractively located land parcels available at a reasonable cost, extensive and substantial permitting requirements, limitations on self-storage development in certain local municipalities, and our desire to obtain an attractive return on our investment when considering the 36 to 48 months that it takes to fill up newly-developed self-storage space with tenants and other associated risks of development. As a result, we do not expect such activities to have a significant impact upon our liquidity or earnings in the next 12 to 18 months.
Other investments we have made in the past, and may make in the future, include i) further investment in Shurgard Europe, ii) further investment in PSB, and iii) the early retirement of debt or redemption of preferred securities. There can be no assurance that these other investment alternatives will be attractive in the long-term, or will even be available as investment alternatives.
We believe that we are not dependent upon raising capital to fund our operations or meet our obligations, due to our low levels of debt and significant cash from operations (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below). However, access to capital is important to growing our property portfolio. We choose between the issuance of common and preferred securities based upon the relative cost of capital. For at least the last ten years, we have raised cash proceeds for growth and other corporate purposes primarily through the issuance of preferred securities, while we have issued common equity only in connection with mergers and the acquisition of interests in real estate entities. Our ability to raise capital with favorable terms is dependent upon capital market conditions. When market conditions are favorable, we have generally been able to raise capital as necessary; however, there can be no assurance that future market conditions will permit us to do so. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued approximately $863 million of preferred securities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we issued another $1.7 billion of preferred securities, including $495.0 million of preferred securities issued most recently at a coupon of 5.375%.
At September 30, 2012, we had approximately $536 million of cash. In October 2012, we redeemed our Series F and Series X Cumulative Preferred Shares at par for approximately $367 million, and we acquired three self-storage facilities for approximately $37.3 million in cash. As of November 8, 2012, we were under contract to acquire three self-storage facilities for approximately $26.7 million in cash, subject to contingencies. On December 27, 2012, we will redeem our 6.250% Series Z, 6.125% Series A, and 6.180% Series D Cumulative Preferred Shares, at par, totaling $362.5 million. We expect to fund these activities with cash on hand, the issuance of equity securities, or borrowings on our line of credit. We have no other significant commitments until 2013, when $264.9 million of existing debt comes due.
Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, net income allocable to our common shareholders was $202.5 million or $1.18 per diluted common share compared to $118.0 million or $0.69 per diluted common share for the same period in 2011, representing an increase of $84.5 million or $0.49 per diluted common share. This increase is due to (i) a $37.3 million increase resulting from foreign currency exchange gains and losses incurred in translating the value of our Euro-denominated loan receivable from Shurgard Europe into a U.S. Dollar equivalent, (ii) improved property operations and (iii) reduced allocations of income to our preferred shareholders due primarily to lower average coupon rates and lower average outstanding preferred shares.
Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net income allocable to our common shareholders was $460.2 million or $2.68 per diluted common share, compared to $397.5 million or $2.33 per diluted common share for the same period in 2011, representing an increase of $62.7 million or $0.35 per diluted common share. This increase is due to (i) improved property operations and (ii) a $16.7 million reduction in allocations of net income to preferred shareholders based upon distributions paid due to lower average coupon rates and lower average outstanding preferred shares, offset partially by (iii) a $27.8 million decrease in earnings due to the application of EITF D-42 to our and PSB’s redemptions of preferred securities, and (iv) a $16.0 million decrease due to foreign exchange gains and losses in translating our Euro-denominated loan receivable from Shurgard Europe into U.S. Dollars.
Funds from Operations
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, funds from operations (“FFO”) was $1.73 per diluted common share as compared to $1.29 for the same period in 2011, representing an increase of 34.1%.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, FFO was impacted by a foreign currency exchange gain of $9.0 million (compared to a $28.3 million loss for the same period in 2011) and a $12.9 million charge in applying EITF D-42 due to redemptions of preferred securities, including our equity share of PSB (compared to a $16.2 million charge for the same period in 2011).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, FFO was $4.46 per diluted common share as compared to $4.17 for the same period in 2011, representing an increase of 7.0%.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, FFO was impacted by a foreign currency exchange loss of $2.5 million (compared to a $13.5 million gain for the same period in 2011) and a $56.9 million charge in applying EITF D-42 due to redemptions of preferred securities, including our equity share of PSB (compared to a $29.1 million net charge for the same period in 2011).
Our FFO was also impacted by other items such as impairment charges with respect to non-real estate assets, our equity share of PSB’s lease termination benefits, and costs associated with the acquisition of real estate facilities, which reduced FFO per diluted common share $0.02 in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, and $0.01 in each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
The following table provides a summary of the per-share impact of the items noted above (unaudited):
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO per diluted common share prior to adjustments for the following items | | $ | 1.76 | | | $ | 1.56 | | | | 12.8 | % | | $ | 4.82 | | | $ | 4.27 | | | | 12.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) | | | 0.05 | | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | 0.08 | | | | | |
Application of EITF D-42 | | | (0.08 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | | | | | (0.33 | ) | | | (0.17 | ) | | | | |
Other items, net | | | - | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO per diluted common share, as reported | | $ | 1.73 | | | $ | 1.29 | | | | 34.1 | % | | $ | 4.46 | | | $ | 4.17 | | | | 7.0 | % |
FFO is a term defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. It is generally defined as net income before depreciation, gains and losses, and impairment charges with respect to real estate assets. FFO is presented because management and many analysts consider FFO to be one measure of the performance of real estate companies. In addition, we believe that FFO is helpful to investors as an additional measure of the performance of a REIT, because net income includes the impact of depreciation, which assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, while we believe that the value of real estate fluctuates due to market conditions and in response to inflation. FFO computations do not consider scheduled principal payments on debt, capital improvements, distributions and other obligations of the Company. FFO is not a substitute for our cash flow or net income as a measure of our liquidity or operating performance or our ability to pay dividends. Other REITs may not compute FFO in the same manner; accordingly, FFO may not be comparable among REITs. See the following reconciliation of net income to FFO.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) | |
Computation of FFO allocable to Common Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 264,819 | | | $ | 194,513 | | | $ | 670,472 | | | $ | 616,022 | |
Add back – depreciation and amortization, including amounts classified as discontinued operations | | | 89,991 | | | | 90,956 | | | | 265,517 | | | | 268,695 | |
Add back – depreciation from unconsolidated real estate investments | | | 18,391 | | | | 17,925 | | | | 56,955 | | | | 52,351 | |
Eliminate – gains on sale of real estate investments, including discontinued operations and from unconsolidated real estate investments | | | (13,010 | ) | | | (5,943 | ) | | | (14,273 | ) | | | (5,818 | ) |
FFO allocable to equity holders | | | 360,191 | | | | 297,451 | | | | 978,671 | | | | 931,250 | |
Less allocations of FFO to: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noncontrolling equity interests | | | (1,730 | ) | | | (3,784 | ) | | | (4,950 | ) | | | (13,696 | ) |
Preferred shareholders - distributions | | | (49,267 | ) | | | (56,670 | ) | | | (156,272 | ) | | | (172,926 | ) |
Preferred shareholders - redemptions | | | (11,350 | ) | | | (16,178 | ) | | | (49,677 | ) | | | (32,077 | ) |
Restricted share unitholders | | | (1,198 | ) | | | (641 | ) | | | (2,990 | ) | | | (2,060 | ) |
FFO allocable to Common Shares | | $ | 296,646 | | | $ | 220,178 | | | $ | 764,782 | | | $ | 710,491 | |
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 171,700 | | | | 170,830 | | | | 171,558 | | | | 170,538 | |
FFO per diluted common share | | $ | 1.73 | | | $ | 1.29 | | | $ | 4.46 | | | $ | 4.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Self-Storage Operations: Our domestic self-storage operations are by far our largest segment, representing 93% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We analyze our domestic self-storage operations in two groups: (i) the Same Store Facilities, representing the facilities that we have owned and operated on a stabilized basis since January 1, 2010, and (ii) all other facilities, which are newly acquired, newly developed, or recently expanded facilities (the “Non Same Store Facilities”).
Self-Storage Operations Summary | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollar amounts in thousands) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | $ | 412,641 | | | $ | 393,819 | | | | 4.8 | % | | $ | 1,191,269 | | | $ | 1,135,859 | | | | 4.9 | % |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | 28,277 | | | | 21,733 | | | | 30.1 | % | | | 76,987 | | | | 58,894 | | | | 30.7 | % |
Total rental income | | | 440,918 | | | | 415,552 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 1,268,256 | | | | 1,194,753 | | | | 6.2 | % |
Cost of operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | | 118,566 | | | | 121,338 | | | | (2.3 | )% | | | 370,291 | | | | 372,409 | | | | (0.6 | )% |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | 8,801 | | | | 7,449 | | | | 18.2 | % | | | 25,090 | | | | 21,037 | | | | 19.3 | % |
Total cost of operations | | | 127,367 | | | | 128,787 | | | | (1.1 | )% | | | 395,381 | | | | 393,446 | | | | 0.5 | % |
Net operating income (a): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | | 294,075 | | | | 272,481 | | | | 7.9 | % | | | 820,978 | | | | 763,450 | | | | 7.5 | % |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | 19,476 | | | | 14,284 | | | | 36.3 | % | | | 51,897 | | | | 37,857 | | | | 37.1 | % |
Total net operating income | | | 313,551 | | | | 286,765 | | | | 9.3 | % | | | 872,875 | | | | 801,307 | | | | 8.9 | % |
Total depreciation and amortization expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | | (78,452 | ) | | | (79,229 | ) | | | (1.0 | )% | | | (235,876 | ) | | | (240,679 | ) | | | (2.0 | )% |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | (10,742 | ) | | | (10,933 | ) | | | (1.7 | )% | | | (27,233 | ) | | | (25,588 | ) | | | 6.4 | % |
Total depreciation and amortization expense | | | (89,194 | ) | | | (90,162 | ) | | | (1.1 | )% | | | (263,109 | ) | | | (266,267 | ) | | | (1.2 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net income | | $ | 224,357 | | | $ | 196,603 | | | | 14.1 | % | | $ | 609,766 | | | $ | 535,040 | | | | 14.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of facilities at period end: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,941 | | | | 1,941 | | | | - | |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 114 | | | | 95 | | | | 20.0 | % |
Net rentable square footage at period end (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 122,464 | | | | 122,464 | | | | - | |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,412 | | | | 6,877 | | | | 22.3 | % |
(a) See “Net Operating Income” below for further information regarding this non-GAAP measure.
Same Store Facilities
The Same Store Facilities represent those 1,941 facilities that have been owned and operated on a stabilized basis since January 1, 2010, and therefore, provide meaningful comparisons for 2011 and 2012. The following table summarizes the historical operating results of these facilities:
SAME STORE FACILITIES | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | (Dollar amounts in thousands, except weighted average amounts) | |
Rental income | | $ | 391,461 | | | $ | 372,301 | | | | 5.1 | % | | $ | 1,130,548 | | | $ | 1,076,400 | | | | 5.0 | % |
Late charges and administrative fees | | | 21,180 | | | | 21,518 | | | | (1.6 | )% | | | 60,721 | | | | 59,459 | | | | 2.1 | % |
Total revenues (a) | | | 412,641 | | | | 393,819 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 1,191,269 | | | | 1,135,859 | | | | 4.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property taxes | | | 40,580 | | | | 39,550 | | | | 2.6 | % | | | 125,563 | | | | 121,196 | | | | 3.6 | % |
On-site property manager payroll | | | 24,694 | | | | 25,289 | | | | (2.4 | )% | | | 74,973 | | | | 76,481 | | | | (2.0 | )% |
Repairs and maintenance | | | 8,487 | | | | 10,960 | | | | (22.6 | )% | | | 31,097 | | | | 32,718 | | | | (5.0 | )% |
Utilities | | | 10,153 | | | | 10,501 | | | | (3.3 | )% | | | 27,852 | | | | 29,175 | | | | (4.5 | )% |
Media advertising | | | 1,239 | | | | 2,144 | | | | (42.2 | )% | | | 6,275 | | | | 9,550 | | | | (34.3 | )% |
Other advertising and selling expense | | | 8,943 | | | | 7,816 | | | | 14.4 | % | | | 24,968 | | | | 24,589 | | | | 1.5 | % |
Other direct property costs | | | 8,739 | | | | 8,917 | | | | (2.0 | )% | | | 26,492 | | | | 27,215 | | | | (2.7 | )% |
Supervisory payroll | | | 8,191 | | | | 8,199 | | | | (0.1 | )% | | | 25,630 | | | | 24,605 | | | | 4.2 | % |
Allocated overhead | | | 7,540 | | | | 7,962 | | | | (5.3 | )% | | | 27,441 | | | | 26,880 | | | | 2.1 | % |
Total cost of operations (a) | | | 118,566 | | | | 121,338 | | | | (2.3 | )% | | | 370,291 | | | | 372,409 | | | | (0.6 | )% |
Net operating income (b) | | | 294,075 | | | | 272,481 | | | | 7.9 | % | | | 820,978 | | | | 763,450 | | | | 7.5 | % |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (78,452 | ) | | | (79,229 | ) | | | (1.0 | )% | | | (235,876 | ) | | | (240,679 | ) | | | (2.0 | )% |
Net income | | $ | 215,623 | | | $ | 193,252 | | | | 11.6 | % | | $ | 585,102 | | | $ | 522,771 | | | | 11.9 | % |
Gross margin (before depreciation and amortization expense) | | | 71.3 | % | | | 69.2 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 68.9 | % | | | 67.2 | % | | | 2.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average for the period: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Square foot occupancy (c) | | | 92.7 | % | | | 92.2 | % | | | 0.5 | % | | | 91.9 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 0.4 | % |
Realized annual rent per occupied square foot (d)(e) | | $ | 13.79 | | | $ | 13.19 | | | | 4.5 | % | | $ | 13.39 | | | $ | 12.81 | | | | 4.5 | % |
REVPAF (e)(f) | | $ | 12.79 | | | $ | 12.16 | | | | 5.2 | % | | $ | 12.31 | | | $ | 11.72 | | | | 5.0 | % |
Weighted average at September 30: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Square foot occupancy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 92.5 | % | | | 91.7 | % | | | 0.9 | % |
In place annual rent per occupied square foot (g) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 14.63 | | | $ | 14.13 | | | | 3.5 | % |
Total net rentable square feet (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 122,464 | | | | 122,464 | | | | - | |
Number of facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,941 | | | | 1,941 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | Revenues and cost of operations do not include ancillary revenues and expenses generated at the facilities with respect to tenant reinsurance and retail sales. |
(b) | See “Net Operating Income” below for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to our net income in our statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. |
(c) | Square foot occupancies represent weighted average occupancy levels over the entire period. |
(d) | Realized annual rent per occupied square foot is computed by annualizing the result of dividing rental income (which excludes late charges and administrative fees) by the weighted average occupied square feet for the period. Realized annual rent per occupied square foot takes into consideration promotional discounts that reduce rental income from the contractual amounts due. |
(e) | Late charges and administrative fees are excluded from the computation of realized annual rent per occupied square foot and realized annual rent per available foot (“REVPAF”). Exclusion of these amounts provides a better measure of our ongoing level of revenue because late charges are dependent upon the level of delinquency and administrative fees are dependent upon the level of move-ins. |
(f) | REVPAF is computed by dividing rental income (which excludes late charges and administrative fees) by the total available net rentable square feet for the period. |
(g) | In place annual rent per occupied square foot represents annualized contractual rents per occupied square foot without reductions for promotional discounts and excludes late charges and administrative fees. |
Revenues generated by our Same Store Facilities increased by 4.8% and 4.9% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011 due primarily to increased average rental rates charged to our tenants. These rate increases were due to annual increases for tenants that have been renting longer than one year and to reductions in promotional discounts to $24.1 million and $67.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to $26.7 million and $71.3 million for the same periods in 2011, respectively.
Average rental rates to new tenants increased 1.2% and move in volumes increased 3.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, average rental rates for new tenants were flat and move-in volumes increased 2.6% as compared to the same period in 2011.
Our operating strategy is to maintain occupancy levels for our Same Store Facilities at an average of at least 90% for the full year. In order to achieve this strategy, we evaluate changes in traffic patterns of new tenants renting space and the volume of existing tenants vacating. In response to these trends, we increase or decrease rental rates, promotional discounts offered and the frequency of television advertising. We experience seasonal fluctuations in occupancy levels with occupancies generally higher in the summer months than in the winter months. Consequently, rates charged to new tenants are typically higher in the summer months than in the winter months.
Notwithstanding high current occupancy levels compared to historical levels, we intend to continue to be competitive in our pricing and discounting in order to compete with other operators to attract new incoming tenants. Based upon current trends, we expect positive year-over-year growth in rental income to continue.
Cost of operations (excluding depreciation and amortization) decreased 2.3% and 0.6% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011. The decreases were due primarily to reductions in on-site property manager payroll, repairs and maintenance, and media advertising, offset partially by an increase in property tax expense.
Property tax expense increased 2.6% and 3.6% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011. We expect property tax expense growth of approximately 3.5% in the year ending December 31, 2012, due primarily to higher assessed values.
On-site property manager payroll expense decreased approximately 2.4% and 2.0% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011, due primarily to lower incentive compensation. We expect payroll expense to be relatively flat in the remainder of 2012, compared to 2011.
Repairs and maintenance expenditures decreased 22.6% and 5.0% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011. Repairs and maintenance expenditures are dependent upon several factors, such as weather, the timing of periodic needs throughout our portfolio, inflation in material and labor costs, and random events. Included in our repairs and maintenance expenditures in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, was approximately $2.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively, in snow removal costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we accelerated some of our normal repair and maintenance expenditures due to mild weather, and as a result, repairs and maintenance expenditures were lower in the six months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011. During the three months ending December 31, 2012, we expect repairs and maintenance expense to be flat as compared to the same period in 2011.
Utility expenses decreased 3.3% and 4.5% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011. These decreases are due primarily to reduced usage driven by milder weather. It is difficult to estimate future utility cost levels because utility costs are primarily dependent upon factors such as changes in demand driven by weather and temperature, as well as fuel prices, each of which is volatile and not predictable.
Media advertising decreased 42.2% and 34.3% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011. These decreases are due primarily to reductions in the number of markets in which we advertised on television. We do not expect any spending on media advertising in the quarter ending December 31, 2012. Media advertising costs in particular can be volatile and may increase or decrease significantly in the short-term.
Other advertising and selling expense increased 14.4% and 1.5% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011. This expense is comprised principally of yellow page, Internet advertising, and the operating costs of our telephone reservation center. The increases are due to higher Internet advertising spending, offset partially by reduced yellow page advertising. We expect other advertising and selling expense for the remainder of 2012 to be approximately 10% to 15% higher as compared to the same period in 2011.
Other direct property costs include administrative expenses that are solely attributable to the self-storage facilities, such as property insurance, office expenses incurred at the property, telephone and data communication lines at the properties, business license costs, and bank charges related to handling the properties’ cash deposits. We expect moderate growth in other direct property costs in the remainder of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.
Supervisory payroll expense, which represents compensation paid to the management personnel who directly and indirectly supervise the on-site property managers, was flat in the three months ended September 30, 2012, and up 4.2% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011. The increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was due principally to increased headcount. We expect more moderate growth in supervisory payroll in the remainder of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.
Allocated overhead represents administrative expenses for shared general corporate functions, which are allocated to self-storage property operations to the extent their efforts are devoted to self-storage operations. Such functions include data processing, human resources, operational accounting and finance, marketing, and costs of senior executives (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer). The increase is due principally to increased headcount. We expect moderate growth in allocated overhead in the remainder of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.
Impact of Hurricane Sandy
On October 30, 2012, Hurricane Sandy caused extensive damage to parts of the New Jersey/New York area (the “New York Market”). We have 90 facilities operating in the New York Market, of which 79 facilities are included in our Same Store pool. Property damage to our facilities appears to be minimal. Within a few days after the storm all of our facilities were opened for business.
The New York Market is our third largest market behind Los Angeles and San Francisco, with revenues and square foot occupancy for the 79 Same Store facilities in the New York Market of $27.1 million and 93.0%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2012.
We expect to incur less than $1.5 million in increased repairs and maintenance expenditures during the fourth quarter of 2012 as a result of storm damage, and do not expect any significant negative impact on our revenues. Our evaluation, however, could change as we continue to develop and implement remediation plans.
The following table summarizes selected quarterly financial data with respect to the Same Store Facilities:
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Amounts in thousands, except for per square foot amount) |
Total revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 383,928 | | | $ | 394,700 | | | $ | 412,641 | | | | | | | |
2011 | | $ | 366,497 | | | $ | 375,543 | | | $ | 393,819 | | | $ | 386,196 | | | $ | 1,522,055 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 130,682 | | | $ | 121,043 | | | $ | 118,566 | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | $ | 128,295 | | | $ | 122,776 | | | $ | 121,338 | | | $ | 104,632 | | | $ | 477,041 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | | |
Property tax expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 43,058 | | | $ | 41,925 | | | $ | 40,580 | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | $ | 41,382 | | | $ | 40,264 | | | $ | 39,550 | | | $ | 26,063 | | | $ | 147,259 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repairs and maintenance expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 12,025 | | | $ | 10,585 | | | $ | 8,487 | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | $ | 10,765 | | | $ | 10,993 | | | $ | 10,960 | | | $ | 12,519 | | | $ | 45,237 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Media advertising expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 3,145 | | | $ | 1,891 | | | $ | 1,239 | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | $ | 4,046 | | | $ | 3,360 | | | $ | 2,144 | | | $ | 992 | | | $ | 10,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
REVPAF: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 11.89 | | | $ | 12.25 | | | $ | 12.79 | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | $ | 11.36 | | | $ | 11.64 | | | $ | 12.16 | | | $ | 11.96 | | | $ | 11.78 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average realized annual rent per occupied square foot: | | | | | |
2012 | | $ | 13.17 | | | $ | 13.23 | | | $ | 13.79 | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | $ | 12.65 | | | $ | 12.61 | | | $ | 13.19 | | | $ | 13.26 | | | $ | 12.92 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average occupancy levels for the period: | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | | 90.3 | % | | | 92.6 | % | | | 92.7 | % | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | | 89.8 | % | | | 92.3 | % | | | 92.2 | % | | | 90.2 | % | | | 91.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Analysis of Regional Trends – Same Store Facilities
The following table sets forth selected regional trends in our Same Store Facilities:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Amounts in thousands, except for weighted average data) | |
Same Store Facilities Operating Trends by Region | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California (191 facilities) | | $ | 61,281 | | | $ | 58,752 | | | | 4.3 | % | | $ | 178,487 | | | $ | 171,565 | | | | 4.0 | % |
Northern California (167 facilities) | | | 41,773 | | | | 39,760 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 121,321 | | | | 114,947 | | | | 5.5 | % |
Texas (228 facilities) | | | 41,096 | | | | 38,748 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 118,269 | | | | 111,106 | | | | 6.4 | % |
Florida (181 facilities) | | | 38,310 | | | | 36,479 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 110,991 | | | | 105,605 | | | | 5.1 | % |
Illinois (121 facilities) | | | 25,448 | | | | 24,235 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 73,111 | | | | 69,853 | | | | 4.7 | % |
Georgia (92 facilities) | | | 14,967 | | | | 14,407 | | | | 3.9 | % | | | 43,318 | | | | 41,433 | | | | 4.5 | % |
Washington (89 facilities) | | | 20,622 | | | | 19,683 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 59,127 | | | | 56,679 | | | | 4.3 | % |
All other states (872 facilities) | | | 169,144 | | | | 161,755 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 486,645 | | | | 464,671 | | | | 4.7 | % |
Total revenues | | | 412,641 | | | | 393,819 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 1,191,269 | | | | 1,135,859 | | | | 4.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California | | | 48,258 | | | | 45,501 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 138,364 | | | | 132,694 | | | | 4.3 | % |
Northern California | | | 32,137 | | | | 30,071 | | | | 6.9 | % | | | 91,754 | | | | 85,930 | | | | 6.8 | % |
Texas | | | 27,686 | | | | 24,743 | | | | 11.9 | % | | | 76,918 | | | | 69,132 | | | | 11.3 | % |
Florida | | | 25,871 | | | | 23,768 | | | | 8.8 | % | | | 72,947 | | | | 67,121 | | | | 8.7 | % |
Illinois | | | 15,543 | | | | 13,973 | | | | 11.2 | % | | | 40,309 | | | | 36,447 | | | | 10.6 | % |
Georgia | | | 10,546 | | | | 9,782 | | | | 7.8 | % | | | 29,068 | | | | 27,129 | | | | 7.1 | % |
Washington | | | 15,893 | | | | 14,905 | | | | 6.6 | % | | | 43,887 | | | | 41,696 | | | | 5.3 | % |
All other states | | | 118,141 | | | | 109,738 | | | | 7.7 | % | | | 327,731 | | | | 303,301 | | | | 8.1 | % |
Total net operating income | | $ | 294,075 | | | $ | 272,481 | | | | 7.9 | % | | $ | 820,978 | | | $ | 763,450 | | | | 7.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average occupancy: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California | | | 92.7 | % | | | 91.9 | % | | | 0.9 | % | | | 92.5 | % | | | 92.0 | % | | | 0.5 | % |
Northern California | | | 93.1 | % | | | 93.5 | % | | | (0.4 | )% | | | 93.0 | % | | | 92.8 | % | | | 0.2 | % |
Texas | | | 93.0 | % | | | 92.3 | % | | | 0.8 | % | | | 92.0 | % | | | 91.2 | % | | | 0.9 | % |
Florida | | | 92.3 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 0.9 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 90.8 | % | | | 0.8 | % |
Illinois | | | 93.0 | % | | | 92.3 | % | | | 0.8 | % | | | 92.3 | % | | | 91.1 | % | | | 1.3 | % |
Georgia | | | 91.7 | % | | | 91.9 | % | | | (0.2 | )% | | | 90.4 | % | | | 90.5 | % | | | (0.1 | )% |
Washington | | | 92.2 | % | | | 92.0 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | 91.1 | % | | | 91.2 | % | | | (0.1 | )% |
All other states | | | 92.8 | % | | | 92.3 | % | | | 0.5 | % | | | 91.7 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 0.2 | % |
Total weighted average occupancy | | | 92.7 | % | | | 92.2 | % | | | 0.5 | % | | | 91.9 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 0.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities Operating Trends by Region (Continued) | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Amounts in thousands, except for weighted average data) | |
Realized annual rent per occupied square foot: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California | | $ | 19.18 | | | $ | 18.49 | | | | 3.7 | % | | $ | 18.65 | | | $ | 17.98 | | | | 3.7 | % |
Northern California | | | 17.93 | | | | 16.95 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 17.37 | | | | 16.45 | | | | 5.6 | % |
Texas | | | 11.10 | | | | 10.49 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 10.76 | | | | 10.19 | | | | 5.6 | % |
Florida | | | 12.99 | | | | 12.41 | | | | 4.7 | % | | | 12.66 | | | | 12.11 | | | | 4.5 | % |
Illinois | | | 13.53 | | | | 12.93 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 13.07 | | | | 12.65 | | | | 3.3 | % |
Georgia | | | 10.11 | | | | 9.67 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 9.90 | | | | 9.43 | | | | 5.0 | % |
Washington | | | 14.70 | | | | 13.98 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 14.21 | | | | 13.57 | | | | 4.7 | % |
All other states | | | 12.98 | | | | 12.44 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 12.61 | | | | 12.06 | | | | 4.6 | % |
Total realized rent per square foot | | $ | 13.79 | | | $ | 13.19 | | | | 4.5 | % | | $ | 13.39 | | | $ | 12.81 | | | | 4.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
REVPAF: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California | | $ | 17.77 | | | $ | 16.99 | | | | 4.6 | % | | $ | 17.25 | | | $ | 16.54 | | | | 4.3 | % |
Northern California | | | 16.68 | | | | 15.85 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 16.15 | | | | 15.27 | | | | 5.8 | % |
Texas | | | 10.33 | | | | 9.69 | | | | 6.6 | % | | | 9.90 | | | | 9.29 | | | | 6.6 | % |
Florida | | | 11.99 | | | | 11.36 | | | | 5.5 | % | | | 11.58 | | | | 10.99 | | | | 5.4 | % |
Illinois | | | 12.58 | | | | 11.93 | | | | 5.4 | % | | | 12.06 | | | | 11.53 | | | | 4.6 | % |
Georgia | | | 9.27 | | | | 8.88 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 8.95 | | | | 8.53 | | | | 4.9 | % |
Washington | | | 13.55 | | | | 12.87 | | | | 5.3 | % | | | 12.95 | | | | 12.37 | | | | 4.7 | % |
All other states | | | 12.05 | | | | 11.48 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 11.56 | | | | 11.03 | | | | 4.8 | % |
Total REVPAF | | $ | 12.79 | | | $ | 12.16 | | | | 5.2 | % | | $ | 12.31 | | | $ | 11.72 | | | | 5.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We believe that our geographic diversification and scale provide some insulation from localized economic effects and add to the stability of our cash flows. It is difficult to predict localized trends in short-term self-storage demand and operating results. Over the long run, we believe that markets that experience population growth, high employment, and otherwise exhibit economic strength and consistency will outperform markets that do not exhibit these characteristics.
Non Same Store Facilities
The Non Same Store Facilities at September 30, 2012 represent 114 facilities that were not stabilized with respect to occupancies or rental rates since January 1, 2010, or were acquired since January 1, 2010. As a result of the stabilization process and timing of when the facilities were placed into service, year-over-year changes can be significant. In the following table, “Facilities placed into service in 2012” includes 14 facilities acquired from third parties and three facilities that we obtained control of and began consolidating in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. “Facilities placed into service in 2011” includes 11 facilities acquired from third parties, one facility that was newly developed, and two facilities that we obtained control of and began consolidating in the year ended December 31, 2011. “Other facilities” includes 42 facilities we acquired in 2010, as well as 41 other facilities that we have owned since January 1, 2010 that are not stabilized due to the addition of more net rentable square feet or due to casualty damage.
The following table summarizes operating data with respect to these facilities:
NON SAME STORE FACILITIES | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollar amounts in thousands, except square foot amounts) | |
Rental income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities placed into service in 2012 | | $ | 2,806 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,806 | | | $ | 4,417 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 4,417 | |
Facilities placed into service in 2011 | | | 3,476 | | | | 1,955 | | | | 1,521 | | | | 9,750 | | | | 3,122 | | | | 6,628 | |
Other facilities | | | 21,995 | | | | 19,778 | | | | 2,217 | | | | 62,820 | | | | 55,772 | | | | 7,048 | |
Total rental income | | | 28,277 | | | | 21,733 | | | | 6,544 | | | | 76,987 | | | | 58,894 | | | | 18,093 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of operations before depreciation and amortization expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities placed into service in 2012 | | $ | 1,228 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,228 | | | $ | 1,962 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,962 | |
Facilities placed into service in 2011 | | | 974 | | | | 829 | | | | 145 | | | | 3,059 | | | | 1,299 | | | | 1,760 | |
Other facilities | | | 6,599 | | | | 6,620 | | | | (21 | ) | | | 20,069 | | | | 19,738 | | | | 331 | |
Total cost of operations | | | 8,801 | | | | 7,449 | | | | 1,352 | | | | 25,090 | | | | 21,037 | | | | 4,053 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income before depreciation and amortization expense (a): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities placed into service in 2012 | | $ | 1,578 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,578 | | | $ | 2,455 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,455 | |
Facilities placed into service in 2011 | | | 2,502 | | | | 1,126 | | | | 1,376 | | | | 6,691 | | | | 1,823 | | | | 4,868 | |
Other facilities | | | 15,396 | | | | 13,158 | | | | 2,238 | | | | 42,751 | | | | 36,034 | | | | 6,717 | |
Total net operating income (a) | | | 19,476 | | | | 14,284 | | | | 5,192 | | | | 51,897 | | | | 37,857 | | | | 14,040 | |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (10,742 | ) | | | (10,933 | ) | | | 191 | | | | (27,233 | ) | | | (25,588 | ) | | | (1,645 | ) |
Net income | | $ | 8,734 | | | $ | 3,351 | | | $ | 5,383 | | | $ | 24,664 | | | $ | 12,269 | | | $ | 12,395 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At September 30: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Square foot occupancy: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities placed into service in 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 79.4 | % | | | - | | | | - | |
Facilities placed into service in 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 82.0 | % | | | 74.9 | % | | | 9.5 | % |
Other facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 91.2 | % | | | 87.5 | % | | | 4.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 88.0 | % | | | 85.6 | % | | | 2.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In place annual rent per occupied square foot: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities placed into service in 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 14.65 | | | $ | - | | | | - | |
Facilities placed into service in 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15.21 | | | | 14.13 | | | | 7.6 | % |
Other facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16.34 | | | | 15.78 | | | | 3.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 15.95 | | | $ | 15.56 | | | | 2.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of Facilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities placed into service in 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17 | | | | - | | | | 17 | |
Facilities placed into service in 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 14 | | | | 12 | | | | 2 | |
Other facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 83 | | | | 83 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 114 | | | | 95 | | | | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net rentable square feet (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities placed into service in 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,331 | | | | - | | | | 1,331 | |
Facilities placed into service in 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,166 | | | | 1,011 | | | | 155 | |
Other facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,915 | | | | 5,866 | | | | 49 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,412 | | | | 6,877 | | | | 1,535 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | See “Net Operating Income” below for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to our net income in our statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we acquired 14 facilities for an aggregate cost of $143.8 million. The weighted average aggregate capitalization rates for the 10 properties acquired in the first six months of 2012 (total cost of $87.8 million), based upon annualizing the net operating income for the period we owned them, was approximately 5.3%, and the corresponding related weighted average occupancy was approximately 77.4%. The weighted average aggregate capitalization rate for the four properties acquired in the third quarter of 2012 is not meaningful due to our limited ownership period.
In 2011, we acquired 11 facilities for an aggregate cost of $80.4 million. The weighted average aggregate capitalization rates for these acquisitions, based upon annualizing the net operating income of these facilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was approximately 8.2% and the corresponding related weighted average occupancy was 81.9%.
In addition, during 2011, we obtained control of two entities in which we had a partial interest, and began consolidating the two stabilized self-storage facilities (143,000 net rentable square feet) owned by these entities. During 2012, we acquired control of another entity in which we had a partial interest, and began consolidating the three stabilized self-storage facilities (183,000 net rentable square feet) owned by this entity.
We believe that our management and operating infrastructure will result in newly acquired facilities stabilizing at a higher level of net operating income than was achieved by the previous owners, who are typically smaller operators. However, it can take 24 or more months for these newly acquired facilities to reach stabilization, and the ultimate levels of rent to be achieved can be affected by changes in general economic conditions. As a result, there can be no assurance that our expectations with respect to these facilities will be achieved. However, we expect the Non Same Store Facilities to continue to provide earnings growth during 2012 as these facilities approach stabilized occupancy levels, and the earnings of the 2011 and 2012 acquisitions are reflected in our operations for a longer period in 2012 as compared to 2011.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate entities
At September 30, 2012, we have equity investments in PSB, Shurgard Europe and various limited partnerships. We account for such investments using the equity method.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate entities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 consists of our pro-rata share of the net income of these unconsolidated real estate entities for each period. The following table sets forth the significant components of equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate entities.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,801 | | | $ | 8,117 | | | $ | (5,316 | ) | | $ | 5,427 | | | $ | 22,982 | | | $ | (17,555 | ) |
| | | 9,442 | | | | 6,702 | | | | 2,740 | | | | 23,764 | | | | 17,471 | | | | 6,293 | |
| | | 399 | | | | 450 | | | | (51 | ) | | | 1,162 | | | | 1,302 | | | | (140 | ) |
| | $ | 12,642 | | | $ | 15,269 | | | $ | (2,627 | ) | | $ | 30,353 | | | $ | 41,755 | | | $ | (11,402 | ) |
Investment in PSB: At September 30, 2012, we have an approximate 41% common equity interest in PSB, comprised of our ownership of 5,801,606 shares of PSB’s common stock and 7,305,355 limited partnership units in PSB’s underlying operating partnership. The limited partnership units are convertible at our option, subject to certain conditions, on a one-for-one basis into PSB common stock.
At September 30, 2012, PSB owned and operated 28.2 million rentable square feet of commercial space located in eight states. PSB also manages commercial space owned by the Company and affiliated entities pursuant to property management agreements.
Equity in earnings from PSB decreased to $2.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $8.1 million in the same period in 2011, and to $5.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $23.0 million in the same period in 2011. These decreases were principally due to (i) the impact of PSB’s redemptions of preferred securities in 2011 and 2012, which reduced income allocated to the common equity holders in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, and increased income allocable to the common equity holders in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, (ii) increased depreciation and interest expense as a result of the properties PSB acquired in 2011, partially offset by (iii) incremental income generated by the properties PSB acquired in 2011 and 2012. See Note 4 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements for selected financial information on PSB, as well as PSB’s filings and selected financial information that can be accessed through the SEC, and on PSB’s website, www.psbusinessparks.com.
Our investment in PSB, which we plan on holding for the long-term, provides us with some diversification into another asset type.
Investment in Shurgard Europe: Equity in earnings of Shurgard Europe represents our 49% equity share of Shurgard Europe’s net income. At December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, Shurgard Europe’s operations are comprised of 188 wholly-owned facilities with 10.1 million net rentable square feet. Selected financial data for Shurgard Europe for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, is included in Note 4 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements. As described in more detail in Note 4, we receive interest income and trademark license fees from Shurgard Europe, of which 49% is classified as equity in earnings and the remaining 51% as interest and other income.
Equity in earnings from Shurgard Europe increased to $9.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $6.7 million for the same period in 2011 and to $23.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $17.5 million from the same period in 2011. The increases are due to our equity share of a $1.1 million gain on disposition of assets recorded by Shurgard Europe in the three months ended September 30, 2012, reductions in depreciation expense principally with respect to intangible assets and, for the nine month period, the impact of Shurgard Europe’s acquisition on March 2, 2011 of the 80% interests it did not own in two joint ventures that owned 72 self-storage facilities. These increases were offset partially by a reduction in the average exchange rate for the U.S. Dollar to the Euro from 1.415 and 1.406 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, to 1.251 and 1.282 for the same periods in 2012. The reductions in exchange rates resulted in a reduction to our earnings from Shurgard Europe of approximately $1.2 million and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011.
Our future earnings from Shurgard Europe will be affected primarily by the operating results of its existing stabilized facilities described below, which represent 162 of the 188 facilities that Shurgard Europe owns, as well as the exchange rate between the U.S. Dollar and currencies in the countries Shurgard conducts its business, principally the Euro.
Shurgard Europe’s 26 non-same store facilities had average occupancies of approximately 67% and 66% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. There can be no assurance about the ultimate stabilized level of occupancy of the non-same store facilities.
European Same Store Facilities: The Shurgard Europe Same Store Pool represents the 162 facilities (8.6 million net rentable square feet) that have been consolidated and operated by Shurgard Europe on a stabilized basis since January 1, 2010 and therefore provide meaningful comparisons for 2011 and 2012. We evaluate the performance of these facilities because Shurgard Europe’s ability to effectively manage stabilized facilities represents an important measure of its ability to grow its earnings over the long-term.
The following table reflects 100% of the operating results of those 162 facilities, and we restate the exchange rates used in prior year’s presentation to the actual exchange rates for 2012. However, only our pro rata share of the operating results for these facilities, based upon the actual exchange rates for each period, is included in “equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate entities” on our statements of income.
In Note 4 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements, we disclose Shurgard Europe’s consolidated operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Shurgard Europe’s consolidated operating results include 26 additional facilities that are not Same Store Facilities, and are based upon historical exchange rates rather than constant exchange rates for each of the respective periods.
Selected Operating Data for the Shurgard Europe Same Store Pool (162 facilities): | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollar amounts in thousands, except weighted average data, utilizing constant exchange rates) (a) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues (including late charges and administrative fees) | | $ | 46,953 | | | $ | 47,891 | | | | (2.0 | )% | | $ | 140,871 | | | $ | 141,676 | | | | (0.6 | )% |
Less: Cost of operations (excluding depreciation and amortization expenses) | | | 19,250 | | | | 20,758 | | | | (7.3 | )% | | | 59,970 | | | | 62,012 | | | | (3.3 | )% |
Net operating income (b) | | $ | 27,703 | | | $ | 27,133 | | | | 2.1 | % | | $ | 80,901 | | | $ | 79,664 | | | | 1.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | | 59.0 | % | | | 56.7 | % | | | 4.1 | % | | | 57.4 | % | | | 56.2 | % | | | 2.1 | % |
Weighted average for the period: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Square foot occupancy (c) | | | 83.5 | % | | | 86.1 | % | | | (3.0 | )% | | | 83.5 | % | | | 85.3 | % | | | (2.1 | )% |
Realized annual rent per occupied square foot (d)(e) | | $ | 25.65 | | | $ | 25.32 | | | | 1.3 | % | | $ | 25.63 | | | $ | 25.19 | | | | 1.7 | % |
REVPAF (e)(f) | | $ | 21.42 | | | $ | 21.80 | | | | (1.7 | )% | | $ | 21.40 | | | $ | 21.49 | | | | (0.4 | )% |
Weighted average at September 30: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Square foot occupancy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 83.3 | % | | | 86.0 | % | | | (3.1 | )% |
In place annual rent per occupied square foot (g) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 28.14 | | | $ | 27.19 | | | | 3.5 | % |
Total net rentable square feet (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,627 | | | | 8,627 | | | | - | |
Average Euro to the U.S. Dollar (a): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Constant exchange rates used herein | | | 1.251 | | | | 1.251 | | | | - | | | | 1.282 | | | | 1.282 | | | | - | |
Actual historical exchange rates | | | 1.251 | | | | 1.415 | | | | (11.6 | )% | | | 1.282 | | | | 1.406 | | | | (8.8 | )% |
(a) | In order to isolate changes in the underlying operations from the impact of exchange rates, the amounts in this table are presented on a constant exchange rate basis. The amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 have been restated using the actual exchange rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. |
(b) | We present net operating income “NOI” of the European Same Store Facilities, which is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization expense. Although depreciation and amortization is a component of GAAP net income, we believe that NOI is a meaningful measure of operating performance, because we utilize NOI in making decisions with respect to capital allocations, segment performance, and comparing period-to-period and market-to-market property operating results. In addition, the investment community utilizes NOI in determining real estate values, and does not consider depreciation expense as it is based upon historical cost. NOI is not a substitute for net operating income after depreciation and amortization in evaluating our operating results. |
(c) | Square foot occupancies represent weighted average occupancy levels over the entire period. |
(d) | Realized annual rent per occupied square foot is computed by annualizing the result of dividing rental income (which excludes late charges and administrative fees) by the weighted average occupied square feet for the period. Realized annual rent per occupied square foot takes into consideration promotional discounts that reduce rental income from the contractual amounts due. |
(e) | Late charges and administrative fees are excluded from the computation of realized annual rent per occupied square foot and REVPAF. Exclusion of these amounts provides a better measure of our ongoing level of revenue because late charges are dependent upon the level of delinquency and administrative fees are dependent upon the level of move-ins. |
(f) | Realized annual rent per available foot or “REVPAF” is computed by dividing rental income before late charges and administrative fees by the total available net rentable square feet for the period. |
(g) | In place annual rent per occupied square foot represents annualized contractual rents per occupied square foot without reductions for promotional discounts and excludes late charges and administrative fees. |
Net operating income increased 2.1% and 1.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011, due principally to decreases in expenses. Based upon current operating trends and metrics, we do not expect growth in the net operating income of the European Same Store Facilities in the remainder of 2012.
See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Shurgard Europe” for additional information on Shurgard Europe’s liquidity.
Other Investments: The “Other Investments” at September 30, 2012 are comprised primarily of our equity in earnings from various limited partnerships that own an aggregate of 14 self-storage facilities (791,000 net rentable square feet). Our future earnings with respect to the Other Investments will be dependent upon the operating results of the facilities these entities own. See Note 4 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements under the “Other Investments” for the operating results of these entities.
Ancillary Operations
Ancillary revenues and expenses include amounts associated with (i) the reinsurance of policies against losses to goods stored by tenants in our self-storage facilities in the U.S., (ii) merchandise sales, (iii) commercial property operations, and (iv) management of approximately 30 facilities owned by third parties and the 14 facilities owned by the limited partnerships mentioned above.
Commercial property operations are included in our commercial segment and all other ancillary revenues and costs of operations are not allocated to any segment. See Note 11 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements for further information regarding our segments and for a reconciliation of these ancillary revenues and cost of operations to our net income.
The following table sets forth our ancillary operations as presented on our statements of income.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Amounts in thousands) | |
Ancillary Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenant reinsurance premiums | | $ | 19,943 | | | $ | 18,822 | | | $ | 1,121 | | | $ | 57,958 | | | $ | 53,045 | | | $ | 4,913 | |
Commercial | | | 3,457 | | | | 3,590 | | | | (133 | ) | | | 10,596 | | | | 11,010 | | | | (414 | ) |
Merchandise and other | | | 8,613 | | | | 7,599 | | | | 1,014 | | | | 24,468 | | | | 21,762 | | | | 2,706 | |
Total revenues | | | 32,013 | | | | 30,011 | | | | 2,002 | | | | 93,022 | | | | 85,817 | | | | 7,205 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ancillary Cost of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenant reinsurance | | | 3,801 | | | | 3,436 | | | | 365 | | | | 10,650 | | | | 9,814 | | | | 836 | |
Commercial | | | 1,100 | | | | 1,381 | | | | (281 | ) | | | 3,620 | | | | 4,247 | | | | (627 | ) |
Merchandise and other | | | 4,956 | | | | 4,976 | | | | (20 | ) | | | 14,886 | | | | 14,243 | | | | 643 | |
Total cost of operations | | | 9,857 | | | | 9,793 | | | | 64 | | | | 29,156 | | | | 28,304 | | | | 852 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial depreciation | | | 703 | | | | 659 | | | | 44 | | | | 2,086 | | | | 1,987 | | | | 99 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ancillary net income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenant reinsurance | | | 16,142 | | | | 15,386 | | | | 756 | | | | 47,308 | | | | 43,231 | | | | 4,077 | |
Commercial | | | 1,654 | | | | 1,550 | | | | 104 | | | | 4,890 | | | | 4,776 | | | | 114 | |
Merchandise and other | | | 3,657 | | | | 2,623 | | | | 1,034 | | | | 9,582 | | | | 7,519 | | | | 2,063 | |
Total ancillary net income | | $ | 21,453 | | | $ | 19,559 | | | $ | 1,894 | | | $ | 61,780 | | | $ | 55,526 | | | $ | 6,254 | |
Tenant reinsurance operations: We reinsure policies offered through a non-affiliated insurance company against losses to goods stored by tenants in the domestic self-storage facilities we operate. The level of tenant reinsurance revenues is largely dependent upon the level of premiums charged for such insurance and the number of tenants that participate in the insurance program. Cost of operations primarily includes claims paid that are not covered by our outside third-party insurers, as well as claims adjustment expenses. These costs are dependent primarily upon the level of losses incurred, including the level of catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, that occur and affect our properties thereby increasing tenant insurance claims.
The increase in tenant reinsurance revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011, was due primarily to an increase in the number of our tenants that participate in the insurance program (approximately 5% higher) combined with an increase in average premium rates (approximately 1% and 3% higher in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011). On average, approximately 63% of our tenants had such policies during each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, as compared to 62% and 61% for the same periods in 2011. We expect less growth in the percentage of tenants that participate in the insurance program and a moderation in the growth in the average premium rate in the remainder of 2012 as compared to the same periods in 2011.
Commercial operations: We also operate commercial facilities, primarily small storefronts and office space located on or near our existing self-storage facilities that are rented to third parties. We do not expect any significant changes in revenues or profitability from our commercial operations.
Merchandise sales and other: We sell locks, boxes, and packing supplies at the self-storage facilities that we operate, and to a much lesser extent, we manage self-storage facilities in the U.S. for third party owners and various unconsolidated affiliated limited partnerships. The primary factor impacting the level of merchandise sales is the level of customer traffic at our self-storage facilities, including the level of move-ins. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, merchandise sales and margins were positively impacted by higher retail prices for our locks, as compared to the same periods in 2011.
Other Income and Expense Items
Interest and other income: Interest and other income was $5.4 million and $16.6 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to $6.9 million and $25.2 million for the same periods in 2011, comprised primarily of interest and other income from Shurgard Europe.
Interest and other income includes interest income on loans receivable from Shurgard Europe, as well as trademark license fees received from Shurgard Europe for the use of the “Shurgard” trade name. We record 51% of the aggregate interest income and trademark license fees as interest and other income, while 49% is presented as additional equity in earnings on our statements of income.
Interest and other income received from Shurgard Europe decreased from $6.2 million and $21.2 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 to $4.9 million and $14.9 million in the same periods in 2012, due primarily to (i) reduced interest on a bridge loan to Shurgard Europe for which we had recognized approximately $2.5 million in interest income during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and (ii) principal payments received in 2011 on our currently outstanding loan receivable from Shurgard Europe. We also received $1.5 million in other income from our joint venture partner during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (see Note 5 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements for more information).
The loan receivable from Shurgard Europe, denominated in Euros, totaling €311.0 million ($399.8 million) as of September 30, 2012, and €311.0 million ($402.7 million) as of December 31, 2011, matures in February 2015. Future interest income recorded in connection with this loan will be dependent upon the average outstanding balance as well as the exchange rate of the Euro versus the U.S. Dollar. All such interest has been paid currently when due and we expect the interest to continue to be paid when due with Shurgard Europe’s operating cash flow. The terms of a loan payable by Shurgard Europe to a bank requires significant principal reduction through the maturity date in November 2014, as a result during this period future principal repayments on our loan will be limited.
The remainder of our interest and other income is comprised primarily of interest earned on cash balances as well as sundry other income items that are received from time to time in varying amounts. Interest income on cash balances has been minimal, because rates have been at historic lows of 0.1% or less, and we expect this trend to continue in the foreseeable future. Future earnings from sundry other income items are not predictable.
Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense was $89.9 million and $265.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to $90.8 million and $268.3 million for the same periods in 2011. The level of future depreciation and amortization will primarily depend upon the level of acquisitions of facilities and the level of capital expenditures we incur on our facilities.
General and administrative expense: General and administrative expense was $15.3 million and $44.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to $14.1 million and $40.9 million for the same periods in 2011, and is set forth in the following table:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Amounts in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock based compensation expense | | $ | 7,111 | | | $ | 6,147 | | | $ | 964 | | | $ | 18,394 | | | $ | 17,968 | | | $ | 426 | |
Costs of senior executives | | | 419 | | | | 419 | | | | - | | | | 4,319 | | | | 2,915 | | | | 1,404 | |
Development and acquisition overhead | | | 1,228 | | | | 1,026 | | | | 202 | | | | 4,694 | | | | 3,571 | | | | 1,123 | |
Tax compliance costs and taxes paid | | | 1,240 | | | | 1,785 | | | | (545 | ) | | | 3,840 | | | | 4,546 | | | | (706 | ) |
Legal costs | | | 1,083 | | | | 675 | | | | 408 | | | | 3,082 | | | | 2,597 | | | | 485 | |
Public company costs | | | 721 | | | | 684 | | | | 37 | | | | 2,238 | | | | 2,261 | | | | (23 | ) |
Other costs | | | 3,496 | | | | 3,380 | | | | 116 | | | | 7,550 | | | | 7,086 | | | | 464 | |
Total | | $ | 15,298 | | | $ | 14,116 | | | $ | 1,182 | | | $ | 44,117 | | | $ | 40,944 | | | $ | 3,173 | |
Stock based compensation expense includes the amortization of restricted share and stock options granted to employees, as well as employer taxes incurred upon vesting of restricted shares and upon exercise of employee stock options. The level of stock-based compensation expense varies based upon the level of grants and forfeitures. See Note 10 to our September 30, 2012 financial statement for further information on our stock-based compensation.
Costs of senior executives represents the cash compensation paid to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, and has increased due to an increase in incentive compensation paid in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.
Development and acquisition overhead represents the internal and external expenses of identifying, evaluating, and implementing our acquisition and development activities and varies primarily based upon the level of development and acquisition activities undertaken.
Tax compliance costs and taxes paid include taxes paid to various state and local authorities based upon our self-storage activities, as well as the internal and external costs of filing tax returns and other costs associated with complying with federal and state tax laws.
Legal costs include internal personnel as well as fees paid to legal firms and other third parties with respect to general corporate legal matters and risk management, and varies based upon the level of litigation.
Public company costs represent the incremental costs of operating as a publicly-traded REIT, such as internal and external investor relations expenses, stock listing and transfer agent fees, board of directors’ costs, and costs associated with maintaining compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Interest expense: Interest expense was $4.9 million and $15.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to $5.9 million and $18.8 million for the same periods in 2011.
The decrease in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011 is due primarily to principal repayments on our mortgage notes during 2011 and the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
See Note 6 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements for a schedule of our notes payable balances, principal repayment requirements, and average interest rates.
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss): We recorded a foreign currency translation gain of $9.0 million and a loss of $2.5 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to a loss of $28.3 million and a gain of $13.5 million for the same periods in 2011, respectively, representing the change in the U.S. Dollar equivalent of our Euro-based loan receivable from Shurgard Europe due to fluctuations in exchange rates. We have not entered into any agreements to mitigate the impact of currency exchange fluctuations between the U.S. Dollar and the Euro, therefore the amount of U.S. Dollars we will receive on repayment will depend upon the currency exchange rates at that time. We record the exchange gains or losses into net income each period because of our continued expectation of repayment of the loan in the foreseeable future. The U.S. Dollar exchange rate relative to the Euro was approximately 1.286, 1.258 and 1.295 at September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Future foreign exchange gains or losses will be dependent primarily upon the movement of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar, the amount owed from Shurgard Europe and our continued expectation of collecting the principal on the loan in the foreseeable future.
Discontinued Operations: In addition to the revenues and expenses of disposed self-storage facilities, discontinued operations includes $11.7 million in gains on disposition of real estate facilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $1.7 million and $1.4 million in net gains on disposition of real estate facilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
Net Income Allocable to Noncontrolling Interests: Net income allocable to noncontrolling interests decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011, due primarily to our acquisition of noncontrolling interests during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Net Income Allocable to Preferred Shareholders: Net income allocable to preferred shareholders increased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011 due primarily to the impact of applying EITF D-42 to redemptions. Based upon our preferred shares outstanding at September 30, 2012, but excluding the Series F and Series X Cumulative Preferred Shares which were redeemed on October 15, 2012, and the Series Z, Series A and Series D Cumulative Preferred Shares, which will be redeemed on December 27, 2012, our regular quarterly preferred distribution is expected to be approximately $42.5 million.
In our discussions above, we refer to net operating income (“NOI”) of our self-storage facilities, which is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization expense. Although depreciation and amortization are a component of GAAP net income, we believe that NOI is a meaningful measure of operating performance, because we utilize NOI in making decisions with respect to capital allocations, property performance, and comparing period-to-period and market-to-market property operating results. In addition, we believe the investment community utilizes NOI in determining operating performance and real estate values, and does not consider depreciation expense as it is based upon historical cost. NOI is not a substitute for net operating income after depreciation and amortization or net income in evaluating our operating results. The following reconciles NOI generated by our self-storage segment to our net income in our September 30, 2012 financial statements.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Amounts in thousands) | |
Self-storage net operating income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | $ | 294,075 | | | $ | 272,481 | | | $ | 820,978 | | | $ | 763,450 | |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | 19,476 | | | | 14,284 | | | | 51,897 | | | | 37,857 | |
| | | 313,551 | | | | 286,765 | | | | 872,875 | | | | 801,307 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Self-storage depreciation expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | | (78,452 | ) | | | (79,229 | ) | | | (235,876 | ) | | | (240,679 | ) |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | (10,742 | ) | | | (10,933 | ) | | | (27,233 | ) | | | (25,588 | ) |
| | | (89,194 | ) | | | (90,162 | ) | | | (263,109 | ) | | | (266,267 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Self-storage net income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Facilities | | | 215,623 | | | | 193,252 | | | | 585,102 | | | | 522,771 | |
Non Same Store Facilities | | | 8,734 | | | | 3,351 | | | | 24,664 | | | | 12,269 | |
Total net income from self-storage | | | 224,357 | | | | 196,603 | | | | 609,766 | | | | 535,040 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ancillary operating revenue | | | 32,013 | | | | 30,011 | | | | 93,022 | | | | 85,817 | |
Ancillary cost of operations | | | (9,857 | ) | | | (9,793 | ) | | | (29,156 | ) | | | (28,304 | ) |
Commercial depreciation and amortization | | | (703 | ) | | | (659 | ) | | | (2,086 | ) | | | (1,987 | ) |
General and administrative expense | | | (15,298 | ) | | | (14,116 | ) | | | (44,117 | ) | | | (40,944 | ) |
Asset impairment charges | | | - | | | | (2,186 | ) | | | - | | | | (2,186 | ) |
Interest and other income | | | 5,444 | | | | 6,875 | | | | 16,639 | | | | 25,218 | |
Interest expense | | | (4,926 | ) | | | (5,862 | ) | | | (15,327 | ) | | | (18,779 | ) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate entities | | | 12,642 | | | | 15,269 | | | | 30,353 | | | | 41,755 | |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) | | | 9,019 | | | | (28,253 | ) | | | (2,481 | ) | | | 13,495 | |
Gain on real estate sales and debt retirement | | | 193 | | | | 4,983 | | | | 1,456 | | | | 5,111 | |
Discontinued operations | | | 11,935 | | | | 1,641 | | | | 12,403 | | | | 1,786 | |
Net income | | $ | 264,819 | | | $ | 194,513 | | | $ | 670,472 | | | $ | 616,022 | |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our cash balances and net cash provided by our operating activities will continue to be sufficient to enable us to meet our operating expenses, debt service, capital improvements and distribution requirements to our shareholders for the foreseeable future.
Operating as a REIT, our ability to retain cash flow for reinvestment is restricted. In order for us to maintain our REIT status, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow must be distributed to our shareholders (see “Requirement to Pay Distributions” below). However, despite the significant distribution requirements, we have been able to retain a significant amount of our operating cash flow. The following table summarizes our ability to fund capital improvements to maintain our facilities, distributions to the noncontrolling interests, and distributions to our shareholders through the use of cash provided by operating activities. The remaining cash flow generated is available to make both scheduled and optional principal payments on debt and for reinvestment.
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | |
| | (Amount in thousands) | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities (a) | | $ | 955,755 | | | $ | 908,793 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Capital improvements to real estate facilities | | | (58,642 | ) | | | (57,026 | ) |
Remaining operating cash flow available for distributions to equity holders | | | 897,113 | | | | 851,767 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Distributions paid to: | | | | | | | | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | (4,341 | ) | | | (12,237 | ) |
Common shareholders and restricted share unitholders ($3.30 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $2.70 per share for the same period in 2011) | | | (564,727 | ) | | | (459,322 | ) |
Preferred shareholders | | | (156,272 | ) | | | (172,926 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash from operations available for principal payments on debt and reinvestment (b) | | $ | 171,773 | | | $ | 207,282 | |
(a) | Represents net cash provided by operating activities for each respective period as presented in our September 30, 2012 statements of cash flows. |
(b) | We present cash from operations available for principal payments on debt and reinvestment because we believe it is an important measure to evaluate our ongoing liquidity. This measure is not a substitute for cash flows from operations or net cash flows in evaluating our liquidity, ability to repay our debt, or to meet our distribution requirements. |
Our financial profile is characterized by a low level of debt-to-total-capitalization. We expect to fund our long-term growth strategies and debt obligations with (i) cash at September 30, 2012, (ii) retained operating cash flows, (iii) depending upon market conditions, proceeds from the issuance of common or preferred equity, and (iv) in the case of acquisitions of facilities, the assumption of existing debt. In general, our strategy is to continue to finance our growth with permanent capital, either retained operating cash flow or capital raised through the issuance of common or preferred equity to the extent that market conditions are favorable.
We have elected to use preferred securities as a form of leverage despite the fact that the dividend rates of our preferred securities exceed the prevailing market interest rates on conventional debt. We have chosen this method of financing for the following reasons: (i) under the REIT structure, a significant amount of operating cash flow needs to be distributed to our shareholders, making it difficult to repay debt with operating cash flow alone, (ii) our perpetual preferred shares have no sinking fund requirement or maturity date and do not require redemption, all of which eliminate future refinancing risks, (iii) after the end of a non-call period, we have the option to redeem the preferred shares at any time, which enables us to refinance higher coupon preferred shares with new preferred shares at lower rates if appropriate, (iv) preferred shares do not contain covenants, thus allowing us to maintain significant financial flexibility, and (v) dividends on the preferred shares can be applied to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements.
Our credit ratings on each of our series of preferred shares are “A3” by Moody’s, “BBB+” by Standard & Poor’s and “A-” by Fitch Ratings.
Summary of Current Cash Balances and Short-term Capital Commitments: At September 30, 2012, we had approximately $536 million of cash. In October 2012, we redeemed our Series F and Series X Cumulative Preferred Shares at par for approximately $367 million, and we acquired three self-storage facilities for approximately $37.3 million in cash. As of November 8, 2012, we were under contract to acquire three self-storage facilities for approximately $26.7 million in cash, subject to contingencies. On December 27, 2012, we will redeem our 6.250% Series Z, 6.125% Series A, and 6.180% Series D Cumulative Preferred Shares, at par, totaling $362.5 million. We expect to fund these activities with cash on hand, the issuance of equity securities, or borrowings on our line of credit. We have no other significant commitments until 2013, when $264.9 million of existing debt comes due.
Access to Additional Capital: We have a revolving line of credit for borrowings up to $300 million which expires March 21, 2017, with no outstanding borrowings at November 8, 2012. We seldom borrow on the line of credit and generally view borrowings on the line as a means to bridge capital needs until we are able to refinance them with permanent capital.
We believe that we are not dependent upon raising capital to fund our operations or meet our obligations. However, access to capital is important to growing our property portfolio. When growth capital is needed, we select either common or preferred securities based upon the relative cost of capital. For at least the last ten years, we have raised cash proceeds for growth and other corporate purposes primarily through the issuance of preferred securities, while we have issued common stock only in connection with mergers and the acquisition of interests in real estate entities. During periods of favorable market conditions, we have generally been able to raise capital at attractive costs; however, there can be no assurance that future market conditions will be favorable.
Debt Service Requirements: At September 30, 2012, outstanding debt totaled approximately $347.9 million. Approximate principal maturities are as follows (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | |
2012 (remainder) | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,799 | | | $ | 1,799 | |
2013 | | | 186,460 | | | | 78,391 | | | | 264,851 | |
2014 | | | - | | | | 35,127 | | | | 35,127 | |
2015 | | | - | | | | 30,009 | | | | 30,009 | |
2016 | | | - | | | | 10,065 | | | | 10,065 | |
Thereafter | | | - | | | | 6,092 | | | | 6,092 | |
| | $ | 186,460 | | | $ | 161,483 | | | $ | 347,943 | |
Our current intention is to repay debt at maturity and not seek to refinance with additional debt. Alternatively, we may prepay debt and finance such prepayments with cash on-hand or proceeds from the issuance of preferred or common securities.
Our portfolio of real estate facilities is substantially unencumbered. At September 30, 2012, we have 1,988 self-storage facilities with an aggregate net book value of approximately $7.0 billion that are unencumbered.
Capital Improvement Requirements: Capital improvements include major repairs or replacements to elements of our facilities, which keep the facilities in good operating condition and maintain their visual appeal to the customer. Capital improvements do not include costs relating to the development of new facilities or the expansion of net rentable square footage of existing facilities. We incurred capital improvements totaling $58.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. For the year ending December 31, 2012, we expect to incur approximately $73.0 million for capital improvements and expect to fund such improvements with operating cash flow. For the last three years, our capital expenditures have ranged between approximately $0.55 and $0.60 per net rentable square foot per year.
Requirement to Pay Distributions: We have operated, and intend to continue to operate, in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT under the Code, but no assurance can be given that we will at all times so qualify. To the extent that we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will not be taxed, with certain limited exceptions, on the REIT taxable income that is distributed to our shareholders, provided that at least 90% of our taxable income is so distributed. We believe we have satisfied the REIT distribution requirement since 1981.
Aggregate REIT qualifying distributions paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 totaled $721.0 million, consisting of $156.3 million to cumulative preferred shareholders and $564.7 million to common shareholders and restricted share unitholders.
We estimate the annual distribution requirements with respect to our cumulative preferred shares outstanding at September 30, 2012, excluding the Series F and Series X Cumulative Preferred Shares that were redeemed in October 2012, and excluding our Series Z, Series A and Series D Cumulative Preferred Shares which will be redeemed on December 27, 2012, to be approximately $170 million per year.
On November 8, 2012, our Board of Trustees declared a regular common quarterly dividend of $1.10 per common share. Our consistent, long-term dividend policy has been to distribute only our taxable income. Future quarterly distributions with respect to the common shares will continue to be determined based upon our REIT distribution requirements after taking into consideration distributions to the preferred shareholders and will be funded with operating cash flow.
We are obligated to pay distributions to noncontrolling interests in our consolidated subsidiaries based upon the operating cash flows of the respective subsidiary less any required reserves for capital expenditures or debt repayment. We estimate annual distributions of approximately $5.8 million with respect to such non-controlling interests outstanding at September 30, 2012.
Acquisition Activities: During October 2012, we acquired three properties for approximately $37.3 million in cash. As of November 8, 2012, we have acquired or are under contract (subject to contingencies) to acquire three additional self-storage facilities from third parties for approximately $26.7 million in cash. During the remainder of 2012, we will continue to seek to acquire self-storage facilities from third parties; however, it is difficult to estimate the amount of third party acquisitions we will undertake.
Development Activities: We have a nominal pipeline of identified development projects at September 30, 2012. In part due to the significant increase in prices being paid for existing facilities, in many cases well above replacement cost, we have expanded our new property development efforts and we expect to increase our level of development activities over the next 12 to 18 months. However, we believe that there are limitations on the level of investment that we can undertake. Such limitations include limited attractively located land parcels available at a reasonable cost, extensive and substantial permitting requirements, limitations on self-storage development in certain local municipalities, and our desire to obtain an attractive return on our investment when considering the 36 to 48 months that it takes to fill up newly-developed self-storage space with tenants and other associated risks of development. As a result, we do not expect such activities to have a significant impact upon our liquidity or earnings in the next 12 to 18 months.
Shurgard Europe: We have a 49% interest in Shurgard Europe and our institutional partner owns the remaining 51% interest. As of September 30, 2012, we had a €311.0 million loan receivable from Shurgard Europe totaling $399.8 million, which bears interest at a fixed rate of 9.0% per annum and matures February 15, 2015. The loan can be prepaid in part or in full at any time without penalty. This loan is denominated in Euros and is translated to U.S. Dollars for financial statement purposes.
In addition to our loan, Shurgard Europe has a term loan with Wells Fargo (the “Wells Fargo Loan”) with a balance of approximately €168.0 million at September 30, 2012, that matures in November 2014. Our loan participates pari passu with the Wells Fargo Loan in the event of a liquidation of Shurgard Europe. Shurgard Europe is obligated to utilize most of its available cashflow to make principal payments on the Wells Fargo Loan, which limits the principal payments that could otherwise be made on our loan.
Future prepayments will be dependent upon Shurgard Europe’s management’s evaluation of uses for the capital available from operations after making principal payments on the Wells Fargo Loan, and the availability of other sources of capital. Further, consistent with prior years, we do not expect to receive cash distributions from Shurgard Europe with respect to our 49% equity interest for the foreseeable future.
Redemption of Preferred Securities: On December 27, 2012, we will redeem our 6.250% Series Z, 6.125% Series A, and 6.180% Series D Cumulative Preferred Shares, at par, totaling $362.5 million. We have no other series of preferred shares that are redeemable before April 2015 and none of our preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the holders.
Repurchases of Company’s Common Shares: Our Board of Trustees has authorized the repurchase from time to time of up to 35,000,000 of our common shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not repurchase any of our common shares. From the inception of the repurchase program through November 8, 2012, we have repurchased a total of 23,721,916 common shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $679.1 million. Future levels of common share repurchases will be dependent upon our available capital, investment alternatives, and the trading price of our common shares.
Contractual Obligations
Our significant contractual obligations at September 30, 2012 and their impact on our cash flows and liquidity are summarized below for the years ending December 31 (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt (1) | | $ | 369,100 | | | $ | 6,734 | | | $ | 274,424 | | | $ | 38,534 | | | $ | 31,357 | | | $ | 10,851 | | | $ | 7,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred shares called for redemption (2) | | | 367,325 | | | | 367,325 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating leases (3) | | | 70,597 | | | | 1,101 | | | | 4,521 | | | | 4,383 | | | | 3,471 | | | | 3,358 | | | | 53,763 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Construction and purchase commitments | | | 2,231 | | | | 1,785 | | | | 446 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 809,253 | | | $ | 376,945 | | | $ | 279,391 | | | $ | 42,917 | | | $ | 34,828 | | | $ | 14,209 | | | $ | 60,963 | |
(1) | Amounts include principal and interest payments (all of which are fixed-rate) on our notes payable based on their contractual terms. See Note 6 to our September 30, 2012 financial statements for additional information on our notes payable. |
(2) | In September 2012, we called for redemption all of our Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series F and Series X, at par plus accrued dividends. We redeemed these shares on October 15, 2012. Amounts include the aggregate liquidation amount of $367.3 million. |
(3) | We lease land, equipment and office space under various operating leases. Certain leases are cancelable; however, significant penalties would be incurred upon cancellation. Amounts reflected above consider continuance of the lease without cancellation. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: At September 30, 2012, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined under Regulation S-K 303(a)(4) and the instructions thereto.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
To limit our exposure to market risk, we are capitalized primarily with preferred and common equity. Our preferred shares are redeemable at our option generally five years after issuance, but the holder has no redemption option. Our debt is our only market-risk sensitive portion of our capital structure, which totals $347.9 million and represents 4.2% of the book value of our equity at September 30, 2012.
We have foreign currency exposures related to our investment in Shurgard Europe, which has a book value of $391.6 million at September 30, 2012, as well as our loan receivable from Shurgard Europe, which is denominated in Euros, totaling €311.0 million ($399.8 million) at September 30, 2012.
The table below summarizes annual debt maturities and weighted-average interest rates on our outstanding debt at the end of each year and fair values required to evaluate our expected cash-flows under debt agreements and our sensitivity to interest rate changes at September 30, 2012 (dollar amounts in thousands).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed rate debt | | $ | 1,799 | | | $ | 264,851 | | | $ | 35,127 | | | $ | 30,009 | | | $ | 10,065 | | | $ | 6,092 | | | $ | 347,943 | | | $ | 353,898 | |
Average interest rate | | | 5.16 | % | | | 5.73 | % | | | 5.35 | % | | | 4.34 | % | | | 5.59 | % | | | 5.66 | % | | | | | | | | |
| |
Variable rate debt (1) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Average interest rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(1) | Amounts include borrowings under our line of credit, which expires in March 2017. As of September 30, 2012, we have no borrowings under our line of credit. |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in accordance with SEC guidelines and that such information is communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures in reaching that level of reasonable assurance. We also have investments in certain unconsolidated entities and because we do not control these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at a reasonable assurance level.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information set forth under the heading “Contingent Losses” in Note 12 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference in this Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2011, in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and in our subsequent Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks and other filings with the SEC. These factors may materially affect our business, financial condition and operating results and could cause our actual results to differ materially from expectations. In addition, in considering the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q and elsewhere, you should refer to the qualifications and limitations on our forward-looking statements that are described in Forward Looking Statements at the beginning of Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Common Share Repurchases
Our Board of Trustees has authorized the repurchase from time to time of up to 35,000,000 of our common shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not repurchase any of our common shares. From the inception of the repurchase program through November 8, 2012, we have repurchased a total of 23,721,916 common shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $679.1 million. Our common share repurchase program does not have an expiration date and there are 11,278,084 common shares that may yet be repurchased under our repurchase program as of September 30, 2012. Future levels of common share repurchases will be dependent upon our available capital, investment alternatives, and the trading price of our common shares.
Preferred Share Redemptions
During July 2012, we redeemed all 6.9 million of our outstanding Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series N with a liquidation amount of $172.5 million for an aggregate of $172.5 million in cash (inclusive of accrued dividends).
During July 2012, we redeemed all 4.4 million of our outstanding Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series C with a liquidation amount of $110.6 million for an aggregate of $110.8 million in cash (inclusive of accrued dividends).
During August 2012, we redeemed all 5.3 million of our outstanding Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series W with a liquidation amount of $132.5 million for an aggregate of $133.3 million in cash (inclusive of accrued dividends).
The following table presents monthly information related to our redemption of all of our outstanding Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series N, Series C and Series W during the three months ended September 30, 2012:
| | Total Number of Shares Repurchased | | | Average Price Paid per Share | |
| | | | | | |
July 1, 2012 – July 31, 2012 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred Shares - Series N | | | 6,900,000 | | | $ | 25.00 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred Shares - Series C | | | 4,425,000 | | | $ | 25.00 | |
| | | | | | | | |
August 1, 2012 – August 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred Shares - Series W | | | 5,300,000 | | | $ | 25.00 | |
| | | | | | | | |
September 1, 2012 – September 30, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 16,625,000 | | | $ | 25.00 | |
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference and are listed in the attached Exhibit Index which is incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DATED: November 8, 2012 |
| |
PUBLIC STORAGE |
| |
By: | /s/ John Reyes |
| John Reyes Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial officer and duly authorized officer) |
PUBLIC STORAGE
INDEX TO EXHIBITS (1)
(Items 15(a)(3) and 15(c))
3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Public Storage, a Maryland real estate investment trust. Filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.2 | Bylaws of Public Storage, a Maryland real estate investment trust. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 11, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.3 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.250% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series Z. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.4 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series A. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.5 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.180% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series D. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.6 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.875% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series O. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.7 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.500% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series P. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.8 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.5% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series Q. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 2, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.9 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.35% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series R. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.10 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 5.900% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series S. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 9, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.11 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 5.750% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series T. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.12 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 5.625% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series U. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
3.13 | Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 5.375% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series V. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein. |
4.1 | Master Deposit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein. |
10.1 | Amended Management Agreement between Registrant and Public Storage Commercial Properties Group, Inc. dated as of February 21, 1995. Filed with Public Storage Inc.’s (“PSI”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.2 | Second Amended and Restated Management Agreement by and among Registrant and the entities listed therein dated as of November 16, 1995. Filed with PS Partners, Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (SEC File No. 001-11186) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.3 | Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. Filed with PS Business Parks, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.4 | Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Storage Trust Properties, L.P. (March 12, 1999). Filed with PSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.5 | Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PSA Institutional Partners, L.P. Filed with PSI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.6 | Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PSA Institutional Partners, L.P. Filed with PSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2000 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.7 | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PSA Institutional Partners, L.P. Filed with PSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.8 | Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PSA Institutional Partners, L.P. Filed with PSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.9 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated as joint lead arrangers, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the other financial institutions party thereto, dated as of March 21, 2012. Filed with PSI’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 27, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.10* | Post-Retirement Agreement between Registrant and B. Wayne Hughes dated as of March 11, 2004. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.11* | Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. 2004 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan. Filed as Appendix A of Definitive Proxy Statement dated June 7, 2004 filed by Shurgard (SEC File No. 001-11455) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.12* | Public Storage, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (“2001 Plan”). Filed with PSI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-59218) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.13* | Form of 2001 Plan Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement. Filed with PSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.14* | Form of 2001 Plan Restricted Share Unit Agreement. Filed with PSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.15* | Form of 2001 Plan Non-Qualified Outside Director Stock Option Agreement. Filed with PSI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (SEC File No. 001-0839) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.16* | Public Storage 2007 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-144907) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.17* | Form of 2007 Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.18* | Form of 2007 Plan Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.19* | Form of Indemnity Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-141448) and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.20*. | Amendment to Form of Trustee Stock Option Agreement. Filed as Exhibit 10.30 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference. |
10.21* | Revised Form of Trustee Stock Option Agreement. Filed as Exhibit 10.31 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference. |
12 | Statement Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. Filed herewith. |
31.1 | 31.1 Rule 13a – 14(a) Certification. Filed herewith. |
31.2 | 31.2 Rule 13a – 14(a) Certification. Filed herewith. |
32 | Section 1350 Certifications. Filed herewith. |
101 .INS** | XBRL Instance Document |
101 .SCH** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
101 .CAL** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
101 .DEF** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
101 .LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
101 .PRE** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Link |
_ | (1) | SEC File No. 001-33519 unless otherwise indicated. |
* | Denotes management compensatory plan agreement or arrangement. |