Fair Value Measurements | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | ' |
Fair Value Measurements | ' |
7 | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued expenses, debt obligations, and preferred stock warrants. The carrying amount of accounts payable and accrued expenses are considered a reasonable estimate of their fair value, due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of debt is also considered to be a reasonable estimate of the fair value based on the short term nature of the debt and because the debt bears interest at the prevailing market rate for instruments with similar characteristics. |
|
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value are performed in a manner to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. |
|
The accounting standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following: |
|
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the market date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs for which all significant inputs are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
|
A summary of the financial assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis at fair value as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, is as follows: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements Using | |
| | Carrying | | | Quoted Prices in | | | Significant | | | Significant | |
Value | Active Markets | Other | Unobservable |
| for Identical | Observable | Inputs |
| Assets | Inputs | (Level 3) |
| (Level 1) | (Level 2) | |
September 30, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 57,688,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 57,688,000 | | | $ | — | |
December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 5,233,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,233,000 | | | $ | — | |
Preferred stock warrant liability | | | 928,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 928,000 | |
|
The Company’s debt obligations are Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. |
|
The Company’s money market funds have been valued on the basis of valuations provided by third-party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. The Company is ultimately responsible for the consolidated financial statements and underlying estimates. Accordingly, the Company assesses the reasonableness of the valuations provided by the third-party pricing services by reviewing actual trade data, broker/dealer quotes and other similar data, which are obtained from quoted market prices or other sources. |
|
No transfers between levels have occurred during the periods presented. |
|
The reconciliation of the Company’s preferred stock warrant liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred Stock Warrant | |
| | Series B | | | Series C | | | Series D | | | Total | |
Balance — December 31, 2012 | | $ | 7,000 | | | $ | 500,000 | | | $ | 623,000 | | | $ | 1,130,000 | |
Decrease in fair value recorded in other income | | | (3,000 | ) | | | (140,000 | ) | | | (101,000 | ) | | | (244,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance — September 30, 2013 | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 360,000 | | | $ | 522,000 | | | $ | 886,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred Stock Warrant | |
| | Series B | | | Series C | | | Series D | | | Total | |
Balance — December 31, 2013 | | $ | 4,000 | | | $ | 386,000 | | | $ | 538,000 | | | $ | 928,000 | |
Decrease in fair value recorded in other income | | | (2,000 | ) | | | (227,000 | ) | | | (275,000 | ) | | | (504,000 | ) |
Conversion to common stock warrants | | | (2,000 | ) | | | (159,000 | ) | | | (263,000 | ) | | | (424,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance — September 30, 2014 | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company’s warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected life | | 4-8 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 2.29%-2.90% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected volatility | | 64%-65% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected dividend rate | | — % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The preferred stock warrant liability was reclassified to additional paid-in capital at its fair value in connection with the completion of the IPO on April 15, 2014. |