former store managers, store managers in training, and similarly situated current and former employees (collectively, the “Mason Putative Class Employees”) alleging that the Company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) by classifying the Mason Putative Class Employees as exempt (the “Mason matter”). The alleged violations include failure to pay for overtime work.
In April 2021, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“Mason MOU”) with counsel for the lead plaintiffs in the Mason matter. Under the terms of the Mason MOU, the Company agreed to pay up to $7.0 million to settle the claims asserted in the Mason matter.
In the first quarter of 2022, the court gave final approval to the settlement. As a result of the final approval, the Company paid $7.0 million, plus an additional $0.1 million in taxes, in the second quarter of 2022 to a court appointed administrator who handles distribution to the plaintiffs. Any checks issued to the Collective Members and the New York Non Opt-Ins which are not cashed by March 1, 2023, will revert to the Company.
Savidis Lawsuit
In April 2020, LL Flooring was served with a lawsuit filed by Tanya Savidis, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated (collectively, the “Savidis Plaintiffs”). Ms. Savidis filed a purported class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda on March 6, 2020, on behalf of all current and former LL Flooring employees employed as non-exempt employees. The complaint alleges violation of the California Labor Code including, among other items, failure to pay minimum wages and overtime wages, failure to provide meal periods, failure to permit rest breaks, failure to reimburse business expenses, failure to provide accurate wage statements, failure to pay all wages due upon separation within the required time, and engaging in unfair business practices (the “Savidis matter”).
In December 2020, the Company began contacting individuals who constitute the Savidis Plaintiffs and offered individual settlements in satisfaction of their claims. In April 2021, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“Savidis MOU”) with counsel for the lead plaintiffs in the Savidis matter. Under the terms of the Savidis MOU, the Company agreed to pay $0.9 million reduced by a credit of $0.1 million for amounts already paid to the individuals who accepted the Company’s prior settlement offer. In January 2022, the Court provided final approval of the settlement. In April 2022, the Company paid $0.8 million to a court appointed administrator who handles the distribution to the class members who did not opt out of participating in the settlement. Settlement checks were mailed to class members in May 2022, and the Company expects the Court to dismiss the matter during the fourth quarter of 2022.
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Investigation
The Company is subject to antidumping (“AD”) and countervailing duties (“CVD”) for certain imports of multilayered wood flooring from China. The Company’s multilayered wood flooring imports from China accounted for approximately 3% of its flooring purchases in 2021.
At the time of import, the Company makes deposits at the then prevailing rate. This rate is subsequently reviewed to establish the final rate. When rates are declared final by the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”), the Company accrues a receivable or payable depending on where that final rate compares to the deposits it has made. The Company and/or the domestic manufacturers can appeal the final rate for any period. Because of the length of time for finalization of rates as well as appeals, any subsequent adjustment of AD and CVD rates typically flows through a period different from those in which the inventory was originally purchased and/or sold.
Results by period for the Company are shown below. The “Total AD/CVD Receivable/Liability Balance as of September 30, 2022” represents the amount the Company would receive or pay (net of any collections or payments) as the result of subsequent adjustment to rates whether due to finalization by the DOC or because of action of a court based on appeals by various parties. It does not include any initial amounts paid for AD or CVD in the current period at the in-effect rate at that time.
The Company recorded net interest expense related to antidumping of $0.05 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 compared to net interest income of $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021. The