SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements | ' |
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents. |
|
Cash equivalents represent highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of less than three months when purchased. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | ' |
Revenues. |
|
We perform a multitude of services for our clients, including film-to-tape transfer, video and audio editing, standards conversions, adding special effects, duplication, distribution, etc. A customer orders one or more of these services with respect to an element (movie, television show, etc.). The sum total of services performed on a particular element (a “package”) becomes the deliverable (i.e., the customer will pay for the services ordered in total when the entire job is completed). Occasionally, a major studio will request that package services be performed on multiple elements. Each element creates a separate revenue stream which is recognized only when all requested services have been performed on that element. At the end of an accounting period, revenue is accrued for un-invoiced but shipped work. |
|
Certain jobs specify that many discrete tasks must be performed which require up to four months to complete. In such cases, we use the proportional performance method for recognizing revenue. Under the proportional performance method, revenue is recognized based on the value of services already completed on each specific element. |
|
In some instances, a client will request that we store (or “vault”) an element for a period ranging from a day to indefinitely. The Company attempts to bill customers a nominal amount for storage, but some customers, especially major movie studios, will not pay for this service. In the latter instance, storage is an accommodation to foster additional business with respect to the related element. It is impossible to estimate (i) the length of time we may house the element, or (ii) the amount of additional services we may be called upon to perform on an element. We do not treat vaulting as a separate deliverable in those instances in which the customer does not pay. |
|
The Company records all revenues when all of the following criteria are met: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered; (iii) the Company’s price to the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Additionally, in instances where package services are performed on multiple elements or where the proportional performance method is applied, revenue is recognized based on the value of each stand-alone service completed. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | ' |
Allowance for doubtful accounts. |
|
We are required to make judgments, based on historical experience and future expectations, as to the collectability of accounts receivable. The allowances for doubtful accounts represent allowances for customer trade accounts receivable that are estimated to be partially or entirely uncollectible. These allowances are used to reduce gross trade receivables to their net realizable value. The Company records these allowances as a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses based on estimates related to the following factors: (i) customer specific allowance; (ii) amounts based upon an aging schedule and (iii) an estimated amount, based on the Company’s historical experience, for issues not yet identified. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Research and Development | ' |
Research and Development. |
|
Research and development costs include expenditures for planned search and investigation aimed at discovery of new knowledge to be used to develop new services or processes or significantly enhance existing processes. Research and development costs also include the implementation of the new knowledge through design, testing of service alternatives, or construction of prototypes. The cost of materials and equipment or facilities that are acquired or constructed for research and development activities and that have alternative future uses are capitalized as tangible assets when acquired or constructed. All other research and development costs are expensed as incurred. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Accounting for income taxes | ' |
Accounting for income taxes. |
|
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
At June 30, 2014, the Company has no uncertain tax positions. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. The deferred tax assets are fully reserved at June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Concentration of Credit Risk | ' |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions; at times, such balances with any one financial institution may exceed FDIC insured limits, which was the case as of June 30, 2014. |
|
Credit risk with respect to trade receivables is concentrated due to the large number of orders with major entertainment studios in any particular reporting period. Our five largest studio customers represented 60% and 61% of accounts receivable at June 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Twentieth Century Fox (and affiliates) accounted for 22% and 21% of accounts receivable as of June 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Disney accounted for 23% and 32% of accounts receivable as of June 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Fremantle Media accounted for 12% and 7% of accounts receivable as of June 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. The Company reviews credit evaluations of its customers but does not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables. |
|
The five largest studio customers accounted for 67%, 68% and 69% of net revenues for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Twentieth Century Fox (and affiliates) accounted for 25%, 32% and 25% of revenues in the years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Fremantle Media accounted for 9%, 12% and 15% of sales in the years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively, while sales to Disney were 27%, 19% and 22% of sales in the years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Inventories | ' |
Inventories |
|
Inventories comprise raw materials, principally tape stock, and DVD’s, and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the average cost method. The rental library for the Movie>Q stores consists of DVD’s available for rental by customers. Because of the DVD’s relatively short useful lives, we view these assets to be current assets. We utilize the accelerated method of depreciation because it approximates the demand for the product. A nominal residual value is established. Movie>Q depreciation expense totaled $125,000, $142,000 and $144,000 for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Property and Equipment | ' |
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for additions and major improvements are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the remaining lease term. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Leases | ' |
Operating Leases |
|
Operating leases are accounted for in accordance with FASB Accounting Standard Codification Topic 840, “Accounting for Leases.” Rent expense under operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The difference between the rent expense and the rent payment is recorded as an increase or decrease in deferred rent liability. The Company accounts for tenant allowances in lease agreements as a deferred lease incentive. The deferred lease incentive is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. For operating leases that include rent free periods or escalation clauses over the term of the lease, the Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis and the difference between expense and amounts paid is recorded as deferred rent in current and long-term liabilities. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Advertising Costs | ' |
Advertising Costs |
|
Advertising costs are not significant to the Company’s operations and are expensed as incurred. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value Measurement | ' |
Fair Value Measurement |
|
The Company follows a framework for consistently measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and the disclosures of fair value measurements. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy to classify the source of the information. |
|
The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value and include the following: |
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, the only Level 1 input applicable to the Company (there are no Level 2 or 3 inputs), is stated on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. |
|
As of June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2014, the carrying value of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The carrying value of notes payable, capital lease obligations, and other long-term liabilities approximates fair value as the related interest rates approximate rates currently available to the Company. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment of long lived assets | ' |
Impairment of long lived assets |
|
Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following: |
|
| · | Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy of our overall business; | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Significant negative industry or economic trends; | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Our market capitalization relative to net book value. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
When we determine that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on comparing the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value in a current transaction between willing parties or, in the absence of such measurement, on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Any amount of impairment so determined would be written off as a charge to the statement of operations, together with an equal reduction of the related asset. Net long-lived assets amounted to approximately $10.2 million as of June 30, 2014. |
|
As of June 30, 2014, we compared the book value of our building ($7.5 at June 30, 2014) to market comparables provided by a licensed real estate broker, and equipment ($2.7 at June 30, 2014) to an appraisal performed in conjunction with a new financing arrangement completed during fiscal 2013 which indicated no impairment. We then considered operating cash flows for the three years then ended together with a forecast for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. As indicated in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company reported the following “Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities” for the last three fiscal years: |
|
Year ended June 30, 2012 | | $ | 6,147,000 | | | | | | | |
Year ended June 30, 2013 | | | 1,719,000 | | | | | | | |
Year ended June 30, 2014 | | | -60,000 | | | | | | | |
|
We also considered the Company’s closing stock price which ranged from $1.50 to $0.34 per share over the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 ($0.36 as of June 30, 2014). While the stock price could be an indicator of impairment, we believe that it is not an appropriate measurement of value for Point.360 since market fluctuations (both increases and decreases) are often short term in nature, and the stock is thinly traded, can fluctuate widely on very low volume, and there is no significant institutional ownership. We believe the appraisals and cash flow are the more relevant indicators. |
|
We have also considered the evolution of our past production work from physical to file-based formats. This trend is expected to continue, and we have taken and will continue to take, steps to consolidate facilities and realign capabilities which have enhanced operating cash flow. While this evolution will create uncertainties which may result in a material future impairment, we do not believe such impairment exists, and that further impairment testing is not required, for the year ended June 30, 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Valuation of long-lived assets | ' |
Valuation of long-lived assets. |
|
Long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment, comprise a significant portion of the Company’s total assets. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances have indicated that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to its fair value in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation sale. |
|
In fiscal 2010, the Company acquired assets and technology from Kiosk Concepts, LLC and DVDs on the Run, Inc. for use in developing the Movie>Q proof of concept. The assets included (i) vending machine type kiosks and related machinery, and (ii) an automated DVD management system. The Movie>Q R&D project evaluated the capabilities and potential economics of both models. In 2010, the Company opened three Movie>Q stores incorporating the automated inventory management (AIM) system while further investigating potential uses of the kiosk assets. On March 31, 2011, the Company determined that the AIM system would be used exclusively for Movie>Q, and that the kiosk assets of the Movie>Q business segment were impaired for accounting purposes. |
|
For purposes of impairment testing under ASC 360, we considered potential cash flows from the kiosk assets. Since the decision was made to use the AIM system, and because the kiosk assets were easily separable from both the AIM assets and the chosen Movie>Q business model, separate kiosk cash flow evaluation was deemed appropriate. The kiosks are specialty retail machines that could conceivably be employed by the Company or another entity to compete with the Redbox-type business, but the kiosks were significantly larger than the Redbox version, required software development to become functional, and would require potentially large expenditures to ship them to a buyer. Because of these factors and our inability to attract a buyer, we deemed the potential cash flow from the kiosks to be negligible to zero, and that the salvage value is zero. |
|
Due to the specialized nature of the assets, management’s decision not to use the kiosk assets in Movie>Q, no perceived alternative use for the assets, and no indicated market value for the assets, management determined that the kiosk assets were fully impaired and recorded an impairment loss of $684,000 in the year ended June 30, 2011. |
|
There were no impairment charges during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2013, and 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share | ' |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
The Company has historically followed Accounting Standards Codification No. 260, “Earnings per Share” (“ASC 260”), and related interpretations for reporting earnings per share. ASC 260 requires dual presentation of basic earnings per share (“Basic EPS”) and diluted earnings per share (“Diluted EPS”). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reported period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if a company had a stock option plan and stock options were exercised using the treasury stock method. |
|
A reconciliation of the denominator of the basic EPS computation to the denominator of the diluted EPS computation is as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | Year Ended | |
June 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computation of basic EPS | | | 10,513 | | | 10,513 | | | 10,533 | |
Dilutive number of outstanding stock options | | | 10 | | | - | | | - | |
Weighted average number of common and potential common shares outstanding used in computation of Diluted EPS | | | 10,523 | | | 10,513 | | | 10,533 | |
Number of dilutive options excluded in the computation of diluted EPS due to net loss | | | - | | | 30 | | | 71 | |
|
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding was the same amount for both basic and diluted income or loss per share in the 2013 and 2014 periods presented. The effect of potentially dilutive securities for the 2013 and 2014 periods was excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the Company reported a net loss, and the effect of inclusion would be anti-dilutive (i.e., including such securities would result in a lower loss per share). Potentially dilutive securities in the 2012 period consists of stock options for which the exercise price is less than the Company’s stock price. The number of anti-dilutive shares were 0, 1,728,500 and 0 as of June 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
Changes to accounting principles are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of accounting standards updates (ASU’s) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification. We consider the applicability and impact of all ASU’s. ASU’s not listed below were assessed and determined to be not applicable to our financial position or results of operations. |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11, Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, an amendment to FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, (“FASB ASU 2013-11”). This update clarifies that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. In situations where a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction or the tax law of the jurisdiction does not require, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Retrospective application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or presentation thereof. |
| | | | | | | | | | |