Summary Of Business And Significant Accounting Policies | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | Reverse merger transaction |
|
On October 3, 2014, Cybergy Holdings, Inc. (“Cybergy”, “the Company”), formerly Mount Knowledge Holdings, Inc. (“MKHD”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with MK Merger Acquisition Sub, Inc., a whollyowned subsidiary of MKHD (“Merger Sub”), Access Alternative Group S.A., and Cybergy Partners, Inc. (“Partners”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Partners (the “Merger”), with Partners surviving the Merger as a whollyowned subsidiary of MKHD. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the shareholders of Partners and MKHD initially exchanged shares in the respective companies for 88% and 12% ownership, respectively, of the surviving company. |
|
The Merger of Partners and MKHD, a nonoperating public shell corporation, resulted in the owners and management of Partners obtaining actual and effective voting and operating control of the combined company. The Merger was treated as a public shell reverse acquisition and therefore treated as a capital transaction in substance, rather than a business combination. The historical financial statements of MKHD before the Merger were replaced with the historical financial statements of Partners before the Merger. As a result of the Merger, Cybergy acquired the business of Partners, and has continued the existing business operations of Partners. |
|
Principles of Consolidation, Basis of Presentation, and Fiscal Periods |
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Cybergy Holdings, Inc. (“Cybergy”, “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information reflects all normal and recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company and its results of operations for the interim periods set forth herein. The consolidated condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 presented herein has been derived from the audited balance sheet included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 2014. |
|
Certain information and footnote disclosures, which are normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 2014. The information reflects all normal and recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company and its results of operations for the interim periods set forth herein. |
|
The results for the three months ended March 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other period. |
|
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of Cybergy, its whollyowned subsidiaries; Partners, New West, Primetrix, Labs, and its 51% owned New WestEnergetics Joint Venture, LLC (“JV”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
In 2015, the Company changed from a calendar end date to a “4/4/5 weekly” quarterly close cycle. The Company’s three month fiscal periods ended on April 3, 2015 and March 31, 2014. Our balance sheet dates are referred to herein as March 2015 and December 2014. Our three month fiscal periods are referred to herein as March 2015 and 2014. |
|
Going Concern |
|
In 2014 and 2015, the Company had negative cash flow from operations due to declining gross margin, increased personnel costs as well as merger and acquisition costs related to the acquisition and merger. The decline in gross margin was due primarily to the delay on the transition from our JV contract to the follow-on MOTS contract with the Department of Energy. We expect to incur additional operating losses for the year ending December 2015. |
|
These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. |
|
The Company does not currently believe that its existing cash resources are sufficient to meet its anticipated needs for the year ending December 2015. We need to obtain significant additional capital resources in order to develop products and fund operations and make scheduled debt payments. |
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has a history of recurring losses and had negative working capital at March 2015. |
|
There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in reducing its negative operating cash flows, and that such cash flows will be sufficient to sustain the Company’s operations through 2015. Nor can there be any assurance that the Company can raise additional capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated condensed financial statements were prepared assuming that the Company is a going concern. The consolidated condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are focused on managing its cash flow, the proper timing of its capital expenditures, and raising additional capital or financing in the future. |
|
In April and May 2015, the Company raised net proceeds of $1,660,000 from the sale of Series C preferred stock and short term bridge loans as more fully discussed in the following notes. |
|
Management believes the Company will need additional capital in 2015 of approximately $1.5 to $2.0 million to further fund operations and market expansion of the SmartFile software. The Company intends to cover its future operating expenses through additional financing from existing and prospective investors, revenue from existing and new contracts, revenue from potential grants and collaborative marketing agreements, as well as revenue from the commercialization of products and services. However, we may not be successful in obtaining funding from new or existing collaborative agreements or the commercialization of our products and services. Further, actual revenue may be less than forecasted. |
|
Additionally, we have engaged a financial advisor to raise capital through the sale of stock, issuance of convertible debt or asset based loans, which has a track record of successfully raising capital for hundreds of development stage to midcap scale companies. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Significant estimates affecting the financial statements include accruals for contract reserves, recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets and earnout obligations related to the acquisition of New West, warrant, conversion, and put valuations and income taxes. The valuation of the warrant, conversion, and put derivative liabilities using a Lattice model is based upon interest rates, stock prices, maturity estimates, volatility and other factors. The Company believes these estimates and assumptions are reliable. However, these estimates and assumptions may change in the future based on actual experience as well as market conditions. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change in the near term. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions with which it invests. |
|
Concentration of Credit Risk/Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade receivables. We believe that concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited as they are primarily from government agencies. |
|
Credit Risk |
|
The Company grants credit in the normal course of business to customers in the United States. The Company periodically performs credit analysis and monitors the financial condition of its customers to reduce credit risk. Contracts with the federal government, either as a prime or subcontractor, accounted for approximately 94% and 93% of revenues in 2015 and 2014, respectively and one customer accounted for 92% and 83% of total revenues in 2015 and 2014, respectively. At March 2015 and December 2014, the same customer accounted for 74% of total contract receivables. |
|
Financial Instruments |
|
The Company uses fair value measurements in areas that include, but are not limited to: the allocation of purchase price consideration to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and valuation of derivative liabilities. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, contract receivables, accounts payable, and other current assets and liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of our bank debt approximates fair value due to the variable nature of the interest rates under our Credit Facility and current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and risk. Since the put option is embedded in an outstanding share, management chose the “fair value option” in which the entire instrument (the common stock and the put feature) is recorded at fair value. |
|
The conversion features embedded in, and warrants attached to, the convertible debentures and the put liability are valued at estimated fair value utilizing a Lattice model. The Company, using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies, has estimated the fair value of its financial instruments. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting data to develop the estimates of fair value. |
|
Contract Receivables |
|
The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business but mitigates the associated credit risk by evaluating customers' creditworthiness and actively pursuing past due accounts. Management of the Company reviews the collectability of customer receivables on an individual basis based on its historical collection experience with customers. Many of the Company's customers are governmental agencies and are, therefore, subject to the terms and conditions of the Prompt Payment Act, which, with certain exceptions, requires the U.S. government to pay the Company within 30 days from the date of submission of a properly prepared invoice. |
|
Government contract receivables arise from long-term U.S. government prime contracts and subcontracts. Unbilled contract receivables represent services provided but not yet billed. The amount reflects the actual amount anticipated to be billed. The Company evaluates unbilled amounts for collectability based on estimates of workinprogress that may not be billed based on knowledge of individual balances. |
|
The Company does not accrue finance or interest charges on its receivables. Contract receivables determined to be uncollectible are expensed in the period such determination is made. No allowance was considered necessary as of March 2015 or December 2014. |
|
Included in Contract receivables are retainage amounts of $76,000 and $73,000 at March 2015 and December 2014, respectively. |
|
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are stated net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $308,000 and $249,000 at March 2015 and December 2014, respectively. |
|
Goodwill |
|
We review goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. |
|
Intangibles |
|
Intangibles are stated net of accumulated amortization of $980,000 and $790,000 at March 2015 and December 2014, respectively. |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency. |
|
The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt and equity instruments it issues to determine whether there are derivative instruments, including an embedded conversion or put options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. In circumstances where a host instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including a conversion option, that is required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument. Also, in connection with the sale of convertible debt and equity instruments, the Company may issue freestanding warrants or put options that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity. |
|
Derivative instruments are initially recorded at fair value and are then revalued at each reporting date with changes in the fair value reported as nonoperating income or expense. When the convertible debt or equity instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcated and accounted for as liabilities, the total proceeds allocated to the convertible host instruments are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the convertible instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instruments being recorded at a discount from their face value. The discount from the face value of the convertible debt, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to interest expense, using the effective interest method. |
|
The Company has determined that certain of the features (specifically, the embedded conversion feature, the mandatory conversion feature, the antidilution provisions, and default interest) embedded in its Convertible debentures were not considered “clearly and closely related” to the economic characteristics of the Convertible debenture, nor did they meet the definition of being indexed to the Company’s own stock. The Company applies the applicable accounting provisions for the accounting of the valuation of these features and associated warrants. The liability is adjusted quarterly to the estimated fair value based upon then current market conditions. The Company records the change in the estimated fair value of the derivative liability in other income or expense. |
|
The derivative liability was valued using a combination of a Brownian Motion technique and a Binomial Lattice (“Lattice”) model. A Lattice approach is a preferred valuation methodology relative to a closedform option pricing model (e.g., a BlackScholes option pricing model) because (i) it embodies all of the assumptions that market participants would likely consider in negotiating the transfer of the Convertible debentures, (ii) it simulates the exercise of the Convertible debentures prior to the expiration date, and iii) it incorporates potential variability for inputs that are not static such as the occurrence of a mandatory conversion, an event of default or a dilutive issuance. The Lattice model utilizes interest rates, stock prices, contractually remaining term of the underlying financial instruments and volatility factors. We utilize historical volatility over a period generally commensurate with the remaining contractual term of the underlying financial instruments and use daily intervals for price observations. However, the Company does not have sufficient trading activity on which to base an estimate of future stock price volatility. Therefore, management determined that use of historical volatility of a comparable peer group over a term consistent with the remaining contractual terms of the Convertible debentures was the best indicator of the stock’s future volatility. The Company believes these estimates and assumptions are reliable. However, these estimates and assumptions may change in the future based on actual experience as well as market conditions. |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
Substantially all of our work is performed for our customers on a contract basis based on time and materials. Revenues result from work performed on these contracts by our employees and our subcontractors and from costs for materials and other work related costs allowed under our contracts. |
|
Revenues for time and materials contracts are recorded on the basis of contract allowable labor hours worked multiplied by the contract defined billing rates, plus the direct costs and indirect cost burdens associated with materials and subcontract work used in performance on the contract. Generally, gross profit on time and materials contracts result from the difference between the cost of services performed and the contract defined billing rates for these services. |
|
Under certain contracts with the U.S. government and other governmental entities, contract costs, including indirect costs, are subject to audit by and adjustment through negotiation with governmental representatives. Revenue is recorded in amounts expected to be realized on final settlement of any such audits. |
|
Share-Based Compensation |
|
We account for sharebased awards in accordance with the applicable accounting rules that require the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all sharebased payment awards based on estimated fair values. That cost is recognized over the requisite service period in which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting period. |
|
Net Earnings (Loss) per Share of Common Stock |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share are computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period adjusted to reflect potentially dilutive securities. The computation of earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each of the periods based upon the exchange ratio of shares issued in the merger. |
|
The shareholders of Partners received Series C preferred stock in connection with the Merger, therefore the exchange ratio to common stock was zero. Through the merger date in 2014, there were no outstanding common shares. |
|
The following is a reconciliation of net earnings used in the calculation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 2015: |
|
Net income attributable to Cybergy | | $ | 104,420,000 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | |
Preferred stock | | | - | |
Stock options | | | 8,000 | |
Convertible debentures | | | (43,067,000 | ) |
Warrants | | | (3,562,000 | ) |
Put option | | | (59,453,000 | ) |
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to Cybergy | | $ | (1,654,000 | ) |
|
The following is a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 2015: |
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding | | 20,498,591 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | |
Preferred stock | | | 523,785,360 | |
Stock options | | | 17,712,458 | |
Convertible debentures | | | 80,313,600 | |
Warrants | | | 6,482,452 | |
Put option | | | - | |
Dilutive potential common shares | | | 648,792,461 | |
|
The following securities were not included in the computation of diluted net earnings per share as their effect would have been antidilutive: |
|
Stock options | | 503,295 | |
Warrants | | | 501,755 | |
| | | 1,005,050 | |
|
Income Taxes |
|
The current provision for income taxes represents estimated amounts payable or refundable on tax returns filed or to be filed for the year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for net operating loss and tax credit carryovers. The overall change in deferred tax assets and liabilities for the period measures the deferred tax expense or benefit for the period. Effects of changes in enacted tax laws on deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected as adjustments to tax expense in the period of enactment. |
|
When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets to offset future tax benefits that may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, based in part upon management’s judgments regarding future events and past operating results. |
|
The Company follows the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 740, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. ASC Topic 740 prescribes a more-likely-than-not measurement methodology to reflect the financial statement impact of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) recently released ASU 2015-03; Interest—Imputation of Interest, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs that requires debt issuance costs be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt instead of as a noncurrent asset. The change brings requirements into line with those of premiums and discounts on debt. ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to adopt ASU 2015-03 in 2016 and does not expect the adoption will have a significant impact on the consolidated balance sheet. |