In rendering the opinions set forth below, we have assumed further that (1) the Québec Guarantors are validly existing and in good standing under the law of Québec and have duly authorized, executed, issued and delivered the Underwriting Agreement, the Indenture and their Guarantees, as applicable, in accordance with their organizational documents and the law of Québec, (2) the execution, issuance, delivery and performance by the Québec Guarantors of the Underwriting Agreement, the Indenture and their Guarantees, as applicable, do not constitute a breach or violation of their organizational documents or violate the law of Québec or any other applicable jurisdiction (except that no such assumption is made with respect to the federal law of the United States, the law of the State of New York, the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “DLLCA”) or the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the “DRULPA”)) and (3) the execution, issuance, delivery and performance by the Company and each Guarantor of the Underwriting Agreement, the Indenture, the Notes and the Guarantees, as applicable, do not constitute a breach or default under any agreement or instrument which is binding upon the Company or any such Guarantor.
Based upon the foregoing, and subject to the qualifications, assumptions and limitations stated herein, we are of the opinion that:
1. Assuming due authentication thereof by the Trustee and upon payment and delivery in accordance with the provisions of the Underwriting Agreement, the Notes will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Company enforceable against the Company in accordance with their terms.
2. Assuming due authentication of the Notes by the Trustee and upon payment for and delivery of the Notes in accordance with the Underwriting Agreement, the Guarantees will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Guarantors enforceable against the Guarantors in accordance with their terms.
3