Harrison Conference Services of Wellesley 424B3 Prospectus supplement

FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 424 (B)(3)

File Number 333-144884

ARAMARK CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 TO

MARKET MAKING PROSPECTUS DATED

JANUARY 27, 2009

THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS MAY 13, 2009

ON MAY 13, 2009, ARAMARK CORPORATION FILED THE ATTACHED FORM

10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 3, 2009

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period ended April 3, 2009

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission File Number 001-04762

ARAMARK CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	95-2051630
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

ARAMARK Tower 1101 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania	19107
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(215) 238-3000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨	Accelerated filer  ¨	Non-accelerated filer  x	Smaller reporting company  ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common stock outstanding at May 1, 2009: 1,000 shares

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM  1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

	April 3, 2009			October 3, 2008
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	107,539		$	148,919
Receivables		827,755			949,638
Inventories, at lower of cost or market		495,082			535,746
Prepayments and other current assets		212,955			164,017
Total current assets		1,643,331			1,798,320
Property and Equipment, net		1,177,817			1,223,096
Goodwill		4,483,435			4,512,133
Other Intangible Assets		2,131,051			2,215,321
Other Assets		802,296	��		774,533
	$	10,237,930		$	10,523,403
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term borrowings	$	37,632		$	54,677
Accounts payable		608,335			747,887
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		966,994			1,009,080
Total current liabilities		1,612,961			1,811,644
Long-Term Borrowings		5,814,899			5,804,880
Deferred Income Taxes and Other Noncurrent Liabilities		1,320,658			1,337,472
Common Stock Subject to Repurchase		180,328			229,628
Shareholder’s Equity:
Common stock, par value $.01 (authorized: 1,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 1,000 shares)		—			—
Capital surplus		1,448,555			1,391,550
Earnings retained for use in the business		38,336			55,519
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(177,807	)		(107,290	)
Total shareholder’s equity		1,309,084			1,339,779
	$	10,237,930		$	10,523,403

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In Thousands)

	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009			Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
Sales	$	3,029,301		$	3,173,177
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of services provided		2,782,289			2,891,566
Depreciation and amortization		123,571			125,110
Selling and general corporate expenses		51,994			49,594
		2,957,854			3,066,270
Operating income		71,447			106,907
Interest and Other Financing Costs, net		119,214			129,406
Loss before income taxes		(47,767	)		(22,499	)
Benefit for Income Taxes		(22,413	)		(5,891	)
Net loss	$	(25,354	)	$	(16,608	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In Thousands)

	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009			Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Sales	$	6,203,258		$	6,523,797
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of services provided		5,645,487			5,906,903
Depreciation and amortization		247,583			248,094
Selling and general corporate expenses		103,163			96,360
		5,996,233			6,251,357
Operating income		207,025			272,440
Interest and Other Financing Costs, net		244,411			258,402
Income (Loss) before income taxes		(37,386	)		14,038
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes		(20,203	)		4,563
Net income (loss)	$	(17,183	)	$	9,475

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In Thousands)

	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009			Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(17,183	)	$	9,475
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		247,583			248,094
Income taxes deferred		(25,931	)		1,473
Share-based compensation expense		19,380			16,509
Changes in noncash working capital		(103,529	)		(207,059	)
Net change in proceeds from sale of receivables		(11,820	)		14,600
Other operating activities		27,756			11,567
Net cash provided by operating activities		136,256			94,659
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment and client contract investments		(166,337	)		(147,415	)
Disposals of property and equipment		16,414			7,242
Acquisition of certain businesses, net of cash acquired		(49,364	)		(15,722	)
Other investing activities		4,215			(3,497	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(195,072	)		(159,392	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		52,711			65,898
Payment of long-term borrowings		(25,049	)		(14,899	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		4,615			3,599
Repurchase of stock		(14,943	)		(4,011	)
Other financing activities		102			3,196
Net cash provided by financing activities		17,436			53,783
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(41,380	)		(10,950	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		148,919			83,638
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	107,539		$	72,688

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

ARAMARK Corporation (the “Company” or “ARAMARK”) was acquired on January 26, 2007 through a merger transaction with RMK Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation controlled by investment funds associated with GS Capital Partners, CCMP Capital Advisors, J.P. Morgan Partners, Thomas H. Lee Partners and Warburg Pincus LLC (collectively, the “Sponsors”), Joseph Neubauer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ARAMARK, and certain other members of the Company’s management. The acquisition was accomplished through the merger of RMK Acquisition Corporation with and into ARAMARK Corporation with ARAMARK Corporation being the surviving company (the “Transaction”).

The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARAMARK Intermediate Holdco Corporation, which is wholly-owned by ARAMARK Holdings Corporation (the “Parent Company”). ARAMARK Holdings Corporation, ARAMARK Intermediate Holdco Corporation and RMK Acquisition Corporation were formed for the purpose of facilitating the Transaction and have no operations other than ownership of the Company. ARAMARK Holdings Corporation has 600.0 million common shares authorized, approximately 207.3 million issued and approximately 205.0 million outstanding as of April 3, 2009.

On March 30, 2007, ARAMARK Corporation was merged with and into ARAMARK Services, Inc. with ARAMARK Services, Inc. being the surviving corporation. In connection with the consummation of the merger, ARAMARK Services, Inc. changed its name to ARAMARK Corporation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. The condensed consolidated financial statements exclude the accounts of ARAMARK Holdings Corporation and ARAMARK Intermediate Holdco Corporation, but do reflect the Sponsors’ investment cost basis allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired on January 26, 2007.

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes to those statements, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 3, 2008 was derived from audited financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of the Company, the statements include all adjustments (which, other than the effects of the Transaction, include only normal recurring adjustments) required for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year, due to the seasonality of some of the Company’s business activities and the possibility of changes in general economic conditions.

Certain immaterial corrections have been made to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Comprehensive Income (Loss) as of March 28, 2008 related to the currency effects of purchase accounting (See Note 5). The Company calculated the benefit for income taxes for the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 based on actual year-to-date results. The Company applied an estimated annual effective tax rate to the year-to-date income (loss) before income taxes to derive the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008.

(2) ACQUISITION OF ARAMARK CORPORATION:

As discussed in Note 1, the Transaction was completed on January 26, 2007 and was financed by a combination of borrowings under a new senior secured credit agreement, the issuance of 8.50% senior notes due 2015 and senior floating rate notes due 2015, and equity investments of the Sponsors and certain members of ARAMARK’s management. See Note 5 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008 for a description of the Company’s indebtedness.

Purchase Price Allocation

Following business combination accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to the Company’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on the estimated fair values as of January 26, 2007 as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price to property and equipment, intangible assets and deferred income taxes was based upon valuation data and estimates.

5

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

	(in millions)
Purchase consideration, including carryover basis of $146 million	$	6,168
Direct acquisition costs		71
Deemed dividend adjustment		(408	)
	$	5,831
Net current assets	$	307
Property and equipment		1,197
Customer relationship assets		1,705
Tradename		764
Other assets		789
Goodwill		4,485
Debt assumed		(2,036	)
Noncurrent liabilities and deferred taxes		(1,380	)
	$	5,831

Mr. Neubauer held an equity investment in the Company prior to the Transaction and continues to hold an equity interest in the Parent Company subsequent to the Transaction. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 88-16, “Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions,” Mr. Neubauer’s investment is included in the purchase consideration at the carryover basis and an adjustment of $408 million was made to reduce “Capital surplus” reflecting the deemed dividend.

(3) ACQUISITIONS

During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company paid approximately $24.5 million towards the acquisition of the remaining 20% of its Chilean subsidiary. The Company’s pro forma results of operations for the first six months of fiscal 2009 and 2008 would not have been materially different than reported, assuming the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the respective fiscal periods.

(4) SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION AND OTHER:

The Company made interest payments of approximately $221.4 million and $183.0 million and income tax payments of approximately $22.6 million and $46.6 million during the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, respectively.

Pension expense related to defined benefit plans for the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008 was approximately $3.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

(5) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):

Pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” comprehensive income includes all changes to shareholders’ equity during a period, except those resulting from investment by and distributions to shareholders. Components of comprehensive income include net income (loss), changes in foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax), pension plan adjustments (net of tax) and changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges (net of tax). Total comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended April 3, 2009 was approximately ($24.3) million and ($87.7) million, respectively. For the three and six months ended March 28, 2008, total comprehensive loss was approximately ($68.0) million and ($76.8) million, respectively. As of April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” consists of pension plan adjustments (net of tax) of approximately ($9.7) million and ($11.3) million, respectively, foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax) of approximately ($6.7) million and $6.8 million, respectively, and fair value of cash flow hedges (net of tax) of approximately ($161.4) million and ($102.8) million, respectively.

Certain immaterial corrections have been made to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 28, 2008 related to the currency effects of purchase accounting. The corrections resulted in a decrease in Goodwill of approximately $3.2 million, increases in Other Intangible Assets of approximately $29.5 million, Other Assets of approximately $18.9 million and Deferred Income Taxes and Other Noncurrent Liabilities of approximately $16.9 million and a decrease in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss of approximately $28.3 million. Although there was no effect on net income, comprehensive loss of ($75.6) million and ($84.2) million previously presented in the Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 28, 2008, respectively, has been changed to comprehensive loss of ($68.0) million and ($76.8) million, respectively.

6

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(6) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Changes in total goodwill during the six months ended April 3, 2009 follow (in thousands):

Segment	October 3, 2008		Acquisitions		Translation			April 3, 2009
Food and Support Services – North America	$	3,477,824	$	2,289	$	—		$	3,480,113
Food and Support Services – International		438,124		5,766		(37,888	)		406,002
Uniform and Career Apparel		596,185		1,135		—			597,320
	$	4,512,133	$	9,190	$	(37,888	)	$	4,483,435

The amounts for fiscal 2009 acquisitions may be revised upon final determination of the purchase price allocation.

Other intangible assets consist of (in thousands):

	April 3, 2009							October 3, 2008
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount
Customer relationship assets	$	1,769,516	$	(396,488	)	$	1,373,028	$	1,757,818	$	(305,961	)	$	1,451,857
Tradename		758,023		—			758,023		763,464		—			763,464
	$	2,527,539	$	(396,488	)	$	2,131,051	$	2,521,282	$	(305,961	)	$	2,215,321

Acquisition-related intangible assets consist of customer relationship assets and the ARAMARK tradename. Customer relationship assets are amortizable and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit, 2 to 15 years, with a weighted average life of approximately 11 years. The ARAMARK tradename is an indefinite lived intangible asset and is not amortizable.

Amortization of intangible assets for the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008 was approximately $90.5 million and $90.6 million, respectively.

(7) ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:

The Company enters into derivative contractual arrangements to manage changes in market conditions related to debt obligations, foreign currency exposures and exposure to fluctuating natural gas, gasoline and diesel fuel prices. Derivative instruments utilized during the period include interest rate swap agreements, foreign currency forward exchange contracts, and natural gas, gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements. The Company follows the provisions of SFAS 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended. In the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for derivative instruments and hedging activities. All derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value at the end of each quarter. The counterparties to the Company’s contractual derivative agreements are all major international financial institutions. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. The Company continually monitors its positions and the credit ratings of its counterparties, and does not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company has entered into $3.78 billion, £75 million and ¥5.0 billion of interest rate swap agreements, fixing the rate on a like amount of variable rate term loan borrowings and floating rate notes. The Company entered into $200 million of these interest rate swap agreements during the six months ended April 3, 2009, which were effective January 1, 2009. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as and meets all the required criteria for a cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects earnings. As of April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, approximately ($141.3) million and ($90.0) million of unrealized net losses, net of tax, related to the interest rate swaps were included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss,” respectively. The hedge ineffectiveness for these cash flow hedging instruments during the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008 was immaterial.

The Company entered into a $169.6 million amortizing forward starting cross currency swap to mitigate the risk of variability in principal and interest payments on the Canadian subsidiary’s variable rate debt denominated in U.S. dollars. The agreement fixes the rate on the variable rate borrowings and mitigates changes in the Canadian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as and meets all the required criteria for a cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects earnings.

7

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

During the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, approximately $9.7 million of unrealized gain, net of tax, and ($1.7) million of unrealized loss, net of tax, related to the swap were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss,” respectively. Approximately ($13.8) million and ($3.3) million were reclassified to offset net translation losses on the foreign currency denominated debt during the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, respectively. As of April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, unrealized losses of approximately ($11.9) million, net of tax, and ($7.8) million, net of tax, related to the cross currency swap were included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss,” respectively. The hedge ineffectiveness for this cash flow hedging instrument during the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008 was immaterial.

The Company entered into a series of pay fixed/receive floating natural gas hedge agreements based on a NYMEX price in order to limit its exposure to price increases for natural gas, primarily in the Uniform and Career Apparel segment. As of April 3, 2009, the Company has contracts for approximately 825,000 MMBtu’s outstanding for fiscal 2009 and 2010 that are designated as cash flow hedging instruments. These contracts are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects earnings. As of April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, unrecognized net of tax losses of approximately ($1.9) million and ($1.7) million, respectively, were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for these contracts. There was no hedge ineffectiveness for the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008.

The Company entered into a series of pay fixed/receive floating gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements based on the Department of Energy weekly retail on-highway index in order to limit its exposure to price fluctuations for gasoline and diesel fuel. The Company has contracts for approximately 10.7 million gallons outstanding for fiscal 2009 and 2010 that are designated as cash flow hedging instruments. During the six months ended April 3, 2009, the Company entered into contracts totaling approximately 7.5 million gallons. These contracts are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects earnings. As of April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, an unrealized loss, net of tax, of approximately ($6.3) million and ($3.3) million was recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for these contracts, respectively. The hedge ineffectiveness for the gasoline and diesel fuel hedging instruments during the six months ended April 3, 2009 was immaterial.

The following table summarizes the effect of our derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments under SFAS 133 on Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009			Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
Interest rate swap agreements	$	9,559		$	(62,918	)
Cross currency swap agreements		276			(4,204	)
Natural gas hedge agreements		104			277
Gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements		2,251			(70	)
	$	12,190		$	(66,915	)
	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009			Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Interest rate swap agreements	$	(51,234	)	$	(103,968	)
Cross currency swap agreements		(4,075	)		(4,929	)
Natural gas hedge agreements		(309	)		293
Gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements		(2,972	)		77
	$	(58,590	)	$	(108,527	)

Derivatives not Designated in Hedging Relationships

As of April 3, 2009, the Company had foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding with notional amounts of €11.6 million, £8.2 million and CAD 25.0 million to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on short-term intercompany loans to certain international subsidiaries. Gains and losses on these foreign currency exchange contracts are recognized in income currently as the contracts were not designated as hedging instruments, substantially offsetting currency transaction gains and losses on the short term intercompany loans.

8

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following table summarizes the location and fair value of our derivatives designated and not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 in our Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets (in thousands):

	Balance Sheet Location	April 3, 2009		October 3, 2008
ASSETS
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swap agreements	Other Assets	$	—	$	589
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	Prepayments		—		926
Total derivatives		$	—	$	1,515
LIABILITIES
Designated as hedging instruments:
Natural gas hedge agreements	Accounts Payable	$	3,188	$	2,679
Gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements	Accounts Payable		9,617		5,503
Interest rate swap agreements	Accrued Expenses		41,840		—
Interest rate swap agreements	Other Noncurrent Liabilities		195,462		153,383
Cross currency swap agreements	Other Noncurrent Liabilities		8,062		23,025
Gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements	Other Noncurrent Liabilities		798		—
			258,967		184,590
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	Accounts Payable		258		—
Total derivatives		$	259,225	$	184,590

The following table summarizes the location of (gain) loss reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” into earnings for our derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):

	Account	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009		Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
Interest rate swap agreements	Interest Expense	$	31,158	$	3,503
Cross currency swap agreements	Interest Expense		1,131		335
Natural gas hedge agreements	Cost of services provided		1,755		38
Gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements	Cost of services provided		4,103		280
		$	38,147	$	4,156

	Account	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009		Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Interest rate swap agreements	Interest Expense	$	43,598	$	2,954
Cross currency swap agreements	Interest Expense		1,373		590
Natural gas hedge agreements	Cost of services provided		2,769		344
Gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements	Cost of services provided		5,472		280
		$	53,212	$	4,168

9

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following table summarizes the location of (gain) loss for our derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):

	Account	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009		Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	Interest Expense	$	111	$	123

	Account	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009		Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts	Interest Expense	$	188	$	7

Subsequent to April 3, 2009, the Company entered into $500 million of interest rate swap agreements that are effective beginning in fiscal 2010. These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedging instruments and fix the rate on a like amount of variable rate borrowings.

(8) CAPITAL STOCK:

Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement of the Parent Company, commencing on January 26, 2008, upon termination of employment from the Company or one of its subsidiaries, members of the Company’s management (other than Mr. Neubauer) who hold shares of common stock of the Parent Company can cause the Parent Company to repurchase all of their initial investment shares (as defined) at appraised fair market value. Generally, payment for shares repurchased could be, at the Parent Company’s option, in cash or installment notes. The amount of common stock subject to repurchase as of April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008 was $180.3 million and $229.6 million, respectively, which is based on approximately 14.4 million and 15.2 million shares of common stock of the Parent Company valued at $12.53 per share and $15.15 per share, respectively. The fair value of our common stock subject to repurchase is calculated using discounted cash flow techniques, comparable public company trading multiples and transaction multiples. During the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, approximately $16.4 million and $4.0 million of common stock of the Parent Company was repurchased, respectively. The Stockholders Agreement, the senior secured credit agreement and the indenture governing the 8.50% senior notes due 2015 and the senior floating rate notes due 2015 contain limitations on the amount the Company can expend for such share repurchases.

(9) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION:

During the three and six months ended April 3, 2009, share-based compensation expense was approximately $9.6 million, before taxes of $3.8 million, and approximately $19.4 million, before taxes of $7.6 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended March 28, 2008, share-based compensation expense was approximately $7.5 million, before taxes of $2.9 million, and approximately $16.5 million, before taxes of $6.4 million, respectively.

Stock Options

Time-Based Options

The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended April 3, 2009 for Time-Based Options was approximately $3.0 million and $5.6 million, respectively. The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended March 28, 2008 for Time-Based Options was approximately $3.0 million and $5.3 million, respectively.

Performance-Based Options

On December 10, 2008, the Parent Company Board waived the EBIT target for fiscal 2008 with respect to approximately 2.6 million options representing 75% of the portion of the Performance-Based Options whose vesting was subject to the achievement of the Company’s fiscal 2008 EBIT target. Accordingly, such portion of the Performance-Based Options vest when the time-based vesting requirement of such options is satisfied. In addition on December 10, 2008, the Parent Company Board approved new annual and cumulative EBIT targets for fiscal 2009 that were revised to recognize the effects of the economic environment at the time on the Company’s business and correspondingly reduced the cumulative targets for fiscal 2010 and beyond. Approximately 3.4 million options were affected by the new annual and cumulative EBIT targets for fiscal 2009. In accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” the fair value of these Performance-Based Options were revalued at the award modification date. The fair value of the Performance-Based Options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the weighted-average assumptions noted in the table below.

10

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009
Expected volatility	35	%
Expected dividend yield	0	%
Expected life (in years)	4.10-5.80
Risk-free interest rate	1.62	%

The weighted-average fair value of the Performance-Based Options modified on December 10, 2008 was $5.54 per option.

The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended April 3, 2009 for Performance-Based Options was approximately $6.2 million and $13.4 million, respectively. The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended March 28, 2008 for Performance-Based Options was approximately $3.4 million and $7.8 million, respectively. As of April 3, 2009, there was approximately $0.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested Performance-Based Options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.26 years.

Nonvested Shares

The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended April 3, 2009 for nonvested share awards was $0. The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended March 28, 2008 for nonvested shares was approximately $0.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

Deferred Stock Units

The Company granted 31,920 deferred stock units during the six months ended April 3, 2009. The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended April 3, 2009 for deferred stock units was approximately $0.4 million in each period. The Company granted 21,850 deferred stock units during the six months ended March 28, 2008. The compensation cost charged to expense during the three and six months ended March 28, 2008 for deferred stock units was approximately $0.3 million in each period.

(10) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION:

The Company has an agreement (the Receivables Facility) with several financial institutions whereby it sells on a continuous basis an undivided interest in all eligible trade accounts receivable, as defined in the Receivables Facility. As part of the Transaction, the Company amended and restated the Receivables Facility, increasing the maximum sales amount from $225 million to $250 million. Pursuant to the Receivables Facility, the Company formed ARAMARK Receivables, LLC, a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. ARAMARK Receivables, LLC was formed for the sole purpose of buying and selling receivables generated by certain subsidiaries of the Company. Under the Receivables Facility, certain subsidiaries of the Company transfer without recourse all of their accounts receivable to ARAMARK Receivables, LLC. ARAMARK Receivables, LLC, in turn, has sold and, subject to certain conditions, may from time to time sell an undivided interest in these receivables. As collections reduce previously sold interests, interests in new, eligible receivables can be sold, subject to meeting certain conditions. This two-step transaction is accounted for as a sale of receivables following the provisions of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities—a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125.”

The Company has retained an undivided interest in the transferred receivables of approximately $236.8 million and $296.2 million at April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, which is subject to a security interest. Because the sold accounts receivable underlying the retained ownership interest are generally short-term in nature, the fair value of the retained interest approximated its carrying value at both April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008. The fair value of the retained interest is measured based on expected future cash flows adjusted for unobservable inputs used to assess the risk of credit losses. Those inputs reflect the diversified customer base, the short-term nature of the securitized asset, aging trends and historic collections experience. The Company believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts balance is a reasonable approximation of any credit risk of the customers that generated the receivables. At April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, $238.2 million and $250.0 million of accounts receivable were sold and removed from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. The Company has retained collection and administrative responsibility for the participating interest sold but has not recorded an asset or liability related to the servicing responsibility retained as the fees earned for servicing were estimated to approximate fair value of the services provided. During the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, ARAMARK Receivables, LLC sold an undivided

11

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

interest in approximately $1.5 billion of trade account receivables in both periods and remitted to bank conduits, pursuant to the servicing agreement, approximately $1.5 billion in collections on trade account receivables previously sold in both periods. The discount on the sale of the undivided interest in the transferred receivables is based on the cost of the commercial paper borrowings of the buyers. The loss on the sale of receivables was $3.4 million and $6.9 million for the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, respectively, and is included in “Interest and Other Financing Costs, net” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(11) EQUITY INVESTMENTS:

The Company’s principal equity method investment is its 50% ownership interest in AIM Services Co., Ltd., a Japanese food and support services company (approximately $211.9 million and $190.7 million at April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, which is included in “Other Assets” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets). Summarized financial information for AIM Services Co., Ltd. follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009		Six Months Ended April 3, 2009
Sales	$	391,166	$	762,394
Gross profit		46,090		93,649
Net income		9,463		18,401
	Three Months Ended March 28, 2008		Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Sales	$	335,714	$	665,722
Gross profit		39,083		80,643
Net income		4,949		12,205

ARAMARK’s equity in undistributed earnings of AIM Services Co., Ltd., net of amortization of allocated purchase consideration (see Note 2), was $3.8 million and $7.3 million for the three and six months ended April 3, 2009, respectively. For the three and six months ended March 28, 2008, ARAMARK’s equity in undistributed earnings of AIM Services Co., Ltd., net of amortization of allocated purchase consideration, was $1.5 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

(12) DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL SEGMENT

During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company initiated a repositioning effort to reduce the cost structure and address the demand softness in the WearGuard direct marketing business. The Company will be exiting a portion of its direct marketing business directed at consumers and very small businesses by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and migrating its distribution and customization functions from its facilities in Norwell, Massachusetts to its facilities in Salem, Virginia and Reno, Nevada. In addition, the Company is reducing its headcount in all the businesses in the Uniform and Career Apparel segment. As a result of these actions, the Company recorded a total charge of approximately $34.2 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 for severance and other related costs (approximately $8.5 million, which is included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet), inventory write-downs (approximately $18.5 million primarily as a result of the exit from a portion of its direct marketing business and approximately $2.2 million at other businesses within the segment in response to demand softness) and other asset write-downs (approximately $5.0 million, of which $2.0 million related to additional reserves for receivables and $3.0 million related to facility and equipment write-downs), which is included in “Cost of services provided” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company expects to incur additional costs of approximately $4.0 million in association with the repositioning efforts over the next four fiscal quarters as the relocation of the WearGuard distribution and operations functions are completed.

(13) BUSINESS SEGMENTS:

Sales and operating income (loss) by reportable segment follow (in thousands):

Sales	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009		Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
Food and Support Services—North America	$	2,070,074	$	2,084,943
Food and Support Services—International		560,282		661,314
Uniform and Career Apparel		398,945		426,920
	$	3,029,301	$	3,173,177

12

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Operating Income (Loss)	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009			Three Months Ended March 28, 2008
Food and Support Services—North America	$	84,424		$	74,583
Food and Support Services—International		19,629			21,117
Uniform and Career Apparel		(13,854	)		27,975
		90,199			123,675
Corporate		(18,752	)		(16,768	)
Operating Income		71,447			106,907
Interest, net		(119,214	)		(129,406	)
Loss Before Taxes	$	(47,767	)	$	(22,499	)

Sales	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009		Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Food and Support Services—North America	$	4,212,833	$	4,330,303
Food and Support Services—International		1,161,746		1,319,602
Uniform and Career Apparel		828,679		873,892
	$	6,203,258	$	6,523,797

Operating Income	Six Months Ended April 3, 2009			Six Months Ended March 28, 2008
Food and Support Services—North America	$	189,055		$	196,431
Food and Support Services—International		39,228			46,065
Uniform and Career Apparel		15,881			62,826
		244,164			305,322
Corporate		(37,139	)		(32,882	)
Operating Income		207,025			272,440
Interest, net		(244,411	)		(258,402	)
Income (Loss) Before Taxes	$	(37,386	)	$	14,038

In the first and second fiscal quarters, within the “Food and Support Services—North America” segment, historically there has been a lower level of activity at the higher margin sports, entertainment and recreational food service operations which is partly offset by increased activity in the educational operations. However, in the third and fourth fiscal quarters, historically there has been a significant increase at sports, entertainment and recreational accounts which is partially offset by the effect of summer recess on the educational accounts. In addition, there is a seasonal increase in volume of directly marketed work clothing during the first fiscal quarter.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company initiated a repositioning effort to reduce the cost structure and address the demand softness in the WearGuard direct marketing business. In addition, the Company is reducing its headcount in all the businesses in the Uniform and Career Apparel segment. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $34.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 related to these actions (see Note 12).

Corporate expenses include share-based compensation expense (see Note 9).

(14) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which enhances and expands the disclosures for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for ARAMARK in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company adopted SFAS No. 161 in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 (see Note 7).

13

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which allows companies to elect fair-value measurement when an eligible financial asset or financial liability is initially recognized or when an event, such as a business combination, triggers a new basis of accounting for that financial asset or financial liability. The election must be applied to individual contracts, is irrevocable for every contract chosen to be measured at fair value, and must be applied to an entire contract, not to only specified risks, specific cash flows, or portions of that contract. Changes in the fair value of contracts elected to be measured at fair value are recognized in earnings each reporting period. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 in fiscal 2009 with no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company did not use the fair-value measurement election for any eligible financial assets or financial liabilities.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for ARAMARK beginning in fiscal 2009 for financial assets and financial liabilities and fiscal 2010 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities in fiscal 2009 (see Note 16). The Company is currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 157 will have on nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” which expands the fair value disclosures required for all financial instruments within the scope of SFAS Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to interim periods for publicly traded entities. This FSP also requires entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments on an interim basis and to highlight any changes of the methods and significant assumptions from prior periods. FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for ARAMARK beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the disclosures under this FSP.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employer’s Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.“ This FSP amends SFAS Statement No. 132 (Revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,“ to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP is effective for ARAMARK beginning in fiscal 2010. The Company is currently evaluating this pronouncement.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets,” which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective for ARAMARK beginning in fiscal 2010. The Company is currently evaluating this pronouncement.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations,” which will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. SFAS 141R will impact financial statement both on the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. Under SFAS 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date, with limited exceptions. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred, restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement periods impact income tax expense. SFAS 141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS 141R is effective for ARAMARK for business combinations finalized beginning in fiscal 2010.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51,” which establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Among other matters, it also requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the consolidated statement of income. SFAS No. 160 is effective for ARAMARK beginning in fiscal 2010. The Company is currently evaluating this pronouncement.

(15) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Certain of the Company’s lease arrangements, primarily vehicle leases, with terms of one to eight years, contain provisions related to residual value guarantees. The maximum potential liability to ARAMARK under such arrangements was approximately $88.9 million at April 3, 2009 if the terminal fair value of vehicles coming off lease was zero. Consistent with past experience, management does not expect any significant payments will be required pursuant to these arrangements. No amounts have been accrued for guarantee arrangements at April 3, 2009.

14

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal actions and investigations involving claims incidental to the conduct of its business, including actions by clients, customers, employees, government entities and third parties, including under federal and state employment laws, wage and hour laws and customs, import and export control laws, environmental laws, false claims statutes and dram shop laws. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage, established reserves and other resources, the Company does not believe that any such actions are likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, in the event of unexpected further developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or other similar matters, if unfavorable, may be materially adverse to the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On October 3, 2008, the Company and a subsidiary were served with a complaint in a Qui Tam action filed by Relator Robert Pritsker (which was originally filed on October 30, 2003) naming the Company and certain other companies in its industry in the United States District Court, E.D.PA. and alleging, among other things, that the defendants, including the Company, caused the making of certain false certifications to the federal government of compliance with U.S.D.A. regulations and seeking unspecified damages. The United States declined to join in this action in 2005. On March 6, 2009, in response to motions by all defendants, the Court dismissed this action with prejudice. On April 3, 2009, Relator filed notice of an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which appeal is still pending. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend against these claims.

(16) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:

In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,“ for financial assets and financial liabilities. The cumulative effect of adoption resulted in a reduction to “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” of approximately $7.5 million, net of tax, related to considering both the Company’s and the counterparties’ credit risk in the fair value measurement of our interest rate swaps. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

• Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets

• Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument

• Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement

15

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

At April 3, 2009, the following financial assets and financial liabilities were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the type of inputs shown (in thousands):

	April 3, 2009		Quoted prices in active markets Level 1		Significant other observable inputs Level 2		Significant unobservable inputs Level 3
Assets:
Undivided retained interest in trade receivables sold under the Company’s Receivable Facility	$	236,828	$	—	$	—	$	236,828
	April 3, 2009		Quoted prices in active markets Level 1		Significant other observable inputs Level 2		Significant unobservable inputs Level 3
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap agreements	$	237,302	$	—	$	237,302	$	—
Cross currency swap agreements		8,062		—		8,062		—
Natural gas hedge agreements		3,188		—		3,188		—
Gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements		10,415		—		10,415		—
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts		258		—		258		—
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	259,225	$	—	$	259,225	$	—
Common Stock Subject to Repurchase	$	180,328	$	—	$	—	$	180,328

The following table presents the changes in financial instruments for which Level 3 inputs were significant to their valuation for the six months ended April 3, 2009 (in thousands):

	Undivided retained interest in trade receivables			Common Stock Subject to Repurchase
Balance at October 3, 2008	$	296,200		$	229,628
Net realized gains/(losses) included in earnings		(2,257	)		—
Net purchases, issuances and settlements		(57,115	)		(10,745	)
Change in fair market value of common stock of the Parent Company		—			(38,555	)
Balance at April 3, 2009	$	236,828		$	180,328

16

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(17) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES:

The following condensed consolidating financial statements of ARAMARK Corporation and subsidiaries have been prepared pursuant to Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X.

These condensed consolidating financial statements have been prepared from the Company’s financial information on the same basis of accounting as the condensed consolidated financial statements. Interest expense and certain administrative costs are partially allocated to all of the subsidiaries of the Company. Goodwill and other intangible assets have been allocated to all of the subsidiaries of the Company based on management’s estimates. On January 26, 2007, in connection with the Transaction, the Company issued 8.50% senior notes due 2015 and senior floating rate notes due 2015. The senior notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by substantially all of the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries (excluding the receivables facility subsidiary) (“Guarantors”). Each of the Guarantors is wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. All other subsidiaries of the Company, either direct or indirect, do not guarantee the senior notes (“Non-Guarantors”). The Guarantors also guarantee certain other unregistered debt.

17

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS

April 3, 2009

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation		Guarantors		Non Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	42.9	$	26.1	$	38.5	$	—		$	107.5
Receivables		0.7		189.6		637.5		—			827.8
Inventories, at lower of cost or market		17.3		411.3		66.5		—			495.1
Prepayments and other current assets		90.8		117.2		5.0		—			213.0
Total current assets		151.7		744.2		747.5		—			1,643.4
Property and Equipment, net		42.8		929.1		205.9		—			1,177.8
Goodwill		173.1		3,899.4		410.9		—			4,483.4
Investment in and Advances to Subsidiaries		6,935.9		205.0		242.5		(7,383.4	)		—
Other Intangible Assets		74.9		1,820.1		236.0		—			2,131.0
Other Assets		114.4		417.9		272.0		(2.0	)		802.3
	$	7,492.8	$	8,015.7	$	2,114.8	$	(7,385.4	)	$	10,237.9
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term borrowings	$	2.3	$	11.7	$	23.6	$	—		$	37.6
Accounts payable		118.5		262.1		227.7		—			608.3
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		248.0		569.4		149.6		—			967.0
Total current liabilities		368.8		843.2		400.9		—			1,612.9
Long-Term Borrowings		5,221.4		41.5		552.1		—			5,815.0
Deferred Income Taxes and Other Noncurrent Liabilities		413.3		810.8		96.6		—			1,320.7
Intercompany Payable		—		6,169.0		937.0		(7,106.0	)		—
Common Stock Subject to Repurchase		180.3		—		—		—			180.3
Shareholder’s Equity		1,309.0		151.2		128.2		(279.4	)		1,309.0
	$	7,492.8	$	8,015.7	$	2,114.8	$	(7,385.4	)	$	10,237.9

18

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS

October 3, 2008

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation		Guarantors		Non Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	78.4	$	31.7	$	38.8	$	—		$	148.9
Receivables		—		230.9		718.8		—			949.7
Inventories, at lower of cost or market		18.3		446.2		71.3		—			535.8
Prepayments and other current assets		32.3		111.8		19.9		—			164.0
Total current assets		129.0		820.6		848.8		—			1,798.4
Property and Equipment, net		47.1		972.1		203.9		—			1,223.1
Goodwill		173.1		3,900.9		438.1		—			4,512.1
Investment in and Advances to Subsidiaries		6,929.4		186.3		235.1		(7,350.8	)		—
Other Intangible Assets		79.6		1,895.4		240.3		—			2,215.3
Other Assets		124.2		399.1		253.2		(2.0	)		774.5
	$	7,482.4	$	8,174.4	$	2,219.4	$	(7,352.8	)	$	10,523.4
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term borrowings	$	2.2	$	16.2	$	36.3	$	—		$	54.7
Accounts payable		135.1		356.6		256.2		—			747.9
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		172.5		668.0		168.5		—			1,009.0
Total current liabilities		309.8		1,040.8		461.0		—			1,811.6
Long-Term Borrowings		5,217.9		44.3		542.7		—			5,804.9
Deferred Income Taxes and Other Noncurrent Liabilities		385.2		817.7		134.5		—			1,337.4
Intercompany Payable		—		6,099.8		966.9		(7,066.7	)		—
Common Stock Subject to Repurchase		229.6		—		—		—			229.6
Shareholder’s Equity		1,339.9		171.8		114.3		(286.1	)		1,339.9
	$	7,482.4	$	8,174.4	$	2,219.4	$	(7,352.8	)	$	10,523.4

19

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three months ended April 3, 2009

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation			Guarantors			Non Guarantors		Eliminations		Consolidated
Sales	$	245.5		$	1,989.4		$	794.4	$	—	$	3,029.3
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of services provided		230.4			1,819.8			732.0		—		2,782.2
Depreciation and amortization		5.3			98.9			19.4		—		123.6
Selling and general corporate expenses		21.9			25.1			5.0		—		52.0
Interest and other financing costs		109.6			0.3			9.4		—		119.3
Expense allocation		(124.5	)		122.1			2.4		—		—
		242.7			2,066.2			768.2		—		3,077.1
Income (Loss) before income taxes		2.8			(76.8	)		26.2		—		(47.8	)
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes		(6.0	)		(22.4	)		6.0		—		(22.4	)
Equity in Net Income of Subsidiaries		(34.2	)		—			—		34.2		—
Net income (loss)	$	(25.4	)	$	(54.4	)	$	20.2	$	34.2	$	(25.4	)

20

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the six months ended April 3, 2009

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation			Guarantors			Non Guarantors		Eliminations		Consolidated
Sales	$	499.6		$	4,079.5		$	1,624.2	$	—	$	6,203.3
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of services provided		471.1			3,676.3			1,498.1		—		5,645.5
Depreciation and amortization		11.6			194.1			41.9		—		247.6
Selling and general corporate expenses		42.4			50.5			10.3		—		103.2
Interest and other financing costs		221.0			0.9			22.5		—		244.4
Expense allocation		(227.6	)		220.3			7.3		—		—
		518.5			4,142.1			1,580.1		—		6,240.7
Income (Loss) before income taxes		(18.9	)		(62.6	)		44.1		—		(37.4	)
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes		(10.2	)		(20.3	)		10.3		—		(20.2	)
Equity in Net Income of Subsidiaries		(8.5	)		—			—		8.5		—
Net income (loss)	$	(17.2	)	$	(42.3	)	$	33.8	$	8.5	$	(17.2	)

21

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three months ended March 28, 2008

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation			Guarantors			Non Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales	$	281.0		$	1,989.2		$	903.0	$	—		$	3,173.2
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of services provided		277.2			1,778.6			835.8		—			2,891.6
Depreciation and amortization		7.2			94.9			23.0		—			125.1
Selling and general corporate expenses		18.9			24.8			5.9		—			49.6
Interest and other financing costs		113.2			0.7			15.5		—			129.4
Expense allocation		(112.0	)		106.6			5.4		—			—
		304.5			2,005.6			885.6		—			3,195.7
Income (Loss) before income taxes		(23.5	)		(16.4	)		17.4		—			(22.5	)
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes		(5.8	)		(4.7	)		4.6		—			(5.9	)
Equity in Net Income of Subsidiaries		1.1			—			—		(1.1	)		—
Net income (loss)	$	(16.6	)	$	(11.7	)	$	12.8	$	(1.1	)	$	(16.6	)

22

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the six months ended March 28, 2008

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation			Guarantors			Non Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales	$	572.6		$	4,130.3		$	1,820.9	$	—		$	6,523.8
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of services provided		564.4			3,662.3			1,680.2		—			5,906.9
Depreciation and amortization		14.4			188.4			45.3		—			248.1
Selling and general corporate expenses		36.5			47.7			12.1		—			96.3
Interest and other financing costs		224.7			1.3			32.4		—			258.4
Expense allocation		(246.8	)		234.8			12.0		—			—
		593.2			4,134.5			1,782.0		—			6,509.7
Income (Loss) before income taxes		(20.6	)		(4.2	)		38.9		—			14.1
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes		(5.7	)		(0.1	)		10.4		—			4.6
Equity in Net Income of Subsidiaries		24.4			—			—		(24.4	)		—
Net income (loss)	$	9.5		$	(4.1	)	$	28.5	$	(24.4	)	$	9.5

23

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six months ended April 3, 2009

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation			Guarantors			Non Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	11.0		$	23.7		$	105.4		$	(3.9	)	$	136.2
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment and client contract investments		(2.4	)		(118.3	)		(45.7	)		—			(166.4	)
Disposals of property and equipment		0.6			13.8			2.0			—			16.4
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired		—			(5.3	)		(44.0	)		—			(49.3	)
Other investing activities		(1.4	)		4.5			1.1			—			4.2
Net cash used in investing activities		(3.2	)		(105.3	)		(86.6	)		—			(195.1	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from additional long-term borrowings		—			—			52.7			—			52.7
Payment of long-term borrowings		(1.1	)		(7.4	)		(16.5	)		—			(25.0	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		4.6			—			—			—			4.6
Repurchase of stock		(14.9	)		—			—			—			(14.9	)
Other financing activities		0.1			—			—			—			0.1
Change in intercompany, net		(32.0	)		83.4			(55.3	)		3.9			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(43.3	)		76.0			(19.1	)		3.9			17.5
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(35.5	)		(5.6	)		(0.3	)		—			(41.4	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		78.4			31.7			38.8			—			148.9
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	42.9		$	26.1		$	38.5		$	—		$	107.5

24

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six months ended March 28, 2008

(in millions)

	ARAMARK Corporation			Guarantors			Non Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(7.1	)	$	9.1		$	59.4		$	33.2		$	94.6
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment and client contract investments		(7.0	)		(99.4	)		(41.0	)		—			(147.4	)
Disposals of property and equipment		0.2			3.6			3.5			—			7.3
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired		—			(8.6	)		(7.1	)		—			(15.7	)
Other investing activities		0.3			(4.8	)		1.0			—			(3.5	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(6.5	)		(109.2	)		(43.6	)		—			(159.3	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from additional long-term borrowings		39.6			—			26.3			—			65.9
Payment of long-term borrowings		(0.9	)		(3.0	)		(11.0	)		—			(14.9	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		3.6			—			—			—			3.6
Repurchase of stock		(4.0	)		—			—			—			(4.0	)
Other financing activities		3.2			—			—			—			3.2
Change in intercompany, net		(51.9	)		103.5			(18.4	)		(33.2	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(10.4	)		100.5			(3.1	)		(33.2	)		53.8
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(24.0	)		0.4			12.7			—			(10.9	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		34.4			28.5			20.7			—			83.6
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	10.4		$	28.9		$	33.4		$	—		$	72.7

25

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition for the three and six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008 should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes to those statements, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008.

ARAMARK Corporation (the “Company” or “ARAMARK”) was acquired on January 26, 2007 through a merger transaction with RMK Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation controlled by investment funds associated with GS Capital Partners, CCMP Capital Advisors, J.P. Morgan Partners, Thomas H. Lee Partners and Warburg Pincus LLC (collectively, the “Sponsors”), Joseph Neubauer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ARAMARK, and certain other members of the Company’s management. The acquisition was accomplished through the merger of RMK Acquisition Corporation with and into ARAMARK Corporation with ARAMARK Corporation being the surviving company (the “Transaction”).

The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARAMARK Intermediate Holdco Corporation, which is wholly-owned by ARAMARK Holdings Corporation (the “Parent Company”). ARAMARK Holdings Corporation, ARAMARK Intermediate Holdco Corporation and RMK Acquisition Corporation were formed for the purpose of facilitating the Transaction and have no operations other than ownership of the Company.

On March 30, 2007, ARAMARK Corporation was merged with and into ARAMARK Services, Inc. with ARAMARK Services, Inc. being the surviving corporation. In connection with the consummation of the merger, ARAMARK Services, Inc. changed its name to ARAMARK Corporation.

Our discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, opinions, expectations, anticipations, intentions and beliefs. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in those forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In the following discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial conditions, certain financial measures may be considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. These rules require supplemental explanation and reconciliation, which is provided elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in our fiscal 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. As described in such notes, the Company recognizes sales in the period in which services are provided pursuant to the terms of our contractual relationships with our clients.

In preparing our financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that, among other things, affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are most significant where they involve levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or matters susceptible to change, and where they can have a material impact on our financial condition and operating performance. We discuss below the more significant estimates and related assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. If actual results were to differ materially from the estimates made, the reported results could be materially affected.

Asset Impairment Determinations

As a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill and tradename are no longer amortized. Under this accounting standard, goodwill and tradename are subject to an impairment test that we conduct at least annually, using a discounted cash flow technique. In addition, goodwill is tested more frequently if a change in circumstances or the occurrence of events indicates that potential impairment exists.

With respect to our other long-lived assets, we are required to test for asset impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We apply SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” in order to determine whether or not an asset was impaired. This standard requires an impairment analysis when indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, the standard indicates that if the sum of the future expected cash flows from the asset, undiscounted and without interest charges, is less than the carrying value, an asset impairment must be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of the impairment is the difference between the fair value of the asset and the carrying value of the asset.

In making future cash flow analyses of various assets, the Company makes assumptions relating to the following:

• The intended use of assets and the expected future cash flows resulting directly from such use.

• Comparable market valuations of businesses similar to ARAMARK’s business segments.

26

• Industry specific economic conditions.

• Competitor activities and regulatory initiatives.

• Client and customer preferences and behavior patterns.

We believe that an accounting estimate relating to asset impairment is a critical accounting estimate because the assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are subject to change from time to time and the recognition of an impairment could have a significant impact on our income statement.

Environmental Loss Contingencies

Accruals for environmental loss contingencies (i.e., environmental reserves) are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can reasonably be estimated. Management views the measurement of environmental reserves as a critical accounting estimate because of the considerable uncertainty surrounding estimation, including the need to forecast well into the future. We are involved in legal proceedings under state, federal and local environmental laws in connection with operations of our uniform rental segment or businesses conducted by our predecessors or companies that we have acquired. The calculation of environmental reserves is based on the evaluation of currently available information, prior experience in the remediation of contaminated sites and assumptions with respect to government regulations and enforcement activity, changes in remediation technology and practices, and financial obligations and credit worthiness of other responsible parties and insurers.

Litigation and Claims

The Company is a party to various legal actions and investigations including, among others, employment matters, compliance with government regulations, including import and export controls and customs laws, federal and state employment laws, including wage and hour laws, human health and safety laws, dram shop laws, environmental laws, false claim statutes, contractual disputes and other matters, including matters arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims may be brought by, among others, the government, clients, customers, employees and third parties. Management considers the measurement of litigation reserves as a critical accounting estimate because of the significant uncertainty in some cases relating to the outcome of potential claims or litigation and the difficulty of predicting the likelihood and range of potential liability involved, coupled with the material impact on our results of operations that could result from litigation or other claims. In determining legal reserves, management considers, among other issues:

• Interpretation of contractual rights and obligations.

• The status of government regulatory initiatives, interpretations and investigations.

• The status of settlement negotiations.

• Prior experience with similar types of claims.

• Whether there is available insurance.

• Advice of counsel.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We encounter risks associated with sales and the collection of the associated accounts receivable. We record a provision for accounts receivable that are considered to be uncollectible. In order to calculate the appropriate provision, management analyzes the creditworthiness of specific customers and the aging of customer balances. Management also considers general and specific industry

economic conditions, industry concentrations, such as exposure to small and medium-sized businesses, the non-profit healthcare sector and the automotive, airline and financial services industries, and contractual rights and obligations.

Management believes that the accounting estimate related to the allowance for doubtful accounts is a critical accounting estimate because the underlying assumptions used for the allowance can change from time to time and uncollectible accounts could potentially have a material impact on our results of operations.

Inventory Obsolescence

We record an inventory obsolescence reserve for obsolete, excess and slow-moving inventory, principally in the Uniform and Career Apparel segment. In calculating our inventory obsolescence reserve, management analyzes historical data regarding customer demand within specific product categories and makes assumptions regarding economic conditions within customer specific industries, as well as style and product changes. Management believes that its accounting estimate related to inventory obsolescence is a critical accounting estimate because customer demand in certain of our businesses can be variable and changes in our reserve for inventory obsolescence could materially affect our financial results.

27

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and for deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. We must make assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine our current provision for income taxes and also our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be recorded against a deferred tax asset. Our assumptions, judgments and estimates relative to the current provision for income tax take into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws and possible outcomes of current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax authorities. Changes in tax law or our interpretation of tax laws and the resolution of current and future tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in our consolidated financial statements. Our assumptions, judgments and estimates relative to the amount of deferred income taxes take into account estimates of the amount of future taxable income, and actual operating results in future years could render our current assumptions, judgments and estimates inaccurate. Any of the assumptions, judgments and estimates mentioned above could cause our actual income tax obligations to differ from our estimates.

Generally, accounting standards require companies to provide for income taxes each quarter based on their estimate of the effective tax rate for the full year. In fiscal 2008, the Company applied an estimated annual effective tax rate to the interim period income (loss) before income taxes to derive the provision (benefit) for income taxes for each quarter. FASB Interpretation No. 18, “Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods” allows an alternative method when, in certain situations, the actual interim period effective tax rate may be used if it provides the best estimate of the annual effective tax rate. The Company applied this alternative method and computed the discrete benefit for income taxes for interim periods in fiscal 2009 based on actual year-to-date results.

Share-Based Compensation

As discussed in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements in our fiscal 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we value our employee stock options using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model uses assumptions of the expected volatility of our stock, the expected dividend yield of our stock, the expected term of the options and the risk free interest rate. Since our stock is not publicly traded, the expected volatility is based on an average of the historical volatility of our competitors’ stocks over the expected term of the stock options. The expected term of stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. The expected term was calculated using the simplified method permitted under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon the rate applicable to the U.S. Treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected term of the option on the grant date. The dividend yield assumption is based on our history and expected future of dividend payouts.

As share-based compensation expense recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on our historical experience.

For the Performance-Based Options, management must assess the probability of the achievement of the earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) targets. If the probability of achievement of the EBIT targets change, changes in the recognition of share-based compensation expense may occur. Management makes its probability assessments based on the Company’s actual and projected results of operations.

Management believes that the accounting estimate related to the expense of stock options is a critical accounting estimate because the underlying assumptions can change from time to time and, as a result, the compensation expense that we record in future periods under SFAS No. 123R may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period with respect to similar instruments.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,“ for financial assets and financial liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

• Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets

• Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument

• Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement

28

We disclosed the fair values of our financial instruments in Note 16 of our condensed consolidated financial statements. The fair values for interest rate swap agreements, foreign currency forward exchange contracts and natural gas, gasoline and diesel fuel hedge agreements are based on quoted market prices from various banks for similar instruments, adjusted for the Company and the counterparties’ credit risk. The Company performs an independent review of these values to determine if they are reasonable. The fair value of our derivative instruments are impacted by changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and the prices of natural gas, gasoline and diesel fuel. The fair value of our undivided retained interest in trade receivables and common stock subject to repurchase are derived principally from unobservable inputs. Management believes that the accounting estimate related to the fair value of our financial assets and financial liabilities is a critical accounting estimate due to its complexity and the significant judgments and estimates involved in determining fair value in the absence of quoted market prices.

*****

Critical accounting estimates and the related assumptions are evaluated periodically as conditions warrant, and changes to such estimates are recorded as new information or changed conditions require revision.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following tables present our sales and operating income (loss), and related percentages, attributable to each operating segment, for the three and six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008 (dollars in millions).

	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	April 3, 2009					March 28, 2008					April 3, 2009					March 28, 2008
Sales by Segment	$			%		$			%		$			%		$			%
Food and Support Services – North America	$	2,070.1		68	%	$	2,085.0		66	%	$	4,212.8		68	%	$	4,330.3		66	%
Food and Support Services – International		560.3		19	%		661.3		21	%		1,161.8		19	%		1,319.6		20	%
Uniform and Career Apparel		398.9		13	%		426.9		13	%		828.7		13	%		873.9		14	%
	$	3,029.3		100	%	$	3,173.2		100	%	$	6,203.3		100	%	$	6,523.8		100	%
	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	April 3, 2009					March 28, 2008					April 3, 2009					March 28, 2008
Operating Income (Loss) by Segment	$			%		$			%		$			%		$			%
Food and Support Services – North America	$	84.4		118	%	$	74.6		70	%	$	189.0		91	%	$	196.4		72	%
Food and Support Services – International		19.6		27	%		21.1		20	%		39.2		19	%		46.1		17	%
Uniform and Career Apparel		(13.8	)	-19	%		28.0		26	%		15.9		8	%		62.8		23	%
		90.2		126	%		123.7		116	%		244.1		118	%		305.3		112	%
Corporate		(18.8	)	-26	%		(16.8	)	-16	%		(37.1	)	-18	%		(32.9	)	-12	%
	$	71.4		100	%	$	106.9		100	%	$	207.0		100	%	$	272.4		100	%

Consolidated Overview

Sales of $3.0 billion for the fiscal 2009 second quarter and $6.2 billion for the six month period represented a decrease of 5% over both the prior year periods. This decrease is primarily attributable to the impact of foreign currency translation (approximately -5%) in the three and six month periods.

Operating income was $71.4 million for the fiscal 2009 second quarter compared to $106.9 million for the prior year period. The decline in operating income in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was caused by the negative impact of foreign currency translation (approximately -7%) and a charge of approximately $34.2 million recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 related to the repositioning of our Uniform and Career Apparel segment (see Note 12), which more than offset our cost mitigation and cost control efforts throughout the Company and the positive impact from additional service days in the quarter. Operating income was $207.0 million for the six month period of fiscal 2009 compared to $272.4 million for the prior year period. The decline in operating income in the six month period of fiscal 2009 was caused by the negative impact of foreign currency translation (approximately -5%) and the approximately $34.2 million charge recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 related to the repositioning of our Uniform and Career Apparel segment that more than offset our cost mitigation and cost control efforts throughout the Company.

Interest and other financing costs, net, for the three and six months of fiscal 2009 decreased approximately $10.2 million and $14.0 million from the prior year periods, respectively, primarily due to lower interest rates. The effective tax rate for the second quarter and

29

six months of fiscal 2009 was 46.9% and 54.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008 was 26.2% and 32.5%, respectively. The Company calculated the benefit for income taxes for the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 based on actual year-to-date results. The Company applied an estimated annual effective tax rate to the year-to-date income (loss) before income taxes to derive the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008. We anticipate that our effective tax rate may be volatile in future periods due to the effect that tax credits and other items have on our reduced pretax income as a result of the Transaction.

Net income (loss) for the three and six months of fiscal 2009 was ($25.4) million and ($17.2) million, compared to ($16.6) million and $9.5 million in the prior year periods, respectively.

Segment Results

The following tables present a fiscal 2009/2008 comparison of segment sales and operating income (loss) together with the amount of and percentage change between periods (dollars in millions).

	Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
Sales by Segment	April 3, 2009			March 28, 2008			Change					April 3, 2009			March 28, 2008			Change
							$			%								$			%
Food and Support Services – North America	$	2,070.1		$	2,085.0		$	(14.9	)	-1	%	$	4,212.8		$	4,330.3		$	(117.5	)	-3	%
Food and Support Services – International		560.3			661.3			(101.0	)	-15	%		1,161.8			1,319.6			(157.8	)	-12	%
Uniform and Career Apparel		398.9			426.9			(28.0	)	-7	%		828.7			873.9			(45.2	)	-5	%
	$	3,029.3		$	3,173.2		$	(143.9	)	-5	%	$	6,203.3		$	6,523.8		$	(320.5	)	-5	%
	Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
	April 3, 2009			March 28, 2008			Change					April 3, 2009			March 28, 2008			Change
Operating Income (Loss) by Segment							$			%								$			%
Food and Support Services – North America	$	84.4		$	74.6		$	9.8		13	%	$	189.0		$	196.4		$	(7.4	)	-4	%
Food and Support Services – International		19.6			21.1			(1.5	)	-7	%		39.2			46.1			(6.9	)	-15	%
Uniform and Career Apparel		(13.8	)		28.0			(41.8	)	-149	%		15.9			62.8			(46.9	)	-75	%
Corporate		(18.8	)		(16.8	)		(2.0	)	12	%		(37.1	)		(32.9	)		(4.2	)	13	%
	$	71.4		$	106.9		$	(35.5	)	-33	%	$	207.0		$	272.4		$	(65.4	)	-24	%

Food and Support Services—North America Segment

Food and Support Services—North America segment sales for the three and six month periods of fiscal 2009 decreased 1% and 3% over the prior year periods, respectively, with growth in Higher Education being more than offset by declines in the Business & Industry and Sports & Entertainment sectors, as well as the negative impact of foreign currency translation (approximately -2% in both periods). The Business & Industry sector had a mid-single digit sales decline for the three and six month periods of 2009, with higher sales in Facility Services and our remote services business in Canada as well as the impact of several small acquisitions in our Refreshment Services business being offset by a decline in business food services and Refreshment Services due to lower populations and reduced discretionary spending across our account portfolio. The Education sector had high-single digit sales growth for the second quarter and low-single digit sales growth for the six month period of 2009, with base business growth in our Higher Education food business offset somewhat by the impact of prior year lost business in K-12. The sector did benefit somewhat in the second quarter from additional service days. In our Healthcare sector, we realized a low-single digit sales decline for the three and six month periods of 2009, with base business growth being offset by the impact from certain lost business in the prior year as well as the weakness of the Canadian dollar. Our Sports & Entertainment sector had a mid-teens sales decline for the second quarter and low-double digit sales decline for the six month period of 2009, reflecting particular weakness in both our Convention Centers and Parks businesses, in addition to some softness in Arenas due to lower attendance at NBA and NHL events.

Operating income in the Food and Support Services—North America segment was $84.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to $74.6 million in the prior year period, led in particular by the effect of increased profit performance in the Education and Healthcare sectors driven by base business growth and effective control of costs. In addition, segment results did benefit somewhat from additional service days in the quarter, while being negatively affected by currency translation related to the Canadian dollar. Our cost mitigation and cost control efforts across the segment had a positive impact and contributed to the segment’s margin performance in the quarter. Operating income in the Food and Support Services—North America segment was $189.0 million for the six month period of fiscal 2009 compared to $196.4 million in the prior year period, with increased profit performance in the Education and Healthcare sectors being more than offset by the negative effect of currency translation related to the Canadian dollar.

30

Food and Support Services—International Segment

Sales in the Food and Support Services—International segment for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were $560.3 million, a decrease of 15% compared to the prior year period as a result of foreign currency translation (approximately -20%). The impact of foreign currency translation was partially offset by the addition of new contracts in the U.K., Chile and Spain as well as the timing of the Easter holiday, which fell during the fiscal second quarter in 2008. For the six month period of fiscal 2009, sales decreased 12% to $1.2 billion compared to the prior year period as a result of foreign currency translation (approximately -19%). The impact of foreign currency translation was partially offset by an increase in base and net new business growth, primarily in the U.K., Chile, Spain, Germany and Belgium.

Operating income for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was $19.6 million, down 7% from the prior year quarter, as currency translation negatively impacted the quarter by approximately 20%. The results in the quarter benefited from additional service days primarily due to the timing of the Easter holiday. For the six month period of fiscal 2009, operating income was $39.2 million, down 15% over the prior year period due to the negative impact of foreign currency translation (approximately -15%).

Uniform and Career Apparel Segment

In the Uniform and Career Apparel segment, second quarter sales of $398.9 million were down 7% from the prior year period, as our uniform rental business declined slightly and our direct marketing business experienced a double-digit sales decline. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, sales during the second quarter were also down 7%, with the rental business down slightly. For the six month period of fiscal 2009, sales were $828.7 million, down 5% from the prior year period, with our uniform rental business flat. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, sales during the six month period were down in the mid-single digits, with the rental business down slightly.

Operating income (loss) for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was ($13.8) million compared to $28.0 million in the prior year period. For the six month period of fiscal 2009, operating income was $15.9 million compared to $62.8 million in the prior year period. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company initiated a repositioning effort to reduce the cost structure and address the demand softness in the WearGuard direct marketing business. The Company will be exiting a portion of its direct marketing business by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and migrating its distribution and customization functions from its facilities in Norwell, Massachusetts to its facilities in Salem, Virginia and Reno, Nevada. In addition, the Company is reducing its headcount in all the businesses in this segment. As a result of these actions, the Company recorded a total charge of approximately $34.2 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 related to severance and other related costs, inventory write-downs and other asset write-downs, which is included in “Cost of services provided” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company expects to incur additional costs of approximately $4.0 million in association with these repositioning efforts over the next four fiscal quarters as the relocation of the WearGuard distribution and operations functions are completed.

Corporate

Corporate expenses, those administrative expenses not allocated to the business segments, were $18.8 million and $37.1 million for the three and six month periods of fiscal 2009, compared to $16.8 million and $32.9 million for the prior year periods, respectively, reflecting higher share-based compensation expense partially offset by reduced staff spending.

OUTLOOK

We anticipate that the current economic environment, including reduced consumer and client spending, reduced headcount at our clients, an increase in bankruptcies and companies going out of business and the variability of food and fuel costs, will likely continue to have an impact on our operations, particularly at our business, sports and entertainment and uniform client locations. In response to the lower levels of demand across our more economically sensitive food and facility services businesses, our teams will continue to pursue both revenue enhancements and appropriate cost controls. Our uniform rental team is focused on managing the business through this environment with a particular focus on appropriately reducing the cost structure, while maintaining high levels of customer service and continued efforts to acquire new customers. The repositioning of our Uniform and Career Apparel segment should enable us to operate more efficiently while allowing us to continue to provide our uniform customers with a broad set of both rental and direct sale options. Finally, as we experienced in the first half of fiscal 2009, to the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against other currencies, it could continue to negatively affect the reported results for our international operations.

31

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

Reference to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows will facilitate understanding of the discussion that follows.

Cash provided by operating activities was $136.3 million in the fiscal 2009 six month period compared to $94.7 million in the comparable six month period of fiscal 2008. The principal components (in millions) of the net change of $41.6 million were:

•       Decrease in the total of net income and noncash charges	$	(51.7	)
•       Decrease in accounts receivable sale proceeds		(26.4	)
•       Reduced working capital requirements		103.5
•       Other, net		16.2
	$	41.6

The decrease in the total of net income and noncash charges results mainly from the lower operating results of the Company, as discussed above. The accounts receivable proceeds decreased as a result of the timing of funding under the facility in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. As expected and consistent with historical patterns, working capital was a use of cash for us during the first half of our fiscal year. The change in working capital requirements relates principally to changes in Accounts Receivable (approximately $156.8 million), primarily due to lower sales and improved collections in fiscal 2009, and Inventory (approximately $41.9 million), primarily due to the inventory reserves established in the Uniform and Career Apparel segment repositioning and other Company-wide inventory control measures, offset by the timing of disbursements from Accounts Payable (approximately $58.5 million) and Accrued Expenses (approximately $28.9 million) as compared to the prior year, primarily due to the timing of interest payments at the end of the current quarter. The “Other, net” caption increased primarily due to increases in certain noncurrent liabilities (retirement plans and insurance).

While the global capital markets are experiencing historic adverse conditions, management continues to believe that the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, cash flows provided by operating activities and the unused committed credit availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility (approximately $518.0 million and $531.3 million at May 1, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively) will be adequate to meet anticipated cash requirements to fund working capital, capital spending, debt repayments and other cash needs. While we believe we enjoy a strong liquidity position overall, the Company will continue to seek to invest strategically but prudently in certain sectors and geographies. Over time, the Company has repositioned its service portfolio so that today a significant portion of the Food and Support Services operating income in North America comes from sectors such as education, healthcare and corrections, which we believe to be economically less sensitive. In addition, we have worked to further diversify our international business by geography and sector. The Company is closely monitoring its cash flow as well as the condition of the capital markets and cannot predict with any certainty the impact on the Company of further disruption in these markets.

As of April 3, 2009, there was approximately $461.9 million outstanding in foreign currency borrowings. The Company entered into $200 million of interest rate swap agreements during fiscal 2009, which were effective January 1, 2009. These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedging instruments and fix the rate on a like amount of variable rate term loan borrowings. Subsequent to April 3, 2009, the Company entered into $500 million of interest rate swap agreements that are effective in fiscal 2010. These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedging instruments and fix the rate on a like amount of variable rate borrowings.

Covenant Compliance

The senior secured credit agreement contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to: incur additional indebtedness; issue preferred stock or provide guarantees; create liens on assets; engage in mergers or consolidations; sell assets; pay dividends, make distributions or repurchase our capital stock; make investments, loans or advances; repay or repurchase any notes, except as scheduled or at maturity; create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to us from our restricted subsidiaries; make certain acquisitions; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; amend material agreements governing the notes (or any indebtedness that refinances the notes); and fundamentally change the Company’s business. The indenture governing the 8.50% senior notes due 2015 and the senior floating rate notes due 2015 contains similar provisions. As of April 3, 2009, we are in compliance with these covenants.

Under the senior secured credit agreement and the indenture governing the 8.50% senior notes due 2015 and the senior floating rate notes due 2015, we are required to satisfy and maintain specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests and covenants. Our continued ability to meet those financial ratios, tests and covenants can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those ratios, tests and covenants.

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) plus interest and other financing costs, net, provision (benefit) for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA, further adjusted to give effect to adjustments required in calculating covenant ratios and compliance under our senior secured credit agreement and the indenture. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP, are not measures of financial performance or condition, liquidity or profitability, and should not be considered as an alternative to (1) net income, operating income or any other performance measures

32

determined in accordance with GAAP or (2) operating cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to be measures of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as they do not consider certain cash requirements such as interest payments, tax payments and debt service requirements.

Our presentation of EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, these presentations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. We believe that the presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional information about the calculation of certain financial covenants in the senior secured credit agreement and the indenture. Adjusted EBITDA is a material component of these covenants. For instance, our senior secured credit agreement and the indenture contain financial ratios that are calculated by reference to Adjusted EBITDA. Non-compliance with the maximum Consolidated Secured Debt Ratio contained in our senior secured credit agreement could result in the requirement to immediately repay all amounts outstanding under such agreement, while non-compliance with the Interest Coverage Ratio contained in our senior secured credit agreement and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio contained in the indenture could prohibit us from being able to incur additional indebtedness, other than the additional funding provided for under the senior secured credit agreement and pursuant to specified exceptions, and make certain restricted payments.

The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss), which is a GAAP measure of our operating results, to Adjusted EBITDA as defined in our debt agreements. The terms and related calculations are defined in the senior secured credit agreement and indenture.

(in millions)	Three Months Ended April 3, 2009			Three Months Ended January 2, 2009			Three Months Ended October 3, 2008			Three Months Ended June 27, 2008			Twelve Months Ended April 3, 2009
Net income (loss)	$	(25.4	)	$	8.2		$	33.6		$	(3.6	)	$	12.8
Interest and other financing costs, net		119.2			125.2			132.4			123.9			500.7
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(22.4	)		2.2			8.9			(1.4	)		(12.7	)
Depreciation and amortization		123.6			124.0			134.9			126.1			508.6
EBITDA		195.0			259.6			309.8			245.0			1,009.4
Stock-based compensation expense(1)		9.6			9.8			(10.3	)		5.6			14.7
Unusual or non-recurring losses(2)		34.2			—			—			—			34.2
Pro forma EBITDA for equity method investees(3)		8.0			6.0			2.8			4.2			21.0
Pro forma EBITDA for certain transactions(4)		—			0.4			1.3			1.7			3.4
Other(5)		3.7			(0.4	)		0.2			0.6			4.1
Adjusted EBITDA	$	250.5		$	275.4		$	303.8		$	257.1		$	1,086.8

(1) Represents share-based compensation expense resulting from the application of SFAS No. 123R for stock options and deferred stock unit awards (see Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements).

(2) Represents the charge for the repositioning of the Uniform and Career Apparel segment (see Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements).

(3) Represents our estimated share of EBITDA from our AIM Services Co., Ltd. equity method investment not already reflected in our EBITDA. EBITDA for this equity method investee is calculated in a manner consistent with consolidated EBITDA but does not represent cash distributions received from this investee.

(4) Represents the annualizing of estimated EBITDA from acquisitions made during the period.

(5) Other includes certain other miscellaneous items.

Our covenant requirements and actual ratios for the twelve months ended April 3, 2009 are as follows:

	Covenant Requirements		Actual Ratios
Maximum Consolidated Secured Debt Ratio (1)	5.50	x	3.65	x
Interest Coverage Ratio (Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio) (2)	2.00	x	2.26	x

(1) Beginning with the twelve months ended June 29, 2007, our senior secured credit agreement requires us to maintain a maximum Consolidated Secured Debt Ratio, defined as consolidated total indebtedness secured by a lien to Adjusted EBITDA, of 5.875x, being reduced over time to 4.25x by the end of 2013. Consolidated total indebtedness secured by a lien is defined in the senior secured credit agreement as total indebtedness outstanding under the senior secured credit agreement, capital leases, advances under the Receivables Facility and any other indebtedness secured by a lien reduced by the lesser of the amount of cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet that is free and clear of any lien and $75 million. Non-compliance with the maximum

33

Consolidated Secured Debt Ratio could result in the requirement to immediately repay all amounts outstanding under such agreement, which, if our lenders failed to waive any such default, would also constitute a default under our indenture.

(2) Our senior secured credit agreement establishes an incurrence-based minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, defined as Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated interest expense, the achievement of which is a condition for us to incur additional indebtedness and to make certain restricted payments. If we do not maintain this minimum Interest Coverage Ratio calculated on a pro forma basis for any such additional indebtedness or restricted payments, we could be prohibited from being able to incur additional indebtedness, other than the additional funding provided for under the senior secured credit agreement and pursuant to specified exceptions, and make certain restricted payments, other than pursuant to certain exceptions. The minimum Interest Coverage Ratio is 2.00x for the term of the senior secured credit agreement. Consolidated interest expense is defined in the senior secured credit agreement as consolidated interest expense excluding interest income, adjusted for acquisitions (including the Transaction) and dispositions, further adjusted for certain non-cash or nonrecurring interest expense and our estimated share of interest expense from one equity method investee. The indenture includes a similar requirement which is referred to as a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio.

The Company and its subsidiaries, affiliates or significant shareholders may from time to time, in their sole discretion, purchase, repay, redeem or retire any of the Company’s outstanding debt securities (including any publicly issued debt securities), in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise.

Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement of the Parent Company, commencing on January 26, 2008, upon termination of employment from the Company or one of its subsidiaries, members of the Company’s management (other than Mr. Neubauer) who hold shares of common stock of the Parent Company can cause the Parent Company to repurchase all of their initial investment shares (as defined) at appraised fair market value. Generally, payment for shares repurchased could be, at the Parent Company’s option, in cash or installment notes. The amount of common stock subject to repurchase as of April 3, 2009 was $180.3 million, which is based on approximately 14.4 million shares of common stock of the Parent Company valued at $12.53 per share. The Stockholders Agreement, the senior secured credit agreement and the indenture governing the 8.50% senior notes due 2015 and the senior floating rate notes due 2015 contain limitations on the amount the Company can expend for such share repurchases.

The Company has an agreement (the Receivables Facility) with several financial institutions whereby it sells on a continuous basis an undivided interest in all eligible trade accounts receivable, as defined in the Receivables Facility. As part of the Transaction, the Company amended and restated the Receivables Facility, increasing the maximum sales amount from $225 million to $250 million. Pursuant to the Receivables Facility, the Company formed ARAMARK Receivables, LLC, a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. ARAMARK Receivables, LLC was formed for the sole purpose of buying and selling receivables generated by certain subsidiaries of the Company. Under the Receivables Facility, certain subsidiaries of the Company transfer without recourse all of their accounts receivable to ARAMARK Receivables, LLC. ARAMARK Receivables, LLC, in turn, has sold and, subject to certain conditions, may from time to time sell an undivided interest in these receivables. As collections reduce previously sold interests, interests in new, eligible receivables can be sold, subject to meeting certain conditions. This two-step transaction is accounted for as a sale of receivables following the provisions of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities—a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125.”

The Company has retained an undivided interest in the transferred receivables of approximately $236.8 million and $296.2 million at April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, which is subject to a security interest. Because the sold accounts receivable underlying the retained ownership interest are generally short-term in nature, the fair value of the retained interest approximated its carrying value at both April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008. The fair value of the retained interest is measured based on expected future cash flows adjusted for unobservable inputs used to assess the risk of credit losses. Those inputs reflect the diversified customer base, the short-term nature of the securitized asset, aging trends and historic collections experience. The Company believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts balance is a reasonable approximation of any credit risk of the customers that generated the receivables. At April 3, 2009 and October 3, 2008, $238.2 million and $250.0 million of accounts receivable were sold and removed from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. The Company has retained collection and administrative responsibility for the participating interest sold but has not recorded an asset or liability related to the servicing responsibility retained as the fees earned for servicing were estimated to approximate fair value of the services provided. During the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, ARAMARK Receivables, LLC sold an undivided interest in approximately $1.5 billion of trade account receivables in both periods and remitted to bank conduits, pursuant to the servicing agreement, approximately $1.5 billion in collections on trade account receivables previously sold in both periods. The discount on the sale of the undivided interest in the transferred receivables is based on the cost of the commercial paper borrowings of the buyers. The loss on the sale of receivables was $3.4 million and $6.9 million for the six months ended April 3, 2009 and March 28, 2008, respectively, and is included in “Interest and Other Financing Costs, net” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company’s business activities do not include the use of unconsolidated special purpose entities, and there are no significant business transactions that have not been reflected in the accompanying financial statements. The Company is self-insured for a portion

34

of the risk retained under its general liability and workers’ compensation arrangements. Self-insurance reserves are recorded based on actuarial analyses.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are a party to various legal actions and investigations involving claims incidental to the conduct of our business, including actions by clients, customers, employees, government entities and third parties, including under federal and state employment laws, wage and hour laws, customs, import and export control laws, environmental laws, false claims statutes and dram shop laws. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage, established reserves and other resources, we do not believe that any such current actions are likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or other similar matters, if unfavorable, may be materially adverse to our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On October 3, 2008, the Company and a subsidiary were served with a complaint in a Qui Tam action filed by Relator Robert Pritsker (which was originally filed on October 30, 2003) naming the Company and certain other companies in its industry in the United States District Court, E.D.PA. and alleging, among other things, that the defendants, including the Company, caused the making of certain false certifications to the federal government of compliance with U.S.D.A. regulations and seeking unspecified damages. The United States declined to join in this action in 2005. On March 6, 2009, in response to motions by all defendants, the Court dismissed this action with prejudice. On April 3, 2009, Relator filed notice of an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which appeal is still pending. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend against these claims.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption.

SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that reflect our current views as to future events and financial performance with respect to our operations. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “are confident,” “estimate,” “expect,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in conjunction with a discussion of future operating or financial performance.

These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include: unfavorable economic conditions, including ramifications of any future terrorist attacks or increased security alert levels; increased operating costs, including increased food costs, labor-related, energy or product sourcing and distribution costs; shortages of qualified personnel or increases in labor costs; costs and possible effects of further unionization of our workforce; currency risks and other risks associated with international markets; risks associated with acquisitions, including acquisition integration issues and costs; our ability to integrate and derive the expected benefits from our recent acquisitions; competition; a decline in attendance at client facilities; the unpredictability of sales and expenses due to contract terms and terminations; the impact of natural disasters on our sales and operating results; the risk that clients have or may become insolvent; the risk that our insurers may become insolvent or may liquidate; the contract intensive nature of our business, which may lead to client disputes; high leverage; claims relating to the provision of food services; costs of compliance with governmental regulations and government investigations; liability associated with noncompliance with our business conduct policy and governmental regulations, including regulations pertaining to food services, the environment, the Federal school lunch program, Federal and state employment and wage and hour laws, human health and safety laws and import and export controls and customs laws; dram shop compliance and litigation; contract compliance and administration issues, inability to retain current clients and renew existing client contracts; a determination by customers to reduce their outsourcing and use of preferred vendors; seasonality; our competitor’s activities or announced planned activities; the effect on our operations of increased leverage and limitations on our flexibility as a result of increased restrictions in our debt agreements; potential future conflicts of interest between our Sponsors and other stakeholders; the impact on our business if we are unable to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness; the inability of our subsidiaries to generate enough cash flow to repay our debt; risks related to the structuring of our debt; our potential inability to repurchase our notes upon a change of control; and other risks that are set forth in the “Risk Factors,” “Legal Proceedings” and “Management Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” sections and other sections of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect the events or circumstances arising after the date as of which they are made. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements included in this report or that may be made in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or elsewhere from time to time by, or on behalf of, us.

35

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and manage this exposure through the use of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and by utilizing interest rate swaps. We do not enter into contracts for trading purposes and do not use leveraged instruments. The market risk associated with debt obligations as of April 3, 2009 has not materially changed from October 3, 2008 (See Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 3, 2008). During the six months ended April 3, 2009, the Company entered into $200 million of interest rate swap agreements, which are designated as cash flow hedging instruments and fix the rate on a like amount of variable rate term loan borrowings. Subsequent to April 3, 2009, the Company entered into $500 million of interest rate swap agreements, which are designated as cash flow hedging instruments and fix the rate on a like amount of variable rate borrowings. See Note 7 of the condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company’s derivative instruments.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(c) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Company’s second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

36

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Part 1, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition- Legal Proceedings” for a description of the Company’s legal proceedings.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

On May 12, 2009, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Bart J. Colli, the Company’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, who will retire on May 15, 2009, pursuant to which Mr. Colli will provide consulting services to the Company until May 16, 2010 (the “Consulting Period”) and will receive $500,000 for that year unless the Company terminates him for cause or he terminates for any reason. Mr. Colli will also be provided continued health insurance coverage under the terms of the Company’s welfare benefits program for executive officers of the Company until he and his wife attain the age of 65, a portion of the premiums for which will be reimbursed by the Company and a portion of which will be paid by Mr. Colli.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of ARAMARK Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ARAMARK Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007, pursuant to the Exchange Act (file number 001-16807)).
3.2	By-laws of ARAMARK Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ARAMARK Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007, pursuant to the Exchange Act (file number 001-16807)).
10.1	Letter agreement dated May 12, 2009 between ARAMARK Corporation and Bart J. Colli.
31.1	Certification of Joseph Neubauer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of L. Frederick Sutherland pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Joseph Neubauer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of L. Frederick Sutherland pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

37

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	ARAMARK CORPORATION
May 13, 2009	/s/ JOSEPH MUNNELLY
	Joseph Munnelly
	Senior Vice President, Controller
	and Chief Accounting Officer

38

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of ARAMARK Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ARAMARK Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007, pursuant to the Exchange Act (file number 001-16807)).
3.2	By-laws of ARAMARK Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ARAMARK Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007, pursuant to the Exchange Act (file number 001-16807)).
10.1	Letter agreement dated May 12, 2009 between ARAMARK Corporation and Bart J. Colli.
31.1	Certification of Joseph Neubauer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of L. Frederick Sutherland pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Joseph Neubauer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of L. Frederick Sutherland pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

39