THE COMPANY | 3 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract] | ' |
THE COMPANY | ' |
Note 1 – THE COMPANY |
|
Point.360 and subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we” or “our”) provides high definition and standard definition digital mastering, data conversion, video and film asset management and sophisticated computer graphics services to owners, producers and distributors of entertainment and advertising content. The Company provides the services necessary to edit, master, reformat, convert, archive and ultimately distribute its clients’ film and video content, including television programming feature films and movie trailers. The Company’s interconnected facilities provide service coverage to all major U.S. media centers. Clients include major motion picture studios and independent producers. The Company also rents and sells DVDs directly to consumers through its Movie>Q retail stores. |
|
The Company operates in two business segments from three post production and three Movie>Q locations. Each post production location is electronically tied to the others and serves the same customer base. Depending on the location size, the production equipment consists of tape duplication, editing, encoding, standards conversion, and other machinery. Each location employs personnel with the skills required to efficiently run the equipment and handle customer requirements. While all locations are not exactly the same, an order received at one location may be fulfilled at one or more “sister” facilities to use resources in the most efficient manner. |
|
Typically, a feature film or television show or related material will be submitted to a facility by a motion picture studio, independent producer, advertising agency, or corporation for processing and distribution. A common sales force markets the Company’s capability for all facilities. Once an order is received, the local customer service representative determines the most cost-effective way to perform the services considering geographical logistics and facility capabilities. |
|
In fiscal 2010, the Company purchased assets and intellectual property for a research and development project to address the viability of the DVD rental business being abandoned by the closure of Movie Gallery/Hollywood Video and Blockbuster stores. The DVD rental market consists principally of online services (Netflix), vending machines (Redbox) and other video stores. |
|
As of September 30, 2014, the Company had opened three Movie>Q stores in Southern California. The stores employ an automated inventory management (“AIM”) system in a 1,200-1,600 square foot facility. By saving space and personnel costs which caused the big box stores to be uncompetitive with lower priced online and vending machine rental alternatives, Movie>Q can offer up to 10,000 unit selections to a customer at competitive rental rates. Movie>Q provides online reservations, an in-store destination experience, first run movie titles and a large unit selection (as opposed to 400-700 for a Redbox vending machine). |
|
Based on the success of the stores, the Company may seek to expand the number of Movie>Q stores while further streamlining the design and production of the AIM system. Movie>Q provides the Company with a content distribution capability complimentary to the Company’s post production business. |
|
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts and transactions of the Company, including those of the Company’s subsidiaries. The statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations for reporting interim financial statements and footnotes. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Operating results for the three month period ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2014. |
|
Pro Forma Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
A reconciliation of the denominator of the basic earnings per share (“EPS”) computation to the denominator of the diluted EPS computation is as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | Three Months | | Three Months | |
Ended | Ended |
September 30, | September 30, |
| | 2013 | | 2014 | |
Pro forma weighted average of number of shares | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computation of basic EPS | | | 10,521 | | | 10,537 | |
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options | | | - | | | - | |
Weighted average number of common and potential Common shares outstanding used in computation of Diluted EPS | | | 10,521 | | | 10,537 | |
Effect of dilutive options excluded in the computation of diluted EPS due to net loss | | | 249 | | | 27 | |
|
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding were the same amount for both basic and diluted loss per share in the three month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2014. The effect of potentially dilutive securities for those periods were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the Company reported a net loss, and the effect of inclusion would be anti-dilutive (i.e., including such securities would result in a higher earnings per share, or lower loss per share, respectively). There were 2,358,585 and 2,648,473 potentially dilutive shares at September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
The Company follows a framework for consistently measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and the disclosures of fair value measurements. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy to classify the source of the information. |
|
The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value and include the following: |
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Cash, the only Level 1 input applicable to the Company (there are no Level 2 or 3 inputs), is stated on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. |
|
As of September 30, 2014 the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The carrying value of capital lease obligations, notes payable and other long-term liabilities approximates fair value as the related interest rates approximate rates currently available to the Company. |
| | | | | | | |