COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS | COLLABORATIVE LICENSE AGREEMENTS Lilly collaboration and share purchase agreements On October 25, 2018, the Company entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Lilly Collaboration Agreement”) with Lilly for the discovery, development, and commercialization of potential new medicines in the areas of cardiometabolic disease, neurodegeneration, and pain. Under the terms of the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Lilly will seek to use the Company’s proprietary GalXC RNAi technology platform to progress new drug targets toward clinical development and commercialization. In addition, the Company and Lilly will collaborate to extend the GalXC RNAi platform technology to non-liver (i.e., non-hepatocyte) tissues, including neural tissues. The Lilly Collaboration Agreement provides that the Company will work exclusively with Lilly in the neurodegeneration and pain fields, with the exception of mutually agreed upon orphan indications. Additionally, the Company will work exclusively with Lilly on select targets in the cardiometabolic field. Under the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, the Company will provide Lilly with exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to support the companies’ activities and to enable Lilly to commercialize products derived from or containing compounds developed pursuant to such agreement. The Lilly Collaboration Agreement provides for three initially named hepatocyte targets, and the Company and Lilly have agreed to develop an initial research program with the goal of researching and developing multiple lead candidates directed to each of these initial targets. The Lilly Collaboration Agreement contemplates in excess of 10 targets. Under the terms of the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, Lilly agreed to pay the Company a non-refundable, non-creditable upfront payment of $100.0 million . The Company is also eligible to receive up to $350.0 million , per target, in development and commercialization milestones, in addition to a $5.0 million payment, which will become due for each of the non-hepatocyte targets when a product candidate achieves proof of principle in an animal model. In addition, the Company is eligible to earn mid-single to low-double digit royalties on product sales on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis until the later of expiration of patent rights in a country, the expiration of data or regulatory exclusivity in such country, or 10 years after the first product sale in such country, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement. Simultaneously with the entry into the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Lilly entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Lilly Share Issuance Agreement”), pursuant to which Lilly purchased 5,414,185 shares of the Company’s common stock at $18.47 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $100.0 million . Management concluded that the Lilly Share Issuance Agreement is to be combined with the Lilly Collaboration Agreement (together, the “Combined Agreements”) for accounting purposes. Of the total $200.0 million upfront compensation, the Company applied equity accounting guidance to measure the $51.3 million recorded in equity upon the issuance of the shares, and $148.7 million was identified as the transaction price allocated to the revenue arrangement. The Combined Agreements were subject to customary closing conditions and clearances, including clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, and closed in December 2018. The Company concluded that Lilly is a customer in this arrangement, and as such, the element of the arrangement unrelated to the issuance of the shares falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. The Company identified contract promises under the Combined Agreements for licenses of intellectual property and know-how rights, associated research and development services for targets and for a new platform, and participation on a joint steering committee. The Company d etermined that the performance obligations were not separately identifiable and were not distinct or distinct within the context of the contract due to the specialized nature of the services to be provided by Dicerna, specifically with respect to the Company’s therapeutic expertise related to RNAi and the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and the interdependent relationship between the performance obligations. As such, the Company concluded that there is a single identified combined performance obligation. The Company used the most likely amount method to estimate variable consideration and estimated that the most likely amount for each potential development milestone payment under this agreement, which is considered variable consideration, was zero , as the achievement of those milestones is uncertain and highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company’s control. Accordingly, all such milestones were excluded from the transaction price. Management will re-evaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur and adjust the transaction price as necessary. Sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, were also excluded from the transaction price, as the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate. The Company will recognize such revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). Revenue associated with the performance obligation will be recognized as services are provided using a cost-to-cost measure of progress method. The transfer of control occurs over time and, in management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation and reflects a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods and services. The Company recognized $0.5 million of revenue under the Lilly Collaboration Agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The amount of the Company’s partially unsatisfied performance obligation, recorded as a contract liability presented in deferred revenue at March 31, 2019, is $148.1 million , of which $46.1 million is included in the current portion of deferred revenue. As of March 31, 2019, the Company expected to recognize this amount over the remaining research term of the agreement, which is expected to extend through the first quarter of 2022, with the majority being recognized through the fourth quarter of 2021. Alexion collaboration and equity agreements On October 22, 2018, the Company and Alexion Pharma Holding Unlimited Company (“Alexion Pharma Holding”), an affiliate of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alexion Pharmaceuticals” and, together with Alexion Pharma Holding, “Alexion”) entered into a Collaborative Research and License Agreement (the “Alexion Collaboration Agreement”). The Alexion Collaboration Agreement is for the joint discovery and development of RNAi therapies for complement-mediated diseases. Under the terms of the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Alexion will collaborate on the discovery and development of subcutaneously delivered GalXC candidates, currently in preclinical development, for the treatment of complement-mediated diseases with potential global commercialization by Alexion. The Company will lead the joint discovery and research efforts through the preclinical stage, and Alexion will lead development efforts beginning with Phase 1 studies. The Company will be responsible for manufacturing of the GalXC candidates through the completion of Phase 1, and the related costs will be paid by Alexion. Alexion will be solely responsible for the manufacturing of any product candidate subsequent to the completion of Phase 1. The Alexion Collaboration Agreement provides Alexion with exclusive worldwide licenses as well as development and commercial rights for two of the Company’s preclinical, subcutaneously delivered GalXC RNAi candidates and an exclusive option for the discovery and development of GalXC RNAi candidates against two additional complement pathway targets. Under the terms of the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, Alexion agreed to pay the Company a non-refundable, non-reimbursable, and non-creditable upfront payment of $22.0 million . The Alexion Collaboration Agreement also provides for potential additional payments to the Company of up to $600.0 million from proceeds from target option exercises and development and sales milestones, as defined in the agreement, which is comprised of: (i) option exercise fees of up to $20.0 million , representing $10.0 million for each of the targets selected; (ii) development milestones of up to $105.0 million for each product; and (iii) aggregate sales milestones of up to $160.0 million . Under the agreement, Alexion also agreed to pay to the Company mid-single to low-double digit royalties on potential product sales on a country-by-country, product-by-product basis until the later of the expiration of patent rights in a country, the expiration of market or regulatory exclusivity in such country, or 10 years after the first product sale in such country, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement. Simultaneously with the entry into the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Alexion Pharmaceuticals entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Alexion Share Issuance Agreement”), pursuant to which Alexion Pharmaceuticals purchased 835,834 shares of the Company’s common stock at $17.95 per share at issuance, for an aggregate stated purchase price of $15.0 million . Management concluded that the Alexion Share Issuance Agreement is to be combined with the Alexion Collaboration Agreement (together, the “Alexion Agreements”) for accounting purposes. With respect to the $15.0 million of cash received upon issuance of the shares, the Company applied equity accounting guidance to measure the $9.1 million recorded in equity upon the issuance of the shares, and the remaining $5.9 million was included as a component of the transaction price attributable to the revenue arrangement. Alexion selected two targets upon entry into the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, which, as noted above, provides Alexion with the option to select up to two additional targets, in exchange for an option fee payment of $10.0 million for each selected target. The Company concluded that Alexion is a customer in this arrangement, and as such, the element of the arrangement unrelated to the issuance of the shares falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. The Company identified the following promises under the arrangement: (i) the granting of licenses of intellectual property and know-how rights; (ii) the option to select additional targets; (iii) the option to perform validation testing on additional targets; (iv) associated research and development services for the initial and, as applicable, additional targets; and (v) the Company’s participation in the joint steering committee. The Company concluded that the research and development services were not capable of being distinct from the research and development license, and were not distinct within the context of the contract, and should therefore be combined into a single performance obligation for each program. The Company considered the level of Alexion’s therapeutic expertise specifically related to RNAi, as well as Alexion’s know-how of the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and concluded that Alexion cannot currently benefit from the granted license on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to Alexion, including relationships with oligonucleotide vendors who synthesize GalXC conjugates under contract with the Company. As a result, the combination of the license of intellectual property together with the provision of research and development services together represent the highest level of goods and services that can be deemed distinct. Additionally, the Company determined that the options to select additional targets and to perform validation testing on additional targets were not priced at a discount and, as such, do not provide Alexion with material rights. Based on management’s assessments, the Company identified a single performance obligation, namely, the combined license and research and development services, for each of the two initially nominated targets. At the outset of the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, the transaction price was determined to be $37.4 million , which is comprised of the $22.0 million upfront payment, the $5.9 million identified upon issuance of the shares, as described above, and $9.5 million in aggregate contingent milestone payments that were either received or probable of achievement and under the Company’s control. The Company used the most likely amount method to estimate variable consideration and estimated that the most likely amount for each potential development milestone payment beyond the three initial research program milestones under this agreement was zero , as the achievement of those milestones is uncertain and highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company’s control. Accordingly, such milestones were excluded from the transaction price. Management will re-evaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur and adjust the transaction price as necessary. Sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, were also excluded from the transaction price, as the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate. The Company will recognize such revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). Revenue associated with the performance obligations is being recognized as services are provided using an input method based on a cost-to-cost measure of progress method. The transfer of control occurs over time and, in management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation and reflects a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods and services. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company recognized $0.4 million as revenue under the Alexion Agreements. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s partially unsatisfied performance obligations and recorded as deferred revenue at March 31, 2019 is $33.9 million , of which $8.9 million is included in the current portion of deferred revenue. As of March 31, 2019, t he Company expects to recognize this amount over the remaining research program term, which is estimated to extend through the fourth quarter of 2023, with the majority being recognized through the fourth quarter of 2021. BI Agreement and related amendments On October 27, 2017, the Company entered into a collaborative research and license agreement with BI (the “BI Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company and BI jointly research and develop product candidates for the treatment of chronic liver disease using the GalXC platform, Dicerna’s proprietary RNAi-based technology. The BI Agreement is for the development of product candidates against one target gene with an option for BI to add the development of product candidates that target a second gene (the “Second Target”). Pursuant to the BI Agreement, Dicerna granted BI a worldwide license in connection with the research and development of such product candidates and transferred certain intellectual property rights of the selected product candidates to BI for clinical development and commercialization. Dicerna also may provide assistance to BI in order to help BI further develop selected product candidates. Under the terms of the BI Agreement, BI agreed to pay Dicerna a non-refundable upfront payment of $10.0 million for the first target, less a refundable withholding tax in Germany of $1.6 million . BI also agreed to reimburse Dicerna certain third-party expenses of $0.3 million . The German withholding tax was withheld by BI and remitted to the German tax authorities in accordance with local tax law. The Company received reimbursement of this tax in July 2018. During the term of the research program, BI will reimburse Dicerna the cost of certain materials and third-party expenses that have been included in the preclinical studies. The Company is eligible to receive up to $191.0 million in potential development and commercial milestones related to the initial target. Dicerna is also eligible to receive royalty payments on potential global net sales, subject to certain adjustments, tiered from high single digits up to low double-digits. BI’s Second Target option provided for an option fee payment of $5.0 million and success-based development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments to Dicerna. Milestone payments that are contingent upon the Company’s performance under the BI Agreement include potential developmental milestones totaling $99.0 million . The Company has excluded these amounts from allocable consideration at the outset of the arrangement, as described below. All potential net sales milestones, totaling $95.0 million , will be accounted for in the same manner as royalties and recorded as revenue at the later of the achievement of the milestone or the satisfaction of the performance obligation. The Company concluded that BI is a customer in this arrangement, and as such, the arrangement falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. The Company identified the following performance obligations under the contract: the license of intellectual property and conducting agreed-upon research program services. The Company concluded that the license and research and development services are not capable of being distinct and are not distinct within the context of the contract; therefore, the Company considers these to be one performance obligation. The Company concluded the option underlying the transfer of future licenses and potential associated research for any not-yet-known target gene is not a performance obligation of the contract at inception because the option fee reflects the standalone selling price of the option, and therefore, the option is not considered to be a material right. The Company considered the level of BI’s therapeutic expertise specifically related to RNAi, as well as BI’s know-how with regard to the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and concluded that BI cannot currently benefit from the granted license on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to BI, including relationships with oligonucleotide vendors who synthesize GalXC conjugates under contract with the Company. As a result, the combination of the license of intellectual property together with the provision of research and development support services together represent the highest level of goods and services that can be deemed distinct. Based on management’s evaluation, the $10.0 million non-refundable upfront fee and the $0.3 million agreed-upon reimbursable third-party expenses constituted the amount of the consideration to be included in the transaction price and was allocated to the performance obligation identified. None of the development milestones have been included in the transaction price during the period, since none of such milestone amounts are within the control of the Company and are not considered probable to occur until confirmed by BI, at BI’s sole discretion. Any consideration related to commercial sales-based milestones (including royalties) will be recognized when the related sales occur, since these amounts have been determined to relate predominantly to the license granted to BI and therefore are recognized at the later of when the performance obligation is satisfied or when the related sales occur. The Company re-evaluates the transaction price in each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur and adjusts the transaction price as necessary. The $10.3 million transaction price is recognized over the research term, currently estimated to extend through June 2019, which represents the Company’s current best estimate of the period of the obligation to provide research support services to BI. Related revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis, which is, in management’s judgment, an appropriate measure of progress toward satisfying the performance obligation, largely in absence of evidence that obligations are fulfilled in a specific pattern. The Company recognized $1.4 million associated with the first target under the BI Agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s partially unsatisfied performance obligations and recorded as deferred revenue at March 31, 2019 is $1.8 million , all of which is included in the current portion of deferred revenue. BI contract amendment In October 2018, BI exercised its Second Target option, which entitles the Company to a non-refundable payment of $5.0 million upon the agreement of a research work plan and budget for the Second Target. The terms of the Second Target option exercise and related rights and obligations associated with the Second Target were agreed between the Company and BI in an Additional Target Agreement (the “ATA”), which was entered into on December 31, 2018. Under the terms of the ATA, BI will be responsible for future clinical development and commercialization of candidate products for the Second Target. Additionally, during the term of the research program, BI will reimburse the Company for certain expenses. The Company is eligible to receive up to $170.0 million in potential development and commercial milestones related to the Second Target. The Company is also eligible to receive tiered royalty payments on potential global net sales, subject to certain adjustments, in the mid-single digits. Except as otherwise set forth in the ATA, development of the Second Target is subject to the terms of the original BI Agreement. The exercise of the Second Target option on December 31, 2018 through the ATA created a new contract for accounting purposes, and management determined that the $5.0 million exercise price was representative of the standalone selling price. Consistent with the reasons described related to the initial target, management concluded that the non-refundable Second Target option exercise fee (akin to an upfront payment) constituted the amount of the consideration to be included in the transaction price and has been allocated to the single performance obligation. The basis for the conclusions regarding the treatment of development and sales-based milestones associated with the Second Target are consistent with those associated with the initial combined performance obligation under the BI Agreement. The Company will re-evaluate the transaction price in each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur. The $5.0 million transaction price began being recognized as revenue in January 2019 and will be recognized over the research term, which is currently estimated to extend through June 2022. Consistent with the first target, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis, which is in management’s judgment an appropriate measure of progress toward satisfying the performance obligation, largely in absence of evidence that obligations are fulfilled in a specific pattern. The Company recognized $0.8 million associated with the Second Target under the BI Agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s partially unsatisfied performance obligation and recorded as deferred revenue at March 31, 2019 is $4.2 million , $3.0 million of which is included in the current portion of deferred revenue. In addition to establishing the terms of the Second Target option exercise, the ATA also amends the BI Agreement to provide BI with the option to add, over a three -year period, the development of product candidates targeting a further additional target gene (the “Third Target Option”). Per the ATA, if BI elects, in its sole discretion, to exercise the Third Target Option, the parties would agree to a research work plan and budget for the additional gene and negotiate development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments to the Company, and BI would make an option fee payment to the Company of $5.0 million . This option exercise fee is consistent with the Second Target option exercise fee, which management concluded was representative of the standalone selling price. If BI chooses to exercise the Third Target Option, the Company will be responsible for the discovery and initial profiling of the product candidates, including primary preclinical studies, synthesis, and delivery. BI will be responsible for evaluating and selecting the product candidates for further development. If BI selects one or more product candidates, it will be responsible for further preclinical development, clinical development, manufacturing, and commercialization of those products. If the Third Target Option is exercised, such exercise would result in a new contract for accounting purposes, as the licensing rights and research and development services underlying the Third Target Option are distinct from those associated with the initial and Second Target. The following table presents changes in the Company’s aggregate deferred revenue balances for each reporting period: THREE MONTHS ENDED BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD Deferred revenue, current and noncurrent $ 183,186 $ 8,000 $ (3,107 ) $ 188,079 YEAR ENDED BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD Deferred revenue, current and noncurrent $ 9,270 $ 180,092 $ (6,176 ) $ 183,186 |