FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | In accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, financial instruments were measured at fair value using a three-level hierarchy which maximizes use of observable inputs and minimizes use of unobservable inputs: · Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments · Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments that are directly or indirectly observable in the market · Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity. Financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, for which determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At May 31, 2016 and February 29, 2016, the warrant liability and put exchange feature liability balances were classified as Level 3 instruments. Derivative Warrant Liability The following table sets forth the changes in the estimated fair value for ou r Level 3 classified derivative warrant liability: Note Payable Warrants Series B Warrants Total Fair value at February 29, 2016 $ 188,351 $ 46,110 $ 234,461 Additions 15,225 - 15,225 Change in fair value: 31,636 2,856 34,492 Fair value at May 31, 2016 $ 235,212 $ 48,966 $ 284,178 The Series B Warrants contain an adjustment clause affecting the exercise price of the Series B warrants, which may be reduced if the Company issues shares of common stock or convertible securities at a price below the then-current exercise price of the Series B warrants. As a result, we determined that the Series B warrants were not indexed to the Companys common stock and therefore should be recorded as a derivative liability. The Series B Warrants were measured at fair value on the issuance date using a Monte Carlo simulation and will be re-measured to fair value at each balance sheet date, and any resulta In connection with the issuance of the Promissory Note on July 31, 2015, the Company issued a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 43,636 shares of common stock. The warrant was issued on July 31, 2015, was originally exercisable at $8.25 per share and expires on July 31, 2020. The warrant contains a full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provision that requires liability treatment and the exercise price of this warrant was adjusted to $2.00 during the three months ended May 31, 2016. The fair value of the warrant at May 31, 2016 and February 29, 2016 was determined to be $79,127 and $64,438, respectively, as calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo simulation as of May 31, 2016 and February 29, 2016 used the following assumptions: (1) stock price of $2.00 and $1.80, respectively; (2) a risk free rate of 1.23% and 1.13%, respectively; (3) an expected volatility of 136% and 134%, respectively; and (4) a fundraising event to occur on July 31, 2016 and May 15, 2016, respectively, that would result in the issuance of additional common stock. In connection with the execution of the Note Amendment on February 12, 2016, the Company issued a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 43,636 shares of common stock. The warrant was issued on February 12, 2016, initially exercisable at $8.25 per share and expires on February 11, 2021. The warrant contains a full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provision that requires liability treatment and the exercise price of this warrant was adjusted to $2.20 during the three months ended May 31, 2016. The fair value of the warrant at May 31, 2016 and February 29, 2016 was determined to be $78,576 and $68,292, respectively, as calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo simulation as of May 31, 2016 and February 29, 2016 used the following assumptions: (1) stock price of $2.00 and $1.80, respectively; (2) a risk free rate of 1.32% and 1.20%, respectively; (3) an expected volatility of 136% and 134%, respectively; and (4) a fundraising event to occur on July 31, 2016 and May 15, 2016, respectively, that would result in the issuance of additional common stock. In connection with the issuance of OID Notes in February 2016, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 36,367 shares of common stock. These warrants were issued between February 12 and 22, 2016, were initially exercisable at $8.25 per share and expire between February 11 and 21, 2021. These warrants contain a full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provision that requires liability treatment and the exercise price of these warrants were adjusted to $2.00 during the three months ended May 31, 2016. The fair value of these warrants at May 31, 2016 and February 29, 2016 was determined to be $60,750 and $55,621, respectively, as calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo simulation as of May 31, 2016 and February 29, 2016 used the following weighted-average assumptions: (1) stock price of $2.00 and $1.80, respectively; (2) a risk free rate of 1.32% and 1.21%, respectively; (3) an expected volatility of 136% and 134%, respectively; and (4) a fundraising event to occur on July 31, 2016 and May 15, 2016, respectively, that would result in the issuance of additional common stock. In connection with the issuance of OID Notes in March 2016, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 9,092 shares of common stock. These warrants were issued between March 4 and 15, 2016, were initially exercisable at $8.25 per share and expire between March 4 and 15, 2021. These warrants contain a full-ratchet anti-dilution price protection provision that requires liability treatment and the exercise price of these warrants were adjusted to $2.00 during the three months ended May 31, 2016. The fair value of these warrants at May 31, 2016 and at issuance between March 4 and 15, 2016 was determined to be $16,760 and $15,225, respectively, as calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo simulation as of May 31, 2016, and between March 4 and 15, 2016 used the following weighted-average assumptions: (1) stock price of $2.00 and $1.97, respectively; (2) a risk free rate of 1.33% and 1.41%, respectively; (3) an expected volatility of 136% and 136%, respectively; and (4) a fundraising event to occur on July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2016, respectively, that would result in the issuance of additional common stock. Put Exchange Feature Liability The following table sets forth the changes in the estimated fair value for our Level 3 classified put exchange feature liabilities: Promissory Note, as amended OID Notes Total Fair value, February 29, 2016: $ 339,979 $ 136,423 $ 476,402 Additions - 32,497 32,497 Change in fair value: 28,676 25,323 53,999 Fair value, May 31, 2016: $ 368,655 $ 194,243 $ 562,898 The Promissory Note issued on July 31, 2015, as amended on February 12, 2016, contains a Note Voluntary Exchange provision that is a contingent put that requires liability treatment (see Note 6). The fair value of this put exchange feature at February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2016 was determined to be $339,979 and $368,655, respectively. The fair value was calculated using a probability weighted present value methodology. The significant inputs to the fair value model were 1) the timing of a Qualified Offering expected to occur in May 2016 at February 29, 2016 and July 31, 2016 at May 31, 2016; 2) the combined probability of both a Qualified Offering and a voluntary exchange to occur, which was determined to be 71% at both February 29 and May 31, 2016 and 3) a discount rate of 18%, approximating high yield distressed debt rates, used for all measurement dates. The OID Notes issued contain an OID Note Voluntary Exchange provision that is a contingent put that requires liability treatment (see Note 6). The fair value of this put exchange feature at February 29, 2016 and May 31, 2016 was determined to be $136,423 and $194,243, respectively, as calculated using a probability weighted present value methodology. The significant inputs to the fair value model at all measurement dates were 1) the timing of a Qualified Offering expected to occur in May 2016 at February 29, 2016 and July 31, 2016 at May 31, 2016; 2) the combined probability of both a Qualified Offering and a voluntary exchange to occur, which was determined to be 81%; and 3) a discount rate of 18%, approximating high yield distressed debt rates, used for all measurement dates. |