Virginia Savings Bancorp 10-Q 2009 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURUSANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number: 000-52946

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

VIRGINIA	20-8947933
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

600 Commerce Avenue, Front Royal, Virginia 22630

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(540) 635-4137

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.).    ¨  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of August 19, 2009, there were issued and outstanding 1,899,984 shares of the registrant’s common stock.

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2009

INDEX

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 -	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (Unaudited)	Page 3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations, Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	Page 4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations, Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	Page 5
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, Six and Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 (Unaudited)	Page 6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	Page 7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	Page 8
Item 2 -	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	Page 18
Item 3 -	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	Page 33
Item 4T -	Controls and Procedures	Page 33
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 -	Legal Proceedings	Page 35
Item 1A -	Risk Factors	Page 35
Item 2 -	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	Page 35
Item 3-	Default Upon Senior Securities	Page 35
Item 4 -	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	Page 35
Item 5 -	Other Information	Page 35
Item 6 -	Exhibits	Page 35
Signatures		Page 36

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (Unaudited)

	June 30, 2009		Dec. 31, 2008
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	4,009,123	$	3,509,491
Interest bearing deposits at other banks		4,491,668		6,767,289
Federal funds sold		1,126,000		2,067,000
Total cash and cash equivalents		9,626,791		12,343,780
Investment securities available for sale		3,920,120		5,046,563
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $4,510,362 and $3,020,452 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008)		4,510,540		3,020,714
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,440,600 and $1,375,900 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		102,008,939		102,857,617
Premises and equipment, net		5,849,744		5,768,357
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta Stock, at cost		261,300		322,300
Foreclosed real estate		2,471,141		3,656,322
Real estate held for sale		533,300		533,300
Other assets		1,783,920		2,231,281
Total Assets	$	130,965,795	$	135,780,234
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities
Interest bearing deposits	$	111,346,456	$	118,039,571
Non-interest bearing deposits		6,638,612		5,115,286
Total Deposits		117,985,068		123,154,857
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		39,333		78,268
Other liabilities		898,454		458,024
Total Liabilities	$	118,922,855	$	123,691,149
Equity
Preferred stock, $10.00 par (500,000 shares authorized, zero shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008)		—		—
Common stock, $1.00 par (5,000,000 shares authorized; 1,899,984 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008)		1,899,984		1,899,984
Additional paid-in capital on common stock		1,266,015		1,266,015
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		25,925		(54,466	)
Retained earnings		7,851,016		7,977,552
Total Virginia Savings Bancorp, Inc. stockholders’ equity		11,042,940		11,089,085
Preferred stock of subsidiary		1,000,000		1,000,000
Total Equity		12,042,940		12,089,085
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	130,965,795	$	135,780,234

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

3

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

	Six Months ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	3,180,693		$	3,654,380
Interest and dividends on investments		109,351			373,012
Other interest income		4,248			66,627
Total Interest Income		3,294,292			4,094,019
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits		1,222,864			1,958,285
Interest on short term borrowings		51			129,148
Total Interest Expense		1,222,915			2,087,433
Net interest income		2,071,377			2,006,586
Less: Provision for loan losses		191,334			953,388
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		1,880,043			1,053,198
Non-Interest Income
Loan fees and late charges		77,372			108,934
Income from mortgage banking activities		26,658			59,643
Fees from transaction accounts		455,116			566,348
Net gain (loss) on foreclosed real estate		(1,355	)		831,458
Other income		6,981			42,291
Total Non-Interest Income		564,772			1,608,674
Non-Interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		1,277,853			1,384,964
Director compensation		39,099			127,140
Occupancy, furniture and equipment		200,424			174,232
Professional fees		140,029			134,988
Data processing		391,783			449,938
Marketing		30,475			52,100
Foreclosed real estate		42,962			173,070
FDIC Insurance premiums		202,997			8,185
Overdraft protection plan expenses		31,102			52,145
Other		219,627			231,749
Total non-interest expense		2,576,351			2,788,511
Loss before income tax benefit		(131,536	)		(126,639	)
Income tax benefit		(42,500	)		(65,000	)
Net loss		(89,036	)		(61,639	)
Dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary		(37,500	)		(37,500	)
Net loss attributable to common shares	$	(126,536	)	$	(99,139	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.05	)
Dividends declared per common share	$	—		$	0.06

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

4

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

	Three Months ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	1,584,545		$	1,768,271
Interest and dividends on investments		49,021			107,737
Other interest income		1,702			44,176
Total Interest Income		1,635,268			1,920,184
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits		572,218			904,315
Interest on short term borrowings		14			13,350
Total Interest Expense		572,232			917,665
Net interest income		1,063,036			1,002,519
Less: Provision for loan losses		151,611			878,172
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		911,425			124,347
Non-Interest Income
Loan fees and late charges		38,712			50,406
Income from mortgage banking activities		8,238			26,986
Fees from transaction accounts		243,335			288,633
Net gain (loss) on foreclosed real estate		(1,136	)		831,458
Other income		5,946			39,350
Total Non-Interest Income		295,095			1,236,833
Non-Interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		631,562			679,971
Director compensation		19,385			63,911
Occupancy, furniture and equipment		102,849			88,377
Professional fees		74,319			67,466
Data processing		198,539			230,146
Marketing		15,000			2,075
Foreclosed real estate		26,880			173,070
FDIC Insurance premiums		176,322			4,148
Overdraft protection plan expenses		17,896			27,639
Other		129,809			112,466
Total non-interest expense		1,392,561			1,449,269
Loss before income tax benefit		(186,041	)		(88,089	)
Income tax benefit		(63,500	)		(38,600	)
Net loss		(122,541	)		(49,489	)
Dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary		(18,750	)		(18,750	)
Net loss attributable to common shares	$	(141,291	)	$	(68,239	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.04	)
Dividends declared per common share	$	—		$	0.06

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

5

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Unaudited)

	Six Months ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Net loss	$	(89,036	)	$	(61,639	)
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes:
Unrealized net gains on securities available for sale, net of tax of $49,400		80,391			—
Comprehensive loss		(8,645	)		(61,639	)
	Three Months ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Net loss	$	(122,541	)	$	(49,489	)
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes:
Unrealized net gains on securities available for sale, net of tax of $35,600		83,125			—
Comprehensive loss		(39,416	)		(49,489	)

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

6

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(89,036	)	$	(61,639	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		191,334			953,388
Provision for losses on foreclosed real estate		24,357			12,400
Loss (gains) on foreclosed real estate		1,355			(831,458	)
Amortization (accretion) of premiums and discounts on investments		27,288			(863	)
Depreciation expense		123,473			100,808
Decrease (increase) in other assets		383,334			(343,046	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		440,430			(173,430	)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		1,102,535			(343,840	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Maturities or call of available for sale investments		1,000,000			—
Purchases of available for sale investments		—			(11,521,465	)
Purchases of held to maturity investments		(4,500,000	)		—
Maturities of held to maturity investments		3,023,408			27,000,000
Principal repayments on mortgage backed securities		230,339			814
Net redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		61,000			595,000
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable		657,344			(373,363	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate		1,173,935			1,029,658
Cash paid for improvements made on foreclosed real estate		(14,466	)		(243,504	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(204,860	)		(1,248,968	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,426,700			15,238,172
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net decrease in deposits		(5,169,789	)		(4,760,915	)
Increase (decrease) in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		(38,935	)		56,942
Net decrease in short-term borrowings		—			(8,871,000	)
Dividends paid on common stock		—			(113,999	)
Dividends paid on preferred stock of subsidiary		(37,500	)		(37,500	)
Net cash used by financing activities		(5,246,224	)		(13,726,472	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(2,716,989	)		1,167,860
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		12,343,780			5,040,422
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	9,626,791		$	6,208,282
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,220,998		$	2,142,930
Income taxes		—			22,100
Transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate	$	—		$	2,338,623
Transfer of loans held for sale to portfolio		—			5,329,374

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

7

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Virginia Savings Bancorp, Inc. (“the Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or the entire year ending December 31, 2009. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 165,Subsequent Events. SFAS 165 establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the statement of financial condition date but before the financial statements are issued. SFAS 165 sets forth the period after the statement of financial condition date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition in the financial statements, identifies circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the statement of financial condition date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that occur after the statement of financial condition date. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluated the events and transactions that occurred from July 1, 2009 through August 19, 2009 the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Note 2 – Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per common share was computed on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is computed on a weighted average basis under the “if converted” method assuming conversion as of January 1, 2009. Potential converted shares represent the conversion of the 100,000 shares of convertible preferred stock of the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Virginia Savings Bank, F.S.B. (“the Bank”), that is convertible in the ratio of two shares of common stock to three shares of preferred stock, or 66,666 common shares. These “if Converted” shares have been excluded from the earnings per share calculation as they would be anti-dilutive. With the exception of preferred stock dividends of subsidiary, there were no adjustments to net loss in the computation of diluted loss per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

8

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Net loss before dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary	$	(89,036	)	$	(61,639	)
Dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary		(37,500	)		(37,500	)
Net loss attributable to common stock		(126,536	)		(99,139	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		1,899,984			1,899,984
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.05	)
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Net loss before dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary	$	(122,541	)	$	(49,489	)
Dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary		(18,750	)		(18,750	)
Net loss attributable to common stock		(141,291	)		(68,239	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		1,899,984			1,899,984
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.04	)

Note 3 – Guarantees

The Bank issues stand-by letters of credit that are unconditional commitments guaranteeing performance by a customer to a third party. These guarantees are issued primarily to support private borrowing arrangements, generally limited to real estate transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing these guarantees is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, with consideration given to collateral and risk of default, management does not believe its exposure to these letters of credit is significant. These stand-by letters of credit were approximately $49,200 and $330,800, respectively, at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 with current expiration dates through August 10, 2010. The liability under these guarantees is not material.

The Bank also issues standard representations, warranties and indemnifications in the course of selling mortgage loans and other types of loans. The Bank has not been required to act on such guarantees in the past and does not believe that any payments pursuant to them would materially change the financial condition or results of operations as presented herein.

Note 4 – Investments

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments(FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will

9

recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.

In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. This FSP is effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods ended June 30, 2009 and thereafter. The adoption of this FSP for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Investment securities by contractual maturities at June 30, 2009 are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2009
Investments Available for Sale at Fair Value	Within 1 Year		After 1 Year Through 5 Years		Total
Corporate Bonds	$	2,375,976	$	517,670	$	2,893,646
Mortgage backed securities maturing:
Before June 30, 2010		598,524				598,524
After June 30, 2010		—		427,951		427,951
Total	$	2,974,500	$	945,621	$	3,920,120
	June 30, 2009
Investments Held to Maturity at Amortized Cost	Within 1 Year		After 10 Years		Total
Certificates of deposit	$	4,002,269	$	—	$	4,002,269
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Bond		500,000			$	500,000
Mortgage backed securities		—		8,271		8,271
Total	$	4,502,269	$	8,271	$	4,510,540

10

Below is a schedule of securities with unrealized gains and losses as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Investments Available for Sale	June 30, 2009
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Corporate Bonds	$	2,875,663	$	27,331	$	(9,349	)	$	2,893,645
Mortgage backed securities		1,002,532		23,943		—			1,026,475
Total Available for Sale Investments	$	3,878,195	$	51,274	$	(9,349	)	$	3,920,120
Investments Held to Maturity	June 30, 2009
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Certificates of deposit	$	4,002,269	$	—	$	—		$	4,002,269
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Bond		500,000		—		—			500,000
Mortgage backed securities		8,271		—		(178	)		8,093
Total Held to Maturity Investments	$	4,510,540	$	—	$	(178	)	$	4,510,362

The Company’s available for sale securities held at June 30, 2009 were in unrealized gain or loss positions for twelve months or less. The Company’s held to maturity investments at June 30, 2009 included four certificates of deposit, a federal agency security that had fair values equal to their recorded costs and three mortgage backed securities with a fair value of $8,093 that have been in an immaterial unrealized loss for more than twelve months.

Investments Available for Sale	December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value
Municipal Bond	$	1,000,000	$	—	$	—		$	1,000,000
Corporate Bonds		2,900,010		—		(83,535	)		2,816,475
Mortgage backed securities		1,234,419		—		(4,331	)		1,230,088
Total Investments	$	5,134,429	$	—	$	(87,866	)	$	5,046,563
Investments Held to Maturity	December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value
Certificates of deposit	$	3,011,051	$	—	$	—		$	3,011,051
Mortgage backed securities		9,663		—		(262	)		9,401
Total Held to Maturity Investments	$	3,020,714	$	—	$	(262	)	$	3,020,452

The Company’s available for sale securities held at December 31, 2008 were all purchased in fiscal year 2008 and therefore were in a unrealized loss position for less than 12 months. These securities consisted of one municipal bond, four corporate bonds and three mortgage backed securities. The Company’s held to maturity investments at December 31, 2008 included three certificates of deposit that had fair values equal to their recorded cost and three mortgage backed securities that had been in an unrealized position for more than 12 months.

Management evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment no less frequently than quarterly. The Company obtains security prices and debt ratings from two independent sources in order to make a determination that any decreases in fair value below recorded costs of the

11

securities are not other than temporary impairment. Management believes that the unrealized losses noted above at June 30, 2009 were primarily the result of changes in market interest rates and not indicative of credit quality issues. There were no sales of securities in the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company has the intent to hold the securities and does not believe it will be required to sell securities with unrealized losses before recovery occurs.

Management evaluates the Company’s restricted stock in the FHLB for impairment in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 01-6,Accounting by Certain Entities (Including With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance The Activities of Others.Management’s determination of whether this investment is impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB. The Company has concluded that the restricted stock investment is not impaired as of June 30, 2009.

Note 5 – Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments(FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends FASB Statement No. 107,Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28,Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.

This FSP is effective for the Company for interim reporting periods June 30, 2009 and after. The adoption of this FSP for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations:.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are summarized below. The fair values of a significant portion of these financial instruments are estimates derived using present value techniques and may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation values. Also, the calculation of estimated fair values is based on market conditions at a specific point in time and may not reflect current or future fair values.

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value for cash, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other banks due to the short-term nature of these investments. The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities. Loans receivable were discounted using a single discount rate, comparing the current market rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. These rates were used for each aggregated category of loans as reported on the OTS Quarterly

12

Interest Rate Risk Exposure Report. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposits is by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using market rates currently offered on deposits of similar remaining maturities. The fair value of short-term FHLB advances, all with original terms of one year or less, is the amount payable at the reporting date.

The carrying amounts for interest receivable, interest payable, and mortgage servicing rights approximate their fair value at the balance sheet date.

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business, including loan commitments and letters of credit. The off-balance sheet fair values are based on fees charged for similar agreements. The liabilities related to these financial instruments do not represent material risks to the Company. The Company does not believe that these obligations will materially affect its financial condition or results of operations.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)				(In Thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,627	$	9,627	$	12,344	$	12,344
Investment securities held to maturity		4,511		4,510		3,021		3,020
Investment securities available for sale		3,920		3,920		5,047		5,047
FHLB of Atlanta stock, at cost		261		261		322		322
Loans receivable, net		102,009		105,592		102,858		104,700
Accrued interest receivable		561		561		621		621
Mortgage servicing rights		171		171		205		205
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		117,985		119,925		123,155		125,425
Accrued interest payable		6		6		4		4
Financial Instruments - Off BalanceSheet	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly(FSP FAS 157-4). FASB Statement157, Fair Value Measurements,defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance on determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

FSP FAS 157-4 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with Statement 157.

13

This FSP clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The FSP provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods for the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and after. The adoption of this FSP for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

SFAS 157,Fair Value Measurements, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are as follows:

Level 1:	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2:	Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3:	Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For assets that the Company measures at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:

	June 30, 2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments available for sale	$	3,920,120	$	—	$	3,920,120	$	—
	Dec. 31, 2008		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments available for sale	$	5,046,563	$	—	$	5,046,563	$	—

14

For assets that the Company measures at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:

	June 30, 2009		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Impaired loans	$	3,112,443			$	3,112,443
Foreclosed real estate		2,080,500				2,080,500
	Dec. 31, 2008		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Impaired loans	$	247,230			$	247,230
Foreclosed real estate		1,305,878				1,305,878

The following valuation techniques were used to measure the fair value of assets in the table.

The Company reviews its available for sale investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to evaluate the fair value of these investments. The Company obtains price quotes for securities with comparable financial characteristics and maturities from two third party sources, and are therefore included as Level 2 fair values.

Loans included in the above table are those which were accounted for under SFAS Number 114,“Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (“SFAS 114”), under which the Company has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consists of the loan balances of $3,458,143 and $527,230 less their valuation allowances of $345,700 and $280,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, as determined under SFAS 114. Additional provision for loan losses on these impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were $169,100, and $187,000, respectively.

Fair values of foreclosed real estate were based on independent third party appraisals of the properties or discounted cash flows based upon the expected sales proceeds upon disposition of the assets. These values were generally determined based on the sales prices of similar properties in the proximate vicinity. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consists of foreclosed real estate of $2,236,366 and $1,682,221 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, less net valuation allowances of $155,866 at June 30, 2009 and $376,343 at December 31, 2008. The Company recognized net adjustments to the carrying value of real estate owned of $12,500 and $24,357, respectively that is included in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

Note 6 – Preferred Stock of Subsidiary

On March 31, 2006, the Bank entered into a stock purchase agreement with a third party pursuant to which the Bank sold 100,000 shares of Series A preferred stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. The Series A preferred stock pays a $0.75 annual dividend, payable in quarterly installments. The dividends payable on the Series A preferred stock are prior and in preference to any dividend on the Bank’s common stock. Beginning on March 31, 2008, the Series A preferred stock became redeemable at the option of the Bank, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of (1) $10.00 per share and (2) and accrued but unpaid dividends. Beginning on April 1, 2008, the holder of Series A preferred stock of the Bank became entitled to convert the security into shares of the Company’s common stock such that for every three shares of Series A preferred stock the former holder thereof would receive two shares of the Company’s common stock.

15

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51 (“SFAS 160”), which requires non-controlling interests (previously referred to a minority interests) to be treated as a separate component of equity. SFAS No. 160 was effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application was prohibited. SFAS No. 160 applies to the Series A preferred stock of the Bank. SFAS No. 160 is applied prospectively to all non-controlling interests, including any that arose before the effective date except that comparative period information must be recast to re-classify non-controlling interest in equity, attribute net income and other comprehensive income to non-controlling interest, and provide other disclosures required by SFAS No. 160. The following table presents the effect of adoption of SFAS No. 160 on the statement of financial condition.

	January 1, 2009		Adjustments		January 1, 2009
	(as reported)				(restated)
Total stockholders’ equity	$	11,089,085	$	—	$	11,089,085
Preferred stock of subsidiary		—		1,000,000		1,000,000
Total Equity	$	11,089,085	$	1,000,000	$	12,089,085

Note 7 - New Accounting Pronouncements

No. 111 (“SAB 111”). SAB 111 amends and replaces SAB Topic 5.M. in the SAB Series entitled “Other Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” SAB 111 maintains the SEC Staff’s previous views related to equity securities and amends Topic 5.M. to exclude debt securities from its scope. The Company does not expect the implementation of SAB 111 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.This statement prescribes the information that a reporting entity must provide in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Specifically, among other aspects, SFAS 166 amends Statement of Financial Standard No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, (“SFAS 140”), by removing the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS 140 and removes the exception from applying FIN 46(R) to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities. It also modifies the financial-components approach used in SFAS 140. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We have not determined the effect that the adoption of SFAS 166 will have on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R.)This statement amends FASB Interpretation No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities revised December 2003 — an interpretation of ARB No. 51, or FIN 46(R), to require an enterprise to determine whether it’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that

16

could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. SFAS 167 also amends FIN 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 167 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168,The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162,The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, to establish the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Note 7 - Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s method of presentation. These reclassifications had no effect upon previously reported results of operations or retained earnings.

17

Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report of the Company contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “should,” and “anticipate” and words of similar construction are intended in part to help identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty and certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that may affect future results include, but are not limited to, changes in the economy, interest rate movements, timely developments of technology resources for customer services and operating systems, the impact of competitive services and pricing, Congressional legislation and similar matters. Management cautions readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are subject to influence by the foregoing risk factors and unanticipated future events.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or the entire year ending December 31, 2009.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s accounting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to practices generally followed in the banking industry. Certain of these policies involve a significant amount of judgment and estimates based on assumptions for which the actual results are uncertain. Different assumptions in the preparation of these estimates could result in material changes in the Company’s financial position and results of operations. Our judgments and estimates are based upon historical experience and other factors management believes to be reasonable within the context of the circumstances in which they are applied.

There are three areas of accounting policy and practice that are particularly sensitive to management’s judgment and in which significant estimates are used. These are allowances for losses on loans, allowances for losses on foreclosed real estate, and other than temporary impairment of investment securities. Other accounting policies also involve the use of judgment and significant estimates but the impact of these processes are not material to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

FASB 114,Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, provides guidelines for the valuation of impaired loans. More extensive guidelines have been published by bank regulatory bodies. The latter provide for the classification of problem loans as sub-standard, doubtful and loss. There is also a regulatory special mention category for performing loans that are the subject of heightened management concern as potential problem loans.

It is the Bank’s general policy to place loans in a non-accrual status when they become 90 days delinquent. Loans may, however, be placed in a non-accrual status regardless of their term of delinquency if the borrower exhibits signs of financial distress or if the collateral property decreases in value significantly below the loan balance. As of June 30, 2009, the Bank evaluated loans for impairment that were:

1. In a non-accrual status,

18

2. Accruing and were included in the Bank’s classified assets, and

3. That were not in either of the two categories above but were classified as restructured troubled debt.

The Bank has provided specific loan loss allowances against these loans that totaled $345,700. No specific allowances were required on the remaining loans because management believes they have collateral values that exceed the related loan balances.

Under FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies (“FASB 5”), loan loss allowances on large groups of homogeneous loans are provided based upon the Bank’s historical loss experience for similar types of loans. As part of its loan loss analysis under FASB 5, management also considers qualitative factors including concentrations of credit and current economic conditions as they may impact borrowers’ ability to meet their financial obligations.

Management identified four classifications of loans that represent high concentrations of credit. Three of these credit concentration areas fall in a range of 100% to 200% of equity. These loan products are home equity lines of credit, balloon loans, non-residential real estate loans and builder construction loans. Loans to builders for the speculative construction of homes were $3.7 million at June 30, 2009 and are less than equity. Home equity lines of credit and balloon loans are collateralized by residential one-to-four family properties and had balances of approximately $13.1 million and $36.5 million, respectively, at June 30, 2009. Non-residential real estate loans approximated $19.4 million at June 30, 2009.

During its most recent evaluation of the adequacy of the Company’s loan allowances conducted as of June 30, 2009, management concluded that the factors applied to performing loans to derive loss allowances were adequate as of end of the current quarter. We reached that conclusion after considering that balances in high concentration credit areas are diminishing, particularly in builder construction loans, and that there has not been a significant change in environmental factors since the previous evaluation as of March 31, 2009.

Management believes that as of June 30, 2009, the loan loss allowances provided are adequate to absorb the losses inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio. We, however, caution that continued deterioration of real estate values and general economic conditions may result in the need for further additions to loan loss allowances if collateral values fall below loan balances on non-performing loans, and if home builders and other large borrowers who depend upon sales of real estate properties for repayment of their loans do not realize sufficient cash flows to repay their loans in full when they become due.

While management segments the loan portfolio into several categories for purposes of evaluating the adequacy of loan loss allowances and makes tentative allocations of these allowances to specific loan products, all general loss reserves are available to absorb losses from any sector of the loan portfolio.

The Company evaluates the fair value of foreclosed real estate. Such evaluations are based upon observable market values of comparable properties obtained through appraisals when available.

19

In the absence of adequate appraisal values, the properties are valued using the discounted present value of the anticipated future cash flows. In addition to the appraisal values, the Bank considers costs which may be necessary to make the property saleable, and selling costs to dispose of the property. The net realizable values derived through this process are measured against the recorded book value of the loan. The Bank records foreclosed real estate at fair value less estimated disposal costs at the foreclosure date. If the fair value of the foreclosed real estate exceeds the related loan balance at the date of foreclosure, the positive valuation adjustment is recorded as a credit to other income. If the fair value of the foreclosed real estate is less than the related loan balance at the date of foreclosure, the negative valuation adjustment is recorded as a charge against the loan loss allowance. Subsequent to the initial recording at fair value, foreclosed real estate properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and are evaluated for impairment not less frequently than quarterly after the initial evaluation is performed at the time of acquisition. Any increase to the allowance for losses on foreclosed real estate made after the initial valuation is recorded as an expense. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the allowance for losses on foreclosed real estate increased $12,500 and $24,357, respectively.

The Company reviews its investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible other than temporary impairment. The determination of whether or not other than temporary impairment exists is a matter of judgment. Management considers the current economic conditions, the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than cost, interest rates, and the bond rating of each security. All of the securities are highly rated as investments grade and management does not believe that it will incur any losses. Such securities are written down to their fair value when there is impairment in value that is other than temporary. The Company has the ability and intent to hold the investment securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value, and does not believe it is more likely than not that it will have to sell the securities before recovery occurs. At June 30, 2009, the Company’s held to maturity investment securities had a fair value that approximates book value.

The Company’s available for sale investment securities had a fair value of approximately $41,900 above book value. An unrealized gain of $134,900 was recorded in the current quarter as an increase to the securities’ carrying value with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income. The $41,900 accumulated gain, net of a $16,000 provision for income taxes, is a component of equity.

Overview of Performance

Virginia Savings Bancorp, Inc. is a holding company incorporated in Virginia and headquartered in Front Royal, Virginia. The Company’s banking subsidiary is Virginia Savings Bank, FSB.

The Company recorded a net loss of $126,500 attributable to common shareholders for the first half of 2009. This compares to an $99,100 loss for the same period in 2008. During the current quarter the Company recorded a $191,300 provision to its loss allowance accounts and a $12,500 provision for losses on foreclosed real estate The Company’s net interest income for the first half of 2009 increased $ 64,800 over first half 2008.

20

Financial Condition

At June 30, 2009, the total assets of the Company were $131.0 million, a decrease of $4.8 million since December 31, 2008. Significant decreases occurred in several areas; cash and cash equivalents decreased $2.7 million, loans receivable decreased $848,700, and foreclosed real estate decreased $1.1 million.

Deposits decreased $5.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Core deposit accounts, primarily checking and passbook savings accounts, increased $3.7 million from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009. Certificate of deposit accounts decreased $8.9 million during the same time period. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had no short-term borrowings.

Asset Quality

Asset quality has been an area requiring considerable attention from management since early in 2008. At the end of the current quarter, the Bank had $10.6 million of classified assets including $2.5 million of foreclosed real estate. Management takes a proactive approach to problem asset resolution and is aggressive in identifying and foreclosing when necessary on impaired loans. As a consequence, we foreclosed upon $3.1 million of real estate loans during the year ended December 31, 2008 but did not have to foreclose upon any loans during the first half of 2009. Non-accrual loans were approximately $2.0 million at December 31, 2008 and are currently $3.6 million. Management believes that it has identified all problem loans in loans receivable as of June 30, 2009 and has provided adequate loan loss allowances for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio. In making this statement, we must caution that we are in a period of great uncertainty regarding the economic and financial conditions nationally and in the Company’s market area. Today’s well-performing loan may eventually become a problem asset.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

The Company recorded a loss attributable to common shareholders of $126,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $27,400 from the $99,100 loss, for the same period in 2008. Net interest income increased $64,800 from the same period last year. Non-interest income decreased $1,043,900. Non-interest expenses decreased $212,200.

Net interest margin, the difference between interest income and interest expense, is the primary source of operating revenues for the Company. Table 1 below presents, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the average balances, related interest income and expense amounts, and average yields and costs which influence the Bank’s net interest margin. Table 2 reflects the changes in interest income and interest expense between the periods which resulted from changes in average volumes and average rates.

21

Average Balance Sheet Dollars in thousands											Table 1
	For The Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009						2008
	Average Volume		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate		Average Volume		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate
Assets
Interest Earning Assets
Loans receivable (1)	$	102,958	$	3,181	6.18	%	$	111,865	$	3,654	6.53	%
Investment securities (2)		8,046		109	2.71	%		21,413		356	3.33	%
Other interest earning assets (3)		6,934		4	0.12	%		576		67	23.26	%
FHLB stock		291		—	0.00	%		3,697		17	0.92	%
Total Interest Earning Assets	$	118,229	$	3,294	5.57	%	$	137,551	$	4,094	5.95	%
Other Assets
Cash and due from banks		3,102						5,579
Premises and equipment, net		5,881						5,171
Accrued interest receivable		584						710
Foreclosed real estate		3,382						1,094
Branch building held for sale		533						—
Mortgage servicing rights		195						233
Other assets		1,045						18
Total Other Assets		14,722						12,805
Total Assets	$	132,951					$	150,356
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Checking accounts	$	21,313	$	25	0.23	%	$	20,511	$	66	0.64	%
Money market accounts		1,705		3	0.35	%		2,072		8	0.77	%
Savings accounts		19,785		82	0.83	%		18,111		134	1.48	%
Certificates of deposit		70,766		1,113	3.15	%		82,742		1,750	4.23	%
Short term borrowings		13		—	0.00	%		5,606		129	4.60	%
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities	$	113,582	$	1,223	2.15	%	$	129,042	$	2,087	3.23	%
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	6,880					$	7,503
Other liabilities		368						596
Preferred stock of subsidiary		1,000						1,000
Stockholders’ Equity (4)		11,121						12,215
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	132,951					$	150,356
Net Interest Income/Spread			$	2,071	3.42	%			$	2,007	2.72	%
Net interest margin					3.50	%					2.92	%

(1) Includes non-accrual loans.

(2) Includes mortgage backed securities.

(3) The yield on other interest earning assets is computed using average daily general ledger balances. Due to the Bank’s issuance of large dollar amounts of cashier checks in 2008, this balance was significantly less than the interest earning balances at our correspondent bank because of float.

(4) Average balances are based on average daily balances except for Stockholders’ Equity which is computed on month end balances.

22

Analysis of Change in Net Interest Income (Dollars in thousands)		Table 2
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 vs 2008 Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Vol/Rate			Total
Interest Income On:
Loans Receivable	$	(291	)	$	(198	)	$	16		$	(473	)
Investments Securities		(222	)		(65	)		40			(247	)
Other Interest Earning Investments		58			(65	)		(56	)		(63	)
FHLB Stock		—			(17	)		—			(17	)
		(164	)		(147	)		(16	)		(327	)
Total Interest Earning Assets	$	(455	)	$	(345	)	$	0		$	(800	)
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Checking Accounts	$	(16	)	$	(33	)	$	8		$	(41	)
Money Market		(1	)		(5	)		1			(5	)
Savings Accounts		12			(59	)		(5	)		(52	)
Certificates of Deposit		(253	)		(449	)		65			(637	)
Short term borrowings		(129	)		—			—			(129	)
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities	$	(387	)	$	(546	)	$	69		$	(864	)
Net Interest Income	$	(68	)	$	201		$	(69	)	$	64

Net interest income increased $64,000 from the first half of 2008 to the first half of 2009. This is net of an $800,000 decrease in interest income and a decrease of $865,000 in interest expense.

Interest on loans receivable decreased $473,000 for the six months year-to-date (“YTD”) ended June 30, 2009 from the same period in 2008. Table 2 above indicates that the decrease in interest income from loans was due to a decrease in the average volume of loans outstanding and a decrease in income caused by lower interest rates in the current period. The average balance of loans outstanding, as reported in Table 1, decreased by $8.9 million from 2008 to 2009, while the average yield on loans receivable decreased by 35 basis points. Loans receivable had an average yield of 6.18% for the first half of 2009, which is down from 6.53% in first half of 2008. The data in Table 2 indicates that the lower average volume of loans outstanding during the first half of 2009 decreased interest income by $291,000, and that lower interest rates decreased income by $198,000.

Interest and dividend income on investments decreased by $327,000 for the six months YTD in 2009 versus the six months YTD in the 2008. Interest income on investment securities decreased by $247,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 from the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to a lower average balance outstanding in the first half of 2009 and a decrease in the average interest rate. The average balance of investment securities decreased by $13.4 million in the first half of 2009 from the same period in 2008, and the average rate decreased by 62 basis points. The remaining sources of dividend and interest income decreased $80,000 which was primarily rate driven. Late in the first quarter of 2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“ FHLB”) announced that it suspended dividend payments on its capital stock until further notice. The Bank’s overall yield on interest earning assets was 5.57% in 2009, a 38 basis point decrease from the 5.95% achieved in 2008.

23

Interest expense decreased $864,000 in the first half of 2009 from the first half of 2008. The decrease in interest expense was primarily caused by a $637,000 decrease in interest on certificates of deposit and a $129,000 decrease in interest on short-term borrowings. The average balance of certificates of deposit decreased by $12.0 million in the first half of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, and the average interest rate decreased 108 basis points. These changes resulted in a $253,000 decrease in interest expense due to the decreased volume of accounts outstanding and a $449,000 decrease in interest expense due to lower interest rates paid. Interest on transaction accounts decreased $98,000 and was primarily rate driven. The Company’s use of borrowings was extremely limited in 2009. The $129,000 decrease in interest expense for the first half of 2009 was entirely volume driven.

The Company’s overall cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased 108 basis points in the first half of 2009 versus the first half of 2008, decreasing from 3.23% in 2008 to 2.15% in 2009.

The Company made a $191,300 provision for loan losses for the six ended June 30, 2009 as compared to a $953,400 provision for loan losses in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Bank accounts for the credit risk associated with its lending activities through its provision for loan losses. The provision is the expense recognized in the statement of operations to adjust the loan loss allowance to an appropriate balance as determined by the Bank’s credit risk analysis procedures. See “Critical Accounting Policies” for a discussion of the Bank’s methodology for determining loan loss allowances.

The $191,300 provision for loan losses is in recognition of concentrations of credit risk in the Bank’s loan portfolio, the Bank’s recent experiences in management of foreclosed real estate, environmental concerns over both the local and national real estate markets, and other economic uncertainties potentially affecting the performance of the loan portfolio.

Total other income decreased $1,043,900 from the six months YTD ended June 30, 2008 to the same period in 2009.

Loan fees and late charges decreased $31,600, or 29.0% from first half 2008 to first half 2009. This decrease was due to a $29,300 decrease in fees for short-term loan extensions. All other fees decreased a net amount of $2,300.

Income from mortgage banking activities decreased $33,000, or 55.3%. Fees for loans originated on behalf of a correspondent decreased $11,600. In addition, loan servicing fees decreased $5,900 and amortization of mortgage servicing rights, an offset to income, increased by $11,600.

Fees from transaction accounts decreased 19.6% or $111,200 from first half 2008 to first half 2009 primarily due to an $83,300 decrease in insufficient fund fees. ATM fees decreased $11,700 from first half 2008. All other transaction account fees decreased a net amount of $16,200 in the current period compared to the same period in 2008. Anecdotal evidence from customer comments indicate that they are managing their financial affairs more carefully to avoid deposit account fees because of their concerns about the economy.

24

Net gains on foreclosed real estate were $831,500 in first half 2008 compared to a $1,300 loss in 2009. The large gain in 2008 was the result of unique circumstances in which the Company recognized a positive valuation adjustment of approximately $889,000 on foreclosed real estate properties. In first half 2009, three foreclosed real estate properties were sold at an approximate breakeven.

Other income decreased $35,300 from first half 2008 to first half 2009. Income received from Bankers Title Company, that decreased $33,700, was exceptionally high in 2008 because of an equity distribution received as the result of payment of entrance fees by new investors in the prior year.

Non-interest expenses decreased $212,200, or 7.6%, in the first half of 2009 compared to the first half of 2008. Management instituted a cost-cutting program in 2008, the effects of which are reflected in the Company’s first half 2009 results. Most controllable expense categories are reduced from their first half 2008 levels. An increase in FDIC insurance premiums for first half of 2009 of $194,800 significantly affected the cost reductions otherwise achieved by the Company.

Salaries and employee benefits decreased $107,100, or 7.7%, in the first half 2009 from the first half of 2008. Salaries decreased $79,000 and group insurance benefits decreased $19,900. Effective January 1, 2009, the salaries of all employees of the Company were reduced approximately 5% as a temporary cost savings measure until a return to profitable operations is achieved. The Company selected a new insurance company to provide group health insurance for employees at a lower cost than that available from the previous insurance company. All other compensation related expense are reduced a net amount of $8,200.

Directors’ fees and expenses decreased $88,000, or 69.2%, in the first half of 2009 from the first half of 2008 due to the implementation of a lower cost insurance benefit plan that reduced insurance premiums by $80,500, and a reduction in meeting fees totaling $10,100.

Data processing expenses decreased $58,200, or 12.9%, in the first half 2009 from the first half of 2008 primarily due to a $42,700 decrease in deposit account servicing costs and a $9,500 decrease in data communication costs. All other data processing expense increased a net amount of $6,000.

Marketing expenses decreased $21,600, or 41.5% in the first half of 2009 from the first half of 2008. As part of its cost reduction efforts, management assessed its marketing needs and significantly reduced its advertising plans and reduced its marketing expenses accordingly

Occupancy, furniture and equipment expense increased $26,200, or 15.0%, in the first half 2009 from the first half of 2008 primarily due to a $15,900 increase in building depreciation expense and a $10,000 increase in utilities expense related to the opening of a new branch in July, 2008.

Foreclosed real estate expense decreased $130,100, or 75.2%, in the first half 2009 from the first half of 2008. In 2008, significant expenses were incurred as the result of foreclosures conducted on several properties. In 2009, there was no foreclosure activity. The 2009 expenses incurred were for the payment of real estate taxes and the maintenance and protection of existing foreclosed real estate properties.

FDIC insurance premiums increased by $194,800 in the first half 2009 from the first half of 2008. In the current year, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all financial institutions which was

25

approximately $60,000 for the Bank. The remainder of the increase is due to higher regular assessments imposed by the FDIC in 2009 versus 2008, and a catch up of the accrual as of June 30, 2009.

Overdraft protection plan expenses decreased by $21,000 in the first half 2009 from the first half of 2008. This decrease is related to the reduction in insufficient fund fee income.

Income tax benefit for the first half of 2009 was $42,500, a decrease of $22,500 from the first half of 2008’s income tax benefit of $65,000. The effective tax benefit rate for the six months YTD in 2009 was 32.3% versus 51.3% in the same period in 2008.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2008

The Company recorded a loss attributable to common shareholders of $141,300 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $73,100 from the $68,200 net loss, for the same period in 2008. Net interest income increased $60,500 from the same period last year. Non-interest income decreased $941,700. Non-interest expenses decreased $56,700.

Net interest margin, the difference between interest income and interest expense, is the primary source of operating revenues for the Company. Table 3 below presents, for the three months ended June 30 2009 and 2008, the average balances, related interest income and expense amounts, and average yields and costs which influence the Bank’s net interest margin. Table 4 reflects the changes in interest income and interest expense between the periods which resulted from changes in average volumes and average rates.

26

Average Balance Sheet Dollars in thousands											Table 3
	For The Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009						2008
	Average Volume		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate		Average Volume		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate
Assets
Interest Earning Assets
Loans receivable (1)	$	102,608	$	1,584	6.17	%	$	111,359	$	1,768	6.35	%
Investment securities (2)		8,118		49	2.41	%		12,015		103	3.43	%
Other interest earning assets (3)		6,440		2	0.12	%		353		44	49.86	%
FHLB stock		262		—	0.00	%		5,765		5	0.35	%
Total Interest Earning Assets	$	117,428	$	1,635	5.57	%	$	129,492	$	1,920	5.93	%
Other Assets
Cash and due from banks		3,031						7,207
Premises and equipment, net		5,909						5,466
Accrued interest receivable		674						647
Foreclosed real estate		3,242						1,601
Branch building held for sale		533						—
Mortgage servicing rights		188						228
Other assets		888						269
Total Other Assets		14,465						15,418
Total Assets	$	131,893					$	144,910
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Checking accounts	$	21,522	$	13	0.24	%	$	21,977	$	37	0.67	%
Money market accounts		1,732		1	0.23	%		2,072		4	0.77	%
Savings accounts		20,226		41	0.81	%		18,535		70	1.51	%
Certificates of deposit		68,594		517	3.01	%		80,101		793	3.96	%
Short term borrowings		7		0	0.00	%		1,083		13	4.80	%
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities	$	112,081	$	572	2.04	%	$	123,768	$	917	2.96	%
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	7,216					$	7,647
Other Liabilities		520						363
Preferred stock of subsidiary		1,000						1,000
Stockholders’ Equity (4)		11,076						12,132
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	131,893					$	144,910
Net Interest Income/Spread			$	1,063	3.53	%			$	1,003	2.97	%
Net interest margin					3.62	%					3.10	%

(1) Includes non-accrual loans.

(2) Includes mortgage backed securities.

(3) The yield on other interest earning assets is computed using average daily general ledger balances. Due to the Bank’s issuance of large dollar amounts of cashier checks in 2008, this balance was significantly less than the interest earning balances at our correspondent bank because of float.

(4) Average balances are based on average daily balances except for Stockholders’ Equity which is computed on month end balances.

27

Analysis of Change in Net Interest Income (Dollars in thousands)											Table 4
	Quarters Ended June 30, 2009 vs 2008 Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Vol/Rate			Total
Interest Income On:
Loans Receivable	$	(139	)	$	(49	)	$	4		$	(184	)
Investments Securities		(33	)		(30	)		9			(54	)
Other Interest Earning Investments		5			(42	)		(5	)		(42	)
FHLB Stock		—			(5	)		—			(5	)
		(28	)		(77	)		4			(101	)
Total Interest Earning Assets	$	(167	)	$	(126	)	$	8		$	(285	)
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Checking Accounts	$	(10	)	$	(20	)	$	6		$	(24	)
Money Market		(1	)		(2	)		—			(3	)
Savings Accounts		6			(32	)		(3	)		(29	)
Certificates of Deposit		(114	)		(189	)		27			(276	)
Short term borrowings		(13	)		—			—			(13	)
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities	$	(132	)	$	(243	)	$	30		$	(345	)
Net Interest Income	$	(35	)	$	117		$	(22	)	$	60

Net interest income increased $60,000 from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009. This is the net of a $285,000 decrease in interest income and a decrease of $345,000 in interest expense.

Interest on loans receivable decreased $184,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 from the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Table 4 above indicates that the decrease in interest income from loans was due to a decrease in the average volume of loans outstanding and a decrease in income caused by lower interest rates in the current period. The average balance of loans outstanding, as reported in Table 3, decreased by $8.8 million from 2008 to 2009, while the average yield on loans receivable decreased by 18 basis points. Loans receivable had an average yield of 6.17% for the first quarter of 2009, which is down from 6.35% in second quarter of 2008. The data in Table 4 indicates that the lower average volume of loans outstanding during the first quarter of 2009 decreased interest income by $139,000, and that lower interest rates decreased income by $49,000.

Interest and dividend income on investments decreased by $101,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 from the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Interest income on investment securities decreased by $54,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 from the quarter ended June 30, 2008 due to a lower average balance outstanding in the second quarter of 2009 and a decrease in the average interest rate. The average balance of investment securities decreased by $3.9 million in the second quarter of 2009 from the same period in 2008, and the average rate decreased by 102 basis points. Interest income on other interest earning investments decreased $42,000, which was

28

primarily rate driven. Late in the first quarter of 2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“ FHLB”) announced that it suspended dividend payments on its capital stock until further notice. The Bank’s overall yield on interest earning assets was 5.57% in 2009, a 36 basis point decrease from the 5.93% achieved in 2008.

Interest expense decreased $345,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 from the quarter ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in interest expense was primarily caused by a $276,000 decrease in interest on certificates of deposit and a $13,000 decrease in interest on short-term borrowings. The average balance of certificates of deposit decreased by $11.5 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same quarter in 2008, and the average interest rate decreased 95 basis points. These changes resulted in a $114,000 decrease in interest expense due to the decreased volume of accounts outstanding and a $189,000 decrease in interest expense due to lower interest rates paid. Interest on transaction accounts decreased $56,000. The decrease in interest on transaction accounts was primarily rate driven. The Company’s use of borrowings was extremely limited in 2009. The $13,000 decrease in interest expense for the second quarter of 2009 was entirely volume driven.

The Company’s overall cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased 92 basis points in the second quarter of 2009 versus the second quarter of 2008, decreasing from 2.96% in 2008 to 2.04% in 2009.

The Company made a $151,600 provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to a $878,200 provision for loan losses in the three months ended June 30, 2008. The Bank accounts for the credit risk associated with its lending activities through its provision for loan losses. The provision is the expense recognized in the statement of operations to adjust the loan loss allowance to an appropriate balance as determined by the Bank’s credit risk analysis procedures. See “Critical Accounting Policies” for a discussion of the Bank’s methodology for determining loan loss allowances.

The $151,600 provision for loan losses is in recognition of concentrations of credit risk in the Bank’s loan portfolio, the Bank’s recent experiences in management of foreclosed real estate, environmental concerns over both the local and national real estate markets, and other economic uncertainties potentially affecting the performance of the loan portfolio.

Total other income decreased $941,700 from the quarter ended June 30, 2008 to the same period in 2009.

Loan fees and late charges decreased $11,700, or 23.2%, from second quarter, 2008 to second quarter 2009. This decrease was due to a $11,400 decrease in fees for short-term loan extensions. All other fees decreased a net amount of $300.

Income from mortgage banking activities decreased $18,700, or 69.5%. Loan servicing fees decreased $3,400 and amortization of mortgage servicing rights, an offset to income, increased by $14,200.

Fees from transaction accounts decreased 15.7% or $45,300, from second quarter 2008 to second quarter 2009 primarily due to a $34,200 decrease in insufficient fund fees. All other transaction account fees decreased a net amount of $11,100 in the current period from the same period in 2008.

29

Net gains on foreclosed real estate were $832,600 in second quarter 2008 compared to a $1,100 loss in 2009. The large gain in 2008 was the result of unique circumstances in which the Company recognized a positive valuation of approximately $889,000 on foreclosed real estate properties. In second quarter 2009, three foreclosed real estate properties were sold at an approximate breakeven.

Other income decreased $33,400 from second quarter 2008 to second quarter 2009. Income received from Bankers Title Company, that decreased $31,200, was exceptionally high in 2008 because of an equity distribution received.

Non-interest expenses decreased $56,700 in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008. Management instituted a cost-cutting program in 2008, the effects of which are reflected in the Company’s first quarter 2009 results. Most controllable expense categories are reduced from their second quarter 2008 levels. An increase in FDIC insurance premiums for second quarter of 2009 of $172,200 significantly affected the cost reductions otherwise achieved by the Company.

Salaries and employee benefits decreased $48,400, or 7.1%, in second quarter 2009 from the second quarter of 2008. Salaries decreased $37,000 and group insurance benefits decreased $11,000. Effective January 1, 2009, the salaries of all employees of the Company were reduced approximately 5% as a temporary cost savings measure until a return to profitable operations is achieved. The Company selected a new insurance company to provide group health insurance for employees at a lower cost than that available from the previous insurance company. All other compensation related expense are reduced a net amount of $400.

Directors’ fees and expenses decreased $44,500, or 69.7%, in the second quarter 2009 from the second quarter of 2008 due to the implementation of a lower cost insurance benefit plan that reduced insurance premiums by $40,300, and a reduction in meeting fees totaling $3,200.

Data processing expenses decreased $31,600, or 13.7%, in the second quarter 2009 from the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to a $24,500 decrease in deposit account servicing costs and a $9,200 decrease in data communication costs. All other data processing expense increased a net amount of $2,100.

Marketing expenses increased $12,900 in second quarter 2009 from second quarter 2008. As part of its cost reduction efforts, in second quarter 2008, management assessed its marketing needs and significantly reduced its advertising plans and reversed previously accrued marketing expenses.

Professional fees increased $6,900 in the second quarter of 2009 from the second quarter of 2008. The increase is related to a $16,000 increase in audit and tax services expense that was offset by decreased legal and other professional service fees.

Foreclosed real estate expense decreased $146,200 in the second quarter of 2009 from the second quarter of 2008. In 2008, significant expenses were incurred as the result of foreclosures conducted on several properties. In 2009, there was no foreclosure activity. The 2009 expenses incurred were for the payment of real estate taxes and the maintenance and protection of existing foreclosed real estate properties.

30

FDIC insurance premiums increased by $172,200 in the second quarter of 2009 from the second quarter of 2008. In the current year, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all financial institutions which was approximately $60,000 for the Bank. The remainder of the increase is due to higher regular assessments imposed by the FDIC in second quarter 2009 versus second quarter 2008, and a catch up of the accrual as of June 30, 2009.

Overdraft protection plan expenses decreased by $9,700 in second quarter 2009 from second quarter of 2008. This decrease is related to the reduction in insufficient fund fee income.

Other expenses increased $17,300 in second quarter 2009 from second quarter of 2008 due to a delayed billing of general insurance premiums.

Income tax benefit for the second quarter of 2009 was $63,500, an increase of $24,900 over the second quarter of 2008’s income tax benefit of $38,600. The effective tax benefit rate for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was 34.1% versus 43.8% for the same period in 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $9.6 million of liquid assets in the form of cash and cash equivalent investments. The Company also has $3.9 million of investment securities that are classified as available for sale and $4.5 million of investments classified as held to maturity. $4.0 million dollars of the held to maturity investments have short-term maturities. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has pledged $500,000 of held to maturity US agency bonds as collateral for public deposits of Virginia counties.

The Company has approximately $29.4 million of pre-approved credit from the FHLB with funding available on a same day basis and did not have any borrowings outstanding against this line of credit at June 30, 2009.

The Company’s current liquidity position is more than adequate to meet its lending needs and to fund potential customer withdrawals from deposit accounts.

At June 30, 2009, the Company’s common equity was equal to 8.4% of total assets and is essentially unchanged from 8.2% at December 31, 2008. Total equity decreased by $46,100 during the first half of 2009. This is the net of a $89,000 operating loss plus $37,500 of dividend payments, less a $80,400 decrease in other comprehensive loss.

The Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) regulations require federal savings banks to maintain minimum capital standards: a 4.0% of tangible assets Tier 1 (core) capital requirement, and an 8.0% risk based capital requirement. These capital requirements are applicable to the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Virginia Savings Bank, F.S.B. The OTS does not have specific capital requirements applicable to thrift holding companies.

The Bank is required to file a quarterly report on its financial condition, results of operations and other financial information with the OTS. OTS financial reporting rules follow the same generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) applicable to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q except for certain specified areas in which regulatory accounting principles (“RAP”) differ from GAAP.

31

One of these areas is accounting for properties acquired through foreclosure. GAAP indicates that these properties should be accounted for at their fair value on the foreclosure date and at the lower of cost or fair value thereafter. OTS RAP specifies that they be reported at the lower of their historical cost or their fair value. Application of RAP to the Bank’s accounting for real estate acquired through foreclosure initially resulted in approximately $603,000 less in prior period earnings and tangible capital, as reported to the OTS than the amounts determined under GAAP. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, one of the foreclosed real estate properties affecting this difference was sold. The current difference between GAAP and Rap is approximately $452,000. This difference between GAAP and RAP will continue to exist until the Bank disposes of the remaining properties. Table 5 reflects the $452,000 lower amount of capital reported to OTS. In addition to this accounting difference, the financial information reported to the OTS is for the Bank only. The Company is not subject to minimum capital requirements under OTS regulations.

Actual and required regulatory capital requirements at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follow:

Capital Position Virginia Savings Bank, F.S.B. Table 5

	Capital Amounts				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Actual Amount		% of Assets		Required Amount		% of Assets		Required Amount		% of Assets
June 30, 2009
Tangible (1)	$	11,343,951	8.67	%	$	1,962,846	1.50	%		N/A	N/A
Tier I (2)		10,343,951	10.22	%		N/A	N/A		$	6,071,611	6.00	%
Core (1)		10,343,951	7.90	%		5,234,257	4.00	%		6,542,821	5.00	%
Total (2)		12,437,851	12.29	%		8,095,481	8.00	%		10,119,351	10.00	%
Dec. 31, 2008
Tangible (1)	$	11,241,354	8.31	%	$	2,028,085	1.50	%		N/A	N/A
Tier I (2)		10,241,354	9.73	%		N/A	N/A		$	6,314,006	6.00	%
Core (1)		10,241,354	7.57	%		5,408,227	4.00	%		6,760,284	5.00	%
Total (2)		12,337,254	11.72	%		8,418,675	8.00	%		10,523,343	10.00	%

(1) To adjusted total assets.

(2) To risk-weighted assets.

To be considered a well-capitalized institution under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, the Bank must have a core capital ratio of at least 5.0%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of at least 6%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%. The most recent notification from the OTS categorized the Bank as well-capitalized.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Bank routinely engages in off-balance sheet arrangements in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These arrangements consist of outstanding mortgage loan commitments, letters of credit and lines of credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial condition. The contractual amounts of these instruments are an indication of the extent of involvement the Bank

32

has in each class of off-balance sheet financial instruments. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss from non-performance by the other party to the above-mentioned financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

The Bank had outstanding commitments to make mortgage loans secured by real property, exclusive of the undisbursed portion of loans in process, of approximately $660,000 at June 30, 2009, all of which expire within one year. Loans in process represent the undisbursed portion of construction loans already on the Bank’s books. Disbursements are made at each stage of the construction process after an inspection by a qualified real estate appraiser. At June 30, 2009, the Bank had loans in process commitments of approximately $895,000 that expire within nine months.

The Bank also issues stand-by letters of credit that are unsecured conditional commitments issued by the Bank guaranteeing performance by a customer to a third party. These guarantees are issued primarily to support private borrowing arrangements. At June 30, 2009, the Bank had $49,200 of stand-by letters of credit outstanding with expiration dates through August 10, 2010.

Lines of credit are loan commitments to individuals and companies that have fixed expiration dates as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The Company, at June 30, 2009, had secured lines of credit with available balances of $11.7 million and unsecured lines of credit with available balances of $1.2 million. Many of these commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn down. The total commitment amounts do not therefore necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The risks involved in these off-balance sheet arrangements are essentially the same as those involved in extending loan facilities to customers. No amount has been recognized in the statement of financial condition as of June 30, 2009 as a liability for credit loss due to off-balance sheet arrangements. Management does not anticipate any difficulties in funding these commitments.

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The information in this item is not required of smaller reporting companies.

Item 4T - Controls and Procedures

Management’s Disclosure Controls

Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation of the accompanying financial statements and for their integrity and objectivity. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management also prepares the other information in this quarterly report and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the financial statements.

33

Management has designed what it believes are appropriate disclosure controls and procedures. These controls and procedures are designed to insure that management receives all pertinent information that may be required to be disclosed in its quarterly reports. Such information is not limited to financial data but also includes non-financial information that should be considered for disclosure.

Management has concluded that as of June 30, 2009, implementation of its structure of disclosure controls and procedures was not wholly effective in meeting their intended purposes. The most recent review of these systems, conducted as of June 30, 2009, indicated material weaknesses, which are detailed below, that could adversely affect the Company’s ability to properly and accurately record and report financial data.

The Company, under the direction of its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. Management’s assessment identified material weaknesses that existed as of the previous quarter end, and which continue to exist as of June 30, 2009, in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of ineffective controls related to computations, methodology and presentation of a limited number of non-routine complex transactions which could potentially aggregate to material misstatements in financial reporting. Management’s assessment of internal controls also identified instances of significant deficiencies in internal controls pertaining to segregation of duties and independent review that existed at March 31, 2009, and which continue to exist as of June 30, 2009, which when combined, are considered by management to be a material weakness in internal controls.

The Company has taken the following actions to address the material weaknesses described above:

Management added accounting staff in the first quarter of 2009 to better segregate accounting duties and to provide additional support to the financial accounting review process leading to the preparation of financial statements. Management developed policies and procedures to ensure that the complex non-routine transactions identified in managements’ evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting have a sufficient level of review to ensure that the risk of misstatement is minimized. The Company anticipates that such policies and procedures will continue to be improved throughout 2009 as the training and education of our accounting staff continues. No activity has occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2009 with regard to the non-routine complex transactions which previously caused material weaknesses, therefore, there has been no opportunity to test the effectiveness of the control system improvements. Until the corrective measures are fully tested and validated, the related internal control systems will continue to be deemed as having material weaknesses.

Management has also implemented changes in control policies and procedures as of June 30, 2009, to correct the majority of the significant deficiencies identified during its March 31, 2009 internal control evaluation. Testing of the revised control policies and procedures did not commence until after the date of these consolidated financial statements, therefore, these significant deficiencies continue to constitute a material weakness in internal controls taken as a whole.

34

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or which are reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings. Based upon information currently available, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

Item 1A - Risk Factors

The information in this item is not required of smaller reporting companies.

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3 - Default Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5 - Other Information

None

Item 6 - Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
31-1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CEO Certification
31-2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CFO Certification
32	Section 1350 Certification

35

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

VIRGINIA SAVINGS BANCORP, INC.
	By:	/s/ W. Michael Funk
August 19, 2009		W. Michael Funk
Date		President & Chief Executive Officer
	By:	/s/ Noel F. Pilon
August 19, 2009		Noel F. Pilon
Date		Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

36