SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation These interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP, and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, for interim reporting. Pursuant to these rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. Therefore, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 . The condensed consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2019 , and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 , are unaudited, but include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial information set forth herein in accordance with GAAP. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2018 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 . The accounts of wholly-owned subsidiaries are included in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim periods or for the full year. Concentration of Major Customers The Company sells EXPAREL through a drop-ship program under which orders are processed through wholesalers (including AmerisourceBergen Health Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and McKesson Drug Company), but shipments of the product are sent directly to individual accounts, such as hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers and individual doctors. The Company also sells EXPAREL directly to ambulatory surgical centers and physicians. The table below includes the percentage of net product sales processed by the Company’s three largest wholesalers in each period presented: Three Months Ended 2019 2018 Largest wholesaler 36% 34% Second largest wholesaler 29% 31% Third largest wholesaler 26% 26% Total 91% 91% Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) , and subsequently issued clarifications and corrections to the update by issuing ASU 2018-10 in July 2018. This update required lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous authoritative guidance. For income statement purposes, the new standard retained a dual model similar to Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 840, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or financing. Operating leases continue to result in straight-line expense while financing leases result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to previous accounting guidance by lessees for operating and capital leases, respectively, under ASC 840). The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 using the effective date method. There were a number of practical expedients available to the Company at transition which it elected to apply upon adoption. The Company did not re-assess (i) whether its contracts contained a lease under the new definition of a lease and (ii) the classification of those leases. There were no initial direct costs previously capitalized on the consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the Company applied hindsight in the determination of the lease terms, in the assessment of the likelihood that a lease renewal, termination or purchase option will be exercised, and in the assessment of any potential impairments that existed on the right-of-use, or ROU, assets recognized at adoption. The Company also elected not to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability for those leases with a remaining lease term of 12 months or less. At adoption on January 1, 2019, the lease liability was equal to the present value of future lease payments and a ROU asset was recorded based on the lease liability, adjusted for items such as prepaid and accrued lease payments. The Company recorded $36.5 million of lease liabilities and $27.6 million of ROU assets as of January 1, 2019, the difference representing previously recorded lease-related assets and liabilities. There was a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of $0.2 million upon adoption. Refer to Note 6, Leases , for further information on the Company’s existing leases. The lease liability recognized upon adoption was based upon the present value of the sum of the remaining minimum lease payments (as previously identified under ASC 840), determined using the discount rate as of the date of adoption. The discount rate was based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate on a collateralized basis over a similar remaining term and in a similar economic environment. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Adopted as of March 31, 2019 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments , which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Entities will now use forward-looking information to better form their credit loss estimates. This update also requires enhanced disclosures to help financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an entity’s portfolio. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework. The purpose of the update is to improve the effectiveness of the fair value measurement disclosures that allows for clear communication of information that is most important to the users of financial statements. There were certain required disclosures that have been removed or modified. In addition, the update added the following disclosures: (i) changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and (ii) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-13 on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract , which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The update provides guidance to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as they relate to the service contract and which costs to expense. In addition, the update further defines the term of the hosting arrangement to include the non-cancelable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (i) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option; (ii) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain not to exercise the termination option and (iii) an option to extend (or not to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. Any expense related to the capitalized implementation costs should be recorded in the same financial statement line item in the consolidated statements of operations as the fees associated with the hosting element of the arrangement, and the payments for capitalized implementation costs should be classified in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element in the consolidated statements of cash flows. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The amendments may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-15 on its consolidated financial statements. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, which provides amendments to the recognition and measurement of certain financial assets and financial liabilities. One of those amendments requires that equity securities without readily determinable fair values accounted for under the measurement alternative be re-measured when an orderly transaction is identified for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2019-04 on its consolidated financial statements. Other pronouncements issued by the FASB or other authoritative accounting standards groups with future effective dates are either not applicable or not significant to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Leases |