THE COMPANY | 9 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract] | ' |
THE COMPANY | ' |
Note 1 – THE COMPANY |
|
Point.360 (the “Company” or “we”) provides high definition and standard definition digital mastering, data conversion, video and film asset management, distribution and other services to owners, producers and distributors of entertainment and advertising content. The Company provides the services necessary to edit, master, reformat, convert, archive and ultimately distribute its clients’ film and video content, including television programming feature films and movie trailers. The Company’s interconnected facilities provide service coverage to all major U.S. media centers. Clients include major motion picture studios and independent producers. The Company also rents and sells DVDs directly to consumers through its Movie>Q retail stores. |
|
The Company operates in two business segments from three post production and three Movie>Q locations. Each post production location is electronically tied to the others and serves the same customer base. Depending on the location size, the production equipment consists of tape duplication, editing, encoding, standards conversion, and other machinery. Each location employs personnel with the skills required to efficiently run the equipment and handle customer requirements. While all locations are not exactly the same, an order received at one location may be fulfilled at one or more “sister” facilities to use resources in the most efficient manner. |
|
Typically, a feature film or television show or related material will be submitted to a facility by a motion picture studio, independent producer, advertising agency, or corporation for processing and distribution. A common sales force markets the Company’s capability for all facilities. Once an order is received, the local customer service representative determines the most cost-effective way to perform the services considering geographical logistics and facility capabilities. |
|
In fiscal 2010, the Company purchased assets and intellectual property for a research and development project to address the viability of the DVD rental business being abandoned by the closure of Movie Gallery/Hollywood Video and Blockbuster stores. The DVD rental market consists principally of online services (Netflix), vending machines (Redbox) and other video stores. |
|
As of March 31, 2014, the Company had opened three Movie>Q stores in Southern California employing an automated inventory management (“AIM”) system in a 1,200-1,600 square foot facility. By saving space and personnel costs which caused the big box stores to be uncompetitive with lower priced online and vending machine rental alternatives, Movie>Q can offer up to 10,000 unit selections to a customer at competitive rental rates. Movie>Q provides online reservations, an in-store destination experience, first run movie titles and a large unit selection (as opposed to 400-700 for a Redbox vending machine). |
|
Based on the success of the stores, the Company may seek to expand the number of Movie>Q stores while further streamlining the design and production of the AIM system. Movie>Q provides the Company with a content distribution capability complimentary to the Company’s post production business. |
|
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts and transactions of the Company, including those of the Company’s subsidiaries. The statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations for reporting interim financial statements and footnotes. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2013. |
|
Pro Forma Earnings (Loss) Per Share A reconciliation of the denominator of the basic earnings per share (“EPS”) computation to the denominator of the diluted EPS computation is as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | | Three Months | | | Three Months | | | Nine Months | | | Nine Months | |
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended |
March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | March 31, |
| | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | |
Pro forma weighted average of number of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computation of basic EPS | | | 10,513 | | | 10,537 | | | 10,513 | | | 10,532 | |
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Weighted average number of common and potential Common shares outstanding used in computation of Diluted EPS | | | 10,513 | | | 10,537 | | | 10,513 | | | 10,532 | |
Effect of dilutive options excluded in the computation of diluted EPS due to net loss | | | - | | | 87 | | | - | | | 53 | |
|
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding was the same amount for both basic and diluted income per share in the three month period ended March 31, 2014 and the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2014. The effect of potentially dilutive securities for those periods were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive (i.e., including such securities would result in a higher earnings per share, or lower loss per share, respectively). There were 984,025 and 1,177,485 potentially dilutive shares at March 31, 2013 and 2014, respectively. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
The Company follows a framework for consistently measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and the disclosures of fair value measurements. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy to classify the source of the information. |
|
The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value and include the following: |
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Cash, the only Level 1 input applicable to the Company (there are no Level 2 or 3 inputs), is stated on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. |
|
As of March 31, 2014 the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The carrying value of capital lease obligations, notes payable and other long-term liabilities approximates fair value as the related interest rates approximate rates currently available to the Company. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
Changes to accounting principles are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of accounting standards updates (ASU’s) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification. We consider the applicability and impact of all ASU’s. ASU’s not listed below were assessed and determined to be not applicable to our financial position or results of operations. |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11, Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, an amendment to FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, (“FASB ASU 2013-11”). This update clarifies that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. In situations where a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction or the tax law of the jurisdiction does not require, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Retrospective application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or presentation thereof. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |